Monday, February 4, 2013
Why are Anti-Birthers freaking out about Qualifications for Office in the Constitution?
FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:
As seen on:
______________________________________________________________________
Why are Anti-Birthers freaking out about Qualifications for Office in the Constitution?
______________________________________________________________________
For the last 8 years I have wondered almost with an astonishment why "Anti-Birthers", those people who consider it an insult to ask for a politician to at least qualify for the office they are running for per demand of the Constitution, that defines for us the minimum standards for the Offices in our Government.
For that reason I wanted to create in as simple a format as possible, in less then 2 minutes, a video that defined for the simple minded person what exactly our Constitution demanded from candidates running for office as a bare minimum, and explain the reasons for such if I could.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITCr420K4i8
My first experience with this was seeing Sen. John McCain's picture on the front of TIME MAGAZINE with the title of "HONOR" underneath it. As I read the article which trotted out Sen. McCain's interest in the presidential nomination of the Republican party in 2008 I suddenly felt a sick feeling in the pit of my stomach as I realized what the implications were in someone getting into the office of the president who was not a natural born citizen.
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1837246,00.html
McCain was not a 'natural born citizen' in my mind as he was born in Panama. That would forever be his beginning and natural state of affinity. It was in the panama hospital and I read an in-depth study which proffered McCain was born 1100 yards short and 11 months late and it was an Act of Congress that gave McCain citizenship, which absolutely defies nature giving it to him. I decided to act on my gut and 3 days before McCain was made the nominee I served the National Republican Committee and 2McCain a Federal District law suit I hoped would be a reminder of Honor.
1 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1157621
2http://www.scribd.com/doc/22288917/Judy-v-Obama
We have constantly heard that if Barack Obama was not born in Hawaii he could not be president. I don't know how many times I've heard that, but at that time I had not even heard of him. Many Hillary Clinton democrats were on board and the media looked to be scrutinizing McCain pretty good. I felt I certainly had a cause the party I had run for office in was behind. That was until U.S. Sen. Resolution 511 happened which was the second Act of Government trying to supersede 'nature' in handing McCain deferred status as a 'natural born citizen'.
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/110/sres511/text
I had run as a Democrat for office before, in Utah's 1st Congressional District for Representative in 2002 and for U.S. Senate in 2004 on my own first hand experience of seeing the Constitution tossed out the window by Republicans in criminal court evidence demands and a union of church and state, but looking back now, even then, I did not understand the full significance of what could possibly happen if our Constitution came to its own demise with the wanton disrespect of those actually in the offices it defined.
To me it was as simple as just reading the definitions for the offices of Representative Senator, and President in the Constitution however many people have not done that and don't carry a pocket Constitution with them. There have been reports that Obama actually won with the most dumbed down class of people voting America has ever produced in United States history, which may very well have been rooted in the Republican party. If your not teaching the principles of the Constitution with your party, with your candidates it probably should come as no surprise that its true. If conservatism knew the Constitution, and simply stood by the demands of the offices laid out cleanly in the Constitution, there's no way Obama could withstand major players in the Republican party going into court demanding judgement.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/13/bobby-jindal-gop_n_2121511.html
As a kid in school I had so much faith in our Government I never gave it a second thought. I mean the Constitution wasn't some monstrous 2,700 page report we had to read in 2 weeks before voting and passing it in Congress like Obamacare was. I'll always remember Rep. Nancy Pelosi saying "we have to pass this so we can find out what's in it." I mean..what? Is there anyone out there who thinks we might be in trouble when a speaker of the House, the leader, comes out and says that?
http://blog.sfgate.com/djsaunders/2012/10/11/nancy-pelosi-says-she-read-obamacare-bill/
I also begin to sense we were in real trouble when I learned that Congress, both the House and the Senate, when they had a Constitutional question, were relying on the Congressional Research Service more than their own pocket constitutions for which I featured in 2 videos, because the information delivered to Congressmen basically manipulated the 'natural born citizen' term out of rulings and replaced it with 'Citizen'. The tell all tale of that was when I received multiple letters from my own elected Congressmen stating in slapped down terms there was not an issue with someone who had produced a forged and fabricated birth certificate, that if taken as genuine would still deny him eligibility for the office of President, as Barack Obama.
This ultimately led me to running for President in 2012 also and taking this information as well as the results of over 2600 hours of law enforcement investigation to the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276. It is unfortunate to learn first hand that just because your right doesn't always mean your going to win. Things can happen that shift the momentum away from you, just ask the Baltimore Ravens who nearly had their Superbowl victory taken when the lights went out in the Superbowl in a 35 minute delay.
I congratulate the Baltimore Ravens in their world champion Superbowl victory, but they would understand entirely what I'm talking about if that victory had been taken by the San Francisco 49's. The point is that there are so many factors that can come into play that its almost entirely impossible to predict which way the wind is going to blow and getting to the United States Supreme Court, no small task in and of itself, does not mean they will give you the time of day of which thus far I have well understood.
We like to think and believe we are living in a Nation that advocates Justice for all, fairness, and living under the same rules, but it is far from perfect. The lack of perfections are advocated by those in authority as slips in the cracks that are regrettable; but it really sucks when you're one of the pieces of debris that has slipped through the cracks.
Education is sincerely one of the best defenses for our Country. I made it a central theme in my 2010 U.S. Senate run to memorize the Amendments and deliver those on YouTube for elementary, junior high, high school, even college classes. I am convinced that to make a more perfect union we must arm ourselves with education of the founding documents of our Country. This video features in very plain language fundamentally to our advantage which is, I believe, is divinely inspired, the forethought of the problems we face now on the qualifications of the President.
With the most basic rudimentary powers of deduction we can assimilate the facts that "Natural Born Citizen" is indeed something greater in criteria then being a "Citizen", which was indeed mentioned three times in the qualifications for Representative, Senator, and President, but that was intended for the office of the President ONLY for those living prior to the Constitution being signed. For all those born after the Constitution was signed the term "Citizen" no longer applied and it was indeed intended to protect our Country by the natural determination of two generations.
Because the President of the executive branch is the commander-in-chief of our military, it was thought to be a good idea that the extra stringent protections of our national security not be given to anyone but a "Natural Born Citizen". By deductive reasoning and by Supreme Court precedent we know there have never been any doubts to those who were "Born in the U.S. to Citizen parents" as to fulfilling that criteria.
If the economic fact that Obama has spent more money then all the Presidents combined from Washington to Bush, spending our future into oblivion is not an astounding alarm to you, I have very little hope for you to recognize trouble before its too late. If my experience has taught me anything it is that when you are in a jail cell or a prison cell with armed guards around you, with no ability to procure defense, by then its too late.
If you ever thought you might have to believe in God as slaves in America just like the Israelites did under the edicts of Pharaoh Ramsey of the Egyptians and have God very slow to hear your cry, you might have an idea of what you may have to go through by not heeding the Constitution and its gift to you purchased by the blood of those who fought America's Revolution.
It is my very humble prayer not to see you in the bonds of those prison camps of the Red Dawn where everything is perceived as normal, but everything is far from normal. We have inherited our freedom but we must constantly fight for it. I think what's even more disturbing watching her review, is that the young generation seems to feel inoculated from being thrown into the 9 digital era.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35PZRStpv8o
Its real life: the lack of concern for our Constitution and thus our freedom and liberty by a generation that has indeed had their freedom handed to them on a silver platter. If coddling or favoring China's market over Human Rights isn't the biggest sign to you that communism is something our freedom and liberty should fear I don't know what would be.
Please enjoy and share the video "A Constitution Reckoning"
Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES CODY JUDY
A Constitution Reckoning - CRJ 2016
A Constitutional Reckoning recites the qualifications for office of Representatives and Senators and the President pointing out and highlighting the difference demanded in the Office of the President for a natural born citizen. Is Obama above the law? If he is and the Constitution is not the standard for everyone there's a whole lot of people in prison who should be released.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITCr420K4i8&feature=youtu.be
Labels:
2016,
Barack Obama,
birther,
Citizen,
Clarence Thomas,
cody robert judy,
election 2012,
John Roberts,
natural born citizen,
politico,
politics,
president,
prison,
sCOTUS,
Supreme court
Friday, February 1, 2013
The Creative Power of the People Being Run Down by Government
The Creative Power of the People Being Run Down by Government
Checks and Balances in the 3 Branches of our Government are meant to be a deterrent against sabotage of the creative power we the people have. The purpose of government is to foster that creative power that we as individuals have, and this is the primary positive incentive from which our Constitutional Republic was born. The Constitution was intended to be the defense for individual creativity, making the most positive labor force in the world.
It is therefore a telling tale of a government who wants to possess this creativity for itself by theft, or worse to prohibit outright the productive creating ability of the people by enslavement; either be economic indebtedness which is a form of enslavement or by and through the use of war as subjugation.
Dependency on the government is indeed what is fostered in projecting enslavement in the form of socialism, but even this must be paid for. It is paid for in the form of taxes. The crippling blow of the government made upon the ability to create.
It is true that Government wants you on the dole now. It is true there is a reason to stifle your creative powers. One thing this enslavement to socialism is not though that we can all agree on- it is not a believe in you or your creative powers.
So how is it with the vast improvement of technologies that we have witnessed from, I remind you, 1981 test flights of the space shuttles, the same year that IBM released it's first PC and I was a freshmen in high school- when 64 GB cell phones didn't exist in the pocket of every teen-ager, that the NASA Program became so expensive we had to shut it down?
Texas Governor Perry just slammed Obama for shutting down NASA space shuttle flights after 30 years;"Unfortunately, with the final landing of the Shuttle Atlantis and no indication of plans for future missions, this administration has set a significantly different milestone by shutting down our nation's legacy of leadership in human spaceflight and exploration," Perry said.
Are you really telling me that the vast improvement of technologies has not made things easier and less expensive? Are you really telling me that the convenience, saved time, and speed of technologies have not made it easier and created a lighter load?
Our government is saying the load is too heavy? It takes too much time? Its too expensive? There basically saying that all the advancements in our modern world are costing more, taking up more time, and have become a burden that you must pay for with higher taxes. This is an outright assault on your creativity. Now you know as well as I do they wouldn't be doing or saying this unless there was a massive panic that you would somehow recognize this.
Because if you did recognize this that would mean what? You saw an emperor with no clothes on? You recognized a perpetual oil and gas supply was actually created by our Earth. You recognized that real freedom and liberty were at your fingertips and that our national debt was actually a fabrication with one goal in mind?
To keep the elite who were so dumb or lazy they couldn't create for themselves in the elite chairs. They are panicked they may have to get a real job and they are willing to kill you in a war, enslave you to a debt, and or otherwise do anything they can think of to keep the status quo. No where has this been demonstrated so clearly then in Hillary Clinton's deflect and blame strategies in the Benghazi Congressional hearings while the most important question was not asked: Why was Chris Stevens even there on 9-11-2012 in the first place left unprotected in the barbecue of Libya?
The only problem with that is the cork is bound to pop. The power of the people to create is what, in fact, they are battling. Imagine a government releasing that creative power rather then trying to cross-tie it, and you can imagine what a Cody Robert Judy Administration would look like?
Imagine getting over hurdles in life, rather then having them act as block-aids that prohibit you. That is why our Constitution must be upheld and protected and especially the demands that the President be a natural born citizen qualified according to the Constitution that is the map of protection to your creative power. That is why Barack Hussein Obama was taken to the United States Supreme Court by Cody Robert Judy (myself) in Case No. 12-5276.
The greatest threat to your creative power is a usurper occupying the White House apposed to the very creative power that has made America the opportunity that it is for the individual. We must protect that opportunity and fight for it with every fiber of our creative power and demand Congress recognize Obama is indeed what he is trying to create out of our citizens- liabilities. Obama is a disability according to the 14th Amendment Section 3 and Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court should subjugate itself to these demands of our Constitution to which they are sworn.
Obama is not worthy of impeachment nor is Obama's qualified to be impeached. Obama is not qualified to be U.S. President, and he's not a nice guy for not recognizing it and thinking your too dumb and ignorant to recognize it. He might be a nice guy on the basketball court or the golf course, but in the White House as a walking talking violation of the Constitution he is not a nice guy at all, and most usurpers aren't.
Cody Robert Judy
CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRESIDENT 2016
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4otwMXGzvac
Thursday, January 31, 2013
The American Erosion of Law-Barack Hussein Obama Arrested by the Secret Service for Identity Fraud?
Why are Federal Secret Service Agents investigating a man whose name resembles the biggest fraud and forgery case in American history?
Turning a blind eye on Barack Hussein Obama is exactly what the Secret Service is doing as Sheriff Joe Arapaio's Cold Case Posse has positively identified multiple reasons why Barack Hussein Obama's long form birth certificate, draft selective service forms, and social security card are indeed either altered or assigned to a different person.
This raises the point that "Fraud & Forgery" when it comes to identity theft and alterations that might deceive the American people are acceptable but a small time case the Secret Service is all over.
http://fox13now.com/2013/01/30/police-arrest-suspect-in-major-fraud-ring/
The problem is that when area, or in this case Salt Lake City police, contacted Secret Service agents who then file a federal fraud complaint through the U.S. Attorney’s Office in most fraud and forgery cases of identity theft,it is done, but in Barack Hussein Obama's case Eric Holder is unwilling to investigate the guy in the White House in the face of alarming evidence of law enforcement.
This raises a big question however about Obama's commitment as well as law enforcement's commitment all over the country to, "everyone following the same rules" and being held to the same degree of the law. As it stands now the guy whose name resembles Barack Hussein Obama's who was caught in Salt Lake City is being charged with 35 counts so far.
If the law was equal Barack Hussein Obama would be charged with fraud for every single vote placed for him in the 2012 election which would amount to 60,193,076 counts of fraud. Of course this fraud is connected to money also with every contributions to a candidate who is not qualified as a natural born citizen for the office of the president, every dollar was given under an assumption that is false.
This is why the case in Salt Lake City, Utah of the guy whose name resembles Barack Hussein Obama, whose name is Furat Awel Hussain should at the very least be given a pardon by Barack Hussein Obama immediately, or why the Selective Service Agency should not bother prosecuting another case of fraud or forgery. Barack Hussein Obama's exploits in the manner rising to the office in the White House as a usurper have effectively put to rest or mooted any other charges filed against any other person in fairness under the law.
If I were apart of Furat Awel Hussain legal team, I would plead innocent claiming their is no law against such activity as Barack Hussein Obama has got away with it and the Secret Service is not interested in prosecuting any such activity against Barack Hussein Obama whose crimes far exceed 35 counts of fraud and forgery to the tune of over 60 million.
The Attorney General then should not be interested in prosecuting Furat Awel Hussain because of the proven executive choices of Obama in lying to the American public about his being a natural born citizen qualified for the office of the President he now resides in as a usurper.
Equal protection under the law applied to everyone is something we all hoped for, but Barack Hussein Obama has done more to unravel the integrity, truthfulness,honor, and respect for the law than anyone prior in the White House.
Who may have the greater interest in this? Believe it or not it may be the people pushing for same-sex marriage. In a featured story on CNN Obama said, ""I want everyone treated fairly in this country. We have never gone wrong when we've extended rights and responsibilities to everybody," he said, drawing big applause. "That doesn't weaken families, that strengthens families."
Under the current humiliation, desecration, and contempt for the law Barack Hussein Obama has demonstrated a dis-respect that will be permanently held up as a standard by everyone being prosecuted, and will I'm sure put many many more of our families in grave danger in society, from those who have sworn to uphold the law under such contempt as local law enforcement officials, to those innocent in our schools and churches as the umbrella of Truth and Honor withdraws from our society and we are left unto ourselves.
One of the reasons it is so important and we have so much respect for Jesus Christ is he subjected himself to the law so that he could become the master of the law and in such he found our respect, honor, and ultimately our happiness. Barack Hussein Obama has no such claim as he skirts the law and professes against the law.
Indeed we all are sinners, subject to our own frailties and there isn't a one of us who is without sin who can cast the first stone as Jesus asked those who accused the women caught in adultery to do.
John 8:4-11 They say to him, Master, this woman was taken in adultery, in the very act. 5Now Moses in the law commanded us, that such should be stoned: but what say you? 6This they said, tempting him, that they might have to accuse him. But Jesus stooped down, and with his finger wrote on the ground, as though he heard them not. 7So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said to them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her. 8And again he stooped down, and wrote on the ground. 9And they which heard it, being convicted by their own conscience, went out one by one, beginning at the oldest, even to the last: and Jesus was left alone, and the woman standing in the middle. 10When Jesus had lifted up himself, and saw none but the woman, he said to her, Woman, where are those your accusers? has no man condemned you? 11She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said to her, Neither do I condemn you: go, and sin no more.
Personally, I think if we all did more forgiving then prosecuting we would be better off. It is very difficult when you are accused of breaking the law and prosecuted not to want exactness in the law.
That is why I as a natural born citizen - born in the United States to two Citizens - having run a race with Barack Hussein Obama have felt that the United States Supreme Court has let me down and held me to a standard that they didn't hold Barack Hussein Obama to.
Indeed Congress has held that the 'natural born citizen' clause of the Constitution demanding a natural born citizen in the office of the President and Vice President is indeed different than the qualification found in the Constitution for U.S. Representatives and U.S. Senators.
I ran the race in 2012 as a qualified candidate and Barack Hussein Obama did not. In deed in spite of the accomplishments of Lance Armstrong in winning so many prestigious races when it was found that he had not competed fairly with the other racers, the Administrations responsible for over seeing those races ensuring fairness and equality stripped him of all of his titles.
So to should Congress and the United States Supreme Court find the fairness and equality of the law in the most important race in America that effects literally every single American, the Presidential Race, and strip Barack Hussein Obama from the office of the President for not being qualified.
The demand for a black president should not supersede the demand for the black president to at least be qualified under the Constitution. The Constitution is after all what has provided such an attractive border to cross for many minorities looking for equal protection under the law. If that is not upheld America is actually debased into a land that no longer respects and honors individual rights, but actually apposes those for the mobs and the gangs to rule.
Indeed what minorities should fear more than a jail cell or gun to the head, when they come to America is the individual rights provided by America's constitution eroded away through the qualifications of the office of the president. Barack Hussein Obama may indeed be fighting for more votes by granting amnesty somewhere, but Citizenship through amnesty to a country that no longer respects equal and fair protection under the law is citizenship into a country that perhaps is as dangerous now as the country they came from. What is the point of following the path of citizenship if Barack Hussein Obama hasn't followed it only to die in America?
Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sVTov29ZQ4
Presenting: The Promise Man - by The Cody Robert Judy Band celebrating SCOTUS Case # 12-5276 Judy v. Obama and demonstrating the reasons for protecting the Constitution that provide the opportunity in America. This includes the natural born citizen clause unique to the Office of the President Obama fails not being born in the U.S. to Citizen parents.
(Words)
The Promise Man
Prelude:
I'm talkn' to all you dreamers -- think America is your opportunity..yea -- you can't hide from me -- I see you out there- loving the opportunity- That America brings -- Yea you got your own style- and that's what I want to talk to you about.
Vs.1 -- You see that ole ball is slowing down but your dreams are speeding up- That economic ladders growing faster and let's face it you aint keeping up- Obama's got a spending habit, he's a generational spending jack rabbit- Now its you he's selling out- and for this there aint no doubt- You're the new American slave-That's what this is all about -- That's what this is all about.
Vs.2 -- You know I don't mince no words --No I aint got time for all of that- But I give this time to you- Hell, you know it's the least that I could do.- Because you are my American brother from another mother- Before it gets to cold- You know that fortune favors the bold.-And that snake is coming around telln' you it aint maken' a sound- And its grip is getn' tighter-Its gonna squeeze till there aint no fighter -- And then what you gonna do -- All those dreams aint coming true -- All those dreams aint coming true.
Vs.3 - You need to walk out on this man -- Whose putting a curse on this here promise land-While your purse is getn' lighter --You say Code your just a Constitutional fighter- I'm telling you 16 trillion ain't no joke -- Turning all that hope into --Now you gotta cope- While this country's going up in smoke -- You know you're all goin broke. --The ball aint slamming down quite as fast- Hell your good times-They aint gonna last-Cuz your freedom suffered a concussion -- Remember this is America -- This aint Russia.
Vs.4- I'm not tryn to be no rock'n rapper- Hell, I'm a politician- I got dreams just like you- I'm calling to your recognition- You know I don't use dope -- Hell, I don't even smoke- But ole Uncle Sam's going broke- This aint what you call superstition. -- Why I'm tryn' to tell you about Obama-Gate -- I'm not tryn' to excommunicate -- But you don't wanna hear -- The loss of freedom and liberties your biggest fear -- I'm just like you -- Writing at my kitchen table- Tell'n you about Obama's fable -- Telln' you about Obama's fable.
Chorus: (insert between verses total 4)
I'm putting on my coat -- I'm walking out on this man (repeat 4 times) I'm putting on my coat-walkn out on this man- make me the promise land --make me the promise land. I'm putting on my coat --I'm walk'n out on this man -- I'm putting on my coat- I'll be your promise man -- Yeah, I'll be your promise man.
Sunday, January 27, 2013
Let's Give Up the Constitution for a Piece of Trash? Hummm?
The following transcript from the video, and the video seen below is the most benign friendly piece of trash. What makes it so vagarious is its framer Professor of Constitutional Law at Georgetown University Louis Michael Seidman seems so dangerous who would pay him any attention?
Mild mannered, even tempered and a constitutional law professor - wasn't Obama also a "senior lecturer," at the University of Chicago Law School who said he "served as a professor" and said he was "regarded as" a professor?
I'd like to take this time to make some scratch marks over his "simple idea" which I've encased in [] and start with the first sentence which jumps right out of the gate on you like the orders from the leader of a flash mob set to trash a retail store in the mall:
[I've got a simple idea: Let's give up on the Constitution.]
Simple ideas are genuinely pure and straight forward, but even if he used the 6 words to shock you, the resulting vacuum of the Republic for which we stand has vanished for what we must assume is not a Republic, in which the majority mob rules and the individual loses. What would the ACLU say to that?
[I know, it sounds radical, but it's really not. Constitutional disobedience is as American as apple pie.]
Well, he has admitted to being radical here but knows its necessary to try and convince you otherwise. Our prisons are full of people who decided to break the law and here he is advocating "Constitutional disobedience" which is basically a disobedience of the Supreme Law of the Land the likes of which every office holder of the court and government have sworn to uphold.
[For example, most of our greatest Presidents -- Jefferson, Lincoln, Wilson, and both Roosevelts -- had doubts about the Constitution, and many of them disobeyed it when it got in their way.]
Perfect examples Presidents? - irregardless of any circumstances that our Constitution actually allows and provides for within the Constitution, which would make it not against the Constitution. He uses past presidents, who in his words in the bottom paragraph we would consider "ancient and outdated" as his examples of giving up on the Constitution? How is it possible to use "ancient and outdated" material to discredit "ancient and outdated material"? Shouldn't he be using modern material if he wants to discredit "ancient and outdated material"? He makes no sense.
[To be clear, I don't think we should give up on everything in the Constitution. The Constitution has many important and inspiring provisions, but we should obey these because they are important and inspiring, not because a bunch of people who are now long-dead favored them two centuries ago.]
Ohhhh so he thinks some things are good in the Constitution now and wants to save the "parts" of it that are "important and inspiring provisions", according to who? Him? I find the "natural born citizen clause for the Office of the President quite inspiring that has for over 200 years prevented a foreign leader from financing his own heirs on to the throne of the White House.
[Unfortunately, the Constitution also contains some provisions that are not so inspiring. For example, one allows a presidential candidate who is rejected by a majority of the American people to assume office. Suppose that Barack Obama really wasn't a natural-born citizen. So what?]
Holy Cow!- This guy is nuts. So the Electorate actually does their job and finds out because of a little investigation that the President Elect is only 11 years old and is the son of North Korea Kim Jong II- a son he had born in Hawaii. Anyone see a problem with that? He obviously doesn't. Or was he talking about the off chance insanity plot of the the Pres and VP actually being assassinated and our Constitution providing a back up in the chain of command who would have the authority vested in them, but who were not elected specifically for that office while we got together and voted again? He doesn't like that part.
[Constitutional obedience has a pernicious impact on our political culture. Take the recent debate about gun control. None of my friends can believe it, but I happen to be skeptical of most forms of gun control.]
Pernicious? Such a coy word - Having a harmful effect, esp. in a gradual or subtle way. What? He just said we should abandon the Constitution and he doesn't think he is being pernicious? Then he has the audacity to chum up to the Constitution's 2nd Amendment? This guys dumb and he's got balls. That's a dangerous combination. The fact his friends don't believe he's a friend to the Constitution makes me wonder if his friends are right. His opening statement did in fact say "Give Up the Constitution" rather then "Give Up parts of the Constitution" in some sensible and reasonable term as the Constitution permits, being flexible and adaptable to modern times by 2/3rds of a majority. Does he have a problem with finding 2/3rd of the Representatives and Senators that we the people, the majority, pick actually agreeing on an Amendment? What - its not fast enough for him or is it the fact that 2/3rd is just too heavy of a burden?
[I understand, though, that's not everyone's view, and I'm eager to talk with people who disagree.]
Yes, he's eager to talk to people who disagree with the 2nd Amendment because they are more his friends then the ones he was referring to can't believe he's a 2nd Amendment champion?
[But what happens when the issue gets Constitutional-ized? Then we turn the question over to lawyers, and lawyers do with it what lawyers do. So instead of talking about whether gun control makes sense in our country, we talk about what people thought of it two centuries ago.]
Now he's comparing taking a stand for the Constitution to constipation in the word "Constitutional-ized" is that even a word in the wiki dictionary? Yes it is and it means: Incorporated into a constitution. How does that happen? Oh yes, 2/3rd of the Congress agree to it. Then he reveals his true colors on gun control advocating the notion that people two centuries ago could not have possibly wanted a gun for the same reason our military does, our own militia's do, and our own hunters do? How could the line of thinking still exist of overthrowing a tyrannical government? Is tyrannical dictator king still a word he understands?
[Worse yet, talking about gun control in terms of constitutional obligation needlessly raises the temperature of political discussion. Instead of a question on policy, about which reasonable people can disagree, it becomes a test of one's commitment to our foundational document and, so, to America itself.]
More on Gun Control out of his 2nd Amendment respecting mouth here; funny I've never heard of anyone at the NRA's rally's getting riled about people giving them weapons. Its always the people wanting to take their water and bee-bee guns away that pisses them off.
[This is our country. We live in it, and we have a right to the kind of country we want. We would not allow the French or the United Nations to rule us, and neither should we allow people who died over two centuries ago and knew nothing of our country as it exists today.]
A little patriotism out of his mouth respecting America's Constitution and its flexibility for our modern age? No, he's mocking it. He also advocates that the French and United Nations should not rule over us and then throws the founder and framers overboard with them. He just doesn't understand our Constitution is flexible and provides a great way for Amendments does he? He also doesn't seem to understand that people who lived two centuries ago thought making-love was a lot better then making war. That's pretty standard I think. The proof? We're here because our Daddys got our Mama's pregnant and managed enough food to feed us. WhaWhoo!
[If we are to take back our own country, we have to start making decisions for ourselves, and stop deferring to an ancient and outdated document.]
Take back our country? From who? It sounds like this guy is advocating for England to take back the States. In which case he is aiding and abetting for something even more ancient and outdated then the Constitution. If this professor from Georgetown University, a school that was on my list to attend when I was 18, is anything like the others I'd say America has no friend there, but old King George might have, and I made the right decision not to attend. Reminds me of a few words of my new song The Promise Man - "your the new American slave, that's what this is all about."
Now if you wanna hear this pompous elitist B.S. in action just hit the play button.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-3445_162-57566014/professor-take-our-country-back-from-the-constitution/
Labels:
Barack Obama,
birther,
cbs,
constitution,
constitutional law,
election,
electorate,
Georgetown,
gun rights,
Louis Michael Seidman,
natural born citizen,
news,
NRA,
politics,
president,
Sunday Morning,
University
Wednesday, January 23, 2013
Your Promise Man- A Cody Robert Judy Band Original
The biggest crowd affected are young people, College, Highschool, its their dreams that the politicians in Washington DC are in fact selling with our debt and no incentives to stop the spending, after all they won't be in office by the time the other shoe drops.
It is with this concern that I have made the following rap song and put it together in a format that young people might be attracted to dig in and learn the truth of what is going on and how their futures are being sold.
I have a deep seated love for freedom and liberty because of the experiences I have had where the Constitution counted for nothing. In this situations and circumstances unfortunately a real appreciation for our rights our established.
I'm working on a rap sheet with the words that I will post soon, so stay tuned and check back here! Mean while enjoy. Please bear in mind that it is not the people who already believe in the Constitution that we need to engage, attract,inform and educate It is people who are not in our crowd yet.
One clip in the video of former Republican Candidate for Vice President Ryan, who many would say was on tract and defending the Constitution; yet you see he makes fun of those of us Birthers who are standing up for truth despite unpopular media coverage as we have recognized that the economic conditions in our country have indeed been compromised with the principles of our Constitution being flushed.
If leaders like Representative Ryan cannot afford to take a stand for the qualifications of the office of the President, we can safely say they are not willing to take a stand on our economy and disastrous debt. Its a pretty safe bet that these kind of leaders are not steering our Country in a direction that will maintain our freedom and liberties and that they are not concerned with anyone else but their own private motives of power and passing the buck on to us UNTIL they are not in office.
Your Promise Man - An upbeat rap song by The Cody Robert Judy Band exposes Obama's identity documents as altered and recites that he's not qualified as a natural born citizen, his long form birth cert is altered, his draft registration is altered which means we have a usurper in the White House.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sVTov29ZQ4
Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY
It is with this concern that I have made the following rap song and put it together in a format that young people might be attracted to dig in and learn the truth of what is going on and how their futures are being sold.
I have a deep seated love for freedom and liberty because of the experiences I have had where the Constitution counted for nothing. In this situations and circumstances unfortunately a real appreciation for our rights our established.
I'm working on a rap sheet with the words that I will post soon, so stay tuned and check back here! Mean while enjoy. Please bear in mind that it is not the people who already believe in the Constitution that we need to engage, attract,inform and educate It is people who are not in our crowd yet.
One clip in the video of former Republican Candidate for Vice President Ryan, who many would say was on tract and defending the Constitution; yet you see he makes fun of those of us Birthers who are standing up for truth despite unpopular media coverage as we have recognized that the economic conditions in our country have indeed been compromised with the principles of our Constitution being flushed.
If leaders like Representative Ryan cannot afford to take a stand for the qualifications of the office of the President, we can safely say they are not willing to take a stand on our economy and disastrous debt. Its a pretty safe bet that these kind of leaders are not steering our Country in a direction that will maintain our freedom and liberties and that they are not concerned with anyone else but their own private motives of power and passing the buck on to us UNTIL they are not in office.
Your Promise Man - An upbeat rap song by The Cody Robert Judy Band exposes Obama's identity documents as altered and recites that he's not qualified as a natural born citizen, his long form birth cert is altered, his draft registration is altered which means we have a usurper in the White House.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sVTov29ZQ4
Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY
Tuesday, January 15, 2013
SCOTUS Election Challenge: Obama’s Operation to Amputate
SCOTUS Election Challenge: Obama’s Operation to Amputate
The progressive war on women continues with the Obama Administration as Obama considers a plethora of restrictions this week on the public’s right to bear arms, protected by the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution, Joe Biden has corralled as recommendations just waiting for the Executive Order and signature of Obama – a candidate for President who fails the ‘natural born citizen’ clause of the Constitution occupying the White House, whose using a social security number assigned from Connecticut and never has been a resident there, whose own attorneys are on record reporting his long form birth certificate is a forgery- whose own draft registration has been called by a criminal investigation of law enforcement altered.
Coming on the heels of Obama’s executive order granting him tax-payer funded Secret Service protection for life, The Sandy-Hook slaughter has had a major affect upon an emboldened Administration for restrictions against those suffering “any” mental health problems targeting and profiling the guns of any household with persons on mental health medications.
Now why would the Administration want to target all house-holds with anyone taking mental health prescribed drugs if they didn’t trust the drugs? It boils down to an assault upon the female gender or a complete lack of faith in the mental health drugs.
Statistically the major portions of the population suffering from mental health issues are predominantly women. In fact in Utah considered by many to be per capita the psycho-tropic capital of the United States it would easily dis-arm half of the population and house-holds. In fact about 25 or so guns caught in security checks out of Utah airports and the rest of the nation here.
Wither women are more likely to go see a psychiatrist for marital problems in counseling, more vulnerable to depression, more sensitive spiritually, or weaker in a physical confrontation, it all boils down to the female populations weaknesses that this administration is targeting and profiling because they would be the most affected by such an executive order.
How is this unwanted advance on gun and Wallmart ammo control and household gun confiscation to effect Women who have been sexually assaulted, raped, and been prescribed any psychiatric medication for stress? If signed into law, these women would be considered a sever risk to carry hand-guns, and their house-holds could be stripped of arms their husbands could use to protect them, leaving no protection other then steak-knives and base ball bats. Assaults happen within 5 minutes and so the police are nowhere in range to help.
Post traumatic syndrome, rape victims, an aunt, mother, teen-ager treated for depression, memory loss, forgetfulness, amnesia under the roof of any man who is a hunter and owner of guns would necessarily have to give up the guns in the household. If the Doctor didn’t ask you about guns in your home when prescribing such meds, then Doctors could be prosecuted for a felony.
Now Birthers have called these spécificités of Obama’s background that would prohibit his 2nd Amendment right to own, buy, or use a firearm because of a failed back ground check , a concern warranting criminal investigations, but it’s not fair to call Obama a criminal for hiding under the umbrella and cover of identity fraud simply because it hasn’t been prosecuted.
Newly elected Utah Attorney General John Swallow has invited an investigation by the United States Attorney General’s office in the alleged bribery scandal opened by testimony of Jeremy Johnson to eliminate any doubt of wrong doing; however Obama remains fearful of any Congressional hearings in his identity problems and an open court review of the qualification demands of the Office of the President. Why is Obama so fearful of this review in open court or Congress?
In Oprah Winfrey’s interview with Lance Armstrong’s came a review from Psychologist suggesting Lance’s personality dis-order highlighted by the ability to lie for years about taking performance enhancement drugs could have been the result of child hood trauma. Lance Armstrong hasn't just denied ever using performance enhancing drugs, he has done so in an indignant, even threatening way much the way Obama has treated Birthers. Both may be suffering from narcissism because they must be loved , have to be adored , have the ability lie to a camera, feels the truth has no value, and have built up a huge following on the lies that are told and thus the expectations are demanding. Now Armstrong may be cornered by the U.S. State Department for damages as a rep for the post office.
No one wants that kind of person, or the criminally insane armed and in the White House as President? Institutionalized persons can’t pass a back ground check, but neither could Obama if you run his social security number or honored his Jakarta State adoption by step-father Lolo Soetoro which allowed him to enroll and attend school. Now what good are records if we are just going to ignore them? Make no mistake Obama wants “your” medical records though?
Now, radio show host Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck continue to raise the warning signs of Obama’s dictatorial and tyrannical behavior, that most believing in the Constitution would call ‘insane’ and more then wrong-doing but a ‘crime’ and he’s in the White House! Do you see how fast the “label” of someone can affect you personally?
Recently former Presidential Candidate Jon Huntsman has made association with the“No Label” conference aimed at helping people find solutions rather than so much ideology with party and many Americans are getting sick of the Republican and the Democrat Parties. Obama seeks to label people, in a divide and conquer mentality and with that label "mental health" confiscate the house-holds weapons and suspend the Constitution. It’s no secret Obama’s own lies are to be permitted while Birthers telling the truth are put down. Labels are and can be more often used by the dictates of the eyes of the beholder. That is why Obama must be held accountable to the Constitution.
Rush and Glen both say there’s a thing called The Constitution and that it is a bulwark of law. Now they say executive orders are not meant for the President to get around or violate the Constitution. The Constitution defines our Country. It holds our country together. Obama’s signed 23 Executive Orders ( 144 total) on guns in the usurpation of the Constitution because no one will stand up against that? If Congress doesn’t stand up for the Constitution the Office of the President can wipe them, and all their work, out by executive order.
Executive Orders are not supposed to break the law, change the law, and they certainly are not meant to grant unfettered dictatorial power. The Legislative Branch is supposed to be the Branch writing laws. I want you to understand this.
Rush and Glenn both want you to know they would not lie to you either. Big question then: Why aren’t they Birthers? Why do they cover for Obama’s violating the Constitution in the natural born citizen clause in the Constitution?
So all that needs to happen is “accusations” of your mental unfitness by a doctor who orders and then prescribes a medications and bam your Constitutional Rights are non-existent? Should any women have a right to own a gun? Once you suffered from depression can’t you always be susceptible- once an alcoholic always an alcoholic? Glenn Beck admits he could fall off the wagon tomorrow. This is the mentality that has no bounds in its ability to suspend your rights by doctor’s orders, and thus your right to bear arms.
Do Doctors ever make mistakes referenced as SRE's (serious re-portable events)? Oh I think there were only half a million people mis-identified and operated on last year that were mistakenly assumed by doctors needing treatments like amputations and organ transplants. The wrong patients woke up without spleens or limbs that had been cut off accidentally, or an instrument sewed up inside them. With mental health issues you only need to look at the law suits of particular mental health medications recommended actually causing harm to know when it comes to chemistry many Doctors are actually shooting in the dark and to think that blindfolded they could actually prohibit your Constitutional rights is pretty legitimate for what American patriots would call political insanity.
How do you define “mental illness”? “Paranoia” often is a symptom of a mental health dis-order and many main stream media commentators who have called for confiscations of weapons from any household where mental health medications have been prescribed are indeed suffering from a delusional fear of safety and security. We don’t ban cars because of car accidents, but the solution to dis-arming all house-holds who have under the roof someone taking mental health drugs is actually palatable? How in the world is taking away from women the right to arm themselves against attackers palatable?
This gets into an assault upon religious beliefs to. Do you believe in the Holy Ghost? If you do, you need psychiatric medication? If you believe Mary conceived baby Jesus by Holy Conception are you insane? If you believe Moses received the 10 Commandments from God’s holy finger are you insane? You see how fast the entire Country can be called by an atheist believing doctor insane and in need of “psychiatric medication” and thus needs to be dis-armed?
How many people with mental dis-orders now won’t trust their doctors? I’d say Obama has done more to ruin the patient doctor relationship then any single person occupying the White House in the last month. When you consider the confiscation of guns and ammunition on every house-hold or under any roof where there is a person with a mental health issue you’re basically with one executive order able to dis-arm more than 50% of the population now armed. That’s why Obama’s going after the women on the mental health issue.
Lithium – Prozac – all the anxiety and depression drugs once used to help people now are used to target, profile and dis-arm American households. How’s that for progressive?
Now, why go over all of this, why discuss it? Well, the most important part of selecting a president is to find someone who understands these threats to your security. These are threats to your free speech, your right to bear arms, even your right to worship freely. These fundamental inalienable rights are under direct assault by Obama and he is unqualified for the Office of the President.
If your security demands upholding the Constitution then you have to find a President who at least understands the Constitution and isn’t a walking talking violation of the Constitution. People talk about people who have died because of guns, what about the people who have died for our Constitution? Has the Gov. of New York forgotten them in the Cuomo bill?
Statistically, Sandy-Hook is an anomaly but it doesn’t relieve the grief of the families bearing the grief and loss of their households; however, no law can bring them back to life again either.
How many of those parents seeing a perpetrator walk through their front door wouldn’t want a gun or use a gun to protect their children in a dangerous situation? I haven’t seen any suggestions such as a push button alarm put under every teacher’s desk that could sound a siren distracting a would-be perpetrator much like a bank has that notifies officials of a bank robber? Doesn’t it make more sense to protect our children then it does to protect our money? That makes more sense than dis-arming women who have suffered attacks based on their receiving any help in prescribed medications.
Laws are only as good as they are enforced and Obama’s occupation in the White House as an unqualified person for the Office of the President is a perfect shining example on the Hill that no matter the executive order or law passed by Congress we have an example in the White House of just how to get around the law rather than live by the law.
This has been the cause of my action in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 in the United States Supreme Court, which has thus far been evaded by the Court. The Chief Justice of the Untied States Supreme Court- Justice John Roberts received this letter today in the action.
Your item was delivered at 10:50 am on January 15, 2013 in WASHINGTON, DC 20543.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fNjSTFI7_I
Cody Robert Judy
We need your help - America needs your help - http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm Here is where you can help Cody.
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Cody Robert Judy for President
Plaintiff/ SCOTUS Case No. JUDY v. OBAMA 12-5276
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODY JUDY
FEC REGISTERED http://fec-candidates.findthedata.org/l/4426/Judy-Cody-Robert
Candidate ID P20003372
Committee ID C00501593
Petition for Rehearing under consideration:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/113046270/Judy-v-Obama-12-5276-Petition-for-Rehearing
Writ of Cert under consideration Judy v. Obama 12-5276
http://www.scribd.com/doc/100156244/Judy-v-Obama-Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-Revision-per-U-S-Clerk-Case-Analyst-Appendix-Stamped-Orders-Included
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




