Author - Cody Robert Judy
Conservative Independent American
Candidate for Pres 16, 12, 08
U.S. Senate 18, 10, 04, 00
U.S. Rep. 02
Book: Taking A Stand - The conservative independent Voice
With Case17-4055 in the U.S. Tenth Circuit Court shortly to be ruled on, the top mentions of the impressive 700 Donor List over the last three months continues to emerge on, if the U.S. Tenth Circuit Court in Denver, Colorado rules in favor of the Plaintiff, an investment in a Usurper's Library.
What is clear is these Corporations and Philanthropist didn't get the "Memo", or in other words, the facts responsibly reported by the MSM they depend upon.
This could be bigger than missing the Trump victory as they called Hillary ahead by 332 Electoral Votes .
With the amount of money going into what would be a "Usurper's Library", this could prove rather embarrassing to those contributing. We recall the utter shock and awe of those caught red-handed in the "DC MSM Bubble" in the 2016 Election?
Let's take a look at the evidence that the U.S. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals has, which is not being reported that could finally lead to an ultimate "throwing in of the towel" by those supporting the DNC "Leaders" feeding them full of "goose-berries"?
In considering these facts and evidences we should also consider the very diabolical possibility that "Justice" may be staked out and replaced by the Bribing Dollar, which will leave a whole lot of Americans in the pit those who call themselves Elite seek to imprison and enslave them in wiping out the American Dream.
The Lawful Sheriff's Investigation proving Obama's Long Form Birth Certificate is a Forgery and is not a copy of an Original, backed up by two independent document forensics experts.
The copy of the State of Hawaii's lack of Constitutional Certification of Obama, and Rep. Nancy Pelosi's dis-enfranchisement of the State's Correct Certification with one of her own made-up, as well as one for the other 49 States which also does not Certify Obama as Constitutionally Qualified.
The Complaint of a Presidential Candidate in the Democratic Party who has objected to his Civil Rights as a Candidate for President being violated by an unfair and unequal Standard. That tradition and Standard in U.S. History being upheld and continued in a tradition also upheld and unchanged by the U.S. House and U.S. Senate for 241 years through dozens of attempts that have failed as "America's Choice".
What this amounts to is Domestic Terror against the American People by Traitors inside the United States of America in compromising the 2008, and 2012 Elections far and away much more clearly and directly than any "meeting" taking place during the 2016 elections that amounted to a fizzle of nothing exchanged that we have seen the MSM in a foaming mouth about.
We sure want to thank everyone who has followed us along this Blogs' 7 year Journey! Thank You!
CRJ
Notice of APPELLEE(s) Failure to RESPOND and CONCESSION OF FACTS.
Cody Robert Judy Contribution save/secure Paypal Contribute Now for a Restoration of Faith in Justice or Mail your donation to:
Cody Robert Judy 3037 South Ogden Ave Suite 1 Ogden, Utah 84401
OPENING BRIEF BY PETITIONER/APPELLANT
When we see two Document Forensic Experts tell Sheriff Joe Arpaio that Obama's Long Form Birth Certificate is a fabrication confirming his own Cold Case Posse's 5 year investigation we wonder why the MSM has a problem with evidence and spends its time on things with no evidence?
FEATURED EDITORIAL The Post & Email Forgetting JUSTICE is the Recipe for FAILURE - Chopping Block v. Tight Collar - Trumps Poor Salesmanship Selling Obama...Care
TRUMP EXPOSED
REPAIRING & RESTORING OBAMACARE is essentially what President Trump has done in his failed and now infamous No-Name Repeal & Replace pulled before being even out on Parole. The strategy for Democrats shouldn't be on how to Doom Trump, but to simply stand aside and let him break every Campaign Promise that comes close to 1/5 the National Debt.
Of course the Affordable Care Act - ACC is unknown to the Citizenry, they were sold Obamacare. I have never witnessed in my life time or nor did I every imagine President Trump as well the GOP Majority, such horrible sales people on the Campaign Promise of "Repeal & Replace".
A 'Ruse' is an action designed to deceive or to trick - it's a tactic. Fundamentally the Republicans are geniuses at it. Take the Patriot Act for instance garnered with thoughts of Americanism- True to the Red, White, and Blue's Freedom's and Liberties, the Patriot Act opened the door to everything that violates Trust between the People and the Government. Of course some would argue during war-time that would essentially be necessary and Citizen's Rights in a state-of-war are severely suspended in Marshall Law.
The Point is Republicans did not even name their version of the Repeal & Replacement of Obamacare. Are we surprised that it was Pulled without the Republican Votes to push it through? How did President Trump sell this hybrid of Obamacare? With Obama's name..you mean the ineligible Usurper who violated the U.S. Constitution's Qualifications for eight years with the Ruse of his Identification fabrication?
Oh! And President Trump is just to stupid to recognize invalid Obama- which is the name of Obama on Obamacare is valetudinarian?, The supposed Promise to Repeal and Replace Obamacare with what "No Name Repeal and Replace"? That was the tactically good plan? The first thing you do is NAME YOUR LEGISLATION. That's how something gets sold. Anyone know what Trump's Proposal was called? "World's Greatest Health Care Plan of 2017 Bill 1275?
Think I haven't spent any time on solutions? Of course Trump got my proposal! Called Code-Care
I hope Republicans that are/were/ still are Birthers will recognize the Ruse in Trump's Sales pitch of Obamacare on R&R, and the Promise stuffed like Doritos down their throat? Who is Trump the President of? "The World?" or the USA? Why would call something American's are paying for the Worlds? Is that the dumbest idea you've ever heard?
( Seventy-two percent 72% of registered Republican voters still doubt President Obama's citizenship, according to a recent NBC News|SurveyMonkey poll conducted in late June and early July of more than 1,700 registered voters. And this skepticism even exists among Republicans high in political knowledge.) August 10th 2016.
The one very simple Test for a successful Trump Presidency was Day 1. - Remove the name of ObamaANYTHING as Constitutionally Ineligible and a Violent Usurpation upon the Americans' Election and Legislative Process based on Fraud, Forgery, Fabrication that result-en Usurpation.
Wow! After that Congress has a clean slate with a simple Majority. Basically anything passes because there is NOTHING of the Usurper left to entangle and fight through. Instead, President Trump has sought to endorse Obama's Usurpation- Even declaring Obamacare needs to be Repealed and Replaced in Campaign Stop after Campaign Stop. How about VOID WHERE PROHIBITED and PROHIBITED IN THE USA?
The stupidest thing, is the Republicans had the chance to let the U.S. Constitution be the bad/good guy in Repealing anything Obama signed, touched, or breathed on in the 8 year usurpation. "We have no Choice- The U.S. Constitution demands it". Who can argue Politically one way or the other?
Image by CNS News
By trying to Repeal & Replace, (which I will call a Ruse) all Republicans have done is put Obamacare on R&R [Rest & Relaxation] which acts as a steroid.
Obama gestures 'Thumbs Up' - 'I'm bound by the Constitution' and Republicans Annexation of my Constitutional Qualifications assures my Usurpation stays in tact.
With Trump's abandonment of Birthers during the Campaign and failure at rallying the GOP elect as a leader who could muster the votes to Pass something of a no-name health care plan, he's proven he's no one to protect, preserve, and defend the Constitution.
Of course, as the Candidate goes so goes the Campaign and the first 100 days set's the Agenda and many say the momentum for the entire rest of the four year term, and very tacitly can wreck re-election.
Trump has lost tremendous advantage and leverage he had publicly. He's wasted by fighting unnecessary fights and by not fighting the ones that would have counted. Trump admits most of this himself, so it should come as no surprise to anyone.
I myself hoped for Trump when he was elected. Hoped he understood the Value of Taking a Stand on the ineligibility of Obama and using his bully pulpit for Justice, but it seems and all Birthers on the left or right will agree, Trump's not equivocating success in Economy with Justice. Separating the two might work as a businessman, but as a politician it is of the greatest importance to uphold Justice and the Standard as President he has sworn an oath to publicly. He was never asked to do that as a businessman.
Adopting the usurpation of Obama is an act of obstructing Justice, and that is the recipe for failure economically. If the Debt Ceiling had been 5 Trillion Obama right now would be loathed by Democrats but younger generations were robbed, so they bought some time. But make no mistake, the Storm is not over and may very well be set to unleash on Trumps four years, and I'm not sure any Republican Majority will exist if Trump is given what Obama was for protection - another 10 Trillion.
It's kind of interesting to see who crawls up and bugs the President's ear. There is no doubt in my mind that Briebart News has had more than it's share of influence:
Along with speechwriter Stephen Miller, Bannon and Hahn form a nationalist wing of the administration – one that has shaped its intellectual worldview.
We can speculate on founder Andrew Briebart- and the direction of Brietbart News asking would Andrew Briebart be satisfied? He also was a researcher for and close friend of Arianna Huffington, and he helped create an early version of The Huffington Post.
It was after his death and speech declaring damages coming up to Obama that the Vetting Series was released by Briebart News exposing Obama's own narrative in his book bio that he was born in Kenya, years before the Cold Case Posse and the Criminal Investigation conducted by the lawful authority of Sheriff Joe Arpaio - Maricopa County, AZ proving in March 2012 that the document Released by Obama as his long form birth certificate presented as a copy of an original was indeed fabricated and not such. ( see the evidenced Video, Order to Show Cause, and Motion for Reconsideration below)
With Brietbart News Executive Chair Bannon as Trump's close confident it would be very hard to imagine the Birther Eligibility Usurpation ignorant of Trump's ears. In fact, there is no way I can even fathom that. The theory of Trump's naivety thus is as void of Obama's Usurpation as Obama's is about the problem of his ineligibility and why he went to such great lengths to mask and bask in the Cover-Up himself.
Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy has been at the Constitution's Heart the bi-partisan protector ,defender, and preserver of the U.S. Constitution's Presidential Qualifications taking both McCain and Obama to task for not being [Born in the United States to United States Citizen Parents].
With McCain's Loss in 2008 the Federal Judge directed the burden fell upon Obama as the Usurper and McCain's action moot. This is something the Republicans have been very well aware of and informed. It's crucial to have a Constitutional President and not some Usurper up there signing papers in the White House. How crucial if not played out in the Justice Arena might very well fall upon the Americans in the Economic Arena as one BIG DISASTROUS LESSON.
Trump's Failure in the Repeal and Replacement procedure being Pulled by the Majority Speaker of the House simply shows the tentacles of this Failure of Justice. You want to support and defend a Usurper in front of God's Eyes in the Oval Office you might as well be asking to suffer even as Jesus Christ suffered, and it be like there was no redemption made- 'Catastrophic' is an under-estimation!
" I have no doubt that it will be shown on the big screen to be True. I'm just surprised Trump would want it shown especially regarding the part of Obama's back-up that he is playing. I underestimated Trump's desire to be a failure but sometimes the lessons in failure are the ones that are innately desired by people who have been successful. That's the danger of voting for a successful businessman whose values are negotiable. "
- Cody Robert Judy
The following never-before-seen letter was sent and received by the Trump Campaign August 17th, 2015 from Mr. Judy asking, in fact begging for Trump's assistance financially in the Ineligibility Case of Barack Obama in front of the U.S. Supreme Court. Trump's assistance financially was not forth coming.
It would seem to me that with Trump's 10 Billion that even a loan that is proposed at 5% Interest might have been some kind of action Trump would have wanted on his resume based upon the Birther Heat he took being called a Racist, and more especially backing up someone who could not be called racist based on impartial actions taken against Obama but not McCain who was not born in the United States of America and retains a Panamanian Native Born Citizenship.
I think Birthers and I'm talking the 72% of Republicans should know and understand that Trump has refused every opportunity to support the effort legally he could. That's makes us ask the question why? The video below the correspondence may just be the reason why and it has to do with Trump winning the Old Post Office Bid for a Hotel over three or four other bidders much more credentialed in the Motel Business then Trump. So we see, the business angle was always and foremost on Trump's mind and upholding the U.S. Constitution a far field and forgotten mirage.
How can that be a recipe for success? Thus we are seeing Trump's stymied by his own Failure to Hear and Act for the Values in the Constitution. That is the predominate job description in the oath. You might not take it seriously but you can be sure, and Trust God has heard it as well as recorded this.
This should expose Trump for what he has represented, but it should come as no surprise to anyone. I mean it's right there in our faces. Any support that Republican Constituents had for Trump as a Constitutional Defender, Protector, or Preserver should dissipate with the reality of where he would put his mouth, but wouldn't put his wallet?
This is really a compete 'set-up' for Mr. Trump, and I do not know if he sees it coming back based on his answer, "I don't like to talk about it now...etc.,etc.,"
As you are aware now September 28this an unprecedented 2nd Hearing that is scheduled in the Supreme Court of the United States in the longest lasting Obama ineligibility case in U.S. History. Now in my first letter I extended my hand to Mr. Trump, more especially in my last paragraph:
" The info is telling enough. Of course being President entails reaching across the isle for help and assistance for no one can do it alone. Would hope this is seen as nothing other than that with the experience I have had in some 14 Cases across the Nation on this issue. I certainly agree to meet Mr. Trump at his expense, and would prefer any further intelligence regarding this matter be made in private and face to face for obvious reasons."
Clearly it must be assumed with Mr. Trump's response to this being, shall we call it 'moot' or a 'disappointment of disinterest', has not seen the 'value' associated with helping financially with this Great Task with almost impossible odds. Clearly, Mr. Trump did not run for President in 2008 or 2012 and had no 'Standing' as a Candidate for President that I myself do have for the Supreme Court's consideration which along with a Federal Law Suit Originating Judy v. Obama 14-9396rather then an Originating State Law Suite SCOTUS Judy v. Obama 12-5276 makes a BIG difference. Don't be fooled that the Summer Extension on this case is all about $300 filing fee. It is much more and the MSM is really culpable as recently was recorded by an Editor-In-Chief's comment deleted on an ABC news story about Presidential Candidates.
What Mr. Trump does have, however, is a reputation of financial ability and capability. Mr. Romney was considered in 2012 as also Mr. Trump was equally for a much needed helping hand. Mr. Romney unlike Mr. Trump was actually in the Presidential Race and we all know the outcome of that now. Mr. Trump is very capable of making the exact same mistake that Mr. Romney made in refusing to support this Cause. Don't let this be the 47% comment mark Mr. Trump referenced on Mr. Romney?
What Cause is that? It is the Cause that is also recited in the Oath of the President in the words agreeing to 'preserve, protect, and defend the United States Constitution." Very simply, my law suit attest Obama is a walking talking violation of the Constitution's demand for a natural born Citizen ie. born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.
Shall Mr. Trump say, "Good Job Cody, I applaud your efforts and success and although I have given to so many Candidates I refused the extended hand of this Candidate because he was so small I thought he could do nothing, and I had no faith in our Judicial Branch and Justice? Please pardon me, I was not apart of the biggest take-down of scandal and fraud in American History! I'm sorry?" It doesn't bode well for Mr. Trump if that is the Case.
If that is the way its going down, by all means it will be a Record of Failure, but it won't be on Mr. Judy's Record. It is my opinion that those who have been given much are also expected, in a greater appreciation of what they have been given by all accounts, to give. Mr. Judy's 14 Cases in History on this Issue and Principle is the only one in U.S. History that represents a bi-partisan stand of equality in both major political parties. McCain and Obama - Cruz, Rubio, and Jindal mentioned in the Case File 15A25 of the SCOTUS. This is what would cost in DC Lawyer accounting firms a multi-million dollar Record that represents damages done.
I have outlined briefly two ways to which Mr. Trump could Claim Assistance on Record for this worthy endeavor as follows:
1) Plainly my Campaign is in real bad shape and we are not prepared to Represent well in the coming SCOTUS Case 14-9396 Case's 2nd and coming hearings. We need modestly 10K-40K in legal contributions of $2,800 per person/ $5,400 per couple /or/ to the Leadership PAC of $5,000 per person.
I would be very grateful to Mr. Trump if he would accept this offer also allowing me to buy back the 5% with a modest 5% fixed annual percentage interest rate and would consider Mr. Trump a ' ' 'vital interest of support' in this amazing Case for and of Justice in actually doing something to 'preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States in the Stand of the qualifications for the Office of the President held within our U.S. Constitution, that so many others actually refused, if he can and will assist this way.
If the latter (2) offer is chosen Mr. Trump may very discreetly, and I must say we need it immediately make the purchase of the 5% of USA LEGACY ENTREES LLC by wiring the (40K) money to my personal account un-associated with any Campaign but my business of which I am 100% owner: That routing and account number is: US BANK Routing Number: 124302150 Account Number: 153153334450 This Email will stand as my commitment to the agreement.
From: "info" <info@donaldtrump.com> To: cody@codyjudy.us Sent: Monday, August 3, 2015 12:42:29 PM Subject: Re: URGENT: SCOTUS Case Petitioner/Candidate JUDY V. OBAMA 14-9396 sending a friendly warning
Cody,
Thank you for your message and concerns. We will forward your suggestions to our advisors and they will investigate it further. We appreciate your willingness to help the campaign. Together we can Make America Great Again!
Sincerely,
Team Trump
From:cody@codyjudy.us <cody@codyjudy.us> Sent: Monday, August 3, 2015 2:27 PM To: info Subject: URGENT: SCOTUS Case Petitioner/Candidate JUDY V. OBAMA 14-9396 sending a friendly warning
URGENT INTEL
Dear Mr. Trump:
Received this Email Address as the best way to contact you/your Campaign Manager Corey R. Lewandowski.
To introduce myself very briefly. My name is Cody Robert Judy (801) 497-6655. I am an FEC 2016 Registered Candidate for President in the Democratic Party and was also in '08 and '12.www.codyjudy.us my blog www.codyjudy.blogspot.com just went over 275,500. Yes I am small, however: I have now the distinction of currently having the longest lasting SCOTUS Case pending right now on Obama's Ineligibility Judy v. Obama et.al.,14-9396 in United States History. I am the only former/current Candidate in America with a bi-partisan stand against both McCain/and/Obama on the 'natural born Citizen' clause of Art. 2, Sect.3, Clause 5. My Campaign is now a FEATURED STORY at The Post & Email.
Listen, when it comes to making America great again under the U.S. Constitution we are on the same team and I hope to extend my hand in friendship, perhaps, work with you under some confidentiality of course. I really do think that both 'Party Establishments' are setting your campaign up for a fall and this is how it will happen, unless you take the urgent steps needed to protect yourself before the Aug 6th Debate!
Was up all night writing the following Post that I believe you should seriously consider as a warning that the Republican Establishment through the Obama Administration influence may be setting your Campaign up for a doozy.
1- Over 300 News Agencies in every State of the Union Received the following Press Release this morning WILL TRUMP SUE? and since being released at 7am has been distributed to 180 Facebook Group sites and has about 230 likes. You may have received my Tweets regarding this already. ie., See the Blog site.
I will leave it at that. The info is telling enough. Of course being President entails reaching across the isle for help and assistance for no one can do it alone. Would hope this is seen as nothing other than that with the experience I have had in some 14 Cases across the Nation on this issue. I certainly agree to meet Mr. Trump at his expense, and would prefer any further intelligence regarding this matter be made in private and face to face for obvious reasons.
Post Note: Comment
[Welcome your constructive detailed op @marlene Thank you for your comment. The article is specific with the “pulled” Bill by the GOP and is in harmony also with Trump’s words “Thought that would be how it went” with the abandonment of “Conservative Principles” that many conservative Congressman actually stood tall for.
Health Care is a huge portion of the budget representing at least 1/5 of the National Budget. Trump know doubt has cut some excess but it’s trinkets surrounding about 5% of EPA ie. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/26/magazine/trump-vs-congress-now-what.html?_r=0
Excerpt 1
“even the cabinet secretaries at the E.P.A. and Interior are saying these cuts aren’t going to happen. They’re going to protect their grant programs, their payments to states, their Superfunds. So how do you cut 31 percent of the E.P.A. out of the 5 percent that isn’t protected? And a bill that cuts all money for the N.E.A. will not pass. For Republicans in the West” — states whose vast rural areas benefit disproportionately from N.E.A. grants — “that’s a re-election killer. The campaign commercials write themselves.”
Excerpt 2
“and leading a conspiratorial crusade in 2011 to force Obama to release his birth certificate. ”
Excerpt 3
“The only major legislation that congressional committees have even seen thus far is a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, which met with a stunning rebuke from Trump’s own party, forcing Ryan to withdraw the measure on the afternoon of March 24. At this stage of his presidency, Barack Obama had already signed into law his $787 billion economic-stimulus package and had moved on to holding White House meetings on health care. It’s conceivable that Trump could hit Day 100 with only minor symbolic legislative achievements to his name.”
If there is some specific detail of the article you would construe as “fake news” I’m all ears.
The article details specifically how much support from the Republican Constituency that supports the Constitution and in that requiring a ‘natural born Citizen’ Trump has been give credit for “leading” with as the article details negligence in support both financially and now politically.]
💗
CRJ
MOTION BEFORE THE FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT (Utah Division)
A Motion for Reconsideration of the MOTION FOR A RELIEF OF JUDGEMENT or to REOPEN the Case due to the new evidence provided by a law enforcement investigation Cold Case Posse unit deputized under Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa Country AZ provided the evidence that Obama's long form birth certificate is a Fabricated Forgery, not an original, with the use of Johanna Ah'Nees identity birth certificate and was only recently released and available for criminal consideration by the Judicial Branch. See the Motion & Video below
If you would like to assist CRJ with his Court Case Judy v. Obama 14-00093 happening now in the Federal District Court (Utah Division) please make a Contribution through the safe and secure PayPal link TodayHERE
FEATURED EDITORIAL: The Post & Email BREAKING NEWS: The Ineligibility Storm in the SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Judy v. Obama
In the interest of so many people wanting to know where the Writ of Certiorari is and why it has not yet been docketed in the Supreme Court of the United States up to this this date of April 20th, it having been served and noticed on this blog and Featured in Editorials here and here , it has come upon me to explain or perhaps redirect focus to where I have found the troubling storm to be in the Supreme Court of the United States.
It is not my wish to draw a scathing picture of criticism or ineptitude upon the brilliance of what is considered the highest Court in the United States of America and I have sat on this very frustrating experience since the Court received and returned my Writ of Certiorari stating to me something that just was not true, that my Motion for Informa Pauperis and Affidavit to the Supreme Court of the United States was not 'signed'.
Indeed, this was not true, clearly there are two signatures. It was a false statement made by the Office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States. Your right, you would not expect that. I mean its the Supreme Court with the top brass of scholastic legal achievers coming out great schools and high recommendations. Let's face it, there are not to many who get to Clerk for the top Court in the Nation. This is what makes this so disconcerting and inviting to the distortion of the administration of Justice.
With the discretion of the glass being half full, Court Error and Mistakes indeed can occur and it no doubt would be the 'justification' of any Clerk of the Court, but you know there is a standard of difficulty in filing a Writ of Certiorari in the Supreme Court of the United States. Shall we say those that have done it know, and if you haven't tried it you wouldn't know. If you've paid for a lawyer to do it you did understand it wasn't cheap and it was a much bigger deal than filing a motion.
Because the Court Clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States passed the writ of certiorari as acceptable by not objecting to any part of that in the letter; the only objection or discretionary review that was troublesome to the Clerk was really a complete bewilderment to me. The court clerk stated there was "no signature" on the Motion and Affidavit to proceed with the cost of the proceeding deferred in what is referred to as Informa Pauperis status. There was though. Both the Motion and Affidavit were signed and dated March 30th, 2015 which is the same date the Clerk noticed or acknowledged it was postmarked.
Indeed, we must all scratch our heads about this because on page 2 of that Motion and on page 3 which was the Affidavit is a big fat signature with a date of March 30th, 2015. Now to complicate this just a little bit in so doing the Supreme Court advises that the 'writ of certiorari' cannot be altered in any way as to content. That affirms there isn't anything technically or majorly wrong with it. The backhand to the face comes to the petitioner with the declaration from the Court clerk that the whole petition with the altered Motion and Affidavit must be re-served upon the Defendant/Respondents. The approximated time or purpose in requiring just that basically is shall we say an extra thirty days, more printing cost, and is very burdensome upon the poor or economically challenged class that I myself understand. The disadvantage also cost me a back seat to the Court's schedule and term in 2012 as the back and forth went on something like six times before being docketed finally when a bunch of other cases came up from Georgia that oddly had no Presidential Candidate in them. This of course is an easy shuffle to hide if you wanted to do that sort of thing.
Like I said, most people don't know what's involved. Just to review for those not filing informa pauperis status forty copies of a 54 page printed document in booklet form is required.The cost with the $300 dollar filing fee just for printing and service for mine would be $1386.81 and you can imagine if it cost that much to print it's going to cost a lot more for an attorney to write it especially when the stakes of the circumstances of the writ are factored in. Of course that's chump change for those making over $100,000 in the land of opportunity in the United States economy able to focus their full time effort in doing just that.
But what about those like myself, who are concerned about the opportunity being protected? We have and are dedicating and focusing so much effort into seeing that it is protected that our time is taken, and also is not compensated for? Elected leaders get a paycheck every month that you the tax payer have signed. If you lose elections you don't get a paycheck.
Barack Obama has been getting a paycheck from you the last six years of half a million dollars, as well all the Senators and Representatives with their compensations and appropriations who have been hired across the nation to represent the people none of whom I might add have taken Obama's ineligibility to Court. No not one has their name attached to a Court Record. Does that make the principle of the Constitution that the Office of the President be filled with someone who is a natural born Citizen, -Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents-, less valuable, true, of little consequence if its trampled? Secretary Hillary Clinton's words she wanted to be a Champion, a Champion for the working class People in her declaration and kick off Candidacy? Where or Who is the Champion of the Constitution's 'natural born Citizen' clause for the Office of the President?
'Hillary Clinton’s campaign announcement to the press included an embarrassing typo, as it declared the candidate has “fought children and families all her career.” It was, of course, supposed to claim that she fought for children and families.''The hard truth beneath all the gauzy campaign rhetoric is that government power tends to enrich those plugged into government. The ruling Party and its special friends make out like bandits, while everyone else is taught to make do with less. Obama’s tenure has offered an incredibly clear demonstration of this truth'
Well, I'm one of those people who has had to make do with less and make the most out of what I have. That has meant sacrificing tremendously on the focus of making a living for the sake of being a Champion for the U.S. Constitution's demand that a qualified person be in the Office of the President. Indeed, most know that 'standing' requirements for even bringing this to Court are required and notably fall upon someone in the presidential race as a candidate. The translation of that is there is no lawyer, no elected official whose not running for President, no Judge, no Officer of the Law that can Champion this "natural born Citizen' requirement legally. That burden has been mine and I'm the only Candidate for President in the entire United States of America who has done it on a bi-partisan non-racist level. see: McCainObama consistently.
Now the main stream media, MSM , doesn't want or hasn't thought to tell you this. They continually trump Birthers as 'racist' and even point to Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio who have just entered the ring as Presidential Candidates as proof Birthers are Racist. Now, what do you think of someone who 'hides' and keeps 'secret' in their stories to the public what is plainly available on Court Records for the public? Well, that's seems a little like what the United States Supreme Court Clerk has done to me, actually seeing right there in plain site my signature twice on the first two pages of a document but yet stating its not there. It is there..right there! Everyone can type the numbers in I've provided and see they were delivered. I offer any Political Reporter who would like to see the certification in a submission, but they could also see the 10th Circuit and lower Court had already granted the Informa Pauperis status and its been less then a year since July 7th, 2014 when the original action was filed.
There is no affirmative action ACT OF CONGRESS upon the Office of the President and there is no gender diversity clause as an ACT OF CONGRESS upon the Office of the President. There's no family genealogy name required for the Office of the President and no former elected office requirement for the Office of the President. There's no economic millionaire status for the Office of the President, but there is a 'natural born Citizen' status or requirement. I really think its a dis-service to journalism to see so many 'racist' and 'sexist' reviews for the Office of the President but that is exactly what is happening when you withhold vital information that is pertinent to the Constitution's requirements.
Not building my story on 'racism' or 'sexism' hasn't been hard. Why it has been withheld from the public in the form of media print is what an example of 'secretive journalism', 'stealth reporting' or 'camouflaged court referencing' what is it? You know one thing the Reporters really hate is when a Government Representative in affect 'frame' a story by withholding very important information that would either make the story completely different or at least completely change the affect of the story. Well, don't you think "Reporters" that the public feels the same way about you 'forgetting' information or 'failing' to run a Court search or read a Court record before you print a story that is handed to you for your convenience on this blog? The truthfulness of a Record is an accounting of all the facts, not dust sweeping a few of them for the convenience of the political popular under the carpet.
The mirage of stability that has been built upon a weak foundation or lies is a credibility problem. It certainly is not little old me who threatens everything Obama has built, it is Obama's own weak foundation that threatens his own work. He didn't build it on truth, but built it on a lie. It doesn't matter how high it is or how grand it is if the foundation isn't true any structural engineer will tell you that it won't last. The United States of America's foundation has proven strong. Principle is much greater in power than any particular party or person. The principles will stand long after we are gone.
That all being said, I have tried to hold my tongue or key board, hoping the Supreme Court would see this error but it seems more and more likely that if they can sweep anything under the carpet that has Obama's name on it, especially coming from someone who is a eligible and qualified Candidate for Office of the U.S. President who has standing, they will do it. Let's hope it just a clerical error, but their error cost me another $14 dollars in mailing. Of course that's just nickels and dimes for rich people who sometimes it seems just don't get it.
Redacted Writ of Certiorari for Judy ( A U.S. Presidential Candidate ’08, ’12, ‘16) v. Obama (President Elect failing to Qualify Amend XX) et. al., signed and submitted to the Supreme Court of the United States post marked March 30th, 2015. Included are the important Ltr 2, and Ltr. 1 to the Court Clerk with the assigned United States Postal Service tracking numbers available for anyone to look up at usps.com as proof that they were served and received, and in so describe no fault of the Petitioner as to the delay of docketing this Case. It should be noted the page numbers of this redacted version are meant as a convenience but are otherwise in order as prescribed by each section having its own page numbers in the Supreme Court of the United States. The Informa pauperis Motion and Affidavit are acknowledged by the Clerk’s letter but are redacted from this document.
Again-
Enjoy our newly March Released THREE MINUTE infomercial entitled The Birthers and please join us anyway you can in supporting the restoration of our U.S. Constitution along with our Nation and the opportunity we all want. Please understand that however benign you may attribute a Candidate who is not qualified by being 'Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents', the very process of dismissing and not honoring the Office of the President with its unique qualification is a process to destroy the umbrella with the Office that sits in the middle of the United States Constitution, as its most important key holder.
The compromise on the 'natural born Citizen' clause is a compromise on the Blessings of God our Nation has been protected by, and a witness that time and place included in describing the Birth of our Nation are of no value.
Join us in taking a stand for "this place" and "this time" honored tradition in the United States of America.]
Cody Robert Judy for President 2016 find us on Facebook, Twitter and the Web.
We need your help. Will you help us or are the outrageous lies your being told by your elected leaders okay for you and your children? Indeed, it is time to Restore America's Trust Today for a Better America Tomorrow.
We NEED YOUR HELP AMERICA now, to take the 10th Circuit Court's Decision not to hear Cody's Case to the U.S. Supreme Court. We are Taking a Stand for individual Civil Rights and against an unprecedented ASSAULT upon your Constitution and prior decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court! With your help we can make it happen. You are a very important key to this. So its up to you America to help Restore America Today for a Better America Tomorrow. Like, Share, and Help us in the Contribution Revolution.
CRJ
Get your questions answered by ordering Cody Robert Judy's Book here.
FEATURED EDITORIAL: The Post & Email
BREAKING NEWS - Obama Eligibility Case Decision and Response Includes Obama's Justice Nomination
The U.S. 10th Circuit delivered a punishing blow to Judy v. Obama et.al., 14-4136 dismissing it and upholding the lower U.S. District Courts decision calling it frivolous, malicious, and wholly incredible. The 5 page decision was rendered to day out of the Denver Appellate Court after being reported in chambers for more than a month.
My initial reaction was one of being pretty disappointed and hurt. I'm not sure being dismissed as frivolous and malicious was as insulting as if I'd been dismissed for a lack of standing, but the result is all the same. It was flabbergasting to read the Court's Order and Judgement to say the least understanding first hand how very harmful allowing Obama to run roughshod over my legitimate qualified and Constitutionally adherent Campaign was and how deceitful and fabricated his was.
As I begin delving into the decision after my initial shock thinking this was just incredibly awful, came the question on who were these Justices? That's when I looked them up and found one of the three had in fact been nominated by the Defendant/Appellee of the case Barack Obama and the other Democrat was nominated by President Bill Clinton. I could not have imagined a more ridiculous scenario then to think that the Judge entering this decision was receiving his paycheck based on a defendant I was making a claim against?
All the thousands of hours and hard work just goes up in smoke to something far less deserving and destructive of the U.S. Constitution in Obama's forged and fraudulent identifications known as the fabricated long form birth certificate and draft registration. Yes, he is in the Office of the President but under what horror and fraudulent circumstances?
Yes, receiving more votes but for who in the consideration of the fabricated long form birth certificate and certainly Obama's own admission his father Obama Sr. was a foreign citizen at the time of his birth. Indeed, the founders and framers had expressed interest firmly that the Office of the President was not to devolve upon foreign or alien persons. That was the reason they expressly formulated a higher criteria of demands for qualifications in the Office of the President from that of U.S. Representatives and U.S. Senators.
A two generation protection was laid out for the Office of the President cited as a natural born Citizen, rather then a Citizen cited for the lower Congressional House and Senate. No foreign influence was discerned as meaning 'born in the U.S. to Citizen parents.'
The eight attempts since 2003 to legally change the qualifications for the Office of the President bear the greatest testament to that definition as they all wanted to change the meaning mentioned to something along side the qualifications of U.S. Reps and U.S. Senators requirement of "Citizen". These attempts failed but do broadcast to all that Congress knows exactly what I'm saying to be true. If it wasn't so, why would it have been necessary to change at all?
I think the American People know that something is a foul, and the trust has been spoiled but still without a champion to lead the Court cases being in the Presidential Race, everyone shrugs their shoulders in hopelessness and despair. Not even the strongest politicians have any hope of moving it into the Courts without being called racist by the Media because they cite McCain as not being questioned about his foreign birth. I did take McCain to Court but the Court ruled after the election that it was moot because he had lost.
So Obama won and is ineligible and now what does the Court say? Its highly unlikely going to be successful. Well it sure as heck isn't if the Court won't even hear it that's for sure.
You can read the ORDER and JUDGEMENThere and... you can read my RESPONSE or request for a REHEARING En Blanchere.
Update: Here are the three very important questions I posed to the Court to justify Rehearing if:
Question #1- Does Justice Gregory A. Phillips having ENTERED FOR THE COURT the ORDER AND JUDGEMENT on this case February 3rd,2015 having been considered to the U.S. Senate for Confirmation with the favor of the Appellee/Defendant in this case, Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro in the nomination process and thus his very employment as a Justice in the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals constitute an prejudiced dismissal summarily instigated upon the Plaintiff that would seem at best a compromise of judicial discipline in recusal decorum and at worst an impeachable offense?
Question#2- June 25th, 2014 this Court handed down a decision favorable to ‘individual rights’, considered standing and upheld marriage in Kitchen v. Herbert No. 13-4178 and considered the rights of an individual who is unpopular more important per the conflicting referendum of all the people in the entire State of Utah and it’s Constitutional Amendment in the State, which does not come on political easy street; isn’t the ORDER AND JUDGEMENT of this case dismissing it as frivolous a conflict of the Court’s own interest and judgment in that case in the interest of Individual Rights?
Question#3- The conflicting statements in the ORDER and JUDGEMENT asserted by the Court leave criminal mischief, fraud, forgery, and a declaration of the precedent case in Minor v. Happersett regarding a natural born Citizen being “Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents” by the U.S. Supreme Court undefended and a wreck; and fair elections on equal terms for all the Candidates, per race, per qualifications within the U.S. Constitution in total disarray and the Appellant/Plaintiff without recourse in the infringements of his Civil Rights to a fair race; Does this not deserve the attention of the full Court and the political corrections that might be made for the next general election where the entire U.S. population has a stake and claim for fairness, equal treatment under the law in the considerations of our Republic?
WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE IN COURTS AT THE SAME COURT?
To decipher this a little, the Order and Judgement released today was authorized by a panel of three judges. The whole or full Court considered to a panel of five or more. So, the decision released today was by a panel of three justices and my asking for a rehearing en banc is a request for a bigger panel of Justices to make a decision on wither to hear it.
I've basically asked the Court to recuse both the two Democrat Judges nominated by Obama and President Clinton because as I stated in the Petition for Rehearing Clinton's appointment conflicts with Hillary potentially being a Candidate for the Office of the President in 2016 and there is a interest to protect that.
So that's the news, we'll submit this and see what happens. I could sure use your help and thank you for passing it on and considering this essential to our national security.
Yours Truly
Cody Robert Judy
We need your help. Will you help us or are the outrageous lies your being told by your elected leaders okay for you and your children? If you won't defend your children and their future who will you defend?
She had been in prison for years, neglected, and tortured without cause. Her accusers had never held a trial on her. They laughed and jeered about her in their smoke filled money laundering rooms collecting at her expense and the ounce of integrity she had given them once. Her dress was dirty and torn as they had not bothered to replace it after each came in and had their way with her. She’d learned to lay there numb with the pain and just take it for fighting back earned her further abuse and insult. Rape, Assault, Torture, and threats of being killed haunted her dreams and her principle guardian now was a Usurper, a malfeasant bully of malcontent she called the worst yet.
He flagrantly lengthened the line of those standing just waiting for their turn with her as they watched the others do. He incited them to practices never before thought of; even those who had been a little bit nice to her were now raw in their egregious aptitude to violate. She had hoped with a hundred other women she might find at least one who was willing to stand up for her, somehow feel her pain, maybe try and break her lose or give her some aid and comfort but this was not to be. They stared at her, hating her because of her beauty they were jealous of with smirks on their face, watching her abuse with the awful thoughts, “she was getting what she deserved”.
Though her beauty was tarnished one could see the fire that still burned bright in her eyes as she indeed was no ordinary character, somehow her captors had never managed to break the necklace engraved with her name by those who had once been captives like her. They had called her U.S. Constitution.
A STRAIGHT BILL OF LADING
A straight bill of lading is used when a payment has been made in advance of shipment and requires a carrier to deliver the merchandise to the appropriate party. This is really an example of what the U.S. Constitution amounts to for We The People.
As a product the U.S. Constitution in affect has been purchased by the blood of all those who have sacrificed their lives for it. The carriers of the U.S. Constitution are indeed elected leaders as well as Judges appointed and elected in our systems and we the people are also Carriers as we exercise our voting rights. When the merchandise is not delivered to we as a people by those who are elected or administering justice, a clear usurpation is made upon our rights.
Now 24 States are fully engaged in signing on to legal challenges on Obama's executive action on immigration, yet not one of these has raised a finger to support, or defend the 'natural born Citizen' clause that Obama in the Office of the President must adhere to in order to sign executive orders lawfully.
The coalition of 24 led by incoming Texas Governor Greg Abbott who served as Texas Attorney General all know Obama has a long form birth certificate posted on whitehouse.gov that clearly serves notice to Valdmir Putin,Xi Jinping,Kim Jong-un,David Cameron,Juan Carolos Varela,Bronislaw Komorowski, or Benjamin Netanyahu, they can find an American Girlfriend have a child and finance them to the Presidency as a "Citizen"? I hardly think so.
It is the most clear recognition in Congressional Judicial Committee Counsels that prohibited changing the 'natural born Citizen' clause for the Office of the President to 'Citizen' on line with the qualifications for U.S. Representatives and U.S. Senators. The Office of the President commands the whole of the military as Commander-In-Chief and any Representative or Senator will tell you their position is shared by a whole lot more elected people than the Office of the President's is. This is motive and reason for declaring two full generations exist in the national security border of demanding that the President be born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents covering two generations.
That national security border can be breached by any foreign alienship bedding an American. "Citizen" only was permitted for the Office of the President to those who were citizens at the time of the adoption of the Constitution and since Obama was born much later then to qualify as a 'citizen', the standard of 'natural born Citizen' must be adhered to. Obama passed his own indictment out when he handed out in the white house press core room to reporters his long form birth certificate stating his father was not an American Citizen at the time of his birth. No, his father was not Putin, Netanyahu, or Varela, but as far as being a foreigner to the U.S. he was.
THE ACTIONS OF A USURPER MIRROR THE FRAUD UPON AMERICA TYING THE LABEL TO THE USURPER
In Abbott's own words as reported by CNN, " The president's proposed executive decree violates the U.S. Constitution and federal law, circumvents the will of the American people and is an affront to the families and individuals who follow our laws to legally immigrate to the United States." Meaning 'individuals' do matter, the U.S. Constitution does apply and matter, but he misses like he's stupid the qualification that the U.S. Constitution places on the Office of the President Obama fails.
Doesn't it seem stupid to cry about the executive decrees of a Usurper while totally ignoring the law that makes clear that the usurper is a usurper? On one hand Abbot calls him "President" basically stating the U.S. Constitution doesn't matter. On the other hand, he says the actions of the person in the Office of the President are illegal and violate the U.S. Constitution. This is clearly a a mixed back of sour mash for normal people to digest in one paragraph like white lighting that will nearly instantly put you on the floor, or two point worshiping the porcelain god.
Its the same stupid logic that exists with Bohner and the Republicans who have today teamed up to pass a bill that fully funds Obamacare, and Obama's immigration executive order, while taking a stand for the light bulb.
From Moonbatter -[By cutting a deal to fund the Department of Homeland Security through Feb. 27, the House Republican leadership has given President Obama more than two and a half months to move forward with his unilateral amnesty of illegal aliens. During that time, Obama will be able to give illegal aliens visas and Social Security Numbers.
The law is still funded, but there’s no new money for it. There’s also no new ACA-related funding for the Internal Revenue Service and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the two agencies most responsible for implementing the law. The bill also would cut the budget of the Independent Payment Advisory Board — what Republicans have called “the death panel” — by $10 million.
The $10 million is an insignificant token gesture. Most congresscritters could run up a bigger bar tab.]
While attorney generals, and governors, and representatives, and senators wring their hands and wipe their brows with frustration, they needn't do so. All they really need to do is start voicing on their pulpits the need to support Cody Robert Judy for President who has taken a stand for the qualification for President in mutual bi-partisanship not offensive to Democrats, because Judy has sued McCain and Obama. That basically takes the 'racist' card away from the Media and Obama's employment tactics.
Instead of dividing America, it unites America again in the agreement of law that the U.S. Constitution stands for as an umbrella for all of our civil rights, Cody's included. To stand with Obama in the title of "president" is to commit civil rights violations against Cody Robert Judy. It doesn't get any more simple.
Buying the U.S. Constitution a new dress and taking her out of her abusive chains and captors is a step in restoring the beauty of liberty and freedom in America.
Cody Robert Judy
U.S. President 2016 ABC (American Birther Campaign)
YOU DIDN'T KNOW HIM
As a matter of housekeeping we here at the Cody Robert Judy Campaign for President 2016 would like to thank you for your awesome support. We're enjoying you and we hope you keep coming back. Here's a celebration tip from Cody's Mom once again, "Celebrate your wins!" Thank you for every view here.
This 2016 Commercial was the first one in the 2016 Race for President with near 1500 views already. The commercial emphasize why Republicans and Democrats are not fit to lead America at this time. Please watch it and share this with your friends. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4otwMXGzvac
These times are hard times in the trenches. It seems to be the nature of contributions and donations to follow winners, rather then those who are maintaining the high ground. Campaigns are not cheap and if you sacrifice your principles you'll find its only a very expensive war that could take your whole life that is necessary to get them back. THERE IS SOMETHING GOING ON - ITS DARK BEFORE THE DAWN
We need your help. Will you help us or are the outrageous lies your being told by your elected leaders okay for you and your children? If you won't defend your children and their future who will you defend?
