Will The Alabama Supreme Court Collapse Obama’s House Of Cards or Fall To The Racism Charge?

Will The Alabama Supreme Court Collapse Obama’s House Of Cards or Fall To The Racism Charge?

The frustration that Obama has had the 'race card' to play has been kept alive by Conservatives unwilling to recognize the inequality of say, giving (1* & 2*)McCain a pass to run for President when he was not born in the United States, but throwing a fit about Obama not being born in the U.S. to Citizen parents. There is only one man in the United States of America that actually stood on the principle, ran for President in 2008 and 2012, and socked the principle to both McCain and Obama.

Some may say its hard to do anything in America regarding politics that hasn't been done or is unique to the political arena. However in the case above in the years stated, the distinction of suing Obama and McCain as an official candidate for President belongs to me alone.

That doesn't make my case something Judges can flip off like a light switch in hopes they never saw the criteria they themselves created as a match to indeed challenge Obama's qualification in a game of fulfill-the-criteria-and-we'll -create-a-new-one like rules of a game changing when someone you don't want to win starts to win. Confiscating my individual rights is akin to suspending your own. Who wants to be the first to give up your rights?

That's what the Constitution's for as the Supreme Law of the Land. Remember, "one nation under God indivisible with liberty and justice for all"? I was included in the "all" part of that.

This blog entry contains much of the information related to the following article link below. So if you'r lost to my blog entry comments please refer to this in order of catching the comments in regards to it.

http://www.westernjournalism.com/alabama-supreme-court-may-collapse-obamas-house-cards/#VMUPJfLUtP2rliEY.99

Comment on the above linked article:

I'm not sure why Mr. Thomson, referred to the Georgia case's and Judge Malihi changing his tune, while stating in the same article regarding the Alabama Supreme Court;
".. it will be the first and only civil case in which Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse is personally involved".

Sheriff Joe Arpaio's case results and all involved was inserted with their reputation on the line, into Judy v. Obama 12-5276 at the Georgia Civil Superior Court level March 2nd,2012 and thus appealed to Georgia's Supreme Crt and traveled clear to the U.S. Supreme Court from Malihi's Administrative Court decision.

http://www.birtherreport.com/2012/02/judge-malihi-rules-against-plaintiffs.html

The importance of this maybe a small detail, however, small details that are missed can be excruciatingly painful in a Court especially in light of the way it may be introduced or re-introduced to the United States Supreme Court if a hearing is indeed desired.

I certainly applaud The Western Center for Journalism for carrying Mr. Thomson's article.

World Net Daily a known media advocate for the Constitution's natural born citizen clause however did not cover:
1)A single story of Judy v. Obama 12-5276 (2012) and (2013) in spite of it coming from a Presidential Candidate with standing in the Presidential Race within the Democratic Party so it was more politically neutral.

2) It being the only case that actually did insert Sheriff Joe's Cold Case Posse results from Georgia as evidence supporting the claim of ineligibility.

3) It based on the 'race neutrality' of Judy v. Obama 12-5276 also having roots in Judy v. McCain in 2008 which no other Presidential Candidate in the nation had claim to.

However, they did a small mention in stories of the case when it was a Georgia Supreme Court case here and here but again without any of the three strengths of the case mentioned above.

While respecting to Mr. Thomson's enthusiasm we need to keep the facts well understood; "What’s been the biggest obstacle in challenging Obama’s eligibility in court? It’s been finding a judge who isn’t afraid to allow the merits of the case against Obama to be argued in court.", is not quite legally right with the majority of cases dismissed for the lack of standing, which according to Obama's own lawyers represented is a claim made by someone in the presidential race or contest.

The tough sell in Alabama could be the exact same problem as we saw with Berg v. Obama in 2008 in the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed on a lack of standing, that I also wrote an Amicus Curiae in support of.

You've heard it a million times: “It’s OK to make a mistake, but never make the same mistake twice!” Or “Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me.” One of the giant myths we love to believe is that we make a mistake only once.

For those conservatives interested in results the biggest problem has yet been combining forces with the strengths of every spoke in the wheel so a case doesn't wobble and fall off track, though it is true that Judges do retain some discretion on what they will hear more especially with pro se litigants and the opportunity for the law to be upheld in justice without being blinded as someone who couldn't see the Forrest for a single tree. They may have upheld "The Standing" argument but they sure let pass the qualifications for the Office of the President brought to them by someone with standing in my cases.

Without the slightest degree of envy or jealousy for credit, I have always stood firm with my hand extended to those brilliant reputable lawyers filing cases as a witness for them if they so chose to accept my invitation. My witness could stand up on the "principle" of the (3*)natural born citizen clause because of my complaint against McCain, who was born in a Panama Hospital not in any military hospital and is a son of Panama in the same fashion as those who stood against Obama for not being born in the U.S. to Citizen parents.

The resulting hesitation to admit such a testimony only stands to solidify what in the Main Stream Media circles will always be a 'racist charge', because in fact there is merit. If Obama is not allowed into the "natural born circle" its plain and simple, McCain should not have been either.

I AM AMERICANhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=4otwMXGzvac


>
[ If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign”, or ABC Campaign ,which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President please make a contributions here: ]
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES


1*-Summation of McCain's not being born in the U.S. or a military hospital
http://www.michiganlawreview.org/articles/why-senator-john-mccain-cannot-be-president-eleven-months-and-a-hundred-yards-short-of-citizenship

2* Non-binding U.S. Senate Resolution 511 sponsored by Obama and Clinton in a 'good-ole-boys' non-binding resolution which was not at all binding on the Constitution's qualification for the Office of Pres. declared "two citizen parents" necessary however which Obama fails. This was the second ACT of Congress in regards to McCain's identity which is a naturalization process governed by Amend 14, and excludes parameters of a 'natural born citizen'. I don't need 2 acts of Congress first declaring I'm a citizen and then another declaring I'm a natural born citizen. McCain seemed to think he did for some reason.

3* Natural born citizen - Citizen - Native Graphs depictions here and here for those interested.

New Commercial Featuring Judy v. Obama 12-5276 SCOTUS

FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:

New Commercial Featuring Judy v. Obama 12-5276 SCOTUS

If you've been hiding from the news that Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign has recently been accepted in the United States Supreme Court on a Petition For Rehearing that is scheduled for January 4th, 2013 a few weeks before Obama's is set to be inaugurated for 2nd Term, then this commercial is for you!

Some people may not know that construction laws prevent the adding and subtracting to the Constitution. Only 2/3rd of a Majority of Congress can amend our Constitution that stands as the United States Supreme Law of the Land.

Now that doesn't mean that politicians won't give it a good shot and try to circumvent it. That's one of the reasons that the Courts are there for We The People, and we in the United States hold firm to "Justice For All", rather then justice for the few, or justice for the rich.

Barack Obama brags about an administration where everyone "plays by the same rules", but he actually lied about being a natural born citizen qualified for the Office of the President, that's if you believe that he at least got his parents names correct. Barack's claimed father was never a "Citizen" of the United States and to be a natural born citizen, you must be born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.

The Constitution itself discusses, in the same clause that outlines the qualifications of the Office of President,the boundaries not to be infringed. Yes, that's right. If you were a 'Citizen' at the time of the adoption of the Constitution, then you could run for President without being a natural born citizen. Many of the early framers of our Nation were either not born here, or did not have parents who were U.S. Citizens, so they exempted themselves, understanding that our new Nation would soon bare children who held no allegiance to any other nation either by birth or by parental heritage.

Many don't understand that being a dual citizen at birth prohibits one from qualifying for United States President, and Obama is by British Law a British subject and was so at birth. Contrary to what many understand Obama has never produced a genuine long form birth certificate. The one he released has been proven to be a forged document with excerpts muddling its originality or authenticity.

This isn't just me saying this, its been investigated by experienced law forensic specialist who have done this kind of work as a profession for years and years. So of course the big question is why has Obama been allowed to get away with it?

Well, Obama and his defenders have spent well over a million dollars in doing what anyone of us would do if we were charged. He's been getting off on technicalities. Of course technicalities are to be respected, after all who among us wants a different set of laws that moves back and forth, and shifts in the order of prosecution? The biggest 'hinge' of law that has worked in Obama's favor has been what's called "standing", essentially barring anyone who was side-lined from the presidential race as a spectator or citizen, rather then a participant.

Now, not only did you have to be a candidate in the race, but you had to show competitive standing. In the event that Obama was removed as a disability according to the 14th Amendment, Sect 3, any candidate challenging had to be able to show he was competitive with for instance the Republican Candidate Mitt Romney. Cody Robert Judy did just that, registered with the Federal Election Commission, has a detailed platform on a 100+ page web site, amassed nearly 190 YouTube Videos many tailored to specific State caucuses and primaries that begin in Iowa, and has been featured in interviews and articles throughout the entire campaign.

Of course the main-stream media tends to ignore candidates against an incumbent, especially within the same party, but that didn't stop Cody. He believes that the Constitution is meant for all parties and that Obama should not be allowed to get away with running the Presidential Race under a different set of rules then he has had to. Obama is not a natural born citizen, Cody is. The fact Obama has got away with occupying the White House because no one could challenge his authenticity and qualifications in 2008 does not make him a legal qualified person for the Office of the President.

Of course we know that technically Obama has received enough votes to occupy the White House for a 2nd term, however Obama is technically no more qualified in 2012 then he was in 2008; there is no 'status' for getting away and skirting the law with a lie for 4 years that all of a sudden makes you legal for another 4 years.

Cody Robert Judy's whole campaign has kept a focus on maintaining "competitive standing" while at the same time starting with the lowest level court challenges against Obama for not being a natural born citizen qualified for the Office of the President according to the demands of the Constitution. Cody has gone through some 13 Courts over the last 4 years on the demand for a natural born citizen because like any other part of the Constitution, de-construction of the Constitution is not a legal action, especially in the demands for qualification for an elected office like the President.

Not even a war-time emergency or national disaster should suspend the simplest qualification, as long as elections can be held with integrity.

That's what this commercial is about. De-constructing the Constitution is illegal, and Obama's not a natural born citizen. That said, we all can understand why the lower courts preferred to hand this case off to the higher courts and why it now has reached the United States Supreme Court. Actions like this are best handled by a panel of judges, and Cody Robert Judy sure has standing.

For all intensive purposes, Cody should be heard in the United States Supreme Court and that decision is going to be made January 4th, 2013. If Cody wins his case in the United States Supreme Court and Obama is found to have lied about being a natural born citizen, his whole campaign chest could be exactly what he loses. If that happens, of course then Congress would look very foolish and remiss if they didn't hold hearings and a court themselves to remove Obama as a disability immediately.

After that, Cody would either be declared President for not conceding the race as Mitt Romney did, or Congress could choose to hold another election and a President pro tempore could be assigned to fill the office until that election was held, providing he was also qualified. Who knows, George W. Bush could be called up as a man who last legally held the Office.

America has dealt with far worse crisis then having a rogue in office and the circumstance was actually contemplated by the Framers and Founders evident by the directions given to us to follow.

Stay tuned in and enjoy the latest Cody Robert Judy Presidential Commercial for 2012-2016, and it would be greatly appreciated if you'd make a contribution to the campaign, because while Cody's campaign has no debt the bills are continual coming and we need you help now more than ever now Mitt Romney has conceded.
http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm

Martin Luther King Jr. had a saying "The wheels of justice turn slowly, but they do turn"

A New Ride

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDRTVakr7NI



HELP US SPREAD THE WORD .. your social networks can help bring more contributions to get these commercials on the air in the next 19 days! Send this to your friends or your local press!

The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign

Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
Contribute: http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES
FEC REGISTERED http://fec-candidates.findthedata.org/l/4426/Judy-Cody-Robert
Candidate ID P20003372
Committee ID C00501593

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/12-5276.htm

Breaking: ELECTION ELIGIBILITY CHALLENGE IN SCOTUS V. MILITARY COVERS PULLED

FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:
Update: UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT RECEIVES AFFIDAVIT REQUESTED DOCUMENT MONDAY.
03122120000212936912
Priority Mail®
Delivered
November 26, 2012, 10:59 am
WASHINGTON, DC 20543
Expected Delivery By:
November 21, 2012
Delivery Confirmation™
READ THE AFFIDAVIT ENTERING UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT TODAY HERE
http://www.scribd.com/doc/113860602/Judy-v-Obama-12-5276-Affidavit-affirmation-of-Petition-for-Rehearing-timing

We need your help today, please make a contribution here and now.

Breaking: ELECTION ELIGIBILITY CHALLENGE IN SCOTUS V. MILITARY COVERS PULLED

The reasons Benghazi and Fast & Furious don’t pull out Obama’s root cover-up

Well, if you thought that Benghazi was the answer that would lead to unseating Obama along with its smaller twin Fast & Furious, the gun-running operation that placed weapons into the hands of gangsters across the border with the intent of tracing crime, you have again underestimated the ability of our Government to indulge military operations with the cover of secrecy and the reason being that whatever they said, because it really doesn’t matter what they said, was said to protect national security operations and to protect and not compromise their sources.

I believe its Ill. Sen. Dick Durham that is out blocking for Susan Rice saying that the reason they didn’t publicize the Al-Qaida role in Benghazi was simply because they didn’t want to compromise their sources. What part of that don’t you get Rush, Glenn & Sean?


Ask yourself one question: Does the President and those working under him, have the right to lie to the media and thus the public in the order of National Security?

If you’re having difficulty with that answer, then try this one. Your door is knocked on. You open it to see 3 burly men asking if they could have a moment with your 3 year old daughter alone and asking if she was home. Do YOU have a right to lie OR obscure the truth for her safety? How many children are taught to tell a knocker at the door that their parent is in the shower or bathroom when they are not home?

I know without a doubt anyone of the talk show host would say it’s a defense for their home security to re-direct incoming harm or violence. Now perhaps the guy who made the video should now be given a pardon for his parole violation, in appreciation of the Obama Administration for playing such cover for the Obama Administration that protected people in the field for a week.

It’s just foolishness that Republicans and Conservative Radio show host continue to hammer away at what Obama and his Administration knew and what he said, regardless of timing of an election. The bottom line, in your own intelligence ideals, tells you that you wouldn’t want a guy in the White House blowing cover for other people in the field and that cover stories exist to protect people.

We had a rough enough time with Obama spilling the beans by even mentioning “Seal Team 6” all over the press, hours after the supposed take down of Osama bin Laden and his mysterious burial at sea? Yes, the intelligence community was very angry about being ousted a day later rather than waiting a week or so after Obama’s Mayday, Mayday, Mayday that happened on May 1st, 2012, you recall was brought to fruition based on 60% of voters listening to Donald Trump’s pull on Obama’s forged Birth Certificate which he pulled out of his hat to squash the story. Obama's Mayday Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxFho4DQnBY

Why don’t people remember that? Osama bin Laden happened May 1st as a distraction away from the long form birth certificate Donald Trump was instrumental in pulling out of the White House after 3 years of silence, and now that has been proven a forgery by Sheriff Joe’s Cold Case Posse: a well trained and experienced law enforcement posse the report of which is now also in the United States Supreme Court case Judy v. Obama 12-5276.

Of course we know these are cover stories for Osama bin Laden, Fast & Furious, and Benghazi, but we can’t deny their legal. That is why the most important case against Obama is the one happening in the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276’s ‘Petition for Rehearing' received by the United States Supreme Court Election day about 11am, and also why you should be supporting it, and telling all your conservative friends this really does have the possibility of showcasing Obama’s illegal act of portraying himself as a natural born citizen, when he is not, and also by presenting forged documents as identity records.

Of course Obama is not a natural born citizen by the admittance of his foreign father in the first place, in much the same way Marco Rubio, Rick Santorum, or John McCain are not a natural born citizens. The Government cannot bypass the supremacy of natural law for a natural born citizen is born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents. 1) http://www.codyjudy.blogspot.com/2012/11/election-2012-what-went-wrong-reasons.html 2)http://www.codyjudy.blogspot.com/2012/10/santorum-joins-obama-mccain-in.html

No matter how hard the Government yells about being more powerful then nature, they are puny in comparison and I have stood firmly on the ground that our Constitution’s demand and qualification for the Office of President in a ‘natural born citizen’ was not something Government could possibly interfere with by an ‘Act of Congress’.

Any “What if’s” are, in my book, and the Constitution’s, ineligible: Born in the United States to Citizen Parents. It’s simple, and it is much the blame of the powerful and rich ‘egos’ of men entrenched in their own fame rather than the Constitution’s glory, in Washington DC who make it complicated in the order of boosting themselves up and tearing the United States down and in the process making a total muck of it.
You wonder why the United States of America is in such a bad need of a non-politician in Washington DC as a stall boy sent to clean house as President. That’s the truth! Can you handle it?

Rush, Sean, and Glenn’s panties are all tied up in a knot over Benghazi, Fast & Furious yet they proclaim with loud trumps to be defenders of the Constitution. Have you ever seen a minority in the United States, with the proper media attention and public showcase, who had for its defense the Constitution lose?

How many minorities brought to the Justice of the Supreme Court Decisions have become precedent or ruling cases?

Yet Rush, Sean, and Glenn who I pick on with a great deal of respect, (smile) because I think they are capable of so much more, cannot figure out how a Republican or Conservative minority can win when they are outnumbered by Democrats?

You talk about a difficult task; it’s said Elephants never forget, but getting the information into their thick head is pretty hard and that has been the challenge of the eligibility or Birther Movement when it comes to the Republican leadership. When it comes to the Republican general populous I don’t think it’s so hard, yet they even are scanty, scarce, and scroogy to come up with any cash to actually support the movement despite the plague of Obama care coming down around their necks, higher taxes, and more loss like a yoke of bondage crippling small businesses.

You know Democrats can turn out thousands to support minorities in demonstrations over night like rabbits, but when something as pivotal as removing Obama as a disability of the Constitution comes around like Judy v. Obama 12-5276 already in the United States Supreme court that challenges at the core of the election Obama’s ability to stay in the White House, Republicans and Conservatives are turtles and seem to sit on their haunches like an ass would you can’t move.

Patriots and friends, those people who I actually need help from, just as Abraham Lincoln did, so elegantly portrayed in the new movie Lincoln when at the jibber and jabber of his Cabinet seated around his desk he finally slammed his hand down and said in so many words, “By God almighty, why do I have such opposition from my friends about what can’t be done when this is what I am telling you needs to be done! "This Amendment is that cure: Our Nation needs hope and a reminder that one person can make a difference. Its people who care enough to help that are giving that hope.




Now please, I pray you, help me. Contribute your time, money, and talent in this cause. We fight, We Stand, WE DELIVER this Nation by the Constitution and we need not a majority in the General Population to win!

If you will fight for this case with your zeal, and bring it to the door with authority we will win. Of course it’s not easy, but it’s easier than losing the election to an un-constitutional brat who thinks lying and forgery are common place as a Politician. If you want integrity you have to support it.

I’m sorry about Mitt Romney’s integrity towards the Constitution, but that is not my fault. I did everything I could to point out that to Mitt Romney and his supporters and a quick look at a few dozen commercials in my campaign will leave the undeniable impression a fact to you.

Romney’s integrity towards the Constitution didn’t exist in my book and he lost because I believe he went along with the cover-up of Obama’s ineligibility of the Office republicans leadership are also entrenched in. He reached to deeply into Bill Clinton’s pant pocket pulling out the long wily note that said “It’s about the economy stupid”, knowing full well Obama could divert the attack pointing to Bush and four years wasn’t long enough.

I want you to support and to show the Congress, every last one of them that you are behind this effort and you have got to do that by contributing.

While I am extremely grateful for the dozen or so contributions towards this effort, isn’t it rather telling how willingly you are to let the Constitution go down the drain by not supporting the effort of this case in the United States Supreme Court that could make a difference in the election? We have raised about $500 and are well behind our goal of $10,000 but for all the people who profess to want Obama out of office we ought to be able to raise 1 million without blinking an eye. Contributions listed: http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2012/11/breaking-election-2012-us-supreme-court.html

If I win with the U.S. Supreme Court, Congress will have been mandated to take the case also! Now last time I checked we still had a few conservatives on the Court, unless you’re just a coward for the Constitution, you have to understand, yes, there are many conservative issues that are important and are also being litigated that you feel a need to support, but does any of them hinge on very real possibility of Obama being tossed out?
No.

That then makes this case, or should make this case of paramount importance to you as a citizen, a businessman, a professional, or as a plain and simple as it gets, an American.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4otwMXGzvac&feature=plcp

Please will you reach deep within your conservative pocket and support me? I’m asking for your support because we need to make a big impression. I’ve done all the work necessary to get the case there with very little from you, but now it’s time for you to shine and fight, and stand and deliver and to hold on to America! http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm

Please pass this on, and support my Campaign by making a contribution now, if for no other reason than the alternative is going to cost you much more later, and you can count on saving that if we win.

I haven’t gone into any Court knowing I was going to win, but I’ve never gone into a court believing I shouldn’t win. If you looked at that like any small business in America it’s the same thing.

No one starts a business knowing they are going to be successful. You work and drive and push and pull in the hope that your labors will pay off. Risk is a beautiful factor when jumping out of a perfectly good flying airplane with a parachute strapped to you. It’s very scary and frightening and exhilarating.

So join me in the rush (smile) and let’s do this because we are Americans and we all know Obama’s not eligible for the Office of the President.


Thank you!
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Contribute: http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm
Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES
FEC REGISTERED http://fec-candidates.findthedata.org/l/4426/Judy-Cody-Robert
Candidate ID P20003372
Committee ID C00501593



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4otwMXGzvac&feature=plcp

Remember our Framers and Founders in Judy v. Obama SCOTUS 12-5276

FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:


Remember our Framers and Founders in Judy v. Obama SCOTUS 12-5276

In a newly released video The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign reflects the principles and standards of our framers and founders that have been ingrained in us. This certainly presents a genuine reflecting pool for Americans to all ponder.

From one who earned a reputation as a great communicator , Ronald Reagan said, "Freedom is a fragile thing and is never more than one generation away from extinction. It is not ours by inheritance; it must be fought for and defended constantly by each generation, for it comes only once to a people. Those who have known freedom and then lost it have never known it again."

It is very easy to see that in no point in our modern history has our Constitution come under such a heavy domestic threat from the very people who have enjoyed the freedom of speech and freedom of the press.

Getting close to politicians, the press in many cases now days, must often acquiesce their stories for Government approval for the politically correct establishment of the State. While
'being in' is certainly "no sin", the price is often compromising professional journalism.

No where in our American history have we seen this placed upon the sacrificial table more then Obama's fraudulent identification transparency by the press. Indeed it may well be said in our future that "The Press" lost itself in the dis-ease of the "State" and they along with the United States Supreme Court Justices become relics to the principle they once served that was surrendered by their own hands.

Remember Framers and Founders in Judy v. Obama United States Supreme Court 12-5276

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxK7Dtn2Gx8




Cody Robert Judy reflects on his childhood and compares the demolition of his fathers house to the demolition of the United States Constitution. "Yet", he reflects, " The founding fathers built on straight and sound principles and those have been ingrained in me". The Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court Case challenges the crooked and twisted path of Obama's fraudulent identification transparency.

Cody Robert Judy continues to raise the voice of warning and fight with courage the onslaught of negativity that comes from the very people he is fighting to protect: Those who actually depend upon the Constitution but "think" they don't or that it will never change.

Asked upon where he draws the strength to continue Cody has no problem acknowledging the Creator whose blessings of love flow from Heaven like the sweetest nectar one could imagine.

"I've endeared things that I thought I couldn't endure", Cody said, " I remember twenty years ago the onslaught of abuse I received from those in power and control who kept me locked down 23 hours a day in a space as big as your everyday bathroom for nearly 4 years of my 8 years of incarceration because of the length of my hair. It didn't make the least bit of common sense but they did it every day just waiting for me to crack."

"The guards would come and mock me and tell me it was NEVER going to change; that the Supreme Court would never rule in my favor. That things were set and that's just the way it was. There were men who didn't cut their hair because of religious reasons who also had suffered this miserable cruel and unusual treatment, but I didn't sue them because of that. I sued them because it wasn't a sanitary or health care problem as they insisted, because the women inmates had a code that was one sentence long, "Women inmates can grow their hair as long as they want", it was a discrimination of gender. Something the Supreme Court agreed on and it made sense."

"Most people could understand that, but somehow someway the ones who got into powerful positions had lost their common sense. They had gone crazy and were the loons. That's a scary situation to be in and we are very close to that when it comes to the respect of our Constitution, and the understanding of exactly what freedom and liberty creates verses the lock down of an enslaved population."

"What Ronald Reagan said is very true, 'Those who have known freedom and then lost it have never known it again." Much of the press ignores the actions of Obama releasing compromised identification papers, and a host of other willful malfeasance and called it legit, and instead want to focus on my incarceration which is over on an offense of words made in a religious meeting some 20 years ago. That doesn't make any sense."

"I've told people I paid society what they wanted completely and our United States Constitution declares that we will NOT discriminate in the political arena denying people the right to vote, and in such the right to run for office, based on race, color, or previous conditions of servitude. In truth this is a great lesson on forgiveness we are pressed to understand. You don't keep asking for freight money on something that has been paid for, while some one who hasn't paid any freight, like Obama, is loading the ship up heavy and walking away with it."

"This case in the United States Supreme Court is not about me and my wrong doing, its about Obama's not telling the truth on his "Declaration of Candidacy" and the fall out from that one lie that continues to rack up points on being the biggest fraud and forgery in our history! For all intensive purposes the Utah Media is Republican.. the majority of Politicians in Utah are Republican, and this "was the place" that had no problem doing to me what they did which is consistent with the national Republican Party sweeping their own complacency under the rug of the biggest fraud and forgery case in American history. How can they deny that?"

"Now asking me how they should feel about it, is not something I care to comment about. Maybe it is something you should ask them about, because it doesn't make any sense to me? That to me is bizarre, loony, crazy, and just plain weird as it relates to the sound conservative principles of the Founders and Framers of the United States of America?"

www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube:CODE4PRES
Political Commericals: CRJ TV

Why I Took Obama to the United States Supreme Court

Why I took Obama to Court on his Eligibility?
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT DOCKETED CASE NO 12-1576 - NOTICE OF

http://www.scribd.com/doc/100696281/Judy-v-Obama-U-S-Supreme-Court-Notice-of-Docketing-Case-No-12-5276

Many people have asked me why I took Obama to Court on his eligibility. The demands of the United States Constitution for the Office of President in the United States Constitution demand a ‘natural born citizen’. Determined by the laws of nature and held in the United States Supreme Court as precedent, that means simply,” Born in the United States to citizen parents”.

The two prong test essentially eliminates “foreign” influence in the Commander-In-Chief’s position. This has been a thorn in the side of the enemies of the United States since the signing of the Constitution.

Some would say Obama’s managed okay and he hasn’t done anything wrong. Many others would look at his record and recognize in his first term a dangerous shadow and foreboding which confronts our national security both economically and militarily if Obama is allowed to propagate the simply lie he told when he witnessed on his “Declaration of Candidacy” that he was a ‘natural born citizen’.

Through the broad and warm smile of Obama’s polished white teeth is one who makes a lie, laughs, and mocks the truth. In this he defies God, and places promises of his own safety and comforts over and above others and in this the regard for the innocent is completely lost.

Perhaps Obama himself doesn’t recognize in his own denial the venom perpetrated upon his own children in such, but his own family is a victim of it; and if he’s willing to do such to his own, how much easier is it to do to yours? It certainly appears the philosophy of Obama lies is in the paradox that if you tell the lie long enough that it will become the truth to you.

I suppose the truth in my suing Obama remains that his lie came home to personally affect me, my campaign for President in 2008 and 2012, and everyone in the United States. Obama’s lie doesn’t simply affect a small pool of people around him, but traverses the entire Untied States, and affects our history, our current state, and our future generations.

That kind of a circle is something that even most elected politicians haven’t seen the gravity in ignoring nor heeded the flashing red lights and warning signs they have felt in the pit of their stomach. They have even become callused to the evidence of law enforcement investigations such as Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse who’s spent literally thousands of hours dissecting the government docs Obama has chosen to represent himself with.

The audacity of hope and change has become the audacity of cover-up and scandal in forgery-gate that makes Water-gate look like a home-made water fall in contrast with Niagara Falls.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hprNwVFF1fU&feature=fvwrel


Many also have been lulled into a sullied passivism that the enemies of the United States are incapable, incompetent, or have long been vanquished. Many in the United States have even begin holding a grudge against the United State’s goodness in favor of progressivism they hold as a mark of their own bad lot in life compared with their neighbors. The sin of coveting thy neighbor’s property is seen as the justification of spreading the wealth by force and confiscation in giving the government more and more power over the independent lives of the individual.

When you consider that in combination with the same kind of pressure from those outside the United States who also envy and seek to climb up the economic ladder by pulling someone down, you understand that the United States formidably has many enemies. These are hidden in disguise but I assure you that when the dastardly plan to wreck the United States both economically and militarily doesn’t go according to plan, those enemies will come out of hiding and there will be no further doubt in your mind.

I have no doubt that if the whole world combines against the United States solid principles of freedom and liberty which has come to be represented in our history and mark in the world, that though we may pay a heavy price for it, the union will stand. We are not built on a lie. The bedrock of the United States is as solid of truth in the eye of divine power as God is God that led the Israelites out of the bondage of Pharos’s Egypt into the bastion of freedom and liberty.

Though we may walk in the shadow of death, and hell may rage all around us, we shall fear no evil in the hand of our God-Creator clearly represented in arms of Lady Liberty statuette torch and tablets evoking the law that has come to be called the United States Constitution and our independence of July 4th,1776.

The very first thing I took courage in was seeing “76” in the last two digits of my case number in Judy v. Obama 12-1576 and the representation to me that I was TAKING A STAND for our independence mirroring the title of my book Taking A Stand- The Conservative Independent Voice.

http://www.amazon.com/s?ie=UTF8&rh=n%3A283155%2Ck%3Acody%20judy%20taking%20a%20stand&page=1

As soon as Obama made the decision to become part of something illegal and contrary to our law in the United States Constitution that was as personal as his simple “Declaration of Candidacy”, he made the choice of what side of the line he was standing on. Every opportunity has been given to him to resign his post as a ‘disability’ but he has remained boldly cowardice in his own knowledge that he is not a natural born citizen, representing himself.

I can speak with all of my faults and frailties weaknesses and imperfections solemnly, that at least I am qualified to be President of the United States of America. I represent myself in truth and there is no lie in my foundation, nor will it crack or crumble for it is eternal and made strong by the fires of Celestial Heavens where corruption and dilapidation have no hold on the vision of our future of real truth and light and where though hell may rage with the gnashing of teeth it hath no power but to bruise my heel.

Please permit my eternal gratitude to God and the instruments of the eternal promise proclaimated by our Founders, Framers, Sons of the Republic, and our first President George Washington, that this Union of the United States of America shall stand so help us God.




Please help me with your contributions to this Campaign that is courageously upholding our United States Constitution here.

http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm


My sincere condolences go out to those injured and the families of those whom were lost in the tragic shooting in Colorado. May God bless them in their recovery and grief.
Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES
CRJ TV

Newly Released Triple Recordings Cody Robert Judy Originals!

A triple Release of New Recordings written,performed and produced by Cody Robert Judy Enjoy !

Black Cat


Someone To Love



Jacqueline

Cody Robert Judy makes a comment on Orly's Q. to Newt on Politico Article

POLITICO HIGHLIGHTS

http://www.politico.com/blogs/burns-haberman/2012/02/newt-goes-positive-encounters-orly-taitz-114382.html#comments

My COMMENT on POLITICO

For all those comments that have 'jacked' the Birther Movement, which is really the Constitution's demand for a good reason, and don't tell me any of you haven't benefited enormously from The Constitution as well as realizing it’s the only doc that binds 50 States together without which we'd be looking like the Europe or Africa right now, your arguments smack of ignorance. Obama's Eligibility has never hit a Judicial Court yet on the merits, those 100 or so you all say we lost, was due in part because Obama got the jump in 2008 and no one knew he would be the nominee until late. 2012 is a little different; we head him off at the pass objecting to his being on any State Ballot.

The worst thing about the degradation of Birthers is thinking that somehow Obama has the right to use a fraudulent social security number that makes a failure in our own E-Verify System, and backs that up with that long form fabrication. I mean who are you all defending and if you’re defending them why don't you let out all of the guys in prison and protest them being in the joint that have stolen identities and defrauded people like your Grandmother!

And don’t pull that easy ‘racist’ card out like you haven’t done a days’ work in your life. I’m a plaintiff in the Georgia Case. The administrative hearing in Georgia was the very FIRST trial ever that evidence was documented on the merits of Obama’s identity fraud and dual citizenship that prohibits his White house occupancy. Now that was not really a Judicial Court but was an Administrative Court.
That action however was a necessary hurdle that we never had the opportunity to clear in 2008. You all tell me someone who jumps the gun in a race and heads off 50 yards down the track is going to win. Oh yeah, he might win the 100 yard dash, but we are gonna catch him in the 440.

Gosh, do all these Anti-Birthers have some grudge against keeping America’s elections free of corruption? Obama is not a natural born citizen and neither was McCain who lied to everyone and said he was born in some military hospital in Panama. He was born on foreign soil in a foreign hospital and it took an Act of Congress to make him a Citizen and another Act of Congress to make him a Natural Born Citizen. That’s the process we call ‘naturalization’ and it has nothing to do with the laws of nature. Yes it affects both parties and guess who promoted McCain’s Eligibility? That’s right Sen. Hillary Clinton and Sen. Barack Obama.

Now would you please tell me why, with that ounce of brain you have left that has a conscience?

And before you all pounce on me as some racist, please bear in mind that I was the only Presidential Candidate that sued McCain first… and then Obama in 2008. It is a Constitutional issue, not a racist one. So get over it and educate yourselves on the facts that we don’t want foreign allegiance in the highest office of the United States! Reason why? It’s much easier to use our nukes against our own people in a black mail game against the whole Congress, and drain the treasury. Does that sound like a National Security problem to you? Yes and it’s a BIG ONE.

Obama’s spent more now in our treasury than all President’s combined from George Washington to H.W. Bush. What? Do you all want to see the first part of that conspiracy theory come true before you’ll believe? I mean nearly 5 Trillion dollars is a heck of a big down payment on believing. Don’t tell me you wanna see a mushroom cloud in New York City. That is not cool, and neither are these attacks on Patriots who are defending the same Constitution that all of our servicemen have died for. Don’t make their sacrifice moot in the argument to conceal corruption Nixon wouldn’t have thought of doing.

Swenson Takes A Swipe at Orly's Clients on The Manning Report- Update

Update of Mr.Swensson response in Update Post I and my response in Update Post II can be seen scrolling down.

Carl Swensson Takes Obama To Court For Real
Interview of Dr. Pastor Manning with Carl Swenson represented by Hatfield Esq.
Re: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HGh2AyVfB2Q&list=UUR6prZ4gShuBbA60Cns0nVw&index=5&feature=plcp
At 2 min to 2:40 min

Comments to Video

Mr. Swensson seems a little bitter to Orly Taitz and her clients that I am apart of. Its seems a shame that Mr. Swensson would loft himself into a degenerative state about myself (Cody Robert Judy) as a Presidential Candidate when he should know the 9th Circuit ruled that Presidential candidates have the best standing to challenge the case, not to mention all the Campaign work , traveling to New York and testifying in the CIA Columbia Obama Trial in New York, and Orly happened to request all the docs first.

Code4Pres 1 second ago


Patriots attempt to deride one another in a show of superiority that isnt' consistent with the facts, we hurt the cause in general. I for one am greatful Mr. Swensson as a concerned citizen made it known through the legal channels of his State, however lest Mr. Swensson forget there are 50 states and his testimony can't be used in all 50 , mine can. Lets stay together on this folks we have a ways to go.

Code4Pres 1 sec ago in playlist Uploaded videos

Reply

Mrs. Orly Taitz has been a real champion for this fight, a thorough, and dedicated Attorney fighting not only in Georgia but also in New Hampshire along with me. I see no reason at all why in review of the hearing Orly should not be given credit for bringing upon the Judge much more weight to the Judges mind of criminal wrong doing in the eligibility of Barack Obama, making it much harder for him not to grant the Default to us, and also make clear the very important case that Obama has indeed sought to cover up his ineligibility with actions that are criminal.

Orly's arguments were slated as 3rd because they were so thorough and she had so many more expert witnesses testifying. While Mr. Hatfield's Esq. and Mr. Van Irion Esq. arguments are strictly on the natural born citizen requirement and avoid the illegal actions Obama has taken, the burden of those illegal actions are no doubt red meat on a Judges shoulders for misprision of felony and that no doubt is much harder to shuffle off in an ineligibility argument.

There can be no dispute Orly Taitz has learned through the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, that has enlightened everyone, that Presidential Candidates have greater standing than legislatures, retired military personal, active military personal,citizens, and Obama's relatives. We work very very hard on our campaigns to ensure an argument for our cause is won in "Competitive Standing" meaning we have to keep up a rigorous and demanding appearance of a competitive campaign in case the argument comes that would rival Mitt Romney's or Newt Gingrich's campaigns, but we don't have the funding they do. That means much more work on our part that we don't get paid for.

For me that has been a nice looking credible 50 page web site, having positions on just about every issue on Earth that are accessible to the media, reporting to the FEC, Fundraising,traveling, YouTube Station with 142 Commercials and Video as an authority on the eligibility issue since 2008 and law suits on both candidates in 2008 that took up a tremendous amount of time and money, Amicus Curia's filed in the Supreme court and on behalf of Lt. Col Terry Lakin, and much more including responding to questions from every lobbyist organization on the planet.

The fact that Mr. Swenson doesn't really know me kinda shows us all that he's maybe doing what he accused me as a Presidential Candidate of doing, "grandstanding".

The biggest difference is, I've got a lot of battle scars from the front lines since 2008 that Mr. Swenson hasn't even seen. I am the only Presidential Candidate running in 2012 who remains out of the class of 2008 that has formally charged Mr. Obama as ineligible in the entire United States. I've got Obama's tire tracks run over me allready in 2008, I don't need yours too.

Please Mr. Swensson, please tell me you at least read Mrs. Taitz argument and that a good portion of the reason I am listed on the complaint is because the Democrat Party Leaders refused to put me on the ballot, and hopefully that is not only rectified judicially, but is articulated any time you speak about me again when it comes to this case.

Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES


Post Note I. - Jan. 27th 2012:

From: prevere@riseupforamerica.com
To: codyjudy@HOTMAIL.COM
CC: atlah1@aol.com; pb_realestate@yahoo.com; dean@deanhaskins.com; htansey@t-room.us
Subject: RE: Swenson Bad Mouths Orly's clients on Manning Report
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:19:01 -0500


Dear Cody Judy,

I do have regrets that I mentioned her and her case in a negative way and can offer no excuse since any difference I have must be delivered in person. That situation did not occur yesterday though I was fully prepared for that. What you saw was my frustration at not being able to deliver that message.

As to what went on yesterday… It has taken 2 years of constantly getting before my State reps with special emphasis on Brian Kemp, to get these challenge hearings established which he did. For that I will forever be in his debt as a voter and now staunch supporter. His assigning this Judge meant a very special alignment of the stars had just occurred and the opportunity to get, on open record, the issue of nbC status which we did. That has been and remains the focus of my efforts. Remember, this was a challenge hearing, not a court case. Orly did use this as a platform to get her issues on record but has never acknowledged the hard work of others to make this day happen. Yeah, I find that a bit disconcerting and again, that’s unfortunately, what came out.

My thinking, whether some feel it’s flawed or not, is to take the direct approach to get him off the ballot based on the only pleadings that could be applicable in this hearing. If or once that occurs, the criminal issues will necessarily follow and that is where She can do the most good. ALL the records are now entered into evidence and both Mark and Van did a masterful job of crafting them submitting them and entering them. Both were extremely careful to draw the line of separation between what we were doing and what Orly intended to do. Only Mark put forth the motion to shift the burden of proof from the Plaintiff’s to the Defense and that has yet to be ruled on. If we get a favorable ruling on that one point alone, all future Pres. Candidates will have to put up or shut up when seeking their name placement on GA’s ballot.

So, in closing, I’d like to offer you my apology for making the derogatory statement concerning her actions in court. I reduced myself in that moment. We are all in this fight and I agree this type of infighting is uncalled for. My bad.

Please share with everyone on your list.

Sincerely,

Carl Swensson

Post Note II Jan. 27th, 2012:

Dear Mr. Swensson,

As for me, I appreciate so much all the efforts you and those associated with you gave to the defense of our Constitution Jan 26th,2012, and all the time that you have put forth in this effort for as long as you have.

It certainly is my only desire to encourage everyone to do the same. As I said, we have a long way to go and a few more States are necessary for sure. Not all the States have the same laws as Georgia, in which case as we did in New Hampshire it required going into open court which is much more expensive and time consuming.

Hopefully we all can work together. I accept your apology and hope that you will remove from your web site the dis-spirited remark you made of Mrs. Taitz ( That she was embarrassing which as the second inconsideration I saw associated with you) in the consideration that we have 50 States to go and the efforts of all our attorneys are deeply appreciated. We can't afford to fall into the trap of calling each other the names that the media calls us. We all have our weaknesses and we should not prey upon one another in this manner.

Certainly the matter of separating the cases is a legal position your attorneys can take, but I feel strongly that dis-association with each other will not help our cause, or enable us to proceed faster.

I will forward your sincerity with appreciation to you. As far as I am concerned the matter is closed and the only reason I was moved to make a defense about it is because it was made a YouTube Video and that record will remain forever. We can't erase it so many copies get down loaded and transferred to other sights that its impossible to contain. I wouldn't have made the effort I did in making it a BLOG piece of mine if that wasn't the case.

Unfortunately when we estrange each other in these situations it is all used against us by the opposition. We really need to keep in mind that we are all under the banner of our Constitution and the Glory of each of all our efforts be to God. For in this light we will prevail and he will prepare the way before us making us strong where we are weak.

I admired and applauded the many interviews you did and featured them very profoundly in our efforts together positively. This is my best wish for you and I hope you for me because together we are stronger.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icENBpyzmVQ&list=UUymbINcxgM2q9HBmY2VnKdw&index=2&feature=plcp

Sincerely
Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
YouTube: CODE4PRES




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: prevere@riseupforamerica.com
To: codyjudy@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: Swenson Bad Mouths Orly's clients on Manning Report
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:21:51 -0500


I have posted my public apology to Orly on my web site and highlighted it so that all will be sure to see it. Crow for breakfast, crow for lunch.., look forward to a regular meal.
http://riseupforamerica.com
I must now make a Public apology for words I used, in a deragatory fashion, concerning Patriot Orly Taitz. We all make mistakes and that one was a real boner on my part. I do hope Orly will accept my apology as we are ALL in this fight together
Carl

The good Lord has nothing but good to say about our eating crow. God Bless you Mr. Swensson, it takes a bigger man to apologize than to hold tight that which makes us small.

Cody Robert Judy

Cody Robert Judy asked, "Is the Democrat Party Doomed in light of Georgia?"

Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S. C. Eligibility Campaign is the campaign committee honored to represent Cody Robert Judy who is also a patriot courageously standing up for the Constitution in the Atlanta Georgia Obama Eligibility Hearings represented by Orly Taitz, as a Democrat in the disregard of the demands of the Constitution by Barack Obama.

Proceedings in the hearing were concluded around 11 am Jan. 26th, 2012 and Cody Robert Judy twittered comments regarding the proceeding during the hearing which can be viewed at www.codyjudy.blogspot.com .

For a reporters view of the hearings:

A very good blow by blow of the hearing held is found here

Also,Dr. Jerome R. Corsi of WND reported on the hearing here:

http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/georgia-court-told-obama-slam-dunk-disqualified/
Sharon Rondeau reported from the Post & Email here:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/01/26/georgia-ballot-hearing-under-way/

From the Huffington Post we see a head line that was searing in its nature about the contempt Obama has for the rule of law-
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/23/obama-birther-case-georgia_n_1225304.html
Obama Birther Case In Georgia Unlikely To Bring The President, Despite Judge's Order.

“I was sadly disappointed for America to see the arrogance of Obama and his attorney to boycott the hearing after responding with a “motion to quash the Subpoena” on record and a second attempt to run around the whole proceeding with a document letter to Georgia Sec. of State Kemp which also was responded to.” , said Mr. Judy.

When asked about how the Democrat Party should feel about Obama’s boycott, “ As far as the Democrat Party is concerned I am embarrassed about Obama’s behavior in a very simple request to produce some documents that have never been produced and to address the concerns I have represented in my complaint along with Georgia Citizens. Obviously not all Democrats boycotted the hearing, I was there represented and I feel representing the Constitution for the Democrat Party. Remember we are all Americans under the Constitution.”

“The concern I have is that all of America will think that the Democrat Party is representing an example of snubbing a court of law if things don’t go your way with a couple of motions you get denied, that is not the case, and Obama is not representing the values and principles of America the Democrat Party is accustom to representing.” Cody Robert Judy said.

When the Democrat Candidate for President was asked what he thought would be the outcome of the hearing he said, “Well, if I were in the Judges place and I realized first hand Obama’s attorney had responded to the Subpoena and also been warned by the Secretary of State in Georgia that boycotting the hearing might be a bad idea, I would have to consider all the evidence presented on its face value as un-challenged by Obama and or his representative Attorney and thusly fact if it was comprehensive to law and rational understanding. In that light, not only recommend Obama not be allowed on the ballot due to his ineligibility of not being a natural born citizen, but I would have to certify my contention that a criminal investigation was needed due to the crimes being represented in social security fraud, identity fraud or perhaps be guilty of misprision of felony myself.”

“It seems Obama has no empathy or moral code to throw as many people under the bus as he can. Those who have been run over find themselves having to go along or be tried for sedition or treason themselves. This narcissism knows no bounds and victimizes everyone around him including very sadly his family.”

“If it hasn’t become clear to the American People by now it should be very clear now that we have in the White House a man who not only is not qualified, but has known he was not qualified, and made every effort to make us think otherwise. This is the essence of fraud, forgery, and deceit. If the leadership of the Democrat Party continues to align itself with such principles it will find itself extinct. I have offered a reasonable choice and extended my hand for the sound principles America was built on and to represent to everyone the Democrat Party is alive and well with the standard of the Constitution.”

“I would encourage all Democrats to see the writing on the wall and understand the Titanic did sink when it struck the iceberg that was infinitely bigger than the ship. As such our Constitution and America and all those who have died and do now fight for our Constitution is infinitely bigger than the corruption of Obama’s actions as one man.”

“It is time to jump into the life boats, and begin representing a clear and Constitutional choice in my candidacy, which is clearly a clean message compared to the mainstream Republican Candidates who we see are very willing to sweep the dirt under the carpet, as well as our Constitution, and that’s not the President’s job or oath!”




Cody Robert Judy website can be seen at www.codyjudy.us , his blog www.codyjudy.blogspot.com , and 142 videos on his YouTube Station CODE4PRES.
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES

WND Breaking News Cody Robert Judy for Pres 2012 Wins Subpoena Battle w Obama

Boy the last few days have been BIG DAYs... GOOD DAYs!



The campaign was featured at The Post and Email in the BLOG OF THE DAY-http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/01/19/what-are-competitive-standing-and-the-political-doctrine-question-in-obamas-q/
, which is a very nice honor as they receive so many.

The campaign was also featured in another publication World Net Daily (WND.com):here


1- Jan 3rd 2012 Obama must be Constitutionally Eligiblehttp://www.wnd.com/2012/01/court-obama-must-be-constitutionally-eligible/

2- Jan 18th 2012 Obama argues against appearing at eligibility hearinghttp://www.wnd.com/2012/01/obama-argues-against-appearing-at-eligibility-hearing/

3- Jan 20th 2012 Judge regects Obama demand to quash subpoenahttp://www.wnd.com/2012/01/judge-rejects-obama-demand-to-quash-subpoena/

In an effort to help Americans understand more of what was happening with our Campaign the following email exchanges were made between Mr. Judy and Mr. Unruh. We publish these as a matter of record for all to see so that we don't have to keep responding to individuals who are asking us why Cody Robert Judy doesn't contain a link in the WND articles, which is just basically a consideration of professional consideration in a Presidential Election that would help people link Cody Robert Judy's name with at the very least a link to his web site www.codyjudy.us

We at the here at the Cody Robert Judy Camp would also like to give a BIG SHOUT OUT to Orly Taitz Esq. for a great job in representing Cody with great American Zeal in the Opposition to the Motion to Quash the Subpoena. Obama's attorney got a little quiver in his lip as the Judge denied his Motion with his bully and defamation tactics which were disgusting.

Of course these are small battles and victories but they are moving in the right direction and we certainly can share her celebration for the Constitution's Principles we endeavor to defend as a Plaintiff in the case Farrer v. Obama.




From: codyjudy@hotmail.com
To: runruh@wnd.com
Subject: Again? Will you Please link my name? FW: Your story Obama argues against appearing at eligiblity hearing
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 02:42:17 +0000


Dear Mr. Unruh,

Well, thanks for the updated story however you did it again , not having the courtesty to place a link on my name as a Plaintiff at www.codyjudy.us , and this time you made it sound like all of Mrs. Taitz Plaintiffs are Georgia Citizens...

http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/judge-rejects-obama-demand-to-quash-subpoena/
I'd really appreciate your understanding that this is not "all " about Obama being taken off the ballot, but also allowing "other Democrat Candidates" on the ballot. I have been denied on the ballot. A reading of the Complaint makes that very clear but your story is really missing entirely this angle of the complaint.

Thank you for your consideration in this and your attention to the last email I sent you that you promised to address this morning.

Sincerely
Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: runruh@wnd.com
To: codyjudy@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: Your story Obama argues against appearing at eligiblity hearing
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:27:58 -0700


thanks for your note. am swamped with assignments that need to get finished tonight right now. will take a look first thing in the morning. regards. bob
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: cody judy [mailto:codyjudy@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 6:59 PM
To: WND Rpt Unruh; WNDCEO
Subject: Re: Your story Obama argues against appearing at eligiblity hearing



RE: Obama argues against appearing at eligibility hearing


Dear Mr. Unruh;

Thank you so much for covering the story entitled "Obama argues against appearing at eligibility hearing". Your article was very well understood, the approach, and angle appreciated.

Mr. Unruh, this article represents the second article that my name, Cody Judy, ( I prefer Cody Robert Judy which is also listed in the body of pleadings from my attorney Orly Taitz, as an honor to my father who also served in the army, and to distinguish me from others with the same name.) has been mentioned in the context of the article as a Plaintiff in Farrar v. Obama, which I really appreciate also. I'm running a campaign for President and have been working very hard on exposure and building this campaign for the last 6 months.

If at all possible, I was wondering if you would be so kind as to insert a link on my name at www.codyjudy.us , just as a service for people to see my campaign site, platform, and get to know me a little better at their discretion?

You know I was published today at the Post & Email and received the honor post of BLOG-OF-THE-DAY over there and what I wrote in that article I'd really appreciate your taking the time to read, if at all possible, because you should know after 68 cases dismissed it "Takes a Good Plaintiff ", and I am a good Plaintiff for Orly Taitz for many reasons, a few I mention in this article.

Of course it takes a good lawyer too, but without the Plaintiff there is no case for the Lawyer, and with Obama sitting in the White House you can bet the Judges are doing a little research on the Plaintiffs on their own.

We need to band together as Birthers and help one another fight for our Constitution, and people need to know who they can support that is taking on Obama with "Competitive Standing" don't you think? Some people don't even know what that is or how a candidate achieves it.

Please read this article and I'd be very happy to answer any questions you may have that might come of it.

http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/01/19/what-are-competitive-standing-and-the-political-doctrine-question-in-obamas-q/

I'm not sure if just being a Democrat and standing up within the Democrat Party is such a bad thing to WND that they haven't mentioned my campaign or if its just because I haven't been elected before, but it would really be an appreciated gesture if WND could at least place a link on my name to my web site for those who are curious and would like to know more.

Of course they can google it if they are interested to, .. I understand that, but I just think that it would say something about WND if they just gave a little respect to those standing up in this case for all of America.

WND has been a leader in the Birther Movement and has spent millions of dollars in campaigns for the public eye and I for one have appreciated that so much I've even featured the Bill Board Campaign and some articles on my Station!

There are expenses to a campaign as your well aware of no matter what, and those expenses must be absorbed by contributors or the candidate. So far I'm the one absorbing the cost as I've only had $435 worth of contributions which doesn't even pay phone bill for 6 months, but I am very greatful for them coming in from TX, NC, NY, MIN.,AZ.,CA.,UT.,FL.,WA.,WY. These are meaningful contributions coming from folks who care a great deal about our Country and our Constitution in tough times. I ask God to bless every one who makes an effort to help and it touches my heart to read notes within them.., " don't let us down", " keep fighting ", " We are behind you".

As far as time goes it has been all consuming even though you may not have heard of my campaign: The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign. I have put so much work into it building my web site, making commercials. I mean it takes a week to outline,shoot, an edit a commercial and I have 141 on my YouTube Station CODE4PRES, most of them dealing with the usurpation of Obama.

Thank you so much for taking the time out of your day to read this, I appreciate it.

Sincerely

Cody Robert Judy

The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign

www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

YouTube: CODE4PRES


Latest Video- Here's My Subpoena for Obama Where's Yours Congress?





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07hH-ZbdnxM&feature=related

What are Competitive Standing and the Political Doctrine Question in Obama’s Q?

What are Competitive Standing and the Political Doctrine Question in Obama’s Q?

“We The People” must consider and ascertain how a small minority is capable of moving a majority. The secret of the Republic for which we stand is indeed bound in our Constitution, but there are weapons that also embolden the mob against the individual in the perfect storm of legal terminology: “Competitive Standing” and “The Political Doctrine Question” are double edged swords.

If anyone thought that Republicans , Democrats or Independents in the back of their mind did not appreciate the Constitution’s base that allowed both a private land owner to tell 300 million others to get off his property with a ‘no trespassing sign’ Amend. IV., as it also is protecting the civil right of a women, a black man or someone with prior servitude on record to vote against the cry of gender bias, the mob, or the indignation of holier-than-thou Christians picking up stones against a debt that had been paid to society Article XV. - We all have reasons to stand up for the Constitution no matter what party affiliation we are from.

When it comes down to it Americans would fall on their face against the mob pitted against independence in many areas of our life that we all too often may take for granted. As we head into the 2012 Election Year unchartered waters make for dangerous tides to navigate on the Constitutional Eligibility demand for President Obama as is relevant in the Georgia Trial scheduled January 26th, 2012.

Those who have been involved affectionately in the Birther Movement or Article II Patriot Stand, which is bigger than the Tea Party as statistics have repeatedly shown us,( http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0211/49554.html ) know that in 2008 many law suits were dismissed on the basis of “Standing”. Those who were not in the Presidential race spun out as Citizens demanding from the race a qualified candidate, and there were very few actual Presidential Candidates who had the courage to take a stand against Obama.

By the time Obama was made a nominee for the Democrat Party his wheel was running so fast no one could stop it so many people were involved in yielding the sound ground of the Constitution up. That included all U.S. Senate Republicans who in 2008 saw fit to give Sen. John McCain non-binding U.S. Senate Resolution 511 that was co-sponsored by Sen. Hillary Clinton and Sen. Barack Obama of the Democrat controlled U.S. Senate, declaring McCain a natural born citizen.

This was the second Congressional Action needed to allow Sen. McCain to run for President. The first was a special Congressional Act needed to first declare him a Citizen of the U.S. by naturalization from his birth hospital of Panama when he was 11 months old.

The irony of getting the Republicans help to actual insulate Obama from eligibility permeated Republicans down to V.P. Dick Cheney not asking for objections in the Electoral Vote Count in Congress which is documented well here: YouTube: Elector Vote Count
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcGt8hQZzg4&feature=related

Understanding this is crucial to understanding why main stream Republican Candidates refused to pick up the duty towards the Constitution as Candidates for President in 2008 and Judges in the Judicial Branch of the Government in charge of interpreting the Constitution took an obvious cowardice stance to what had taken place in the Legislative Branch. One of the ways justice became water in the Justices hands is termed the Political Question Doctrine.

The political question doctrine encourages courts to decline to rule in certain categories of controversial cases. The theory portends, a court acknowledges that the Constitution might have been violated but declines to act in a see-no-evil, hear-no-evil, do-no-evil crouch. It is often described as a type of judicial restraint, although it can be considered a form of judicial activism against plaintiffs whose rights have been violated and find their cases dismissed.

In the insight of “Standing” we learned from 2008 recently in 2011 of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals that Presidential Candidates who are in the race have the best standing and, active military personnel; former military personnel; state representatives; federal taxpayers; relatives of President Obama did not.

The remaining category “Presidential Candidates” were basically summarily denied because they failed to challenge soon enough for the court to provide redress before the U-Haul pulled up to the White House unloading Obama’s things in it and living there 3 years; citing it would be impossible for the Federal Courts to grant removing him from office. The Court basically giving Obama’s imminent domain of the White House illegally standing over and above the Constitution with the political question doctrine.

My name is Cody Robert Judy and I ran for President in 2008 suing both McCain and Obama and I am currently the only candidate in 2012 who did so and is still in the fight against Obama’s eligibility in Court as well as in Public.

The arguments of not objecting to Obama as Candidates in 2008 will plague candidates legally who are standing up against him in 2012 for the popularity of running for office in all parties Republican, Democrats and Independents but that is the second hole to the media calling them racist, and Obama’s attorneys calling them out as non-completive candidates in a legal concept termed “Competitive Standing”.

This covers two areas: The first is the fact that Republicans and Independents actually have nothing to do with the Democrats until after each have selected their National Candidate. So the courts receiving complaints from a republican candidate could say that the complaint is not ripe for hearing and dismiss the case until the Republicans decided who was going to be their nominee.

The second area considers the breadth and width of a candidate’s campaign that could actually sustain damages warranting relief. How many thousands of dollars have been contributed to the candidate, how many campaign commercials does the candidate have, how professional is the web site, and how big is the structure of the campaign in scope of competitiveness.

This has been the reason for such hard work at my campaign to make and establish the parameters of a national campaign with commercials specifically addressing key states and primaries applicable to the race within the Democrat Party against Obama, because ultimately there is not one Republican Candidate standing up for the Eligibility of Obama whose going to become the Republican Nominee and win that parties nomination. That’s a reality we all can agree on.

Now consider the opposite happening in the Democrat Party with myself. What happens if because of my objections to Obama since 2008 and in the Democrat party he is disqualified from being on a State Ballot and an ensuing domino affect actually takes him completely out of the race, and out of the White House?

Do you think that anyone working for Obama as Secretary of State or in his Cabinet that has stood by and watched him work destroying the Constitution is going to receive any Independent votes or Republican Vote that is necessary to win an election? Anyone on Obama’s coat tails is gonna have no chance in competing nationally, however I would.

I would have the Democrat Party shaped up in an instant for my stand against Obama, and I would be courting the Independent vote and Republican Vote based on their candidates silence on a matter of the biggest fraud and national security threat that has faced our Nation since Pearl Harbor. That defines “Competitive Standing” in my favor and with 141 Campaign Commercials and Videos about me and my campaign featured on my YouTube station: CODE4PRES with a comparison of say Mitt Romney’s current 98 videos and campaign commercials, my campaign is competitive.

This is information that should be considered because it is very relevant in the success that we Birthers or Article II Patriots are going to have in the defense of our Constitution. I hope that it will indeed sway support for those who want to see our Constitution win the eligibility contest as they consider the different candidates to support and the reasons for that support.

I am and have been a Plaintiff represented by Orly Taitz Esq., in the New Hampshire Supreme Court Challenge as well as the Georgia Trial that is set to take place January 26th, 2012 that has trumped Obama’s Motion to Dismiss and warranted a Subpoena issued by a Judge that Obama received for his documents.

Mrs. Taitz is doing a tremendous job and is representing me pro bono and I encourage those wanting to contribute to her justice foundation to do so if possible, but please don’t forget by Obama’s count 68 cases have been concluded based on plaintiffs with no standing, plaintiffs in the wrong party, plaintiffs without competitive standing, so it takes a good Plaintiff to make a case. Your support is all a part of making a good Plaintiff.

By supporting my candidacy your dollars are going to count for “Standing” that is Competitive, and has insulation against the racist charge being flung at the Birther Movement, because I am and have the longest running challenge to Obama’s Eligibility in the entire United States of America. That is very unique to say, so say it a few times and let it sink in.

The message that will be sent to Washington D.C. by sending Cody Robert Judy ( me) there will be one of Restoring our Republic for which we all pledge our allegiance.
Those who would like to visit my web site, catch the 3 Ropes of my Platform, and see the work I’ve done legally are welcome and please make your contribution to a campaign that has been going since before Republican Gov. Rick Perry got in the race and has outlasted Rep. Michelle Bachmann, Gov. Jon Huntsman, Gov. Gary Johnson, and Businessmen Herman Cain campaign and all the money that was contributed to those campaigns.

We at this Campaign are pulling teeth and working so very hard to Defend our Constitution providing a Vision To Believe In - www.codyjudy.us Thank you for your time and your consideration.

Make a contribution now.
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES