Author - Cody Robert Judy
Conservative Independent American
Candidate for Pres 16, 12, 08
U.S. Senate 18, 10, 04, 00
U.S. Rep. 02
Book: Taking A Stand - The conservative independent Voice
The two Party System controlled by Republicans and Democrats in America have seen better days. Democrats face internal party discord in the vacuum of Obama hijacking the Democratic Party machinations with 'Organization for Action' (OFA) that starved States Democratic Parties and built around Obama. Trump pinned by Democrats, "Leader of the Birther Movement", never filed a single legal paper on the ineligibility of his own Republican Presidential Candidate colleagues Cruz, Rubio, or Jindal, but now is learning just how hard it is to navigate the hurling rapids of the Judicial Branch's dichotomous abuse of the U.S. Constitution in the security interest of the Nation that an unqualified ineligible person in the Office of the President poses; as well illegal immigrants the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals just jammed open repelling Trump's security interest of a temporary ban for 7 war-torn countries that 50,000 bomb-laden-drone-in-chief Obama dropped his last two years in office democrats hardly know anything about.
SEE YOU IN COURT, THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!
Trump Tweeted "See You in Court" as the 9th Circuit Federal Appeals Court Panel ruled without opposition against him 3-0. If that is what winning looks like the campaign promise Trump made about winning is off to a very bad start.
The biggest problem in context of Trump's Tweet is he only has a couple of choices. Appeal to the Full 11 Panel Court in the 9th Circuit or to the U.S. Supreme Court. If he appeals to the U.S. Supreme Court political lines drawn a 4 to 4 split decision would simply defer it back in the favor of standing with the 9th Circuits decision. Trump does not have a favorable U.S. Supreme Court yet with his nomination of Judge Neil Gorsuch from the 10th Circuit in Colorado unconfirmed and sure to receive some fight with Democrats in the confirmation process.
If Trump gives up now and rewrites the Executive Order he acknowledges Security in the United States has also been hijacked by the Judicial Branches unclassified hands. Now we must acknowledge one of the most disturbing things about this 9th Circuit Decision is one of the three Judges was appointed by a Constitutionally Ineligible President Obama -Judge Michelle Friedland.
Now tell me, Trump should not dig in on Obama's Ineligibility or that the U.S. Constitution doesn't matter? Obama has already hung Trump out to dry and Trump has made a big mistake underestimating the wicked medieval obstacle course Obama has set for him to pass through.
One of the more disturbing things about this ruling in the 9th Circuit that really negates a host of Classified Intelligence a President has, was the unleashed scathing attack Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Amazon, Apple,Uber, Reddit, Netflix and Dropbox , all depending upon the United States of America under the U.S. Constitution that provided for them the 'opportunity' to reap the bountiful harvest they sowed with ingenuity and entrepreneurship, all harnessed together against the Security of the Country. They all filed opposition legal briefs against Trumps Travel Ban. It is as if these U.S. based Companies - have set themselves up as being responsible under Civil Penalty for any wrongful deaths that might come from Terror Attacks in the interest of the almighty corporate dollar and their treasure chest founded in greed of exploiting American Workers for cheap foreign, maybe even slave labor.
The lack of appreciation for their beginnings and the land of free and home of the brave that gave them independently a chance has remarkable been forgotten. They have lost respect for Civil Rights afforded to American Citizens who are under the umbrella of the U.S. Constitution. No one else is. With their Briefs, any terror attacks resulting from their jam of security for a Nation is a legal witness of their Civil Responsibility in wrongful deaths. They have entered a very dark path in their agreement with Responsibility and Accountability. The Judges can point to them as contributors and enablers to America's vulnerability in Terror Attacks if they come as a result of this action.
Here is the 29 Page decision:
Since when President Trump was the security of our Nation not at Stake with an Constitutionally Ineligible person in the Office of the President? Since when have the Birthers, who have fought this in that same obstacle course being castigated and unsupported, received a dime of contributions from your 10 Billion the last 8 years?
Now before I blow the blood vessels out of my temples screaming at President Trump for his lethargic and low-energy bush-like characteristics on what the Birthers have been Championing in the pits of hell, I mean the Judicial Branch, as the Security of our Nation, let's us all peacefully join in a civil conversation to consider in strategy what is most effective in the National Security of our Nation?
A-Fighting the Eligibility Fight- A Commander-In-Chief who used Fraud and Forgery to obtain the highest office illegally with a fraudulent long form birth certificate and a fraudulent draft registration stamp so he could use deferred prosecution as a tool to open the borders wide open to a vulnerable population, and appoint Federal Judges to back him up for years
or
B- Fighting retroactively in defense every single case to the U.S. Supreme Court that comes along in 50 States of those who have crossed the Border and found their illegal act represented by the ACLU and Democrats taken to the court where that illegal commander in chief has appointed Federal Judges to rule in their favor.
Hummmm... it seems like an easy decision especially now Obama is 'unseated'. The decent representation of the Federal Attorney General's Office has been appealed for in just such a Case believe it or not now pending in a MOTION FOR RELIEF OF JUDGMENT to ReOpen based on the new evidence brought up by Sheriff Joe's Cold Case Posse.
Next the Cold Case Posse make the Case Obama's Birth Certificate is a Fraud.
In the violation action afforded in the Sherman and corresponding Clayton Act of Congress, a Plaintiff can indeed and is supposed to receive assistance by a reporting Judge in the prosecution of a cabal or cartel who forms with two corporations to snuff out lower competition with illegal activity- fraud. This is exactly what has been called for in the cartel formed by the DNC Democratic National Committee and OFA (Organization For Action) in the Civil Rights Claims of a Presidential Candidate with Standing against Obama's unqualified illegal state in the Office of the President that four of Obama's nominees in the 10th Circuit also snuffed out.
The Birther Benefits yet escaping the Establishment Groupies of both the Democratic and Republican Parties, as well as the Main Stream Media (MSM) the same way the Brexit did, gives us a Prime example of why Hillary Clinton is about to lose what the Democrats have worked so hard at the last seven and a half years in the election of Republican Party Nominee Donald J. Trump with the ire and outrage of the Nation as the catapult. What?
How could the Democratic Party let ire and outrage go to waste like that- especially in a sleeping giant that awakens? I know it sounds impossible, but six months ago saying Donald J. Trump never elected as mayor or even dog-catcher was going to be the Republican Nominee at the Republican National Convention was laughable.
In the good-ole-days Democrats use to be smart people about Civil Rights. You know in the days before the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin before they tapped the same stupid-tree Hillary Clinton tapped into when with so many examples in her life she reiterates that in "hindsight it wasn't a good idea" in the form of an apology actually no real sound minded person would buy.
Democrats have to buy the snake oil though because they got into the pit of selling "The First" rather than actually understanding moral character could not be uploaded and every Citizen had the right to vote already. They started discrimination all over again after they'd just won the battle. That was the same stupid-tree that Obama tapped into in voting "the first" colored person into office, and the same one Hillary decided to tap into asking people to vote based on her sex as "the first" women.
Minorities grabbed the microphone and started selling race, color, and sex as gender asking for preferential treatment or discrimination based upon those particular chromosomes. It's fad now to get preferential treatment based on a chromosome? What makes the KKK different in the supremacist ideology? I see very little difference in the discrimination of color, race, religion, sex, and national origin as I do the preferential treatment of color, race, religion, sex and national origin. Preferential treatment is discrimination and is beating itself upside the head creating divides were they had been mended,
They are after all, bound to the sinking ship of Barack Obama who never was and never will be qualified for the Office of the President according to the U.S. Constitution's demand that only a [natural born Citizen] or a [Citizen] at the time of the adoption of the Constitution be allowed by the Constitution's authority to be President. That was not a discrimination against immigrants or first generation Americans it was a discrimination or qualification of TIME in the interest of allegiance to the Country; really no different than the age/or Time discrimination between the offices of Representative (25), Senator (30), and President (35) that took into account seasons of experience and time on the earth also figured from the moment of birth.
There is a new case in the U.S. Supreme Court that is rattling the Birther Benefits department, and though it does not involve Barack Obama the ramifications will. This Case is titled Carmon Elliott v. Ted Cruz No. 16-13. Whether Obama can skate-out of office, like Hillary Clinton skated out of the Secretary of State office having usurped the office and responsibility to the people in FOIA accountability with her private servers, is questionable and hinging upon a few variables.
The hope of the Birthers in this case might modestly be scaled to the comment of chief anti-birther 'Doc' or Dr. Conspiracy himself Mr. Kevin Davidson on his Blog Obamaconspiracy.org and Post and Comment pictured here about it.
[So if I am reading that correctly, the Supreme Court could review the Elliott case if it so chose. And I think Apuzzo's argument that it is not moot is sufficient. I'm not willing to attach the DOOMED graphic to this one.]
While it's not a fabricated long form birth certificate with layers, and I am not dead like the poor drowned Hawaii Health Department Director Loretta Fuddy, (The only official to say she saw Obama's long form birth certificate -May she rest in peace), I will attest to the validity of the comment in the constructs of my own research into the case that have profound new twist.
They say everything in Obama's Birther Circus and Carnival Barker Town has been litigated and then comes a long a State Court Judge who did not get the 'Obama memo' on this issue- 'you must stay plugged into the stupid-tree' and actually constructs a smart argument that [Standing] is sufficient by any old Citizen wanting to vote for a qualified Candidate, and brilliantly defies [The Political Question Doctrine] - something Judges have been hiding behind for decades on the qualification definition. The two Issues the Pennsylvania State Court Judge plowed through with nuclear powered tank are two issues that have been the malignant tumor-cancers that have plagued Birthers for nearly a decade.
The RED DISTRICT LIGHT flashing for the United States Supreme Court in Elliott v. Cruz 16-13, see Elliott's Go-Fund-Me site here, might just be in the advent of stopping the rogue argument of standing and the political question doctrine that in the process necessitates the Court actually defining [natural born Citizen] in the same light that Roe v. Wade was applicable even though the pregnancy was no more, in the facts presented under the Mootness Standard, that the issue was more than likely going to come up again and again and again in two applications:
1- Voluntary cessation of unlawful conduct
2- Conduct capable of repetition yet evading review
The 'Ark' that was touched in Elliott v. Cruz was that the Pennsylvania State Supreme Court 'affirmed' the State Court Judge's 'Opinion' that now if the U.S. Supreme Court does not here walks and talks like the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed also! This may be the last chance the highest Court in the Land gets a chance to weigh in on the Judicial Branches divine appointment to regulate a distinctive application that is part of the United States Constitution.
As the attorney for the Case Mario Apuzzo Esq. ran around touching all the bases of the Pennsylvania Case, conservative Justice Samuel Alito will chair in handling Motions in the duties of his in the Third Circuit Command, it was very well articulated the Legislative Branch was not given any powers in the U.S. Constitution to altar or control the definition of [natural born Citizen] in their limited capacity of [naturalization powers] Article I. Section 8 Cl.4 that are codified in the congressional acts of The Naturalization Act 8 U.S Code §1401 Nationals and Citizens at Birth a-h also reviewed in the 14th Amendment.
a- For jus sanguinis U.S. citizenship, i.e., citizenship for the children born abroad of U.S. citizen parents, which is established only by congressional statute and not the U.S. Constitution
b. For jus soli, or "right of the territory" the provisions in Section 1 interpreted to the effect that children born on United States soil, with very few exceptions, are U.S. citizens. (Notice: Not [natural born Citizens] This type of guarantee—legally termed again by congressional statute seen in the 14th Amendment.
[Natural Born Citizen] as Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents was codified by Nature and Nature's God something the United States Congress was not given authority to over-rule by the definitions of Article I, Section 8, Cl.4, and the Executive Branch sure wasn't given any authority in the U.S. Constitution to interpret [natural born Citizen], neither the MSM or the People's Vote as we here in the United States of America are a Constitution Republic not a mob-is-right Democracy as the Writ of Certiorari shines the light on. (Ref.pg 10-12)
Finally the [Conflict of Courts] (the very strong basis for the U.S .Supreme Court hearing a Writ of Certioari) comes smashing through the windows of the U.S. Supreme Court!
[In arriving at his holding, Judge Pellegrini and authorities upon whom he relies have concluded that neither the English common law nor the Fourteenth amendment provide the definitive definition of an article II natural born citizen. Where Judge Pellegrini errs is in placing his reliance for his definition of a natural born citizen upon Charles Gordon, Jack Maskell, Paul Clement,and Neal Katyal (footnote 4) rather than on primary historical and legal sources, including decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court. The arguments of these commentators, who focus on “at birth” and “by birth” rather than on the birth circumstances upon which the Framers relied for defining a natural born citizen, are flawed and cannot serve as any reasonable basis for defining a natural born citizen]
PART II. THE PROTECTION OF OBAMA HAS BECOME A RACIST ARGUMENT
The Question of Standing has been a criteria of the Court dismissing 95% of the Writ's coming into the United States Supreme Court who recently upheld Affirmative Action at the University of Texas in Fisher v. University of Texas, No. 14-981 , but no where in the U.S. Constitution is affirmative action declared as a protection upon the Qualification of the Office of the President.
But let's just set that aside, and say the U.S. Supreme Court has indeed received two cases with Standing from 2008 Write-In Candidate and 2012 and 2016 [Democratic Party] Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy who has suffered a great deal of damages the Court saw fit not to recognize in even hearing that asks the exact same questions for the Court to define [natural born Citizen] giving much the same argument in two Cases 12-5276 and 14-9396.
The last case 14-9396 considered closed only October of 2015 (9 months ago) denied arbitrarily the Petitioner's right to have the fees and printing cost waved due to poverty. The court was even sent bank statements showing no possible way to pay the cost of printing and filing fees, yet Justice Sotomayor, presumed to be notable for low income people, responsible for the Tenth Circuit handling of Motions, deliberately slashed the tires of Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in an outrageous affront to low income people!
This has done more for Donald J. Trump's Campaign to the Republican Nomination than any single thing. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg recently called Donald J. Trump a 'Faker', and that is true in the Birther Fields in that Donald J. Trump never filed a single legal paper against his unqualified opponents even when he had Standing to do just that preferring a 'Bullies Way of doing things' to that of Law and Order!
While Justice Ginsburg rationalized if Donald J. Trump gets in the Office of the President "everything is up for grabs", Democrats are aghast to the support the U.S. Supreme Court has flat-out given as an endorsement to Donald J. Trump as the King of Birthers without filing a single legal brief. Indeed, the issue is hotly contested in the 2016 election as Slate.com just two days ago published 141 Lies Donald Trump's told- Number 33 [Questioned President Obama’s American citizenship, bringing the “birther” campaign into the mainstream]
Hey it's not [Citizenship] it's [natural born Citizen] for the Office of the President.
Still the MSM as well as the Liberal Left of the Court, doesn't seem to get they are on the opposite side of the Brexit Standard in their pejorative of Birthers in the United States of America and compared to Hillary's 5 Lies, just in the latest FBI Criminal Investigation Review, they make Trump out to be a hero for questioning Obama for a Standard of Law equal under the Supreme Law of the Land totally bewildered of the General Population's (SMH) disbelief at their tap to the stupid-tree!
The Supreme Court of the United States blatantly not hearing a case that has had a [Bipartisan Standing] (Judy v. McCain and Judy v. Obama) is and has paved the way for the reality of Justice Ginsburg HOLY GRAIL DECLARATION that "everything is up for grabs", if Trump is elected President with the nominations most likely to occur in the Court during the next four years.
What we are to gather from this is the Stupid-Tree Tappers are willing to give up Choice for Women, Same Sex Marriage for Citizens, Health Care, and whatever else is on the agenda of the Left including $15 dollars per hour for Obama's Ineligibility! I ask them, "Is that WORTH IT? Is that worth it?!
Apparently this is the Left Liberals giving the American Bird Sign to the Left of the Court and the part of the story where the head of the snake eats the tail and consumes itself into obliteration. That's the Stupid-Tree! Democrats have lost their mind, and they are about to lose a lot more than that and be just as surprised Election Morning as the world was at Brexit.
Of course there is a solution! Lock her Up in an orchard of Stupid Trees and let her nurse on them till she dies; get her as far away from Government Office as one can possible get. Maybe Syria where she can enjoy her reality of sniper fire and cattle futures and the way a 500% increase of refugees can be least expensive - shipping her there instead of bring them here? She'd could be with her experience a great Ambassador to them as Chris Stevens was.
The Democratic Party National Convention is not for two more weeks and in Gore v. Bush the Court decided the outcome in eight days. It is not impossible for the Court to acknowledge a mistake and in hindsight regret their decision to devastate the poor who have come to the Court for Justice in Truth and Faithfulness against the Lies and Deceit.
Otherwise.., what can we say? They just do not care about anything or any body and they proved it to us. Their Court will not last another four years.
Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
The Qualifications for the Presidential Race Not the President's Race
[natural born Citizen]
The consideration given the Office of the President in the United States Constitution as a Story, is for all intensive purposes the Main Character. References to the Office of President in the Constitution Index Pamphlet of 46 pages number 13 pages to the closest reference coming in 2 or 3
The dangers of a Despot or Rogue Leader at the Head of the Government were by the careful considerations the biggest fear to guard against and also anticipate.
In the 1933 Ratification of Amendment XX we find..[ or if the President elect shall fail to qualify, ]. This proposes the most dreadful consequence of a Presidential Candidate falsifying or by other fraudulent means in the form of his identification, precipitating his election by the huge swath of the general public and still as a "President Elect" actually failing to qualify.
Who could imagine such a horrendous nightmare?
Isn't it interesting that its happened? Of course no one would dispute the requirement of Time of "35 years of age or older, if someone was 34.9 years old they are not 35 years old.
No one would dispute the 14 years a resident if only 13 years, 11 months had been accomplished.
We are left with the TIME it takes for two to become Citizens and have a child in the United States. Its a TIME FACTOR, not a race question. This time factor can also be interrupted and would then have to be restarted with the same goal or condition of Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.
There are few things that make me ill more than to have regulated a TIME consideration given to the highest office of our Government as a Race related issue. That summation that the [natural born Citizen] qualification specific be about anything else but TIME regarded in the U.S. Constitution for the Office of President and Vice President is both demeaning and insulting pejorative not about Presidential Race, but about the President's Race.
The Main Stream Media needs to ask themselves a hard question: How does a "Time Period" equate to a Racism? That doesn't even make sense! Now what is the tag for someone who calls someone a Racist that actually is not? Actually Bigot might serve as one term if Racist itself doesn't apply.
Whatever the case, calling my Stand for the [natural born Citizen] qualification anything but a TEST-OF-TIME .. and literally meaning a period of time, really makes me ill.
The respect and love for the richness I find in every race and culture makes it sickening to me and I have done everything in my power to dispute the insulting narrative that race or culture guided me rather than simply a loyalty TIME period. The rationale of the entire qualification was that no foreigner occupy the Office of the President. Those with dual citizen ships are in fact considered foreigners to an office requiring a monogamous loyalty in citizenship ie. Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.
If it was understanding anyone asked or sought, I have in my blog made my concentrations and meanings abundantly clear.
An interesting parallel has been brought up by ANTI-birthers I think that peals a layer of the onion back in the case that they seek to destroy the Constitution and get around its precepts rather than Stand for it as a defense for our Nation.
The point was brought up in the context of the illegal immigrants. It was stated in a conversation on Obamaconspiracy.org Entitled "Confusing natural born Citizen", that Birthers bring up the facts that until the U.S. Supreme Court rules on it is left to the States in the comment:
[The problem is the next leap that birthers make. The right wing is making the same leap when it comes to illegal immigrants]
My response was WELCOME to the World of Obama The difference between negative proof and positive proof
Welcome to the world of proving a negative, rather than positively proving.
#1 Scenario ie. U.S. Court: [speaking to a number of litigants contesting Obama's ineligibility] "You don't have Standing". This is not Obama proving anything, and is considered a "negative proof" for Obama.
ANTI-birther interpretation: OBAMA has won over 200 Cases! As if he had positively proven his qualifications. He hasn't. Not one court in the whole USA has actually heard or seen Obama prove he was qualified. They have listened to a whole lot of people who have tried to prove a negative and laughed at them because they couldn't do it, or in my case simply refused to hear the Case on Merits.
#2 Scenario ie. U.S. Court: Your case is wholly incredible or in other words frivolous ( This is what the lower courts said about mine at least not stating my case was dismissed because I didn't have standing, but was frivolous or wholly incredible. I'm not sure which is worse? Stating that a Presidential Candidate's Campaign is not hurt or damaged by one who is ineligible and wins the seat or office in conflict irregardless of LAW as is exactly the scenario anticipated by the U.S. Constitution's Amendment XX, stating in so many words that circumstances is frivolous in the face of evidence provided which shows a determination against the truth, against the facts, and against the law or stating the illegal immigrants are legal?
The ANTI-birther Interpretation: That's the REASON you don't get forma pauperis status.
The bizarre twist is they wish better treatment upon those who are not U.S. Citizens then those who are. It the greatest sense of twist this disavows Citizenship in the United States and regulates it to a cause of humanity or Citizenship in the World where in fact minorities, women, and individuals in cases such as same-sex marriage lose the respect and dignity of free speech, freedom of religion, the rights of privileges afforded to all Citizens equally, and many other rights including voting rights the U.S. Constitution actually upholds that a foreign citizenship in the world intends to trample.
#3 Scenario ie. U.S. Court: "Your forma pauperis status is denied in spite of two LOWER COURT's agreeing in the same year, by a Form asking for Yearly Income Reports that was granted and is not disputed.
ANTI-birther interpretation: 1) If your cause was credible you could have raised the money. 2) You can't point to any Case Law stating the Forma Pauperis Yearly Report Form is good for a Year.
This is like stating the reasons the poor are poor is basically their fault and of no circumstance out of their realm of choices or circumstances including death, job loss, health, accident, divorce, child custody disputes, and contract agreements abandoned by partners that inflicted a state of poverty.
One true aspect of the absurdity relied upon by ANTI -birthers is that they are somehow compassionate people in the act of opening the door for strangers on one hand and watching their family be slaughtered rather then defending their own family on the other. It might be subject to debate by those being slaughtered verses the ones coming in the front door with enthusiastic welcome who did the slaughtering.
Our U.S. Constitution is an agreement of terms. The idiotic reasoning tactics of ANTI-birthers are at least in perfect parallel with the derelictic deductive reasoning skills and example stating the qualification for President is the same for those in 1787 as it is for those in 2016 when the Constitution states very plainly in Article II, Section 1. C-5 differently:
1) [natural born Citizen]
OR
2) [Citizen] at the [TIME] of the [Adoption of this Constitution]
and then providing absolutely no distinction for the [two requisites].
To state you understand perfectly Obama has occupied an office he has never proven he is qualified for is exactly in line with the [negative proof] hurdle that Anti-Birthers are complaining about. I do understand their frustration seeing Obama occupy an office he was not, is not, never will be qualified to hold based on the TIME factor considered necessary for both parents to be U.S. Citizens and have a child in the United States jurisdiction maintaining the loyalty for, until 35 years and at least 14 years being a resident distinct from U.S. Representatives and U.S. Senators.
I have even fought for the frustration of the ANTI - birthers hoping the U.S. Supreme Court would hold; there has not been a dispute between Presidential Candidates in the Office of the President's distinct and unique qualification of [natural born Citizen] rather then allow Obama to be dis proven a qualified candidate without the benefit and access to documentation Obama has sealed; or at least attending to the documentation Obama by his own hand has released showing his father was never a U.S. Citizen in fact starting the Time demanded for the Office of President with Obama's heirs. If Obama and his wife are Citizens their children would be natural born Citizens qualified for President in the Time Consideration.
ITS ABOUT "TIME" WATCH
This has been the motivation for my Campaign to release the incredibly jeweled, solar paneled,motorized, computerized, glow in the dark limited edition CODY ROBERT JUDY BLUE WATCH. The only watch that allows your finger into Time, because its all about time.
The Cody Robert Judy Blue Watch
$1,000,000.00 secures yours in this Limited Edition
American Treasure
We are incredibly excited about this WATCH! You have just never seen anything like it in the world! This watch encapsulates the epiphany of the rare,rich and valuable Principle of Transparency, our U.S. Constitution's natural born Citizen clause has afforded our Nation's People in a greater goodness and mercy even than any particular Church or Religion I know. Priced reasonably for the many many Billionaires who would really love to show their gratitude for the opportunity America has provided them, (rather than have their work confiscated by the Government), in supporting the U.S. Constitution we here at the Cody Robert Judy Today for a Better America Tomorrow are excited to offer this limited Collection of 200 Watches at One Million Dollars Each! Some Campaigns sell hats, we do to, but we wanted something very very special that set our Campaign apart from just hats, and gave you the opportunity to support a campaign that is supporting the U.S. Constitution like no other in America!
What Church has not held Priesthood for Men only? What Church has not held the healing properties of Priesthood away from minorities and women to vote in the Church? What Church has held equality in the privilege of marriage and Parenting to all Citizens equally? Of course you are free to choose which one, but understand unequivocally it is by the U.S. Constitution that you can choose.
Of course it is the right of the Churches to discriminate according to their beliefs. We adopt that in the freedom of religions, but our Blessed U.S. Constitution when we see it in the light it was meant to be seen in has afforded the voting rights to minorities,women, and the privileges of all Citizens afforded to all Citizens.
While everyone is free to bash and trash each others religions explaining why they think theirs is the truest one, there still remains a respect and honor of even that right afforded by our U.S. Constitution that I love and believe we here in America should celebrate in our recognized diversity.
There are many different religions in the United States who believe with all their hearts America is going to be judged for this Love and Mercy the same way the Islamic Republic of Iran is going to be judged or China, or Russia or any other Nation.
This of course is a denial of the very reasons God set America as the United States apart in such a diversity and is showing the world what great blessings might be attained in the release of information, technology and an unparalleled Standard of Liberty and Freedom in the world with innovation, attraction, ingenuity, entrepreneurial diverse inspiration we have called uniquely American excellence. .. Like this WATCH you have never seen is so unique and rare in the World.
We are indeed held to a higher standard also of this kind of Love and Mercy. We find power as a Nation with great gratitude in the cooperation amongst our fellow man, much more than we experience a loss of power in a belief of superiority.
While many religions speak against freedom of speech, we welcome it. While many religions speak against women's rights, we welcome it. While many religions speak against minority rights, we welcome them. However, that is not at the expense of suffering the protections afforded in our U.S. Constitution to be secure in our Homes and in our Property secured to us in our 4th Amendment and 5th Amendments that includes "public danger".
Many have suggested it was "not what America was about in a wise protection of our U.S. Citizens from public danger in the potential of importing terrorism and called for a STOP when it come to assuring a rigorous vetting process for refugees or immigrants. Where shall 72% of America's men go if terrorism strikes in our United States of America? Shall we go to Europe or Africa or Russia or China? How about Syria? NO! We shall Stay in America fighting for the Law and our Country.
I have proposed that any Refugee of course be drafted into the same force that fights for freedom in their land in our land. In other words, how different are the circumstances of fighting for your own land then fighting for America? Are they prepared to meet the requirements of America?
If you come to America you are expected to fight for America, adopt America's principles afforded to those who are gay, minority, or female. If you cannot do that with a pledge it doesn't matter what religion you are, you will be in conflict with America's Principles under our U.S. Constitution. If you are a refugee in America and you are drafted in the Military and sent to the front lines to fight in Syria how much greater will be your victory in death fighting for Freedom and Liberty?
This might be the reason Obama wants to welcome you? Perhaps he wishes to strengthen our military presents in Syria with you as a soldier for America fighting on the front lines of Syria against ISIS and being shot for treason if you turn around in cowardice? Perhaps he wants to tax you 80% of income for 10 years if you do not want to serve for 5 years in the Military to repay to the tax payer the refugee funds of $65,000 per year?
Obama will not be around in the Office of the President much longer so there is a good chance that what you think the circumstances are of coming to America are not what the circumstances will be in a very short time.
America will not be compromised. We will not compromise our rights, those rights of women, those rights of minorities, those rights of the LGBT citizens are protected here under laws and those acting outside our laws are indeed punished according to our criminal codes. The Government has the responsibility to assure as much as possible that we maintain a safe and secure America with the rights and justice for all held as a very high Standard. This is why I have asked the Governors of the United States to join together in insisting our U.S. Constitution be upheld in the Office of the President. Any person unlawfully occupying the Office of the President must be stopped. This is a protection and a defense of the public safety. Now may God Bless you and may God Bless America in the mighty terror of our U.S. Constitution that grips the hearts and souls making weak the knees, sinews, and joints of traitors and tyrants fearing the protections of a God they know not, but whom they shall meet who is the Founder and the Framer of our United States of America.
Cody Robert Judy
The Comment Section in reference to this article are copied below.
Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396
Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin
The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.
Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
.D. Reed [..(Democrats)…come off as transparent hypocrisy given the amount of ridicule Democrats and liberals have (justifiably) rained on birthers]
Justified Ridicule = The saddest tactic of lawlessness being correct in Order ie. The devil throws a raging temper-tantrum in what will never be Heaven. His fight in vain. For he craves the Order of Heaven in the Chaos of his habitation. Not even the devil likes Hell. All desire heaven.
@Pete [Strictly speaking, that’s probably true (that you can’t say with 100% certainty until and unless the Supreme Court speaks on the issue).1. The “general consensus” of real legal scholars is that Ted Cruz is eligible.]
Noticing the difference in Mr. Donald Trump and the @realdonaltrump. I’m wondering why he doesn’t change his name to Mr. Real Donald Trump?
I suppose he didn’t have enough money to buy from others his own name? The draft of placing [real] seems pretty close to phoney when it comes to [Legal].
Interesting that Legal Scholars do agree that the possibility of having an [illegal] person in the Office of President [elected] but failing to Qualify exist.
This would be the quintistoxic shock to MainStream Media , especially if the illegal one was a Democrat. Maybe not so much shock of Republican.
1933 Ratification of Amendment XX. …[ or if the President elect shall have failed to Qualify, ]
Isn’t it interesting that it’s happened? Of course no one would dispute the requirement of TIME of 35 years old if someone was 34.9 years old, they are not 35. No one would dispute the 14 years a resident if only 13 years, 11 months had been accomplished.
We are left with the TIME it takes for two to become Citizens and have a child in the United States. Its a TIME FACTOR not a race question.
People always want to rush to get some place they are not. Its human nature to get on the freeway and drive somewhere as fast as the speed limit allows.
There are a few things that make me ill. I’ve got a pretty good cast iron stomach. Some say it’s because I consume the BIG JARS of sliced jalapeno peppers (about 1 every two weeks). . some say it’s because I like hot women, ( beauty is in the eye of the beholder).
Whatever the case, calling my stand for the [natural born Citizen] qualification anything but a TEST-of-Time , simply a period of TIME, really makes me ill.
The respect and love for the richness I find in every race and culture makes it thus for me.
I certainly have done all I can and will continue to do all I can to bring this TRUTH to light.
Interesting that Legal Scholars do agree that the possibility of having an [illegal] person in the Office of President [elected] but failing to Qualify exist.
If an unqualified person ever were to be elected president, it would be up to Congress to remedy it.
This would be the quintistoxic shock to MainStream Media
Quintistoxic? People might take you more seriously if you used real words.
I certainly have done all I can and will continue to do all I can to bring this TRUTH to light.
You wouldn’t know the truth if you tripped over it.
Let’s face the facts. So few people care about your quixotic efforts to legitimize your specious “two citizen parents” argument that you couldn’t even raise enough money to pay your SCOTUS filing fee and printing expenses. Your campaign for president is a farce. You are not going to be on the ballot in a single state and it is unlikely that anyone outside of your immediate family would vote for you. Your book is #9,757,126 in sales at Amazon.
You are still young enough to do something positive with your life, instead of spending all of your time blogging and tweeting nonsense.
Cody Robert JudyThank You for caring Rickey. I’m 49.11 years old.. That’s close enough to 50 to make my own words and let you figure them out.
It’s true, I still have time to become a U.S. Supreme Court Justice whose qualification, as Justice Thomas admitted is not quite as rigorous, far more lengthy in tenure, and does not require one to be [natural born Citizen] ie. “Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents”
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Eu6OiTiua08 Of course blogging and tweeting are very much a part of free speech. Something our Constitution is an advocate for but also something Madame Secretary HRC is fuming about:
Steve: Strictly speaking, that’s probably true (that you can’t say with 100% certainty until and unless the Supreme Court speaks on the issue).
The problem is the next leap that birthers make. The right wing is making the same leap when it comes to illegal immigrants. They go from:
The Supreme Court hasn’t ruled on this specific issue, therefore there’s still a question.
To: The Supreme Court hasn’t ruled against me, therefore my interpretation is the right one.
As an example, take a look at what the right wing has done with the question of citizenship of illegal immigrants. They started by stating that the Supreme Court hasn’t specifically ruled that the children of illegal immigrants are U.S. Citizens (they have, but we’ll get into that later).
Then they went to that illegal immigrants are not covered under the 14th Amendment (they are), and their children are not really citizens.
@ dunstvangeet
[Steve: Strictly speaking, that’s probably true (that you can’t say with 100% certainty until and unless the Supreme Court speaks on the issue).
The problem is the next leap that birthers make. The right wing is making the same leap when it comes to illegal immigrants. ]
Welcome to the world of proving a negative, rather than positively proving.
ie. Court: “You don’t have Standing”
ANTI-Birther Interpretation: OBAMA has won over 200 Cases!
ie. Court: “You case is Wholly Incredible”
ANTI-Birther Interpretation: That’s the reason you don’t get forma pauperis status
ie. Court: “Your forma pauperis status is denied in spite of two LOWER COURT’S agreeing in the same year by a form asking for YEARLY INCOME REPORT that it’s granted.
ANTI-Birther Interpretation: 1) IF your cause was credible you could have raised the money. 2) You can’t point to any Case Law stating the Forma PAUPERIS [Yearly] Report Form is good for a Year.
The only thing true about these idiotic reasoning tactics is they are similar to the lack of deductive reasoning skills and example stating the qualification for President is the same for those in 1787 as it is for those in 2016 when the Constitution States very plainly in Article II, Section 1, C-5 differently:
1) [natural born Citizen]
OR
2) [Citizen] at the [TIME] of the Adoption of this Constitution
and then said example provides no distinction for the two requisites.
To state you understand perfectly Obama has occupied an office he has never proven that he is qualified for is exactly in line with the negative proof hurdle your complaining about.
I do understand your frustration and I have done everything I could to relieve that frustration.
[Steve: Strictly speaking, that’s probably true (that you can’t say with 100% certainty until and unless the Supreme Court speaks on the issue).
The problem is the next leap that birthers make. The right wing is making the same leap when it comes to illegal immigrants. ]
ANTI-Birther Interpretation: OBAMA has won over 200 Cases!
ANTI-Birther Interpretation: That’s the reason you don’t get forma pauperis status
ANTI-Birther Interpretation: 1) IF your cause was credible you could have raised the money. 2) You can’t point to any Case Law stating the Forma PAUPERIS [Yearly] Report Form is good for a Year.
OR
2) [Citizen] at the [TIME] of the Adoption of this Constitution