FATE OF NATION AND 141 MILLION DOLLARS REST IN HANDS OF CLERK

FATE OF NATION AND 141 MILLION DOLLARS REST IN HANDS OF CLERK
FEATURED EDITORIAL: The Post & Email

Who says being clerk is a lowly job of no particular importance? That is certainly not the case in the U.S. District Court in the State of Utah where the Chief Justice and Presiding Judge Honorable Ted Stewart just handed the Clerk of the Court the responsibility wherein the fate of the whole United States of America and $141 Million Dollars waits with anticipation on the clerks ruling on a "Default Certificate".

Before submitting the Motion for Default and the Proposed Order I called the Clerk stating a Certificate of Default was necessary to which I was told by the Clerk that it was up to the Judge so I made a Motion for Default and an Order up and sent them in. Now I have an Order from the Judge saying that its up to the Clerk.

Its odd working in the same building with multiple Clerks working tirelessly from 8AM to 4PM Monday through Friday for the Judge himself, and other Clerks working in the receiving room that someone didn't mention something at lunch like "oh yea, did you get the Judy v. Obama Certificate of Default up to Chief Judge Ted Stewart? You know the Defendants were served and didn't respond to the Courts Stamped Summons, and its long past the 20 Days that the Court requested an answer or Default by Judgement would be taken against them."

Well its probably because of the work load! I mean who can keep track of these things, thousands or at least hundreds of cases being filed right? What? What was that, this case is number 93? You mean its September and they haven't had 100 cases filed this year yet? Let's see here, between 14 Judges that's 6.6 lets round that up and say 7 cases per Judge and its the end of the 8th month so, a little less than 1 case per month per Judge.

That is understandably a mystery. I'm sorry, perhaps I am being a tiny bit facetious, but that's how I felt when I read that the Chief Justice was going to "leave the determination to the Clerk of the Court in the first instance.", when he could have made a phone call and got the report from the clerk in 5 minutes.

I actually don't believe the Judge didn't make that phone call, or that his personal Clerk didn't say Hi to the Clerks down stairs or some how didn't talk about it at lunch, on their break, or in passing each other in the halls. That just seems like an impossibility to me especially with those kind of names on the case.


So anyway, today I received from the Presiding Judge Ted Stewart of the United States District Court ((Utah Division)) a August 26th signed MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER OF JUDGEMENT on the Motion For Default and Proposed Order that I submitted to him. If you haven't read the Motion for Default or the Order you can do that here and I'd recommend that you do and after we can discuss a little bit of what we can determine based on what we have so far. That's the really fun part of all of this you political and legal crack junkies you. (smile) Hey if you can't have any fun with this or maintain a sense of humor, you really are in danger of losing it all. We can talk some serious things, and we can laugh and crack a joke or two at the same time.

Update on Judy v. Obama 1:14-cv-93 filed in the U.S. Court (District of Utah)
1. MOTION FOR DEFAULT W PROPOSED ORDER OF JUDGEMENT

2. ORDER OF DEFAULT JUDGEMENT (PROPOSED)


For anyone wishing to read the U.S. Federal Civil Rights Complaint you may now do so here now as it is public information: Judy v. Obama 2014 U.S. FED Case No. 1:14cv00093


Now that you've read it thoroughly and have some idea of what we are talking about, especially the MOTION FOR DEFAULT, you can understand Judge Ted Stewarts first paragraph in the Memorandum Decision.

"This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Default Order of Judgement.(reference No. 6 docket) In his Motion, Plaintiff asserts that Defendants have been properly served and have failed to appear or otherwise defend within the time allotted by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. On this basis, Plaintiff seeks a default judgement that includes an award of $141 million in damages."

Can't you just see the Judge looking at his Clerk and very slowly saying, "one hundred forty one million dollars- That's a lot of cash to dismiss in an Motion to Dismiss Default Judgement if it was granted. Whew!"

Before I get to far in to this report, let me just clarify a few basics just in case a few of you decided you didn't want to read the Complaint, the Motion For Default and the Proposed Order. This case actually does something unprecedented in political history! You have probably never thought that a political contribution was an investment that could actually increase in your whole life.

Can't you just see all the contributors of former Gov. Mitt Romney, Sen. John McCain,Sen. Hillary Clinton's and former Senator Barack Obama's 2012 presidential campaign scratching their heads right now trying to even comprehend how a political contribution could increase let say a hundred fold. That's where a $25 dollar contribution is refunded as $2500 because the contribution was given with a certain expectation of the 'rules of the race' and having the rules changed and not being notified of the change before the race started actually caused an inconvenience that needed to be reimbursed because of basically fraudulent circumstances?

Well, that's what I've actually proposed in this law suit that I would do to with every person that actually contributed to my campaign because we didn't know the the "natural born Citizen" qualification had been canceled in the U.S. Constitution by Republicans and Democrats presidential candidates in U.S. Senate Res. 511 where Sen. Hillary Clinton, Sen. Barack Obama and Sen. John McCain all made a deal that it would be changed and every U.S. Senator not apart of that voted for it.

Of course I wasn't there and neither was America or the 300 million Citizens of the U.S. to see the change that a non-binding U.S. Senate resolution had on an Article II of the Constitution that defines the rules and qualifications of the race for President so we just need to get our money back and some damages for not informing us that the U.S. Constitution had been changed, because if we had known it was changed we certainly wouldn't have run the races or contributed our hard earned money.

Can you imagine Mitt Romney doing that? Telling all of his contributors, "Hey you guys deserve a refund and some damages because the rules got changed and I wasn't in on it"? Well, that's kind of what I've said and I think its fair especially when we have a standard and there are rules. So we basically, just get a refund and Obama stays in the Office of the President. Of course that is unless Congress catches wind that a refund has been given to all the contributors based on a breach of the Constitution. Then of course, Congress is free to act as they will given the circumstances.

Those contributing to my campaign I'm sure will be very happy about their refund coming, while there probably will be a few people who contributed to rich Mitt Romney who are still less then satisfied. Oh, so it goes. I mean you certainly get a choice at who your going to support. Can you imagine the disappointment of those who gave to all four McCain, Romney twice, Hillary Clinton, and Obama? They will probably be really disappointed. That's like betting on every horse on the race except the one that won or did some good for you! (hahaha)Who says you have to win the race in order to win on principle? Who says 'principle doesn't pay off?'

Okay, back to the Judge's second paragraph-
"Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) provides that "[w]hen a party against whom a judgement for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party's default." Then, "[i]f the plaintiff's claim is for a sum certain... the clerk- on Plaintiff's request, with an affidavit showing the amount due-must enter judgement for that amount and cost against a defendant who has been defaulted." (reference Fed R. Civ.P 55 (b)(1). However, where, as here, the judgement sought is not for a sum certain, or for a sum that can be made certain, "the party must apply to the court for a default judgement." (reference 3 Id. 55(b)(2)."

That's kind of a mouthful, but I guess what it means is I need to submit an Affidavit to the Clerk, even though a signed Motion and an Order in my mind is kind of the same thing- an affidavit is sworn to and has a specific amount.

Third Paragraph-
"Plaintiff has applied to the Court for a default judgement. However, Plaintiff has not yet received a default certificate as required by Rule 55 (a). Until Plaintiff receives a default certificate from the Clerk of Court, the Court cannot reach the merits of Plaintiff's Motion for Default Order of Judgement. For this reason, the Court will deny Plaintiff's Motion without prejudice. In so doing, the Court does not reach the merits of Plaintiff's claim of proper service or entitlement to a default certificate. Rather, it will leave that determination to the Clerk of Court in the first instance."
Fourth Paragraph-
"Based on the foregoing, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Default Order of Judgement (Docket No.6) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DATED this 26th day of August, 2014. (Signed by) U.S. District Judge Ted Stewart"

You know I have to say I think that was very nice of Judge Ted Stewart, I really do. You know when I opened the envelope up I thought here we go, another "DISMISSAL in your face you don't know what the word frivolous means do you? YOU MUST BE STUPID STUPID STUPID", type of an ORDER. I don't feel that way at all with this Order. I think it was very concise and I didn't feel STUPID STUPID STUPID, even though and I'm sure he knows, I could easily qualify for that kind of insult legally speaking with years of inexperience rather then the years of experience he has.

You know I'm never offended with intelligence and quality and I've got a pretty good eye at recognizing quality. Yes, even in my ex-wifes. I sure didn't marry them because they weren't quality women. I never thought to myself, " I wonder why I married her?". I knew why I did, and never regretted it with all three.

So now let's briefly discuss what Judge Stewart didn't do, that he actually could have. If for instance he had DISMISSED the Motion with PREJUDICE or DISMISSED THE COMPLAINT as frivolous that would be the end..good night..turn off the lights. You don't bother the Courts again with this. That's it. He did'nt do that and I love him because he didn't do that and he could have.

There is nothing that means more to my heart then 'good judgement'. Its for me like admiring a supreme performance by a reining horse that spins like a top and slides 60 feet on a lose reign with just a few cues from the rider. That to someone else might be like admiring a really rare piece of art and understanding the artist, the history, and value of a favorite collection, or how about a mother who tries to explain the beauty of her sleeping child as her heart swells with joy this child brings her?

I know it sounds strange, but losing a race the best that you can is every bit as important as winning with your best effort. If you give it all you got and lose, its okay to walk away. When I think about all the "likes" I've got on facebook from the general public people who don't even know me, and their sharing what I've written I am so humbled and filled with gratitude. Its just amazing. When ever I've received a contribution in the mail or on line from my web site I've remembered to thank God for that and treated it just as honorably as the widow's mite Jesus pointed out was so valuable.

Well, that's all the news I have to report today for those you following this case and interested in it. Thanks for sharing and caring.., You really do mean the world to me and I thank you.

If you'd like to contribute to the ABC Campaign (American Birther Campaign)for Cody Robert Judy U.S. President 2016 you can do so on the contribution page of www.codyjudy.us

Sincerely
Cody Robert Judy

Wow!Just found my book, Taking A Stand, on sale at your local B&N for nook users if you prefer over soft or hard bound - only $8.49 That's a Great price

Cody Robert Judy
For U.S. President 2016

If you think “Truth” is worth it, support it and quit supporting the lie. That is the beginning of change, or we can just keep on going down this road and see where it leads with Obama. Which is it going to be?

TRUTH IS REAL

The Commercial is simply called "America"

Is Mitt a Hit or a Misfit?

Is Mitt a Hit or a Misfit for the Office of the President?

The speculation that Mitt Romney may or may not 'run' for President is once again blasting ears of the American Public like a reverb button that has been turned up high and continues to echo in your head. On the Democratic Party side we are blasted in the news with Sen. Hillary Clinton's mojo, as if her giving up against Obama in the Democratic Party nomination was a reward for receiving the nomination in 2016.

Is there a hit in Mitt and Hillary yet or do we have old school songs that have been remixed one to many times already? Don't get me wrong, I love Tanya Tucker singing Delta Dawn, but I keep wondering if America still hasn't heard the notes that were not quite in tune when it comes to the actual job requirement of the President in defending, protecting, and preserving the United States Constitution?

If you recall Mitt Romney ran for President in 2008 losing the Republican nomination to Sen. John McCain. He re-rallied the forces for another ride in 2012 this time hurdling the Republican Nomination he'd tripped over in 2008 only to experience a melt down with Barack Obama in the 2012 showdown general election.

What Mitt failed to do in his campaigns of 2008 and 2012 was actually defend the United States Constitution from an unqualified candidate. Both McCain and Obama were not 'Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents' as is defined in the term 'natural born Citizen', the requirement for the Office of the President in the United States Constitution. Excluding foreign influence in both nature and nurture the Office of the President is unique in its requirement from U.S. Representatives and U.S. Senators and a foreign influence can permeate that office either by a foreign birth or a foreign or alien parent.

While being born outside the United States or being born to an alien parent does not make your skin blue, it does create a certain allegiance that persons "born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents" are not subjects to in a legal arena as far as being granted a foreign citizenship that might create a dual citizenship prohibited in the Office of the President. The question is not is the alien citizenship employed, but rather does the alien citizenship exist? If it does, that is prohibited from the Office of the President in the United States of America.

Its not a matter of 'discrimination' its a matter of 'qualification', much the same as the age restrictions also noted are different from U.S. Reps, U.S. Sen., and U.S. Presidents, or for that matter the age restrictions on driving a car, or buying alcohol exist. Allowing infants to drive your car, or juveniles to buy your alcohol is illegal and is not lawful, yet the voting public has over the last two presidential cycles not had any candidates in the major parties that have agreed with the law.

If you like the idea of 'infants on thrones' you need to understand there is a difference between someone who is of wise judgement and that being seen as good or innocent like an infant, and the negative contraction of the idea existing stating, those who are not qualified or fail to qualify should not be allowed in the Office for good reasons much the same as we don't allow people who are 7 to drive or those who are 14 to buy alcohol because your just asking for an accident to happen.

Like former Gov. Mitt Romney failed to challenge Sen. John McCain in his 'qualification failure for not being born in the U.S. but receiving his native born citizenship from Panama and generally populating the idea that McCain had not one but two Congressional Acts on his Citizenship generally formed under the 14th Amendment or non-binding U.S. Senate Resolution 511, Hillary Clinton failed to do the same thing on Barack Obama. In her democratic party campaign she failed a most basic objection to his candidacy for the nomination in 2012 which ultimately could have prohibited any further crisis and given her the nomination. This is why I say she 'gave up' against Barack Obama in her campaign and failed to do the most basic duty of a President in objecting to an unqualified candidate in the race.

Mitt Romney went on to repeat Hillary Clinton's failure, and thus suffered the same defeat.

The premise is very basic but reveals or uncovers quite a bit,If you can't at the very least stand up and defend, preserve, and protect the U.S. Constitution while your in the race for President by objecting to unqualified candidates in affect threatening the office of the President unlawfully, how are you going to do it if you were elected? Why should someone be rewarded with the Office of the President who neglects the most basic task from the very beginning?

Now through out this stage of experimentation with our Republic, that's the Republic for which we stand, for those who have forgotten the Pledge of Allegiance, neither Mitt Romney or Hillary Clinton have changed their tune about Barack Obama who is not a qualified individual in the Office of the President. One of the very basic tenants of a Republic is that elections don't over-ride the Constitution but are suppose to co-inside with the Constitution.

What that means is that it does not matter how many people voted for Barack Obama without being educated that he was not a natural born Citizen, what matters is the Constitution and one person standing up and saying so. One person can stand against every one that voted for Barack Obama. In a Constitution Republic, if that one person is right by the Constitution, all those votes really do not count because they were cast under a veil of fraud, deceit, and cover-up of an identity.

The way I see it as the only U.S. Presidential Candidate who actually as a matter of record in Court objected to both McCain and Obama's qualification for the Office of the President all the way through the election cycles of 2008 and 2012, is if the tune hasn't changed, its probably the same old song. I've been waiting for an objection cast from the lips of both Mitt Romney and Hillary Clinton, but so far all I hear is silence. There is no music being played that would turn me on. In fact I actually see a confirmation that indeed their tune hasn't changed.


Recently Mitt Romney said, "I mean, you hope you learn from your mistakes," he said, "but at the same time, there are people who are not yet known by the American public who have extraordinary records, great capability, Paul Ryan being one of them, Scott Walker, Bobby Jindal, Marco Rubio. Of course, people are getting to know Chris Christie. Jeb Bush, they don’t know Jeb Bush as the governor of Florida, and the kind of record he has and had there. These are people who I think have the potential to really ignite interest in our party and potentially win the general."

http://www.businessinsider.com/mitt-romney-2016-president-hugh-hewitt

No offense Mitt, but even some of your recommendations as far as 'good people' for the Office of the President would be walking talking violations of the U.S. Constitution if they were to win the Office of the President. I can not recommend 16 year olds buying alcohol and say that it is good. It has nothing to do with Marco Rubio or Bobby Jindal not being good fathers or parents or a good U.S. Senator or Governor it has to do with the qualifications the American People have set up for the Office of the President that both Marco Rubio and Bobby Jindal fail.

Now I don't think Mitt Romney is a bad guy or Hillary Clinton is a bad gal nor do I think Barack Obama is a bad guy. There are many good qualities about Romney, Clinton, and Obama as well as McCain, Rubio, Jindal, Cruz,as well as Santorum all of whom I even recently challenged in the ALS Ice bucket challenge, only because I knew Mitt had already done it and challenged his wife also, but we have to start facing facts.

If all of these people recommend that 16 year olds can buy alcohol and 7 year olds can drive, maybe their advice is somewhat of a misfit and not something we want in the Office of the President? They are all free every day to accept a challenge and begin fresh and I for one sincerely hope they do, because nothing would be better to me than if I could have someone to vote for who was legal besides myself.

Will Mitt Romney take another run who knows? What I do know is that the tune hasn't changed. I've written some 60+ songs and many of them I actually dreamed about. You can imagine my surprise when I leaped out of bed with this tune being chanted in my head during my sleep by not just me but many many people. It sounded pretty good as a chorus of many people, not as good with just me, but look at the date on this thing and then ask yourself is Mitt Romney running again as a hit or a misfit?

I just checked this link and its only been seen 11 times! You know how hard that is to do with a video published June 20th,2013, over a year ago? ( smile ) Maybe the 'reverbs' a little to high? Let's hope they all change their tune!

Mitt Romney's Loop te Loop





Update on Judy v. Obama 1:14-cv-93 filed in the U.S. Court (District of Utah)
1. MOTION FOR DEFAULT W PROPOSED ORDER OF JUDGEMENT

2. ORDER OF DEFAULT JUDGEMENT (PROPOSED)


Those wishing to read the U.S. Federal Civil Rights Complaint may now do so here now as it is public information: Judy v. Obama 2014 U.S. FED Case No. 1:14cv00093


Wow!Just found my book, Taking A Stand, on sale at your local B&N for nook users if you prefer over soft or hard bound - only $8.49 That's a Great price

Cody Robert Judy
For U.S. President 2016

If you think “Truth” is worth it, support it and quit supporting the lie. That is the beginning of change, or we can just keep on going down this road and see where it leads with Obama. Which is it going to be?

TRUTH IS REAL

The Commercial is simply called "America"

ALS Icebucketchallenge - CRJ accepts and Challenges Who?

The ALS Icebucket Challenge is accepted and you just have to watch the video to see who Cody Robert Judy Candidate for President Challenges next!




Will you now join 221others across the country representing every state in the nation of informed patriots who have liked my Facebook page for President? Cody Robert Judy for President 2016 Thank you for your consideration.
https://m.facebook.com/CodyRobertJudyForPresident2016


Update on Judy v. Obama 1:14-cv-93 filed in the U.S. Court (District of Utah)
1. MOTION FOR DEFAULT W PROPOSED ORDER OF JUDGEMENT

2. ORDER OF DEFAULT JUDGEMENT (PROPOSED)


Those wishing to read the U.S. Federal Civil Rights Complaint may now do so here now as it is public information: Judy v. Obama 2014 U.S. FED Case No. 1:14cv00093


Wow!Just found my book, Taking A Stand, on sale at your local B&N for nook users if you prefer over soft or hard bound - only $8.49 That's a Great price

Cody Robert Judy
For U.S. President 2016

If you think “Truth” is worth it, support it and quit supporting the lie. That is the beginning of change, or we can just keep on going down this road and see where it leads with Obama. Which is it going to be?

TRUTH IS REAL

The Commercial is simply called "America"