BREAKING NEWS: #SCOTUS -The COURT WITHIN THE COURT Judges Recused in OBAMA's INELIGIBLE Case?

BREAKING NEWS:

FEATURED EDITORIAL: The Post & Email

SPECIAL REPORT

 #SCOTUS The COURT WITHIN THE COURT 

Judges Recused in OBAMA's INELIGIBLE Case?

What may come down to the most important APPLICATION filed in the United States Supreme Court History the Court received today the reason they cannot accept an unqualified person in the Office of the President. "Without a qualified President under the United States Constitution's demand, in Obama's case for a 'natural born Citizen' ie., 'Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents', the People's Vote dismisses the U.S. Supreme Court's Jurisdiction under the U.S. Constitution. It's one or the other", said Petitioner and Candidate for President Cody Robert Judy.

If you have only just begin to watch or tune-in-to the longest lasting Case challenging Obama's eligibility under the United States Constitution, The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for President has a Special Feature for you. We have prepared a 60 Second Video for you to catch up on what has happened thus far.

SCOTUS MATRIX Judy v. Obama 14-9396

NEW FILING -RECOGNIZED IN COURT TODAY

The new document delivered in the Court today with USPS Tracking No. EK 559361263 US , is entitled 'APPLICATION FOR STAY ON DENIAL PENDING FULL REVIEW ON THE RECUSAL OF JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT and KAGAN FROM PROCEEDINGS'

The Document is here on SCRIBD and following it I will discuss some of the 'Why's' of its importance if you care to stick around after reading it.

Document Found also embedded at the End of this Post. Delivery Noticed by By: J KOUROS  //  WASHINGTON,  DC  20543 //  11:04 am

WHY WAS THIS DOCUMENT FILED

The obvious reason that Obama has nominated Justice Sotomayor and Justice Kagan may seem the obvious reasons to all, so they real reasons have more to do with the 'hostile judgments' that have been received by Justice Sotomayor's own hand which have lent the credibility to the APPLICATION. 

In other words, I haven't just 'supposed' from the get-go that a simple 'nomination', much different by-the-way and should not be confused with the word 'appointment'. Obama did not 'appoint' Justice Sotomayor or Justice Kagan. The were 'nominated' and then received their confirmations from the Congress.

Now I have left it to Justice Sotomayor to reveal or implicate the magnitude of impact that has and by her own judgments implicate the reasons Justice Kagan should also be considered in the RECUSAL also. We already know the Justice Sotomayor has refused to recuse herself on this matter as she has been the one that issued a judgement on the APPLICATION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME.  

Justice Sotomayor has in my opinion 'Denied' something the extension of time request in a hostile act towards justice. It just doesn't make sense to anyone. The Court had set a September 28th 2nd Conference and the APPLICATION simply made a more formal path towards that. 

At times a Court will assign "Forma Pauperis" (IFP) motions to a Magistrate Judge. This is to say a Jr. under them. While I do not know the Judge who 'Denied' my forma pauperis status, in the U.S. Supreme Court, we do know Justice Sotomayor is in charge of motions and applications coming out of the Tenth Circuit/Utah Division and that my forma pauperis status was 'confirmed' by both the Tenth Circuit and Utah District Court. In the latter it was indeed a Magistrate Judge and not the Judge of the Case that granted my forma pauperis status.

So we do know that under Justice Sotomayor, what has been relatively a simply admission into the Lower Circuit and District Courts by the lack of funds presented to the Court in a quite lengthy 5 page report that includes things as intricate as 'clothing allowances', 'mileage on your car', down to your utilities and food budget , as well as the U.S. Supreme Court in 2012 in case 12-5276 which also granted my forma pauperis status with no problem and my financial status not getting better through the last three years but rather worse, that Justice Sotomayor has ruled in a way that would be seen as hostile towards the poor, and hostile towards justice.

We could surmise differently by the Court's Scheduling a September 28th hearing after I submitted a Motion for Reconsideration and Review on my IFP status, however, the DENIAL on the 25A15 Application for a Time Extension that is very elemental as a request for the Court really stacks the deck about an un-hostile judicial environment. 

It rather comes down to understanding that if I was a beggar on the streets about to die of thirst without a drink of water and Justice Sotomayor was passing with a six pack of water, she would let me die rather then give me one. I have allowed her to make that very clear to me before moving for a Recusal, and why would I take another chance with Kagan in the room understanding the conditions of Sotomayor and Kagan are similar? I just couldn't in all fairness myself.

It is impossible to notice that no Supreme Court Justice can make it to the Confirmation Hearings of the Congress without a 'Nomination' by a qualified President. While it may be token for the President it is still vitally important and if the Court were to find in my Case damages were properly actuate undertaking the Case  De Novo,  which it can and which has been requested, there would indeed have to be 'further proceedings' in the Cases of consideration which might come in the form of an Act of Congress also then signed by a qualified President. 

For all those people out there who consider Obama a friend, I say to them, you can continue to be his friend, but in considering the actions required by our Constitution, are you willing to give up every right you have under the Constitution's powers based on friendship? We are not considering Obama as a friend, we are considering him in these deliberations as a unqualified person in the Office of the President. 

In other words, you can still have a friend after he is kicked out of the Office of the President, nothing changes, but you simply cannot afford sacrificing any one of the Constitutional Rights we have under the umbrella. Shall we discuss some of those rights? 

Well, just recently the Supreme Court ruled that same-sex marriage was a guaranteed right under the 14th Amendment. If there is no Constitution there certainly is no 14th Amendment. 

The Court also ruled recently that you as a private citizen have the right to bear arms under the 2nd Amendment. If there is no Constitution there is no 2nd Amendment.

Here's a list of Cases the Supreme Court has ruled upon that allow free religion, free speech, a free press, and freedom to assemble under the First Amendment. How many of you enjoy rights under the 1st Amendment and are willing to sacrifice those because Obama's your friend?  

The point is those apposed to my action in Court actually are opposing their own rights under the Constitution of the United States and the Justices of the Supreme Court opposed to my Case are apposing their own tenure. We can see how important the Constitution is on both sides of the isle liberal and conservative and to secure your rights, those rights,  you simply must have a Constitution and a qualified person in the Office of the President. 

I need your help in passing this on to your neighbors so everyone gets an understanding of what is happening and can thus support or pass on it. I can't think of a much crueler punishment though then for people to suddenly wake up one morning and have the Constitution of the United States gone and all the rights established under it. That happened to me you know and it is I have to say the biggest reason I have fought so hard. I understand it's ramifications.

WHAT DOES THIS APPLICATION DO

What this APPLICATION actually does is request or demand that the entire Court come in for a decision on Justice Sotomayor and Justice Kagan, consider the actions in the APPLICATION and the Full Court can 'STAY' her denial of the Time Extension and also consider the basis of a Recusal. I wrote once we had to get the EYE of the Court, and we did with Justice Sotomayor acting. Now we gain the EYE of the Entire Court if we didn't have it. What this action does is ruin any probability that this Case can be channeled into a dismissal by a single Justice. Sotomayer controls the entire Tenth Circuit and Kagan controls for the Court both the Sixth and Seventh Circuits. This combines to cover, well see for yourself. This a Court within a Court. ( UT.,WY.,CO.,KS.,OK.,N.M.,WI.,ILL.,IN.,MI.,OH.,KY.,TN.,) From the APPLICATION  FOR STAY ON SOTOMAYERS DENIAL which asks for a Full Review, meaning from the Full Court.

"    The reason this Court cannot exempt an unqualified President is because the Constitution is then made null and void. By that this Court’s official Jurisdiction is also ended under the U.S. Constitution, overruled by the People’s vote.

   It is therefore requisite of the Court to consider very seriously the qualifications for the Office of the President this Case affords and the People’s vote particularly relevant under fraudulent circumstances is not valid."

Now I think the people who have money are about the least likely people to understand this. The Lord says it is very difficult for a rich man to understand. In fact he says its easier for a camel to walk through the eye of a needle than a wealthy man into the kingdom of God, nevertheless it is possible.( ref. Holy Bible-Mark 10:25; Luke 18:25) At the same time, I can think of no man who needs the Constitution more than a rich man, for without it things change very quickly. 

There is no rich people who have supported my Case. It is very true they do not know or understand what is at stake. If they did, they would be supporting it. That is why it is important for we poor people to help them see and understand. We as poor people are rich in understanding and it is our job to help the rich people in their poverty of understanding this. 

Pass it on, support this anyway you can.

Cody Robert Judy - Candidate for President '08-'12-'16

You get to decide that. I'd say don't trust bad legal advice and contribute what you can TODAY FOR A BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW

Cody Robert Judy- Presidential Candidate '08-'12-'16

www.codyjudy.us

Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts

12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial

13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008

14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case

15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016

The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President

www.codyjudy.us

www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

INSPIRING - I believe in You

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI

APPLICATION FOR STAY PENDING FULL REVIEW ON THE RECUSAL OF JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT AND KAGAN FROM PROCEEDINGS

  Application for Stay on Denial- Judy v. Obama 14-9396

Part II. The Axe-Grinding Propelling Utah's Self Inflicted Injury In Marriage? Sotomayor Stays

Part II. The Axe-Grinding Propelling Utah's Self Inflicted Injury In Marriage? Sotomayor Stays
Part I. Featured Editorial

Wow! If you ever thought that if you lost or won at the Federal District Court and Appeals Court that you couldn’t win or lose at the United States Supreme Court level, this case just proved your idea’s wrong. Of course it doesn’t happen that often, but don’t say it hasn’t or never will happened. The United States Supreme Court Justice Sotomayer issued a “stay” today on issuing same-sex marriage licenses in Utah after the stay had been declined by the Federal Court and the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals.

A same-sex marriage is now once again illegal in Utah and in the legal cross-hairs lays 900 couples and families that were formed in the interim of the action that opened the flood gate the 27th of December 2013 to Jan 6th, 2014.
Of course it’s the custom action of political warfare to use the time frame as a time when the guard is down and the public attention is on Christmas and the New Year, so to say this wasn’t politically planned or that it doesn’t strategically work out for the left is kind of a stretch of the imagination.

Now, the Plaintiff(s) of course argue there are now 900 family’s lives that will be altered inexcusably in the negative if their marriages are now considered to be “moot”. Can you imagine if heterosexuals being married woke up one morning and found the Government all of a sudden breaks the news to you that you and your husband were not bound? How’s that going to work out on the tax filing for these married couples this year? Do they get the marriage tax credit or is the year broken up with a Government Mandated Divorce?

The United States Supreme Court issued the stay on performing marriages for same-sex couples, thereby creating a Governmental Discrimination Wall between those same-sex couples who rushed into their marriages and those who had actually have planned their weddings into the new year that of course has placed a great deal of frustration for the Grooms, and.. the Grooms in the Bridal affair.

Can’t you just hear Barack Obama screaming like Ronald Reagan did to Gorbechev about the Wall in Russia, “Tear down this Wall” to the United States Supreme Court?

If anyone’s been through the wedding planning process you know this “Wall” probably just created one of the biggest domestic violence issues of our time that the Government can be held liable for? Don’t be surprised if the domestic dick-tying knot that stayed the weddings comes crashing down on the State of Utah being sued for the botched wedding collapses, financial ruin, heart ache and mental anguish for a lot more than 900 couples, which could triple the State’s expenses over the matter.

The State of Utah’s had a great year, but this issue has the potential to wipe out the whole State’s rainy day fund even though the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals has agreed to expedite hearing the case issuing a February deadline for written briefs and a March date for Oral arguments; which in no way reflects a sexual preference or performance for the parties.

A colleague barked to me that I “should forget about “social issues” and get back on the track of saving our Country by only concentrating on electing Senators and Representatives to combat Obama and make him moot, because he would never be impeached because he was the first black president.”

I just kind of casually remarked that issues indeed were products of “principles” and these principles have potential to in fact weaken or strengthen our whole country; for instance the issue of “slavery”? Did we not fight a very bloody civil war over that divided national principle? How about “prohibition” that created wet and dry states and put a stain on the Constitution that is still there for everyone to see? Anyone recall the Utah War when the Federal Government sent out a battalion of the army on an expedition to put down the ‘Mormon rebellion’ over marriage? Of course these are not issues that ever come down to the shedding of blood right? Wrong.

Of course we should only concentrate on the State’s elections of Senators and Representatives to make Obama moot, how silly of me?

She conjectured it was ludicrous to think of Obama serving a third term, and I asked her if she based that ludicrous thought on the fact Obama had upheld so many of the other parts of the Constitution sacred as well as construction laws of the Constitution?

I continued; Thinking that there was no way he could get that part of the Constitution changed in three more years compared to what he has done in the last 5 years with Obamacare taking over 1/5 of the nation’s economy, gutting the military ranks, and the more than 2 dozen scandals that have erupted we are finding out took place over the last 5 years beginning with the violation of the qualification of the Office of the President held within the Constitution Obama is a walking talking violation of, is the real underestimation of the past deceptions and fraud don’t you think? Being delusional certainly comes down to a denial of the secular facts.

This stay by the United States Supreme Court was not the first that Justice Sotomayor parted ways from the Obama Administration. Briepart News reported also on forcing Nuns to either sign a waiver or carry condoms as birth control to hand out at the “Little Sisters of the poor” sanctuaries. If the nuns didn’t sign they’d get shot by the Obamacare with millions of dollars in fines and if they didn’t carry condoms (birth control) they’d get shot by the gun toting IRS, either way they get shot! What choice is that? The nuns felt if they signed they died, and if they carried the died to based on their religion.

This is very poignant to understand for it sets the precedent of strictly being able to abstain; and I understand that very well. What it does is plain and simply bashing the brains out of the free conscience with a sledge hammer!

How far away from the free conscience, free expression, and free enterprise has Obama and Hillary Clinton departed from in the visionary creative imaginative paradigm of Steve Jobs who was so gifted in those realms of order in Apple Computers, and in fact the 60’s revolutionary that the spying and wire tapping in America is puttering out in the rotten core of leadership? Is this what America was all about in the 60’s?

Can we in fact look forward to a fresh start in pioneers forging ahead in technology without the shackles of Government locking the conscience down when the tenders of our Constitution are burned by those who have become what they hated and fought against when they were young? How could they have come to this?

Through the lack of trust and the fears of insecurity they have calculated that risks are no longer viable. If there ever was a death wish they magnify it and compound it exponentially in their pollution of the minds in America. We have a far more dangerous and greater pollution going on in the minds of our young people then we do in the dirtiest cities of America when it comes to the carbon footprint from the left being tread upon the Constitution.

Unfortunately Obama is to the Democrats of today what Nixon was to the Republicans in the White House for Republicans in the 60’s, an embarrassment who needs to be fired now as a disability!

Consider now what is happening just with this case in Utah for just one moment with me. What happens to our Nation when we have States that allow same-sex Marriage and States that don’t allow same-sex Marriage? Isn’t a chasm created within our Nation that weakens it? How long in the divisions of these principles of our Constitution is it before one State refuses to fight alongside another State?

Can you see one State seeing another State in the United States bombed and one or the other states thinking, “that’s ok, it’s not our problem and frankly they deserved it?” That’s how important the decisions on the social issues of our day are, and the way in which they are fed to the American People. When you force feed someone, or in fact force nuns to sign or carry, what sympathies do you create?

One of the very good things happening in our Country right now is the sides are being declared with very loud trumpets and that everyone is being effected like a virus that has broken out, it’s being carried to each house. Obamacare exempts no one from the law in its final determination, ( of course Obama has provided exemptions from those who don’t have the stomach at this time to be force fed Obamacare big corporations, Government workers in divisions, and even some small businesses), which is the way of gaining a coalition of support politically.

If it was such a good law why not lay it down for everyone at the same time the way our Constitution establishes that everyone could be fairly treated under the law?

In fact, Obamacare in its own form of discrimination through exemptions declares an inequality showing you plainly Obama is not re-distributing wealth based on a fundamental financial equality, he’s securing it for himself and those in his income bracket of elite cronies who have simultaneously been propping him up out of the law securing for us a ‘natural born citizen’ in the Office of the President?

Like a puppet on the fat Republican Rhino strings of Bohner, why do you think there has not been an OPEN HEARING on Obama’s eligibility thus far in the House of Representatives? Why else wouldn’t there be one on the schedule right now with a stop so thick on the finances of Government that Obama and the Senate were choked out of their own pay checks because the House demanded only themselves fit for a pay-check until our Constitution and the facts of Obama’s Eligibility were aired out in the transparency promised to us?

We are on perilous ground right now folks with an abandonment of the United States principles of equality under the law that is weakening, dividing, and threatening with an invitation to enemies of the United States an invasion of our own backyards. War is being courted and danced with by our leaders in Washington DC who have refused the invitations of peace and prosperity through trust and productive innovative good risk of our conscience with the fundamental fraud of Obama’s ineligibility at the wheel of the emperor walking down the streets with no clothes on.

Like a homophobic fever unleashed upon the U.S. Representatives and U.S. Senators there’s a naked man at the wheel and they refuse to see his appendaged pride flopping around or at least having the courage to dismiss him as a disability with the Constitution’s demands for a natural born citizen as a man would properly protect his wife and children from an exposing assailant. The duties of a gentleman have been removed from the House’ and Senate’s Order, and what can be said of these hired assassins and pirates of principle?

What are we left to do but to plead to our God to open the eyes, and unstop the ears, and expose with equity and justice the solutions we seek as these are our brothers who we would rather fall by the sword for, than take up arms against.

We do know that our tears are seen, and our voices are heard, and that our God is on time and that the Union will stand. The events needed to preserve that will happen for love is perfect and will have her perfect way on Earth as it is in Heaven. I pray we are granted the strength we need for the day in which we live.


Note Dec 26th,2013: Breaking News : Orrin Hatch R - U.S Senator from Utah and Mitch McConnell R- U.S. Senator from Kentcky just requested two sheriffs kits produced by Michael Volin of WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com (WOBC) with the purpose of informing the public and elected officials of the forgery of the long-form birth certificate image posted since April 27, 2011 on the White House website. These kits contain the same evidence released in March 1,2012 (and a little more) that I included in my case against Obama that went from Georgia State- Georgia State Supreme- to U.S. Supreme 12-5276 in Judy v. Obama.

Please urge and encourage your Representatives to OPEN AND TRANSPARENT HEARINGS in the House of Representatives on Obama's eligibility as the solution to eliminating Obamacare. These hearings must be held and the evidence must be heard that are in the Sheriff's kits most all of the Representatives have received now.

If these hearings are conducted in the open and reported in the open, the evidence will mount collectively and the U.S. Senate although it has a majority of Democrats will have to concede to the facts and evidences or will be seen as completely unfit for their duties and as incompetent. Utah would most likely see more benefits come from supporting the Candidates like myself, (well, Candidate as myself because there were no other candidates in the entire U.S.A. who stood up for principle regardless of party), fighting for equal protections under the law in pushing for Open and Transparent Hearings in Congress with two million dollars on Obama's Verification Eligibility qualification hearings on the stage to remove him as a disability according to Amend 14, Sec.3, than they would ever hope to find fighting this and appealing to an unauthorized usurper's recommendation of Justice Sotomayer; and it would happen a lot faster because there is no stay in place while they fight it in court.

You can probably count on a battle for years while gay couples happily marry and begin contemplating suing churches for discrimination of not being wed in the churches and temples next, because that's going to be very lucrative against congregations if the churches and the state keep mixing-up and combining the terminology of marriage. I wonder who the stay would have gone to if Sotomayor wasn't an Obama nomination?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITCr420K4i8


Like CODY ROBERT JUDY'S NEW 2016 PAGE ON FACEBOOK HERE
Follow me on Twitter: Official Cody Robert Judy 2016 on Tweeter here

You Can Help Me
[ If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign”, or ABC Campaign ,which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President please make a contributions here:

Let me now wish everyone a very happy and warm New Year as we pray for the Lord to save our Country and restore America from the dilapidation we now find ourselves and the principles of the Constitution in, for this I am Taking A Stand.

Sincerely,

Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES TV
Get Cody's Book: Taking A Stand

The Axe-Grinding Propelling Utah's Self Inflicted Injury In a Rush of Same-Sex Marriage?

The Axe-Grinding Propelling Utah's Self Inflicted Injury In Marriage?
Featured Editorial at The Post & Email

The eyes of the Nation fell on Utah as the first same-sex weddings in Utah were held a week ago today,(which just happened to be my birthday Dec 27th) just hours after Federal Judge, the Honorable Shelby, ruled the state's 2004 Referendum banning same-sex marriage was unconstitutional. The R-Governor of Utah Gary Herbert was quick to draw his axe saying he'd use his power "to defend traditional marriage within the state's borders" calling the Judge an 'activist' attempting to override the will of the people of Utah.

What Utah residence that voted for the referendum might find shocking is the same so-called "conservative leaders" including their Governor,U.S. Senator's and Congressmen in the greatest breach of the Constitution's history, have in fact been siding with the 'activist' agenda and doing pretty much anything and everything to see to it that the "transformation agenda" was carried out in supporting Obama's eligibility that is contrary to the United States Constitution's qualification requirements for a President, and in fact the U.S. Supreme Court Justice whose seat was filled by none other then Obama's recommendation.

Sotomayor handles emergency requests from Utah as well as other Rocky Mountain states.

Now Utah's people, (less then a dozen whom voted for the Presidential Candidate who challenged not only Obama's Eligibility in 2012 and 2013 in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 that included the legal Sheriff's Report of over 2500 hours of investigation stating Obama's Long form Birth Certificate was a proven fabrication, but also McCain's in 2008 in Judy v. McCain living in their own backyard), find themselves fighting for the very hair of marriage. Is it irony the whole state of Utah now finds they're subjects of one of the Justices Obama nominated in Justice Sotomeyer in their State Attorney General's appeal that will easily cost the state at the very least two million dollars?

Utah's no stranger to the political campaigns of Cody Robert Judy (myself). No Sirree, I ran in 2002 for the 1st Congressional District, and 3 times for the U.S. Senate Seat: 2000 Judy v. Hatch, 2004 Judy v. Bennett and in 2010 Judy v. Bennett again, as my book Taking A Stand recalls in detail.

The Utah Referendum known as Amendment 3 in 2004 was passed by 65.86% stated as follows: 1) Marriage consists only of the legal union between a man and a woman. 2) No other domestic union, however denominated, may be recognized as a marriage or given the same or substantially equivalent legal effect.

The referendum was sold as a bill of goods that its proponents said would do 3 things:
1)Prevent state courts from making a ruling that current Utah marriage legislation as being unconstitutional.
2)Prevent state courts from forcing recognition of out-of-state marriages.
3)Prevent the creation of "counterfeit marriages", such as civil unions.
They also said the amendment would not hurt heterosexual marriage, common law marriages, or the right to will property to whomever one wishes.

In one chop Federal District Judge Shelby found, in a case brought by two gay men (which were different people from the two people in Utah who voted for Cody Robert Judy in 2012), making the claim that "the state law violated their right to equal protection and due process under the U.S. Constitution",that the state's current laws deny its gay and lesbian citizens their fundamental right to marry and, in so doing, demean the dignity of these same-sex couples for no rational reason," Shelby asserted and "Accordingly, the court finds that these laws are unconstitutional."

This is a perfect case scenario to illustrate that "The Will of the People" in a particular State does not always over-turn "The Republic" based on the U.S. Constitution's "Will of the People" if indeed you considered the will of the 593,297 people voting in Utah as slightly higher then the 2 gay men stating their rights were being infringed plus the one judge who interpreted it as so. So, if your going to remember the rights of 2 gay men in Utah why won't you remember my rights and standing as a Presidential Candidate having standing in my damaged campaign based on Obama's ineligibility? That's the idea in a Constitution Republic. The will of the people is reined in when their will over-rides the law. It is possible for the majority's will to supersede the laws of the Constitution and Obama's Campaign is a perfect example of this happening when no court would even hear me.

The heavily populated LDS or Mormon state of Utah wants the marriages to stop while it appeals a judge's decision, which said banning gay couples from marrying violates their right to equal treatment under the law.

Its an interesting argument to wonder if the minority communities such as the gay and lesbian circles would ask their rights be upheld to marry, but yet spurn a court or Congress who heard my campaigns plight based upon the Constitution's requirement for a natural born citizen in the Office of the President who was born in the U.S. to Citizen parents to which there was never a doubt, (Minor v. Happersett), or in matters of national security do they feel leaving some doubt is okay and my campaign doesn't deserve to be treated fairly under the law?

Is it your minority and your rights until you get them, and then forget or spurn anyone's when it comes to a trial on Obama's eligibility I'd ask the 900 gay couples who rushed off and got hitched in Utah? Don't forget I ran as a Democrat and had claim on Obama's eligibility in 2012 through my 2008 claim as well without being bogged down with the 'racist' argument those who gave McCain a pass on inherited from the Main Stream Media.

Back to the case on the rights of every individual to life,liberty, and pursuit of happiness, which I think is a better argument then attacking the 'statute' of the State to marry. I've long held the State should get out of the 'mariage' business and into the civil-union business leaving 'marriage' for the churches. As long as the State's like Utah fight for a statute of the state on 'marriage', ever citizen has claim on the statute sponsored by the state regardless of gender.

The legal argument of getting the state out of the marriage business and into the civil union business for all, should be the law that Congress should "make no law respecting the establishment of any particular religion", held in the First Amendment "or prohibiting the free exercise thereof", but if they are determined on it the arguments get really weak when it comes to claiming some kind of utopia for a child raised by a mother and a father especially with a mockery of the utopia that the 60% divorce rate in the country blast out of the water.

Lawyers ask Supreme Court to allow same-sex unions in Utah
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/01/03/lawyers-ask-supreme-court-to-allow-same-sex-unions-in-utah/

"Attorney Peggy Tomsic said the state's request for an emergency stay on same-sex unions should be denied because Utah has not demonstrated how the weddings are harming anyone else. The state has also failed to show it will likely win an appeal of the Dec. 20 ruling from a federal judge, she said."

"Tomsic wrote that the state's' "hodgepodge of articles that purportedly show that same-sex parents are inferior to opposite-sex parents" is not only false, but fails to address the constitutional issues addressed in the ruling."

"Utah state attorneys argue that children are best raised by a mother and father in a good relationship. Tomsic, who represents three gay and lesbian couples from Utah, countered that argument by saying gay and lesbian couples can also be good parents."

"Respondents agree with applicants that marriage provides enormous benefits for children," Tomsic wrote, "But excluding the children of same-sex couples from those benefits causes severe harm to those children, without providing any benefit to the children of opposite-sex parents."

"Utah insists that states have the authority to define marriage as between a man and woman. Tomsic argues that the state's rationale for asking for a halt to the same-sex marriages doesn't make sense."

"Applicants cannot simultaneously concede that being stripped of one's marital status causes profound, irreparable harm and urge the Court to inflict that very injury on the married Respondents and other married same-sex couples," Tomsic said."

One of the state of Utah's major papers The Deseret News ran an op-ed declaring the actions of Honorable Shelby to be nothing more than "Judicial Tyranny" and a mighty big case of ignoring "precedent" and "rational arguments'.

I'd ask The Deseret News, "How's that feel?", as they bewail the plight of "not even being heard" because of summary judgement while they have neglected the very tenant of the Constitution on Obama's Eligibility that if upheld in a conservative way would not have got them where they're at?

The tepid argument that Republicans cannot do anything with a majority in the House with Obama's Eligibility flies in the face of the check and balance system we have, and the House is the bigger part of that 'check' as they cut the finances for the Government to run. If the House had a transparent and open hearing on Obama's eligibility framed without the error that Obamacare has become infamous for, the Senate would look like the greatest bunch of incontinent elders the world has ever seen to deny the facts and rational argument.

As you can see, its difficult to sympathize with leaders and proponents whose opinions and beliefs are so devastatingly easy to slice as fulsome. It does seem a bit odd that Utah has come under the spotlight as a beacon of leadership under the "marriage umbrella" as to represent conservatism when adjusting the marital norms that have served society for millennia in face of the reputation of christian polygamy practiced for more than a millennia in the Bible with the accounts of Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses,David, Solomon, and certainly Joseph Smith and Brigham Young.

Its a wonder the State has a leg to stand on or that they are not laughed out of Washington DC for the exact same reasons I've pointed out? They have cooperated with Obama fully and haven't had the courage or intelligence to lead Grandma across the street, let alone a Nation under the United States Constitution, when you take into account Obama's ineligibility in their face.

See Now Part II. The Axe-Grinding Propelling Utah's Self Inflicted Injury In Marriage? Sotomayor Stays


Note Dec 26th,2013: Breaking News : Orrin Hatch R - U.S Senator from Utah and Mitch McConnell R- U.S. Senator from Kentcky just requested two sheriffs kits produced by Michael Volin of WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com (WOBC) with the purpose of informing the public and elected officials of the forgery of the long-form birth certificate image posted since April 27, 2011 on the White House website. These kits contain the same evidence released in March 1,2012 (and a little more) that I included in my case against Obama that went from Georgia State- Georgia State Supreme- to U.S. Supreme 12-5276 in Judy v. Obama.

Please urge and encourage your Representatives to OPEN AND TRANSPARENT HEARINGS in the House of Representatives on Obama's eligibility as the solution to eliminating Obamacare. These hearings must be held and the evidence must be heard that are in the Sheriff's kits most all of the Representatives have received now.

If these hearings are conducted in the open and reported in the open, the evidence will mount collectively and the U.S. Senate although it has a majority of Democrats will have to concede to the facts and evidences or will be seen as completely unfit for their duties and as incompetent. Utah would most likely see more benefits come from supporting the Candidates like myself, (well, Candidate as myself because there were no other candidates in the entire U.S.A. who stood up for principle regardless of party), fighting for equal protections under the law in pushing for Open and Transparent Hearings in Congress with two million dollars on Obama's Verification Eligibility qualification hearings on the stage to remove him as a disability according to Amend 14, Sec.3, than they would ever hope to find fighting this and appealing to an unauthorized usurper's recommendation of Justice Sotomayer; and it would happen a lot faster because there is no stay in place while they fight it in court.

You can probably count on a battle for years while gay couples happily marry and begin contemplating suing churches for discrimination of not being wed in the churches and temples next, because that's going to be very lucrative against congregations if the churches and the state keep mixing-up and combining the terminology of marriage. I wonder who the stay would have gone to if Sotomayor wasn't an Obama nomination?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITCr420K4i8


Like CODY ROBERT JUDY'S NEW 2016 PAGE ON FACEBOOK HERE
Follow me on Twitter: Official Cody Robert Judy 2016 on Tweeter here

You Can Help Me
[ If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign”, or ABC Campaign ,which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President please make a contributions here:

Let me now wish everyone a very happy and warm New Year as we pray for the Lord to save our Country and restore America from the dilapidation we now find ourselves and the principles of the Constitution in, for this I am Taking A Stand.

Sincerely,

Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES TV
Get Cody's Book: Taking A Stand