NATURAL BORN CITIZEN WALL
failing the art of the deal
TRUMP v. JUDY
Endorses TX Cruz as Constitutionally Qualified- R.I.P. TX Gov. Rick Perry
Featured Editorial: The Post & Email
Featured Editorial: The Post & Email
In my third political race as a presidential candidate I've experienced some things that those making 2016 their first presidential political race have not. For instance I've experienced making it past the first one to drop out three times now R.I.P Gov. Rick Perry. TX-R. I've also experienced in the two presidential elections that I made it to the general election on, casting a write-in vote for myself on, watching a few Candidates make big mistakes that didn't end their races, and watching a few candidates make minor mistakes that people credited their dropping out of the race on. That is what I'd like to address in this post.
Last night I had a dream kind of exposing this theme and made a comment last night on Facebook that also may have contributed to this line of thought. In my dream I was showing up for a college test in a class that was rather like a social studies test. I had missed only one hour of the class during the year forgetting for some reason where it was held. In other words, I hadn't missed it because I wanted to sluff it or thought it unimportant. So it was it seemed I was showing up for the Finals Test slightly not as prepared as I'd like, and a little nervous.
I asked one of my class mates who was quite a brain in the class about the pronunciation in identifying the body parts ending in the suffix aux and whether the "O" was pronounced or the "X" was sounded out. She looked at me and grinned and said it didn't really matter and advised me to just take the test and do the best I could because the teacher was going to be very lenient in grading such and that it wouldn't count as much as I thought which relieved my nervousness somewhat. This was the end of the dream.
Many of the articles I read about TX. Gov. Rick Perry dropping out related in their reports that he just was never able to overcome his fumble in the debate of 2012 in which he failed to recall at the instant which of the three Government Cabinet positions or Agencies of Government he was proposing to cut. If you missed that here's the clip from the 2012 debate:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTNjhcyx7dM
Now you notice in the video Gov. Perry turns to his fellow Texan 2013 Rep. Ron Paul- 14th District acknowledging him for his plan to cut 5 burgeoning bureaucratic agencies down. Ron Paul had detailed an economic savings package for the Government by terminating over 200,000 jobs in the Departments of Commerce, Education, Energy, Interior, and Housing & Urban Development he felt were counter productive. Rep. Paul offered not one life-saving word to assist his own Texas Governor instead opting to watched him sink and drowned on the stage of the debate even though Governor Perry has acknowledged that there was some good ideas in Paul's plan. But I don't think that had much to do with Perry's Popularity.
The question then became who did the American People think had failed more in the debate? Would Gov. Perry's gaffe -[(/gaf/) an unintentional act or remark causing embarrassment to its originator; a blunder] or Rep Paul's faux pas [(fō ˈpä/) an embarrassing or tactless act or remark in a social situation] end up worse?
I really do not think there has been one story written about Rep. Paul's unwillingness to throw a 'one word' life saving rope to Gov. Perry's rescue. We are left with the word "Energy" effectively contributing according to the Media to the entire downfall of Perry's Presidential Campaign in 2012 and still effectively recognized in now an exiting 2016 bid for the Office of the President. I'll tell you one thing, I wouldn't hesitate when it comes to experience in Texas and our nations borders asking Governor Rick Perry for advice. I really feel in my heart he loves America.
Consider for a moment what we are regulating the Office of the President to if we are simply subjecting our debating Presidential Candidates to a spelling bee - memorization test- or academic social studies class they can have no notes for on stage? I noticed FL. Gov. Jeb Bush didn't hesitate to push this as an advantage when Reported in a September 3rd story he said, "You gotta know the who the players are" referring to an interview Trump did with Hugh Hewitt where Trump accused him of asking 'Gotcha Questions'. Hugh Hewitt had quizzed Trump on knowing the leaders of the four terrorist organizations Hamas, Hezbollah, al-Nusra and ISIS as well as not knowing the General of the Iranian elite Quds forces, he took for Kurds.
Presidential Candidate Fiorina jabbed Trump also on the lapse stating it was important to have 'requisite knowledge'. She stated on Hugh Hewitt's Radio Show, "I think it is very difficult to lead if you don't have the requisite knowledge," Sunday morning of Trump's mix-up of the Kurds and Quds Forces.
I wonder if Fiorina could have named our own U.S. Military Leaders in the Marines-Commandant Joesph F. Dunford Jr., Army-Secretary John McHugh, Navy-Secretary Ray Maybus, Air force-General Mark A. Welsh III, Special Forces-General Joseph L. Votel, and Coast Guard Admiral Paul F. Zukufnt ?
Academic tests are for the most part graded upon the memorization of ingested answers and comprehension of material that is downloaded in your brain for recall. The answers in the presidential race can be googled by anyone really to make any 'natural born Citizen' qualified, look pretty smart. Not allowing the Candidates to have an iPhone available to google things along with a 30 second time period with which to 'call a friend' to solicit a brief, or 'google', is essentially regulating the Office of the President to 'Google knowledge' without 'Google' or 'Friends to call upon'. This is essentially like basing your vote on a game-show type criteria rather than the reality of the parameters understood for the Office of the President.
The only problem with that is it's not real. While in the Office of the President any person has access to google and a host of friends and colleagues to call upon in order to be briefed on any pressing subject. Gov. Perry's record in Texas is quite impressive as Aaron Gardner wrote in Red State 's Sept. 11,entitled article 'They Will Fall One By One, An Unpitied Sacrifice in a Contemptible Struggle:
"It troubles me greatly that we are at a moment in the conservative movement, and the Republican Party as a whole, in which a 14 year Governor of the world's 12th largest economy, a state that created 1.5 million jobs when the rest of the nation lost 400,000, is rejected out of hand for a pompous T.V. reality star attempting to purchase the GOP Primary. Even more troubling is the movement conservatives who have been either complacent, or complicit in the rise of Trump. I can't honestly remain a registered Republican if Donald Trump is to be the standard bearer."
Gardner makes a couple of mistakes in his reasoning here as far as the United States of America's leadership. Number one, he assumes that Gov. Perry is more qualified than Presidential Candidate Donald Trump to run the Country based on Perry's experience as an elected official. As I've written about before, Kenya does have a regulation for their Deputy President that we do not. For instance their President must come from a prior government position as well as having a scholastic requirement. This instigates very easily a ruling elite class based on economics and a social ladder that can easily become corrupted in what we see as an 'Establishment' that is stumbling here now in America in both major parties because of their poor performances.
If one of those requirements were implemented in our U.S. Constitution for the Office of the President do you realize Mr. Trump, Mrs. Fiorina, and Mr. Carson would be constitutionally unqualified? Now, rather then respect the wisdom and soundness of this, these three have not said a word about Cruz, Rubio, and Jindal being constitutionally unqualified as 'natural born Citizens' ie. Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.
One thing that was very *poignant however about Gardner's article was this paragraph I found enthralling as a "tell" if you will, or give-a-way of a gambler you could count on to know if he's bluffing or has a good hand:
*"Running for President, especially as a movement conservative, must be done from principle. Those who compromise their principle for a temporary tactical advantage, those who are more concerned with positioning in the polls and wither at the risk involved to associate with the good.. these people have displayed a serious flaw in their character." How true that is...and it applies to Gov. Perry's lack of principle in the interest of our national security 'natural born Citizen clause he has not used his bully pulpit for.
I commented on my FBF Bettina Viviano page posting of Gardner's article understanding she is a Gov. Rick Perry fan on steroids: " Wonder if all the Gov. Rick Perry supporters will support me if my SCOTUS Case hammers out Obama, Cruz, Rubio, and Jindal, or, if they would just hope Gov. Perry gets back in?" She hasn't "liked" the comment yet but three others have and four others 'liked' my reflection of Gardner's paragraph as *'poignant' including the author.
The reasons I like this paragraph and the reasons others like it are probably on different sides of the planet and the only reason they would be is because rooted in the 'conservative principles' certainly most any conservative would admit is Article II., Sect I, clause 5 which holds the qualifications of the Office of the President to be a higher standard than those of a U.S. Rep., and U.S. Senator including the 'natural born Citizen' clause unmentioned in the latter's qualifications.
Now if you want to make history and case law your friends in that defense, why do you not acknowledge we have had 41 President's who were qualified under the Constitution's terms of 'natural born Citizen' or 'Citizen' at the time of the adoption of the Constitution and 1 who burned his identification records and 1 in the Office now who posted something that resembles more of a cut and paste job rather than what an original 1961 typewriter could hammer out, and on that you have a disqualifying dual citizenship recognized as inherited from his Kenyan father who was never a U.S. Citizen?
You might also recognize the purpose of the 'national security' principle was to strictly prohibit Kings, Prime Ministers, Dictators,Tyrants, and Foreign Despots from bedding an American gal down and inheriting the U.S. Office as the President he financed himself to, entirely possible without the WALL.
Now what difference does it make if Donald Trump builds a WALL for our national security purposes but adopts a 'constitutional construction' format that lets the WALL placed in our Constitution to be breached by foreigners to that office because the assailant of that WALL is certainly not going to enforce the parameter of the one built by Trump at the border. So which WALL is more important to uphold first?
Of course you gotta protect the inside of the vessel or protecting the outside of the vessel doesn't make any sense and is necessarily moot. If you allow a grenade to be placed on the inside of a ceramic vase while you protect the outside with a fence so it doesn't get knocked over, how much sense does that make? If you pull the pin in the grenade how long will your outside parameter fence last before the vase is blown up from the inside? Right! Maybe three seconds!
Now let me illustrate this in real time with real issues applying to us right now.
Trump just endorsed Cruz as eligible for the Office of the President read it on FLIP FLOP: DONALD TRUMP
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has reversed his position on Ted Cruz’s eligibility to run for president, now saying his Canadian birthplace shouldn’t disqualify him.
“I hear it was checked out by every attorney and every which way and I understand Ted is in fine shape,” Trump told ABC News just before speaking at a Capitol Hill rally blasting the Iran nuclear deal.
That stands in stark contrast to what Trump said about Cruz in December, when he told ABC News that Cruz’s Canadian birth could prevent him from running.This stand in stark contrast to the one of this Campaigns Latest Video's spotlighting Trump's birther comments in the Media:
JUST ONE ASPECT OF THE JUDY V. OBAMA in The IRAN TREATY DEAL
Now let's just pretend for an instant that what the Republican Side of the isle is saying is true - That the Iran Deal is a bad deal with grave consequences for decades as Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell suggested, and House Republican Leader John Boehner said that Obama violated the law because he didn't give Congress all the information on the Iran nuclear deal.
Would Congress even be considering anything from Obama's Desk if he is not eligible or is unqualified according to the 'natural born Citizen' clause of the Constitution for the Office of the President? Absolutely not.
So why Republicans wring the hands and wipe the sweat off their brow about Obama's lawlessness, they ignore Obama's constitutional ineligibility, which is the Law, themselves. How much sense does that make?
We are also faced now with Israel being wiped off the face of the map, and terrorist attacks escalating into the nuclear realm all because of three words "natural born Citizen" not being enforced.
We all know the Iran Deal had to be sent to Congress for consideration with a signature of an eligible qualified person in the Office of the White House. So if its approved by Congress and they did not have the votes to stop it while they winked at the 'natural born Citizen' clause as a trivial national security measure, perhaps if in the future Iran has and releases the nuclear bomb wiping Israel out or a major city like New York in the U.S. , you all might come to the reality that the 'natural born Citizen' qualification in the Constitution was actually very important words and was a WALL that was taken down, by most all the politicians as well as the leading Republican Candidate for President now in Mr. Trump.
It's interesting he has called the Iran Nuclear Deal a bad deal, but just endorsed it with an endorsement of Cruz. If you do not start drawing lines from point to point, your choices are going to haunt you for the rest of your life America. Can you imagine the horror of hearing not that a building was knocked down by a plane and some explosions, but that an entire city with a population of 8-9 million was gone?
By God I'll bet that would get your attention wouldn't it! Yes, well I'm trying to get your attention before that happens and have been begging you to listen. Is Israel listening to me? No. Is the Republican Party Listening to me? No. Is the Democratic Party listening to me? No. Is the United States Supreme Court listening to me? Well, we are going to see. We will see in the Conference of September 28th, 2015 how favored the Justices are in wiping Israel off the map or a large city in the U.S because they failed to take a stand with three words in the Constitution raised by someone with legal standing.
I wonder how much of Mr. Donald's Trump's wealth would vanish if New York City was wiped out? Its interesting because he really could be reduced to ashes by his endorsement of Cruz as qualified. That's how fast it can happen. Mr. Trump reduced to ashes because he didn't have the courage for the Constitution and now look at him? A man who was worth 10 Billion reduced to a negative pittance.
You know what if Mr. Trump were so smart he would have 10 lawyers at my door by noon today with red carpet, champagne,sweet potato and roasted onion triscuits and caviar making sure I didn't stub my toe in
getting to the U.S. Supreme Court to protect his fortune... but it appears in that way he's just not that intelligent.
As for 'conservative principles' Gardner nailed it but not in a genuine defense of conservative principles because he fails to recognize how important of a 'conservative principle' the 'natural born Citizen' requirement is for the Office of the President. While it maybe a test, its in the Constitution and none of the Candidate's running that are cow-tipped by the Media have stood up for it. It is a much greater 'national security' concern than anything we face at this point as is made very clear now with the Iran Nuclear Deal.
As for 'conservative principles' Gardner nailed it but not in a genuine defense of conservative principles because he fails to recognize how important of a 'conservative principle' the 'natural born Citizen' requirement is for the Office of the President. While it maybe a test, its in the Constitution and none of the Candidate's running that are cow-tipped by the Media have stood up for it. It is a much greater 'national security' concern than anything we face at this point as is made very clear now with the Iran Nuclear Deal.
In fact, I urged Bettina, who also is a witness on my SCOTUS Case by-the-way that Bill and Hillary Clinton know Obama's not qualified, to get Gov. Perry to start to rally for my cause and the Birthers when he nose dived in the Polls. I have posted a message myself on Gov. Perry's FB board, but it was just on deaf ears. I really do not see any difference between Trump's art of the deal than he places as a void upon all the other candidates including Perry- and now you know why.
Let me say this and I think there is truth to be seen in the Republican Leadership not going full tilt boogie on Obama and this Iran deal especially given the Corker Principle applied. My intelligence sources tell me Iran's already got the nuke. The Iran Nuclear Deal is really a $150 Billion dollar hush-puppy-money deal made so they don't use it on Obama's watch, but it will be 20/20 hindsight regarding Obama's watch that he did let them get it. That's kind of like President Bill Clinton not inheriting the devastation the reversal of the Glass-Steagall Act caused in the housing market on his watch, but it happened.
You don't think the General to Iran's elite fighting Quds Force- Qasem Soleimani was meeting with Russia President Putin just for better caviar do you? Remember Pakistan was able to acquire a Nuclear Bomb without the world knowing until after they had it also with a cover-up. We know Russia is selling the S-300 Anti-Aircraft System to Iran and China has made a new air force being purchased by Iran with the $150 Billion proceeds Obama is lifting, and for what its worth, the systems and protections must be now very necessary to protect what would be nuclear devastation to Iran if it were hit.
Do we really suppose Obama failed to get our 4 hostages, set up a 24 day waiting period of time and what could be a weeks-end-process to get to the 24 days as a firm grip on Iran, while they receive 150 Billion in lifted sanctions because they do not have a bomb?
Can we make a better deal or does Iran already have us over a barrel? Both seem to ring true unfortunately. Do you suppose just because Iran got a nuclear weapon they would use it instantly, or would they use it as Mr. Trump so often quotes as leverage to squeeze the best possible circumstances out of it becoming a favored nation? Has Obama fudged a little on what was happening in Benghazi to the American People to protect his reputation and election of 2012? Why do you suppose less is happening with Iran when the deal is so bad?
Why doesn't Obama just hold up a sign that says:
Americans, get smart, get educated, and then stand up and support that which has given you so much, as a well that never fails. It does remind me that this time was foretold: Amos 8:11
"Behold, the days come, saith the Lord GOD, that I will send a famine in the land, not a famine of bread, nor a thirst for water, but of hearing the words of the LORD"
God Bless You!
Please, consider a Contribution Now by clicking the secure Paypal link. You contribution Today will help make a Better America Tomorrow!
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Cody Robert Judy's book :
Taking A Stand- the Conservative Independent Voice.
Let me say this and I think there is truth to be seen in the Republican Leadership not going full tilt boogie on Obama and this Iran deal especially given the Corker Principle applied. My intelligence sources tell me Iran's already got the nuke. The Iran Nuclear Deal is really a $150 Billion dollar hush-puppy-money deal made so they don't use it on Obama's watch, but it will be 20/20 hindsight regarding Obama's watch that he did let them get it. That's kind of like President Bill Clinton not inheriting the devastation the reversal of the Glass-Steagall Act caused in the housing market on his watch, but it happened.
You don't think the General to Iran's elite fighting Quds Force- Qasem Soleimani was meeting with Russia President Putin just for better caviar do you? Remember Pakistan was able to acquire a Nuclear Bomb without the world knowing until after they had it also with a cover-up. We know Russia is selling the S-300 Anti-Aircraft System to Iran and China has made a new air force being purchased by Iran with the $150 Billion proceeds Obama is lifting, and for what its worth, the systems and protections must be now very necessary to protect what would be nuclear devastation to Iran if it were hit.
Do we really suppose Obama failed to get our 4 hostages, set up a 24 day waiting period of time and what could be a weeks-end-process to get to the 24 days as a firm grip on Iran, while they receive 150 Billion in lifted sanctions because they do not have a bomb?
Can we make a better deal or does Iran already have us over a barrel? Both seem to ring true unfortunately. Do you suppose just because Iran got a nuclear weapon they would use it instantly, or would they use it as Mr. Trump so often quotes as leverage to squeeze the best possible circumstances out of it becoming a favored nation? Has Obama fudged a little on what was happening in Benghazi to the American People to protect his reputation and election of 2012? Why do you suppose less is happening with Iran when the deal is so bad?
Why doesn't Obama just hold up a sign that says:
"Welcome to the Nuclear World Iran- Paid for by the U.S.A."
Began this Post with the defending Gov. Perry's mistakes on the debate stage. Defended his gaffes on the stage as most irrelevant compared to his mistakes of not standing up against Obama's ineligibility. We see in understanding this a much greater judgement is necessarily in the deliberations for choosing a person to be president. It will be to navigate our ship through the mine fields we have as a challenge and really President George Washington had it right when he referred our defense to the omnipotence of that God alone able to protect us.
Tis not schooling or memorization we need now America. It's the ability to receive REVELATION from God. I am humbled by the fact that I alone am the only one who has a bi-partisan record in federal court on this 'natural born Citizen' clause as the nucleus of our Constitution to which there is a grenade. That is my stand in the U.S. Supreme Court folks. The stand not one Republican or Democratic Party Candidate for president supports in a recognition of conservative principles that binds our nation together. I recognize myself this revelation in doing what I have been doing the last six and a half years.
There are many things I am weak in and grammar, punctuation, spelling, and articulation are among them I admit. If I were elected President I would do my very best not to embarrass our People in representing myself well. As a component of that I would employ getting Briefings from the very best we had in varying points of views. But basically much comes down to a simple yes or no given the circumstances we find ourselves in weighed in the balance of preserving, protecting, and defending the Constitution of the United States, which is in the President's Oath.
Moses also referred himself to be a little slower in speech which is why the Lord gave him Aaron who was a mouthpiece.Exodus 4:10 but Moses was able to guide the children of Israel through the deserts and out of harms way with a navigation we understand to be Revelation. You might wisely check that in your box as a consideration for who you choose for President considering also how Cody Robert Judy is the only Candidate for President who has a bi-partisan Record on the 'natural born Citizen' clause of our Constitution and then remember how important it is with what we are facing now.
Americans, get smart, get educated, and then stand up and support that which has given you so much, as a well that never fails. It does remind me that this time was foretold: Amos 8:11
"Behold, the days come, saith the Lord GOD, that I will send a famine in the land, not a famine of bread, nor a thirst for water, but of hearing the words of the LORD"
God Bless You!
Please, consider a Contribution Now by clicking the secure Paypal link. You contribution Today will help make a Better America Tomorrow!
Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy
2016 D- CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT
The CRJ TODAY for a BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW
Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.
Web Site www.codyjudy.us
Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.
Web Site www.codyjudy.us
Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Cody Robert Judy's book :
Taking A Stand- the Conservative Independent Voice.
Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.
*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396
Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin
The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.
Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.
INSPIRING - I believe in You
APPLICATION FOR STAY PENDING FULL REVIEW ON THE RECUSAL OF JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT AND KAGAN FROM PROCEEDINGS
