Part III. Obama/ Holder FED's OPEN FIRE on Utah Governor's Declaration to State Agencies to HAULT 1300 SAME-SEX Marriages

Part III. Obama/ Holder FED's OPEN FIRE on Utah Governor's Declaration to State Agencies to HAULT 1300 SAME-SEX Marriages

The great shake-up continued in Utah today with the same-sex marriage war as Attorney General Eric Holder under the executive hand of Obama at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue representing the Federal Government just said the 1300 marriages performed, that the Governor of Utah stated yesterday would not be recognized by his state agencies, would be recognized by the Federal Government. Video here of the announcement.


Rush Limbaugh just featured it on his show comparing the Feds engaging in executive orders of this kind, like Obama would, basically waving a magic wond saying the Governors words in his own state should be “moot”. The Governors of the individual States represent the executive branch of the State, as Obama represents the executive branch of the Federal Government and typically it falls on the executive branch to be the “enforcer of the law” while the Judicial Branch represents the “interpetation” of the law and the legislative branch represents the “law makers”.

Jan 8th,2014, the State Representative LaVar Christensen, original sponsor of Utah's Amendment 3 that actually became part of Utah's Constitution Rod Arquette show made the argument that Utah’s Referendum passed in 2004 declaring “marriage” to be only between a man and women was simply an insurance policy of the inalienable rights assured under the laws of nature that God had given as was previously discussed in Part I and Part II of this saga.

That the ‘marriage’ statute of the State was not given by man, but was a right given by God was the argument Utah State Rep. Christensen made, basically stating it was well within the State's right to legislate morality and it did. He mentioned the Creator in the Declaration of Independence, "Under God" in the pledge of allegiance as examples of our Nation being a Christian centered nation with the laws of morality coming as inalienable rights. Of course the Constitution says very little about “married couples”, but says a whole lot about protecting ‘individual rights’ regardless of race, color, or previous conditions of servitude.

Citizen(s) is/are determined to be those born or naturalized in the United States, which takes ‘gender’ out of the discrimination line ,Amendment 19, and it does say in Amendment 14, Sect 1. , that “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States, nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protections of the laws.” The protections of the laws or benefits to ‘married couples’ then must be equally accessible to every citizen without a bias of religion or gender. “Marriage” of course has nothing to do with the rights of procreation under inalienable rights. God has granted the rights of a women to get pregnant within a marriage contract or without, which we then would ascribe as a ‘natural law’ verses say a state statute of marriage.

The word “Marriage” has been used for thousands of years to describe a union of a man and women where the wife would represent the female part of that marriage, however, concubine also goes back thousands of years to describe a union of a man and a women as in Abraham’s time in the Bible as the the legislature brought the “moral” aspect of the Biblical Christian nature of our nation was founded upon into his interview with Mr. Arquette.

As I’ve listened to Rod Arquette on his shows about this issue, as he has admitted himself, this issue is to him about like stuffing a whole chicken down his throat with the feathers on. He is compassionate to all people, but really guards that word “marriage” to be only used by a man and a women. There is nothing however in the words “Same-Sex Marriage” that is shared with “Hetrosexual Marriage” accept the word “marriage”. Sodomy, Adultry, Fornication, and intercourse all share in their communication or understanding the word “Sex” depending upon who’s saying it to whom. The abbreviation of the word Book Of Mormon (B.O.M) does not infringe upon the word BOMB. The point of course is it wouldn't be the first time the State of Utah as represented by authorities was wrong, mistaken, or in other words had just hooked up the cinch to the bridle of the horse. Yeah, it doesn't go there.

If you were anti-mormon you could say the B.O.M. was a flop or wasn’t considered a cannon in your religious opinon, or if you were mormon you might say the B.O.M. was dynomite in your opinion and argue it was a cannon of religion. Of course if this were argued in a church meeting the factual evidence would declare the truth, but you have to understand the State of Utah has in more then one instance denied facts like these and in a completely dillusional state of mind incarcerated a person(s) before, for over eight years.

That’s not a joke folks, but it was the subject of Jon Stewarts Daily Show in a comedy show here 'Putting the Con back in Congress :



In the 9th Century BC the prophet Elijah proposes a direct test of the powers of Baal and Yahweh. The people of Israel, 450 prophets of Baal, and 400 prophets of Asherah are summoned to Mount Carmel. Two altars are built, one for Baal and one for Yahweh. Wood is laid on the altars. Two oxen are slaughtered and cut into pieces; the pieces are laid on the wood. Elijah then invites the priests of Baal to pray for fire to light the sacrifice. They pray from morning to noon without success. Elijah ridicules their efforts. They respond by cutting themselves and adding their own blood to the sacrifice (such mutilation of the body was strictly forbidden in the Mosaic law). They continue praying until evening without success.

Elijah's offering is consumed by fire from heaven in a stained glass window at St. Matthew's German Evangelical Lutheran Church in Charleston, South Carolina

Elijah now orders that the altar of Yahweh be drenched with water from "four large jars" poured three times (1 Kings 18:33–34). He asks God to accept the sacrifice. Fire falls from the sky, consuming the water, the sacrifice and the stones of the altar itself as well. Elijah seizes the moment and orders the death of the prophets of Baal. Elijah prays earnestly for rain to fall again on the land. Then the rains begin, signaling the end of the famine.

I hope Rod Arquette and the Utah Legislatures and Governor don’t start cutting on themselves and throwing themselves off of tall buildings as the fire from Washington DC in Obama and Holder comes down to them, when they themselves have been unwilling to uphold the United States Constitution in Obama’s eligiblity choosing rather to sacrifice over 2 million dollars in the defense of the referendum of 2004 and certainly all of the money that went in to getting it past as well.

The first amendment certainly guarantees the freedom of speech and it seems Utah’s referendum of 2004 deals more with semantics rather than ‘laws of nature’ which we would consider inalienable rights given by God, so I think there is more in the Constitution that requires the State to recognize the rights of every individual’s preference to a union of our species as citizens under the Constitution or Supreme Law of the Land.

Now, our Constitution includes “Citizens” so I don’t think those people who want to marry their cat or dog or horse should be given a marriage licence with the full benefits of federal and state agency protections under the law. The cat, dog, and horse are not ‘citizens’ upon which the Constitution applies.

Indeed in another analogy Rod Arquette and the State of Utah law makers and Governor have ignored the laws of nature and not had any problem with endorsing Obama as “President” , even though he is not a ‘Natural Born Citizen’ qualified under the Constitution’s demand for the Office of the President which is the only difference actually distinguishing in the Constitution’s language for the Office of the President from U.S. Reps, and U.S. Senators whose designation is "Citizen".

If discrimination is the word for "different age qualifications" use it as you will, there are differences in qualifications afforded to us for very good and well thought out reasons standing as principles of the Constitution. In short, a ‘natural born citizen’ requires two full generations void of alien citizenship to be the commander in chief of the armies and President of the United States. The distinction was put in place to prevent a foreign dictator from placing an heir in the position. A Qualification for an office is indeed a legal discrimination, but if you'll notice it wasn't based on race, color, or previous conditions of servitude, or gender.

If a person is born in the United States to Citizen parents, there is a two generation protection. That protection, considered to be a national security measure, was respected until Obama usurped the office against Laws of Nations mentioned in Article I, Sect. 8 for which Congress is given charge stating : “ and Offenses against the Law of Nations;”. Capitals not paraphrased.

The United States can not afford not to recognize the 'natural born citizen' clause of the demand for the Office of the President regardless of race, color, or previous conditions of servitude or gender. Just because Obama is black doesn't mean that he doesn't have to be a natural born citizen to be president and at least 35 years of age.

Utah’s only defense on the enforcement of the Federal dictation would be that Obama is not a qualified enforcer of federal law that is recognized by the States under the United States Constitution agreed upon by the States in the Union.

This of course would be like throwing the book at Obama who has taken it upon himself to line item veto any part of Obamacare ruling by edict, and it would actually be a recognition of the law of the Constitution upon the Office of the President, void Obamacare, and certainly would be a notable charge for the State’s rights to at least recognize their own authority upon their state agencies.

Of course Governor Gary Herbert could I suppose still authorize the Driver's License bureau in Utah not to change the drivers liscenses of those seeking a change due to the same-sex marriage recognition of 1300 couples as well as insurance policies etc., but that is an uphill fight that I believe he will come out on the losing end of because so much is afforded in individual rights that has not been recognized in Utah.

Now I like my Utah Governor Gary Herbert, I sure do. I think him to be an honorable and reasonable man. I believe he works his tail end off for Utah and I believe in his heart he is doing what he believes is the will of the people in Utah. What I do think is missing in this argument is an understanding of the argument for the people.

You get a crowd going in one direction its not likely that each individual has had the time or the argument laid out for them as a Judge might.

That's exactly what happened with Obama in fact, and how we got a usurpation of the Office of the President. The crowd got excited about a first black president, and the media loved the story even more than the wisdom of the law. Its one of the most important aspects of the United States Constitution and Utah's Constitution also, those of the rights of the individual over the mob or crowd.

That is a fundamental paradigm shifts of the power of the United States Citizen that the world has stood in shock over. However, any right can be violated if Good Men do nothing and refuse to take a stand, which is another reason Obama still resides at 16oo Pennsylvania Avenue and our Nation is distressed and stretched domestically so far from the United States Constitution that unlawful prosecutions take place and the rights of many are trampled under foot by those who believe themselves to be appointers of the law but not subjects to the law as has almost become common place in America now days.

What I do know is the days have come when no man can live on barrowed light and that each and every individual must search out for themselves the wisdom of the Constitution which I continually find sound and admire in its simplicity,direction, and course. Our forefathers knew that to have a Nation full of diverse religions wouldn't necessarily be easy, but it would be worth it, and that is why Congress it was said, "must not make any law respecting a particular establishment of religion" and why marriage should be afforded to any consenting citizen according to the age particulars afforded by the States Laws in which they reside, and why I not only think Utah's Referendum was wrong and indeed is unconstitutional, but why the 1887 Edmunds-Tucker Act of the United States Congress is just as equally wrong and unconstitutional. So if Holder feels it necessary to over-turn a Utah Referendum about marriage let him not be a hypocrit and not overturn that Federal Referendum or Act of Congress.

Breaking: Breaking News : Orrin Hatch R - U.S Senator from Utah and Mitch McConnell R- U.S. Senator from Kentcky just requested two sheriffs kits produced by Michael Volin of WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com (WOBC) with the purpose of informing the public and elected officials of the forgery of the long-form birth certificate image posted since April 27, 2011 on the White House website. These kits (Get Yours Free Here) contain the same evidence released in March 1,2012 (and a little more) that I included in my case against Obama that went from Georgia State- Georgia State Supreme- to U.S. Supreme 12-5276 in Judy v. Obama.

Please urge and encourage your Representatives to OPEN AND TRANSPARENT HEARINGS in the House of Representatives on Obama's eligibility as the solution to eliminating Obamacare. These hearings must be held and the evidence must be heard that are in the Sheriff's kits most all of the Representatives have received now.

If these hearings are conducted in the open and reported in the open, the evidence will mount collectively and the U.S. Senate although it has a majority of Democrats will have to concede to the facts and evidences or will be seen as completely unfit for their duties and as incompetent. Utah would most likely see more benefits come from supporting the Candidates like myself, (well, Candidate as myself because there were no other candidates in the entire U.S.A. who stood up for principle regardless of party), fighting for equal protections under the law in pushing for Open and Transparent Hearings in Congress with two million dollars on Obama's Verification Eligibility qualification hearings on the stage to remove him as a disability according to Amend 14, Sec.3 would be a lot faster solution.

Like CODY ROBERT JUDY'S NEW 2016 PAGE ON FACEBOOK HERE
Follow me on Twitter: Official Cody Robert Judy 2016 on Tweeter here

You Can Help Me [ If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign”, or ABC Campaign ,which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President please make a contributions here:

Let me now wish everyone a very happy and warm New Year as we pray for the Lord to save our Country and restore America from the dilapidation we now find ourselves and the principles of the Constitution in, for this I am Taking A Stand.

Sincerely, Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us www.codyjudy.blogspot.com YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES TV Get Cody's Book: Taking A Stand

SCOTUS AGREES TO HEAR- ELATION BREAKS OUT IN O’S ELIGIBILITY LAND- HOLD IT!

SCOTUS AGREES TO HEAR- ELATION BREAKS OUT IN O’S ELIGIBILITY LAND- HOLD IT!

Just as Obama predicted when he handed out his long form birth certificate 3 years later from the White House press core room May 1st, 2011, ‘there would always be circus acts and carnival barkers’, who would not believe it was real, ie Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse and Birther Queen Orly Taitz to name two, the United States Supreme Court agreed to hear Judy v. Obama 12-5276, and very surprisingly Birthers and Anti-Birthers joined hands throughout America and the whole Nation jumped for joy!

Millions of letters have flooded the Supreme Court of the United States over the last two weeks from both Republican and Democrat Anti-Birthers as well as Birthers- mainly conservatives, wanting to put to rest, once and for all, the eligibility issue that Obama was not a ‘natural born citizen’ demanded by the Constitution’s qualifications for the Office of the President, before Obama’s second term in the White House, as a way of healing the Nation of the strife.

Hold it! Did I hear that right? Why would Anti-Birthers be sending letters hoping that SCOTUS heard this case? That would mean literally all of Congress on both sides of the isle, Republicans and Democrats actually were advocating SCOTUS hear this case.

Well, that could be the headline in two weeks as SCOTUS considers in their Jan 4th conference the Petition for Rehearing drawn up for Judy v. Obama 12-5276 and the argument is pretty positive on both sides that they want this heard! Let’s take a look at both.

Republicans and Democrats in Congress know just how hard it is to get a Constitutional Amendment passed with 2/3rds a majority of Congress. Just ask UT. R. Senator Orin Hatch, a perfect example of the Anti-Birther movement, how much time he has put in trying to get one through both houses that wasn’t just a non-binding resolution. For instance, in the U.S. Senate like “second”, the non-binding U.S. Senate Resolution 511 for John McCain passed in 2007-8, who was not born in the U.S. , at any military hospital, and “first” who was given his Citizenship 11 months after his birth 1936 by an Act of Congress specifically for the Panama Canal Zone in 1937.

Among other Anti-Birther leaders including the mixed crowd of Bobby Jindal, Rick Santorum, Marco Rubio, John McCain who are naturalized Citizens is the ever transparent Barack Obama who whole heartedly now supports the SCOTUS hearing a case millions of Americans are wanting heard. One must ask, “Why now have the Anti-Birthers become so exuberant and elated in the context of finally seeing a precedent come out of the highest court?”

The answer of course lies in two parts. First, the Plaintiff Cody Robert Judy: and second, the continuation of the Republican Party finally being able to out maneuver the Democrats at their own game.

Notice there are four guys on the national stage, five if you want to include the former California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger for Republicans , and only 1 Democrat Barack Obama who has a natural born citizen problem. Of course Democrats have already made a coronation for Hillary Clinton for 2016 and she has no problem with either birth place or parents being Citizens. So this whole argument is not about Democrats it’s about the Republican Party future.

Now the lone Democrat in the bunch Barack Obama wants to shut the mouths forever of advocates of the natural born citizen definition being “born in the U.S. to Citizen parents”, especially dog-gone attorneys like Mario Apuzzo, Larry Klayman, and Orly Taitz, not to mention Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse. How better to do that then by advocating the SCOTUS actually hear a case like the ones they are or have represented, but don’t have them as Counsel representing the Plaintiff? That answer is Cody Robert Judy v. Barack Obama Case 12-5276.

My case is actually a God send to Anti-Birthers (as well as Birthers), which is why they are actually converting and sending letters into SCOTUS advocating for them to hear this case, and becoming Birthers. They have never had a chance so marvelously placed before them for a ‘Precedent’ ruling adjudicated from the bench. From their position, there is no way they can lose against me!

I’m the biggest failure to ever hit politics! I’ve never won a political race in my life and I’ve ran five times; once for U.S. Representative in the House, twice for the U.S. Senate, and twice for President. That’s a record that Anti-Birthers are loving now, but wait there’s more when it comes to a record. How about 8 years in prison? Yes, I did 8 years in the Republican dominate State of Utah’s Correctional Facility.

Are you getting the picture of why Anti-birthers are saying “Yes Yes Yes..we can’t lose against this guy AND we can get a precedent case!”? But wait that’s not all, if you think that’s the peanut butter sandwich, wait till you see the strawberry jam that makes this so sweet. I have a record of failure even within the United States Supreme Court.

Many people don’t recall my case trying to pry the evidence out of the LDS Church Presidencies hands of the video tape featuring the act for which I was criminally prosecuted in Utah for what amounted to ‘entering a building with the ‘intent’ of committing a felony’, seen under United States Supreme Court Case Judy v. Hinckley 96-7655. Summing it up the LDS Church Presidency held the tape that showed me getting the shit kicked out of me, and refused to let me use it as evidence against the prosecution of case even thought the Government used it!

Of course many Anti-Birthers are quick to point out my criminal conviction twenty years ago, holding with that interest the facts generally presumed by the flippant statement, “Hey, if Judy couldn’t even get the SCOTUS to rule that evidence used against him in a court must in accordance with the Constitution be given to him to use”, then there’s NO WAY we are going to lose this eligibility case, so bring it on!

“Justice For All” really means “Justice for Whom the U.S. Supreme Court sees fit.
You see in my criminal case, the LDS “Mormon” Church Presidency had the tape of the whole incident, and to make a long story short, they gave it to the prosecuting attorney who gave it to the Judge, also at the time acting as a Bishop for the LDS Church, which coincidentally Mitt Romney has also acted as, and neither myself or the news media under FOIA could get it, because it would have completely unraveled the criminal conviction out in the public square. That didn’t look good for Republicans or the Church headquartered in Utah. Now all that wouldn’t be relevant unless the action for which I was prosecuted actually happened in a Church Meeting and the video showed my ‘intent’ something other than committing an unnamed felony.

This was also showcased in much the same hilarious way it sounds in 2002, that you can only grasp as told by the loveable Mr. Jon Stewart on the Daily Show. For a good laugh you gotta watch this clip, which also shows the loveable Stewart with slightly darker hair and a few less wrinkles then he has now.

http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-april-24-2002/putting-the-con-back-in-congress

!!!!

The Daily Show with Jon Stewart	Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c
Putting the Con back in Congress
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor & Satire Blog The Daily Show on Facebook

This mountain, and I mean MOUNTAIN, of evidence exist on the Anti-Birther side. Its got five future stars for the Republican Party and one guy whose already sat in the White House for four years just eyeballing this case like a fairway that was 200 yards wide and 400 yards deep with no sand traps or trees in it. There’s no way to lose to the Birthers by SCOTUS hearing this case and we have a chance to get a precedent out of this case that will totally shut everyone’s mouth.

Now Birthers would say of Sen. John McCain running for President again,”If it takes an Act of Congress to declare you first a “Citizen”, and a second Act of Congress to declare you a “Natural Born Citizen”, you probably have nature testifying against you and Congress trying to desperately over-ride nature.”

They would also point out that Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s whole Cold Case Posse Investigation, which they claim has well over 2600 hours of experienced law enforcement investigation in it declaring Obama’s long form birth certificate and his draft registration is actually a fraud, is inserted in the Judy v. Obama case for the SCOTUS. I’m sorry folks, but Sheriff Joe can’t get higher than the U.S. Supreme Court in a criminal investigation.

Anti-Birthers are delighted that within the Judy v. Obama 12-5276 is the entire Cold Case Posse Investigation! Yes, Sheriff Joe is in the United States Supreme Court as well as his Cold Case Posse findings. So along with this pathetically weak Plaintiff which stands no chance of winning is everyone they basically want to shut up. What could go wrong?

Birthers have been shut down out of so many courts due to “Standing” and even a more rigidly held legal precedent termed “competitive standing”, that they would just be delighted if the Supreme Court of the United States would actually hear the case, and they could get back to the dental office, or sheriff department, or complaining about the economy rather than the eligibility argument. Let’s face it, this argument has cost the U.S. billions of dollars, and is not the solution to raising the unemployment percentage in the United States. Hasn’t WND’s “Where’s the ‘real’ Birth Certificate” billboard campaign all over the nation been driving you nuts?

The Birthers think they have it won if the Court would just look at it. I mean Obama is only one out of how many Democrats competing for the Office of the President that isn’t natural born citizen? If there is a hard core look and argument at understanding that two things play a role in this: Place of Birth and Parents, Obama may have a 50/50 chance.

If both parents are respected as equals, and one parent is a U.S. Citizen and the other is say British. Is it fair for the U.S. Courts not to respect the British parent’s allegiance for the child?

If say the Court looks at the Father as the predominant parent because the wife takes his name in that whole male dominance thing in traditional marriages we are accustom to in our norms, shouldn’t Obama’s father, who is a Kenyan/British subject be given the respect he deserves for his son by our Courts?

Shouldn’t our Courts also respect the laws of Indonesia and the adoption laws and schooling laws which enabled Barack Obama to go to school over there, as a Citizen of Indonesia, with his adoption by Lolo Soetoro his step-father?

You know I have all these Anti-Birthers screaming and yelling at me, and I say to them, what in the world do you have to fear, and what in the world are you doing? Can’t you see that this is a case put on a silver platter for you?

You should be advocating at the top of your lungs along with Marco Rubio, Bobby Jindal, Rick Santorum, and John McCain that you would actually love along with the one Democrat Obama, to have the United States Supreme Court hear this case!

So come on you Anti-Birthers send your letter (suggested letter at end of post) in today advocating the Court hear this case, and send this to the media so they can start prepping this case up to the heightened state of awareness worthy of the big win your sure to achieve.

If you’re a Democrat who loves Obama, or a Democrat who secretly hoping for a future for the Republican Party, there is no reason to fear, because this cat’s in the bag for you! Right?

I want to thank the Anti-Birthers for coming around and supporting my candidacy for President, and also thank the Birthers for their continued conservative support, after all , it’s the Constitution this is all about and I’m just here to serve you anyway I can.

It’s not easy being used as a loser, but someone’s got to do it.




Thanks for Passing it on, supporting or contributing in any way you feel you can.

Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign


Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.us
Contribute: http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES
FEC REGISTERED  http://fec-candidates.findthedata.org/l/4426/Judy-Cody-Robert
Candidate ID P20003372
Committee ID C00501593

Links used in this article:

http://www.deseretnews.com/article/595096558/Hatch-is-pushing-Arnold-bill.html?pg=all

http://archives.utah.gov/src/srcappeal-1994-13.html

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/12-5276.htm

Name:
Address: City- State- Zip
- - - - - -
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Office of the Clerk – Mr. William K. Suter 1st Street N.E Washington, DC 20543-0001
RE: Cody Robert Judy v. Barack Obama 12-5276 This __Day of ____,201___


As a concerned Citizen, I would like to express my sincere interest in your upholding the rights of Cody Robert Judy as a natural born citizen and hear this case. The media is not representing my interest especially and everyone should be playing by the same rules.

Obama is not playing by the same rules in the race for President and I believe this deserves you utmost attention as the #_____ issue in the Constitution, mentioned 13 pages out of the 48 pages in the pamphlet of The Constitution that has to do with the Office of the President out numbering any other demand or principle at least 10 to 1. Is it any wonder I’m concerned?

This pillar of our Constitution demanding a natural born citizen affects literally every other right and organization of Government, and literally hinges our elections which I am aware are the laughing stalk of many foreign countries and governments now including many of our allies, as they even see we are totally ignoring this very important pillar.


As a patriot of The United States of America, I understand that a Elector can be dismissed if he/she is voting for an unqualified candidate and according to Obama's attorney Fischer the Electoral College as a body, should decide who is eligible as President and who is not, but that doesn't excuse the United States Supreme Court from its duty as an interpreter of the Constitution in the Judicial Body of our Government and specifically in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 because Congress Members cannot be Electors.

I affix my signature hereon of my own free will, and plainly state to you I am willing to lay my life down for the Constitution.
Sincerely Yours,
__________________


cc: Governor of my State __________________

Romney's Mormonism v. Obama's Muslim-ism

Romney's Mormonism v. Obama's Muslim for Islam?

Protecting the Right to Offend- Mormon Rising or Double Standard?

Since the unjustified assaults on the U.S. embassies and consulates in Egypt, Libya, and over 23 countries Glenn Beck linked the Libya Cover Up and attack to an assault on free speech basically asking the question "Is Obama a Crook?".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QkOOwdK4psM



I think just like Fast and Furious was the brain-child as a blow to our 2nd Amendment until its cover was blown, that Libya's Cover-up is indeed an aggravated assault on our 1st Amend as a 'video' up for months with only 40,000 hits prior to our U.S. Ambassador Chris Steven's last breath,finds it way into being the cause of an uproar that spans 23 countries.

That kind of reminds me of a video of Romney's "47% remark" going global after sitting for 4 months undiscovered. How convenient for Obama's campaign to have the 47% working everywhere. America might just find that her leaders are in fact unable to travel abroad because of the U.N's desire to abrogate America's will. Indeed the U.N. might find out the meaning of spiting your own nose off to spite your face. Its a lose lose proposition.

Obama himself is laid open to law suit by Iran's own “A complaint could be filed with US courts against Obama for his violation of articles 18 and 27 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) calling for respect of faiths,” Javad Mohammadi, the deputy head of the Supreme Council of Cultural Revolution (SCCR), said on Sunday.

Can Americans think of any other reason to celebrate the passage of the U.N. Small Arms Treaty yesterday which the Obama Administration and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton passed off on, other than to get Obama locked up by the U.N. for Fast and Furious citing the purpose of the small arms treaty as "highlighting the international community’s renewed commitment to preventing, combating and eradicating the illicit trade."

So, 6 years to disarm us, at two year intervals. Can we expect legislation, more false flag operations and the continued dumbing down of America’s youth, to accept the yoke of a particular religion? Will it be Romney's Mormonism or Obama's Islam?


It sure fits the same pattern/assault on our United States Constitution Obama and his Administration has been consistent on, but you can see it took an assault on the qualifications of the Office of the President to orchestrate 'Fast & Furious' as well as 'Libya's Cover-Gate' both involving weapons going to the wrong side in the order of that agenda through the office of the President.


People wonder why the demanding qualifications of a 'natural born citizen' was instituted in our Constitution in the first place. It wisely places a two-generation gap between foreign leaders ambitions and the Office that has the power to orchestrate such things.

Now let's examine a few other things along the same line of Beck's logic:

If Glenn Beck believes in his own report, you might think it would be an easy conversion for him to be a Birther, but he remains distant from The Birther Movement, calling all the work and investigation by Sheriff Joe a 'distraction' and somehow honoring Sen.Hillary Clinton's investigation that put to rest her ambition for President. See Becks' rant here against the Birther Movement where he notes the qualification demands for President in Obama's case 'kept him up for minutes..no wait half a minute.'

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D67TpSAYVJo




Now consider Utah's U.S. Senator Orrin Hatch's push to eliminate the security clause of the Constitution on the office of the President made public for Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger, here, http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/2004-12-02-schwarzenegger-amendment_x.htm
Senator Hatch concluded: "The restriction on the foreign-born "has become an anachronism that is decidedly un-American,"

Wow! Republicans' have to be so proud of that one.

2004 Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., a Judiciary committee member, sees merit in the restriction. "I don't think it is unfair to say the president of the United States should be a native-born citizen," she said at the hearing. "Your allegiance is driven by your birth.", but she sure as hell doesn't include Obama in that remark.

Now with the seat of the Presidency on the line Mitt Romney's line of "No one's ever asked to see my birth certificate. They know that this is the place that I was born and raised.", is not seen as a joke, while Mitt passed it off as one.

So which is it?

Mitt Romney, Glenn Beck, and Orrin Hatch all share in common the Mormon Faith, and in 1993 I went to prison for 8 years based on an offense of words, it can't be any clearer then said exactly like that.

I made a statement to then President of the Quorum that I did not intend to hurt anyone, and claimed the "Book of Mormon" was abbreviated B.O.M., backed up with that particular evidence, in a religious meeting, where the broadest of 1st Amendment rights should be respected.

In 2002 The Daily Show even did a show about this.
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-april-24-2002/putting-the-con-back-in-congress


Did the Mormon religion respect the 1st Amendment rights? Did Utah's Mormon leaders respect the Constitution over their faith?

The answer was clearly "no", they did not. All of them knew but none of them objected to the closure of the 1st Amendment of the Constitution for their religion.

All of them clearly understanding my case, but none of them weighing in on the side of the Constitution. Would we expect Mitt Romney to be any different than Obama?

Is it any more clear that Obama has financed the Arab Springs with American military for the Muslim Brotherhood take over instituting Islam as a religion with over a billion dollars of support and blaming it when appearing on The David Letterman Show on one 'shady character' who produced a video,then what Mitt Romney did for his religion ignoring the 1st Amendment rights of all Americans in a controversial interruption or protest in his own religion?

Is there a concerted effort to uphold or replace the Constitution by these two men?

Obama was raised Muslim and pledged peace as a Muslim following Islam. Obama as shall we say 'Christian' has been very christian to the cause and power of Islam. America has seen a spike in the upset under Obama who claims our billion dollars was not even a wrinkle in the Muslim cause in Libya and Egypt but we all know without America's fire-power the shariah law would not be instituted as it is now in those countries.
Obama in his own words: http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=tCAffMSWSzY#t=28

One thing is very clear. Obama has never asked the Congress for a declaration of war in Libya, and Egypt which leads us to clearly understand that billions of dollars can cross the President's desk to any particular religion, and with the past experiences we have all suffered with Obama and Mitt Romney, they have both demonstrated the propensity to act according to their records of which I have elaborated.

There's only one problem with that. America doesn't fight religious wars because we are a Nation that respects all faiths. To ignore the principle in the office of the President is to invite disastrous consequences that the President does not need Congress's approval, and while we haven't respected the Constitution's demands for the office of the President, shall we just 'can' or 'fire' the whole Constitution and invite whatever chaos the world see's fit to bring or are we not obligated to uphold it as our Supreme Law of the Land?

We'll incarcerate anyone we want to for whatever reason we want, both Obama and Romney approve of NDAA ability to do just that and wouldn't change a thing, God forbid the wrong person actually round up Congress and incarcerate them all from the U.N. or wherever, we American's must resist the temptations of these indulgences and the immorality of our Constitution, and the world's clamor for us to join rather than lead.

Why not simply respect America's Constitution, and understand that instituting religions from the President's desk has disastrous consequences, and that defending our allies as Country's, comes when they are attacked by whoever attacks them, if they call for help and Congress approves it.

America is a Republic and that is what we pledge allegiance to. Our leaders and Representatives of Government, as well the United States Supreme Court take an oath to the Constitution, not to the President.

That is why Obama should be clearly disqualified as constitutionally eligible to serve as President or run as a candidate,by the United States Supreme Court, regardless of the power of the party. Let the party do with that ruling what they will, the Constitution is clear and so is Obama's lack of qualifications.

We'll deal with Mitt Romney after Obama is disqualified in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 set for conference Monday Sept 24th,2012 in the United States Supreme Court.

Now should a man be judged as ineligible based on his faith? Absolutely not.., but what he has done for his faith is quite another question especially when it deals with actions contrary to the morality or principles of the Constitution.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s30P-Gi12ns&feature=player_embedded




The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Cody Robert Judy for President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES

Obama's Long Certificate Forensically Exumed Jon Stewart by Cody Judy

While Article 2 Patriots are decried as racist by Dave Lettermen, Jon Stewart transforms the hate of Birthers to Longformers and is respected in journalistic integrity compared to other circus reporters; Cody Judy’s Cousins specialist in forensic exumination prove Obama’s long form birth certificate is really ?

Obama’s Long Certificate Forensically Exumed Jon Stewart by Cody Judy

Obama's Unlawful Constipation BirthersToilet- A Conversation With God

Obama's Unlawful Constipation BirthersToilet- A Conversation With God

Cody Judy hosting The Lion's Den Show gets caught with his pants down on the john without toilet paper, has a conversation with God about Birthers, Jon Stewart weighs in on the bowl, and Congresss is summoned for a verification hearing of Obama Qualification to acess Obama's long form birth certificate and parental heritage at the time of Obama's birth affirming Constitution's demand for 'natural born citizen'.




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6DbRnUlVms

Understanding the sanity behind the Restore Sanity Rally

How is it that a restoration of sanity in Washington DC rally would not include the qualifications of the President of the United States being tried by the U.S. Senate?
How is it that Republicans running for Congress would not vote to restore our Constitution?

How is it that our United States Constitution has become so far out of reach of even Republicans on this important issue? It’s as if they either don’t understand that a President has Veto power that will haunt them if they do gain control of the House and the Senate and the only way to retire Obama’s Pen is to literally arrest him from power, or they literally are running the greatest bluff game I've ever seen and will pounce hard on Obama Constitutionally when the elections over and that's their game plan all along.

When did it become sane to allow a president who is not a natural born citizen to pretend he is?

When did it become sane to allow zero accountability, and cloak transparency with a wall of secrecy?

When did it become sane to socialize America and forget about the freedom and liberty that has made her so great.

I fully hope that Jon Stewarts Restore Sanity Rally is recognized by America because if we don’t restore our Constitution and it’s simple qualifications for our President, we are simply underestimating our potential to say the least, and giving up on America at the worst.

One thing I do believe is that those thinking it would be so great to destroy America, shred the Constitution, and continue down the road of eliminating America’s Sovereignty, will find that when it comes down to it, ruling America isn’t all that its’ cracked up to be, because we American’s just are not really that good at being ruled by other Nations.

That’s why we have needed the U.S. Constitution in the first place; it was the guarantee of our rights as individuals that we call the independence of every individual that kept us in line.

I sure admire George Washington’s remarks when he said American Christians would rather die standing up, then submit kneeling down. I think those who seek to destroy our U.S. Constitution that is the heart of America will find the problems they face far outweigh the enjoyment, and that America is much better off as a free and independent Nation meant to be a beacon of hope, a light in the darkness, and a place where dreams come true.

So it is my advice to you who seek to destroy the United States by the pollution of our standard the United States Constitution, the 1 thing that brought our states together in harmony, that you will not rope is freedom and liberty and individual rights our Constitution demands. You will see that in trying to do so, the body of what you hoped to rope will dissolve from what you thought you had, into so many different states that the wholeness is not yours to gain.

Unfortunately for you, the very thing you hope to gain is only held together by our Constitution and in destroying it, as your doing with the pass you have given to Obama and McCain as far as being ‘qualified’ under our Constitution, though neither of them were, and every voter wither Republican or Democrat should be just as outraged that their vote was thrown away on a fraudulent unqualified candidate, your admiration of our strength will be a cruel disappointment and a bigger hassle then you could have ever possibly imagined. You will see exactly what I mean in a very short time if you understand sanity and can "see clearly" see "two videos' below" to understand.

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart	Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c
Rally to Restore Sanity and/or Fear Announcement
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor Rally to Restore Sanity

Cody Judy
www.codyjudy.us
YouTube CODE4PRES