Cody Judy host TheLion's Den Show featuring America faces Lt. Col. Terry Lakin Week while Obama hides in smoke and mirrors. Obama's transparency is costing Lt. Col. Terry Lakin his whole life of honorable service as the trial for a court martial begins this week and Obama hides under a cloak of fraud free with his blackberry.
Cody Judy
Showing posts with label cia columbia trial. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cia columbia trial. Show all posts
Sunday, December 12, 2010
Sunday, October 24, 2010
CIA Columbia Obama Trial Standing Find is Still Standing

CIA Columbia Obama Trial Standing Find is Still Standing
Can the all important legal precedent of ‘standing’ used as the harpoon that laid waste to dozens of law suits in 2008 challenging the presidential qualifications of McCain and Obama, be found as missing from the CIA COLUMBIA OBAMA TRIAL held in Harlem, New York, May 14-19th, 2010?
Most agree thousands of hours and millions of dollars were laid waste in the Federal Courts protecting the grounds where the Constitution forbids any to tread in the 2008Federal District Courts contest of presidential candidates. Grand Old Party lawyers didn’t hesitate to use the Constitution in their defense arguments with a defense of “lack of standing” against those bringing the Constitution’s qualification for president to the Federal Courts against foreign born Senator’s John Sidney McCain III and Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro.
Though Senator McCain came clean with his long and short form applications proving his foreign soil birth in Panama, making him ineligible,(*1) Barack Hussein Obama/aka Barry Soetoro was rushed into the White House as a usurper, after Congress failed objection protocol, and after the Presidential Oath was haphazardly administered twice in as many days by the Chief Justice. Obama quickly issued his first cloak on transparency affectively burying deep the proof of his own identity of school, college, and work records; while his long form birth certificate is reported as non-existent by a representative who worked as a manager at Hawaii’s Health Department.
As if the faux-pas of the administration of the presidential oath wasn’t enough, the double candidate nomination forms signed by Nancy Pelosi, one for Hawaii, and one for the other 49 states, signed the same day, certify for the 49 he was not Qualified under the Constitution, but was the candidate preferred by the Democrat Party, really manifested double trouble, especially when compared with 2000,2004. (*2)
How all of these floundering configurations could not be seen as Freudian slips of the false being covered with bits of truth spilled out is the stand upon which the CIA Columbia Obama Trial catches the lawyers in their own pit dug for opponents on the barrage of cases dismissed because of “lack of standing”.
In an article by Josh Richman, Oakland Tribune published 08/28/2008 19:23 PM PDT, entitled “Lawsuit over McCain Citizenship Should be Tossed”, GOP lawyers say and the Judge upheld, the clear reason for legal dismissal of the action Markham Robinson, chairman-elect of California’s American Independent Party brought against Senator McCain was that Robinson was not in the presidential race, and therefore lacked ‘standing’. (*3)
Republican lawyers with that argument could not dismiss the verdict of ‘guilty’ on all accounts from the CIA Columbia Obama Trial jury, because of the testimony of me, Cody Robert Judy. I’m in Utah running for U.S. Senate now and my testimony is seen in the trial transcripts on Day 2 pages 48-77 (*4)
My testimony erases the ‘standing’ defense used by the high powered attorneys of the GOP as I was indeed a candidate in the race, and suffered direct damages from the qualification deficiencies of McCain, and Obama challenged respectively. Nothing in my past could or does come close to erasing these indisputable facts as I witnessed them in the Trial of the century if not the millennium. My witness is available for every United States Senator, Department of Justice lawyer, and citizen of the United States to read.
The absurd argument that my witness is somehow not credible for a past conviction unrelated is to argue that someone hit by a car is somehow guilty because of interrupting or protesting a meeting 17 years ago. The two are so unrelated in deference to justice that the argument assumes anyone being accused or convicted of anything has somehow sacrificed their claim on justice for all time which is simply corrupt thinking to begin with, and certainly doesn’t stop me from being qualified to run, hold office, or being a witness to these illegal actions of fraud on every voter voting democrat and republican for that matter.
In the last consideration of value of my testimony, lawyers will and have argued that I would have to beat, or it should be better stated, that I could beat that opponent. This argument is one in which for all intensive purposes kicks lawyers out of the sound ground of reason and fact and places them on the ground better reserved for the clergy in churches who at least have a fair claim on ‘prophesy’.
It’s Sunday, so why not use and example out of the Bible. If those lawyers could prophesy of the affect that dis-qualifying Sen. John McCain or Sen. Barack Hussein Obama would have no affect on someone’s candidacy their argument is laughable at best and unsound in the least. Even as laughable as the prophets of Baal that Elijah mocked as the 450 of them contested his challenge to call down fire from heaven to burn their bull laid on an alter as a sacrifice recorded in 1st Kings chapter 18 of the Bible.
In 1st Kings Ch: 18:27 we read, “And it came to pass at noon, that Elijah mocked them, and said, Cry aloud: for he is a god; either he is talking, or he is pursuing, or he is in a journey, or peradventure he sleepeth, and must be awaked.” They cut themselves, and bled all over the place but there was no answer. Then Elijah told them to soak his offering with water three times and the Lord took everything up in a fire from Heaven.
That’s what you call taking the bull by the horns and respectively not taking the bullshit. The lawyers argument that no candidacy would be helped by eliminating a reputable candidate who was through his not being qualified attempting to de fraud every single vote cast for him/her on an alter or platform of fraud, is really a bunch of bullshit. How could anyone’s candidacy not be helped by such?
While Obama has stated he can’t go around with his birth certificate plastered to his forehead as an answer to a question unrelated to that subject from Brian Williams, the two questions that ought to be asked by every Republican in Utah: “How in the world can we trust a Republican Lawyer for U.S. Senate like Mike Lee, who is out of the same pattern as the Republican Lawyers fighting against the Constitution’s qualifications for president?”, and , “Why aren’t we as Republicans angry our vote was wasted on an unqualified candidate for President in 2008?
Mike Lee the constitutional lawyer champion he is touted to be, could right now be using the transcripts of testimony found in the CIA Columbia Obama Trial as evidence in a U.S. Senate Trial to kick Obama out of the Whitehouse, thereby declaring the policies that Obama has signed into law void, or moot. He's vowed to fight policies of Obama but is doing it with the hand Obama wants tied behind him.
All those bills do not have any legal standing; they are non- binding without a qualified President’s signature, as is required to make them valid; neither is any executive order Obama signed valid. Obama is the one with no standing, like the emperor with no clothes we simply need to recognize this as the laughable action it is.
Remember the childhood song “Ring around the roses, pocket full of posies, ashes, ashes, they all fall down”? Well, Obama’s lack of qualification is not complicated it’s just that simple.
I am the candidate for U.S. Senate in Utah who is recognizing this, and is running as a write-in. Write my name on your ballot CODY JUDY - U.S. SENATE it’s just that simple- you can do it or you can take the waste that Republicans and Democrats are still serving up to you.
My hope has been to explain this to you as clearly as possible, and that you will recognize it as the truth and contribute to my campaign so that we can help others to see it clearly also.
Sincerely,
Cody Judy U.S. Senate
Write-in www.codyjudy.us
(*1)http://www.scribd.com/doc/11110505/JohnMcCain-Birth-Certificate-long-and-short-form-Colon-Panama-1936
(*2)http://www.scribd.com/doc/37694108/2000-2004-2008-Hawaii-Democratic-Party-Certification-of-Nomination-for-Presidential-Candidates
The excerpt of the article here:
(*3).[Lawyers for John McCain and the state and national Republican Party on Thursday asked a federal judge in San Francisco to dismiss a lawsuit challenging the candidate's place on California's Nov. 4 ballot.
Markham Robinson of Vacaville, chairman-elect of California's American Independent Party, sued McCain, the GOP and California Secretary of State Debra Bowen on Aug. 11, arguing the presidential candidate's birth 72 years ago today in the Panama Canal Zone means he's not a "natural-born citizen" — a Constitutional requirement to be president.
But lawyers for the GOP and McCain wrote Thursday that Robinson lacks standing to sue and is asking the courts to tread where the Constitution forbids.
Robinson hasn't shown McCain's candidacy causes him any harm, they said: He's neither a presidential candidate himself nor authorized to sue on behalf of his party…]
(*4) http://beforeitsnews.com/story/229/560/Here_is_the_Official_C.I.A._Columbia_Obama_Sedition_and_Treason_Trial_Transcripts_from_May_14-18,_2010.html
Wednesday, July 7, 2010
Color,Race, and Prior Servitude Amend.XV and The Parable of The Unfaithful Wife
Race,Color, and Prior Servitude U.S.C Amendment XV
Parable of the Unfaithful Wife
The mysteries of the Lord are sought out by churches and the people that attend them in literally every nation of the world. God is always revealing hidden truths, yet is at the same time the same yesterday, today, and forever. The bible is full of parables and dreams and visions as applicable today as they were the day they were given, yet the Lord still teaches in parables in everyone’s own day that they too can understand and have the experience of finding the hidden truths. Parables give us the experience of finding ourselves… treasures that are of great worth. The Lord says when you come to a child to speak in the language of the child, and so it is I would like to rehearse a modern day parable.
There was a certain women who had become disdained of her husband. She was no longer enchanted by his money, charm, or good looks. She no longer found him attractive and looked to find fault in him daily. She was a goodly women adorned with nice clothes, a clean women who kept herself moderately. She had come from a divorce and had a nice house and children who were nearly raised and it seemed she was coming to the same conclusion of this new husband as she had about the first husband.
Let’s just put a name on this second husband, so we can all simply refer to him with a name. Let’s call him… Abraham. That is a name that comes from the Bible and is pretty respected by every Christian Church. Now the Lord had told this Abraham, just the same as he had told Abraham of old that he would be a man of whom a great nation came, and also that his family would be one even as Abraham’s of old.
Abraham was a faithful man and had been very true to the Lord and had sought diligently to remain in that favor for the Lord had indeed graced him abundantly with many heavenly gifts which were a delight to him, thus he sought to please the Lord and to remain a faithful servant of his Lords’. In this Abraham’s first marriage finances had come to bare down on his young family and his wife had lost faith in him encouraged by her family who wished her back in their own lands and so she went. It pleased the Lord to bruise Abraham that he might learn wisdom and understanding and become even a man of his own heart.
Now, as I said Abraham had sought the Lord diligently to gain some understanding of why his first wife and family had been taken from him and the Lord taught him many things of which he had failed and thus Abraham learned what he was doing that was wrong as a father and husband according to the Lord’s intelligence that was somewhat different then the ‘norms’ of the society he was from. Thus Abraham was encouraged finding some meaning to his heart break in the loss of his family.
So this Abraham in my parable was encouraged, and again went out to get him a wife. This time, faithfully, he understood more of the Lord’s intelligence, and he knew that he could no longer rely on the ‘social norms’ which he had grown up with finding only heartache and loss in those customs. Our Abraham in this parable did meet a woman who he felt was a good woman and he sought diligently to court her and in every way to impress her as a suitor, and she was impressed. They became what we’d call in our modern day world ‘serious’ in their relationship.
Of course Abraham had now a difficult challenge. He had to convey to his fiancĂ© all the Lord had taught him, for it was incumbent upon him to encourage his faithfulness to the Lord, and also his soon-to-be wife. Yet it was ever present on his mind, what had happened to his first wife, and he certainly did not want to make the same mistakes, so it was with a great deal of trembling courage that Abraham related to his finance’ all the Lord had taught him, knowing full well that these revelations could indeed also spoil his new found love that he had worked hard to impress and court.
You can imagine Abraham’s happiness when after all was revealed that this new wife accepted his proposal in marriage. Abraham took a deep breath seeing all had gone ok and his faith in the Lord was not jeopardized and the Lord had blessed him in his new romance. Abraham was, to barrow a modern phrase “tickled to death”, overjoyed, and he sought diligently to make well with his new family. Soon they were married and both of them trudged through some difficult times as the Lord sought to test this marriage.
They had wanted a child together and had sought to achieve that, though they had both had children in their earlier marriages who were near grown and out of the house but nothing happened for two years. Abraham was told in a dream that if his wife would do this and that she would become pregnant, but the this and that involved the trial of their love which the Lord had taught Abraham of which he had conveyed to wife before being married, but had never done.
Of course Abraham knew that it was not enough to worship the Lord in lip service saying, “yes yes Lord” on one hand, perhaps even on a Sunday, and then running out and saying ‘no no Lord” on the other hand, perhaps, even the six other days of the week.
So it was with great trembling again, Abraham related this to his wife who was to Abraham’s sadness not so willing to accommodate what the Lord had related. Nevertheless, Abraham was gentle with her knowing the Lord in his love had been gentle with him at times, and as their talks went on finally they were accomplished in the test the Lord had presented though it wasn’t without a few dents and bruises. This of course was familiar to Abraham, being bruised by the Lord before, but had not really been known to her so it was difficult.
She ordered a separation and thus it had been nearly 3 months since she had seen Abraham, when on occasion she accepted an invitation to go on a trip with him. Abraham grieved in his missing her and doting on his love for her, again sought to court and spoil her in any way he could manage. Though he wasn’t rich he had managed a plane ride, a wonderful dinner, and a room at a luxurious hotel. There she was receptive to him and their love was renewed. Although Abraham was delighted about their love, he sensed something was different about her but he couldn’t figure it out.
Over an ice-cream cone as the trip was nearing an end the next day, she pulled out of her purse and ultrasound picture and related she was 3 months pregnant. Yes, the Lord had indeed blessed them as they were faithful in their own, shall we call it a "test of Abraham".
Time went on and the baby was born which was a delight to both of them, but the baby had not healed her feelings all the way through and though she had seen the blessings, she sought about daily to prove her husband wrong in all of the things he loved. It was as if some competition had invigorated her and through this daily barrage of insults she did not relate to him so directly as she did her friends and her family, gradually another separation occurred.
This was a great sadness to him for he had felt for sure that the blessing and fulfilling of the Lord’s words would also seal her testimony, but it did not. Her heart was different and she was set hard and no amount of courting or attempts by him to restore his marriage worked. The child grew and was a beautiful child whom they both delighted in greatly, he had taken his first steps and they were still separated.
Abraham was weighed down in his grief, for he had sought diligently to please the Lord, but again it pleased the Lord to bruise him. She had taken off her wedding ring which had embarrassed Abraham and she was flippant in her ability without him feeling she had no need for him. She was satisfied and had no desire for him. Abraham weighed down in his grief returned his wedding ring to her jewelry box next to the one he had given her that she no longer felt any value for. He told her perhaps they should put the rings in a trust account for their baby.
One day as Abraham was weighed down in grief and standing in a line with his head bowed a girl he had known, only as an acquaintance, turned as she was in front of him in the line he was waiting in, and felt for his sorrow. She put her arms around his neck and said “Abraham, don’t be sad!”, and he acknowledged her good will towards him as a friend who simply didn’t want to see a friend sad. It was just a pure coincidence that his wife had seen this exchange and after the girl who had put her arms around Abraham and told him not to be sad left bounding off, as to Abraham probably not to be seen coincidentally again, the wife headed off towards the girl and cornered her.
She asked the girl whom she didn’t know at all, seeing her arms around her husband, “Have you ever made-love to my husband?” The girl responded, “Hundreds of times!”, and bounded off again as if not to blink an eye. She then came to her husband and said, “Haah, caught you cheating!”
Now this is the end of the parable.
There are always questions at the end of every parable to be answered. This is the process of a parable. For every church to ask and for every person to ask themselves if in this parable Abraham was actually Jesus and the women in the parable was the Church to whom is married to Jesus in similiar parables of the Bible; in what manner of cheating have you accused the Lord after his faithfulness to you?
Do you not suppose the Lord to visit other churches at all?
Hasn’t he still favored you with many blessings, yet you accuse him of cheating with others who have not truly known him either?
Why have you entreated your husband to accusations of unfaithfulness when he has so patiently and lovingly taught you faithfully all that is known to inherit his kingdom? Are you so bent on hurting him that you would cast him in to prison if he arrived?
And, what must you do now, or what will you do now you have seen as you are seen, taking your ring off? Will you choose to keep it off and find another Lord and who might that Lord be; your usurping president Obama?
What do the rings represent?
Is Obama's love of unfaithfulness towards the Constitution what you really want in a President?
Do you not desire faithfulness? You must desire faithfulness, or you certainly wouldn’t accuse anyone of being unfaithful?
What an oddity it is for people to crave faithfulness and truthfulness but vote for a lie. It is if they can’t help but inherit exactly what they are… unfaithful and liars themselves, blind yet they see.
Monday, June 21, 2010
The Constitutional Train 911... is so urgent.. emergency

The Constitutional Train 911
Emergency it's so urgent.. Emergency…
CrashhhhhBAMmm! She didn’t know what had hit her, or that she’d even been hit. All she knew was the driver was dead, she was bleeding internally pretty bad as her white shirt began staining with blood near her abdomen and some man was helping her to the hospital quicker than the ambulance could arrive. Her name was America and she had just suffered the worst sedition she could recall in the annals’ of history.
In the broadest sense a fraud is any crime (or civil wrong) for gain that utilizes some deception practiced on the victim as its principal method. For purposes of connecting the dots I just thought I’d see how many things in common I could find between Barack Hussein Obama and Osama bin Ladin, their names have been the subjected to a host of mix ups, Freudian slips, and mis-appropriations.
A Freudian slip if often known as a "slip of the tongue" in which a mistake in speech reveals something of the nature of the speaker's unconscious or semi-conscious desires.
Read more: How to Recognize a Freudian Slip | eHow.com http://www.ehow.com/how_2178668_recognize-freudian-slip.html#ixzz0rXGiLomHHere is a clip of those:
When you make a slip of the tongue or an error of gross misinterpretation (such as with the personals ad example), ask yourself if there might be something deeper to it, or if it's just a silly mistake that's trivial. In fact, ask a friend about your own slips, since after all, we're dealing here with topics that we may not want to acknowledge to ourselves!
Now here are a few minor details that are interesting regarding the similarities of Obama and Osama that are not just slips of the tongue.
1) Both were reportedly born within a 4 year time frame Osama 57, Obama 61 but no long form birth certificate exist.
2) Both their parents divorced soon after they were born
3) Both their mothers soon remarried
4) Both were surrounded by 1 half sister and 2 or 3 half brothers depending on your news source.
5) Both were raised as devout Muslims… but both seem to have major conflicts with some tenants of the religion and I’m not sure they would be considered “Good Examples” of that faith?
a. Obama for example doesn’t have multiple wifes, but he does have multiple sides ie., is a known bi-sexual man having had 2 known lovers come forward Larry Sinclair. Sinclair claims that Young had a similar relationship to BHO and that Young had likely communicated his "jealous displeasure" about BHO's fling with Sinclair and paid for it with his life. Sinclair also charges that Obama gave Young his phone numbers to inquire if Sinclair revealed these secrets to anyone else.
i. Donald Young was the openly gay music director of TUCC who was found murdered in his home with a bullet to the back of his head on Dec. 23, 2007. Two other openly gay TUCC men died under suspicious circumstances in the same time period.
ii. And it goes without saying that Obama is the one who has vowed to hunt down his Muslim brother Osama and has engaged in the increase of over 30,000 more troops in Afghanistan, something Osama should clearly see is a Muslim killing Muslims.
iii.
b. Osama seems to think America has been anti-Muslim and has been on a crusade in spite of the 2500 Mosques in America, the training he himself received from America, and the little known recipe that Afghanistan would have been trounced upon by the Soviet Union if it weren’t for the very generous American people who financed covertly the stingers that turned the tide very well depicted in the movie Charlie Wilson’s War starring Tom Hanks.
i. It would seem to me that if ‘reciprocity’ were a key tenant of Muslims as Osama seems to indicate that Muslims ought to be very happy about America’s help in that war, which we certainly were never paid for.
6) Both had fair complexions with the purple hue lips common in Philippines, Malaysia, Indonesia and some Arab Countries
7) Both mens past get very hazy when they were recruited by the CIA for the same fight.. ironically in or around 1979-1981 in the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.
a. Osama was recruited by Abdulla Azzam- a Palestine born professor and founder of Hamas, the Palestine militant group after the 1979 Soviet invasion of Afghanistan Assam solicited bin Laden’s to raise money and recruit Arabs to help Muslims repel the Soviets and he played an instrumental role in early development of al Qaeda.
b. Obama in 1979 attended Occidental College where he was recruited by the CIA to assist in the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. He was a natural at Swahili dialect and was seen as a shoe in with an Indonesian passport having been born in Kenya, raised Muslim.
8) Both have pictures they have represented of themselves at different stages of their life that have had the photo shop guy very busy providing a misleading images to the public and ya can’t help but wonder why, here’s just a few of many famous examples?
a. In this photo Obama is seen with his maternal grandparents supposedly in NY after a graduation from Columbia. Notice Obama’s wedding ring on near 10 years before he married Michelle.

i. The most glaring anomaly is the fact that his grandfather appears to be suffering from a severe anatomical distortion: he has 3 arms! Look closely at his left shoulder. His arm is obviously hidden but is clearly hanging at his side. Simultaneously, Stanley Dunham puts his 'third hand' over Barack's shoulder (without raising his arm), but it doesn't quite rest on the shoulder -- it floats in the air!
ii. A closer examination reveals that even the park bench is fraudulent. The photo appears to have been compiled in layers and in the following order: the bench, Stanley Dunham, Barack Obama, Madelyn Dunham, Stanley Dunham's suit jacket—entire left side, and Madelyn Dunham's suit jacket — entire right side.
9) Osama’s Photo Shop pict. Look at his shoulders over bundled and his hands cut off inside the coat.

10) Again with Obama this one representing a family picture: Enlargement (zooming in) of the above photo again reveals some peculiar anomalies which demonstrate a continuing pattern of obfuscation and fraud. How is it that one is unable to identify certain members of one's own family? The answer to that question is found, first, in considering this photo is an entire composite hoax and never actually occurred at all in realtime.

a. Barack Obama, Jr. and all other subjects have been compiled into this photo to give the fraudulent representation of a family gathering. Obama's hands appear to be resting on the shoulders of his half-sister, Auma and his grandmother, Kezia. One can see his cupped hands do not look natural—especially his right thumb—and are merely superimposed to look like they are really there. The hand of Abongo (Roy) Obama, his so-called step-brother, rests on Barack's shoulder, while the same hand is holding the hand of an unknown woman. Enlargement reveals that Abongo's right hand has been altered (masked) by photographic editing, showing a large, square pixel in place of the hand.
i. Again the unknown individual (back row, 2nd from the right) is wearing dark clothes intended to obfuscate the compiled abnormalities which cannot be hidden by other means. The unknown individual (back row, far right) next to him is sporting two-toned trousers, the left leg being powder blue, and the right leg being dark purple. Even the trousers’ inseam on the left leg is purple and is inconsistent with the lack of natural shadows within the entire picture. Nevertheless, that individual's right shoe remains white, while the color of his right pant leg has turned purple.
There’s a lot more of these found here:
http://www.whale.to/b/nicoloff6.html and here if you’d like http://www.directlightproductions.com/
11) Osama seems to have only had 2 reported interviews from 1980 to 2001, both of which are a little sketchy. One in 1996 and 1 in1998. Although some famous tapes are played worldwide, we see constantly that he made a lot of money betting on ‘shorts’ to his known disasters, and then also building and getting contracts from the USA, which were huge! Seems kind of weird to have been trained by the CIA, have billions of dollars to spend, and give some pretty hefty political advice to Americans about whom they should be voting for in the coming elections, almost like he is running?
a. Interesting note that Osama claims America is anti-Muslim with over 2500 Mosques in America and Fox News now owned by Arabs.
12) Now of course, Obama was an awesome political funds raiser, in fact we could call him the billion dollar boy after the campaign of 2008 from such humble beginnings with the CIA and now as President is bombing Afghanistan vowing to capture or kill his Muslim brother Osama who is hiding in the caves that have been renovated with billions of dollars and presumably having lost billions somewhere? Umm I wonder where it went? I’d like to see those caves.
http://whatreallyhappened.wikia.com/wiki/Osama_bin_Laden
“Osama bin Laden was trained by the CIA, as an asset to use against the Soviets. His ties to the CIA were never severed” One consistent claim in the WRH, (‘What Really Happened’), site is that Osama bin Laden has been dead for a long time, and that none of the evidence which might suggest otherwise is credible. He is "a dead nemesis perpetuated by the US government". The main article on that subject gives various items of evidence, and the opinion of several people who might be expected to know, or to have a good idea about this. It also puts a date on his death by citing an obituary, in an Egyptian newspaper, which was published on December 26 2001 and which referred to his death and funeral ten days earlier.
It would follow, from bin Laden's death in 2001, that most, if not all of the tapes purportedly issued by him are fakes. Some could have been recorded before his death and spliced together, in the "fake bin Laden audio tape" article, Swiss researchers are quoted as saying in 2002 there was only a 5% risk of error in their conclusion that the latest tape was a fake. Also, when the Fake 2001 bin Laden Video Tape, a videotape purportedly showing Osama bin Laden confessing to the 9/11 attacks, is subjected to an examination of facial feature differences which leaves little doubt about its lack of authenticity.
Read "Gaping Holes in the 'CIA vs. bin Laden' Story," by Jared Israel, and click the links. http://emperors-clothes.com/news/probestop-i.htm
Speaking of Osama:
“U.S. officials turned down the offer of extradition. 'The Washington Post' article that reported this goes into some length quoting U.S. officials attempting to explain exactly why they turned down the offer. The officials are quoted explaining that the Saudis were afraid of a fundamentalist backlash if they jailed and executed bin Laden, that they resented Sudan, that the U.S. resented Sudan, that the U.S. didn't have sufficient evidence to put him on trial. Everything, in fact, except the simplest explanation: that bin Laden was a U.S. asset - either part of the CIA, or someone whom the CIA used. Perhaps the 'Washington Post' writers were hinting at this explanation when they wrote:
"And there were the beginnings of a debate, intensified lately, on whether the United States wanted to indict and try bin Laden or to treat him as a combatant in an underground war." ('The Washington Post,' 3 October 2001)
Emphasis on the word 'treat' as in 'pretend that he was.'
“Moreover, according to the highly reputable 'Jane's Intelligence Review:'
"In February 1995, US authorities named bin Laden and his Saudi brother-in-law, Mohammed Jamal Khalifa, among 172 unindicted co-conspirators with the 11 Muslims charged for the World Trade Center bombing and the associated plot to blow up other New York landmarks." ('Jane's Intelligence Review,' 1 October 1995)”
“So bin Laden had been named as an unindicted co-conspirator a year before Sudan offered to extradite him.”
“It is mind boggling that U.S. government officials would try to justify rejecting Sudan's offer to extradite bin Laden because the Clinton administration was 'lacking a case to indict him in U.S. courts at the time,' ('WP', 3 Oct.)” “Doesn't it sound like bin Laden's real friends were not in Sudan, as President Clinton tried to convince the world when he sent cruise missiles to destroy a Sudanese medicine factory, but in the U.S. State Department?”
“When Almighty God rendered successful a convoy of Muslims, the vanguards of Islam, He allowed them to destroy the United States. I ask God Almighty to elevate their status and grant them Paradise." This latter statement was pre-recorded and released immediately after the U.S. government started bombing Afghanistan, that is, precisely when Mr. Bush needed the emotional impact of just such a statement in order to 'justify' yet another illegal war; (3)”
http://www.findingosamabinladen.com/info/Osama-Bin-Laden/Did-We-Create-Osama-bin-Laden.htmlMany who follow the history of Osama bin Laden will tell you that the USA created the man, who later became its worst enemy. Many decades prior the US helped the Freedom Fighters in Afghanistan stave off the Russian encroachment.
The US Government supplied the Osama bin Laden Freedom Fighters and the 135 stinger missiles, with tactical advisors and CIA exploits was somewhat an interesting game and Russian Domino affect, as well but America support then did produce Russia's Viet Nam so to speak, he was a semi-left over from that era. His father was also an ally, so many years back as a Saudi Construction man of the Bin Laden Group.
Yes, you could say there were some errors made and some animosity left over there. Indeed hindsight of supporting guerrillas and over throwing dictators and replacing them (such as Afghanistan) around the globe in a Machiavellian world is not easy. America thought they had done the best that they thought they could, however it is very easy to re-write history and call everything a mistake.
One mistake was allowing OBL to turn into a national hero, as Uncle Sam tried to send in Tomahawk missiles to get him and failed and made him even more popular with his radical Islamic followers and added to his stature and made him a symbol, bigger than life. History is interesting and Americas support of Osama previously was also. But that was then and this is now. So, consider all this in your thoughts on the so called "War on Terror".
http://www.findingosamabinladen.com/info/Osama-Bin-Laden/Why-We-Have-Not-Caught-Osama-bin-Laden-Yet.html
{“Isn't it ironic that the Emergency Services number to call in the US is 911. The same as the date of the New York incident ?
Its is also alledged that two months before September 11, Osama bin Laden flew to Dubai for 10 days for treatment at the American hospital, where he was visited by the local CIA agent, according to the French newspaper Le Figaro.
The disclosures are known to come from French intelligence which is keen to reveal the ambiguous role of the CIA, and to restrain Washington from extending the war to Iraq and elsewhere.
Bin Laden is reported to have arrived in Dubai on July 4 from Quetta in Pakistan with his own personal doctor, nurse and four bodyguards, to be treated in the urology department. While there he was visited by several members of his family and Saudi personalities, and the CIA.”}
http://terrorism.about.com/gi/o.htm?zi=1/XJ&zTi=1&sdn=terrorism&cdn=newsissues&tm=1498&gps=341_326_1276_484&f=00&tt=11&bt=1&bts=1&zu=http%3A//www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/binladen/who/interview.html
Quotes from Osama bin Laden in interview:
“The leaders in America and in other countries as well have fallen victim to Jewish Zionist blackmail” “The truth is that the whole Muslim world is the victim of international terrorism, engineered by America at the United Nations.”
“The Western regimes and the government of the United States of America bear the blame for what might happen. If their people do not wish to be harmed inside their very own countries, they should seek to elect governments that are truly representative of them and that can protect their interests. ...”
“If the people have elected those governments in the latest elections, it is because they have fallen prey to the Western media which portray things contrary to what they really are.”
“Do you expect anything but treatment by reciprocity?"
“We have communicated their fatwahs and stirred the nation to drive out the enemy who has occupied our land and usurped our country and suppressed our people and to rid the land of the two Holy Mosques from their presence.”
“We are certain - with the grace of Allah - that we shall prevail over the Jews and over those fighting with them. Today however, our battle against the Americans is far greater than our battle was against the Russians. Americans have committed unprecedented stupidity. They have attacked Islam and its most significant sacrosanct symbols ... . We anticipate a black future for America. Instead of remaining United States, it shall end up separated states and shall have to carry the bodies of its sons back to America”.
“Our religion forbids us from killing innocent people such as women and children. This, however, does not apply to women fighters. A woman who puts herself in the same trench with men, gets what they get. ...”
“The American government is leading the country towards hell. ... We say to the Americans as people and to American mothers, if they cherish their lives and if they cherish their sons, they must elect an American patriotic government that caters to their interests not the interests of the Jews. If the present injustice continues with the wave of national consciousness, it will inevitably move the battle to American soil, just as Ramzi Yousef and others have done. This is my message to the American people. I urge them to find a serious administration that acts in their interest and does not attack people and violate their honor and pilfer their wealth. ...”
“Let not the West be taken in by those who say that Muslims choose nothing but slaughtering. Their brothers in East Europe, in Turkey and in Albania have been guided by Allah to submit to Islam and to experience the bliss of Islam. Unlike those, the European and the American people and some of the Arabs are under the influence of Jewish media. ...”
Video You tube- Obama is Osama parody
That was pretty wild video, though I see some differences, the coincidences are apparent also. The important part of this all is to realize that Obama is a fraud, because he is not a natural born citizen, having a Kenyan father he does not meet the Constitutional standards for being a natural born citizen, and their vote was given under conditions other then what were present. This represented a disdainful disrespect for America and We The People, reprehensible as criminal conduct
As for America she has led the way in tolerence for all religons to practice their tenents and represents a mix of most every religion on the planet. However make no mistake, America was founded as a Christian nation allowing others the same privelege not excluding themselves so others can feel comfortable.
Our Constitution says it was signed "in the year of our Lord"..,and makes reference to it being that many years 1787 since that Lord, known to our founding fathers as Jesus Christ, was born. The Declarations of Independence declares boldly that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness Let no man who is a usurping President say this nation is not a Christian Nation, lest he be called the fool who is a fraud.
Cody Robert Judy
Wednesday, June 9, 2010
Amicus Curiae in Defence of Lt.Col. Lakin

Cody Robert Judy
No. West
UT. 84
(801)497-
_____________________________________________________________________________
IN THE HONORABLE MILITARY COURT
U.S. ARMY (Plaintiff)
v. Amicus Curiae under UCMJ
LAKIN (Defendant)
Cody Robert Judy- Amicus Curiae LTC Driscoll
______________________________________________________________________________
daniel.driscoll@amedd.army.mil
cc: www.personalinjuryattorneylaw.com info@jensenlawyers.com att: Jenson & Associates- c/o Attorney Paul Rolf Jensen
Re: Amicus Curiae on behalf of the defendant Lakin
Amicus Curiae Concern for Defendant in the matter of U.S. Army v. Lakin in the matter wherein Lakin was charged:
"With one specification of a violation of Article 87, Missing Movement and four specifications of a violation of Article 92 (three specifications of Failure to Obey a Lawful Order, and one Specification of Dereliction of Duty)," said Chuck Dasey, spokesman at Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, where Lakin is assigned.
*Motion to file leave of Amicus Curiae is respectfully submitted if applicable in UCMJ
______________________________________
Reasons why the Amicus Curiae from Cody Robert Judy is applicable to this Court:
______________________________________
• Cody Robert Judy was a candidate in the 2008 elections for President of the United States, who has filed litigation in two Federal Courts regarding the qualifications of Sen. John McCain, and Sen. Barack Hussein Obama who now occupies the White House. Here are the following Internet Link in support:
• http://www.codyjudy.us/crj4ussenatorut_031.htm Judy vs. McCain
• http://www.scribd.com/doc/22288917/Judy-v-Obama Judy vs. Obama
Cody Robert Judy also recently testified in the CIA Columbia Obama Trial as an injured presidential candidate, who by being in the same Presidential race as Obama has standing, and who swore to tell the truth at the trial where a 10 Amendment Court was held, a Jury selected, Defendant’s were served and given the chance to defend themselves, 6 days of trial witnesses and evidence were produced, and the Jury rendered a guilty verdict on 17 accounts ranging from fraud to sedition on Barack Hussein Obama, Michael Sovern, and Columbia University. The closing arguments are here:
• http://atlah.org/atlahworldwide/?p=8342
• http://www.sonorannews.com/archives/2010/100519/ftpgObamaTrial.html (News)
• http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2010/05/12-cia-columbia-jury-are-chosen-and-13.html
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBJihJBePcs 31 sec. video witness Michelle Obama
The Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 32 Investigation, paragraph 1, reads:
(a) No charge or specification may be referred to a general court-martial for trial until a through and impartial investigation of all the matters set forth therein has been made. This investigation shall include inquiry as to the truth of the matter set forth in the charges, consideration of the form of charges, and recommendation as to the disposition which should be made of the case in the interest of justice and discipline.
a. While the Federal Courts have an interest in procuring justice in the matter, the technicalities of those courts and whatever rulings have or have not transpired do not apply to facts and information relevant to this matter. So it is that this court may also consider whatever evidence it seems true and faithful to the U.S.C.
(b) Your statement in paragraph 6 making a unilateral ruling on the role Congress may or may not play in any eligibility determination is incorrect. Obama has been sued prior to his (presumably) legally becoming President since he had never shown himself to be legally eligible to hold that office and in fact lied on his Declaration of Candidacy. Your pretense that somehow Congress could impeach a person ineligible to hold office actually is contrary to what would happen in the matter of an ineligible person who was sitting in the presidential seat of authority as a usurper.
(c) The Frame Work necessary to straighten the executive branch should be recognized by this court as a matter of jurisprudence, and if there exist evidence that would release the charges by statutes of compliance towards duty, that should be considered equitably. If there is one advantage of a military court, it is that of examining evidence and testimony minus the political fever at large. Now I challenge this court to hear my testimony, and to examine the evidence herein as a matter of defense for Lt. Col. Lakin as I do have direct standing in the matter which surrounds the issues with which he is so charged with, and I offer myself as witness for his behalf feeling it would be beyond my ability to withhold my testimony as a natural born citizen of the United States who has standing in the 2008 Presidential Election, in the defense of the same military which is sworn to protect me and uphold the United States Constitution.
(d) The Frame Work of the CIA Columbia Obama Trial held in Harlem, NY May 14-19th 2010, brought a comprehensive and collection of evidence never before packaged in such a way at great cost and sacrifice and should be presented for Senate/House Congressional Trial to Judicial Committee by a coalition of presenters, and to this Military Court. Men of courage such as Maj. Gen Paul E Valley (retired): citing the Constitutional Authority as such:
a. U.S.C. Art. I, Sect 8, Clause 10 the Congress shall have power “to define and punish Offenses against the Law of Nations;” for “Natural Born Citizen” requirement subject to Art.II Sect. 1, Clause 5, in the directive of Clause 6 [In case of the Removal of the President from Office – due to –inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office] Obama can’t be impeached as he was never qualified to be President.
(e) Today in this article http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=164409 your Honorable Sir, Major General Paul E Valley stated: "We now must call for the immediate resignation of Barry Soetero (AKA President Barack Hussein Obama) … based on incompetence, deceit, fraud, corruption, dishonesty and violation of the U.S. oath of office and the Constitution," he said in remarks delivered to a Lincoln Reagan dinner in Virginia City, Mont., last week and published today on the Stand Up America website. "And a call for a national petition for new elections to select the next president of the United States of America must be initiated," he continued. "We can wait no longer for a traditional change of power and new government."
I, Cody Robert Judy, do affirm that I have submitted this testimony and evidence under no obligation or threat of harm, and do so with my own volition and with the utmost integrity to relate the facts where upon I am so relevant in the matter, and upon necessary means am willing to come to this court and so testify to the courts satisfaction under cross examination and oath.
I further say not.
Cody Robert Judy /s/ affixed this 9th day of June,2010. Wensday 8:16pm
Witness in CIA Columbia Obama Trial- as an injured 2008 Presidential Candidate
http://www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
The Frame Work of Obama's Constitutional Eligibility

The Frame Work Necessary to Straighten the Executive Branch
http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/06/09/the-post-emails-exclusive-interview-with-eligibility-attorney-mario-apuzzo/comment-page-1/#comment-12765
Great Article here that highlights 2 very important things
1) Republican Senators gagged themselves with Sen. Res 511.
2) The Constitutional Eligibility of the U.S. Presidency is not a racial issue it's a Constitutional issue
The Post & Email’s exclusive interview with Eligibility Attorney Mario Apuzzo
“THE FOUNDERS GAVE US A DEFINITION THAT WE COULD ALL AGREE ON”
by Sharon Rondeau
"Attorney Mario Apuzzo, who represents the four plaintiffs in Kerchner v. Obama
(Jun. 9, 2010) — Mario Apuzzo was born on June 30, 1956. He graduated from Jamesburg High School in New Jersey in 1975. He obtained his undergraduate degree in Political Science from Wilkes University in Wilkes-Barre, PA. He then attended Temple University School of Law in Philadelphia, from which he graduated with a Juris Doctorate degree in 1982. He then continued his post-graduate legal studies at the University of the Pacific in Sacramento, CA, at its McGeorge School of Law and in Salzburg, Austria, which also included coursework in Milan, Italy, receiving a Diploma in Advanced International Legal Studies in 1983. He has also studied comparative international law at Temple University, in Rome, and has pursued a second law degree in the European civil law system at the University of Naples.
Mr. Apuzzo founded his law firm in 1983, at which time he went into private practice in New Jersey. He currently has his law offices at 185 Gatzmer Avenue, Jamesburg, New Jersey 08831. He is engaged in the general practice of law which includes trials and appellate work in both the state and federal courts."

"Regarding the Obama eligibility controversy, Attorney Apuzzo published his first blog entry on December 20, 2008 after having followed and contributed to the postings on the websites of Leo Donofrio and Orly Taitz. Commander Charles Kerchner was put in touch with Attorney Apuzzo by an acquaintance who had known he had been seeking an attorney to challenge Congress and Obama regarding Obama’s eligibility to serve as President of the United States."
Cody Judy says:
Wednesday, June 9, 2010 at 2:27 PM
Great Article and report here, it was so refreshing to hear an expert in the field speak of the McCain Gag Order that all the R U.S. Senators tied on themselves, and the Racial issue which is bogus, based in fact by the many law suits McCain also faced.
Mario Appuzzo would be another great mind to present evidence to Congress along with Maj. Gen Paul E Valley
Consider: www.wnd.com/?pageId=164409
The Frame Work necessary to straighten the Executive Branch
The CIA Columbia Trial brought a comprehensive and collection of evidence never before packaged in such a way at great cost and sacrifice and should be presented for Senate/House Congressional Trial to Judicial Committee by a coalition of presenters. Men of courage such as Maj. Gen Paul E Valley: citing the Constitutional Authority as such: U.S.C. Art. I, Sect 8, Clause 10 ..the Congress shall have power “to define and punish Offenses against the Law of Nations;” for Natural Born Citizen requirement subject to Art.II Sect. 1, Clause 5, in the directive of Clause 6 [In case of the Removal of the President from Office – due to –inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office] Obama can’t be impeached as he was never qualified to be President.
I can’t help think that due to the excessive time placed in the Judicial Branch in the Appeals process on every single legal issue, the right of the Legislative Branch to hold trial and the presentments to the Judicial Committee’s of the House and the Senate might be a much better way to go and I don’t think there is any prohibitive reason that an expert would be prohibited from acting in such a way just because of Judicial Branch engagements, especially in the light of the seriousness of the offense and the destruction taking place to America by the executive branch.
Cody Robert Judy
Witness in CIA Columbia Trial- as an injured 2008 Presidential Candidate
Obama and McCain challenged in law suit here:
http://www.codyjudy.us/crj4ussenatorut_031.htm
http://www.scribd.com/doc/22288917/Judy-v-Obamahttp://www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
Friday, June 4, 2010
Rumbling’s felt day after CIA Columbia Obama Trial shakes Blair and Stock Market-Law Of Nations-Natural Born Citizen

Earth Rumbling’s felt day after CIA Columbia Obama Trial shakes Blair and Stock Market-Law Of Nations-Natural Born Citizen-both found in the United States Constitution
Two significant things happened the day after the CIA Columbia Obama Trial that are note-worthy as far as being earth shakers.
First, Mr. Dennis C. Blair, the most senior intelligence adviser to the President, resigned. Sure it may be a coincidence, but it follows on the heels of Pastor James David Manning’s assertions that a CIA Operative had received orders to assassinate him and had decided not to follow orders.
Could not following orders be associated with “misspeaking reports” that surfaced from the past?
Dennis C. Blair, became the first high-profile departure from President Obama's national security team on Thursday, one day after the CIA Columbia Obama Trial in which he was found guilty by a Jury from across America of a number of criminal actions ranging from fraud to sedition.
Now, the next thing you need to ask yourself is does Obama have a significant temper in the past of letting the gauntlet go quickly?
You may recall Obama’s reputation of actually being called “Fast Break” Obama?
http://www.newsweek.com/2009/02/25/fast-break-obama.html
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/may/21/blair-resigns-from-top-spy-post/
“Mr. Blair also had to retract criticism he made publicly about the administration's decision to pursue a civil trial for Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, charged as the would-be Christmas Day jetliner bomber.
For example, Mr. Blair told a Senate hearing in January that Mr. Abdulmutallab should have been interrogated by a special unit created for high-value terrorism suspects.
Hours after the unusual public criticism during the Senate testimony, Mr. Blair's office released a statement saying he had misspoken, and noted that the interrogation unit, known as the High Value Interrogation Group or HIG, had not yet been established.”
Does it sound like Mr. Blair is the type of guy that had bucked the orders once too many times?
The next interesting thing that occurred 1 day after the guilty verdict on Obama was the biggest single day drop in the stock market in 166 years- a thousand point drop in the stock market in 1 day without anyone’ really being found to blame. This article details the mad rush to find someone, but surmises it was ‘everyone’ to blame.
http://www.minyanville.com/businessmarkets/articles/dow-drop-dow-jones-industrial-average/5/10/2010/id/28191“Over the past five days, global regulators and market makers have been running around trying to answer the "whodunit" mystery surrounding Thursday's thousand-point drop in the Dow.
Well I have what may be troubling news for all of them. The answer, quite simply, is "we did."
By we, I mean everyone”
In a sense, we are responsible for our Constitution, each one of us. We are all responsible for either putting up with Obama’s lack of eligibility to be President because he is not a “Natural Born Citizen” demanded by our Republic’s Constitution, or rationalizing that the virtual uncanny financial success of our America was not afforded by the unique freedom and liberty provided by our U.S. Constitution?
What’s it gonna be? You really can’t have this one both ways America, and it’s a foolish man’s bet, that without the umbrella of God, on our men and women within the dictates of our USA Constitution, since the adoption of that on the seventeenth day (17) of September (9) in the YEAR OF OUR LORD one thousand seven hundred and eighty seven (1787), we would have had anywhere near the success we have had in the adolescent national status of 223 years of age.
If you doubt that ask England, (whose British Kenyon subject son Barack Obama Senior fathered another British subject Obama who lives in the White House), who has watched this in dis-belief?
Oh America, do not dis believe the provident hand that has nurtured you, and cared for you, for if you do, you will certainly bare a crash unlike anything in your history!
May the Christian Nation in the USA please stand up and demand the resignation of Congress subverting the Nation and our U.S. Constitution as a… a piece of trash to be discarded? There is a time to be tolerant, but it is not that time.
U.S.C.Article1,Sect.8, applicable ‘To define and punish Offenses against the Law of Nations.” The definition of the Natural Born Citizen contained in “The Law of Nations or, Principles of the Law of Nature, applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns by the Swiss philosopher and jurist Emmerich De Vattel.
By the authority of the First, Second, Ninth, and Tenth Amendment preserving rights to the people, of the Constitutional clause of Article II of the Constitution stating, “No person except a Natural Born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President”.
The secondary statement of this clause concludes:
The Founders of the Constitution were subject citizens of Britain, and in understanding this and their own non-natural born citizenship either by soil and by parental ancestry, placed an exception in the clause for their own individual circumstances “or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution”: The significant note being the missing “Natural Born” clause from “Citizen of the United States” at the time of the adoption of this Constitution.
Obama is not a qualified candidate person for either the first part of the clause Natural Born Citizen, or a qualified candidate person for the second part of the clause “Citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of the Constitution”.
The Congress has the ability to call for Trial; in Obama’s case Art. 2, Sect 1, Clause 6 [in Case of the Removal of the President from .. inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office] Obama’s not qualified for office so he can’t be impeached as a President.
Cody Robert Judy
U.S. Senate 2010 UT
Tuesday, June 1, 2010
Press Release: It's Time To Clue In

Press Release: It's Time To Clue In
What you may have missed that Cody Robert Judy has been up to in defending our U.S. Constitution and running for U.S. Senate in Utah 2010.
Cody has recently returned from Harlem, New York where he was a witness/plaintiff in the CIA Columbia Obama Trial held May 14-19th. Cody's witness gave the court "standing" as he was personally injured as a candidate in the Presidential contest of 2008 with Barack Hussein Obama's lack of qualifications Constitutionally.
1)Cody sued John McCain in 2008 on his birth in Panama, the only Conservative Candidate in the Country to do so, and served McCain and the National Republican Party Committee days before McCain was made the nominee.
2)The RNC made a choice not to inform the electors of the law suit, which may have altered their choice for a nominee.
3)Within the suit, Cody pointed out and testified that U.S. Senate Resolution 511, (which granted McCain natural born citizen status with two U.S. citizens as parents but born outside the U.S. borders) was co-sponsored by Sen. Hillary Clinton and Sen. Barack Hussein Obama. Wonder Why?
This U.S. Sen Resolution acted as a 'gag' order for all Republican U.S. Senators who passed this for McCain, in a silent bargain for silence on the eligibility issue against Obama, who didn't have 2 parents that were U.S. citizens and whose birth place has been questioned even by his own wife who recently said he was from Kenya, and whose birth certificate posted on line has been professionally dissected as a fraud. Essentially, Republicans got their man McCain, and because of his eligibility questionability, they endorsed, they in affect had a shoe put in their mouth about Obama's qualification issue.
Here: 31 second video Michelle announces Obama's home country http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBJihJBePcs
The fact Obama's father is British affectively places Obama under British laws which Cody demonstrated with his testimony which you can also read here on scripd : http://www.scribd.com/doc/22288917/Judy-v-Obama
4) Cody's law suit's against McCain, and Obama essentially prove fraudulent activity by Republicans and Democrats upon the American Voter in the 2008 Election, and have been an intense fight for our Constitution and he is fighting for a Senate Trial where all the evidence presented to the CIA Columbia Obama Trial in which a 12 member jury found Obama, Michael Sovern, and Columbia University guilty of 17 count including fraud and sedition, can be presented to the U.S. Senate with the Supreme Court overseeing it.
This seems like too big of an issue for a single Federal Judge to take on and bare the burden of. Cody's actions prove this is a Constitutional issue that the country can unite on, rather then a racial issue that the left is claiming, to silence the issue and is affectively used to divide the country.
The link of the closing arguments is here.
http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2010/05/12-cia-columbia-jury-are-chosen-and-13.html (1 hour long)
Here is the Sonoran News article in CaveCreek, Arizona, which is right next to Scottsdale/Phoenix,AZ. and the premier Conservative News Paper who gave a report of Cody's testimony.
http://www.sonorannews.com/archives/2010/100519/ftpgObamaTrial.html
They also published my letter of thanks here:
http://www.sonorannews.com/archives/2010/100526/letters2e.html#letter2
This is American Grand Jury- which you can join for free and is really starting to play a major part in alternative media and tea party orchestrations.
http://americangrandjury.org/latest-letter-from-dr-james-man...ning-regarding-the-columbia-trial-verdic
Here is the Conservative Monster You Tube video series recapping each day of the CIA Columbia Obama Trial- Steve's Cooper's website just blew up with hits during the Trial because he was there covering it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5kC-GHp52i8&feature=related
From Cody:
You know I thought a lot last night about what you said about your "hoping" something would happen or come out of what is happening. The thought occurred to me, that if this effort fails, there is no one else who is going to come along to save it, I recall David O' McKay's words,"where ere thou art, act well thy part", and that is the "why" of what I have done in my small part.
I believe our Country is under an assault of freedom and liberty by those who are in authority like we have never seen before, and if you take a look at Obama's legislation passing with lighting speed literally throwing our Country into a massive 13 billion dollar debt and more importantly a Federal Power grab as we haven't seen in our history,you know what I'm talking about.
If something is not done, our children indeed will wake up homeless and enslaved. I guess I would rather take that burden on in my own life with my own fortune as I no doubt am doing in the political activity I have charged with. I need your help, and I hope that you will see with my actions present and past in defending our Constitution, that you will know I am serious. I don't own 4 wheelers, or boats, or new cars, or a home...and the number 1 reason I don't is because my money has gone to back up my mouth. It wasn't easy sueing Sen. John McCain, or Obama, but these actions now are proving their invaluable worth.
My own hope is that every day business owners and citizens, may take note, and give their vote and support to a candidate who is in 'deed' fighting with everything he has verses someone who is giving you good lip service. I guess sooner or later just as the Jews were faced with a loss of liberty and freedom but rationalized their political hotbed with their own economical success until they heard the knock on their own door, and the boots coming up their own stairs. If they had known their fate, wouldn't they have woke up sooner?
When you want justice and deny it, the day will come when you need it and you won't find it. If I have been incarcerated due to violations of the Constitution, the day will come that because you didn't defend those rights, you will need those right but will not find them. What is going to be your choice, and what has been your choice in the past? Taking A Stand is my book, my witness for the Constitution, for my rights, and for yours. If you continue to deny me mine, you will also be denied yours very soon. It's time we come together in the defense of our U.S. Constitution for the freedom and liberty of our Country.
It takes radio and tv adds to inform the public and a little from every one makes alot... maybe you know others who would be willing to help put together a pool for adds for my campaign? I also need 1,000 registered Utah voters to get on the ballot Here if you can help that way:
http://www.petitiononline.com/codyjudy/petition.html
Here is a recent article on my blog I wrote about Tim Bridgewater and Mike Lee one of the two who will be chosen for the R' Party.
Is America Sick of Seeing United States Senate Seats Sold-Will Republican Voters in Utah figure it out?
http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2010/05/is-america-sick-of-seeing-united-states.htm
Here are a couple of videos from Pastor James David Manning who hosted the CIA Columbia Obama Trial-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ugv2ZQd66D0&feature=related "Go To Hell Obama" James Manning Video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvdPAOqG7x4 " Last Sitting President" James Manning Video
That's probably more then your share of "Updates" have a good one, and if you'd like to help me out by contributing to my campaign call me (801-497-6655) and I can run a credit card for a smaller fee then paypal does on my web site contribution page here, but if your more comfortable doing it through paypal, here is the site:
Contribute to Cody's campaign for U.S. Senate 2010 UT
http://www.codyjudy.us/crj4ussenatorut_011.htm
Thank you for all you can do, and if you can do nothing else but forward this to a friend that is very appreciated.
Cody Robert Judy
U.S.Senate 2010 UT
Cody's Blog
Monday, May 31, 2010
Our Valiant Warriors Dis-Honored In Obama’s Words

Our Valiant Warriors Dis-Honored In Obama’s Words
Oh men, who dwell safely in the land of liberty, think of the cost of our ease. We who mature and grow old with cares only of the living, who each day face life and not death- Remember, remember our young brothers and sisters who fell in the trenches or from the skies; who left a sweetheart’s embrace never again in mortality to feel their warmth, who never held sons or daughters, and who died before parents. To these valiant young warriors we owe a debt that can never be repaid and may only be partially settled by devotion to the ideals for which they gave their blood.
(Adopted from “Valiant Young Men” Bryce Gibby p.269)
And what ideals did they devote and give their blood to? Was it not found in the words of the U.S. Constitution which outlined our inalienable rights, freedoms, and liberties and made us “the Republic for which we stand”?
These great deeds have dwindled in your reasonable and sane minds as you support Mr. President Obama who has hood winked the entire U.S. Supreme Court, The U.S. Senate, The U.S. House of Representatives and the American People in stating he was a “natural born citizen” unequivocally constitutionally qualified to by President; without a father who was a United States Citizen and whose wife says he is from Kenya; what an honor to your veterans?
The deeds of honor wherein Obama received a distinguished Columbia University Degree with a C average from Occidental College, and later went on to Harvard, excepting not a single person remembers him at Columbia, not a single professor has come forward to acknowledge they taught this man, not a single fellow student recalls him there, and your children can’t go down and admire the grades of a President and his fabrication of lies you have bought with the blood of your veterans! What an honor?
What an honor it is that the records of this man you call your President, He has closed by executive order, and every record by which you might check his background has been blocked, what an honor that is?
How honorable it is that all the People across the land know and think Obama is such an honor to the blood of their ancestors being spilt for them, yet are trapped for whatever reason from demanding from their U.S. Senators a Senate Trail over this dis-honor?
What a sad, sad, sad dis-honor. How can you possibly honor those who have died for our Republic, who have died for the U.S. Constitution’s penned words, while not making an honorable demand from your U.S. Senator here?
Dear U.S. Senator I demand of You Now a Senate Trial on Obama! http://www.scribd.com/doc/24630764/Obama-has-to-go-OBOGO-Petition
In Mr. Obama’s own words, “Don’t tell me words don’t mean anything.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SgMcht-EW6I
Yes, Mr. Obama, they do, and you have dis-honored America in your Declaration of Candidacy for U.S. President by not being Constitutionally Qualified to hold the office and you lied about that, you lied about ever being at Columbia University. You need to move out and resign to ever hope to recover your own soul from the jaws of hell; for the devil doesn’t care about you and will not honor the deal with you for he is a liar and is bound to lie, just as you have.
Wake Up America and demand a U.S. Senate Trial on the verification of qualification of Barack Hussein Obama with the evidence used in the CIA Columbia Obama Trial in which he was found dis-honorable and guilty!
Time to be as Your Valiant Warriors, a Valiant People for no amount of money contributed to a candidate is worth the blood of so many generations past, who have honored us in their sacrifices for the U.S. Constitution.
Excerpts from CIA Columbia Obama Trial held in Harlem, NY May 14-19th,2010
http://atlah.org/atlahworldwide/?p=8412
Cody Robert Judy
U.S. Senate 2010 UT
Thursday, May 27, 2010
The 12 CIA Columbia Jury are Chosen, and 13 Marches Around Columbia Made

The 12 CIA Columbia Jury are Chosen, and 13 Marches Around Columbia Made
Much has been written and said about the ‘verdict’ of “Guilty” on the CIA Columbia Obama Trial, but not much has been said about Day 1 and how the Jury was chosen. This unique Trial in American History is not going to pass or fade away, in fact, I think it’s just barely starting to take off and explode. As a witness to the trial all 7 days, in fact the only person to make all 13 marches with Pastor Manning around Columbia, and as a witness in the Trial, the perspective I have, is certainly unique.
Just for a moment close your eyes and imagine you are in fact being questioned for jury duty. Now imagine the defendant is sitting in the White House acting as the President of The United States. While your initial response may be excitement to be on the Jury, when you began to contemplate the gravity of the circumstances and intense implications a certain weight is bound to come down upon you, and so it was the 12 chosen jury members of the CIA Columbia Obama Trial held in Harlem, NY May 14-19th, 2010.
First let me say, in my references to Pastor James David Manning as Pastor Manning, I do not mean to assert he is my Pastor or Reverend, Bishop, or moral Church Authority in a personal way. I refer to my asking him what I should call him in my first meeting with him and he asserted “Pastor Manning would be fine.”, and I use the term as a simple sign of respect to and for him.
In fact I first met him just a day and a half before the Trial was set to began as I arrived in Harlem, NY having only had 3 phone conversations with him prior to that time, and having seen The Manning Report roughly a dozen times before that. I mean only to assert the very limited contact I had with even knowing him prior to the Trial. I had sent him the court records I had filed in Judy vs. McCain and Barnett vs. Obama, which also had my 2008 Declaration of Candidacy for the President of The United States within, and a small note stating because I was in fact in the same election race with Obama, that I had been directly hurt by Obama’s lack of Constitutional Eligibility and in that sense had ‘Standing’, something the Federal Judicial Court’s had used to dismiss a host of law suits against Obama for the same reason.
My concern in going at all was that I had no idea how my testimony would be used, I had some idea how it could help, but I also was of the mind that my testimony would also be bitterly contested from the shadows of my past as to the credibility of my testimony. In one of the phone conversations I had with Pastor Manning prior to going I expressed my very meager means of paying for a trip like this, and the only thing really going for me was that because I was self employed, I wouldn’t lose my job or have to worry about getting time off to be at the trial all 7 days.
Pastor Manning first agreed to help me with travel, food and shelter in the second phone call I had with him, which was proceeded by a first wherein only a second appointment was made for the following day. A few days went by and I hadn’t heard from him. I then called as the time was approaching and he conceded that due to the expenses he was incurring there would be no way he could help get me there.
The night before this conversation had taken place I’d had a dream that I was
arriving in New York via my Saturn Vue pulling my work trailer just in time to hear my name called as a witness. I saw in the dream I was helping in some small duties of the trial and was staying in a bunk there and stating to someone that I had driven clear across America to come to this.
Without that dream I wouldn’t have had the courage to go, but I felt very sure I was suppose to go, and thought though my car didn’t exactly need the miles, and I had some trouble recently with the transmission light coming on, somehow things would work out. I had to have some money to get across the Country so endeavored to buy a load of meat I in my business sell, and go to Battle Mountain, Nevada to sell it. I had been to Battle Mountain, Nevada before to sell, and felt perhaps the time was ripe for those former customers to be ready to buy again. I had 2 days before I had to leave if I was going to go.
That’s where things started to happen, that were affirmative in pointing me that way. The first day I arrived in Battle Mountain however I was only able to make 3 small sales and I’d hit most all the affluent places and past customers and I learned from many, another meat company had recently been through. The situation was looking grim and it was discouraging to me. The following day however proved different as I served an area that was a lot less affluent with income, but for some reason was buying from me as if my meat were hot pancakes coming off the griddle after a 3 day fast. I ended that day sold out.
I now had the money to at least get out there and service my vehicle before doing so with an oil change and a quick check on the brakes. I knew however it would be very close and I might not have the money to get back, but hoped perhaps in making the trip that I might get a contribution or two as people saw from my blog, website, and facebook what I was doing. Perhaps they would help and I would find the some help along my course. I endeavored to call my journey, “The Taking A Stand CIA Columbia Obama Wake Up America Trial Tour” and you can see the pictures of that on my facebook.
The fact was also present in my mind, that if I ran into any vehicle problems across the entire country and back that I could be in some serious problems. I in making and returning safely do express my gratitude to God for the safe arrival and return.
The first day I arrived I did in fact find Pastor Manning very busy and many of the congregation working tirelessly in preparation for the trial. Not being afraid of work, I mentioned my building skills in building a platform for the second jury bench to raise it up approximately 3 to 4 inches. Within an hour I was at Home Depot in Harlem, NY picking out materials to do just that and by the end of that day had finished building that. In some ways being at Home Depot, and working with familiar tools eased my own out of water experience in being in New York and the traffic terror I had experienced just getting there.
The first night I indeed slept in my trailer parked in the street that the Atlah Church in Harlem cornered in the same place this YouTube Video shows my Vue and Work Trailer in the back ground.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPQK-1LvhG0
The very 1st march didn’t proceed the first day of the Trial, but the day proceeding the first day of the Trial, and for whatever reason, Pastor Manning asked me to go along with an Elder Adam, I belive was his name. We three did what Pastor Manning called a “dry-run” of the 26 block area around Columbia and Elder Adam and I flanked Pastor Manning and handed out about 200 flyers each as we made the march. While I didn’t know it, this was being counted as the first day of the 7 days of the Columbia march, the 7th day culminating in 7 rounds around Columbia, making it 13 rounds all together.
The Elder that attended the first march with me was unable to attend a few of the other marches, but I made them all, so was the only one besides Pastor Manning to do so. That seemed almost odd to me for some reason that he would ask me to go, but he did and I was grateful feeling it very inspired that for some reason I had been chosen and was in fact asked to go even though I was not a member of Pastor Manning’s’ congregation.
In a spiritual sense the march was a witness to God about what the Trial surrounded, and that was, our United States Constitution being held up as the banner and Supreme Law of the Land, more especially in the presidential qualifications held within its sentiment and reflections. In the spiritual realms of Justice for all, it is by two witnesses that God’s word is established, and so it was there were at least two witnesses who marched 13 times around the Columbia University area. I don’t know how critical that is or was, but I suspect it will someday be known to all of us.
The first day of the Trial was mostly taken up with introductions and the formality of choosing a Jury. Pastor Manning had a list of some 70 potential jurors. These were people who had emailed him from all over the Country stating they would be willing to serve as jurors and would be able to serve on the jury the whole time.
This of course wouldn’t be easy to accomplish either, if you just for a minute think about leaving whatever you are doing for at least 9 days, if you counted one day for travel there,7 days of trial, and at least 1 day travel back home. Imagine just for a minute the sacrifice that would require of you if you had to do it, and you will begin to realize that every one of the jurors had to do that exact thing.
It took tremendous sacrifice to serve on that jury, and the only thing they received was lunch one day. The jury received absolutely no stipend or pay whatsoever.
As I recall a few of the witnesses and where they were from, a lady had traveled from Germany who was a U.S. Citizen, a man from Texas whose wife was also in the hospital, a guy from New Mexico, a guy from Florida, a couple of the jurors were from upper New York, so as I said a wide variety of locations.
Pastor Manning questioned each of near 20 potential jurors who made it there on their own accord and from that pool, chose 12 and 2 alternates. I was surprised that every one of the 12 chosen actually hung in there every single day, and the alternate didn’t have to be used to my knowledge although I was not present in the approximate 3 and half hour jury deliberations, so cannot say that without that stated.
The questions Pastor Manning asked ranged and were not all asked of every juror, but as a guide generally followed this form:
Juror by name:
Where are you from? What do/did you do for a living? Where did you go to school? How did you come to know about this Trial? What party affiliation are you from? Do you think if evidence is presented that Obama is indeed constitutionally qualified for President that you can recognize that in your decision? If you find through the evidence presented that Obama is not constitutionally qualified can you find a guilty verdict in your decision? Do you think you can be fair and just with the evidence presented to you? Are you a plant set to disrupt the trial in a subversive way in say making sure there is a ‘hung jury’?
After each potential juror was questioned, it was noted that the Defendant had been served the indictment and had chosen not to attend and that they certainly had the opportunity at that time to cross examine every juror, if they had wanted to. The defense dream team for Obama never showed up.
The jury was sworn in, and the Trial began. In just examining this part of the proceedings I would ask every single American if they were on that Jury and the acting President of the United States was named as a defendant, if you yourself would not take the duty seriously.
I was very impressed with the burden that fell upon the shoulders of each juror and that was also reflected in their continuous and dutiful attendance, nothing slacking, many of them note taking, and I can say at no time during the entire proceeding where any of them found sleeping on the job. They were very attentive, alert, and I believe were represented in a pretty evenly represented way in gender, diversity of age, and cross cultural way in education, income diversity and race. I believe it was 7 women and 5 men that were ultimately chosen.
Hear the closing arguments to the Jury here:
http://atlah.org/atlahworldwide/?p=8342
‘Our peculiar security is in the possession of a written Constitution. Let us not make it a blank paper by construction”. - Thomas Jefferson to Wilson Nicholas, 1803
Cody Robert Judy
Help Cody in his run for U.S. Senate 2010 in Utah
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)