Monday, December 5, 2011

Racism Run's Rampant Among Anti-Birthers





Racism Runs Rampant Among Anti-Birthers
News Flash- Its about the Constitution Stupid

Re: Nine NH Republicans help birther cause

http://www.salon.com/2011/12/05/nine_nh_republicans_help_birther_cause/singleton/#


'representatives have brought shame on the institution they serve and the state of New Hampshire'

Why don't you show some respect and capitalize "Representatives"? These elected officials were elected by the people in their communities. They also swore oaths to the Constitution.

Obama may have thought he secured his "race" card in the U.S. Congress by sponsoring Sen. McCain's bestowed 'natural born citizen' declaration in non-binding U.S. Sen. Res. 511,but that didn't fly with me I sued McCain first and then Obama.

The sad affect of underpublizing meaningful constitutional based judicial action is corrupt capitalization on those who are are not educated, especially when it comes to the capitalization of 'racism'.

Salons report here has brought shame on journalism, and motive seems intent on lack of respect for authority by not capitalizing 'r' in Represenative, as well as outlining the fact that a court of law has not heard or seen the evidence that supports the highest office in the land actually forging and falsifying identification documentation.

One simply has to ask "What would Obama and supporters be afraid of?", to understand the rage of racism flaunted here in comments.

This is sad to me and offers no respect for our Constituion's qualifications demands of a natural born citizen. Its about the Constitution, not about race.

Playing the victim and saying its about "race" underscores either ignorance of facts surrounding Obama and McCain and the quid pro quo that existed among the Federal Government. The same quid pro quo doesn't exist between every State Elections Office and that is where Obama's Manipulation will fall apart.

Unruly behavior in the Elections Law Commission decision started with a polite crumpling of the agreement between 50 States, and no matter how polite a decision is made contrary to the respect of our Constitution, it is an unruly assault upon We The People.

A thorough read for those disagreeing is available here: Judy v. Obama


www.codyjudy.us

http://www.scribd.com/doc/22288917/Judy-v-Obama

Saturday, December 3, 2011

Welcome to: "Operation Occupy the Democrat Primary"




Welcome to Operation: " Occupy The Democrat Primary "

Dear Registered Citizen Voters of America

The time has come for "We The People" to come out of the closet. I would like to Report to you that I am thrilled with the amount of people who are couragiously stepping forward as "Americans" who are concerned about our Country, the direction we are going, as well and most importantly, the corruption of the Constitution in Obama's Ineligibility, and where this is leading us.

The warm fuzzy fact about corruption is when the American People "GET IT", they move in such a force that hell hath no fire. Meaning there is no fire in hell the American People cannot put out. You've heard the saying "When Hell freezes over" as if that would never happen, I contend the exception is when the American People move for TRUTH and FAITHFULNESS towards our Constitution.

The courage a "Free Man" has is unlike any paid government soldier, or any paid federal employee. A free man fighting for a true and faithful course has the power of influence and pursuasion unmatched with any elite aristocrat.

That is the reason I am encouraging and reporting and predicting that the rise in Democrat Registration is going to hit an all time high. Republicans all over are going to feel the blanket pulled off their bare asses. Democrats are going to think they are in for a wind fall, until the Primary comes along and Obama finds himself losing!

Welcome to "Occupy The Democrat Primary", I don't think you'll like it unless you love the Constitution, unless you have some respect for the blood that has been spilt for that Constitution that is in full force and effect now. The same one Obama has been trying to change but hasn't managed yet. The same one the Republicans hide in shame from.

God Bless every American who registers as a Democrat for the Primaries and votes for Cody Robert Judy. That vote is NOT WASTED. That vote is a full fledged "Wake Up and SMELL the coffee cuz we are tired of the dog shit you serving Washington DC Insiders.

Not only is the Republican Party given a "sit up and take dictation" notice by a vote for me, but Obama is defeated. Can you think of a better way, a more civil way, to have Washington DC declare, "We found ourselves in a Revolution with the People" and we LOST!

If you think your freedom and liberty are important, if you think your rights as a Citizen should be stood up for, if you value the Constitution as the Declaration of those rights that unites 50 States then you qualify for "The Occupy The Democrat Primary".

If that is remotely of interest to you then join "The Occupy The Democrat Primary" party today, register as a Democrat, and contribute to my campaign. Go to my web site on the volunteer link, and help by learning the 10.5 ways to help my campaign for free.

Sincerely
Cody Robert Judy

Thursday, December 1, 2011

UNPRECEDENTED ELIGIBILITY STATES RIGHTS FIGHT






FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAEOeQ5KRDA&feature=channel_video_title


UNPRECEDENTED ELIGIBILITY STATES RIGHTS FIGHT



In an unprecedented constitutional move Democrat Candidate for President of the United States- Cody Robert Judy has teamed up with Dr. Orly Taitz Esq. in rolling out the red carpet for the Constitutional demand for a Natural Born Citizen and spotlighting the ineligibility of Barack Obama to meet that requirement in virtually every State of the Union contesting every Democrat Primary and Caucus in the United States in the 2012 Elections.



What makes this unprecedented in history? While the Federal Government has a jurisdiction over federal elections it is the States that ultimately make up the entire Federal Government and have power over candidates in the “ballot access” , and nowhere is that more apparently expressed than in U.S.C. Article X.



“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”



Every one of the 50 States has a State Elections Office wherein a challenge can be made to the individual State on the merits of Barack Obama’s eligibility and in most cases these are handled by an Attorney General of that State, or some Elections Law Commission designated by the States Legislature to by a type of Super Committee of elections.



These Election Law Commissions or authorized Committees are duly charged to screen candidates asking to be included on Primary Ballots and Caucuses. This could be the first place a candidate is vetted by a legal represented authority of the people after the candidate has declared him/herself a candidate to the Federal Election Commission.



What are candidates screened or vetted for at this level? They are screened and vetted for eligibility of the particular office they want to be elected to, and most often the Commission or State Elections Office, Secretary of State, or authorized individual charged with the task of accepting a candidates Declaration of Candidacy stating they are eligible also receive the money or fee from the candidate called for by the State to be included on the ballot of the State Primary.



Candidates at this level are indeed subject to Complaints and Objections as to the candidate’s legal or Constitutional qualifications set forth by law and most often these are directly sent to the States Attorney General’s Office for delegation of the Complaint to the body set forth by the State Legislatures for handling such complaints.



For example in New Hampshire the site of the first State Primary, Secretary of State William Gardner or his designee has removed at leasttwo candidates from previous New Hampshire ballots for constitutional ineligibility: Abdul K. Hassan, Esq., a naturalized citizen born in Guyana, and Sal Mohamed, who was born in Egypt and was naturalized as a citizen in 1983.



While most States grant ballot access to a candidate on face value, in other words they don’t question a candidates declarations, ballot access does not preclude litigation from proper plaintiffs to remove a candidate’s name from the ballot if the candidate does not satisfy the qualification for, in this case, President of the United States.



The term “proper plaintiffs” has been designated by the courts, by many dismissals of Barack Obama eligibility cases in 2008, to mean having proper standing or in other words, “a candidate for the same office”.



In the “Primary Stage of an Election” standing would be most importantly accepted fact to someone from the same Party, as it could be argued a challenge from a candidate from another party is not ripe for argument until the challenging candidate was indeed made the nominee of his/her respective Party.



One way to understand this is to picture a horserace and understand that when a jockey is weighed with his tack no less than a certain amount of weight can be placed upon a horse to make the race fair. If for example one horse was carrying 119 pounds and another horse 109 pounds the horse that is carrying the least amount of weight would have an advantage.



Of course the entire general audience can’t fit into a place to see every jockey weighed, so it comes to be that other jockeys can object to each other in front of the official standing in front of the scale. They have proper standing as they have entered and in such have paid the price to race. They stand to lose the most by an ‘unfair race’ to someone who has defiled the rules.



Rewind: 2008 the Democrat Party was plain and simply overwhelmed or beset by Barack Obama due in large part to Republican Candidate Sen. John McCain who was bestowed Non-binding U.S. Senate Resolution 511 co-sponsored by Sen. Hillary Clinton and Sen. Barack Obama and voted “yes” on by every Republican U.S. Senator save one: Sen. John McCain.



Evidence would support the fix for Obama was in already and Sen. Hillary Clinton knew all about it because she had nothing to gain from Sen. Res. 511, and Sen. Barack Obama had everything to gain by it namely the “Race Card”. If a single U.S. Senator raised his voice against Barack Obama’s Eligibility the “racist tag” would be so clear and present no elected official could stand it because of the Bestowed 511 McCain received, and no unelected official candidate either as was the case with Donald Trump who at one time had garnered the favor of 75% of the Republicans.



If McCain was given the pass on his Congressional Honorable Mention as a Natural Born Citizen born in the foreign nation of Panama, and Obama were questioned about his father being a Citizen from Kenya, East Africa, the major difference between McCain and Obama would be pounced on: “Color”.



Rather than lick their wounds and realize the war dog had become a whore dog to the Constitution, Republicans doubled down and bit their tongue hoping for a comeback in 2012.



This all happened in 2008 with the exception of one Presidential Candidate who ran as a conservative write-in: Cody Robert Judy. Cody sued Sen. John McCain first and the entire Republican National Committee and then he included Sen. Barack Obama before the 2008 candidates were even made nominees’ of the respective parties.



HELP CODY GET ON STATE BALLOTS http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm



However the process of the 2008 Election Primaries were over when Mr. Judy filed his suit against McCain, although the timing could have been argued as perfect for standing because McCain was made the Republican Nominee 3 days after the suit was filed and Mr. Judy was not running as a Republican.



Fast forward: 2012 the Primaries have not begun but are set to begin in 1 month set first is the Iowa Caucus Jan. 3rd, and then New Hampshire’s first-in-the-nation-Primary January 10th, 2011 and the Democrat Party is set up for a collision with Cody Robert Judy running against Barack Obama as a “proper Plaintiff” filing complaint after complaint in every single state and what better attorney to represent the Constitutions fight then Orly Taitz. (See the Attachment on this file- Esquire Represenation Declaration)



In short we have the right candidate at the right time with the right legal professional fighting in every single state of the Union. Barack Obama may have had sympathizers in the United States Senate across the aisle because of their teeter tauter with McCain, but that quid pro quo didn’t happen with every single State attorney General and every single State Legislature in the entire country.


HELP CODY GET ON THE PRIMARY BALLOTS
http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm


If just one state prohibits Obama from gaining access to the ballot the domino effect could officially end Barack Obama’s run in the White House. That’s why it is so important for you to spread the word, spread this story like wild fire because this decision is coming back to the people and its gaining momentum. Cody Robert Judy needs your help to pay his Primary Ballot access that could cost upwards of $1,000 per State.


In truth many will join as the wheel gets rolling but we Birthers who are on the front line have got to push with all of our might in order to get that wheel turning. The battle lines are drawn. If every person who watched Orly Taitz argument at the New Hampshire Election Law Commission Hearing just gave $2 dollars to Cody Robert Judy’s Campaign we could secure his name on the ballot of every State.

If you’re a Birther, and Article II Patriot and you haven’t contributed to Cody Robert Judy’s campaign, now you should understand what is happening and why that is so very important.


We invite you to tour the many pages of Cody Robert Judy that are new or improved from the last time you vistited including : CRJ Intro, CRJ TV ,the CRJ Bio page which has drop down links now to many of the issues that are important to you. On the official Cody Robert Judy for President web site at www.codyjudy.us we are dedicated to improvement and will continue to upgrade and pave.



The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign. We are looking for your help

Contribute:
http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm

Volunteer:

http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_008.htm


Why America needs more than Mitt Romney as President?




Why Mitt Romney Would Not Be A Good President

Much has been said about Mitt Romney as the developing candidate of the Republican Party and why he would be a good President. Personally, I don’t think, “It’s his turn”, is any reason to vote for someone as President, because sooner or later it would be Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger turn, Sen. Marco Rubio’s turn, or even Glenn Beck’s turn, though the latter would be more constitutionally qualified than the formers.`

Opponents on Mitt’s right, even more so than on his left, seem determined to continue the assault upon the former Governor of Massachusetts and Salt Lake City, Utah Olympic turnaround C.E.O “Mitt-Romney-Tender” over his flip-flopping ways. But hey, a coin or a dollar’s assessment is made valuable by both the heads and the tails of it.

Proponents of Mitt Romney like to exploit the fact that because he has flip-flopped on many issues, he would appeal to the conservative democrats and independents, and by that means perhaps gain favor in a general elections, thereby making flip-flopping a positive incentive for all candidates.

That said the dream I had last night ( 11-29-2011) makes more sense than all of these and I believe it points to the truth of why Mitt Romney would not be a good President. The dream seemed to come as an intelligence report more than a scene or a play.

‘Mitt Romney would not be a good president because of his temperament. Although Mitt would be invaluable in a key position of any administration such as in Labor, Commerce, HUD, or the Treasury Departments, more is needed when it comes to being President.”

Mitt Romney’s work for Bain Capital, the Salt Lake City Olympics had to do with trimming the fat or finding the excess and he was good at that because he is exceptional at dotting the I’s and crossing the T’s of detail in a micro managerial way, but more is needed to be President in the temperament department and that’s a weakness of Mitt Romney and not one we need right now as President.

Personally, I’ve never met Mitt Romney but I’ve heard of rumored nasty outburst that happened at the Salt Lake City Olympics, and I saw the way he acted when Gov. Rick Perry TX., interrupted him in debates, and I think these would classify the pugnacious disposition I’m referring to.



Now the reason I thought that this ‘intel’ dream was interesting is because “Temperament” does reflect in a direct way to a person’s actions in leadership capacity. While I related I’ve never met Gov. Romney, he’s never met me either, but he knows who I am as a Mormon.

Protesting the leadership capacities of the Mormon Church Hierarchy I spent nearly a decade in prison in Utah, not because I physically assaulted or maimed anyone, or destroyed or took property that wasn’t mine, or even brandished a weapon. I simply stood up and said I don’t think your being honest leaders.

I demonstrated my protest and feelings with a “Book Of Mormon” that is abbreviated B.O.M. in a LDS Religious or Mormon Fireside Meeting, standing up in that meeting, and taking a stand for my beliefs on where they were going wrong. Of course I was Mormon at the time and felt obliged as long as I was, to voice my opinion which I had tried to do earlier in the week less spectacularly but found myself rudely recognized.

Of course my interruption of the meeting made the people of the Mormon Faith angry at me because they do think their leaders are directed by God, and can’t make any mistakes. They were so angry with me they lost their tempers and beat me and assaulted me. This was all recorded on Tape the LDS Presidency has copyrighted.
The “Temper” part of Temperament that is bad happens when equanimity has lost its place in composure of the United States Constitution. My incarceration was unlawful based upon insubordination of Constitutional Rights not given to us by the Constitution but defended by the Constitution.

One might ask is it a sin to ‘protest’ a wrong, or be convicted of protesting by a mutiny of the Constitution? Well, I think you probably understand the point of my saying my case was an ‘unlawful prosecution’ in Criminal Courts, although the Church Discipline of excommunication was completely within the lawful bounds of the religion.

Perfect examples don’t come along often, but when they do, they should be shouted as precedent.

Now if Gov. Mitt Romney says his Mormon Faith or ties or obedience to his Religious leaders would never be compromised in the position of United States President, and we know of a case where in the Religious Leaders of the LDS Church were in collaboration with the Civil Authorities in the Constitutions protections of rights of evidence of the accused in a criminal proceeding, wouldn’t it be fair to expect Gov. Romney to side for the Constitution in such a case, even if it angered his religious leaders?

Has Gov. Romney acted for the Constitution in his Mormon Faith, or against it in my case? Well, he’s certainly aware of my case, just as he is aware of the case that Barack Obama is not a natural born citizen by Obama’s own revelation that his father is not a U.S. Citizen on his long form birth certificate. Mitt Romney’s campaign received every press release I ever sent out in his 2008 campaign for President while I sued Sen. John McCain and Sen. Barack Obama.

In defense of the Constitution Governor Romney’s response to his personal knowledge of my case within his own Religious Faith’s bounds, and his personal knowledge of Barack Obama’s not being a natural born citizen have what in common? Silence: These are the tough questions he should be asked in debate.

Silence in defense of the United States Constitution is not something that is required by the oath of the President. However, Silence in defense of the Constitution might well be described as a prerequisite for the hope and change of the progression of communism or Totalitarianism, or perhaps even a Theocracy such as is the desire of the radical jihad known in parts of the Middle East as Islam’s Sharia Law.

Here in America we are a mixing pot of religions and our Constitution declares Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion. Mitt Romney’s silence in my case shows his temperament for respect of the Constitution.

Silence in these cases I’ve outlined is the attribution of rebelliousness and harm of the Constitution, and I forthwith do not portend that as a useful character in the office of the President of the United States who is sworn to uphold, protect, and defend the Constitution as the Leader of the freedom and liberty of America. The ripening of a leader in America may well come from America’s dysfunction rather than its elite function. That is why America doesn’t need Mitt Romney as the next President.

Sure the President has to submit budgets and recommendations to Congress, and no doubt the President’s job is a tough job, but many people have forgotten the number one job of the President is to preserve and protect and defend the Constitution because it provides the opportunity of America all of our rights listed in the Constitution defend. That is also why Barack Obama is a walking talking violation of the Constitution and the very rights and opportunity of all America.

This election is about our Constitution, and the Constitution is about the health of our economy. Gov. Mitt Romney may be able to help our Economy, but he has not been a fierce defender of our Constitution and that has everything to do with being a good President.

Sunday, November 20, 2011

The Racist Standard of Law over the Constitutional Standard of Law






The Racist Standard of Law over the Constitutional Standard of Law

- New Hampshire Law Commission upholds former sending U.S. spiraling backwards in time-


Upon watching the entire hearing I was moved to tears at the points made by every witness, and thought Orly conducted her presentation very well. After hearing that all the Election Law Committee were Democrats, I wish she had "rubbed" in the fact, just a little, that she had a Democrat Presidential Candidate who wasn't blind to the Constitutional Requirements of President, and that there decision reflects a loss of revenue towards the Primary Ballot with my boycott of the Primary as long as the Constitution has been removed from their favor in a bias of racism!

If their duty towards the Constitution in upholding the natural born citizen qualifications for President as the standard for being eligible for the New Hampshire Primary Ballot has been defeated, we are sadly left with the ugly truth of their duty towards racism being upheld as the basis of their decision. Racism is the belief that inherent different traits in human racial groups justify discrimination.

Their discrimination towards me in favor of Barack Obama's eligibility has no Constitutional backing. They therefore show in their actions the telling signs of racism against me. Discrimination is the unequal treatment of individuals. The unequal standard of allowing Barack Obama on the primary ballot with proof he is not a natural born citizen by the measure of his own release of long form birth certificate showing his father as a Kenya, East African Citizen is therefore racial prejudice, against the standard I am held to.

Prejudice is an attitude, however when it results in an action such as the Election Law Commission's taken against me, it becomes discrimination and allowing Obama on the Ballot with indifference to me is based if you will on "reverse racism" rather than the Constitution.

This is a very sad day in the fight for equality under the standards of our Constitution. This is clearly motivated as a cruelty towards equality in the United States of America, hostile towards and causing harm upon our Constitution by the very people entrusted to defend the Standard.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhDKQtaR38s&list=UUymbINcxgM2q9HBmY2VnKdw&feature=plcp

Cody Robert Judy - D
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES


Hearing Link:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/11/20/orly-taitz-nh-ballot-law-commission-and-fraudulent-obama-filing/

Friday, November 18, 2011

DOJ Election Trust Demands New Hampshire Revisit Obama on Primary Ballot‏




Dear New Hampshire DOJ Election Law:

Thank you, for your consideration of my letter/complaint. I am a candidate for office in the same party, and the same position as Barack Obama. Thus the argument of partisan politics does not enter into consideration of my complaint.

First let me say, I knew Mrs. Orly Taitz would have the problem of the Law Commission 11-18-2012, 2 pm hearing, saying they did not have jurisdiction over criminal matters when she brought up the alleged Social Security Number fraud and Fraudulent or Forged long form Birth Certificate.

However let me say, cooler thought prevailing, the criminal aspect of the allegations need not be considered to warrant prohibition on the Primary Ballot in the interest of protecting the Voter in the Primary Election from wasting a vote on a constitutionally unqualified candidate.

I hope my letter/complaint exhibits Barack Obama by his own release of his long form B.C. showed all of us, he was not eligible by the standards of a Natural Born Citizen showing his father is not a Citizen of the United States but is listed as an "Kenya ,East Africa" Citizen at the time of Obama's birth.






Of course this is in no way exhibited as a "racially prejudice fact", but as a "disqualification fact" that is based on demand of our Constitution's requirements for President, and this is the Supreme Law of the Land. These facts afford a removal from the Primary Ballot with the burden of further deliberation or review upon the candidate Barack Obama.

Obama holds by his own record and release of his Long Form Birth Certificate naturally a dual loyalty of inherited citizenship, which is forbidden by our Constitutions expressed demands for president as a Natural Born Citizen. This is a national security concern of voting citizens.

It does not need to be proven that it is forged or fraudulent. Obama's Released Long form birth certificate appeals to the hard facts as prohibitory for running as a qualified candidate, or holding, the office of President. If the intent of the Ballot Law Commission's review is to prohibit unqualified candidates from the ballot in the interest of the qualifying standards of office demanded by We The People through our Constitution, Obama's release of his long form birth certificate is where the facts come from that disqualifies him, and my witness stands against his qualification.

One interesting note to read regarding the Ballot Law Commission's Review:
http://www.sos.nh.gov/Ballot%20Law%20Commission/PDF%27s/Secretary%20of%20State%20vs.%20eight%20candidates%20on%20primary%20ballot.pdf " The Ballot law commission shall hear and determine disputes arising over whether nomination papers or declarations of candidacy filed with the secretary of state conform with law. The decisions of the ballot commission in such cases shall be final as to questions both of law and fact, and no court shall have jurisdiction to review such decision."

This is a absolute powerfully corrupt statement, as it places the review of decisions out of jurisdiction of the Judicial Branch's Court of law including the United States Supreme Court, while at the same time leaving the "Primary Voter" without an Appeal to very important and pertinent information that includes election law and fact meant to protect the integrity of actual qualified candidates as myself, and more importantly the trust that voters give in the hope they can at the very least participate in Democracy's Beacon of hope for the world, voting in the Primary for an actual qualified candidate.

Facts are hard to deny that are actually given by the Candidate to the Ballot Law Commission. Barack Obama need not agree whether forged or fraudulent facts; for that is not the issue. The issue, we all agree on: Obama has given these set of facts contained in his long form birth certificate, and from this, any decision allowing him on a Primary Ballot is knowingly presenting as a choice an unqualified candidate to Primary voters.

Knowingly presenting an unqualified candidate to Primary voters would be considered a dereliction of duty of the Ballot Law Commission.

You also have a point of entry and trust that needs to be considered by the Legislatures of New Hampshire, and the DOJ of New Hampshire, regarding the integrity of the voting system as an agent to justice, our Constitution, and the Republic for which we stand.

I hope my complaint to the DOJ in New Hampshire won't fall on deaf ears, and they will see the cracks in the side walk that need to be repaired.
Again here are the links that detail my complaint and warrant your immediate attention for the eyes of the Nation are on New Hampshire.

1- http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/11/18/presidential-candidate-adds-name-to-obama-election-complaint-in-new-hampshire/
2-http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2011/11/complaint-joinder-ltr-new-hampshire.html
3- http://inagist.com/Drudge_Report/137577430402609152/
4-http://www.concordmonitor.com/article/293101/birther-challenges-obama?CSAuthResp=1321635127:kac5p0ac2a53k27d9iernpe2m5:CSUserId|CSGroupId:approved:C7BFB10B487EEBB060A53F45DE1EA54D&CSUserId=94&CSGroupId=1
5-http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=369241

Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign codyjudy@hotmail.com
www.codyjudy.us www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Complaint Joinder LTR: The New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission



Cody Robert Judy
Federal Election Commission Candidate & Committee Registration Number:
P20003372 FEC Candidate number 0003372.
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, UT. 84403
801
- - - -
The New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission
New Hampshire Legislative Building
33 North State Street
Concord, New Hampshire 03301-6328
(603) 271-3321
- - - -
Re:
Hearing is scheduled Friday at 2 p.m. in Room 307 of the New Hampshire Legislative Office Building, and
Cody Robert Judy-D Candidate for President, joining Taitz (Petitioner) demands removal of Obama from the New Hampshire Primary ballot.


On October 11,2011 William M. Gardner, New Hampshire Secretary of State, issued a statement regarding the importance of the New Hampshire Primary stating "It is probably the most important political decision each of us makes because our choice can affect the lives and happiness of ourselves and our children for years into our future."

Regarding the vital role of smaller states he elaborated New Hampshire’s primary since 1916 is first for a reason and said, "Worse yet, if a national primary was held, or if the role of small states was eliminated, only the very rich or famous candidates would be able to put on the major campaigns needed for victory or to exceed expectations".

One vital way that we preserve our democracy is to have an election system that allows for the long-standing American dream to come about that just about anyone can grow up to be President of the United States, and that our boys and girls going to school now could feel that our Constitutional Qualifications for President held in the U.S. Constitution are just as affective preserving their chances in the future as it did in1787.

The keys of our Commander-In-Chief are exclusively rewarded to only those who are Natural Born Citizens, or who were Citizens at the time of the adoption of our Constitution in 1787. The distinction of Citizen and Natural Born Citizen clearly made within the Constitution itself. The only other requirement is that of being 35 yrs of age and 14 years a resident within the U.S., which I do hereby present myself as to being qualified for as I was born in Idaho Falls, Idaho in 1965 to parents who were also generationally natural born citizens.

In 2008 I ran as a Write-In Candidate for President and filed suit in the Federal Court of Las Vegas, Nevada against Sen. John McCain and included Sen. Barack Obama in that law suit Judy v. McCain. I am familiar with the 'partisan politics' represented and the malign of our Constitution's requirements of Qualification for President into the slippery slope of racism which threatens to divide our country.

With that said, I represent the same fortitude and resolve that our Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land; our United States intact, and the Qualification demands as well in tact by the fact that nothing has been remitted or repealed by the required two thirds of both Houses of Congress enumerated in Article V, as to the Presidents Qualifications in Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5.

To this I witness by the power of my testimony, with standing as a Presidential Candidate that Barack Obama's own public release of his long form birth certificate, prohibits his running for President, or his occupation of said office even at this moment of time. He is not a Natural Born Citizen, which even by United States Supreme Court precedent in Minor v. Happersett acknowledges the definition of being born in the United States to citizen parents.

I acknowledge herein my desire to enter into the New Hampshire Primary as a Candidate for President, by said entry date of the 3rd Friday of November, 2011 upon the confirmation by The New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission that the Constitution's requirements are still in effect, and Barack Obama is prohibited from the New Hampshire Primary as a qualified candidate.

If this matter is extended by lawful decision, I herein also request that an extension of my entry fee of $1,000 be extended for the decision, or in lieu of merit are extended until after the Primary if necessary. For it is my only desire to enter a constitutionally legal Primary, and that such would clearly uphold the U.S. Constitution, in a Presidential Candidates Qualification, is reasonable expectation.

If the matter, by your decision, is to allow Barack Obama on the Primary Ballot of New Hampshire when he clearly by his own represented record is not a natural born citizen qualified under the Constitution's guidelines and Supreme Court Case precedent, then of course standards so long upheld and extolled by New Hampshire's own Secretary of State are null and void, as well the reputation held in high esteem of New Hampshire's Primary since 1916, nearly 100 years of its States tradition.

By this I adjoin my complaint to Mrs. Orly Taitz complaint by my own accord and witness herein freely and by my own liberty.

Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy /s/ Cody Robert Judy Dated : November 16th 2011
Democrat Candidate for President 2012
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign