Now "DEMOCRATS" want THE CONSTITUTION? HILLARY v. TRUMP over alleged CONSPIRACY THEORY

Now "DEMOCRATS" want THE CONSTITUTION? 

FEATURED EDITORIAL 

 https://www.thepostemail.com/2018/04/20/now-democrats-want-the-constitution/

Update:6:45pm MST

 TRUMP REDPONDS

HILLARY v. TRUMP over alleged CONSPIRACY THEORY

April 20th, 2018 WASHINGTON DC

Hillary Clinton and the DNC on Friday April 18th,2018 sued President Trump's Campaign alleging a conspiracy between his campaign and the Russian Government with the circumstantial evidence of her losing based upon hacking from the Romanian source of Guccifer and Wikileaks with no mention of the 'Details' of the released documentation being the culprit of the loss.

Former NY Mayor Rudy Giuliani joins President Trumps Legal Team 

In other words, they are [not] mad about the solicitous, harmful, and fowl dialogue they consumed themselves in, (leading to Debbie Wasserman Schultz's Resigning from DNC Chairman) but are mad it was stolen and distributed through the hacking of foreign actors. They are not mad about the Democratic Party Primaries being "Rigged", as was stated by Elizabeth Warren, Donna Brazille-DNC Chairman, Bernie Sanders and of course Cody Robert Jud both Presidential Candidates in the Democratic Party in 2016.

They aren't mad about the favorable and fewer Debates Hillary garnered on weekends, nor turning the debate stage into their own hand picked candidates surely she could handle. The Cabalish Cartel, likened to the dark embalming tombs fertile for the fawning scarab beetles to lay in, had "promised" Hillary the Democratic Party Nomination for President with the great gifts bestowed upon her from the one and only usurping leader Barack Hussein Obama.

Favors like the Secretary of State Office with an open leash to usurp the office from The People with her own private email system leveraged in the shadows of the blackmail she had, been did not use, in the constitutionally ineligible, usurping, and disbarred Barack Hussein Obama aka. Barry Soetoro Allegedly failed to state his alias to the Bar: Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois

Congressman Keith Ellison - who backed Mr Sanders and is now the deputy chairman of the DNC - said in a statement "it is our responsibility to acknowledge that millions of Americans still feel hurt and betrayed by the events of the 2016 presidential primary".

One might report, if you were of the Media-Propaganda-Democratic -Party-Foundation-Supporter mentality over the last twelve years,  Hillary Clinton was acting like a [Birther], with much less circumstantial evidence and Constitutional Support  than the Cold Case Posse commissioned by now Senate Candidate and former six-term Maricopa County, AZ Sheriff -Joe Arpaio.

Presented in the conclusive CSI like forensics reports of two separate specialty examining fields, on two different continents for genuine ID documentation examination, the final Press Conference confirmed 9 points of Forgery confirming and presenting the actual theft of birth certificate information, representing ID Fraud which is a Felony on the document Barack Hussein Obama presented as his at the White House Press Briefing April 27th of 2011.



Seen Here as evidence presented to the COURT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGEMHOEil5c

Today it is still being discussed and talked about. The Post & Email Editor and Chief just released a News Story entitled:

FOX & FRIENDS DISCUSSES PRESIDENTIAL ELIGIBILITY



[(Apr. 20, 2018) — During the 6 AM hour on Friday’s “Fox & Friends,” co-host Steve Doocy quickly reviewed the qualifications for the President of the United States gleaned from Article II of the U.S. Constitution. ]

The discussion arose after New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo called himself “undocumented” in remarks made during an April 12 bill-signing in an effort to protest President Donald Trump’s immigration policies.][“I’m undocumented. You want to deport an undocumented person, start with me because I’m an undocumented person,” Cuomo said on April 12 in opposition to Trump’s policies. His full remarks can be heard here.]

[During a December 2007 broadcast of his “Hardball” show, MSNBC host Chris Matthews stated unequivocally that Obama was “born in Indonesia.” Previously, credible news sources had reported Obama as having been “born in Kenya.”]

[In 1991 Obama’s own literary agent issued a promotional pamphlet which said that the new author was “born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii.” The publication went unchallenged until April 2007, two months after Obama declared himself a presidential candidate on a cold, windy day in Springfield, Illinois.]

[As most Americans understand the term “natural born Citizen” to mean “born in the United States,” reportage indicating otherwise cast doubt for some as to Obama’s eligibility. Likewise, McCain’s birth in Panama while his father was serving as an admiral in the U.S. Navy raised doubts as to his presidential eligibility, as it had during the 2000 Republican primaries.]

[In 2008, then-presidential candidate Cody Robert Judy sued both McCain and Obama, claiming that neither was eligible to serve as president and commander-in-chief. As Obama has for some time publicly claimed he was born in Hawaii, Judy deemed him ineligible as a result of his father’s foreign citizenship.]

GOP reps refer Comey, Clinton, McCabe for criminal investigation

Under normal circumstances you might think the FBI or the CIA might  be the appropriate agency to turn to with evidence of fabricated and forged identification in the American Government, but these do not seem to be 'normal times'.

Murder Mysteries that the CIA and FBI have not found
answers to including Seth Rich and three really close friends
of Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro losing their lives
with gun shots to the head.

[Nearly a dozen Republican members of Congress on Wednesday sent a criminal referral to the Justice Department and FBI seeking an investigation of former bureau boss James Comey, his deputy Andrew McCabe, ex-Attorney General Loretta Lynch and Hillary Clinton in connection with 2016 campaign controversies.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions already announced last month he had assigned a federal prosecutor to review some of those broader issues, while resisting calls for a second special counsel. But the referral represents an escalation of Republican pressure to probe top Democrats and Trump critics.]

The fact remains had Hillary Clinton won the 2016 Presidential Election the snake pit unfolding would have never been understood or known to the American Public.

You might think that the Judicial Branch has not been tainted with the Political Bias allegedly referred by Members of Congress, but you would be a fool to read the Cases of Cody Robert Judy v. Barack Hussein Obama et. al., in the United States Supreme Court Case Number 12-5276 & 14-9396, as well as 17-4055 in the 10th Circuit which houses in the Docket a Courtesy Copy of the Individual Petition to Justice Gorsuch. That petition was received by the Court Clerks in the U.S. Supreme Court but never docketed. 

Catastrophic Corruption has become wormwood in the United States of America. Wormwood in the Ukraine is Chernobyl, which refers to the nuclear spill of horrendous proportions. If their was a principle in the United States Constitution that might have saved otherwise good people that ended up selling their souls the mighty simple but powerful qualification requirement in Article II, Section 1. Clause 5, might have been the one to cling to like the trunk of the tree during a category 5 hurricane. 

Next time you talk to Hillary Clinton, why don't you ask her about the 'conspiracy theory' differences between the Trump-Russia Collusion Case and the Barack Hussein Obama Birther case?

I think the most notable differences are Mueller's Special Counsel, that has got to be costing over one million dollars a day with seventeen of his hand picked working for a over a year now and
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein telling President Trump he is not a Target yesterday verses Sheriff Joe Arpiao's Cold Case Posse coming out with 9 points of Forgery on a Government Identification Document.

It may come to President Trump's attention that as long as he appeases Obama's Ineligibility the root of the problem will never come out. The Swamp will never get drained. It may also come to President Trump's attention, especially with these law suits, that its either him or Obama that's going down because they won't stop until he's gone. 

It may indeed be self preservation that makes Trump come out on top of Obama. Understanding that when you have a U.S. Supreme Court that is fundamentally flawed in upholding the U.S. Constitution in the most basic values and understandings of the difference between [naturalization] or in other words a statute or act of Congress and [natural born Citizen] covering nature's law of soil and both parents, (separating the office by two generations as a wall of protection), you fundamentally feed a swamp you must wade through again, and again.

TRUMP RESPONDS:

If this lawsuit proceeds, the Trump Campaign will be prepared to leverage the discovery process and explore the DNC’s now-secret records about the actual corruption they perpetrated to influence the outcome of the 2016 presidential election. Everything will be on the table, including:

• How the DNC contributed to the fake dossier, using Fusion GPS along with the Clinton Campaign as the basis for the launch of a phony investigation.

• Why the FBI was never allowed access to the DNC servers in the course of their investigation into the Clinton e-mail scandal.

• How the DNC conspired to hand Hillary Clinton the nomination over Bernie Sanders.

• How officials at the highest levels of the DNC colluded with the news media to influence the outcome of the DNC nomination.

• Management decisions by Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Donna Brazile, Tom Perez, and John Podesta; their e-mails, personnel decisions, budgets, opposition research, and more.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/04/breaking-trump-campaign-responds-to-frivolous-dnc-lawsuit-warns-loser-democrats-of-aggressive-discovery-phase/


This Article Also:

 FEATURED EDITORIAL
 https://www.thepostemail.com/2018/04/20/now-democrats-want-the-constitution/

NBC wants Dibs on POLITICAL CORRECTNESS in Comedy on the SNL Show?

FEATURED EDITORIAL

The Post & Email

NBC wants Dibs on POLITICAL CORRECTNESS in Comedy on the SNL Show

There is a great illustration here on a subject that is certainly affecting our Communities and particularly our Education Fields when it comes to Political Correctness colliding with Copyright and the ability to interject "fair use" into an already biased Media. While they love to quote and back quote and run quotes on political news nearly controlling or employing a monopoly of communication upon the People, they get really angry when it's done to them or in other words when their words are framed exposing a different angle.

You might not think Comedy is used as a tool to 'Frame' political sensitive subjects, but it is a Primary Tool that has been used and employed by the Left. The [Birther Movement] or Label or Subject, which in fact does account for Political and Legal definition officially represented in our U.S. Constitution in the term exclusively used for the Office of the President and Vice President that controls a whole branch of our Check and Balance three legged stool style Republic in the Executive Branch, has in fact been cruelly castigated with Comedy.

 Indeed we have heard so much rancor regarding "Alt-Media","Censorship", "Restriction", "Fake News" lately from big political players like Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. We stand very much on a teeter-totter or precipice of the extinction of Free Press, Free Speech, Free Religion, and Freedom to Assemble, and even to Petition the Government for grievances (See SCOTUS 14-9396 DISMISSED for lack of funds on printing and court filing fees cost) all principle parts to our First Amendment Rights as Americans.

To witt I decided to conduct a little experiment to demonstrate this in shall we say, or what I hoped would be, the very least offensive way that I might, also employing "Comedy" as the tool, but on a Politically Relevant and legal definition of [natural born Citizen] as far as Education, Criticism, Reporting, and Teaching, all principles known for [Fair Use].

As an official Plaintiff/litigant in the United States Supreme Court as a Presidential Candidate in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 & 14-9396 & Judy v. McCain representing both unqualified candidates from Democrats and Republicans I am none to happy when I see a national jury pool spoiled with false presentations to the public that can affect my case. It is therefore Fair Use in my book to inform, educate, and correct when I can in the same manner.

The Experiment consist of a Saturday Night Live skit involving what NBC's Saturday  Night Live called "Hillary Actually" that you can view here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAhF8tPqafQ

Comedy becomes Comedy when you take what are kernels of truth or what could be very believable and make them or assume them into a reality. The subjects of Comedy often are scaled in the realities of Politics because generally it is a familiar subject to many people. Who doesn't know Obama lives in the White House? So if you take a political script and make it a different political script in a commentary of education through comedy on comedy that has indulged on a Political Platform, why would there be any objection?

In the real Saturday Night Live Skit, Hillary Actually, Hillary Clinton appears at the door and runs the Electoral College Vote into the ground with bribery, which would be considered an assault upon the U.S. Constitution and is also represented as illegal with a $1,000 dollar fine, (something she's willing to cover for the offender), if an Electoral College Voter departs from the vote of his/her State.

Now try to watch my version of commentary on a subject of equal illegality. That of usurping the office of the President by not adhering to the qualifications for President of [natural born Citizen] ie. born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.

 If you can at this Link . After 2 views it was yanked down by YouTube stating NBC had objected to it though, there was no proof of their objection, and the front and back clearly represented as did the content a different Political View for Education. I did not upload it with a criteria of voluntary ads to make it profitable. If you get to see it on this Link, things have changed from when I first uploaded it.

HILLARY ACTUALLY [BIRTHER] (B)SnL
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNLIMo7XQ6A&feature=youtu.be

I have also uploaded it on my Free Public Political Facebook Page if you by chance don't see in on YouTube try here on FACEBOOK:

For a little conversation let's look at the Fair Use policies generally governing the commentary of many arm-chair quarter back pundits, reporters, and of course comedians because when you start to threaten political material with copyright you are very close to controlling Public Perception with Media which would also be governed in what is termed Propaganda- information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. 

Something we have seen infiltrate the Courts and Media excessively with the qualifications for President as [natural born Citizen] actually deferring to the qualification of [public popularity] 

http://www.gcflearnfree.org/blogbasics/copyright-and-fair-use/full/

Using copyrighted material

As you learned earlier, you generally need to license copyrighted material in order to use it, which often costs money. The exception to this is a rule called Fair Use. Fair Use means you can use copyrighted material without a license only for certain purposes. These include:

• Commentary
• Criticism
• Reporting
• Teaching

For example, you can't just grab a copyrighted photo and use it on your blog because you think it's pretty. However, it probably would be considered Fair Use if you included that photo in a blog post that commented on and analyzed a photographer's work.

Guidelines for Fair Use

• A majority of the content you post must be your own.
  To return to the example above, it's probably Fair Use to include a few relevant photos in a long post. However, using those same photos in a post with only a few lines of commentary might not be Fair Use. For another example, let's imagine you found a useful tutorial you wanted to feature on your blog. Including one tip from the tutorial would be Fair Use. Including the entire tutorial would not be Fair Use, even if you linked to the original source.
• Give credit to the copyright holder.
  In order for something to be Fair Use, you must give full credit to the person who created it. This includes the creator's name, as well as other information that will help people find the original work or source. For example, if you're posting and commenting on an image that was published on a newspaper's website, you should include a link to the original story.
• Don't make money off of the copyrighted work.
  In general, it's much easier to claim Fair Use when you're using the copyrighted material for noncommercial purposes. While posting images of your favorite TV shows and adding funny captions and commentary might be considered Fair Use, selling those images on T-shirts would not. Making money from ads on your blog can also limit your ability to claim Fair Use.

A Quote from the Book "Spinning the Law: Trying Cases in the Court of Public Opinion" by Kendall Coffey states on page 159:
Although the "show biz" of many talking heads may annoy some high-profile lawyers with all their second-guessing, the greater concern is for juries. Legal commentators can make outlandish remarks on television about an on-going trial that might land one in jail if made by lawyers representing parties. And yet gag orders do not gag talking heads. Nor do ethical rules constrain lawyers who are on the outside of a trial. Harvard Professor Alan M. Dershowitz suggest that standards are needed for legal commentators, not only to guide their conduct but also to validate their competency. The extent of harm created by television commentary is not quantifiable, and Morvillo acknowledges that trial lawyers "don't know how much of that misperception gets to juries." Yet the potential for damages is real. And some of the real players believe that the Monday-morning quarterbacks should exercise greater restraint so that television trash-talking does not add to the publicity poison that already contaminates high-profile cases.]

Indeed Writers, Producers, Directors,Entertainers,Comedians, Actors and Singers all want royalties and pay on their work, but when those are indeed paid in an Original, they have been paid,
Commentary, Criticism, Reporting, and Teaching are hopefully fields that all would relent on. If Corporations are allowed to control a subject politically the definition becomes privatized.

The Birther issue is a particular one that had been bastardized by the Far Left Media and it has done a lot of damage to our Country and to me as a Candidate for President with a represented Platform that I have spent a lot of time nurturing and cultivating and representing legally.

I hope NBC would understand that two minutes on cue cards with 5 Million hits on their YouTube Channel on that 2-3 minutes influences a lot of real voters and there must be fire to fight fire. I think my Video that I made and wrote as a little different take on their own has changed at over 20 times what they represented and it does represent a " Fair Use" of Political Criticism, Education, Reporting, and Teaching in actually a much more sound and legal construct tapping into Comedy as a resource.

The other possibility of this is that NBC has not said a dog-gone thing and that YouTube has decided to insert and play it's own Political Bias which indeed I have been subjected to with their terms. If they were to sue me for damages made from the profit of 100,000 views total on my YouTube Station they would be asking for the division of $200 dollars in over 250 Videos and 700 Blog Post in damages reconcilable to the project they objected to. They are welcome to the frivolity.



CRJ


The following 9min 45sec VIDEO was posted 24 hours and has generated over 5K VIEWS  combining Obama's Last Press Conference highlights with the Cold Case Posse findings released by Sheriff Joe just the previous day. Not one Reporter in Obama's Final Press Conference asked Obama about the Fraud and Fabrication of his long form Birth Certificate now assessed forensically to be evidence of multiple criminal acts.

OBAMA'S LAST PRESS CONFERENCE BLOWS UP WITH BIRTH CERTIFICATE FORGERY!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGEMHOEil5c

Assist Cody Robert Judy' Campaign Debt here thank you
http://codyjudy.us/information/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm

For the LOVE OF TRUMP- MEDIA - SCOTUS - HILLARY & SANDERS They ALL LOVE HIM! Here's the Proof

BREAKING REPORT

~For the LOVE OF TRUMP!~

MEDIA - SCOTUS - HILLARY & SANDERS 

They ALL LOVE HIM! Here's the Proof

___________________________

MAINSTREAM MEDIA PROTECTING TRUMP'S POLITICAL BASE?

PLUS

UK - LONDON -

 MAYOR Boris Johnson 

QUESTIONS FRACTURED ALLEGIANCE 

OF OBAMA

                                            

You have to admit it! We were all fooled. The MSM is not against Trump but secretly they Love him!!!❤ And that goes for the U.S. Supreme Court JUSTICES too!

The stomach problems of Democrats are actually love butterflies in the tummy! They love the way he trash talks, and labels reminiscent of their own famous vagina diaries further talk with "Birthers!"

Why it's a well known fact Donald Trump's rise into the Politic Arena began by asking Obama to show his long form birth certificate.

That revelation 3 years AFTER the 2008 Election simply proved Obama had a [foreign father] which most scholars agree was a qualifier in the [natural born Citizen] allegiance to America in the Office of President; unless you were a [Citizen] at the time of the adoption of the Constitution.

Mr. TRUMP solidified his political base with TENS-of- Millions of Americans without filing a single legal paper.

Of course Mr. Cody Robert Judy has fought hard through 15 Cases, two that ended up in the U.S. Supreme Court 12-5276 & 14-9396 that the #MainStreamMedia would not Cover a single story on.

This in fact was because the Main Stream Media was secretly working to keep Mr. Trumps Base secure.

They knew if a single story was written about ACTUAL "Legal Standing" and a "Presidential Candidate" who had also sued McCain in 2008 for being born outside the United States and being naturalized by an Act of Congress not once but twice, that TRUMP's Base pulled from asking Obama would be threatened; so they didn't.

Mr. Trump is the Luckiest son of New York to have even the Democratic Spin in Media helping him!!!❤ Boy, haven't they done a Great Job protecting Trumps Base?
They 'fawn-over-the-Don' don't they? So from now on Folks if you hear Rachael Madow saying she's all for the Republicans and has a GOP inside liner blanket she sleeps in at night, you know she has protected at all cost Trumps Base and it's True!

When you here any word out of the U.S. Supreme Court that they haven't taken a position politically you know they are simply protecting Trumps Base. They wouldn't want to mess it up by Hearing Judy v. Obama 14-9396 at ALL COSTS!

That's why they denied the forma pauperis Motion even arbitrarily. They had to protect Mr. Trump's Base and Mr. Judy was a Democrat.

They don't care even about looking bad about denying Justice to poor people. Its the rich by God they are dedicated to serve.

Protect the TENS-of-Millions in Trump's Base at all Cost- Even $350 filing fee and printing cost. They really don't want any of that Base threatened because he'll need it to beat the FBI enchanted Hillary Clinton, and those Sanders Supporters keep'em coming over to "The Don". That's why Sanders will interfer with Birthers being actually heard by the SCOTUS, but not a peep out of him about protecting the poor in the Courts of Law, and not a peep out of him about #EmailGate. COVER IT UP, protect Trump's Base at all Cost.


The WALL they want secretly must get BUILT! The Muslims they don't want here must be kept out at all Cost! That requires protecting Trumps Base and making Damn Well Good and Sure no one.. and you can ask Jeb Bush to confirm this, no one under any circumstances and at any cost cuts into Trump's Base.

So you see how we have all been really fooled by the Megyn Kelly "blood sport" FOX NEWS, ABC NEWS, CBS NEWS, NBC NEWS, CNN, MSNBC.. All of them LOVE Mr. Donald Trump and have viciously and fiercly defended The Rise of Trump, by keeping the real OBAMA Ineligibility Case filed in Court covered up!!!❤

Can I get an 'AMEN' Brother? Can I get a
Hallel.. uuuuu.. jah ?! Trump's got them working for him.The whole Bunch of them and the U.S. Supreme Court. Its True, believe me. All evidence supports these facts.

Even with a defacto President in the Office, they do NOT want that Case Heard. Gotta protect Trump's Base.

Here.. Watch the video.

 Birther Pie In the Sky 

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hRVY2t3OchE

UK - LONDON -

 MAYOR Boris Johnson 

QUESTIONS FRACTURED ALLEGIANCE 

OF OBAMA

In what can be called a simply brilliant observation the London U.K Mayor, rumored to be favored to replace David Cameron as Prime Minister, stated what was simply natural to Obama in his divided or fractured allegiances of [inherited] Kenyan Citizenship from father and U.S. Citizenship from mother - that Obama basically had a grudge against the U.K. based in contextually or inherited allegiance of and from his father's Kenyan natural born Citizenship.

When trying to understand someone's actions parents are naturally often referred to in gaining an understanding in what's called the 'Dose Affect". The Father affects of abandoning a child is really damaging: research has shown that many kids whose fathers have died fare better than those whose fathers have left as Obama Sr. did. Each [Parent] equally ( Jus sanguinis (Latin: right of blood) ) plays a part of the 'natural' in [natural born Citizen] inherited by a child, as well as [Place] of birth (Jus soli meaning 'right of the soil' ) which more stridently reflects the official or legal jurisdiction of laws a child was born under as far as Country or Nation.

Ted Cruz is not a natural born Citizen missing two legs of
the three legs he was [naturalized] by statute or law

A combination of four factors, father, mother, soil and choice allow a multitude of dual allegiances formally recognized by governments of the world. The [naturalization] processes of most Governments allow one to choose a citizenship perhaps not even associated with the other three. That process is also a adaptation or adoption understood as being 'naturalized', however it is an adoptive statute of law that is foreign to natures own recipe of [natural born Citizen] ie. born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.  

Kenya gained it's independence from England as a Nation December 3rd, 1963. Obama was born August 4th, 1961 according to the long form birth certificate he released to the White House Press core April 4th, 2011 as The New York Times Reported [WASHINGTON — President Obama released his long-form birth certificate on Wednesday, a step that injected him directly into the simmering “birther” controversy in the hope of finally ending it, or even turning it to his advantage.]

This is exactly why Divided or Dual Citizenship was/and is/ suppose to be prohibited from the Office of the President of the United States and why a fractured allegiance lends government disaster towards a malfeasance of credibility disassociate of one truly representative as undivided or un-fractured of the U.S.A. as a sovereign Nation Country. It remains the reason why we call 'naturalized' persons [Citizens] but have reserved the rights as Americans of the Office of the President to only [natural born Citizens] which ultimately is a TIME TEST of coming around and sticking around.

Twas not just 'favor' in ones own Country, or towards a native land that the [natural born Citizen] ie. born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents, was initiated and has survived, but also what would be considered inappropriate 'disfavor' that can malign an ally-Country ill-faded in this instance for the United States of America in judgement, trade, or friendly association all of which are key components of being an ally. 

The U.S. House Congressional Testimony of 2002 in the Judicial Committee brought this into the spotlight focusing the attention of Congress on the merits which lead to a defeat of an alteration of the qualification. Therein it was confirmed and recognized that although a first generation or naturalized U.S. Citizen commits to being American and distinguished loyalty can be awarded and noticed in the offices of Judges, Representatives, and Senators, and military there is a significant American adaptation that also takes place naturally in the second generation of someone Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents that takes more TIME.  This time factor is really what opponents are wedgie'd over, however it is precisely the time factor which places a natural barrier towards infiltration or usurpation of what has become the greatest military force on the Earth by the grace of God.

This adaptation to cultural norms is especially prevalent for those coming from Theocracies or Religion Republics where toleration for multiple religions is scorned or even illegal. For Example, "The Islamic Republic of Iran" setting favor for a particular religion Islam, or even the mind-set of control wherein a Totalitarian or Empirical State has been the custom for lifetimes like The People's Republic of China where single candidate elections are the norm, and a very tight state control against the pluralitas of religion theology is taken in contrast from a system of equal checks and balances of authority, as the norm in the United States is understood under the U.S. Constitution in its three legged stool of Judicial, Legislative and Executive Branches all having a check and balance on the other, and standing strong for multiple Faiths in freedom of religion.

So many press reporters and scholars have pointed to the [ natural born Citizen] clause as 'out-dated' and laughed incredulously at the notion of the Office of President being infiltrated by foreign influence or a foreigner in our day, even calling it discriminatory to every 'naturalized' Citizen, without the slightest thought to what a divided loyalty or fractured allegiance can represent or in fact misrepresent in a dual or fractured allegiance by Parent or Place as it is resolved upon the child as the predominant forces of natural accommodation that is subsequently chosen by the Creator. 

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-suggests-part-kenyan-obama-may-have-an-ancestral-dislike-of-britain-a6995826.html

News Flash

China: April 22, 2016 Test Ballistic Missiles Capable of Reaching United States that Could be Fitted with 10 Nuclear Warheads 

Russia: March 17th, 2016 High Operational Intensity and Improved Inter-Service Coordination

Iran: April 22, 2016 - U.S. Military Marine General says Iran nuclear deal fell short.

North Korea- April 22, 2016 - North Korea Preparations for 5th Nuclear Test Complete

Hillary Clinton- Feb 1, 2016  The Public Policy Implications of Clinton’s Emailgate -'Under Clinton, the State Department approved $165 billion worth of commercial arms sales to 20 nations whose governments gave millions to the Clinton Foundation.'

While Hillary Clinton is a [natural born Citizen] the work she did under Obama was certainly work done under a great compromise of the Office of the President's [natural born Citizen] qualification requirement, and that has nothing to do with where Obama was born, but who he and the State of Hawaii has said his father was- a Kenyan natural born Citizen which split Obama's natural allegiances into an inherited dual citizenship or fractured allegiance. 

While foreign Government's are updating systems that could very well wipe out literally millions of American's with new supersonic maneuvering capabilities of sophisticated intercontinental ballistic missiles capable of delivering a pay load of ten warheads in thirty minutes to multiple targets the happy reporter children of propaganda have grown up seeing Obama admonish Congress from releasing the 28 pages believed to involve the Saudi Arabia financing of both 9/11 tragedies in America. You'd think they'd learn?

Still!, they haven't digested a fact that the [natural born Citizen] clause in our Constitution just might be what has thus far allowed them to grow up and report. The mudslinging they're doing upon the Principle of [natural born Citizen] might not have the same benefit for their own children in their national security welfare.

Not only do we see Obama involved in the disparaging the UK in the return of a special heartfelt memorial given on loan from the British government to the White House after the September 11th attacks back in 2001 from England of Winston Churchill, but they are involved in a cover up and lie about doing so!

The White House said in 2012 that the story of the bust being moved was “100 per cent false” and that the bust remained in the White House, having been moved to the President's private residence.

It was however later forced to clarify that the Churchill bust still located in the President's residence was in fact a different bust, and that one had indeed been removed.

 If that is not endemic of the inner fractured allegiances within the person of Obama and the ability to cover it up right in front of the Main Stream Media, I don't know what is? That the Media for all it's hype about scrutinizing Presidential candidates and vetting them thoroughly on one hand and on the other were seen turning their nose down on Sheriff Joe Arpaio's cold case posse investigation relating the [long form birth certificate] was a [fraudulent document], a stunning revelation from a law enforcement investigation that Congress has failed to even hear, is sickening at best and traitorous at worst to the national security concerns of our Country.

The Mayor from London Boris Johnson said that the US would never dream of engaging in an arrangement similar to the EU. While that might be true under normal circumstances, we have slipped. Where the sovereignty of our own nation is so broadly dismantled to foreigners and disrespected by domestic enemies of that sovereignty, it certainly seems that's exactly what Obama's been up to with the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP apposed by Democrats) and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP apposed by Democrats)? His own Political Party is appalled by his free balling our sovereignty!

Boris Johnson: UK and America can be better friends than ever Mr Obama... if we LEAVE the EU.

So, why does Obama want the UK to stay in the EU? [US President Barack Obama is in the UK to impose the “toxic” Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) deal on Britain, a move which will allow US firms to demolish the state health system and more besides, War on Want warns.]

Title 8 Nationality and Naturalization defining [Citizen]
'naturalized Citizens' are not nor can be [natural born Citizens]

The idea that the [natural born Citizen] clause is a technical miscreant or that it doesn't matter is almost as easily splintered by what Democratic Party Representative Levin from Michigan stated was important about the technical aspects of our Trade Agreements with foreign nations.

The top Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee Rep. D-MI Sander Levin also opposes a provision in the agreement that would make it easier for member countries to undercut the U.S. auto industry by importing cheap auto parts from China. He said the complex “rules of origin” system could allow TPP member countries to ship Chinese parts to auto plants in Mexico where cars destined for U.S. dealerships are assembled.

“They are very technical but they really matter,” Levin said. Well, the [natural born Citizen] requirement for the Office of the President is very technical, but it really does matter.

CRJ

CRJ

Here's the Link to Contribute if you'd like to Cody's Campaign improve your record for Taking A Stand for the Constitution.
 www.codyjudy.us

Thank You!

CRJFacebookPersonal

CRJFacebookPres2016 JOIN US!

CRJTwitter

Sincerely,

Cody Robert Judy Campaign

Cody Robert Judy

The CRJ TODAY for a BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW

Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.

Web Site www.codyjudy.us

Keep coming back!

Blog: www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

INSPIRING - I believe in You

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI

Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

WHY DO PEOPLE LIKE CODY ROBERT JUDY (CRJ)?

Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts

12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial

13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008

14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case

15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016

The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President

www.codyjudy.us

www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

BREAKING REPORT : BIRTHER BIRTHER U.S. SUPREME COURT BIRTHER PIE-IN-THE-SKY - Best Serving America

BIRTHER BREAKING REPORT :

~U.S. SUPREME COURT BIRTHER Pie-In-The-Sky !~

Best Serving America

Over the last few days America has been thrust into the Birther World yet again with lead Polling Republican Presidential Candidate Donald Trump, who seems the perfect anti-establishment Porcupine- touch him and you will get a quill shot into you- attacking Presidential Candidate and U.S. Senator Ted Cruz on questions of his eligibility, or Constitutional authority to assume the Office of President should he be elected to it.

Mr. Trump has highlighted the facts that Senator Cruz was not born in America and his parents appear to both be Canadian Citizens at the time of Cruz's birth, which is the Time Frame required for the establishment of [natural born Citizen]. Cruz's mother was a U.S. Citizen at the time of her birth however may have been under her adopted Canadian Citizenship at the time of her son's birth as Canada required an oath of allegiance to work there, which may have been the reason Ted Cruz's father opted out of his native born Cuban Citizenship. Cruz only formally disavowed his Canadian Citizenship due to his desire to run for U.S. President.  

No documentation has provided proof that Cruz's mother was not a Canadian Citizen at the time of Cruz's Birth. New Treasures by Googling BIRTHER have over the last few days proven worth its weight in Gold. 

U.S. Senator John McCain opined the issue with Cruz was a legitimate concern and not illegitimate to look into. U.S. Representative Nancy Pelosi chimed in the [natural born Citizen] qualification was an open door in the consideration of Ted Cruz. The White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest weighed in that he didn't know if Obama was taking a side on the issue but he was enjoying it after Obama's grief about being born in Kenya.

The common thread between Obama and Cruz of course is that of the disqualifying factor that both do not have fathers who were [Citizen] of the U.S. at the time of their birth. The dissimilarity is Obama claims he was born in Hawaii and Cruz birth is affirmed in Canada. Of course Obama provided a long form birth Certificate in 2011 after Mr. Trump took credit of picking Obama's own quill out of him but it only confirmed Obama was not [Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] the definition of [natural born Citizen] the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed in Minor v. Happersett was never in doubt. Mr. Judy's appeal dealt with the lower Courts in contradiction with the precedent case.

Despite the Main Stream Media's ploy that the Principle Definition has been settled the fact remains McCain and Pelosi have got it right on this- its unsettled by the U.S. Supreme Court with two Presidential Candidates at odds against each other, both standing to lose a great deal based on the Principle definition observed in the Constitution Requirement.

The U.S. Supreme Court just two months ago DENIED a Motion for Forma Pauperis by a Presidential Candidate, Cody Robert Judy, the only Candidate for President in America with a bi-partisan Federal Court Record appealing the Principle on first McCain in 2008 and respectfully Obama in 2012 Case No. 12-5276 and '13 as well as 2014 Judy v. Obama 14-9396. 

In a YouTube Video released Today by Cody Robert Judy's Campaign ,CRJ Today for a Better America Tomorrow, Cody rehearses the 'bad behavior' displayed by the U.S. Supreme Court in denying his Motion for Forma Pauperis as a excuse not to hear his Writ of Certiorari based on:

1- The Federal Form being a 12 month Form
2-The U.S. Supreme Court granting his Motion in 2012 and 2013 Review
3-The District Court granting the Grant for Forma Pauperis in 2014
4-The Tenth Circuit Court granting the Forma Pauperis for a Review on Appeal.
5-The Fact the U.S. Supreme Court did not cite Rule 39.8 as a guideline for Denial of the 2014 Motion. 

Mr. Judy rehearses the Massive amount of money expended in the Main Stream Media on the eligibility question now in Ted Cruz's behalf and contrast that, if the U.S. Supreme Court handled the definition of [natural born Citizen] virtually every Main Stream Media (MSM) outlet has reported as speculation in over 50 pages of MSM Reports googled under Birther and Natural Born Citizen, that America would be better served rather than received pie-in-the-eye by the Courts silence.

BIRTHER Pie-In-The-Sky U.S. Supreme Court 

America on both sides of the issue would be much better served if the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) would affirm terms. Actually anti-birthers or the MSM in general would be much better served in the reporting of the issue Americans are finding troubling in the Trust of Government. 

Cody says that Anti-Birthers are actually the ones who should be clamoring at the SCOTUS for a decision on the issue, as Judge Napolitano  cited the issue on Obama may be moot due to Obama being in his 7th year and 2nd term of the Office of President. Even if he was disqualified he's only lose a year and if the ruling went in his favor, it doesn't affect him at all. 

Considering the peril that America could be found in if a Major Candidate walked into the U.S. Supreme Court say Hillary Clinton with a 49% popular vote loss to a 51% popular vote advantage by Ted Cruz winning the popular vote with his eligibility in question, the Country could be literally torn down with a Losers Rage! 

It makes so much more sense to hear Judy v. Obama 14-9396 so that an Election is not predicated on the Opinion and America can come together in an agreement of terms. For this reason we are hoping U.S. Senator Ted Cruz will accept the Challenge made by Cody Robert Judy that he and his Republican Senators would propose a U.S. Senate Resolution for the U.S. Supreme Court to hear Judy v. Obama 14-9396 and sending that to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The Challenge was issued on Cody Robert Judy's Twitter Account and sent to several Major Media Outlets.

Thank You!

CRJFacebookPersonal

CRJFacebookPres2016 JOIN US!

CRJTwitter

Sincerely,

Cody Robert Judy Campaign

Cody Robert Judy

Sincerely, 

Cody Robert Judy

Cody Robert Judy

The CRJ TODAY for a BETTER AMERICA TOMORROW

Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.

Web Site www.codyjudy.us

We want to thank you for the 330,000 views on this Blog!

Keep coming back!

Blog: www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

INSPIRING - I believe in You

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI

Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

WHY DO PEOPLE LIKE CODY ROBERT JUDY (CRJ)?

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

Cody Robert Judy's book :

 Taking A Stand- the Conservative Independent Voice.

Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts

12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial

13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008

14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case

15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016

The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President

www.codyjudy.us

www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.