Wednesday, June 29, 2016

ICEBERG TIP: On A Personal Server, All Emails Are Private


BREAKING NEWS

ICEBERG TIP: On A Personal Server, All Emails Are Personal
IT's THAT BIG!

Hillary's conceptual semantics game with the FBI Criminal Investigation, as well as the Judicial Watch Citizens United FOIA just went into over-drive. On the one hand we have Hillary stating she did not want any chance of her personal emails becoming public to her long time aid Huma Abedin recently deposed under oath. On the other hand Hillary knew all of the emails on her Personal Server were not subject to anyone but herself as judge, jury, and deliverer to any FOIA REQUEST. So 'all the emails' she was referencing in an email correspondence with aid Huma Abedin were in fact "personal" to her and in conceptual semantics she knew the State Department would have to go through her to get anything off her personal server, in fact making every email she wrote whether personal or business, or received as Secretary of State [personal]. This is how the Secretary of State Office of the United States Government was subverted and usurped. No one else had access to it, until the FBI recovered what they did after her Server was confiscated.

If we are privileged to Hillary's own brand of conceptual semantics, she has just reported to her husband over dinner, "The ICEBERG TIP has just cracked through the hull Bill, and we're taking in serious water."

"Clinton responded in the 2010 exchange that she could get a “separate address or device” but said she didn’t “want any risk of the personal being accessible,” according to the e-mail chain. Abedin replied that the missed communications were “not a good system.”

Again, "personal" included all secretary of state business emails, because in Hillary's mind, the State Department did not have access to her personal server, she knew she was conducting all of her secretary of state business on. To sure up this point we simply need to ask Hillary why she chose to go through herself and decide what emails were personal and which ones were private? The follow up question would be how did you expect the State Department to submit to FOIA request on the Secretary of State Office under your tenure?

"State Department spokesman Mark Toner said, in a statement that Clinton had said repeatedly that the 55,000 pages represented “all federal email records in her custody.” 

We know of 165 pages that were not submitted but were indeed Secretary of State Business. On Monday, Judicial Watch, published an additional 165 pages of e-mails from Clinton’s time as secretary of state. Those e-mails sabotage Clinton’s claim she turned over all work-related e-mails to the State Department after stepping down in 2013.

A June 29th AP Report states "Judicial Watch lawyers repeatedly pressed Abedin to explain Clinton's concern expressed to her in a November 2010 message that her emails might become public, but the longtime aide insisted that Clinton's interest in wanting to keep her personal correspondence from being exposed was similar to any private citizen's."

That's were we see the 'semantics code' being used between Hillary Clinton and her Aid Huma Abedin. They both knew that the state department had no access to Hillary's Private Server of which Huma in her continued employ after the New York U.S. Senate and 2008 Presidential Run with Hillary took up residence with her own Clinton-server-email address.

The AP Report is grossly covering tracks for Hillary Clinton, or is in the journalistic mire of the campaign's clutches though as the two paragraphs from the story relate: 

"Longtime Hillary Clinton aide Huma Abedin said in a legal proceeding that Clinton did not want the private emails that she mixed in with State Department emails on her private computer server to be accessible to "anybody," according to transcripts released Wednesday."

"But Clinton's private server contained tens of thousands of work-related emails as well as private messages, and her decision to conduct both private and government business on her system meant that she kept control of both types of correspondence, effectively preventing her State Department correspondence from being archived by the agency and made available for public records requests. It was not until late 2014 - more than a year after Clinton left office - that the State Department learned that she held all of her email and requested that she turn over all work-related records.

This last underlined sentence is very important and is blatantly false as the Memorandum of March 17th, 2009 relates. In a Post Report filed yesterday on this Blog we read of the State Department's awareness in 2009 of the Private Server as well as it's location:

 Judicial Watch Uncovers Smoking Gun Clinton Emails
http://www.breitbart.com/hillary-clinton/2016/06/28/judicial-watch-uncovers-smoking-gun-clinton-emails/
OBAMA KNEW
March 17, 2009 memorandum prepared by S/ES-IRM staff regarding communications equipment in the Secretary’s New York residence identified a server located in the basement. (This email shows early on that the Obama State Department was very much aware of Mrs. Clinton’s email serverdown to its very location in her house!)

However, that lapse in the Associated Press's June 29th article might be minuscule to the giant revelation coming from the National Review June 29th article that reveals the titanic may have just had contact with the tip of the iceberg. That's the two billion dollar Clinton Foundation Charity. In fact in another story from National Review today we learn the State Department was aiding and abetting the very covert work of Clinton's Secretary of State Business and the Clinton Foundation Charity work!

"Citizens United is slated to receive all e-mails sent to and from Lona Valmoro, Clinton’s State Department scheduler, in the two-week periods before each of 14 international trips Clinton took during her four years in office. David Bossie, president of Citizens United, hopes to confirm suspicions that Clinton maintained an off-the-books schedule, meeting with Clinton Foundation donors on the taxpayer’s dime. “Citizens United wants to know how many overseas dinners Secretary Clinton attended with Clinton Foundation donors that didn’t make it on her schedule,” he says."

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/437312/hillary-clinton-emails-secret-meetings-clinton-foundation-donors

"Citizens United presented the judge with several pieces of evidence suggesting Valmoro deliberately struck from the official schedule a December 6, 2012 dinner in Dublin, Ireland with several Clinton Foundation and Clinton campaign donors, organized by Teneo co-founder Declan Kelly. Though Valmoro was made aware of the Dublin meeting through an earlier e-mail chain, neither Clinton’s archived daily calendar nor her detailed official schedule make any note of it. Citizens United characterizes the State Department’s decision to go along with the filing as an acknowledgement that Clinton did, in fact, maintain a secret schedule. Collyer was apparently convinced, ordering the State Department on Wednesday to produce 500 pages of Valmoro’s e-mails by the end of August. An additional 500 pages will be released every four weeks from that date, until Citizens United obtains all messages relating to the 14 overseas trips specified."

THE CONSCIENCE CLAUSE

The only saving grace Democrats may have now is what is called a Conscience Clause which is based on the Delegates in the Primaries of every State being released and not being bound to the Candidate of their State's Primary based on the lies and fabrications that were covered up by that Candidates own corruption in past circumstances and situations initiated by the Democratic Party National Convention's Rules Committee.

Delegates should/shall not be bound to any Candidate so entangled by criminal corruption in previous Government Office as privatizing entire offices of the United States Government. This is a Republic. We the People did not authorize the Secretary of State Office to be usurped by Hillary Clinton anymore than we authorized the Office of the President to be usurped by someone who is not a [natural born Citizen ie. born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.] U.S. Supreme Court ref: Minor v. Happersett.  and Judy v. Obama 14-9396.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T41tTkKrBQ4&feature=player_embedded


________________________


CRJ

Support Today the Choice Democrats have of a solid common-sense-defense , not a politically correct weakness

Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
Contribute to the Cody Robert Judy Working Today for a Better America Tomorrow Campaign 2016 for U.S. President

https://twitter.com/CodyRobertJudy/status/742455835314376704


http://codyjudy.us/i…/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm

Here's the Link to Contribute if you'd like to Cody's Campaign improve your record for Taking A Stand for the Constitution.



Thank You!


Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy



Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.


Web Site www.codyjudy.us
Keep coming back!


INSPIRING - I believe in You


Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!








































Tuesday, June 28, 2016

SPECIAL REPORT : The "Crooked Hillary" Label Democrats are Setting In Stone

SPECIAL REPORT


The "Crooked Hillary" Label Democrats are Setting In Stone
THE PUBLIC TRIAL BE CONDUCTED
PART I
PART II Continued here:

One of the main reasons for a Primary Season in any General Election Year is to formidably test the Candidates within the particular Political Party before the selection for representation is made. The 'presumption' the Democrats have made this year that has noticeably been egregious to Candidates such as myself in a coronation standardization evidenced by everything from the miniaturized-weekender-debate-schedule to the favored-candidate-status in the mechanics of the Democratic Party contact munitions favoring Hillary Rodham Clinton, with the greatest qualification from the Candidate's own mouth being, "Don't you want to see a women be President, as if she's about to lift her skirt, may just be the worst thing to every happen to women in the equality of gender movement.

One might ask if I'm a registered in the Democratic Party why I would offer such harsh criticism of Hillary Rodham Clinton as a Candidate for President? The best answer I can give you is because I do indeed care deeply about the pivotal social issues of our time and frankly the representation of inclusiveness that for a long time Democrats have shared for the Constitution,Civil Rights, and the representation of Justice for all U.S. Citizens that government corruption can wipe out without the scrutiny. No team can really get on the field and play a good game without scrimmage practices and come game day those that do will take the field to their chagrin.

Democrats flatly refused anyone on the Debate Stage who was willing to formidably test Hillary Clinton the way Republicans will and are beginning to now, which was a Big Mistake. If I would have been allowed on the Stage I would have objected to Senator Sanders classifying the Private Server she maintained of the Government Secretary of State Office for the People as a "Horror Novel" rather than something we shouldn't be interested in.  Not only has the democratic party baptized itself in the stagnated lead tainted water of the shark pool known as 'Group Think' filtered only by party Established Insiders running the Democratic Party like Muammar Gaddafi into rebel forces where he was cornered and then killed by rebel forces, but in the delusion of 'Gender Classification', they have espoused in "government corruption practices" a preferred type of scrimmage which is only a laughing stock by the standard of our Constitution Republic and a hope as a Light to the World.

Just three hours ago the Washington Post released a story [Hillary Clinton's email story gets harder and harder to believe]  Link: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/06/28/hillary-clintons-email-story-continues-to-get-harder-and-harder-to-believe/ wherein they report upon 165 pages that were just released that were not among the 55,000 she chose to release to the State Department via the FOIA Request while she was Secretary of State providing a glimpse into how Hillary Rodham Clinton (HRC) works when in Government Office appointing herself as judge, jury and executioner in what can only be called a nefarious responsibility to the Public Service requirements that communications for Public Office be subject to public oversight proving at best bad decision and, at worst, something more sinister on the level of Treason.

Saying it's harder and harder to believe HRC is about as kind as you can get when calling someone you need to trust, like your husband or wife, a Liar, as they are stuck in denial when you roll out the video in front of them romping in the car with the low jack auto upload YouTube Station you installed for the public display of their affair and affection. With the Youtube Video rolling Hillary is saying it wasn't her, she wasn't there, and it had to be an animation trick of some kind.

Yes, it was a "Trick" alright more stylized in the urban dictionary than a magic act. The problem is the consequences of the "Lies" she has told on the Debate Stage tens of millions of people have fallen victim to as "Everything Partisan". How can it be partisan if I am a Democrat Candidate for President registered with the FEC and a Democratic Party member? In fact how can what I'm saying not be believed when it is solidified by the fact that you haven't heard of me in the Main Stream Media but the Federal Election Commission knows me, so does Facebook, so does Twitter, so does Blogspot, so does my web site up for 8 years www.codyjudy.us , and so does the U.S. Supreme Court along with about 14 other Courts it took to get Judy v. Obama 14-9396?

The level of Group Think is horrifying said the monkeys of hear no evil, see no evil , speak no evil. The problem is not remotely HRC's alone, but is a culmination represented in a combination of corruption cast by an ineligible candidate for President running in 2008 with a fraudulent identification long form birth certificate fabricated and released by his own hand in 2011 at the behest of Donald Trump poignantly on The View and illustrated in Part I of this Report by Judge Jeanine.

It's only getting worse as the Smoking Gun was uncovered showing Obama's State Department, and thus Obama by complicity knew all about his Secretary of State running an anti-FOIA OPERATION.
 Judicial Watch Uncovers Smoking Gun Clinton Emails
http://www.breitbart.com/hillary-clinton/2016/06/28/judicial-watch-uncovers-smoking-gun-clinton-emails/
OBAMA KNEW
March 17, 2009 memorandum prepared by S/ES-IRM staff regarding communications equipment in the Secretary’s New York residence identified a server located in the basement. (This email shows early on that the Obama State Department was very much aware of Mrs. Clinton’s email server, down to its very location in her house!)

We must ask ourselves to take a look in the mirror in a serious self-scrutiny Democrats. How on earth can we be representing the Constitution, Civil Rights, and the Jurisdiction and Protections in the United States of America for Justice for All when the corrupt leaders are so corrupt and anti-American that when the Benghazi Report finally comes out, or when Americans watch the Movie 13 Hours, or read the book Clinton Cash or see that movie set to Release on the Eve of the Democratic National Convention July 24th, 2016, Americans cannot hold their lunches down?

Clinton Cash investigates how Bill and Hillary Clinton went from being “dead broke” after leaving the White House to amassing a net worth of over $150 million, with $2 billion in donations to their foundation, wealth accumulated during Mrs. Clinton’s tenure as Sec. of State through lucrative speaking fees and contracts paid for by foreign companies and Clinton Foundation donors.

Under the constructs of the Labeling theory concerns are identified mostly not with the normal roles that define our lives, but with those very special roles that society provides for deviant behavior, called deviant roles, stigmatic roles, or social stigma.  What in years ahead will we be telling our little boys not to be a Tricky-Dick or for our little girls not to be a "Crooked-Hillary" with the 50 Facts Donald Trump just outlined? A social role is a set of expectations we have about a behavior. Social roles are necessary for the organization and functioning of any society or group. We expect the postman, for example, to adhere to certain fixed rules about how he does his job. "Deviance" for a sociologist does not mean morally wrong, but rather behavior that is condemned by society. Deviant behavior can include both criminal and non-criminal activities.
Many Christians have been especially apposed to Trump's special brand of what's called 'Identity Politics' based on philosophies of not wanting to offend. The problem is when the "Truth" is understood as a foundation and a label is denied in a delusion, education of the subjects cannot be measured and therefore is not real.

Obama and the main stream media have been very good at the virtue of labeling Birthers as those who simply want the [natural born Citizen] clause of the qualification for President upheld as Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents as is mentioned in the SCOTUS Case of Minor v. Happersett, Obama fails, and which prohibits those such as the shooters in San Bernardino, California. and Orlando, Florida from the Office of the President, although the hand is extended for them to be Representatives and Senators.

TRUTH is SOMETHING Christians have been getting farther and farther away from. I came across this article entitled The Virtue of Name-Calling or Labels and immediate thought of both Main Stream Media unapologetic pajorative of Birthers, their distaste for it used against Hillary, and Donald Trump's brand during the Primary Election season? 

When we are labeled a wonderful chance for introspection is created. Is there Truth about Hillary Clinton being ‪#‎CrookedHillary‬? What is the Truth to the U.S, Supreme Court Justices being a pit of Vipers or ‪#‎PigsOfJustice‬ for the discrimination of income Inequality in denying a forma pauperis motion in Judy v. Obama 14-9396 the Media still refuses to identify as corruption and denying Evidence of The Constitutions Qualification for President? Can we not see if the Qualifications would have been upheld on Obama that the corruption of Clinton in what's happened just since 2008 wouldn't have been allowed? We have to remember justice slipping through the cracks has intense ramifications of the Trust of the People, as well as the Hope of the People! When Trust is destroyed so is the Hope.

[ In the Virtue of Labels we can find Truth and Jesus Christ used and employed labels in truth-telling quite often. Those who take the Truth to be hard are wicked those who receive Truth will benefit in correction. (Unfortunately, most professed Christians today seem never to have gotten past Matthew 7. That’s too bad, for they should proceed to read Matthew 23. In that chapter alone, Christ calls the scribes and Pharisees names 16 times. The names are “hypocrites” (7 times), “son of Hell” (once),”blind guides” (twice), “fools and blind” (3 times), “whited sepulchres” (once), “serpents” (once), and “offspring of vipers” (once). Since Christ was without sin, we may deduce by good and necessary consequence that name-calling as such is not a sin. Since everything Christ did was righteous and virtuous, we may deduce by good and necessary consequence that accurate name-calling is a virtue.) ] http://www.trinityfoundation.org/journal.php?id=8

I suppose in essence when the shoe fits you wear it, but Democrats have also been saddled up with corruption based on fabrications, frauds, and lies these two Candidates have represented themselves with, making it very dis-heartening for Democrats who truly want to represent the culture of American Jurisdiction under the U.S. Constitution.

THE CONSCIENCE CLAUSE

The only saving grace Democrats may have now is what is called a Conscience Clause which is based on the Delegates in the Primaries of every State being released and not being bound to the Candidate of their State's Primary based on the lies and fabrications that were covered up by that Candidates own corruption in past circumstances and situations initiated by the Democratic Party National Convention's Rules Committee.

Delegates should/shall not be bound to any Candidate so entangled by criminal corruption in previous Government Office as privatizing entire offices of the United States Government. This is a Republic. We the People did not authorize the Secretary of State Office to be usurped by Hillary Clinton anymore than we authorized the Office of the President to be usurped by someone who is not a [natural born Citizen ie. born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.] U.S. Supreme Court ref: Minor v. Happersett.  and Judy v. Obama 14-9396.
God Forbid!

Red Flags noticed by the Huffington Post [You might be dating a Sociopath] the same might be seen as true when it comes to Courting a Candidate for President of the United States in Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama when we really start looking at the Standards of Law. The fact that the U.S. Supreme Court has refused my Case that has standing in defining and defending that standard of the qualification for President dismissing it on a arbitrarily denied Motion for forma pauperis is more of a witness of confirmation for me than it is a confirmation for Obama when most Constitutional Scholars agree its unsettled law and everyone sees millions of dollars tied up in Campaigns that are questionably illegal. 

RED FLAG #1. Having an oversized ego.

RED FLAG #2. Lying and exhibiting manipulative behavior.

RED FLAG #3. Exhibiting a lack of empathy

RED FLAG #4. Showing a lack of remorse or shame.

RED FLAG #5. Staying eerily calm in scary or dangerous situations.

RED FLAG #6. Behaving irresponsibly or with extreme impulsivity.

RED FLAG #7. Having few friends.

RED FLAG #8. Being charming—but only superficially.

RED FLAG #9. Living by the “pleasure principle.

RED FLAG #10. Showing disregard for societal norms.

RED FLAG #11. Having “intense” eyes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T41tTkKrBQ4&feature=player_embedded


________________________


CRJ

Support Today the Choice Democrats have of a solid common-sense-defense , not a politically correct weakness

Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
Contribute to the Cody Robert Judy Working Today for a Better America Tomorrow Campaign 2016 for U.S. President

https://twitter.com/CodyRobertJudy/status/742455835314376704


http://codyjudy.us/i…/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm

Here's the Link to Contribute if you'd like to Cody's Campaign improve your record for Taking A Stand for the Constitution.



Thank You!


Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy



Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.


Web Site www.codyjudy.us
Keep coming back!


INSPIRING - I believe in You


Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!