Author - Cody Robert Judy
Conservative Independent American
Candidate for Pres 16, 12, 08
U.S. Senate 18, 10, 04, 00
U.S. Rep. 02
Book: Taking A Stand - The conservative independent Voice
Showing posts with label u.s.supreme court. Show all posts
Showing posts with label u.s.supreme court. Show all posts
Over the last few days America has been thrust into the Birther World yet again with lead Polling Republican Presidential Candidate Donald Trump, who seems the perfect anti-establishment Porcupine- touch him and you will get a quill shot into you- attacking Presidential Candidate and U.S. Senator Ted Cruz on questions of his eligibility, or Constitutional authority to assume the Office of President should he be elected to it. Mr. Trump has highlighted the facts that Senator Cruz was not born in America and his parents appear to both be Canadian Citizens at the time of Cruz's birth, which is the Time Frame required for the establishment of [natural born Citizen]. Cruz's mother was a U.S. Citizen at the time of her birth however may have been under her adopted Canadian Citizenship at the time of her son's birth as Canada required an oath of allegiance to work there, which may have been the reason Ted Cruz's father opted out of his native born Cuban Citizenship. Cruz only formally disavowed his Canadian Citizenship due to his desire to run for U.S. President. No documentation has provided proof that Cruz's mother was not a Canadian Citizen at the time of Cruz's Birth. New Treasures by Googling BIRTHER have over the last few days proven worth its weight in Gold. U.S. Senator John McCain opined the issue with Cruz was a legitimate concern and not illegitimate to look into. U.S. Representative Nancy Pelosi chimed in the [natural born Citizen] qualification was an open door in the consideration of Ted Cruz. The White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest weighed in that he didn't know if Obama was taking a side on the issue but he was enjoying it after Obama's grief about being born in Kenya. The common thread between Obama and Cruz of course is that of the disqualifying factor that both do not have fathers who were [Citizen] of the U.S. at the time of their birth. The dissimilarity is Obama claims he was born in Hawaii and Cruz birth is affirmed in Canada. Of course Obama provided a long form birth Certificate in 2011 after Mr. Trump took credit of picking Obama's own quill out of him but it only confirmed Obama was not [Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] the definition of [natural born Citizen] the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed in Minor v. Happersett was never in doubt. Mr. Judy's appeal dealt with the lower Courts in contradiction with the precedent case. Despite the Main Stream Media's ploy that the Principle Definition has been settled the fact remains McCain and Pelosi have got it right on this- its unsettled by the U.S. Supreme Court with two Presidential Candidates at odds against each other, both standing to lose a great deal based on the Principle definition observed in the Constitution Requirement. The U.S. Supreme Court just two months ago DENIED a Motion for Forma Pauperis by a Presidential Candidate, Cody Robert Judy, the only Candidate for President in America with a bi-partisan Federal Court Record appealing the Principle on first McCain in 2008 and respectfully Obama in 2012 Case No. 12-5276 and '13 as well as 2014 Judy v. Obama 14-9396. In a YouTube Video released Today by Cody Robert Judy's Campaign ,CRJ Today for a Better America Tomorrow, Cody rehearses the 'bad behavior' displayed by the U.S. Supreme Court in denying his Motion for Forma Pauperis as a excuse not to hear his Writ of Certiorari based on: 1- The Federal Form being a 12 month Form 2-The U.S. Supreme Court granting his Motion in 2012 and 2013 Review 3-The District Court granting the Grant for Forma Pauperis in 2014 4-The Tenth Circuit Court granting the Forma Pauperis for a Review on Appeal. 5-The Fact the U.S. Supreme Court did not cite Rule 39.8 as a guideline for Denial of the 2014 Motion. Mr. Judy rehearses the Massive amount of money expended in the Main Stream Media on the eligibility question now in Ted Cruz's behalf and contrast that, if the U.S. Supreme Court handled the definition of [natural born Citizen] virtually every Main Stream Media (MSM) outlet has reported as speculation in over 50 pages of MSM Reports googled under Birther and Natural Born Citizen, that America would be better served rather than received pie-in-the-eye by the Courts silence.
America on both sides of the issue would be much better served if the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) would affirm terms. Actually anti-birthers or the MSM in general would be much better served in the reporting of the issue Americans are finding troubling in the Trust of Government. Cody says that Anti-Birthers are actually the ones who should be clamoring at the SCOTUS for a decision on the issue, as Judge Napolitano cited the issue on Obama may be moot due to Obama being in his 7th year and 2nd term of the Office of President. Even if he was disqualified he's only lose a year and if the ruling went in his favor, it doesn't affect him at all. Considering the peril that America could be found in if a Major Candidate walked into the U.S. Supreme Court say Hillary Clinton with a 49% popular vote loss to a 51% popular vote advantage by Ted Cruz winning the popular vote with his eligibility in question, the Country could be literally torn down with a Losers Rage! It makes so much more sense to hear Judy v. Obama 14-9396 so that an Election is not predicated on the Opinion and America can come together in an agreement of terms. For this reason we are hoping U.S. Senator Ted Cruz will accept the Challenge made by Cody Robert Judy that he and his Republican Senators would propose a U.S. Senate Resolution for the U.S. Supreme Court to hear Judy v. Obama 14-9396 and sending that to the U.S. Supreme Court.
The Challenge was issued on Cody Robert Judy's Twitter Account and sent to several Major Media Outlets.
Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396
Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin
The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.
Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
There's a friendly SHOWDOWN happening in The Birther Movement Cody Robert Judy Explains
Recall there were about 2 other cases in Georgia happening along with mine in January.
Well...
Its July now and two of them teamed up together after the Georgia Supreme Court and one split away from me - David Farrar represented by Orly Taitz in the Georgia Supreme Court.
Now there are 3 cases in the United States Supreme Court that have come out of Georgia.
Between the three (3) teams my case is the only one represented with a Candidate for President. I am a Democratic Party Candidate for President. The other two teams do not have a Presidential Candidate and the importance of that is dicussed in my last blog here. But both the other teams do have something else in common.
They rejected me as viable..or credible and they are all Republicans.
Prior to the decision I received on June 21st I received a call from Mr. Richard Powell who inquired about the July 1st,2012, or thirty day date that the Court had set to make a decision.
We spoke at length and I explained that because the case was docketed May 31st,2012 that the Supreme Court of Georgia had under normal conditions until July 1st, 2012 to make a decision. Of course that decision came earlier then anticipated on June 21st,2012 which I was delighted with mostly because it gave me an extra week to get to filing my case with the U.S. Supreme Court.
Our cases have all hit the Court within about 15 days of each other so I know they were waiting for a decision in my case before they filed in the U.S. Supreme Court.
Now within The Birther Movement it is no secret that I am not really credited with anything. I'm not on the Conservative Talk Show Circuit and have never been asked to speak at a Tea Party or Birther Event. Whenever there have been events I was not called or asked to speak at them.
You recall even Dr. Rev. James David Manning only used me in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial after Alan Keyes, and Wayne Allan Root didn't show up, as well as Orly Taitz.
I drove out to New York from Nevada strictly on faith not knowing what part I would play, if at all, but I ended up being a big factor, which he acknowledged to me at the time after my day of testimony. However he has never hardly mentioned my name since then and has even endorsed and had on his show, The Manning Report, many more times Lori Roth who is running as an independent.
Lori Roth was on the law suit with me along with Leah Lax as candidates for President but after Taitz was barred from practicing in the Superior Court, they never responded to the case and thus a Motion for Dis-Joinder was necessary removing them from the case in order to proceed.
That left me as the only Presidential Candidate left in all of Georgia's Ballot Challenges.
Orly Taitz took off with David Farrar to the Georgia Supreme Court and left me to filing myself, after I had worked hard to get he and I through the Superior Court in Georgia. So there's a little friendly showdown happening in the Birther Movement. (smile)
The showdown I suppose is which case if any will the United States Supreme Court agree to hear? Or, could they agree to hear them all? We all just don't really know.
The Federal Ninth (9th) Circuit ruled in 2011 only current candidates running for President have standing or credit to bring an eligibility complaint. The other two teams have ignored that opinion where I have worked at accommodating that opinion.
I was never asked to join the WELDON et.al., v. OBAMA case by the attorneys Irion or Hatfield though I know they certainly could have asked me having inquired directly to me regarding the decision of the Georgia Supreme Court through Mr. Powell prior to their case being filed in the United States Supreme Court.
In fact Mr. Powell and Mr. Swensson did not team up until after their respective Georgia Supreme Court cases with their separate attorneys Irion and Hatfield.
Upon learning of their cases I sent the following email to the attorneys and also posted it to Mr. Swensson on facebook:
[Dear Mr. Irion and Mr. Hatfield:
Please accept my sincere congratulations and excitement to see that you have filed in the U.S. Supreme Court. I am so pleased, in the valiant effort to sustain our Constitution, to rub shoulders with you and your clients.
As I saw your stamp from the U.S. Supreme Court I noticed that our Petitions for Writ of Cert actually were stamped the same day by the Court. That was an incredible unplanned phenomenon and I'll just bet you that the Clerks were having a "pull'n out hair day".
I wish you the very best of luck and appreciate your efforts and I hope you will convey this also to all your represented clients.
The attachment file I'm forwarding to you is the only effort, I can see, that might help me in my campaign for President in the Democratic Party.
The urgency is of course mentioned therein as the Democratic Party Convention being held Sept.5th,2012. If my case is dismissed early I sure hope that yours continues and is successful.
This is simply a little bit of a 'heads-up', as I wouldn't put it past SCOTUS if by chance they accepted my case to want to combine all our cases together, if only to hear your own professional Oral Arguments.
I'm simply am just not that practiced in the 'norm' of the court in situations like this, so if that sounds totally off the wall please forgive me.
All the best to you in these unchartered waters!
Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
www.codyjudy.us]
END LTR.
Cont..blog entry
I did not receive any response from either attorney, however, Mr. Swensson graciously responded on Facebook in the hope that we would both meet in Washington DC at the Supreme Court.
In thinking back over the last 4 years and all of the attorneys I have approached, or who have approached me in a tentative conversation about the eligibility case against Barack Obama I begin to feel a little sad that I have not had any of them help me through the Judicial Courts...not a single one.
In fact as I thought back at all the names I've emailed and their legal experience I was even depressed a little more.
Mario Apuzzo, Phil Berg, Gary Kreep, Larry Klayman, Orly Taitz, Van Irion, Mark Hatfield if each had 15 years legal experience that would amount to over 100 years of legal training and experience combined I just never could get the benefit of the doubt from.
My case is very unique and different too, from all the others but its on the same issue. I guess you could say "my approach" to the basketball hoop, or golf T was different. My play on the football field was different. We all could certainly be dismissed, but what if, what if, different was better?
Wouldn't it be like "shock and awe" if my case made it? It would be like hitting the Jackpot or Lotto with about the same odds wouldn't it?
Well, I suppose my hand has been dealt already and we will soon see. Recall Roy McAvoy 'Tin Cup's' words played by Kevin Costner in the golf Movie "Tin Cup" to his Caddie Romeo (Cheech Marin), "Greatness Courts Failure Romeo"?
And it all comes down to this last ball in the bag.. if I don't make this I'm disqualified in that there's no where else to go, kind of re-counted in this scene from "Tin Cup"
The United States Postal Service Representative took my information and a case number was assigned to the investigation: CA109421272
I was told that sometimes a piece of mail is not scanned through a sort facility and it may have been delivered already, but that they would check. I was told they would call me and let me know what has happened.
Tonight, 9:30PM , still have not received a call, but ran a check on the numbers again Supreme Court 0310 3490 0000 1692 0099 and Solicitor General 0310 3490 0000 0068 and found that both pieces had in fact today passed through the Washington DC Sort facility just today respectively BOTH at 9:44AM.
If all goes well they should both be delivered tomorrow July 24th,2012 after being stamped by the postal service July 16th,2012 in the 'Priority Mail Service".
The Judicial Courts usually give 3 days for mailing service and with the time sensitive material this is a set-back to the Court even receiving word of the time-sensitive urgency of my case. Nine (9) days to get a Motion to the Court? Excuse me?
With this kind of snail-mail the case might be heard sometime after Obama's second term.
Of course the Motion and Order was emailed to the Court and the respective Counsel(s) and it still hasn't been docketed on the Case No. 12-1576 Judy v. Obama Here:
CRJ UPDATE
As always I would certainly appreciate your contributions to my campaign and hope that you would feel that this is a Campaign worth its weight in gold for what it has done in standing up for our Constitution.
The United States Supreme Court marks the 6th Court this election cycle I have been through and that's not counting the 5 others I was involved with from 2008 up till 2012 including Lt. Col. Terri Lakin's Amicus Curia filed in a military court which we all should recall here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTERVtZzRR8
If you can make a contribution it would be very appreciated.
Cody, Have you noticed how few the numbers are of people willing to put their lives on hold in order that this case (yours mine and the other States cases) be pushed forward to their logical conclusion? I have. Many will post on blogs or Twitter or Tweet their concerns but precious few have or will go the distance. Regardless of how your candidacy pans out or our cases proceed, I just want to take the time and offer up a harty THANK YOU for the service to this Nation you have put on display. It's because of people like you that I find the inner strength to soldier on. The American dream and America's heart are alive and well in this movement.
1
Wonder why the California attorney Orly Taitz who has been coined "The Birther Queen" and has been featured as spear-heading the Birther Movement at times by most of the main stream media, has asked to be removed from the email list of Cody Robert Judy who is a Presidential Candidate in the Democratic Party who was recently given a case number in the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama case no. 12-1576 that actually started out in the Georgia Ballot Challenge with Orly Taitz representing?
Call it a suspicious twist of irony, that the attorney claiming on her web site to be "The Worlds Leading Obama Eligibility Challenge Web Site" find no interest in a case she actually started that has now reached the United States Supreme Court.
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign received the following email from Mrs. Taitz email address stating as follows:
From: Orly Taitz (orly.taitz@gmail.com)
Sent: Sat 7/21/12 6:31 PM
To: cody judy (codyjudy@hotmail.com)
Hotmail Active View
please, take me off your mailing list, I do not wish to get your e-mails
_______________________________________________________________________________
You have been removed Mrs. Orly Taitz.
_______________________________________________________________________________
When Cody was asked about this he said it came as no surprise. "Orly Taitz has been a spear-head of distraction to the Birther Movement. She's been a poster child for the main stream media featured in interview after interview. Let's just say they 'love' to hate her and the distraction has been no friend to the cause that the 14th Amendment did not replace the qualifications embedded in Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of our Constitution demanding a natural born citizen."
"Clearly the 14th Amendment specifies "Citizen" just as the requirements of a U.S. Representative and a U.S. Senator does in the Constitution, and no where in the 14th Amendment is the words "natural born citizen" or a correction of the qualification demands of our President."
One finds it personally revealing Orly would want off an email list that puts out maybe 1 or 2 press releases a week at most, and is so relevant to what her own web site is grandly claiming to be "The Worlds Leading Obama Eligibility Challenge Web Site", that she finds no interest in whatsoever now.
Cody Robert Judy offered the Birther Movement one other thing other then his challenge to Obama's eligibility. He offers the Birther Movement in the purest form a Constitutional Stand on the eligibility challenge of Obama because he sued John McCain in 2008 on his eligibility issue being born outside the U.S. Judy v. McCain
The main stream media has been quick to point out that many of these other candidates for President seem to be racially motivated mainly because of their pass for McCain in 2008.
While challenges to Obama's eligibility have widened in the 2012 race, what the main stream media will not let anyone forget including flirting presidential candidate Donald Trump was that a challenge to Obama from the any political party is racist if their was no challenge to McCain by the same party.
Cody continued, " I think in the Birther movement it is really about time to take a closer look at what is happening in the 'left field' as a distraction and ask ourselves why the main stream media will only invite Orly Taitz on their programs because I can't recall the main stream media interviewing any other attorney, or petitioner for that matter, representing the eligibility or birther movement quite so much as Orly Taitz."
One must ask,'Why do they love to hate her?
"Where Mrs. Taitz has worked tirelessly is at being a distraction with a Russian dialect that made the Birther argument foreign to mainstream America. The facts are when Mrs. Taitz got close to what you would say was a goal of the Birther Movement, she actually moved away from the pursuit. My case in working with her was an excellent example."
"I started with her as a representative of my own Candidacy for President in the New Hampshire Primary Ballot Challenge which went clear to the New Hampshire Supreme Court early in the Presidential Race. One must ask, "Why an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court was not undertaken right there?". An appeal from a State Supreme Court is the quickest way to the United States Supreme Court"
"Then we went down to Georgia and in that Ballot Challenge we did get something that the Birther Movement hadn't every received before. An actual opinion from an Administrative Court Judge that specified the 14th Amendment had actually wiped out Article II, Section I, Clause 5's demands for a 'natural born citizen' in so many words. On appeal to the Judicial Branch Superior Court Orly was stopped in her tracks from representing me, and I was forced to pick up the pieces in Farrar-Judy v. Obama. Surprisingly, Orly refused any assistance whatsoever to questions I had sent her in emails regarding procedure and general advice. It was clearly a blow to the case, and my thoughts of her as genuinely interested in the eligibility issue."
"One must recall now the Federal 9th Circuit Court of Appeals opinion in Keyes (Barnett) v. Obama , that 'standing' and thus 'jurisdiction' was only attained by a Candidate for President who had actual competitive standing, with the eligibility challenge of the contested candidate, in this case Obama. By the time that case reached the 9th Circuit in 2011, the 2008 election in contest was over and the 'political doctrine question' was in the ground as a pounded stake that could not be dis-lodged"
"The 'Competitive Doctrine Question' and "competitive standing" are double edge swords in the Judicial arena and I have written about them here:
Excerpt :
"The Political Doctrine Question encourages courts to decline to rule in certain categories of controversial cases. The theory portends, a court acknowledges that the Constitution might have been violated but declines to act in a see-no-evil, hear-no-evil, do-no-evil crouch. It is often described as a type of Judicial restraint, although it can be considered a form of judicial activism against Plaintiffs whose rights have been violated and find their cases dismissed."
Standing requirements
There are three standing requirements:
Injury: The plaintiff must have suffered or imminently will suffer injury—an invasion of a legally protected interest that is concrete and particularized. The injury must be actual or imminent, distinct and palpable, not abstract. This injury could be economic as well as non-economic.
Causation: There must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of, so that the injury is fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendant and not the result of the independent action of some third party who is not before the court.
Redressability: It must be likely, as opposed to merely speculative, that a favorable court decision will redress the injury.
"At that time I wrote that blog entry, I actually encouraged people to contribute to Orly's legal fees in her representation because Georgia's Trial was coming up on January 26th,2012. I can no longer in full faith and credit recommend this to supporters and it has nothing to do with my personal feelings as I have never met Mrs. Taitz, but has to do with the facts she's representing and supporting now."
WHAT HAPPENED IN GEORGIA STAYS IN GEORGIA
"While I was no longer represented in Georgia by an attorney because Orly had been denied her pro hac vice Motion, David Farrar and I agreed to hang together through the battle in the Superior Court which had been paid for. David didn't no to much about the law and so I drafted the motions and responses in the proceeding and it was here that I was able to on March 2nd, 2012 interject a little nitro into the case by including Sheriff Joe's Cold Case Posse results as evidence after his March 1st, 2012 press release."
"I felt such gratitude that Sheriff Joe Arpaio's constituency had cared enough to petition their Sheriff to open an investigation on Obama's eligibility and I felt with the 2200 hours of professional investigation that his Cold Case Posse had undertaken, that a step up had been managed from say the private professional investigation field that had been submitted as evidence, and perhaps the Courts would respect even more this legal submission of evidence."
"That was not to be the case in the Judicial Superior Court and it was at this time that Orly had woo'ed the Plaintiff David Farrar away from including me in the case as a Candidate for President, in favor of his sole citizen representation he represented in the presentation to the Georgia Supreme Court, which made no legal sense at all. As the case begin there was also another Democratic Party Presidential Candidate named Leah Lax and an independent candidate Lori Roth who also received the endorsement of the California Republican 5th place finisher for the U.S. Senate republican nomination candidate Orly Taitz."
"The problem with that as far as the eligibility question was concerned in the Farrar-Judy v. Obama case was that legally all the other plaintiffs in the case like Lax and Roth were given a chance to continue the case in the Georgia Superior Court and failed to respond and thus were eliminated from the case as litigants officially in a Dis-Joinder Motion."
"Remember Orly chose as a favored route David Farrar as a Citizen over me, a Presidential Candidate in the Democratic Party positioned perfectly to contend Obama's eligibility with standing and before the Democratic Party National Convention where the 'political doctrine question' would have little effect, in direct contradiction of the Federal 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decision in which she had been Representative Counsel on. How is that not assumed to be 'failing the Birther Movement' when the goal is in site?"
"Orly Taitz ditched me, the only remaining candidate for President she had when she chose to represent David Farrar without me in the Georgia Supreme Court and told me in a phone conversation I could do it on my own. Talk about stopping just before you score and then looking up and wondering why everyone's calling you 'the best player for the opposing team'? "
That alone should have stopped any and all contributions to Orly Taitz in the illogical legal sense she was representing. She was in direct contrast to the Federal Court of Appeals Decision and Opinion that she had worked for in Keyes-Barnett v. Obama and was in the site of all the world flipping off the Judges in their opinion of 'standing' and 'the political doctrine question' with her actions at the same time her hand was extended for more contributions in State Ballot Challenges.
If your a contributor challenge yourself to make sense of that other then to say, "She's being paid to be a distraction to the Birther Movement and make the whole Constitutional issue seem like foreign food", and she's been well equipped to do just that.
With her own actions speaking louder than words Orly's case in Farrar v. Obama was dismissed in the Georgia Supreme Court and she has positioned herself in an appeal to a single Justice Clarence Thomas of the U.S. Supreme Court 12A-25 without a presidential candidate which was also dismissed.
Orly Taitz - You have been dismissed and your title of Birther Queen has been revoked for anti-birther obama's-prima donna - 1
1-The term "prima donna" has come into common usage in any field denoting someone who behaves in a demanding, often temperamental fashion, revealing an inflated view of themselves, their talent, and their importance. Due to this association, the contemporary meaning of the word has taken on this negative connotation.
USNORTHCOM OBAMA’S MILITARY INDISCRETION De-Classified Att: General Charles H. Jacoby, Jr.
The time has come that our military commanders consider pressing charges against Mr. Barack Obama. Our military men and women swear an oath to the Constitution, not to the office of the President that is occupied by a legitimate President who is qualified under the Constitution. They certainly do not swear an oath to an illegitimate president that includes at this time most especially one who mocks the very essence of what the military is sworn to.
The totality of evidence brought and considered in every State Ballot Challenge is stacking up against Barack Obama. Employed attorneys all over the Country sought out to defend Barack Obama’s illegitimacy have been using different legal tactics depending upon the State they are in.
In Georgia Obama’s legal ‘Officer of the Court’ wrote an official letter representing Barack Obama and demanding that the Secretary of State actually pull the case out from under the Administrative Court Judge Malihi. In that letter Obama was represented with the long form birth certificate he released included in the letter by his 'Officer of the Court', and a summation that if the Secretary of State didn’t call off the dogs, pulling the case, Obama would boycott the hearing.
That ultimately happened with Georgia’s Secretary of State Kemp, Obama’s purported long form birth certificate in hand, responding that if Obama did boycott the hearing he would do so at his own peril January 25th,2012.
Fast forward to New Jersey Ballot Challenge April 10th a mere 80 days around the world later, and watch the New Jersey Judge rely on the fact that Obama has not submitted anything remotely resembling a long form birth certificated to him or the Secretary of State, thus the witness that was there to debunk the authenticity of the Birth Certificate posted by Barack Obama as his legitimate birth record and spoon fed to the media which resulted in a swarming feeding frenzy against birthers led by “sworn enemy to the Birthers” Chris Mathews, was kept seated.
While Georgia law required the burden rest upon the candidate at the hearings, the New Jersey Law placed the burden upon the ballot challengers necessitating the differing defenses.
While Georgia and New Jersey are indeed different States, Barack Obama is a single defendant in action. While the differing States may find Obama’s duck and dodge defense tactical, the single common denominators consistently are made fools of. What are the single common denominators, or rather should we say who are they? The Military; the Press; the Democratic Party, and We the People.
Although smug in their defense as ‘Officer’s of the Court’, in any given particular statutes regarding Ballot access, the totality in the representation of one client can be easily sequestered as evidence against Obama; let me elaborate upon The Military, for it stands to reason that upon the facts of forgery and false identification Obama is in fact an ‘invader’ of the military on false pretenses making him domestic enemy and reasonably the biggest threat to national security this Country has ever witnessed with the perpetration of the highest office of the land.
Indeed every day that the fire climbs higher into Obama’s Birther Bed, is a more dangerous day for innocent civilians who may become the subjects of an Obama blackmailing scheme. Like a teeter that begins to totter the other way, a dangerous circumstance exists as Obama gets cornered with his finger on the nuclear buttons.
The United States Military is not divided into States with separate statutes and regulations. In fact the military has Courts, Military Rules, and a Code of conduct Obama is in fact subject to as an occupier in the Military Order as assumed Commander-In-Chief or assumed usurper acting within.
How would our Military treat a case of espionage, a spy acting in the order against the Constitution or for another State Country? They would arrest the subject, set a bail, and Military Trial for the double agent would not be afforded Civil rights under Civil Criminal Code.
Given the evidence in New Jersey’s Ballot Challenge, Obama’s representative, smug about the courts not giving in to the ‘political doctrine question,’ basically stated for the Court, Obama knew the long form birth certificate released by Obama at the White House to the Press was such a laughing stalk forgery that no one should take it seriously.
While the extraordinarily brazen and audacious defense worked in New Jersey, the Military Commanders see the totality of Obama’s defense and can see that in Georgia Obama did in fact submit the long form birth certificate as authentic to both the Judge and the Secretary of State.
Of course the whole nation was witness to Obama’s press conference releasing the long form birth certificate and his statement authenticating it from the presumed position of authority. This is seen by the Military as the presumed Commander in Chief releasing an “order”, but it was seen by the public as ‘The President” releasing his true identification papers. Obama no doubt would argue he was not ‘under oath’ in releasing the information so if it was a lie, he was not civilly responsible.
The question then could be presumed when is a President not acting as the Commander-In-Chief? The answer is ‘never’U.S.C. Art.2,Sect. 2… someone always has to be at the head and this may be where Obama’s defenses are tripping up.
Standing at his bully pulpit Obama issues an “Order” of his Birth, and if that ‘Order’ is false, fabricated, or forged, Obama has painted himself into a corner with the Military Court of which the position of Commander-In-Chief is subject to.
Obama may find sideshows and carnival barkers (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zKCHnc0zb8 ) out here in Birther Land his audience to muse about decorating coffee mugs and tee-shirts with the forged long form birth certificate, however when his “Officers in Court” admit they know it’s a forgery in Court smugly aware that no State attorney general will prosecute for jurisdiction problems, and his ultimate appointment of the U.S. attorney general not about to press charges against boss; what is not calculated or forgotten is that every minute of every day Obama is assumed to be ‘Commander In Chief’, a position subject to the Military Courts of law and order sworn to allegiance of The United States Constitution.
The totality of Obama’s actions in every State can be assumed as one that is subject to a Military Tribunal and thusly the submission of the long form birth certificate to a “Secretary Of State” as evidence for a decision in Georgia, as well as the testimony of Obama’s officer in the Court in New Jersey stating the long form birth certificate is a forgery, all constitutes evidence in a military court that the Commander In Chief’s position has been ‘invaded’ by a ‘usurper’, and thusly demands Military apprehension and a military tribunal.
The list of retired military personal charging Obama is known in many an instant but to name a couple: There is no higher authority for a U.S. naval commander than the superior office of commander-in-chief of the U.S. armed forces, the president of the United States. Yet, Cmdr. Fitzpatrick has publicly and formally charged "President" Barack Hussein Obama with the high crime of treason in a federal complaint filed with James R. Dedrick U.S. Attorney, Eastern District Tennessee, and Edgar Schmutzer, Dedrick’s Assistant U.S. Attorney on March 17, 2009.
In doing so, LCDR Fitzpatrick opened himself up to the very serious charge of mutiny, a crime which requires Court Martial and carries the penalty of death. In the criminal complaint, Fitzpatrick has charged Barack Hussein Obama (and others alleged complicit) with treason, an act that, if false, constitutes an act of mutiny on behalf of Commander Fitzpatrick.
Fitzpatrick was right, and his action constituted the ultimate selfless act of true patriotism, and a glowing example of what it means to stand on an oath to protect and defend the U.S. Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and domestic.
Lt. Col. Terry Lakin actually has done time in Fort Leavenworth for the action that Obama now constitutes as a joke. How does one come to imagine the nefariousness of Obama’s actions against the military as requisite with the honor of the Office of the President?
You must imagine the heart of the adversary against America and the principle core values of Freedom and Liberty. You must imagine slavery, bondage, torture upon the innocent who’ve stood up with courage, and you must also imagine the victims of those who could not stand up for themselves.
There are a couple of reasons that I believe it is the inherit duty of our Military to conduct the arrest and the Military Tribunal. According to U.S.C. Art. 2,Sect.2, the person acting as President is actually drafted into the Military as Commander in Chief, but that is assuming he is eligible. Sect 4 declares the right for the Military to make intervention against all the officers of the Government including The President, Vice President, and all civil Officers of the United States for Conviction of treason.
One must assume to get conviction of Treason, insurrection, or the crime of using the military without proper credentials, there must be a military tribunal for a military breach of perhaps violations of the Posse Comitatus Act requiring that any authority using the Army and the Air Force must exist with the United States Constitution or Act of Congress and Obama as an illegal unqualified president does not fulfill that requirement, and in such is a violation militarily.
In the al-Awlaki case, the White House briefly considered attempting to capture al-Awlaki instead of killing him. The decision to kill was ostensibly made because a snatch operation was too risky, but the real reason was that it would lead to a trial—and the question of a military tribunal or a civilian court would be debated in Congress and the media. The evidence against al-Awlaki included considerable classified information that might reveal intelligence community sources and methods; if this material were excluded, the remaining evidence might not be sufficient to convince a jury or tribunal that he was guilty of anything other than exercising his First Amendment rights.
Interestingly, the National Security Council meeting where the al-Awlaki issue was discussed was recorded in a memo from which any discussion of the dangers of going to trial was excised, leaving only an account of the tactical difficulties in attempting a capture instead of an assassination.
President Bush also determined that the captured al-Qa’eda and Taliban fighters were not eligible for prisoner of war status.
Since the al-Qa’eda fighters belong to a terrorist organization and are not recognized members of an armed force, they are unlawful belligerents under the law of war.
On November 13, 2001, President Bush signed an executive (military) order which authorized the creation of military tribunals to try certain “non-citizens” for engaging in terrorist acts against the U.S. or aiding or abetting in terrorist acts against the U.S.
Congress has specifically provided for the use of military commissions in Article 21 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) wherein we find Art. 94 : Any person subject to this chapter (The Office of President being included under military as “Commander in Chief”) (1)with intent to usurp or override lawful military authority /or/( 2) cause the overthrow or destruction of lawful civil authority, creates, in concert with any other person, revolt, violence, or other disturbance against that authority is guilty of sedition.
There may also be a case involving Art. 106, as Obama has acted under ‘false pretenses’, and has given Russia information providing Moscow with the SM-3 data, despite reservations from security officials who say that doing so could compromise the effectiveness of the system by allowing Russian weapons technicians to counter the missile. The weapons are considered some of the most effective high-speed interceptors in the U.S. missile defense arsenal.
A court-martial is empowered to determine the guilt of members of the armed forces subject to military law, and, if the defendant is found guilty, to decide upon punishment. However, Obama as an ineligible usurper is not an official member of the military, yet he has operated within the military as an infiltrator constituting the ambition to override lawful military authority through an office he was not qualified for, and did knowing release false documents in the concerted effort to protect his usurpation.
A military tribunal is an inquisitorial system based on charges brought by military authorities, prosecuted by a military authority, judged by military officers, and sentenced by military officers against a member of an adversarial force and is the safest manner to isolate Barack Obama as his citizenship is in question. Additionally, no act Obama has signed as a usurping President is binding to the military and thus every identity record every known or connected to Obama is in fact the Military's to sequester.
The United States has made use of military tribunals or commissions, rather than rely on a court-martial, within the military justice system, during times of declared war or rebellion, and according to the Constitution Obama is seen as a “disability” not being qualified for Congress to conduct hearings upon. That is found in the 14th Amendment Sect.3. The Military however has a different approach in considering “rebellion”, “infiltration”, and “unlawful enemy combatants”.
The administration of George W. Bush sought to use military tribunals to try "unlawful enemy combatants", mostly individuals captured abroad and held at a prison camp at a military base at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, and according to the Constitution President George W. Bush has never been succeeded, pro tempore, by a qualified person that would qualify officially ending his term according to U.S.C. Amendment XX, Sect 3, and Amendment XXV.
SUMMARY
In order to maintain the civil peace I believe it is incumbent upon our Military to ascertain the damage, isolate the offender from politically orchestrating greater collateral damage, and constitute a peaceful settlement on the chain of command being succinctly rendered as to maintain efficiency of the Military Order and the safety of the United States Citizenry.
The military is without a doubt the most reliable source of enforcement in a domestic usurpation of the Office of the President that might engage directly and successfully with the secret service protection of Obama, maintaining an undisputed civil peace for the population in the interest of procedural requirements of justice during any proceeding by Congress and the Military Court in the interest of the Republic.
The Military is within its jurisdiction of enforcement within the executive branch, under the Constitution of the United States as the Supreme Law of the Land in the Republic for which our Military stands, where the Judicial and Legislative Branches are not directly assigned to go.
For IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE: Do Politicians in Washington DC Fear To Hear?
Dear WND Mr. Unruh and REPORTERS WORLD WIDE :
Just wanted to touch base with you on this developing story, and I think it is particular noteworthy given the responses of the Congressman asked about the investigation into Obama forgeries that report Drew Zahn featured in a recent WND story.
The link below provides the link on Scribd that details Sheriff Joe Arpaio's investigation has indeed reached the top already. In the case of Congressmen they most assuredly need or would rather have the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in order to substantiate Hearings of Investigation on Verification of Qualification.
Indeed they probably feel that the election is the best way out from underneath Obama, or, as many believe they are fixed on the way to handle Obama through policy rather then principle I'm sorry to say.
Principles of our Constitution have clearly been redefined by the GOP Candidates as they endured a scolding from Sheriff Joe himself reported in another story at WND.
Isn't it a sad day when "principles' of conservatism are no longer seen as important, and rather the 'economy' is instituted as the 'higher law' by the GOP?
You can't say the same thing about the Democratic Party though, least not in total, as I am running as a Democrat for President, and have taken Sheriff Joe's investigation and incorporated it from its initial release on March 1st,2012 right into the Superior Court of GA. March 2nd,2012, and representing it in the case on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court in the Petitioner for Writ of Certiori found here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/88039329/CRJ-Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-U-S-Supreme-Crt-Judy-v-Obama showing 331 reads here,
Attached to this is the file that the U.S. Supreme Court received the Petitioner today even though the mailed method was estimated to be delivered last Friday April 6th,2012. I believe it was delayed through security as the tracking report showed that it was in Washington DC and had processed through their sort center at 2:02pm April 6th,2012, granted it was a big weekend with Passover happening with Jews and the Resurrection of Christ being celebrated on Easter with the Christians both of which celebrate uniquely a time of "Freedom and Liberation" from oppression of different times.
It would be an interesting research project probably only Heaven could have taken to ascertain the amount of prayer dedicated to God in prayers this last weekend for our Constitution, in our day, to be upheld, and for a delivery to take place. I think it would be nice to inform people a delivery did take place, via the U.S. Postal Service record. Perhaps many question the manner in which prayers are fulfilled but if you knew the story that took place, the whole story, in getting this done and mailed, you would understand most sincerely how the obstacles overcome were great and how humbled I was feeling the divine providence watching over the work herein expressed.
Perhaps people will have trouble with the messenger, but who are we to decide who will deliver the message? Certainly with the record of Moses nearly being stoned to death by the Jews, and of course Jesus Christ being crucified by his own, that record explains with a little bit of 20/20 hindsight vision is perfect vision, if you are a messenger you better have protection because there will be a lot of people who do not want to hear the message.
That brings me to the next point I want to express: Hearing the message without Fear. Americans are a brave and courageous people at heart I believe and of course by history. Ours has been carved out by great trials and test of courageous actions marked by The United States Constitution that declares a disciplined sovereignty for our Republic. I would like to say that as long as Congress has a fear to hear the truth, the American People should know there is a big problem!
If you don't think that 10,000 politicians in American have thought about doing what I have done you'd probably be wrong. I believe that over 10,000 politicians have indeed 'thought' about doing what I have done, but the point was they didn't do it. Maybe it was 'fear', maybe it was that they 'heard' but didn't listen. Is there a 'conspiracy' to hear when we indeed can hear? When we 'fear to hear', that's when we are in trouble.
My campaign is a campaign against the fear to hear and to listen. When a political regime is afraid, or fears being criticized, you undoubtedly have what became a famous clarion to JFK's Administration called "Think Tank", which is kind of what we have with all the politicians in Washington DC right now regarding Obama's eligibility. Who knows when difficult things are heard that actions contrary to the ones chosen might have ended something that got worse because of the initial decision to ignore them.
What if President George W. Bush as soon as he heard that a airliner had crashed into tower 1 had indeed acted with a swift phone call to scramble jets to protect the skies from the second hit coming in? Might things have been different? One thing we do know, there were American passengers who chose that day to act without the President's knowledge or directive and because of those actions lost their life's but protected many others. There are people who hear and listen who are not nor have they ever been in government.
As for my part, since 2008 when I listened and made the decision to challenge Sen. John McCain's eligibility as I did, I had no idea about Obama's plan to secure his own eligibility through the charge of racism that would exist because no one running for President challenged McCain's Eligibility, when I decided to run and challenge both of them. The time-line and development of Obama's plan has long roots and those roots must be discovered and understood plainly for all to see so America can stay together.
America is not and will not be a victim anyone can just do anything to because politicians hear but won't listen. I believe the blessing of the Creator are still upon this land and that prayers are answered. America was reserved for a light to the world, a beacon of hope, freedom, and liberty and ungodly cowardice actions that seek to undermine what men and women of America have consecrated with their prayers, with their sweat, and with their blood shall in no way go unrecognized by the Heavens throne, nor will they stand.
Under our United States Constitution is a safety that is the foundation of conservatism. Those standing up for it may truthfully have claim on conservative principles. Those denying and shucking it though they had the power will be soon found out and removed by the people. Indeed there is an election coming up and those in Washington DC should be fearing and trembling at their records and oaths that have been trampled in broad daylight of those people electing them.
There will be no place to hide their records and their recommends handed out by The United States Constitution.
Sincerely, Cody Robert Judy The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign www.codyjudy.us www.codyjudy.blogspot.com YouTube: CODE4PRES
23063250000021211149 Priority Mail Delivered April 09, 2012, 7:45 am WASHINGTON, DC 20543 Expected Delivery By: April 6, 2012
Signature Confirmation™
Proof of Delivery
Notice Left (No Authorized Recipient Available) April 08, 2012, 1:14 pm WASHINGTON, DC 20543
Notice Left (No Authorized Recipient Available) April 08, 2012, 1:10 pm WASHINGTON, DC 20543
Arrival at Unit April 08, 2012, 7:07 am WASHINGTON, DC 20018
Processed through USPS Sort Facility April 06, 2012, 2:02 am WASHINGTON, DC 20066
Depart USPS Sort Facility April 05, 2012 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84199
Processed at USPS Origin Sort Facility April 05, 2012, 1:09 am SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84199
Acceptance April 04, 2012, 4:39 pm OGDEN, UT 84401
United States Supreme Court Letter on Obama's and McCain's eligibility- Cody Judy reads a letter sent to the United States Supreme Court Justices in 2008, an Order in the case of Judy v. McCain, and a Letter to Utah Senator Orrin Hatch on the eligibility of Obama and McCain, on The Lion's Den Show.
