BREAKING REPORT:
#SCOTUS SILENCE RAMPANT RACE BAITING GAME
Why has the Media failed to report to the General Population Judy v. McCain?
Bi-Partisan BIRTHER BOY asks, " WHAT ARE YOU [HEARING]?"
Cody Robert Judy says its about the Media and the Courts not the Presidential Candidates. "The qualification for President is a legitimate Constitutional concern recognized by most every Elected Politician as legitimate, and is of great importance and concern for most every American. Who wants the Country led by a Constitutionally Unqualified person raise your hand? It is a Constitutional Question and one we know the Supreme Court has stated openly through Justice Thomas they are evading, yet it is acknowledged by Politicians as unaddressed by the U.S. Supreme Court."
"That's not their job", says Cody, "and in the #SCOTUS SILENCE a vicious and rampant Race Baiting Game continues to inflict America as well as a potential crippling and abusive fraud that is mounting a case for Bad Behavior on the part of the Justices."
"I've had some 15 Cases all over the Country related to the Office of the President's Constitutional Qualification Question on [natural born Citizen] that started in 2008 with my law suit against Sen. John McCain and the RNC and has continued with resistance with Obama at the U.S. Supreme Court in 12-5276 and 14-9396. My last case was arbitrarily denied owing to my poverty they recognized in 2012, the District Court and the Tenth Circuit Court recognized in 2015, but the U.S. Supreme Court DENIED in my informa pauperis motion of 14-9396.
The Main Stream continues to spit out a continual stream of garbage posted up in the direction of it being a Racial Issue against Obama. How can they even say that with a Federal Court Record against McCain, unless its the minority race war they want to stir up in America pushing for an extermination of our multi-colored culture and society? Need examples?
Sept. 23rd, 2015 POLITICFACT Did Hillary Clinton Start the Birther Movement
See any mention of Judy v. McCain in that Article? Nope.
Dec. 1st 2015 Huffington Post: Dog Whistles and Hypocrisy: The GOP's Selective Birthers
See any mention of Judy v. McCain in that article? Nope.
Jan 11th, 2016 New York Daily News KING: Birthers question Obama wasn't an American Citizen have no problem with Canadian-born Ted Cruz.
See any mention of Judy v. McCain in that article? Nope.
We could go on and on and on, but what is clear is either the Main Stream Media is pushing for a Race War pinning the Brown and Black crowd against the White Crowd or they just do not care about researching and reporting Federal Court Records accurately.
In Judy v. McCain the Federal District Court Judge in fact related in his Dismissal of the Case that Obama had won the election, and so the burden had shifted from McCain's responsibility making the case 'moot'. Where did the Federal Court insinuate the responsibility had shifted because of the Election Win? Yes, the Federal Court shifted it to Obama based on his win.
Now, do we see reports of the Federal District Courts being Racist? No, they handled the case equally according to the win of the election, the burden shifted to Obama who was also questioned in the Case as unqualified albeit much later because the battle between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama lasted so long in the Democratic Party Nomination of 2008.
Cody Robert Judy was a Candidate for President running in 2008 as a Write-In Candidate so his standing was secured against both McCain and Obama. He felt as a conservative issue the Qualification Question represents, a more tactical approach and more success might be upheld by suing McCain and the RNC first. Politically at the time, Sen. John McCain looked as if was the heavy weight in the Presidential Political Arena with a big story in Time Magazine and Obama was still a relatively unknown and seen as the lightweight candidate. Of course with time Obama pulled out the win.
It was a win however that was masked in covered-up. Indeed Obama's eligibility question had reached the U.S. Supreme Court, but it was flatly denied based on Democrat Phil Berg's lack of standing as a Presidential Candidate and the U.S. Supreme Court's failure to respect Cody Robert Judy's Amicus Curiae in the Case as a Presidential Candidate.
The Political World is a big world to the Courts when it comes to the Presidential Elections, but the Constitution of the United States should be a bigger world. Justices are given Life Tenure's to secure the principles encapsulated in the Constitution uninhibited by Political Personalities considering as well two four year term limits reining in the Office of the President.
Cody Robert Judy has continued his stand as a Candidate for President continually since that time never yielding his standing in defense of Principle over Party because he saw it as fundamentally important across party lines in the considerations of National Security for our Nation. The U.S. Supreme Court only two months in October of 2015 DENIED Cody's request for Review that his Motion for Forma Pauperis be accepted based on:
1- The bank accounts showing Cody and his Campaign wholly incapable of the near combined $5,000 dollar printing and Court fee.
2- The Motion being granted by the two lower Courts U.S. Fed District Utah Division, and Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals in 2015
3- The fact the U.S. Supreme Court granted his Motion in 2013, as well did not deny or penalize the Motion on the basis of rule 39.8 for abusive and excessive filings. Mr. Judy has had only 3 Cases in the U.S. Supreme Court over the last 25 years. ie: Hinckley 96-7655 ; Obama 12-5276 ; and Obama 14-9396
One thing many Constitutional Scholars have indicated with the difficulty of the U.S. Supreme Court hearing a case on the Principle of [natural born Citizen] is in fact recognizing the Legislative Branch's Constitutional Mandate that has secured [born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] across party lines for the entire history of the United States. Even in modern history since 2004 eight attempts were proposed to change the qualification but they were soundly defeated.
In looking at the Principle, if the Judicial Branch's highest Court were to take a look at it, there is no doubt these Legislative Proposals that were defeated are heavy weights for the Court to also consider against a personality who is popular. By avoiding the issue however, especially with Obama because he as the ineligible one in question got in the Office rather than McCain, the Court in its silence is running the a rampant race baiting game in America in the Election that more American show up to vote in, and by far contribute more of their hard earned dollars in.
As the the highest Court authorized by The People to interpret the Constitution, by far they are the authority most people look to. One of the things Cody Robert Judy said he was most proud of was that through out his quest to administer to the Court a Case in which they could settle the Principle between Presidential Candidates without a Civil War where the Country was divided in a 49% to 51% split of the popular election with the 51% percent being Republican and the 49% being Democrat wanting their Constitutional Rights upheld on the Eligibility of the Office of the President.
A fight between say Hillary Clinton at 49% and Ted Cruz at 51% could very easily provide the kindling for just such a split given the polarities of the two candidates. Cody Robert Judy has recognized this and has fought continually for the health and well being of America to provide a Case for the Court to rule on without the entire Presidential Election hinging on the outcome and a scenario in which the Country as a whole would be better served and could unite behind.
Thus far, the SCOTUS Court has not seen the wisdom in that, and has not seen the DENIAL of his Motion for Forma Pauperis as some kind of a clerical error within the Court that could be easily reversed as they considered the Writ of Certiorari and the question now still according to on the Republican side Sen. McCain as well as GOP Front Runner Mr. Donald Trump and on the Democratic Party side Florida Representative Alan Grayson, Nancy Pelosi , as well as Presidential Candidate Mr. Cody Robert Judy. (Ever linked name provides a link to a story relating to the Principle being unsettled)
Through out Cody's appeals in 15 Cases one of the things he says he has been very proud about is the fact that none of his cases were dismissed because of a lack of Standing or because of the Political Doctrine Question.
The consideration of the difficulty in bringing a Federal Law Suit to the door of the SCOTUS of two Presidential Candidates in the Constitution's qualification question on [natural born Citizen] without totally dividing the Country to all sane minds seems a good idea. It is therefore the silence of the Supreme Court, as well as the Media's failure to always include Judy v. McCain on the Constitutional Question as a weight in fairness and equality, that can only be considered pushing for a race war in the United States of America.
BIRTHER Pie-In-The-Sky U.S. Supreme Court
Thank You!
Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy
Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy
Cody Robert Judy
Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.
Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Cody Robert Judy's book :
Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.
*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396
Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin
The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.
Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.
[Steve: Strictly speaking, that’s probably true (that you can’t say with 100% certainty until and unless the Supreme Court speaks on the issue).
The problem is the next leap that birthers make. The right wing is making the same leap when it comes to illegal immigrants. ]
ANTI-Birther Interpretation: OBAMA has won over 200 Cases!
ANTI-Birther Interpretation: That’s the reason you don’t get forma pauperis status
ANTI-Birther Interpretation: 1) IF your cause was credible you could have raised the money. 2) You can’t point to any Case Law stating the Forma PAUPERIS [Yearly] Report Form is good for a Year.
OR
2) [Citizen] at the [TIME] of the Adoption of this Constitution