Showing posts with label caucus. Show all posts
Showing posts with label caucus. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 20, 2016

Press Release: The Democratic Party Contested Convention - Three Candidates Remain


Press Release:
FEATURED EDITORIAL
THE POST & EMAIL
~The Democratic Party Contested Convention Taking Shape ~
________________

 ~Three Candidates Remain~
Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, & Cody Robert Judy
_______________

Much hububalu has been made about whether or not the Republican Party is going to have, or could have, with their Presidential Candidates coming in under the 1,237 Delegate Majority a Contested Convention in Cleveland. Perhaps because of the greater Media support for controversy stirring Republicans up against each other with seventeen Candidates, has the Democratic National Convention been featured much less as potentially contested, but it very well is looking like it with more than the two Candidates so prominently featured in the Primaries and Caucuses.

2016 Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy (CRJ) is a man who has done things before that most people said were impossible or insane that were really just different one might venture even trail-blazing. "He has a way of wrapping your head into a pretzel and making the inconceivable actually probable", said one of his friends.

When he announced in 1990 at age 23 to his extended family he was buying a 2.5 acre plot of ground in California and building a house and matching stable on it from scratch everyone wondered what bank he was going to for the construction financing? When Cody announced he wasn't going to a bank and was going to do it on his own personal credit cards whose interest rates varied in 1990 from 12 to 18% and he was building it all himself, that was labeled crazy.

Construction Building Loans in California at the time were loaned with a minimum of $1500 charge, and big balloon payments until construction was finished and long term financing transferred the loan into a 15-30 year mortgage. Cody told his then wife Jill he would have the house done in no more then six months for which he asked her and their three children all under 5 to live temporarily on the grounds in a 40 foot trailer he had purchased for $500, remodeled and refinished with a full size bathtub and oven included in it.

He avoided the $1,500 flat charge, the much bigger balloon payments during the building process making smaller minimums on the half a dozen credit cards he reserved for the purpose and got the Final on the House and financing in 5 months. When the bank for the long term financing came up to estimate the value Cody had actually accumulated in sweat equity over half the value of the property.

"You just have to believe in yourself", said Cody. "No one knows better than you what you can do and can't do. The world will always expect you to conform to what they understood, but 'they' are not you, and they will always say 'You can't', and then they will sit back and watch."

The story of Cody building his house in California is indicative of success in ways unimaginable at the time. Its' easy now to see the House still standing there pictured in Cody's book Taking A Stand -the Conservative Independent Voice at Amazon.com  and principled at Barnes & Noble, but it was a well calculated risk. Things worked out.

The story is synonymous with what Cody has done running for U.S. President in '08, '12, and now '2016 as one of the three Candidates left standing in the Democratic Party no one is really seeing or paying attention to, but Cody sees away to the nomination or away of doing things others do not see.
With half of the delegates handed out to Secretary Clinton and Senator Sanders one might ask Cody, "How many Delegates do you have so far?" expecting Cody to say zero.

The truth however is Cody like Sanders and Clinton in the Democratic Party with the way the party rules work can claim he has 700 Delegates already just waiting to be talked into his Campaign that Sanders and Clinton cannot official claim at all right now. They are as free as a bird right now and though they may say this or that, the rules state they can change, reverse, or hold their vote right up until the 2016 Convention Ballot Voting takes place.

What could happen in the next few months could be very interesting. While the Republicans provided a lower tier debate pedestal for near half of their seventeen that were recognized in the field, the Democrat National Committee had a hand in denying those who were officially recognized and declared Candidates for President from Debate in the Democratic Party and the Media had more of a hand in stipulating for qualification who would be included in the debate and who would have their names mentioned in national Polls. Most polls did not bother asking or including the names of even half of the Democratic Candidates officially declared in the Federal Election Commission (FEC) deciding for themselves who would be spoon fed to the public.

"It was and remains a very discouraging process, maybe even corrupt and rigged as others have labeled it", says CRJ. "It's pretty easy to poll at 1% nationally if your name is mentioned in a Poll", and as evidence of the slight Cody asks, "Find one single Poll of the twenty that were recognized as credible by the Media, who did not have access to the FEC database of [Officially Declared Candidates], did not have access to a computer to access web sites, video, commercials, and social media web sites, and who has on their Record a single question including my name in their Poll?"

The corruption or crime of abuse in this is all the money the Democratic Party and Republican Party predominately the major two party system in American Politics receive in 'contributions' from the General Public from the General Population Tax Base to put on their "Private Party Primaries" and maybe even some in Caucuses. State Legislatures often finance all [Political Party Primaries] from their Tax Base.

Utah's Legislature this year actually refused to fund that with a three million dollar bill, and the minority parties (that included the Democrats) suffered the worse in limping along with a Caucus System, that even the Republican Governor saw as a disenfranchisement of a very big part of the population contrasted with 2008 calling for a Return to the Funded Primary. [About 280,000 people participated in the Democratic and Republican caucuses on Tuesday. In 2008, about 430,000 people participated in a state-run presidential primary.] If the Democrats had funded their own Primary the cost would have been about $100,000 and the State Committee opted instead to fund Candidates and let the Primary drift incredibly into a dilapidated Caucus.

Nation Wide Tax Payer's ponied up over four-hundred million ($400,000,000.00) for Primaries in 2012 funding "Partisan Primaries" and under the system [all candidates and all voters] are suppose to be able to participate on a single ballot. So what does it tells us when Candidates for the Democratic Party officially recognized by the Federal Election Commission are not recognized on a Primary Ballot for the Voter's Choice?

It tells us that the tax dollars are being mis-used and manipulated by a very few and is geared for a 'select few Candidates', and fewer still Party Chiefs making the selection of who gets on the Ballot. It is very easily described as 'Rigged'. This is in essence the way a "Few" turn the "General Population" into a private funded enterprise which is a disgrace to the Republic and our Democracy.

Now, the burden is also placed simultaneously on the Candidates running for a General Election at varying levels to come up with 'Fees' $1,000-$5,000 and 'Signatures' that vary astronomically- Indiana asks for 4,500 at least 500 from every County. That's registered voters, Printed Name, Signature, and Address required. Imagine the ground game you have to have to get on 50 State Primary Ballots- Its' impossible for lesser known Candidates and it can be a dis qualifier for known Candidates who 'cheat' or are 'contested'. When you start going through 4,500 signatures and addresses it only takes a few to rule the whole pot is corrupted and fails nullifying the Votes cast in the primary for that Candidate.

Now after all that Tax Payer money funding your State Primary, won't you be happy to know that the "Personal or 'Partisan' Party" has, with their Rules Adopted every year, the ability to pick who they want anyway? The Democratic Party has 700 so-called Super Delegates especially designated to prevent a 'Contested Convention'.

Ok, sounds fair enough to prevent a Contested Primary, or actually function and get a Candidate in a tightly contested Primary. The 700 can weigh insurmountably two candidates and can still function within reason if say one of the Candidates is indicted on FBI Charges for, oh I don't know, 2000 Reports that were Classified leaking out or 22 Top Secret Reports blasted out to known enemies, whilst a Charity Foundation wracked up a cool Billion or even if another Candidate dropped dead coughing, or from a heart attack predisposed in elderly mid seventies. The party has still got to function for a Candidate and that can all happen in an OPEN CONVENTION.

The delegates selected in the States respective Primary supposedly held to cast their vote according to the state-funded primary, are all released if a sum of majority, picked by the Party Commission Leaders, is not reached, releasing the delegates to vote for who they want to. The Candidate in a OPEN CONVENTION not even necessarily participating in the Primary Process, if those who were on it failed in any way shape or form. These are avoidable contingencies that the Delegates go home to and lift their hands up about saying, 'We just did what we had to do with the options and time we had'.

The Electoral College System designed provides a fail safe method coming up with a Candidate even in the eventuality of unforeseen circumstances beyond the ability to reform State Primaries at great expense.
[CONSTITUTIONAL TOPIC: THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE]
The function and details of how the Electoral College meets and how they vote was changed in the 12th Amendment. First, a discussion of the original plan, outlined inArticle 2, Section 1, Clauses 2 and 3, then what is different today:Each state chose a number of electors equal to the number of congress people that state had. Each state, then, got at least three electors (two Senators and at least one Representative). Electors may not be an employee or elected representative of the Federal Government. Each state was allowed to otherwise choose whomever they wish to be the Electors for that state.]

The $64,000 question remains; If the Tax Base of the general population is going to be funding Private or Partisan Party Primaries, what responsibility does the Private Party (ie. Republican, Democratic Parties), have in including, as the Federal Election Commission does, all the choices as far as Candidates to be represented for the Public to choose from in the Primaries?

What we are seeing erupt this year is an Anti-Establishment Movement propelled by the Anger of the Voter at the Establishment that's been festering like an infected sore, but even in this anger the "Choices" are being manipulated by the Party Elites and Big Money Candidates not necessarily the Principle of the People in what we hope is Justice for All.

As we see the Democratic Party, and the Polls, and Democratic Party Debates, did not even closely resemble the available Democratic Party Candidates for President; and there were not so many Candidates, as represented here, that a simple Ballot could not have been created very cheaply in today's Data-Intelligence-Computer-Ballot Box Systems. We now see only three Candidates still Active.

What we are seeing is an actual shafting or short-changed public whose choice is not Free or even Represented by our own FEC, by not including Candidates the Federal Election Commission has Record of. We The People, as the tax payers are funding Primaries and a very few are deciding for us with our money in the State Primary who we can vote for by not including Candidates officially counted by the Federal Election Commission.

The way the system of the tax funded Primary for any particular party is suppose to work is not based on the discrimination that is taking place today, but rather that the Public be able to actually choose from the selection of Officially Recognized Candidates.

All the same, the system as it is allows for a Candidate like Cody Robert Judy to also maintain an assemblage of Delegates that are not bound in a way shape or form until the National Convention takes place. In a tightly contested convention two candidates may struggle through the Primary and Caucus's of the State, and arrive to find the FBI waiting with handcuffs?

Such a Candidate who had bound delegates might then be influenced to for what ever reason endorse or recommend someone other than the presumable rival. In that case an unknown suddenly becomes a factor for what could be a whole lot of varying reasons and circumstances that might include JUSTICE.

The RAGE in and Against the MACHINE

It is no secret that Hillary Clinton's #EmailGate with profound consequences in the FBI and Justice Department are riddling her Campaign. Her private server confiscated by the FBI now have components leaked out to the Justice Department which are now subject to 'cover-up' or stealth maneuvers in the Federal Court that a  report by JOSH GERSTEIN covered entitled Under the Radar .
[Lawyers for a reporter demanding access to email messages and files the FBI has reportedly retrieved from Hillary Clinton's private server are objecting to a secret filing the Justice Department submitted to a federal court last month as part of a bid to keep those messages under wraps.]
Read more: http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2016/04/protest-lodged-over-secrecy-in-clinton-email-case-222207#ixzz46QDx5bnu
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook

The Democratic Party has a great dissension within it already as the Huffington Post articulated here in A Contested Democratic Convention Is Now a Near Statistical Certainty, but what can be contested and why are vague.

One of the many circumstances we are seeing this year affect millions of contributions is still what Constitutional Scholars have referred to as "Unaddressed" in the Constitutional Qualification of 'natural born Citizen' by the U.S. Supreme Court. Cody Robert Judy is the only Candidate in America with a bi-partisan Federal Court Record on this matter culminating in two U.S. Supreme Court Cases: 12-5276 and 14-9396.

Election or not, the Court has had at least two chances to hear the Case, and while that may be a small issue to so many in the Media, what remains the instrument of adverse antagony is the U.S. Supreme Court itself denying arbitrarily the forma pauperis motion and the Motion to Re Open by Mr. Judy. There are few things that fit into the narrative so well that the Democratic Party Establishment has slipped from the age of hippie love into the Elite 1% represented by Hillary Clinton right now.

The success of Senator Sanders in large part has been that Justice is not being served to the lower and middle shrinking class. What bigger exclamation mark do you need then when a poor person below the federal poverty line, is actually denied Justice in Court of Law in the interest of the Court hammering a $350 dollar Court Fee and a $4,000.00 Print job as reason to deny Justice, when the Public readily is prepared according to law to cover the interest of Constitutional Principle so many revered scholars are nearly exasperated on with the Court refusing to hear?

Literally Millions of dollars of contributions are be defrauded out of the Public Trust by ineligible Candidates. Its' not a laughing matter when the interest of the public to not only vote for an eligible candidate, but the interest in maintaining trust and integrity of the Standards of the Constitution are at large.

Sen. Bernie Sanders doesn't want to comment on Hillary Clinton's EmailGate because it's a on-going law enforcement investigation, but he has no problem commenting on Judicially Active and Unresolved Cases, by using pejorative, negatively framed terms, like 'The Birthers' to describe what nearly every Constitutional Scholar confirms is UNDECIDED by the U.S. Supreme Court! Sen. Sanders claims to want to represent the poor much better by not taking the Super PAC money, but what? He can't see an arbitrarily decided Motion against the poor in our Judicial Branch as a case in point, or is somehow dismissive of Justice in the matter of the Court hearing poor people's cases, because they can't afford the exorbitant fees of printing cost in the U.S. Supreme Court?

How does that story bode to Democrats? I can assure you if the Story is told it does not bid well and adds to the Rage in the Machine. How many people are affected by this injustice? The same question might be asked by asking how many people contributed to Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio's Campaigns this year in the Republican Party.
It's not just that the General Public is seeing right in front of their faces the inconsistencies but they are realizing that injustice is shattering their TRUST of Justice for All.

Their hopes and dreams, things they counted on always at least being there, some descent integrity, some honor, some courage for our U.S. Constitution besides the brave men and women who put on uniforms might be had in our Elected Leaders, shattered and broken!

Lies, and deceit, Fraud and conceit, have replaced right before their eyes in broad day light, the hope they had in a better America Tomorrow.

That is the reason we are seeing the Anti-Establishment movements that we are seeing in our Election 2016, and ready or not, Justice might just be right around the corner coming in ways you never thought it would come. Because when their is a will of the people, their is not bombed bridge, or blocking dump-truck that will stand, The People will find away!

CRJ
Here's the Link to Contribute if you'd like to Cody's Campaign improve your record for Taking A Stand for the Constitution.
 www.codyjudy.us


Thank You!


Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy



Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.

Web Site www.codyjudy.us
Keep coming back!


INSPIRING - I believe in You


Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!





Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION


1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts

12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial

13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008

14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case

15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.






















































Wednesday, August 26, 2015

HILLARY'S BAD EXPERIENCES ENCOURAGE MORE INCLUSIVE DEBATE for Democratic Party HEALTH?


HILLARY'S BAD EXPERIENCES 
 ENCOURAGE MORE INCLUSIVE DEBATE 
for Democratic Party HEALTH?
FEATURED EDITORIAL THE POST & EMAIL

The CRJ Today for a Better America Tomorrow has released another political campaign commercial emphasizing the need for a REAL Debate between the Primary Democratic Candidates that Cody Robert Judy should be involved in.

Of course healthy debate is good for the Democratic Primary Candidates for President to help them get warmed up to meet the Republican Nominee. By picking and choosing easy Debate Primary Challengers the Democratic Party is doing its best to cover up for Mrs. Clinton .. again, and it is a quick way to assure Democrats lose.

The Video is divided into clear segments that haunt Mrs. Clinton's past as Secretary of State and are bound to come up in Debate and Commercial barrages by the Republican Nominee and the march of Super PACs stashing money for the election in 2016.

Segment 1 - Benghazi - If Mrs. Clinton is willing to 'use' radicals Islamist to further an election agenda, how will American's Trust her or believe she will not turn them over or give the enemies of the United States weapons that will be used to kill American sons and daughters?

Mrs. Clinton essentially was willing to blame a little known videotape which was ultimately American's free speech, for the attack on Benghazi, when now it is known the attack was preempted 10 days prior to it happening, in collusion with weapons be funneled from Qatar to Turkey details coming from the re-opened investigation of Benghazi and Judicial Watch'es uncovering SECRET EMAILS. [Judicial Watch announced today that newly revealed testimony from the Obama State Department under court order directly ties Hillary Clinton, for the first time, to the now-debunked Benghazi talking points used by United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice to claim that the attack was the result of a “spontaneous protest” gone awry.  The Obama administration also sent false talking points about the attack to Congress.  The State Department is refusing to divulge the contents of the email, citing a discretionary “deliberative process” privilege.]

Segment 2 - The Clinton Foundation Foreign Money Contributors and Public Speaking making Mrs. Clinton filthy rich in a very short time which really begins to look like a 'Pay-To-Play' scheme has been worked out for those seeking access to the White House. This then could count to compromise Mrs. Clinton's decisions by dozens of  Foreign Corporations as well as American Corporations working in the interest of promoting foreign slave labor for higher and higher profits.


Segment 3- Begins with Mrs. Clinton's Email Server being confiscated by the FBI after she had told she would not turn over the Server. Of course government business as an official employee with a top 20 Security Clearance has a funny way of compromising your 'privacy' when you make the decision and choice as Mrs. Clinton did choose to use her own private server for Government Business while on duty.

The objectives of course in Mrs. Clinton's words were that it was a simple convenience for her. The result was that Government Freedom of Information Access or FOIA request could actually be fuddled because the Server was not Government Property. Also, as you see at the end of the Commercial Mrs. Clinton make very clear she is the one who makes the decisions on what is private and what was work.

So, she compromises Government Security for her own protection from FOIA request that allows for full or partial disclosure of previously unreleased information and documents controlled by the United States Government.  In short, Hillary assures the U.S. Government cannot look over her shoulder, but she insist they look over yours. Its the old adage of wanting to have your cake and eat it too, which makes no sense when it comes to transparency and working for Americans as their public servant.

There is no doubt Mrs. Clinton's in a partnership with The Clinton Foundation has received literally millions of dollars from Foreign Governments and it is known that some of these were received during her tenure as Secretary of State which is highly suspect of a pay-to-play conspiracy that could compromise U.S. Intelligence. This places Hillary Clinton in a key position for a bidding war also in order for the access. Her husband Bill Clinton also paid literally millions of dollars for speaking engagements while his wife is that position.

This is not centered in just 'Foreign Contributions' to the Clinton Foundation but spills over into the Domestic Corporations of which have done the same thing easily presumed to be a compromise of the Office of the President when/if she gets there. How does a President stand up against an unruly Corporation if that Corporation owns her and threatens her if they are subject to laws that pertain to smaller businesses? Its the recipe for disaster and America just cannot afford Mrs. Hillary Clinton and neither can a healthy Democratic Party.




Candidate for President Mr. Judy understands he also has his weaknesses being incarcerated by Republicans in the State of Utah who paid no attention to the Constitution, with an unlawful prosecution, but that could work a little better than the cover-up of Benghazi through the 'video tape' fable Mrs. Clinton paraded around the networks, as well as compromising National Security that was alone Mrs. Clinton's choice with no one but herself to blame it on. 

Democrats should be very concerned that Mrs. Clinton is in the position to take a fall for Democrats leadership in the White House and we should stand strong and appose this.  Don't let Mrs. Clinton be the Candidate for Republicans hope for.

Thanks for watching, passing it on, and encouraging your Democratic Party Leaders and Country Chairs to support a healthy and open debate between the Democratic Presidential Candidate Challengers. If its a choice the Democratic Party truly believes in for women, why not give them the choice in the Debates?

Its very hypocritical to Represent as a Party of inclusiveness and choice for women and then take it away from the Primary Voters of the Democratic Party in the Caucuses and Primaries, don't you think? Would that be a sign that Mrs. Clinton as a women President would also take away your choices? It seems it would be a telling sign to consider.

House Keeping- We want to thank you for pushing us over 285,000 Views!!! Thank YOU Folks! Keep spreading the word and the post on your social media sites - Great Job!

Keep up and in Touch with the Latest News happening with the Obama Ineligibility Conference scheduled September 28th, 2015 in  the UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT Judy v. Obama 14-9396.


Sincerely, 
Cody Robert Judy
2016 D- CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT

The CRJ TODAY for a BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW
Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.
Web Site www.codyjudy.us 

Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.




Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!



Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!


Cody Robert Judy's book :
 Taking A Stand- the Conservative Independent Voice.





Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.


INSPIRING - I believe in You



APPLICATION FOR STAY PENDING FULL REVIEW ON THE RECUSAL OF JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT AND KAGAN FROM PROCEEDINGS










Friday, January 3, 2014

The Axe-Grinding Propelling Utah's Self Inflicted Injury In a Rush of Same-Sex Marriage?



The Axe-Grinding Propelling Utah's Self Inflicted Injury In Marriage?
Featured Editorial at The Post & Email

The eyes of the Nation fell on Utah as the first same-sex weddings in Utah were held a week ago today,(which just happened to be my birthday Dec 27th) just hours after Federal Judge, the Honorable Shelby, ruled the state's 2004 Referendum banning same-sex marriage was unconstitutional. The R-Governor of Utah Gary Herbert was quick to draw his axe saying he'd use his power "to defend traditional marriage within the state's borders" calling the Judge an 'activist' attempting to override the will of the people of Utah.
What Utah residence that voted for the referendum might find shocking is the same so-called "conservative leaders" including their Governor,U.S. Senator's and Congressmen in the greatest breach of the Constitution's history, have in fact been siding with the 'activist' agenda and doing pretty much anything and everything to see to it that the "transformation agenda" was carried out in supporting Obama's eligibility that is contrary to the United States Constitution's qualification requirements for a President, and in fact the U.S. Supreme Court Justice whose seat was filled by none other then Obama's recommendation.
Sotomayor handles emergency requests from Utah as well as other Rocky Mountain states.

Now Utah's people, (less then a dozen whom voted for the Presidential Candidate who challenged not only Obama's Eligibility in 2012 and 2013 in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 that included the legal Sheriff's Report of over 2500 hours of investigation stating Obama's Long form Birth Certificate was a proven fabrication, but also McCain's in 2008 in Judy v. McCain living in their own backyard), find themselves fighting for the very hair of marriage. Is it irony the whole state of Utah now finds they're subjects of one of the Justices Obama nominated in Justice Sotomeyer in their State Attorney General's appeal that will easily cost the state at the very least two million dollars?

Utah's no stranger to the political campaigns of Cody Robert Judy (myself). No Sirree, I ran in 2002 for the 1st Congressional District, and 3 times for the U.S. Senate Seat: 2000 Judy v. Hatch, 2004 Judy v. Bennett and in 2010 Judy v. Bennett again, as my book Taking A Stand recalls in detail.

The Utah Referendum known as Amendment 3 in 2004 was passed by 65.86% stated as follows: 1) Marriage consists only of the legal union between a man and a woman. 2) No other domestic union, however denominated, may be recognized as a marriage or given the same or substantially equivalent legal effect.

The referendum was sold as a bill of goods that its proponents said would do 3 things:
1)Prevent state courts from making a ruling that current Utah marriage legislation as being unconstitutional.
2)Prevent state courts from forcing recognition of out-of-state marriages.
3)Prevent the creation of "counterfeit marriages", such as civil unions.
They also said the amendment would not hurt heterosexual marriage, common law marriages, or the right to will property to whomever one wishes.

In one chop Federal District Judge Shelby found, in a case brought by two gay men (which were different people from the two people in Utah who voted for Cody Robert Judy in 2012), making the claim that "the state law violated their right to equal protection and due process under the U.S. Constitution",that the state's current laws deny its gay and lesbian citizens their fundamental right to marry and, in so doing, demean the dignity of these same-sex couples for no rational reason," Shelby asserted and "Accordingly, the court finds that these laws are unconstitutional."

This is a perfect case scenario to illustrate that "The Will of the People" in a particular State does not always over-turn "The Republic" based on the U.S. Constitution's "Will of the People" if indeed you considered the will of the 593,297 people voting in Utah as slightly higher then the 2 gay men stating their rights were being infringed plus the one judge who interpreted it as so. So, if your going to remember the rights of 2 gay men in Utah why won't you remember my rights and standing as a Presidential Candidate having standing in my damaged campaign based on Obama's ineligibility? That's the idea in a Constitution Republic. The will of the people is reined in when their will over-rides the law. It is possible for the majority's will to supersede the laws of the Constitution and Obama's Campaign is a perfect example of this happening when no court would even hear me.

The heavily populated LDS or Mormon state of Utah wants the marriages to stop while it appeals a judge's decision, which said banning gay couples from marrying violates their right to equal treatment under the law.

Its an interesting argument to wonder if the minority communities such as the gay and lesbian circles would ask their rights be upheld to marry, but yet spurn a court or Congress who heard my campaigns plight based upon the Constitution's requirement for a natural born citizen in the Office of the President who was born in the U.S. to Citizen parents to which there was never a doubt, (Minor v. Happersett), or in matters of national security do they feel leaving some doubt is okay and my campaign doesn't deserve to be treated fairly under the law?

Is it your minority and your rights until you get them, and then forget or spurn anyone's when it comes to a trial on Obama's eligibility I'd ask the 900 gay couples who rushed off and got hitched in Utah? Don't forget I ran as a Democrat and had claim on Obama's eligibility in 2012 through my 2008 claim as well without being bogged down with the 'racist' argument those who gave McCain a pass on inherited from the Main Stream Media.

Back to the case on the rights of every individual to life,liberty, and pursuit of happiness, which I think is a better argument then attacking the 'statute' of the State to marry. I've long held the State should get out of the 'mariage' business and into the civil-union business leaving 'marriage' for the churches. As long as the State's like Utah fight for a statute of the state on 'marriage', ever citizen has claim on the statute sponsored by the state regardless of gender.

The legal argument of getting the state out of the marriage business and into the civil union business for all, should be the law that Congress should "make no law respecting the establishment of any particular religion", held in the First Amendment "or prohibiting the free exercise thereof", but if they are determined on it the arguments get really weak when it comes to claiming some kind of utopia for a child raised by a mother and a father especially with a mockery of the utopia that the 60% divorce rate in the country blast out of the water.

Lawyers ask Supreme Court to allow same-sex unions in Utah
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/01/03/lawyers-ask-supreme-court-to-allow-same-sex-unions-in-utah/

"Attorney Peggy Tomsic said the state's request for an emergency stay on same-sex unions should be denied because Utah has not demonstrated how the weddings are harming anyone else. The state has also failed to show it will likely win an appeal of the Dec. 20 ruling from a federal judge, she said."

"Tomsic wrote that the state's' "hodgepodge of articles that purportedly show that same-sex parents are inferior to opposite-sex parents" is not only false, but fails to address the constitutional issues addressed in the ruling."

"Utah state attorneys argue that children are best raised by a mother and father in a good relationship. Tomsic, who represents three gay and lesbian couples from Utah, countered that argument by saying gay and lesbian couples can also be good parents."

"Respondents agree with applicants that marriage provides enormous benefits for children," Tomsic wrote, "But excluding the children of same-sex couples from those benefits causes severe harm to those children, without providing any benefit to the children of opposite-sex parents."

"Utah insists that states have the authority to define marriage as between a man and woman. Tomsic argues that the state's rationale for asking for a halt to the same-sex marriages doesn't make sense."

"Applicants cannot simultaneously concede that being stripped of one's marital status causes profound, irreparable harm and urge the Court to inflict that very injury on the married Respondents and other married same-sex couples," Tomsic said."

One of the state of Utah's major papers The Deseret News ran an op-ed declaring the actions of Honorable Shelby to be nothing more than "Judicial Tyranny" and a mighty big case of ignoring "precedent" and "rational arguments'.

I'd ask The Deseret News, "How's that feel?", as they bewail the plight of "not even being heard" because of summary judgement while they have neglected the very tenant of the Constitution on Obama's Eligibility that if upheld in a conservative way would not have got them where they're at?

The tepid argument that Republicans cannot do anything with a majority in the House with Obama's Eligibility flies in the face of the check and balance system we have, and the House is the bigger part of that 'check' as they cut the finances for the Government to run. If the House had a transparent and open hearing on Obama's eligibility framed without the error that Obamacare has become infamous for, the Senate would look like the greatest bunch of incontinent elders the world has ever seen to deny the facts and rational argument.

As you can see, its difficult to sympathize with leaders and proponents whose opinions and beliefs are so devastatingly easy to slice as fulsome. It does seem a bit odd that Utah has come under the spotlight as a beacon of leadership under the "marriage umbrella" as to represent conservatism when adjusting the marital norms that have served society for millennia in face of the reputation of christian polygamy practiced for more than a millennia in the Bible with the accounts of Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses,David, Solomon, and certainly Joseph Smith and Brigham Young.

Its a wonder the State has a leg to stand on or that they are not laughed out of Washington DC for the exact same reasons I've pointed out? They have cooperated with Obama fully and haven't had the courage or intelligence to lead Grandma across the street, let alone a Nation under the United States Constitution, when you take into account Obama's ineligibility in their face.

See Now Part II. The Axe-Grinding Propelling Utah's Self Inflicted Injury In Marriage? Sotomayor Stays


Note Dec 26th,2013: Breaking News : Orrin Hatch R - U.S Senator from Utah and Mitch McConnell R- U.S. Senator from Kentcky just requested two sheriffs kits produced by Michael Volin of WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com (WOBC) with the purpose of informing the public and elected officials of the forgery of the long-form birth certificate image posted since April 27, 2011 on the White House website. These kits contain the same evidence released in March 1,2012 (and a little more) that I included in my case against Obama that went from Georgia State- Georgia State Supreme- to U.S. Supreme 12-5276 in Judy v. Obama.

Please urge and encourage your Representatives to OPEN AND TRANSPARENT HEARINGS in the House of Representatives on Obama's eligibility as the solution to eliminating Obamacare. These hearings must be held and the evidence must be heard that are in the Sheriff's kits most all of the Representatives have received now.

If these hearings are conducted in the open and reported in the open, the evidence will mount collectively and the U.S. Senate although it has a majority of Democrats will have to concede to the facts and evidences or will be seen as completely unfit for their duties and as incompetent. Utah would most likely see more benefits come from supporting the Candidates like myself, (well, Candidate as myself because there were no other candidates in the entire U.S.A. who stood up for principle regardless of party), fighting for equal protections under the law in pushing for Open and Transparent Hearings in Congress with two million dollars on Obama's Verification Eligibility qualification hearings on the stage to remove him as a disability according to Amend 14, Sec.3, than they would ever hope to find fighting this and appealing to an unauthorized usurper's recommendation of Justice Sotomayer; and it would happen a lot faster because there is no stay in place while they fight it in court.

You can probably count on a battle for years while gay couples happily marry and begin contemplating suing churches for discrimination of not being wed in the churches and temples next, because that's going to be very lucrative against congregations if the churches and the state keep mixing-up and combining the terminology of marriage. I wonder who the stay would have gone to if Sotomayor wasn't an Obama nomination?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITCr420K4i8


Like CODY ROBERT JUDY'S NEW 2016 PAGE ON FACEBOOK HERE
Follow me on Twitter: Official Cody Robert Judy 2016 on Tweeter here

You Can Help Me
[ If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign”, or ABC Campaign ,which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President please make a contributions here:

Let me now wish everyone a very happy and warm New Year as we pray for the Lord to save our Country and restore America from the dilapidation we now find ourselves and the principles of the Constitution in, for this I am Taking A Stand.

Sincerely,

Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES TV
Get Cody's Book: Taking A Stand