BREAKING NEWS: SCRAMBLE! U.S. Supreme Court Receives DEFAULT NOTICE for Obama Ineligibility on DAY of CONFERENCE!

BREAKING NEWS: SCRAMBLE! U.S. Supreme Court Receives DEFAULT NOTICE for Obama Ineligibility on DAY of CONFERENCE!

The Default Notice to the Untied States Supreme Court arrived early Thursday, June 18th, 2015 the same day as the Conference in the Court for the Case is scheduled. It was sent Priority Mail with a Two Day Estimated Arrival time that would have placed it on the Courts Record probably Tuesday. Here it is Thursday and just barely arriving at the Court while it sat in Washington DC Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, and was delivered Thursday Morning. Interesting?

"I have never found it "Easy" to sign up for the Electronic Court Filing System", said pro se litigant Cody Robert Judy. "It ought to be a simple 'click and go registration of some kind with a licence' but its not. It has placed me at a disadvantage for filing many times before in Legal Cases having to rely on the Mail, and the Mail in Obama's Cases having a notorious record of a week to two weeks delivery for Priority Mail. I've never seen anything like it, but its just something I had to try and deal with. At Least it has arrived on time of the Conference Date with remarkably concinnity with the cold sore on my lip."
The two Mailing Documents below: In Regards to this Document asking for Default

SCOTUS COPY OF DEFAULT

USPS1 U.S. Supreme Crt 14-9396 DefaultTracking

SOLICITOR GENERAL COPY OF DEFAULT

USPS2 U.S. Supreme Crt 14-9396 DefaultTracking

WHAT DO YOU THINK YOUR CHANCES ARE

Asked about how he thought his Chances were in the United States Supreme Court with a Case that involves Obama's Identity and literal qualifications demanded for the Office of the President in the United States Constitution Mr. Judy responded.

"There are many people who say this will never happen. It is the same people who said we would never have a triple crown winner and the same people that say Jesus Christ isn't coming back, the "We'll believe it when we see it" Crowd. Of course science said we literally could not have a triple crown winner again. The deck was just stacked against that ever happening and science was so smart now. Thirty four years later we have one in American Pharaoh. You know things happen sometimes beyond the grasp of science. Its the fact that makes science humble. Things do happen every day that people say 'would never happen'and we are much happier for it.

Who would have believed the leading Democratic Candidate in the Polls would be scheduled for a Racketeering Charge on her Families Charity Foundation the same month as the Iowa Caucus January 2016? But we see a lot of people have put their money on her.

Wild Bill made a little video about it, but in some respects he acts like people are no good if they do anything wrong and get caught and are called a felon or criminal. This part is distasteful to me. Remember on Record is Jesus also being called a malefactor (Bible-John 18:30) and crucified along side of two thief's for his actions we would call "Freedom of Speech" by those who honored Moses.


"I guess the point is often people are not quite as aligned with Justice as we might expect... and leaders we have elected while we would like to hope are perfect are certainly all sinners and when the day is done we all can look upon our past and see something that we maybe wish wasn't there, but also may have taught us something that we wouldn't have known otherwise, but needed to.

"People, candidates are not perfect, they are people too and sometimes people do the wrong things for what they feel are the right reasons. One thing I really like is the facts that more and more people are learning this and realizing it. Donald Trump has had three wives and is running for President in the Republican Party! He's had children with all three, but he's without a doubt the most successful businessman of any of the Republican Candidates. Mitt Romney was undoubtedly the Most Successful Republican to run against an Ineligible Candidate named Barack Obama and lost twice!

"Things happen and America is a great place to sit back and watch it happen. We defy the world in many ways. Let us strive with all of our might, mind, and strength to defy and the world in showing the capacity for America to love is greater also. That is and must be protected by the United States Constitution and that standard is and remains our hope.

"We don't always get it right, but let us strive for it. Where we have made mistakes let us make amends. Amends that will protect our future. I believe in Jesus Christ and that he died for the sins of the world. He did not die for the sins of the world that are not confessed or swept under the carpet like dirt. He died for those sins which are contritely admitted and humbly forsaken.

"Second chances are possible for everyone because of this very wonderful mercy and grace of God to keep Justice as a standard of Review untainted. Justice has her perfect way. Without a Savior we all are lost. With a Savior we have a Faith and a Hope that though we have stumbled at times in our life, we are not lost.

"I am privileged to live in a Country that I can express my feelings and sentiment and not be thrown in prison. That happened to me once twenty-two years ago you know, but its over. There has been a long walk away from the past and the future I see everyday with hope and with great gratitude for the many blessings I have in the simplest things.

"Wither I win or lose is not what I am about. I know Justice will happen, or God would cease to be God. We at times suffer injustices and learn great lessons in the trials. I can say I probably wouldn't care what was happening in the political arena unless I had spent myself 3018 days in prison. I know what that's like by the experience I have. Suffering a civil death is something that is devastating, but I made it through that.

"I love my mother's thoughts that in fact we are all captive within different kinds of prisons and to say one is worse than another is really irrelevant to the circumstances of finding our release and parole from them in a process."

"Thank you for all of your support, your prayers, and well wishes during this historical time we are apart of. May God Bless you Americans to love and live the liberty and freedom we have dedicated in this land. May God protect and help us Restore America today for a better America Tomorrow"

The Cody Robert Judy for President Camp
www.codyjudy.us

Quick Reminder Cody's interview with Mike Volin coming up TONIGHT at WOBC Radio so tune in! Tune in here: -

HOUSE KEEPING NOTE:
Cody Robert Judy's FB page has filled up with 5,000 so we would ask you to join the new and growing list of supporters on FB here! Pass it on!

We hope you will not spare your Contribution today in the Res-TOUR-Ation of our NATION and support Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President today.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

Thank you to everyone who is and has contributed just a little here and just a little there, for we are working very hard in using the little that we do have as efficiently and proficiently as it comes in, as I'm sure everyone would agree. Please consider a contribution
Let's make it Official and support a Qualified Candidate whose has dedicated his time and talent to taking a stand for America. Let's raise a million dollars and give you the right to say, "I'm not an Idiot, I'm a Patriot!".

INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI

BREAKING NEWS: U.S. SUPREME COURT Qualification CONFERENCE to TRIAL Case Judy v. Obama- Judy Tees Off on OBAMA-DEFAULT!

FEATURED EDITORIAL The Post&Email
BREAKING NEWS: U.S. SUPREME COURT Qualification CONFERENCE to TRIAL Case Judy v. Obama- Judy Tees Off on OBAMA-DEFAULT!

It is probably the most [a]cidic and [o]dd circumstances used as tactics upon the United States Supreme Court ever devised by the Respondents, to completely fail to respond, but that is what is being done by Barack Hussein Obama in the highly controversial case Judy v. Obama 14-9396 set for Conference in the U.S. Supreme Court just six days from now. What remains to be seen is if the 'Triple Bogie' for Obama is seen as Par for the U.S. Supreme Court, and that Par is good enough.

OBAMA HAS FAILED ALL OF THE 'SHOULDs' that LEGAL EXPERTS AGREE UPON

The Rules are verily simple that after a Cert is filed a response is due 30 days afterwards. A brief
in opposition, sometimes colloquially referred to as a “cert opp,” must be filed within 30 days. Sup. Ct. R. 15.2.,and Obama failed to do so hooking his T shot far to the left and landing in another fairway entirely.

The rules do not require a respondent to file a brief in opposition or other response to a cert petition unless the Court otherwise directs. See Sup. Ct. R. 15.1 (“A brief in opposition to a petition for a writ of certiorari may be filed by the respondent in any case, but is not mandatory except in a capital case… or when ordered by the Court.”).

If a respondent decides to forgo its right to file a brief in opposition, the Court’s waiver form, which also serves as an entry of appearance for the respondent’s counsel of record, should be submitted within the time allowed for filing a brief in opposition. Although filing a waiver is not mandatory, a respondent who does not plan to submit a
cert opp should file the waiver form, which is available on the Court’s website. See Waiver, Supreme Court of the United States, http://www.supremecourt.gov/casehand/waiver.pdf This is Obama's second shot on a Par 5 that lands him in the sand trap.

While filing a Waiver is not Mandatory even that does require a signature and the Court in Judy v. Obama 14-9396 does not have one. This is the ball hit out of the sand trap hitting the opposing wall of the sand trap and rolling back to the feet of Obama now three strokes behind and headed for that triple bogie.

HOW TO APPOSE A CERT POSITION
[The alternative—waiting to see whether, based on review of the petition and any supporting amicus briefs, one or more
Justices are interested enough to require a response—may place a respondent at a disadvantage. See id. at 256.

By opposing a petition at the outset, a respondent eliminates the risk that one or more members of the Court may form a subjective opinion leaning toward granting certiorari before considering the respondent’s point of view. Chief Justice Rehnquist once said that:
“[w]hether or not to vote to grant certiorari strikes me as a rather subjective decision, made up in part of intuition and in part of legal judgment.” William H. Rehnquist, The Supreme Court, How It Was, How It Is, 265 (1987). It is clearly better to have an early influence on that decision. Needless to say, most lawyers would prefer to avoid having to advise their client that the Supreme Court has just agreed to hear a case after you voluntarily waived the right to file a brief in opposition to the cert petition.]

The Court normally will not grant review without first issuing a “CFR,” a for “call for response,” which the Clerk will issue upon the request of even a single Justice. See David C. Thompson & Melanie F. Wachtell, An Empirical Analysis of Supreme Court Certiorari Petition Procedures: The Call for Response and the Call for the Views of the Solicitor General, Geo. Mason. L. Rev. 237, 242, 247–48, Vol. 16:2 (2009).

HISTORY OF OBAMA FAILING COURT DIRECTIVE

The history of the Court not only giving Obama latitude most pro se litigants are not afforded is legendary. In fact as the Petitioner Noticed to the U.S. Supreme Court in a highly unusual Motion for DEFAULT JUDGEMENT UPON RESPONDENT FOR FAILING TO RESPOND TO THE COURTS ORDER OF A MAY 20TH RESPONSE, the Petitioner hailed Obama's as being coddled by the Courts to the point of injustice.

While in the process of exhausting State Remedies Mr. Judy as a Presidential Candidate in the Democratic Party was challenging Obama's ineligibility at the first T which was an executive court ballot challenge in 2012. This was not even in the Judicial Branch's authority as yet but was an executive branch court. The Judge in the case, Judge Malihi ORDERED, Obama to make an appearance or respond by Counsel and Obama's attorney instead high-tailed it to the Secretary of State in Georgia stating they would do no such thing. The Secretary of State told Obama if he didn't respond he did so at his own peril. Accordingly, Obama set precedent that if charged the best defense was just to not show up to Court. Both he and his lawyer failed to show up for court in violation of a subpoena to do so. At the hearing Obama sat mulling over the defense contracts that had just been arranged with the State of Georgia to widen the ports and build defense equipment. Not surprising, Malihi made a turn about and not only personally excused Obama but slammed the Petitioners witnesses and evidence to the wall.

Mr. Judy as a Presidential Candidate appealed the decision into the Judicial Courts of Georgia clear to the Georgia Supreme Court, which obviously still had "Georgia's best interest' rather then the Country's best interest at stake. This was appealed then to the U.S. Supreme Court which also failed to hear the Case in Judy v. Obama 12-5276.

The circumstance was recently revisited in Malihi's Court but had a dramatically different outcome as the defense, a candidate for office was ordered 'off the ballot' and the Secretary of State in Georgia complied with the Judges ruling.

From the Petitioner Candidate for President 2016 we heard today, " Normally, the Court does require a Response 30 days after the Petition for Cert is filed. Obama's due date for that was May 20th, 2015, and here it is June 12,2015 and still we have not a legitimate and certified response. There is a Waiver filed on the docket of the Court, but the Justices have not seen that is not recognized and is invalid because it doesn't even have a signature on it. Virtually anyone could have filed that including Russian President Vladimir Putin. There is absolutely no way to discern who that waiver is from. None, so it is as if the Government and Obama, both served this petition independently, have neither made a response. This is highly unusual and odd."

"Defaults are generally a lower Court proceeding and that happens when a Respondent fails to respond after being served. This actually happened in my lower Court Case but the lower Court refused just like Judge Malihi in Georgia to recognize service and decided after six months of litigation to dismiss the case. Again, very odd and unusual and we of course appealed.

"First we went to the Denver based 10th Circuit Court and they refused us twice. This is not unusual with a highly political case they think really should be reserved for the U.S. Supreme Court. There are many scholarly opinions now urging the Court to hear this kind of a case which has two Presidential Candidates at the head, one insisting the other is not qualified. It is a very difficult case to procure judicially and is like the ark of the covenant before the U.S. Supreme Court.

"Normally, we would see a lot of headlines on this kind of a case, but it's seems like the Media has jumped in the tank on this one. On this Blog posted May 22nd Obama's waiver showed up on the Court Docket. In that post three cases were cited as evidence that just because a 'Waiver' is filed, doesn't mean the Court is necessarily not going to hear the case. The three cases were cited showing 'Waivers' filed and Cert Granted. A "formal response" was also requested by the Court either the day it was posted for Conference or about five days after the Conference was set.

"More than five days now have elapsed on this Case since it was set for Conference. This is realistically bad news. What we would call 'Dead-Filed', with no Amicus Curiae's being filed on either side of the issue. None have been filed for Obama and none have been filed to date for myself, the Petitioner in the case, although any and all were formally invited by me on the Docket Report entry number two (2)- "Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from petitioner.".

"Of course I had hoped America and those opposed to Obama would be on board in wanting to see Justice take place and Sheriff Joe's Cold Case Posse Report holding that Obama's identifications in selective service registration and long form birth certificates are forged be heard in an friendly Amicus Curiae brief to the Court. It is stunning to see that there are no Citizens, or Groups of Citizens in any organization who have filed any thing especially given the wide publicity this Case has seen in shattering circulation of well over 30,000 views the last month.

"The greatest Response from those who you would think able and willing has been something a long the lines of this COMMENT-OF-THE-DAY we featured today in fact. i.e., [Pictured Comment]

It just is a FACT that when a case does have a "Amicus Curiae" or Friend of the Court Brief filed on behalf of one side or the other, that it does place the Case in a higher priority for the Court to hear.

" What can I say, I'm deeply disappointed a few thousand dollars couldn't have been pooled together for a group of concerned Citizens to get one filed. Its as if the People want Justice, but want it free also. The price of Justice while reprehensible to think of in a bribe, is no less important as having a price to defend. Indeed, can anyone deny this in the blood that has come at the price of establishing the United States of America? What price is that? Well, blood comes much more expensively than does the paper money and coins in our pockets, but even that was needed to supply the Army with rifles and bullets and cannons and pay for the soldiers willing to establish and hence defend the Nation.

"Pointing out to the Court not a single Amicus Curiae or Friend of the Court Brief was filed on behalf of Obama, defending his eligibility as well as Ted Cruz's, Marco Rubio's, and Bobby Jindals who are now Presidential Candidates for 2016 is a recognizable fact, but one that might be along the lines of allowing the Court an ease of sweeping the dirt under the table and no one noticing.

As a last ditch effort to show the Court that Obama is no friend or gentlemen to the decorum and process of the Court, I have indeed filed today what is termed a " MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT ON ORDER OF THE COURT FOR RESPONSE MAY 20TH 2015 "

Judy v. Obama Judgement for A Default U.S. Supreme Court

"of course I don't know what else can be done that hasn't been done from my person. I mean, obviously, the Waiver is unsigned, obviously even the Court's own provided Waiver requires a signature. Both the Government and Barack Obama have failed the directive of the Court and it is up to the Court to decide what to do next.

"The Conference of the Court for the Case will indeed be held June 18th,2015 just six days away now and I have outlined for the Court in very simple terms that the Respondent's were served at every turn from the beginning. Now there is one principle that defines for us the Courts ability to do exactly what I am asking the Justices to consider and that though unusual REQUEST for a DEFAULT JUDGEMENT ON ITS OWN ORDER.

CAN THE U.S. Supreme Court issue a DEFAULT JUDGEMENT ON ITS OWN ORDER, when it is an Appeal from a Lower Court?

"The term that makes such a thing possible is called a TRIAL De Novo Review. As fortune would have it, I requested this in my Petition for Writ of Certiorari. Under de novo review, the appellate court acts as if it were considering the question(s) for the first time, affording no deference to the decision(s) below. Legal decisions of a lower court on questions of law are reviewed using this standard. This is sometimes also called the "legal error" standard. It allows the appeals court to substitute its own judgment about whether the lower court correctly applied the law.
A new trial in which all issues are reviewed as if for the first time is called a trial de novo.

"Under the Trial de novo review, the U.S. Supreme Court can look upon the Case as if it has original case jurisdiction. This would be as if none of the District Court or the Circuit Courts decisions existed or had ever seen the case. Obama and the Government were served the Case as if they had not been served, and it was to a great deal of trouble that I did this, but it might well have been worth the effort now.

"If the U.S. Supreme Court is an Original Court set under the standards of a new Trial, then DEFAULT for a Respondent and not showing up, and not answering, and not following the decorum or edicts of the Court can be seen as meritorous reasons for DEFAULT JUDGMENTS. These could include awarding me with the sum total of what was asked for in the law suit which would be $140,000,000.00 U.S. Dollars split up between the DNC and Obama's Campaign Corporations. Now if the Court did that do you suppose we would see that deer-in-the-headlights stare from the likes of the DNC and Obama?

"Of course we won't know what comes out of the Conference until after the Conference, but these are now possibilities that must be considered legally binding upon the Respondent(s) and acutely within the borders of the United States Supreme Court powers."

[Cody Robert Judy] The Restoration of Justice is the Restoration of Hope for America!

HOUSE KEEPING NOTE:
Cody Robert Judy's FB page has filled up with 5,000 so we would ask you to join the new and growing list of supporters on FB here! Pass it on!

We hope you will not spare your Contribution today in the Res-TOUR-Ation of our NATION and support Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President today.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

Thank you to everyone who is and has contributed just a little here and just a little there, for we are working very hard in using the little that we do have as efficiently and proficiently as it comes in, as I'm sure everyone would agree. Please consider a contribution
Let's make it Official and support a Qualified Candidate whose has dedicated his time and talent to taking a stand for America. Let's raise a million dollars and give you the right to say, "I'm not an Idiot, I'm a Patriot!".

INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI

Obama's Default Blown Sky High 2014 U.S. Crt. on Eligibility by 2016 Pres Candidate

FEATURED EDITORIAL- The Post & Email

Obama's Default Blown Sky High 2014 U.S. Crt. on Eligibility by 2016 Pres Candidate
Script for the Video Below for those who would rather read it-

"Good Morning - I'm Cody Robert Judy Candidate for U.S. President 2016 and I have some news I'd like to report to you that effects each and every American from sea to shining sea.

On July 7th,I filed in the U.S. Federal Court, District of Utah, a Civil Rights Law Suit for damages to my candidacy for President in 2008 and 2012 as well as the ongoing damages in my 2016 candidacy thus far.

With my complaint and attached to it were the 20 day Summons of the defendants that included, Barack Obama - The Democratic Party Leadership, as well as Barack Hussein Obama's Organization for America- In sum, those responsible corporations for the campaigns of Barack Hussein Obama.

Approximately a week later my motion to proceed was granted by the Court's assigned Judge and I received copies of the Summons I had delivered to the Court the prior week, in the mail, to be served.

The Court stamped Summons were served to the Defendants at the Democratic Party Headquarters, along with the Complaint July 16th and a Return Summons was filed in the Court the same day.

On July 21st Notice of a change of Judges was recognized by the Court in the form of an Order of Recusal by Judge Jenkins and Chief Judge Ted Stewart was reassigned for all further proceedings. That order signed by Judge Jenkins July 15.

The twenty day Summons served and Return of Service to the Court filed July 16th allowed Defendants to respond and oppose the facts so stated by August 5th, with a mailing of 3 days August 8th at the latest.

Page 2.

Forty years ago on August 8th,1974 President Richard Nixon announced his resignation. As Americans we celebrated truth and transparency that day from the cover up of just one person who happened to be, at that time, in the Office of President.

Today is August 9th, neither the Court nor I have received any dispute of the facts so stated in the complaint that presented evidence Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro is not a natural born Citizen qualified under the United States of America's Constitution.

The facts are undisputed, in the U.S. Court, a nefarious cover up has taken place involving fraud and forgery, involving one person, who just happens to be in the Office of the President.

Undisputed facts in a recognized U.S. Court of law that amounts to an admission of guilt - an admission that Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro is not a natural born Citizen qualified for the Office of the President according to the standard of the United States Constitution.

Ladies and Gentlemen today we celebrate transparency and truth- God has blessed America. I want you to pass this on to your Congressmen because it is Congress's responsibility to recognize facts the Judicial Branch has served.

I'm Cody Robert Judy and may God continue to bless America.

Here is an update on the Court Proceeding Judy v. Obama 1-14-cv-93 and the process I have to go through to get a Default Judgement signed by the Judge in the U.S. District Court.

Update on Judy v. Obama 1:14-cv-93 filed in the U.S. Court (District of Utah)
1. MOTION FOR DEFAULT W PROPOSED ORDER OF JUDGEMENT

2. ORDER OF DEFAULT JUDGEMENT (PROPOSED)


Those wishing to read the U.S. Federal Civil Rights Complaint may now do so here now as it is public information: Judy v. Obama 2014 U.S. FED Case No. 1:14cv00093




Obama's Default Blown Sky High 2014 U.S. Crt. on Eligibility by 2016 Pres Candidate


I'd sure appreciate your helping me out in the American Birther Campaign (ABC) Campaign for Cody Robert Judy for President 2016. Thank you for your consideration.



The Commercial is simply called "America"


With the new patriotic hit being written, produced, and performed by myself. ( 2016 U.S. Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy) here: "Dawn Your Light America"

Meant as a wake-up call to America of the dire circumstances we now face in our Republic, and all the beautiful reason we need to take an active part now in our political process, I hoped to inspire and at the same time warn America that if the goal of immigration has 'changed' from the opportunity to produce and enjoy the fruits of your own labor to being able to devour someone one elses we have a very clear reason to be concerned with Obama's transformation of America and a very clear reason we need to enforce the qualifications of the Office of the President as its described in the United States Constitution for our own national defense.



Wow!Just found my book, Taking A Stand, on sale at your local B&N for nook users if you prefer over soft or hard bound - only $8.49 That's a Great price

Last, but certainly not least we want to Thank You for tuning in and reading this blog. We celebrate today 150,000 Views and appreciate every single one.

Cody Robert Judy
For U.S. President 2016

If you think “Truth” is worth it, support it and quit supporting the lie. That is the beginning of change, or we can just keep on going down this road and see where it leads with Obama. Which is it going to be?

TRUTH IS REAL