GOD'S MERCY Who is it extended to? LBGT's ?

GOD'S MERCY Who is it extended to? LBGT's ?

 Part I.

If God's Mercy were carte blanche Justice would have no effect, thus it is extended to all those who will take upon them the name of Jesus Christ in their actions. Thus the Lord will justify many who keep his old and new and everlasting covenant.

Ref:
Isaiah 56:4-5
Isaiah 57:3-14

https://youtu.be/6oFhWrOcJpg

Part II.

https://youtu.be/E3050spvcCk

Part II. The Axe-Grinding Propelling Utah's Self Inflicted Injury In Marriage? Sotomayor Stays

Part II. The Axe-Grinding Propelling Utah's Self Inflicted Injury In Marriage? Sotomayor Stays
Part I. Featured Editorial

Wow! If you ever thought that if you lost or won at the Federal District Court and Appeals Court that you couldn’t win or lose at the United States Supreme Court level, this case just proved your idea’s wrong. Of course it doesn’t happen that often, but don’t say it hasn’t or never will happened. The United States Supreme Court Justice Sotomayer issued a “stay” today on issuing same-sex marriage licenses in Utah after the stay had been declined by the Federal Court and the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals.

A same-sex marriage is now once again illegal in Utah and in the legal cross-hairs lays 900 couples and families that were formed in the interim of the action that opened the flood gate the 27th of December 2013 to Jan 6th, 2014.
Of course it’s the custom action of political warfare to use the time frame as a time when the guard is down and the public attention is on Christmas and the New Year, so to say this wasn’t politically planned or that it doesn’t strategically work out for the left is kind of a stretch of the imagination.

Now, the Plaintiff(s) of course argue there are now 900 family’s lives that will be altered inexcusably in the negative if their marriages are now considered to be “moot”. Can you imagine if heterosexuals being married woke up one morning and found the Government all of a sudden breaks the news to you that you and your husband were not bound? How’s that going to work out on the tax filing for these married couples this year? Do they get the marriage tax credit or is the year broken up with a Government Mandated Divorce?

The United States Supreme Court issued the stay on performing marriages for same-sex couples, thereby creating a Governmental Discrimination Wall between those same-sex couples who rushed into their marriages and those who had actually have planned their weddings into the new year that of course has placed a great deal of frustration for the Grooms, and.. the Grooms in the Bridal affair.

Can’t you just hear Barack Obama screaming like Ronald Reagan did to Gorbechev about the Wall in Russia, “Tear down this Wall” to the United States Supreme Court?

If anyone’s been through the wedding planning process you know this “Wall” probably just created one of the biggest domestic violence issues of our time that the Government can be held liable for? Don’t be surprised if the domestic dick-tying knot that stayed the weddings comes crashing down on the State of Utah being sued for the botched wedding collapses, financial ruin, heart ache and mental anguish for a lot more than 900 couples, which could triple the State’s expenses over the matter.

The State of Utah’s had a great year, but this issue has the potential to wipe out the whole State’s rainy day fund even though the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals has agreed to expedite hearing the case issuing a February deadline for written briefs and a March date for Oral arguments; which in no way reflects a sexual preference or performance for the parties.

A colleague barked to me that I “should forget about “social issues” and get back on the track of saving our Country by only concentrating on electing Senators and Representatives to combat Obama and make him moot, because he would never be impeached because he was the first black president.”

I just kind of casually remarked that issues indeed were products of “principles” and these principles have potential to in fact weaken or strengthen our whole country; for instance the issue of “slavery”? Did we not fight a very bloody civil war over that divided national principle? How about “prohibition” that created wet and dry states and put a stain on the Constitution that is still there for everyone to see? Anyone recall the Utah War when the Federal Government sent out a battalion of the army on an expedition to put down the ‘Mormon rebellion’ over marriage? Of course these are not issues that ever come down to the shedding of blood right? Wrong.

Of course we should only concentrate on the State’s elections of Senators and Representatives to make Obama moot, how silly of me?

She conjectured it was ludicrous to think of Obama serving a third term, and I asked her if she based that ludicrous thought on the fact Obama had upheld so many of the other parts of the Constitution sacred as well as construction laws of the Constitution?

I continued; Thinking that there was no way he could get that part of the Constitution changed in three more years compared to what he has done in the last 5 years with Obamacare taking over 1/5 of the nation’s economy, gutting the military ranks, and the more than 2 dozen scandals that have erupted we are finding out took place over the last 5 years beginning with the violation of the qualification of the Office of the President held within the Constitution Obama is a walking talking violation of, is the real underestimation of the past deceptions and fraud don’t you think? Being delusional certainly comes down to a denial of the secular facts.

This stay by the United States Supreme Court was not the first that Justice Sotomayor parted ways from the Obama Administration. Briepart News reported also on forcing Nuns to either sign a waiver or carry condoms as birth control to hand out at the “Little Sisters of the poor” sanctuaries. If the nuns didn’t sign they’d get shot by the Obamacare with millions of dollars in fines and if they didn’t carry condoms (birth control) they’d get shot by the gun toting IRS, either way they get shot! What choice is that? The nuns felt if they signed they died, and if they carried the died to based on their religion.

This is very poignant to understand for it sets the precedent of strictly being able to abstain; and I understand that very well. What it does is plain and simply bashing the brains out of the free conscience with a sledge hammer!

How far away from the free conscience, free expression, and free enterprise has Obama and Hillary Clinton departed from in the visionary creative imaginative paradigm of Steve Jobs who was so gifted in those realms of order in Apple Computers, and in fact the 60’s revolutionary that the spying and wire tapping in America is puttering out in the rotten core of leadership? Is this what America was all about in the 60’s?

Can we in fact look forward to a fresh start in pioneers forging ahead in technology without the shackles of Government locking the conscience down when the tenders of our Constitution are burned by those who have become what they hated and fought against when they were young? How could they have come to this?

Through the lack of trust and the fears of insecurity they have calculated that risks are no longer viable. If there ever was a death wish they magnify it and compound it exponentially in their pollution of the minds in America. We have a far more dangerous and greater pollution going on in the minds of our young people then we do in the dirtiest cities of America when it comes to the carbon footprint from the left being tread upon the Constitution.

Unfortunately Obama is to the Democrats of today what Nixon was to the Republicans in the White House for Republicans in the 60’s, an embarrassment who needs to be fired now as a disability!

Consider now what is happening just with this case in Utah for just one moment with me. What happens to our Nation when we have States that allow same-sex Marriage and States that don’t allow same-sex Marriage? Isn’t a chasm created within our Nation that weakens it? How long in the divisions of these principles of our Constitution is it before one State refuses to fight alongside another State?

Can you see one State seeing another State in the United States bombed and one or the other states thinking, “that’s ok, it’s not our problem and frankly they deserved it?” That’s how important the decisions on the social issues of our day are, and the way in which they are fed to the American People. When you force feed someone, or in fact force nuns to sign or carry, what sympathies do you create?

One of the very good things happening in our Country right now is the sides are being declared with very loud trumpets and that everyone is being effected like a virus that has broken out, it’s being carried to each house. Obamacare exempts no one from the law in its final determination, ( of course Obama has provided exemptions from those who don’t have the stomach at this time to be force fed Obamacare big corporations, Government workers in divisions, and even some small businesses), which is the way of gaining a coalition of support politically.

If it was such a good law why not lay it down for everyone at the same time the way our Constitution establishes that everyone could be fairly treated under the law?

In fact, Obamacare in its own form of discrimination through exemptions declares an inequality showing you plainly Obama is not re-distributing wealth based on a fundamental financial equality, he’s securing it for himself and those in his income bracket of elite cronies who have simultaneously been propping him up out of the law securing for us a ‘natural born citizen’ in the Office of the President?

Like a puppet on the fat Republican Rhino strings of Bohner, why do you think there has not been an OPEN HEARING on Obama’s eligibility thus far in the House of Representatives? Why else wouldn’t there be one on the schedule right now with a stop so thick on the finances of Government that Obama and the Senate were choked out of their own pay checks because the House demanded only themselves fit for a pay-check until our Constitution and the facts of Obama’s Eligibility were aired out in the transparency promised to us?

We are on perilous ground right now folks with an abandonment of the United States principles of equality under the law that is weakening, dividing, and threatening with an invitation to enemies of the United States an invasion of our own backyards. War is being courted and danced with by our leaders in Washington DC who have refused the invitations of peace and prosperity through trust and productive innovative good risk of our conscience with the fundamental fraud of Obama’s ineligibility at the wheel of the emperor walking down the streets with no clothes on.

Like a homophobic fever unleashed upon the U.S. Representatives and U.S. Senators there’s a naked man at the wheel and they refuse to see his appendaged pride flopping around or at least having the courage to dismiss him as a disability with the Constitution’s demands for a natural born citizen as a man would properly protect his wife and children from an exposing assailant. The duties of a gentleman have been removed from the House’ and Senate’s Order, and what can be said of these hired assassins and pirates of principle?

What are we left to do but to plead to our God to open the eyes, and unstop the ears, and expose with equity and justice the solutions we seek as these are our brothers who we would rather fall by the sword for, than take up arms against.

We do know that our tears are seen, and our voices are heard, and that our God is on time and that the Union will stand. The events needed to preserve that will happen for love is perfect and will have her perfect way on Earth as it is in Heaven. I pray we are granted the strength we need for the day in which we live.


Note Dec 26th,2013: Breaking News : Orrin Hatch R - U.S Senator from Utah and Mitch McConnell R- U.S. Senator from Kentcky just requested two sheriffs kits produced by Michael Volin of WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com (WOBC) with the purpose of informing the public and elected officials of the forgery of the long-form birth certificate image posted since April 27, 2011 on the White House website. These kits contain the same evidence released in March 1,2012 (and a little more) that I included in my case against Obama that went from Georgia State- Georgia State Supreme- to U.S. Supreme 12-5276 in Judy v. Obama.

Please urge and encourage your Representatives to OPEN AND TRANSPARENT HEARINGS in the House of Representatives on Obama's eligibility as the solution to eliminating Obamacare. These hearings must be held and the evidence must be heard that are in the Sheriff's kits most all of the Representatives have received now.

If these hearings are conducted in the open and reported in the open, the evidence will mount collectively and the U.S. Senate although it has a majority of Democrats will have to concede to the facts and evidences or will be seen as completely unfit for their duties and as incompetent. Utah would most likely see more benefits come from supporting the Candidates like myself, (well, Candidate as myself because there were no other candidates in the entire U.S.A. who stood up for principle regardless of party), fighting for equal protections under the law in pushing for Open and Transparent Hearings in Congress with two million dollars on Obama's Verification Eligibility qualification hearings on the stage to remove him as a disability according to Amend 14, Sec.3, than they would ever hope to find fighting this and appealing to an unauthorized usurper's recommendation of Justice Sotomayer; and it would happen a lot faster because there is no stay in place while they fight it in court.

You can probably count on a battle for years while gay couples happily marry and begin contemplating suing churches for discrimination of not being wed in the churches and temples next, because that's going to be very lucrative against congregations if the churches and the state keep mixing-up and combining the terminology of marriage. I wonder who the stay would have gone to if Sotomayor wasn't an Obama nomination?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITCr420K4i8


Like CODY ROBERT JUDY'S NEW 2016 PAGE ON FACEBOOK HERE
Follow me on Twitter: Official Cody Robert Judy 2016 on Tweeter here

You Can Help Me
[ If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign”, or ABC Campaign ,which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President please make a contributions here:

Let me now wish everyone a very happy and warm New Year as we pray for the Lord to save our Country and restore America from the dilapidation we now find ourselves and the principles of the Constitution in, for this I am Taking A Stand.

Sincerely,

Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES TV
Get Cody's Book: Taking A Stand

The Axe-Grinding Propelling Utah's Self Inflicted Injury In a Rush of Same-Sex Marriage?

The Axe-Grinding Propelling Utah's Self Inflicted Injury In Marriage?
Featured Editorial at The Post & Email

The eyes of the Nation fell on Utah as the first same-sex weddings in Utah were held a week ago today,(which just happened to be my birthday Dec 27th) just hours after Federal Judge, the Honorable Shelby, ruled the state's 2004 Referendum banning same-sex marriage was unconstitutional. The R-Governor of Utah Gary Herbert was quick to draw his axe saying he'd use his power "to defend traditional marriage within the state's borders" calling the Judge an 'activist' attempting to override the will of the people of Utah.

What Utah residence that voted for the referendum might find shocking is the same so-called "conservative leaders" including their Governor,U.S. Senator's and Congressmen in the greatest breach of the Constitution's history, have in fact been siding with the 'activist' agenda and doing pretty much anything and everything to see to it that the "transformation agenda" was carried out in supporting Obama's eligibility that is contrary to the United States Constitution's qualification requirements for a President, and in fact the U.S. Supreme Court Justice whose seat was filled by none other then Obama's recommendation.

Sotomayor handles emergency requests from Utah as well as other Rocky Mountain states.

Now Utah's people, (less then a dozen whom voted for the Presidential Candidate who challenged not only Obama's Eligibility in 2012 and 2013 in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 that included the legal Sheriff's Report of over 2500 hours of investigation stating Obama's Long form Birth Certificate was a proven fabrication, but also McCain's in 2008 in Judy v. McCain living in their own backyard), find themselves fighting for the very hair of marriage. Is it irony the whole state of Utah now finds they're subjects of one of the Justices Obama nominated in Justice Sotomeyer in their State Attorney General's appeal that will easily cost the state at the very least two million dollars?

Utah's no stranger to the political campaigns of Cody Robert Judy (myself). No Sirree, I ran in 2002 for the 1st Congressional District, and 3 times for the U.S. Senate Seat: 2000 Judy v. Hatch, 2004 Judy v. Bennett and in 2010 Judy v. Bennett again, as my book Taking A Stand recalls in detail.

The Utah Referendum known as Amendment 3 in 2004 was passed by 65.86% stated as follows: 1) Marriage consists only of the legal union between a man and a woman. 2) No other domestic union, however denominated, may be recognized as a marriage or given the same or substantially equivalent legal effect.

The referendum was sold as a bill of goods that its proponents said would do 3 things:
1)Prevent state courts from making a ruling that current Utah marriage legislation as being unconstitutional.
2)Prevent state courts from forcing recognition of out-of-state marriages.
3)Prevent the creation of "counterfeit marriages", such as civil unions.
They also said the amendment would not hurt heterosexual marriage, common law marriages, or the right to will property to whomever one wishes.

In one chop Federal District Judge Shelby found, in a case brought by two gay men (which were different people from the two people in Utah who voted for Cody Robert Judy in 2012), making the claim that "the state law violated their right to equal protection and due process under the U.S. Constitution",that the state's current laws deny its gay and lesbian citizens their fundamental right to marry and, in so doing, demean the dignity of these same-sex couples for no rational reason," Shelby asserted and "Accordingly, the court finds that these laws are unconstitutional."

This is a perfect case scenario to illustrate that "The Will of the People" in a particular State does not always over-turn "The Republic" based on the U.S. Constitution's "Will of the People" if indeed you considered the will of the 593,297 people voting in Utah as slightly higher then the 2 gay men stating their rights were being infringed plus the one judge who interpreted it as so. So, if your going to remember the rights of 2 gay men in Utah why won't you remember my rights and standing as a Presidential Candidate having standing in my damaged campaign based on Obama's ineligibility? That's the idea in a Constitution Republic. The will of the people is reined in when their will over-rides the law. It is possible for the majority's will to supersede the laws of the Constitution and Obama's Campaign is a perfect example of this happening when no court would even hear me.

The heavily populated LDS or Mormon state of Utah wants the marriages to stop while it appeals a judge's decision, which said banning gay couples from marrying violates their right to equal treatment under the law.

Its an interesting argument to wonder if the minority communities such as the gay and lesbian circles would ask their rights be upheld to marry, but yet spurn a court or Congress who heard my campaigns plight based upon the Constitution's requirement for a natural born citizen in the Office of the President who was born in the U.S. to Citizen parents to which there was never a doubt, (Minor v. Happersett), or in matters of national security do they feel leaving some doubt is okay and my campaign doesn't deserve to be treated fairly under the law?

Is it your minority and your rights until you get them, and then forget or spurn anyone's when it comes to a trial on Obama's eligibility I'd ask the 900 gay couples who rushed off and got hitched in Utah? Don't forget I ran as a Democrat and had claim on Obama's eligibility in 2012 through my 2008 claim as well without being bogged down with the 'racist' argument those who gave McCain a pass on inherited from the Main Stream Media.

Back to the case on the rights of every individual to life,liberty, and pursuit of happiness, which I think is a better argument then attacking the 'statute' of the State to marry. I've long held the State should get out of the 'mariage' business and into the civil-union business leaving 'marriage' for the churches. As long as the State's like Utah fight for a statute of the state on 'marriage', ever citizen has claim on the statute sponsored by the state regardless of gender.

The legal argument of getting the state out of the marriage business and into the civil union business for all, should be the law that Congress should "make no law respecting the establishment of any particular religion", held in the First Amendment "or prohibiting the free exercise thereof", but if they are determined on it the arguments get really weak when it comes to claiming some kind of utopia for a child raised by a mother and a father especially with a mockery of the utopia that the 60% divorce rate in the country blast out of the water.

Lawyers ask Supreme Court to allow same-sex unions in Utah
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/01/03/lawyers-ask-supreme-court-to-allow-same-sex-unions-in-utah/

"Attorney Peggy Tomsic said the state's request for an emergency stay on same-sex unions should be denied because Utah has not demonstrated how the weddings are harming anyone else. The state has also failed to show it will likely win an appeal of the Dec. 20 ruling from a federal judge, she said."

"Tomsic wrote that the state's' "hodgepodge of articles that purportedly show that same-sex parents are inferior to opposite-sex parents" is not only false, but fails to address the constitutional issues addressed in the ruling."

"Utah state attorneys argue that children are best raised by a mother and father in a good relationship. Tomsic, who represents three gay and lesbian couples from Utah, countered that argument by saying gay and lesbian couples can also be good parents."

"Respondents agree with applicants that marriage provides enormous benefits for children," Tomsic wrote, "But excluding the children of same-sex couples from those benefits causes severe harm to those children, without providing any benefit to the children of opposite-sex parents."

"Utah insists that states have the authority to define marriage as between a man and woman. Tomsic argues that the state's rationale for asking for a halt to the same-sex marriages doesn't make sense."

"Applicants cannot simultaneously concede that being stripped of one's marital status causes profound, irreparable harm and urge the Court to inflict that very injury on the married Respondents and other married same-sex couples," Tomsic said."

One of the state of Utah's major papers The Deseret News ran an op-ed declaring the actions of Honorable Shelby to be nothing more than "Judicial Tyranny" and a mighty big case of ignoring "precedent" and "rational arguments'.

I'd ask The Deseret News, "How's that feel?", as they bewail the plight of "not even being heard" because of summary judgement while they have neglected the very tenant of the Constitution on Obama's Eligibility that if upheld in a conservative way would not have got them where they're at?

The tepid argument that Republicans cannot do anything with a majority in the House with Obama's Eligibility flies in the face of the check and balance system we have, and the House is the bigger part of that 'check' as they cut the finances for the Government to run. If the House had a transparent and open hearing on Obama's eligibility framed without the error that Obamacare has become infamous for, the Senate would look like the greatest bunch of incontinent elders the world has ever seen to deny the facts and rational argument.

As you can see, its difficult to sympathize with leaders and proponents whose opinions and beliefs are so devastatingly easy to slice as fulsome. It does seem a bit odd that Utah has come under the spotlight as a beacon of leadership under the "marriage umbrella" as to represent conservatism when adjusting the marital norms that have served society for millennia in face of the reputation of christian polygamy practiced for more than a millennia in the Bible with the accounts of Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses,David, Solomon, and certainly Joseph Smith and Brigham Young.

Its a wonder the State has a leg to stand on or that they are not laughed out of Washington DC for the exact same reasons I've pointed out? They have cooperated with Obama fully and haven't had the courage or intelligence to lead Grandma across the street, let alone a Nation under the United States Constitution, when you take into account Obama's ineligibility in their face.

See Now Part II. The Axe-Grinding Propelling Utah's Self Inflicted Injury In Marriage? Sotomayor Stays


Note Dec 26th,2013: Breaking News : Orrin Hatch R - U.S Senator from Utah and Mitch McConnell R- U.S. Senator from Kentcky just requested two sheriffs kits produced by Michael Volin of WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com (WOBC) with the purpose of informing the public and elected officials of the forgery of the long-form birth certificate image posted since April 27, 2011 on the White House website. These kits contain the same evidence released in March 1,2012 (and a little more) that I included in my case against Obama that went from Georgia State- Georgia State Supreme- to U.S. Supreme 12-5276 in Judy v. Obama.

Please urge and encourage your Representatives to OPEN AND TRANSPARENT HEARINGS in the House of Representatives on Obama's eligibility as the solution to eliminating Obamacare. These hearings must be held and the evidence must be heard that are in the Sheriff's kits most all of the Representatives have received now.

If these hearings are conducted in the open and reported in the open, the evidence will mount collectively and the U.S. Senate although it has a majority of Democrats will have to concede to the facts and evidences or will be seen as completely unfit for their duties and as incompetent. Utah would most likely see more benefits come from supporting the Candidates like myself, (well, Candidate as myself because there were no other candidates in the entire U.S.A. who stood up for principle regardless of party), fighting for equal protections under the law in pushing for Open and Transparent Hearings in Congress with two million dollars on Obama's Verification Eligibility qualification hearings on the stage to remove him as a disability according to Amend 14, Sec.3, than they would ever hope to find fighting this and appealing to an unauthorized usurper's recommendation of Justice Sotomayer; and it would happen a lot faster because there is no stay in place while they fight it in court.

You can probably count on a battle for years while gay couples happily marry and begin contemplating suing churches for discrimination of not being wed in the churches and temples next, because that's going to be very lucrative against congregations if the churches and the state keep mixing-up and combining the terminology of marriage. I wonder who the stay would have gone to if Sotomayor wasn't an Obama nomination?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITCr420K4i8


Like CODY ROBERT JUDY'S NEW 2016 PAGE ON FACEBOOK HERE
Follow me on Twitter: Official Cody Robert Judy 2016 on Tweeter here

You Can Help Me
[ If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign”, or ABC Campaign ,which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President please make a contributions here:

Let me now wish everyone a very happy and warm New Year as we pray for the Lord to save our Country and restore America from the dilapidation we now find ourselves and the principles of the Constitution in, for this I am Taking A Stand.

Sincerely,

Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES TV
Get Cody's Book: Taking A Stand

Straight & Gay Realities From the Womb or Nature

Straight & Gay Realities from the Womb or Nature



Hello, and welcome to The Lion’s Den Show, I’m your host Cody Robert Judy. You’ll have to pardon me today, it was one of those ‘under the weather days’ for me. You know one of those days where you drag yourself to the pharmacy isle for pain relief and not only find what your looking for, but also find some relief that your not the only one feeling like that because as your walking by people you hear them sigh, and grunt, and groan as they are rummaging through the available medicines tryn to bend down and find them- and you just know they had the same kind of morning or day you did.

Today is a strange day and the forces of opposition are working overtime it seems to unravel the family unit. I myself am in the middle of a regrettable divorce my fourth one, with 3 women. Now of course I wasn’t married to them all at the same time, as my wife’s attorney would have you belief. No..I’ve never had but one wife at a time and haven’t been very successful with that.

I think to put it in grocery store terms I am kind of like those frozen concentrate juice things you buy, where it’s going to taste a lot better if you dilute it with 3 cans of water. So, after this divorce I think I’m just going to pretend I’m 18 years old again and dating. I’ll be needing a Mon-Tuesday girlfriend, a Wensday-Thursday girlfriend, and a Friday-Saturday girlfriend.

Now in all fairness to me, I’ve tried to explain that to my x-wifes, but they don’t want to believe me. We get into a marriage and sure enough it ends up bad for everyone. What’s strange, and I’ve always said this, you never marry a better person, just a different set of problems.

Yeah I think it will just work out a whole lot better for them and me, if they in their right mind will read the directions on my forehead that says dilute with 3 cans of water.

And Jesus’s Disciples questioned the matter also, saying in Matthew 19:10 ... “if the case of the man be so with his wife, it is not good to marry”. And then Jesus elaborates to them that there are different ‘natures’ that actually are born out of the womb. Now if you just happen to be of a different ‘nature’ then say what ‘the society’ your living in subscribes to, well your actually gonna be walking through hell most of the days of your life, and that includes people like me who are concentrates and those of the gay community.

Divorce now seems common; around 55 to 60 % of marriages end up in divorce. This I believe is due to ‘pride’ and ‘selfishness’, and is more a result of the lack of recognition and appreciation towards your spouse, or the opposite gender, and what you “think” happiness entails or is suppose to entail anyway.

Jesus said Matthew 19:12 “All men cannot receive this saying, save they to whom it is given. For there are some eunuchs, which were so, born from their mother’s womb: and there are some Eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven’s sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.” Now for those who don’t know eunuchs is a reference in the Bible to a class of de-masculated men. Men who are either refusing marriage in a celibacy vow, or a homosexual.

Now what Jesus is saying here is that we men don’t all have the same natures, and you women shouldn’t expect that we do, Even within the gay community there are different ways in which that comes about. In reverse order, You may have a priest that chooses celibacy for the kingdom of heaven’s sake, you might have a homosexual that follows that pattern based on the people he hangs out with which could also be a little more along the lines of a transvestites nature, and you can definitely have a homosexual that came out of his mother’s womb that way.

It’s interesting Jesus says, your all not going to get this, save they to whom it is given. Jesus himself said, Great are the words of Isaiah and listen to what Isaiah said: “ For thus saith the Lord unto the eunuchs that keep my Sabbaths, and choose the things that please me, and take hold of my covenant: Even unto them will I give in mine house and within my walls a place and a name better than of sons and of daughters: I will give them an everlasting name, that shall not be cut off.”
Now the covenant basically referred to here is any contract, or bonds or obligations, oaths, vows, performances, connections, umm associations or even expectations that are made and sealed in the name of God are good with God. Now these connections can vary between genders. There’s a whole host of them. Even in the histories of the Native Americans we can find the associations and connections that were made by homosexual individuals who were set apart in tribes and consecrated to representing the tranquility of brotherhood between other tribes.

This is to say that man lying with another man is not always bad. It can represent a good, a harmony. And likewise we all ready know that a man lying with a women can also be good, and can it can be bad.

I want to post this article for you to read, because I think it very clearly shows the incentives our Judicial Branch of Government, in more of a polluted justice, is giving for women if they will file divorce. And this article gives some interesting statistics as to the percentages of women verses men who are filing divorce. I don’t want to spoil it all for you, but here is the link, the article is entitled Divorce Is Highway Robbery:

http://byrdeye.blogspot.com/2008/02/divorce-is-highway-robbery.html

Now of course divorce has been around as long as marriage has it seems, and I hope you won’t think ill of me for delving into this subject. My hope is perhaps you may find in discovery, some new ways to find more wisdom and understanding with your spouse and the opposite gender.

One thing all these statistics tell us, and that is when you pit man against nature, nature always wins. I’ll say that a different way, when you pit a society who perverts the natural laws of men into something unnatural, well that society will self corrupt.

In Jeremiah 3:20 we read, “Surely as a wife treacherously departeth from her husband, so have ye dealt treacherously with me, O house of Israel, saith the Lord”
Our society is indeed being torn apart with a lot of different things, and a lot of different agendas. It’s time that we built upon the firm foundations of ‘nature’ rather than being found in an opposition of nature, which ultimately spells failure.
Judgments about relationships that are wrong and appose nature can do a great harm to a society, and the opposite is true also. Righteous Judgments’, or good ones, can be a great blessing to society and my hope in this segment was to open your eyes to understanding the natures of men and how God has created the institutions for harmony for all relationships, and it only takes a little research of the wisest men in our history to gain their understanding and wisdom.