The great shake-up continued in Utah today with the same-sex marriage war as Attorney General Eric Holder under the executive hand of Obama at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue representing the Federal Government just said the 1300 marriages performed, that the Governor of Utah stated yesterday would not be recognized by his state agencies, would be recognized by the Federal Government. Video here of the announcement.
Rush Limbaugh just featured it on his show comparing the Feds engaging in executive orders of this kind, like Obama would, basically waving a magic wond saying the Governors words in his own state should be “moot”. The Governors of the individual States represent the executive branch of the State, as Obama represents the executive branch of the Federal Government and typically it falls on the executive branch to be the “enforcer of the law” while the Judicial Branch represents the “interpetation” of the law and the legislative branch represents the “law makers”.
Jan 8th,2014, the State Representative LaVar Christensen, original sponsor of Utah's Amendment 3 that actually became part of Utah's Constitution Rod Arquette show made the argument that Utah’s Referendum passed in 2004 declaring “marriage” to be only between a man and women was simply an insurance policy of the inalienable rights assured under the laws of nature that God had given as was previously discussed in Part I and Part II of this saga.
That the ‘marriage’ statute of the State was not given by man, but was a right given by God was the argument Utah State Rep. Christensen made, basically stating it was well within the State's right to legislate morality and it did. He mentioned the Creator in the Declaration of Independence, "Under God" in the pledge of allegiance as examples of our Nation being a Christian centered nation with the laws of morality coming as inalienable rights. Of course the Constitution says very little about “married couples”, but says a whole lot about protecting ‘individual rights’ regardless of race, color, or previous conditions of servitude.
Citizen(s) is/are determined to be those born or naturalized in the United States, which takes ‘gender’ out of the discrimination line ,Amendment 19, and it does say in Amendment 14, Sect 1. , that “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States, nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protections of the laws.” The protections of the laws or benefits to ‘married couples’ then must be equally accessible to every citizen without a bias of religion or gender. “Marriage” of course has nothing to do with the rights of procreation under inalienable rights. God has granted the rights of a women to get pregnant within a marriage contract or without, which we then would ascribe as a ‘natural law’ verses say a state statute of marriage.
The word “Marriage” has been used for thousands of years to describe a union of a man and women where the wife would represent the female part of that marriage, however, concubine also goes back thousands of years to describe a union of a man and a women as in Abraham’s time in the Bible as the the legislature brought the “moral” aspect of the Biblical Christian nature of our nation was founded upon into his interview with Mr. Arquette.
As I’ve listened to Rod Arquette on his shows about this issue, as he has admitted himself, this issue is to him about like stuffing a whole chicken down his throat with the feathers on. He is compassionate to all people, but really guards that word “marriage” to be only used by a man and a women. There is nothing however in the words “Same-Sex Marriage” that is shared with “Hetrosexual Marriage” accept the word “marriage”. Sodomy, Adultry, Fornication, and intercourse all share in their communication or understanding the word “Sex” depending upon who’s saying it to whom. The abbreviation of the word Book Of Mormon (B.O.M) does not infringe upon the word BOMB. The point of course is it wouldn't be the first time the State of Utah as represented by authorities was wrong, mistaken, or in other words had just hooked up the cinch to the bridle of the horse. Yeah, it doesn't go there.
If you were anti-mormon you could say the B.O.M. was a flop or wasn’t considered a cannon in your religious opinon, or if you were mormon you might say the B.O.M. was dynomite in your opinion and argue it was a cannon of religion. Of course if this were argued in a church meeting the factual evidence would declare the truth, but you have to understand the State of Utah has in more then one instance denied facts like these and in a completely dillusional state of mind incarcerated a person(s) before, for over eight years.
That’s not a joke folks, but it was the subject of Jon Stewarts Daily Show in a comedy show here 'Putting the Con back in Congress :
In the 9th Century BC the prophet Elijah proposes a direct test of the powers of Baal and Yahweh. The people of Israel, 450 prophets of Baal, and 400 prophets of Asherah are summoned to Mount Carmel. Two altars are built, one for Baal and one for Yahweh. Wood is laid on the altars. Two oxen are slaughtered and cut into pieces; the pieces are laid on the wood. Elijah then invites the priests of Baal to pray for fire to light the sacrifice. They pray from morning to noon without success. Elijah ridicules their efforts. They respond by cutting themselves and adding their own blood to the sacrifice (such mutilation of the body was strictly forbidden in the Mosaic law). They continue praying until evening without success.
Elijah now orders that the altar of Yahweh be drenched with water from "four large jars" poured three times (1 Kings 18:33–34). He asks God to accept the sacrifice. Fire falls from the sky, consuming the water, the sacrifice and the stones of the altar itself as well. Elijah seizes the moment and orders the death of the prophets of Baal. Elijah prays earnestly for rain to fall again on the land. Then the rains begin, signaling the end of the famine.
I hope Rod Arquette and the Utah Legislatures and Governor don’t start cutting on themselves and throwing themselves off of tall buildings as the fire from Washington DC in Obama and Holder comes down to them, when they themselves have been unwilling to uphold the United States Constitution in Obama’s eligiblity choosing rather to sacrifice over 2 million dollars in the defense of the referendum of 2004 and certainly all of the money that went in to getting it past as well.
The first amendment certainly guarantees the freedom of speech and it seems Utah’s referendum of 2004 deals more with semantics rather than ‘laws of nature’ which we would consider inalienable rights given by God, so I think there is more in the Constitution that requires the State to recognize the rights of every individual’s preference to a union of our species as citizens under the Constitution or Supreme Law of the Land.
Now, our Constitution includes “Citizens” so I don’t think those people who want to marry their cat or dog or horse should be given a marriage licence with the full benefits of federal and state agency protections under the law. The cat, dog, and horse are not ‘citizens’ upon which the Constitution applies.
Indeed in another analogy Rod Arquette and the State of Utah law makers and Governor have ignored the laws of nature and not had any problem with endorsing Obama as “President” , even though he is not a ‘Natural Born Citizen’ qualified under the Constitution’s demand for the Office of the President which is the only difference actually distinguishing in the Constitution’s language for the Office of the President from U.S. Reps, and U.S. Senators whose designation is "Citizen".
If discrimination is the word for "different age qualifications" use it as you will, there are differences in qualifications afforded to us for very good and well thought out reasons standing as principles of the Constitution. In short, a ‘natural born citizen’ requires two full generations void of alien citizenship to be the commander in chief of the armies and President of the United States. The distinction was put in place to prevent a foreign dictator from placing an heir in the position. A Qualification for an office is indeed a legal discrimination, but if you'll notice it wasn't based on race, color, or previous conditions of servitude, or gender.
If a person is born in the United States to Citizen parents, there is a two generation protection. That protection, considered to be a national security measure, was respected until Obama usurped the office against Laws of Nations mentioned in Article I, Sect. 8 for which Congress is given charge stating : “ and Offenses against the Law of Nations;”. Capitals not paraphrased.
The United States can not afford not to recognize the 'natural born citizen' clause of the demand for the Office of the President regardless of race, color, or previous conditions of servitude or gender. Just because Obama is black doesn't mean that he doesn't have to be a natural born citizen to be president and at least 35 years of age.
Utah’s only defense on the enforcement of the Federal dictation would be that Obama is not a qualified enforcer of federal law that is recognized by the States under the United States Constitution agreed upon by the States in the Union.
This of course would be like throwing the book at Obama who has taken it upon himself to line item veto any part of Obamacare ruling by edict, and it would actually be a recognition of the law of the Constitution upon the Office of the President, void Obamacare, and certainly would be a notable charge for the State’s rights to at least recognize their own authority upon their state agencies.
Of course Governor Gary Herbert could I suppose still authorize the Driver's License bureau in Utah not to change the drivers liscenses of those seeking a change due to the same-sex marriage recognition of 1300 couples as well as insurance policies etc., but that is an uphill fight that I believe he will come out on the losing end of because so much is afforded in individual rights that has not been recognized in Utah.
Now I like my Utah Governor Gary Herbert, I sure do. I think him to be an honorable and reasonable man. I believe he works his tail end off for Utah and I believe in his heart he is doing what he believes is the will of the people in Utah. What I do think is missing in this argument is an understanding of the argument for the people.
You get a crowd going in one direction its not likely that each individual has had the time or the argument laid out for them as a Judge might.
That's exactly what happened with Obama in fact, and how we got a usurpation of the Office of the President. The crowd got excited about a first black president, and the media loved the story even more than the wisdom of the law. Its one of the most important aspects of the United States Constitution and Utah's Constitution also, those of the rights of the individual over the mob or crowd.
That is a fundamental paradigm shifts of the power of the United States Citizen that the world has stood in shock over. However, any right can be violated if Good Men do nothing and refuse to take a stand, which is another reason Obama still resides at 16oo Pennsylvania Avenue and our Nation is distressed and stretched domestically so far from the United States Constitution that unlawful prosecutions take place and the rights of many are trampled under foot by those who believe themselves to be appointers of the law but not subjects to the law as has almost become common place in America now days.
What I do know is the days have come when no man can live on barrowed light and that each and every individual must search out for themselves the wisdom of the Constitution which I continually find sound and admire in its simplicity,direction, and course. Our forefathers knew that to have a Nation full of diverse religions wouldn't necessarily be easy, but it would be worth it, and that is why Congress it was said, "must not make any law respecting a particular establishment of religion" and why marriage should be afforded to any consenting citizen according to the age particulars afforded by the States Laws in which they reside, and why I not only think Utah's Referendum was wrong and indeed is unconstitutional, but why the 1887 Edmunds-Tucker Act of the United States Congress is just as equally wrong and unconstitutional. So if Holder feels it necessary to over-turn a Utah Referendum about marriage let him not be a hypocrit and not overturn that Federal Referendum or Act of Congress.
Breaking: Breaking News : Orrin Hatch R - U.S Senator from Utah and Mitch McConnell R- U.S. Senator from Kentcky just requested two sheriffs kits produced by Michael Volin of WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com (WOBC) with the purpose of informing the public and elected officials of the forgery of the long-form birth certificate image posted since April 27, 2011 on the White House website. These kits (Get Yours Free Here) contain the same evidence released in March 1,2012 (and a little more) that I included in my case against Obama that went from Georgia State- Georgia State Supreme- to U.S. Supreme 12-5276 in Judy v. Obama.
Please urge and encourage your Representatives to OPEN AND TRANSPARENT HEARINGS in the House of Representatives on Obama's eligibility as the solution to eliminating Obamacare. These hearings must be held and the evidence must be heard that are in the Sheriff's kits most all of the Representatives have received now.
If these hearings are conducted in the open and reported in the open, the evidence will mount collectively and the U.S. Senate although it has a majority of Democrats will have to concede to the facts and evidences or will be seen as completely unfit for their duties and as incompetent. Utah would most likely see more benefits come from supporting the Candidates like myself, (well, Candidate as myself because there were no other candidates in the entire U.S.A. who stood up for principle regardless of party), fighting for equal protections under the law in pushing for Open and Transparent Hearings in Congress with two million dollars on Obama's Verification Eligibility qualification hearings on the stage to remove him as a disability according to Amend 14, Sec.3 would be a lot faster solution.
Like CODY ROBERT JUDY'S NEW 2016 PAGE ON FACEBOOK HERE
Follow me on Twitter: Official Cody Robert Judy 2016 on Tweeter here
You Can Help Me [ If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign”, or ABC Campaign ,which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President please make a contributions here:
Let me now wish everyone a very happy and warm New Year as we pray for the Lord to save our Country and restore America from the dilapidation we now find ourselves and the principles of the Constitution in, for this I am Taking A Stand.
Sincerely, Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us www.codyjudy.blogspot.com YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES TV Get Cody's Book: Taking A Stand
