Author - Cody Robert Judy
Conservative Independent American
Candidate for Pres 16, 12, 08
U.S. Senate 18, 10, 04, 00
U.S. Rep. 02
Book: Taking A Stand - The conservative independent Voice
Over the last few days America has been thrust into the Birther World yet again with lead Polling Republican Presidential Candidate Donald Trump, who seems the perfect anti-establishment Porcupine- touch him and you will get a quill shot into you- attacking Presidential Candidate and U.S. Senator Ted Cruz on questions of his eligibility, or Constitutional authority to assume the Office of President should he be elected to it. Mr. Trump has highlighted the facts that Senator Cruz was not born in America and his parents appear to both be Canadian Citizens at the time of Cruz's birth, which is the Time Frame required for the establishment of [natural born Citizen]. Cruz's mother was a U.S. Citizen at the time of her birth however may have been under her adopted Canadian Citizenship at the time of her son's birth as Canada required an oath of allegiance to work there, which may have been the reason Ted Cruz's father opted out of his native born Cuban Citizenship. Cruz only formally disavowed his Canadian Citizenship due to his desire to run for U.S. President. No documentation has provided proof that Cruz's mother was not a Canadian Citizen at the time of Cruz's Birth. New Treasures by Googling BIRTHER have over the last few days proven worth its weight in Gold. U.S. Senator John McCain opined the issue with Cruz was a legitimate concern and not illegitimate to look into. U.S. Representative Nancy Pelosi chimed in the [natural born Citizen] qualification was an open door in the consideration of Ted Cruz. The White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest weighed in that he didn't know if Obama was taking a side on the issue but he was enjoying it after Obama's grief about being born in Kenya. The common thread between Obama and Cruz of course is that of the disqualifying factor that both do not have fathers who were [Citizen] of the U.S. at the time of their birth. The dissimilarity is Obama claims he was born in Hawaii and Cruz birth is affirmed in Canada. Of course Obama provided a long form birth Certificate in 2011 after Mr. Trump took credit of picking Obama's own quill out of him but it only confirmed Obama was not [Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] the definition of [natural born Citizen] the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed in Minor v. Happersett was never in doubt. Mr. Judy's appeal dealt with the lower Courts in contradiction with the precedent case. Despite the Main Stream Media's ploy that the Principle Definition has been settled the fact remains McCain and Pelosi have got it right on this- its unsettled by the U.S. Supreme Court with two Presidential Candidates at odds against each other, both standing to lose a great deal based on the Principle definition observed in the Constitution Requirement. The U.S. Supreme Court just two months ago DENIED a Motion for Forma Pauperis by a Presidential Candidate, Cody Robert Judy, the only Candidate for President in America with a bi-partisan Federal Court Record appealing the Principle on first McCain in 2008 and respectfully Obama in 2012 Case No. 12-5276 and '13 as well as 2014 Judy v. Obama 14-9396. In a YouTube Video released Today by Cody Robert Judy's Campaign ,CRJ Today for a Better America Tomorrow, Cody rehearses the 'bad behavior' displayed by the U.S. Supreme Court in denying his Motion for Forma Pauperis as a excuse not to hear his Writ of Certiorari based on: 1- The Federal Form being a 12 month Form 2-The U.S. Supreme Court granting his Motion in 2012 and 2013 Review 3-The District Court granting the Grant for Forma Pauperis in 2014 4-The Tenth Circuit Court granting the Forma Pauperis for a Review on Appeal. 5-The Fact the U.S. Supreme Court did not cite Rule 39.8 as a guideline for Denial of the 2014 Motion. Mr. Judy rehearses the Massive amount of money expended in the Main Stream Media on the eligibility question now in Ted Cruz's behalf and contrast that, if the U.S. Supreme Court handled the definition of [natural born Citizen] virtually every Main Stream Media (MSM) outlet has reported as speculation in over 50 pages of MSM Reports googled under Birther and Natural Born Citizen, that America would be better served rather than received pie-in-the-eye by the Courts silence.
America on both sides of the issue would be much better served if the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) would affirm terms. Actually anti-birthers or the MSM in general would be much better served in the reporting of the issue Americans are finding troubling in the Trust of Government. Cody says that Anti-Birthers are actually the ones who should be clamoring at the SCOTUS for a decision on the issue, as Judge Napolitano cited the issue on Obama may be moot due to Obama being in his 7th year and 2nd term of the Office of President. Even if he was disqualified he's only lose a year and if the ruling went in his favor, it doesn't affect him at all. Considering the peril that America could be found in if a Major Candidate walked into the U.S. Supreme Court say Hillary Clinton with a 49% popular vote loss to a 51% popular vote advantage by Ted Cruz winning the popular vote with his eligibility in question, the Country could be literally torn down with a Losers Rage! It makes so much more sense to hear Judy v. Obama 14-9396 so that an Election is not predicated on the Opinion and America can come together in an agreement of terms. For this reason we are hoping U.S. Senator Ted Cruz will accept the Challenge made by Cody Robert Judy that he and his Republican Senators would propose a U.S. Senate Resolution for the U.S. Supreme Court to hear Judy v. Obama 14-9396 and sending that to the U.S. Supreme Court.
The Challenge was issued on Cody Robert Judy's Twitter Account and sent to several Major Media Outlets.
Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!
Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.
1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396
Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin
The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.
Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
Featured Editorial- The Post & Email Breaking News Report: Obama Fires off Saturday Night Special at Congress for Islamic Republic of Iran
Is OBAMA'S IMPALING HIMSELF WITH EXECUTIVE PEN? This is the question surrounding a Saturday Night Letter fired off on behalf of the Obama Administration to Congress last night. The White House insists Congress will play a role, but that the coequal branch of government should only act how and when it's told to act.", when it comes to Iran. Do you think Obama should not be throwing stink bombs or firing Saturday night specials at Congress w Executive Amnesty?
Why not work with Congress in drafting a resolution that in the end might be successful with Congress before drafting with the Islamic Republic of Iran? Perhaps Obama prefers working with terrorist more than his own Countrymen? Or perhaps foreigners are his countrymen over Citizens of the U.S? He does have a fabricated long form Birth Certificate and draft registration that have been apprehended by local law enforcement including every Sheriff in America that you can also get here. Have we heard that before?
"The Administration's request to the Congress is simple: let us complete the negotiations before the Congress acts on legislation," McDonough states, stemming from 46 congressman sending a letter to Iran leaders informing them any deal reached had to go through Congress and in such could easily be incapacitated with Obama leaving office."
"Let's us pass it, then act on it?" Seems I recall the same language about Obama(S)care? In the three page letter first seen at The Huff (& Puff and I'll blow your house down) Post the White House Issued Saturday Night a Warning to the U.S. Senate about Iran. Its important to realize Obama's skewed version that really doesn't view Congress as elected by the People.
Tensions between Congress and Obama have grown after Obama's foreign diplomacy was anchored last week by Congress's invitation for Israel P.M. Benjamin Netanyahu to speak on the threat's Israel was facing with ISIS and Iran. The speech was roundly and warmly received by everyone really but Obama and a small contingent of Democratic Party Elected Officials who boycotted the speech.
Investigations are now underway as reported by WND in the U.S. Senate regarding Obama's infiltration into Israel's elections through a $350,000 dollar grant and Obama's own key elected managers given to the State Department jump-boarding in Israel's Election. “Funding” to OneVoice Movement, which is a partner in a get-out-the-vote drive with a newly-formed Israeli political action group calling itself V15 that list the U.S. State Department under Obama as a partner.
'V15, short for Victory 2015, attracted U.S. media attention after it hired 270 Strategies, a consulting firm whose senior leadership is comprised mostly of former top staffers for President Obama’s 2012 re-election campaign.'
Obama's Veto pen has largely been taken out due to the recent election of 2014 where the American People trounced and doused the Democratic Party by voting a new majority into the U.S. Senate and further increasing the majority in the U.S. Congress. Recent Obama impalements include vetoing the KeyStone Piple Line Bill which the U.S. Senate failed to override March 4th,2015.
"The filing came in a case filed by Sheriff Joe Arpaio from Maricopa County, in Arizona. Sheriff Arpaio argues the president’s amnesty will lead to more illegal immigrants in the future, which means his department will have to deal with more crime and a higher workload. That higher workload, he argues, is an injury that gives him standing to sue."
Recently the U.S. Senate caved to a Crominbus spending bill that hinged on a defunding of Homeland Security. When it came down to it the spending bill the U.S. Senate surrendered to Obama, and many of the U.S. Senators didn't care for that much. This led to even Sen. McCain supporting and defending his joining the 46 Senators who signed the letter organized by Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark. to the Islamic Republic of Iran.
I'm actually really happy Sen. McCain and I could agree on something as I was tasked by conscience to suing him in 2008 because he had a native born citizenship to Panama which in my opinion precluded his run for U.S. President in 2008. See Judy. v. McCain. McCain said as reported by AZ Central, "I signed that letter, and I believe that it is a direct result of the president's statement that he would veto any role that the United States Congress should play in the ratification or non-ratification of a pending agreement. And that is what triggered the letter from Senator Cotton, and that's why I stand by it."
THE SATURDAY NIGHT SPECIAL
The letter fired off Saturday Night Style by White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough for Obama while admitting Congress was a coequal Branch of the Government basically told them they didn't come first which gives us a little insight into Obama's mind when it comes to equality. Its all good as long as he comes first.
After reading the letter, I thought Obama's strategy for Iran was very evident. He wishes to make a deal then politically hammer it home in the public and make Congress look silly if they reject it. This is how Obama has worked for a long time, but it may be one of the first times that Obama is in fact acting on the defense side of an action of Congress simply informing the Islamic Republic of Iran that they need to be mindful that Obama is not King indefinite and his lame duck last two years is really that of an incapacitated carnival barker that literally any rogue terrorist organization can summon for a nickle, including their rival gang for power ISIS. Armed by Obama's with draw without bringing our weapons home and assisted by Obama's training camps, the Iraq Dirty Brigades armed and trained under Obama now committing mayhem upon civilians and being investigated for war-crimes.
Indeed, Obama seems bent on arming ISIS, Iraq, and Iran with automatic weapons ( look at the pictures!) while at the same time he is disarming Americans. If you take a look at the weapons Obama chose to leave in Iraq you'd see Democrats profusely confused and scratching their heads about Eric Holder calling for Ferguson police to be dis-armed and the recent action causing a shock wave of 80,000 AR-15 rifle and ammunition enthusiast to come out of the woodwork against proposals that would have set a precedent for all rifle ammo.
Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, said he is “pleased that the Obama administration has abandoned its attack on the Second Amendment.”
Indeed, Americans were told and sold, "They could keep their Doctor", and that the 10 Trillion spent on Obama's watch was a reduction in the deficit. We were also told when Obama was campaigning he would include the Congress in making decisions rather than pummel Congress by executive action and veto. You might recall Obama's also retelling the story about not knowing in advance about Benghazi and the assassination of Ambassador Stephens, Foreign Service Information Officer Sean Smith, and CIA contractors and former Navy SEALS Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty during the terrorist raids , and blaming the youtube video on the death of our Americans? Also that his Administration would be the most 'transparent' in history. Remember "Fast and Furious was a field initiative started by the prior administration" that led to American Border Patrol agent Brian Terry's assassination and of course "not even a smidgen of corruption".
If that's not a good reason for the U.S. Senate to send a letter informing Iran of a fundamental American disagreement between equal houses of power and understanding the trust they can have with Obama is on par with American's Trust that has been shattered time and time again with his lies, I only wonder why the other U.S. Senators withheld their agreement and didn't sign the letter free hand.
I also wonder why the whole U.S. Senate doesn't open up an investigation Eligibility Trial upon Obama for his ineligibility as a non-natural born Citizen required for the Office of the President by the Constitution with the mountain of evidence that exist against him before he gets us in a whole lot more trouble with our allies then we ever bargained for with his disastrous and dangerous foreign policy sympathizing with terrorist and interfering with foreign elections.
We need your help. Will you help us or are the outrageous lies your being told by your elected leaders okay for you and your children? Indeed, it is time to Restore America's Trust Today for a Better America Tomorrow.
Cody Robert Judy
We NEED YOUR HELP AMERICA now, to take the 10th Circuit Court's Decision not to hear Cody's Case to the U.S. Supreme Court taking a stand for individual Civil Rights and an unprecedented ASSAULT upon your Constitution and prior decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court! Without your help it's just not going to happen. So its up to you America but there is a very limited amount of time in which to appeal.
CRJ
Get your questions answered by ordering Cody Robert Judy's Book here.
There was great commotion in what was known as The Great Hall as The Assembly that had been called was gathering. The Hall in brief consisted of some sixty rows of seats in height in an ‘L’ shape facing the speaking podium. When speaking to the hall the speakers back faced the near three stories of glass that rose behind him. Interest and speculations were being discussed as to the details of such. As odd as it was, even the great ones who were honored in the Hall from many different generations did not know. This “little known” only heightened the enthusiastic atmosphere. What was known by all, was the “Who” that was scheduled for the address. Every Christians eyes turned when The Lord and King Jesus Christ spoke.
His advocacy was like a deadly two edged sword and those who challenged him did so with their soul and utter existence on the line for he gave nothing less then what was expected. You could not presume him to put his soul on the line and then in challenging him expect to put half of yours up. His wisdom and understanding had surpassed everyone’s and time and time again he had proven to know what was best. All of the honored knew, for the United States, the Supreme Law of the Land was the U.S. Constitution; divinely inspired.
How could anyone forget the time David had been chosen out of his seven brothers? Samuel the Prophet sent by the Lord to find which of all the sons of Jesse the Lord had chosen. Even the Prophet was puzzled when none of the seven were chosen that were before them. He was utterly bewildered as was Jesse when the Lord submitted: “Look not on his countenance or on his height of his stature; because I have refused him; for the Lord seeth not as man seeth; for man looketh on the outward appearance, but the Lord looketh on the heart.”, long before David slew Goliath with a stone from his sling while all the armies of Saul had trembled at the site of the Giant. One might have wondered why the Lord just didn’t tell Samuel, “Hey this guy’s name is David and he’s the little one out herding the goats.”
Had something changed in 2500 years? Sometimes it’s not exactly easy to figure things as a student of the Lord. Why should the Lord deny Samuel the opportunity to learn a lesson at the same time? The story simply illustrates a point I would like to make. Often and so many times the world does not see as the Lord sees even though the world is actually taking part in the production. Like being in a play or a movie you don’t know you’re in. Of course you know your part and what you’ve done, but you don’t often see how that fits in to the big picture or story. And this is the challenge for you.
How does what you “do” and the part you’re playing fit into the big picture? How do you feel about that? And is there anything you’d like to do better? There is nothing insignificant about your achievements. They are to be honored as your life story. We for the most part know our story best, and while it might be seen as insignificant by others, the Lord looketh on the heart and considers things that the world does not take into account. So what are the things you are doing that the world doesn’t see that the Lord might be seeing more clearly and how big of a shock is that to the world?
THE MEDIA TODAY
It’s a wonderful life. You only get one that we actually understand now; one body plus one spirit equals one soul. Yesterday I wrote a note to Greta Van Susteren, American commentator and television personality on the Fox News Channel. Many might not know she’s a former criminal defense and civil trial lawyer. The occasion was actually a post I received of her’s from a friend to post on my FB Wall that basically was politically advocating in a type of campaign a transparency from the Obama Administration regarding Iran’s nuclear stage.
The reason for the campaign was so American’s could just be informed on the matter. With intelligence comes ability for Americans to influence their own Representatives and Senators. The results are accountability to the people. I understood her point very well. If our U.S. Government is in the mode of “We know Best” all the time and won’t inform us, and Iran decides to strap a nuke to an intercontinental ballistic missile and fire away at say New York City you got eight million American Citizens who are going to be wiped out one morning that didn’t really have a say in the matter as it was developing.
Who knows what could have been done different? Generally speaking Americans are pretty hot about Benghazi going down the way it did as our Government Officials sat on their hands, watched, and blamed a YouTube Video for weeks afterwards. Americans find it hard to believe that they can’t make a good decision when they are presented with all the facts. The problem is when all the facts are not understood or in the unknown factor when something very important is on the line.
To be fair here’s Greta’s entire post so they are not my words they are hers and my post comment posted to her post:
[If you agree with me -- please SHARE this post and ask people to LIKE my Facebook page so that we can continue to have this dialogue.
As a citizen, I want the straight story -- enough of this nod and wink, leaks stuff etc. fueling endless wild discussion by all. I want the straight story so we citizens can have a straight talk and make smart decisions. We can't do that without facts. I am talking about Iran and nuclear weapons. I just don't trust our government to make these decisions alone - I want to be brought into the discussion but I need to know the facts. I bet you feel the same way.
The American people should be told exactly what the US govt knows about the Iranian nuclear weapons program. Why should that be classified? What is the big secret? The US Govt can protect sources and still disclose the facts to the American people. And if there is a solid reason not to give us the complete straight story and now -- our leaders should be frank and tell us that and back that up with a convincing argument. We are not getting the facts (the nitty gritty) nor are we getting a convincing argument why we should not have them.
And why do I care? Because the issue of Iran and nuclear weapons is very important to the world and to the United States. For many, this is about survival and for all, it is about changing the world as we know it.
Without facts, we are all flying blind talking about it and that makes it impossible, in our role as good citizens, to encourage our leaders to do or not do something on behalf of us. Some leaders are even dismissive of us and what we want and hope because we citizens are not in the know. The "we know better" attitude.
Enough of the government's "trust us" mantra - I don't buy that anymore. We need to know ourselves so that we citizens can participate in the stewardship of our government.
I want the straight story now - whatever it is. I can handle it. You can, too. What we can't handle is being played by our government. Enough of the "trust us" -- I want the "tell us."]
A MESSAGE TO Greta-, Thanks for the post.(Referring to her request to post Alarm of U.S. Gov't knowledge about Iran in “they know best” mentality)
I would like to say more and more the press is seeing the harvest of not vetting Obama, and not standing for the common knowledge that the Office of the President not be vested in any foreign alienship for two generations- natural born Citizen ( Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents). This should be looked at simply as an age qualification that includes two foreign free generations by birth and parents.
Wise qualifications have protected generations of Americans and FOX has dropped the ball as much as any of the others and allowed Obama a pass.
It wasn't a pass of principle but a pass of division as the race card has been continually played. What's not fair about that and Why is it proved a Discrimination?
Well, as a Candidate for Pres in '08 and '12 I sued McCain first and then Obama - Records in U.S. Fed. Court. I have standing. I have a Civil Right to expect and demand candidates in the race are fairly and equally qualified according to the Constitution. It’s simple.
While I have continually had this in front of Courts requiring a monumental effort, the Media through not reporting it has kept and encouraged the Government's position in "We know Best" , now seen as a (the) problem to you as Press.
You are politically, through this post trying to get a story on what the Government knows through public support, but at the same time allowing them the right to hide it by not holding them accountable to what we even now know. What sense does that make?
Please, there a BIGGER STORY here Greta than Iran, and telling that story might spark the fire that protects Americans from the secrecy of which you now are so alarmed by in Nukes to Iran.
Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
www.codyjudy.us
I further “commented” on my own Post to a few Groups this:
[ Having others pass my letter on to her also helps her know you know. This shows a demand for the story too.
A lot of people don't realize this, but my main purpose is sharing this is for others to share it right back to her. It shows her you know these facts. It creates accountability.]
One comment I remember from someone was “She’s a paid actress”. I thought that was a rough one for Greta to digest coming from her background in criminal defense as civil trial lawyer and George Town University Law Center schooling JD. I actually defended Greta when I saw that comment.
[True Alice, but you know that even Actresses and Actors are people underneath every role they've played in right and wrong.]
Who can deny Obama has been given a pass by the Media, including the FOX News Network Greta works for? It’s very hard to see Greta pine for transparency from an administration she’s left covered in secrecy and ineligibility. I mean isn’t that story big enough Greta, or, are you like the reporter that only wants the BIG story she can’t have, rather than the BIG one she’s been given?
Why Greta would you even expect accountability towards transparency in and from a person in the Office of the President who did not win and was never elected by the demanding statutes afforded in our U.S. Constitution’s Art. II, Sect. I, Clause 5? Obama is not a natural born Citizen. You know it, he knows it, and we all know it. This is the BIGGEST STORY or elephant in the room. Reporters in history only dare to dream of such a big story to report.
Greta has had experience in defending people in criminal proceedings she didn’t necessarily agree with. That’s the job of a Defense Lawyer in many instances. Defending someone you know is guilty because you’re given or assigned that job. She knows and understands that side of law. Greta defended Kelvin D. Smith (No. 86-393) in a murder case in which he and others caused the death of Catherine Fuller by inserting a metal pipe eleven inches into her rectum in the course of a kidnapping and Robbery. You might think being a journalist was a little different than being in the Court room though and the ability to tell both sides of a story was given more latitude.
This hasn’t been the case when it comes to Barack Obama’s ineligibility no Court in the Judicial Branch or Legislative Branch has even heard. Of course I’m very familiar with those battles in Court having my name on not less than ten of them. So many people scoff at the ‘loss’ of all these cases and I have to think are they cases that represent a good cause?
Many a soldier has died on the battlefield fighting a battle he was just a small part of. He wonders at who wins and who loses and hopes he at least was fighting for good. He hopes his sacrifices were not in vein. He deliberates on being wounded in battles that were lost. Do those losses on the battlefield and the wounds received in those battles receive no honor? Do we only honor men with medals in battles that were won? Of course not; many heroic deeds and actions occur in losing battles the same as battles that are won. We honor the soldiers who report the actions on the field of battle.
Our national interest and vital protection requires a standing army and we honor those men and women serving our military and decorate them according to circumstances and deeds. How many military men and women would you say would fight to save the President of the United States life if he were on the battlefield himself if they were put in that situation and circumstance?
The honor of the Office of the Presidency is defined in terms within our U.S. Constitution as heading the Executive Branch, being Commander-In-Chief of the U.S. Military, carrying out the duties of the President, and preserving, defending, and protecting the U.S. Constitution. Many don’t know the important differences between enlisted men and the President’s Oath in regards to the U.S. Constitution.
For enlisted men that part reads and by the way is the same for U.S. Representatives and U.S. Senators:
“I _________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic..”
For the President that part reads: “…and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
The differences are in the words, “Support and Defend” and “Preserve, Protect, and Defend”. The obligation is much heavier for those in the Office of the President to ‘protect’ and ‘preserve’ the U.S. Constitution. It’s a very difficult job and what’s worse is when someone’s in the office that actually represents subversion and a perversion of the actual qualifications for the Office in the Constitution.
That fight and battle is not even being valued by the Main Stream Media or MSM. In fact, they are on the opposite side of the battle with a degrading term for those who fight that battle called “Birthers”. U.S. Senator Rand Paul runs from the term declaring “I’m not a Birther”. The interesting part of the protections the U.S. Constitution has inherently written in it which has served many generations well is that age particular to American service requirement in the ‘natural born Citizen’- Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.
This does not represent a discrimination of any kind. It represents a time honored qualification of American loyalty. I often look at it as a two generation time requirement. Let’s say your parents are Citizens when you’re born and they each 25 years old then it takes you another 35 years to run for President. That’s a combined total of 85 years and really represents kind of a minimum. We’ve never had a President who was 35 years old. Looks look at Ronald Reagan’s age requirement as a natural born Citizen across two generations.
He was born in 1911 his mother was 28 years old a U.S. Citizen at his birth. His father was the same age 28 years old, for a combined age represented in 28+28=56. President Ronald Reagan became president at 69 and his age at plus the combined age of his parents represented 69+56 = 125 years of American loyalty after his birth in the United States. This is how you figure a two generation buffer from any kind of alienship or foreign influence especially considering the Office of the President which is the only office to have such a qualification. No foreign Depot lives 125 years so it’s a natural protector from first generation Americans that could very possibly hold foreign sympathies.
Obama seems to me the epitomic of foreign sympathies and the six years he’s been in office has been a great test for Americans half of which voted for him either not understanding or not knowing he was not a ‘natural born Citizen’. With an assault on the Office of the President only Presidential Candidates had standing to take this to Court hoping the Judicial Branch would at least hear the case. I also took McCain before Obama to Court who also was not ‘Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents’ holding both Republicans and Democrats accountable in the national security defense of the Office.
If you translated and honored ever battle I’ve lost in Court with medals like you would an enlisted man in uniform in the military, my uniform and decoration might look something like this, but the world doesn’t see this. They look differently at these things much like Samuel did looking at size and stature rather than heart.
The most vulnerable position in our Government is that of the Office of the President. The reason is because of all the power one man has. In the House of Representatives power is split into 435 positions. The U.S. Senate is split into 100 positions. Those positions encapsulate whole bodies that have to act in a majority within the Legislative Body. The Judicial Branch is split in many more Courts and Judges then even the Legislative Body. Appellant Courts like U.S. Circuit Courts and the U.S. Supreme Court have more than one Judge or a panel of Judges encapsulating their movements. The President’s position has no such restrictions and that was necessary especially in the absolute formation and readiness of a defense when a body of men cannot begin to come together in time to make a defense. One man's Orders are much appreciated in such times.
Paint the picture that God is seeing in you. Deliver it for others to see. In a reflection of Matt. 5:16 Let your Light so Shine that others might see your good works and glorify your Father which is heaven. I may have lost ten court battles but it is a fool’s errand to say that those battles haven’t been fought on the right or sound side of our national security interest or the U.S. Constitution’s provision and I am the only Candidate for President in America bringing the issue to U.S. Federal Court for both Parties. The honor is mine, in the service of my Country so help me God.
BREAKING NEWS: JUDY V. OBAMA et.al., 14-4136 RESULTS OF POLL JUST CAME IN UPDATE POST
As PROMISED: ,I said I would keep you updated as things happen and discuss my case in more detail as we find out what the Court's decision is. I received this ORDER from the Court last night about 6pm. The results of the Poll taken by the Court on a rehearing consideration was negative America. The same Court that has honored individual rights for each American to 'marry' has rejected the petition for every American to have the same applications of qualifications applied when it comes to the qualifications for the Office of the President in this Rehearing En Banc.
This is a deeply upsetting and nefarious discrimination and outrage America upon all of our rights. Today, the Court handed down a poll that said they were not interested in equal rights under the law. A decision that said Obama is an exception and Cody's rights do not count. This is a decision that we would equate to turning back the clock and seeing the Court adopt acceptable forms of slavery based on color. Its a day when we see the Court rolling the rights back that so many Civil Rights Leaders have fought and bled and born the stripes. A sad day for those celebrating in Selma and a reminder of the fight that still needs to be fought.
A day has come to the Court Steps that the full Court has adopted 'elite' babies and rejected those 'poor' ones in an economical and judicial hypocritical nazi eugenics outrage! The Court practice of engaging 'Individual rights' in the same behavior or activity to proceed in marriage but that deny to me the same practices in which to run a fair race for the Office of the Presidency for which they have criticized me in their adoption of hypocrisy is staggering to the Civil Mind.
The Court has repelled the advise of the United States Supreme Court that a 'natural born Citizen' was 'born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents' so advised in Minor v. Happersett and invited the reinstitution of slavery upon the heads of every minority person standing in the welfare line with such sullied discrimination. It truly is a sad day for Equal Justice in America and I just don't know if America sees what is happening or gets it? Evan those opposed to me as a Candidate for President ought to be concerned and at the very least sustaining the Constitutional Qualifications for the Office of the President be applied equally to all Americans according to the Constitutions obvious and acknowledged responsibilities to that office.
Today we see the Court refuse to do that and dishonor the Office of the President. The Court refused to honor the tradition of "Justice For All" in America, burned the pledge of allegiance of all Americans, and blew the ashes in our eyes America.
We NEED YOUR HELP AMERICA now, to take this and report this ASSAULT upon your Constitution to the U.S. Supreme Court!
CRJ
We need your help. Will you help us or are the outrageous lies your being told by your elected leaders okay for you and your children? If you won't defend your children and their future who will you defend?
Get your questions answered by ordering Cody Robert Judy's Book here.
