Showing posts with label marriage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label marriage. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 19, 2014

LOSING THE LADIES- Can the USA Recover?

Featured News Update:
Just a little good news to share: Today approximately 1pm United States Representative Randy Neugebauer of the 19th District of Texas favorited a tweet I sent him with this referenced link: Dividing A Nation - The Republican Roll-Out as Birther Barrage Goes Mainstream. I replied to him how much I appreciated that "favoriting", (cept I think my phone got the closest word to it listed on my spell check..covorting..lol, I'm hoping he knew what I meant)my tweet continued, ' it means a lot to know there are Representatives who care for our U.S.C.'
Like CODY ROBERT JUDY'S NEW 2016 PAGE ON FACEBOOK HERE
Follow me on Twitter: Official Cody Robert Judy 2016 on Tweeter here

The second update today, mostly because this post has to do with the "Ladies", I want to give Robyn Wright a shout out today for what she said that Glenn Beck also reiterated on his broadcast this morning.

In her research for House of Cards she mentioned how sleezy Washington DC had really become, and specifically mentioned what a political-sex-trade-for-info place D.C. was stating media correspondents were regularly sleeping with their contacts for info she learned from her research on House of Cards. This is just testimonial evidence of the slime in the sewer, how sad not standing up for principles has become, but mostly how compromised the media has become losing their value along the way. This certainly is in dire need of being restored, but I want to thank Robyn her very brave comment. Truth is not always easy to admit but it certainly does set us free and lightens the load.

LOSING THE LADIES- Can the USA Recover?
The family unit is the core of any successful society, so I think its worth addressing as a core issue politically. Of course we've made some mistakes, but that doesn't prevent us from learning from them making our weaknesses strengths through a little more wisdom and understanding.

Somethings been on my mind and I've been thinking about it for awhile like a little chipmunk you'd watch on the fence post not quite knowing what to do with it. I've had a powerful observation point in a study some might think I'm not qualified to give any expertise upon, but as I've been observing Honey, no one is giving you good advice on a top to bottom self recognition of your character.

I did a little research project called," Why are divorced women losers?". Guaranteed if you google those words the majority of answers you're going to get back are coming from 'women' who are generating an income on 'Divorced Women' from some field they call themselves experts in, and the majority of them are looking from a perspective of your being a loser simply based on who fairs better coming out of a 'Divorce' financially, a year or four years after a divorce rather than focusing on the weakness of your character.

You see those highlighted words, those aren't just highlights of words, those are reading assignments. Here's the advice of 10 year professional divorce coach Claudia Broome in an example of what I'm saying, " “Women can’t bury their heads in the sand and pretend that divorce won’t happen to them. They must prepare for the worst case scenario and hope for the best case! They must do what it takes to protect themselves and they must let go of their idealism believing that they will be married forever. Women must not quit their jobs to stay at home with the children until they they have a post-nup in place.“

What's the point of my telling you something you don't want to hear, or worse yet thinking perhaps a lot less of me in hearing? Well, in one word, "Happiness". Whose your "Divorce Coach"? Is she a women that understands you so well? You know what I'm mean 10 to 1 all those 'little sayings' flying around on facebook are generated by women about how "he" 'should be' and 'what's wrong with him'posted by women who are not self reflecting anything but 'negativity', whining,disgruntled un-lady like qualities of character.

Lots of advice out there by women on how to be a gentlemen, problem is they aren't gentlemen, and your right I will never be a lady. So why should you take any advice from me? Well, any man who can school a women on bras you might want to listen to just a little, and I do have a psychology degree if you must know.

Cody Robert Judy — Original Red EBbra
ebbra.bigcartel.com
The Emergency Bra (EBbra) is a protective garment that can be easily and quickly be used as a gas-mask.
3 hours ago · Like · 2 ·
JoAnne Enlightened Consciousness Dang Cody.. I just got schooled in bras by a guy. Nice one.
· Unlike · 2













To that, I came across some good advice from a Doctor, but it wasn't generated just for women, but I think its really good advice for them:


If your going to find character in a man, you have first got to be able to identify it, and what better way then to identify it in yourself? So, you've decided to enter the business world and become a tycoon. Good for you, but now your faced with another dilemma right? Do you know what that is? Have you ever heard of "Power Divorces"?

Wow! What a surprise to find out “High-earning, professional women are the big losers in the divorce courts", and here's another professional, Brooke Kroeger whose going to tell you why”. The bottom line is when you get married and are successful, it works both ways, as far as the word 'half', or what Brooke called "legal hijinks for women". “‘ My husband gets part of this?’ is a typical question,”; “And the answer is yes.” The best recognition in the article reflects, “But it’s also unromantic to get a divorce.”.

Complaining is synonymous with failure, and guess what? Failure is associated with 'filing for a divorce' and guess whose doing the most of it? Its the same sex whose doing much more of the complaining in the first place. Ok, why not? Let's show you from another expert Cathy Meyer whose going to tell us, "Why Most Divorces are Filed by Women".

So, the answer if you were to become financially successful and independent as a women is the same advice you hate when it's being proposed by a man, " pre- or post-nuptial agreement ", because if someone loved you they wouldn't want one right? Well, the shoe fits on the other foot as, 'If you love him/her, it shouldn't matter' because your going to be together forever right?

Indeed fair minded people understand that marriage is indeed a agreement, and as it goes when its split its a financial agreement so why wouldn't you consider it going into the marriage, when both of you are going to consider it applicable as such if you fly out of it?

But that's not what I want to address in this article. I want to address the character traits mostly associated with divorce. If we don't address those character flaws in you how are you ever going to be successful, which is what I think a "Coach", or "Councilor" ought to be advising. Of course many won't seek counseling for one reason or the other, but the biggest reason maybe someone 'wants' to go to counseling in the 'hopes' of being proved 'right' and he should change 'his' ways...warm?

Two thirds of divorces are in fact initiated by women. That's an incredible number admitting failure in a marriage vow that states : " to be true to you in good times and in bad, in sickness and in health. I will love you and honor you all the days of my life."

So maybe we could figure this out together; self discovery is always the best way to change. What are the character traits needed by both sexes to be true to someone in good times and in bad times, in sickness and in health, and to love someone and honor them all the days of your life?

Its interesting in the study related in the above referenced article "Verbal Abuse", and "Emotional Neglect" are listed as the biggest reasons listed for women to file a divorce between the ages of 40 and 79.

"Physical abuse is easily identified. There is no doubt, once you have been hit, that you have been physically abused. You don’t second guess yourself because the bruises and scars are visible evidence that abuse has taken place. Verbal abuse is different. The damage is internal, there are no physical bruises or scars, just a wounded spirit and sense of self-esteem."

Do you remember "Stick and Stones may brake my bones but names and faces will never hurt me?" Of course unless you let them. No one can take away your self esteem unless you let them. That doesn't mean you have to get even, or let it sink in. That's always your choice. The best advice I received about 'verbal abuse' is 'let it run of your back like water runs off a ducks back". I've found it very necessary and useful advice

"Emotional intimacy is one of the most wonderful experiences we ever have. Nothing else really comes close to the experience of sharing our deepest thoughts and feelings with another, of being deeply seen and known, of sharing love, passion, laughter, joy, and/or creativity. The experience of intimacy fills our souls and takes away our loneliness."

Now when reading those would you guess they were written by a women, because I'm not sure 'emotional intimacy' would be written like that from a man's perspective, but I do know women can identify with it. So, how do I know women could identify with that is a good question, but the better one is why don't women understand that's not the definition for a man? I mean, in a hetrosexual question are you marrying a man or a women?

In honoring a man wouldn't it be more successful for you if you understood his perspective? How does this not involve becoming a "Lady" anymore? You want a "Gentleman", isn't it a pretty well understood theory that to earn one, you have to become the other? So, whose teaching our little girls to be "Ladies", for I see a whole lot of divorced Mom's teaching their sons how to be 'Gentleman'.

I'm not sure of the personal lives of these women I've quoted, but I do know I've been through three divorces and they were all filed first by the female/wife. I also remember I was the one who asked or proposed marriage to them. I've lost three estates, that's not a successful marital or financial record by any means. I have a life-long male friend. We're the same 48 years of age. He's never been married and just last week he was saying to me, there is one word that has prevented me from getting married; "Half".

Well, he doesn't mess around with pinning it down, but at first glance you'd say he's worried about losing his finances right? There is a deeper problem though. Let's go deeper then even your second guess, 'selfishness', right? Yes, lets go to the heart of it "Trust".

Now when women think of a 'trust issue' what's the brain teaser flying around in your head? He's a 'cheater' right? When a man thinks of a 'trust issue' what's the brain teaser more often? Whose doing better five years after the marriage is dissolved if neither have married up the financial chain? The "Trust" for a man is indeed the "Bank", shall we call it "The Family Bank & Trust".

You know there's books that could be written and are written, but the real point I want to make is really a question. How can a women help ease the 'trust uneasiness' of a guy in the understood qualities of a 'Lady'? Buried deep is understanding the differences in sexes in a real general aspect of testosterone, the majority of which has been given to the man in the order of "The Family Bank & Trust".

Women who are not "Ladies" don't understand in the slightest that "jealousy' while painful is quite a temporary while it lies in ignorance. The advice from women in the 1800's was quite different then the advice in the 21st Century, but has that advice really been the best financial advice? Leave because your heart broken he's had an affair?

What part of the trust was broken when he had an affair "Ladies"? A Lady provides every physical need for her Gentleman, because she understands her own "jealousy" does not help increase the bank, and simultaneously‎ understands that testosterone is worth a lot more sticking with him through an affair that your honoring rather than allowing it to deplete and ruin. Allowed to fester jealousy an insatiable thirst that will push a marriage into a bankruptcy or divorce.

Communication is indeed the 'key'. Ladies know how to find out what her man really wants and then to go about providing that. When you provide that kind of 'security' to a man, your worth and value is certainly unprecedented among women. If a man doesn't see that he really is blind. What I'm saying is if you can figure out as a "Lady" how to remove the reasons for a divorce, don't you think your marriage is going to last longer?

Traditionally, a women now days seeks the instant satisfaction of filing divorce. Generally that involves a lack of patience. Patience is a virtue or character trait. Understanding phases everyone goes through and comes out of is a part of being 'understanding' and 'wise'. Again these are character traits of a "Lady". Whose teaching these out of all the Divorce Coaches?

My Mom divorced my Dad when I was four years old. She was a professional women, that had no idea or clue what she was doing to her children in that decision. It was all about 'herself' and 'changing' and 'showing' him. Did she have any idea she was wiping out her children's inheritance for a life-time of work at the time she was filing? No, she didn't, but she does now.

While in todays world the reasons for a divorce have been coached and manipulated by those who stood to gain financially from divorce, lawyers, divorce coaches, even councilors, it is very rare that the character of a "Lady" is respected and honored by all those giving advice.

This has made the value of a real "Lady" something men have almost lost hope in. Indeed, the character traits involved in the following verses describe what all women need to become "Ladies". Why would any women read the following and think it wasn't for her? While this was written quite some time ago, it seems just as true today, and the failures of filing for divorce are easily seen as a lack of honor for 'principles' much more than not being honored. Honor is earned through a life of 'principles', so go out an earn what you think your worth. It really is up to you and what you can show of yourself being a "Lady". When that is held in front of your vision your self esteem is not so shallow but grows deep as a fresh rewarding well of eternal principles.

You've heard it said a little faith can move mountains, well, a women who is a "Lady" can move a man over great distances. Ask yourself where is that advice on how to become and be a "Lady" and where would you go to find such?

Proverbs 31:10-31
10b A wife of noble character who can find? She is worth far more than rubies. (self esteem rising as your appreciated for what?)

11 Her husband has full confidence in her and lacks nothing of value. (Trust in the Family Bank based in Principles)

12 She brings him good, not harm,all the days of her life. (She doesn't gossip or back bite him with anyone, and never would think of stabbing in the back with her mouth. She's true to him)

13 She selects wool and flax and works with eager hands. (Humm.. looks like she can still be a professional and work??

14 She is like the merchant ships,bringing her food from afar.

15 She gets up while it is still night;she provides food for her family and portions for her female servants. (If you don't have help in the house cleaning etc., because your poor whose fault is that? What do you have to give that's no skin off your nose?)

16 She considers a field and buys it;out of her earnings she plants a vineyard. (Wow,she's successful in her own so much she's got a little extra to do something for an increase for her family and the Family Bank & Trust)

17 She sets about her work vigorously;her arms are strong for her tasks (Looks like the Gym isn't excluded or keeping in shape)

18 She sees that her trading is profitable,and her lamp does not go out at night. ( Love isn't something that slacks, is lacking in energy or has a headache, ideas to please or protect in a wise way are much easier when you open your arms to include rather then exclude.)

19 In her hand she holds the distaff and grasps the spindle with her fingers. ( Using your head and understanding you can't do it all, is not a downfall, its a wisdom in recognizing facts and getting the help you need)

20 She opens her arms to the poor and extends her hands to the needy. (this is always a wonderful thing to be able to do instead of hoarding with fear that have away of playing their hand out if you are'nt choosing the principles that breed success. Fear most always follows with failure.)

21 When it snows, she has no fear for her household; for all of them are clothed in scarlet. ( Sounds like dressing nice is still in fashion. You don't have to dress poorly to be humble)

22 She makes coverings for her bed; she is clothed in fine linen and purple. (When you act like a Lady you dress like one and a man sure notices)

23 Her husband is respected at the city gate,where he takes his seat among the elders of the land. (Character seems to attract character here)

24 She makes linen garments and sells them,and supplies the merchants with sashes. (Isn't this using your head and using your industriousness as a tool rather than a handicap?)

25 She is clothed with strength and dignity; she can laugh at the days to come.(Interesting that clothing is referred here as character traits. How can you be clothed in 'strength' if your giving into the whims of 'jealousy'? How can dignity come to you if you haven't risen above the call of what most women might crack to because they didn't have the slightest idea of how to be a "Lady"? How can laughter come facing our weaknesses as we laugh at ourselves for silly tendencies that are petty while we are indeed recognizing the sort is increasing your strengths in every field you can possibly imagine?

26 She speaks with wisdom,and faithful instruction is on her tongue. ("Why would anyone get married?" said a great leader of women? Nancy Pelosi - A former Speaker of the House and a Representative? A shocking understanding of the happiness of a family which is the unit of any successful society she admits its because you found someone irresistible and that they had to get married.)

27 She watches over the affairs of her household and does not eat the bread of idleness. (Being attentive to every need requires actually an open conversation of a man's real feelings which you need to be able to digest in fairness. Having it your way all the time isn't really fair right? Ignoring your husbands' feelings is eating the bread of idleness."

28 Her children arise and call her blessed;her husband also, and he praises her: ( The long term is in her sites as well as the short term and you consider this seriously, and find ways to overcome the insatiable negatives that will deprive you and your children of everything rewarding.)

29 “Many women do noble things,but you surpass them all.” (In the long haul, you find what is needed to make it work finding the honor you desire. That brings more self esteem which is a rich reward! Nothing easy is worth much, so honor yourself by honoring your vow.)

30 Charm is deceptive, and beauty is fleeting;but a woman who fears the Lord is to be praised.

31 Honor her for all that her hands have done,and let her works bring her praise at the city gate. (Honoring a women for being a "Lady" is very much an earned character that every women can become, and its within your grasps. Make it so with all your decisions. )

So, when was the last time you whispered in your spouses ear?
Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy

For more articles, pieces, and thoughts Cody Robert Judy has written on dating,relationships,and marriage type those words in the search box located in the top right hand corner search box.


Like CODY ROBERT JUDY'S NEW 2016 PAGE ON FACEBOOK HERE
Follow me on Twitter: Official Cody Robert Judy 2016 on Tweeter here

You Can Help Me [ If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign”, or ABC Campaign ,which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President please make a contributions here:

We pray for the Lord to save our Country and restore America from the dilapidation we now find ourselves, and the principles of the Constitution in. For this I am Taking A Stand.

Sincerely, Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us www.codyjudy.blogspot.com YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES TV Get Cody's Book: Taking A Stand

P.S.
I want all to know my desire is simply to uphold our Constitution. It is the law by which I know we all will be blessed against all odds. Now enjoy the new song I wrote, performed, and produced. Crank it up and Enjoy! WHEN LOVE'S IN THE RAIN http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stFyfFMQT-M





















Tuesday, January 21, 2014

Being a Marriage Defender Every Day and Being Single


Last night I had a dream that was kind of interesting. I was a professor teaching a class on marriage and being a defender of marriage. Well, its interesting because I'm single and have failed three marriages, but I certainly enjoyed each and every one of them.

I've had the good fortune to be married to three very beautiful women and I wouldn't have gotten a divorce from any of them. I loved marriage and the concept of working together. Life's not to bad being single with a child I watch 50/50 and my X and I get along pretty good. In fact I got a bag of home-made chocolate chip cookies this morning. Who could complain about that as far as an ex-wife? We both work at what we have left very hard.

Ecclesiastes 4:9-10 Two are better than one; because they have a good reward for their labour. For if they fall , the one will lift up his fellow: but woe to him that is alone when he falleth ; for he hath not another to help him up.

While our society seems overwhelmed with divorce now, and I've been through three of them, I still believe in love and I still believe in marriage. I've never regretted any of my marriages and have learned so much from each one of them.

One of the things I believe about marriage that is taxing us is an unhealthy picture of what a "marriage" really is. Unrealistic expectations I belive are severely handicapping marriages and those expectations are cultivating a divorced-happy state.

While our society may be slow, I don't think we are all that dumb. Its true that with a divorce comes a split up of the economic pile that is certainly devastating. Some say 90% of divorces are rooted in some kind of finance or money problems.

Some say 90% of married women claim its their mother-in-law as far as being the biggest bone of contentions.

Others say we never marry who we truly love, maybe having something to do with the above two thoughts on 90%?

One thing that is 100% true is that "high expectations" of marriage leads to divorce. Believing someone is never going to change, or hoping someone does faster then their own pace is a big part of those 'unrealistically high expectations'. I love Eddie Murphy's gig on Lowered expectations.

The truth about the ease of which 'falling in love' happens, and the simultaneous work that marriage is certainly gets lost in teaching. Everyone from parents to professors seems to mix up the messages of marriages to the point that over 50% don't work in our modern world.

The reasons they don't work are of course multi-faceted but readily can be grouped into a lack of defense of marriage. Marriage is certainly meant for two however in our 'high expectations' the reasons we 'justify' a divorce has contributed to that lack of defense.

Most people getting a divorce are so focused on a particular problem, they have no clue what being single and or divorced down the road 5, 10, 15 and even 50 years down the road will mean, and the problems they will face not being married.

Inheritences get squandered by step-families, children grow up disolutioned about one parent or the other that leads to marital problems themselves, and of course the finances get split and a double dip in everything takes place from the tooth brush to a child's bed if children are involved.

One doesn't really think about needing help or assistance to the car or to the bathroom for that matter as we get older but one thing is clear, without a partner being alone can be very hard in many ways, and in many situations, circumstances, and ages.

One of the things I do see changing is what I call 'the evolution of the marriage expectation' where maintaining a friend for life in a marriage is taught to be more important than keeping what people "think" marriage should be today as a standard for justifying or getting a divorce.

Its easy to say I'm gonna divorce his ass if he/she has an affair on me, much harder to say, I know marriage is more then a sexual act that last 15 minutes a day with the remaining 23 hours and 45 minutes to think about. He/She is a person growing who has maintained a friendship with me and that in my marriage is the "gold" or most valuable character of it, and I'm not threatened by a sexual encounter.

With many states opening up to same-sex marriage, indeed a revolution is happening that might just help hetrosexual marriages to understand or see something about the value of 'partnership' over 'expectations that disolve' a marriage.

Multi personed marriages known as polygamy or Polyandry for that matter are nothing short of a group effort on the finances that make things easier on everyone perhaps 23 hours of the day and the one hour of the day around intimacy is agreed upon and worked out.

We have a whole generation that needs to be taught how to swing with a few things for an hour to make the 23 hours in the day a little easier for everyone involved. I mean, who really says "no" to easing the house payments, car payments, bills to perhaps seasonal vacations!

The logic is overtaking our tendencies of jealousy, greed, and splitting hairs, and its looking like a good thing. Imagine as a society the able bodied welfare state of single people, which is by far the fastest growing in the food stamp and welfare line believe it or not, decreasing and society not having to annie up because 2 or 3 bedrooms just got filled in every house in America as Marriage Groups started pulling their resources instead of dividing them up?

Some people will say "God will never go for it?" using religion as a back-bone for refusing the logic, but indeed in the Bible of what most Christians hold to, God is certainly much more understanding and frugal with the marriage for groups such as Abraham had or many other prophets of old.

In the secular world those apposed must simply drop back on the old pernicious ideaology of "greed","jealosy", and a hoarding of wealth. The very concepts that fall short of christain principles that deplore such selfishness.

Indeed in many things like a house,car,schooling, or vacation, independents just isn't cutting it and most are severly lacking in what could be a more comfortable existence. If people looked at their marriage as more of a friendship that was going to give them much more then a divorce every would, I think we would start seeing people understand the value of marriage that uplifts rather the destructive force of divorce that splits.

In my dream being a 'marriage defender every day' was something that was seen as valuable. An understanding that we as people need to be much more responsible and understanding to other people's growth sexually at different times in ones life within marriage then we are now is not a marriage problem its an education problem and its one that we had better figure a positive solution to quick because social security, medicare, and medicaid simply can not sustain the pride, greed, and plain ole 'selfishness' so many are implementing and teaching their children by their actions now.

I could probably write a book on this and there are many, but where the shoe meets the pavement is about as down to earth as I am and plainly all the divorces are not serving us well.

Maybe its time to re-think the parameters of marriage and value the 23 hours over the one hour that's the problem by defending marriage every day?

I'm single but I do appreciate what marriage is and the value of it. I've never been afraid of marriage but I am afraid of the "small things" that are tending to break marriages up now days. I'm not afraid of taking the vows of marriage but I am afraid of an unrealistic expectation of marriage that procludes a different stages in my life I am going to have to go through.

I've never been afraid of wisdom and understanding, but I am afraid of un-wise judgements and mis-understandings that handicap me in a financtual state. The resulting condition have men on the run and women just really pissed off about marriage.

Maybe we should step back take a deep breath and start communicating what really is bothering us. If you are married, value that like gold, use the power of understanding and love that brought you together in the first place. Always assume the worse, and realize you wouldn't divorce your child; work it out. Indeed the worst most often isn't the end of the world, and the sun comes up another day.

Keep your friendship going, and nurture and promote with encouragement growth understanding phases and habits don't always last forever and age catches up to us all.


Thanks for your time, and I hope if anything that I could be a positive force in our world today for the love that Jesus Christ has offered and shown to me I see as a gift of mercy for all my weaknesses and imperfections. I certainly am clear on one thing and 100% positive of it, love is the greatest power and force on the earth that exist. When its employed mirracles happen.

Please enjoy some winter fun I've had in the two videos one of me and my son tubing and one of my day skiing up to Park City during the Sundance Independent Film Festival. Indeed over the 30 years a dream has been fullfilled of Robert Redford as a place for independents to come together in a love Utah is very proud of.

Utah is a beautiful state with beautiful imperfect people just like any other taking it one day at a time.


Check out the little Independent Film I made yesterday sking up at Park City during the Sundance Independent Film Festival in Park City! It was fun!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UlyYKiSidMA



Radical Tubing Fun to open up our Sundance Film Festival Festivities! Check it out - its totally TUBULAR! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=srkTkdeSlEs



Just a little politics on the side here to let you know how you can help and what's up.

The Coasting Code-Care Act


Breaking: Breaking News : Orrin Hatch R - U.S Senator from Utah and Mitch McConnell R- U.S. Senator from Kentcky just requested two sheriffs kits produced by Michael Volin of WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com (WOBC) with the purpose of informing the public and elected officials of the forgery of the long-form birth certificate image posted since April 27, 2011 on the White House website. These kits (Get Yours Free Here) contain the same evidence released in March 1,2012 (and a little more) that I included in my case against Obama that went from Georgia State- Georgia State Supreme- to U.S. Supreme 12-5276 in Judy v. Obama.

Please urge and encourage your Representatives to OPEN AND TRANSPARENT HEARINGS in the House of Representatives on Obama's eligibility as the solution to eliminating Obamacare. These hearings must be held and the evidence must be heard that are in the Sheriff's kits most all of the Representatives have received now.

If these hearings are conducted in the open and reported in the open, the evidence will mount collectively and the U.S. Senate although it has a majority of Democrats will have to concede to the facts and evidences or will be seen as completely unfit for their duties and as incompetent. Utah would most likely see more benefits come from supporting the Candidates like myself, (well, Candidate as myself because there were no other candidates in the entire U.S.A. who stood up for principle regardless of party), fighting for equal protections under the law in pushing for Open and Transparent Hearings in Congress with two million dollars on Obama's Verification Eligibility qualification hearings on the stage to remove him as a disability according to Amend 14, Sec.3 would be a lot faster solution.

Like CODY ROBERT JUDY'S NEW 2016 PAGE ON FACEBOOK HERE
Follow me on Twitter: Official Cody Robert Judy 2016 on Tweeter here

You Can Help Me [ If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign”, or ABC Campaign ,which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President please make a contributions here:

Let me now wish everyone a very happy and warm New Year as we pray for the Lord to save our Country and restore America from the dilapidation we now find ourselves and the principles of the Constitution in, for this I am Taking A Stand.

Sincerely, Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us www.codyjudy.blogspot.com YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES TV Get Cody's Book: Taking A Stand




















Friday, January 10, 2014

Part III. Obama/ Holder FED's OPEN FIRE on Utah Governor's Declaration to State Agencies to HAULT 1300 SAME-SEX Marriages

Part III. Obama/ Holder FED's OPEN FIRE on Utah Governor's Declaration to State Agencies to HAULT 1300 SAME-SEX Marriages

The great shake-up continued in Utah today with the same-sex marriage war as Attorney General Eric Holder under the executive hand of Obama at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue representing the Federal Government just said the 1300 marriages performed, that the Governor of Utah stated yesterday would not be recognized by his state agencies, would be recognized by the Federal Government. Video here of the announcement.


Rush Limbaugh just featured it on his show comparing the Feds engaging in executive orders of this kind, like Obama would, basically waving a magic wond saying the Governors words in his own state should be “moot”. The Governors of the individual States represent the executive branch of the State, as Obama represents the executive branch of the Federal Government and typically it falls on the executive branch to be the “enforcer of the law” while the Judicial Branch represents the “interpetation” of the law and the legislative branch represents the “law makers”.

Jan 8th,2014, the State Representative LaVar Christensen, original sponsor of Utah's Amendment 3 that actually became part of Utah's Constitution Rod Arquette show made the argument that Utah’s Referendum passed in 2004 declaring “marriage” to be only between a man and women was simply an insurance policy of the inalienable rights assured under the laws of nature that God had given as was previously discussed in Part I and Part II of this saga.

That the ‘marriage’ statute of the State was not given by man, but was a right given by God was the argument Utah State Rep. Christensen made, basically stating it was well within the State's right to legislate morality and it did. He mentioned the Creator in the Declaration of Independence, "Under God" in the pledge of allegiance as examples of our Nation being a Christian centered nation with the laws of morality coming as inalienable rights. Of course the Constitution says very little about “married couples”, but says a whole lot about protecting ‘individual rights’ regardless of race, color, or previous conditions of servitude.

Citizen(s) is/are determined to be those born or naturalized in the United States, which takes ‘gender’ out of the discrimination line ,Amendment 19, and it does say in Amendment 14, Sect 1. , that “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States, nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protections of the laws.” The protections of the laws or benefits to ‘married couples’ then must be equally accessible to every citizen without a bias of religion or gender. “Marriage” of course has nothing to do with the rights of procreation under inalienable rights. God has granted the rights of a women to get pregnant within a marriage contract or without, which we then would ascribe as a ‘natural law’ verses say a state statute of marriage.

The word “Marriage” has been used for thousands of years to describe a union of a man and women where the wife would represent the female part of that marriage, however, concubine also goes back thousands of years to describe a union of a man and a women as in Abraham’s time in the Bible as the the legislature brought the “moral” aspect of the Biblical Christian nature of our nation was founded upon into his interview with Mr. Arquette.

As I’ve listened to Rod Arquette on his shows about this issue, as he has admitted himself, this issue is to him about like stuffing a whole chicken down his throat with the feathers on. He is compassionate to all people, but really guards that word “marriage” to be only used by a man and a women. There is nothing however in the words “Same-Sex Marriage” that is shared with “Hetrosexual Marriage” accept the word “marriage”. Sodomy, Adultry, Fornication, and intercourse all share in their communication or understanding the word “Sex” depending upon who’s saying it to whom. The abbreviation of the word Book Of Mormon (B.O.M) does not infringe upon the word BOMB. The point of course is it wouldn't be the first time the State of Utah as represented by authorities was wrong, mistaken, or in other words had just hooked up the cinch to the bridle of the horse. Yeah, it doesn't go there.

If you were anti-mormon you could say the B.O.M. was a flop or wasn’t considered a cannon in your religious opinon, or if you were mormon you might say the B.O.M. was dynomite in your opinion and argue it was a cannon of religion. Of course if this were argued in a church meeting the factual evidence would declare the truth, but you have to understand the State of Utah has in more then one instance denied facts like these and in a completely dillusional state of mind incarcerated a person(s) before, for over eight years.

That’s not a joke folks, but it was the subject of Jon Stewarts Daily Show in a comedy show here 'Putting the Con back in Congress :



In the 9th Century BC the prophet Elijah proposes a direct test of the powers of Baal and Yahweh. The people of Israel, 450 prophets of Baal, and 400 prophets of Asherah are summoned to Mount Carmel. Two altars are built, one for Baal and one for Yahweh. Wood is laid on the altars. Two oxen are slaughtered and cut into pieces; the pieces are laid on the wood. Elijah then invites the priests of Baal to pray for fire to light the sacrifice. They pray from morning to noon without success. Elijah ridicules their efforts. They respond by cutting themselves and adding their own blood to the sacrifice (such mutilation of the body was strictly forbidden in the Mosaic law). They continue praying until evening without success.

Elijah's offering is consumed by fire from heaven in a stained glass window at St. Matthew's German Evangelical Lutheran Church in Charleston, South Carolina

Elijah now orders that the altar of Yahweh be drenched with water from "four large jars" poured three times (1 Kings 18:33–34). He asks God to accept the sacrifice. Fire falls from the sky, consuming the water, the sacrifice and the stones of the altar itself as well. Elijah seizes the moment and orders the death of the prophets of Baal. Elijah prays earnestly for rain to fall again on the land. Then the rains begin, signaling the end of the famine.

I hope Rod Arquette and the Utah Legislatures and Governor don’t start cutting on themselves and throwing themselves off of tall buildings as the fire from Washington DC in Obama and Holder comes down to them, when they themselves have been unwilling to uphold the United States Constitution in Obama’s eligiblity choosing rather to sacrifice over 2 million dollars in the defense of the referendum of 2004 and certainly all of the money that went in to getting it past as well.

The first amendment certainly guarantees the freedom of speech and it seems Utah’s referendum of 2004 deals more with semantics rather than ‘laws of nature’ which we would consider inalienable rights given by God, so I think there is more in the Constitution that requires the State to recognize the rights of every individual’s preference to a union of our species as citizens under the Constitution or Supreme Law of the Land.

Now, our Constitution includes “Citizens” so I don’t think those people who want to marry their cat or dog or horse should be given a marriage licence with the full benefits of federal and state agency protections under the law. The cat, dog, and horse are not ‘citizens’ upon which the Constitution applies.

Indeed in another analogy Rod Arquette and the State of Utah law makers and Governor have ignored the laws of nature and not had any problem with endorsing Obama as “President” , even though he is not a ‘Natural Born Citizen’ qualified under the Constitution’s demand for the Office of the President which is the only difference actually distinguishing in the Constitution’s language for the Office of the President from U.S. Reps, and U.S. Senators whose designation is "Citizen".

If discrimination is the word for "different age qualifications" use it as you will, there are differences in qualifications afforded to us for very good and well thought out reasons standing as principles of the Constitution. In short, a ‘natural born citizen’ requires two full generations void of alien citizenship to be the commander in chief of the armies and President of the United States. The distinction was put in place to prevent a foreign dictator from placing an heir in the position. A Qualification for an office is indeed a legal discrimination, but if you'll notice it wasn't based on race, color, or previous conditions of servitude, or gender.

If a person is born in the United States to Citizen parents, there is a two generation protection. That protection, considered to be a national security measure, was respected until Obama usurped the office against Laws of Nations mentioned in Article I, Sect. 8 for which Congress is given charge stating : “ and Offenses against the Law of Nations;”. Capitals not paraphrased.

The United States can not afford not to recognize the 'natural born citizen' clause of the demand for the Office of the President regardless of race, color, or previous conditions of servitude or gender. Just because Obama is black doesn't mean that he doesn't have to be a natural born citizen to be president and at least 35 years of age.

Utah’s only defense on the enforcement of the Federal dictation would be that Obama is not a qualified enforcer of federal law that is recognized by the States under the United States Constitution agreed upon by the States in the Union.

This of course would be like throwing the book at Obama who has taken it upon himself to line item veto any part of Obamacare ruling by edict, and it would actually be a recognition of the law of the Constitution upon the Office of the President, void Obamacare, and certainly would be a notable charge for the State’s rights to at least recognize their own authority upon their state agencies.

Of course Governor Gary Herbert could I suppose still authorize the Driver's License bureau in Utah not to change the drivers liscenses of those seeking a change due to the same-sex marriage recognition of 1300 couples as well as insurance policies etc., but that is an uphill fight that I believe he will come out on the losing end of because so much is afforded in individual rights that has not been recognized in Utah.

Now I like my Utah Governor Gary Herbert, I sure do. I think him to be an honorable and reasonable man. I believe he works his tail end off for Utah and I believe in his heart he is doing what he believes is the will of the people in Utah. What I do think is missing in this argument is an understanding of the argument for the people.

You get a crowd going in one direction its not likely that each individual has had the time or the argument laid out for them as a Judge might.

That's exactly what happened with Obama in fact, and how we got a usurpation of the Office of the President. The crowd got excited about a first black president, and the media loved the story even more than the wisdom of the law. Its one of the most important aspects of the United States Constitution and Utah's Constitution also, those of the rights of the individual over the mob or crowd.

That is a fundamental paradigm shifts of the power of the United States Citizen that the world has stood in shock over. However, any right can be violated if Good Men do nothing and refuse to take a stand, which is another reason Obama still resides at 16oo Pennsylvania Avenue and our Nation is distressed and stretched domestically so far from the United States Constitution that unlawful prosecutions take place and the rights of many are trampled under foot by those who believe themselves to be appointers of the law but not subjects to the law as has almost become common place in America now days.

What I do know is the days have come when no man can live on barrowed light and that each and every individual must search out for themselves the wisdom of the Constitution which I continually find sound and admire in its simplicity,direction, and course. Our forefathers knew that to have a Nation full of diverse religions wouldn't necessarily be easy, but it would be worth it, and that is why Congress it was said, "must not make any law respecting a particular establishment of religion" and why marriage should be afforded to any consenting citizen according to the age particulars afforded by the States Laws in which they reside, and why I not only think Utah's Referendum was wrong and indeed is unconstitutional, but why the 1887 Edmunds-Tucker Act of the United States Congress is just as equally wrong and unconstitutional. So if Holder feels it necessary to over-turn a Utah Referendum about marriage let him not be a hypocrit and not overturn that Federal Referendum or Act of Congress.

Breaking: Breaking News : Orrin Hatch R - U.S Senator from Utah and Mitch McConnell R- U.S. Senator from Kentcky just requested two sheriffs kits produced by Michael Volin of WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com (WOBC) with the purpose of informing the public and elected officials of the forgery of the long-form birth certificate image posted since April 27, 2011 on the White House website. These kits (Get Yours Free Here) contain the same evidence released in March 1,2012 (and a little more) that I included in my case against Obama that went from Georgia State- Georgia State Supreme- to U.S. Supreme 12-5276 in Judy v. Obama.

Please urge and encourage your Representatives to OPEN AND TRANSPARENT HEARINGS in the House of Representatives on Obama's eligibility as the solution to eliminating Obamacare. These hearings must be held and the evidence must be heard that are in the Sheriff's kits most all of the Representatives have received now.

If these hearings are conducted in the open and reported in the open, the evidence will mount collectively and the U.S. Senate although it has a majority of Democrats will have to concede to the facts and evidences or will be seen as completely unfit for their duties and as incompetent. Utah would most likely see more benefits come from supporting the Candidates like myself, (well, Candidate as myself because there were no other candidates in the entire U.S.A. who stood up for principle regardless of party), fighting for equal protections under the law in pushing for Open and Transparent Hearings in Congress with two million dollars on Obama's Verification Eligibility qualification hearings on the stage to remove him as a disability according to Amend 14, Sec.3 would be a lot faster solution.

Like CODY ROBERT JUDY'S NEW 2016 PAGE ON FACEBOOK HERE
Follow me on Twitter: Official Cody Robert Judy 2016 on Tweeter here

You Can Help Me [ If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign”, or ABC Campaign ,which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President please make a contributions here:

Let me now wish everyone a very happy and warm New Year as we pray for the Lord to save our Country and restore America from the dilapidation we now find ourselves and the principles of the Constitution in, for this I am Taking A Stand.

Sincerely, Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us www.codyjudy.blogspot.com YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES TV Get Cody's Book: Taking A Stand









Friday, January 3, 2014

The Axe-Grinding Propelling Utah's Self Inflicted Injury In a Rush of Same-Sex Marriage?



The Axe-Grinding Propelling Utah's Self Inflicted Injury In Marriage?
Featured Editorial at The Post & Email

The eyes of the Nation fell on Utah as the first same-sex weddings in Utah were held a week ago today,(which just happened to be my birthday Dec 27th) just hours after Federal Judge, the Honorable Shelby, ruled the state's 2004 Referendum banning same-sex marriage was unconstitutional. The R-Governor of Utah Gary Herbert was quick to draw his axe saying he'd use his power "to defend traditional marriage within the state's borders" calling the Judge an 'activist' attempting to override the will of the people of Utah.
What Utah residence that voted for the referendum might find shocking is the same so-called "conservative leaders" including their Governor,U.S. Senator's and Congressmen in the greatest breach of the Constitution's history, have in fact been siding with the 'activist' agenda and doing pretty much anything and everything to see to it that the "transformation agenda" was carried out in supporting Obama's eligibility that is contrary to the United States Constitution's qualification requirements for a President, and in fact the U.S. Supreme Court Justice whose seat was filled by none other then Obama's recommendation.
Sotomayor handles emergency requests from Utah as well as other Rocky Mountain states.

Now Utah's people, (less then a dozen whom voted for the Presidential Candidate who challenged not only Obama's Eligibility in 2012 and 2013 in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 that included the legal Sheriff's Report of over 2500 hours of investigation stating Obama's Long form Birth Certificate was a proven fabrication, but also McCain's in 2008 in Judy v. McCain living in their own backyard), find themselves fighting for the very hair of marriage. Is it irony the whole state of Utah now finds they're subjects of one of the Justices Obama nominated in Justice Sotomeyer in their State Attorney General's appeal that will easily cost the state at the very least two million dollars?

Utah's no stranger to the political campaigns of Cody Robert Judy (myself). No Sirree, I ran in 2002 for the 1st Congressional District, and 3 times for the U.S. Senate Seat: 2000 Judy v. Hatch, 2004 Judy v. Bennett and in 2010 Judy v. Bennett again, as my book Taking A Stand recalls in detail.

The Utah Referendum known as Amendment 3 in 2004 was passed by 65.86% stated as follows: 1) Marriage consists only of the legal union between a man and a woman. 2) No other domestic union, however denominated, may be recognized as a marriage or given the same or substantially equivalent legal effect.

The referendum was sold as a bill of goods that its proponents said would do 3 things:
1)Prevent state courts from making a ruling that current Utah marriage legislation as being unconstitutional.
2)Prevent state courts from forcing recognition of out-of-state marriages.
3)Prevent the creation of "counterfeit marriages", such as civil unions.
They also said the amendment would not hurt heterosexual marriage, common law marriages, or the right to will property to whomever one wishes.

In one chop Federal District Judge Shelby found, in a case brought by two gay men (which were different people from the two people in Utah who voted for Cody Robert Judy in 2012), making the claim that "the state law violated their right to equal protection and due process under the U.S. Constitution",that the state's current laws deny its gay and lesbian citizens their fundamental right to marry and, in so doing, demean the dignity of these same-sex couples for no rational reason," Shelby asserted and "Accordingly, the court finds that these laws are unconstitutional."

This is a perfect case scenario to illustrate that "The Will of the People" in a particular State does not always over-turn "The Republic" based on the U.S. Constitution's "Will of the People" if indeed you considered the will of the 593,297 people voting in Utah as slightly higher then the 2 gay men stating their rights were being infringed plus the one judge who interpreted it as so. So, if your going to remember the rights of 2 gay men in Utah why won't you remember my rights and standing as a Presidential Candidate having standing in my damaged campaign based on Obama's ineligibility? That's the idea in a Constitution Republic. The will of the people is reined in when their will over-rides the law. It is possible for the majority's will to supersede the laws of the Constitution and Obama's Campaign is a perfect example of this happening when no court would even hear me.

The heavily populated LDS or Mormon state of Utah wants the marriages to stop while it appeals a judge's decision, which said banning gay couples from marrying violates their right to equal treatment under the law.

Its an interesting argument to wonder if the minority communities such as the gay and lesbian circles would ask their rights be upheld to marry, but yet spurn a court or Congress who heard my campaigns plight based upon the Constitution's requirement for a natural born citizen in the Office of the President who was born in the U.S. to Citizen parents to which there was never a doubt, (Minor v. Happersett), or in matters of national security do they feel leaving some doubt is okay and my campaign doesn't deserve to be treated fairly under the law?

Is it your minority and your rights until you get them, and then forget or spurn anyone's when it comes to a trial on Obama's eligibility I'd ask the 900 gay couples who rushed off and got hitched in Utah? Don't forget I ran as a Democrat and had claim on Obama's eligibility in 2012 through my 2008 claim as well without being bogged down with the 'racist' argument those who gave McCain a pass on inherited from the Main Stream Media.

Back to the case on the rights of every individual to life,liberty, and pursuit of happiness, which I think is a better argument then attacking the 'statute' of the State to marry. I've long held the State should get out of the 'mariage' business and into the civil-union business leaving 'marriage' for the churches. As long as the State's like Utah fight for a statute of the state on 'marriage', ever citizen has claim on the statute sponsored by the state regardless of gender.

The legal argument of getting the state out of the marriage business and into the civil union business for all, should be the law that Congress should "make no law respecting the establishment of any particular religion", held in the First Amendment "or prohibiting the free exercise thereof", but if they are determined on it the arguments get really weak when it comes to claiming some kind of utopia for a child raised by a mother and a father especially with a mockery of the utopia that the 60% divorce rate in the country blast out of the water.

Lawyers ask Supreme Court to allow same-sex unions in Utah
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/01/03/lawyers-ask-supreme-court-to-allow-same-sex-unions-in-utah/

"Attorney Peggy Tomsic said the state's request for an emergency stay on same-sex unions should be denied because Utah has not demonstrated how the weddings are harming anyone else. The state has also failed to show it will likely win an appeal of the Dec. 20 ruling from a federal judge, she said."

"Tomsic wrote that the state's' "hodgepodge of articles that purportedly show that same-sex parents are inferior to opposite-sex parents" is not only false, but fails to address the constitutional issues addressed in the ruling."

"Utah state attorneys argue that children are best raised by a mother and father in a good relationship. Tomsic, who represents three gay and lesbian couples from Utah, countered that argument by saying gay and lesbian couples can also be good parents."

"Respondents agree with applicants that marriage provides enormous benefits for children," Tomsic wrote, "But excluding the children of same-sex couples from those benefits causes severe harm to those children, without providing any benefit to the children of opposite-sex parents."

"Utah insists that states have the authority to define marriage as between a man and woman. Tomsic argues that the state's rationale for asking for a halt to the same-sex marriages doesn't make sense."

"Applicants cannot simultaneously concede that being stripped of one's marital status causes profound, irreparable harm and urge the Court to inflict that very injury on the married Respondents and other married same-sex couples," Tomsic said."

One of the state of Utah's major papers The Deseret News ran an op-ed declaring the actions of Honorable Shelby to be nothing more than "Judicial Tyranny" and a mighty big case of ignoring "precedent" and "rational arguments'.

I'd ask The Deseret News, "How's that feel?", as they bewail the plight of "not even being heard" because of summary judgement while they have neglected the very tenant of the Constitution on Obama's Eligibility that if upheld in a conservative way would not have got them where they're at?

The tepid argument that Republicans cannot do anything with a majority in the House with Obama's Eligibility flies in the face of the check and balance system we have, and the House is the bigger part of that 'check' as they cut the finances for the Government to run. If the House had a transparent and open hearing on Obama's eligibility framed without the error that Obamacare has become infamous for, the Senate would look like the greatest bunch of incontinent elders the world has ever seen to deny the facts and rational argument.

As you can see, its difficult to sympathize with leaders and proponents whose opinions and beliefs are so devastatingly easy to slice as fulsome. It does seem a bit odd that Utah has come under the spotlight as a beacon of leadership under the "marriage umbrella" as to represent conservatism when adjusting the marital norms that have served society for millennia in face of the reputation of christian polygamy practiced for more than a millennia in the Bible with the accounts of Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses,David, Solomon, and certainly Joseph Smith and Brigham Young.

Its a wonder the State has a leg to stand on or that they are not laughed out of Washington DC for the exact same reasons I've pointed out? They have cooperated with Obama fully and haven't had the courage or intelligence to lead Grandma across the street, let alone a Nation under the United States Constitution, when you take into account Obama's ineligibility in their face.

See Now Part II. The Axe-Grinding Propelling Utah's Self Inflicted Injury In Marriage? Sotomayor Stays


Note Dec 26th,2013: Breaking News : Orrin Hatch R - U.S Senator from Utah and Mitch McConnell R- U.S. Senator from Kentcky just requested two sheriffs kits produced by Michael Volin of WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com (WOBC) with the purpose of informing the public and elected officials of the forgery of the long-form birth certificate image posted since April 27, 2011 on the White House website. These kits contain the same evidence released in March 1,2012 (and a little more) that I included in my case against Obama that went from Georgia State- Georgia State Supreme- to U.S. Supreme 12-5276 in Judy v. Obama.

Please urge and encourage your Representatives to OPEN AND TRANSPARENT HEARINGS in the House of Representatives on Obama's eligibility as the solution to eliminating Obamacare. These hearings must be held and the evidence must be heard that are in the Sheriff's kits most all of the Representatives have received now.

If these hearings are conducted in the open and reported in the open, the evidence will mount collectively and the U.S. Senate although it has a majority of Democrats will have to concede to the facts and evidences or will be seen as completely unfit for their duties and as incompetent. Utah would most likely see more benefits come from supporting the Candidates like myself, (well, Candidate as myself because there were no other candidates in the entire U.S.A. who stood up for principle regardless of party), fighting for equal protections under the law in pushing for Open and Transparent Hearings in Congress with two million dollars on Obama's Verification Eligibility qualification hearings on the stage to remove him as a disability according to Amend 14, Sec.3, than they would ever hope to find fighting this and appealing to an unauthorized usurper's recommendation of Justice Sotomayer; and it would happen a lot faster because there is no stay in place while they fight it in court.

You can probably count on a battle for years while gay couples happily marry and begin contemplating suing churches for discrimination of not being wed in the churches and temples next, because that's going to be very lucrative against congregations if the churches and the state keep mixing-up and combining the terminology of marriage. I wonder who the stay would have gone to if Sotomayor wasn't an Obama nomination?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITCr420K4i8


Like CODY ROBERT JUDY'S NEW 2016 PAGE ON FACEBOOK HERE
Follow me on Twitter: Official Cody Robert Judy 2016 on Tweeter here

You Can Help Me
[ If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign”, or ABC Campaign ,which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President please make a contributions here:

Let me now wish everyone a very happy and warm New Year as we pray for the Lord to save our Country and restore America from the dilapidation we now find ourselves and the principles of the Constitution in, for this I am Taking A Stand.

Sincerely,

Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES TV
Get Cody's Book: Taking A Stand











Saturday, January 29, 2011

My Boy Was Just Like Me, Cat's And The Cradle

The importance of our fathers is often underestimated. Cody has put this production together to encourage fathers and inspire a fathers role in a child's life. This collage is of Cody's 3 sons with two different marriages 20 years apart. Cody feels fortunate to have the relationship he does with his younger son because he didn't get much of a chance with the older ones, which like the time he was able to spend with his father because of divorce, inspired the collage's song,Cat's And The Cradle.

Enjoy, pass on and remember the value of your own father.