BREAKING REPORT:
AMERICANS CONCERNED AS UNSTABLE OBAMA THREATENS
U.S.A's NATIONAL SECURITY
Asked a very simple question if he had any hint about Joe Biden's entry into the Presidential Race, Obama's response nearly took the wind out of the lungs in the room, "This is about climate change, guys, after all , the climate meeting was merely about 'survival of the planet." racked Obama to the Press Question.
The national security concern is that when Obama declares "survival of the planet" looms, almost as if something seen indistinctly at a distance through the fog with only 455 days left in his second term, clearly a veiled threat of great concern to the USA's national security is articulated.
The greatest concern for so many Americans is that Obama lied so much to get there. The capability and calculations haven't been what we would call benign. It wasn't until 2011 that Obama released a long form birth certificate, which still showed he was not qualified for the Office of the President as son of a Kenyan Citizen regardless of his birth place.
April 10th a non-binding resolution was introduced into the U.S. Senate by Claire McCaskill, co-sponsored by then Sen. Obama and Sen. Clinton asserting two parents for Sen. John McCain was a good enough consideration to neutralize his Panamanian nativity of birth, and for the first time use a 'naturalization process', meaning using the Government, to dicta to determine a 'natural born Citizen' rather then the laws of nature ie. born in the Country to two citizen parents.
It was a one body legislative tool used that had far reaching implications and by the end of April that same year, or in about 20 days, it had passed. Of course it was not passed by the House, or signed by a President, but it cleared a path through the sage for legitimacy for Sen. McCain to run for President after 8 attempts since 2003 failed in Congress to change the Constitution's discipline of 'natural born Citizen' for the President and Vice President ie Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.
The born in the U.S. had been dropped, and the two parent requirement had been kept. Of course Sen. McCain will always be a native born Panamanian. That's where it all begin for him. He will always have roots there. The Senate, saw an opening and manipulated it jeopardizing the USA's national security.
Many do not recall the reason the 'natural born Citizen' clause was implemented into the Constitution in the first place.
In a purported alma mater of Obama's College years Columbia University, exist an essay entitled "The Papers of John Jay" under the heading John Jay and the Philadelphia Convention we read: [On 25th of July 1787 he addressed a letter to George Washington, the Convention's presiding officer, advancing that the Chief Executive should be a "natural born citizen", a suggestion to be embodied in Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution.]
Of course we do still have that letter and its contents certainly leavers little doubt as to the reason that the 'natural born Citizen' was being considered for the Office of the President , but was not being considered for the requirements of the Office of Representative or Senator. The Letter reads:
"Permit me to hint, whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government, and to declare expressly that the Command in chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolve on , any but a natural born Citizen.
The RATIONALE
Clearly the U.S.A's concern of foreign princes has been marginalized by simple disparaging of the terms of nobility. So we must consider who is a prince to defeat even the term expressed as a nobility title. Article 1, Section 9, clause 8 of the U.S. Constitution forbids 'granting' titles of nobility. However, the greater respect of the USA's Citizenship Award, apart and contrasting the 'subject award' of England, was that all Citizens were granted the ability to serve in leadership rolls, but that Office of the President was reserved only for 'natural born citizens'. This and all of the many rights and privileges granted in the Pledge "Justice for All" clearly made all Americans in parlance, 'kings and princes in their own castles' or "queens and princesses" rather than just a ruling class or family.
The summary is its a fools errand to say that the USA has no more reason for a vigilant guard against foreign influence, because in notable terms Obama can easily be seen as a prince Saudi Arabia financed at Harvard. Questions still swirl in affirmation and denial regarding a large grant made by Saudi Arabia Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal to Harvard University about the time Obama again was purported to attend and served as President of the Harvard Law Review.
The continued assault upon America's Guard for a 'natural born Citizen' in the Office of the President as a defense against foreign influence is about the only thing that is [n]ot foreign. Eight attempts just since 2003 have been made to change it in Congress, but all were soundly defeated justifying what we would call a Legislative Mandate.
Of course those serving in the House and the Senate who are not qualified for the Office of the President would be the clearest choices to assault this guard much more readily than the People. Those have included on the Republican side of the isle in 2016 Sen. Ted Cruz, Sen. Marco Rubio, Gov. Bobby Jindal and of course in 2008 Sen. McCain. On the Democratic side of the isle Sen. Obama remains the most infamous usurper of the Constitution's 'natural born citizen' clause requirement.
A quick glance of Obama's record clearly points to an abandonment of other principles that can be laid at the feet of knocking the guard out, but I'm not going to go into it in detail. It is clear under Obama more debt has been added to the National Debt than a combination of all the other President's put together, and this certainly is telling upon the backs of America's children.
The biggest story of that may be the one untold. He didn't do it alone, he's had a lot of help from Republicans that are seen to be riding Obama for all they are worth. They have recaptured the House, the Senate, and are poised to clearly take the Presidency. To say Obama has not been their pony to exploit would be an understatement, but is that deserving of America's vote and trust?
Not a single Mainstream Candidate for Republicans in 2008,2012, and now 2016 has yet to even object to the natural born citizenship requirement guard that has been let down in a severe breach of America's national security.
This has made great fodder for Republican Leaders like Rep. Trey Gowdy whose rip roaring speech making the rounds on the internet is a remarkably candid about 'saying one thing, and doing another". He is very upset about the "President" not executing the laws of Congress as part of his duty and oath on the one hand, but offers not a single word about the duty of Congress to execute its duty to see to it that a 'natural born Citizen' devolve upon the Office of the President.
THE HOUSE DOES NOT PASS SUGGESTIONS WE PASS LAWS
In the interest and preservation of the Guard of our U.S. Constitution's demand for a natural born Citizen, I am the only Candidate for President in America over this disaster who has continually appealed for the resolution of the breach in the wall suing McCain and Obama.
The latest Case in the U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396 has just been punitively closed citing non payment of fees, and proper submission to the Court in printing the Petition in booklet form that can run upwards of $4500 dollars and a denial of the forma pauperis standing that was asked for from the Court to continue the Case.
America has always been known for Justice for All, however this latest breach has concerned many Americans who see a failure in that standard. This has lead to my introducing CRJ Resolution to both the Judiciary Committees of the House and the Senate alerting them of the need for a RESOLUTION that would serve to notify the COURT of this breach upon the poor as a #WarOnPoor.
Collectively we know the House and the Senate are controlled by a majority of Republicans now. If a resolution was passed which can happen within a matter of weeks, it would be a strength to Republicans to be seen concerned about the poor's plight to Justice. If Democrats objected to it, understanding it might inflict Obama, of course the object reality to the public would be seen as Democrats truly against the poor... an illuminating perspective for the voting public.
We understand how fast a non-binding RESOLUTION can be passed and mailed to the U.S. Supreme Court demanding either an investigation or a flat out demand the case be heard. Every Citizen has been encouraged in an effort to get this on board with their Republican and Democrat Senators and Representatives hopefully with the understanding that a NON-BINDING RESOLUTION , just like U.S. Senate Res. 511 can pass very easily in as little as twenty (20) days.
We hope that you will take notice of this and read the following proposal and forward it to your Elected Leaders who are suppose to serve you in the Federal Government positions of U.S. Senator and U.S. Representative.
Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy
2016 D. President Candidate for President.
IN THE 114TH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION IN THE YEAR OF OUR LORD 2015
U.S. House of Representatives
U.S. Senate
U.S. House of Representatives
U.S. Senate
CRJ WAR ON THE POOR RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION
Indictment of IMPEACHMENT for Bad Behavior on ALL CURRENT SERVING U.S. Supreme Court Justice(s) for WAR ON THE POOR ACTION prohibiting the Poor from seeking Justice in the U.S. Supreme Court
WHEREAS : It is the U.S. Federal Law that [Justice For All] shall not be Prohibited from any United States Citizen on account of forma pauperis standing or condition of Poverty
WHEREAS: The Petitioner in the Case was not sanctioned OR dismissed by U.S. SUPREME COURT RULES 39.8
WHEREAS: TWO LOWER Court's of Law in the Federal District Court (Utah Division) and Federal Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals have undertaken Proceedings GRANTING Cody Robert Judy (CRJ) a 2008,'12, and 2016 Candidate for the Office of President Forma Pauperis Standing in the Calendar Year JULY 2014-15
WHEREAS: Federal Statute honors a GRANTED Forma Pauperis Standing for a Calendar YEAR
WHEREAS: TWO WITNESSES of the Judicial Branch have on the Federal Court Record GRANTED CRJ access to JUSTICE of their Court(s), but the U.S. Supreme Court has Denied Access to JUSTICE from it's Bench in the same Calendar Year by a single Justice Sotomayor and upon [REVIEW] the FULL or entire U.S. SUPREME COURT BENCH, and has Denied ACCESS to [Justice] in the U.S. Supreme Court solely on the conditions of Poverty PUNITIVELY upon CRJ in CASE 14-9396 on account of his Poverty as the Docket indicates , a WAR ON THE POOR is Noticed and has been Noticeably declared by the U.S. Supreme Court Justices.
WHEREAS: ANY U.S. Citizen is considered Equal under the Supreme Law of the Land in and under the benevolence of The U.S. Constitution formed by the Union of the 50 individual State(s) forming the United States as the Body of We The People, a WAR ON THE POOR of one is considered a WAR ON THE POOR of all.
WHEREAS: U.S.C. ARTICLE III Sect.I provides Judicial Powers vested in the U.S. Supreme Court and in inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.
WHEREAS: U.S.C ARTICLE III Sect. 1 states: The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during [good Behaviour] and Sect 2 states: Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States to all cases affecting [Citizens] thereof.
WHEREAS: Denial of ACCESS to any Federal Court established under the U.S. Constitution solely on the basis of Poverty can only be contrived as the WORST POSSIBLE CASE of JUSTICE in the United States of America under the banner and [Pledge of Allegiance] in JUSTICE For All constituting BAD BEHAVIOUR
BE IT RESOLVED
That this BODY OF LEGISLATURE [U.S. House of Representatives] and [U.S. Senate] in their JUDICIAL COMMITTEES SHALL take the TWO Inferior Courts of Law as Witnesses, as well CRJ as a Third Witness, and SHALL RESOLVE to undertake IMMEDIATE IMPEACHMENT Proceedings against those so named individual Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court constituting the FULL REVIEW for Bad Behaviour upon the U.S. Constitution and Justice for All.
That this BODY OF LEGISLATURE [U.S. House of Representatives] and [U.S. Senate] in their JUDICIAL COMMITTEES SHALL take the TWO Inferior Courts of Law as Witnesses, as well CRJ as a Third Witness, and SHALL RESOLVE to undertake IMMEDIATE IMPEACHMENT Proceedings against those so named individual Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court constituting the FULL REVIEW for Bad Behaviour upon the U.S. Constitution and Justice for All.
END
AGAIN YOUR HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT:
It is the Duty of the Individual Citizens of every Particular State to Forward this to their ELECTED LEADERS as that is Who they were elected to Serve and more often then not the Elected Officials in your State will not take a Resolution Proposition from someone of a different State. Its usually very easily E-Mailed if you Google your State U.S Representative and U.S. Senator. DO IT TODAY!
It is the Duty of the Individual Citizens of every Particular State to Forward this to their ELECTED LEADERS as that is Who they were elected to Serve and more often then not the Elected Officials in your State will not take a Resolution Proposition from someone of a different State. Its usually very easily E-Mailed if you Google your State U.S Representative and U.S. Senator. DO IT TODAY!
U.S. HOUSE JUDICIARY- Subcommittee-Constitution and Civil Justice
OPINION
Of course I would not ask anyone to do anything that I wouldn't do, so I include my information here that let my own Utah U.S. Senator Hatch and U.S. Senator Lee as well as my U.S. Representative Rob Bishop 1st Congressional District of Utah know about this injustice that needs to be remedied.
It is very difficult for me to understand why any Senator or U.S. Representative would be against treating the poor equally and who would not see this as a matter of very important consideration.
Just a few questions I have received so far in introducing this:
Q. Would removing the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court undue their decisions on marriage equality?
There might be a reasonable argument for challenging any opinion that has been brought down by a Court whose Justices are impeached' for 'bad behavior ", but I wouldn't count on it.
Q. The Court has granted several 'forma pauperis' petitioners, doesn't this fact place your proposed legislation in jeopardy of not holding water?
Of course there have been cases this Court has granted Forma Pauperis standing on. The fact is emphasized in not granting mine, when two Courts below did,(as well as the U.S. Supreme Court themselves in 2012, and my Motion for Forma Pauperis standing was not dismissed on any basis of [abusive filings] as the U.S. Supreme Court has indicated for some Cases under Rule 39.8), and has placed my case in an even more grievous circumstances of what we would refer to as 'selective dismissals' on the issues. Its a very dangerous road to go down when that becomes the 'norm'. Its become very pervasive in Obama's dictatorial ways of governing understood as 'prosecutorial discretion'.
Q. Isn't this kind of a light case to be considered as a 'bad behavioral' charge worth 'impeachment' proceedings by Congress on the U.S. Supreme Court Justices?
I suppose if your rich you might feel that way, but I see it as a very big STOP SIGN and one that I'm sure hasn't just happened with me.
Q. Does pushing this legislation do anything for the Case Considerations of Obama's Ineligibility?
No, it doesn't. That is certainly why both Democrats and Republicans should not feel any hesitancy whatsoever in passing Resolutions to began IMPEACHMENT of the Justices for this action. This is really a separate matter and strictly involves removing the 'WAR ON THE POOR" in the punitive actions of not allowing access to the Courts Granting Certs and I think will have far reaching affects that even U.S. Justices are not above the law and that the day they decide that equality and justice under our U.S. Constitution is not a good idea, that's the day they need to consider the Life Tenure for good behavior just came to an End.
Q. Can the Court Change its Ruling on your Case to avoid impeachment proceedings?
Well, I am not a Justice, but as Justice goes there might be some considerations made for "clerical errors". That is why through the Proceedings of Impeachment Congress can summon the Supreme Court Justices to their Bench and find out exactly who knew what and when. This is just the process we have to go through.
" I say to Americans that if you are going to find Justice for All, and find your U.S. Constitutional Civil Rights in tact, that you had better start looking just a little deeper into the action instead of the words of your favorite Presidential Candidate.
"Wither a "clerical error" or some other error the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in Case No. 14-9396 needs to be changed. Mistakes in the Court happen I understand, but correction demands action over words also. "
REP. TRENT FRANKS CHAIR
V.C Rep. Ron DeSantis
Members: REP. King, REP. Gohmert, REP. Cohen., REP. Nadler, REP. Deutch
V.C Rep. Ron DeSantis
Members: REP. King, REP. Gohmert, REP. Cohen., REP. Nadler, REP. Deutch
U.S SENATE JUDICIARY Committee- Subcommittee on Constitution
SENATOR CORNYN - CHAIR
R.M Sen. Durbin
Members:
Sen. Tillis
Sen. Graham
Sen. Whitehouse
Sen. Coons
Sen. Cruz
Sen. Franken
Sen. Vitter
Sen. Tillis
Sen. Graham
Sen. Whitehouse
Sen. Coons
Sen. Cruz
Sen. Franken
Sen. Vitter
OPINION
Of course I would not ask anyone to do anything that I wouldn't do, so I include my information here that let my own Utah U.S. Senator Hatch and U.S. Senator Lee as well as my U.S. Representative Rob Bishop 1st Congressional District of Utah know about this injustice that needs to be remedied.
It is very difficult for me to understand why any Senator or U.S. Representative would be against treating the poor equally and who would not see this as a matter of very important consideration.
Just a few questions I have received so far in introducing this:
Q. Would removing the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court undue their decisions on marriage equality?
There might be a reasonable argument for challenging any opinion that has been brought down by a Court whose Justices are impeached' for 'bad behavior ", but I wouldn't count on it.
Q. The Court has granted several 'forma pauperis' petitioners, doesn't this fact place your proposed legislation in jeopardy of not holding water?
Of course there have been cases this Court has granted Forma Pauperis standing on. The fact is emphasized in not granting mine, when two Courts below did,(as well as the U.S. Supreme Court themselves in 2012, and my Motion for Forma Pauperis standing was not dismissed on any basis of [abusive filings] as the U.S. Supreme Court has indicated for some Cases under Rule 39.8), and has placed my case in an even more grievous circumstances of what we would refer to as 'selective dismissals' on the issues. Its a very dangerous road to go down when that becomes the 'norm'. Its become very pervasive in Obama's dictatorial ways of governing understood as 'prosecutorial discretion'.
Q. Isn't this kind of a light case to be considered as a 'bad behavioral' charge worth 'impeachment' proceedings by Congress on the U.S. Supreme Court Justices?
I suppose if your rich you might feel that way, but I see it as a very big STOP SIGN and one that I'm sure hasn't just happened with me.
Q. Does pushing this legislation do anything for the Case Considerations of Obama's Ineligibility?
No, it doesn't. That is certainly why both Democrats and Republicans should not feel any hesitancy whatsoever in passing Resolutions to began IMPEACHMENT of the Justices for this action. This is really a separate matter and strictly involves removing the 'WAR ON THE POOR" in the punitive actions of not allowing access to the Courts Granting Certs and I think will have far reaching affects that even U.S. Justices are not above the law and that the day they decide that equality and justice under our U.S. Constitution is not a good idea, that's the day they need to consider the Life Tenure for good behavior just came to an End.
Q. Can the Court Change its Ruling on your Case to avoid impeachment proceedings?
Well, I am not a Justice, but as Justice goes there might be some considerations made for "clerical errors". That is why through the Proceedings of Impeachment Congress can summon the Supreme Court Justices to their Bench and find out exactly who knew what and when. This is just the process we have to go through.
" I say to Americans that if you are going to find Justice for All, and find your U.S. Constitutional Civil Rights in tact, that you had better start looking just a little deeper into the action instead of the words of your favorite Presidential Candidate.
"Wither a "clerical error" or some other error the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in Case No. 14-9396 needs to be changed. Mistakes in the Court happen I understand, but correction demands action over words also. "
Thank You!
Please, consider a Contribution Now by clicking the secure Paypal link. You contribution Today will help make a Better America Tomorrow!
Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy
2016 D- CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT
Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Cody Robert Judy's book :
Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.
*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396
Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin
The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.
Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.
INSPIRING - I believe in You
APPLICATION FOR STAY PENDING FULL REVIEW ON THE RECUSAL OF JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT AND KAGAN FROM PROCEEDINGS
