Showing posts with label Nancy Pelosi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nancy Pelosi. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 3, 2017

The Spider That Sat Down Beside Her - Rep. Nancy Pelosi's in Deep in the Obama Ineligibility Cover-Up Web


Contribute Now for a Restoration of Faith in Justice

RECENT FEATURED STORIES IN THE POST&EMAIL
Interviewing 08, 12, and 2016 Candidate Cody Robert Judy

-The Spider That Sat Down Beside Her -
Rep. Nancy Pelosi's in Deep in the Obama Ineligibility Cover-Up Web
Will Nancy Pelosi's role in the Fraud cost her an expulsion from Congress?

Under Article I, Section 5, clause 2, of the Constitution, a Member of Congress may be removed from office before the normal expiration of his or her constitutional term by an “expulsion” from the Senate (if a Senator) or from the House of Representatives (if a Representative) upon a formal vote on a resolution agreed
Much more is known about Obama's Ineligibility then has been focused on with the fabricated long form birth certificate that was the subject and now is serving as Evidence for Proof in the Tenth Circuit and U.S. Supreme Court. Obama certainly didn't pull his usurpation off without a lot of very wealthy and very influential help. Enter stage left Representative Nancy Pelosi and what she knew and did to tie the Democratic Party and Democratic National Committee into the law suit claiming that a cartel was formed in the conjoining Corporations of the DNC and OFA - Organization for America that was founded by none other then Michelle Obama. So when did they know and what were are the alleged illegalities or crimes committed allowing this small group to usurp the U.S. Constitution? We examine the the two forms that Rep. Nancy Pelosi signed opening the gate for Obama the entry into all 50 States of the Union in the Spider Sat Down Beside Her.

WHAT CHANGED WITH OBAMA?
FEATURED EDITORIAL The Post & Email

The "Certificate of Nomination" is required by each "State" as well as the "National Nomination" of the particular party once the Party has decided who will represent them in the General Election.

Now to get an idea of this let's look at Hawaii's State Certificate of Nomination in 2008 and compare that with the Elections of 2004 and 2000. What did Hawaii's Democratic Party know about Obama before the 2008 Election? In the following comparisons' we see that Hawaii indeed changed their language and refused to certify Obama as Constitutionally Qualified under the Constitution with the missing language as follows:

2000/2004/2008 Democratic Party of Hawaii Certifications of Nominations





In the United States, to become a party’s (e.g., the Democratic Party) presidential candidate, one must go through the following:
Step 1: Receive the votes of the majority of party delegates from the 50 states.
Step 2: The delegates’ votes are tallied and certified at the party’s national convention.
Step 3: Each state’s party must certify that the candidate is constitutionally eligible to be President of the United States of America.
Step 4: After the parties of all 50 states produced their Certificates of Nomination, the Chair of the National Party Convention also signs off certifying that the nominee indeed is constitutionally eligible.

Needless to say, fraud can be committed at each step of the process.

In 2000 and 2004, the Democratic Party of Hawaii’s official Certifications of Nomination for Al Gore and Joe Lieberman (2000) and John Kerry and John Edwards (2004) both had the following identical language:

This is to certify that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution and are the duly chosen candidates of both the state and the national Democratic Parties by balloting at the Presidential Preference Poll and Caucus held _____ in the State of Hawaii and by acclamation at the National Democratic Convention held ______ in _______.

In 2008, the Democratic Party of Hawaii’s official Certification of Nomination for Barack Obama and Joe Biden carried this language:

This is to certify that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the national Democratic Parties balloting at the Presidential Preferences Poll and Caucus held on February 19, 2008 in the State of Hawaii and by acclamation at the National Democratic Convention held August 27, 2008 in Denver, Colorado.
What the Democratic Party of Hawaii’s 2008 Certification of Nomination left out are these words:

“of the United States Constitution and are the duly chosen candidates of both the state and”
In contrast  and contradicting with this, we see there was no mistake in 2000 and 2004.

In 2000 and 2004, the Democratic Party of Hawaii’s official Certifications of Nomination for Al Gore and Joe Lieberman (2000) and John Kerry and John Edwards (2004) both had the following identical language:

This is to certify that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution and are the duly chosen candidates of both the state and the national Democratic Parties by balloting at the Presidential Preference Poll and Caucus held _____ in the State of Hawaii and by acclamation at the National Democratic Convention held ______ in _______.
On the Left:Hawaii Certified Constitutionally by Nancy Pelosi in 
contradiction to Hawaii's Democratic Party nomination  lacking 
Constitutional Qualification in order to usurp Hawaii's Democratic
 Party's nomination, comply with State of Hawaii Laws, and in such 
Fabricate Obama's Constitutional Qualifications nationally. 

On the Right is Nancy Pelosi's signature, the same day, for 49 other States that
fails to include Obama's is legally qualified to serve in the Office of President
 under the provisions of the Constitution of the United States.

[“…somebody claiming to represent the DNC stated on a discussion board that the DNC relies on the state parties to verify Constitutional eligibility for candidates, so the oath by Pelosi and Germond would just confirm that the state democratic parties had confirmed the Constitutional eligibility of the candidates.

 But this is where the argument totally falls apart, because the Hawaii Democratic Party actually ignored their protocols in 2008 in order to specifically NOT certify Obama’s eligibility as they had done for candidates in the past.

 IOW, if Pelosi based her decision to certify on whether the state party would confirm eligibility, then she had a duty to NOT certify Obama’s eligibility, because the democratic party of the state supposedly holding Obama’s birth certificate REFUSED TO CERTIFY Obama’s eligibility.”]

However, what we see in the National Nomination or Certification signed by Rep. Nancy Pelosi, is a total disregard for the State of Hawaii's lack of Constitutional Certification, as well as her signature specifically needed on two different 'national nomination' certificates because by law Hawaii required it and the State of Hawaii's Democratic Party had validated and certified no such language.

For many years I wondered why Representative Pelosi's signature would be needed twice for the 50 States - one for Hawaii and one for the other 49 as this was not the norm in protocol?

Everyone has thought that it was just Hawaii's Law that a Candidate must be certified to be qualified under the U.S. Constitution and the other 49 States did not have such language. It wasn't until I saw Hawaii's lack of language that I understood Mrs. Pelosi knew she had a problem, and her actions from that point forward in the matter were under the construction of treason and a full blown usurpation of the United States Constitution.



[In other words, by omitting the above words, the Democratic Party of Hawaii (DPH) was signalling the following:
DPH is merely certifying that Obama is legally qualified to serve as President by virtue of the ballots of the Democratic Parties of the 50 states. The DPH is not certifying that Obama is legally qualified to serve as President under the provisions of the U.S. Constitution!
The DPH is also saying that Obama and Biden are NOT the chosen candidates of the state of Hawaii.]


Further:

[According to the Cyclopedia of Law and Procedure, vol. 15 (NY: American Law Book Company, 1905), pp. 338-339:

When the authority to make a nomination is legally challenged by objections filed to the certificate of nomination, and violation or disregard of the party rules is alleged, the court must hear the facts and determine the question.
Before we break out the party noisemakers, here’s some sobering information from p. 339 of the same Cyclopedia of Law and Procedure concerning who can object and the time period for making an objection:

One who is not a member of the party making nominations cannot object to the regularity of the proceedings resulting in the nomination.
It is usually provided by statute that objections to nomination papers shall be made within a designated time after such papers are filed, or within a certain number of days before election. And, after the time for filing objections has passed, in the absence of fraud a certificate of nomination to which no objections were filed and which is regular in form cannot be attacked. At all events such objection should be made before the election, for if not so made the legal authority of a convention will in the absence of fraud be conclusively presumed.]
 What this means is only someone who is a member of the Democratic Party, and presumably a Candidate for President in the eyes of the Court, who would/or/could have "standing" to challenge in Judicial Branch's Courts of Law.

This is also the way in which the Democratic Party's Democratic National Committee - DNC, became a partner in the conspiracy to defraud the American People's U.S. Constitution in the qualifications for the Office of the President in a cartelish action with OFA, in the fraudulent certification and nomination process of Barack Obama who never was qualified, and why so few people had the ability to challenge this. Cody Robert Judy's Action in Court took on not only a Civil Rights Claim but also a claim that forbids Cartel Monopolies in the actions of fraud of two or more Corporations known as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.

This is information and intelligence that is being used in the Judy v. Obama Forgery/Fraud case in the Tenth Circuit and U.S. Supreme Court that also concludes as worthy evidence the 2011 long form fabricated birth certificate that Obama himself used to deceive and usurp the election of 2012 that President Trump credited himself for.


Up to this point, no Court in the 15 Cases has even allowed a hearing on the matter, tried, or heard this evidence along with the experts certifying that Barack Obama's long form birth certificate was a fabrication used to defraud the American Public in not one but two National Elections of the United States.

Isn't it odd that the MSM always points to the newspaper clippings that went out from the Hawaii Department of Health upon any report of a birth by a family member ( Obama's Grandparents) were the ones living in Hawaii who could have reported the birth to the Hawaii Health Department who then spawned the report to the newspaper second hand.

To date no Hospital in Hawaii has publicly claimed Obama was born there in any form accept the fabricated long form birth certificate which has been used by Obama and the Media to qualify his birth here. Why would one need to be fabricated?

2008, Britain’s Daily Mail had this to say: “…It has become apparent that what has been discovered is an unspecified listing or notation of Obama’s birth that someone has made in the state archives, and not a birth certificate. […] A long ­­form, hospital-generated birth certificate for Barack Obama may not exist within the vital records maintained by the Hawaii Department of Health…He acknowledged the birth certificate issue would have ‘political implications’ for the next presidential election ‘that we simply cannot have.’”

Furthermore, it is reported that the State told the media that the original copy of his birth certificate had “disappeared,” since all such records were supposedly ‘discarded’ in 2001 , yet Obama surfaced with one once his mother's friend became Hawaii's Department of Health Director.

In 2008 no one knew where in Hawaii he was born, and Obama was not saying. Reports by his own sister Maya Soetoro (in two separate interviews) state that he was born at two different hospitals, The Queen’s Medical Center at 1301 Punchbowl Street, Honolulu, Hawaii and/or the Kapi’olani Medical Center at 1319 Punahou Street, Honolulu.

Although every record Obama has produced still leaves him with a father who was a voting member or Citizen of Kenya who ironically also demands no foreign allegiance in their Elections for the office of President.
Candidate for Election as President (and Deputy President Candidate)
Qualifications:
  • Must be a Kenyan citizen by birth
  • Must not hold dual citizenship
  • Must not owe allegiance to a foreign state
  • Must be qualified to stand for election as a member of Parliament
  • Must be a registered voter
  • Must be a holder of a degree from a University recognized in Kenya
  • Must be nominated by a Political Party or is an independent candidate

Lacking in public support for this endeavor Cody Robert Judy, who also sued McCain in 2008 for not being born in the United States under the jurisdiction of one of the Union's 50 States, has appealed to the Public for it's help in the continuing pursuit of the Truth for Justice.

Today marked his 10th donation in saving lives with just a little time for Plasma donation that is also serving as a monetary fund for postage to the Courts.

"Hey it's worth it if we are saving lives as well as saving our Republic. I much rather donate then see blood shed", he said, "as our own Sovereignty is at the Stake that so many of our founders, framers, and patriots of this Republic gave their lives for and continue to do so."

While many Americans think Obama's 2 Terms have ended many of the policies and practices of the usurpation continue to dog American's Presidency and Congress costing billions of dollars as well as Obama still being paid the salary of a Cabinet Member as a retired President who is even in retirement suppose to be a person who was a legally qualified candidate under the provisions of the U.S. Constitution.

By allowing it to continue or to never be publicly rectified the message is clear to Congress and the office holders included in the U.S. Constitution. That while the document which articulates their offices and paychecks out of the treasury is important, the principles once they get in can be usurped.

Update:

Review of BRITISH NATIONAL ARCHIVES

Included Hillary's visit

https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2012/08/24/british-national-archives-show-a-son-was-born-to-obama-sr-in-1961-in-kenya/

RECENT FEATURED STORIES IN THE POST&EMAIL
Interviewing 08, 12, and 2016 Candidate Cody Robert Judy



See the Video Judges are Reviewing!

U.S. Tenth Circuit Court
U.S. Supreme Court- Application to Individual Justice Petition for Mandamus

A MOTION FOR A RELIEF OF JUDGEMENT or to REOPEN the Case due to the new evidence provided by a law enforcement investigation Cold Case Posse unit deputized under Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa Country AZ provided the evidence that Obama's long form birth certificate is a Fabricated Forgery, not an original, with the use of Johanna Ah'Nees identity birth certificate and was only recently released and available for criminal consideration by the Judicial Branch. See the video below





Cody Robert Judy Contribution

save/secure paypal

Contribute Now for a Restoration of Faith in Justice
or

Mail your donation to

Cody Robert Judy
3037 South Ogden Ave
Suite 1
Ogden, Utah 84401


























Wednesday, January 4, 2017

WHY OBAMA WAS IMPOTENT? - CONSTITUTIONALLY UNQUALIFIED Law Makers Knew It


FEATURED EDITORIAL
The Post & Email


~WHY OBAMA WAS IMPOTENT ~
  CONSTITUTIONALLY UNQUALIFIED
 "Law Makers" used it as Blackmail Fodder

It seems illogical, irrational, even delusional for the Political Party Champions of Civil Rights to go for the Hail Mary with a Quarter Back who had two legs that were broken, but that is exactly what Democrats did, and it makes me shake my head at Rep. Nancy Pelosi even more. It makes me weep for Blacks who hoped their Civil Rights would be made stronger. It is a contradiction of terms to hope for Civil Rights by a walking talking violation of Political Rights.

What Obama could have done if he had been Constitutionally Qualified! They say every champion has a weakness. My own Prison Sentence of eight years that began 24 years ago, wasn't exactly what you see people scrabbling to get put on their resume. (Although, in America.. maybe it should be as it produces a lot more understanding!)

I have now seen that regret in Obama's own words much more clear than I did before.

[In his final weeks in office, Obama addressed racism, maintaining in a CNN interview that it wasn't a major component in GOP opposition to his agenda. But, he said, it was a factor for some Americans. "Are there folks whose primary concern about me has been that I seem foreign, the other? Are those who champion the 'birther' movement feeding off of bias? Absolutely," he told CNN.]
What I now see in that statement is that the GOP used Obama's lack of Constitutional Qualification as the "LEVERAGE" to pin Democrats to the floor rather than risk Democrats recovering from a INELIGIBILITY IMPEACHMENT HEARING and it sickens me.

I think if you read between the lines of what Obama said, simply because there was absolutely no Cyanide Birther Pill that made any difference at all with Congress, the Courts, or the General Public in the Electoral College, what Obama is saying in just a little different wording would be:

It wasn't Racism that hurt me the most, it was my ineligibility that ham-strung me because the GOP constantly reminded me they could have my head on a spit, so I better do what they said"
Obama ended up being Republicans best friend, there was hardly a budget or anything really important that Obama didn't get. His Administration was hardily the most well financed Administration in the history of the U.S. Government if you count the Federal Deficit before Obama took office and look at it now. U.S. Ends Fiscal 2016 With 1.4 Trillion Dollar Increase - that's your Republican Congress Spending at the Purse Folks!
The United States government closed out the 2016 fiscal year that ended a few days ago on Friday September 30th with a debt level of $19,573,444,713,936.79.  That’s an increase of $1,422,827,047,452.46 over last year’s fiscal year close.
The AP has run a story today that seeing traction entitled, with a clip I've highlighted :


AP

Obama racial legacy: Pride, promise, regret _ and deep rift


By SHARON COHEN and DEEPTI HAJELA Associated Press
[Some historians believe Obama's race will ultimately matter less than his record. He'll be measured by "Obamacare," how he handled the staggering financial mess he inherited and advances in gay rights, says Princeton University historian Kevin Kruse.
That view was supported in a Pew poll last month that found 35 percent of those surveyed believed Obama would be remembered most for his health care legislation — double those who said it would be for being the first black president.
Kruse also says Obama stayed true to his promise to be colorblind. "He really tried to be a president of all people."
In hindsight, Harris sees that as a failed strategy. "How can you be colorblind in an increasingly racially polarized nation?" he asks.]

The biggest reason Obama could not be a Black President is because he was Constitutionally Ineligible. It's a faux pas to say the lie behind Republican Rhinos was not Obama and it's a lie to say the Civil Rights can be best defended by someone who is a walking talking violation of the U.S. Constitution.

I don't care what the Lower Courts said, the U.S. Supreme Court would not hear this Case because they knew they could not rule in Obama's personal favor. It would have just been impossible for them if I was up arguing it.

1- There is no way you can have a people who are Citizens of the U.S. Constitution before it was ratified. That ratification created a new LEGAL JURISDICTION of LAW with which to be born under.

2- That's the REASON that ART. II., Section 1, C-5 included in the Qualifications for President
       a- [CITIZEN] at the Time of the Adoption of this Constitution
       b. [NATURAL BORN CITIZEN] for those thereafter ie. Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents

3- Congress cannot make [natural born Citizens] with [naturalization (or in other words Adoption Law)]. The two terms are polar opposites as clearly as Adoption is from a literal Blood Birth] Congress has [naturalization powers]

4- It is well said that the Constitution does not in fact say what a [natural born Citizen] is because there is no doubt that [born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] clearly negates any Act or Determination by Adoption. There is  no Judge in the United States who is going to say that anyone who is born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents is not a [natural born Citizen]. Get that? Zero!

5- Clearly the Qualification for Representatives and Senators is [Citizen] and not [natural born Citizen]

6- The 14th Amendment when ever it was used in argument was and always has been a [naturalization] argument not a [natural born Citizen] argument. (for those who argue Wong Kim Ark changed anything)

7- Minor v. Happersett clear states there was never a doubt that those born of the Country to it's Citizens are themselves the [natural born Citizens] and to the others there have been doubts. That's U.S. Supreme Court precedent.

8- Congress men and women 8 times since 2003 tried to change the definition but those attempts failed in Congressional Votes. Ask yourself why? Why attempt to change anything on the [natural born Citizen] requirement for President if it always meant [Citizen] as the requirement for Representatives and Senators has been? And why was [Citizen] actually mentioned in the Constitution for those who were present at the time of the Adoption if they could have been [natural born Citizens] in the first place?

BEING BLACK and UNQUALIFIED meant BEING BLACKMAILED

The greatest failure for Obama was not the fact that he was Black, but the fact that he could be Blackmailed by those in Congress who knew damn well he was not a [natural born Citizen] and could use it to threaten him! 

The fact Congress has not had a single HEARING on this is not a testimony of legitimacy for Republicans, it's a witness they used it against Obama legally... secretly... but legally. That hemmed Obama up from actually being a black President.

You know one of the most disturbing things for me as a Democrat is to see the fall out of Democrats Obama has created across the Country. Do republicans for Trump credit a Democratic Party Presidential Candidate for holding Obama's feet to the fire in the U.S. Supreme Court whilst not a single main stream Republican Candidate set foot in Court against Obama. 

How can they say nothing good comes out of the Democratic Party while their own have failed so miserably to hold the Constitution up and instead or rather preferred to use Black Mail tactics on the American Public?

It was very bitter reading another AP Story that highlighted the misery Obama has caused for the Democratic Party in losing over 1,000 races, and basically being in competition with the DNC for funds that would go to Local Races. Three Excerpts include:

Out of power, state Dems frustrated with national committee

 State leaders also say Obama's grassroots group Organizing for Action has functioned more like competition than a partner.]

["I love President Obama, but he and his administration allowed for the deterioration, the terrible deterioration, of the state parties over the last eight years," said Mark Brewer, who led the Michigan Democratic Party for 18 years.]

[State officials say it's been hard to plan long term and recruit and train candidates in off-election years due to inconsistent funding from the DNC. Under Dean, the national party installed and paid several staff members in each state. But that program ended after Obama's election. State parties began to receive monthly payments of anywhere from $5,000 to $10,000, an amount that varies depending on the year. At some point, the parties have received no money at all. The DNC does provide some money to state parties for elections based on the state's competitive races and other factors.The change has left some states scrambling.]
The witnesses below of Congress and the Courts are exhibits to the Truth.
Next the Cold Case Posse make the Case Obama's Birth Certificate is a Fraud.
40,000 + Hits in a two weeks!
Obama's Last Press Conference BLOWS UP with Birth Certificate https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGEMHOEil5c








Wednesday, November 30, 2016

OBAMA ALT MEDIA MVP- Altered v. Alternative DEMOCRATS FACE VOID OF TRUTH



OBAMA 
ALT-MEDIA MVP 
Altered or Alternative
Democrats face void of Truth

One thing that Democrats might be good at and that's "making labels up" for Americans- Birthers- Truthers- Alt-Media- Deplorables to name just a few. In fact, Truther had it's originating base line copied for the term Birther, even though more than half of Democrats believed Bush was complicit in 9/11. The lost defense of TRUTH hit Hillary Rodham Clinton hard in the 2016 Election. The good thing about that was the showing for all Americans that Truth still has value after all it was indeed Obama who waited three years before handing out his long form birth certificate and it was more than half of Republicans who didn't believe Obama was ever born in the U.S. or qualified as a [natural born Citizen] ie. born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents. 

Alt-Media was a term Hillary Clinton made famous in her Presidential Campaign speech, but what it really signified was Media the Democrats couldn't control affecting the Altered-Media the Democrats force-fed as controlled Mainstream Media. So if Altered Media and Alternative Media are confusing to you, let's explore the MVP of Altered Media -Obama and understand the Alternative Media only became alternative because the Altered Media was throwing good apples out behind the barn with the rest of the horse biscuits and calling it Horse Sh*t which confused many people with no experience as a stall boy.

As a former professional horsemen and the son of Farmers with all kinds of animals in the barn, I have had a lot of experience with cleaning out stalls. To save sawdust my Mom used to engage us in "picking up the horse biscuits with our hands because a pitch-fork took out too much sawdust with the waste. The key in that process was getting to the mess before it was strewn around to much. We cleaned stalls every day and we took pride in a clean barn. Another way you might say that which we heard quite a bit about in the Presidential Campaign Crowds of President Elect Donald J. Trump was 'draining the swamp'. 'Draining the swamp', 'cleaning the stalls'-  it all has to do with a fresh clean slate to lay down in and be comfortable without smelling the stench so bad that you pass out, lose interest, walk away, or don't vote.

Democrats today are voting for a Speaker of the House. A position Rep. Nancy Pelosi has held for 14 years- eight of which have been presiding over losing 1,000 seats across the Country to Republicans. Still Democrats laud her ability to "Raise Money". Well, if raising money was about winning, she's proved to us the two do not go hand-in-hand. 

If raising money was her gift to Democrats why would she stop raising money for Democrats if she lost the Speaker-ship? If she stopped raising money on the basis of her position, couldn't the money she is raising in her position just be called blackmail/extortion money anyway? Thus Democrats should theoretically not worry about the money Rep. Nancy Pelosi has raised, it should come in anyway if it's the Democratic Party Platform that counts right?

Of course Rep. Nancy Pelosi has hung on to her gavel with 134 votes, but it also came with a price tag - fewer coronations and more reality checks in the interest of young Democrats noticed as hung out to dry in the leadership pariah-of-the-clan that gathering opposition steam represented by a surprising 63 votes! 

Represenative Nancy Pelosi indeed may have raised some good money for the Democratic Party, but Republican Establishment favorite Jeb Bush blew through a 100M and Democratic Establishment favorite Hillary Rodham Clinton blew through a Billion with identity politics as the small rudder navigating a large ship that has lost its way in bedrock values such as fairness, equality,  and opportunity for quite some time now


[..the majority of Americans live in states in which there are Republican trifectas or veto-proof legislative majorities. Two-thirds of the nation’s governors are Republicans; more than two-thirds of our state legislative houses are under Republican control. Republicans control both houses of Congress and have just won the presidency.]
Still the Democrats persist money is the key to winning and Obama is on a tangent about alternative media which sounds a little more like a Defacto President who is decrying freedom of speech - one of those staples we all know he defends? The problem for the Democrats is presented as a conundrum represented in the picture of this Post.

Obama installed as a usurper of the U.S. Constitution cannot possibly be it's defender. He is and never was qualified for the Office of the President demanding in the Qualification section a natural born Citizen ie. born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents. 

Obama is as legal in the Office of the President as Jack-a-lopes bound the prairies of the United States. They normally don't have horns and abnormally do.  Rabbits with horns don't exist and neither does a legal Constitutional Qualified President in Barack Obama. It has only been the Altered Media that has thought so fabricating , just as Obama's long form birth certificate was fabricated and proven such by a law enforcement investigation, suppressed by the MSM, Congress, and the Courts.

On one hand Obama understands that without the U.S. Constitution minorities like Muslims [insert any religion]Americans, Irananian-Americans, Turkish Americans, Mexican-Americans, and every other [ [insert foreign state-Americans], male[insert sex]-Americans are not subject to fairness, equality, and opportunity, and the Democratic Party has been a big champion for minorities. They have counted on that vote, but haven't done much less of standing up for American-Americans. 

In their desire to help and assist minorities there begin to be a real hateful disparaging discrimination against American-Americans- ie. The natural born Citizens [born in the U.S. to Citizen parents]. They turned blindly against the foundation of propagated Americans that was not dependent upon the 14th Amendment or any other naturalization act of Congress that the Office of the President was reserved for exempting only those born at the time of the Adoption of the U.S. Constitution. American-Americans felt that and spoke out about it in the 2016 Election. President Elect Donald J. Trump saw the opening plain as day and Obama had no answer accept an attempt to pacify with this fabricated long form birth certificate certified by his mother's friend Loretta Fuddy, now deceased, at the Hawaii Health Department and his childhood friend as Governor. 

In the conundrum of the Post Picture, Obama laments that if we didn't have the Constitution, including the Electoral College System held within it, Democrats would have won the Election. So, you have an unqualified candidate in Obama who is a walking talking violation of the Constitution that Democrats are supposed to defend, lamenting that, gosh, if we didn't have the Constitution's Electoral College , Democrats would be winning. 

No they wouldn't. 

Because most Democrats are minorities and depend upon the U.S. Constitution for a defense. This presents a big problem for Democrats. Defend Obama or Defend Minorities but you can't do both or you lose. That's a real truth. Democrats will never gain any kind of high ground until they acknowledge Truth. Obama is not Qualified under the same Constitution that is the Supreme Law of the Land and is represented as the Republic for which we stand. Maybe Democrats feel the Pledge of Allegiance is out-dated too and they would prefer a message from 'Anonymous' for our elementary school children to the Pledge that protects minorities with "Justice for All" Citizens under the Constitution? 

Democracy in it's purest form is the bully of the crowd trampling the rights of the minorities. Minorities need to be very afraid of that for good reason. They will lose their rights and privileges to a pure Democracy. They are clearly outnumbered and shouldn't forget it. That should make them the biggest defenders of the U.S. Constitution and the biggest opponents of Barack Obama. I understand it as a Democratic Candidate for President in 2012 and 2016, but do you think Rep. Nancy Pelosi gets it?

No she doesn't. 

If Obama was a painting Nancy Pelosi was the brush stroking the canvas. She was included in two different forms signing off to the States he was Constitutionally Eligible in U.S. Supreme Court Case Judy v. Obama No. 14-9396. She lied and its cost Democrats over the last eight years much more money than Rep. Nancy Pelosi ever raised for the Party. The Democratic Party swerved left for a fast gain and now has hit the wall against Americans they put up themselves. They turned their back on the Law, but in their defense it took a lot of complacent Establishment Republicans including Mitt Romney also decried by President Elect Trump a big loser.


AUTHOR CALLS 'CONSTITUTIONAL QUALIFICATIONS'- 'RACIST'

In opposition to an editorial run in the Miami Harold I made the following comment based mostly in the fact that there is a lot of truth hanging in the balance of the MSM and Journalist of the Altered Media that somehow the Constitution's Qualifications for Office are Racist ( also clearly defended in another Editorial here ) which only firms up the discrimination against American-Americans leaving the hole exposed by Democrats that lost the 2016 Election. The Altered Media is the MSM in it's delusion. Americans are getting it!

The author no doubt has fallen for the gas depicting himself as the “Elitist” He no doubt has called the Constitution’s Qualifications as a tail of the horse the 5th leg.
We American-Americans or [ natural born Citizens] know different.
It’s despicable that he’d throw an apple in the pile of muck behind the barn and call the apple Horse Sh*t!
QUOTES
[ The people who insist that President Obama is not a native-born American deny they are racists. Yes they are.] The Qualification for President is [ natural born Citizen] ie. Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents- not native born citizen idiot!

[One of my favorite Abraham Lincoln stories relates his encounter with an elitist lawyer who, during a trial, dismissed him as a rustic bumpkin. Lincoln posed him a simple riddle. “If we call a tail a leg, how many legs does a horse have?’ The smug lawyer replied, “Five.” Lincoln corrected him. “No, he still has four legs, because calling a tail a leg does not make it one.”
People are free to engage in self-delusion if they wish, but if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck and swims like a duck, it is a duck, and these comments are racist. But perhaps these bigots should heed the poet Robert Burns’ advice in the poem “To A Louse.”
‘O would some power the gift give us to see ourselves as others see us.’]

Oh why can't he see himself as he is? Is he a Stupid Idiot or is he the bowling ball wrecking Dems?

If American-Americans can't even have one office reserved for them in their own land and instead feel the dragons breath of the MSM, what incentive is there? Well, clearly the American-Americans heard that call and felt the fire of being called another name made up by Hillary Clinton "Deplorables". 


The facts that the MSM have altered, their participating General Public perception, is as evident as the General Public not hearing about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 from the inception of it being filed in Utah's Federal Court system to the U.S. Supreme Court but the opposite happening in the Same-Sex Court Cases. There have hundreds of Press Releases they have "sat on" in participation of the cover up. That is what 'altering media' is. It's altered the Public Perception of Truth - which was in fact the U.S. Constitution's Qualification.

As another example, the cover-up that Hillary Clinton avoided FOIA with her Email Set Up was also altered as a "Convenience". Avoiding FOIA is a crime for a Government Official especially against The American People.  Convenience had less to do with it than avoiding accountability and responsibility to the Law, but the laws that most applied were not the ones the FBI held her accountable too. 

If Truth prevailed with the MSM regarding [Birthers], they would understand the two part qualification of soil and parents with [natural born Citizen] and that it has nothing to do with [religion] which they would like to present as a  narrative of bigotry. This is false also. The Qualification for President in the Constitution of the United States has no religious test.
The truth is Obama was enrolled in a Muslim only elementary school in Indonesia and was registered in it as a Muslim by the name of Barry Soetoro. 

  Of course people in the U.S. are free to change their Religions and the fact that he was registered Muslim has little to do with his present religion and that has less to do with any qualification required by the U.S. Constitution. His recorded foreign adoption might however in legal theory and has some merit in truth as far as his mother's inherited citizenship to him. 

If a traitor to the U.S. gives up their U.S. Citizenship for a foreign citizenship, being a U.S. Citizen no longer applies. Anwar al Awlaki born in the State of New Mexico to foreign nationals of Yemen held dual citizenship America and with Yemen and Obama sent a drone over to kill him.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anwar_al-Awlaki

In the respect Obama is not qualified for U.S. President neither was Anwar al Awlaki, yet both may have run for Representative or Senator which only requires [Citizen] and is included in the naturalization act Title 8 subsection 1401, a-h. Obama like Anwar has an inherited citizenship from Kenya from his father. The place of Anwar's birth made little difference to his inheriting citizenship to Yemen through both his Parents. 

If the Birther issue was 'racist', how did (Caucasian) McCain, Cuban Rubio/ Cruz and Indonesian Jindal get on the SCOTUS Record of my presidential petition and claim to the U.S. Supreme Court? And Why has the media hidden those aspects away in participation in the cover up to the General Public unless they are participating in a cover up of altered media?

The U.S. Supreme Court denied me a Hearing based on not having the funds to pay when my poverty condition was in fact accepted in lower courts as well was given to them in official record. This amounted to a #waronpoor and against Justice for All. How do Democrats feel about equality and fairness in a Presidential Race? Well, their treatment for Presidential Candidate Bernie Sanders is documented, but let's not forget my Campaign or for that matter President Elect Donald J. Trump's who has never held Public Office Dems. 

The jury may still be out on whether money trumps truth or wither truth can save Democrats and MLK Jr. seemed to agree stating:
The truth of these words is beyond doubt, but the mission to which they call us is a most difficult one. 

CRJ


There will be one more National Presser from Sheriff Joe and the Cold Case Possee December 15th, 2016.

CRJ

Cody Robert Judy was the only Presidential Candidate in America to have a bi- Partisan Federal Court Record taking a stand for the [ natural born Citizen] Qualification for U.S. President in three runs for President 2008, 2012, and 2016.

 See: Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, NV.
U.S. Supreme Court Judy v. Obama 12-5276 &14-9396.

Thank You!


Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy



Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.
Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy

BLOG www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
WEB: www.codyjudy.us




























Friday, January 8, 2016

BREAKING REPORT : BIRTHER BIRTHER U.S. SUPREME COURT BIRTHER PIE-IN-THE-SKY - Best Serving America


BIRTHER BREAKING REPORT :

~U.S. SUPREME COURT BIRTHER Pie-In-The-Sky !~

Over the last few days America has been thrust into the Birther World yet again with lead Polling Republican Presidential Candidate Donald Trump, who seems the perfect anti-establishment Porcupine- touch him and you will get a quill shot into you- attacking Presidential Candidate and U.S. Senator Ted Cruz on questions of his eligibility, or Constitutional authority to assume the Office of President should he be elected to it.

Mr. Trump has highlighted the facts that Senator Cruz was not born in America and his parents appear to both be Canadian Citizens at the time of Cruz's birth, which is the Time Frame required for the establishment of [natural born Citizen]. Cruz's mother was a U.S. Citizen at the time of her birth however may have been under her adopted Canadian Citizenship at the time of her son's birth as Canada required an oath of allegiance to work there, which may have been the reason Ted Cruz's father opted out of his native born Cuban Citizenship. Cruz only formally disavowed his Canadian Citizenship due to his desire to run for U.S. President.  

No documentation has provided proof that Cruz's mother was not a Canadian Citizen at the time of Cruz's Birth. New Treasures by Googling BIRTHER have over the last few days proven worth its weight in Gold. 

U.S. Senator John McCain opined the issue with Cruz was a legitimate concern and not illegitimate to look into. U.S. Representative Nancy Pelosi chimed in the [natural born Citizen] qualification was an open door in the consideration of Ted Cruz. The White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest weighed in that he didn't know if Obama was taking a side on the issue but he was enjoying it after Obama's grief about being born in Kenya.

The common thread between Obama and Cruz of course is that of the disqualifying factor that both do not have fathers who were [Citizen] of the U.S. at the time of their birth. The dissimilarity is Obama claims he was born in Hawaii and Cruz birth is affirmed in Canada. Of course Obama provided a long form birth Certificate in 2011 after Mr. Trump took credit of picking Obama's own quill out of him but it only confirmed Obama was not [Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] the definition of [natural born Citizen] the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed in Minor v. Happersett was never in doubt. Mr. Judy's appeal dealt with the lower Courts in contradiction with the precedent case.

Despite the Main Stream Media's ploy that the Principle Definition has been settled the fact remains McCain and Pelosi have got it right on this- its unsettled by the U.S. Supreme Court with two Presidential Candidates at odds against each other, both standing to lose a great deal based on the Principle definition observed in the Constitution Requirement.

The U.S. Supreme Court just two months ago DENIED a Motion for Forma Pauperis by a Presidential Candidate, Cody Robert Judy, the only Candidate for President in America with a bi-partisan Federal Court Record appealing the Principle on first McCain in 2008 and respectfully Obama in 2012 Case No. 12-5276 and '13 as well as 2014 Judy v. Obama 14-9396. 

In a YouTube Video released Today by Cody Robert Judy's Campaign ,CRJ Today for a Better America Tomorrow, Cody rehearses the 'bad behavior' displayed by the U.S. Supreme Court in denying his Motion for Forma Pauperis as a excuse not to hear his Writ of Certiorari based on:

1- The Federal Form being a 12 month Form
2-The U.S. Supreme Court granting his Motion in 2012 and 2013 Review
3-The District Court granting the Grant for Forma Pauperis in 2014
4-The Tenth Circuit Court granting the Forma Pauperis for a Review on Appeal.
5-The Fact the U.S. Supreme Court did not cite Rule 39.8 as a guideline for Denial of the 2014 Motion. 

Mr. Judy rehearses the Massive amount of money expended in the Main Stream Media on the eligibility question now in Ted Cruz's behalf and contrast that, if the U.S. Supreme Court handled the definition of [natural born Citizen] virtually every Main Stream Media (MSM) outlet has reported as speculation in over 50 pages of MSM Reports googled under Birther and Natural Born Citizen, that America would be better served rather than received pie-in-the-eye by the Courts silence.

BIRTHER Pie-In-The-Sky U.S. Supreme Court 


America on both sides of the issue would be much better served if the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) would affirm terms. Actually anti-birthers or the MSM in general would be much better served in the reporting of the issue Americans are finding troubling in the Trust of Government. 

Cody says that Anti-Birthers are actually the ones who should be clamoring at the SCOTUS for a decision on the issue, as Judge Napolitano  cited the issue on Obama may be moot due to Obama being in his 7th year and 2nd term of the Office of President. Even if he was disqualified he's only lose a year and if the ruling went in his favor, it doesn't affect him at all. 

Considering the peril that America could be found in if a Major Candidate walked into the U.S. Supreme Court say Hillary Clinton with a 49% popular vote loss to a 51% popular vote advantage by Ted Cruz winning the popular vote with his eligibility in question, the Country could be literally torn down with a Losers Rage! 

It makes so much more sense to hear Judy v. Obama 14-9396 so that an Election is not predicated on the Opinion and America can come together in an agreement of terms. For this reason we are hoping U.S. Senator Ted Cruz will accept the Challenge made by Cody Robert Judy that he and his Republican Senators would propose a U.S. Senate Resolution for the U.S. Supreme Court to hear Judy v. Obama 14-9396 and sending that to the U.S. Supreme Court.
The Challenge was issued on Cody Robert Judy's Twitter Account and sent to several Major Media Outlets.


Thank You!


Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign




Cody Robert Judy

Sincerely, 
Cody Robert Judy




Cody Robert Judy
Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.
Web Site www.codyjudy.us

We want to thank you for the 330,000 views on this Blog!

Keep coming back!





Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.




Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!



Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!


Cody Robert Judy's book :





Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.