Wednesday, January 27, 2016

Breaking Report: Do U.S. Supreme Court Justices Owe Americans an Opinion on Natural Born Citizen?

Breaking Report: 
Featured at Post & Email
Do U.S. Supreme Court Justices Owe?
 Justices Owe Americans an Opinion on Natural Born Citizen?

Judy v. Obama 14-9396

The [natural born Citizen] qualification for the Office of the President is not the same as the [Citizen] requirement for U.S. Senators or Representatives. The Qualifications encoded in the U.S. Constitution directly give them a Special Priority in the accountability of the U.S. Supreme Court Justices duty in a Life Tenure. The differing opinions in Constitutional Scholarly Opinions even differ, as does the opinion of every American Citizen judge giving their opinions on Facebook as fact of Law. The differing opinions are not new, however what is relatively new is the application of the qualification in the modern Political Arena affecting Americans now in three major Presidential Elections of 2008, 2012, and now 2016 with Cruz, Rubio, Jindal, McCain, Obama. and the problem is particularly affecting millions of Americans right now in many different ways as well as Candidates, so the question is: Do the U.S. Supreme Court Justices owe America an Opinion on the definition of [natural born Citizen] particularly in the Race for the U.S. Presidency?

There is only one Presidential Candidate in America that has a Bi-Partisan Federal Court Record in the defense of the [natural born Citizen] qualification for the Office of the President who has been a Candidate in every one of the last three Presidential Elections and that is Cody Robert Judy. Bi-Partisan means he has sued both major parties- The Republicans in McCain and The Democrats in Obama. He also has two Cases appealing for an Opinion in the high U.S. Supreme Court ie Case No. 12-5276 and 14-9396.

Cody says, " I do believe the U.S. Justices owe Americans an Opinion. Any Constitutional Scholar will tell you the difficulty that exist in getting a Case like mine, with two Presidential Candidates in the same party, running for the same office, which fulfills the difficult the standing requirement to the U.S. Supreme Court and preferably without an Election hanging in the Balance, but that is exactly what I've done in Judy v. Obama 14-9396."

"Obama has been in office 7 years now. He has every benefit of really being defacto President. He's enjoyed the White House, decision making, the good, bad, and the ugly of the Office. I on the other hand have not and have suffered the damages Obama's being in that Office illegally has caused. No one really wants to look at the damages of the illegal usurpation upon someone like myself, but they are significant and accountable damages and I have brought those to the attention of the Court in a lawful manner I don't think anyone could say the way I've brought those to the Court was not in an honorary, civil, and gentleman's way."

"The problem is that the problem is not going away. If you have read my law suit which is only about 15 pages in single lines, you understand that the questions are asked that indeed are affecting U.S. Senator Cruz, U.S. Senator Marco Rubio, Governor Bobby Jindal, U.S. Sen. John McCain, and U.S. Senator Barack Obama and cover 3 Presidential Elections. It is not easy in the ripening doctrine of Case litigation to be around for a decision from the U.S. Supreme Court. In average cases 7 years is not a far stretch of the imagination to get a case to the U.S. Supreme Court as was recently exampled from Proposition 8 to national gay marriage."

Indeed the problems caused by the broad based scope of interpretation by politicians seizing upon their own popularity rather than the narrow directive articulated quite plainly in Art. II, Section I, Clause 5 is not localized to just Presidential Candidates but has affected every Citizens Contribution to or for any Presidential Candidate.

The Constitution plainly states two types of qualifications for the Office of the President. One type was for those who were distinguished revolutionary patriot [Citizen]s such as were at the time of the Adoption of the Constitution. The other, an incentive to propagate the new American Nations, and also to avoid foreign influence, or the [natural born Citizen] articulated selectively as [born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] as these are the [natural born Citizens] as was held in the precedent findings of Minor v. Happersett. These are noticed in a quick 2 minute video by the CRJ Campaign entitled a Constitutional Reckoning here:

We asked Cody what he felt worst about, his own losses or the losses of those Contributing to Presidential Campaigns under the presumption the Candidate would be qualified to hold the Office if elected?

"This has probably been mine own worst nightmare. Contributions have meant so much to my Campaign because they have been so rare. When someone sent me $2, or $10, or one time I received $200 I knew there was a real trust in those dollars for our Constitution and especially in my Stands and noticed U.S. Supreme Court Cases for the [natural born Citizen] qualification to be upheld."

"Although the contributions to my Campaigns have been few, they held great weight on my shoulders, but it just wasn't the Contributions to my campaign I was counting. I also counted those who trusted other Presidential Candidates to actually be qualified for the Office. If I knew the Candidates they had contributed to were not constitutionally qualified, that was a contribution collected in a deceptiveness or fraudulent way."

The campaign collection of Candidates who are still questionably qualified under the U.S. Constitution's Standards range:
Sen. John McCain Total: 368 Million
Sen. Barack Obama: 730 Million (2008)  964 Million (2012)
Sen. Ted Cruz: 39 Million
Sen. Marco Rubio: 17 Million
Gov. Bobby Jindal: 1 Million

Total: 2,119 Billion

"It seems incomprehensible to me", said Cody, "that the U.S. Supreme Court Justices would not see the great responsibility to clear up the definition to an over 2 Billion dollar potential or alleged abuse of American's contribution dollars to illegal or unqualified Presidential candidates.

 "Its like they have no conscience! Remember that is not counting the dollars to candidates who were qualified under the two generation accountability of [born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents], but only the ones that were not. To understand the cognitive dissonance of the Justices is to recite that my case relatively claimed 40 Million in damages of time, talent, and money in elections 2008 and 2012 and their opinion did not count or ask them to disqualify a Candidate from Office but only recognize the [damages] giving the responsibility to Congress to remove if deemed necessary. That's pretty important, and relative to the damages of 2 Billion upon Americans 40 Million is a drop in the bucket, but indeed is able to affect the future of Campaign Contributions as well as Presidential Campaigns. But let's not forget about the 10 Trillion added to the national debt by Obama?"

"If we consider the U.S. Supreme Court Justices accountable to the U.S. Constitution, yet allowing this under-handed fraud to go on in broad daylight, until say the whole election comes rushing in like Gore v. Bush did on counting chads only it has to do with the [natural born Citizen] qualification, how much more difficult is that as far as the Union of our Nation? And what kind of a responsibility is it to refuse my Case based on a $300 dollar filing fee and approximated $4,500 printing cost, I did not have the money for as I showed them in Review with Bank Statements and my 5 page forma pauperis motion granted in fact by the Utah District Court and the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals?"

We are seeing the damages that are being done to U.S. Senator Ted Cruz's campaign for President by the simple assertion from Mr. Donald J. Trump's Campaign that he is not qualified. This is not the Court's opinion officially but the question that remains unanswered by the U.S. Supreme Court. Of course Sen. Cruz was invited along with Mr. Rubio to file a Amicus Curiae April 27th 2014 which is a friend of the Court, assisting in relativity of affect in the decision in favor or against the action.

We have seen in real time how the trial in public court has affected Sen. Cruz negatively as we look at his Poll Numbers in Iowa where he started to surge against Mr. Trump at times  until Mr. Trump began questioning Cruz's eligibility because he was doing better.

It just seems obvious that the U.S. Supreme Court should handle this question and with a Case in front of them that only needs a reversal of the Motion for forma pauperis it seems a real dis-service to the Nation and all of the contributions Americans make to the Presidential Candidates not to protect those contributions now and in the future.

Thank You America for the 340,000 Views on this Blog!

The only Presidential Candidate in America with a bi-partisan Federal Court Record on the [natural born Citizen] clause in defense of it can't afford the printing and filing cost to the U.S. Supreme Court. What's wrong with this picture America?

America, we are in need of a Contribution Revolution! Wont' you now Take a Stand with me? We would like to thank publicly The POST & EMAIL today for recognizing in a story our hard work!

Here's the Link to Contribute if you'd like to improve your record for Taking A Stand for the Constitution. Direct…/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm

It's not a prank, or a joke, or a thrill. It's a Crime and it's Time America takes a Stand for the Man whose been preserving, protecting, and defending the Constitution's natural born Citizen Clause as a hero for all Americans and our Future-

My Writ before the Court has not been denied. Please read these post for a detail of why my Forma Pauperis Motion has been denied.

Cody Robert Judy

D-Candidate for President 2016

BIRTHER Pie-In-The-Sky U.S. Supreme Court

The Challenge was issued on Cody Robert Judy's Twitter Account and sent to several Major Media Outlets.

Thank You!

CRJFacebookPres2016 JOIN US!

Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy


Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.

Web Site

We want to thank you for the 330,000 views on this Blog!

Keep coming back!


INSPIRING - I believe in You

Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!


Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

Cody Robert Judy's book :
Taking A Stand- the Conservative Independent Voice.

Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.


1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts

12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial

13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008

14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case

15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

No comments:

Post a Comment