 |
| First Republican Party Debates Scheduled August 6th see 'lowered expectations' at Fox |
FOX NEWS DEBATES Lowering Expectations- More Interested in Position of President than the Job of President?
The anticipation of the first Fox News Republican Debate is rising, but the rise is offset by the lowered expectations for the Candidates. Politico's theme demonstrates with headlines what I'm talking about - Fox Lowers Threshold for Early Debate. Many may not be exposed to the lowered expectations I'm speaking about, because they're way to familiar with the dramatic comedy twist of SNL skits placed on 'lowered expectations'. ie.,See the short clip for understanding.
No, its not that kind of 'lowered expectations', its much much worse. To expose that we turn to a Fox News Commentator who to retain his/her free speech, I mean his/her/ job, asked for complete anonymity.
"Although we are relaxing one component of our entry criteria- the requirement that candidates must score 1% or higher in an average of five most recent national polls- all other components of the criteria remain in effect for the 5PM/ET debate. Participants must meet all U.S. Constitutional requirements ( "you see our No. 1 requirement", our insider said again asking for complete and total anonymity, "right there is SO messed up because if that were true, U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz and U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio and Gov. Bobby Jindal would be disqualified because they are not natural born Citizens ie. born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents . Sobbing the insider weakly confessed his emotional, or her emotional, outburst as a defense for Carly Fiorina. "If it wasn't for those illegal men my girl would be on at 9PM!" )
We agree and patted his/her shoulder assuring we would not divulge the insider's name at Politico. It is certainly a sad day for Republican and Democrat Women everywhere seeking an interest in Presidential Politics. We asked our insider why he/she thought that Carly or Hillary for that matter didn't charge these men with being Constitutionally illegal for the Office of the President? "Probably because they are women", he/she said, "and they just don't feel comfortable in the good ole boys club enough to do it."
"Of course...of course", we lamented with him/her. "That is the reason if Hillary Clinton owned a men's razor factory and had gathered 50 male models together, let's say in the U.S. Senate Chambers for a commercial, she would not be interested in their opinion of how the razor works on their beards in their shaving patterns."
Bursting into a big smile and wiping away his/her tears our anonymity political insider at politico just delightfully called out, "You.... You... YOU get it! You are so wise." It was then that in a rush we felt a bond and a need for a group hug. I thought that would be fine. Our insider just happened to grab my left cheek and squeezed it gently and rolled his/her eyes at me and it was then that I realized this could be a set-up to enrage my.. well, lets just say I pulled away and extended my hand in a friendly handshake.
It is true, that Fox News has lowered the expectations of the Republican Candidates but the worst part of that lowered expectations is the insult to the qualifications of the President that Cruz, Rubio, and Jindal present and the least bothersome is the Polling place of the lower tiered candidates. Let's be honest and as Obama has coined "Let me be Clear", the Poll has replaced the President's Qualifications in the Constitution as the Prequalifier of the Fox Debate.
The rest of the qualifiers included," Must announce and register a formal campaign for president; and must file all necessary paperwork with the Federal Election Commission (FEC), including financial disclosure. We assume the financial disclosure was a means of checking to see if the Candidates were on the 'millionaires list'? That is quite important for Republicans unless your a qualified minority who is not 'completely white'.
It's quite amusing that Fox News chose to include in their report that Jeb Bush has received the least amount of time since declaring their Candidacy June 15, but delayed longer because his millionaire donor list was longer then any of the others. After you declare officially you can't count on as much cash from them as you can in the exploratory stage. Heck, he even raked in some of the Democrat Donors Cash as Hillary presumed to encourage DemocratsForBush in an panic-attack against Trump securing the bond of the Repubicrat formulated with U.S. Sen. Res. 511 of which she was a co-sponsor along with Obama.
 |
| Hillary and Obama both Co-sponsors of U.S. Sen. Res. 511 non-binding naturalizing McCain as a natural born Citizen. |
This of course pushed through the security wall Americans counted on as a protection by selling short the qualifications for President as a 'natural born Citizen' as 'Citizen' that had failed in Congress 8 times since 2004, as a non-binding agreement between good ole boys, that then Sen. Clinton sewed herself into.
You know the greatest heartbreak for me as a man wanting to see women be able to progress to the Office of the President, if you're interested in my opinion incidentally that Hillary Clinton is not in the least bit interested in? The blade for shaving a man's whiskers needs to be a little sharper a little thicker for a good shave.
In other words, no one is sabotaging Carly Fiorina or Hillary Clinton's Campaigns. They are their own worst enemies holding themselves back. Frankly I have to tell you Carly Fiorina is one sharp Lady. I've listened to a couple of her speeches and even included her in a post April 17th , May 17th, June 5th, July 6th here, but she learned nothing from my suggestions to stand up in order to stand out.
Can you imagine for instance if Carly Fiorina had started out her Campaign as a security for the Constitution, which of course is the President's prescribed job articulated in the Oath of the President. Can you imagine for instance where she would rank among the Republicans if she had single or evenhandedly removed Rubio, Cruz, and Jindal by simply using her pulpit to declare they were not Qualified under the Constitution. She didn't even have to do it in Court. She could have just said you know, "That is what the job requires that I'm running for and that's what the majority of Americans deserve." How often do you have the chance as a women to actually dismiss three men from a job they are not qualified for in front of all of America?
That's what Principle over Party means! For Democrats the same opportunity has been given to Hillary Clinton with Barack Obama but she has failed badly, miserably and terribly to barrow the connection of adverbs to verbs hailed by Trump. The worst part is she has 50 Million already in the Campaign war chest but most of that came before Democrats had a dose of her Record becoming public.
Has it really been the stand for the Constitution that has aged among Republican and Democratic Party Candidates for President or do they just not really think the Constitution of the Untied States is pretty cool? I actually do- but Hillary and Obama and all the Rest of the Republican Candidates involved in the last Presidential Election if you recall were not leaders in defending the rights of all Citizens to even marry by the promise of the 14th Amendment which states:
"..No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of Citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law: nor deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protections of the laws. of equality and happiness.
* Underlined words for emphasis added. Cody Robert Judy has.
Ronald Reagan is remembered for a lot of things, but one thing stressed by those 'establishment Republcrats' is that of remembering the 11th Commandment noted in the Holy Wikipedia, '" Thou shalt not speak ill of any fellow Republican". I really believe former President Ronald Reagan, who I just loved, admired, and have read a couple of biographies of, would have stopped short of not reprimanding fellow colleagues as Candidates for President who were not Qualified under the Constitution of the United States. even his gentle 'opinion'. I can almost hear him say, " You know, there you go again, but you are not a qualified natural born Citizen' and that is what you need to be for the Office of the President. "
Leaders are more often 'Right' before being 'right' is popular. Its the nature of being a leader, being a pioneer, or even what some liberals describe as 'progressive'. Are Republicans celebrating Abraham Lincoln as 'progressive' in his stand against slavery in the interest and preservation of the Union securing the freedom of slaves in the 13th Amendment or has 'progressive' now days become a bad word to them?
Indeed, I am not acknowledged in defending these rights long before Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama were converted publicly. I was more interested in actually doing the job as President in preserving, protecting, and defending the Constitution of the United States of America than I was interested in the position of President. If that meant losing a race I was in it didn't matter because the principle for every Citizen is something that I just felt was very important to be protected.
The weakness of Democrats I believe in their support for Hillary Clinton, which there is no doubt of, for she is leading in the Democratic Party Arena Polls like Trump is leading in the Republican Arena Polls, I see as expressing more of a 'fear' of being challenged then in finding out who actually is the best Candidate representing the ideals of the Party.
Now does the Democratic Party endorse crime and illegal activity? Of course not. Pushed on that issue even the acclaimed far left social leaning D- Candidate Bernie Sanders said he apposes 'open borders', and listed the idea as one promoted by the Republicans go-to-the-bank-guys Koch Brothers.
[Ezra Klein
Mr. Klein: You said being a democratic socialist means a more international view. I think if you take global poverty that seriously, it leads you to conclusions that in the US are considered out of political bounds. Things like sharply raising the level of immigration we permit, even up to a level of open borders. About sharply increasing ..
Mr. Sanders: Open borders? No, that’s a Koch brothers proposal.
Mr. Klein: Really?
Sanders: Of course. That’s a right-wing proposal, which says essentially there is no United States. .a
Mr. Klein: But it would make ...e
Mr. Klein: But it would make ...e
Mr. Sanders: Excuse me ...
Mr. Klein: It would make a lot of global poor richer, wouldn’t it?
Sanders: It would make everybody in America poorer — you're doing away with the concept of a nation state.…]
Maybe its time the Republicans faced their worst fears of the 'label' being considered 'anti-minority' based on 'illegal immigration', and Democrats stopped being afraid of the Truth that without the Constitution, which also requires a 'natural born Citizen', the 14th Amendment does not exist either confirming voting rights described in the 15th Amendment that include race, color, and previous conditions of servitude?As a Democratic Party Candidate I challenge every Candidate for President in the question; "Why can't we raise the standards of accountability towards America instead of lowering expectations?" Lowering expectations simply for the position of President only serves to insure a deterioration of America all for the job of President. Its' just not worth it.
Thank you and may God Bless America.
Have a Great Weekend!
Sincerely your Candidate for President,
Cody Robert Judy
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Cody Robert Judy- Presidential Candidate '08-'12-'16
That's just one story.. I have a lot (smile) Check out my book :
Taking A Stand- the Conservative Independent Voice.
Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.
*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396
Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin
The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.
Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.
INSPIRING - I believe in You
APPLICATION FOR STAY PENDING FULL REVIEW ON THE RECUSAL OF JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT AND KAGAN FROM PROCEEDINGS
No comments:
Post a Comment