Wednesday, March 9, 2016

Breaking Report:CONTESTED CONVENTION- The STATUE OF LIBERTY PLAY Cody Robert Judy Unveils Play for Democratic Nomination requiring JUSTICE


Breaking Report:
CONTESTED CONVENTION STATUE-OF-LIBERTY 'PLAY'
and the Pending Requirement of  Justice
Cody Robert Judy Unveils Play for Democratic Nomination as Statue of Liberty Play

Judy unveils The Statue of Liberty Play for Democratic Nomination 

[In the last two episodes of season six of The West Wing, the Democratic Party fought through a brokered convention, with dark horse candidate Matthew Santos (Jimmy Smits) prevailing.] In House of Cards Season 4 Episode 8  Frank suggests that he should not choose her (Claire) himself. The party should do it during an open Democratic convention, one that surely will lead to a surge of support for Claire Underwood as vice president — something that the president and first lady simply did not see coming at all. Contested Conventions in 2016 are something the Republicans and Democrats could see this year for very different reasons.

[Under the Democratic National Convention rules, "A majority vote of the Convention's delegates shall be required to nominate the presidential candidate" and "Balloting will continue until a nominee is selected". The role of the super-delegates was established in-part to limit such conflicts and multi-rounds of voting on the convention floor, and instead allow the candidates to woo these delegates before the convention.]

My CRJ plan on going forward to the Democratic Nomination in a Contested Convention where a nominee fails to get the required the 2383 magic number of Delegates for Nomination relies on two things that I'll discuss at length:

1) The U.S. Supreme Court Hearing Judy v. Obama 14-9396 defining [ natural born Citizen ] as [Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] effectively and indirectly neutering Cruz and Rubio's Campaigns and peeling Trump's Base supporters away.

The notoriety of this U.S. Supreme Court case would completely saturate Main Stream Media and the Halls of Congress as well shock the Public awake with the Lighting Bolt and Thunder of the U.S. Constitution!!! As far as waves are concerned, I think the Constitution would be the best wave to ride in on for America- a Wave of a solid Record that Rocks both Houses. Maybe they shouldn't being building their houses with cards?
The Thunder and Lighting of the Constitution will Shock America!

2) Hillary Clinton throwing her political support to me because she is buried in an FBI Indictment charge no longer parlayed by Obama's moot weight in the Justice Department.

As you can see JUSTICE is the Central Feature of this Statue of Liberty Play and is also dependent upon the Receivers of [Justice Reform] catching the Ball!

Indeed there are more than a few players on the field influencing right and wrong, justice and injustice.

The American People know longer have to wonder if Justice is a consideration of the [natural born Citizen] requirement for the Office of the President in the Halls of Justice - Its' there! But let's not get ahead of ourselves without affirming our founding grasp on what defines [natural born Citizen].

IF you believe Obama is ineligible, why would you Trust a U.S. Senator who NEVER spoke up on that huge issue of Usurpation as a matter of objecting to the legality of Obamacare in a speech from the U.S. Senate floor lasting 21 hours?

Indeed Senator Cruz thought more of 'Dr. Sues's Green Eggs and Ham" than he did about Obama's constitutional ineligibility, and therefore right to sign anything in to Law as is required by the Executive Branch for Law to become Law. 

Its a simple matter of fact that without a 'Qualified President's Signature' no law or Act of Congress can take affect. With Ted Cruz's desire's upon the Office of the President we find his motivation for abandoning the most important aspect of the Constitution that would in affect silence Obama's pen past, present, and future, without so much as a single law suit to fight for the next President, his eligibility for the Office- also one of Ted's Problems.

Ted Cruz never said anything, not one word about Obama's ineligibility on the Floor of Congress. If Ted Cruz really believed in the Principles of the Constitution he would have challenged Obama's ineligibility in Congress, but instead he's using Obama as his guard in the Primaries- that's very liberal of Ted.

So let's take a 12 minute trip down Constitution Hall and see about [natural born Citizen]  before we get into the U.S. Supreme Court's cover-up of Judy v. Obama 14-9396 and whether it has satisfied the demands of Justice required of it, or wither it has shirked its duty with an injustice condemning the directive of the Court to interpret the Constitution in much the same way that Acts of Congress are challenged for constitutionality in the Judicial Branch.

 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=h9PxdDvgQks
[This [12 minutes] explains "natural born Citizen" in Article II, Sec. 1, clause 5, US Constitution: How our first Presidents were "naturalized citizens" and had to be exempted from the "natural born citizen" (NBC) requirement; shows the common understanding of NBC at the time our Constitution was drafted and ratified; explains 14th Amendment citizenship; and shows why Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz are not NBCs.]


Now Sen. Ted Cruz stated in 2012 as an expert on the Constitution having argued in the U.S. Supreme Court http://truthcdm.com/confirmed-senator-ted-cruz-is-neither-a-u-s-natural-born-citizen-or-a-legal-u-s-citizen/

"Obama's mother's citizenship is irrelevant since his father wasn't American and he wasn't born in America. He can't be President" and then then politically and conveniently noticed:

"All you need to know about my parentage is my mother was a Citizen. My father and place of birth are irrelevant."

“Citizen at birth” is a 14th Amendment naturalization term based upon “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.” That is also recognized in Judy v. Obama 14-9396 under the Codification in 1926 of Naturalization Act Aliens and Citizens at Birth Title 8 § 1401 (a-h) recognized by Cornell University Law School LEGAL INFORMATION INSTITUTE in which Sen. Cruz, Sen. Rubio and Barack Obama's citizenship statutes can be found. 

There is a good reason that the one circumstance, [ Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents], we call [natural born Citizen] is not found in or under any Statute of Naturalization Process by Congress or the Constitution; that is because, to take a line out of the United States Supreme Court Case Minor v. Happersett [ it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their Page 88 U. S. 168 parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first.] and also I might add, as important as borders are, the people of a nation are very important: [ There cannot be a nation without a people].

The combination of both [Place] and [Parents] were plainly considered as relevant by the U.S. Supreme Court in determination and the combination of the two left clearly stated were not in any doubt [natural born Citizens]. 

Now after listening to the 12 minute video we understand the reasons that with the new jurisdiction of Law as the United States Constitution that even the Founders were not [natural born Citizens] born under the Supreme Law of the Land. This made it necessary to grandfather themselves in as loyalist or what was termed in those days [Citizens] or distinguished patriots of the revolution [at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution].

With Obama's open border policies being challenged in the U.S. Supreme Court Soon, “natural born Citizen Americans” those with no tie to any foreign nation, will be in the American minority and they will be ruled by a sea of dual citizenship Citizens with equal allegiances and ties as foreigners to a foreign country as they are to the U.S. This is a strategic goal of the break-up of the United States of America and key to that is allowing dual citizenship into the Executive Branch's highest ranking Military Position - The U.S. Presidency even as Obama is now and is moving for in an Election Voting Override.

Now that we have established what that a [Natural Born Citizen] is indeed born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents, let's discuss what's happening in Judy v. Obama 14-9396  First of all you can't let anyone tell you that this Petition has been dismissed on the merits of the Writ. That Writ has never [officially] been heard or seen yet, by the U.S. Supreme Court. It can't have been without payment or a grant of deferred cost first.

The only thing that has happened in this case is a forma pauperis Motion was denied arbitrarily in some form, credited to the Justices, and with a read of the Motion to Reopen and Reconsider the Motion for Forma Pauperis found below, we see not only a malfeasance exposed, but a discrimination against the poor who are below the Federal Standardized Poverty Level to Justice.

With the calls to Reform Justice this has to be paramount in the discussion of injustice being dished out arbitrarily to the poor deliberately based on income disparity and discrimination.
  
1- http://www.scribd.com/doc/299578126/CRJ-CRIMINAL-COMPLAINT-Ltr-Clerk-following-the-February-11-2016
2-http://www.scribd.com/doc/299578125/SCOTUS-LTR-from-Clerk-Feb-11-2016-Judy-v-Obama-14-9396

You simply [cannot] dismiss legally a forma pauperis motion without good cause or a claim of excessive or abusive filings, which has not been claimed by the Court in this case by Rule 39.8  to do so is deliberate abuse and discrimination of justice based on  an income inequality wholly contemptible to the Standards of Justice in the USA.

 CLINTON TINDER-OF-DELEGATES IN THE DEMOCRATIC PRIMARIES?

DON'T ASK DON'T TELL anyone why in Michigan last night on #SuperTuesday2 Senator Bernie Sanders won the popular vote gaining 65 delegates to Clinton's 58 but came out losing in the delegate count. Michigan has 17 Superdelegates 10 pledged to Clinton the other 7 have not committed putting her at 68 and Senator Sanders at 58. What a celebration for Sanders winning but losing?

Superdelegates in many circumstances are those who are in line with the Establishment's Agenda and considerations, but those can change very quickly also. In some cases we would want to see those change very dramatically.

For instance if Hillary Clinton's certain EmailGate FBI Investigation were to forward an indictment of criminal charges that for some reason was not considered any longer under the 'deferred prosecution' list of the Obama' Administration or leveraged by some backroom deal between Obama and the Clinton's on the Golf Course, her Campaign could be in real trouble.
Crazy-Eyed Bill Clinton puts the Vice Grips to Obama
We go Down You Go Down!
The other consideration of this is IF a Case like Judy v. Obama 14-9396 effectively neutered Obama's ability in obeisance to respect such non-binding good-ole-boy agreement because his ineligibility were exposed; the deck would simply reverse itself. 

Obama could no longer control the Justice Department with his being ineligible and/or by a Special Prosecutor being assigned, the matter is completely removed from his hand. 

This One Action in the Judicial Branch could completely unhinge the Democratic Party nominating contest and it would all be in the interest of Justice, not in the interest of Injustice- Big Difference!

Of course it would not be Cody Robert Judy's fault that so many delays of the Court process to the U.S. Supreme Court and sorting through all the paper work and fault of clerks or what not, that this culminated just before the National Convention, so why should he be punished for a positive outcome of his case, which if it had happened 6 months sooner or even a year sooner (June 18th 2015) would have resulted in his being a Top Contender in the Democratic Primary season just as previous un-elected Trump is an outsider doing very well in the GOP  Contest?

With that kind of publicity, Bernie Sanders quickly fades as simply does every other Obama bowing politician in the public eye. The Democratic National Convention is contested with these facts and the Delegates and Superdelegates are released from their loyalty to unconstitutional sympathizers and the criminally charged/indicted/ or convicted. Cody Robert Judy wins the Nomination hands down with his Stand and Charge FOR the Constitution against both Republican Sen. John McCain and Democrat Sen. Barack Obama- The only Candidate in America with a Bi-Partisan Federal Court Record to do so.

Unlike the Republicans who still have two ineligible Candidates formidably in their Primary in Sen. Cruz and Establishment Favorite Rubio, Republicans would suffer much more than Democrats now with the Principle of [natural born Citizen] being upheld. Cruz and Rubio's Campaigns would or could be totality eviscerated never to rise again and Mr. Trump would be left with a bag of only using the bully pulpit to do anything... like a bully. He never answered the call to serve the Constitution and file Ballot Challenges against Cruz or Rubio.
The Potential Debate in the General Election of 2016 between
Cody Robert Judy for D's and Donald J. Trump for R's
While it may have been cheaper, and Mr. Trump has a reputation of being a penny-pincher, how can it be argued eliminating Obama's Signature as eligible as the "key" to dismantling ObamaCare the most affordable way? Mr. Trump fails.

While not filing Ballot Challenges may have saved him money on an attorney because unlike Mr. Judy, Mr. Trump is unable to do his own legal work, he has 10 Billion dollars, and given the extremes Mr. Trump recently donated 1,000,000.00 to the Veterans but could not manage $1.00 to eliminating ObamaCare through a Ballot Challenge to save the deception of so many of his Party from potentially Cuban Drafted Cruz and Rubio whose Campaigns fleeced about 1 Billion from the Presidential Race?

This is where 1 Million in legal fees, maybe less than that, compared to 1 Billion in Campaign Contributions would have made a Huge Difference in faith and trust of the American Public, but Trump thought he could "get-by" without making a stand.
Report Shows Cuba does not recognize Citizenship of those with Cuban Parents
http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2015/11/breaking-report-us-embassy-warning-to.html

In contrast to a Democratic Contested Convention as outlined a Republican Contested Convention we would then see as about "taking the Votes away from the People" to serve the Establishment's Interest, where the Contested Democratic Party Contested Convention would be to wrestle for the high ground of Justice and Equality.

Now if this doesn't happen, we know for certain the game is so rigged that Justice could not have a place in American's Heart and that the strangle or joke hold is so tight "Justice Reform" is something we will never see again in America.

Minority groups can't possible believe Justice Reform is on the dinner plate of America when it is defiance of Justice and Equality that those in power and office  not deserving in any Constitutional Manner to be where they are, are rewarded with the Offices and power. This is why it made perfect sense to me to see the it was in the Minority Groups indeed voting for the Constitution, needing it most to be upheld, understood that in the Candidacy of Cody Robert Judy and that that saves America!

That is the Dream full filled of Martin Luther King Jr. no Question about it!

Please consider a contribution to Cody Robert Judy's Campaign - Working Today for a Better America Tomorrow

MOTION TO REOPEN and RECONSIDER 



Here's the Link to Contribute if you'd like to Cody's Campaign improve your record for Taking A Stand for the Constitution.
 www.codyjudy.us



CRJ TODAY FOR A BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW.

My Writ before the Court has not been denied. Please read these post for a detail of why my Forma Pauperis Motion has been denied.

Cody Robert Judy
D-Candidate for President 2016


Direct http://codyjudy.us/i…/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm





Thank You!


Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy



Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.

Web Site www.codyjudy.us
Keep coming back!


INSPIRING - I believe in You


Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!


Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

Cody Robert Judy's book :



Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION


1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts

12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial

13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008

14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case

15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.





















Monday, March 7, 2016

BREAKING NEWS: NOTICE IS GIVEN U.S. SUPREME COURT JUDY v. OBAMA 14-9396


BREAKING NEWS: 
NOTICE IS GIVEN U.S. SUPREME COURT
 JUDY v. OBAMA 14-9396 The NATURAL BORN CITIZEN Case

Running for U.S. President isn't the easiest thing to do in the world. It takes a lot of grueling work. While most Citizens consider their civil duty completed with a trip to their Polling Place, there are so many more things that go into even the Primary Balloting we are seeing happening in the Republican and Democratic Parties now in every State. 

Underscoring the difficulty at the bottom  of this Post is just for instance the difficulty the Democratic Party is having right now in hosting a Primary. They did not have the $100,000 worth funds to pay for a Primary, the National Party is not helping, and the GOP Controlled Senate didn't pass a bill that would fund the Primaries of every Party. 

Parties also seek help from the Candidates charging them upwards of $1,000 dollars to get on the Primary Ballot. Times that by every state and it would be $50,000 and some States also require a number of signatures (Utah just passed one requiring 28,000 for State Wide Races ) which then requires boots-on-the-ground in that State to collect those. Its very easy to see why FUND RAISING is so important and why Candidates get so angry when they either cannot tap into the National Political Party vehicle of emails and addresses to even do that.

Senator Bernie Sanders sued the DNC for $600,000 dollars per day weeks before the Iowa Caucus and I myself was noticed on Record at having sued the DNC in a Report for the combination or formation of a cartel of corporations that formed a cabal allowing Barack Obama into the Ballot Box in violation of the rules of the race requiring a Presidential Candidate to be a [natural born Citizen] in the 2008 and 2012 Campaigns to the tune of $40,000,000 (Million) Dollars. Judy v. Obama Utah Division.

30 Documents, 3 Courts, and nearly two years Later the matter in Judy v. Obama 14-9396 has been arbitrarily refused or denied to proceed by the denial of a forma pauperis Motion which is utterly corrupt and is surmised now in a Criminal Complaint to the Attorney General . The good news is the U.S. Supreme Court Clerks have not sent that Motion to Re-Open and Re-Consider the Motion for Forma Pauperis with new evidence. The Bad News is that they have not Docketed the Motion either leading to all sorts of conspiracies of corruption and this is a big problem in the Justice Department and calls for Justice Reform we are seeing today.

So neither the orchestration of getting on the State Ballots is cheap, nor is the implied duty of the Court in seeing to it that Candidates for the same race are the only ones who have Standing to challenge for damages other Candidates who are ineligible for the office. This places a great financial burden on Candidates the public really does not see when they walk in to the ballot box and vote for their Candidate.

That is not the only problem we face as Americans threatened by the corruption of our elections. The system we have of checks and balances is favorited when it works to STOP something we want stopped, oh say like Barack Obama's Executive Orders/Actions of the Executive Branch being challenged in the Civil Court or the Judicial Branch for constitutionality as the U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear regarding 5 million immigrants for deportation and their questionable voting ability in the 2016 election which can swing a close election. 

It's easy to see that Obama through the guises of loving "immigrants" has greater sites on "winning elections" then sympathy for immigrants in his fundamental transformation promise to make America foreign to Americans by importation discretion of the Executive Branch and deferred prosecution of existing law that prohibits illegal immigration.  Of course this is what we would expect from an "illegal constitutionally unqualified person in the oval office".

The surprise is really the 'idea' that the voting processes in America are not being protected in the checks and balances of the Judicial Branch upon the Executive Branch through Trial of ineligibility as I have brought to the U.S. Supreme Court now in two instances. 12-5276 and 14-9396

The problems created by such have led to the creation of an insurgence not seen in American Politics that multi Billionaire Donald Trump is riding high on the Republican Side as well as Senator Bernie Sanders a more famous Independent then Democrat on the Democratic Party Side. The American People are angry and they are being pinned down, cornered, and corralled. 

The Establishment is paying a heavy price for the Public's anger, but they still have ineligible Candidates in the race in freshman Senators Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio, who without Donald Trump's keen eye seeing an opening would be taking advantage of the situation going unopposed.
Ted Cruz Part I Ted Cruz Part II

There still remains the question on whether socialism is represented in a Presidential Campaign that is not privately funded and wither Mr. Trump should he win the Presidency would basically tell the People he bought the seat and now owns the seat and is not responsible to the Constitution any more than the Judicial Branch held Obama responsible to the qualifications of the Office of President.

There can be great danger in the ability of a very rich class of people oligarchy formed to high-jack a Republic with the amount of money created. On the Democratic Party side, there also lays great danger that Justice will exempt a class of rich elitism which in no way embodies the interest of minorities or Justice for all. 

NOTICE IS GIVEN

GOT SOME LOVE Pleased to announce #SCOTUS 14-9396 retained the Motion to ReOpen & Reconsider Judy v. Obama @cnnbrk @FoxNews @thehill @TheView NOTICE is GIVEN: #Democrats #DemDebate March 4, 2016 at 2:46 am (Quote) #

[CRJ ANSWER]:

I’m pleased to announce the 3 week test is complete in SCOTUS maintaining the Motion to Re Open and Reconsider the Motion for forma pauperis.
in Judy v. Obama 14-9396.


“CRJ CRIMINAL COMPLAINT/Ltr. Clerk following the February 11, 2016” on Scribd. 
Read more: http://scribd.com/doc/299578126
I’m reading “SCOTUS LTR from Clerk Feb 11,2016 Judy v. Obama 14-9396” on Scribd. 





FEATURED COMMENT-OF-THE-DAY CRJ March 6, 2016 at 11:22 am (Quote) # 

[bob: Judy can look forward to a lifetime of being ignored.]

CRJ response:

That idea is not that offensive to me in some ways. I don’t mind being left alone with the rights of our Constitution. Look, I do my best to express my feelings. I’m ðŸ˜  hurt and angry that the Judicial Branch as a whole has not acted in their capacity and duty of Checks and Balances.
For my part as a Plaintiff in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 and 14-9396 I’ve sited damages to my person and Campaign(s) and have not received even the courtesy of a Hearing of evidence.
While I understand completely there are tons of people who voted for an ineligible Candidate in Obama, that doesn’t simply make my represented interpretation of [natural born Citizen] wrong.
I have reasonably approached the Court for simple compensation of damages. In short stating, Listen you can keep Obama in Office, keep the responsibility of his impeachment or disability in the Legislative Branch, but still act in the courtesy of hearing my case for Damages based on a Standard Principle agreed to at the beginning of the Race.
By contrast the U.S. Supreme Court has conducted itself in a manner towards me it’s fair to say , that also clearly anyone can see as I’ve shown you with their letter, by lying deceptive utterances on official records.
These things hurt my feelings and make me angry as normally as that treatment would anyone also treated the same way. None of you would hope in your wildest dreams to be lied to and deceived with fraudulent intent by the U.S. Supreme Court and it’s happened by God multiple times.
In fact the behavior of the SCOTUS reminds me of the panel of 3 Judges seen in the movie Valkyrie starring Tom Cruise based on a True Story of failed attempts to dislodge Hitler. You can see a little of that at 2 minute 50 Second mark of this scene
The scene I recollect is of that panel of passive aggressive Judges saying ” Do you mean to say you know better than our Fuhrer “. It was just a classic line representing a departure from Law where everyone as individuals were held accountable to an elitism that is manufactured departing a Republic such as is based on a Standard.
Indeed, I have never ever heard anyone in this group state regarding the definition of [natural born Citizen ] that someone [ Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] was not a [ natural born Citizen].
To the others there have been disagreements and differences even as the SCOTUS Case Minor v. Happersett indicates. So, with statutes being articulated by Congress for the others in naturalization powers given in the Legislature , what does it say a legislative mandate honoring my definition is ignored and deceptively crafted with out right lies?
What it says to me, which is the source of my being hurt and angered, is they don’t care about my rights as an individual. They are comfortable with a Bully.. Maybe even like the two GOP Presidential Candidates leading in the delegate count?
One who is clearly Foreign Born with a Foreign Father and mother by standards of Canada and Cuba seen in Ted Cruz.
And, one who protest in public court in a Bully pulpit as vehemently as imminent domain suffers someone no compensation whatsoever for the take over of private property we are seeing in Donald Trump refusal to submit to the Judicial Branch in an ELIGIBILITY challenge towards Ted Cruz (or Marco Rubio). This is pure democracy that eventually bullys you out of private property at the desire of the public mob. Might is right mentality.
I suppose you can judge on which is the better Bully., but in my opinion the Justices of SCOTUS are just asking for the Bully to come in and remove them and the Standard of Law they were instituted for and given Life Tenure to defend.

[Rickey: Translation: It has been three weeks since CRJ was informed that SCOTUS is never, ever going to reopen his case.]

CRJ Response:
True.
That is quite a long time considering they usually get back to me within a week.

CRJ Response:
Oh my gosh, that is funny! I love it when people look for the kernels of truth. It really is refreshing!
http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/…/republican-attorney-in-p…/…
‪#‎DEMOCRATS‬ You can help support my Campaign in the Defense of our Constitution at www.codyjudy.us

FOLLOW UP COMMENT
March 7, 2016 at 9:36 pm  (Quote) # 
Notorial Dissent: Actually, I rather suspect that the filing fees to get on the ballot are well outside of Judy’s pocket change these days, if they ever were attainable. IIRC some of those fees are pretty hefty.
True!
And many also require actual boots on the ground to collect a number of signatures in addition to upwards of $1,000 times that by 50 States and you start seeing why being cut-out of the Democrats accessible Records steamed Sen. Bernie Sanders into Court against them when he was cut off.
2- Has A Candidate Sued The DNC Before? Bernie Sanders Isn’t The First, Technically – Cody Robert Judy
http://www.bustle.com/articles/130896-has-a-candidate-sued-the-dnc-before-bernie-sanders-isnt-the-first-technically
The Utah Democratic Party Primary has been changed into a Caucus because the Party lacked the $100,000 to pay for it in addition to the GOP Controlled Legislature denying the 3 Million which would have funded Primaries for all the Parties.



MOTION TO REOPEN and RECONSIDER 



Here's the Link to Contribute if you'd like to Cody's Campaign improve your record for Taking A Stand for the Constitution.
 www.codyjudy.us



CRJ TODAY FOR A BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW.

My Writ before the Court has not been denied. Please read these post for a detail of why my Forma Pauperis Motion has been denied.

Cody Robert Judy
D-Candidate for President 2016


Direct http://codyjudy.us/i…/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm





Thank You!


Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy



Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.

Web Site www.codyjudy.us
Keep coming back!


INSPIRING - I believe in You


Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!


Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

Cody Robert Judy's book :



Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION


1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts

12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial

13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008

14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case

15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.