SCOTUS Election Challenge presents: The Standing Argument Wipe Out

UPDATE: Friday - Jan 4th, 2013
I have been informed that a more comprehensive understanding will be generated Monday at 9:30 AM from the United States Supreme Court on case 12-5276 Judy v. Obama http://www.supremecourt.gov/

SCOTUS Election Challenge presents: The Standing Argument Wipe Out... again.


The pesky "Standing Doctrine" again haunts Orly Taitz again at the Ca. State Supreme hearing challenging the electoral college vote count, just as it did in California Courts in Keyes (Barnett) v. Obama which went to the 10th Circuit Appeals Court and was met with rejection because none of the plaintiffs who were running in 2008 continued their run for President in 2012.

Throughout Birther History, or since the dawn of Obama's opposition to the Constitution's demand for a 'natural born citizen' required by Article II, Section I, clause 5, "STANDING" has been the biggest challenge and a Presidential Candidate is needed for standing.

Orly didn't have a presidential candidate as a plaintiff today in the State Supreme Court of California ... again. Pastor James David Manning had me testify at the CIA COLUMBIA OBAMA SEDITION AND TREASON Trial, specifically because I had 'Standing'as a Presidential candidate who suffered harm in the general election. It was very compelling for the jury who found him guilty to understand my campaign had been formidably hurt and maliciously maligned by Obama's belief he could run on a different set of rules then are outlined by requirements in the Constitution.

When lawyers who have been told over and over and over again they have to have a petitioner who has "standing", or in other words are hurt by the action very directly and thereby substantiating good cause that a restraining order is sought for, what makes them think they don't? I don't get it.

It hurts the whole Birther movement accept for accounting for negative publicity. That should be the first line of offense for a plaintiff, not the best defense for the defendant. I am sorry for the money Orly spent and her effort, because I had hoped for the Constitution.

However,WE in the Birther movement have known and do understand the "standing" argument, made very clear or if we don't we should know greater standing is achieved with a presidential candidate straight from O's defense lawyers.

Report from the Tribune on Orly Taitz attempt to halt electoral college vote count.
http://www.sanluisobispo.com/2013/01/03/2345384/judge-rejects-birther-challenge.html

You know what. I've been involved in some 13 case in the Birther Movement and none of mine have been dismissed because I lacked "standing". That should tell people something. The most important or acknowledged pronunciation of judgement coming out of any case I've been involved in was either a 'guilty' verdict as happened in the CIA COLUMBIA OBAMA SEDITION AND TREASON TRIAL or , a ruling that in fact over ruled with the 14th Amendment the demand for a natural born citizen made in Article II, Section I, Clause 5 in direct violation of construction laws prohibiting that action.

This is what is being heard tomorrow in conference of the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276.

The worst part of this is not being able to be a fly on the wall in the conference.I won't ever know what Justices voted to hear the case and which voted against hearing the case. Every member of the Supreme Court of the United States will be there, its not just a single justice of the United States Supreme Court, they will all vote thumbs up or thumbs down to hear this case. I need a majority of the Court to give me a thumbs up to hear it. I need 5 thumbs up of the 9 Justices.

Just as a refresher course "standing" is best understood by the following three criteria:
Standing requirements
There are three standing requirements:

1-Injury: The plaintiff must have suffered or imminently will suffer injury—an invasion of a legally protected interest that is concrete and particularized. The injury must be actual or imminent, distinct and palpable, not abstract. This injury could be economic as well as non-economic.

2-Causation: There must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of, so that the injury is fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendant and not the result of the independent action of some third party who is not before the court.

3-Redressability: It must be likely, as opposed to merely speculative, that a favorable court decision will redress the injury.

In light of this one can understand how being competitively in a race with a campaign that is hurt or maliciously maligned with another candidates fraudulent practices in the race can account for a sincere standing.

If the Court refuses to hear my case tomorrow it won't be because of 'standing' that's for sure. A negative response may be purely political rather than suited on constitutional principle.

The standard pillar which stands center court in our Constitution as a principle is the qualification that the President be a natural born citizen. If foreign influence can perpetrate the Office of the President the affect is no less than having a nuclear bomb at the center of the Constitution.

Its easy to remember with the New Year being 2013, that 13 of the 48 pages of The Constitution pamphlet are referenced to the President, far outweighing any other constitutional principle by at least 10 to 1.

What does that say to you if for instance you wanted to destroy the Constitution? What office do you do it through?

A great spectacle has taken place in front of the America populous just the last 3 weeks over what? 435 Members of the House of Representatives 100 U.S. Senators and how many in the Executive Branch- One - have positioned themselves over the U.S. Economy.

Obama upped the ante from 800 Billion to 1.6 Trillion. Obama effectively just beat the hell out of 435 Representatives who were shaking in their seats with fear that they would be saddled with the blame if the largest tax increase in history went into affect.

Rush Limbaugh's side kick announced yesterday, that Republicans were no longer the party of tax cuts. They have effectively ponied up to the Democrats and done so after repeated kicks to the groin in which a condition of blue-balls was developed. Having a case of blue balls is often worse then the case of not having any at all.

One wonders why on Earth the new Republican House doesn't throw down the Constitutional gauntlet and open up investigations into the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama rather then fighting with one hand tide behind their back continually?

The Electoral Votes are being counted and Objections to the Vote could open up such an investigation. I have standing and would be happy to testify in front of Congress of the malign done to me and my campaign for President due to the "rules" that Obama has run under verses the "rules" the rest of us have run under.

You know, many times in our department of justice things happen that aren't or don't seem fair to one or more persons. Some guy gets off with a technicality that we have to honor because if we didn't it would deprive others of the same right. Sir William Blackstone himself said famously- 1765 " It is better to let 10 guilty go free than to let 1 innocent suffer" and I agree.

What the Untied States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 and Congress is deliberating in Obama's ineligibility however is justice for every American, not just Obama. Every America is being affected by our economy and payroll tax increases, income tax increases, wither it be by a job that is not created because that money is sent in, or wither it is from the shrinking of one's business rather than the expansion.

Those who are wealthy from assets are not really going to be affected that much, so if your rich already kudos to you. Raising taxes on income may have been the surest way to shrink an economy that was immediately available. The Constitution's eligibility demand for the Office of the President to be a "natural born citizen" may be the surest way to shrink Obama's pen that is immediately available.

Please pass it along and help any way you feel you can.

Cody Robert Judy
A New Ride
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDRTVakr7NI




Doritos- Has Justice been Jacked Women? 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqbwN8wzEhg





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fNjSTFI7_I




If you'd like to help Cody in the fight at the United States Supreme Court please contribute here:http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm


The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Cody Robert Judy for President
Plaintiff/ SCOTUS Case No. JUDY v. OBAMA 12-5276
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY
FEC REGISTERED  http://fec-candidates.findthedata.org/l/4426/Judy-Cody-Robert
Candidate ID P20003372
Committee ID C00501593

Petition for Rehearing under consideration:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/113046270/Judy-v-Obama-12-5276-Petition-for-Rehearing


Writ of Cert under consideration Judy v. Obama 12-5276
http://www.scribd.com/doc/100156244/Judy-v-Obama-Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-Revision-per-U-S-Clerk-Case-Analyst-Appendix-Stamped-Orders-Included

SCOTUS Election Challenge 2012-United States Judges banking on the Wrong Buck?

SCOTUS Election Challenge 2012 presents:
United States Judges Banking on the Wrong Buck?

As the breaking of the dawn unfurls upon a New Year sliding across the Nation as a dark shadow giving way to the light, we contemplate January 4th wherein two big things are going to happen: 1) Congress by HJ 122 resolution has agreed to count the electoral college vote rather then January 6th or 7th or 8th: & 2) The United States Supreme Court will take into Conference Judy v. Obama 12-5276 which is basically an election challenge to Barack Obama's eligibility for the Office of the President made by another candidate for President, myself,Cody Robert Judy. This is a good time for all of us to contemplate our futures.

A Day late and a Dollar short many United States Judges have been hedging on upholding the Constitution in the Barack Obama eligibility scandal banking on the buck of futures, understanding what many have called the 'death knell' in a ruling that actually upheld the Constitution's demand for a 'natural born citizen' in the Office of the President as demanded by Article II,Section 1,Clause 5.

Denial of due process, discrimination against other presidential candidates, upholding voter fraud, elections fraud,identification fraud,document fraud,social security fraud,contributions under false identification fraud, all have roots in upholding Obama's occupancy in the White House over and above the Constitution's demand that only a 'natural born citizen', born in the U.S. to Citizen parents, or absent all foreign influence as natural law affords, dawn the Office of the President.

In an abbreviated form its a type of domestic terrorism or assault upon the United States Constitution. In the long form the hole gets deeper; the Judges banking on future appointments and rewards.

One of the most logically upheld statutes that has not been assaulted in the Constitution, which I think may even be harder to overcome than the 'natural born citizen' clause, is the "two-term" limitation of the President. Bill Clinton couldn't over come that one.

If we do have to wait it out another four years those Judges are in fact banking on the very short term of Barack Obama's tenure, which will indeed be replaced. Case in point, pit-bull attorney Larry Klayman, a former Justice Department prosecutor and the founder of Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch- authoring latest book called “Whores: Why and How I Came to Fight the Establishment.”, recently cited in a WND article:

http://www.wnd.com/2012/12/obama-eligible-only-to-defraud/#wwAa8ZtTPFkGh5rs.99
[In a recently filed case in Florida, which I timely filed for Democrat Michael Voeltz, following Obama’s latest fraudulent caper in the Nov. 6, 2012, presidential election, the Leon County Circuit Court judge, the Honorable (sic) Kevin Carroll, even said as much in his week-old, two and a half page, hastily written order dismissing the case – where he made reference to his former Circuit Court “judicial buddy” having been recently nominated and sworn in by Obama as a federal court judge to preside in a courthouse down the street. Carroll obviously hopes that his largesse toward Obama will someday similarly reward him with a federal judgeship as well.]

When betting on the Buck, Obama's horns are about two years away from being a lame duck anyway, so I'm not so sure he's the right Buck to bet on? Americans have a really nice way of patiently waiting for justice. It may not come tomorrow as we hoped, but it will come!

Which of these Bucks would you bet on for the future, one who has about two years to go, or one whose got about eight years of future in the White House?

I don't know what god these Judges are praying to, their religious practice is not my concern, but they may need religion a lot sooner then they supposed on the record of their performances against the United States Constitution in the biggest scandal to hit this Nation's history books. Their bet on futures is about as stupid as placing it all on a two point buck deer rather than and eight point buck deer who waits just inside the tree-line obscure from view right now.

When the truth comes out, and the truth always comes out, I don't think these men and women will be able to get a job judging a rodeo or an elementary art contest. Their careers are in ruins already, they simply haven't got the memo yet and that should be the message to Judges across the Nation who swore oaths to the Constitution; not Obama.We should not discriminate against Obama for not being a natural born citizen. Obama deserves the truth of the Constitution just like anyone else.

You know another up and coming President appointed and elected by WE THE PEOPLE, just might unfurl the biggest ring of impeachment trials this Nation has ever seen! Where in the hell will these Judges hide? I can tell you right now as I recall a scripture verse that says something more about the caves and rocks rather than under a desk.

Klayman put it very nicely I thought:

"As of last Friday, despite the urgency of resolving Voeltz’s presidential election challenge, Judge Carroll was still sitting on our motion for rehearing, despite our renewed emergency request to grant us a hearing, vacate his dismissal order and allow my client Voeltz due process of law. According to his assistant, with whom I spoke late that day, the judge was indeed in his office all week, perhaps now hiding under his desk for cover. Unfortunately for Judge Carroll, it’s only a matter of time when he can no longer run and hide from the law or, if that doesn't work, the wrath of those patriotic Americans who will call him to legal account in an appropriate, peaceful way.

Revelations 6:16 says it more boldly: "And said to the mountains and rocks, Fall on us, and hide us from the face of him that sits on the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb:"

Now why on God's green Earth would the Lamb of God have cause to wrath, or anger? And what could we infer about those who make a mockery out of justice in our courts and that saying about the warped judgement being whipped out of courts?

Was that John 2:15? Something about "Jesus made a whip from some ropes and chased them all out of the Temple-King James Bible (Cambridge Ed.)traders whom the covetous priests and rulers encouraged to make a market-place of its courts.." - huh? That's kind of interesting.

These traitors.. oh I mean traders where doing unholy things in places they ought naught be doing them, I guess, is a way to look at it.

So if a Judge in a Court of law basically over-rides the Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land, that would be cause for the people to elect someone who would see to it that justice was restored to the Courts and the best way to do that would be to see to it that Judges who "winked" in the biggest case of United States elections fraud be impeached or undergo impeachment trials?

Seems to me a President who is in charge of the Executive Branch of Government could bring such Trials to Congress and an Attorney General.

Well, the bottom line is that Eric Holder isn't going to be the Attorney General forever and Barack Obama is indeed not going to be in the Office of the President forever, but these Judges have made decisions which really need to be given some due process.

If ever there was a demand made by a Judge for attention, I'm thinking the biggest fraud in United States history just might deserve that kind of attention in a few short years.

I only have one thing to say about that, "Good luck with that future investment you're making because I think that it would be an understatement to say, "there will be all hell to pay", from a future American President elected by the people. They may find themselves gift wrapped and sent to China as a large down payment on our debt.

There are many things I actually look up to China, as well as Mormons for: Frugality and Industry, are staples in their diets. The good people who cultivate this for their children are to be admired. On the flip side the gluttonous actions in Washington DC are often embarrassing to us when it comes to these principles that are sound and wise.

Of course $500 dollars a month to build apple computers, that includes overtime, may be half of what American's minimum wage jobs pay and maybe seen as a luxurious job in China for a million people but I'm pretty sure that's not minimum wage in America, and Mormons might not take the freedom of speech literally in their religious meetings if someone calls out the abbreviation of the Book Of Mormon or B.O.M. in their meetings backed up with evidence, but they are trying to improve these things as religious sentiment is expressed. I think my case 20 years ago was the last one that put someone away for that. Man did I ever 'LEARN' to appreciate the Constitution there! Sadly, it took losing my rights for me to pay attention, but I am now grateful for the experience. Its taken a long time for me to say that, and understand it.

I think my example of more time in prison then many murderers with the Constitution locked up as well, when it came to evidence, cementing a union of church and state,as well as my sincere apologies have sufficed to shut people up. I certainly do not want to defend any hypocrisy and when I'm wrong I admit it, which is what I'm wondering about all these judges betting on Barack Obama on the side of hypocrisy towards our Constitution and the absolute fraud of a "natural born citizen" Obama is? This obstruction of justice has taken our Nation and set it off balance and our debt is a symptom of the sickness.

As we struggle to find our balance, I am so proud of Americans who have cut up their credit cards, or have decided that insurmountable debt is a weight that is near to slavery and miserable, and that a pay-as-you-go-balance can afford a much healthier lifestyle of happiness. We as Americans desire this health and freedom which is accompanied with liberty for our future.

We have integrity and want to pay off our debts, but we cannot be shackled down by the intolerable glutton our Government has become made so by the decisions as comparable to the corruption of foreign metals in the purifying process of gold that have burned us and sold entire generations into bondage.

Let me take this time to wish you and yours a very Happy New Year!

Cody Robert Judy
A New Ride
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDRTVakr7NI



Doritos- Has Justice been Jacked Women? 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqbwN8wzEhg




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fNjSTFI7_I



If you'd like to help Cody in the fight at the United States Supreme Court please contribute here:http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm


The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Cody Robert Judy for President
Plaintiff/ SCOTUS Case No. JUDY v. OBAMA 12-5276
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY
FEC REGISTERED  http://fec-candidates.findthedata.org/l/4426/Judy-Cody-Robert
Candidate ID P20003372
Committee ID C00501593

Petition for Rehearing under consideration:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/113046270/Judy-v-Obama-12-5276-Petition-for-Rehearing


Writ of Cert under consideration Judy v. Obama 12-5276
http://www.scribd.com/doc/100156244/Judy-v-Obama-Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-Revision-per-U-S-Clerk-Case-Analyst-Appendix-Stamped-Orders-Included

The End of 2012 Provides a New Beginning in 2013

Wow.. have you entered a project, or got in a car, not really knowing for sure where it would take you?

That's kind of the way I feel as I look back on everything that has taken place in 2012. A lot of work, but it seems very little to show for it.

The last post of 2012 and where are we on the eligibility of Barack Obama?

Well, we were in the United States Supreme Court one time in October, but were denied perhaps because our case wasn't yet ripe. We start off 2013 right back in there on January 4th, 2013 Judy v. Obama 12-5276 and its as ripe as its every going to get.

Thank you to all my friends and patriots! YOUR the best part of 2012 for me. The prayers from you have kept me afloat in deep waters, kept me safe in troubles and accidents. There is no measurable way to express my gratitude to you for your support, for which I am very humbled and honored by.

Being engaged in a good cause is very consuming and time just flies by as if it were a dream. What greater cause to be in the trenches laboring for than for the children of America to have the opportunity of freedom and liberty our Republic stands for?

The freedom of our future generations demands upholding our Constitution. Even those who succumb to the bitterness of shredding it in favor of the unknown abyss acknowledge the principles set as pillars on a firm foundation and when it comes down to it, end up admitting more of the principle pillars than the ones they'd like to abandon.

What a flat out honor being an American is! I'm here to tell you I love it! Its cool! While leading often requires splitting the walls of fierce adversarial winds,my wings seem to bask in the uplifting powerful drafts at the same time.

I am frightened, and scared, and thrilled for the gift of failure, because it has not precluded my ability to succeed. Happy New Year!

God Bless You..God Bless You Birthers.. God Bless our Constitution.. and God Bless the Republic for which we stand- God Bless the United States of America

Cheers to the New Ride in 2013!
Cody Robert Judy

A New Ride

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDRTVakr7NI





Doritos- Has Justice been Jacked Women? 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqbwN8wzEhg








http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fNjSTFI7_I




If you'd like to help Cody in the fight at the United States Supreme Court please contribute here:http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm




The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Cody Robert Judy for President
Plaintiff/ SCOTUS Case No. JUDY v. OBAMA 12-5276
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY
FEC REGISTERED  http://fec-candidates.findthedata.org/l/4426/Judy-Cody-Robert
Candidate ID P20003372
Committee ID C00501593




Petition for Rehearing under consideration:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/113046270/Judy-v-Obama-12-5276-Petition-for-Rehearing





Writ of Cert under consideration Judy v. Obama 12-5276
http://www.scribd.com/doc/100156244/Judy-v-Obama-Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-Revision-per-U-S-Clerk-Case-Analyst-Appendix-Stamped-Orders-Included

Election Challenge Presents: Has Justice been Jacked in America Women?

Election Challenge Presents: Has Justice been Jacked in America?

I pledge of allegiance to the flag – Of the United States of America – and to the Republic for which it stands- One Nation – Under God – Indivisible with liberty – And Justice for all.

Our Pledge of allegiance ends with a profound statement encompassing every American with justice. So what does it tell you about what’s happening to justice in America when a simple definition of a ‘natural born citizen’- ‘born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents’- has thus far been hi-jacked by the occupant of the White House as well as the Courts?

Well, I’ve run for President in 2008, and 2012, and have begun 2016 and I tell you justice has thus far escaped me as an American in the demand that only a ‘natural born citizen’ could qualify according to the Constitution Article II Section 1,Clause 5 for the office of President.

The problem with that, and the reason you should be concerned, is that justice has escaped you also. Justice for you has been jacked for quite some time.

On January 4th, 2013 the United States Supreme Court meets in conference to discuss a couple of things regarding my case Judy v. Obama 12-5276. Among them the ripeness of the case, the competitive standing of the petitioner (me), and the reconsideration ultimately that the Courts can’t have it both ways as far as the ‘natural born citizen’ qualification demand for the Office of the President.

Justice can’t demand the ‘natural born citizen’ qualification for the office of the President be upheld in denying a ‘naturalized citizen’ the ability to run for President as the case in a Sept.28, 2012 ruling in the Federal District Court for the District of Columbia Hassan v. F.E.C;11-2189, by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan, in principled terms concurring that the ‘natural born citizen’ qualification demand for the Office of the President within the Constitution’s Article II, Sect. I., Clause 5 had not been “trumped, abrogated and implicitly repealed” by, the Equal Protection guarantee of the Fifth Amendment and the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, as was the case by an Administrative Court ruling in Judy v. Obama, the subsequent Superior Court, and Georgia Supreme Court holding that the 14th Amendment did in fact over-rule the ‘natural born citizen’ qualification demand for the Office of the President within the Constitution’s Article II, Sect. I., Clause 5.

There could not be a plainer simpler determination to see in the presumption that justice has been jacked.

It seems that just as soon as the name Barack Obama is not included in the action before the Court that all of a sudden the Court upholds the ‘natural born citizen’ qualification as a standard that demands no foreign influence in the office by birth or parents. This is how it was suppose to be as the unique demand for’ natural born citizen’ only exists for the President and Vice President Office and is not a part of the qualifications for the Offices for House of Representatives or U.S. Senate.

The Constitution itself in the clause lays bare the exception to a ‘natural born citizen’ occupying the Office of the President as it declares that ‘a citizen’ is able to occupy the office if the person was not a ‘natural born citizen’ prior to the signing of the Constitution.

The Judicial Branch of our Government has long been held as the Branch most dedicated to upholding justice for individuals. The Courts is where we go when we have been wronged rather than the gun cabinet as was so often frequented in the Wild West. We are a nation of laws and our Constitution has long been held the factor that made the United States ‘indivisible’ in our pledge of allegiance as we uphold that as the Supreme Law of the Land.

Of course States could vary on many issues, but upon the United States Constitution every State and every Political Party for that matter came together lest civil war unfurl its banners with death and mayhem being carried out dividing us in our own backyards as a Republic.

Ask yourself if you’re questioning that document if you’d appreciate a few States being allowed to incorporate slavery again? Women’s suffrage? 2nd Amendment Right to bare arms? Or even prohibition?

Hollywood might engage support in terminating weapons meant to throw off a repressive Government clearly out of step with the Supreme Law of the land, however, just as soon as you remove the ability for them to use weapons in the movies, or curtail free speech in a Hollywood Drama in anyway including Broke Back Mountain, you might see Hollywood reaching for and supporting the 2nd Amendment very quickly with an aim that is very sharp.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=B1EObqM9Z0s



Yes, it’s just a matter of liberty and freedom when it really comes down to it that is very important to all of us. This freedom and liberty has unleashed Hollywood to spectacular heights in the eye of the world but those heights also mean that the fall can be a painful one if our Constitution is not upheld.

I’m sure they get it and don’t need a lecture from me, accept sometimes people think they can have it both ways. In the past we have done a pretty good job in maintaining balance in America which is not easy. You've got to want it badly. The forces against women especially are continually urging for repression and the defense is continually assaulted.

That’s why it pains me so bad to see especially women standing against the United States Constitution in the demand for a “natural born citizen” in the Office of the President. I mean you want to talk about slavery again, putting a veil over your face, losing your right to vote as a citizen, and a return to the dark ages, those who voted for Obama seem to have no clear idea of exactly what a termination of the Constitution means to them personally or the effect upon our Constitution through the office of the President.

Yes, I have long been denied justice in my runs for President. I have long been denied a fair race. Obama has seen himself as an exception to the rule of law. Many courts have seen that and concurred. Obama’s lie about being a ‘natural born citizen’ is probably only surmounted by his lie to women that he does not want to see them stripped of their citizenship.

If actions speak louder than words, and they do, it is clear or should be clear, that not holding up the Constitution in the demand for a ‘natural born citizen’ in the office of the President is just as good as wiping away a women’s citizenship completely. There is no better way to get the task done.

You don’t think he’d do it? Well, you must be very good at lying to yourself, and to others, to have this lie perpetrated against you. Obama is a perpetrator in your house- the same house that has protected women’s rights in the United States Constitution.

Here’s the question: How long are you willing to wait for justice to roll around to hearing your cry again? How long are you comfortable weeping? 2008-2012-2016, have you ever thought about how many years it will take you to gain justice again for your plight if the Constitution is null and void?

And the worst part of it? It was done by your own hand…your own vote.

I am the biggest advocate for women’s rights you have at your disposal. I have been serving you in all the years that I have been denied justice in this fight to defend the ‘natural born citizen’ clause of the Constitution for the Office of the President. I pray to God that my suffering won’t translate into your suffering, because once that takes place I cannot guarantee that you won’t be denied justice just the same as I have been denied justice for as many years and that is pain I don’t want to see you experience…again.

Doritos- Has Justice been Jacked Women?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqbwN8wzEhg





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fNjSTFI7_I




If you'd like to help Cody in the fight at the United States Supreme Court please contribute here:http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm

The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Cody Robert Judy for President
Plaintiff/ SCOTUS Case No. JUDY v. OBAMA 12-5276
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY
FEC REGISTERED  http://fec-candidates.findthedata.org/l/4426/Judy-Cody-Robert
Candidate ID P20003372
Committee ID C00501593

Petition for Rehearing under consideration:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/113046270/Judy-v-Obama-12-5276-Petition-for-Rehearing


Writ of Cert under consideration Judy v. Obama 12-5276
http://www.scribd.com/doc/100156244/Judy-v-Obama-Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-Revision-per-U-S-Clerk-Case-Analyst-Appendix-Stamped-Orders-Included