Showing posts with label Mario Apuzzo. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mario Apuzzo. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 19, 2016

BIRTHER BENEFITS - A New Hope in the U.S. Supreme Court Tapping the Stupid-Tree of the MSM

Special Report
FEATURED EDITORIAL
  THE POST & EMAIL
~BIRTHER BENEFITS~
A New Hope in the U.S. Supreme Court


The Birther Benefits yet escaping the Establishment Groupies of both the Democratic and Republican Parties, as well as the Main Stream Media (MSM) the same way the Brexit did, gives us a Prime example of why Hillary Clinton is about to lose what the Democrats have worked so hard at the last seven and a half years in the election of Republican Party Nominee Donald J. Trump with the ire and outrage of the Nation as the catapult. What? 

How could the Democratic Party let ire and outrage go to waste like that- especially in a sleeping giant that awakens? I know it sounds impossible, but six months ago saying Donald J. Trump never elected as mayor or even dog-catcher was going to be the Republican Nominee at the Republican National Convention was laughable. 

In the good-ole-days Democrats use to be smart people about Civil Rights. You know in the days before the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin before they tapped the same stupid-tree Hillary Clinton tapped into when with so many examples in her life she reiterates that in "hindsight it wasn't a good idea" in the form of an apology actually no real sound minded person would buy.

Democrats  have to buy the snake oil though because they got into the pit of selling "The First" rather than actually understanding moral character could not be uploaded and every Citizen had the right to vote already. They started discrimination all over again after they'd just won the battle. That was the same stupid-tree that Obama tapped into in voting "the first" colored person into office, and the same one Hillary decided to tap into asking people to vote based on her sex as "the first" women.

Minorities grabbed the microphone and started selling race, color, and sex as gender asking for preferential treatment or discrimination based upon those particular chromosomes. It's fad now to get preferential treatment based on a chromosome? What makes the KKK different in the supremacist ideology? I see very little difference in the discrimination of color, race, religion, sex, and national origin as I do the preferential treatment of color, race, religion, sex and national origin. Preferential treatment is discrimination and is beating itself upside the head creating divides were they had been mended,

They are after all, bound to the sinking ship of Barack Obama who never was and never will be qualified for the Office of the President according to the U.S. Constitution's demand that only a [natural born Citizen] or a [Citizen] at the time of the adoption of the Constitution be allowed by the Constitution's authority to be President. That was not a discrimination against immigrants or first generation Americans it was a discrimination or qualification of TIME in the interest of allegiance to the Country; really no different than the age/or Time discrimination between the offices of Representative (25), Senator (30), and President (35) that took into account seasons of experience and time on the earth also figured from the moment of birth.

There is a new case in the U.S. Supreme Court that is rattling the Birther Benefits department, and though it does not involve Barack Obama the ramifications will. This Case is titled Carmon Elliott v. Ted Cruz No. 16-13. Whether Obama can skate-out of office, like Hillary Clinton skated out of the Secretary of State office having usurped the office and responsibility to the people in FOIA accountability with her private servers, is questionable and hinging upon a few variables.

The hope of the Birthers in this case might modestly be scaled to the comment of chief anti-birther 'Doc' or Dr. Conspiracy himself Mr. Kevin Davidson on his Blog Obamaconspiracy.org and Post  and Comment pictured here about it.

 [So if I am reading that correctly, the Supreme Court could review the Elliott case if it so chose. And I think Apuzzo's argument that it is not moot is sufficient. I'm not willing to attach the DOOMED graphic to this one.]

  While it's not a fabricated long form birth certificate with layers, and I am not dead like the poor drowned Hawaii Health Department Director Loretta Fuddy, (The only official to say she saw Obama's long form birth certificate -May she rest in peace), I will attest to the validity of the comment in the constructs of my own research into the case that have profound new twist.


They say everything in Obama's Birther Circus and Carnival Barker Town has been litigated and then comes a long a State Court Judge who did not get the 'Obama memo' on this issue- 'you must stay plugged into the stupid-tree' and actually constructs a smart argument that [Standing] is sufficient by any old Citizen wanting to vote for a qualified Candidate, and brilliantly defies [The Political Question Doctrine] - something Judges have been hiding behind for decades on the qualification definition. The two Issues the Pennsylvania State Court Judge plowed through with nuclear powered tank are two issues that have been the malignant tumor-cancers that have plagued Birthers for nearly a decade.

The RED DISTRICT LIGHT flashing for the United States Supreme Court in Elliott v. Cruz 16-13, see Elliott's Go-Fund-Me site here, might just be in the advent of stopping the rogue argument of standing and the political question doctrine that in the process necessitates the Court actually defining [natural born Citizen] in the same light that Roe v. Wade was applicable even though the pregnancy was no more, in the facts presented under the Mootness Standard, that the issue was more than likely going to come up again and again and again in two applications:
1- Voluntary cessation of unlawful conduct
2- Conduct capable of repetition yet evading review

The 'Ark' that was touched in Elliott v. Cruz was that the Pennsylvania State Supreme Court 'affirmed' the State Court Judge's 'Opinion' that now if the U.S. Supreme Court does not here walks and talks like the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed also! This may be the last chance the highest Court in the Land gets a chance to weigh in on the Judicial Branches divine appointment to regulate a distinctive application that is part of the United States Constitution. 

As the attorney for the Case Mario Apuzzo Esq. ran around touching all the bases of the Pennsylvania Case, conservative Justice Samuel Alito will chair in handling Motions in the duties of his in the Third Circuit Command,  it was very well articulated the Legislative Branch was not given any powers in the U.S. Constitution to altar or control the definition of [natural born Citizen] in their limited capacity of [naturalization powers] Article I. Section 8 Cl.4 that are codified in the congressional acts of The Naturalization Act 8 U.S Code §1401 Nationals and Citizens at Birth a-h also reviewed in the 14th Amendment.

a- For jus sanguinis U.S. citizenship, i.e., citizenship for the children born abroad of U.S. citizen parents, which is established only by congressional statute and not the U.S. Constitution

b. For jus soli, or "right of the territory" the provisions in Section 1 interpreted to the effect that children born on United States soil, with very few exceptions, are U.S. citizens. (Notice: Not [natural born Citizens] This type of guarantee—legally termed again by congressional statute seen in the 14th Amendment.

[Natural Born Citizen] as Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents was codified by Nature and Nature's God something the United States Congress was not given authority to over-rule by the definitions of Article I, Section 8, Cl.4, and the Executive Branch sure wasn't given any authority in the U.S. Constitution to interpret [natural born Citizen], neither the MSM or the People's Vote as we here in the United States of America are a Constitution Republic not a mob-is-right Democracy as the Writ of Certiorari  shines the light on. (Ref.pg 10-12)

Finally the [Conflict of Courts] (the very strong basis for the U.S .Supreme Court hearing a Writ of Certioari) comes smashing through the windows of the U.S. Supreme Court!

[In arriving at his holding, Judge Pellegrini and authorities upon whom he relies have concluded that neither the English common law nor the Fourteenth amendment provide the definitive definition of an article II natural born citizen. Where Judge Pellegrini errs is in placing his reliance for his definition of a natural born citizen upon Charles Gordon, Jack Maskell, Paul Clement,and Neal Katyal (footnote 4) rather than on primary historical and legal sources, including decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court. The arguments of these commentators, who focus on “at birth” and “by birth” rather than on the birth circumstances upon which the Framers relied for defining a natural born citizen, are flawed and cannot serve as any reasonable basis for defining a natural born citizen]

PART II.     THE PROTECTION OF OBAMA HAS BECOME A RACIST ARGUMENT

The Question of Standing has been a criteria of the Court dismissing 95% of the Writ's coming into the United States Supreme Court who recently upheld Affirmative Action at the University of Texas in Fisher v. University of Texas, No. 14-981 , but no where in the U.S. Constitution is affirmative action declared as a protection upon the Qualification of the Office of the President. 

But let's just set that aside, and say the U.S. Supreme Court has indeed received two cases with Standing from 2008 Write-In Candidate and 2012 and 2016 [Democratic Party] Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy who has suffered a great deal of damages the Court saw fit not to recognize in even hearing that asks the exact same questions for the Court to define [natural born Citizen] giving much the same argument in two Cases 12-5276 and 14-9396.


The last case 14-9396 considered closed only October of 2015 (9 months ago) denied arbitrarily the Petitioner's right to have the fees and printing cost waved due to poverty. The court was even sent bank statements showing no possible way to pay the cost of printing and filing fees, yet Justice Sotomayor, presumed to be notable for low income people, responsible for the Tenth Circuit handling of Motions, deliberately slashed the tires of Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in an outrageous affront to low income people!

This has done more for Donald J. Trump's Campaign to the Republican Nomination than any single thing. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg recently called Donald J. Trump a 'Faker', and that is true in the Birther Fields in that Donald J. Trump never filed a single legal paper against his unqualified opponents even when he had Standing to do just that preferring a 'Bullies Way of doing things' to that of Law and Order!

 While Justice Ginsburg rationalized if Donald J. Trump gets in the Office of the President "everything is up for grabs", Democrats are aghast to the support the U.S. Supreme Court has flat-out given as an endorsement to Donald J. Trump as the King of Birthers without filing a single legal brief. Indeed, the issue is hotly contested in the 2016 election as Slate.com just two days ago published 141 Lies Donald Trump's told- Number 33 [Questioned President Obama’s American citizenship, bringing the “birther” campaign into the mainstream]

Hey it's not [Citizenship] it's [natural born Citizen] for the Office of the President.

Still the MSM as well as the Liberal Left of the Court, doesn't seem to get they are on the opposite side of the Brexit Standard in their pejorative of Birthers in the United States of America and compared to Hillary's 5 Lies, just in the latest FBI Criminal Investigation Review, they make Trump out to be a hero for questioning Obama for a Standard of Law equal under the Supreme Law of the Land totally bewildered of the General Population's (SMH) disbelief at their tap to the stupid-tree!

 The Supreme Court of the United States blatantly not hearing a case that has had a [Bipartisan Standing] (Judy v. McCain and Judy v. Obama) is and has paved the way for the reality of Justice Ginsburg HOLY GRAIL DECLARATION that "everything is up for grabs", if Trump is elected President with the nominations most likely to occur in the Court during the next four years.

What we are to gather from this is the Stupid-Tree Tappers are willing to give up Choice for Women, Same Sex Marriage for Citizens, Health Care, and whatever else is on the agenda of the Left including $15 dollars per hour for Obama's Ineligibility! I ask them, "Is that WORTH IT? Is that worth it?!

Apparently this is the Left Liberals giving the American Bird Sign to the Left of the Court and the part of the story where the head of the snake eats the tail and consumes itself into obliteration. That's the Stupid-Tree! Democrats have lost their mind, and they are about to lose a lot more than that and be just as surprised Election Morning as the world was at Brexit.

Of course there is a solution! Lock her Up in an orchard of Stupid Trees and let her nurse on them till she dies; get her as far away from Government Office as one can possible get. Maybe Syria where she can enjoy her reality of sniper fire and cattle futures and the way a 500% increase of refugees can be least expensive - shipping her there instead of bring them here? She'd could be with her experience a great Ambassador to them as Chris Stevens was. 

The Democratic Party National Convention is not for two more weeks and in Gore v. Bush the Court decided the outcome in eight days. It is not impossible for the Court to acknowledge a mistake and in hindsight regret their decision to devastate the poor who have come to the Court for Justice in Truth and Faithfulness against the Lies and Deceit. 

Otherwise.., what can we say? They just do not care about anything or any body and they proved it to us. Their Court will not last another four years.

CRJ 
www.codyjudy.us






CRJ

Thank You!


Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy



Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.


Web Site www.codyjudy.us
Keep coming back!


INSPIRING - I believe in You


Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!










































Wednesday, April 1, 2015

PARTY TO PRINCIPLE Part II Restoration Is Necessary


FEATURED EDITORIAL- The Post & Email

Yesterday this Blog Featured "PARTY TO PRINCIPLE- Birth of the Nation - Announcing U.S. Supreme Court Appeal on Cruz'N Obama Ineligibility" and today we wanted to focus just a little bit more on the key elements of why being a Party to Principle is so important and why a Restoration is indeed necessary for a stabilization of our Nation we hope to begin again with the appeal of Judy v. Obama 14-4136 to the U.S. Supreme Court in a Writ of Certiorari.

Our Nation was Born, and it has grown in leaps and bounds into a young teenager who is gangly, rebellious, and inherently clumsy. It is a natural course. It takes teenagers a good 10 to 15 years to look back and say, "You know Mom and Dad, I want to thank you for teaching me what you did, because I now see the value in it. Stapling this point to the board we need only look around at just how many of us no longer see the U.S. Constitution as preciously valuable.

Our Writ of Certiorari goes into this a little noticing a correlating anthem that is somewhat flat from respected academia. It is very easy for someone who can sing very well to hit some flat notes. All that has to happen is for the voice not to be heard for an instant which scores the great importance of hearing and listening. Amazing is the voice that is in tune and awful is the one that is just a little off. Of course we have honest mistakes that we can bear but the when voice begins to nauseate our stomach we must stop and find out how to best correct it.

We all have weaknesses and we all have strengths. My strength might not be,. let me correct that, is not spelling. Its unfortunate good spelling is considered such an important detail in communication because I feel often like I am in a constant state of apology for misspelling and grammatical errors which seem to come so easily to others I admire. I have and constantly work hard to improve my weaknesses and make them stronger. We are celebrating this week going over 500 post on this Blog and 200,000 views and as you roll back the blog I believe you can see improvement. My point in this is academic professors all though schooled and trained in certain aspects of detail and having great strength in some areas can also be infants in others.

We all know President Elect Barack Obama (U.S.C. Amend. XX Sect. 3 'if the President elect shall have failed to qualify') and Sen. Ted Cruz were once Professors of Constitutional Law and both attended Harvard. In the political arena you'd have to be a recluse to not see the two former Solicitor Generals who have had their Commentary - On the Meaning of “Natural Born Citizen” published in the Harvard Law Review MAR 11, 2015 128 Harv. L. Rev. F. 161,Neal Katyal & Paul Clement, of which Obama was elected as President at one time. An opposing view of the article from notable Mario Appuzzo is here.

I might add here that their may or may not have been a Twenty Million Dollar grant and for sure there was major influence from Saudi Arabia at about the same time.
Saudi Prince Paid for Obama
1987 Bill Ayers solicited Khalid Abdullah Tariq al-Mansour (a.k.a. Donald Warden) to raise money for Obama’s Harvard Law School education. al-Mansour is an orthodox Muslim, a black nationalist, an outspoken enemy of Israel, and mentor to Black Panther Party founder Huey Newton and his cohort, Bobby Seale. At the time al-Mansour associate Percy Sutton was raising money for Obama’s education, al-Mansour was the top financial advisor to mega-billionaire Prince Alwaleed (Alwalid) bin Talal of the Saudi royal family.

1988-1991 Obama attended Harvard Law School.

This brings me to another academically respected Professor teaching at the Columbus School of Law of Catholic University of America Sarah Helene Duggin. She is well noticed of late, because of her research as a Professor who was published Oct. 28th 2013 specifically: Is Sen. Ted Cruz a natural born Citizen eligible to serve as president Constitution Daily's theme is 'Smart conversation from the National Constitution Center', is "The first and only institution in America established by Congress to "disseminate information about the United States Constitution on a non-partisan basis in order to increase the awareness and understanding of the Constitution among the American people."

Now in this article she specifically states that "There are no more Princes wanting to infiltrate America's Presidency which Obama's financed education and adoption is a walking talking repudiation of. She says: "Finally, the natural born citizenship clause is both an anomaly and an anachronism. The way in which the clause differentiates among United States citizens is contrary to the overall spirit of the Constitution; the risk that foreign nobility will infiltrate our government is long past; and place of birth is a poor surrogate for loyalty to one’s homeland in our increasingly mobile society and our ever more interconnected world. The best solution would be to amend the Constitution, as many legislators on both sides of the aisle have proposed over the years. In the absence of an amendment, the clause should be narrowly interpreted."

While admitting "Foreign Influence" was the historical scope of Supreme Court Chief Jay's Letter to President Washington as the check and motive for 'natural born Citizen' in the qualifications for Office of President, she cites the Naturalization Act of 1790 - The Naturalization Act of 1790 probably constitutes the most significant evidence available. Congress enacted this legislation just three years after the drafting of the Constitution, and many of those who voted on it had participated in the Constitutional Convention. The act provided that “children of citizens of the United States, that may be born beyond the sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural-born citizens.”- but does not mention the specific detailed repeal in 1795 of "natural born Citizen" words replaced with "Citizen".

While recognizing the problems with getting a Presidential Candidate with standing to repudiate an infringement clear to the U.S. Supreme Court she argues Sen. McCain's case with no mention of Judy v. McCain or past U.S.S.C case Judy v. Obama as if these records were unknown to her enlightenment and research. To her credit she admits the subject is not decided and is in need of U.S. Supreme Court Review, but advises until then that the Constitutional Key of the Office of the President in qualifications be run over or 'narrowly interpreted', assuming the great difficulty that I indeed face in getting to the U.S. Supreme Court properly, and representing a bi-partisan effort, is never going to happen.

The United States Naturalization Act of January 29, 1795 (1 Stat. 414) repealed and replaced the Naturalization Act of 1790. The 1795 Act differed from the 1790 Act by increasing the period of required residence from two to five years in the United States, by introducing the Declaration of Intention requirement, or "first papers", which created a two-step naturalization process, and by conferring the status of citizen and not natural born citizen. The Act specified that naturalized citizenship was reserved only for "free white person[s]." It also changed the requirement in the 1790 Act of "good character" to read "good moral character."

How interesting that the act of 1795 as well changing the absolute conundrum of naturalization with natural law in Citizen and natural born Citizen, as well made the distinction of "good character" and "good moral character". While maintaining as professors 'good character' in their esteemed and respected positions of scholastic reputation a morality of the Constitution is certainly lost as the integrity of boundaries is breached in their assertions that 'time' and 'place' in the term 'natural born Citizen' - Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents - is worth being narrowly interpreted. Now is it benign or malicious?

What would we as Americans say to someone who says, The time of the Convention Monday, September 17th, 1787 never happened. This nation was never born and the United States of America has no boundaries or place attributing anything considered as opposing that view as 'contrary to the overall spirit of the Constitution'? Wouldn't you say that person is really stupid or is acting as a domestic enemy of the United States?

We are forced to address these issues in the Writ of Certiorari because of the respect our own U.S. Supreme Court Justices indeed have for these men and women. I don't like to have to make it a public record, but they obviously have no hesitation in making their's public and without argument it can indeed become policy. Way down the road it may seem like an obvious mistake which was regretted and would need to be changed just as that Naturalization Act of 1790 which lasted 5 years and was regretted.

Why do we keep going the rounds and dipping and diving on this issue? Its because there is and always will be a hunger in the belly for power, recognition, and fame. If those hungry for it see a boundary against their acquisition they will tend to take the fence down and hope no one notices their prying the squeaky nails out of the boards and pulling the post till the fence is down and then they will say the fence never existed.

This is why a Restoration is necessary and why I feel like I'm in a meat grinder being disposed as frivolous. SHOCKING! When you have a U.S. Supreme Court Justice in a mainstream report headline read, "Antonin Scalia: The Constitution is 'dead', you better believe a restoration is necessary. 'Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia says the Constitution is “dead, dead, dead,” rather than a “living document.”. If he meant that it is cut and dried and should not be added to or taken away from he also dismisses the 2/3rds majority of Congress necessary to change it. (U.S.C. Art. V)If he meant that it is not the U.S. Supreme Law of the Land then he's occupying a office as a Justice De Facto rather than De Jure.

I would like to announce it will be my pleasure to address on The Meat and Potatoes Show, which is great for an Idaho Born spud like me, (smile)some of the detail of this Writ of Certiorari and the importance of the the natural born Citizen clause in our Constitution as a qualifier that we must take a stand for as Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.

The issues and hurdles that I have to bring to the attention of the U.S. Supreme Court in this Writ of Certiorari are indeed of great importance to our Nation and the future for our children. One of the most basic cruel critiques of natural born Citizen is that it is some how 'against' the spirit of our Constitution in that it is seen as a discriminating disqualifier like some kind of a nasty racist remark, rather then a wise standard of qualification. For those insinuations a defense must also be made. You never see those who say they want to change or merge the terms 'Citizen' and 'natural born Citizen' say anything about equalizing the qualifications for every office in the Constitution including the varying age requirements and time requirements that differentiate U.S. Representative, U.S. Senator, and U.S. President. This to me is clearly their agreement that age is important and time in the U.S. is important as these two qualifications differ between all three offices.

What they don't see is that 'natural born Citizen' is also an age requirement as it takes more "time" to fully ripen. In fact that's all it is is another time oriented qualifier encapsulating or enveloping two generations. This is a huge crack in their side walk for to rant and rave about one age qualifier and not care about another is self defeating of their own argument. Indeed a maturity is seen in U.S. Reps 25 year age qualifier, a U.S. Senator's 30 year age qualifier and 35 year of age qualifier for U.S. President. The time in the U.S. requirement also is progressive in a different way 7 years a Citizen of the U.S. for Representatives, 9 years a Citizen for U.S. Senators, and 14 years a resident within the U.S. where 'Citizen' is not even mentioned. You don't see eight challenges to these qualifications made since 2003 that have failed, you only see an attack on the 'natural born Citizen' qualifier for President. Its just sad to me that such blatant immorality exist for so many of our elected leaders.

In closing I would like to say I think Sen. Ted Cruz entering the arena of the race for U.S. President 2016 is probably the best thing to happen because it finally gives a bi-partisan loss or equality to both Republicans and Democrats in the determination rather then being inflammatory to one of the respective major parties. This has a powerful effect upon the Court to be able to say this is a bi-partisan issue that effects all of America and does not necessarily effect one party in favor of another. This in fact neuters the political doctrine question argument which is very encouraging for this Petition.

I hope to empower you with the intelligence necessary to ignore the Media who either deliberately ignores the actions I've taken to stand up for the Constitution's qualifications for President, or who is so enumerated and inundated with information they themselves don't know I exist. It does seem the likelihood of the former is greater than the latter simply because I make it a point to email at least 1 or 2 reporters and editors in 2 to 4 Newspapers in every State of the Union hoping to educate and inform the population if nothing else by a note from them that their are different opinions that do count among us and these scholars of respected institutions.

Enjoy our newly March Released THREE MINUTE infomercial entitled The Birthers and please join us anyway you can in supporting the restoration of our U.S. Constitution along with our Nation and the opportunity we all want. Please understand that however benign you may
attribute a Candidate who is not qualified by being 'Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents', the very process of dismissing and not honoring the Office of the President with its unique qualification is a process to destroy the umbrella with the Office that sits in the middle of the United States Constitution, as it most important key holder. The compromise on the 'natural born Citizen' clause is a compromise on the Blessings of God our Nation has been protected by, and a witness that time and place included in describing the Birth of our Nation are of no value.



Join us in taking a stand for "this place" and "this time" honored tradition in the United States of America.]

Cody Robert Judy for President 2016 find us on Facebook, Twitter and the Web.

Please visit my web site www.codyjudy.us and study the 3 point platform and 7 point platform.
Thanks You so much!
Cody Robert Judy


We need your help. Will you help us or are the outrageous lies your being told by your elected leaders okay for you and your children? Indeed, it is time to Restore America's Trust Today for a Better America Tomorrow.



We NEED YOUR HELP AMERICA now, to take the 10th Circuit Court's Decision not to hear Cody's Case to the U.S. Supreme Court. We are Taking a Stand for individual Civil Rights and against an unprecedented ASSAULT upon your Constitution and prior decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court! With your help we can make it happen. You are a very important key to this. So its up to you America to help Restore America Today for a Better America Tomorrow. Like, Share, and Help us in the Contribution Revolution.

CRJ

Get your questions answered by ordering Cody Robert Judy's Book here.

The 2016 Campaign begins now. Please send your contributions and help with the ABC (American Birther Campaign) today and my election for President in 2016 and Join the 257 of us now on my Facebook Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President 2016 site.



Cody Robert Judy for President 2016
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, Utah 84401

Thank you
Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for United States President 2016
www.codyjudy.us

CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION



The Commercial is simply called "America"


Join the new CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRES 2016 FB SITE Here