ObamaQuake is Coming

Had a dream last night that I used my cell phone to call 911 twice on two separate, but related incidences, on a robbery and authorities would not respond. Left me with an ominous feeling and I thought this morning when I woke up that it was as bad as authorities not responding to Obama's fraudulent identification and non-natural born citizenship status. When the law fails us we are alone in times of trouble. When the people we have entrusted to enforce the law fail to do so, the law indeed has become corrupt. Its a bad feeling and a tragic societal suicide that comes in ObamaQuake. I just have a bad feeling we're headed for a pit of hell unparalleled in our Country.

It seems troublesome at best especially in the wake of this news about such gains with the Dow also touched a record intraday high at 14,716.46

In the past whenever I've dreamed of a cell phone its signified for me that I was pretty tuned in and receptive to what was about to happen. This accompanied with the two repeated 911 calls lets me know their is a BIG lesson headed (my) or our way perhaps the authorities haven't even seen coming?



You know I wouldn't wish it on anyone but I know when our Government aligns itself against the Constitution, somethings going to give and I don't think its going to be the Constitution that carries so much valiant blood with it.

Response LTR to Dinesha D'Souza's Director/Writer of Obama's America 2016 response to Cody Robert Judy request.

Dear Mr. D'Souza:

Thank you so much for your response. That is very appreciated and very kind of you. I look forward to seeing "America" and was very happy about your great success on "Obama's America 2016".

When I took my Mom to see it and we walked out the "somber mood" was palatable of the packed house. Its a real shame that the RNC and their candidate Romney didn't/wouldn't support the USC in the eligibility demands of our USC that Obama clearly fails. In 2008 I sued Sen. John McCain also as a Pres Candidate and served the RNC Chairs and McCain 3 days before he made the nomination.

Running as a Democrat in 2012 I sued Obama all the way through the N.H. and Georgia State Courts to the U.S. Supreme Court culminating in Judy v. Obama 12- 5276. It was just sad that nearly 60% of Republicans did not believe Obama was a NBC but the leadership refused to get behind efforts like mine in the Congress as well as support in front of the Courts.

When McCain landed U.S. Sen. Res. 511, the second Congressional Act of his own murky citizenship defying natural law, the deal was struck with co-sponsors Obama and Clinton on the non-binding senate resolution 511 and Obama's path was paved by both R's and D's.

Listening to your CPAC speech, I agreed. The Lion Tamer "Obama" is weaker then the Lion "The American People", but arousing the facilities of the Lion and presenting a legal path responsible to our Republic in the Constitution's Law has all but been bulldozed and disregarded in both parties.

In rewarding the *spirit* of entrepreneurship in your new movie "America" remember, the only defense for America is the United States Constitution. No other law exist as the Supreme Law of the Land and without the foundation of the "Natural Born Citizen" = Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents, as the national security demands in the Office of the Pres, and President George Washington and the Chief Justice John Jay agreed, there is no resolution to foreign heads of states taking the U.S. Military and thus The People. Its that important!

The founders of our Nation wanted a nation for everyone, where ones status of birth would not limit their ability to succeed in almost any task that they could set their hearts and minds too. This is what your new movie is about no? Yet, they had put pen to paper to set aside only one aspiration from all citizens and to reserve that for a class of citizens whose members are called “a natural born citizen,” demanded for only the office of the President and Vice President of the United States of America.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITCr420K4i8&list=PL42539C3948B285D1&index=1



Article II, Section 1

“No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.”

Because 1/3rd of our Government rest in one man's hands in the Executive Branch which is the enforcing Branch the military Branch, greater qualification was necessary. Don't you think it remarkable that throughout 237 years and many attempts at changing it the Legislative Branch has held firm in NOT CHANGING IT? It's a legislative mandate, yet it is unenforceable by Congress and the Judicial Branch as a matter of men being ruled by the Supreme law of the Land all have sworn oaths to?

The spirit of America's appreciation for entrepreneurship, over a ruling or elite class, is only managed by the USC's principles. When they are abandoned, America is no better off then any other Nation and freedom and liberty have been chained up and shackled, the light on the hill has been doused.

It is sincerely difficult to be right in the law but helpless to enforcing it when the Courts have turned a blind eye and taken their blindfold off for Obama. I am one who had standing and was severely run over in a hit and run by Obama in the Presidential Race. My record of the events is available in the U.S. Supreme Court Judy v. Obama 12-5276. It is certainly a travesty to see so many people witness this hit-and-run, and offer no help but simply keep doing what they are doing.

All I have is the record of the incident and recklessness of Obama, but the record is true and correct, and clearly shows he is a usurper. I'm sure you understand a usurper is an illegitimate or controversial claimant to power, often but not always in a monarchy. This may include a person who succeeds in establishing himself as a monarch without inheriting the throne or any other person exercising authority unconstitutionally. It may also be applied to an official acting ultra vires, outside his authority or jurisdiction.

My Best Regards to your future endeavors,
Cody Robert Judy

CRJ PRODUCTIONS
Cody Robert Judy
Ph:
YouTube: CODY JUDY
Project :
I AM YOUR MAN a Movie/Script based on the book TAKING A STAND




Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 13:42:58 -0400
Subject: Re: I AM YOUR MAN - TAKING A STAND
From: Dinesh D'souza
To:

Thanks so much. I'm working on a few film myself and can't take on additional projects.

best, Dineshá

Republicans & Democrats make Bright Future for 3rd Independent Party

Republicans & Democrats make Bright Future for 3rd Independent Party

The FUTURE is looking Bright for 3rd Independent Party

Constitution Defenders have two extremely bright reports for a 3rd Independent Party rising out of the crisp Constitution burning in the Republican and Democrat Party.

Eric Cantor and Paul Ryan are pretend conservatives with plans to cave on universal background checks.

[The] Republican Majority Leader is leading the charge to cut a deal with President Obama.

The following are just some of the threats to our 2nd Amendment liberties that Republicans are about to shove down our throats:

1.The NRA is cutting backroom deals to centralize gun owner data collection into the Obama/Holder massive government data base.

A centralized system is less costly to fight and far more lucrative for the NRA to appear to be “fixing“.

Like all establishment political lobbies the key to their job security is assisting in making problems they end up being called upon to “fix“.

2. Republican Majority Leader Eric Cantor is leading the charge to give Obama and Holder what they want in exchange for appearing to be “fixing” the problem of innocent children being butchered in our public and private schools.

3. Newly appointed Republican Judiciary Chairman, Bob Goodlatte R-VA 6th District, is providing political cover for the sneaky back room gun control deals and gun grabbing sell outs that his political masters - – John Boehner and Eric Cantor – - are cutting with Obama and his corrupt Attorney General, Eric Holder.

4.Political insiders have confirmed Goodlatte earned his brand new chairmanship by ignoring the constitutional demands and grievances of every Republican Unit Chairman in his own 6th district.


5.With Republicans in control of the US House of Representatives gun control legislation is already beginning to see so-called “conservative champions” folding to pressure from the anti-gun media to sell-out gun owners.

6.Former Vice Presidential candidate, Congressman Paul Ryan, has stated that he would support legislation that bans private sales at gun shows.

7.In the House, Majority Leader Eric Cantor, along with the help of Rep. Scott Rigell (VA), Patrick Meehan (PA) and others, have stated openly that they will work together with anti-gun Democrats from Maryland and New York to tighten restrictions on private firearms sales and expand background checks.

8.Possibly even more upsetting has been Senator Tom Coburn’s willingness to work alongside anti-gunner Chuck Schumer (NY) to propose “bi-partisan” anti-gun legislation in the Senate.

Make no mistake, so-called “expansion” of background checks is little more than a blatant attempt by anti-gunners to register all firearms and gun owners in America and that's why the future is looking bright for America's 3rd Independent Party.

I also wanted to publish for readers a consideration to keep in the back of your mind. Its a response from me to an article written by Lawrence Sellins who I always enjoy reading. Here's the article link I responded to and did so because we do need hope and faith in our day that allied to our Constitution our Land can maintain freedom and liberty under the United States Constitution, while providing a place for dreams to come true we don't have to abandon our poor and needy or our elderly and sick.


Written By Lawrence Sellin
http://www.newyorkdailysun.com/obamas-dystopia/1855


Nice article Lawrence, always like your writing style. You know in reading that it makes you wonder about the 2nd Coming of Christ and how exactly Zion will be set up? Christ of course taught Peter and the Church was set up on that kind of a system, all contributing to all and receiving all in a consecration type of 'utopia'.

What it seemed is that you identify "selfishness", and "greed" as values of a whole society unworthy of a "utopia" but exterminating those values wouldn't lead to such; so 'dystopia" is all there is to look forward to or to hope in?

Its a very difficult thing to address but one every great writer should consider. Jesus had a society where all contributed to all and all received all that was needed. The matter was self exposed in the story in Act 5.

What I was wondering or intrigued by is the question in my mind about what you felt was the difference between what your advocating and how Jesus had set up his Church on Earth which then Peter inherited as leader because obviously as Christians we keep that in mind, but you kind of left it out of your article when Christ did indeed have that kind of a system.

With Christ example however it was indeed the Sadducee and Pharisees that wrecked utopia (Zion) and not Christ and I'm not sure why his example is not used in speaking of a perfect society in the positive sense,as "Plato's Republic" to the French Revolution to the "Communist Manifesto" were used as negative notes of failure.

I think if people lose hope in such a system of perfection, Christ certainly would be considered an enemy by supposed Christians upon his return, wouldn't you?

Of course barring in mind when an elected Legislature betrays the system of checks and balances meant to keep our Executive Branch in check, I suppose a sign of weaknesses under our American Constitution is understood. As our Legislature or the elected Representatives don't have the collective will to remove Obama as a non-natural born citizen, they invite their own removal and stoke the public perceptions to question.

Certainly is interesting times we live in.

Of course a Christian believe is indeed set up to embrace a King system, understanding that under a righteous King indeed lays a 1000 year Millennium as the Bible teaches if Christians do believe in the Bible's prophesy and have not deposed it to a Dystopia.

Inspiring the balance is probably only achieved by the complete wrecking of what we have known as we well deserve in the sins of pride and greed and selfishness, which ultimately we are seeing.

I hope you will keep the inspired hope alive in your powerful writing, as we as a society and people do need to believe in righteousness and truth.

Of course I know you have blasted both Dems and Rep. in the utter failure of defending our Constitution and ultimately our Constitution which if followed I do believe is a good balance allowing freedom, choice, and defending those rights set therein, and providing a system of charity where Christianities highest principles of grace, mercy, and justice can prevail.

We do need to have a hope of perfection, to maintain a hope in God's Heavens.

Always a pleasure reading your writing.

Cody Robert Judy

More and More people I think are starting to understand that the Republicans and Democrat Centralized Party system controllers have paralyzed our United States Constitution and there's no denying what they are up to.

With both parties unwilling to address the natural born citizen clause of our Constitution and apply it with Obama as not a natural born citizen, there really is no obstacle between breaking up the United States into less then a perfect union. Obama's lack of transparency is even recognized today here with the mainstream lamestream, as MSN covered a Slate article that called Obama's transparency an Iron Wall.

This then defines the place and work for the 3rd party. We all know the other parties will gravitate to what is popularly supported. If the American People will support this effort Obama may be retired much earlier based on the Constitution.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4otwMXGzvac



If your still with me you gotta check out my new song and some awesome stunts I did in the video that included jumping from one train to another!

www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY or CODE4PRES

Check out Cody's new song here: I AM YOUR MAN

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yzoFwprP5is

Hope & Change 2nd Amendment v. Your NBC Family Defense

Hope & Change v. Your Family Defense

An interesting thought has come up this morning with Glenn Beck commentary about the 2nd Amendment which I think is very relevant to the Natural Born Citizen qualification of the Constitution for the Office of the President. Why not just change the Constitution if you think you’re so right?

One of the many wonderful things about our progressive Founding Fathers wanting to empower individuals as Citizens rather than Subjects of the King was that they realized in what can only be seen as a bow of humility toward intellectualism that it was true, they may not have been able to predict problems that may arise in the future for which the United States Constitution was not equipped, so they actually put in a direct way to change the Constitution.
If you thought your idea was so good with the population, and so wildly popular there is a mechanism within the Constitution to change it, and it can be done very quickly! All you need is a 2/3rds vote of Congress.

Certainly with the mainstream media behind the usurpation of the Office of the president by an illegal person who’s not qualified for the Office of the President, the consenting Republicans in office like Sen. John McCain who actually received his “Citizen” status by law when he was 11 months old, and his “Natural Born Citizen” status in 2008 by Non-binding U.S. Sen. Res. 511 with only one objection by Republicans, and the majority in the U.S. Senate with Democrats, it would be a cinch right?

If progressive Democrats feel the population is so widely for rescinding the Constitution’s unique qualifications for the Office of the President as a “Natural Born Citizen”, which protects by two generations any person from ascending into the White House by the demand of being born in the U.S. to Citizen parents, then why don’t they just change it? Why haven’t they changed it so that for instance a young Supreme Leader from say North Korea could copulate with an American Citizen and finance his off-spring to the head of the U.S. Government long before he passes away?

I mean talk about a good idea! If you were North Korea’s new leader and you wanted to get your hands on the U.S. Nuclear Stock Pile, don’t you think that would be a good plan? I mean that’s all you have to do. Just snatch a poor young American Girl and have a baby with her and bam you have got the White House!

As a dictator you’ve got your entire Country paying you directly all the taxes just like the King of England’s subjects whose duty was to come over to America and subjugate the wild young colonialist in America. You don’t have to rely on contributions to your campaign; you just take it from your subjects at whatever rate you feel will do the job.
What is wrong with that idea Democrats & Republicans?

You know one of the really nice things about this? You don’t have Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Lora Ingram, Marco Rubio, Rick Santorum, John McCain, Bobby Jindal, Newt Gingrich, even Sarah Palin, and not one of the former Candidate Republican stars who ran for President in 2012 like Mitt Romney or Jon Huntsman speaking out against the idea! What could possibly go wrong?

I mean these guys are acting as the best friend of North Korea or Iran’s Supreme Leaders future children. The foreign leaders wouldn’t even have to copulate with the American girl, they could just fly their sperm over here and have it artificially inseminated into the American mother, and bam 9 months later out pops their kid on U.S. Soil, and 35 years later they have their own son or daughter controlling the whole nuclear arsenal of the United States as well as the treasury.

Don’t you think that’s a good idea? Don’t you think that should be a breeze to change in the Constitution with 2/3rds majority in Congress? Look how easy Obamacare passed with a majority in the House, Senate and Obama in the White House. What’s the difference in doing the same thing with the 2nd Amendment if you’re so opposed to an armed American Population? Change it. Change the Constitution if you’re so sure your idea is so good.

You mean to tell me after 5 years Obama can’t change the “Natural Born Citizen” qualification in the Constitution after it has been challenged in Congress with testimony in the Judiciary Committee’s of the House and Senate over and over and over and over as recent as 2000 and 2004?

If you think the idea of requiring a two generation defense in place for the top position of the Executive Branch of our Government and that not doing so is SOOOOO discriminatory that you’re willing to place the entire American Army and the entire nuclear arsenal in the hands of a puppet or subject of the King, then just change it. I’m sure you have the entire population behind changing it, just like you have the entire population behind changing the 2nd Amendment to read “no one has a right to a weapon loaded with bullets”.

Please, let me spell out what a completely asinine paradox this is. It seems obvious but apparently the so called ‘conservative leaders’ don’t get it, so let’s make it very clear okay?

You mean to tell me I’m unreasonable for saying that the “Natural Born Citizen “requirement as a defense of the people from our Executive Branch of Government, meaning a check point of trust by the people from the President, the one guy that controls an entire Branch of the 3 Branches we have in our Government and the one Branch who has all the weapons at its disposal, the one guy who controls the armies of the United States, and has the ability to topple regimes like say Libya, Afghanistan, or in the future Syria without Congressional approval, is something that you would concede on but you want to keep your rifle to protect yourself from a foreign Government invasion?



Maybe you haven’t read the testimonies in 2000 of 106th Congress’s Judicial Committee’s have heard about the really bad idea of exempting the President’s requirement of a Natural Born Citizen, but I have. I can tell you that somehow responsible people with a lot of love for our Country and you personally have made good decisions in not removing that requirement.
I can tell you that it’s really insane, or stupid, or crazy or delusional to freak out about someone wanting to take your rifle while you give the keys away to a dictator that has your own nuclear bomb pointed right at you!
Okay rational hypothetical announcement here coming over the airways with all the major networks covering the President’s press conference:

“My dear sweet constituents who have voted for me time and time again, we’ve come to a road where I just don’t think it’s very good for criminals to to have a gun period. You’ve put me here and it’s been overwhelmingly humbling because, except for the Birthers and their few bastards who tried to take a stand for the Constitution in the natural born citizen clause in the U.S. Supreme Court, for which we know there is a microcosm of support because they are so awful and foul as to warrant extermination, I have made the executive order that I would like voluntarily for anyone who has a gun to place it in their recycle bin this coming Tuesday. Now, I’ve got the drones equipped with a new metal identifying scanner that can actually see into your house and as far as 4 feet below the surface and plain and simply if that drone flys over your house and detects non-compliance with my executive order this Tuesday, we’ll know your planning insurrection and we’ll with the same drone just drop an incendiary device on your house and your whole family will die. There may be a few women and children that die but you must realize we tried to protect you and simply asked you to comply with turning in a piece of garbage. So it’s really you who killed your children and wife by not complying and if you care so little about your children and wife as to not turn in a piece of garbage, all of society will know your not rational and must be a terrorist. In fact all of your children and wife are probably just as dangerous as you if in hearing this message they don’t turn you in before Tuesday. Now, I’m sorry to interrupt your programming please enjoy the rest of your evening and don’t forget to send me $3 dollars for my Executive Order “Americans for a violent free America.”



This is principally the way the proponents of the 2nd Amendment are seen by the Obama Administration and a good reason to draw attention to it. Why would the Government care about your rifle when they have a nuclear weapon ready and pointed at your head and your entire family as hostages? Don’t you think you’d give up your gun for your children, your wife, your brother, your sister, even your parents?

So the question is who wouldn’t give up their guns for their family? And, how easy would it be to declare those who wouldn’t give up their guns for their family probably not rational people?

Let me just say how much I know and appreciate those who have stood up to Obama and his not being a natural born citizen qualified for the Office of the president. I know they actually love you, love our Country, and love freedom and liberty.

It speaks volumes about someone willing to take a stand against such odds in the political arena. It speaks volumes for someone who realizes that in protecting the Natural Born Citizen clause of the Constitution for the Office of the president, and its intentions of 2 generations as a defense for the people,born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents, that they have the best interest for your family at hand.

If you find a politician willing to fight for your family like that and defend your loved one, I’d think that was a politician that was worth keeping around. It would just make sense.



Cody Robert Judy
YouTube: CODY JUDY - CODE4PRES
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
www.codyjudy.us

Judy v. Obama 12-5276 - Letter to Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee Rep Bob Goodlatte

Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for U.S. President 2012, 2016
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite 2
Ogden, UT. 84401
Ph:
codyjudy@hotmail.com
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY
- - - - -

Attn. Congressman Bob Goodlatte
Chairman of the Committee on Judiciary of the U.S. House of Representatives
WASHINGTON, DC OFFICE
2309 Rayburn HOB
Washington, D.C. 20515
Phone: (202) 225-5431
Fax: (202) 225-9681

(Confirmed by phone: Bob Goodlatte Office received this Fax by office secretary 'John' at 1:56pm MST Feb.20th,2013.)

Re:
PETITION FOR AN IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION BY THE U.S. HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE REGARDING EVIDENCE OF EMPLOYEES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES HIDING FROM JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT PLEADINGS AND DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED BY PLAINTIFF, AND EVIDENCE OF MANIPULATING CASE JUDY V. OBAMA 12-5276 OUT OF THE CONFERENCES OF JUSTICES MAKING THE JUSTICES CLUELESS ABOUT THE VERY EXISTENCES OF THE CASE.

Dear Mr. Goodlatte: 02.19.2013

Thank you for your sincere attention in what I believe to be the most serious breach of security between the two branches of Government (Judicial and Legislative) our Nation has ever faced in its history.

As a Presidential Candidate in the Democrat Party of 2012 I submitted evidence through the court system until finally reaching the SCOTUS in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 that showed not only does Obama violate constitutional presidential eligibility law as a natural born citizen, but he helped hide multiple vital document forgeries, of a “birth certificate,” Selective Service registration and stolen Social Security numbers- all well documented, via official law enforcement professionals as well as private investigations.

Let me say I am aware that in on May 5th,2009 that you co-sponsored H.R. 1503, which was a bill that would require future presidential candidates to provide proof of citizenship by submitting copies of their birth certificate and I’m also aware that on Feb. 11,2013 Attorney Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. filed a complaint with your office regarding quite the same thing as I am submitting. Of course by the mouth of two witnesses with separate instances but in similar contextual circumstances, a serious warrant of investigation should prevail in the Judicial Committee, as well it should, even loosely based on the Congressional Research Committee’s Jack Maskell (CRS’s ) memorandum Video 1 Video 2 that was a misleading manipulation to Congress members regarding this defense requirement of “natural born citizen” vs. citizen. ( SCOTUS Minor v. Happersett ) I would think this would be particularly alarming to Congress?

The dismissal of the many complaints filed in the Courts in 2008 to 2012 was primarily because of lack of "standing” and every court ducked the substantive Constitution demand reasonably based on this important and necessary principle of law which is also a modern day tested and tried Legislative Mandate. However, since my case totally satisfied “standing”, much more sinister and corrupt action has been perpetrated upon me, and I feel the Justices as well.

I believe the Judicial Committee in the House is the only place that serious investigation can be afforded and undertaken that might inform and enlighten the Justices themselves of what is or has happened in their own Court and with their own law clerks as subversive towards their appointments. It’s a well known fact 60% of Republicans & Independents are in favor of this, as well as 25% of Democrats. Ultimately hearings I believe would do more to unite the country publically as education dispels ignorance.

Why are we to assume that the U.S. Supreme Court Justices have removed themselves so far away from Justice that they are willing to be complacent in the face of crimes? Would they really risk their own impeachment? For heaven’s sake, this fact alone testifies very soundly to you that the allegations myself and others are bringing to the committee are true and far less important issues have been undertaken by the Committee.

In my case overwhelming and never refuted evidence shows Barack Obama using a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425, which was never assigned to him according to E-Verify and SSNVS. Sworn affidavit of Chief investigator of special Investigations unit of the U.S. Coast Guard shows Obama using a forged Selective Service Certificate and multiple experts, including over 2600 hours of law enforcement professionals, showed the alleged copy of Obama’s birth certificate to be a forgery.

Obama’s personal attorneys submitted a new copy of the birth certificate, which according to experts represents a forgery of a forgery, which was made to minimize the white halo effect around the letters. This white halo effect created by computer manipulation made the initial forgery released on April 27, 2011 a complete joke. Is this really what our Government has come down to Sir?

For four and a half years now in spite of multiple legal actions, not one single judge or jury ever saw an original 1961 birth certificate for Obama, original selective service certificate or original SS-5 application for the Social Security number 042-68-4425, which Obama claims to be assigned to him. Obama has committed a crime in stating he was a “natural born citizen” on his candidate form violating the 2 generations protection of birth and citizen parents. The manipulation of two different certifications of eligibility is public knowledge. Undeniably, with the Democrat Chair signature affixed to both they are in fact testimony certifying this.

Due to lack of any original identifying documents on Obama and a mountain of evidence showing the alleged copies to be crude forgeries, it is safe to assume an investigation based on Obama’s own covert actions with his identity is warranted. He in fact warrants and clamors his own investigation Sir.

We have a documented citizen of Indonesia Barry Soebarkah, aka Barry Soetoro as the person claiming to be Barack Obama using forged and fraudulent forms of I.D., who is usurping the U.S. Presidency.

If we do not hold ourselves accountable to law in the identity documents from the beginning of a person’s life, giving more credence to respecting the craftsmanship of forgers and their work, based on someone’s adult life, we simply encourage and are complacent with false identities paving the way for the cover up of virtually any crime committed by any bodied person.

As a candidate for President my constitutional rights have been violated by Barack Obama. His assent to the Office has victims of the perpetration of his crimes, and you are hearing from one of them right now. The morality of law is to protect the innocent not to defy justice. If I cannot run for President with the same set of rules against other candidates, the constitutional boundaries and qualifications are of no effect.

If any nefarious foreign dictator can mate with a U.S. Citizen and the child be considered a “Natural Born Citizen” eligible for the U.S. President, the two generations natural defense has in fact broken down to one generation defeating the whole purpose of that national defense. The child can be financed by foreign government to the Commander-In-Chief of our military. That is why in Minor v. Happersett it was stated that if someone was born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents there have never been any doubts to that person being a Natural Born Citizen, but to anything less there have been doubts.

It is up to you; I’ve done all I could. I ran in for U.S. President in 2008 and sued McCain for the same thing because he was given his “Citizen” status by an act of Congress as well as his “Natural Born Citizen” status, which fit into the “naturalized” category rather than the “natural or nature “category. I relate to this as an important factor simply because it dispels any contradiction that I have acted on some other factor other then the Constitution’s principle.

I have been true to that principle regardless of party, and it’s up to each and every American to fight this criminal enterprise ruling the country and regain some decency and some constitutional and civil rights. If you do not fight for our rights, the ruling criminal enterprise will take away more and more of your rights until Congress itself is defunct or released. Then, you would be like me having nowhere to turn for justice. Your hands will be totally tied.



Conclusion:

I’m sure we agree when those influential in places of authority have shirked their duties perhaps passing it on to the higher court to avoid the spotlight, regarding the qualifications of the Office of the President demanded by law. If the cover-ups in the Judicial Branch’s highest court could be essentially run by Clerks averting the Justices, without a spot-light to dispel the corruption, evil days loom ahead for America unparalleled, and the whole purpose of the lower courts deferring to the higher courts in important national security issues is lost to appeals only granted by the lower courts and then appealed by the Government.

This in fact leaves the whole country vulnerable to lack of courage rather than courage.

If there is no light where justice should shine in the halls, but only darkness just think about the invitation of nefarious darkness outside the parameters of the so called “place of justice”?

I as a plaintiff, as well as others and their attorneys, are demanding an immediate investigation of both the actions of the employees of the Supreme Court of the United States in hiding pleadings and exhibits from the Justices and Barack Obama’s parade and use of forged IDs and a stolen Social Security 042-68-4425.

My case is not a paid case, but is filed on the grace of informa pauperis which I feel is indeed a great responsibility to me to see to it that justice is sought; for it is the people that have granted this opportunity to me in supporting the Constitution.

It would absolutely shock you as to what I have experienced at the United States Supreme Court level with the Clerks, which I reserve for testimony. Suffice it to say I have never received proof of any of the times I’ve been there that an actual Justice signed an order or heard my case in conference which has been represented to the public as being heard and denied.

I think the only way this loop can be closed is by a sincere investigation by Congress.

Not addressing this represents a gross maleficence against the United States of America and people of the United States of America.

Respectfully submitted
Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY - CODE4PRES

The Global Problem Caused by Obama's Blowing Seeds

The Global Problem Caused by Obama's Blowing Seeds
Why Complain About the Seeds of Obama If You Didn't Complain About the Roots?

Glenn Beck is finally making a little bit of sense, and so is Rush Limbaugh as they are coming to grips that the Republican GOP, is about as dead to conservatism as dead can be.

That spells big trouble for America though. Under Obama the left extreme of the Democrat party is hogging the remote control. Have you ever been in the room with someone who hogged the remote control and constantly turned the volume up and down till you felt you were going to go crazy?

America is struggling; the conservative principles of the Constitution, our sound economic welfare it guides, and simply the common sense most of us regard as essential for success are all struggling as they are being diluted out of existence and or set on the chopping block.

The conservative radio voices are seeing more and more the signs that Obama's directed Fast & Furious gun-running as a domestic operation paralleled in the big fat shadow of Libya "gun-running" to the supposed 'rebels' - al-Qaeda that is a global militant Islamist organization founded by Osama bin Laden between August 1988 and late 1989.

One might wonder at Obama and his gratitude towards Osama bin Laden, supposedly killing him, or at the very least "using" his corpse as thunder for the 2012 election. Indeed al-Qaeda members ought to be suspect of their being used by Obama for good reason - he has a capacity of justifying their death and cannot be trusted.

Its kind of like putting an un-loaded gun in someone's hands and then accusing them of drawing fire first while you lay waste to them. Now, al-Qaeda is not my concern, however, if Obama has no problem putting al-Qaeda members and leaders to death and laying seize to the United States Constitution at the same time in his own conspiracy, America can make the conclusion that there is a third party involved of which al-Qaeda at one time fought against- the communism of old Russia as in the invasion of Afghanistan, or even China?

One must ask why China has so stealthily been building a nuke program that now rivals Russia's and the United States? Why are we considering North Korea's test so threatening? In Obama's wild-cow-eyed insanity to dis-arm America he has sparked through gun-running operations to Mexico and Libya the biggest buying operation in U.S. History , and he has provoked the biggest build up of nuclear arsenal in China's history. http://online.wsj.com/article/global_view.html

If for instance Russia wanted to provoke a war aided by Obama at China, al-Qaeda might be the necessary first blood spilt to neither sides grief accept the members of al-Qaeda. Running arms to Syrian rebels (al-Qaeda - Muslim Brotherhood) through Turkey is supposedly or in-directly a real jab at Russia much the same as if Cuba started conducting military recon flights over Florida and testing their own nukes would be to us.

Syrian President Bashar al-Assad has had no better friend than Vladimir Putin's Russia. Last week, three Russian ships reportedly headed to reinforce Syria and China has all but given Syria a licence to kill. http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/russian-chinese-vetoes-gave-syria-license-kill-white-213415115.html

You really have to start thinking about the integrity of Obama and his Administration when you see them siphoning gas out of your own cars gas-tank, but that's exactly whats happening and Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh are showing signs of seeing the light.

The only problem is the 2012 election is over and all of their strength instead of being used in the right place, which would have been supporting candidates for President, like myself, in the Judicial actions of removing Obama by the Constitution's demand for a 'natural born citizen' in the United States Supreme Court is gone, but that doesn't mean it can't be helped.

Now, just for a minute think to yourself, if Glenn Beck Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and the rest of them,had decided to get behind a real candidate supporting the Constitution, not just by his lips but by actions, (such as SCOTUS CASE # JUDY V. OBAMA 12-5276) and threw their weight behind someone like me, your talking 60% of Republicans and nearly 25% of Democrats and massive demonstrations outside of the Supreme Court, do you think Obama would be in the White House?

Today, Glenn Beck went off on former Sen. Chuck Hagel and Obama's CIA Director nominee John Brennan playing clips of his statements referring to Jerusalem as Al Quds (Muslims identity of Jerusalem). Obama has no inhibitions or concerns about alienating and distressing the vast majority of Jews who voted for him and who he now takes for granted.

Hagel faces charges he's received compensation from foreign governments and from an organization called the Friends of Hamas and he's never voted for sanctions against Iran.

Former Governor Mike Huckabee said today , "If true, it absolutely disqualifies him for any consideration even so much as to be a gatekeeper at a national park much less the defense secretary,"
http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/politics/2013/February/Senate-Committee-to-Vote-on-Hagel-Appointment/

What doesn't make any sense at all is that Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, and the Conservative talk show bunch would be up in arms about Obama's appointments whilst they have no objection to Obama in the White House as a walking talking violation of the United States Constitution's demands for a "natural born citizen" unique from the qualifications of U.S. Representatives and U.S. Senators also found in the Constitution.

That is like complaining about the seeds of a weed blowing about after you confirmed the weed being planted in your garden as a particular fruit you'd accept. I mean what did they expect from a guy whose not a natural born citizen in the White House or to put it a different; do you think Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh would be complaining about "nominations" of Obama if Obama wasn't in the White House at all? Of course they wouldn't.

Could we assume Beck and Limbaugh's' silence towards Obama's not being qualified as a natural born citizen contributed to Obama re-election? Do you think that silence helped Obama or hurt him? Do you think that silence helped me in contributions to my campaign or hurt my getting contributions?

Many people think that because Obama was re-instated illegally and unqualified that somehow makes it okay. It doesn't. I mean if robbing your gas tank was illegal yesterday and the day before its still illegal today and tomorrow. If a weed is bothering you do you think trying to catch all of its seeds is the right course or do you just rip it out by the roots?


Of Course we do need a movement in the Conservative Grass Roots of America, but that movement must be founded in the strengths of our Constitution and if you can't agree that ignoring the qualifications of the President in the Constitution has caused us much more grief then losing the 2nd Amendment or losing Freedom of Speech, you have got your head tied up in a pretzel on whom it is assaulting these rights and threatening them.

Now the sooner they start talking about the root of the problem, which was the abandonment of the Constitution in the qualifications of the Office of the President, the sooner we can get back on track.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITCr420K4i8





Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES CODY JUDY

Why are Anti-Birthers freaking out about Qualifications for Office in the Constitution?

FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:
As seen on:
______________________________________________________________________
Why are Anti-Birthers freaking out about Qualifications for Office in the Constitution?
______________________________________________________________________

For the last 8 years I have wondered almost with an astonishment why "Anti-Birthers", those people who consider it an insult to ask for a politician to at least qualify for the office they are running for per demand of the Constitution, that defines for us the minimum standards for the Offices in our Government.
For that reason I wanted to create in as simple a format as possible, in less then 2 minutes, a video that defined for the simple minded person what exactly our Constitution demanded from candidates running for office as a bare minimum, and explain the reasons for such if I could.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITCr420K4i8



My first experience with this was seeing Sen. John McCain's picture on the front of TIME MAGAZINE with the title of "HONOR" underneath it. As I read the article which trotted out Sen. McCain's interest in the presidential nomination of the Republican party in 2008 I suddenly felt a sick feeling in the pit of my stomach as I realized what the implications were in someone getting into the office of the president who was not a natural born citizen.
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1837246,00.html


McCain was not a 'natural born citizen' in my mind as he was born in Panama. That would forever be his beginning and natural state of affinity. It was in the panama hospital and I read an in-depth study which proffered McCain was born 1100 yards short and 11 months late and it was an Act of Congress that gave McCain citizenship, which absolutely defies nature giving it to him. I decided to act on my gut and 3 days before McCain was made the nominee I served the National Republican Committee and 2McCain a Federal District law suit I hoped would be a reminder of Honor.
1 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1157621
2http://www.scribd.com/doc/22288917/Judy-v-Obama

We have constantly heard that if Barack Obama was not born in Hawaii he could not be president. I don't know how many times I've heard that, but at that time I had not even heard of him. Many Hillary Clinton democrats were on board and the media looked to be scrutinizing McCain pretty good. I felt I certainly had a cause the party I had run for office in was behind. That was until U.S. Sen. Resolution 511 happened which was the second Act of Government trying to supersede 'nature' in handing McCain deferred status as a 'natural born citizen'.
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/110/sres511/text

I had run as a Democrat for office before, in Utah's 1st Congressional District for Representative in 2002 and for U.S. Senate in 2004 on my own first hand experience of seeing the Constitution tossed out the window by Republicans in criminal court evidence demands and a union of church and state, but looking back now, even then, I did not understand the full significance of what could possibly happen if our Constitution came to its own demise with the wanton disrespect of those actually in the offices it defined.

To me it was as simple as just reading the definitions for the offices of Representative Senator, and President in the Constitution however many people have not done that and don't carry a pocket Constitution with them. There have been reports that Obama actually won with the most dumbed down class of people voting America has ever produced in United States history, which may very well have been rooted in the Republican party. If your not teaching the principles of the Constitution with your party, with your candidates it probably should come as no surprise that its true. If conservatism knew the Constitution, and simply stood by the demands of the offices laid out cleanly in the Constitution, there's no way Obama could withstand major players in the Republican party going into court demanding judgement.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/13/bobby-jindal-gop_n_2121511.html

As a kid in school I had so much faith in our Government I never gave it a second thought. I mean the Constitution wasn't some monstrous 2,700 page report we had to read in 2 weeks before voting and passing it in Congress like Obamacare was. I'll always remember Rep. Nancy Pelosi saying "we have to pass this so we can find out what's in it." I mean..what? Is there anyone out there who thinks we might be in trouble when a speaker of the House, the leader, comes out and says that?
http://blog.sfgate.com/djsaunders/2012/10/11/nancy-pelosi-says-she-read-obamacare-bill/

I also begin to sense we were in real trouble when I learned that Congress, both the House and the Senate, when they had a Constitutional question, were relying on the Congressional Research Service more than their own pocket constitutions for which I featured in 2 videos, because the information delivered to Congressmen basically manipulated the 'natural born citizen' term out of rulings and replaced it with 'Citizen'. The tell all tale of that was when I received multiple letters from my own elected Congressmen stating in slapped down terms there was not an issue with someone who had produced a forged and fabricated birth certificate, that if taken as genuine would still deny him eligibility for the office of President, as Barack Obama.

This ultimately led me to running for President in 2012 also and taking this information as well as the results of over 2600 hours of law enforcement investigation to the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276. It is unfortunate to learn first hand that just because your right doesn't always mean your going to win. Things can happen that shift the momentum away from you, just ask the Baltimore Ravens who nearly had their Superbowl victory taken when the lights went out in the Superbowl in a 35 minute delay.

I congratulate the Baltimore Ravens in their world champion Superbowl victory, but they would understand entirely what I'm talking about if that victory had been taken by the San Francisco 49's. The point is that there are so many factors that can come into play that its almost entirely impossible to predict which way the wind is going to blow and getting to the United States Supreme Court, no small task in and of itself, does not mean they will give you the time of day of which thus far I have well understood.

We like to think and believe we are living in a Nation that advocates Justice for all, fairness, and living under the same rules, but it is far from perfect. The lack of perfections are advocated by those in authority as slips in the cracks that are regrettable; but it really sucks when you're one of the pieces of debris that has slipped through the cracks.

Education is sincerely one of the best defenses for our Country. I made it a central theme in my 2010 U.S. Senate run to memorize the Amendments and deliver those on YouTube for elementary, junior high, high school, even college classes. I am convinced that to make a more perfect union we must arm ourselves with education of the founding documents of our Country. This video features in very plain language fundamentally to our advantage which is, I believe, is divinely inspired, the forethought of the problems we face now on the qualifications of the President.

With the most basic rudimentary powers of deduction we can assimilate the facts that "Natural Born Citizen" is indeed something greater in criteria then being a "Citizen", which was indeed mentioned three times in the qualifications for Representative, Senator, and President, but that was intended for the office of the President ONLY for those living prior to the Constitution being signed. For all those born after the Constitution was signed the term "Citizen" no longer applied and it was indeed intended to protect our Country by the natural determination of two generations.

Because the President of the executive branch is the commander-in-chief of our military, it was thought to be a good idea that the extra stringent protections of our national security not be given to anyone but a "Natural Born Citizen". By deductive reasoning and by Supreme Court precedent we know there have never been any doubts to those who were "Born in the U.S. to Citizen parents" as to fulfilling that criteria.

If the economic fact that Obama has spent more money then all the Presidents combined from Washington to Bush, spending our future into oblivion is not an astounding alarm to you, I have very little hope for you to recognize trouble before its too late. If my experience has taught me anything it is that when you are in a jail cell or a prison cell with armed guards around you, with no ability to procure defense, by then its too late.

If you ever thought you might have to believe in God as slaves in America just like the Israelites did under the edicts of Pharaoh Ramsey of the Egyptians and have God very slow to hear your cry, you might have an idea of what you may have to go through by not heeding the Constitution and its gift to you purchased by the blood of those who fought America's Revolution.

It is my very humble prayer not to see you in the bonds of those prison camps of the Red Dawn where everything is perceived as normal, but everything is far from normal. We have inherited our freedom but we must constantly fight for it. I think what's even more disturbing watching her review, is that the young generation seems to feel inoculated from being thrown into the 9 digital era.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35PZRStpv8o



Its real life: the lack of concern for our Constitution and thus our freedom and liberty by a generation that has indeed had their freedom handed to them on a silver platter. If coddling or favoring China's market over Human Rights isn't the biggest sign to you that communism is something our freedom and liberty should fear I don't know what would be.



Please enjoy and share the video "A Constitution Reckoning"




Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES CODY JUDY