Author - Cody Robert Judy
Conservative Independent American
Candidate for Pres 16, 12, 08
U.S. Senate 18, 10, 04, 00
U.S. Rep. 02
Book: Taking A Stand - The conservative independent Voice
Request for Help: Can you Contribute Today?
Dear CRJ Supporters,
Thank you for your support in the Past. The time is upon us to step-up and kick-in as we are facing a critical juncture that could very easily propel us back into the U.S. Supreme Court which is my sincere hope. Let me preface my remarks with a LTR to Post & Email Editor Sharon Rondeau.
I think it gave me an excellent opportunity to not only inform people not all Democrats are for Common Core, but an excellent opportunity to address the APPLICATION of [natural born Citizen] and its affect on education in regards to our Children's Futures.
As Seen On: http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2016/01/press-release-application-of-education.html
I sincerely hope to get some contributions as I'm facing a real red line here and
appreciate any Help. Haven't had any contributions whatsoever since the U.S. Supreme
Court denied the forma pauperis Motion, but I hope showing the application can be
revisited and reviewed in a New Year 2016, by the Court will inspire people with courage to
support my Campaign a little longer.
Please Remember that the U.S. Supreme Court will NOT entertain any law suit without a Presidential Candidate claiming damages. This was well established in 2008 and 2012 law suits that included reviews by the U.S. Supreme Court in Berg v. Obama and The Ninth Circuit Barnett v. Obama.
We simply musthave a Presidential Candidate involved in this in a bi-partisan way and Cody Robert Judy is the only one with the Record since 2008 that accomplishes this for the Court Review.
We need to raise $2,000 dollars to keep ourselves afloat, while petitioning the U.S. Supreme Court to reconsider their review. We hope to do that with the Educators, Public and Civic Leaders, as well as the support from the Parents of our Nation who are opposed to Common Core as my latest Post intertwines as one cause.
Can you help my Campaign out one more time Today please? With your support you will be added to a 2016 Letter for Reconsideration of Review of Judy v. Obama 14-9396 sent to the U.S. Supreme Court. This will include the detail of how important the Case is and how it can unify the Country in definition of terms and in a way most importantly that does not have an Election at the Stake!
You have seen that Mr. Donald J. Trump has put our cause front and center in the Main Stream Media unbelievably with his questioning Sen. Ted Cruz's eligibility to qualify in the Public Court. You have also seen that Hillary Clinton with what we would call a question [Planted] to her of her consideration to nominate Barack Obama to the U.S. Supreme Court, that she stated she'd never thought about before but upon consideration would be an excellent idea. That's a life time appointment folks and one nomination we cannot afford to even entertain or have considered! http://www.cbsnews.com/news/hillary-clinton-is-open-to-idea-of-nominating-president-obama-to-supreme-court/
I tell you that there is only one way to STOP that from happening and the Public Court of questioning Ted Cruz's eligibility is not enough. We need the U.S. Supreme Court to take up the Case of Obama's Ineligibility and make sure it's recorded in the History of the United States that Obama was the precedent case of what [NOT] to do if you are not qualified as a [natural born Citizen] ie born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents. You do not run for Offices you are not qualified for under the Constitution.
We need to make Obama the precedent Case of a [disability] understood by Amendment 14, Section 3!
The idea that being elected was necessary was ceremoniously thrown out the window with the successes of Presidential Candidates Campaigns like Trump, Carson, and Fiorina, but the Democrats have not yet considered the Judy Campaign worthy of their Democratic Debates. Let's change that with your support.
We have to also make the U.S. Supreme Court's recognize the PRINCIPLES of our U.S. Constitution cannot be sacrificed based on the establishment or money, we have got to make Principle an important part of that and we need to make it correctly in our Courts of Law. My friends, I have stood up for the right way of defining terms, not slunk to bullying the terms over as I view Cruz, Rubio, Jindal, and Obama have.
God Bless Donald Trump for bringing it to the Public Court but you and I know how fast and easily that can disappear if its not Official Court Record standing in our highest Court. Frankly, this is about our children's futures and elections are important, but you have seen how one Constitutional Scholar has trumped another and how we are rocking back and forth. We need a U.S. Supreme Court decision now brought to them specifically in the consideration of Art. II, Section 1, Clause 5., and Cruz, Rubio, Jindal, and Obama should be in support of this not balking or afraid of it.
We need to capitalize on this swinging back and forth and with your support we can! How about helping out today? I haven't given up, and neither should you. I am here for you and you have seen me here for you Taking A Stand over and over and over again. Once again my friends, there is no Rule which prohibits the U.S. Supreme Court from revisiting their Review of my Motion for forma pauperis and reversing their decision. They can do it!
~ {Natural Born Citizen} in our Children's Futures ~
Following the Report of published by The Post & Email 2016 Democratic Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy issued the following letter to the Common Core Conference invitation for Presidential Candidates that we feel is very important for everyone. Not everyone understands the Application in so many arenas that the [natural born Citizen] qualification unique to the Office of President and Vice President from Representatives and Senators actually has; but the futures of our children in their national security, health, peace and tranquility as well as education is at the forefront of what has been termed The Birther Movement in America.
The conference IT'S ABOUT THE CHILD features a Jefferson quoted in his Bill for Religious Freedom '...and finally, that truth is great and will prevail if left to herself; that she is the proper and sufficient antagonist to error, and has nothing to fear from the conflict unless by human interposition disarmed of her [natural] weapons, free argument and debate.'
Of course my emphasis is on the word [natural] as it applies to the [natural born Citizen] clause in our U.S. Constitution that so many Republicans and Democrats in unison have acted to tear down subjecting our children to the dangers that a two generational barrier or wall in the TIME qualification for the Office of President presented.
There might be many 'good guys' running for President that you know have defended what you consider important in the fundamental fight for freedom and liberty in America, however if that fight does not include the fight for the [natural born Citizen] feature unique to the Office of the President, it is about as impudent as objecting to a porous border and feigning about reform of criminal justice whilst standing with a sign in the other hand that says Open Border and Justice for the Elite.
With my letter to ITS ABOUT THE CHILDREN that I challenge the directors to read as a courtesy of information to those who are there, I hope that not all Republicans and not all Democrats are seen as apposing each other in the values and directives and standards of our U.S. Constitution of which we should all find common ground.
With the following letter it is my hope to arouse the Faculties of our Educators, Civil Leaders, and Parents to my hope that with your support the forma pauperis Motion of my U.S. Supreme Court Case Judy v. Obama 14-9396 can be revisited by the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court and seen as unjustly denied, and that the proceedings can go forward, however this is predicated upon your awareness, support, and civil responsibility to advocate such to all who are accountable to you as Public Servants.
Thank you for your work and the work so many of you are involved with as Civic Leaders, Teacher, and especially as Parents in educating the general public about the harm to children of Common Core curriculum. I am an FEC Officially Registered Presidential Candidate for the Democratic Party here with you in this effort and notably the only Candidate in America with a Bi-Partisan Federal Court Record standing for the Constitution's qualifications for President.
It sounds to me like the Constitution is very important to this crowd. (smile) It sounds to me like the work of Barack Obama is opposed by this Crowd. Yet, I am the only Candidate for President lawfully engaged in civil action with two Cases in the U.S. Supreme Court entitled Judy v. Obama 12-5276 and Judy v. Obama 14-9396.How do these effect you?
I consider you to be an educated crowd so you will understand the Value in my first Stand for the [natural Born Citizen] qualification found in Art. II, Section 1, Clause 5, in Judy v. McCain in 2008 Las Vegas, NV Federal District Court. Obama and the Mainstream Media have used the Race Card against the Constitution, but my stand defeats that for Principle in the U.S. Constitution as Bi-Partisan. If my friends cannot see the Value in that, my enemies certainly do.
It's been an extrodinary hardship to be a Democrat opposed to Obama through the Principles of the Constitution but I am not alone, though the DNC Leadership in some instances would have you think so. This fight is for our children and the future of our children; and short of blood this Civil Stand remains the center of our Constitution and abandoning it will lead to the un-civil fight none of us wants for our children's future.
The Fight is real and getting into the U.S. Supreme Court was not easy. If you believe as I do that Obama's ineligibility is the KEY to rolling back the racism, the fascism, the Marxism, the Divisiveness opposed to our Constitutional Standards, please help me in this fight from within and behind the Democratic Party with your financial support.
We must infiltrate the enemy of our children's education not just from the front but from within. There are so many Democrats who are with us, but I can't get to them because of the restrictions of the Democratic Party Leaders in prohibiting my inclusion of Democratic Debates and Democratic emails, but I can ask for your help as I'm doing now.
Interestingly we share much more in common as Parents, Teachers,Education and Civil Leaders in this fight for the Constitution and it's my pleasure to point this out.
Art. II, Section 1, Clause 5 is a Happy Barrier or wall of protection existing for our children for the last near 240 years, but without enforcement it's a wall come crashing down to just the enemy those who oppose Common Core are fighting against now in communistic propaganda.
Identifying and clarifying an enemy is essential to defeating an enemy crashing through our national security protection. The Article says in plain English: 1-You can be a [Citizen] at the Time of the Adoption of the Constitution. This referred to distinguished Revolutionary Patriot Citizens of the 13 original States /or/
2- A [natural born Citizen] ie. Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents that requires a two generation American Culture acclamation before being qualified for the Office of President. This is distinct and unique from the Qualification of [Citizen] required for representatives and senators.
The President controls an entire Branch of the Three Branches, two generations of American Culture is a Barrier or Wall of Time. We are in trouble with Obama because the Wall came down. He is not born of American or U.S. Citizen [Parents].
As educators you know the power and influence of nurture and nature. To respect one without the other makes no [common] sense. As Parents we know the place of birth as jurisdiction under the Law is important, but so is what is taught and going into the heads of our children.
Why then on God's green Earth would you oppose Common Core but be found in favor of letting the Two Generation Barrier Wall down in the Office of President come down unless you want to be defeated and want the future of our children exposed in the fight we are in Today?!
I've shown to you Today the vital importance of Parents in Education of Children intertwined and connected to our Constitutional Standard and Principles. I would love to be there speaking to you directly but I do not have the money to come to you not do I have the money to send a representative. We've spent our resources in Legal Actions over 7 years and 15 recognized Civil Courts under the Constitution.
Please go to my Blog www.codyjudy.blogspot.com to confirm this at the bottom of every Post and check out my Web Site www.codyjudy.us that I have received a 5 day extension on to collect enough to keep going next month.
Please help me Today with a $5, $20,$50 or $100 everyone, it is needed desperately and is vital to the promotion of my Campaign and most importantly the Principles we share in common that articulate Defending our Children. We must fight the fight from both Major Parties perspectives.
We are on the brink of the cliff and I need your help. Please get your credit card out and contribute what you can Today.
If you watched the GOP Debate last night you noticed not one other Candidate on the Stage brought up the vital importance of the Office of President qualification but Donald Trump mentioned it about Ted Cruz on CNN. This speaks volumes of the Establishment Agenda we should consider.
Please forward this message to every concerned Parent and Education Professional you can. We must Take A Stand together. Thank You!
The Cody Robert Judy Campaign Mentioned in the National Story at the Post & Email Today announcing Cold Case Posse lead detective Mike Zullo appearing on Freedom Friday tonight.
Thank You America for the 340,000 Views on this Blog!
The only Presidential Candidate in America with a bi-partisan Federal Court Record on the [natural born Citizen] clause in defense of it can't afford the printing and filing cost to the U.S. Supreme Court. What's wrong with this picture America?
America, we are in need of a Contribution Revolution! Wont' you now Take a Stand with me? We would like to thank publicly The POST & EMAIL today for recognizing in a story our hard work!
It's not a prank, or a joke, or a thrill. It's a Crime and it's Time America takes a Stand for the Man whose been preserving, protecting, and defending the Constitution's natural born Citizen Clause as a hero for all Americans and our Future-
CRJ TODAY FOR A BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW.
My Writ before the Court has not been denied. Please read these post for a detail of why my Forma Pauperis Motion has been denied.
Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396
Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin
The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.
Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
Justices Owe Americans an Opinion on Natural Born Citizen?
Judy v. Obama 14-9396
The [natural born Citizen] qualification for the Office of the President is not the same as the [Citizen] requirement for U.S. Senators or Representatives. The Qualifications encoded in the U.S. Constitution directly give them a Special Priority in the accountability of the U.S. Supreme Court Justices duty in a Life Tenure. The differing opinions in Constitutional Scholarly Opinions even differ, as does the opinion of every American Citizen judge giving their opinions on Facebook as fact of Law. The differing opinions are not new, however what is relatively new is the application of the qualification in the modern Political Arena affecting Americans now in three major Presidential Elections of 2008, 2012, and now 2016 with Cruz, Rubio, Jindal, McCain, Obama. and the problem is particularly affecting millions of Americans right now in many different ways as well as Candidates, so the question is: Do the U.S. Supreme Court Justices owe America an Opinion on the definition of [natural born Citizen] particularly in the Race for the U.S. Presidency?
There is only one Presidential Candidate in America that has a Bi-Partisan Federal Court Record in the defense of the [natural born Citizen] qualification for the Office of the President who has been a Candidate in every one of the last three Presidential Elections and that is Cody Robert Judy. Bi-Partisan means he has sued both major parties- The Republicans in McCain and The Democrats in Obama. He also has two Cases appealing for an Opinion in the high U.S. Supreme Court ie Case No. 12-5276 and 14-9396.
Cody says, " I do believe the U.S. Justices owe Americans an Opinion. Any Constitutional Scholar will tell you the difficulty that exist in getting a Case like mine, with two Presidential Candidates in the same party, running for the same office, which fulfills the difficult the standing requirement to the U.S. Supreme Court and preferably without an Election hanging in the Balance, but that is exactly what I've done in Judy v. Obama 14-9396."
"Obama has been in office 7 years now. He has every benefit of really being defacto President. He's enjoyed the White House, decision making, the good, bad, and the ugly of the Office. I on the other hand have not and have suffered the damages Obama's being in that Office illegally has caused. No one really wants to look at the damages of the illegal usurpation upon someone like myself, but they are significant and accountable damages and I have brought those to the attention of the Court in a lawful manner I don't think anyone could say the way I've brought those to the Court was not in an honorary, civil, and gentleman's way."
"The problem is that the problem is not going away. If you have read my law suit which is only about 15 pages in single lines, you understand that the questions are asked that indeed are affecting U.S. Senator Cruz, U.S. Senator Marco Rubio, Governor Bobby Jindal, U.S. Sen. John McCain, and U.S. Senator Barack Obama and cover 3 Presidential Elections. It is not easy in the ripening doctrine of Case litigation to be around for a decision from the U.S. Supreme Court. In average cases 7 years is not a far stretch of the imagination to get a case to the U.S. Supreme Court as was recently exampled from Proposition 8 to national gay marriage."
Indeed the problems caused by the broad based scope of interpretation by politicians seizing upon their own popularity rather than the narrow directive articulated quite plainly in Art. II, Section I, Clause 5 is not localized to just Presidential Candidates but has affected every Citizens Contribution to or for any Presidential Candidate.
The Constitution plainly states two types of qualifications for the Office of the President. One type was for those who were distinguished revolutionary patriot [Citizen]s such as were at the time of the Adoption of the Constitution. The other, an incentive to propagate the new American Nations, and also to avoid foreign influence, or the [natural born Citizen] articulated selectively as [born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] as these are the [natural born Citizens] as was held in the precedent findings of Minor v. Happersett. These are noticed in a quick 2 minute video by the CRJ Campaign entitled a Constitutional Reckoning here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITCr420K4i8
We asked Cody what he felt worst about, his own losses or the losses of those Contributing to Presidential Campaigns under the presumption the Candidate would be qualified to hold the Office if elected?
"This has probably been mine own worst nightmare. Contributions have meant so much to my Campaign because they have been so rare. When someone sent me $2, or $10, or one time I received $200 I knew there was a real trust in those dollars for our Constitution and especially in my Stands and noticed U.S. Supreme Court Cases for the [natural born Citizen] qualification to be upheld."
"Although the contributions to my Campaigns have been few, they held great weight on my shoulders, but it just wasn't the Contributions to my campaign I was counting. I also counted those who trusted other Presidential Candidates to actually be qualified for the Office. If I knew the Candidates they had contributed to were not constitutionally qualified, that was a contribution collected in a deceptiveness or fraudulent way."
The campaign collection of Candidates who are still questionably qualified under the U.S. Constitution's Standards range:
Sen. John McCain Total: 368 Million
Sen. Barack Obama: 730 Million (2008) 964 Million (2012)
Sen. Ted Cruz: 39 Million
Sen. Marco Rubio: 17 Million
Gov. Bobby Jindal: 1 Million
Total: 2,119 Billion
"It seems incomprehensible to me", said Cody, "that the U.S. Supreme Court Justices would not see the great responsibility to clear up the definition to an over 2 Billion dollar potential or alleged abuse of American's contribution dollars to illegal or unqualified Presidential candidates.
"Its like they have no conscience! Remember that is not counting the dollars to candidates who were qualified under the two generation accountability of [born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents], but only the ones that were not. To understand the cognitive dissonance of the Justices is to recite that my case relatively claimed 40 Million in damages of time, talent, and money in elections 2008 and 2012 and their opinion did not count or ask them to disqualify a Candidate from Office but only recognize the [damages] giving the responsibility to Congress to remove if deemed necessary. That's pretty important, and relative to the damages of 2 Billion upon Americans 40 Million is a drop in the bucket, but indeed is able to affect the future of Campaign Contributions as well as Presidential Campaigns. But let's not forget about the 10 Trillion added to the national debt by Obama?"
"If we consider the U.S. Supreme Court Justices accountable to the U.S. Constitution, yet allowing this under-handed fraud to go on in broad daylight, until say the whole election comes rushing in like Gore v. Bush did on counting chads only it has to do with the [natural born Citizen] qualification, how much more difficult is that as far as the Union of our Nation? And what kind of a responsibility is it to refuse my Case based on a $300 dollar filing fee and approximated $4,500 printing cost, I did not have the money for as I showed them in Review with Bank Statements and my 5 page forma pauperis motion granted in fact by the Utah District Court and the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals?"
We are seeing the damages that are being done to U.S. Senator Ted Cruz's campaign for President by the simple assertion from Mr. Donald J. Trump's Campaign that he is not qualified. This is not the Court's opinion officially but the question that remains unanswered by the U.S. Supreme Court. Of course Sen. Cruz was invited along with Mr. Rubio to file a Amicus Curiae April 27th 2014 which is a friend of the Court, assisting in relativity of affect in the decision in favor or against the action.
We have seen in real time how the trial in public court has affected Sen. Cruz negatively as we look at his Poll Numbers in Iowa where he started to surge against Mr. Trump at times until Mr. Trump began questioning Cruz's eligibility because he was doing better.
It just seems obvious that the U.S. Supreme Court should handle this question and with a Case in front of them that only needs a reversal of the Motion for forma pauperis it seems a real dis-service to the Nation and all of the contributions Americans make to the Presidential Candidates not to protect those contributions now and in the future.
Thank You America for the 340,000 Views on this Blog!
The only Presidential Candidate in America with a bi-partisan Federal Court Record on the [natural born Citizen] clause in defense of it can't afford the printing and filing cost to the U.S. Supreme Court. What's wrong with this picture America?
America, we are in need of a Contribution Revolution! Wont' you now Take a Stand with me? We would like to thank publicly The POST & EMAIL today for recognizing in a story our hard work!
It's not a prank, or a joke, or a thrill. It's a Crime and it's Time America takes a Stand for the Man whose been preserving, protecting, and defending the Constitution's natural born Citizen Clause as a hero for all Americans and our Future-
CRJ TODAY FOR A BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW.
My Writ before the Court has not been denied. Please read these post for a detail of why my Forma Pauperis Motion has been denied.
Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396
Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin
The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.
Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
What's your Record? Everyone has got a record. Last Sunday the Denver Broncos played the New England Patriots for AFC Championship and the Carolina Panthers played the Arizona Cardinals for the NFC Championship in the National Football League. The Panthers and Broncos won their respective Conference Championships, after winning their Divisions, and are now qualified to play in Super Bowl 50. Imagine the outrage of America if two teams showed up who had not qualified? This is what his happening in the highest Office of the United States of America, but where is the outrage?
CBS News reported in an Article January 24th written by Scott Simon entitled "Scott Simon: Do away with the "natural born Citizen" clause", that the qualification for President should be done away with. The article essentially derided the amount of time it took to become qualified for President if [born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] were enforced, as it should be excluding even Obama, and Cruz, if [born in the U.S.]were alone the qualification.
Indeed it cannot be denied the totality of the argument includes both Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents. Obama and Cruz both claim the [conferred] citizenship's of their [Parents] at birth, so if this were denied their credibility weakens in the single claim of [conferred] U.S. Citizenship from their mothers.
The 14th Amendment enhances the [Place] as important jurisdiction in the United States of America of the 50 States as a defining territory and certainly cannot be thrown under the bus as an important part of the U.S. Constitution. As Amendments go and considering the difficulty in the Amendment process it stands as credible Law.
Indeed Cruz's citing of the Naturalization Law of 1790 as law actually excludes him as at that time, and in the Act, a mother's citizenship was not allowed in a conferred citizenship as suffrage had not been passed either. The Naturalization Law of 1795 actually retracted two words, natural born, from [natural born Citizen] in favor of [Citizen], and added a word [moral] to character. Of course the titles infer an ACT of Congress considering [naturalization] given to Congress in enumerated powers Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1 and [natural born Citizen] needs no act of Congress for definition.
The absolute failure of most Reports by the Main Stream Media is of course to simply advocate upholding the Constitution's qualifications for President and Vice President distinct and unique from those of Senators and Representatives. The obvious capitulation is to remove the barrier of TIME it takes for [born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] because two generations cannot be skipped, and it may also be lost with a union of a foreigner or a foreign place of birth.
Bancroft wrote in his History of the Formation of the Constitution of the United States (1884) (Volume 1 Page 346):
One question on the qualifications of the president was among the last to be decided. On the twenty-second of August the committee of detail, fixing the requisite age of the president at thirty-five, on their own motion and for the first time required that the president should be a citizen of the United States, and should have been an inhabitant of them for twenty-one years. The idea then arose that no number of years could properly prepare a foreigner for the office of president; but as men of other lands had spilled their blood in the cause of the United States, and had assisted at every stage of the formation of their institutions, the committee of states who were charged with all unfinished business proposed, on the fourth of September, that “no person except a natural-born citizen, or a citizen of the United States at the of the adoption of this constitution, should be eligible to the office of president,” and for the foreign-born proposed a reduction of the requisite years of residence to fourteen. On the seventh of September, the modification, with the restriction as to the age of the president, was unanimously adopted.
The intentions of the qualification was indeed noticed in arguments of Congress as a "Happy Barrier" or Wall that foreign influence would indeed have to recant to in TIME, and during that time of two generations, as is mentioned in Congressional Testimony of the Judicial Committee of the House in 2000, a significant change is perpetuated in cultural loyalty. As the matter is seriously given hearing, the discovery over the eight recent attempts since even 2003 has been not to disregard the wisdom of the Wall or barrier between foreign influence, as well as the incentive for the propagation of Americanism.
Of course the United States of America through the U.S. Constitution opened every single door to every single office to immigrants who become U.S. Citizens who spend some time here, and that time is graduated with responsibility of the considered Office. The Office of President simply had more TIME added to it, and it is resented by the stomping of Hell, and accusations of the devil in great fury!
The question remains in the consideration of the CBS Article, Why? If the devil is stomping and raising hell to get in your house, don't you think there are some good reasons not to let him in? If he says he is a good person and has done so much for you, is that a reason to let him in? If he says, the threats of his past murders, robbing, and general tyrannical behavior is longs since past, is that reason to let him in? If he says the law is old, does not recount modern review of the law, as well the process of The People's representation, but in bullish terms declares it antiquated without any reason to hear any further deliberations, and thusly refuses to even publish legal Case History with parties of standing to examine further his own argument, aren't the reasons he is stomping and raging in hell all the more obvious to be nefarious?
Just two days ago in Iowa, January 23rd, 2015 Mr. Trump throws the hammer at Senator Cruz's eligibility. In an Article Published at The Hill entitled: Trump floats lawsuit over Cruz's birthplace, its reported Trump recognizes his Standing and also opines he won't waste the money to Preserve, Protect, and Defend the Constitution while all of his supporters and those of Ted Cruz's do not have Standing. Mr. Trump said:
“I’ve said Ted has a lot of problems — number one, Canada. He could run for the Prime Minister of Canada and I wouldn’t even complain because he was born in Canada,” Trump joked.
“The Democrats are going to sue if he ever got the nomination within two days. There have already been two lawsuits filed, but they don’t have standing. I have standing to sue. Can you imagine if I did it? Should I do it just for fun?”
Trump added that he believes that he will defeat Cruz without the need of a legal challenge to his candidacy, which is why he probably will not sue.
"It’s probably why I want to save the legal fees," he said of his confidence in winning the GOP nomination.
"If I thought it was going to matter, maybe I would do it, maybe I wouldn’t.”
Mr. Trump recognized his own Standing to sue and he also notices that its only when Cruz does better in Polling that he gets a little worried. But what about all those contributions flowing from good ole hard-working Americans to Ted Cruz's Campaign that otherwise might have been going to Mr. Trump's Campaign? Are they left simply to the popular politicians definition of the Constitution?
Oh! Mr. Trump does not care about those contributions or Americans in general being snookered by an illegal unqualified Candidate? Indeed it is true, while Mr. Trump is without a doubt the most wealthy successfully business operating person, well known, and polling like the devil out there in America, his considered answer to preserving, protecting, and defending the Constitution for Americans who are beset and assaulted with FRAUD, is "Should I do it just for fun?", or, ""It’s probably why I want to save the legal fees,"? Yes it is true, I have petitioned Mr. Trump to help with funding my Legal Cases, but it is also true he has always denied me any and every request as the our Record together reflects.
Now I do not want to rain on Mr. Trump's parade, or infringe on his Polling numbers, nor do I want to take away all of his wealth. In fact I have never met Mr. Trump, but I do like him for several reasons. He is in my estimation a hard-working American Family Man. He has undoubtedly put Immigration as well as the 'natural born Citizen' qualification for the Office of President front and center in the Main Stream Media. As a Presidential Candidate in the Democratic Party that has indeed been fighting that fight in the trenches for 7 Years now, sacrificing 50% of my time and talent much of my money in 3 runs for President '08,'12, and now 2016, I applaud Mr. Trumps efforts.
I applaud Mr. Trump's efforts as the Broncos and Panthers shook the hands of the Patriots and Cardinals who lost but played a good game in their Conference Championships. What I cannot endorse Mr. Trump for, is equating the qualifications of President as not worth his time or worth a dime.
Certainly, Mr. Trump if the Polls are correct can win the Republican Nomination. He's working hard for that. While I do not have the name recognition that Mr. Trump does, we also share in common the fact we have not been elected to Office before. However, I have understood the painful marathon Campaigns against the odds in now 7 Races including one for Representative '02, three for Senator '00,'04,'10 and now three for President '08,'12,'16.
Just considering the three Presidential Campaigns, some 15 Cases noticed at the bottom of this Post, recounts the work in the trenches for the [natural born Citizen] Qualification represented in the Judicial Courts of Law authorized by the U.S. Constitution in Utah, Nevada, California, New York, New Hampshire, Georgia and Washington DC.
That tells you I believe in the Justice System in the United States but that it is not appreciated by Mr. Trump equally or nearly on the same level on the subject of [natural born Citizen]. I think we can all agree on that.
Now if you think it's not that important consider just in Sen. Cruz's Primary run in a single Presidential Race so far, over 39 Million dollars has been collected. If we were to consider the amount in Obama's Campaigns and McCain's over the last two election cycles for President, which we all admit both McCain and Obama's qualification are at least recognized as questionable in both [Place] and [Parents], we have to surmise adding at least another 1.5 BILLION!
This makes Mr. Trump's hypothesis about the standing of a Presidential Candidate, the responsibility and accountability to the members of at least his own Party in challenging legally the credentials in question of a Candidate, very cheap and irresponsible of the duty.
It might be said that my Challenges to Obama in my own Party are buried in the avalanche of news stories, but it cannot be said that I did not care about every single Democrat in my challenges against Obama and every single Republican in my challenges against McCain as a write-in Candidate for President.
The value of that is like the work over the entire NFL season and being denied playing in the Superbowl, even though you have earned it. The Birther black-eye the U.S. Supreme Court gave me in denying my forma paupers motion Judy v. Obama 14-9396 that coincidentally had been granted by two lower Courts within the same year, (without comment or reason that is even tepidly referred to in Rule 39.8 for those who have abused with excessive filings the privilege withheld) makes it even more arbitrary.
Part III.
DEFINING CONSERVATISM
Within the confines of the Conservative national Radio Programs of Rush, Glenn, and Sean lies a deep dark secret. That is basically they have not accounted the [natural born Citizen] clause of the Constitution's qualification for President [born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] valuable within Conservative Principles. They have all bashed the Birthers at one time or another while touting they stood for conservative principles.
Within the basic Philosophy of Conservatism is a definition. That is any political philosophy that favors tradition (in the sense of various religious, cultural, or nationally-defined beliefs and customs) in the face of external forces for change, and is critical of proposals for radical social change is Conservative. At first glance Americans from the Democratic Party might cringe at being called conservatives in the nature of the U.S. Constitution's demand for a [natural born Citizen] in the office of President.
Take one more stab at the Left for a Free Press, Free Speech, Free Religion, Free Choice,
and even Conservation Preservers of Nature and those same Liberals will come out swinging as Conservatives by definition.
How is it those who have stated they believe in Nature, preserving Nature, have held such little respect for the [natural born Citizen] clause that in the very origins of nature's constructs of [nature] and [nurture] have defied their own gravitas?
The [natural born Citizen] clause is a preservation of Americanism. It is threatened by a dilution or pollution of the qualification for the Office of President encompassing two generations. It is distinct and unique.
Are Americans to become extinct as the Amazon Forrest of the U.S. Constitution is burned by Preservationist who neither see nor comprehend their insult, assault, and dereliction of preservation of a pure species: [American]? The Office of the President is the ONLY office left preserved, protected, and defended as [born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] and those crying over the preservation of natural lands, original habitation, indigenous species, in most cases have a flame-thrower going full throttle on the [natural born Citizen] clause of the Constitution, and a 50 Caliber going so hard the barrel is glowing red at the ONLY OFFICE SPACE for Americans left.
With just half the intended defense of the weeds, owls,mice for Americans, the Office of President would have no need to fear becoming extinct to only those born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents. Of course there are many offices for hybrids included in dual citizenship and first generationers', but why can't those Americans with no choice of dual citizenship have something to call home, and for the rest to aspire to, if it is that big, AS a Positive Incentive?
We all want pure water to drink, we all want clean rivers and streams, we all want clean air to breathe, so why in the natural course of the United States of America do we not want a [natural born Citizen] as a qualification of TIME for the Office of the President? I can think of none and neither has the the Congress of the United States or The People for the near 240 years of our existence.
In that respect of Conservatism we as Americans should rally behind a Candidate for President, rally behind the U.S. Supreme Court not only hearing but holding firm the U.S. Constitution's qualifications for the Office of President, as if it is clean water and clean air vital to our existence!
Part IV.
HOW'S YOUR RECORD?
We all have them. What is your Record? Facebook has suspended or shall we say interfered with my [normal] Facebook account activity ,for the last few years, the last few months. Two months just BEFORE the Iowa Caucus seems rather pointed wouldn't you say? Over the last 2 months my Campaign has been suspended 6 Times for upwards of three days to as long as two weeks. That's interfering with a Federal Election Campaign and has been Tweeted to the Attorney Generals Office with pictures and evidence, but will it go unnoticed as a presumable FBI Recommendation for prosecution that Hillary Clinton will be held accountable for national security breaches of the highest levels?
Wow! Certainly is a good day for a revolution and turning the tables. Yes, there are many liberals who support conservative principles and many conservatives who are bastardizing conservatism like the Establishments of both Parties are. America is in a state of Revolution right this minute! Hillary Clinton doesn't get it. Jeb Bush doesn't get it. Donald Trump isn't willing to pay for it, but is using it as a political tool in the public arena against Ted Cruz. The U.S. Supreme Court isn't hearing it and is fighting charges off denying Access to the Courts fits their profile of denial while Americans are left standing with a 39 million dollar bill in Ted Cruz's campaign.
The only Presidential Candidate in America with a bi-partisan Federal Court Record on the [natural born Citizen] clause in defense of it can't afford the printing and filing cost to the U.S. Supreme Court. What's wrong with this picture America?
America, we are in need of a Contribution Revolution! Wont' you now Take a Stand with me? We would like to thank publicly The POST & EMAIL today for recognizing in a story our hard work!
It's not a prank, or a joke, or a thrill. It's a Crime and it's Time America takes a Stand for the Man whose been preserving, protecting, and defending the Constitution's natural born Citizen Clause as a hero for all Americans and our Future-
CRJ TODAY FOR A BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW.
My Writ before the Court has not been denied. Please read these post for a detail of why my Forma Pauperis Motion has been denied.
Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396
Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin
The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.
Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
