Friday, February 13, 2015

Fight Over Forgiveness LDS Church Leaders & Church Owned Deseret Newspaper CEO Charged in Hate Crimes

Fight Over Forgiveness LDS Church Leaders & Church Owned Deseret Newspaper CEO Charged in Hate Crimes

Today is Friday the 13th 2015, I'll never forget a Friday the 13th 1993 when I was walking a long hallway with cell doors and sections down it. I thought, "Boy this seems like a bad day for sure, like I'm walking into to hell." I've tried very hard to live a Christ centered life. To not only treat others the way I'd like to be treated but also to walk the extra mile and forgive not just seven times but to forgive seventy times seven knowing I myself would fall short at times and sin in some way against my brother and that I would need to be forgiven even as I forgave.

The feeling of forgiving someone whole heartedly after they have done you wrong is a good one and it releases a burden on your shoulders. I've tried very hard to separate church and state from my own prosecution and include those principles of goodness we know are inherently good in both, as they are called for by example, in word and deed. There does come a time when you are called to fight back and when you do or when you are called to, you understand God is with you and not against you in the motive and that the tolerance of the Almighty has reached a breaking point for which you know that the seventy times seven time-threshold has been accomplished.

I was startled awake last night with a dream that The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Leadership and its corporate conglomerations associated with The Deseret News should be reported for the 'hate crimes' perpetrated upon me in my federally protected Campaign activity by law. I myself was stunned by the revelation being in such the habit of taking the stripes instead of delivering them as they are merited. I do not deliver the news in any kind of triumph, but rather by duty to the law and the recognition of the wisdom. I will state I have nothing but love for those of the community who are generally good practicing and faithful members of the LDS Church whom I both live around and respect for their general goodness, charity, and all around tranquility in a law abiding way to live peaceable among many differing faiths and beliefs. I am clearly drawing a line of aggression towards those so named in leadership as to the aggrieved state of my person.I am not a representative member any longer being excommunicated by the Faith in 1995 or 1996.

The incidents I related substantiating the violations of The Mathew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Act of 2009 cooperating in line with the 1969 Federal Hate Crimes Law are rooted in both the character assassination made in print at The Deseret News and physical beating I took at the Marriott Center Feb. 7th, 1993 in my civil protest, predicated today in my run(s) for President and other offices over the last twelve years in contaminating and aggravating my record.

To substantiate this I call upon two things. Number One the video tape of the protest at the Marriott Center (The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, hereafter also(LDS) or (Mormon)Fireside. The link provides an attempt by KTVX to also obtain the evidence of the tape you can find at the bottom of the linked article. Also (FootNote 1)

This tape shows the assailants and is a record of me beaten and beaten into an unconscious state and lying on the floor as an attempt to kill or murder me for which I was rushed to the hospital receiving and diagnosed with head trauma, black eyes, broke or cracked rips and multiple bruises up and down my entire body including my legs, calves, thighs, arms, back, and sides.

The tape is held under copyright by The LDS Church Presidency (current). It was given by the LDS Church to the prosecuting attorney in my criminal case, shown to the Judge of my case but I was denied a copy of it, because as the 4th District Court Judge Guy Burningham, criminal case of State of Utah v. Judy, (who also simultaneously was set apart in the LDS Church acting in the office of the Church as a Bishop) told me, "They didn't want it to end up with Barbara Walters on 20/20".

I did do diligence to obtain the tape as instructed by the Judge/Bishop stating I would have to get it from the LDS Church Presidency. I sued the LDS Church Presidency for the evidence depicting the assault but was denied it in Federal Court appealed to the 10th Circuit and then to the United States Supreme Court. From the United States Supreme Court I received the condolences that not enough people suffered from not being given their evidence used against them in criminal proceeding for worry of that court, meaning my individual rights had been violated but that was just to bad.

I was incarcerated for 3018 days, or eight point two years and that begin just over twenty two years ago. The thing which makes this so relevant today has been the continuous actions of The Desert News, a conglomerate subsidiary of the LDS Church as I will show, in a continuously crafted character assassination that fabricates and embellishes not only the incident, but outright lies regarding the prosecution and circumstances, lending a devastation to not only myself but the community at large in fear of the same bias and prejudice treatment based on actual or perceived religion as it relates to our continually evolving digital data record(s) available to anyone that searches the internet.

The Deseret News is singled out here because of a particular practice I find rather unique and which might be directly attributed to the CEO and President of The Desert News Mr. Clark Gilbert. The practice unlike other papers even within the Utah area like the Salt Lake Tribune is to leave off the "year" of the article in the i-phone review of the article. How this relates in the data search fields of the article is seen by users as if it happened yesterday and with me not twenty two years ago BUT yesterday or today.

This then acts as a prosecution of my religion every day of my life, the same as if a sign was held up around the world that desecrated my religion and persecuted me every day for it. The maximum penalty in Utah's discretionary minimum mandatory laws Utah practices sentenced me to 1-15 years. Fifteen years was over seven years ago and the Utah Board of Pardons & Parole actually held me eight years with four on parole, which was incredibly harsh for a first offense with no damages to life, limb or property and no weapon. However, The Deseret News has continually aggrieved and aggravated me over the same thing twenty-two years causing both a hardship on my employment and participation in commercial activity. To add to that, the State forgave me long ago stating I have full filled their obligation of penalty, but the LDS Church has maintained their trespassing restraining order against me even to this day, twenty-two years later. Not that I care or that they don't have a right to do that, but only to emphasize a continued malice that exist that goes hand in hand with these hate crime assertions that collaborate with the Deseret News fabricated headlines.

In fact, if you search my name this story of The Deseret News comes up in the top 5 as number 4 on the Internet. No other television, radio, or newspaper story comes up twenty two years later. The reason for this could be that The Deseret News runs the story as if it happened today with no year attached to the story itself, and represents a 'hate crime' of bias and prejudice against my person that is contrary and in violation of hate crimes laws regulated in particular of this incidence in the frame of "Religion". I also believe the story has been updated to include my middle name in particular since I have been running for Federal Office, which accommodates an active and willful prejudice and bias to do me, and my reputation harm in the federally protected activity of running for office in elections of the population, substantially creating a serious national problem. This warrants the FBI's investigation and a federal grant to accommodate that.

The Hate Crimes perpetrated by these actions are collaborated by the binding ties of the LDS Church Presidency & Twelve Apostles and The Deseret News President Mr. Clark Gilbert as are illustrated in the following snap shots of CEO and President of The Deseret News posted on the Internet.

These snap shots illustrate in the story my testimony that God had told me what to do, what to say, and who to say it to. The harm upon our society as labeling this as a psychotic action is what? No one can say In God We Trust anymore? No one can say, "God told me" and its a direct violation of our God Given Rights and Freedom. God gave us our Freedom. Men did not give it to us. Thus it is only evil men that seek to take away our freedoms. Many times in our Declaration of Independence as well our Constitution is God referred to.

What gives anyone the right to say God didn't tell me that and take away my Freedoms and Liberties and imprison me for it? No one has that right and its a basic right of our inalienable rights. You can certainly tell me to 'shut up', but its the penalty that was attached to it that makes it an infringement of my rights based on MY RELIGION. Did anyone else go to prison? Was anyone else charged? No. So, what we have here is two religious interpretations of my words.

Does the State have the right to come into the Church and dictate terms? That's actually a good sign there is a Tyrannical Dictator involved in Government. Where there is a difference of interpretation and evidence supporting mine exist physically, and the evidence of their's is not, whose should the State's favor? Well, the state and the newspaper should observe mine. I in fact did have nothing but a brief case full of scriptures I do think are dynamite one of which was a Book Of Mormon, most Mormons will tell is not fake, but is abbreviated B.O.M. This makes any headline using the word Bomb a false narrative, a fabrication, an embellishment or aggrandizement of facts.

So, what does that have to do with the headline of The Deseret News story? Well, you can clearly see not only has their headline been false for twenty two years, but they have embellished it contrary to the State charges which amounts to a fabrication of deceit upon the public in a religious assault to me, my family, and my friends making them fear ever hearing from God. That is a hate crime based on an assault upon our inalienable rights. Are you going to arrest Katy Perry next for saying she heard a word from God and received a confirmation for it at the Superbowl half time show or is that ok, because you agree with it?

Now the headline from the Deseret News says what? Well, its false I did not plead guilty to a "Bomb Threat". That's totally false! I mean Brian Williams mis-remembers his helicopter being shot at, and is suspended for six months from a job that pays 10 Million a year and the Deseret News wants to fabricate my life everyday for the rest of my life, make a profit selling advertisment on it, and cut out the "year", so in the general public's mind they supposedly serve, a fabricated story is up every day? That's a hate crime! The first paragraph of the story is totally false.

I did not plead guilty to 'threatening the life of an LDS Church Leader with a fake bomb!" Read the Court documents! It did not happen!


These are fabricated and false headlines meant to do me much more harm in a nefarious intent over a life time! Because I only have one, I have to protect it and there clearly is a much more sinister and libelous account coming from The Desert News that for some reason is much longer lasting. The connection of ownership with the LDS Church Leadership is the obvious connection, and accounts, perhaps on a broader scale the exaggeration and fabrications of falsehood in reporting with the connection of the cover-up of the video tape that has protected those of its members who participated in the mob like violences against my person.

Now I can say nearly every day over twenty two years, I have been psychologically pounded with defending myself of the false report specifically and intentionally kept in the public eye as if it happened yesterday by The Deseret News CEO and President who has a direct tie to the LDS Church 12 Apostles and Church President who have held my evidence and protected the prosecution of others in their assault upon me. That is happening today as vigorously as it was twenty two years ago. This is a hate crime against me based upon my Religion and the word of God to me.

I'm telling you I should not be persecuted or prosecuted like this. We have laws forbidding it and my suffering is intense and is pretty well recorded yet I have no relief and I'm sick of it. I can not bear the fault for relaying a message from God, and that's all I did. I was not playing the enforcer role. I was reporting the truth that was no harm or threat to anyone, yet it is still being framed that way by The Desert News owned by the LDS Church and this is a hate crime against a candidate for Office that is protected as a Federal Activity.

Now the Deseret News has heard my complaint before, but they have not heard that the complaint was formalized into a Civil Rights law suit for damages, and forwarded to the FBI for prosecution. Now if you type in "Cody Judy" you get an even worse scenario the Wiki page of Howard W. Hunter and two stories from the Deseret News, one from BYU Universe regarding this. It takes 5 pages to find another story from another newspaper that has a story actually from the Daily Clipper that revolved around my run for the U.S. Senate in 2004. This is why the policy of continual persecution from a Religious Bias or Prejudice exist with The Deseret News and I feel full fills the hate crime criteria.


The Hate Crimes Bill of 1969 that are also afforded in the more recent Mathew Shepard Act are as follows:

Sec 4701 - Short Title
Sec. 4702
1)The incident of violence motivated by the actual (religion) of victim poses a serious national problem.
2)Such violence disrupts the tranquility and safety of communities and is deeply divisive.

5)A prominent characteristic of a violent crime motivated by bias is that it devastates not just the actual victim and the family and friends of the victim, but frequently savages the community sharing the traits that caused the victim to be selected.

6.B)Members targeted associated with - sustaining employment - or participating in other commercial activity

1)In General
Offenses involving actual or perceived (religion)in origin - whoever willfully causes bodily injury to any person because of the actual or perceived religion of any person -
A) Shall be imprisoned not more than 10 years, fined in accordance with this title or both
ii) An attempt to kill

(2)(c) (1) RULES OF CONSTRUCTION - the term bodily injury has the meaning given such term in section 1365(h)(4) of this title, but do not include solely emotional or psychological harm to the victim:

Conspiracy Against Rights, 18 U.S.C. § 241. Section 241 of Title 18 is the civil rights conspiracy statute. Section 241 makes it unlawful for two or more persons to agree together to injure, threaten, or intimidate a person in any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the Unites States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same). Unlike most conspiracy statutes, Section 241 does not require that one of the conspirators commit an overt act prior to the conspiracy becoming a crime. The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.

Voter Intimidation (upon the readers of The Desert News,State of Utah Citizens, and in fact all the People in the Nation with my Candidacy for President in 2008, 2012, and now 2016.)

Intimidation of Voters, 18 U.S.C. § 594
Section 594 makes it illegal to use intimidation, threats, or coercion, or attempt to use any of these means, to interfere with the right of another to vote or vote as the individual chooses, or to cause the individual to vote or not vote for any particular candidate for federal office.

The State Blew Up my Scriptures in front of the cameras for the news when they knew there was no weapon!

Damage to Religious Property
Damage to Religious Property, 18 U.S.C. § 247. Section 247 of Title 18 prohibits anyone from intentionally defacing, damaging or destroying religious real property because of the religious nature of the property, so long as the crime is committed in or affects interstate commerce. The statute also prohibits anyone from intentionally obstructing or attempting to obstruct, by force or threat of force, a person in the enjoyment of that person's religious beliefs, where the crime is committed in or affects interstate commerce. Finally, the statute prohibits anyone from intentionally defacing, damaging or destroying any religious real property because of the race, color, or ethnic characteristics of any individual associated with the property, regardless of any connection to interstate or foreign commerce. Section 247 also prohibits attempts to do any of the above.

The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.
It took me years to convince my own mother I did not have an incendiary bomb or device because the authorities used theirs to blow up my Bible and B.O.M. (Book of Mormon). They did it to frame me and deceive the whole population!

Hate Crimes adds an element of bias to traditional crimes—and the mixture is toxic to our communities. The FBI States: Crimes of hatred and prejudice—from lynchings to cross burnings to vandalism of synagogues—are a sad fact of American history, but the term “hate crime” did not enter the nation’s vocabulary until the 1980s, when emerging hate groups like the Skinheads launched a wave of bias-related crime. The FBI began investigating what we now call hate crimes as far back as World War I, when the Ku Klux Klan first attracted our attention. Today, we remain dedicated to working with state and local partners to prevent these crimes and to bring to justice those who commit them."

The Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr., Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009 , 18 U.S.C. § 249. Section 249 of Title 18 was enacted as Division E of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (starts at pg. 646 of the Act). Section 249, which went into effect in October 2009, created a new federal criminal prohibition against willfully causing bodily injury (or attempting to do so using fire, a firearm, or another dangerous weapon), when (1) the crime was committed because of the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin of any person, or (2) the crime was committed because of the actual or perceived religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability of any person and the crime affected interstate or foreign commerce or occurred within federal special maritime and territorial jurisdiction. The law also provides federal funding and technical assistance to state, local, and tribal jurisdictions to help them to more effectively investigate and prosecute hate crimes.

With that also comes a LIBEL LAW SUIT
a published false statement that is damaging to a person's reputation; a written defamation.
synonyms: defamation, defamation of character, character assassination, calumny, misrepresentation, scandalmongering; aspersions, denigration, vilification, disparagement, derogation, insult, slander, malicious gossip; lie, slur, smear, untruth, false report; informalmudslinging, bad-mouthing
the action or crime of publishing a false statement about a person.
"a councilor who sued two national newspapers for libel"
a false and malicious statement about a person.
a thing or circumstance that brings undeserved discredit on a person by misrepresentation.
(in admiralty and ecclesiastical law) a plaintiff's written declaration.
defame (someone) by publishing a libel.
"she alleged the magazine had libeled her"

The damages to my life are extensive and as a practicing Christian I believe these are punishable by law. The Cover-Up is scandalous. The Frame Job nefarious. The Prosecution and persecution sinister, intolerable, and happening every day.
I feel conservatively the penalty for the LDS Church Leadership ought to be at least $100,000 per year for 22 years that's $2,200,000.00

For The Deseret News Corporation who has profited upon the fabrications a conservative judgement might be $100 for every day that has passed for 22 years those stories have run- that's $803,000.00.

These would be no more than slaps on the wrist to them and I know that. I'm not trying to run anyone out of business here or destroy something that has been built. I'm fighting for our rights and respect for people and everyone's individual rights. I don't want anyone to have to go to prison like I did. That idea is not appealing to me because I value freedom and liberty so much, but I need a honest penalty to be paid now not only for me, for the honor and respect of our community, my friends, and family as well myself.

Cody Robert Judy



1-State Records Committee Appeal 94-13

UTAH BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLE, Appellee DECISION AND ORDER, Case No. 94-13 By this appeal, United Television, Inc. seeks an order compelling the Utah Board of Pardons to release to it a copy of a video tape regarding an incident at Brigham Young University regarding an assault on Howard W. Hunter, an official of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The initial hearing on this matter was held on July 27, 1994 in which the parties appeared and presented argument before the Records Committee. Based on the issues that were raised in that hearing, the Records Committee requested the parties to research and submit memorandum to the Records Committee on the topics discussed. The Records Committee continued the hearing until the memorandum were submitted. The parties did submit the requested memorandum and the hearing was reconvened on October 5, 1994. The State Records Committee, having reviewed the materials submitted by the parties, having heard testimony from witnesses, having heard oral argument and having solicited public comment at the time of the hearing, and being fully advised in the premises, now issues the following Decision and Order. BACKGROUND 1. The video tape sought by United Television, Inc., was supplied to the Utah Board of Pardons by the Utah County Attorney's Office in response to a request of the Board of Pardons to supply information on Cody Judy, an inmate at the Utah State Prison who had pled guilty and was incarcerated for an assault on Howard W. Hunter at a Church Educational System young adult fireside for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. 2. The portion of the video sought by United Television, Inc. had been blacked out of the live broadcast and had never been published by the Church Educational System. The Church Educational system claimed copyright privilege of the material and had chosen not to broadcast or publish the portion of the fireside blacked out, but contained on a master tape made of the proceedings. 3. The Utah County Attorney's office obtained a copy of portions of the master tape showing the assault for purposes of prosecution. Without permission from the LDS church or other copyright owner of the video tape, it gave a copy of the video tape to the Board of Pardons. The Video was not shown publicly at the Board of Pardons. 4. United Television, Inc., sought release of the video from the Board of Pardons. The Board denied the release of the video on the basis that it was not a record under Utah Code Ann. 63--2- 103(18)(b)(iii). STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DECISION 1. The Government Records Access and Management Act (GRAMA) specifies that "all records are public unless otherwise expressly provided by statute." Utah Code Ann. 63-2-201(2). 2. Materials kept or maintained by a governmental entity or employee that is not a record under GRAMA is not subject to release and disclosure under the Act and the Records Committee has no jurisdiction over such records. Utah Code Ann. 63-2-103(18)(b). 3. Copyrighted material maintained by the State or any of its agencies is not automatically excluded as being a record under GRAMA. The provision excluding copyrighted material includes provisions that it is not a record if access to the material held by the public entity is limited by copyright. 4. The Church Educational System of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints intended the material contained on the videotape to be copyrighted from its inception and gave no permission for the material contained in the blacked out portion of the video tape but contained on the master to be released to the Board of Pardons. The Church Educational System also never published the material which is subject to the request of United Television, Inc. 5. If the video does not fall under the exclusion of Utah Code Ann. 63-2-103 (18)(b)(iii), it is a record and subject to the jurisdiction of the Records Committee to order released if the Records Committee finds it is not protected by other factors. 6. Testimony and evidence raised the issue of the video being subject to a secrecy order entered by a Judge of the Fourth District Judicial Court in Utah County. The Records Committee need not reach this issue because it resolves the issue on other grounds. 7. The video segment sought is not a record under Utah Code Ann. 63-2-103(18)(b)(iii) because the owner of the video intended the video to be copyrighted and never published it. ORDER THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the decision of the Board of Pardons denying release of the video tape sought by the Appellant is affirmed and the appeal is denied. RIGHT TO APPEAL Either party may appeal this Decision and Order to the district court. The petition for review must be filed no later than 30 days after the date of this order. The petition for judicial review must be a complaint. The complaint and the appeals process are governed by the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure and by Utah Code Ann. 63-2-404 and 63-2-502(7). The court is required to make its decision de novo. In order to protect its rights on appeal, a party may wish to seek advice from an attorney. Entered this 11th day of October, 1994. BY THE RECORDS COMMITTEE,
Chairman, State Records Committee

1 comment:

  1. Wow.

    The good people that took you down at the Marriott Center should have hit harder. Would have been better for everyone.