PROOF THE PRESIDENTIAL RACE THAT WAS RIGGED - Bad Examples Can Be Good Reminders

FEATURED EDITORIAL
The Post & Email

THE PRESIDENTIAL RACE THAT WAS RIGGED

Lance Edward Armstrong (born Lance Edward Gunderson, September 18, 1971) is an American former professional road racing cyclist. Armstrong had won the Tour de France a record seven consecutive times from 1999 to 2005, before he was banned for life and all his results from August 1998 were voided, as a result of long-term doping offenses. Armstrong had been the subject of doping allegations ever since winning the 1999 Tour de France. In 2012, a United States Anti-Doping Agency investigation concluded that Armstrong had used performance-enhancing drugs over the course of his career and named him as the ringleader of "the most sophisticated, professionalized and successful doping program that sport has ever seen." Armstrong chose not to contest the charges, citing the potential toll on his family. As a result, he received a lifetime ban from all sports that follow the World Anti-Doping Agency code—effectively ending his athletic career. He was also stripped of all of his achievements after 1998, including his seven Tour de France titles The Union Cycliste Internationale upheld USADA's decision and decided that his stripped wins would not be allocated to other riders. Armstrong chose not to appeal the decision to the Court of Arbitration for Sport. In a 2013 interview, Armstrong confessed that some of the allegations were true.[12][13][14] He has declined to testify about the full extent of his use of the drugs. In the aftermath of his fall from grace, a CNN article wrote that "The epic downfall of cycling's star, once an idolized icon of millions around the globe, stands out in the history of professional sports."

Barrack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro (born - no one knows for sure, because his long form birth certificate was a forgery) (the child of - again, no one knows for sure because his birth certificate is a forgery) is a Politician in the United States (he may be American, but know one knows for sure because his birth certificate is a forgery) Hussein/Soetoro was formally adopted by Lolo Soetoro in order to attend a Muslim elementary schools in Indonesia. There is a record that is not fabricated for us to know that. After losing a Congressional seat Race in 2000, he won a U.S. Senate seat in 2004 by exposing a sealed Divorce Record of a  rival Republican (Jack Ryan). Obama won outspending Alan Keyes Mr. Ryan's replacement 14M to 2.5M. He won the 2008 U.S. Presidential Democratic Nomination after former president Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton running in the Primary refused to question his ineligibility as a Candidate Qualified to be President.  Threats to their daughter Chelsea were rumored after the assassination style death of a close friend, and Arkansas SuperDelegate Chairman. Of course a lush agreement Hillary's Campaign Debts would be paid and she would get a lucrative deal in the Secretary of State Office where Obama would look the other way while she padded the Clinton Charity Foundation with guarantees of her election win in 2016. Obama won re-election in 2012, but only after releasing in April of 2011 what became known as a fabricated or forged identification, or long form birth certificate, in what Obama represented by hand to the Press Core as an Original. Obama let us all know just how corrupt the Law Enforcement could be, as even the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear any argument challenging his Ineligibility in the Democratic Primary (2012) Case No 12-5276 and 2014 Case No 14-9396 ,that both highlighted the Law Enforcement Cold Case Posse Investigation of Maricopa County, Arizona under 6 term winning Sheriff Joe Arpaio with a Presidential Candidate with Standing- Cody Robert Judy.  The Cold Case Posse investigation only sought confirmation of Originality which failed. The epic downfall of Barack Obama stained the U.S. Presidency in a way never realized in corruption in politics involving Politicians and the American People who had no standing as ruled by the lower courts while the highest Court refused, even unjustly dismissing Forma Pauperis Motion granted by lower courts in desperation to cover up the political atrocity. Obama was found to be the ringleader of 'the most sophisticated, professionalized and successful identification fraud in the political arena subverting the Qualifications for President in America's U.S. Constitution Art. II. Sect. 1, C-5, that has ever been seen in U.S. History. After exposure by the Media Obama was stripped of his title as America's 44th President and U.S. History was changed. 

 OBAMA'S LAST PRESS CONFERENCE EXPLODES WITH BIRTH CERTIFICATE FORGERY

50,000 VIEWS Dec 17th - Jan 12,2017 - URL https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGEMHOEil5c

The crowd did not have Standing to object to any cheating in the Race. The American Political contest for the highest office of the land is known as The Race for the Presidency. It's a grueling marathon that surpasses even the training of 2200 mile Tour de France, The Boston Marathon, or the 156 mile Marathon des Sables through the Sahara in southern Morocco. The Presidential Race often begins two years prior the Vote.

Cody Robert Judy has been through three of them- 2008- 2012- and 2016. It should be no surprise he's run an official marathon (2013) Time 4 hours 44 minutes which averages over the 26.2 miles a good 10 minute mile. Not really good for marathon standards, but respectable for the Clydesdale Division which is for men 200 pounds and over. Marathons are not something typical football players run.

In Cody's words, the Presidential Race is much tougher than running a marathon race. It's a battle of not quitting every single day for years that requires selfless sacrifice. There is no pay for it. There is a lot of time, talent, and sacrifice that is involved.

Standing up for the U.S. Constitution required that same sacrifice from husbands, fathers, and sons who missed seeing their families grow up. It requires the sacrifice of those families who missed the support that might have normally been given.

The reason Cody wants you to understand that the Race for the Presidency is a really tough marathon race is because of the Standards of the Race that are defined in the U.S. Constitution have been something he specifically has stood up for with the standing that is represented by competitors in the Race.

[I don't care what the Lower Courts said, the U.S. Supreme Court would not hear this Case because they knew they could not rule in Obama's personal favor. It would have just been impossible for them if I was up arguing it. 

1- There is no way you can have a people who are Citizens of the U.S. Constitution before it was ratified. That ratification created a new LEGAL JURISDICTION of LAW with which to be born under: 

2- That's the REASON that ART. II., Section 1, C-5 included two different Qualifications for President in Time:       a- [CITIZEN] at the Time of the Adoption of this Constitution       b. [NATURAL BORN CITIZEN] for those thereafter ie. Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents 

3- Congress cannot make [natural born Citizens] with [naturalization (or in other words Adoption Law)]. The two terms are polar opposites as clearly as Adoption is from a literal Blood Birth] Congress has [naturalization powers] 

4- It is well said that the Constitution does not in fact say what a [natural born Citizen] is because there is no doubt that [born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] clearly negates any Act or Determination by Adoption. There is  no Judge in the United States who is going to say that anyone who is born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents is not a [natural born Citizen]. Get that? Zero! 

5- Clearly the Qualification for Representatives and Senators is [Citizen] and not [natural born Citizen]  It's a Constitutional Right that America can propagate her own [natural born Citizens] and a violation of our Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution to adhere otherwise.

6- The 14th Amendment when ever it was used in argument was and always has been a [naturalization] argument not a [natural born Citizen] argument. (for those who argue Wong Kim Ark changed anything) 

7- Minor v. Happersett clear states there was never a doubt that those born of the Country to it's Citizens are themselves the [natural born Citizens] and to the others there have been doubts. That's U.S. Supreme Court precedent. 

8- Congress men and women 8 times since 2003 tried to change the definition but those attempts failed in Congressional Votes. Ask yourself why? Why attempt to change anything on the [natural born Citizen] requirement for President if it always meant [Citizen] as the requirement for Representatives and Senators has been? And why was [Citizen] actually mentioned in the Constitution for those who were present at the time of the Adoption if they could have been [natural born Citizens] in the first place?]

A Right is something protected-a action or state that which is morally correct, just, or honorable. The violation of a right is something reprehensible, unjust, and dishonorable. The fact that the U.S. Supreme Court chose to dismiss a Motion for Forma Pauperis in the Order of dismissing Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in no way dismisses the clarity of the right or it's just and honorable cause of action - to run a fair race, under the rules of the race declared in the U.S. Constitution.

Obama's inherited foreign citizenship from his father was the obvious disqualification. The not so obvious one was his fabricated long form birth certificate. It wasn't really necessary and made for a wild goose which simply beefed up the delegitimization based on a disqualification standard assured by Place or Soil of Birth which is the jurisdiction one is born under. Both soil and inheritance of Parents are the considerations required for the [natural born Citizens] of America - those owing no foreign allegiance but to America.

Obama was corrupt and ineligible the moment he entered the Race for the Office of President. Because of the fabrication of the long form birth certificate, we can only assume if we dismiss the idea that a foreign father was a foreign citizenship he inherited,  that a cover up of true place of birth was undertaken.

This would have provided the motive to fabricate or use a forgery and represent it as a Original when it has been proven not to be so.

To dismiss the principle of [inherited citizenship by parent] is to dismiss a common practice of Law Enforcement and our Principles of adoption or naturalization.

We cannot forget either birth or parents in the Civil Right under the U.S. Constitution to have a fair and equitable Race for the Presidency or Office of the President.

Obama will go down in history like another who cheated -Lance Armstrong because Ineligibility does not Inevitably win the Race- Black or White and Bad Examples can be Good Reminders.

CRJ

CRJ
Assist Cody Robert Judy' Campaign Debt here thank you
http://codyjudy.us/information/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm

SPECIAL REPORT: BIRTHER ISSUE IN THE 2016 ELECTION TRUMP v. CLINTON Understanding Trump's Claim of Hillary Clinton being "First Birther"

FEATURED EDITORIAL
The Post & Email

_________________________________
SPECIAL REPORT: BIRTHER ISSUE IN THE 2016 ELECTION 

Understanding Trump's Claim 

 Hillary Clinton - "First Birther"

____________________________

THE TRUTH TO TRUMP'S CLAIM THAT 'HILLARY' WAS THE FIRST "BIRTHER"

Why the denial of Judy v. Obama 14-9396's forma paupers is more about Cover for Murder

and why arbitrary denial is suspect for the cover-up in the U.S. Supreme Court.

____________________________

Sometimes I think being a Federal Declared Official Democratic Party Candidate for President who is mostly covered up, accept by the Federal Election Commission, is a call to be a Reporter. Maybe write some things Reporters and Newspapers hate Blogs for because of their heightened ability of Free Press? Let's face it Barack Obama's motive for getting into the divorce/custody records of his political opponent in 2004 was indeed about "reporting" a Republican's marital infidelities.

In a quick review, Jack Ryan had been a successful Businessmen prior to his U.S. Senate campaign in 2004 against Barack Obama and for a community organizer to out do a successful businessmen with a net worth of tens of millions of dollars, in Illinois getting elected would need some gasoline. You need some real dirt for fire combustion against your political adversary and tapping the guilt of Ryan in front of Republicans 'moral code' was designed as a well justified plan in unsealing his divorce/child custody records leading to his withdraw.

Ryan would later complain it was really an unprecedented maneuver. ' Jack Ryan has characterized what happened to him as a "new low for politics in America".^[15]According to Ryan, it was unprecedented in American politics for a newspaper to sue for access to sealed custody documents. Ryan opposed unsealing the divorce records of Senator John Kerry during Kerry's race against George W. Bush in 2004, and Kerry's divorce records remained sealed. Ryan subsequently made a statement requesting "Let me be the only person this has happened to. Don’t ask for Ted Kennedy’s. Don’t ask for John McCain’s. Don’t ask for Joe Lieberman’s. Just stop. This is not a good precedent for American society if you really want the best and brightest to run."

The desensitization of the Public has nearly come full circle for the Clinton's as they face the new generations of voters learning all about the part Hillary Clinton played in her own enabling of Bill Clinton's indiscretions that produced thousands of dollars in fines for them to pay off.

Bill Clinton Reported by multiple witnesses 2008 as going to bring the Birther
Qualification Principle up at the Democratic National Convention in 2008
against Barack Hussein Obama - but never did it. Speculation remains it was
a calculated truce between Obama's and "Hillary's" being elected after Obama.

It's really never been about liking Bill and Hillary Clinton as imperfect people, they are likable enough, but rather a commitment to the Truth that America has a deep yearning for which the Clintons' have constantly gotten in the habit of withholding or politically shaping for the public in ways most perfect for them.

Who knows why the public wants the Truth or if they prefer to be treated as children in a family?

What is it exactly that is hoped for in the accomplishment of revealing Truth?

Whether getting to the Truth is to 'justify' behavior by pointing out misdeeds of people who are elected in the misfortune we all know of every finding someone perfect, or if its based on the simple respect we hope they have for us, our vote to put them in the seat of authority, to handle the truth in a way greater then being treated in a child-adult relationship, I'm not sure, but what we do know is that TRUTH can be hard for Politicians to bear when it is testifying against them. There's a long line of politicians who have found their fortune, fame, and political seat wiped out with the revelations of truth, so there must be something to it that is not over-rated.

THE TRUTH TO TRUMP'S CLAIM THAT 'HILLARY' WAS THE FIRST "BIRTHER"

Why the denial of Judy v. Obama 14-9396's forma paupers is more about Cover for Murder

and why arbitrary denial is suspect for the cover-up in the U.S. Supreme Court.

In Obamaconspiracy.org's latest Post by hard-working Kevin Davidson aka Doc whose worked for the chagrin of Birthers tirelessly in the field of dis-claiming Obama's ineligibility with now over 4,000 Post, the latest Post entitled Trump blames Hillary for the birthers got my attention because he claimed not a smidgen of evidence exist that ties Hillary Clinton to being a Birther.. ever.

That's a pretty bold claim as the question first should be asked that, "If a Candidate for a Government Office can first be found by an opponent ineligible for that office by the very plain and simple qualifications listed for that office, making it a very easy race to win, shouldn't that be made?

 The very first line of attack, not the last line, should be in answering the question, "Is the person Qualified according to the Constitution outlining the basics?". We all should be in agreement on that.

I mean its rudimentary, elementary, and even an insult to the intelligence of Hillary Clinton to suppose she would not be considering the basic Qualification questions in the advent Presidential race regarding a political opponent, which makes the assertion that everyone including every Presidential Candidate isn't a Birther an insult to intelligence.

Now compound that with every constitutional scholars opinion I've come across as the Qualification Question of [natural born Citizen] is unsettled in the Judicial Branch's Highest Court and you have even more substantial reason to confirm all Candidates for President should be Birthers or they are dumb and stupid totally ignoring Congress's eight failed attempts to change it since 2003.

This explains WHY the Birther Movement is so big. Its' an adherence to the basic Principles of the Qualifications for the Highest Office in our Government.

We start with the first comment I made on Doc's Blog refuting his theory that 'no evidence' exist tying Hillary Clinton to being the first Birther as Trump asserted that he would raise the issue against her just like she would raise it against him. That makes it a very hot-button 2016 Principle Issue demanding Facts from Fiction ,the Public's, Media, as well as the Court's and Congress's attention. Three Video's below detail these facts.

Trump says SHE'S THE ONE WHO STARTED IT

CRJ May 9, 2016 at 10:49 am 

According to the Law Suit Petition of official record filed in the United States Supreme Court Judy v. Obama 14-9396

The Clintons were the original “birthers,” according to multiple witnesses including Bettina Viviano who told WND in an interview in Los Angeles.

“Everybody who has called this a conspiracy from the Republicans or the tea party, they need to know who started it – the Democrats,” she said.

“It was Hillary and Bill, and it percolated up from there,” said Viviano, who had access to the campaign through a documentary she produced on the claims of delegates that Obama and the Democratic National Committee were stealing the nomination from Hillary.

http://citizenwells.net/2012/04/02/obama-ineligible-for-presidency-hollywood-producer-bettina-viviano-recalls-bill-clinton-statement-bill-gwatney-murder-jerome-corsi-interview-of-viviano/

Viviano said that she was on a conference phone call during the primary season in the spring of 2008 in which she heard Bill Clinton refer to Obama as ineligible for the presidency.

In the course of the phone conversation with Hillary delegates, she recalled, Bill Clinton spoke of Obama as [“the non-citizen.”]

[Michele Thomas], a Hillary campaigner from Los Angeles, confirmed to WND that she learned from “many people who were close to Hillary” that Obama “was not eligible to be president.”

She claimed, however, that Bill Clinton’s intention to unequivocally state to the public that Obama was ineligible was stopped in its tracks by the murder of a close friend of the Clintons, Arkansas Democratic Party Chairman Bill Gwatney, just [two weeks] before the Democratic National Convention in Denver.

Gwatney was killed Aug. 13, 2008, when a 50-year-old man entered Democratic Party headquarters in Little Rock and shot him three times. Police killed the murderer after a chase, and investigators found no motive.

The Clintons said in a statement that they were “stunned and shaken” by the killing of their “cherished friend and confidante.”

Viviano said a campaign staffer who was close to Hillary, whose name she requested be withheld for security reasons, told her Gwatney’s murder was a message to Bill Clinton.

“I was told by this person that that was ‘Shut up, Bill, or you’re next,’” she said.

The campaign adviser, according to Viviano, said that despite the intimidation and threats, Bill Clinton was prepared to speak out about Obama’s eligibility

“And then,” Viviano said, paraphrasing the staffer, “they went in and said, ‘OK, it’s your daughter, now, we’ll go after.’

“And then Bill never said anything.”

Others in the campaign who believe Gwatney’s murder was a message to the Clintons think it had to do with the fact that Gwatney was resisting an effort by the Obama campaign and the party to intimidate Hillary delegates into voting for Obama.

But Viviano argues that California delegates also were rebelling, and she says her source told her the same story two years later.

http://mobile.wnd.com/2012/04/hollywood-producer-heard-bill-clinton-say-obama-ineligible/

“I had never voted in my life. I wasn’t a Democrat, I wasn’t a Republican. I wasn’t anything,” Viviano said. “I didn’t know anything about any of this.”

Viviano said that when she and her co-workers informed Hillary campaigners that they were making a film about voter fraud, “the floodgates opened.”

“I mean, everybody had a story to tell about death threats, threats, intimidation, document falsifying, vandalism, property theft,” she said. “It was the most horrible thing I’ve ever heard in my life.”

Viviano said that in research for the film, allegations and evidence that Obama was not eligible “came up immediately.”

“We were getting hit with so many things about Obama,” she said. “This is when (Bill) Ayers and (Rashid) Khalidi were in the news, and then, all of a sudden, ‘Oh, and he’s not eligible to be president.’”

[Viviano was a Neutral Witness Politically Speaking]

Viviano insisted to WND that her reason for speaking out now was not related to the fact that Obama beat Hillary.

“It’s not about Hillary,” she said. “It’s about No. 1, I’m American, I live in a country where there is a Constitution and a set of laws. I also have somebody in the White House who has lied, obfuscated, provided what we all know to be forged documents about who he is.”

She acknowledges that she could jeopardize her Hollywood career.

“What can you do?” she said. “It’s my country. My dad fought for this country in World War II in the 82nd Airborne.”

Her late father, she noted, was shot down twice during the war and was awarded two Purple Hearts.

“I think, would he rather have me sitting in the corner cowering, and afraid of people, or would he rather have me tell the truth and what I saw?”

Read more at http://mobile.wnd.com/2012/04/hollywood-producer-heard-bill-clinton-say-obama-ineligible/#XHmbUjMQEBrmhHxI.99

Viviano today is an avid Anti-Trump advocate and Hillary Clinton is on Record in her 2016 Campaign of having spent 5.3 million against Trump, more than any other candidate on Record.

Not acknowledging the Facts and Witnesses is paramount to participating in Cover Up.

The exaggeration of Clinton’s never being Birthers may be of the Type which only acknowledges self- testimony in being a Birther, and excluding in that Qualification Eligibility, but Anti Birthers have expanded their interpretation of Birthers to be any question of ineligibility with the Standard of Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.

So any Qualification Question by Clinton’s in the past can easily be paraded under the Birther Tent.

I find the credit of Clinton exaggeration of Trump as Islamophobic and an isolationist actually much harder to digest than Trumps claim Clinton was a Birther based on evidence.

Trump’s claims to stop SYRIAN Refugees until they can be properly screened for Radicalism for the safety of Americans has been exaggerated extremely into isolationism and Islamophobia.

That’s taking Fair Trade and National Security as far out in left field as you can go for Political Points and to influence Votes.

Trump does not have to travel out to the extreme right to advocate an Official Record of Clinton’s Birtherism, and only the most naive fool would not consider that line of attack on a political opponent to be the Constitutional Right and thus credible in an attempt to Win.

Murder and the threats of more murder would quite naturally be about the only extreme to silence the Constitutional claims from going main stream by first tier Candidates.

This jives with the story of Viviano.

Docs Remarks

Dr. Conspiracy May 9, 2016 at 10:56 am  (Quote) # 

The story is ludicrous, and lacking in specifics. Who corroborates Viviano’s remark about the conference call? Who are these “many people close to Hillary”? This is the sort of junk that WND publishes. It has no value.

See:

http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/06/silly-story-of-hillary-the-birther/

CRJ: “It was Hillary and Bill, and it percolated up from there,” said Viviano, who had access to the campaign through a documentary she produced on the claims of delegates that Obama and the Democratic National Committee were stealing the nomination from Hillary.

CRJ's Remark

CRJ May 9, 2016 at 2:55 pm  (Quote) # 

Dr. Conspiracy: The story is ludicrous, and lacking in specifics. Who corroborates Viviano’s remark about the conference call? Who are these “many people close to Hillary”? This is the sort of junk that WND publishes. It has no value.

Maybe the question should be “How can you disprove her Report at an Event you had nothing to do with?

Credible Witness – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credible_witness

Several factors affect witnesses’ credibility. A credible witness is “competent to give evidence, and is worthy of belief.”[1] Generally, a witness is deemed to be credible if they are recognized (or can be recognized) as a source of reliable information about someone, an event, or a phenomenon.

That’s exactly why a Court of Law is about the only way for you to establish your Claim that she is not credible. I highly recommend your own well established past of sitting on Facts rather then stirring fiction is one to be admired and one you should consider in this instance.

The oath of Testimony is one that credibly we both would agree needs to happen, and Bill and Hillary Clinton would definitely qualify as “Witnesses” to appose Viviano’s claims and I’d be happy to call them if a Trial is offered.

Short of that, your own claims of corroboration are subject to political pious.

Just another reason why Judy v. Obama 14-9396 really is much more relevant to the Truth I would think you were hoping to defend?

If anything, my Report is Recorded in a Court of Law in an attempt to be heard, whilst your’s is in the public wind of innuendo.

Of an interest to the Public in this matter would be two women's testimonies recorded and seen below as well as the gunning down of the subject who killed Bill Gwatney with the public dash cams of the Officers involved in the chase, and killing; along with Bill Gwatney's wife who in 2008 was chosen and very closely monitored as you see in her delivery of Arkansas delegate count at the National Democratic Party Convention. The first video in the car chase is somewhat graffic discretion for minors is advised.
Bill Gwatney dash-cam Police Kill/Murderer Link/ and Corsi Interview Michele Thomas

and a Quick 34 second partial Betina Viviano Interview with Jerome Corsi that is included in Judy v. Obama 14-9396

The adage that it is better to support a lie than the truth is an embarrassment to any political party hoping for credibility with the Public. The truth is there are reasons, witnesses, and Official Court Record that support Hillary Clinton being a Birther that are supporting Trump in his Claim Hillary was the first Birther and to disclaim that Official Testimony under oath is needed and required. We have definitely seen Clinton's testimony vary a little from public statements to statements made under oath.

In my opinion Hillary Clinton would only do herself credit by admitting it's intelligent to question and recommend a Trial be held on Obama's qualification to settle very important questions like, "Was [Obamacare] even signed by a legitimately constitutionally qualified person in the Office of the President or is it 'moot' by that missing?" This is a very important question that faces the public in choosing the next administration.

To contrast even the relevant facts that are brought forth in this very small report is to indulge in the swamps of fiction and delusion wholly reducible. This is what so many Media Reporters have done in either their political cow-tow to editors or publishers or whatever, amounting to a massive cover-up and little appetite for Truth fueling the anti-establishment movements they seem to be pulling their hair out about. If you want to credit the total collapse of Trust with the Public in political establishments this is a good place to start. Few Reporters will even admit to that they are in such a hypnotized delusion. 

If #Democrats choose Cody Robert Judy as their Presidential Nominee ALL they hope for, ALL they dream of, ALL they Espouse in their Platform is seen as Possible and True in the eyes of ALL THE WORLD and choosing the opposite promotes disrespect and dishonor. 

There is still time for that choice for Democrat Delegates, the FBI, and Hillary Clinton but we need your support to help with that. If you believe there is power in Truth please support us.
 
POSTSCRIPT: Obama's State Department - ONE MORE COVER-UP “Now we know the Obama administration consciously refused to give up key information about Hillary Clinton’s email in 2014. It covered up this email both from the court and Judicial Watch. MAKES YOU WONDER if Clinton has the goods on Obama's Birther Jock Strap #Democrats ,”http://www.westernjournalism.com/judicial-watch-state-department-hid-key-clinton-benghazi-email-for-years/

Sincerely,
CRJ

Here's the Link to Contribute if you'd like to Cody's Campaign improve your record for Taking A Stand for the Constitution.
 www.codyjudy.us

Thank You!

CRJFacebookPersonal

CRJFacebookPres2016 JOIN US!

CRJTwitter

Sincerely,

Cody Robert Judy Campaign

Cody Robert Judy

The CRJ TODAY for a BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW

Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.

Web Site www.codyjudy.us

Keep coming back!

Blog: www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

INSPIRING - I believe in You

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI

Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

WHY DO PEOPLE LIKE CODY ROBERT JUDY (CRJ)?

Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts

12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial

13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008

14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case

15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016

The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President

www.codyjudy.us

www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

Why Hillary's Excuses for Privacy, Don't Exempt Her from Treason

FEATURED EDITORIAL- THE POST & EMAIL
Why Hillary's Excuses for Privacy, Don't Exempt Her from Treason

There has been a volume written on Hillary Clinton's partial release of emails, but at the heart of the issue as the people see it is the "Deterioration of Trust". We along with Hillary agree in hind site it would have been better to use two different devices: one for work, and one for personal. It wasn't too much to expect with a job so important as Secretary of State that is of course dealing with sensitive issues and top secret material on a daily basis.

My feelings are that in any discrepancy like this Hillary's Choice not to use two devices in hind site, should not be the American Peoples loss. Indeed, Hillary was in that office when the Government seized upon General Petraeus's Scandal. As it happened in that, when he wouldn't tow the line, this information became public very fast by the FBI. They knew he and is fling were using the same email account. He would leave a draft email she then would log on and find and visa-a-versa to communicate.

This type of collaboration could very easily have been happening just as easily with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton but she insist that we are understanding and trusting of her judgement to throw away and delete personal emails from Government Emails. Her choice to involve her personal email server in Government work is tantamount to losing her privacy in the concerns of treason.

In fact, we also have her in Office admitting the Clinton Foundation has taken money deemed unethical by the Obama Administration from Foreign Nations. The Logan Act (1 Stat. 613, 18 U.S.C. § 953, enacted January 30, 1799) is a United States federal law that forbids unauthorized citizens from negotiating with foreign governments having a dispute with the U.S. It was intended to prevent the undermining of the government's position and destroying evidence of her Family's Foundation while she's in office when it involves foreign nations is something we should TRUST was not done especially given the revealed donations and contributions of foreign nations deemed unethical by her boss at the time Obama.

Wednesday, the Republican National Committee released a biting video of Obama stating foreign money was "a threat to our democracy." and Mrs. Clinton was standing and smiling next to a few Middle East Leaders. March 7th was the Saturday before and former President Bill Clinton was defending 'their' acceptance of and resuming of foreign funds.

He said being interviewed by comedian Larry Wilmore, "“We do get money from other countries and some of them are in the Middle East,” he said. “For example, the U.A.E. gave us money. Do we agree with everything they do? No, but they are helping us fight ISIS, and they built a great university with NYU.” Similarly, he said, “Do I agree with all the foreign policy of Saudi Arabia? No.” But he said that country is making advances in education for women and girls."

This is tantamount to admitting their Foundation was involved in a Foreign War and the treasury was being built up for it. How does that preclude the Clinton's out of office from the Logan Act violations? There were some foreign donations accepted while she was Secretary of State and it is hard to believe that these contributions don't have an email trail leading directly to Clinton's Email Server.

An erosion of trust has taken place with the circumstantial evidence involving highly classified material and our Governments position in foreign affairs. As the dollars to run for President are gobbled up by folks who are actually either not qualified for President like Sen. Ted Cruz and Sen. Marco Rubio as Obama did in the 2008 and 2012 elections, are we to assume no finance what-so-ever has taken place for a Hillary Clinton run at the Office of the President?

As readily as oil and a stash of cash is sold, the evidence points to American Elections coming dangerously close to being financed by foreign money and in that process a huge disparity exist towards Candidates not positioned as closely as Mrs. Clinton is to it as well as a compromise of our American Republic.

"If any person or persons, owing allegiance to the United States of America, shall levy war against them, or shall adhere to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States, or elsewhere, and shall be thereof convicted on confession in open Court, or on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act of the treason whereof he or they shall stand indicted, such person or persons shall be adjudged guilty of treason against the United States, and SHALL SUFFER DEATH; and that if any person or persons, having knowledge of the commission of any of the treasons aforesaid, shall conceal, and not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President of the United States, or some one of the Judges thereof, or to the President or Governor of a particular State, or some one of the Judges or Justices thereof, such person or persons, on conviction, shall be adjudged guilty of misprision of treason, and shall be imprisoned not exceeding seven years, and fined not exceeding one thousand dollars."

This is not just about Hillary's Email, involvement with foreign contributions, or running a shadow war. The suggestion that Hillary is protecting herself from Obama in what she calls her choice in hind sight that would have better served the American Public with one phone for Government and one for her Personal Use, is Hillary Clinton may have information on that server that holds Obama as ineligible in the Office of the President. Remember, she was one of the original Birthers? Now if that proves to be the case and she has not confided it to a Judge as I've asked her to write an Amicus Curiae several times in Tweets to her reported on this blog, then she makes herself very vulnerable to the follow up: Whomever "Shall conceal, and not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known to one of the Judges of the United States shall be adjudged guilty of misprision of treason"

Its no secret Bill Clinton was reported as stating Barack Obama was not eligible to serve as President and that they would release evidence to this when the time was right.
Video Here: DID BARACK OBAMA CAMPAIGN THREATEN CLINTONS


CONSERVATIVES SUPPORT OF CAMPAIGN FOR A RESTORATION OF TRUST


This leads me finally to a very important letter I penned as a comment to PolitiChics.com in a comment made in their article under 'The Lawless President' by Posted On Mar 11 2015 By : Pamela Anne that up to this point has not been published and is in Review. Ann-Marie Murrell is a FB Friend of mine and she is the CEO/Editor-in-Chief of PolitiChicks.com so I also sent her private message of the comment apologizing for a few spelling and grammar errors made by spell check with a mind of its own. (smile)

THE LAWLESS PRESIDENT
http://www.politichicks.com/2015/03/audio-lawless-president-prevails/
OPEN COMMENT
're: My Comment
This article was fantastic! "So by way of our passiveness and ignorance, we permitted them to soldier our children, dumbing them down to become either passive compliants like ourselves, or evangelists for Marxism with no critical thinking skills to protect themselves or our union.", Nailed it!

As the only Presidential Candidate in America on record in U.S. Federal Courts , with a bi-partisan stand against Sen. McCain, and Sen. Obama in '08, '12,'13,'14 , the latest 14-4136 U.S. Tenth Circuit , for the 'natural born Citizen' qualification (born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents) , you can't imagine the sadness I feel for being so totally ignored by Conservatives about such a vitally important subject principle for the safety and interest of our children in national security.

I'm so heart broken at the seeming non-chalance and lack of Courage from groups like CLC, and CPAC for this antibiotic of division and racism in our Country based so incongruently on the fact I have not been elected before.
The qualifications for President do not include being elected to lower offices first like Gov. Scott Walker, nor do they include being economically rich like Dr. Carson which I think showed amazing Trust by our Framers and Founders in looking at the heart rather than the outward appearances.

The articles here at PolitiChics I think are outstanding and I admire the Editor and my FB Friend Ann Marie Murrell. I read them with joy in my heart for Freedom and Liberty, but also with a tear of sadness in the requisite state of our Nation, and the abandoned critically important Principle outlined in our Constitution regarding the great amount of work I've done and taken a stand for.

My book "Taking A Stand - the conservative Independent voice " is a Triumphant Blast for conservatism and our Constitution but has less then 50 sales at Barnes & Noble.

This site provides an excellent vision of why the Democratic Party is failing. In just the last 4 articles that is very clear, but I do fear the Republicans might be wasting the last Golden Opportunity in not calling for congressional hearings on the Ineligibility of Barack Obama.

As conservative principles go, it is difficult to find a deeper rooted one than the National Security fence of the two generation American loyalty clause unique to the Office of the President understood as "natural born Citizen".
No central feature of our Constitution over-run points so clearly to a poress border, socialist takeover of health care, great piracy on the treasury, an escalation of arming ISIS, Leaving weapons behind in Iraq, a treatise with Iran and works terror organizations whilst at the same time a Domestic triangulation of ammunition, and a erroneous tax payer finance of a Country within a Country.

It is true, Birthers haven't won anything. I know that the fight has been long, hard, and drought stricken in finance. However, the Principle is very strong! It is deep rooted and clearly R's and D's feel it too disastrous to uphold. The consequence of not upholding it though appears rooted in the demise of our Nation!
Racism has been the Claim for not upholding it, but that is only as good as keeping me swept under the carpet because I have standing as a Pres. Candidate and sued McCain first in Las Vegas NV, U.S. District Court.

How can my stand against Obama be called Racist? It can't! Yet, no one will write about it, no one will have me speak about it. Being too BIG to Fail? Having so many implicated in corrupt government practices or inaction.. Excuse .. Obfuscation.. doesn't necessarily mean the Country will not topple because 1 persons stand for Justice was swept under the carpet, but we sure are seeing 1 persons tactic of nefarious intent for our Country demonize and ruin it.

If 1 person can do so much damage, why can't 1 person do so much good? All the damage Obama does only provides more evidence to me how important the qualification principle of natural born Citizen is and was-Divinely inspired .
While R's hypothesize on how to undo what Obama has done, but deny the Power of the Divinely Inspired, how successful do you think God will let them be? In terms familiar to Christians, that's like acknowledging a form of godliness but denying the Power.

Its a gamble and bad bet to underestimate Obama and the ability of Republicans short of an Ineligibility impeachment Trial to stop him. Caught up in the devils trap refusing to call upon God for deliverance doesn't make a bit of scence. The outcome is also being over come.

Thank you for your tireless work on conservative issues.

Cody Robert Judy
Candidate U.S. Pres '08, '12, '16
Follow me here.
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.us

CLOSE COMMENT

With regards to People "hoping" that something in the Courts was not affected by what is happening outside the Courts, it is a real difficult balance to say that 'things happening outside the Court do not affect the justice happening inside the Courts. As an example of this I often quote the U.S. Supreme Court Decision that slavery was tolerable in Dred Scott v. Sandford .

I cite this case to help people understand how valuable their support is and how the Courts do look to what's happening in society to base many of their crucial decisions. Of course no Court of Law has entertained a single hearing in my cases of ineligibility. In deed Justice Thomas has said in open Congressional Testimony the Court is 'avoiding' the eligibility requirement under the Obama Administration.

We had millions of people in Washington DC, in fact the largest gathering protest seen in the DC Mall history with conservatives regarding TARP, but the support for a Candidate with standing who sued both McCain and Obama so as to prevail the 'racist' tag by the leftist mainstream media has been minuscule. It has clearly been as if once you got in Court people just hoped their support was not necessary because they had no part in the formulation of Justice.

Nothing could be further from the Truth in fact Justice is often and has been decided by the mob in retrospect of Obama's Reign. He did not 'earn' the position 'fair and square', he was 'given' it. Its been kind of a might-is-right mentality for a minority as if our Constitution had no respect for "individual rights". This has been a very dangerous road to travel for it is the road of discrimination towards race, gender, and of course our Constitutional Rights.

While I can only do so much there is a lot left for you to do. Our fear is shared when we see almost on a regular basis another unprecedented power grab by the Obama Administration thought previously untouchable. The play card of Republicans has been a disaster and while it may have translated into more offices won it has not translated into Principles Won but rather politics unified with the Democratic Party.

The change we need is a positive push for TRIAL on these issues as it relates to Obama's ineligibility. The implications of not doing so is basically rewarding Obama with a resolve to destroy the Country in his transformation. This is why we desperately need a restoration but it magically happening in Court is a hail Mary pass. Without the support of Patriots, it has more of a chance to fail then it does of success which is again why your support is vital in so many ways. There is a limited amount of time left to Appeal the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals Decision en banc, and much less of a chance in the U.S. Supreme Court without a resolve to support this from conservatives across the Nation. The Choice or ball seems to be in your corner. I'm willing only if your willing, otherwise its not going to get done.

The other political move Hillary Clinton actually has in play is to support such a Campaign in Court. This would bring Democratic party Birthers out of the walls and closets. It is rumored Hillary Clinton is centrist in the Democratic ideals field and Obama does not fancy her taking over the helm because it does not fit his far left agenda. With that rumor is another she is under no less then six investigations instigated by Obama operatives leaking information to the press. If Hillary decides to fight back she may well beat Republicans to the punch and be seen as the Civil Rights Hero saving America from the grips of an unlawful unqualified ineligible person in the White House.

The lack of Conservative Support only increases the likelihood of that happening and is a huge gamble by the Republican Party with many more potential presidential candidates unqualified and ineligible than the Democratic Party in Sen. Ted Cruz and Sen. Marco Rubio. Democrats might only suffer one while Republicans have a flurry of young and vivacious men who would be the young elephants run over with a Democratic Party Stand on Art. II, Sect. I, Clause 5 defining qualifications for the Office of the President.

Cody Robert Judy





BREAKING NEWS: JUDY V. OBAMA et.al., 14-4136 RESULTS OF POLL JUST CAME IN UPDATE POST


As PROMISED: ,I said I would keep you updated as things happen and discuss my case in more detail as we find out what the Court's decision is. I received this ORDER from the Court last night about 6pm. The results of the Poll taken by the Court on a rehearing consideration was negative America. The same Court that has honored individual rights for each American to 'marry' has rejected the petition for every American to have the same applications of qualifications applied when it comes to the qualifications for the Office of the President in this Rehearing En Banc.

This is a deeply upsetting and nefarious discrimination and outrage America upon all of our rights. Today, the Court handed down a poll that said they were not interested in equal rights under the law. A decision that said Obama is an exception and Cody's rights do not count. This is a decision that we would equate to turning back the clock and seeing the Court adopt acceptable forms of slavery based on color. Its a day when we see the Court rolling the rights back that so many Civil Rights Leaders have fought and bled and born the stripes. A sad day for those celebrating in Selma and a reminder of the fight that still needs to be fought.

A day has come to the Court Steps that the full Court has adopted 'elite' babies and rejected those 'poor' ones in an economical and judicial hypocritical nazi eugenics outrage! The Court practice of engaging 'Individual rights' in the same behavior or activity to proceed in marriage but that deny to me the same practices in which to run a fair race for the Office of the Presidency for which they have criticized me in their adoption of hypocrisy is staggering to the Civil Mind.

The Court has repelled the advise of the United States Supreme Court that a 'natural born Citizen' was 'born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents' so advised in Minor v. Happersett and invited the reinstitution of slavery upon the heads of every minority person standing in the welfare line with such sullied discrimination. It truly is a sad day for Equal Justice in America and I just don't know if America sees what is happening or gets it? Evan those opposed to me as a Candidate for President ought to be concerned and at the very least sustaining the Constitutional Qualifications for the Office of the President be applied equally to all Americans according to the Constitutions obvious and acknowledged responsibilities to that office.

The Order admits that the Rehearing En Banc was transmitted to all of the judges of the court who are in regular active service. In other words, appointed and dependent upon their jobs from either Obama himself or Hillary Clinton's husband.

Today we see the Court refuse to do that and dishonor the Office of the President. The Court refused to honor the tradition of "Justice For All" in America, burned the pledge of allegiance of all Americans, and blew the ashes in our eyes America.

We NEED YOUR HELP AMERICA now, to take this and report this ASSAULT upon your Constitution to the U.S. Supreme Court!
CRJ

We need your help. Will you help us or are the outrageous lies your being told by your elected leaders okay for you and your children? If you won't defend your children and their future who will you defend?

Get your questions answered by ordering Cody Robert Judy's Book here.

The 2016 Campaign begins now. Please send your contributions and help with the ABC (American Birther Campaign) today and my election for President in 2016 and Join the 257 of us now on my Facebook Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President 2016 site.



Cody Robert Judy for President 2016
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, Utah 84401

Thank you
Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for United States President 2016
www.codyjudy.us

CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION



The Commercial is simply called "America"


Join the new CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRES 2016 FB SITE Here