Author - Cody Robert Judy
Conservative Independent American
Candidate for Pres 16, 12, 08
U.S. Senate 18, 10, 04, 00
U.S. Rep. 02
Book: Taking A Stand - The conservative independent Voice
Obama Eligibility/Forgery Plaintiff Cody Robert Judy -
Sometimes a Wild Man is Necessary- Offers 3X Your Contribution Back if He Wins
Cody Robert Judy Contribution save/secure Paypal Contribute Now for a Restoration of Faith in Justice or Mail your donation to:
Cody Robert Judy 3037 South Ogden Ave Suite 1 Ogden, Utah 84401
Cody Robert Judy might be best described as a Wild Man, his hairs long and he's got quite the record, but sometimes that is exactly what is necessary. He is the bastion of Birthers, who are credited by Valerie Jarrett and Hillary Clinton to be the pejorative of the loss to President Donald J. Trump. Now with his Tenth Circuit Appeal and Emergency Application to Individual Justice Neil Gorsuch governed by Rule 22 of the U.S. Supreme Court for a Petition of Mandamus, he says there is a call for 'retreat' among Birthers who are or have given up. To that he has issued a call to Patriots everywhere to "Hold The Line" and made a promise that if he wins his Court Cases, everyone who has contributed to him over his Presidential Candidacies of 2008, 2012, and 2016 will receive 3X back what they contributed, up to 1 Million dollars!
MAY 12- 2010 - Seven Years ago today the picture on the left was taken of Cody working in the temporary office Atlah World Missionary Church provided while he was staying there summoned to New York as a witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial. He was the only Presidential Candidate there. The Jury, picked from all over America to serve as Jurist in the Tenth Amendment Trial hosted by Dr. James David Manning , heard his Testimony. Transcripts can be read here, provided to the pubic, at the Link
In doing so, Cody became the only Presidential Candidate in U.S. History to take the Witness Stand and under oath swear that Obama was not a "natural born Citizen" qualified to serve under the Constitutional provisions which are required for that particular office. Cody literally made the trip across the Nation from Nevada with only enough money to buy gas to get there, not even knowing if his testimony would be used or asked for.
"I had a dream a week before the Trial and saw myself arriving just on time to testify", Cody said. "That was the only Faith I had that I would be used in the trial."
Cody's testimony became very unique when he related to Dr. James David Manning upon arrival he was the only Presidential Candidate who had a Federal Case in Court against Sen. John McCain for not being a "natural born Citizen" and had made his objection to Obama made known in an Emergency Motion to the Court which included Phil Berg's Writ of Certiori to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Jury after a 5 Day Trial and many witnesses found Obama "Guilty".
Since then Cody hasn't stopped "Holding the Line" and Petitioned the Court's to hear his Case in the following considered defending "AMERICA'S CHOICE" for a President with no foreign allegiances by parents or soil:
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. action 1action 2 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 14-00093 10) Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado)14- 4136. 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396 12.)Judy v. Obama Application to Independent Justice Neil Gorsuch SCOTUS (pending status)13.Judy v. Obama Tenth Circuit 17-4055
Other Courts
14-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
16-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
17-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin
One of London, Englands revered poets and playrights in the 1800"s Oscar Fingal O'Flahertie Wills Wilde was quoted as saying:
"You can always judge a man by the quality of his enemies." Bearing that in mind...?
Cody's reputation has reached far and wide across the globe for good and bad. Cody's name and actions have earned him a place on the 'BAD' category at Obamaconspiracy.org a staunch defending organization against the 'natural born Citizen' requirement for President in the U.S. Constitution, with the denial that until the Constitution was signed and ratified there were no [Citizens] let alone [natural born Citizens] of the United States of America. Without a Sovereignty or Country what exactly were the people there but a conglomerate of other Countries Citizens with many Country's claiming territory extensions. This is why, as Cody has held, the Founders and Framers were forced to declare themselves eligible as original "Citizens" in the U.S. Constitution's declarative requirement for that Office- "Citizens at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution" Article II, Section I., Clause 5. "There were no Citizens let alone natural born Citizens to a Country which had just declared a new Jurisdiction and Standard of Liberty." There he is known without affection and referred in the pejorative manner as "Ex-Con Judy".
The FOGBOW has dedicated a special thread for digging Cody Robert Judy a public political grave. Dedicated only to him, the thread now is some 40 Pages of ridiculing comments all because Cody chose to stand up for the U.S. Constitution.
There are many examples in our modern time memories but asked to name one, Cody referred to the Patriot movie and a particular scene in which the British Commander Charles Cornwallis had under-estimated in his Pride the strength of the militia as it was used in a strategist way for it's weakness.
In the movie Mel Gibson playing Benjamin Martin a widowed father with children comes to play a key role in the monumental change that eventually leads to the surrender of the British by encouraging those who were weak and in retreat to "HOLD THE LINE!".
Through out Cody's Presidential Races of 2008, 2012, and 2016 Cody has largely financed his Campaigns with his own time and talent, his blog spanning the spectrum since 2010 and sporting over 750 Post and 440,000 Views tells the story but he also has written a book entitled Taking A Stand -the conservative independent voice which captures prior 2010 as it was published in 2008, a commercial of which can be seen on the Link. The book is available in hard or soft covers and for those who use NOOK at a discounted price.
Receiving very few donations, Cody relates the Birther Movement is much like the Movie the Patriot when at the moment of precision many are faltering and this is such an important [American Choice] to be preserved that we just can not let it go. We must take courage and "Hold The Line".
[Make America Great Again] was a great campaign slogan for President Trump, and indeed there are many Americans who agreed that it was long over due. But what of the highest office of the land being preserved and restored if we have allowed a usurpation of that office to go as if we didn't care?
For this reason, Cody has announced as he has done in previous years, that if he wins his law suit in full he will restore every Contribution made three fold. Indeed money goes where it is treated kindly and Cody wants you to know that in him and this American Choice you have an investment in the U.S. Constitution that could pay off 3X what you put in to it!
Of course there are no guarantees he will win, but America was not forged on guarantees. It was formed on a belief and with faith that under God we could form a Nation with liberty and justice for all of her Citizens under the banner and standard of the U.S. Constitution. It must be upheld.
Cody relates that only his own personal and very real life experience as a prisoner for eight years, (put there with an unlawful prosecution as he was denied evidence used against him in a Court of Law, held by his persecutors in an unlawful union between church and state, and receiving no favorable appeal that should change that at the highest court levels, because it didn't affect enough people),could possible have given him the courage and stamina to take a stand for this long with Obama's Ineligibility which represents the biggest circumvent of America's Elections, National Security, and most high-level fraud upon the American People certainly in our lifetimes, maybe in U.S. History!
Cody was ridiculed in prison by Prison Guards every day just like he is today when he refused to cut his hair in a stand for equality in the grooming standards. He faced nearly four years of his incarceration for a stand met for and with the native Americans who had suffered for decades, and eventually won the right for equality in the grooming standards for male and female inmates.
"Only the good Lord speaking to me bore me up in solitary confinement for 4 years on lock-down 23 hours a day 7 days a week, in a cell the size of a small bathroom. The one hour out was to take a shower and walk a hall. Only my dreams saved me as the Lord showed me relief would one day come. I can't explain the gratitude which comes when that relief arrives. It is over-whelming!".
He relates a story of gratitude that was understood by Moses's right hand man who began to murmur behind and against Moses for taking a Ethiopian for a wife which the Lord heard and asked them in for a conference in the tabernacle in The Holy Bible's book of Numbers Ch. 12.
v.2 reads "Has the LORD spoken only through Moses?" they asked. "Hasn't he also spoken through us?" And the LORD heard this.
v.3 Now Moses was a very humble man, more humble than anyone else on the face of the earth.
v.6 (The Lord speaking) he said, "Listen to my words: "When there is a prophet among you, I, the LORD, reveal myself to them in visions, I speak to them in dreams.
v. 10 When the cloud lifted from above the tent, Miriam's skin was leprous --it became as white as snow. Aaron turned toward her and saw that she had a defiling skin disease,
"It was only then that they realized their own error and they pleaded with Moses, the one they had ridiculed and spoke against to plead for their cause to the Lord. Do you suppose the Lord still has ears to hear and eyes to see as he did in the days of Moses?
So, I also plead with you for the cause of our U.S. Constitution. I plead for you to contribute as an honor to the Lord who is the author of all our freedom and liberty. I plead with you because I know he will bless you and he will have mercy upon you and I am willing if you have faith to continue this cause.
It's not over by a long shot. I have filed an Opening Brief which requires a response which could lead to a hearing a traveling to the Court for a Hearing. This must be prepared for. Yesterday I got some bad news that compounds the most meager rent I have been able to sustain throughout the last 7 years. The property has been sold and the new Landlord yesterday placed a 30 Day Notice to Quit on my door giving me 30 days to vacate the property. I believe he wants to renovate the apartment I am in, which really in fact needs to happen. I am in the worst one in the complex and have paid the least rent also. The new property owner wants to optimize his property which I can't blame him for.
The kitchen floor sways a good 3 inches within a 3 foot span making a whole brick necessary under the fridge to prevent the front door from swinging open. The toilet leaks, and it's terribly in dire straights in all the old swaying floors. I haven't complained because the rent was only $450 per month and it allowed my service to the cause enough for me to put up with doing without a nicer place. Needless to say, the situation is a bit perplexing with my attention being split and certainly no salary like those paid Politicians who haven't done near what I have without being elected.
It's true, I have pulled case after case after case out of my own time and talent and the current Brief is just below so you can read it.You can see the evidence and judge the cause for yourself. America's Choice for a U.S. President cannot be compromised to anyone who is not "born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents". There is no attorney in America who has filed in as many Eligibility Cases, No attorney who has dedicated so much time in all of America on this issue. There is no Politician who has held the line in all of America as I have as a Candidate in a bi-partisan stand against any Republican or Democrat who crossed that line. I don't care who you are, that is a line that represents America's Choice and I won't give it up!"
There are many more Republicans who don't like Obama's Fraud or the facts that the Court's have not been just in this matter. How many Republicans care about it? There has to be more then half a dozen? You saw a great crowd within the Democratic Party who did not support Hillary Clinton. Sanders was spoon fed to them and propped up as a candidate she could beat because he was so far left. The crowd who didn't want Hillary was really herded down the Sanders shoot which ultimately imploded. The Democratic Party did not allow Candidates on the debate stage like Republicans did that mirrored Trump, Carson, and Fiorina who had never been elected before. What if there had been a Candidate who was not in the Establishment who was more to the center and was standing up for the Constitution?
I ask for you help and will share in the winnings if we win, paying you 3X what you are willing to contribute to me for this cause up to 1 Million Dollars. You contribute $100 you'll get $300 from me when I win. You contribute $5 you'll get $15 if I win. That means I will be taking up to 1 Million and paying back 3 Million in total. We should be able to handle expenses with that. Thank you for your consideration in this investment. So take courage, and may [God bless you] in ways and means you never thought possible I pray in the name of Jesus Christ - Amen."
Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy
Cody Robert Judy Contribution save/secure Paypal Contribute Now for a Restoration of Faith in Justice or Mail your donation to:
Cody Robert Judy 3037 South Ogden Ave Suite 1 Ogden, Utah 84401
When we see two Document Forensic Experts tell Sheriff Joe Arpaio that Obama's Long Form Birth Certificate is a fabrication confirming his own Cold Case Posse's 5 year investigation?
Never wanted to be a person or Politician whose words were weak compared to Actions. Hoped I've never asked anyone to do as I say, and not do as I do.
Since the Action in Court Reported by The Post & Email I would like to thank the 2 modest donations I've received.
Unfortunately it doesn't cover even Postage and so I have covered the rest with 8 donations of blood. Saving lives with Plasma donations that pay modestly on a credit card that I can then use as cash for Postage.
It seems to me giving my blood for Justice saves lives both ways and modestly provides a way without excuse to donate a little bit.
When you believe what your contributing towards is a worthy cause, and who says Seeking Justice isn't a worthy cause, even President Trump publicly prayed for in the USA to be a place for Justice, who is left with an excuse?
Jesus Christ noticed the " Widows Mite" in ST. MARK 12:42-44 that she gave not of her increase, but of what she survived on. Oh that we were also noticed under the Heaven's?
If you go to a #BIOMAT USA and donate for the first time, mention my name, Cody Robert Judy, and I will receive a $50 dollar referral bonus.
Thank you again for the 2 modest donations I have received since January 2017- Every dollar counts!
The thought occurred to me that woman are not acting like a Minority in defending the United States Constitution. Our Republic under the U.S.Constitution is designed to respect individual rights. The U.S. Constitution protects Individual rights in a synopsis the Minority is able to stand up against the Majority when specific rights are trampled. Because of the 19th Amendment that gave Citizen's suffrage without regard to sex, sometimes we think of women more as a minority needing these protections adopted in the Constitution.
I've been careening my head and wrestling about the dismal support in general of Woman for the [natural born Citizen] qualification for the Office of President. ie. Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents for some two weeks now. Scratching my head at this and trying to understand it because on the outset women have a great interest in protecting their children in a natural instinct of 'nurturing' that I think should be very friendly to this Core Protection in the Constitution.
Additionally, women very much in a Civil understanding have more experience of being treated as weaker sex, not being allowed to vote, being shunned for divorce or not being given a Choice in many instances of history in the reproductive rights, which should engender a defense for the protections of the U.S. Constitution especially at the Core of it in the Office of President.
This however has not translated into support either by Contributions or readership for which I've scratched my head about until the question was formed: Why? Why aren't woman acting like a Minority any more? And the answer is because they just aren't. The laws have been changed to favor them in almost every perspective and as it happens often the majority gets complacent with their rights because they begin taking them for granted. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has no doubt made great strides in achieving office and made unprecedented roads towards the Office of the President, but she's also made unprecedented roads in sacrificing the Principles of that Office by not challenging Obama's ineligibility which has in fact lead to everything we are going through now that is panning out like a golden road to disaster.
Women's choices are protected in most aspects. They can get divorced and file such as a Majority, most always getting favor in property which also might be parallel the majority filing. There's no CIVIL office they are prohibited from based on gender. They can vote. Minimum wage is the same for both genders.
So what's this thing in my head about so little respect for supporting the Constitution especially surrounding the Office of President in the concern for national security via children and weaknesses in vulnerability of gender in a Minority position?
Well, as I researched this I found the facts don't lie. Woman are a Majority and as such are, I believe, slipping into a complacency of their Constitutional Rights afforded and protected by the U.S. Constitution in their voting block faster then they even can comprehend; even whilst Hillary Clinton is promising the world to women they actually already have it as a Majority.
Perhaps in the hope that the FBI does not handle her choice to change the Computer Server of the U.S. Federal Government to her own private server in the official conduct of Secretary of State? No doubt, the U.S. Government might have something to say about changing their server, but she didn't ask, she just made that decision and I don't think it was in the interest of FOIA or serving the people in a responsibility of that office.Yes, its true women are the Majority.
With the exception of Alaska and North Dakota women are the Majority or equal in every State of the Union and Men are the Minority. Tossing the States whose population is equal, Women are a Majority in the Majority of States.
FEATURED number of Women in Congress from 2008 to 2016
So my hunch was correct. Women are more to blame as the irresponsible voting block for our National Security breach in the Office of the President. In 2012 Mitt Romney lost the women's vote by 12 points, the largest ever since recording started in 1952 and despite winning the men's vote by 8 points lost the election by 2 points.
Make no mistake about it as an ineligible person in the Office of President has shown more favorable to open borders that most harmfully leans on women's innocence & children 37% of all federal crimes in 2014, ruining the American way of life as far as prosperity loading 10 Trillion of 20 on the backs of their children effectively adding 70K/person during the last eight years which is generational theft, favoring weapons sales to Muslim Theocratically Controlled Countries that support Sharia Law that is a known [subjectification of women] in philosophy. Four F16 Fighters, 200 Abrams Tanks [given] to Egypt Muslim Brotherhood, Iran Nuclear Deal releases 100 Billion, Saudi Arabia 46 Billion, in fact "the volume of major deals concluded by the Obama administration in its first five years [exceeds] the amount approved by the Bush administration in its full eight years in office by nearly $30 billion. That also means that the Obama administration has approved more arms sales than any U.S. administration since World War II."
Of course the Office of the President or person in it cannot be blamed for every kidnapping, every rape, robbery, stabbing shooting or atrocity, however the choice in that Office is indeed responsible for a general course of action that must be weighed in the balance of good for or against the U.S. Picture a ship in the ocean smooth sailing on one side and shark invested waters on the other in the distance - which do you hope to drift toward with the rudder for a nice afternoon swim?
The President signs every Bill passed by the Legislature- Obamacare was one of those needing a qualified President's signature that encapsulated 1/5 of the entire economy. The Office of the President Directs and Commands nearly every turn of the Military and Border Security General Principle of our Nation. It's near impossible to say the Character of a person in that Office is not affected by Place and both Parents, which should be in the BIGGEST agreement with women as mothers.
It also just so happens to be the only Office in our Government requiring the unique qualification of born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents - [ natural born Citizen] and in the United States Supreme Court the defining articulation in Case,Minor v. Happersett [No Doubt] those born in the Country of Parents who are Citizens of it are [natural born Citizens].
[At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the
Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born
in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon
their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or [natural-born
citizens], as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities
go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction
without reference to the citizenship of their [p168] parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first.]
Oh the irony of the [United States Supreme Court Case] and Decision that defined [natural born Citizen] actually being on behalf of a women- Mrs. Virginia Minor, a native born, free, white citizen of the United States, and of the State of Missouri, over the age of twenty-one years, wishing to vote for electors for President and Vice-President of the United States, and for a representative in Congress, and for other officers, at the general election held in November, 1872, applied to one Happersett, the registrar of voters, to register her as a lawful voter, which he refused to do, assigning for cause that she was not a "male citizen of the United States," but a woman. She thereupon sued him in one of the inferior State courts of Missouri, for willfully refusing to place her name upon the list of registered voters, by which refusal she was deprived of her right to vote.
So it is a Great Burden of women that they as a Majority have and are sacrificing what is most precious to them., their children and innocence by their confirmation of a Majority and their slothful diligence to these precious Principles.
A Contemporary Understanding of two verses in ISAIAH
The circumstances are very difficult indeed for me to make this egregious report owning to my own heart naturally drawn out to protect women most natural and instinctive, but that protection cannot come or be placed upon me as to be my own dereliction accept by my silence.
What can we say after realizing this? Maybe we were not hard enough on you? Maybe we did not teach it well enough? Women today make up half of the entire professional and technical work force in the United States.
Yet men still dominate in political contributions . More women vote, but only about 30% of big donors contributing are women. Understanding this takes on some relevant features such as opinions may stretch:
ie. [ It’s
not that women are less willing or less able to give in general.
Despite the wage gap, women, across a variety of demographic variables,
are more likely to give to charity than men are. Politics is the
outlier, with men’s giving outnumbering women’s. A
philanthropy researcher offers an explanation: “They give out of more
empathetic and altruistic reasons than men do,” said Debra Mesch, the
director of the Women’s Philanthropy Institute at the Indiana University
Lilly Family School of Philanthropy. “Women may not feel that their
money in the political arena is going to fulfill those motivations.”]
What?! Really? If women didn't feel that their money in the political arena was going to fulfill those motivations - in reference to empathetic and altruistic motivations of giving, why do more women vote than men? They obviously feel a responsibility to the voting booth. If women have failed to give in Political Campaigns I believe it's because they have not been educated to the direct link in the generals of the three things we have discussed, or.. well let's get to it.
1-The importance of the Constitution in their rights as individuals; 2- crime upon the innocents that can be given a deferred prosecution status allowed by law in the Executive Commander-In-Chief position in not enforcing borders and laws, and 3- the basics of responsibility to balancing a check book for the safety of our future generations as it pertains to our National Debt and the importance of delaying gratification in the spending department.
That's right 66% of women are carrying credit card debt compared to 33% of men. [ Stick to a budget. The easiest way to avoid credit card debt –
regardless of your age or gender – is to create and stick to a budget.
At the beginning of the month, decide how you’ll spend your money, and
stick to it.]
Let's pose the question for women. You can get the belt and those matching accessory earrings to that outfit or send $25 dollars to your favorite Presidential Candidate which one is more important to you?
What I'm trying to point out here is that women have so much more to lose in my biased male opinion that it is beyond making any sense for them to sacrifice one single line of the Constitution, and if they were to sacrifice a line the one of most value and importance to their rights and the safety of their children in indeed is the one I am protecting and standing up for. I am the only one in America to have a Federal Court Record in protecting and standing up for it in Judy v. McCain and Judy v. Obama in the U.S. Supreme Court. A women's world is the quickest one to change as it was the hardest one to get where they have finally gotten to in America and in the Office of the President can that world change the fastest and most dramatically with an ineligible person.
Now you might be saying to yourself that any money you send to me is a waste because of this or that. That's just bull. If women get together and send me half of what ineligible Ted Cruz has been sent the Politicians in Washington DC will faint!!! Congress would real!!! and I'm thinking we could move the world in ways you have no idea we could, but the most important factors would be those three we discussed.
1- Safety 2- Crime & 3- National Debt -which could very easily lead to WWWIII slaying millions of your sons and daughters and leaving a lot of blood on your hands. No it's not a joking matter.
In my humble service to you, I haven't made a dime in the last 7 years and 15 Cases of law because I've felt it was so important. I hope you know it doesn't make a bit of sense for me to come here and to cuss you out and make you feel bad for not supporting me with contributions in order to get contributions. In this I agree, but in my motivation for doing and delivering the message I have to say it is indeed your Heavenly Father who has seen this and my interest is not in seeing how much or how many contributions I can get, because that is far from the main point of my relaying the message.
What you do with it is between you and God. I had the courage and love to deliver it.
Let it not come to haunt me in my Eternal Judgement that my care, concern, and love for you my sisters in the USA was not a very high priority. I can only say., please please.. Repent of this which means change your course now. Do not let your hands be bloodied by your own children in this. It is an eternal regret that would be very difficult to bear. To have done harm to the ones you said you loved creates a very hot hell of regret that just a little effort now on your part can soothe in a big way. I hope you will take advantage of that now.
May God Bless You for that courage and may any contributions you make be seen as your sincere protection and interest for those little ones and the Rights you have, as something I am very weak in understanding but whom I trust God knows much better than I- Women. I certainly hope you receive this as as matter of great respect that I have for you.
Sincerely,
CRJ
Here's the Link to Contribute if you'd like to Cody's Campaign improve your record for Taking A Stand for the Constitution. www.codyjudy.us
Cody's
Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that
has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of
the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the
collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a
choice in voting for.
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Every
dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your
individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy,
you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because
he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder
than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.
1)
Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New
Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New
Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court
5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama
Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme
Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court
12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah
Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama
U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396
Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin
The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.
Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
Request for Help: Can you Contribute Today?
Dear CRJ Supporters,
Thank you for your support in the Past. The time is upon us to step-up and kick-in as we are facing a critical juncture that could very easily propel us back into the U.S. Supreme Court which is my sincere hope. Let me preface my remarks with a LTR to Post & Email Editor Sharon Rondeau.
I think it gave me an excellent opportunity to not only inform people not all Democrats are for Common Core, but an excellent opportunity to address the APPLICATION of [natural born Citizen] and its affect on education in regards to our Children's Futures.
As Seen On: http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2016/01/press-release-application-of-education.html
I sincerely hope to get some contributions as I'm facing a real red line here and
appreciate any Help. Haven't had any contributions whatsoever since the U.S. Supreme
Court denied the forma pauperis Motion, but I hope showing the application can be
revisited and reviewed in a New Year 2016, by the Court will inspire people with courage to
support my Campaign a little longer.
Please Remember that the U.S. Supreme Court will NOT entertain any law suit without a Presidential Candidate claiming damages. This was well established in 2008 and 2012 law suits that included reviews by the U.S. Supreme Court in Berg v. Obama and The Ninth Circuit Barnett v. Obama.
We simply musthave a Presidential Candidate involved in this in a bi-partisan way and Cody Robert Judy is the only one with the Record since 2008 that accomplishes this for the Court Review.
We need to raise $2,000 dollars to keep ourselves afloat, while petitioning the U.S. Supreme Court to reconsider their review. We hope to do that with the Educators, Public and Civic Leaders, as well as the support from the Parents of our Nation who are opposed to Common Core as my latest Post intertwines as one cause.
Can you help my Campaign out one more time Today please? With your support you will be added to a 2016 Letter for Reconsideration of Review of Judy v. Obama 14-9396 sent to the U.S. Supreme Court. This will include the detail of how important the Case is and how it can unify the Country in definition of terms and in a way most importantly that does not have an Election at the Stake!
You have seen that Mr. Donald J. Trump has put our cause front and center in the Main Stream Media unbelievably with his questioning Sen. Ted Cruz's eligibility to qualify in the Public Court. You have also seen that Hillary Clinton with what we would call a question [Planted] to her of her consideration to nominate Barack Obama to the U.S. Supreme Court, that she stated she'd never thought about before but upon consideration would be an excellent idea. That's a life time appointment folks and one nomination we cannot afford to even entertain or have considered! http://www.cbsnews.com/news/hillary-clinton-is-open-to-idea-of-nominating-president-obama-to-supreme-court/
I tell you that there is only one way to STOP that from happening and the Public Court of questioning Ted Cruz's eligibility is not enough. We need the U.S. Supreme Court to take up the Case of Obama's Ineligibility and make sure it's recorded in the History of the United States that Obama was the precedent case of what [NOT] to do if you are not qualified as a [natural born Citizen] ie born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents. You do not run for Offices you are not qualified for under the Constitution.
We need to make Obama the precedent Case of a [disability] understood by Amendment 14, Section 3!
The idea that being elected was necessary was ceremoniously thrown out the window with the successes of Presidential Candidates Campaigns like Trump, Carson, and Fiorina, but the Democrats have not yet considered the Judy Campaign worthy of their Democratic Debates. Let's change that with your support.
We have to also make the U.S. Supreme Court's recognize the PRINCIPLES of our U.S. Constitution cannot be sacrificed based on the establishment or money, we have got to make Principle an important part of that and we need to make it correctly in our Courts of Law. My friends, I have stood up for the right way of defining terms, not slunk to bullying the terms over as I view Cruz, Rubio, Jindal, and Obama have.
God Bless Donald Trump for bringing it to the Public Court but you and I know how fast and easily that can disappear if its not Official Court Record standing in our highest Court. Frankly, this is about our children's futures and elections are important, but you have seen how one Constitutional Scholar has trumped another and how we are rocking back and forth. We need a U.S. Supreme Court decision now brought to them specifically in the consideration of Art. II, Section 1, Clause 5., and Cruz, Rubio, Jindal, and Obama should be in support of this not balking or afraid of it.
We need to capitalize on this swinging back and forth and with your support we can! How about helping out today? I haven't given up, and neither should you. I am here for you and you have seen me here for you Taking A Stand over and over and over again. Once again my friends, there is no Rule which prohibits the U.S. Supreme Court from revisiting their Review of my Motion for forma pauperis and reversing their decision. They can do it!
POLITICS MAKES STRANGE BEDFELLOWS- Jeb Bush becoming the Victim of Birtherism rather than Champion of Principle?
A few weeks ago now I wrote Jeb Bush a private letter. Often times as we see with the varying Republican Campaign Managers voicing a get-together on a particular vexing problem mutually troublesome like CNBC's low balling questions to Candidates in Wednesday nights Republican Candidate Debate , Candidates even from across the isle can reach out to one another for a mutual principle aggrieved for a more bi-partisan cause and effect.
"Out of your weaknesses which troubles you the most, and how are you going about fixing it?", was in parlance one of those gotcha questions from CNBC Moderators in the debate last night meant to expose Candidates rather than Receive from their View a wisdom.
In their own defense CNBC stuck up for their Moderators stating a Candidate seeking the highest office must be able to field the toughest questions. However, it's a little distracting from a "Candidate's Debate" to embroil or overshadow a debate with the Moderators opinion.
We've yet to see for instance Hillary Clinton asked, " Since you abandoned the cries for help of 4 people in Benghazi who we're murdered, why should Americans not think you'd do the same for them?"
That question would parallel the one asked to Rubio ,(again parlanced), "Since you have failed in your own finances so miserably, Why should America trust you with a Multiple Trillion dollar budget?" , as if the Office of the President was entirely responsible and Congress had no say in it.
It is of course true, Candidates for President are indeed subject to Leadership Questions and all their character flaws are subjects of exposure. Its a lot like being paraded out naked with only a podium to stand behind.
The objectivity of the questions being whose left without blemish, or perhaps even a "now you know how she feels" in a pay-back of a Moderators particular favorite. While not unreasonable, it is very uncomfortable standing naked in the cold for anyone.
Candidates with high expectations have a double edge sword of trouble to face. That sword comes swiftly from opponents at and in Debate as well as the wealthiest contributors of the GOP who have ponied up over 100 Million Dollars so far for say a Candidate like Jeb Bush.
How would you like to be former Gov. Jeb Bush very close to the bottom in losing debates facing your 100 Million Dollars of Contributors this morning?
In multiple Polls "Conservative Drudge" "Liberal CNBC" both showed Bush in lower single digits far below ineligible Candidates Cruz and Rubio thought by Bush early on to be freshman gnats to be swatted away with the Sledge of Fundraising prowess.
"That's why the very small polling bump for Marco Rubio, not the soaring numbers of Trump and Carson, is Bush's biggest threat."
Poll used in Vox Article
The article looks to explain or understand Jeb's sinking ship with Donald Trump's entry into the race, the lack of GOP Grassroots within Bush's Campaign and his reliance on Big Money Donors, but still grasps rather than relates understanding:
[As grim as things are for Bush, he remains effectively even with Rubio in Polls, drawing support in the high single digits both nationally and in New Hampshire. Every other current or former elected official except Ted Cruz - a politician despised by every other politician - is even lower. So when they're all doing so badly, I'm skeptical that its' traits unique to Bush, like his gaffes or his immigration views, that are preventing him from catching fire.]
ANTI-ESTABLISHMENT SO ANGRY
THE PHENOMENON OF BIRTHERISM IN AMERICA
REALITY CHECK RADIO SHOW PROMOTION
So what happened? When did the Establishment lose the Trust of the grass roots conservative movement in America? They seemed they were doing fine and indeed the Republicans have been rewarded with a majority in the U.S. House of Representatives 2010 and recently regained the U.S. Senate in 2014.
Somewhere between 2010 and 2015 the Republican Elite - Well connected and funded Money People lost track of the General Public or Grass Roots Conservative movement and there is still a lot more of the latter than the former when it comes to a long haul election campaign.
But that in-house resistance did not start in 2010 it began in 2008 with the uproar of Birtherism.
America had not had to deal with the problem for a very long time. Indeed every President of the 43 who have served is listed, at least on Wikipedia, as qualified under the Constitution's Article II., Section 1, Clause 5 requirements of being a [Citizen] at the time of the Adoption of the Constitution, or a [natural born Citizen] thereafter ie. [born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents], accept Barack Obama. Only recently in 2008 was Arthur's documents discovered proving his father had not naturalized as a Citizen although this is not seen as the case on Arthur's Wiki page.
While I as a Democratic Candidate for President in 2016, am doing my best to adhere to the rules of the Democratic Party, which has promised to disqualify any Candidate from the Party's remaining Sanctioned debates who strays from the six sanctioned debates authorized by the Democratic National Committee, I am not limited to debating Private Citizens who are not authorized as Candidates and a lot can be learned from just that if America tunes in.
Of all the comments the one that you really heard the Bat Crack on, might as well feature some baseball parallels with the world series going on, was the one made October 27th, 2015 at 1: 19 AM. Here it is , and I explain a little bit about why it is a home-run afterward:
[In question of how did President Washington fulfill 14 Year RESIDENCY requirement?
Noticing the difference between being a [Citizen] for 14 years verses a [Resident] for 14 years is verily clear to me.
The Residency requirement did not require that to be as a Citizen, but a Resident.
One could fulfill the “14 Year Residency” by being a [R]esident in the Geography prior to bring a Citizen at the Adoption of the Constitution and the beginning of the United States.
That is why the Constitution does NOT say and [14 years a Citizen of the United States] for the Office of President.
Now if you Notice this is very different from the Representative Requirements which in fact do say : [seven Years a Citizen of the United States] and also see U.S Senator [nine Years a Citizen of the United States]
Virginia actually was the 10th State to come into the the Union, but did so in 1788 a Year after 1787 signing of the COTUS.
So again, very clearly, the Office the President did not require a [14 year prior Citizenship] but clearly states [14 years a Resident within the United States]
And The first [Citizen] (s) were Adopted at the signing of the Constitution. We all agree Obama was not there.
[Citizen] was the requirement, because they ALL KNEW, (what many here have failed to either understand, or just blatantly want to stay or be ignorant about), there was no [ natural born Citizens]
Natural born Citizen required Birth in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.
Those first generation Adopted U.S. Citizens had children who were the [natural born Citizens] qualified for the Office of President.
It’s the [Supreme Law of the Land] , not racist. It’s WE THE PEOPLE’S [w]ill by Legislative Mandate, not a whipple of any particular minority.]
The INTENT of our Founders is made very bold in this comment and it stands very solid in debilitating the argument made against the unique qualifications for the Office of the President. One usually does not think about heading to the Resident Requirement for the Office of the President in contrast to the Citizenship requirement for U.S. Representatives or U.S. Senator and I'd almost bet that many politicians haven't done or recognized this profound difference.
What does it do? Well, the argument that 'natural born Citizen' and 'Citizen' is synonymous or mean the same thing is the equivalent of the oppositions argument. They would like to make these terms interchangeable like the words "Equal" or "Sum", but that is not the case.
[Natural born Citizen] is very unique. If you follow the debate on the link what you'll see is that those opposing the (born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents) like to say that there were natural born Citizens of the United States even prior to the signing of the U.S. Constitution. If they can eliminate the fact that there wasnota [natural born Citizen] in the U.S., because no one had been born in the U.S. to Citizen Parent, they in affect neutralize the unique clause of the qualification for the Office of the President by diluting it to "Citizen".
Of course this is plainly not the case or , the [Citizen at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution] would not have needed to be implemented at all. The Founders knew there had been many people who had been born in the geography of the New America since Columbus as he set foot in the Bahamas on October 11 1492 and moved his way up the New Continent.
To say there were not generations of people who were born on this new Continent by those who settled there is of course a denial of around 300 years, however unique to the formation of the United States is the American Nation formed by the United States of America. This is when the jurisdiction of and under of the U.S. Constitution began.
This is why the Founders of the U.S. Constitution stated they were effectively 'Adopted' Citizens in the statement of the President's Qualifications, [Or a Citizen at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution].
This gives a Time Frame of which "Citizens" first were considered such under the Jurisdiction of the new Supreme Law of the Land.
The continuation and continuity of that jurisdiction is understood in the phrase "natural born Citizen" which eliminated any foreign allegiance by birth or inheritance from mother or father. If a foreign birth or inheritance of a foreign citizenship or subject is known in an individual that does not preclude them from being a Citizen, but it does preclude them from being a [natural born Citizen] qualified for the Office of the President and even Vice President.
So in answering the question, "How did the early Founders consider themselves eligible for President under the Constitution's requirement of a 14 year Residency, we see they did that easily by not including the word Citizen but including the word RESIDENT only in the Office of the President.
The residency consideration being in the New America. This plainly enforces and substantiates that [natural born Citizens] did not exist prior to the U.S. Constitution and leaves us with an understanding that those fighting in the Revolution, even if they were born to parents who had immigrated to the new America did not consider themselves [natural born Citizens] and were in need of being Adopted under authority of the new U.S. Constitution as Citizens.
The 14 or so total comments total made in the Discussion are all valuable in their rebuttals and assertions of intelligence in the debate format that was being considered and are better reserved in context than simply listed here, but I'll go ahead and list them for convenience and for reference in a shorter format because wading through 135 other comments many that simply related great insult might not be your cup of tea.
I'll leave those at the bottom of this Post.
BIRTHERISM'S PIRATE OF PRINCIPLE
ABOARD A 100 MILLION DOLLAR SINKING SHIP
SO , How is former Florida Jeb Bush, absent from Governing and Political Office for the last 8 years, suddenly responsible for carrying the weight of the ESTABLISHMENT for the anti-establishment's wrath?
That is really a $100 Million Dollar Question! The answer is quite simply that instead of being his own man, Jeb Bush didn't stand up for Principle in the Constitution's demand for a [natural born Citizen] which would have most certainly garnered what is estimated to be 50% of Trump's base support, by at the very least taking a stand against Rubio as an ineligible Candidate for the Office of the President.
Jeb Bush is Jeb Bush's worst weakness because he's acting like a Pirate of the Principles established in and under our U.S. Constitution and by doing so he has allowed Rubio and Cruz under his blanket and they have like leaches sucked out the grass roots blood from his Campaign and are prepared to leave him for dead.
Of course Gov. Jeb Bush at the beginning of this Campaign never expected to be really challenged in the Campaign as he went for the money rather then Constitutional principles. A few television shows and speeches is really all Mr. Donald Trump needed to separate himself from the 'Establishment' word. He did that on The View, and everyone remembered.
Trump never filed a single paper in Court against Obama, and never gave $1 dollar of support to any Candidate for President who had standing and had filed in Court against Obama or McCain. Mr. Trump certainly hasn't filed a single paper in Court against Rubio, Cruz, or Jindal... ,and it may come back to be the worst mistake of his Political Career if Jeb Bush decided to.
Mr. Trump would be labeled the Fraud Birther and Mr. Bush would be labeled the Man who stood up for Principle instead of pirating it. Less than 100 days now exist before the Iowa Caucus and a 100 MILLION DOLLAR MAN ESTABLISHMENT MAN , is being shuffled off for a dead-on-arrival Iowa Caucus, while he has merrily merrily merrily merrily thought the Office of the President was available to any Dreamers.
Being angry is a secondary emotion, first comes hurt. Americans have been hurt by Obama's illegal occupancy of the White House. They have turned angry by Congress or shall we say any elected official using their bully pulpit to move Congress for Hearings on Obama's ineligibility due by the inherited citizenship of Kenya his father passed to Obama. People want to respect his mother's citizenship in the U.S. , but they want to disrespect Obama's father's Kenya Citizenship that Obama received at birth by Obama's own word and released long form birth certificate.
People want to assume Senator Cruz born outside the U.S. is qualified by his mother's U.S. Citizenship, if she didn't adopt a Canadian Citizenship like her husband did from Cuba to Canada. That is a respect of one parent's Citizenship and a disrespect for the other as equal in a child's inheritance.
It's U.S. Senator Marco Rubio's inheritance from Parents that at the time of his birth made him a first generation American by birth under the 14th Amendment's naturalization principles. Marco Rubio is what many Americans refer to as an Anchor Baby. That does not disqualify him from being a U.S. Senator as he was born here in America receiving his Citizenship jus soli or from the soil, understood under the 14th Amendment- " All those born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are Citizens of the United States, and the State wherein they reside."
Clearly the 14th Amendment was not meant to intro-cede or void the qualifications of the Office of the President's 'natural born Citizen' clause, and those born are declared [Citizens], not ['natural born Citizens.']
Because neither Ted Cruz or Marco Rubio are [natural born Citizens] ie. born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents- they are not eligible for the Office of President or Vice President and former Gov. Jeb Bush by not saying so has allowed the life blood line of his Campaign to be cut off with the tens of millions of dollars he has acquiesced by not taking a stand and doing what the President is suppose to even before he gets to Office of President, which is contained within the President's Oath, "preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.
As a Candidate for President we have what is referred in legal terms to be 'standing' that no one else in America or in any other elected position has. That burden is a heavy one to bear even within one's one political party. I myself filed against both McCain and Obama in 2008 and 2012 making my LEGAL OBJECTIONS known and well understood. No other person has standing, and that is why it is such a heavy obligation to the Constitution immediately upon declaring for President.
Now if I was part of the $100 Million Dollar Club of Gov. Jeb Bush's, and I understood this, don't you think I would be calling him giving him a piece of my mind? I'd be saying Gov. Bush, you have STANDING! That is a responsibility and a duty to running for Office that I am not legally authorized to take. I support you because I have faith that you would preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution. If you can't do that, everything else I have invested in America is going to out in the manure spreader and I am really thinking you are not taking the job as a Candidate serious.
Then I'd probably say something like , you know that Mr. Cody Robert Judy had the courage to take a stand for the Constitution even against the powerful McCain and Obama Camps that were loaded for bear, and he was a nobody. Why don't you Gov. Bush have more courage than that no-body for our Constitution? Maybe if you did you wouldn't have put a tourniquet on the life blood source we call the grass roots of a Campaign and let Rubio and Cruz suck the life out of you after I contributed $100 MILLION DOLLARS to you!
Then I'd tell him he had about 5 days to change his mind about the U.S. Constitution and start acting like a President instead of just getting his picture taken. Now I don't expect Gov. Jeb Bush to do that, unless he decides to be his own man and buck the ESTABLISHMENTS bad wrap. But until he does he certainly deserves the label of being a Pirate of our U.S. Constitution's Principle for the Office of the President.
The Founders concerns, as the Judicial Committee's considerations bear out when in hearing to change the natural born Citizen clause in 2000 witness that a significant change takes place in a 2nd Generation American. The "Time" is the consideration in Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents. It accounts for a longer period of time and is not discriminatory as a qualification for the Office of the President any more than being 35 years or older is to younger people.
It is my hope that all Candidates for President will take their obligations of Standing seriously and take the action within their own Parties to steer our Nation as a ship in a more true course for our Constitution realizing the great emotion born in the sacrifices of so many families to establish a land of the free and a home of the brave under the U.S. Constitution.
The greatest consideration in this is to assume for instance that if Hillary Clinton were to win her Parties Nomination, and lets say Rubio or Cruz won the GOP's Nomination and Rubio or Cruz won the General Election. Would Hillary Clinton ask for a U.S. Supreme Court Ruling making the Candidates Ineligible or even a Congressional Hearing. Will she be as gracious of a loser as Gov. Bush to Rubio or Cruz? In my opinion the answer is when the Presidency is on the line, you fight with every Constitutional Tool available and that tool would be available to her with Cruz or Rubio as a nominee. Of course the other thing you could do to make sure of is by electing me as the Democratic Party Nominee. I'd sure do it!
@RC [Thanks again Doc. Also thanks to Brian Reilly and CRJ who called. We went past the two hour streaming limit but the discussion should be in the archive version. We had a discussion with CRJ and about his case and the definition of NBC.]
It was a real pleasure to be in that Round Table Discussion agreeing to disagree.
As I thought about it this morning I appreciated you letting me come on the show. Things like that ROUND TABLE are EPIC and the Discussion Healthy.
Like Doc said about his experience in WOBC there was one point I regretted not saying as we disagreed on “Precedent Case”
And that would have been to emphasize more the reality that the SCOTUS has not had a Discussion on “natural born Citizen” where it Counts – Between TWO PRESIDENTIAL Candidates.
Thus our Campaigns are regulated by Cases considering “Citizen” and not “natural born Citizen”
I do wish the SCOTUS had enough respect for the Constitution to understand the slight. (smile)
You, Doc,Brian, and myself really engaged in a conversation that should be had in the U.S. Supreme Court and broadcast on Prime Time. . if you just for one minute thought about the hundreds of millions of Votes and Billions of dollars that have gone into the ’08. ’12., and now ’16 Presidential Elections. . that’s an easy up.
If the SCOTUS could not be juiced up by THAT I’d have to say they are in the same condition as the majority of Certs that hit their desk .. D.O.A or Deadlisted.
On a side note:
You and Doc are so talented with your voices. I mean REALLY good! Your both amazingly articulate, distinct, and unique and PRIME TIME is missing out.
Doc’s Voice could sell Beef to Cows. Sam Elliot better watch out , because he could lose his dinner over that voice.
You RC really should be MC’n Bloomberg TV or some other high profile show , with your quick wit, intelligence, and all around savvy.
REALLY was my honor in the Discussion with you guys and with Brian Reilly (who worked on the CCP). . whose sincere desire to look for truth I took as genuine.
You know I thought this morning “America’s Got GreatTalent”
Wouldn’t it be something if the best of the best in forensics, in Congress, in Court, in Politics, got together in Principle for the Truth?
Then I thought .., “Well, that was what the great experience and experiment the USA was all about in the first place with the Freedom and Liberty to do it. ”
You know TODAY that Round Table Discussion at Prime Time would cost millions of dollars. . and the Value would be exponentially higher.
I guess we missed the Pro Salary Cap, but it was a great Scrimage.
Comment 2
@Lupin – Do you know what GroupStink is? Try that question for $500.
@RealityCheck I’m doing a write up Post about the Show and would like to Credit You properly. Could you email me your Preferences and Credits cody@codyjudy.us
What do you get when the LEADING OBAMA CONSPIRACY DOCTOR, REALITY CHECK RADIO , A Former COLD CASE POSSE Investigator and a Presidential Candidate with U.S. Supreme Court Cases under his belt get together on a ROUND TABLE DISCUSSION?
WELL “Shake N Bake” , THAT just Happened!
I came on with a question for Doc Conspiracy (Kevin Davidson) at the 90 Minute Mark and the Show went into two 15 Minute OVER TIMES!
Comment 3
@Rickey AND Sen Ted Cruz (?)
The punitive factor of arguing for any particular Candidate is dismissive of the Principles of Law which we ought to be engaged in.
The dislocation of that lays bear the Constitutional Cupboard
Please Excuse Dis-location
I’ve been regulated to the “moderation” board, so I’m not sure if my comments “if approved” will fall in order.
But that might be due to the sensitive info of which that paticular comment had within it. Understandable.
Comment 4
@ REALITY [I believe it was Judy who thought that the failure to respond was tantamount to a default.]
One thing I’ve learned, always ask for everything. You never know what the Court is going to be in the mood to grant. You just might catch a Judge in a mood, but if you didn’t ask, there’s no way he’s/she’s gonna suggest it., FAULT ? YOURS.
To the questions directed towards my writing style-
One thing my Dad said about not writing me much before he passed away, was because he understood how easily things could be misconstrued, or taken out of context.
It is very True. One thing I could do, actually enjoyed doing was reading what I wrote in my Lions Den Show. I can verbally, with the right and correct verbal fluctuations, make it Understandable.
I do understand the problem, and concede it with out taking any offense at all. I do work on it everyday and consider corrections more helpful than ever are meant harmful.
Again time is a wrestling factor. In my college English and Writing I had A’s and B’s nothing lower. My accumlative GPA was 3.7 in College. .and with just two classes short of 3 minors and 1 major thats a lot classes.
More people… More time.. Things get better.
As an example I wholly got a kick out of the story or scene retold By Professional reporters as the Clerk walked outside with the BIG grey box full of copies of the SCOTUS Courts decision.
As you know there’s a literal SHOPPERS GRAB scramble to get a copy, read it, and report it FIRST.
Well, as long sentences go, and varying degrees and nuances are expressed all colesing around the action and subject, these Reporters just shook their heads at reading it and reporting it wrong, and then having to sit down re read, disect, and re evaluate the findings.
I understand no one likes reading something 10 times to understand it. The more you do it though the more understanding that comes.
Many people do not like or enjoy for example reading the Bible for various reasons. I’ve read it over 100 times and continue every day picking new things up in my understanding. Jesus often spoke in parables not to be seen as a smart A$s or vague, but as a tool of assistance. He was smart enough not to deny us the privilege of ah-hah moments when that understanding would come.
I appreciate all of the good humor here in all the comments, and hope to one day have you helping in a Judy Administration with your truly wonderful talents.
I’m really excited to have gotten to know each of you a little better, and I take your expressions and comments as really caring for me deep inside. I appreciate that. I do care about each of you also and wish you well.
Comment 5
@Lupin
Of course the term had some roots in Frenchs esteemed scholar Vattel
codified in the then contemporary encyclopedia “The Law of Nations” (1758) by Emerich de Vattel. (As a legal source “Law of Nations” is mentioned in Article I, Section 8, #10 of the Constitution in respect to the authority of the US Congress to enforce the law of nations, in particular – against piracies and felonies on high seas).
According to Chapter 19, §212 of “Law of Nations”, “The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country of parents who are citizens”. The concept “Natural born citizen” is a twofold criterion meaning that:
Both parents must be the citizens of, and the birth must take place in the concerned country, assuming that the citizenship inherited by this child and the loyalty are never changed ever after.
In other words, a natural born citizen means at least a second generation citizen of the country.
Of interest and respect to your question without being redundant I have a more in depth analysis of the Discussion for your pleasure which includes many Constitutional scholars.
@Pete Well, appreciate that lengthy consideration. I know it takes time, and time is precious.
Now, in Discussion the semi-agreeable sorta.. Maybe.. We’re not sure item which is contrast:
Which Book, if it was a book would the Founders be more pleased to represent?
England’s Sir William Blackstone Justice of the Court of King’s Bench : writing on
Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England Book the Fourth – Chapter the Fifth : Of Offences Against the Law of Nations
Or
Emerich de Vattel -Swiss philosopher, diplomat, legal expert, author : The Law of Nations” (1758 Translate original French) noted to be influencer of George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, Alexander Hamilton
(?)
Lets see, at the TIME we had just gained our Independence with a very bloody war against England, and if my memory serves me correctly with gratitude towards the French Navy which blocked Cornwallis’s escape Yorktown 1781.
The U.S. Constitution ratification 1789
That’s like a far stretch pretty unlikely.
Certainly would notice my innitial word
[ The Law of Nations” (1758) by Emerich de Vattel. (As a legal source “Law of Nations” is mentioned in Article I, Section 8, #10 of the Constitution in respect to the authority of the US Congress to enforce the law of nations, in particular – against piracies and felonies on high seas).] [Noted with] rather then the word [against]
I do apologize for my incorrect placement also for it reads [ To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas;
To establish Post Offices and post roads
To promote science
To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization and uniform Laws
To coin Money
To declare War
To define and punish Offences against the Law of Nations
Etc Etc Etc
I mean I mixed the list up certainly to advocate a point. The importance of each on the list widely varies from the next, and so we can’t necessarily say as it correctly reads
[To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations;].. Are meant to be birds connected together any more than War and The POST OFFICE or Science.
Of course in your argument the word “of” is missing, and the author is aligned with the enemy of the Revolution England.
In my argument there isn’t a single word missing, we have a friendly ally in French, and a well documented history of affinity with very notable U.S. Founders.
I think my evidence as assumptions still stand more clear in my heart, and the argument and evidence you’ve brought to show has not changed my mind respectfully.
Actually it would be quite old , you are right however about it not being new.
@ Pete [ Just because you say, “Well, it coulda been this way. It woulda been this way if I’d been there. It shoulda been this way, because this is what I think the Founders woulda wanted,” none of that makes it so] DITO
Of course I always turn what people say about me or to me and see if their own argument applies to them. Of course it usually does.
So, when I swear, and cuss, and disparage someone I go see how it holds up in the mirror saying it. LOL!
The key to Vattel is not to claim exact implications , but rather attribute influence. There ya go.
As I believe the Discussion started when I brought up Vattel, I was being lectured about reading history more and being educated by a lot of smart people. Apparently I went too far back for a degree of comfort.
@Pete [The birther goes out and searches diligently to see what few strands of straw he can find to beat against the granite rock of history,..]
The GRANITE ROCK of History as it pertains to the USA is of 43 Presidents everyone has been a (Citizen) at the time of the Adoption of the Constitution, or a “natural born Citizen” (ie. Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents) according to Wikipedia. .accept Obama.
Recently, as my latest Post at the Blog related Arthur was found to be only a Citizen due to his father’s naturalization after Aurther’s 14th birthday. He was not re-elected, nor did he squire the Office without an assasination of President Garfield.
This makes Obama the sole elected Office of the President holder elected in violation of the traditions of U.S. History in the specifically outlined manner as criteria.
Now, what I will give you is I am a MUDDY Rucking Goldless Loser in many respects. I have nothing but mud on my bucket. That’s true. I havent won anything by the important Standards anyone here would really respect.
What I have WON is remarkable to me and more precious then the Gold and Pearl of Ophir; the fact I’m even around to convey it really is just as flabberghasting!
You all know I did 3018 days in Prison. You may not know 4.5 Of those years was in solitary isolation maximum security for standing up for and with the Native American’s Civil Rights to worship their God in appearance according to their Religion.
They had been kept in Solitary Confinement, some over a Decade!
I’ve often questioned “WHY” God would want me to plead “guilty” at first, but then just 3 days later Motion to Withdraw my guilty plea.
I know without a shadow of a doubt if I had fought the charges they would have crumbeled in a Public Trial. Religion has a BIG PART in Freedom of Speech. A central role.
Looking back if I asked myself a question of how you get in to a Prison without being part of the guilty my path was perfect.
Now why would anyone want to go to Prison?
Well, I didn’t know why God wanted me to go either. I had no juvenile or adult previous Criminal Record.
I appealed if course, and it was solely upon the LDS Bishop’s intrepation of Rule 11 that he denide the Motion I had to Appeal. I did that and also Appealed Discovery not being allowed the videotape of the whole thing to make Public. It was had by the Prosecutor and witnessed by the LDS Bishop/Federal District Court Judge.
Don’t expect you guys to know anything about that As you haven’t purchased my book Taking A Stand.
Anyway, the Court hid behind the LDS Church Presidencies Copyright of the Videotape. The evidense used at against me denide.
I was told I’d have To take the LDS Presidency to Court in a separate case to obtain it. I did… Clear to the SCOTUS.
TOOK quite a few years to do that. SCOTUS interestingly enough wrote me a letter after they Denied Cert. Said, we recognise your Case, but not enough people suffer not getting their evidence to take it up.
Meantime, I’d sued for Relief of Cruel and Unusual punishment on the basis of Not cutting my hair as a assist to the Native Americans. I didn’t use religion, but a discrimination of Gender defense. We won!
Amazing Day! To see those men walk out of Solitary Confinement after decades into General Population. Was I on an errand from God?
I do recall a humble prayer to God if there was anything I could do for my fellow man that no one else could, I would do it.
Be careful for what you pray huh?
What else was given to me that was so precious and valuable? What else have I WON?
I cannot imagine if I had been afforded every Constitutional CIVIL Right guaranteed in our U.S. Constitution ever doing 8+ years .
If I had NOT DONE 8 years , would there be a BI-Partisan Federal Court Record by a U.S. Presidential Candidate in the SCOTUS?
I can attest there would not be, nor would this conversion or discussion be happening.
It was ONLY through the PROFOUND LOSS that I came to WIN such a devotion, love, and Respect for the U.S. Constitution.
As I am the only Presidential Candidate with a specific Federal Court Record against Sen. McCain and Sen. Obama with great mentions of Cruz, Rubio, and Jindal within, there wouldn’t be a non-racial claim or a stain free Claim by anyone with standing.
I find offensive the claims of Principle to be denigrated to Racism, or Bigotry. They do not serve the True Record . . my Cases are very much considered as part of the Record.
No we haven’t WON a CASE. In that light it’s pretty dark indeed. It’s really pointless to say otherwise at this time other than Doc, I think you won the bet.
What I have WON is not truly understood by you Gentleman , I consider you as American Friends.
Side note @REALITYCHECK I really like the intro to your Radio show. The American song that plays is cool.
There are many Records kept by God. It’s understood by Christians I know that it is out of the Books that men shall be Judged.
When you think about ALL the Civilizations known to man, … Past & Present and you think of the Records of each civilization being their own history. That is Cannon.
Out of all that’s been written their are some Records esteemed much higher than others. Some are lost., some just forgotten.. Some kept up.. Some given as Witnesses.
This is all the Bible is.. A Record of the Jews. Falling away..being brought back in a Restoration. It’s a repeated story, one in which we to are living.
Good Day
Comment 8
@Rickey [ Yet no Democratic candidate argued that his father’s lack of citizenship made Obama ineligible, and in fact no Republican candidate made that claim, either.]
You qualify those who object to the R’s or D’s and seem to exclude Independents. This is certainly dismissive of Independents that now out number both.
Judy v. McCain included an EMERGENCY MOTION near the end of the Docket that submitted Berg v Obama SCOTUS Case. I was a I – Presidential Candidate at the time.
This birds been flying 6.5 years without a rest.. Lol.. Whew!
@Keith I certainly did not mean to say the Colonist were radically set to dispose of EVERYTHING English, including language or the few decencies the English may have picked up on in The Ten Commandments forming a common good. (smile)
That’s taking my suggestion and a sailing out on a limb for sure. Lol
Balance is Key GENTLEMAN.. and flailing about in extremist unbalanced curriculum is not my style, or tantamount to my suggestions with Pete in contrasting two Printed works. One he suggested and one I suggested, which is on record from multiple sources as having “influence” on the Founders as a great assistance. Noted with Vattell I brought up.
I’m sure Blackstone’s work did also as well the 10 Commandments and The Holy Bible which of course does not directly infer any particular religion.
I believe Vattell did write exactly what I inferred he wrote. It seems the opposite is the nature of Pete’s argument.
@Doc I noticed on the Wiki Entry of Arthur they have his father as a U.S. Citizen and not a foreigner. This then places Obama alone.
It really was my extended research on Arthur that lent the 2008 revelation that popped up his father had not naturalized. I would hardly call a recent discovery precedent for Obama. Re: my latest Blog entry http://www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
Truly, according to U.S. History Obama is the only one without credentials under the Conditional Authority of “Citizen at the Time of the Adoption of the U.S. Constitution (the same as Representatives and Senators qualification ) and “natural born Citizen” ie Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents after.
The 8 attempts to change “Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents” to other conditions by Congress since 2003 are strong evidence towards legal reason substantiating this parameter for [natural born Citizen].
The failure of all 8 would be considered a Continued Legislative Mandate for the Judicial Branch to uphold as Constitutional.
Of course the [two citizen Parents] cannot be under estimated in current all be it non binding U.S. Resolution 511 As a remarkable as well modern consideration of Legislation many here fail to include OBAMA himself as a U.S. Senator co- sponsored.
This indicates Obama himself would and did outlaw himself with one U.S. Citizen Parent from the Office of the President in the qualification of [natural born Citizen] under its conditions and justifications excluding “place” in particular circumstances.
@ Doc [ Your hopeless ] I don’t believe so Doc , I tell you I have lots of Hope. But I may indeed be hopeless to avoiding the Facts I bring to the table. I see no reason to abandon them . THEY are FACTS.
Comment 9
Great Example here of Law depicting [Citizen] not [ natural born Citizen] as lawful intrpretation.
The following shall be nationals and [citizens] of the United States at birth: … outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, … 477, title III, ch. … L. 95–432, §§ 1, 3, Oct. 10, 1978, 92 Stat.
8 U.S. Code § 1401 – Nationals and citizens of United States at birth …
Cornell University
It’s a Congress Act ALIENS & NATIONALS which depicts a lawful naturalization a-h none of which include [born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents]
Why?
Because [ natural born Citizen] ie. Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents – there was no need to naturalize. It was a given. It was clearly understood. It was stable. It was common knowledge.
It’s remarkable that the reverse has happened.
When the undefined, but understood , becomes that which is said to be ridiculous or insubstantial in court.
Great Example comes to mind for clarity of what I’m saying. In the movie A FEW GOOD MEN Tom Cruise playing Lt. McCaffee question a Infantryman –
Q.”Can you tell me what page the directions are in the Marine Manual to the Mass Hall? ”
“A.”ummm there isn’t one.”
Q. ” YOU mean you have never had a meal?”
A. “No, I’ve eaten every meal.”
Q. ” How did you know where the Mass Hall was if it’s not in the Manuel?”
Code Red not found in the Manuel is like ( [ natural born Citizen – born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents) or finding the Chow Hall.
Minor v. Happerset simple stated the obvious in saying it was never doubted that those born in the Country to Citizen Parents were themselves natural born citizens.
Comment 10
The distinction of separate terms occurs in one paragraph.
[ No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United Stated , at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President;]
We notice it was impossible for a single person to be [natural born Citizen] Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents because the United States didnt exist until the LAW of Authority in Constitution was signed as Supreme Law.
This made all those at the time [Citizens] of a New Nation.
Congress was given naturalization powers to adopt Citizens.
Anyone born of Citizens in the U.S were [natural born Citizens] under constant jurisdiction of the same law
The term [natural born Citizen] was considered a WALL to foreigners. .and aliens and nationals adopted as Citizens by naturalization or any process of Government are considered Foreigners to that Office of President.
It’s the only thing that preserves the intent of national security, and gives reason the same qualification was not intended for Representatives and Senators.
(Chief Justice) John Jay to (Pres) George Washington
[Permit me to hint, whether it would not be wise & seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expresly that the Command in chief of the american army shall not be given to, nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen.]
Aliens and Nationals are considered adopted by some naturalization process including declarative Congressional Act or Title X a-h which is necessary for entitlement justification.
Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents is not listed in TITLE X but we get entitlements. .because it was never doubted.
Sadly, the twisting and contortions have failed the most basic fundamental truths on some lawyers profound new truth that of its not listed it isn’t. That’s just poppy cock reasoning and voids deductive reasoning we are all very capable of.
Comment 11
@arthur Perhaps you could point out the case of 2 Presidential Candidates, one stating damages to his Campaign with Standing that has occured in the U.S. Supreme Court over the specific [ natural born Citizen] clause unique to the qualification of the Office of President in the U.S. Constitution?
Actually Heard by SCOTUS in History?
If you can’t we must assume it’s pretty recent the shift took place as consideration.
Judy v. Obama 14-9396 gave us as close of an encounter as we have had.
By your standard there should be no hurdle of the Political Doctrine Question or Ripeness Doctrine
Can you recall such a time in History that an all OUT assault on the prohibition of Constitution construction took place?
Comment 12
@Soduko [The courts have consistently held there are only two kinds of citizens, natural born or naturalized. There is no third category of a citizen at birth, by virtue of being born in the US, who is not a natural born citizen.]
Certainly those born in the U.S. qualifying as anchor babies under the NATURALIZED Clause of the 14th amendment would be also understood As naturalized by an Act of Congress.
No one part of the Constitution can void another. Both terms Respected.
The 14thAMEND did not void a qualification for President in Art 2, Sect 1, C-5.
In question of how did President Washington fullfill 14 Year RESIDENCY requirement?
Noticing the difference between being a [Citizen] for 14 years verses a [Resident] for 14 years is verily clear to me.
The Residency requirement did not require that to be as a Citizen, but a Resident.
One could fullfill the “14 Year Residency” by being a [R]esident in the Geography prior to bring a Citizen at the Adoption of the Constitution and the beginning of the United States.
That is why the Constitution does NOT say and [14 years a Citizen of the United States] for the Office of President.
Now if you Notice this is very different from the Representative Requirements which in fact do say :
[seven Years a Citizen of the United States]
and also see U.S Senator
[nine Years a Citizen of the United States]
Virginia actually was the 10th State to come into the the Union, but did so in 1788 a Year after 1787 signing of the COTUS.
So again, very clearly, the Office the President did not require a [14 year prior Citizenship] but clearly states [14 years a Resident within the United States]
And The first [Citizen] (s) were Adopted at the signing of the Constitution. We all agree Obama was not there.
[Citizen] was the requirement, because they ALL KNEW, (what many here have failed to either understand, or just blantantly want to stay or be ignorant about), there was no [ natural born Citizens]
Natural born Citizen required Birth in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.
Those first generation Adopted U.S. Citizens had children who were the [natural born Citizens] qualified for the Office of President.
It’s the [Supreme Law of the Land] , not racist. It’s WE THE PEOPLE’S [w]ill by Legislative Mandate, not a wipple of any particular minority.
Comment 14
@Gorfan [W]as it ratified by the Particular State?
There have been Congress People in the U.S. Congress that have proposed 8 times to change the [natural born Citizen] clause understanding [born in the U.S to Citizen Parents] to something else. They all failed to pass.
The point being just because it’s proposed certainly does not mean ratified. Legislation has been proposed in AZ that would make what Obama did a little less likely to occur. The Gov. Vetoed it.
@Lupin & @Ron Even if Trumps mother was “dual” he was born to U.S. Citizens this making him a [natural born Citizen] ie. Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents. Obama’s father was not a dual citizen he was Kenyan and didn’t even try to be immigrate or naturalize. We should respect Obama’s father’s heritage equally in consideration Obama inherited such Kenyan Citizenship from his father.
To not RESPECT Obama’s father equally is rather racist in my opinion.
@Magic M Thank you for your support in stating that. Indeed.
Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396
Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin
The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.
Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
to Vattel is not to claim exact implications , but rather attribute influence. There ya go.
