FEATURED EDITORIAL The Post & Email
CLINTON CIRCUS - Why?
Hillary Clinton Clowns Coming Around
INTERROGATIONS may Clown the FBI
Federal Prosecutors are deposing Clinton and her aides in the outline of building a criminal case where testimonies and questioning under oath could be used to indict her and her aides in the breach of National Security secrets in her tenure as Secretary of State.
The Criminal Code type interrogations will help Federal Prosecutors better understand whether Clinton or her aides either [knowingly or negligently] discussed classified government secrets over a non-secure email system when she served as secretary of State.
Both [negligence and knowingly] can be prosecuted criminally and could warrant JUSTICE Department indictments that could tailspin Hillary Clinton's Presidential Campaign into a full blown crashing course of catastrophe.
LEGAL experts acknowledge Hillary Clinton warned her staff against conducting official business with their personal email accounts which makes very clear the double standard Clinton herself was doing that she advocated others not to do.
Clinton herself acknowledged a regrettable mistake and lapse of judgement in the face that the FBI confiscated her server after she and her aides deleted some 30,000 Emails she deemed personal and private that the FBI Criminal Forensic Department Unit have now Recovered.
Of those 30,000 Clinton did turn over 2000 plus have been redacted by Classification as national intelligence that can not be disclosed to the United States Public based on degrees of classification ranging from the greatest level of Top Secret to the lower levels of Classification.
Of course it goes without saying anything deemed to risky to divulge to the American Public the FBI would cry out shuddering to have made known to Foreign Intelligence Agencies or known enemies of the United States in acts of espionage by traitorous employees of the United States.
As the top most Senior FOREIGN Intelligence Officer the Secretary of State receives special training on how to classify intelligence and how to recognize it. Hillary Clinton also signed a statement acknowledging prosecution of criminal conduct in a strict degree of violation that would result in any breach of negligence or knowingly placing National Security secrets at risk to unauthorized individuals or governments.
[U.S. law makes it a crime for someone to knowingly or willfully retain classified information, handle it in a grossly negligent manner or to pass it to someone not entitled to see it.]
Her attorney, David Kendall, has been stunned into silence in commenting on her behalf as also have [Lawyers for her closest aides – Huma Abedin, Jake Sullivan, Cheryl Mills and Philippe Renes – remaining silent and declining comment on behalf of their clients.]
Her campaign spokesman, Brian Fallon, admitted Hillary Clinton has no choice but to cooperate with investigators picking up the investigation by interrogation of the possible criminal defendants, Hillary herself could be included with, in what would be the greatest espionage case in U.S. History in the blatant format to avoid accountability of Government to the People of the United States through the FOIA -Freedom of Information Act.
The L.A. Times Reports
The interrogations [also are an indication that much of the investigators' background work – [recovering deleted emails], understanding how the server operated and determining whether it was breached – is nearing completion.] emphasis added.
Much of the national press in the U.S. are also stunned that the Secretary of State received so many huge speaking fees from so many Foreign Governments after she left the Job for hundreds of thousands of dollars each totally between her and Bill 26 Million Dollars in 26 Months.
It's almost unbelievable as it's exposed in this 3 minute video beginning at 2min:12seconds Clinton's FOREIGN and DOMESTIC Speech Tour and the hundreds of thousands collected for each speech is outlined.
The list of speeches made by the Clinton's is here. The problem really occurs with Hillary Clinton resigning her Post as Secretary of State, hopping on this lucrative speaking Tour, and then declaring for the Office of President. The ethics involved in the presumption of a quid pro quo are unquestionably and undeniably circumstantial. Most Presidential Candidates are not being paid millions by Foreign Governments minutes before declaring for Office.
[The Justice Department and FBI began their investigation after receiving what is known as a security referral in July from the inspector general for U.S. intelligence agencies, which at the time were in the midst of reviewing paper copies of nearly 30,500 emails Clinton turned over in 2014 that she said were work-related.
The State Department has since released all 3,871 pages of Clinton’s emails in its possession and has determined that 22 of her emails contained "top secret" information, though they were not marked as such as the time Clinton was undeniably trained to recognize such.
[Legal experts] said Clinton’s emails, even those later deemed classified, were sent to aides cleared to read them, for example, and not private citizens, they said referring to Petreus Case.], however, it is understood Clinton's Emails were indeed back-hacked by or through a back door channel of her confidence friend Sidney Blumenthal as at least one Foreign operative known as Guccifer Russia Today reports included *sensitive classified intelligence regarding Benghazi just before and after the terror attack on 9-11-2012 that killed 4 Americans including Ambassador Stevens and the resulting ISIS state stronghold created in LIBYA, with lucrative oil and gas reserves at forefront, being funded by [Saudi Arabia]: previously with ties also to funding Obama's path to Harvard and on to the White House. **
The resulting national intelligence breaches alleged seem to be at least accumulating steam in the General Public Trial of Hillary Clinton being fed daily as allegations of mis-trust are fueled continually and just as fast stomped down by Clinton's Interested and Invested Parties of the Press - seemingly cream-soft even as she lost by quite a stomping three caucuses this weekend in Hawaii, Alaska, and the big prize Washington State.
IN OTHER NEWS
The JUSTICE DEPARTMENT returned the Cody Robert Judy for President 2016 Complaint that noticed an arbitrary denial on a Motion for Forma Pauperis submitted to the United States Supreme Court Case No. 14-9396 Judy v. Obama that is asking the Court to defend the [natural born Citizen] qualification clause in Article II., Section 1, Clause 5 [born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] hearing the damages and petition *de novo that depicts a sever discrimination on poor people making much less than the Federal Standard Poverty Level. This complaint was sent to Attorney General Loretta Lynch appointed by Obama highlighting the fact Obama also appointed Justice Sotomayor who was responsible for all Motions coming in on Appeal from the Tenth Circuit Court in Denver, Colorado.
*An appeals court hearing a case de novo may refer to the trial court's record to determine the facts, but will rule on the evidence and matters of law without giving deference to that court's findings. A trial court may also hear a case de novo following the appeal of an arbitration decision.
The Tenth Circuit Appeals Court in Denver, Colorado mentioned in their Review hearing the appeal de novo, but did not allow a hearing, argument, or Bench Trial on the material, nor did they rule on the merits of the definition of [natural born Citizen] that the petitioner asked the Court to consider to affirm the damages measured in the co-existing and battling campaigns for the Office of President defined in [qualifications] under the banner of the U.S. Constitution.
Democratic Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy compared the lack of restraint on the qualifications as a run-away horse opening the door to foreign usurpation of the Office of the President and a pollution of the very term [All American]- born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents - no dual citizenship or allegiance allowed in the Office.
"If a Court would actual hear the Case on the merits, just as Congress did in October 2004", Judy said, "in which they refused to change the terms after serious deliberation and testimony and subsequently heard 8 times also with the same rejection to change the terms, and firmly supported by 67% of Americans and apposed by only a minority of 31%.
Who can claim democracy isn't at work when its actually presented with all of the merits and considerations including the abject considerations of dual citizens as President having a divided or fractured loyalty noticed as non-American. Do most Americans even know that in Cuba for instance a communistic controlled dictatorship that foreign birth to Cuban Parents is not even recognized and is their laws would subject a U.S. President with a dual citizenship to their draft or military order?
No, but Courts hearing things like this as well as considering testimony that a real American change happens to first generation radicals who are more accustomed to theocracy forms of Government. It takes time and that change is undeniable in a second generations, confirming not only an incentive for population to come and stick around so their kids can be eligible for the Office of President, but provides sound ground from compromising the Executive Branch's top job also considered to be the Commander-in-Chief of the U.S. Military.
No other position in the U.S. Government is concentrated with so much power as the Judicial Branch and Legislative Branches are broken up into many different positions in Congress and the varying levels of Courts. Those who have allegiance to America certainly do so with the respect of the U.S. Constitution and our Courts are there to defend that and the American People's will without the hood-winking personalities of politicians just trying to get-over the law with bully tactics like Obama, Cruz, Rubio, Jindal and McCain have.
"It certainly isn't a color problem, we have every color involved with huge egos trying to smash the door down", said Cody Robert Judy the only Presidential Candidate in America with a Bi-Partisan Federal Court Record over the last seven years mentioning all the Candidates in his legal action to the U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 14-9396.
Absent the Courts standing for the will of the people as described, the legislative mandate clearly made over history and modern times, there is a minority that is constantly calling for usurpation of the U.S. Constitution and the majority of American must stand firm in parading those individuals in public as Clowns never to be elected again, and forever to be embarrassed as they have embarrassed themselves to the Supreme Law of this Land.
We salute The People who honor that which is unique in the world. We salute you AMERICA. May God Bless Your Union!
ELITISM Most Dangerous Fear for Americans
Here's one called INSPIRING
Here's another BUILDING AMERICA
Please consider a contribution to Cody Robert Judy's Campaign - Working Today for a Better America Tomorrow
Here's the Link to Contribute if you'd like to Cody's Campaign improve your record for Taking A Stand for the Constitution.
CRJ TODAY FOR A BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW.
My Writ before the Court has not been denied. Please read these post for a detail of why my Forma Pauperis Motion has been denied.
Cody Robert Judy
D-Candidate for President 2016
CRJFacebookPres2016 JOIN US!
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy
Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.
Web Site www.codyjudy.us
Keep coming back!
INSPIRING - I believe in You
Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.
Cody Robert Judy's book :
Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.
*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin
The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.
Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.