The New and Improved Birther Movement 2008-2012

The New and Improved Birther Movement 2008-2012
Comprehensive Look at New Hampshire’s Supreme Court Eligibility Complaint

Before the New Hampshire Supreme Court is a case that could shake the political world clear through the Washington Monument. Delving into Taitz v. Garner one sees a deck stacked against Obama in ways that are innovative and original from 2008 showing the Birther Movement has shape shifted into a much more intelligent force than it was in 2008, something Obama and co-conspiratorial Democrats of course were not hoping for when the Obama 2012 theme song was picked out, “I fought the law but the law won”.

Understanding the law has to some degree been left to the lawyers and judges so long that justice may have been left behind; there is no secret that in any case both sides indeed are given a chance to make their point of view hoping that justice will side their way.

While the body of evidence might be stacked to one side there are a host of elements and principles that also must be included in order to accommodate justice. “Standing” was a principle used for the most part against a U.S. Birther Movement in 2008 citing Citizens didn’t have standing to file suits favoring instead actual candidates in the Presidential Race (*9th Circuit).

*( http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/7235-challenge-to-president-obamas-eligibility-to-be-heard-by-9th-circuit-court )

In 2008 Obama had the advantage of the surprise attack from which the Birther Movement could not form and organize fast enough to block. Deals had been struck with the Republican candidates based on a Democrat controlled U.S. Senate giving Sen. John McCain non-binding U.S. Sen. Res. 511 declaring him a ‘natural born citizen’ with two citizen parents even though he was born in the foreign nation of Panama.

Until Obama was declared the Democrat Nominee independent and write-in candidates couldn’t really file complaints because the issue within the Democrat Party was not “ripe”. In other words, then Sen. Hillary Clinton would have been the best example from within the Democrat party to take a stand against Obama’s eligibility. Now, Obama’s fixed Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, was indeed a Co-Sponsor of McCain’s Res. 511. Not only was the valuable media ‘race card’ fixed (which raised its ugly head with Donald Trump in May of 2011), but so was Sen. Clinton’s *Campaign Debt.*( http://articles.cnn.com/2009-04-16/politics/clinton.debt_1_campaign-committee-clinton-s-campaign-hatch-act?_s=PM:POLITICS )

Once Obama cleared the entire Democrat Party his lock was sealed because Republicans had just nominated McCain as their nominee. Anyone not challenging McCain’s Eligibility would or could be called a racist for challenging Obama’s eligibility, and no one knew it better than the 2008 Republican U.S. Senators.

Days prior to McCain being made the nominee McCain v. Judy was filed in the Nevada Federal District Court challenging McCain’s qualifications according to the precepts of Supreme Court Precedent case Minor v. Happersett that maintained without question ‘natural born citizens’ being those whom were born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents, and an Emergency Motion was made in that case against Obama before he was sworn in that featured the case being argued by esq. Phil Berg at the Supreme Court that was dismissed on ‘Standing’ failures.

Phil Berg was stuck and decidedly kept from including Cody Robert Judy in his argument to the U.S. Supreme Court, although Judy had filed Amicus Curiae to him, it was never docketed.

After 3 years, Donald Trump was used to flush the Birther Movement once and for all, uniquely positioned as a Republican who had never held office, with the majority of his contribution money going to Democrats. Trump was rewarded June 22, 2011, with an NBC whopping $130 million dollar contract for Apprentice following the April 27th, 2011 release of Obama’s long form fabrication in spite of NBC’s *Lawrence O’Donnell’s exacerbated cries of Trump as a racist.

*( http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-04-21/entertainment/30037350_1_donald-trump-hatred-racism )

In an era where television salaries are being slashed, long-term contracts are disappearing, and where so-called "Reality TV" (scripted television shows that do not pay their participants, or pay very low fees) is replacing quality programming a contract like this is irrelevant and abusive to the whole entertainment industry. One need only consider the political roots of MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell, who host “The Last Word” to understand the “Racist” tag that was a shot over the bow.

From 1989 through 1992, O'Donnell served as Senior Advisor to Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan. In 1992, he was Chief of Staff to the Senate Committee on the Environment and Public Works. From 1993 through 1995 he was the Chief of Staff of the Senate Finance Committee. He first began working with Sen. Moynihan as Director of Communications in the Senator's 1988 re-election campaign.

Indifference to the major networks patch work on Obama even now in a new * PPP poll a crushing 52% of Americans are part of the Birther Movement and the “Anti-Birther Crowd” is losing followers as fast as Newt in the Iowa polls today

*( http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2011/12/gingrich-collapses-iowa-ron-paul-surges-front/46360/ )

Heading into the Birther Movement 2012 one will see things that didn’t exist in 2008 in the form of growth, evidence, charges, and organization and this is translating itself into support for comprehensive legal work and political maneuvering with Candidates, Lawyers, and a Citizen population, SuperPacs, and many Patriot Organizations galvanized on the common thread among 50 States; The United States Constitution, and specifically Article II, Sect. 1, Clause 5’s demanding qualifications for the President.

New Hampshire has prided itself in supporting the United States Constitution and being the first State Primary to set the pace as a small but significant force in politics. Business is anything but usual in the first post-colonial sovereign north eastern state with what looks to be the most comprehensive well written legal challenge, with Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy representing STANDING in running as a Democrat, to remove Obama off the Ballot in front of the New Hampshire’s Supreme Court with the Primary still a month away.

In layman’s terms, the New Hampshire Supreme Court acting in the highest Judicial Body of law for New Hampshire, subject only to the U.S. Supreme Court, will see evidence of Obama not being qualified for President as a Natural Born Citizen from a presidential candidate within his own party, supported by 10 current members of New Hampshire’s State Legislature, and a lawyer whose the most experienced constitutional eligibility lawyer in the United States: Orly Taitz.

In addition the Court will see evidence supporting the long form birth certificate being a forged document, along with collaborating evidence supporting its forgery from Obama’s misappropriated Social Security identification, his altered draft registration and recent tax records, as well as a stacked or gerrymandered political panel making up the N.H. Election Law Commission.

Support for this action has come from thousands of hours of volunteers and contributors from Patriots all across the United States and its twin action has already been filed in the Georgia Federal District Court. One of the advantages of New Hampshire’s action is it’s at the State Supreme Court Level already with Candidates who have been kept off the ballot by Democrat Operatives for Obama shamefully representing a very small tent in the previously heralded big tent of the Democrat Party.

We here at the Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign headquarters would like to thank everyone who has helped us so far, and we would like to extend our appreciation for the State Senators everywhere who are standing up against the corruption and cronyism that has stained the Democrat Party. We are doing everything in our power to right the ship that has been hijacked by the elitist of the party. The Democrat Party has its roots embedded in the Constitution however many have forgotten about that in both parties.

Please extend your hand today so that we can make a charge in Texas. Now that Texas has 38 Electoral votes, four more than in 2008, and second only to California’s 55, one can see that Texas’ Winner-Take-All Electoral votes is a strategic objective for the Democrats in 2012 and we need to make sure Cody Robert Judy is on the ballot. The deadline for this Ballot is Feb 1st, 2011 so please make your contribution today in support of the Constitution Cody Robert Judy is standing up for so boldly and check out his new Three Ropes Initiative Platform page with a new featured video about the http://www.codyjudy.us/cody%20robert%20judy%204%20pres%202012%203%20ropes%20platform.htm ">3 Point Platform here:

( http://www.codyjudy.us/cody%20robert%20judy%204%20pres%202012%203%20ropes%20platform.htm )

www.codyjudy.us

Sincerely
Ms.Lori Grider
Western Regional Campaign Director
The Cody Robert Judy for President U.S.C Eligibility Campaign

A Dose of Reality- Religion,Gender Discrimination, and Eligibility

To the author known as One Pissed Off Vietnam Veteran in regards to the editorial featured at The Post & Email-

My Time Has Come
http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/10/08/my-time-has-come/

My considered answer entitled:
A Dose of Reality

A Dose of Reality

Dear One Pissed Off Vietnam Vet- First let me say how much I have enjoyed reading many of your articles and how much I respect your position and share your frustration with an unqualified occupant in the White House, that not one major tiered Republican Candidate in the Presidential Race is willing to acknowledge as a walking talking violation of Article 2, Sect 1, clause 5.

Respectfully, I would like to comment upon your stand as a Patriot and to soberly place a few facts before your consideration, which might sting a little. The Lord knows I’ve had a few facts placed before me before that stung a little, so I don’t do this with railing or accusation, but rather meaningfully in a brother to brother way.

Re: Second Paragraph- “.. bad news continues with the cancerous spread of Islam for women, who are forever reduced to second-class citizens. Muslims have a warped world view…”Muslims also spelled Moslem, is an adherent of Islam, a monotheistic, Abrahamic religion based on the Qur'an. As a Presidential Candidate representing your ability to preserve and protect U.S.C. Amendment 1- “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof”, comes a question. Is your statement a blanket statement against religion in America?

Make no mistake Islam is a religion protected under this clause of the United States Constitution. Women in the United States now still endure the short end of the stick when it comes to wage comparisons in the corporate arena. Recently even Wallmart was taken clear to the U.S. Supreme Court who ultimately dismissed the gender based law suit. http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2011/0620/Supreme-Court-dismisses-women-s-class-action-lawsuit-against-Wal-Mart , and the plaintiffs in the case were not represented as Islamic, nor have I seen your editorial about the ‘warped’ view of the public work sector which so many women in the U.S. face every day. Of course I recently saw a report of a mother in the military charging in a hail fire of bullets overhead to save her fellow U.S. soldiers in harm’s way. For her the privilege of serving has been extended to hostile actions in war where it was not so a few short years ago.

I’m sure the discrimination of women as a second class citizen can be extracted out of the King James Bible by any Christian reading that God took from man a rib and created women second, and they are upset about that. You could say God has a major law suit brewing against him for that action, but the job of the President is to protect our Constitution, and religion is a big part of that. Sure as hell you don’t stick up for Islam’s faith, pretty soon the Government comes out with an order calling all Christians who believe in the Holy Ghost delusional, and like TX-Governor Perry-R implemented in the forced vaccine of 12 year old girls, a vaccine supposedly created to prevent cervical cancer, bypassing his Texas Legislature, the government through an executive order of the President makes a drug company rich with a lucrative anti-Christian ghost pill. How important is it to protect religions as a President and stick to saying that freedom of conscience is of course allowed and extended to the Islamic Religion, however the physical implementation of actions against another human being that violate law shall receive the punishment of the law, and you know as well as I do, we have laws against slavery, against involuntary mutilation, against domestic violence, and murder.

My point is the line that is crossed between becoming a President that violates the protections of the Constitution by advocating specific and general nuisances against any particular religion is pretty clear when a specific religion is mentioned in a demeaning way. Contrary to what you imply, our Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land, and our criminal code applies to people across all religious sects. If it is not applied it is available because America doesn’t fight religious wars. That kinda separates us from the mentality of Taliban and we shouldn’t forget it, and if we do, we indeed have turned traitor rather than advocate of our own Constitution.

Paragraph 6- “That Obama is a felon is without question, and those who disagree need to define the word “crazy”: when the brain refuses to accept facts, such as Obama’s bogus Social Security number.” As a presidential candidate I’m sure you understand U.S.C. Amend. VI. In criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial…. To have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.” Again the words Obama is a felon should be replaced as Obama is accused, allegedly, and charged, because it’s not crazy to say Obama’s deeds have not been tried in a court of law, accept by one 10th Amendment Trial the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial of which I was a witness as a presidential candidate in 2008, who had also filed actions on McCain for being foreign born, and Obama for failing the, “to parents who are Citizens” part of the Natural Born Citizen clause. That trial did not involve Obama’s Social Security number however but dealt primarily with his eligibility and harm to the Constitution.

This brings me to the last point I’d like to make regarding what the 2012 Presidential Candidates “want America’s future to look like.” The Post and Email has graciously published 3 articles about my candidacy that is registered in the FEC as “The Cody Robert Judy for President U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign” which features Obama’s identity as a serious Constitutional crisis with my real name attached. As a Presidential Candidate yourself now, we don’t know your name and “One Pissed Off Vietnam Vet’,aka., “OPOVV”, is not your real name or the one that you volunteered for in the United States Military with.

So, your humble reader here, is left wondering wither your actually mocking the efforts of those of us who are serious about our Constitution, or wither we should laugh about your comedic skills as if voting none of the above is a choice we should make, disparaging the choice such as mine that was serious and legitimate?

As a Presidential Candidate who has been in this fight since 2008, as a non-partisan party, suing both McCain and Obama with my own hard earned coin that wasn’t cheap or easily earned, I can tell you as a candidate a few of the questions you will be asked that you must find an answer to; “Where where you in 2008? Why has the qualification question eluded you till now? What legal action did your convictions drive you towards the past 4 years besides exercising your first Amendment rights of free speech? And finally, given the fact that you undoubtedly have read the 3 articles of the Post and Email regarding a legitimate and qualified Presidential Candidate who has a record in Federal Court and has a non partisan record towards making the Qualification Question a Constitutional Issue, and not a partisan or racial issue, why have you not contributed towards that campaign a single dollar? Or if you have, how much did you contribute, or how much time did you spend promoting that if you didn’t have any money to send?

This is a question for every Patriot should ask, and one Sharon Rondeau can affirm with courage that she has spent quite abit of time promoting as a service to our country. Thank you Sharon Rondeau of The Post & Email for that courage!

Thank you for your attention to our Constitution
Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.uswww.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES