FAKE PRESIDENT PROPPED UP BY FAKE NEWS- What Difference Does It Make? Let's Look as Tax-Payers!

FEATURED EDITORIAL
The POST & EMAIL

 ~FAKE PRESIDENT PROPPED UP BY FAKE NEWS~ 

What Difference Does It Make?
WHAT ARE THE CONTINUED COST AMERICA WILL ENDURE? 
What must We Ask Ourselves?
Let's Look as Tax-Payers

The fundamental question the Media is asking about the 2016 Election being upset by the Russians or Recounts seems oblivious or incomprehensible to them when Fraud and Forgery are fundamentally proven to upset the Elections of 2008 and 2012 giving rhyme and reason for the Public Distrust and accusation "Fake President Propped up by Fake News" amidst a Media Jubilee. This report will delve into exactly 'What Difference It Makes" in pursuing the Ineligibility of Obama even after Obama leaves office and why Trump if serious should move with the full force and weight of the all of America's Investigative and Prosecuting Powers with the FBI, CIA, and Attorney General's Office against Obama's Cover Up now shocking the World!

Journalists join together for panel on how to cover Trump

On report from The Hill Journalist are coming together in some sort of Media Jubilee to figure out out how to cover Trump. [The focus of the discussion will include "how journalists and media companies at large can play a bigger role in making sure that fact prevails over fiction in the coming months and years," according to Slate.] Will they start with Obama's Forgery and Fraud, or could they have had a bigger role? It was a massive Propaganda Role.

'08,'12, and '16 Presidential Candidate and U.S. Supreme Court [natural born Citizen] Petitioner (12-5276) (14-9396) Cody Robert Judy says, "The cost are staggering in both tax payer money wasted now and in the future, time wasted in Government now and in the future, and Cost that will run concurrent with the Future Generations, as well as U.S. History and expectations for Law Enforcement and Justice now and in the Future with Government."

" I never started Taking A Stand for this Principle on the basis of Obama alone, (See Judy v. McCain ) its much bigger than out-going Obama, so to say it doesn't make a difference only exposes and exploits the sooth-sayer into an abyss of criminal keep-sake and cover up that is and has been and will yet be very costly. Republicans should be ashamed of the economical conservative faux pas or hypocrisy in this matter."

Cody reports harassment has gotten worse since Sheriff Joe's 3rd and final Press Conference with the Cold Case Posse revelations that debunked Obama's long form birth certificate as an Original. I don't pick my phone up now because of the nefarious and incendiary remarks coming out the other end from all over the United States of America.   

Ever since a Video featuring the Exposure of the Fraud and Forgery of Obama's long form birth certificate in the Cold Case Posse's last Presser was mixed in with the deliberate and staged Media fawning of Obama in his last Press Conference, showing the Media's deliberately shielding Obama from the exposure of Fraud and Forgery in the Law Enforcement Investigation that was held just the previous day, and Cody's Video winding it's way up over 50,000 views, Cody says, "I just have to turn my phone off its such a nightmare." 

OBAMA's LAST PRESS CONFERENCE BLOWS UP W BIRTH CERTIFICATE FORGERY! 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGEMHOEil5c&t=44s

Cody reported it's not all bad with many supporting his Stand but even Republicans now he reports have begin to drift away from calculating the cost of "letting Obama go even as Hillary seems to have been let go with the usurpation of the Secretary of State Office in a Private Server un-overseen by the Public FOIA mechanism accountable to The People. The Great Usurpation of the U.S. Government un- prosecuted, and basically in tact, as walking talking violations of the U.S. Constitution has great consequences besides the High-Fives and Pats on the back for getting away with it. Let's look at a few things that Cody is talking about now.

WHAT ARE THE CONTINUED COST AMERICA WILL ENDURE? 

Let's look at this in a progressively increasing consequential way. In other words the least expensive to the most expensive.

• Obama's Presidential Retirement Package - Pension Amounts. Each former president receives the same salary as a current member of the Presidential Cabinet. For 2013, the amount was $199,700 per year. This number does not take into account the extras the former leader is entitled to including a $96,000 stipend for office staff payroll and free postage for life. With Obama at age 55 and a conceivable 85 year old age cap - 30 years of this Retirement alone will cost Tax Payers close to nine million dollars ($8,880,000.00)       

• A CBS Report entitled, "How much did Republicans Cost You With Every Single Attempt to Repeal Obamacare?", places the Cost of Repealing Obamacare at 1.5 Million Dollars per Vote! The grand total to tax-payers for repealing just one ACT signed by an illegal person in the Office of the President is estimated at seventy-five million dollars ($75,000,000.00) in fifty (50) attempts. Imagine the savings to Tax Payers with an [Ineligibility Hearing on Obama's Presidential Qualifications] as well the on-going Repeal & Replace that is happening in Congress now anyway?

• FORBES put together a Report entitled Obama's Legacy Cost-An Abundance of Executive Actions and extols; "benefit analyses exist for just a handful of the 3,000-plus rules issued annually. Interestingly, the number of memos exceeds the numbers of rules with Office of Management and Budget-reviewed cost-benefit analyses. In other words, while administrations often emphasize the alleged “net benefits” of major rules and assess such for only a handful, those few are rivaled by the number of “mere” memoranda 476, many of which appear significant. But even this just scratches the surface when we step back and look at thousands of unilateral decrees, guidance documents and proclamations by federal agencies beyond their thousands of "normal" regulations. The estimated Cost of the Trump Administration wading through this   RED TAPE MOUNTAIN could be over two years and millions of dollars costing Tax Payers needlessly over illegal or unconstitutional actions that were not signed by a legally qualified Constitutional President. This could extend into whether Trump has success and captures a second term. This would include the 1% pay raise for Federal Workers total 2.5 Billion  

• OBAMA'S VETO BILL -12 NOW need to be looked at in the Terms of an Ineligible Person in the White House wasting in ineligibility the Country's legislative Time. We can see that in Obama's Veto Bill the cost multiplying with the House and Senate's Time in the legislative Branch to 10 in just the last two years for a total of 12. This includes a 612 Billion Dollar Defense Spending Bill. 

•  JUSTICE & THE COURTS EXECUTIVE AMNESTY The Huffington Post exposes in: "Over Half The States Are Suing Obama For Immigration Actions" The 26 states involved in the lawsuit, according to Texas, are: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia and Wisconsin equal to 5 million undocumented residents to remain in the US without fear of deportation for a period of three years. The litigation Cost during the Obama years has been exorbitant to Tax Payers, so think about the savings of not only the past but the future in litigation savings that will amount to Democrats suing the Trump Administration over 4 years that would be negated with Obama's Signature dismantled as ineligible?

  OBAMA'S EXECUTIVE AMNESTY TO COST TAXPAYERS $2 TRILLION

• THE COST OF U.S. HISTORY - The cost of future lives, Campaign Contributions contributed to illegal or unqualified persons based on the U.S. Supreme Court's falter to take the Case presented to them twice in Judy v. Obama (12-5276) (14-9396), remains to be seen, but surely will cost the most in many aspects from what Government Officials 'think' they can now get away with to what the common man on the street now 'thinks' he should be able to get away with based on the example that is set. The fracture to Justice and the Rule of Law is unprecedented. Nixon has the decency to resign, Obama has had no such decency but has boldly gone where no Forgery and Fraud has taken anyone - into the Office of the President calculated as the Usurpation of the Executive Branch of the U.S. Government. 10 Trillion on Obama's watch.

WHAT MUST WE ASK OURSELVES ?

I'm sure there is more such as the TRUST factor between the Media and the Public, but in here there is plenty. To all the above, our Elected Leaders, and even our President Elect we must ask :

What would possible refrain Trump from pursuit of Obama's Ineligibility if the Tax Payer and his own success is in mind?

For what has the TRUTH cost you? For what has the Truth Cost US? And to say, 'What does it matter in the face of lives lost, Obama has dropped over 50,000 Bombs in the last two years, amounting to 3 per hour every 24 hours, non-stop!  (That's embarrassing to a peaceful Record like President Jimmy Carter's who now we look upon in admiration of Peace - We didn't drop a bomb, we didn't fire a bullet ) 

What does it matter in the face of Economic Robbery of the Treasury? Obama's Administration has galloped through 10 Trillion Dollars of a now 20 Trillion Dollar National Debt more than from President Washington to President GWB. And what shall you say to America's Future Generations? "We doubled down! And We doubled Down Again!!! and Again!!! and Again!!! with no thought for you!!!" ?

One HEARING! Think of it? What SAVINGS?

 Shall you now really be so embarrassed to pass these 8 POINTS on?

[I don't care what the Lower Courts said, the U.S. Supreme Court would not hear this Case because they knew they could not rule in Obama's personal favor. It would have just been impossible for them if I was up arguing it.

1- There is no way you can have a people who are Citizens of the U.S. Constitution before it was ratified. That ratification created a new LEGAL JURISDICTION of LAW with which to be born under:

2- That's the REASON that ART. II., Section 1, C-5 included two different Qualifications for President in Time: a- [CITIZEN] at the Time of the Adoption of this Constitution b. [NATURAL BORN CITIZEN] for those thereafter ie. Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents

3- Congress cannot make [natural born Citizens] with [naturalization (or in other words Adoption Law)]. The two terms are polar opposites as clearly as Adoption is from a literal Blood Birth] Congress has [naturalization powers]

4- It is well said that the Constitution does not in fact say what a [natural born Citizen] is because there is no doubt that [born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] clearly negates any Act or Determination by Adoption. There is no Judge in the United States who is going to say that anyone who is born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents is not a [natural born Citizen]. Get that? Zero!

5- Clearly the Qualification for Representatives and Senators is [Citizen] and not [natural born Citizen] It's a Constitutional Right that America can propagate her own [natural born Citizens] and a violation of our Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution to adhere otherwise.

6- The 14th Amendment when ever it was used in argument was and always has been a [naturalization] argument not a [natural born Citizen] argument. (for those who argue Wong Kim Ark changed anything)

7- Minor v. Happersett clear states there was never a doubt that those born of the Country to it's Citizens are themselves the [natural born Citizens] and to the others there have been doubts. That's U.S. Supreme Court precedent.

8- Congress men and women 8 times since 2003 tried to change the definition but those attempts failed in Congressional Votes. Ask yourself why? Why attempt to change anything on the [natural born Citizen] requirement for President if it always meant [Citizen] as the requirement for Representatives and Senators has been? And why was [Citizen] actually mentioned in the Constitution for those who were present at the time of the Adoption if they could have been [natural born Citizens] in the first place?]

The conclusion is no mystery if taught to elementary children. Why should it be a mystery for or to Congress or the Courts? It is both morally and financially the better road to take.

And to you who say Birthers were crazy, fringe, lunatics, fringe, delusional; how can you say now you appear to America's Tax Payers as such with such a simple measure that would have saved, will now save, and will yet save TRILLIONS of Dollars, and untold Lives?

And what has the Cost of Birthers been to you? Nothing but savings and civil peace. Our fight has been one that did not destroy property but is now one noticeable by a stand for TRUTH to be preserving property and our treasury. Our fight has been one that did not burn or set on fire, but sought to extinguish fire. As I think about the Birthers taking the pejorative on the chin, my heart swells in a Constitutional Gratitude and Thankfulness. I know our Founders would be proud of you.

America, to what have you credited the value of that? What amount has been paid by you to save our national Debt and the constant Obama carnage, that even the Media has coddled? Will you yet be silent to your U.S. Representative and your U.S.  Senators?

Yet, I may go away, but not with out a cry for my Countrymen, my sons and daughters, our Future in Freedom and Liberty. Yes, I will not go into the dark night silent or silenced, yet I will raise my voice, for I am one, and I am that I am. . even as God our Creator has made me. "That", I shall fulfill. "That", I shall satisfy- so help me God.  

CRJ

Assist Cody Robert Judy' Campaign Debt here thank you

http://codyjudy.us/information/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm

BREAKING NEWS- OBAMA'S INELIGIBILITY CASE HITS REPUBLICAN DEBATE STAGE!

BREAKING NEWS

SPECIAL REPORT

 OBAMA'S INELIGIBILITY CASE 
HITS REPUBLICAN DEBATE STAGE!

What do people think of women who suffer domestic violence and refuse time and time again to speak out? You know there is that modest courage where you take one punch for the team. However, being an enabler of violence begins after awhile to just make you either look like you enjoy it, in which case if its painful to you your a masochist, you're suffering emotional maladies of self esteem ie., battered person syndrome, your sacrificing yourself for gain often referred to as economic abuse, or you are just stupid.

Its not just domestic violence that happens to women, but there is also an unconstitutional political violence. For instance when men who are not qualified for the Office of the President with brute force push a women like Carly Fiorina to the back of the bus and are all to happy to take what would be her spot on the podium. On the August 6th Fox News Republican Debate at 9PM, that is what is scheduled to happen with Rubio, Cruz, and Jindal not even being qualified to be on the Presidential Debate Stage.

People with high-self-esteem focus on growth and improvement, whereas people with low self-esteem focus on not making mistakes in life. Self blame results in feelings of helplessness rather than empowerment. The feeling of being both responsible for and helpless to stop the violence turns often to depression and passivity.

This learned depression and passivity makes it difficult for the abused partner to marshal the resources and support system needed to remedy the circumstances or situation.  Children with low self-esteem rely on coping strategies that are counter-productive such as bullying, quitting, or even cheating, and its not far from the way adults act either.

This brings us to discussion on a particular set of rules that We The People call our UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION and the way in which the 'natural born Citizen' clause is not only being perpetrated by abusers who are using the bullying and cheating methodology, but also to those enablers engaged in passivity or not standing up for their own rights under the United States Constitution.

There comes that time in a person's campaign where you see it go down hill into an abyss of a credit by your name. Hey, for whatever its worth, Mitt Romney and I share the same accolade of  '08 and '12 Candidate for President'- thousands of hours and sacrifice ought to be worth something. (smile). I've been through 5 losses to formulate perspective of when that happens, and I can look at other people's Campaigns with the experiences I've had and see critical turning points also.

Its happening now with Carly Fiorina's Campaign for President and we have not even had our First Debate! The Fox News Debate happening August 6th as just 'Lowered Expectations' to include those polling at 1% into a 5pm Debate which Carly Fiorina is now qualified for, but she is missing the Main Event Debate at 9pm, whereas Rubio and Cruz are going to be included in that one.  I believe Jindal is polling at 1% with Fiorina however it must be taken into consideration he will pull time away from her while being on the same stage.

Being on that Stage at the First Main Event Debate is crucially important. The staggering cost of a full hour of prime time coverage to a Candidate cannot be underestimated as the result is a boost in confidence and contributions immediately following those Debates.

-------------------

HOW DOES THE SUPREME COURT'S ACTIONS IN 

JUDY V. OBAMA 14-9396

 FIND ITS WAY ON THE REPUBLICAN DEBATE STAGE?

----------------------

You might think its the strangest thing that a little ole candidate like me who has a Case in the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is having an effect on the Republican Debate Stage, but its true. Often the SCOTUS doesn't like to interfere with political elections. Its called the Political Doctrine Question.

"The political question doctrine holds that some questions, in their nature, are fundamentally political, and not legal, and if a question is fundamentally political ... then the court will refuse to hear that case. It will claim that it doesn't have jurisdiction. And it will leave that question to some other aspect of the political process to settle out."

—John E. Finn, professor of government, 2006

This however does not apply to the 'natural born Citizen' qualification for the Office of the President and VP, that does not apply to Representatives and Senators, because it is a fundamental requirement spelled out in our Constitution and is not a hyperbole of naturalization.

Justice Sotomayor, with a reputation of sticking up for the underdogs in my opinion really stepped out of her own character by denying an Application understood as 15A25 (Over 3,500 Views) understood in Judy v. Obama 14-9396

The Key Provisions of this Application for more Time that was Denied by Justice Sotomayor are as follows and are written about here:

[9- DELAY is detrimental for Petitioner as well as Respondent(s) due in part to the Presidential Election in 2016. Fully six months exist before the Iowa Caucus in January 2016. This case revolves around an interpretation of ‘natural born Citizen’ in U.S.C. Art. II, Sect. 1, Clause 5. , that the Republicans U.S. Senator Ted Cruz, LA. Gov. Bobby Jindal, and U.S. Senator Marco Rubio are in effect in violation of as Candidates for President with no timely recourse or due process available. Without a ruling by the SUPREME COURT, Campaign donations as well as confusion exist among the VOTING PUBLIC. This is siphoning off important support to the Petitioner in contributions necessarily going to unqualified Candidates.]

[10- Attending this PRINCIPLE of the U.S. Constitution is vital to the 46% of America’s Voters who are in fact now Independent Voters according to a January 2015 Gallup Poll . The Court avoiding the Issue does not serve them as it affects the race among republicans and democrats and we all look for guidance on the interpretation of the Constitutions’ demanding standards for the Office of the President being different than the “Citizen” standard for Senators and Representatives.
Petitioner then prays that this Motion will be granted in the considerations of the necessity requiring a decision before July 13th, 2015 as instructed by the Court through and by Justice Sotomayer, reviewing Justice for the 10th Circuit.]

We didn't know at the time of this submission that JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR's decision would be playing a key role against women, who are pursuing the Office of the President. Her action in Denying this APPLICATION was a DECISION that not only hurt my fund raising abilities through the Summer, but set the Stage for the Republican Debate. Candidate for President Carly Fiorina's place is actually relegated to a 5pm Debate rather than a PRIME TIME 9PM Debate position, and we see just how she was pushed to the back of the bus by Justice Sotomayor.

Here I am trying to stand up for women's rights and all I get is grief for it? Its a rarity when you see people who are standing up for victims like Mrs. Fiorina and Mrs. Clinton actually get beat up for standing up, but that is actually what the Media is doing by not covering this very important Case happening right now in the Supreme Court.

I have an APPLICATION for a Stay on Sotomayor's Decision  (Over 2,000 Views) times now on SCRIBD right now in the Supreme Court which is a legal maneuver to bar her from her own disastrous decision for women seeking the Office of the President pursuant to her nomination by Obama.

HILLARY CLINTON'S PASSIVITY A DIS-SERVICE 

FOR PROTECTING WOMEN'S RIGHTS

Hillary Clinton has probably found as many pats on the back for standing by her man as she has had the bird flipped at her from women who have found her actions of passivity in what might be termed the philandering abuse of her husband as a disgrace. It would be a different story psychologically speaking if Mrs. Clinton stood up and said Bill and I have agreed to an 'Open Relationship' in our marriage. But she hasn't done that. She hasn't called the women President Bill Clinton has been with sister-wives, or concubines, or anything to do with her family. She's called them bimbos as this HEADLINE indicates:

EXCLUSIVE: Hillary's Camp fears a new Bimbo Eruption will put the Kibosh on Candidacy.
Excerpts:
[Linda Tripp, the woman who outed Monica Lewinsky, felt compelled to speak out against Hillary's presidential bid. She broke more than a decade of silence in an exclusive interview with Daily Mail Online in which she described Hillary as forever associated, 'with the lingering taint of scandal and wrongdoing.'

She revealed how Hillary stage-managed and orchestrated the 'bimbo eruptions,' ruthlessly destroying the credibility of the women who came forward and neatly turning herself into First Victim in the process.]

[GENNIFER] ..[Flowers watched that broadcast with 'disgust' convinced that it was Hillary who was behind her former lover's vociferous attempts to disown and discredit her. She has since asserted that she believes the marriage to be tantamount to a 'business arrangement' with Hillary's own pursuit of her political ambitions as the ultimate pay-off for tolerating her husband's numerous infidelities.]

[According to Lucianne Goldberg, Hillary did more than turn a blind eye. She was heavily involved in covering her husband's tracks. She explained: 'She has known it all along. A lot of those women came to me at the time. There were several. Every one of them was a nice woman.

'They all were approached by Hillary's detectives who would take them out to coffee and shove a piece of paper across the table and say, 'Here sign this,' and it was to say they never had anything to do with Bill Clinton.]

These actions are tantamount to the 'cheating', 'bullying', as well as 'passivity' remember that children use who are suffering from low self-esteem. Hillary Clinton has tried not to make mistakes by covering up rather then dealing with the truth. As far as her role in Judy v. Obama 14-9396 she has been repeatedly been extended a hand to file an Amicus Curiae Brief, or friend of the Court brief and let that opportunity go. This might have been her last opportunity to take a stand for the natural born Citizen clause rather than go down in history as 'victim' to it. 

Feb 27th - Here was my Tweet to Hillary today. 
Help #Hillary2016 @seanhannity & #tedcruz2016 are walloping me as a #Birther Frgt BO get 2R's Rub&Crz for 2 yrs of BO http://t.co/6YdG3rvXZt

March 13- Why Hillary's Excuses do not Exempt her-Now if that proves to be the case and she has not confided it to a Judge as I've asked her to write an Amicus Curiae several times in Tweets to her reported on this blog
May 23-
Not only does a Brief from Hillary signal a home run for destroying gender inequality, to take a stand for the Constitution, it signals the ability to lead both genders in a field of equality.

Interesting as we talk about violence against women and focus in on those running for Office of the President that just before Cruz was queried by Hannity in the Feature Post Feb 27th, he actually joked about abuse and bullying against women:
Cruz: No, I have not stopped beating my wife. (Laughs) (Crowd Laughs)

Hannity: Ok ,Your mother was an American citizen, you talked about your Dad coming from Cuba. You were born in Canada. You had dual citizenship There are a bunch of Liberal birthers out there that would try to make the case that your not eligible? Just a quick.. short answer.

Cruz: “Look, I was born in Calgary, my mother was an American citizen by birth. Under federal law, that made me an American citizen by birth. The Constitution requires that you be a natural born citizen.”

Cruz's equating that a 'Citizen by Birth' is the same as 'natural born Citizen' is a fallacy as the qualifications for Senators and Representatives is 'Citizen'.

What happened to Sen. Clinton in her talks and agreements with Sen. Barack Obama may never be known in the 2008 Campaign, but the understanding that comes out of it? Hillary's Campaign Debts are paid or retired (economic abuse), and she scores a Secretary of State job, but also in that must pay homage to Obama, which in no way shape or form includes calling him out on an abuse of the Constitution's principles that the Office of the President only devolve upon a 'natural born Citizen' ie. born in the U.S to Citizen Parents.

Hillary Clinton's political maneuvering into the 'good ole boys' club began as U.S. Senator when the non-binding U.S. Senate Resolution was co-sponsored by her and Obama for McCain. The three Candidates basically controlling the last three elections now if you want to call Mrs. Clinton's 50 Million dollar war chest a head start on the 2016 Election.

The problem with that of course as we have mentioned is it is affecting so many other women's chances in the future to become President by taking a stand for the Constitution rather than taking one against the Constitution. The American People as far as the Constitution have not Amended the 'natural born Citizen' qualification for the Office of the President and it still stands as a distinct and unique qualification for the Office of the President and Vice President not expected of Representatives and Senators as the following video Constitutional Reckoning depicts very succinctly.



While it takes quite some time to get to the SCOTUS on an issue that they see fulfilling the Ripeness Doctrine' , at least I have done it. The Ripeness Doctrine pertains to the readiness of a case for Litigation:
[Without undertaking to survey the intricacies of the ripeness doctrine it is fair to say that its basic rationale is to prevent the courts, through avoidance of premature adjudication, from entangling themselves in abstract disagreements over administrative policies, and also to protect the agencies from judicial interference until an administrative decision has been formalized and its effects felt in a concrete way by the challenging parties. The problem is best seen in a twofold aspect, requiring us to evaluate both the fitness of the issues for judicial decision and the hardship to the parties of withholding court consideration.]

Again, we are seeing the turning points of whole Campaigns based on the 'natural born Citizen' clause not being upheld as Cruz, Rubio, and Jindal gain a foothold over the only female in the Republican Field. My post yesterday reflected a real sadness at the Lowered Expectations that is an abuse to  Carly Fiorina's Campaign as she will suffer a very tough blow by not making the Prime Time Debate at 9PM on August 6th.

The resulting cost should be magnified in front of all of the JUSTICES of SCOTUS as a reflection of abuse of women especially when it comes to the qualifications for the Office of the President coming under their discretion to act or not to act, either way having very big consequences and unintended consequences.

 If we take the combined 'Contribution Dollars' of Cruz, Rubio, and Jindal the night of Aug. 6th as well as any inferred boost of confidence by what will be seen by millions of Americans which has a dollar value, we can safely say we are looking at perhaps even a fifty million dollar [$50,000,000.00] Advantage all at the stake of the Un-Constitutional Violence happening against women that I am taking a stand for.

As you all think long and hard about that between now and then as I do, perhaps you will feel the naught in your stomach and the tears of sadness that burdens me today in standing up against this Un-Constitutional Tragedy and cycle of abuse we are in. Thank you for passing it on, speaking out, and opposing the dereliction of Justice surrounding the Office of the President at this time with me. Together, let our Voices be Heard.

Thank you and may God Bless America.

Have a Great Weekend!

Sincerely your 2016 Candidate for President

Cody Robert Judy
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

WHY DO PEOPLE LIKE CODY ROBERT JUDY (CRJ)?

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

Cody Robert Judy- Presidential Candidate '08-'12-'16

www.codyjudy.us

That's just one story.. I have a lot (smile) Check out my book :
 Taking A Stand- the Conservative Independent Voice.

Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts

12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial

13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008

14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case

15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016

The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President

www.codyjudy.us

www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

INSPIRING - I believe in You

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI

APPLICATION FOR STAY PENDING FULL REVIEW ON THE RECUSAL OF JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT AND KAGAN FROM PROCEEDINGS

See the F.E.C  CRJ DECLARATION FOR PRESIDENT

  Cody Robert Judy2016 CandidateDeclaration

UNDERSTANDING CHANGE - Hillary Clinton's Compromised- What Happened to Her in the U.S. Senate?

- UNDERSTANDING CHANGE -  Hillary Clinton's Compromised 

What Happened to Her in the U.S. Senate?

~Intro ~
Hillary Clinton quit Barack Obama's Administration as Secretary of State some have said to place distance from Obama and other's have said to simply begin her 'self ' again. Why what Hillary Clinton knew and believed at one time, and perhaps even stood up for, has come to be a very important part for America to notice in her own transformation and change that is not in the best interest of this Country.

The idea that some people change after being in Washington DC is one we are all to familiar with. An unseemly transformation as the stalwart Candidate we voted for has through the battle scars in political war devolved from the barrage, suffering the inset of post traumatic political syndrome, becoming an incapable compromised person for which waging the same war is no longer possible as the strength of the warrior was spent from the valiant person we first sent.

Standing up for America under the U.S. Constitution's umbrella is not the easiest thing in the world because the risks America has been willing to take produced a reward that was not guaranteed and did not 'pay' politicians rewards for standing in line. It is not disrespectful to acknowledge our gratitude for the warrior, but also recognize that warrior simply cannot fight the war we face any more.

WE recognize a very big mistake to make that expectation on anyone. I myself have written Hillary Clinton with admiration of her principles as First Lady others thought she'd compromised by standing by her man through thick and thin.

 One of the great successes of America has been the 'fresh-faced' politician whose principles as tools, clean and polished, are able to make the Stand that is required.  Hillary Clinton is no longer able to carry on as strong as she once was for these principles, because they are know longer in tact under the Constitution and she is compromised. That transition took place about 2008. She'd gone from First Lady to U.S. Senator and was inching towards the nomination of the Democratic Party as a candidate for President, but those titles are short lived bridled by the Constitution's Reins on politicians.

One of the biggest reasons that WE, under our U.S. Constitution have given the Justices of the Supreme Court 'life tenure', predicated upon good behavior, is that it offered that Court the ability to fight for the Constitution's Individual rights; rising above  the clamor of bully politics and resting on the laurel lake of Our Principles.

That is important to notice. Of course we require an oath of all Politicians and Judges, but also recognize the ability for corruption to compromise everyone- even the Office of the President can be compromised and our Constitution lays out procedures that are very clear outlining that circumstance in the 25th Amendment, Sect 3, and 14th Amendment Section 3 that actually allows the removal of any person who after taking an oath comes to the point referred to as a 'Disability' upon the Nation.

The circumstances of such are defined for us as: 'Engaging in insurrection', 'Rebellion' against the same Oath', or 'Giving Aid or Comfort to the enemies of the U.S.' It is this first circumstance of action I would like to address as it pertains the the Office of the President and the Qualifications contained within the Constitution we know for only one other office- that of the Vice President- as it relates to Candidates running for the Office of President. This is the Standard set up as Principle by WE the People.

Age and Citizenship requirements - US Constitution, Article II, Section 1

• No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.

The Compromise - Clueless Cruz Comments-Hillary Started the Birther Movement

Late last night I was engaged in the fight and made the following statement at Obamaconspiracy.com under the above mentioned story heading.  Because it took me awhile to recall the whereabouts of links formulating the comment below, I thought it a good thing to Record under this Blog, which is really becoming an inset into the fabric of Questions about the subject 'key-stone' of our Constitution- understood as the Office of the President, the comment for you Reporters. Its easy to forget and often hard to research or to even know what to research in following stories you might have been actually to young to pay attention to. Remember 7 years ago, many Reporters now were 14 years old.

Let me notice I've provided the kick-back link to Obama Conspiracy Site if you'd like to go back and see the volatile comments made by people who have been engaged in protecting Barack Obama for the last seven years. They are covered in anonymity and I just don't feel the need to give them room here on this blog, but the link is there if you'd like to go back and research the kind of treatment that oozes out and permeates continually Obama's Administration. Its pretty rough and is not the polite scene you see on Television.

Comment:
-------

RECORD OF HILLARY’S -sharing as asked

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/110/s2678/text

http://weblogs.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/blog/2008/03/clinton_ive_crossed_commanderi.html
HC ““I believe that I’ve done that… and you’ll have to ask Sen. Obama with respect to his candidacy,” she said.

HC ” “There are certain critical issues that voters always look to in a general election. National security experience (and) the qualifications to be commander-in-chief are front and center. They always have been. They always will be,” she said.”

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2008/09/the-front-runner-s-fall/306944/

[What is clear from the internal documents is that Clinton’s loss derived not from any specific decision she made but rather from the preponderance of the many she did not make. Her hesitancy and habit of avoiding hard choices exacted a price that eventually sank her chances at the presidency. What follows is the inside account of how the campaign for the seemingly unstoppable Democratic nominee came into being, and then came apart.]

[Clinton was already under attack for an attitude of “inevitability”—the charge being that she imperiously viewed the primary process as a ratifying formality and would not deign to compete for what she felt she was owed]

[Penn also left no doubt about where he stood on the question of a positive versus negative strategy. He made the rather astonishing suggestion to target Obama’s “lack of American roots”:]

[On December 1 [2007], Clinton and her husband attended a private dinner with the influential Des Moines Register editorial board. Seated at opposite ends of a long table, they were stunned to hear journalists praise the skill and efficiency of the Obama and Edwards campaigns and question why Clinton’s own operation was so passive .. On the next morning’s staff conference call, Clinton exploded, demanding to know why the campaign wasn’t on the attack.]

Judy v. McCain https://dockets.justia.com/docket/nevada/nvdce/2:2008cv01162/61642

“Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a ‘natural born Citizen’ under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States,” declares the resolution co-authored by Senators Patrick Leahy, Democrat of Vermont and chairman of the Judiciary Committee, and Senator Claire McCaskill, Democrat of Missouri.
The sponsors include both Democrats vying to be Mr. McCain’s opponent, Senators Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York and Barack Obama of Illinois, as well as Senator Tom Coburn, Republican of Oklahoma.
” Of course, the authors acknowledge the resolution would have little real influence were the matter of Mr. McCain’s eligibility hanging by a legal thread.”

http://codyjudy.us/information/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_028.htm

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/18/us/politics/18web-hulse.html?pagewanted=print
[The sponsors include both Democrats vying to be Mr. McCain’s opponent, Senators Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York and Barack Obama of Illinois, as well as Senator Tom Coburn, Republican of Oklahoma.
Of course, the authors acknowledge the resolution would have little real influence were the matter of Mr. McCain’s eligibility hanging by a legal thread. ]

Rickey: Hillary Clinton was on record as saying that U.S. Sen Res 511 would probably not stand Constitutional scrutiny and or was flimsy to paraphrase her statement.

The last two refer to what I was talking about as far as a paraphrase of Clinton about U.S. Sen. Res 511 the quote speaking about all the ‘authors’ that might be considered co-sponsors and their input and feelings.

------

What is important to recognize that you can collect from the Links provided and the dialogue together as a citation considered as a whole is that Hillary Clinton recognized as well as Barack Obama that there was a jeopardy of Constitutional Principle at stake which if it had its perfect way would have prevented both Sen. John McCain and Sen. Barack Obama from even using the bathroom in the White House let alone being Commander-in-Chief.

The reason this is important is because it shows us clearly not only the line that was crossed, but the knowledge that those crossing the line had and attributed with accrediting or identifying their own efforts.

"Of course, the authors (speaking of those co-sponsoring U.S. Senators who very well can be accredited with helping formulate words with suggestions and applications of intent and spirit of reasoning, as well as actually the ones getting the credit for writing U.S. Senate Resolution 511 out in long hand), acknowledge the resolution would have little real influence were the matter of Mr. McCain's eligibility hanging by a legal thread. "

Put plainly as we consider Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama as co-sponsors of McCain's U.S. Senate Resolution 511, they knew it did not hold the power of an Amendment to the Constitution which must be passed by 2/3rds of Congress (Both Houses) and signed by a Qualified President to gain the devoted loyalty of the Judicial Branch or United States Supreme Court.

Author Mrs. McCaskell had originally penned S. 2678 which had failed, compromising the understanding that a natural born Citizen be '[b]orn in the United States to Citizen Parents',  giving it to to those born abroad to military personnel.   Again, that failed. I 've always thought it should have because it is a well known fact not everyone in the military can run for President anyway due to age restrictions and time in the U.S. as well as not being a 'natural born Citizen'. That is nothing new.

The authors and co-sponsors went back to the drawing board and made it personal to Sen. McCain with which the colleagues or good ole boys of the U.S. Senate good rally behind as they understood it was not a Constitutional Amendment.

 Just as easily noted the Judicial Branch through the highest Court is not required to uphold a 'message' from the United States Senate written on a yellow sticky pad, over and above the Constitution of the United States of America properly ratified and respected by The People and all their Representatives in Principle that is encoded in our Constitution. To do so not only represents bad behavior but is laying the grounds for impeachment of that life tenure job.

U.S. Senate Resolution 511 was the all important point of compromise of the Constitution made by those [C]andidates for President who were simply mad at the Constitution prohibiting any members in their chambers from becoming President. That's what it was. They were all pouty and mad about it because in that Chamber (U.S. Senate)  first generation Americans are welcome to be elected to it.

The Office of the President has by its definition in the Constitution welcomed a pure or non-foreign 2nd American Generation requirement of time. This is understood by the time it takes for a first generation Americans to have children here who are then eligible for the Office of the President. That requirement is what 'natural born Citizen' meant and that is backed up by history, tradition, and legal precedent.

The authors including Clinton and Obama recognized this and stated that U.S. Senate Resolution 511 was at best a little thread that had no weight of enforcement under the Constitution as Amendments do, and that if put to the test under Court scrutiny it would simply be cut up. They could not justify that U.S. Senate Resolution 511 had any validity or standing in a Court of Law represented by in the Judicial Branch. That's why they all recognized and 'acknowledge the resolution would have little real influence were the matter of Mr. McCain’s eligibility hanging by a legal thread'.

That's how flimsy they thought and knew it was in 2008 prior to the Election. Now with Barack Obama occupying the Office stampeding around the world on Air Force One as a power nutted minion and a walking talking violation of the Constitution, some how the Media is trying to justify what amounts to a Constitutional insurrection.

At least Claire McCaskill attempted to propose legislation on changing the 'natural born Citizen' clause to mean something different than what it did mean. Can we offer any of that same respect towards U.S. Senator Ted Cruz or how about U.S. Senator Marco Rubio? We can not. They have not legally proposed through their respective offices any such official proposals in their offices and instead are endeavored to just 'wipe out' the Constitution without Civil Order. That my friends is insurrection in their elected Offices.

In fact they are engaged in using the Funds contributed to them for their U.S. Senate Races for their Campaign races as President.  Side note: ( lets' just say for argument sake they are legal U.S. Citizens for the Office of a Senator. I know there is debate now even on that with Sen. Cruz officially having to denounce his Canadian Citizenship after he was elected a U.S. Senator and I'm sure he didn't represent himself as a Canadian in his Campaign while running for U.S. Senate which could be seen as a fraud and a different outcome imagined quite easily).

So, if you "use" the funds collected in a Campaign Race you were legal in, to support and sustain a new Campaign for which you are illegal, you are in the business of laundering money in an illegal operation. That Folks, is insurrection for the purposes of usurpation of the Office of the President and its got to STOP!

This is why noticed in another Comment in Debate on the above mentioned site Clueless Cruz Comments-Hillary Started the Birther Movement;, Obama was creating his own loophole, not McCains'.
-----

CRJ July 10, 2015 at 9:01 am  (Quote) # 

That’s because McCain had the same problem.

“Obama said: “Senator McCain has earned the right to be his party’s nominee, and no loophole should prevent him from competing in this campaign.”

Calling the qualifications in the Constitution for the Office of President “a loophole” is exactly what they had to figure out how to jump through.

” The McCaskill Senate bill, “Children of Military Families Natural Born Citizen Act”, which she wrote by hand on a notepad after reading the Times article, specified a new part of the definition of “natural born citizen,” which, if the bill had passed, would have included “any person born to any citizen of the United States while serving in the active or reserve components of the United States Armed Forces.”

Democrats knew McCain wasn’t qualified either, but they needed Republicans to get through that loophole Obama was going to need. This is nothing knew, but trying to say there was opposition from “Inside” the D’s or “Outside” from R’s is really sounding like a denial of the facts.(references to there comments made)

” SR 511 was introduced April 10, 2008 by D-McCaskill and co-sponsored by Senators Leahy (D-VT), Obama (D-IL), Coburn (R-OK), Clinton (D-NY) and Webb (D-VA) and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. It was reported out of committee without amendment by Senator Leahy on April 24, 2008.
On April 30, 2008, the non-binding (no force of law) SR 511 was passed by unanimous consent (no recorded vote) stating:
“That John Sidney McCain, III, is a ‘‘natural born Citizen” under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.”

On April 18, 2008, the New York Times concluded that the eligibility issue could only be resolved by a Constitutional amendment, but confirmed the political fait accompli.

“Obviously, we are not going to get the Constitution amended in the next two or three months,” said D- Ms. McCaskill, who was driven to clear up any ambiguity after learning of the potential problem. “We are just trying to send the strongest signal we can as quickly and simply as we can.”

Quotes:
http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/the-strange-2008-mccain-obama-presidential-eligibility-debate#ixzz3fUbveRcv
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
----

There is a big problem when it comes to Mrs. Clinton thinking she is owed the Office of the President, more especially because she is not fighting for it to be a sound Office under the Constitution. She's compromising it. I cannot begin to understand "Why". Maybe she's tired, maybe its just to big of a fight and Obama wore her out. But this much is True, she's not fighting for it any more, but has got a lot more money in the bank to attempt to 'purchase' or 'buy' the Office of the President with money employing 'sexism'.

Of course I respect women, their right to Choose, to be treated fairly, but I do not respect the reversal role of 'sexism' to gain the Office of the President over and above simply defending the 'principles of the Constitution'. If America has devolved into 'voting' for those who have stood in line with a different physical character trait on the outside, then they have devolved into a Nation of discrimination that does not honor the character of Spirit inside the person who is to be in the Office of the President.  I would not have a chance under those circumstances nor do I believe the Nation would survive such, so it wouldn't matter. I wouldn't be losing anything worthwhile.

SUPPORT THE FIGHT THAT IS LEFT - SUPPORT THE FIGHT THAT IS RIGHT

Not only am I the only Candidate in America who has a bi-partisan Federal Court Record fighting for the Office of the President and the Constitution I am the only one left still standing in Judy v. Obama 14-9396. I am also right on the principle being 'Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents'.

While I fight and scrap every day for American to look beyond physical characteristics I implore you to join me and support the fight that is right- Judy v. Obama 14-9396- while it can still be fought for by a warrior who is not compromised.

By supporting Cody Robert Judy for President 2016 you help protect, preserve, and defend the Constitution of the United States of America. Please, help him with a Contribution Today at his safe and secure PAYPAL Contribution Link Here.

Part II. Link Here

Cody Robert Judy
Cody Robert Judy for U.S.  President 2016

Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.


INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI

Is Obama's Bubble about to Burst in Supreme Court because of Liberal Republicans or Conservative Democrats?

FEATURED EDITORIAL: The Post & Email
Is Obama's Bubble about to Burst in Supreme Court because of liberal Republicans or Conservative Democrats?


Is Obama's Bubble about to Burst in Supreme Court because of Liberal Republicans or Conservative Democrats? After more than six years in fighting consistently across party lines in the Judicial Branch for the principles in our Constitution with some thirteen cases and court numbers stretching from Nevada to New Hampshire and down to Georgia and back up to Washington DC, I've learned a fair amount about what is required and what isn't required in now what is my third race for the Office of the President, as have many of you.

The first thing that is noticed is during Obama's time in the White House in the Office of the President not a single elected official has mentioned Obama's ineligibility in Congress. Why? Well, they didn't have the standing that I did running for President and in passing on McCain's eligibility they would be called a racist. How else can you explain a knowledge that Obama has a fabricated long form birth certificate that has been certified by a law enforcement's report in the Cold Case Posse and a altered or phony draft registration yet sits in the honor and respect of the Office of the President without while a whimpering Congress sits on their hands knowing this?

Six years worth of elected officials sitting on their hands in House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate with the biggest fraud, I think we can soundly agree has ever been witnessed in our life times, issuing executive orders on his amnesty and healthcare program spanking Congress whose tied to the bed and held hostage why he rapes America with a race card and lack of standing. For all of the conservatives in America, who would like to lay a claim on conservatism in the Constitutional field of dreams, how does the facts that none of your elected officials have qualifications to take a stand against Obama for the conservative principle of a strong defense for America?

How does that feel conservatives? To have your real Reaganomics of Defense in the Republican Party neutered? I always thought Republicans were for a strong defense and Democrats were the ones who were always slashing and burning defense? Yet, here we are and Republicans are sitting on their hands, tied, bound, and gagged as prisoners in the political prison of Obama's national defense. Republicans have willingly refused to use the one weapon that is available to them which is a Presidential Candidate with standing who has fought for the principled national security defense of a natural born Citizen in the Office of the President. A lot of people would call that being a war hero.

If you have the Office of the President kidnapped and someone rescues that, I mean doesn't that qualify for you? First we must consider the damages to America that are possible at the hands of a usurper in the Office of the President. How about importing an illegal army into the borders, and by the executive pen making them legal? How about signing a mandate that forces Americans to buy something they have never ever been forced to buy before that concedes one fifth of the economy? How about spending with the executive pen more of America's economy and worth than all the President's between Washington and Bush combined together which is about eight trillion when the debt when he took it was about ten and now its eighteen trillion?

Still think popping Obama's bubble isn't worth a dime of your contributions to the one man who has standing and because he took a bi-partisan stand wipes his feet on the mis-used racist card of Obama? Have things really improved for minorities in this Country to the degree they had hoped they would when they cast a vote for someone...who they really didn't know all because of the color of his skin? Do you think things will improve that much if you vote for a person based on their outward appearances, maybe what sex they are will help improve your plight, as if men haven't been taking care of women with their strength since time began and if a women is elected President suddenly all that relief will come? Maybe if we elect a rich person he/she will give us their money? Has that been your hope in a Donald Trump or Mitt Romney?

That just suddenly the counsel that has been totally ignored and unheard before which they have kept a secret all their lives will be unleashed upon your bank account which will fill up. Their success will translate into your success while they have built theirs on your backs? The smart guy asks, why would he put you on his back and now change course?

Successful business people popping up with the promise to perform what, a juggling act for you? Where have they been? Evan Republican Carly Fiorina hopping spaghetti dinners in New Hampshire hoping to share the stage with Secretary Clinton to neutralize the sex issue, and I'm not referring to former President Bill Clinton's because I actually think her's personally used as an advantage, could cause us a lot more problems then his ever thought of causing.

Can't you see me on stage debating in a Primary with Secretary Clinton stating in my opening remarks similar to what Reagan did with Mondale, "Now, I'm want you to know that I will not make age or sex an issue of this Campaign. I am not going to exploit for political purposes my opponents sex and experience that comes with the office"?

Can you believe that? Mrs Carly Fiorina wants to get on the stage and perform with Secretary Clinton to neutralize her sex card? That's what she said. "All I need to do is perform" What exactly is the question and where have you been the last six years with the crisis of national defense happening in the White House? How have you helped any contributions or support there? No.

Oh yeah, out making money on the successful opportunity provided by the United States Constitution but not actually doing anything about it but taking advantage of it? Do you know how much money Mr. Trump, Mr. Romney, former President Clinton and his Secretary wife have contributed to the Campaign that has continued since 2008 against Obama's ineligibility that has cost us eight trillion? Not one dime. Do you know how much Congress Members have contributed to that same campaign or how much your favorite PAC has contributed towards it? Not one dime.

The value of that principle just in the last 6 years totals what in life,liberty, property or the pursuit of happiness?
So what now? The White House has been overrun, a usurper sits in the Office of the President importing as fast as he can the army of illegals and Judy v. Obama 14-9396 is in the Supreme Court of the United States of America which has the standing and the damages to blow Obama's bubble. Should we help that Campaign? Let me think a minute?

Recently, well April 24th, 2015 a online Post called The National Patriot featured a story called "Too Many Hats in the ring" by Craig Andresen and I was given an unfavorable mention in it as follows:
"Naturally, there will be those who will, again, run social media campaigns like John Dummett Jr., Cody Robert Judy, Sam Tittle and others but let’s face it…between all of them, they couldn’t come to a consensus on what time in the morning to open a doughnut shop much less how to run the affairs of state or a nation. They’re just in it for their own aggrandizement on Facebook and as shills for whoever the liberal nominee turns out to be."

This is what's been written about me since Judy v. Obama 14-9396 has entered the Supreme Court of the United States. That's it. Not a single other word other than the Post & Emails publishing as Featured Editorial the two post really declaring we are on the official record.

Now since that has happened and I have declared my Candidacy in the Democratic Party I want to announce how much we have taken in like U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz announced he's taken 4 Million so far, and U.S. Sen. Rubio announced their first day they raked in 1.25 million.

My Campaign has not taken one dime in from Conservatives across this Nation since announcing a couple of things:

1)That for the first time in our Nations history, both major Parties, since both unqualified candidates Sen Cruz and Sen. Rubio having divided loyalties in their history of place and time as well as Obama, have an equal consideration at stake in the Supreme Court of the United States. This is not a partisan issue since the political fields have changed.

2) That for the first time Sheriff Joe's Cold Case Posse' report is available for review by the Supreme Court of the United States that includes the fabrication of identification officially issued from the White House Office of the President brought to them by a Presidential Candidate who has maintained standing in 2008, 2012 and now 2016 as a Candidate for the Office of the United States President.

You know when the email scandal broke that considered Secretary Clinton's private server being used for government position and her discretion deleting 30,000 emails, and then the "Cash Scandal" appeared a few days ago on Secretary Clinton's itinerary and she asked for more cash I begin to wonder who the opponent was on Candidate Clinton's campaign? These are stories that have been waiting for just the right time to appear or be released to the Media.
___________
UPDATE: 4-28-15
Is Obama BEHIND THE VIOLENCE IN BALTIMORE?
YOUR PROPERTY YOUR TAX DOLLARS Baltimore Mayor decides to let it go. @ 7:40 "Its a very delicate balancing act because while we tried to make sure they were protected from the cars.. and the other things that were going on..umm, We also gave those who WISHED to DESTROY space to do that too and we worked very hard to ..a..to keep that balance..and and to put ourselves in the best position to de-escalate." To bad they didn't escort them over to the junk yard but they may be asking for Federal Help and Emergency Assistance which is their "best position" to be in. As the law gets closer to Obama I think we can expect more lawlessness and panic to compel squashing Obama's ineligibility with the use of violence. https://youtu.be/nHv7N8H4bwk
___________

Of course I personally believe Obama is behind the release of Clinton's Cash and Email Server disclosures to the press, because there is not any agreement by Republicans who their nominee will be. So its a real concern for Democrats and I'll tell you its open season when debates come around if Clinton wins the Democratic Primary for a loss. What I really wanted to say though may actually bode a little empathy for Secretary Clinton for desperately trying to get the cash that is needed to run for Office because Americans simply don't seem to think any responsibility towards a Presidential Campaign exist for them.

I can vouch as a three time Presidential Candidate fighting and barely hanging on for dear life to my Campaigns. We have been scraping the bottom of the barrel often times scrambling to come up with mailing, printing, and postage money. Its that serious and the seriousness that America in general has given to Obama's ineligibility is laughable. So in Mrs. Clinton's desperation she's turned to foreign contributions that have now placed a real wedge between the morality and ethics of government positions and family fund raising.

Do supposedly poor foreign governments give aid to Candidates for U.S President unless in the hope that its an investment that will come back to them? I don't think that foreign governments are bound by our U.S. Constitution that's for sure. Former Secretary Hillary Clinton's actual defense for the U.S. Constitution, and let's not forget that is a primary job as the oath asserts for President 'to protect, preserve, and defend the U.S. Constitution', certainly consist of visiting a lot of Country's, but flight time is an activity not an accomplishment.

On the other hand, a United States Supreme Court case delivered to the Supreme Court of the United States against Obama with the evidence in hand for consideration in a Civil Rights and Congressional Acts violation law suit is an accomplishment. Sen. Cruz touts his accomplishments in the U.S. Senate his freshman year for holding up Congress for 21 hours in a filibuster, but did those words and all the words he has spoken in Congress amount to any legislation? They were grand standing for sure, but the possibilities of removing the threat to America with Obama amnesty and Obama Care, and every other executive over reach was like a wind blowing a single leaf down the road as we watched it go by and applauded the effort. It amounts to activity without accomplishment.

Now I do not know if the Supreme Court is going to hear my case, but I do know I do not need 60% of Congress to support it. So are my chances better and is my accomplishment worthy of your support? We need your help to support my Campaign. We need gas money, computers, signs, posters, commercials and all those things that makes up a Campaign.

What exactly is important to you as a conservative Republican or a conservative Democrat? I think both would agree civil rights, individual rights under our Constitution are important. Then why not support a Campaign for President holding these dear and fighting for them? You know as well as I do that the closer you get to Communism the less the individual matters. The collective good as a mob is able to run over with the State as the authority the individual. That is probably the most important aspect of our United States Constitution that STOPS the State from deciding your property is there property and your money is their money.

So you really think my Campaign is just about me and I'm just doing this, spending my own time and my own money for all things that have been needed desperately to muster a Campaign, for the satisfaction of "likes" on Facebook? I can assure you there are many a beautiful girls who dwarf me in 'likes' on a single pinup on Facebook on the 'like' button.
That idea is contemptuous to me in the face of garbage it is so untrue and my accomplishments in trial, court proceeding, and miles all over this Country from sea to shining sea the last six years is a testament to it! Just because it was 'noticed' or documented in a story in the Washington Post or New York Times doesn't mean it hasn't happened.

Of course your right, if my Case is lost in the Supreme Court of the United States it is probably your fault because I know without a doubt every American in this Country has $5 dollars in their pocket or the ability to get it and you just haven't. These are the things that make politicians like Secretary Clinton desperate for foreign money. I think I've got close to 5,000 friends on Facebook and maybe three that have given my Campaign any contribution over the last six years. Sometimes I think they think their $5, or $10, or $20 wouldn't help, or maybe they don't see that a contribution to another Charity actually helps more people and wouldn't be wasted?

Of course all Charities have expenses; and Campaigns Contributions are not tax exempt but Campaigns like this one do not come a long every day either. How many Presidential Campaigns so far have announced for the U.S. Presidency with a Case in the Supreme Court of the United States declaring Obama's ineligibility, that at the same time threatens the two freshman Republican Senators hoping to be rewarded with the minority Cuban/Spanish vote? Again, a physical feature based on the color of skin that Republicans think they need to capitalize on to get minority votes.

What ever happened to just taking a stand for the Constitution that protects every American Citizen of the United States of America in justice for all? I'm really fed up with this 'outward appearances' thing as you can probably tell mostly because America is about more then the good the bad and the ugly. Its about what's on the inside, not what's on the outside and we need to protect and defend that.

Thank you for considering my Campaign worth something to you.

Cody Robert Judy
Now Read: The Invitation for Scholars to Write in with a Practicing SCOTUS Lawyer their Amicus Curiae


Again-
Enjoy our newly March Released THREE MINUTE infomercial entitled The Birthers and please join us anyway you can in supporting the restoration of our U.S. Constitution along with our Nation and the opportunity we all want. Please understand that however benign you may attribute a Candidate who is not qualified by being 'Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents', the very process of dismissing and not honoring the Office of the President with its unique qualification is a process to destroy the umbrella with the Office that sits in the middle of the United States Constitution, as its most important key holder.
The compromise on the 'natural born Citizen' clause is a compromise on the Blessings of God our Nation has been protected by, and a witness that time and place included in describing the Birth of our Nation are of no value.




Join us in taking a stand for "this place" and "this time" honored tradition in the United States of America.]

Cody Robert Judy for President 2016 find us on Facebook, Twitter and the Web.

Please visit my web site www.codyjudy.us and study the 3 point platform and 7 point platform.
Thanks You so much!
Cody Robert Judy


We need your help. Will you help us or are the outrageous lies your being told by your elected leaders okay for you and your children? Indeed, it is time to Restore America's Trust Today for a Better America Tomorrow.

We NEED YOUR HELP AMERICA now, to take the 10th Circuit Court's Decision not to hear Cody's Case to the U.S. Supreme Court. We are Taking a Stand for individual Civil Rights and against an unprecedented ASSAULT upon your Constitution and prior decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court! With your help we can make it happen. You are a very important key to this. So its up to you America to help Restore America Today for a Better America Tomorrow. Like, Share, and Help us in the Contribution Revolution.

CRJ

Get your questions answered by ordering Cody Robert Judy's Book here.

The 2016 Campaign begins now. Please send your contributions and help with the ABC (American Birther Campaign) today and my election for President in 2016 and Join the 257 of us now on my Facebook Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President 2016 site.



Cody Robert Judy for President 2016
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, Utah 84401

Thank you
Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for United States President 2016
www.codyjudy.us

CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION



The Commercial is simply called "America"


Join the new CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRES 2016 FB SITE Here

P.S. I don't get anything for the sales of this coin. No contributions or anything , I just think its kinda cool. Get your commemorative 2015 Birther coin today!