Author - Cody Robert Judy
Conservative Independent American
Candidate for Pres 16, 12, 08
U.S. Senate 18, 10, 04, 00
U.S. Rep. 02
Book: Taking A Stand - The conservative independent Voice
One of the selling points of Hillary Clinton for Democrats was "Her experience", and much of that was extended to her experiences in her last Government appointment as Secretary of State in etiquette foreign relationships . But that experience, by all accounts, seems to be unraveling by the day as more of an extension of baggage rather than a expertise.
Hillary Clinton's gladfly with Obama celebrated as a Russian-Reset has deteriorated into, at first, accusations of the Russian Government hacking into the DNC's Servers to throw the U.S. Elections in a millennial neophyte RedScare, but now has escalated into what the Obama State Department is calling for in a crimes against humanity probe against Russia as Russia is claiming the U.S. is arming ISIS that could escalate into a determined and devastating Nuclear War with powerful nations in disagreement.
Russia isn't the only one that Hillary Clinton is railing at, but the whole Middle East has come under fire from her in what can only be described as a deterioration of relations with U.S. allies Saudi Arabia and Qatar as Hillary's emails come flush out.
DID HILLARY CLINTON RECEIVE IN/or/DIRECTLY a 2.5% SALES COMMISSIONS FOR U.S. WEAPONS SALES FUNDING ISIS BASED ON and in HER POSITION AS SECRETARY OF STATE? Hillary Clinton wrote concerning Qatar and Saudi Arabia,
"... are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL and other radical Sunni groups in the region,”. Qatar has given between $1 million and $5 million to the Clinton Foundation and Saudi Arabia has donated upwards of $25 million dollars to the Foundation. In 2010, Clinton’s top aide said that the up to $60 billion weapons transfer of fighter jets and helicopters to Saudi Arabia was a “top priority.”
25 Million of 60 Billion is 2.5% would be a standard commission on such an amount serving as a weapons sales commission.
As Americans ponder this walking talking disaster the Democratic Party has coordinated in an embarrassing dereliction of the Democratic Party Primary, we see a complete opposite stand from GOP nominee Donald Trump as he expresses hope for U.S. Relations with Russia and with Hillary all we see are accusations that highlight periods of impenitent callous of decorum and the fact every time she opens her mouth about Russia she offends the Foreign Relationship as if the secrets out she's eager for war and wants to do to Putin what she recommended be done to Qaddafi in Libya.
Is this not interfering in Russian Elections just as badly as she claims they are sabotaging her Campaign in her big RedScare and why isn't anyone talking about the Plutonium Russian Deal that contributed to a cash flow to the Clinton Foundation that kind of collaborates with Qatar and Saudi Arabia's contributions to that same Clinton Foundation?
MIND BLOWING! CLINTON CHARITY LINKED TO ISIS! The Wiki LEAKS that show Hillary Clinton knew she was funding ISIS with weapons to Qatar and Saudi Arabia that made her the greatest profiteer and saleswoman in [sales commissions] threaded through the [Clinton Charity Foundation] from Russia, Qatar, and Saudia Arabia ..Stunning Read that closes the Treason Trespass Sign of loyalty to America!
WE STILL NEED YOUR HELP! Exposing corruption is not easy and as someone who has standing to stand up in this type of Government Corruption Cody Robert Judy still needs your help.
Why has the Media failed to report to the General Population Judy v. McCain?
Bi-Partisan BIRTHER BOY asks, " WHAT ARE YOU [HEARING]?"
If you ever thought the Presidential Qualification Question on [natural born Citizen] had never reached the U.S. Supreme Court you would be wrong. If you thought the Presidential Qualification Question on [natural born Citizen] had never been brought as a consideration of a Presidential Candidate against both Republicans and Democrats. black and white, poor and rich, you'd also be wrong, but that is what has either been sold or deliberately covered-up by an agenda in the Main Stream Media.
Cody Robert Judy says its about the Media and the Courts not the Presidential Candidates. "The qualification for President is a legitimate Constitutional concern recognized by most every Elected Politician as legitimate, and is of great importance and concern for most every American. Who wants the Country led by a Constitutionally Unqualified person raise your hand? It is a Constitutional Question and one we know the Supreme Court has stated openly through Justice Thomas they are evading, yet it is acknowledged by Politicians as unaddressed by the U.S. Supreme Court."
"That's not their job", says Cody, "and in the #SCOTUS SILENCE a vicious and rampant Race Baiting Game continues to inflict America as well as a potential crippling and abusive fraud that is mounting a case for Bad Behavior on the part of the Justices."
"I've had some 15 Cases all over the Country related to the Office of the President's Constitutional Qualification Question on [natural born Citizen] that started in 2008 with my law suit against Sen. John McCain and the RNC and has continued with resistance with Obama at the U.S. Supreme Court in 12-5276 and 14-9396. My last case was arbitrarily denied owing to my poverty they recognized in 2012, the District Court and the Tenth Circuit Court recognized in 2015, but the U.S. Supreme Court DENIED in my informa pauperis motion of 14-9396.
The Main Stream continues to spit out a continual stream of garbage posted up in the direction of it being a Racial Issue against Obama. How can they even say that with a Federal Court Record against McCain, unless its the minority race war they want to stir up in America pushing for an extermination of our multi-colored culture and society? Need examples?
We could go on and on and on, but what is clear is either the Main Stream Media is pushing for a Race War pinning the Brown and Black crowd against the White Crowd or they just do not care about researching and reporting Federal Court Records accurately.
In Judy v. McCain the Federal District Court Judge in fact related in his Dismissal of the Case that Obama had won the election, and so the burden had shifted from McCain's responsibility making the case 'moot'. Where did the Federal Court insinuate the responsibility had shifted because of the Election Win? Yes, the Federal Court shifted it to Obama based on his win.
Now, do we see reports of the Federal District Courts being Racist? No, they handled the case equally according to the win of the election, the burden shifted to Obama who was also questioned in the Case as unqualified albeit much later because the battle between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama lasted so long in the Democratic Party Nomination of 2008.
Cody Robert Judy was a Candidate for President running in 2008 as a Write-In Candidate so his standing was secured against both McCain and Obama. He felt as a conservative issue the Qualification Question represents, a more tactical approach and more success might be upheld by suing McCain and the RNC first. Politically at the time, Sen. John McCain looked as if was the heavy weight in the Presidential Political Arena with a big story in Time Magazine and Obama was still a relatively unknown and seen as the lightweight candidate. Of course with time Obama pulled out the win.
It was a win however that was masked in covered-up. Indeed Obama's eligibility question had reached the U.S. Supreme Court, but it was flatly denied based on Democrat Phil Berg's lack of standing as a Presidential Candidate and the U.S. Supreme Court's failure to respect Cody Robert Judy's Amicus Curiae in the Case as a Presidential Candidate.
The Political World is a big world to the Courts when it comes to the Presidential Elections, but the Constitution of the United States should be a bigger world. Justices are given Life Tenure's to secure the principles encapsulated in the Constitution uninhibited by Political Personalities considering as well two four year term limits reining in the Office of the President.
Cody Robert Judy has continued his stand as a Candidate for President continually since that time never yielding his standing in defense of Principle over Party because he saw it as fundamentally important across party lines in the considerations of National Security for our Nation. The U.S. Supreme Court only two months in October of 2015 DENIED Cody's request for Review that his Motion for Forma Pauperis be accepted based on:
1- The bank accounts showing Cody and his Campaign wholly incapable of the near combined $5,000 dollar printing and Court fee.
2- The Motion being granted by the two lower Courts U.S. Fed District Utah Division, and Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals in 2015
3- The fact the U.S. Supreme Court granted his Motion in 2013, as well did not deny or penalize the Motion on the basis of rule 39.8 for abusive and excessive filings. Mr. Judy has had only 3 Cases in the U.S. Supreme Court over the last 25 years. ie: Hinckley 96-7655 ; Obama 12-5276 ; and Obama 14-9396
One thing many Constitutional Scholars have indicated with the difficulty of the U.S. Supreme Court hearing a case on the Principle of [natural born Citizen] is in fact recognizing the Legislative Branch's Constitutional Mandate that has secured [born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] across party lines for the entire history of the United States. Even in modern history since 2004 eight attempts were proposed to change the qualification but they were soundly defeated.
In looking at the Principle, if the Judicial Branch's highest Court were to take a look at it, there is no doubt these Legislative Proposals that were defeated are heavy weights for the Court to also consider against a personality who is popular. By avoiding the issue however, especially with Obama because he as the ineligible one in question got in the Office rather than McCain, the Court in its silence is running the a rampant race baiting game in America in the Election that more American show up to vote in, and by far contribute more of their hard earned dollars in.
As the the highest Court authorized by The People to interpret the Constitution, by far they are the authority most people look to. One of the things Cody Robert Judy said he was most proud of was that through out his quest to administer to the Court a Case in which they could settle the Principle between Presidential Candidates without a Civil War where the Country was divided in a 49% to 51% split of the popular election with the 51% percent being Republican and the 49% being Democrat wanting their Constitutional Rights upheld on the Eligibility of the Office of the President.
A fight between say Hillary Clinton at 49% and Ted Cruz at 51% could very easily provide the kindling for just such a split given the polarities of the two candidates. Cody Robert Judy has recognized this and has fought continually for the health and well being of America to provide a Case for the Court to rule on without the entire Presidential Election hinging on the outcome and a scenario in which the Country as a whole would be better served and could unite behind.
Thus far, the SCOTUS Court has not seen the wisdom in that, and has not seen the DENIAL of his Motion for Forma Pauperis as some kind of a clerical error within the Court that could be easily reversed as they considered the Writ of Certiorari and the question now still according to on the Republican side Sen. McCain as well as GOP Front Runner Mr. Donald Trump and on the Democratic Party side Florida Representative Alan Grayson, Nancy Pelosi , as well as Presidential Candidate Mr. Cody Robert Judy. (Ever linked name provides a link to a story relating to the Principle being unsettled)
Through out Cody's appeals in 15 Cases one of the things he says he has been very proud about is the fact that none of his cases were dismissed because of a lack of Standing or because of the Political Doctrine Question.
The consideration of the difficulty in bringing a Federal Law Suit to the door of the SCOTUS of two Presidential Candidates in the Constitution's qualification question on [natural born Citizen] without totally dividing the Country to all sane minds seems a good idea. It is therefore the silence of the Supreme Court, as well as the Media's failure to always include Judy v. McCain on the Constitutional Question as a weight in fairness and equality, that can only be considered pushing for a race war in the United States of America.
Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396
Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin
The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.
Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
Conservative Democrat Cody Robert Judy v. The Liberal Republican Ted Cruz
Michael Shermer writes in his book, The Believing Brain , that the popular notion that smart people are less prone to believing "Weird Things" than dumb people, is a myth. He says:
1*...smart people believe weird things because they are skilled at defending beliefs they arrived at for nonsmart reasons.
At a time in America where the most valuable Principle might be Trust and the most rare place to find it might be a Politician, the America People can no longer depend upon what a Politician happens to say, but must rely more upon what a Politician has done for Principle, and balancing that along with their own reasoning and judgement.
Notice the difference? What a politician has done is not always centered in Principle. It is to be a Standard Bearer that Presidential Candidates are vying to become the nominee for their parties. U.S. Senator Ted Cruz in the Republican Party and Cody Robert Judy in the Democratic Party have done more than their fair share of things to ruffle their respective Parties feathers and no can say they are quitters; though the debate is still out on whether their fights have yielded any fruits.
"Wherefore by their fruits ye shall no them"- Matt 7:20 encourages us to look at the display of fruits or the product and principles earned in order to balance good judgement from bad, so that a greater Trust can be understood and invested in knowing them. In the political arena it makes good sense as well. These are the reasons Politicians do what they do, and that should be balanced also with particular actions in doing them.
WELCOME to the first FIREFOX Debate between apposing Democrat and a Republican Presidential Candidates. Democrats as well as Republicans have promised to sanction their Candidates firmly if they participated in unsanctioned in-party Debates, but no one said anything about apposing party debates, which we think could be very interesting! Who says we have to wait for the General Election to watch head to head apposing political party Candidates?
In 2013, freshman U.S. Senator Ted Cruz filibustered the whole U.S. Senate for 21 hours in a 2013 failed attempt to stop Obamacare. Many of his Republican counterparts called it nothing more than grandstanding for an expected ambition for President. Then majority leader D. Sen. Reid opined that it wasn't a filibuster but really an agreement he'd made with Cruz to talk. In other words it was theatrics. Flash forward to 2015 and every Republican Presidential Candidate essentially has promised to transform, or abolish completely, Obamacare. That might be seen as a victory for Cruz even though he lost the filibuster, and can be marked a success that simply took some time. No doubt he wonders where his friends on the Presidential Republican debate stage where when he was standing up against the Affordable Health Care Act?
In 2012 Cody Robert Judy a U.S. Senate Candidate in 2004 and 2010, was running for President in the Democratic Party. Only problem with that was he was fiercely fighting his own Parties favorite incumbent Barack Obama in a principled stand for the [natural born Citizen] qualification required by the Constitution for the office of the President and Vice President. Cody had what the Courts referred to as Standing claiming harm to his person and Campaign in damages standing firmly that [natural born Citizen] meant [born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents], citing case law, precedent as it could be found regarding the issue, and history of the United States in conflict with Obama's ineligibility.
So, we thought it might be kind of fun to contrast these two to see what common ground exist and what differences we could discover because in many cases Cruz contends he is the last man standing conservatively for the Constitution in his Republican party touting his support by conservatives. However, Judy claims if Cruz was so true to the Constitution he wouldn't be standing behind Obama the example of Cruz's liberalism on the qualification demands for President, infringing upon what the Democrat has called the Conservative Red Line standing firm against the odds even in the Democratic Party against Obama. So is Cruz Liberal and Judy Conservative, and are they conservative or liberal on where it counts most and for what reasons?
So is it true? Is Ted Cruz apposing Obamacare, but embracing and standing behind Obama's ineligibility to legitimize his won authenticity as a 2014 renounced [native born Canadian] with a dual citizenship from his father's Cuban citizenship also renounced for Canadian? Cruz's entire claim of legitimacy rest upon his inherited citizenship from mother's U.S. Citizenship, which she also may have renounced in a Canadian-ship as her husband renounced his Cuban-ship for Canadian-ship. Its all so confusing.
In honoring Cruz's mother's inheritance of citizenship to him, in the claim to be legit as a U.S. President, (in the exact same way of inheritance Cruz claims makes him eligible), is Cruz's father disrespected or honored - and doesn't his father's citizenship inherited count against the Office of President ? Is the native place [Canada] where Cruz was born honored or shamed in [jurisdictional law] ? These are important questions for every parent to consider and how you'd like your own children to admire you, or sweep you under the carpet and every Country to consider regarding loyalty to their law and a protection of their national defense.
So is it confusing to understand only two types of citizenship really exist [naturalization with all its variables] and [natural born citizen- with no variables]? Judy says, "Not really. The confusion is only created by those who are experts at manipulating their own belief in order to provide them their own self-serving purposes." We notice the quote which began the article by Michael Shermer-smart people believe weird things because they are skilled at defending beliefs they arrived at for nonsmart reasons. So is Cruz just more skilled at pulling the wool over your face then Judy is at fighting an incumbent who was not vetted?
Indeed of 43 Presidents all have easily qualified for the Office with the data known at the time in either being a Citizen of a State in America at the the time of the Adoption of the Constitution, (which was presumed based on no [natural born Citizens ie. born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] existing in the newly formed Union) - or [natural born Citizen]. The jurisdiction or claim of the United States of America was formalized in the U.S. Constitution. Before its inception, only States existed that would soon be joined in the newly formed United States.
In Article II. Section 1, Clause 5 concerning the requirements agreed upon by the States : "natural born Citizen or a Citizen at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution", clearly designates two different requirements given the times and seasons of history for the newly formed Government. It is a preposterous assumption in this that the Framers meant to restate the qualification over in a redundancy rather to articulate two separate conditions mostly because two separate conditions exist and motive in promoting a new Authoritative Jurisdiction of Law to an accountable general population.
A couple of factors within the Constitution confirm this. Emphasizing an understanding is the requirement for the President to have been a Resident at least 14 years. This could not have possibly been accomplished by the Founding fathers as a prerequisite qualification, unless it was regarding the Land or settled [Independent States] that would be joining the Union. Contrasting the President's requirements yet notable because of the Federal Office qualification consideration as a whole, are the requirements for Senators and Representatives that require a time factor of 9 years a Citizen and 7 years a Citizen respectfully.
A Citizenship to the individual States was thus considered the requirement. No Residency requirement is made for those offices accept that they [Representatives and Senators] be an inhabitant in the State they intended to represent.
So, why wasn't the Residency requirement of the Presidential Qualification simply stated as time as a Citizen like it is for Representatives and Senators? Why did it not say for example and "14 years a Citizen" for the qualifications of the President?
The answer reveals a NEW NATIONAL TREASURE movie, because [Citizen] and [natural born Citizen] were two very separate constraints or qualifications. The [natural born Citizen] in born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents boasted a pure natural,with no artificial sweetener, [American heritage and American jurisdiction under U.S. Law]- very simple. It was a separation of TIME; and a creation as well as a celebration of a new culture of diversity that would extend to include the honoring both mother and father and place of birth.
That would take no less than two generations and could not possibly be accomplished by any, alien, immigrant, or national, all considered foreigners in the Office of the President. It was a national security natural barrier of any foreigner in the Office of the President. Indeed, an Alien or National - someone born with foreign allegiance by a parent or birth in a foreign land articulated in the naturalization ACT OF CONGRESS in Title X ALIENS and NATIONALS Subsection 1401 (a-h) is a legal witness to this for [born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] it has never been doubted was authentically American.
The testimony of the House Judicial Committee witnesses in the year 2000 noticing the difference between first and second generation American Citizens is amazing. The clear ambiguity of first generation Americans is focused upon in a questionable sympathizing tradition of foreign cultures as completely natural and denied only in a delusional state. Loyalty to Canada be damned, U.S. Senator Cruz is a perfect example as well as his father's from Cuba of the retraction that can take place very suddenly especially in a very human perilous vulnerability considering short term gains. In deed it is noticed in Cuba that children of parents born in Cuba coming to Cuba might not have their new foreign adopted citizenships even recognized and might be subject to Military Order. It is therefore very incumbent upon the U.S. to take into consideration when thinking about this not to exclude completely other Countries Interest when it comes to a selection for our President.
Senator Cruz wants to add artificial sweeteners to the Office of President - he wants to dilute the Constitution regardless of the Legislative Histories tried and failed eight attempts since 2002 to do just that. This makes Sen. Cruz's assertion into the political Presidential Race Mr. Judy sees as a conspiracy against the Constitution valid. Sen. Cruz in his short freshman term as U.S. Senator from Texas is no slouch in constitutional law teaching (like Obama) as a Professor U.S. Supreme Court litigation and working as Texas Solicitor General, even early on memorizing the Constitution at age 13. Cruz recently opined most violent criminals are Democrats, but what kind of violence to our Constitution is he in the very act of precipitating?
If you do not consider the usurpation of the Office of the President violence against every American, with the nuclear codes in tow to make it aggravated, your determinations of criminality regarding treason need to be reevaluated. Traitors are seen in a lower class of criminal ideology according to the Standard of our Constitution to reasonably minded men and women, and they come in all classes of Citizenship for a myriad of motivations that do not involve keeping you safe and secure in your homes.
What do we call it when elected leaders simply conspire to twist and contort the law to make themselves legal for office when they plain and simply not qualified? They might call it a proposal to change the law, or a mistake if faced with charges. Sen. Cruz has proposed no alterations officially in his term as Senator to the Constitution. He simply wants, like Obama, to subvert the Law and defend the subversion by his position in an expert educated way.
Cruz's confidence like Obama's rest in the knowledge it is very difficult to procure a Candidate for President willing to take the chances in the Judicial Branch that failing to win in a Court Battle would provide in deriding press. Clearly this is an illusion of deception of the elected we consider to be smart people believing really weird things and defending them in an expert way, as Michael Shermer writes for, " non-smart reasons ".
The jeopardy of this atrocity is a much greater and much closer threat to all of us then Climate Change Obama is touting is an impending doom if not dealt with immediately. This eligibility issue happens to include the safety considerations of our national security for all Americans, 8-10 more Trillion of debt just on Obama's watch, 70,000 added debt to each of us, that we cannot deny.
The belief Christians have that God created the Heavens and the Earth has far more latitude to sting Americans for not upholding the U.S. Constitution's Supreme Law on the qualifications for President then a reduction in carbon emissions to tackle Climate Change. Our first President George Washington acknowledged Americans should always remember due to the precarious conditions of our Revolutionary War experienced which might have ended far differently with out Divine Inspirations and Revelations, the cause of Divine Intervention he held gratitude for, that caused to be established the United States of America.
Is U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz a liberal in the defense of his own ambition in this Nation and is Mr. Judy a conservative in the defense of this Country who has sacrificed popularity? You must be the judge.
Stay Tuned for Part II when we consider more topics that make Judy a Conservative Democrat and Cruz a Liberal Republican as @Rickey asks Mr. Judy-
[you wanted to challenge Cruz, you should have declared as a Republican. What were you thinking when you decided to declare as a Democrat?]
1-That I care about People not being put in prison for Free Speech
2- That I’ve advocated Equal Rights to all on the privilege of Marriage long before Obama or Hillary
3-That the #waronpoor is real, long before Sanders
4- That our Civil Rights were under great jeopardy
5- That my concern and love was not predicated on a short term gain for Office
6- That our Constitution was indeed the Greatest Mercy afforded to us by the blood of our fellow Patriots and every word was worth not spilling blood that had already been spilt.
7- That I admired Jimmy Carter for not firing one shot or dropping one bomb
8-That I loved Pres JFK for the terrific Dream he let America date adventure in
9-That I loved Pres. Clinton for his reduction of so much debt (barring refunding glass Steagall
10- That America was fooled in a drug war and a Prison Empire Building System
11- That our responsibility to care for our Elderly -Disability- Veterans could easily be met with what we had also been given
12- That we didn’t have to be burdened unnecessarily by being the Police force of the World at Tax Payers expense with no compensation
13- The Americans in general want to work, but the importation of slave labor for the pockets of Corporate Elites was sacking our Unions, driving our re population quotas down, and tearing our Families ability to support a quality life apart.
14- That a woman’s choice should be defended against her being imprisoned and I did support accusations of murder as a False Witness according to Law.
So.. No takers on the Definition of Standing for Presidential Candidates and what damages the Courts may have alluded to I see. (?)
1*Dr. Conspiracy himself Keven Davidson, who I've got to be internet friends with a little bit turned us on to that quote. One of the most wonderful things about America is the tacit consent to disagree with each other and agree it doesn't have to end the world.
AGAIN...
Our Republic is at stake, and nothing short of acting now is going to change the outcome. As it stands now, America and all her Citizens is in grave danger of descending into an abyss of war where Constitutional Rights are about the last thing you will ever see again. The big question is why wouldn't you do it?
Here's a list of Governors you can easily find your State by clicking a LINK
Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396
Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin
The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.
Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
Cody Robert Judy -D- Candidate for U.S. President 2016 -
Only Candidate in U.S. History with Bi-Partisan Federal Court Record in the Defense of the U.S. Constitution's Qualification demand of 'natural born Citizen' ie born in U.S. to Citizen Parents
*See Update II below September 21st, 2015
* SEE UPDATE BELOW: AUGUST 22,2015
WHY ARE MAINSTREAM DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES AFRAID OF THE DEBATE?
Have you ever in your life seen Main Stream Democratic Party Candidates so completely terrified to debate? I mean the Republicans did trot 17 Candidates up on two debate stages August 6th three of which had never been elected, but at least had been given some coverage by the main stream media. Can that be said for the Democratic Party? The answer is "No-No-No!"
Will 2016 be turned in for the Democrats to be the new-age election where Candidates hunker down, batten down the hatches, avoid the press, avoid questions, pre-select questions, and pre-select living room audiences as Hillary Clinton has been allowed to do so far or will the Press start to "Candidately" admit this looks pretty darn rigged and crooked?
Edit Excerpt: August 13th The Post & Email Editor-in-Chief Sharon Rondeau responding to Post run at BirtherReport of that ABC ran of little known Candidates actually had her Comment 'Removed' or 'deleted' by the Moderates of ABC which only reported a Case in the United States Supreme Court of Judy v. Obama 14-9396. Doesn't it seem odd to have a comment removed from a Newspaper editor-in-chief by ABC that simply reports a pending case in SCOTUS? This is sadly just more evidence that TRUTH is feared more than anything.
While Main Stream Democratic Party Candidates for the most part support Obama, there is one that has thought more of the Constitution then any particular Candidate. Is it a really part of an honorable Republican Platform not to have [a]ny of their mainstream Candidates having any Record at all of actually defending the U.S. Constitution's demand for a 'natural born Citizen'? Is that something Republicans take pride in?
After Reading the Following Story entitled THE DEMOCRATS ARE TERRIFIED TO DEBATE, and being summoned in such as either a part of the "Parade of Losers" or "Kooks", I was left out of the "Crooks" account created for Hillary Clinton in the article. That is until, I clicked on the link of 'Democrat Nominees' of Course included in the story and found the most bias account I may have every read.
All tolled the 18 Democratic Candidates for President that I guess the Democrats don't want you to know about. While Republicans sported 17 Candidates in their first debate 3 of which have not been elected to office before in Trump, Fiorina, and Carson those three seem to be doing much better after the debate. Is it any surprise why the Democrats are actually afraid to let me see the light of day on a debate stage with Hillary Clinton-67, Martin O' Malley-52, and Bernie Sanders-73? I would be the only one still in my 4th Decade at 49?
Clicking on my Name- Cody Robert Judy I read the Editorialized version of Hell Associated with my name and emailed them a few corrections I do not think affords me any great latitude, bias, or their site with any bigotry.
The following Corrections might be appropriate for the Editorialized False information regarding my (Cody Robert Judy) 2016 Candidacy for President.
1) I'm not Mormon- The Church Excommunicated me in 1995 for 'apostasy'. That fact should be included because its not right to mis-represent the LDS Church with a nonfactual membership.
2) If you include that, it might give me some breathing room as the LDS Church and State are seen both punishing me. That at least combines the Church and State in a unlawful prosecution of my protest that is detailed in my book TAKING A STAND - The Conservative Independent Voice. http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/taking-a-stand-cody-robert-judy/1021993097
3- The detail of 'Bomb threat' you included in your arm-chair quarterback position is false, unless you also include people confusing B.O.M (Book of Mormon) with the word bomb and realize the LDS Church copyrighted the whole incident. That video tape was introduced to the Judge by the A.G. , but was refused to me as the Judge , also a Mormon Bishop stated in Court 'We don't want 20/20 Barbara Walters getting it.". Releasing the video would also necessarily convicted many members of the LDS Church of brutal assaults and unnecessary, unrestrained, and violent behavior in a Church Meeting.
4) I really don't think any of this information is biased because it in fact represents the truth. If your willing to write the false narrative you did, why not try a shot at the truth? The official charge was 'aggravated burglary' the small print which says, "entering a building with the intent to commit a felony" although which felony is a mystery, and while its difficult to imagine a weapon the Mormon's use as a canonical text B.O.M, you really need to quit paying so much attention to 'Church owned newspapers' writing bomb, unless you'd like to endorse them for President?
The story of that is here: http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2015/02/fight-over-forgiveness-lds-church.html
6) Now while your spotlighting Candidates for President, and mentioning the worst quite easily noticed, you might just for the laughs and giggles throw in the Best?
Cody Robert Judy is the ONLY candidate in U.S. History to have a bi-partisan Federal Court Record or Stand on defending the Constitution's demand or qualifications for President as a 'natural born Citizen' i.e., Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents. His current case is also the longest lasting eligibility challenge in SCOTUS HISTORY and U.S. Case history. If its so 'dis-proven' why is it pending in the United States Supreme Court now? Isn't that a little risky on your part or at least 'placing a bet, gamble, or perhaps your own prophesy?
I mean if you want your Site to look like a satire joke you can withhold hard facts. The problem with doing that is others began to look at your Site as just that. The choice is yours of course.
Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy
Guess we'll see what if any changes are made?
[ Cody Robert Judy lives in Ogden, Utah. He attended and graduated from Utah State University, with a degree in Psychology. Little information is available on his employment history, but he currently owns his own business.
Judy is a Mormon, and his religious beliefs have led him to questionable actions. In 1993, holding a nondescript briefcase, he ascended uninvited to a Marriot Center stage where Howard W. Hunter, President of the Council of the Twelve of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (the Mormon church), addressed an assembled crowd. Judy then proceeded to threaten Hunter, claiming he had a bomb in his briefcase and that he would detonate it if Hunter did not flee the building. Several audience members and at least two security guards intervened, physically subduing Judy until police could be summoned. Judy admitted to the crime and plead guilty, saying he had done it because God told him he was to be the next prophet of the LDS church. Three doctors who examined Judy testified that he suffered from a delusional disorder but that he rationally understood the charges against him, and he was ruled competent to enter his plea. He served eight years in prison.
Despite his running as a Democrat, Judy has no love for the nation's President. He has spoken out against Barack Obama on the (thoroughly disproven) grounds that Obama is not a natural-born American citizen and is thus ineligible to occupy the White House. He has sued President Obama for this reason, and in fact has done the same to Republican Senator and former presidential contender John McCain, on the same basis.
Judy is a staunchly conservative candidate. He vigorously opposes illegal immigration, calling for the implementation of minefields and high-beam cutting laser fences along the southern border with only legitimate points of entry remaining safe. He categorically rejects amnesty for immigrants already present illegally, and says the immigration system should be strengthened to welcome people legally. He also supports increasing domestic production of energy using fossil fuels, while funding research into more diverse energy sources and the cleaner use of traditional sources. On the issue of healthcare, he advocates for the use of deregulation and tax cuts to enable the population to afford medical treatment under a free market.
With policies decidedly far to the right of the political spectrum, it is ironic that Judy is likely to find his most vehement support among the Republican Tea Party, as he himself seeks the Democratic nomination. His criminal past, however, risks making him into an unacceptable choice for a majority of American voters.]
UPDATED: AUGUST 22-2015
The following Changes were made to my introduction over at POLITICKS.ORG http://2016.democratic-candidates.org/ which we will Post along with my Considered answer found below:
[Cody Robert Judy lives in Ogden, Utah. He attended and graduated from Utah State University, with a degree in Psychology. Little information is available on his employment history, but he currently owns his own business.
Judy is a former Mormon, but has been officially excommunicated from the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (the Mormon church) for apostasy. In 1993, holding a nondescript briefcase, he ascended uninvited to a Marriot Center stage where Howard W. Hunter, President of the Council of the Twelve of the LDS church, addressed an assembled crowd. Official accounts (including eyewitness reports) state that Judy then proceeded to threaten Hunter by claiming he had a bomb in his briefcase and that he would detonate it if Hunter did not flee the building. Several audience members and at least two security guards intervened, physically subduing Judy until police could be summoned. Judy pleaded guilty to Aggravated Burglary, saying he had committed the crime because God told him he was to be the next prophet of the LDS church. He denies that any actual bomb threat was made, explaining that he merely referred aloud to the Book of Mormon (a holy text of Mormonism, considered by that faith to be part of the Holy Bible) by phonetically pronouncing its initials, BOM, which was misunderstood to the alarm of many. Records disagree with his account, but he contends that the official contradiction of his story was unfairly entered against him by a Mormon judge and perpetuated by Mormon newspapers, all seeking to discredit him. Three doctors who examined Judy testified that he suffered from a delusional disorder, but that he rationally understood the charges against him, and he was ruled competent to enter his guilty plea. He served eight years in prison.
Despite his running as a Democrat, Judy has no love for the nation's President. He has spoken out against Barack Obama on the (thoroughly disproven) grounds that Obama is not a natural-born American citizen and is thus ineligible to occupy the White House. He has sued President Obama for this reason, and in fact has done the same to Republican Senator and former presidential contender John McCain, on the same basis.
Judy is a staunchly conservative candidate. He vigorously opposes illegal immigration, calling for the implementation of minefields and high-beam cutting laser fences along the southern border with only legitimate points of entry remaining safe. He categorically rejects amnesty for immigrants already present illegally, and says the immigration system should be strengthened to welcome people legally. He also supports increasing domestic production of energy using fossil fuels, while funding research into more diverse energy sources and the cleaner use of traditional sources. On the issue of healthcare, he advocates for the use of deregulation and tax cuts to enable the population to afford medical treatment under a free market.
With policies decidedly far to the right of the political spectrum, it is ironic that Judy is likely to find his most vehement support among the Republican Tea Party, as he himself seeks the Democratic nomination. His criminal past, however, risks making him into an unacceptable choice for a majority of American voters.] MY RESPONSE:
I want to sincerely "THANK YOU" for respectfully revising my editorialized account. I really appreciate all the time you guys put in. Without you many would not even see me as a candidate unless they headed over to the FEC. That's commendable.
There is still two REALLY MAJOR BIG DEAL, as far as the TRUTH OF THE RECORD is concerned. The U.S. Supreme Court has a 2nd conference scheduled Sept 28th on Obama's INELIGIBILITY and if that goes forward than the 'presumption' that its been legally dealt with could really melt on you.
So again, we are at an impasse with the account of the Record and the assumptions you have made that its settled.
Just stating for the RECORD that Judy v. Obama et.al, 14-9396 is up for a SECOND conference Sept. 28th, 2015 is of course current and simply inclusive of the actual Court Record the U.S. Supreme Court is very much a part of TRUTH.
Your 'staunch conservatism' still labels me in the Pro-Life Category where the reference I gave you actually defending Planned Parenthood and my stand as Pro-Choice for Life disagrees in the politically correct arena.
Why does it matter? Well, by simply stating 'staunchly conservatism' you alienate right away the BIG CHUNCK of D's who support Pro-Choice. I mean its a very big issue right now and there's not to many Candidates who have defended Planned Parenthood on the right side of conservatism right?
That is the truth if you can agree with that? Maybe you need to broaden your "label category" Just an idea? For instance, I call myself a "Conservative Independent Democrat" based on my 'conservatism towards the Constitution in my defense of the natural born Citizen clause outlining the qualifications for the office of President and Vice President, and liberal for freedom, liberty and choice.
I hope that is agreeably understood.
Cody Robert Judy
P.S. I am updating my Blog on this story, Regarding your Post and Link here.
I noticed that you put on Hillary Clinton's Introduction a Video of her Kick Off afforded on YouTube. I hope you will do the same for me? Here is the YouTube url and embedded code for your convenience. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSXjDMq_X7o
Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy
UPDATED September 21st, 2015:
In your editorial regarding me I found for you some other testimonies perhaps you might take into consideration just to you know make your statement regarding my religion practices correct... I guess? It seems you have no problem condescending 'religious Faiths or practices', but ultimately it might be considered a case of libel.
You Write in your false narrative:
[(including eyewitness reports) state that Judy then proceeded to threaten Hunter by claiming he had a bomb in his briefcase and that he would detonate it if Hunter did not flee the building. Several audience members and at least two security guards intervened, physically subduing Judy until police could be summoned]
Why would I ask Hunter to flee the building? That's so stupid to write. There's no basis to it at all. I never asked Hunter to leave the building as you state in the synonymous 22 years ago. I asked him to read an apology statement from the Church for treating me so 'rude', which they had done. If your going to include something that happened 22 years ago, at least get it right?
These kinds of problems can be handled within a Church but when the State comes in and starts dictating what words mean in a church meeting, well then you have really lost the 1st Amendment of our U.S. Constitution haven't you and everybody who believes in God is nuts. Maybe that's the way you want it to appear? If so, your a bigger enemy to the U.S. Constitution and a threat to it, then anyone right?
Statement 1: I was on the opposite side, about 30 rows up, but close enough to see the whole thing play out and hear his voice. I remember watching those valiant Elders of Israel dropping down behind the stands, circling, and then when some old dude rushed the podium with his hand raised, the mob pounced and old Cody Judy disappeared in the melee. It was crazy.
( The statement- some old dude rushed with his hands raised. Doesn't that sound like I was 'rushed' and assaulted?)
Statement 2:[Fascinating and sad. I had never known what happened after the initial report. Thanks for the link.
The fellow, Cody Judy, strikes me as a modern Samuel the Lamanites and his claims make a lot of sense in Mormon context - more than those of the current executive team. Plus he has the balls to back up his claim of divine authority:
"I have seen the resurrected Joseph Smith, Jesus Christ and ancient apostles. They have told me this is what I have to do," Judy said.]
( Here's a statement from an eyewitness that states very importantly within the context of the church what I was saying made sense, and was backed up within the Mormon context and by a religious understanding or context of authority. "More so" this witness states then the current Leadership in his opinion. Samuel the Lamanite was a prophet sent to the people of ancient America to call them to repentance. They shot their bows and arrows at him but could not hit him. He delivered the message and left. Soon (32 years) in the B.O.M. (Book of Mormon) the people were indeed subject to the prophesies made by Samuel the Lamanite.)
Statement 3- [I was there, right behind the stage, about 25 rows up. Great view, saw the whole thing, beginning to end, up close. The stage was close to the back of the auditorium, so really it was one of the best views to watch it all go down. One of the girls in our group threw up. People were crying all over. When they finally got the "detonator" about 50 guys randomly came down from the stands and beat the hell out of him. An exciting evening... Glad to see someone remembers it. :)]
Now, in this context you actually see a witness to 50 guys beating the hell out of me, and that being called an 'Exciting Evening' for a Church Fireside? Can you imagine that all videotaped and held by the LDS Church Authorities, after mine you, what they say was a a threat was removed.
That's an important context. Its like after police have someone on the ground subdued, and then the punching and kicking and beating begins. That is a reprehensible and punishable by excessive force. You in your statements are glamorizing, and enjoying the harm that is being caused in your statements.
Now, of course we notice "detonator" is in quotes, because there was none. Police recovered none, there was no more a threat then you could imagine one made out of a pop-tart. The very disturbing thing is after all that was understood and known, a greater embarrassment came upon the Church Leaders. SWAT Team actually blew my scriptures up on Camera presented to the TV Channels, and they doubled down on their prosecution. Yes, its a huge embarrassment for the Church.
Charges were escalated from misdemeanors to 1st degree felonies with no more 'evidence' no more damage discovered, and no more evidence of any weapon whatsoever, and certainly no harm to any person. These are the facts. This is why I object so much to your 'framing' the event towards newspaper articles owned by the Church or if nothing else condensing the statement to a sentence.
Since you may be big on my opinion mixed with others in your idea of fairness, How about :
Cody Robert Judy, with no juvenile or prior criminal record whatsoever, court records reveal, was framed by LDS Church Leaders cooperating with the then LDS Bishop serving as District Court Judge of the Church/State. Frames of the video tape were released to the Press. It seems the illegal union of church and state authority lied on their part in a plea-bargain to wash the whole thing down the tube with '6 months time served'. Court Records show Cody's Motion to withdraw his guilty plea three days later after the nefarious trap was understood. He served 8 years in prison with 5 Rehearings. Many attempts were made to obtain the evidence of the video tape of the Marriott Center Incident. KTVX Channel 4 with their own lawyers spent 10K to obtain the video-tape they acclimated would make LDS Church Leaders heroes if nothing was amiss. Many witnesses attesting to what is referred to as a mob of upwards of 50 beating Mr. Judy after it was understood no threat existed, while the Church refused the evidence to Mr. Judy on his Appeals. Mr. Judy refused by his Criminal Court Judge/LDS Bishop the evidence, was forced to take the LDS Presidency to Court who maintained Copyright of the Videotape, and appealed clear to the U.S. Supreme Court in Civil Case No. 96-7655. The U.S. Supreme Court ultimately ruled 'not enough people suffered [n]ot getting evidence used against them' to hear the Civil Law Case.
Is there something wrong with that statement? I mean if you have to bring it up at all?
Republican National Committee 310 First Street SE Washington, DC 20003 Phone: 202-863-8700 Fax: 202-863-8820 Email: Info@gop.com
Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy
2016 D- CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT
The CRJ TODAY for a BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW
Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016. www.codyjudy.us
Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396
Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin
The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.
Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
