Breaking Report: Do U.S. Supreme Court Justices Owe Americans an Opinion on Natural Born Citizen?

Breaking Report: 
Featured at Post & Email

Do U.S. Supreme Court Justices Owe?

 Justices Owe Americans an Opinion on Natural Born Citizen?

Judy v. Obama 14-9396

The [natural born Citizen] qualification for the Office of the President is not the same as the [Citizen] requirement for U.S. Senators or Representatives. The Qualifications encoded in the U.S. Constitution directly give them a Special Priority in the accountability of the U.S. Supreme Court Justices duty in a Life Tenure. The differing opinions in Constitutional Scholarly Opinions even differ, as does the opinion of every American Citizen judge giving their opinions on Facebook as fact of Law. The differing opinions are not new, however what is relatively new is the application of the qualification in the modern Political Arena affecting Americans now in three major Presidential Elections of 2008, 2012, and now 2016 with Cruz, Rubio, Jindal, McCain, Obama. and the problem is particularly affecting millions of Americans right now in many different ways as well as Candidates, so the question is: Do the U.S. Supreme Court Justices owe America an Opinion on the definition of [natural born Citizen] particularly in the Race for the U.S. Presidency?

There is only one Presidential Candidate in America that has a Bi-Partisan Federal Court Record in the defense of the [natural born Citizen] qualification for the Office of the President who has been a Candidate in every one of the last three Presidential Elections and that is Cody Robert Judy. Bi-Partisan means he has sued both major parties- The Republicans in McCain and The Democrats in Obama. He also has two Cases appealing for an Opinion in the high U.S. Supreme Court ie Case No. 12-5276 and 14-9396.

Cody says, " I do believe the U.S. Justices owe Americans an Opinion. Any Constitutional Scholar will tell you the difficulty that exist in getting a Case like mine, with two Presidential Candidates in the same party, running for the same office, which fulfills the difficult the standing requirement to the U.S. Supreme Court and preferably without an Election hanging in the Balance, but that is exactly what I've done in Judy v. Obama 14-9396."

"Obama has been in office 7 years now. He has every benefit of really being defacto President. He's enjoyed the White House, decision making, the good, bad, and the ugly of the Office. I on the other hand have not and have suffered the damages Obama's being in that Office illegally has caused. No one really wants to look at the damages of the illegal usurpation upon someone like myself, but they are significant and accountable damages and I have brought those to the attention of the Court in a lawful manner I don't think anyone could say the way I've brought those to the Court was not in an honorary, civil, and gentleman's way."

"The problem is that the problem is not going away. If you have read my law suit which is only about 15 pages in single lines, you understand that the questions are asked that indeed are affecting U.S. Senator Cruz, U.S. Senator Marco Rubio, Governor Bobby Jindal, U.S. Sen. John McCain, and U.S. Senator Barack Obama and cover 3 Presidential Elections. It is not easy in the ripening doctrine of Case litigation to be around for a decision from the U.S. Supreme Court. In average cases 7 years is not a far stretch of the imagination to get a case to the U.S. Supreme Court as was recently exampled from Proposition 8 to national gay marriage."

Indeed the problems caused by the broad based scope of interpretation by politicians seizing upon their own popularity rather than the narrow directive articulated quite plainly in Art. II, Section I, Clause 5 is not localized to just Presidential Candidates but has affected every Citizens Contribution to or for any Presidential Candidate.

The Constitution plainly states two types of qualifications for the Office of the President. One type was for those who were distinguished revolutionary patriot [Citizen]s such as were at the time of the Adoption of the Constitution. The other, an incentive to propagate the new American Nations, and also to avoid foreign influence, or the [natural born Citizen] articulated selectively as [born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] as these are the [natural born Citizens] as was held in the precedent findings of Minor v. Happersett. These are noticed in a quick 2 minute video by the CRJ Campaign entitled a Constitutional Reckoning here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITCr420K4i8

We asked Cody what he felt worst about, his own losses or the losses of those Contributing to Presidential Campaigns under the presumption the Candidate would be qualified to hold the Office if elected?

"This has probably been mine own worst nightmare. Contributions have meant so much to my Campaign because they have been so rare. When someone sent me $2, or $10, or one time I received $200 I knew there was a real trust in those dollars for our Constitution and especially in my Stands and noticed U.S. Supreme Court Cases for the [natural born Citizen] qualification to be upheld."

"Although the contributions to my Campaigns have been few, they held great weight on my shoulders, but it just wasn't the Contributions to my campaign I was counting. I also counted those who trusted other Presidential Candidates to actually be qualified for the Office. If I knew the Candidates they had contributed to were not constitutionally qualified, that was a contribution collected in a deceptiveness or fraudulent way."

The campaign collection of Candidates who are still questionably qualified under the U.S. Constitution's Standards range:
Sen. John McCain Total: 368 Million
Sen. Barack Obama: 730 Million (2008)  964 Million (2012)
Sen. Ted Cruz: 39 Million
Sen. Marco Rubio: 17 Million
Gov. Bobby Jindal: 1 Million

Total: 2,119 Billion

"It seems incomprehensible to me", said Cody, "that the U.S. Supreme Court Justices would not see the great responsibility to clear up the definition to an over 2 Billion dollar potential or alleged abuse of American's contribution dollars to illegal or unqualified Presidential candidates.

 "Its like they have no conscience! Remember that is not counting the dollars to candidates who were qualified under the two generation accountability of [born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents], but only the ones that were not. To understand the cognitive dissonance of the Justices is to recite that my case relatively claimed 40 Million in damages of time, talent, and money in elections 2008 and 2012 and their opinion did not count or ask them to disqualify a Candidate from Office but only recognize the [damages] giving the responsibility to Congress to remove if deemed necessary. That's pretty important, and relative to the damages of 2 Billion upon Americans 40 Million is a drop in the bucket, but indeed is able to affect the future of Campaign Contributions as well as Presidential Campaigns. But let's not forget about the 10 Trillion added to the national debt by Obama?"

"If we consider the U.S. Supreme Court Justices accountable to the U.S. Constitution, yet allowing this under-handed fraud to go on in broad daylight, until say the whole election comes rushing in like Gore v. Bush did on counting chads only it has to do with the [natural born Citizen] qualification, how much more difficult is that as far as the Union of our Nation? And what kind of a responsibility is it to refuse my Case based on a $300 dollar filing fee and approximated $4,500 printing cost, I did not have the money for as I showed them in Review with Bank Statements and my 5 page forma pauperis motion granted in fact by the Utah District Court and the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals?"

We are seeing the damages that are being done to U.S. Senator Ted Cruz's campaign for President by the simple assertion from Mr. Donald J. Trump's Campaign that he is not qualified. This is not the Court's opinion officially but the question that remains unanswered by the U.S. Supreme Court. Of course Sen. Cruz was invited along with Mr. Rubio to file a Amicus Curiae April 27th 2014 which is a friend of the Court, assisting in relativity of affect in the decision in favor or against the action.

We have seen in real time how the trial in public court has affected Sen. Cruz negatively as we look at his Poll Numbers in Iowa where he started to surge against Mr. Trump at times  until Mr. Trump began questioning Cruz's eligibility because he was doing better.

It just seems obvious that the U.S. Supreme Court should handle this question and with a Case in front of them that only needs a reversal of the Motion for forma pauperis it seems a real dis-service to the Nation and all of the contributions Americans make to the Presidential Candidates not to protect those contributions now and in the future.

Thank You America for the 340,000 Views on this Blog!

The only Presidential Candidate in America with a bi-partisan Federal Court Record on the [natural born Citizen] clause in defense of it can't afford the printing and filing cost to the U.S. Supreme Court. What's wrong with this picture America?

America, we are in need of a Contribution Revolution! Wont' you now Take a Stand with me? We would like to thank publicly The POST & EMAIL today for recognizing in a story our hard work!

Here's my ‪#‎songoftheday‬ for your ‪#‎Mondaymadness‬ https://youtu.be/uFxF6UkpuWk

Here's the Link to Contribute if you'd like to improve your record for Taking A Stand for the Constitution. www.codyjudy.us Directhttp://codyjudy.us/i…/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm

It's not a prank, or a joke, or a thrill. It's a Crime and it's Time America takes a Stand for the Man whose been preserving, protecting, and defending the Constitution's natural born Citizen Clause as a hero for all Americans and our Future-
 CRJ TODAY FOR A BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW.


My Writ before the Court has not been denied. Please read these post for a detail of why my Forma Pauperis Motion has been denied.

Cody Robert Judy

D-Candidate for President 2016

BIRTHER Pie-In-The-Sky U.S. Supreme Court



The Challenge was issued on Cody Robert Judy's Twitter Account and sent to several Major Media Outlets.

Thank You!
CRJFacebookPersonal

CRJFacebookPres2016 JOIN US!


CRJTwitter
Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy

The CRJ TODAY for a BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW


Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.

Web Site www.codyjudy.us

We want to thank you for the 330,000 views on this Blog!

Keep coming back!

Blog: www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

INSPIRING - I believe in You

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI

Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

WHY DO PEOPLE LIKE CODY ROBERT JUDY (CRJ)?

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

Cody Robert Judy's book :
Taking A Stand- the Conservative Independent Voice.




Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION


1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts

12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial

13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008

14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case

15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

BREAKING REPORT : BIRTHER BIRTHER U.S. SUPREME COURT BIRTHER PIE-IN-THE-SKY - Best Serving America

BIRTHER BREAKING REPORT :

~U.S. SUPREME COURT BIRTHER Pie-In-The-Sky !~

Best Serving America

Over the last few days America has been thrust into the Birther World yet again with lead Polling Republican Presidential Candidate Donald Trump, who seems the perfect anti-establishment Porcupine- touch him and you will get a quill shot into you- attacking Presidential Candidate and U.S. Senator Ted Cruz on questions of his eligibility, or Constitutional authority to assume the Office of President should he be elected to it.

Mr. Trump has highlighted the facts that Senator Cruz was not born in America and his parents appear to both be Canadian Citizens at the time of Cruz's birth, which is the Time Frame required for the establishment of [natural born Citizen]. Cruz's mother was a U.S. Citizen at the time of her birth however may have been under her adopted Canadian Citizenship at the time of her son's birth as Canada required an oath of allegiance to work there, which may have been the reason Ted Cruz's father opted out of his native born Cuban Citizenship. Cruz only formally disavowed his Canadian Citizenship due to his desire to run for U.S. President.  

No documentation has provided proof that Cruz's mother was not a Canadian Citizen at the time of Cruz's Birth. New Treasures by Googling BIRTHER have over the last few days proven worth its weight in Gold. 

U.S. Senator John McCain opined the issue with Cruz was a legitimate concern and not illegitimate to look into. U.S. Representative Nancy Pelosi chimed in the [natural born Citizen] qualification was an open door in the consideration of Ted Cruz. The White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest weighed in that he didn't know if Obama was taking a side on the issue but he was enjoying it after Obama's grief about being born in Kenya.

The common thread between Obama and Cruz of course is that of the disqualifying factor that both do not have fathers who were [Citizen] of the U.S. at the time of their birth. The dissimilarity is Obama claims he was born in Hawaii and Cruz birth is affirmed in Canada. Of course Obama provided a long form birth Certificate in 2011 after Mr. Trump took credit of picking Obama's own quill out of him but it only confirmed Obama was not [Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] the definition of [natural born Citizen] the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed in Minor v. Happersett was never in doubt. Mr. Judy's appeal dealt with the lower Courts in contradiction with the precedent case.

Despite the Main Stream Media's ploy that the Principle Definition has been settled the fact remains McCain and Pelosi have got it right on this- its unsettled by the U.S. Supreme Court with two Presidential Candidates at odds against each other, both standing to lose a great deal based on the Principle definition observed in the Constitution Requirement.

The U.S. Supreme Court just two months ago DENIED a Motion for Forma Pauperis by a Presidential Candidate, Cody Robert Judy, the only Candidate for President in America with a bi-partisan Federal Court Record appealing the Principle on first McCain in 2008 and respectfully Obama in 2012 Case No. 12-5276 and '13 as well as 2014 Judy v. Obama 14-9396. 

In a YouTube Video released Today by Cody Robert Judy's Campaign ,CRJ Today for a Better America Tomorrow, Cody rehearses the 'bad behavior' displayed by the U.S. Supreme Court in denying his Motion for Forma Pauperis as a excuse not to hear his Writ of Certiorari based on:

1- The Federal Form being a 12 month Form
2-The U.S. Supreme Court granting his Motion in 2012 and 2013 Review
3-The District Court granting the Grant for Forma Pauperis in 2014
4-The Tenth Circuit Court granting the Forma Pauperis for a Review on Appeal.
5-The Fact the U.S. Supreme Court did not cite Rule 39.8 as a guideline for Denial of the 2014 Motion. 

Mr. Judy rehearses the Massive amount of money expended in the Main Stream Media on the eligibility question now in Ted Cruz's behalf and contrast that, if the U.S. Supreme Court handled the definition of [natural born Citizen] virtually every Main Stream Media (MSM) outlet has reported as speculation in over 50 pages of MSM Reports googled under Birther and Natural Born Citizen, that America would be better served rather than received pie-in-the-eye by the Courts silence.

BIRTHER Pie-In-The-Sky U.S. Supreme Court 

America on both sides of the issue would be much better served if the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) would affirm terms. Actually anti-birthers or the MSM in general would be much better served in the reporting of the issue Americans are finding troubling in the Trust of Government. 

Cody says that Anti-Birthers are actually the ones who should be clamoring at the SCOTUS for a decision on the issue, as Judge Napolitano  cited the issue on Obama may be moot due to Obama being in his 7th year and 2nd term of the Office of President. Even if he was disqualified he's only lose a year and if the ruling went in his favor, it doesn't affect him at all. 

Considering the peril that America could be found in if a Major Candidate walked into the U.S. Supreme Court say Hillary Clinton with a 49% popular vote loss to a 51% popular vote advantage by Ted Cruz winning the popular vote with his eligibility in question, the Country could be literally torn down with a Losers Rage! 

It makes so much more sense to hear Judy v. Obama 14-9396 so that an Election is not predicated on the Opinion and America can come together in an agreement of terms. For this reason we are hoping U.S. Senator Ted Cruz will accept the Challenge made by Cody Robert Judy that he and his Republican Senators would propose a U.S. Senate Resolution for the U.S. Supreme Court to hear Judy v. Obama 14-9396 and sending that to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The Challenge was issued on Cody Robert Judy's Twitter Account and sent to several Major Media Outlets.

Thank You!

CRJFacebookPersonal

CRJFacebookPres2016 JOIN US!

CRJTwitter

Sincerely,

Cody Robert Judy Campaign

Cody Robert Judy

Sincerely, 

Cody Robert Judy

Cody Robert Judy

The CRJ TODAY for a BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW

Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.

Web Site www.codyjudy.us

We want to thank you for the 330,000 views on this Blog!

Keep coming back!

Blog: www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

INSPIRING - I believe in You

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI

Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

WHY DO PEOPLE LIKE CODY ROBERT JUDY (CRJ)?

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

Cody Robert Judy's book :

 Taking A Stand- the Conservative Independent Voice.

Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts

12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial

13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008

14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case

15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016

The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President

www.codyjudy.us

www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

ALS Icebucketchallenge - CRJ accepts and Challenges Who?

The ALS Icebucket Challenge is accepted and you just have to watch the video to see who Cody Robert Judy Candidate for President Challenges next!




Will you now join 221others across the country representing every state in the nation of informed patriots who have liked my Facebook page for President? Cody Robert Judy for President 2016 Thank you for your consideration.
https://m.facebook.com/CodyRobertJudyForPresident2016


Update on Judy v. Obama 1:14-cv-93 filed in the U.S. Court (District of Utah)
1. MOTION FOR DEFAULT W PROPOSED ORDER OF JUDGEMENT

2. ORDER OF DEFAULT JUDGEMENT (PROPOSED)


Those wishing to read the U.S. Federal Civil Rights Complaint may now do so here now as it is public information: Judy v. Obama 2014 U.S. FED Case No. 1:14cv00093


Wow!Just found my book, Taking A Stand, on sale at your local B&N for nook users if you prefer over soft or hard bound - only $8.49 That's a Great price

Cody Robert Judy
For U.S. President 2016

If you think “Truth” is worth it, support it and quit supporting the lie. That is the beginning of change, or we can just keep on going down this road and see where it leads with Obama. Which is it going to be?

TRUTH IS REAL

The Commercial is simply called "America"

TAILOR MADE BLACKMAIL- THE CON GAME WITH OBAMA TO CONGRESS

TAILOR MADE BLACKMAIL- THE CON GAME WITH OBAMA TO CONGRESS

FOX NEWs unloaded on Obama this week with a couple of their superstars. Sean Hannity and Judge Jeanine Pirro, as a guest on the Michael Savage Show, in a closely approximated narrative blurting out “Manchurian Candidate” and the "I" (Impeachment) word with Obama as the declarative nativity surrounding the circumstances of their displeasure.

Is this feigned disgust or just another one of the rant and raves we’ve become accustomed to with Fox acting out in panderous outrage about the latest scandal with the promise of a parent that if he does it “one more time” after the 24 other scandals he’s through, insinuated former 1998 House prosecutor of Bill Clinton's Impeachment trial S.C. Senator Lindsey Graham whose facing a primary in deep rooted red state this Tuesday.

How many parents would literally let their kid get away with 24 and counting scandals and issue ultimatums that if it occurred one more time they would discipline the child? I don't believe there's anyone from South Carolina that would let that happen in their home. We have literally seen Congress throw a temper tantrum at Obama with the “Enforce the Law Act” passed in 2014, yet Obama as the belligerent child has basically turned the tables on Congress. One wonders if the Legislative Branch has a check and balance equally on the Executive Branch and the Judicial Branch how is Obama so errant. How does he gloat with such disdain if the check and balance system is so effective? What does he have over Congress? How is he able to treat them like puppets on a string?

Blackmail is the use of threats to prevent another from engaging in a lawful occupation of writing libelous letters or letters that provoke a breach of the peace. The offense of blackmail is often taken or carried out during an act of robbery. This occurs when an offender makes a threat of immediate violence towards someone in order to make a gain as part of a theft. For example , “your money or your life”, is an unlawful threat of violence in order to gain property. Blackmail is an act, often a crime, involving unjustified threats t make a gain or cause loss to another unless a demand is met. It may be defined as coercion involving threats of physical harm, threat of criminal prosecution, or threats issued for the purposes of taking the person’s money or property. Blackmail can be considered a form of extortion or taking of personal property by threat of future harm.

The short answer to this quarry is Congress has used up its “check and balance” powers with the Executive Branch under Obama, and Obama knows it. Creating a legislative act to state what the executive branch is rogue as Congress did in the entitled “Enforce the Law Act” was about as severe a measure as Congress can put out to announce their displeasure with action of the President to enforce the laws. Of course this Act feigns disgust to their constituency at home as a matter of fact. Therein lays both another problem and the question.

You see somehow, some way Congress bought into the fact that Obama was eligible to serve as Commander in Chief in the Office of the President simply because of an “Election”. Now you might think or say, “Cody, after an election it’s all over, that’s it”. If you are saying that it is simply your naiveté about the Constitution’s language that if a “President elect” shall fail to have qualified he can be removed in many ways but for Obama as a disability”.

You mean to tell me that after an election if the President fails to qualify under the Constitution’s qualifications clauses he can still never be allowed to hold the Office of the President? Yes, that’s right. Election be damned, the Constitution’s qualifications for the Office of the President is what comes first and foremost. That is the oath all take before they even get to Congress, over and above bringing the pork home. So, how did this “Pass” Obama received slide out from under Congress’s noses and how does it prevent Congress from acting in a more severe measure to “impeach” or "remove" Obama?

Well, no one knows better than Obama that he actually isn’t qualified as a natural born citizen. Yes, you heard me right, no one knows better than Obama himself. Oh the tangled web of regret Congress has now in tangling with the spider that has them all wrapped up. The tailored way this happened actually occurred when Obama was a Senator in Congress himself.

A deal was constructed with the Democrat Party and the Republican Party that McCain would get his ‘non-binding’ U.S. Senate Resolution 511 declaring him a ‘natural born citizen’ from at least half of Congress and Obama would never be challenged on his because the deal would have been impossible without the majority of the Democrat Senators voting for it along with every Republican U.S. Senate accept Sen. McCain. (Text of 511 here.)

D- Senator Barack Obama and D- Senator Hillary Clinton were actually co-sponsors of that non-binding senate resolution but EVERY SINGLE Republican Senator voting for it added another nail to the coffin of the Constitution, accept McCain who abstained from it basking in the glory he had been drafted by his esteemed colleagues who insisted even upon his adamant vote to refuse such glad tidings. Who would have ever thought a non-binding U.S. Senate Resolution would have such a long lasting and incredible defense for Obama and simultaneously cost Americans untold fortunes through future generations?

There was no objection vote in Congress’s Counting of the Electorate in 2008 because every U.S. Republican Senator had bet heavy on McCain and come up short losing their bet in the election. They would just have to ‘deal’ with Obama even though they might not like it for four years until Gov. Romney would bail them out right?

Certainly they could handle it for 4 more years; they’d done it with Clinton but they had “impeachable powers over Clinton to keep him in line a little bit, and they demonstrated it over a little lie to Congress. Obama has over 24 scandals, big ones, and nothing? Who can escape the illogical and apparently obvious fairness of it all?

In the U.S. Senate Resolution every single Republican U.S. Senator had basically voted to change the Constitution of the United States without consulting the House of Representatives, because their vote was a vote for a ‘hands off’ Obama on his Eligibility Question in exchange for McCain’s Res. 511 which Republicans did not have the vote to carry in a majority controlled U.S. Senate in 2008. Why do you think Democrats were so eager to say, “Sure, we’ll give that to your boy, Sen. McCain”? We won’t allow partisanship to stand in the way of something like that.

Now when someone’s got you over a barrel because you’ve done something wrong in the first place, they can roll you over and over and over that same barrel because the only way to get off that barrel is to admit you did something wrong in the first place. That is always hard to do. As a lie is built upon so are the cost of the lie increased and also the damages of the lie recognized as needing to be defended until it’s “too big to fail”. When did we start hearing that? Federal Reserve Chairmen Ben Bernanke defined it in 2010.

But Truth was what we were taught would prevail. Truth is what we were told would set us free, and cannot stand a lie, especially when the cost of defending the lie threatens the national security of U.S. Sovereignty and future generations wanting and deserving a chance at American’s opportunity and dream. Let me tell you something about former SOS Hillary Clinton's vision of 'globalization'.

It doesn't bode well with individualism and the blessings we seek here in the United States of American. It bodes well with a sacrifice of the individual's rights for what the State sees as the greater good. That message is being channeled through everything she's apart of and says "State first, Individual second" right down to her clothing if you have an understanding of it.

Globalization at what cost? The cost is greatest with the individual, the threat of the individual is the greatest threat perceived by the State. That was the fear of allowing the United States to exist in the first place remember!

Congress can threaten to impeach Obama, but no one knows better than Obama that you cannot “impeach” a person in the Office of the President who isn’t qualified. Impeachment is reserved specifically for a “qualified person in the Office of the President” who has done something wrong. We all recall former President Bill Clinton’s impeachment due to a lie stated under oath to Congress that he had not has sex with Monica Lewinsky, which Lewinsky’s own affidavit and testimony confirmed.

What put President Clinton over the barrel were actual recorded conversations Lewinsky had with a friend she did not know about that were recorded. When those tapes came out Lewinsky’s own word was as muted as President Clinton’s was. She couldn't cover for him with a lie anymore. Sex was not what the Impeachment was about; it was about lying to Congress, impeding justice in a cover-up of what had actually happened. It was the truth we wanted.

If those tapes had not been made and released the whole thing would have never been uncovered. President Clinton surmised it better to be prosecuted for lying than a sexual relationship with an employee or intern subject to his authority. In the end it proved the best course and the U.S. Senate excused him. That acted as a dousing hose on the flame in the House of Representatives. So picture Congress saying to Obama we're going to impeach you and Obama saying "You Can't" as his defense! Congress is caught in their own trap, and Sen. Hillary Clinton is a big part of it and has been from the beginning. She was of course a co-sponsor of U.S. Sen. Res 511.

Now over the course of five years many laws and policies have been enacted under Obama including the granddaddy of them all Obamacare- indeed 1/5 of the entire U.S. economy is under this Act. 1/5 of the entire U.S. Economy represents a lot of money that Congress didn’t have to spend before and now they do. Neither the Republicans nor the Democrats want it to “Go Away” due to it not being signed by an eligible President. Like U.S. Sen. Res 511, the Republicans and Democrats are united on Obamacare. If that wasn't true Republicans wouldn't have financed it in the House.

You do recall that every Act must be signed by a Qualified President right? Think about the "National Defense Authorization Act", that provides indefinite detention of terrorism suspects without trial.

All those laws and all that money, and all that 'control', would just go “poof” if Obama was found “ineligible” to be signing with the authority granted a President’s pen in the Office of the President. Congress would in affect be throwing out a ton of work they have been doing for years. The more time Obama has been in office the more laws have been passed and in such the more insurance Obama has that his “Eligibility” as President would never be questioned in Congress.

The more insurance Obama has that:

1) Congress wouldn’t/doesn’t want to lose all their work, and
2) Congress would not want to admit they did something wrong by not challenging his eligibility right at first regardless of the bi-partisan pass that was given to their loser McCain in Sen. Res. 511.

At least admit with me that had Republicans challenged Obama on his eligibility it would have been an injury to their cooperation with Democrats with U.S. Sen. Res 511. Now you know why Obama can push them over and over the over the same barrel and they just emphatically claim Obama won the election and there's nothing we can do about his fraud and forged documents of identity. In fact, we just have to tell America that forensics on documents is a lie and keep repeating it until its believed.

Obama knows they cannot “impeach” someone who isn’t qualified. Impeachment is reserved for a qualified person who’s done something wrong. The only measure left to Congress is to toss all their work out and admit they messed up pushing politics over principles of the Constitution in order to gain powers since U.S. Sen. Res. 511 was passed.

This is the tailor made blackmail Obama has come to push the envelope on over and over and over in scandal after scandal after scandal.It wouldn't be blackmail if the Constitution was being upheld, it would be politics, but Obama's a walking talking violation of it in the Office of the President. That makes it blackmail. He knows, Congress knows it, we all know it, but Congress doesn't want to trash all the work built up on Obama's false narrative so they keep building upon it which is only going to increase the toxicity and damage of it when it crashes.

The only freedom from this tailor made blackmail is that Congress hold a “disability-impeachment” proceeding which effectively removes Obama as an unqualified candidate and certainly gives up every law that has been signed by Obama as pending for the next qualified person in the Office of the President. I think we could actually make it through that transition smoother than anyone might think.

Now you know what’s at stake, the interesting question to ask is, “if you were in Congress which way would you go?” Well, of course to the Congress as of now they have sided with Obama and the cover-up right through 24 scandals and counting.

The latest has Americans’ screaming about the exchange of 5 Taliban Leaders for one soldier who has allegedly been reported as a deserter by some of his fellow soldiers but has been called by the Obama Administrations Susan Rice as serving honorably. The same Susan Rice who was the star of the Sunday talk shows in claiming Benghazi was the result of a videotape that an investigation supported by Congress has now been leveled as false and Benghaze preventable.

Congress now debates their bloody noses being rubbed in the dirt of Obama’s ineligibility at the cost of 13 years of war in Afghanistan, all the life’s that have been lost, and all of the danger now presented to Americans for a greater incentive to take American’s hostage all over a non-binding U.S. Senate Resolution allowing a unqualified candidate who was not born in the United States to be declared by an Act of Naturalization that he was a “natural born citizen”. The second such Act of Congress the Senator from Arizona has had on his foreign alien-ship.

Do you think it was worth it? All of the life’s lost, all of McCain’s contributions a waste, all of Romney’s contributions a waste, all of the money Afghanistan has cost in getting the 5 caught and captured over the ten years a waste, all of the 24 scandals and counting Congress has not been able to do a thing about, and all of the cost and rights those scandals have cost every single American?

Only one candidate for President in America sued McCain and Obama in 2008 and 2012 that has continually held his hand out to Congress and the Judicial Branch Courts as an aide and a servant of the Constitution in “Standing” to stop the madness. Only one candidate in America with a record of holding ‘principle’ over ‘politics’ regardless of party and irrespective of race. That candidate is I, Cody Robert Judy, and of course that’s another big reason Congress with all of its potential presidential candidates thus far refuses to shake my hand in the offer. Ask yourself a good question, "Who resents the truth and Why?".

In shaking my hand, they also admit they have allowed this mess and it doesn’t bode well on their aspirations for President. That is what you call a tailored blackmail because the Constitution is what’s right and every Congressmen and Justice for that matter is being held up from doing what’s right because they are caught doing what isn’t right and that is covering up this identity scandal and the Constitution's claims about it. They’d just as soon keep me covered up in the dust of the dustpan, which represents the biggest cover-up of all.

Your recognition of this is the other key of the puzzle. In truth We The People indeed do have a choice right now to support the truth and pass it on. "Truth is Real" may seem like kind of a weird campaign slogan when you first read it. However, reflect on it abit. Think about the destruction a lie can cause in your marriage, in your business dealings. When you have been lied to and lied to and lied to what becomes so valuable that you would price it like gold in value? Truth.

If you think “Truth” is worth it, support it and quit supporting the lie. That is the beginning of change, or we can just keep on going down this road and see where it leads with Obama. Which is it going to be?

TRUTH IS REAL

Post by Cody Robert Judy.

I'd sure appreciate your helping me out in the American Birther Campaign (ABC) Campaign for Cody Robert Judy for President 2016. Thank you for your consideration.

Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: Code4Pres

Obama's NATURALIZATION Found With National Security Concern on Moral War in Constitution

Obama's NATURALIZATION Found With National Security Concern on Moral War in Constitution

The Journal Sentinel today featured a piece called the "Latino Connection" that's 10 pages longer, the problem for Obama is that the new form will offer clear instructions, (like the Constitution has for all of us regarding the eligibility requirements for the Office of the President Obama himself fails). The form will have questions also concerning national security, and good moral character (Seen in video below at 1 min 33 seconds), real concerns yet unheard by Congress or the courts regarding Obama himself that actually are featured here in this YouTube Video produced on the matter.

USCIS Revises Form N-400 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WU21WSc01Do




The 'naturalization' process, surprisingly to most, is not foreign to presidential and elected candidates although the national security concerns were not a process they themselves had to go through. Perhaps the concerns are based in part to the damage those individuals are doing to the economy and perhaps the morality of the principles of the Constitution itself?

Chief among those candidates and elected facing problems with "Citizenship" associated with 1st generations Americans and "Natural Born Citizenship" commonly referred to as 2nd generation based on being born in the U.S. to Citizen parents, are of course Barack Obama, John McCain, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Bobby Jindal,and Rick Santorum to name a few.

The Republicans oddly enough seem to have more candidates lined up facing these problems in the future for President then the Democrats, which proves to be a hard-line for the Democratic Party to toe in the future with the scalping of the natural born citizen requirement they've gone to bat for in Obama.

Sen. Barack Obama - aka Barry Soetoro/Soebarkah shadily found to be two places at the same time was indeed registered as an Indonesian citizen adopted by his step father with his mother to young to claim an american citizenship for him in his foreign birth. Of course the lie sold to the American public is exactly the kind of 'national security' and 'moral' character concerning the USCIS.

Obama's long form birth certificate has been exhumed to be nothing more then a long form fabrication by professional law enforcement standards and that was brought to the attention of the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276, for which I served as the Presidential Candidate running in the Democratic Party and after the primary, as an Independent Presidential Candidate securing the 'standing' necessary for the complaint in 2012 and 2013.


Orrin Hatch R - U.S Senator from Utah and Mitch McConnell R- U.S. Senator from Kentcky just requested two sheriffs kits produced by Michael Volin of WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com (WOBC) with the purpose of informing the public and elected officials of the forgery of the long-form birth certificate image posted since April 27, 2011 on the White House website. These kits (Get Yours Free Here) contain the same evidence released in March 1,2012 (and a little more) that I included in my case against Obama that went from Georgia State- Georgia State Supreme- to U.S. Supreme 12-5276 in Judy v. Obama.

Isn't it ironic that after those in authority have gotten away with defying our national security and moral principle in the Constitution that they would actually try closing the loop-holes they themselves went through?

Sen. John McCain was of course born in a Panama Hospital not associated with any military hospital and was granted his 'citizenship' ,because of his foreign birth, with an act of Congress when he was 11 months old. US Supreme Court had ruled in Downes v. Bidwell that unincorporated territories are not the United States. The full Constitution only applies for incorporated territories of the United States.[28] Until the rulings in these so-called Insular Cases, children born of two US citizens in the Canal Zone had been subject to the Naturalization Act of 1795, which granted them statutory US citizenship at birth. With the ruling of 1905, persons born in the Canal Zone became US nationals, not full citizens.

We also recognize it not only grants statutory and declaratory born citizenship to those born in the Canal Zone after February 26, 1904, of at least one US citizen parent, but also does so retroactively for all children born of at least one US citizen in the Canal Zone before the law's enactment. The importance is that with 'one' parent came 'Citizenship', but not 'natural born citizenship'.

Any "ACT" of Congress upon "citizenship" is generally considered to be a process of man made law we call 'naturalization' which contrast of course the laws of nature which govern man. This of course prevoked the second ACT of Congress in the U.S. Senate commonly associated with the 'good ole boys Act insane for Sen. McCain, which was, non-binding, because it was not acted upon by The House, or signed by a Qualified President 'U.S. Resolution 511' was the act 'granting 'McCain 'natural born citizenship' which though written defies natural law.

In this text however is the reasoning that though McCain was born a foreigner to the United States, and thus an alien, because he had been born of two "Citizen" parents, the 'granting' was confirmed. Its always interesting when a lie proceeds forth from the law defying 'natural law', often the truth of the lie is found in the details.

The ACT text follows this suit when it 'claims' falsely that McCain was born in a military hospital. This was either an out right lie told to McCain's good ole boys club the U.S. Senate Republicans by co-sponsors Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama or spun by McCain himself because anyone can clearly see the hospital McCain was born in was not the military hospital, but indeed the Panama Colon Hospital, making even the details of the non-binding resolution false. This was all brought up in Judy v. McCain in 2008 days before McCain was made the nominee.

McCain was severely censored Jan 7th,2014 ,Jan. 26th 2014, based on national security and moral principles against the Constitution by his constituency in a complete and humiliating embarrassment.

While McCain's spokesmen called the censor 'Whacky', I'll let you decide if the same claim might be leveled at the U.S. Senate for passing non-binding U.S. Senate Resolution 511, and which deserves more criticism for being 'Whacky'?

It truly is scary when those with questionable character like Obama and McCain with their understood frauds upon the public, the Constitution's morality, and our National Security are actually "in" Elected Offices and people like myself who have raised the concerns to a level of legal Court action are the ones looked upon as 'dangerous' for representing the principles of the Constitution in our National Security Welfare.

If you can recall such a time that black was white, and white was black in things being so turned around as it is today you would probably discover it was not easy to recover from. Indeed the division amongst has less to do with color and more to do with the moral character upheld in our Constitution necessary for our National Security then any race division.


Please urge and encourage your Representatives to OPEN AND TRANSPARENT HEARINGS in the House of Representatives on Obama's eligibility as the solution to eliminating Obamacare. These hearings must be held and the evidence must be heard that are in the Sheriff's kits most all of the Representatives have received now.

If these hearings are conducted in the open and reported in the open, the evidence will mount collectively and the U.S. Senate although it has a majority of Democrats will have to concede to the facts and evidences or will be seen as completely unfit for their duties and as incompetent. Utah would most likely see more benefits come from supporting the Candidates like myself, (well, Candidate as myself because there were no other candidates in the entire U.S.A. who stood up for principle regardless of party), fighting for equal protections under the law in pushing for Open and Transparent Hearings in Congress with two million dollars on Obama's Verification Eligibility qualification hearings on the stage to remove him as a disability according to Amend 14, Sec.3 would be a lot faster solution.

Like CODY ROBERT JUDY'S NEW 2016 PAGE ON FACEBOOK HERE
Follow me on Twitter: Official Cody Robert Judy 2016 on Tweeter here

You Can Help Me [ If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign”, or ABC Campaign ,which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President please make a contributions here:

Let me now wish everyone a very happy and warm New Year as we pray for the Lord to save our Country and restore America from the dilapidation we now find ourselves and the principles of the Constitution in, for this I am Taking A Stand.

Sincerely, Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us www.codyjudy.blogspot.com YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES TV Get Cody's Book: Taking A Stand

The Dire State-of-The-Union – Democrats are thriving and love Inequality- Republicans to Strategy Session

The Dire State-of-The-Union – Democrats are thriving and love Inequality
Update & Breaking News: [If there is good news in the State-Of-The-Union its that Republicans might get sick of being tossed around like a rag doll soon with another budget crisis looming in the rise of the debt ceiling which is happening in February and Obama says he will not negotiate about with any kind of legislation. This is the "Its my way or the highway" attitude that just might make Republicans throw down, buck up, and pull their boots on for an all out Constitutional challenge on Obama's Eligibility! Republicans are set to strategize their debt ceiling negotiations as they take off Wednesday. ]


If income redistribution and equality was a justification for the Democratic Party it doesn’t take a genius to figure out that shallow promise is the product of the trickery hollow, because the Democratic Party loves inequality and you only have to take a quick look around to discover you’re the genius they keep putting a dunce cap on.

Rush Limbaugh said today, “That’s what their shows about- Making fun of their audience.” The White House Correspondence dinner is as phony as it gets. A bunch of people getting together pretending they like each other when they really don’t, it’s called the phonies night of the year.



Rush offered a new and truthful dialogue for the State-of-the-Coup instead of the State of the Union address. We are promised optimism and a central theme of making things fairer. Obama’s said it several times equality under the law. However, if that were even centrally understood as not to be the phony baloney running through the Democratic Party’s spine don’t you think at the very least they would understand the parameters of running a candidate who is actually qualified for the Office of the President under the Constitution?

I mean its fundamental that in a competitive race the parameters are drawn out that at the very least describe what’s fair or what’s not fair in the race as far as description or qualification, or more importantly what parameters are needed to disqualify a candidate. In a foot race you can’t have a competitor who’s on the track in a motorcycle or a car pulling up to the starting line when everyone else is on foot. That’s what I’m calling fundamental.

Now out of all the people in the whole wide world who would you suspect would understand the most when someone was completely unqualified according to the parameters? It would be the contestants or candidates in the race right? They are the ones that you would most likely suspect would raise their voice if something wasn’t right in the race, unless they were a partner in the unfairness of course.

Rush Limbaugh suggested the White House Correspondence dinner start featuring some awards like the Awards shows in Hollywood for movies and songs and even suggested some fun categories that would make it much more truthful, meaningful, as well as captivatingly entertaining. I agree with him and jotted down a few of his suggestions:

Biggest Fraud – Largest Illegal Donation – Most Insincere Policy – Best Excuse for Failure of a Politician this year- Smear of the Year that worked – Smear that failed – The best successful Hoax – The Best Lie – The Best Lie That Failed, Most useful Lie – Best Supporting Lie to further the best hoax of the year.

Supporting politicians who actually call Obama qualified for the office of the President in the horror of The Biggest Fraud ever perpetrated upon the United States Constitution has got to win the Award of “Best Supporting Lie to Further the Best Hoax of the 2013 year”.

Undeniable proof of Obama handing out a long form fabrication by a law enforcement agency to the White House Press Core, and politicians and the Media in Washington DC continue to call Obama “President”? How fair and equal is that?

If power is simply the perception of power, what law of equality are we living under when a candidate for the Office of the President as myself, in 2008 as an Independent, and 2012 in the Democratic Party, is not heard under the law which governs the Presidential Race and the specifically the Qualifications of the Office of the President at the bare minimum?

You know out of all the people who make up our Constitution Republic I would think that the Representatives in the House would understand more than any of us how important rules to a political race are. They are in a battle every two years and you’d better believe if they had an opponent who was in their race at home, pulling money from contributor’s pockets that could be theirs and would be used against them, you better believe they would OBJECT and do it strongly!

What would we expect them to do? Well, they’d jump in the court first to see if a Judge would rule against their opponent right? Yes, of course that’s what they would do. It’s been done many times and not only settled that way but protected. That’s the important word “protected”.

So, what happened in the 2012 Election when I was a candidate in the Democratic Party for President? Where would you expect that objection to start-Iowa, New Hampshire, Georgia? Yes, Yes, Yes, but we have to go back to the 2008 Election to decipher the reasons Mitt Romney, who finally became the nominee in the Republican Party, would not object to Obama’s ineligibility.

Remember what I said about Candidates being the ones who would object?

“They are the ones that you would most likely suspect would raise their voice if something wasn’t right in the race, UNLESS they were a partner in the unfairness of course", because they have standing to do so.

Now, certainly there would have to be evidence of this somewhere, or I’d just be blowing out some mindless innuendo as a peon candidate who ran his mouth too much and hadn’t a leg to stand on right?

Some evidence that might suggest the whole U.S. Senate Republican minority had partnered or cuddled-up with the U.S. Senate Democratic Party majority, but there’s no way you would ever presume a candidate for the Presidency of the United States would actually have that in his hand right and that as a matter of responsibility towards the integrity of the race and the Constitution he’d have used it in a court of law right?

Certainly that would have been a BIG STORY for the press so as not to get hammered with the Award of covering up the Biggest Fraud, Best Lie, and Support For the Biggest Lie Awards at the White House Correspondence dinner?
Of course the answer is in Judy v. McCain filed in Las Vegas, Nevada Federal District Court where you’ll find reference to a “Non-binding U.S. Senate Resolution 511” for a candidate in the Republican Party who actually had not yet become the nominee of the Republican Party yet.

Which begs the two pronged question: Why would Senator McCain need a non-binding U.S. Senate Resolution declaring him a “Natural Born Citizen” when he’d already had one ACT of Congress declaring him a “Citizen” 11 months after his birth, and Why before the election even got started really would Senator Hillary Clinton and Senator Barack Obama be two of the three sponsors?

Well, the answer is of course because they are the ones who would be the ones to object, if there were objections, as they would be running for President of the United States in the Democratic Party and of course they like things ‘fair’ and ‘equal’ right? Wrong.

This is the ammo in the Alamo of the Nation. Hillary Clinton started the Birther Movement as a ruse and a cover for her own cooperation when she signed on in the deal with McCain and Obama, just in case it went south., and the U.S. Supreme Court was hacked in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 where it was slid between cases without a presidential candidate from the State of Georgia where Obama had first been ordered to appear before the Court and refused to do so.

(check below on House of Rep control majority in 1972)

Did you know the Nixon Resignation started with the revelation from an aide that Impeachment in the House of Representatives was virtually a certainty? Yeah, it didn’t start in the U.S. Senate. Democrats controlled the U.S. House of Representatives at the time when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the Nixon Tapes had to be turned over to the Hearings in the House of Representatives. Don’t you think its interesting Hillary Clinton was involved with research as a lawyer aid in Watergate and after was fired?

Of the May 14th 2013 from Pat Dollard FLASHBACK “Because she was a liar,” Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.” She engaged in a seemingly implausible scheme to deny Richard Nixon the right to counsel during the investigation.

Boy, it sure let's you know she’d witnessed in her political aspirations that you shouldn’t conceal things or conspire to cover things up huh or it would end your political career real quick? Yet, we have a record of her striking that deal with McCain in the race officially April 10,2008, while they were in office and representing people in their respective States and after declaring their intent to run for President in the race.

You know it’s just baffling that Gov. Chris Christie has been made such a scape-goat in bridge-gate and yet you know the Media doesn’t see this story as any story worth water under Christie’s Bridge?

It’s even more surprising to know that Republicans who control the House of Representatives some 42 years after the second-term-Nixon-Impeachment threat, play along with Obama, also as Nixon, easily outraged over political adversaries and have not placed a Hearing on the matter on calendar based on the responsibility placed upon them in a hearing of the matter as “An Offense of the Law of Nations” held in the Constitution, although the definition of a 'natural born citizen' from The Law of Nations has not been used in our history?

Where are all the David Frost’s of our time when like Nixon, wire-tapping of newsmen spying on Americans like Senator Kennedy and other Democrats as Nixon did, has become common place with Obama and his Administration in the AP Wiretapping story scandal and Verizon customers not to mention the entire U.S. Population lied to about Benghazi which SOS Hillary Clinton was directly linked to?

Christ Christie fired someone already on his staff for Bridge-Gate, but not one has been fired or indicted with murders in Benghazi or Fast & Furious both of which amount to gun running and/or selling arms. Mis-use of power is the very essence of tyranny and the frightening implications of that for a free society are indeed at the heart of domestic terrorism.

That indeed is certainly at the very heart of the demands for a “natural born citizen” in our Constitution for the Office of the President, and the revelation of importance to that being a big concern and something more than being a “Citizen” noticed by of course Sen. John McCain, Hillary Clinton, and Barack Obama.

It’s central and vital to our National Security, which we now have a record of running amuck upon us in needlessly spying and scandal breaking out upon America in 2013 like the promised plague of abomination we reap by not being more careful what we have sown.

If Democratic Party leadership was at the very least concerned about equality and fairness they sure would not be employing inequality and unfairness in the biggest race of our Nation, but with their own actions we understand their propagation clearly and are not fooled with the dire state-of-our-Nation.

The fairness and equality we have fought for here is as good as your passing it on because not even Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, or Sean Hannity has covered this story. It is through the merit of our social networking that the information is passed on to each individual and here thats why we celebrate how many people have viewed stories.

If there is good news in the State-Of-The-Union its that Republicans might get sick of being tossed around like a rag doll soon with another budget crisis looming in the rise of the debt ceiling which is happening in February and Obama says he will not negotiate about with any kind of legislation. This is the "Its my way or the highway" attitude that just might make Republicans throw down, buck up, and pull their boots on for an all out Constitutional challenge on Obama's Eligibility!

We are proud and celebrate the work we have done with a humble 100,000 views, and acknowledge compared to 300 Million Americans there is still much to do and a big story to break!

The latest 60 Second TV Spot about Obamacare
The Coasting Code-Care Act


Breaking: Breaking News : Orrin Hatch R - U.S Senator from Utah and Mitch McConnell R- U.S. Senator from Kentcky just requested two sheriffs kits produced by Michael Volin of WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com (WOBC) with the purpose of informing the public and elected officials of the forgery of the long-form birth certificate image posted since April 27, 2011 on the White House website. These kits (Get Yours Free Here) contain the same evidence released in March 1,2012 (and a little more) that I included in my case against Obama that went from Georgia State- Georgia State Supreme- to U.S. Supreme 12-5276 in Judy v. Obama.

Please urge and encourage your Representatives to OPEN AND TRANSPARENT HEARINGS in the House of Representatives on Obama's eligibility as the solution to eliminating Obamacare. These hearings must be held and the evidence must be heard that are in the Sheriff's kits most all of the Representatives have received now.

If these hearings are conducted in the open and reported in the open, the evidence will mount collectively and the U.S. Senate although it has a majority of Democrats will have to concede to the facts and evidences or will be seen as completely unfit for their duties and as incompetent. Utah would most likely see more benefits come from supporting the Candidates like myself, (well, Candidate as myself because there were no other candidates in the entire U.S.A. who stood up for principle regardless of party), fighting for equal protections under the law in pushing for Open and Transparent Hearings in Congress with two million dollars on Obama's Verification Eligibility qualification hearings on the stage to remove him as a disability according to Amend 14, Sec.3 would be a lot faster solution.

Like CODY ROBERT JUDY'S NEW 2016 PAGE ON FACEBOOK HERE
Follow me on Twitter: Official Cody Robert Judy 2016 on Tweeter here

You Can Help Me [ If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign”, or ABC Campaign ,which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President please make a contributions here:

Let me now wish everyone a very happy and warm New Year as we pray for the Lord to save our Country and restore America from the dilapidation we now find ourselves and the principles of the Constitution in, for this I am Taking A Stand.

Sincerely, Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us www.codyjudy.blogspot.com YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES TV Get Cody's Book: Taking A Stand