Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy Goes Sean Hannity?

FEATURED EDITORIAL The Post and Email
2016 Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy Goes Sean Hannity?


There's not many Presidential Candidates who actually have their name as a Plaintiff in the United States Supreme Court with the Respondent being Barack Hussein Obama et. al., but that is exactly what we see happening with Cody Robert Judy.

Now, Sean Hannity is one talk show host Conservatives and Republicans love. He's a family man, a defender of 'conservative issues' with a show on FOX News Obama was recently quoted in a news report as 'wanting to muzzle'. That tells you, Sean isn't the talk show host you'd really think Obama would pick out for a News Special featuring his recent push for the Pacific Trade Deal blocked by U.S. Senate Democrats.

This might be all smoke and mirrors because today on Sean's radio show we heard him back away from Republicans in Congress who were in support of it with Obama, based on Obama's Executive Order capabilities while Democrats on the left feared a Republican President could also run away with the hen house pulling down wages and jobs in America on a fast track.

God Bless those who died or were injured in that horrible speeding Amtrack Train crash that was on a very fast track said to be going twice as fast as it was supposed to be going. This was very sad news today.

Here at the 2016 Presidential Campaign of Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President we have been getting some email like this, and take special notice and care of appreciation to the Semper Fi motto that is used by our United States Marine Corps:

So we wanted to make an effort that our best hand is/has been extended in accepting that offer of Sean Hannity's Show on Fox. We also owe thanks to all of those who are and have supported us in this effort to defend the "conservative principle" of the United States Constitution's demand, as the qualification states that the Office of President and Vice President devolve only upon a 'natural born Citizen', or a 'Citizen' at the time of the Adoption of the Constitution.

It is true we have been nearly six years in this fight, legal petition, and civil course of action but that isn't unusual to get a case to the U.S. Supreme Court that is wholly ripe having exhausted State Remedies which we had to do in the Course of the 2008 and 2012 U.S. District Court Cases against McCain, and Obama in New Hampshire's State Supreme Court, and Georgia's State Supreme Court which also was represented by myself as a presidential candidate in Ballot Challenges, but was unheard by the U.S. Supreme Court in 12-5276.

The action now Judy v. Obama 14-9396 is a completely different legal and jurisdictional animal and the Respondent's have until May 20th, 2015 to respond. Just to be completely open about this, Cody Robert Judy has opened by invitation the scholarly argument's for those who wish to merge the two terms 'Citizen' and 'natural born Citizen' in front of the U.S. Supreme Court by filing the appropriate document and letter to the Court that informs the Court that he is open for all opinions to be sent to the Court by those qualified to practice in the form of an Amicus Curiae, or friend of the Court. What that means, is those wishing to protect or incorporate Obama's version as well as presidential Candidates Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio are welcomed into the case and able to direct the Court in favor of their candidacies. "Its open season, and if no one shows what they believe for Obama, Cruz, and Rubio I guess Cody Robert Judy's interpretation is correct and the Court may take that into consideration",said a supporter for Cody.

With 13 Case numbers in Court, a blog of near 210,000 views noticed all over the world, a YouTube Channel with over 85,000 Views filled with commentary and political commercials over the last six years, a Facebook Page with the limit of 5,000 friends and a new 2016 FB Page created filling up fast with over over 300 people now from all over the United States, its getting harder to say Cody Robert Judy is a fringe candidate with no support from America. To simply dismiss the issue that has really never been heard by the U.S. Supreme Court between two Presidential Candidates of the same Party in the history of the United States really does affect every single American Voter. Yes, Cody ran as a Democrat in 2012 and intends to push ahead into a primary with former Sec. Hillary Clinton. At the heart of a case being heard, or at least one of the criteria for hearing a case in the United States Supreme Court,is the question: "How many people are directly affected by this issue?"

Cody recently did a national interview on the Radio USA Network on the show Chuck Morse Speaks that is available on podcast here as well as WOBC you can listen to here.

Sean Hannity has pointed out himself the unfair advantage of Presidential Candidates given by many of the mainstream networks and the slanted questioning that he has mentioned he is not apart of. For example:

We noticed that Sean Hannity is a pretty fair guy even willing to part with the straight or pointed "Republican" guard when it is especially parting away from the 'conservative' views he shares. We respect that and I think all of America does. That is why, especially given the very important news that Amicus Curiaes' can be accepted by any party affected by this U.S. Supreme Court case as long as it is submitted by a lawyer licensed to practice in that Court as we have enumerated in one of our most popular post on this Blog that has gone viral. We feel it would be a service to the community announcement as well as serving Sean Hannity's audience of 'conservative listeners' of this in Judy v. Obama 14-9396
.
Of course we will Tweet, and Facebook this to #SeanHannity and @SeanHannity and #Foxnews and we hope you also feel free to on your social networks, as you notice our hand is extended to bring this news to one of the best conservative radio host in our Nation! Sean Hannity! Guess we'll see?

We hope you enjoy our newest commercial!

INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI



Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy

We NEED YOUR HELP AMERICA now, to educate Americans in the order of our Constitution to hear Cody's Case to the U.S. Supreme Court. We are Taking a Stand for individual Civil Rights and against an unprecedented ASSAULT upon your Constitution and prior decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court! With your help we can make it happen. You are a very important key to this. So its up to you America to help Restore America Today for a Better America Tomorrow. Like, Share, and Help us in the Contribution Revolution.


Get your questions answered by ordering Cody Robert Judy's Book here.

The 2016 Campaign begins now. Please send your contributions and help with the ABC (American Birther Campaign) today and my election for President in 2016 and Join the 257 of us now on my Facebook Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President 2016 site.



Cody Robert Judy for President 2016
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, Utah 84401

Thank you
Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for United States President 2016
www.codyjudy.us

CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION



The Commercial is simply called "America"


Join the new CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRES 2016 FB SITE Here

P.S. I don't get anything for the sales of this coin. No contributions or anything , I just think its kinda cool. Get your commemorative 2015 Birther coin today!

BREAKING NEWS - Obama Eligibility Case Decision and Response Includes Obama's Justice Nomination

FEATURED EDITORIAL: The Post & Email
BREAKING NEWS - Obama Eligibility Case Decision and Response Includes Obama's Justice Nomination

The U.S. 10th Circuit delivered a punishing blow to Judy v. Obama et.al., 14-4136 dismissing it and upholding the lower U.S. District Courts decision calling it frivolous, malicious, and wholly incredible. The 5 page decision was rendered to day out of the Denver Appellate Court after being reported in chambers for more than a month.

My initial reaction was one of being pretty disappointed and hurt. I'm not sure being dismissed as frivolous and malicious was as insulting as if I'd been dismissed for a lack of standing, but the result is all the same. It was flabbergasting to read the Court's Order and Judgement to say the least understanding first hand how very harmful allowing Obama to run roughshod over my legitimate qualified and Constitutionally adherent Campaign was and how deceitful and fabricated his was.

As I begin delving into the decision after my initial shock thinking this was just incredibly awful, came the question on who were these Justices? That's when I looked them up and found one of the three had in fact been nominated by the Defendant/Appellee of the case Barack Obama and the other Democrat was nominated by President Bill Clinton. I could not have imagined a more ridiculous scenario then to think that the Judge entering this decision was receiving his paycheck based on a defendant I was making a claim against?

All the thousands of hours and hard work just goes up in smoke to something far less deserving and destructive of the U.S. Constitution in Obama's forged and fraudulent identifications known as the fabricated long form birth certificate and draft registration. Yes, he is in the Office of the President but under what horror and fraudulent circumstances?

Yes, receiving more votes but for who in the consideration of the fabricated long form birth certificate and certainly Obama's own admission his father Obama Sr. was a foreign citizen at the time of his birth. Indeed, the founders and framers had expressed interest firmly that the Office of the President was not to devolve upon foreign or alien persons. That was the reason they expressly formulated a higher criteria of demands for qualifications in the Office of the President from that of U.S. Representatives and U.S. Senators.

A two generation protection was laid out for the Office of the President cited as a natural born Citizen, rather then a Citizen cited for the lower Congressional House and Senate. No foreign influence was discerned as meaning 'born in the U.S. to Citizen parents.'

The eight attempts since 2003 to legally change the qualifications for the Office of the President bear the greatest testament to that definition as they all wanted to change the meaning mentioned to something along side the qualifications of U.S. Reps and U.S. Senators requirement of "Citizen". These attempts failed but do broadcast to all that Congress knows exactly what I'm saying to be true. If it wasn't so, why would it have been necessary to change at all?

I think the American People know that something is a foul, and the trust has been spoiled but still without a champion to lead the Court cases being in the Presidential Race, everyone shrugs their shoulders in hopelessness and despair. Not even the strongest politicians have any hope of moving it into the Courts without being called racist by the Media because they cite McCain as not being questioned about his foreign birth. I did take McCain to Court but the Court ruled after the election that it was moot because he had lost.

So Obama won and is ineligible and now what does the Court say? Its highly unlikely going to be successful. Well it sure as heck isn't if the Court won't even hear it that's for sure.

You can read the ORDER and JUDGEMENT here and... you can read my RESPONSE or request for a REHEARING En Blanc here.

Update: Here are the three very important questions I posed to the Court to justify Rehearing if:

Question #1- Does Justice Gregory A. Phillips having ENTERED FOR THE COURT the ORDER AND JUDGEMENT on this case February 3rd,2015 having been considered to the U.S. Senate for Confirmation with the favor of the Appellee/Defendant in this case, Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro in the nomination process and thus his very employment as a Justice in the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals constitute an prejudiced dismissal summarily instigated upon the Plaintiff that would seem at best a compromise of judicial discipline in recusal decorum and at worst an impeachable offense?

Question#2- June 25th, 2014 this Court handed down a decision favorable to ‘individual rights’, considered standing and upheld marriage in Kitchen v. Herbert No. 13-4178 and considered the rights of an individual who is unpopular more important per the conflicting referendum of all the people in the entire State of Utah and it’s Constitutional Amendment in the State, which does not come on political easy street; isn’t the ORDER AND JUDGEMENT of this case dismissing it as frivolous a conflict of the Court’s own interest and judgment in that case in the interest of Individual Rights?

Question#3- The conflicting statements in the ORDER and JUDGEMENT asserted by the Court leave criminal mischief, fraud, forgery, and a declaration of the precedent case in Minor v. Happersett regarding a natural born Citizen being “Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents” by the U.S. Supreme Court undefended and a wreck; and fair elections on equal terms for all the Candidates, per race, per qualifications within the U.S. Constitution in total disarray and the Appellant/Plaintiff without recourse in the infringements of his Civil Rights to a fair race; Does this not deserve the attention of the full Court and the political corrections that might be made for the next general election where the entire U.S. population has a stake and claim for fairness, equal treatment under the law in the considerations of our Republic?

WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE IN COURTS AT THE SAME COURT?

To decipher this a little, the Order and Judgement released today was authorized by a panel of three judges. The whole or full Court considered to a panel of five or more. So, the decision released today was by a panel of three justices and my asking for a rehearing en banc is a request for a bigger panel of Justices to make a decision on wither to hear it.

I've basically asked the Court to recuse both the two Democrat Judges nominated by Obama and President Clinton because as I stated in the Petition for Rehearing Clinton's appointment conflicts with Hillary potentially being a Candidate for the Office of the President in 2016 and there is a interest to protect that.

So that's the news, we'll submit this and see what happens. I could sure use your help and thank you for passing it on and considering this essential to our national security.

Yours Truly
Cody Robert Judy

We need your help. Will you help us or are the outrageous lies your being told by your elected leaders okay for you and your children? If you won't defend your children and their future who will you defend?

The 2016 Campaign begins now. Please send your contributions and help with the ABC (American Birther Campaign) today and my election for President in 2016 and Join the 257 of us now on my Facebook Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President 2016 site.

Cody Robert Judy for President 2016
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, Utah 84401

Thank you
Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for United States President 2016
www.codyjudy.us

CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION



The Commercial is simply called "America"


Join the new CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRES 2016 FB SITE Here