Showing posts with label Carly Fiorina. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Carly Fiorina. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 16, 2015

IN THE WINGS OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY AT THE SECOND REPUBLICAN DEBATE New Narrow Tent of the DNC?


*UPDATED:- 9-17-2015
IN THE WINGS OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY 
AT THE SECOND REPUBLICAN DEBATE & The New Narrow Tent of the DNC?
"Where did that Gal Go?
featured editorial: The Post & Email

Circulating Criticisms of Fox News cutting off the first Republican Debate they hosted Aug. 6th, 2015 from live-streaming Internet Users is the same criticism the DNC Chairman Debbie Wassermann Schultz is facing not allowing Candidates to Debate under the very harsh penalty of not being invited to the six regularly scheduled debates if they should engage in any non-sanctioned debates.

CNN has taken a higher Road for the second Republican Debate opting to air it live stream on CNNgo 2.0. But let's be really clear. Hillary Clinton has her hands all over this as her Poll numbers dive from 71% in July to 41% among Democratic party voting women , while the rest of the Democratic Party is being force fed the speculative presumption they're preemptive nominee may be indicted on criminal charges for breaches of national security and perhaps even illegal foreign aid in her campaign if the server hasn't been wiped.

But Hillary may not be the only one with their hands in this cookie jar Democrats, as Schultz volunteered- reaching back in referencing the 26 debates in the Democratic Party of 2008 when a 'relatively unknown' candidate named Barack Obama was being introduced to the public and more debates were seen as necessary. Yeah, right!

Going from 26 to 6 is a what most people would call extremely radical as well it should be seen as just that.

In fact asked about the possibilities of Republicans drowning out the Democratic chances with their debates being broadcast nation wide Debbie snipped, [“Good. Because you know what?” she asked rhetorically. “I am actually thrilled at the voters across America being able to see the 16 Republican candidates in the food fight that they will engage in tonight.”

"What would she call the 26 debates Hillary and Obama were allowed to engage in without penalties attached in 2008? In par lance its not a food fight but a proper introduction to a choice. She also stated the democratic party had 5 Candidates,  (they have 19 declared), that would be able to participate in 6 debates, while 'Main Streaming America' by the millions tune in to the Republican Debates? If you were running a business this would be akin to hairy-carry or suicide planning. It just isn't smart unless you want to lose?"

"America has not yet even been given the opportunity to hear me at a debate on these issues all because of choices by some party elites. Its very sad and disrespectfully of the equality they pretend."

"On the other hand, maybe Democrats don't want me in debates because they don't like the way I'm standing up for the Constitution and my Civil Rights? Huh? I thought we had confidence in our Justice system and the Second SCOTUS Conference scheduled September 28 is simply part of the process of Justice? What if they were to find Barack Obama was not a natural born Citizen?

 "If I win at the Supreme Court, would the Democratic Party be seen as discouraging Civil Rights that all Americans should have afforded to them in equal opportunity? What would the Democratic Party be doing then? Would six debates do it? These are the questions that will be asked, and what will be their answers. Will Debbie be maintaining her job then? This is why acting against Candidates and in favor of Candidates in the Democratic Debate Forum is really dangerous territory for the Party and the overall prospects of health to the party.", Cody said.

"The Democratic Party is not featuring a single Candidate who has not been elected before and the Republican Party has three based on what ... their high income level? Trump is worth $10 Billion, Carly $80 Million, Carson $5 Million what is the message there? Is the Office of the President up for sale?

"Glenn Beck was insinuating today his concern of Trump's populist movement with a lack of concern for the Constitution. The same theme was repeated on Rush Limbaugh's show today as a caller came on advocating for Sen. Paul and the Constitution. Where would the Republican Candidates be if my case was heard and I won the court advocating a 'natural born Citizen' indeed was 'born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents' in a higher calling in qualifications then a Representative or Senator in the Constitution? Rubios' out.. Cruz out.. Jindals' out. Has Hillary been able to do that? And I do not have an invitation to the Democratic party debates yet? Hummm?

"My point really is that regardless of Party the Constitutional principles are here to stay and neither party can really afford to stray far from its principles as its the Supreme Law that forms the bond in our Union. If the Union under our U.S. Constitution doesn't matter anymore, what is Hillary Clinton even running for President for?"


GOOD BUSINESS ADVICE IS ALSO AT TIMES GOOD POLITICAL ADVICE

The same advice given by CNN's Chief Product Officer Alex Wellen might be good advice for the Democratic Party's National Chairman - he said:

"Given the massive public interest and value of this even (speaking of the CNN Debate tonight) and the launch of CNNgo 2.0 across all platforms, the timing was ripe to roll out this live TV preview to all of our audiences,", he continued, "the goal is to reintroduce tens of millions of CNN consumers -- including our pay TV subscribers - to a service that now has 100 hours of on-demand TV programming, deep personalization and a revolutionary real-time live TV experience'." Wouldn't it be nice if tens of millions of Americans at least had choice in knowing from a debate where the 19 Candidates of the Democratic Party stood? In Debbie's mind, we all have far better avenues to somehow reach 10's of Millions of people? Wrong!

From the article, "When a YouTube channel from Sky News, part of the same parent company as Fox News, was found to be live streaming the debate for free (speaking about the first R Debate) Fox shut it down mid-debate". Shutting campaigns down seems to be more of what the DNC Plan is then assisting the public in getting to know them.

Susan Crawford one of the most prominent critics of the cable business wrote in a blog post after Fox debates that "There are all kinds of public values at stake here, and we shouldn't glide past them.. there is no speech more central to civic life than a political debate. And yet we have allowed access to that speech by way of the common medium of our era - high speed internet access - to be controlled by a cabal of private actors'. Or in the case of the DNC, a few folks who see " An Elite Class of Establishment" is in, and that are doing everything in their power to keep it that way, whilst we see America is screaming for a freshness rather then the same old rotten thistles.

Couldn't the exact same thing be said of Debbie Wassermann Schultz's decision to limit and redefine for the public the interest in the Democratic Party Candidates by those she consulted that had nothing to do with the general public's interest, and everything to do with being force fed what amounts to a communistic curriculum that leaves us a few choices.  In America on the Democratic side of the isle as far as Candidates go, hiding us- 11 declared Candidates, hiding me, from America?

Along with hurting the Democratic Party Campaigns by reason of 'stifling' growth ' in the interest of early debates as far as fund raising, awareness, and introductions to alternative Candidates in the Democratic Party, early debates are invaluable to the Candidates for president in being somewhat more generous and understanding as to the "development of the Campaign".

What I mean by that is the first two Republican Debates America hasn't really expected as much 'detail' from these Campaigns. Its more about generalities, personalities and character. In another month, that is going to change. Americans want details and policy roll-outs which will severely handicap the Democratic Party Candidates as they are behind on all of it... accept for the one who has the biggest problem with TRUST who has been favored in the cold arctic archaic decision.

It might be the worst recipe for "Choice" every contrived in Democratic Party History and is certainly one that will go down with the "Chosen" candidate. So as Hillary rises, so goes the party if she falls, where a simple protection of 'Choices' might have engaged America with at least interesting competition.

Check back here for my thoughts on the 2nd Republican Debate!

*UPDATE 9-17-15 ON THE SECOND REPUBLICAN DEBATE:
To reflect about my notes on the First Republican Debate hit this LINK:

A few notes - 23 million watched the debate. Highest GOP Debate and a Record for CNN
Drudge Poll: Trump 52% Fiorina 22% Rubio/Cruz 6% Carson/Paul 4% Christie/Kasich/Huckabee/Walker/Bush 1%

Trump's practicing stump speeches and mixing it up with the crowds is paying off in dividends. He's more comfortable with the intimidation of being up there with others who have been elected before. He see's the opening of 'common sense' at the kitchen table in America in the political arena.

My thoughts were generally that Jeb Bush did in fact become his own man in this debate. Indeed, I mean that as a compliment. He really did appear to me to be more himself and less his brother or father which I appreciated. Unfortunately for him, I'm not sure he will ever be placed next to the front runner again. If there is every a 2nd Tier Debate, Bush may qualify for that.

For Paul, Rubio, and Cruz a much sharper image was created with the style of the Debate as they were allowed to answer the same questions separating themselves and what they might do. This was a big plus as far as providing clearer choices and explanations for those choices.

Huckabee, Kasich, and Christie appeared a little tired through their answers in general a lot of which did have to do with age as they fought to be recognized with their unique qualities. It didn't work as well as they had hoped. I think America is grasping in these debates you can have 'smarts' and 'fresh' together and when fresh is lacking in a Candidate the ones exhibiting both will be favored.

Fiorina did well with execution. I thought she hit a homer in her closing statement. She made me hope she is not apposed to a Cabinet Position. Isn't it interesting, that Trump and Fiorina polled the best in the debates. Still, on the world stage I do not think 'not talking' to Putin is the best choice while you build up and make ready the military as she said. This is where her need to show toughness gets out of balance of being tough. I do not think as a President she commands the respect by a mutual admiring tendency towards one another.,but to be fair, I did not see that coming from any of the men on stage either accept for Trump a little.

I think Putin gobbles them all up and intimidates the hell out of all of them for many reasons that include age, looks, charisma, and body language which is very important. When your sitting across the table your opponent needs to like you based on an unspoken respect which I think is what Fiorina was addressing in her answer. The only problem is she appears a bit abrasive in that general welcome and that doesn't bode well for foreign relations.

We have got to pick a leader who is friendly to the Lions while playing chess in the Lion's Den with hungry Lions. One sniff up her dress by a Lion, and I do not mean that literally,  I think she turns pale.

As I thought about my answer to the last question many drifted from in asking them, 'What they would hope would be their accomplishment when their Air Force One was parked in a library as Reagan's was?', which I thought was a great soft ball to have pitched across the plate I reflected:

The short answer would be: Communism Tumbled Down in the World and the People Rejoiced. Indeed, the general thoughts of this post are about providing greater choices, providing greater freedom and liberty, and trusting people to use those in genuinely genius ways. I reflect upon the thoughts of Moses when he said , "Would to God all the people were Prophets!" I think the greatest success of a leader is to see a people self governed in their time, talents, and richness God has bestowed upon them unique. I believe if America were to introspect herself, she would find a big missing hole that needed to be filled.

That missing hole comes from 'Believing in yourself' instead of believing in someone else. If that principle were to catch fire over all the world, Governments of every communistic regime would find themselves out of a job. The world of global communications is making it much more difficult to shield the Leaders intentions from the Public's View. That is the power that makes the walls tumble down and eviscerates corrupt establishments.

These corrupt establishments pose the biggest threat to every Country that propagates communism in its most unsavory fashions where the leaders live much higher on top of the people and refuse the self discipline of equality in a genuinely true fashion of integrity and trust.  I feel the People Power across the world is creeping up upon the Leaders Power and that the People's Voice is ready to give a great SHOUT!

 Freedom and Liberty understood by all the Peoples of the World earned by example of our own beehive and industry and what they see as the rewards of it, is the attraction which rises within the Souls of men to believe in their dreams. I believe that can change the world faster than any military war and the ingenuity sprung out of America will yet inspire every corner of the earth.

Happy Constitution Day!

Americans, get smart, get educated, and then stand up and support that which has given you so much, as a well that never fails. It does remind me that this time was foretold: Amos 8:11
"Behold, the days come, saith the Lord GOD, that I will send a famine in the land, not a famine of bread, nor a thirst for water, but of hearing the words of the LORD"
God Bless You!





Please, consider a Contribution Now by clicking the secure Paypal link. You contribution Today will help make a Better America Tomorrow!

Sincerely, 
Cody Robert Judy
2016 D- CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT

Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.
Web Site www.codyjudy.us 

Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.




Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!



Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!


Cody Robert Judy's book :





Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.


INSPIRING - I believe in You



APPLICATION FOR STAY PENDING FULL REVIEW ON THE RECUSAL OF JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT AND KAGAN FROM PROCEEDINGS





















Saturday, September 12, 2015

NATURAL BORN CITIZEN WALL - TRUMP v. JUDY Failing the Art of the Deal R.I.P. TX Gov. Rick Perry




NATURAL BORN CITIZEN WALL
failing the art of the deal
TRUMP v. JUDY
 Endorses TX Cruz as Constitutionally Qualified- R.I.P. TX Gov. Rick Perry
Featured Editorial: The Post & Email 

In my third political race as a presidential candidate I've experienced some things that those making 2016 their first presidential political race have not. For instance I've experienced making it past the first one to drop out three times now R.I.P Gov. Rick Perry. TX-R. I've also experienced in the two presidential elections that I made it to the general election on, casting a write-in vote for myself on, watching a few Candidates make big mistakes that didn't end their races, and watching a few candidates make minor mistakes that people credited their dropping out of the race on. That is what I'd like to address in this post.

Last night I had a dream kind of exposing this theme and made a comment last night on Facebook that also may have contributed to this line of thought. In my dream I was showing up for a college test in a class that was rather like a social studies test. I had missed only one hour of the class during the year forgetting for some reason where it was held. In other words, I hadn't missed it because I wanted to sluff it or thought it unimportant. So it was it seemed I was showing up for the Finals Test slightly not as prepared as I'd like, and a little nervous.

I asked one of my class mates who was quite a brain in the class about the pronunciation  in identifying the body parts ending in the suffix aux and whether the "O" was pronounced or the "X" was sounded out. She looked at me and grinned and said it didn't really matter and advised me to just take the test and do the best I could because the teacher was going to be very lenient in grading such and that it wouldn't count as much as I thought which relieved my nervousness somewhat. This was the end of the dream.

Many of the articles I read about TX. Gov. Rick Perry dropping out related in their reports that he just was never able to overcome his fumble in the debate of 2012 in which he failed to recall at the instant which of the three Government Cabinet positions or Agencies of Government he was proposing to cut. If you missed that here's the clip from the 2012 debate:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTNjhcyx7dM


Now you notice in the video Gov. Perry turns to his fellow Texan 2013 Rep. Ron Paul- 14th District acknowledging him for his plan to cut  5 burgeoning bureaucratic agencies down. Ron Paul had detailed an economic savings package for the Government by terminating over 200,000 jobs in the Departments of Commerce, Education, Energy, Interior, and Housing & Urban Development he felt were counter productive. Rep. Paul offered not one life-saving word to assist his own Texas Governor instead opting to watched him sink and drowned on the stage of the debate even though Governor Perry has acknowledged that there was some good ideas in Paul's plan. But I don't think that had much to do with Perry's Popularity.

The question then became who did the American People think had failed more in the debate? Would Gov. Perry's gaffe -[(/gaf/)  an unintentional act or remark causing embarrassment to its originator; a blunder] or Rep Paul's faux pas  [(fō ˈpä/) an embarrassing or tactless act or remark in a social situation] end up worse?

I really do not think there has been one story written about Rep. Paul's unwillingness to throw a 'one word' life saving rope to Gov. Perry's rescue. We are left with the word "Energy" effectively contributing according to the Media to the entire downfall of Perry's Presidential Campaign in 2012 and still effectively recognized in now an exiting 2016 bid for the Office of the President. I'll tell you one thing, I wouldn't hesitate when it comes to experience in Texas and our nations borders asking Governor Rick Perry for advice. I really feel in my heart he loves America.

Consider for a moment what we are regulating the Office of the President to if we are simply subjecting our debating Presidential Candidates to a spelling bee - memorization test- or academic social studies class they can have no notes for on stage? I noticed FL. Gov. Jeb Bush didn't hesitate to push this as an advantage when Reported in a September 3rd story he said, "You gotta know the who the players are" referring to an interview Trump did with Hugh Hewitt where Trump accused him of asking 'Gotcha Questions'. Hugh Hewitt had quizzed Trump on knowing the leaders of the four terrorist organizations Hamas, Hezbollah, al-Nusra and ISIS as well as not knowing the General of the Iranian elite Quds forces, he took for Kurds.

Presidential Candidate Fiorina jabbed Trump also on the lapse stating it was important to have 'requisite knowledge'. She stated on Hugh Hewitt's Radio Show, "I think it is very difficult to lead if you don't have the requisite knowledge," Sunday morning of Trump's mix-up of the Kurds and Quds Forces.

I wonder if Fiorina could have named our own U.S. Military Leaders in the Marines-Commandant Joesph F. Dunford Jr., Army-Secretary John McHugh, Navy-Secretary Ray Maybus, Air force-General Mark A. Welsh III, Special Forces-General Joseph L. Votel, and Coast Guard Admiral Paul F. Zukufnt ?

Academic tests are for the most part graded upon the memorization of ingested answers and comprehension of material that is downloaded in your brain for recall. The answers in the presidential race can be googled by anyone really to make any 'natural born Citizen' qualified, look pretty smart. Not allowing the Candidates to have an iPhone available to google things along with a 30 second time period with which to 'call a friend' to solicit a brief, or 'google', is essentially regulating the Office of the President to 'Google knowledge' without 'Google' or 'Friends to call upon'. This is essentially like basing your vote on a game-show type criteria rather than the reality of the parameters understood for the Office of the President.

The only problem with that is it's not real. While in the Office of the President any person has access to google and a host of friends and colleagues to call upon in order to be briefed on any pressing subject. Gov. Perry's record in Texas is quite impressive as Aaron Gardner wrote in Red State 's Sept. 11,entitled article 'They Will Fall One By One, An Unpitied Sacrifice in a Contemptible Struggle:

"It troubles me greatly that we are at a moment in the conservative movement, and the Republican Party as a whole, in which a 14 year Governor of the world's 12th largest economy, a state that created 1.5 million jobs when the rest of the nation lost 400,000, is rejected out of hand for a pompous T.V. reality star attempting to purchase the GOP Primary. Even more troubling is the movement conservatives who have been either complacent, or complicit in the rise of Trump. I can't honestly remain a registered Republican if Donald Trump is to be the standard bearer."

Gardner makes a couple of mistakes in his reasoning here as far as the United States of America's leadership. Number one, he assumes that Gov. Perry is more qualified than Presidential Candidate Donald Trump to run the Country based on Perry's experience as an elected official. As I've written about before, Kenya does have a regulation for their Deputy President that we do not. For instance their President must come from a prior government position as well as having a scholastic requirement. This instigates very easily a ruling elite class based on economics and a social ladder that can easily become corrupted in what we see as an 'Establishment' that is stumbling here now in America in both major parties because of their poor performances.

If one of those requirements were implemented in our U.S. Constitution for the Office of the President do you realize Mr. Trump, Mrs. Fiorina, and Mr. Carson would be constitutionally unqualified? Now, rather then respect the wisdom and soundness of this, these three have not said a word about Cruz, Rubio, and Jindal being constitutionally unqualified as 'natural born Citizens' ie. Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.

One thing that was very *poignant however about Gardner's article was this paragraph I found enthralling as a "tell" if you will, or give-a-way of a gambler you could count on to know if he's bluffing or has a good hand:

*"Running for President, especially as a movement conservative, must be done from principle. Those who compromise their principle for a temporary tactical advantage, those who are more concerned with positioning in the polls and wither at the risk involved to associate with the good.. these people have displayed a serious flaw in their character." How true that is...and it applies to Gov. Perry's lack of principle in the interest of our national security 'natural born Citizen clause he has not used his bully pulpit for.

I commented on my FBF Bettina Viviano page posting of Gardner's article understanding she is a Gov. Rick Perry fan on steroids: " Wonder if all the Gov. Rick Perry supporters will support me if my SCOTUS Case hammers out Obama, Cruz, Rubio, and Jindal, or, if they would just hope Gov. Perry gets back in?" She hasn't "liked" the comment yet but three others have and four others 'liked' my reflection of Gardner's paragraph as *'poignant' including the author.

The reasons I like this paragraph and the reasons others like it are probably on different sides of the planet and the only reason they would be is because rooted in the 'conservative principles' certainly most any conservative would admit is Article II., Sect I, clause 5 which holds the qualifications of the Office of the President to be a higher standard than those of a U.S. Rep., and U.S. Senator including the 'natural born Citizen' clause unmentioned in the latter's qualifications.

Now if you want to make history and case law your friends in that defense, why do you not acknowledge we have had 41 President's who were qualified under the Constitution's terms of 'natural born Citizen' or 'Citizen' at the time of the adoption of the Constitution and 1 who burned his identification records and 1 in the Office now who posted something that resembles more of a cut and paste job rather than what an original 1961 typewriter could hammer out, and on that you have a disqualifying dual citizenship recognized as inherited from his Kenyan father who was never a U.S. Citizen?


You might also recognize the purpose of the 'national security' principle was to strictly prohibit Kings, Prime Ministers, Dictators,Tyrants, and Foreign Despots from bedding an American gal down and inheriting the U.S. Office as the President he financed himself to, entirely possible without the WALL.

Now what difference does it make if Donald Trump builds a WALL for our national security purposes but adopts a 'constitutional construction' format that lets the WALL placed in our Constitution to be breached by foreigners to that office because the assailant of that WALL is certainly not going to enforce the parameter of the one built by Trump at the border. So which WALL is more important to uphold first?

Of course you gotta protect the inside of the vessel or protecting the outside of the vessel doesn't make any sense and is necessarily moot. If you allow a grenade to be placed on the inside of a ceramic vase while you protect the outside with a fence so it doesn't get knocked over, how much sense does that make? If you pull the pin in the grenade how long will your outside parameter fence last before the vase is blown up from the inside? Right! Maybe three seconds!

Now let me illustrate this in real time with real issues applying to us right now.

Trump just endorsed Cruz as eligible for the Office of the President read it on FLIP FLOP: DONALD TRUMP
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has reversed his position on Ted Cruz’s eligibility to run for president, now saying his Canadian birthplace shouldn’t disqualify him. 
“I hear it was checked out by every attorney and every which way and I understand Ted is in fine shape,” Trump told ABC News just before speaking at a Capitol Hill rally blasting the Iran nuclear deal. 
That stands in stark contrast to what Trump said about Cruz in December, when he told ABC News that Cruz’s Canadian birth could prevent him from running.
This stand in stark contrast to the one of this Campaigns Latest Video's spotlighting Trump's birther comments in the Media:



JUST ONE ASPECT OF THE  JUDY V. OBAMA in The IRAN TREATY DEAL

Now let's just pretend for an instant that what the Republican Side of the isle is saying is true - That the Iran Deal is a bad deal with grave consequences for decades as Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell suggested, and House Republican Leader John Boehner said that Obama violated the law because he didn't give Congress all the information on the Iran nuclear deal. 

Would Congress even be considering anything from Obama's Desk if he is not eligible or is unqualified according to the 'natural born Citizen' clause of the Constitution for the Office of the President? Absolutely not. 

So why Republicans wring the hands and wipe the sweat off their brow about Obama's lawlessness, they ignore Obama's constitutional ineligibility, which is the Law, themselves. How much sense does that make?
We are also faced now with Israel being wiped off the face of the map, and terrorist attacks escalating into the nuclear realm all because of three words "natural born Citizen" not being enforced. 

We all know the Iran Deal had to be sent to Congress for consideration with a signature of an eligible qualified person in the Office of the White House. So if its approved by Congress and they did not have the votes to stop it while they winked at the 'natural born Citizen' clause as a trivial national security measure, perhaps if in the future Iran has and releases the nuclear bomb wiping Israel out or a major city like New York in the U.S. , you all might come to the reality that the 'natural born Citizen' qualification in the Constitution was actually very important words and was a WALL that was taken down, by most all the politicians as well as the leading Republican Candidate for President now in Mr. Trump.

It's interesting he has called the Iran Nuclear Deal a bad deal, but just endorsed it with an endorsement of Cruz. If you do not start drawing lines from point to point, your choices are going to haunt you for the rest of your life America. Can you imagine the horror of hearing not that a building was knocked down by a plane and some explosions, but that an entire city with a population of 8-9 million was gone?

By God I'll bet that would get your attention wouldn't it! Yes, well I'm trying to get your attention before that happens and have been begging you to listen. Is Israel listening to me? No. Is the Republican Party Listening to me? No. Is the Democratic Party listening to me? No. Is the United States Supreme Court listening to me?  Well, we are going to see. We will see in the Conference of September 28th, 2015 how favored the Justices are in wiping Israel off the map or a large city in the U.S because they failed to take a stand with three words in the Constitution raised by someone with legal standing.

I wonder how much of Mr. Donald's Trump's wealth would vanish if New York City was wiped out? Its interesting because he really could be reduced to ashes by his endorsement of Cruz as qualified. That's how fast it can happen. Mr. Trump reduced to ashes because he didn't have the courage for the Constitution and now look at him? A man who was worth 10 Billion reduced to a negative pittance. 

You know what if Mr. Trump were so smart he would have 10 lawyers at my door by noon today with red carpet, champagne,sweet potato and roasted onion triscuits and caviar making sure I didn't stub my toe in
getting to the U.S. Supreme Court to protect his fortune... but it appears in that way he's just not that intelligent.

As for 'conservative principles' Gardner nailed it but not in a genuine defense of conservative principles because he fails to recognize how important of a 'conservative principle' the 'natural born Citizen' requirement is for the Office of the President. While it maybe a test, its in the Constitution and none of the Candidate's running that are cow-tipped by the Media have stood up for it. It is a much greater 'national security' concern than anything we face at this point as is made very clear now with the Iran Nuclear Deal.

In fact, I urged Bettina, who also is a witness on my SCOTUS Case by-the-way that Bill and Hillary Clinton know Obama's not qualified, to get Gov. Perry to start to rally for my cause and the Birthers when he nose dived in the Polls. I have posted a message myself on Gov. Perry's FB board, but it was just on deaf ears. I really do not see any difference between Trump's art of the deal than he places as a void upon all the other candidates including Perry- and now you know why.

Let me say this and I think there is truth to be seen in the Republican Leadership not going full tilt boogie on Obama and this Iran deal especially given the Corker Principle applied. My intelligence sources tell me Iran's already got the nuke. The Iran Nuclear Deal is really a $150 Billion dollar hush-puppy-money deal made so they don't use it on Obama's watch, but it will be 20/20 hindsight regarding Obama's watch that he did let them get it. That's kind of like President Bill Clinton not inheriting the devastation the reversal of the Glass-Steagall Act caused in the housing market on his watch, but it happened.

You don't think the General to Iran's elite fighting Quds Force- Qasem Soleimani was meeting with Russia President Putin just for better caviar do you? Remember Pakistan was able to acquire a Nuclear Bomb without the world knowing until after they had it also with a cover-up. We know Russia is selling the S-300 Anti-Aircraft System to Iran  and China has made a new air force being purchased by Iran with the $150 Billion proceeds Obama is lifting, and for what its worth, the systems and protections must be now very necessary to protect what would be nuclear devastation to Iran if it were hit.

Do we really suppose Obama failed to get our 4 hostages, set up a 24 day waiting period of time and what could be a weeks-end-process to get to the 24 days as a firm grip on Iran, while they receive 150 Billion in lifted sanctions because they do not have a bomb?

Can we make a better deal or does Iran already have us over a barrel? Both seem to ring true unfortunately. Do you suppose just because Iran got a nuclear weapon they would use it instantly, or would they use it as Mr. Trump so often quotes as leverage to squeeze the best possible circumstances out of it becoming a favored nation?  Has Obama fudged a little on what was happening in Benghazi to the American People to protect his reputation and election of 2012? Why do you suppose less is happening with Iran when the deal is so bad?

Why doesn't Obama just hold up a sign that says:
 "Welcome to the Nuclear World Iran- Paid for by the U.S.A." 

Began this Post with the defending Gov. Perry's mistakes on the debate stage. Defended his gaffes on the stage as most irrelevant compared to his mistakes of not standing up against Obama's ineligibility. We see in understanding this a much greater judgement is necessarily in the deliberations for choosing a person to be president. It will be to navigate our ship through the mine fields we have as a challenge and really President George Washington had it right when he referred our defense to the omnipotence of that God alone able to protect us.

Tis not schooling or memorization we need now America. It's the ability to receive REVELATION from God. I am humbled by the fact that I alone am the only one who has a bi-partisan record in federal court on this 'natural born Citizen' clause as the nucleus of our Constitution to which there is a grenade. That is my stand in the U.S. Supreme Court folks. The stand not one Republican or Democratic Party Candidate for president supports in a recognition of conservative principles that binds our nation together. I recognize myself this revelation in doing what I have been doing the last six and a half years.

There are many things I am weak in and grammar, punctuation, spelling, and articulation are among them I admit. If I were elected President I would do my very best not to embarrass our People in representing myself well. As a component of that I would employ getting Briefings from the very best we had in varying points of views. But basically much comes down to a simple yes or no given the circumstances we find ourselves in weighed in the balance of preserving, protecting, and defending the Constitution of the United States, which is in the President's Oath.

Moses also referred himself to be a little slower in speech which is why the Lord gave him Aaron who was a mouthpiece.Exodus 4:10 but Moses was able to guide the children of Israel through the deserts and out of harms way with a navigation we understand to be Revelation. You might wisely check that in your box as a consideration for who you choose for President considering also how Cody Robert Judy is the only Candidate for President who has a bi-partisan Record on the 'natural born Citizen' clause of our Constitution and then remember how important it is with what we are facing now.

Americans, get smart, get educated, and then stand up and support that which has given you so much, as a well that never fails. It does remind me that this time was foretold: Amos 8:11
"Behold, the days come, saith the Lord GOD, that I will send a famine in the land, not a famine of bread, nor a thirst for water, but of hearing the words of the LORD"
God Bless You!





Please, consider a Contribution Now by clicking the secure Paypal link. You contribution Today will help make a Better America Tomorrow!

Sincerely, 
Cody Robert Judy
2016 D- CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT

The CRJ TODAY for a BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW
Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.
Web Site www.codyjudy.us 

Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.




Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!



Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!


Cody Robert Judy's book :
 Taking A Stand- the Conservative Independent Voice.





Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.


INSPIRING - I believe in You



APPLICATION FOR STAY PENDING FULL REVIEW ON THE RECUSAL OF JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT AND KAGAN FROM PROCEEDINGS

















  








Saturday, August 1, 2015

BREAKING NEWS- OBAMA'S INELIGIBILITY CASE HITS REPUBLICAN DEBATE STAGE!



BREAKING NEWS


SPECIAL REPORT
 OBAMA'S INELIGIBILITY CASE 
HITS REPUBLICAN DEBATE STAGE!


What do people think of women who suffer domestic violence and refuse time and time again to speak out? You know there is that modest courage where you take one punch for the team. However, being an enabler of violence begins after awhile to just make you either look like you enjoy it, in which case if its painful to you your a masochist, you're suffering emotional maladies of self esteem ie., battered person syndrome, your sacrificing yourself for gain often referred to as economic abuse, or you are just stupid.

Its not just domestic violence that happens to women, but there is also an unconstitutional political violence. For instance when men who are not qualified for the Office of the President with brute force push a women like Carly Fiorina to the back of the bus and are all to happy to take what would be her spot on the podium. On the August 6th Fox News Republican Debate at 9PM, that is what is scheduled to happen with Rubio, Cruz, and Jindal not even being qualified to be on the Presidential Debate Stage.

People with high-self-esteem focus on growth and improvement, whereas people with low self-esteem focus on not making mistakes in life. Self blame results in feelings of helplessness rather than empowerment. The feeling of being both responsible for and helpless to stop the violence turns often to depression and passivity.

This learned depression and passivity makes it difficult for the abused partner to marshal the resources and support system needed to remedy the circumstances or situation.  Children with low self-esteem rely on coping strategies that are counter-productive such as bullying, quitting, or even cheating, and its not far from the way adults act either.

This brings us to discussion on a particular set of rules that We The People call our UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION and the way in which the 'natural born Citizen' clause is not only being perpetrated by abusers who are using the bullying and cheating methodology, but also to those enablers engaged in passivity or not standing up for their own rights under the United States Constitution.

There comes that time in a person's campaign where you see it go down hill into an abyss of a credit by your name. Hey, for whatever its worth, Mitt Romney and I share the same accolade of  '08 and '12 Candidate for President'- thousands of hours and sacrifice ought to be worth something. (smile). I've been through 5 losses to formulate perspective of when that happens, and I can look at other people's Campaigns with the experiences I've had and see critical turning points also.

Its happening now with Carly Fiorina's Campaign for President and we have not even had our First Debate! The Fox News Debate happening August 6th as just 'Lowered Expectations' to include those polling at 1% into a 5pm Debate which Carly Fiorina is now qualified for, but she is missing the Main Event Debate at 9pm, whereas Rubio and Cruz are going to be included in that one.  I believe Jindal is polling at 1% with Fiorina however it must be taken into consideration he will pull time away from her while being on the same stage.

Being on that Stage at the First Main Event Debate is crucially important. The staggering cost of a full hour of prime time coverage to a Candidate cannot be underestimated as the result is a boost in confidence and contributions immediately following those Debates.
-------------------
HOW DOES THE SUPREME COURT'S ACTIONS IN 
JUDY V. OBAMA 14-9396
 FIND ITS WAY ON THE REPUBLICAN DEBATE STAGE?
----------------------

You might think its the strangest thing that a little ole candidate like me who has a Case in the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is having an effect on the Republican Debate Stage, but its true. Often the SCOTUS doesn't like to interfere with political elections. Its called the Political Doctrine Question.

"The political question doctrine holds that some questions, in their nature, are fundamentally political, and not legal, and if a question is fundamentally political ... then the court will refuse to hear that case. It will claim that it doesn't have jurisdiction. And it will leave that question to some other aspect of the political process to settle out."
—John E. Finn, professor of government, 2006
This however does not apply to the 'natural born Citizen' qualification for the Office of the President and VP, that does not apply to Representatives and Senators, because it is a fundamental requirement spelled out in our Constitution and is not a hyperbole of naturalization.

Justice Sotomayor, with a reputation of sticking up for the underdogs in my opinion really stepped out of her own character by denying an Application understood as 15A25 (Over 3,500 Views) understood in Judy v. Obama 14-9396

The Key Provisions of this Application for more Time that was Denied by Justice Sotomayor are as follows and are written about here:

[9- DELAY is detrimental for Petitioner as well as Respondent(s) due in part to the Presidential Election in 2016. Fully six months exist before the Iowa Caucus in January 2016. This case revolves around an interpretation of ‘natural born Citizen’ in U.S.C. Art. II, Sect. 1, Clause 5. , that the Republicans U.S. Senator Ted Cruz, LA. Gov. Bobby Jindal, and U.S. Senator Marco Rubio are in effect in violation of as Candidates for President with no timely recourse or due process available. Without a ruling by the SUPREME COURT, Campaign donations as well as confusion exist among the VOTING PUBLIC. This is siphoning off important support to the Petitioner in contributions necessarily going to unqualified Candidates.]

[10- Attending this PRINCIPLE of the U.S. Constitution is vital to the 46% of America’s Voters who are in fact now Independent Voters according to a January 2015 Gallup Poll . The Court avoiding the Issue does not serve them as it affects the race among republicans and democrats and we all look for guidance on the interpretation of the Constitutions’ demanding standards for the Office of the President being different than the “Citizen” standard for Senators and Representatives.
Petitioner then prays that this Motion will be granted in the considerations of the necessity requiring a decision before July 13th, 2015 as instructed by the Court through and by Justice Sotomayer, reviewing Justice for the 10th Circuit.]


We didn't know at the time of this submission that JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR's decision would be playing a key role against women, who are pursuing the Office of the President. Her action in Denying this APPLICATION was a DECISION that not only hurt my fund raising abilities through the Summer, but set the Stage for the Republican Debate. Candidate for President Carly Fiorina's place is actually relegated to a 5pm Debate rather than a PRIME TIME 9PM Debate position, and we see just how she was pushed to the back of the bus by Justice Sotomayor.

Here I am trying to stand up for women's rights and all I get is grief for it? Its a rarity when you see people who are standing up for victims like Mrs. Fiorina and Mrs. Clinton actually get beat up for standing up, but that is actually what the Media is doing by not covering this very important Case happening right now in the Supreme Court.

I have an APPLICATION for a Stay on Sotomayor's Decision  (Over 2,000 Views) times now on SCRIBD right now in the Supreme Court which is a legal maneuver to bar her from her own disastrous decision for women seeking the Office of the President pursuant to her nomination by Obama.


HILLARY CLINTON'S PASSIVITY A DIS-SERVICE 
FOR PROTECTING WOMEN'S RIGHTS

Hillary Clinton has probably found as many pats on the back for standing by her man as she has had the bird flipped at her from women who have found her actions of passivity in what might be termed the philandering abuse of her husband as a disgrace. It would be a different story psychologically speaking if Mrs. Clinton stood up and said Bill and I have agreed to an 'Open Relationship' in our marriage. But she hasn't done that. She hasn't called the women President Bill Clinton has been with sister-wives, or concubines, or anything to do with her family. She's called them bimbos as this HEADLINE indicates:

EXCLUSIVE: Hillary's Camp fears a new Bimbo Eruption will put the Kibosh on Candidacy.
Excerpts:
[Linda Tripp, the woman who outed Monica Lewinsky, felt compelled to speak out against Hillary's presidential bid. She broke more than a decade of silence in an exclusive interview with Daily Mail Online in which she described Hillary as forever associated, 'with the lingering taint of scandal and wrongdoing.'
She revealed how Hillary stage-managed and orchestrated the 'bimbo eruptions,' ruthlessly destroying the credibility of the women who came forward and neatly turning herself into First Victim in the process.]

[GENNIFER] ..[Flowers watched that broadcast with 'disgust' convinced that it was Hillary who was behind her former lover's vociferous attempts to disown and discredit her. She has since asserted that she believes the marriage to be tantamount to a 'business arrangement' with Hillary's own pursuit of her political ambitions as the ultimate pay-off for tolerating her husband's numerous infidelities.]

[According to Lucianne Goldberg, Hillary did more than turn a blind eye. She was heavily involved in covering her husband's tracks. She explained: 'She has known it all along. A lot of those women came to me at the time. There were several. Every one of them was a nice woman.
'They all were approached by Hillary's detectives who would take them out to coffee and shove a piece of paper across the table and say, 'Here sign this,' and it was to say they never had anything to do with Bill Clinton.]

These actions are tantamount to the 'cheating', 'bullying', as well as 'passivity' remember that children use who are suffering from low self-esteem. Hillary Clinton has tried not to make mistakes by covering up rather then dealing with the truth. As far as her role in Judy v. Obama 14-9396 she has been repeatedly been extended a hand to file an Amicus Curiae Brief, or friend of the Court brief and let that opportunity go. This might have been her last opportunity to take a stand for the natural born Citizen clause rather than go down in history as 'victim' to it. 



Feb 27thHere was my Tweet to Hillary today. 
Help #Hillary2016 @seanhannity & #tedcruz2016 are walloping me as a #Birther Frgt BO get 2R's Rub&Crz for 2 yrs of BO http://t.co/6YdG3rvXZt

March 13- Why Hillary's Excuses do not Exempt her-Now if that proves to be the case and she has not confided it to a Judge as I've asked her to write an Amicus Curiae several times in Tweets to her reported on this blog
May 23-
Not only does a Brief from Hillary signal a home run for destroying gender inequality, to take a stand for the Constitution, it signals the ability to lead both genders in a field of equality.

Interesting as we talk about violence against women and focus in on those running for Office of the President that just before Cruz was queried by Hannity in the Feature Post Feb 27th, he actually joked about abuse and bullying against women:
Cruz: No, I have not stopped beating my wife. (Laughs) (Crowd Laughs)

Hannity: Ok ,Your mother was an American citizen, you talked about your Dad coming from Cuba. You were born in Canada. You had dual citizenship There are a bunch of Liberal birthers out there that would try to make the case that your not eligible? Just a quick.. short answer.

Cruz: “Look, I was born in Calgary, my mother was an American citizen by birth. Under federal law, that made me an American citizen by birth. The Constitution requires that you be a natural born citizen.”

Cruz's equating that a 'Citizen by Birth' is the same as 'natural born Citizen' is a fallacy as the qualifications for Senators and Representatives is 'Citizen'.

What happened to Sen. Clinton in her talks and agreements with Sen. Barack Obama may never be known in the 2008 Campaign, but the understanding that comes out of it? Hillary's Campaign Debts are paid or retired (economic abuse), and she scores a Secretary of State job, but also in that must pay homage to Obama, which in no way shape or form includes calling him out on an abuse of the Constitution's principles that the Office of the President only devolve upon a 'natural born Citizen' ie. born in the U.S to Citizen Parents.

Hillary Clinton's political maneuvering into the 'good ole boys' club began as U.S. Senator when the non-binding U.S. Senate Resolution was co-sponsored by her and Obama for McCain. The three Candidates basically controlling the last three elections now if you want to call Mrs. Clinton's 50 Million dollar war chest a head start on the 2016 Election.

The problem with that of course as we have mentioned is it is affecting so many other women's chances in the future to become President by taking a stand for the Constitution rather than taking one against the Constitution. The American People as far as the Constitution have not Amended the 'natural born Citizen' qualification for the Office of the President and it still stands as a distinct and unique qualification for the Office of the President and Vice President not expected of Representatives and Senators as the following video Constitutional Reckoning depicts very succinctly.



While it takes quite some time to get to the SCOTUS on an issue that they see fulfilling the Ripeness Doctrine' , at least I have done it. The Ripeness Doctrine pertains to the readiness of a case for Litigation:
[Without undertaking to survey the intricacies of the ripeness doctrine it is fair to say that its basic rationale is to prevent the courts, through avoidance of premature adjudication, from entangling themselves in abstract disagreements over administrative policies, and also to protect the agencies from judicial interference until an administrative decision has been formalized and its effects felt in a concrete way by the challenging parties. The problem is best seen in a twofold aspect, requiring us to evaluate both the fitness of the issues for judicial decision and the hardship to the parties of withholding court consideration.]

Again, we are seeing the turning points of whole Campaigns based on the 'natural born Citizen' clause not being upheld as Cruz, Rubio, and Jindal gain a foothold over the only female in the Republican Field. My post yesterday reflected a real sadness at the Lowered Expectations that is an abuse to  Carly Fiorina's Campaign as she will suffer a very tough blow by not making the Prime Time Debate at 9PM on August 6th.

The resulting cost should be magnified in front of all of the JUSTICES of SCOTUS as a reflection of abuse of women especially when it comes to the qualifications for the Office of the President coming under their discretion to act or not to act, either way having very big consequences and unintended consequences.

 If we take the combined 'Contribution Dollars' of Cruz, Rubio, and Jindal the night of Aug. 6th as well as any inferred boost of confidence by what will be seen by millions of Americans which has a dollar value, we can safely say we are looking at perhaps even a fifty million dollar [$50,000,000.00] Advantage all at the stake of the Un-Constitutional Violence happening against women that I am taking a stand for.

As you all think long and hard about that between now and then as I do, perhaps you will feel the naught in your stomach and the tears of sadness that burdens me today in standing up against this Un-Constitutional Tragedy and cycle of abuse we are in. Thank you for passing it on, speaking out, and opposing the dereliction of Justice surrounding the Office of the President at this time with me. Together, let our Voices be Heard.

Thank you and may God Bless America.

Have a Great Weekend!
Sincerely your 2016 Candidate for President
Cody Robert Judy
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!


Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

Cody Robert Judy- Presidential Candidate '08-'12-'16


That's just one story.. I have a lot (smile) Check out my book :
 Taking A Stand- the Conservative Independent Voice.





Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.


INSPIRING - I believe in You



APPLICATION FOR STAY PENDING FULL REVIEW ON THE RECUSAL OF JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT AND KAGAN FROM PROCEEDINGS