Saturday, May 30, 2015
BREAKING NEWS REPORT: What IS DRUDGE SAYING? Where are HEADLINES on SCOTUS Case Judy v. Obama 14-9396?
FEATURED EDITORIAL: THE POST & EMAIL -Herculean Deeds
BREAKING NEWS REPORT: What IS DRUDGE Saying? Where are HEADLINES on SCOTUS Case Judy v. Obama 14-9396?
What exactly is The DRUDGE REPORT trying to say in favoring no less than four of our latest half dozen tweets at the Cody Robert Judy for President 2016 Twitter account? Of course Matt Drudge has been named one of the most powerful and influential characters in the Political Arena today. On May 7th the political powerhouse The Hill run a story with the headlines, "Is Matt Drudge the second most influential man in America?" calling him the single most influential man in America Media and posting the question is Drudge the second most powerful man in America?
The power of The Drudge Report has been in the simplicity of the political and eye-catching headlines in a world being drowned out or inundated with headlines. Reliability and trustworthiness have been noticeable hall marks attributing to the Drudge Reports success over its tenure. They would have to be or the credentials of news would be lost in a hurry. Consistently you can scan The Drudge Report and find the general speed of the Nation and World Reports. Does that make The Drudge Report a good Reporter writing detailed reports of everything going on? Absolutely not, that makes The Drudge Report a very good collector of headlines in the news.
So what does it tell you when The Drudge Report favorites four Tweets of the Cody Robert Judy for President 2016 Campaign? Well, you can decipher it yourself, but what that tells us is even Matt Drudge cannot believe there are no headline stories being written about the little known Democratic Party Candidate whose run for President in 2008, 2012, and now 2016 with not a single National Story Report written in the face of Herculean Deeds for the Republic that constitute a politician whose doing much more than spouting off words to capture headlines and is much more about deeds that actually go to the root problem we face in America of our whole Republic being saturated with fraud.
Where does the story rank in anyone's mind of the very real possibility that Mr. Obama is escorted out of the White House in handcuffs for fraud upon the Republic, fraud upon all of the contributors to his Campaigns for President,fraud upon the last two elections of the United States of America, and fraud upon Cody Robert Judy's Campaigns? Maybe the much simpler question is what is bigger than that in anyone's mind when it comes to a National Stories?
Is ISIS bigger? Is Iran Proliferation Bigger? Is the Floods in Texas Bigger? Is former Governor Martin O'Malley's entry into the political arena or Hillary's Campaign or anyone of the twenty Republicans in the field for President now bigger? Is any national world story of any other foreign Country bigger? We think Matt Drudge at The Drudge Report grasp a sense that nothing is bigger or affects more American's and he just can not believe not a single national reporter for a single open news organization has grasps it, or the power in it.
Just looking at the details of the Presidential Candidate with a case in the United States Supreme Court against Obama is pretty big..win.. lose or draw; not a single other Candidate for President in the fields on the Democratic or Republican side has anything remotely considered as a Primary Candidates consideration for actually taking a Recorded Action to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. We remind everyone that is actually in the oath of the Office of the President.
The other thing that we think Matt Drudge of The Drudge Report realizes in the detailed duty of his organization is the very real tear occurring in America that signals a greater problem than we have ever faced in racial divide. And that Cody Robert Judy in his actions over the last 6 years breaches that divide with character and the principles that The United States Constitution reflects upon the Nation, building a bridge for the racial barometer Obama seems bent on exasperating.
The Media has constantly picked upon The Birther Issue as racial, but what do they say to the law suit Cody Robert Judy filed first as a Candidate for President in 2008 that if Sen. McCain had won very well could have tail spun the Nation into another election with the circumstances of an elected Candidate, who still didn't qualify for the Office as is spelled out in circumstances of happening in Amendment XX, SECT.3? Indeed in Judy v. McCain the District Court Judge delayed, and delayed, and delayed again his ruling until after the election and than used the election results to determine the case was "moot".
While that doesn't reflect upon Obama it does reflect on the conditions of the 2011 release of Obama's long form birth certificate, proven to be a fabrication that could not have possibly been a copy of an original document, and that has been submitted as evidence within the U.S. Supreme Court writ of Certiorari in Judy v. Obama 14-9396, along with other evidence that details fraud upon Obama's Selective Service and Social Security identification. Indeed the whole identity of Barack Obama/ aka Barry Soetoro is indeed now questioned in the strict criteria of A) Who exactly was elected and B)Is that person even qualified under the standards of the expectations "We The People" have decided are the qualifications for the Office of the President?
We have a barrage of both Media Reports, populations assumptions, and scholarly opinions that now are saying the qualifications for the U.S. Senators and U.S. Representatives as "Citizen" is the exact same qualifications for the Office of the President's qualification of "natural born Citizen"; lending the question of why exactly would the founders have gone to any effort to make any of the Office qualifications different in the first place? That is in fact what the representations of U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio and U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz as well as Florida Gov. Bobby Jindal's campaigns for President are resting on, and its not a sure foundation at all.
The KEY to their success actually rest upon Cody Robert Judy v. Barack Hussein Obama/aka Barry Soetoro et.al Case No. 14-9396, being dismissed and swept away like some car in a Texas Flood never to be seen again. Believe the fact that there is a great deal of political force being waged now on the behalf of Mr. Obama's legacy by Republicans and Democrats, but we must ask ourselves at what expense to the Republic and those who do not affiliate themselves from any party on the conscripts of fraud?
Does anyone personally staked out to become the victim of Fraud really attribute that as something they hope and aspire to elect and find in a Presidential Candidate? Why not look for the Candidates in Prison who have robbed banks, forged checks, and cranked out false identities with the goal of taking the life savings of your grandparents, parents, and children or those people you call family, and using the proceeds for themselves without asking?
Who is famous among you that will stand up and state "I desire to be the victim of fraud?", George Clooney, You? Oprah Winfrey you? Tom Cruise, You? Brad Pitt, You? How about Angelina? Does she put up with Fraud Brad? You ask those people if they would like to have their life savings taken away with the use of Fraud, and see what they will say? We really don't even think drug dealers like to be taken in fraud. In the prison systems fraud will get you killed so you actually might be dealing with someone with some integrity if you did elect someone from prison.
We know Hillary Clinton doesn't like fraud, or does she? She has personally been invited to file an Amicus Curiae in taking a stand for the Qualifications for the Office of the President twice on Twitter from CRJ2016's Camp, but we have not seen anything from her attorneys yet. So, we have to assume the answer is, "Yes, and she loves and admires those who commit fraud upon the American Public".
There hasn't been a story written with those headlines for the Drudge Report to post. That actually might be a time sensitive story Hillary Clinton could not avoid or control, because of the natural time procedures of the Case in the U.S. Supreme Court reflecting upon her actions of being a champion of character for the people that she says she wants to be.
Do you want a Champion who turns her back while fraud is committed and gives Barack Obama a big hug and says how much she really appreciates him and the outstanding job of fraud he has committed himself to? The real story is that these words are not fringe or harsh at all in the reflections of the Standard placed in front of the Court in Judy v. Obama 14-9396. These words are very civil in nature.
The Drudge Report doesn't write stories, they post them, but if there are no stories written, what possible headline could Drudge Post on the Drudge Report? If he posted a headline directly from the communications of this Campaign it would most certainly be seen as a bias because he doesn't do that for other Candidates. The Drudge Report makes clear notices or favoring Tweets is not considered an endorsement of any Candidate. So, the public, the Drudge Report, and this Campaign are stuck at an impasse of reporters willing to write a story and that seems to be a bridge we all find ourselves on. This brings us to another topic.. Twitter.
THE MANIPULATION OF POLITICAL TWEETS CORRALLED BY TWITTER
Two days ago, my campaign was indeed able to communicate this story to a list of regular top notch writing reporters. That's normally how you get a story out to a reporter fast and easy. Hey, here's a Pulitzer Prize for you that involves some 5 Presidential Candidates pretty directly, and the rest very easily indirectly as they all must indeed realize the Constitution of the United States provides a list of qualifications for the Office of the President they are running for. That ought to be a very ground floor basic consideration for them before the foreign policy is asked about.
The next question would be how many of them would like their Campaign's sabotaged with fraud based upon their meeting those criteria, but someone else not measuring up to those qualifications and winning an election and calling them poor sports? Does that sound like someone else we know? Lance Armstrong was found out but not before winning how many world cup races and destroying the lives of those other racers who might have won? He was stripped of his titles from years back for cheating in the races and enhancing his performance with un-natural and illegal means. The same can be said for Barack Obama who in know way would have been elected if he came out and said, "Listen, these are my fake identifications. Here's my long form fabrications, my selective service fabrications, and you guys already have seen that my social security card could not pass and that I couldn't register for Obamacare. Now based on those qualifications and a couple of great speeches in 2002 please elect me because there's not likely to be a Candidate for President who has standing and makes a Case to the U.S. Supreme Court? So basically, I can get away with it for years!"
There is no way that happens! So why should Obama be allowed to finish his 1.5 years in office with a record of damages another 'racer' is and has brought to the U.S. Supreme Court for Justice? Cody made the point very clear when the question came in?Why not just let Obama finish his term of 1.5 years? Well, it takes a lot of time to exhaust state remedies and Cody's got some 15 Cases that have cost him quite a bit. Additionally, look we have many Senators and people in Offices now pushing and bullying the Qualifications in the Republican field and the action is dangerous to our National Security.
How would anyone of us like half our incomes suddenly confiscated or our cars taken? This easily attributes the pain and damages motivating Cody's pursuit of Justice. He genuinely has suffered a lot of damages, and has not given that up. Now just because other Candidates did give up, doesn't make Obama's actions right, and it doesn't make Cody's legal actions any less significant either as fraud against anyone is a negative action. In fact, by giving up those other Candidates conceded the elections, Cody has never done that and the U.S. Supreme Court has his argument and his record in front of them.
Recently, Cody sent the headlines of this story to Twitter to a group of Reporters who may just not have known about what was happening. There "Handles" on Twitter he includes here for the public consideration. These are reporters who have written major political stories of some kind very recently and had those published many featured on The Drudge Report. They include:
@hunterschwarz, @DdavidGSauage,@Mollyhf,@JuriSense,@JakeTapper,@Toddgillman,@DavidZucchino,@Ruskygal,@DavidCloudLAT,@DylanByers,@StephenHayes,@bdomenech,@Gabby-Hoffman,@BuckSexton,@olivedarcy,@pagesixEmily,@llerer,@ANHQDC,@joebattenfeld.
Additionally, Cody has released his stories to at least 4 to 5 Reporters in 2 to 4 major newspapers in every State of the Union and many Nationally Radio and Televised Programs on all the Major Networks consistently with a dozen articles written on this Blog just since the U.S. Supreme Court Case was Docketed. As far as being a great communicator it is very difficult not to see the over 500 Post on this Blog as a Book Report to the Media of every step politically that has transpired that would be called a transparency unparalleled with most of the Candidates self written work and action. The silence by the Media can only be described as a capitulation of Obama's Fraud due to not reporting the complaint to the public.
Today, Cody tried to send out a Tweet on the CRJ2016 Twitter account @CodyRobertJudy2016 and received a message that he could not include Twitter addresses in his Tweets of people that did not follow him, even though the list above went out two days ago with no problem and none of those reporters followed him. What this does is make it very difficult to communicate a story to a Reporter on Twitter if they don't follow you. Cody did not abuse Tweeting to them numerous times, it was a single Tweet made to four or five of the reporters at a time due to the 120 character restraints placed on Tweets, but at least we do have that on his Twitter Record and the Public knows now.
If these reporters are being threatened in anyway, they can certainly report that on their own account and social networks. They could even Tweet, "Hey, I can't write a story about CRJ2016 Judy v. Obama 14-9396, Boss said "No"", and I'm sure the public would understand.
We here at the Campaign would certainly wish to extend a GENUINE HAT-TIP to The Drudge Report for saying in so many words with 4 Favorites of CRJ2016 Tweets "I don't have a HEADLINE to put on The Drudge Report about this!". We were quite excited Drudge shared that pain with us. At least someone in the Major Political Arena of Reporting recognizes the dedicated hard work Cody has gone through over the last six years unsung and unwritten in the pursuit of Justice for our Republic in really what is an unparalleled story of taking a stand for principle that holds the keys to the United States of America's national security. The fact it was as reported 'the most influential man in the American Media' is simply and undeniably an honor to Cody Robert Judy's 2016 Campaign for United States President and his fight for Principle over Political Party.
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.
Thank you to everyone who is and has contributed just a little here and just a little there, for we are working very hard in using the little that we do have as efficiently and proficiently as it comes in, as I'm sure everyone would agree. Please consider a contribution
Let's make it Official and support a Qualified Candidate whose has dedicated his time and talent to taking a stand for America. Let's raise a million dollars and give you the right to say, "I put my money where my mouth is. I'm not a hypocrite, I'm a Patriot!".
INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI
We NEED YOUR HELP AMERICA now, to educate Americans in the order of our Constitution to hear Cody's Case to the U.S. Supreme Court. We are Taking a Stand for individual Civil Rights and against an unprecedented ASSAULT upon your Constitution and prior decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court! With your help we can make it happen. You are a very important key to this. So its up to you America to help Restore America Today for a Better America Tomorrow. Like, Share, and Help us in the Contribution Revolution.
Get your questions answered by ordering Cody Robert Judy's Book here.
The 2016 Campaign begins now. Please send your contributions and help with the ABC (American Birther Campaign) today and my election for President in 2016 and Join the 257 of us now on my Facebook Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President 2016 site.
Cody Robert Judy for President 2016
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, Utah 84401
Thank you
Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for United States President 2016
www.codyjudy.us
CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION
The Commercial is simply called "America"
Join the new CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRES 2016 FB SITE Here
Labels:
Candidates 2016,
cody robert judy,
hillary clinton,
Judy v. Obama 14-9396,
marco rubio,
Matt Drudge,
natural born citizen,
news,
Obama,
president,
sCOTUS,
Ted Cruz,
The Drudge Report,
twitter
Thursday, May 28, 2015
BREAKING NEWS: OBAMA and GOVERNMENT Defaults U.S. SUPREME COURT'S ORDER to RESPOND in JUDY V. OBAMA
PART I. OF THIS REPORT HERE- IN CASE YOU MISSED IT
FEATURED EDITORIAL: The Post & Email
BREAKING NEWS: OBAMA /GOVERNMENT Defaults U.S. SUPREME COURT'S REQST to RESPOND in JUDY V. OBAMA
APPEARANCES THE U.S. SUPREME COURT "WILL" HERE JUDY V. OBAMA
'08, '12, and 2016 Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy told supporters Wednesday listening to Michael Medved's commercial that called Birthers "Attackers" and queried the listener that there was no good reason not to let foreigners into the Commander-In-Chief's position that handles keys to America's nuclear option as well like Obama has gutted the military commanders chiefly in charge of the leadership responsible for defending America, that there has come another sign or appearance upon the stage that indicates the United States Supreme Court has at least five Justices that would like to hear the case hurdling the Rule of Four that is necessary. [A little 'Thank You' to The Drudge Report for Favoriting our TWEET of this Report!]
"Chief among four things that points us in that direction", Judy said, "transpiring since my latest May 22nd Breaking News Report that has become this Blogs' Second Most Viewed Post eight days ago now on Case Judy v. Obama 14-9396 which you might find interesting as well:
" 1st Point-The Internet Site Certpool.com that manages to keep track of all the cases from every Circuit Court that has filed a Writ of Certiorari in the United States Supreme Court has begin posting CONFERENCE CASES listed for June 11th, 2015, which misses the June 8th Date we had projected as in sinc function of normal procedures for the Court dismissing cases.
"Elaborating on the details of this sites report we see that just one of the cases "set for Conference" had a due date of May 20th for the Respondent to Respond coordinating with mine. The greater number of cases that also contained the May 20th deadline were indeed set from the 10th Circuit for "the June 4th Conference" and the latest date of response I found on the June 4th Conference itinerary was 'Response Due June 8th' overlapping my Cases' Response due date of May 20th by some 17 days.
"Indeed of the 10 cases set for the Conference just from the 10th Circuit 7 have dates extended out beyond mine as "due dates for Response", set by the Court, upon the filing of the Writ of Cert."DRUDGE FAVORS THREE CRJ TWEETS...................................
Not everything is recorded on the Docket Reports that are presented to the public view Cody continued, " I remember from my experience when I filed a Emergency Motion for the U.S. Supreme Court to hear my Case in 2012 based on the term of the Court expiring before the coming election, and it was listed as a Supplemental Brief by the Clerk of the Court, which hardly gives a clue to the Public Eye of what is before the Court. That was filed July 16th, 2012 in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 which would have if heeded given the Court and the political arena plenty of time to adapt for the Nov. Presidential Election. The result of course was not in the public interest or favor of fair elections in 2012 and represented an excruciatingly painful wound for all of us to bear.
"What this suggest is my case is not on the fast track to be dismissed as might otherwise be the case if it was or had been distributed for Conference on June 4th. On that web site, you'll see "BIO" and that stands for "Brief in Opposition" requested and you see that on this particular case listed on the Docket Report of the Site here. This of course tells us that the Court is wanting a response by the Respondent that was not otherwise filed or where the Waiver was filed first. On the other case listed on the BIO Reported cases thus far seen here, you don't see that same Report on the Docket, which exemplifies or emphasizes my point that not all that is happening in a case is seen on the Docket Report.
"2nd Point, and that LITTLE something that doesn't seem to bode all that well for me is that the U.S. Supreme Court Clerk has listed the Caption of my case as (CODY ROBERT JUDY vs. BARACK H. OBAMA, President of the United States et. al.,) and that is of course not how it was filed. Ask yourself how often you see the Clerk changing the caption of a case from how it appears on the papers they receive from attorneys? The public can see the Writ of Certiorari that was filed here on SCRIBD.
"3rd Point- of this would indeed be the actual Response that I received from Donald B. Verrilli Jr. the current Solicitor General just yesterday which was quite interesting in the way it was written. A. it was NOT signed! Now if I filed a Record to the Court that was not signed, it would not be counted as 'valid'. This of course would indeed be considered a HUGE error and represent a formal LACK OF RESPONSE to the U.S. Supreme Court Order. The Court in my case has gone to great lengths in the past to shall we say 'pull my hair out' with trivial points of crossing t's and dotting i's and has not been very lenient to me as a prose litigator causing me great pain at times. This has also been recorded as when they sent my Writ back to me needlessly costing me additional paper work that is expensive with mailing expenses over years as well as providing 'time' for the Respondent and successfully delaying the Case.
"B. It also listed the Case differently than is presented by me in the Court, listing the official position of Barack Obama in the Government as President of the US. last I checked the abbreviation written by most juveniles for the United States of America is was the U.S.A; therefore the wording of "US" pertains directly to, perhaps a small group of people that is not elaborated upon? Your guess is as good as mine. Who is "US"?
"One of the biggest points of my Case is if Obama was elected with fabricated identifications, forged long form birth certificate, fabricated selective service record, fake social security number that couldn't even pass e-verify as was the example when they tried to show how easy Obamacare was to register for, as well as not even being a qualified Candidate that, should he be elected is able to lawfully qualify for the Office and operate the powers of the President by the vested power WE THE PEOPLE have directed for the OFFICE after being both qualified and elected, then how is it possible to even admit Obama in the Court as "President of the US", unless it certainly doesn't mean U.S.A?
"Given the most equitably and lenient discernment possible we come to the body of of the Solicitor General's argument on the Waiver, which states, "The Government was never served in this case and has not appeared in any of the proceedings. The Government hereby waives its right to file a response to the petition in this case, unless requested to do so by the Court" and then.. it's unsigned. (?)
"While I do agree "Government" can be used properly in this case by the Solicitor General based on Rep. Nancy Pelosi's involvement and Sen. Harry Reid in the combination of a functioning 'cartel' formed in the corporations of the DNC and Obama's Campaign Corporation, unsigned its validity is worthless which DEFAULTS the Governments representation. And, let us not forget that May 20th was the date that Obama was given by the Court to Respond and he has failed to Respond by May 20th through any Counsel he might have privately for his defense also constituting a DEFAULT to the Court's Request that RESPONDENT'S file that on or before May 20th.
"4th Point and evenly appreciated is the fact that I did open the case up for any friend of the Court to file an Amicus Curiae Brief. These are filed and appear as little blue squares listed as "Amici" on the Certpool.com site. Of course when people are interested in say 'defending Obama' because they would like his policies protected against any disaster befalling his ability to function as President rather than having his ineligibility exposed by someone with standing in the U.S. Supreme Court and his ineligibility exposed thereby also nixing policies, we see none have been recorded for Obama.
" Summing this up very specifically and technically, the Court has not been addressed as it has ORDERED by either the Government or any person involved in this that was served. Obama was served at the WHITE HOUSE by signature if you remember I have recorded here, and by appearances we see the Court is mulling this over. I think we have 5 Justices that are inclined to hear the case."
We were dumbfounded with the Report of incompetence here. Who is "US"? Of course we will continue to keep you updated with details about when the United States Supreme Court decides to set the Case for Conference. For up to the minute Reports of what is happening in this Case Stay Tuned.
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.
Thank you to everyone who is and has contributed just a little here and just a little there, for we are working very hard in using the little that we do have as efficiently and proficiently as it comes in, as I'm sure everyone would agree. Please consider a contribution
Let's make it Official and support a Qualified Candidate whose has dedicated his time and talent to taking a stand for America. Let's raise a million dollars and give you the right to say, "I put my money where my mouth is. I'm not a hypocrite, I'm a Patriot!".
INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI
We NEED YOUR HELP AMERICA now, to educate Americans in the order of our Constitution to hear Cody's Case to the U.S. Supreme Court. We are Taking a Stand for individual Civil Rights and against an unprecedented ASSAULT upon your Constitution and prior decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court! With your help we can make it happen. You are a very important key to this. So its up to you America to help Restore America Today for a Better America Tomorrow. Like, Share, and Help us in the Contribution Revolution.
Get your questions answered by ordering Cody Robert Judy's Book here.
The 2016 Campaign begins now. Please send your contributions and help with the ABC (American Birther Campaign) today and my election for President in 2016 and Join the 257 of us now on my Facebook Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President 2016 site.
Cody Robert Judy for President 2016
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, Utah 84401
Thank you
Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for United States President 2016
www.codyjudy.us
CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION
The Commercial is simply called "America"
Join the new CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRES 2016 FB SITE Here
Labels:
Amici,
cody robert judy,
Court,
defaults,
Donald B. Verrilli,
election,
Government,
Jr.,
Judy v. Obama 14-9396,
natural born citizen,
Obama,
president,
proceeding,
writ of certiorari
Wednesday, May 27, 2015
Laws of Nature v. The Laws of Men - The Balance in the U.S. Supreme Court being Weighed in Obama's Ineligibility
Laws of Nature v. The Laws of Men - The Balance in the U.S. Supreme Court being Weighed in Obama's Ineligibility
The fundamental question for American Politicians is, "Are you keeping up with America or has America passed you by?" At first it may seem a strange question. America has been rooted in its own traditions even as it is considered a very young Nation, but at the heart of America is Liberty and America's Politicians have become increasing despondent to her calls. A great transformation is occurring in America's yearning for nature, natural, and vintage. The real deal is sought in our water, food, and lifestyle. That translates to America's Political Arena, where liberty is threatened posing a second question; Why have America's Politicians been clamping down on Liberty when the opposite is at the heart of America?
Protection and security have been the staples of an ever increasing mandate of force we have seen stalking us ever closer into the minute details of our lives rather than the protection and security that we needed for our liberty. Barack Obama's forged identity was used as a fabricated package harnessed to cage America into a slavery with its guilt based identity of color rather than character. America increasing feels the call of organic natural food in healing and holistic living, but has had the laws of nature violated in an unqualified ineligible person in the White House who is not a "natural born Citizen" violating America's Constitution.
The false narrative has been fed to American's as a package to supersede nature, like an artificial sweetener, steroid injected meat, or mutated seed that fails to reproduce itself as a standard of control away from nature. So what is, and what has caused the fascination America has right now with 'nature', 'natural', and even 'vintage' that is pushing the limits of nostalgia we might see as a Revolution of canonical proportions?
Isn't it interesting to see the Citizens associated with clean air, clean water, organic food rooting their noses in the mire of exactly the opposite of what they staunchly defend as a diet when it comes to the politics of voting for Barack Obama who is as fabricated and unnatural as a hybrid seed that has had its chromosomes altered to a point of failing to produce itself? The Founders and signers of the Constitution of the United States had high regard for the Laws of Nature because they had a great interest in forming something that would actually last and perpetuate itself by the greatest laws known to man which the Laws of Nature represent.
High above the realms of man-made laws and interventions are those we call The Laws of Nature and it is these laws that have in deed lasted when man-made laws falter and implode upon themselves and the populations that seek to over-rule the laws of nature. Some of the tell tale signs that a population has drifted into the margin call opposing the Laws of Nature are seen as voluminous amounts of legislation seeking control of nearly every aspect of our lives. Another tell-tale sign striking at the heart of guilt is that the prisons become overflowing; another, leviathan national debt robbing future generations.
The reason for this is that the population through its legislation begin to make living as a natural man harder and harder confusing the morality taught in religion with the morality taught by nature. Some might say its been the tradition of religions to drift away from the Laws of Nature God has taught throughout the generations of man. Still, they continually choke off the population in the desire for power like corking off the top of the bottle and violently shaking up the mix which eventually explodes in ways that are unnatural and fly out of the normal means of channeling. The prohibition years proved a perfect example of that. America repealed the 18th Amendment that imposed a dry state suffered the consequences and with the 21st Amendment authorizing a wet one repealing the dry state of affairs. We seemed to learn that lesson.
The one we are facing now manifest itself also in a clogging of the Court Systems with nearly everything we would expect from an ineligible unqualified corruption of the 'natural born Citizen' clause in the Office of the President. We are 'told' that 'natural law' has now become extinct in the Law Schools of America and has been replaced by the study of 'man-made' laws. From what we already know the laws of man opposed to the laws of nature usually cause the population a good deal of problems.
The concern of Birthers goes far beyond the 'person' of Barack Obama whose supporters tragically attribute the opposition of as an unqualified, ineligible person in the Office, towards the physical characteristics of his person. The single definition missing from the quantified man-made 'naturalization' laws we find in aliens and nationals is "Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents" and it stands as a testament of organically grown. The unique establishment and harvest of America's own home grown that comes from Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.
While the office of the President was particularly singled out with the natural born Citizen requirement, the "Citizen" requirement was indeed an open door and welcome mat for those who were first generation Americans. As America has only had 44 President's in its lifetime, the qualification excluding Citizens with a foreign parent or birth place from the Office of the President can hardly be called 'mass discrimination' as if America had no right at all to explicitly require for its President the singleness of heart found in 'natural born Citizen' for and in the protection of our own Liberty.
Indeed, those attempting to drum up other arguments can be shown to necessarily be in the dark works of confining America, her liberty, freedom, and unique Sovereignty in the World. Those who say that Sovereignty is not under constant attack or that America has no need since the end of our Inaugural Revolutionary Ball for concern of elimination are about as blinded in the fog of relative accounts of history as well the evil designs of power hungry men as can be punctuated.
For those wishing and hoping for a more 'natural state' of affairs America in a great historical sense has been a land of just that opportunity. People came from all over drawn in their hearts for a better way of living. A life style of permission they felt deep within their souls. Such beauty was heralding the ability to live as God built them and was/is seen as a Gift from God as pure as nature could have intended.
So why are so many politicians including Presidents opposed to the Laws of Nature? Maybe one of the biggest reasons is that most have come from the worship of the laws of man in their workshops. They saw how their own words could be translated into power over a population from the Districts of Congress, the States of the Senate to the Governorship and for the most part the Laws of Nature in the Office of the President have been historically protected and demanded by America.
The only way in fact to subvert has been by the sly cunning and craftiness of those willing to fabricate, forge, and de-fraud the population for their own gain. This has by its own nature of corruption perpetuated a great dis-trust among the Citizens of the United States of America and a turn is now not only manifesting itself in the populations diet of food, but is beginning to dawn in the political arena of America! Indeed the very laws of nature may be testifying to us as it gets our attention in more ways than one.
If the Laws of Nature are at least worthy of equal consideration in the context of man-made laws and we see the deportation of The Laws of Nature as foreign in our Law Schools, wouldn't we expect those in the Battle to indeed gain our attention? Far from judgement is the argument that is made. This is the time where the jury is listening and that jury now is the United States of America's People. We The People have been charged in forming a more perfect union with the laws of nature that would harmonize and be a construction of peace and good will towards man.
The confusion of darting and dashing from side to side has become the stage for all of us. Do the laws of nature testify that some are born gay and to respect nature our laws in deed must defend that nature by adapting? That consideration is being articulated in the U.S. Supreme Court as we speak. The U.S. Supreme Court also has ObamaCare, ObamaAmnesty, and ObamaForiegn Policy in its cross-hairs yet at the root of all of them is Judy v. Obama 14-9396 is Obama even qualified and eligible to be in the Office of the President wielding the sword as a pen in the Executive Branch of Government and gutting the Constitution's principles as a walking talking violation of the Office.
How can America even look at anything else or not SEE that an ineligible person in the Office of the President is bound to corruption, and in that the corruption of principles, and contempt of the very laws of nature that has kept us pretty well increasing our place in the world as a leader among the Nations? Was it all just a fluke? A happenstance of incredible place in the Universe that can be attributed to the roll of the dice?
We must all ask ourselves these poignant questions and answer them in the quite places of our heart. Indeed, if America had known Obama's social security card, draft card, and long form birth certificate were problematic fabrications and forgeries used to obfuscate an identity that would soil the Office of the President in an unbearable way how could defenders of Obama possible state Obama would have been elected or even state that he was elected? Indeed can it not be reasonable said, that with the considerations of the lie that is Obama- the lie that was elected, the lie which America is suffering now and indeed will continue to suffer in our problematic future,with fullest of confidence which the Laws of Nature provide, and will be protesting getting more and more of our attention as is historically been precedent, that until this be addressed we are bound for an historical hell with Nature unremitting upon even the innocent of our population? Tis with that consideration, I have taken my case to the highest Court available.
These and many more are reasons why I am TAKING a STAND, and representing what I do in my platform and my legal action. Indeed, the unconventional may be just what America is looking for in the coming 2016 election as she yearns for truth more than the lie presented by 'conventional' politicians in typical suits, and typical haircuts, as fake details of their lie rather then the resolve of their character of heart.
Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.
Thank you to everyone who is and has contributed just a little here and just a little there, for we are working very hard in using the little that we do have as efficiently and proficiently as it comes in, as I'm sure everyone would agree. Please consider a contribution
Let's make it Official and support a Qualified Candidate whose has dedicated his time and talent to taking a stand for America. Let's raise a million dollars and give you the right to say, "I put my money where my mouth is. I'm not a hypocrite, I'm a Patriot!".
INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI
We NEED YOUR HELP AMERICA now, to educate Americans in the order of our Constitution to hear Cody's Case to the U.S. Supreme Court. We are Taking a Stand for individual Civil Rights and against an unprecedented ASSAULT upon your Constitution and prior decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court! With your help we can make it happen. You are a very important key to this. So its up to you America to help Restore America Today for a Better America Tomorrow. Like, Share, and Help us in the Contribution Revolution.
Get your questions answered by ordering Cody Robert Judy's Book here.
The 2016 Campaign begins now. Please send your contributions and help with the ABC (American Birther Campaign) today and my election for President in 2016 and Join the 257 of us now on my Facebook Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President 2016 site.
Cody Robert Judy for President 2016
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, Utah 84401
Thank you
Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for United States President 2016
www.codyjudy.us
CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION
The Commercial is simply called "America"
Join the new CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRES 2016 FB SITE Here
Sunday, May 24, 2015
MEMORIAL DAY and MORALE - WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE?
FEATURE EDITORIAL: The Post and Email
MEMORIAL DAY and MORALE - WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE?
A rather stunning SPECIAL REPORT U.S. MILITARY AND CIVILIANS ARE INCREASINGLY DIVIDED By DAVID ZUCCHINO AND DAVID S. CLOUD dawned today from the Los Angeles Times that revealed some very big problems that we have in America today that I feel really do need to be addressed in the public arenas of politics and popularity. This weekend being Memorial Day Weekend, and as we remember with heart felt gratitude those who have given their last breath in the service, dying in the line of duty in our Armed Forces, "giving all", it seems a good time.
Reading the article, one grasps a real sense of the good, the bad, and the ugly presenting a very real and rare picture opposite the sugar coated perspectives we oft times find accompanies journalism today. By that I mean I don't think you'd find the Military Brass and military families completely happy with what is written, nor is the Civilian Population going to find the article not tugging away in their conscience of increasingly insincere platitudes. Just highlighting very briefly a couple of the grim reapers to give you a sense of what I'm talking about without spoiling your own read of the article:
George Baroff's a 90 year old draftee of WWII as a Veteran posed a view: "..today's all-volunteer military has been robbed of the sense of shared sacrifice and national purpose that his[my] generation enjoyed six decades ago. Today's soldiers carry a heavier burden, he said, because the public has been disconnected from the universal responsibility and personal commitment required to fight and win wars." "For soldiers today, the war is never over; the enemy is never defeated." The result he added, is "a state of perpetual anxiety that the rest of the country doesn't experience."
Phillip Ruiz, 46 year old Army staff sergeant wounded twice during three tours in Afghanistan and Iraq said: "So many people give you lip service and offer fake sympathy. Their sons and daughters aren't in the military, so its not their war. Its something that happens to other people"
Douglas Pearce a former Army Lieutenant said civilians seem to think they "can assuage their guilt with five seconds in the airport." "What they're saying is, "I'm glad you served so that I didn't have to, and my kids won't have to."
The combining sentiment of all three of these statements might be more difficult to attribute to "Honor" or "Gratitude" for the opportunity to serve, then say, "Frustration" and or a "Disheartening dispiritedness", but through these I sense a much greater sense of "Concern" and "Love" at the root of their hearts. There were statements made within the article also of civilians just as impervious and disparaging to the understanding of what exactly they are missing in serving in the military that does the population no favors as to the reasons we find such statements coming out of the military.
These are of course the ramifications of what we would call a "Job", rather then a "Service" in the necessary circumstances of a voluntary Armed Forces - meaning there was no "Draft" or "Conscription", we have today. Civilians now look at the voluntary means of which one enters the Military as "Employment", no different then they had to do in filling out an application for their job. Of course their "job" comes with an occasional office party and award also and can be considered a 'service to the community' just as easily as any position in the military, where someone has the ability to say "I quit", "I retire", "I'm not going to do this anymore", or even "Take this job and shove it".
We all get up and do a job of some sort that are not necessarily honored with parades, or greetings, or a lot of fan fair to keep up our moral. Why does the voluntary military services of our Armed Forces require more than what we do serving in our regular civilian jobs that are all necessary to keep society running smoothly, and incorporating the tax money necessary to pay them for their jobs?
This actually is the dis-service or dis-connect of "value" inappropriately attributed to an ego of dis-connect rather than managed or taught as a connection of mutual appreciation. The "My JOB is MORE important then YOUR JOB" syndrome that is a division of classless enmity and that is the dereliction that leads to "might is right" rather than the protection of "individual rights". Of course there is a balancing act that needs to be mastered everyday and that it is where improvement and skill can be made. When the first is honored by the last, and the last is honored by the first, a mutual respect and honor is equally observed and provides a real joy. That joy is the greatest moral booster known to man.The SENSE of "ENTITLEMENT" can be a malignant cancer to the heart and soul of a civilian population and it can just as easily infect the well-oiled-machine of a military expressed as "I deserve more than what I'm getting".
One of the very rich things about America was a purge of royalty as far as privilege that merged leaders and citizens as one from a state of one class above the other. That is even stated plainly in the prohibitions of the President to take on any other titles of nobility in Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 which states:
"No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever from any King, Prince, or foreign State."
Interesting to hear or read "United States" referred to as "Them" as in "Everyone of them 50 States". The problem is we have a Congress that constantly confers upon itself special privileges that include things like 'raises' and 'special health care' and well, they probably know the list better than I do of special privileges they have granted themselves. Yes, its legal, and occasional necessary, but is it balanced well with those also considered for Citizens?
One should very specifically consider that if its good enough for the President its good enough for me, which doesn't necessarily mean everyone should have an Air Force One to jet around in- (smile)Remember 'balance'. Now I want to talk a little more about military service because I thought it was interesting that the 90 year old Veteran Baroff referenced a theft taking place without a conscription stating the Armed Forces as much as having been robbed. Isn't that something we all should be concerned about? If our Military is being robbed of something maybe we should take a look at finding out who the robbers are? Wisdom of the elders huh?
Again Baroff stated that the military was being robbed of a sense.. of shared sacrifice and national purpose. We just talked about a sense of entitlement, so my sense is that that's coming from the Commander-In-Chief's position as the Leader of the Armed Forces. Of course being 'ineligible' and constitutionally unqualified as a natural born Citizen, 'born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents' you understand where America has been robbed of a qualified President and Commander-In-Chief who has robbed the Constitution and taken on a sense of entitlement of the office built on an unstable foundation of a fraudulent identification. This is both a moral decay of character as well as a destructive factor of moral that has to be recognized from the top down. How could it not be considered reasonably? Congress thus far refuses to address these facts as it reflects poorly on them, as well it should.
As both a former '08, '12, and 2016 current Candidate for U.S. President having fought in some 15 Civil Court Cases for the natural born Citizen qualifications of the Office of the President, for no pay, no reward, no parades, and very few pats on the back, I understand whole-heartedly the idea of not being appreciated very much. I think I've got that one down. This battle of the morale of our whole Military is not unrealistically understood here as to the boat adrift with no rudder, no wind, no sail or no engine to power out of the melee.
How many people identify and attribute the direct catastrophic affect of an unqualified person in the Office of the President to the spirit of the Country? How could something so minuscule they forage affect so many and so much? How does a small rudder affect the direction of a ship? How does the gas pedal affect the propulsion of your car? How does love in your home affect you when you walk through the door?
I don't talk about it very much but the experience in prison I had twenty two years ago was not what most people would call "serving in the Military", but it really in many respects is a Military Order of Discipline. I had Sergeants, Lieutenants and Captains to appeal to and inspections happened every day. I have come to appreciate and find gratitude in serving and learning from the time I did. Some people might find it offensive that I would dare compare our military to the service of time I was drafted for, but what that would really be what we'd call a disagreement with rehabilitation wouldn't it and the fantastic job they did?
The draft in our Country didn't give many the opportunity to 'not serve' either, unless you were a 'draft dodger'. They called you and you went. The sense of appreciation I gained might be due more to my "sense of duty" and "sense of service" during that time in my life than anything and we do have a choice as to who we will serve in every circumstance and condition of our life. Wither we will nurture a sense of entitlement or nurture a sense of service?
I served my fellow prisoners, regardless of what they had done or why they were in prison, in the discrimination being apportioned to them in the grooming standards by suffering the same punishments dished out to the Native Americans Indians who were in Maximum Security due to their 'religious belief' in not cutting or shorning their hair. I sued on a discrimination of gender and won, but to do that I had to join them in solitary confinement for three and half years. That meant getting an hour out of a very small individual cell to walk a hallway for an hour every 24 hours for 912 of the 3018 days I served in that military order. There was no family for years, no touching or sweet affection from a spouse or partner, and mail was very important.
One in five Americans have now experienced the conditions of being on probation, parole, or incarcerated: One in five! That is also costing tax payers and is a huge tax burden that many say is 'putting the population in prison'with an indentured servitude to support the empire building system. So my point is one way or the other you could think you are not affected by your "upper class" status, but that would be an unreasonable look at reality just as the 'judgement' against rehabilitated people is seen as a constant on every job application even though the Constitution Amendment 15, Sect. I. says, "the right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
Why does Society spend so much money rehabilitating Citizens and then handicap them after their time is served faithfully? Isn't that like making someone pay the freight on something, and then constantly asking for more when the price has been paid in full? I think it is. Another point, the 2nd Amendment states the "right" of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed". How does the Government justify Citizens who can vote, pay taxes, as part of the people, not allowing them to defend themselves, their persons, and their property just the same as anyone else once their 'time' has been faithfully served that was demanded by Society?
This is the absolute hypocrisy polluting our Nation in the unreal classifications of 'entitlement' and 'divisions' and it has come to a head with Barack Obama being ineligible and unqualified, so that the entire population is now not under Law but is under "Lawlessness" and "Corruption", so you have and now find yourself in prison accused of three felonies a day and your state of living in fear is awful.
And so we find ourselves together looking at one another, and I out of every other Presidential Candidate in the Nation since 2008 am the only one who has filed suit for Justice on a bi- partisan stand against both Republicans and Democrats in McCain and Obama culminating now in front of the United States Supreme Court as Judy v. Obama 14-9396. Yes, a former prisoner who did eight years in prison, (we don't need to go into the circumstances of injustice and unlawful prosecution that surrounded the case but is in my book TAKING A STAND if your interested in reading it)and you can't believe it?
Do you know what I can't believe? I can't believe our Armed Services has not filed an Amicus Curiae as a friend of the Court in the United States Supreme Court Case Judy v. Obama 14-9396. I can't believe that all those organizations opposed to Obamacare and ObamaAmnesty and ObamaExecutive Orders haven't filed an Amicus Curiae. The reversals of rolls begins to make much more sense in a referendum on the sense of entitlements.
It actually makes perfect sense in the reversal God said would happen in just what former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush epitomized as the greatest immoral subversive idea he could think of resonating in Mark 10:31: "But many that are first shall be last."
Today we do in fact honor humbly those who have died for the Constitution and the individual rights in liberty and justice for all found in our Republic under God that we pledge our allegiance to as a Nation formed and called The United States of America. May God Bless the families of those who have suffered the loss of their loved ones and may our Military find an appreciation and value in the service of their fellow patriots with the rich respect and honor found in the service of Citizens.
Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.
Thank you to everyone who is and has contributed just a little here and just a little there, for we are working very hard in using the little that we do have as efficiently and proficiently as it comes in, as I'm sure everyone would agree. Please consider a contribution
Let's make it Official and support a Qualified Candidate whose has dedicated his time and talent to taking a stand for America. Let's raise a million dollars and give you the right to say, "I put my money where my mouth is. I'm not a hypocrite, I'm a Patriot!".
INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI
We NEED YOUR HELP AMERICA now, to educate Americans in the order of our Constitution to hear Cody's Case to the U.S. Supreme Court. We are Taking a Stand for individual Civil Rights and against an unprecedented ASSAULT upon your Constitution and prior decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court! With your help we can make it happen. You are a very important key to this. So its up to you America to help Restore America Today for a Better America Tomorrow. Like, Share, and Help us in the Contribution Revolution.
Get your questions answered by ordering Cody Robert Judy's Book here.
The 2016 Campaign begins now. Please send your contributions and help with the ABC (American Birther Campaign) today and my election for President in 2016 and Join the 257 of us now on my Facebook Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President 2016 site.
Cody Robert Judy for President 2016
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, Utah 84401
Thank you
Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for United States President 2016
www.codyjudy.us
CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION
The Commercial is simply called "America"
Join the new CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRES 2016 FB SITE Here
Labels:
2016 election,
afghanistan,
armed forces,
Cloud,
cody robert judy,
draft,
iraq,
L.A.Times,
Memorial Day,
military,
news,
president,
prison,
Special Report,
veterans,
WWII,
Zucchino
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)