WHAT SHERIFF JOE CAN’T DO – CODY CAN !

WHAT SHERIFF JOE CAN’T DO – CODY ROBERT JUDY CAN...




Things are heating up with the recent published globe article citing Obama’s long form fabrication has been forged and the forgery alleged to have been identified here by Sheriff Arpaio:
BREAKING! Arpaio FINDS MAN who forged Obama Birth Certificate!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uT_PV-Ptjag




The March 1st 2012 Press Conference of Sheriff Joe Arpaio in which a ‘Cold Case Posse’ released some 2200 hours of investigation results finding ‘probable cause’ Obama’s long form birth certificate is really a long formed fabrication as well as Obama’s Draft registration, America is waking up to discover there’s been many a slip between the cup and the lip of their elected representatives.

Understanding the fix Republicans found themselves in when in 2008 they signed on to be the employed silencers on Obama’s gun to the Constitution’s demand for a ‘natural born citizen’ with every Republican Senator voting for the Obama/Clinton co-sponsored U.S. Senate Resolution 511, fermenting the security wanted for Sen. John McCain’s 2008 presidential qualification quagmire as Panama’s most famous son.

Some have wondered why all those Republican Senators and House Congressmen have been so silent- Well now you know the answer! The elephant was painted into a corner by the jackass and has been afraid to come out owing to their own lack of courage for the Constitution’s demands for the Office of the President repeatedly shot down as a Legislative mandate to encroachment.

The fact the Constitution’s demand for a natural born citizen was assaulted some 8-10 times with attempts to change it, just since Obama came into existence on the political stage as a Illinois State Senator is a testimony to the Legislative Mandate secured that the Judicial Branch should not be running rough shod over or avoiding.
Americans are catching a glimpse of what one good Sheriff can do as far as using some intelligence in investigation. Lord knows the House and Senate have the same power but are letting the Sheriff do its bidding.

While the Sheriff has been terrific at releasing the results of the investigations of the Cold Case Posse led by lead investigator Michael Zullo in the March 1st,2012 Press Conference, and the upcoming scheduled July 17th,2012 press conference reported to be even more damaging to Obama’s usurpation and identity cover-up, there’s one thing the good sheriff hasn’t done and that is what Cody Robert Judy, Democratic Party Presidential Candidate, can and has done.

That is taking the investigation results of the Cold Case Posse to an actual formal legal prosecutor!

The Sheriff’s job is largely outlined as an “enforcer” of the law in the executive branch of local government and investigator of crime, but the actual prosecution of the actions always is relayed to a member of the Judicial Branch known as an Attorney General.

Cody Robert Judy is the conduit of Sheriff’s Joe’s investigation result to the Solicitor General of the United States Supreme Court currently held by Donald B. Verrilli Jr.
http://www.justice.gov/osg/meet-osg.html


The task of the Office of the Solicitor General is to supervise and conduct government litigation in the United States Supreme Court. Virtually all such litigation is channeled through the Office of the Solicitor General and is actively conducted by the Office. The United States is involved in approximately two-thirds of all the cases the U.S. Supreme Court decides on the merits each year.

As a Candidate for President of the United States in the Democratic Party, Cody Robert Judy has a very unique and tangible standing that has been used to dismiss nearly 95% of the eligibility cases from the judicial branch.

The employment of the Solicitor General’s requirement is found in an organ of the United States Government called the Federal Election Commission , (FEC) , and what that Federal sponsored commission might be doing that is undermining the Republic?

See the first question on Cody’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari for the U.S. Supreme Court found on page ii outlines the office of the FEC as a culprit that amounts to aiding and abetting candidates who are not qualified in Federal election races according to the demands of the Constitution, as well as the Mailing Declaration found after page 38 showing the Solicitor General address.

Whenever a federal agency’s policies are called into question in a Petition for Writ of Certiorari the Petitioner must file a copy with the Solicitor General as is noted by U.S. Supreme Court Rule 29(4)(b) and also the Act of Congress that certified Obama’s eligibility by the Electorate.

This amounts to Government protection of unqualified candidates by securing for those unqualified candidates Government cover, especially in the solicitation of campaign contributions to those trusting citizens contributing under a false pretense of a Candidates qualification or eligibility to run, not to mention the Republics peril.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/98883410/Judy-v-Obama-U-S-Supreme-Crt-Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-July-2012


At the heart of America is a Constitutional Republic that represents a very unique form of Democracy where ‘We The People’ are represented as ‘individuals’ who can stand up against the mob and win. Might isn’t right, when it comes to trampling individual rights and if each individual’s rights are not stood up for very quickly ‘We The People’ are subverted to another form of Government such as a fascism-dictatorial government, or an elite Oligarchy much more associated with totalitarianism or despotism.

As an example the rich in America are about to find out that Tax- Mandates that run into Health Care insuring 45 million new consumers all at once will soon be found a strategy to stay poor rather than an incentive to progress which has always been the problem in varying degrees of socialism. Unwilling to yield the claim that it works, ultimately the frustration goes to war as the diversion.

So .. first they try to insure you with socialism, then they kill you when it doesn’t work, one way or the other. I think Donald Trump recognizes this with his claim that Obama will start a war before or to win the election. The result will be catastrophic loss of life that socialist were so worried in a false pretense of insuring, not to mention the complete disregard of passing on the debt to future generations who can’t vote right now.

http://www.wnd.com/2012/07/trump-obama-will-start-iran-war-to-win-election/
Taking A Stand is not always the easiest thing to do, but Cody Robert Judy has done it, Taking A Stand for the Constitution’s demands for a ‘natural born citizen’.
Originating out of a “Georgia Administrative Court” Cody received the first ruling by a Judge on the merits of ‘natural born citizen’ that he appealed directly to the Superior Court. Three other petitioners emerged out of that Ballot Challenge also, but Cody’s complaint was the only one to include Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse 2200 hour investigation and probable cause results.

In a spectacular timing coincidence Sheriff Joe released the results of the Cold Case Posse March 1st,2012 and Cody’s response to Obama’s Motion to Dismiss was due March 2nd,2012. Cody was able to use Sheriff Joe’s Cold Case Posse results in the first Judicial Branch Court, the results of which made the investigations findings very appealable to every higher Court.

Cody’s case begin in 2008 as a Presidential Candidate who filed in Federal court against McCain and Obama, in 2010 testifying at the CIA COLUMBIA OBAMA SEDITION AND TREASON TRIAL in New York, and he continues in 2012 his appeal as a Presidential Candidate in the Democratic Party from New Hampshire’s Ballot Challenge to New Hampshire’s Supreme Court and into the Georgia Ballot Challenge, Georgia’s Superior Court then on to the Georgia Supreme Court- the first State Supreme Court to have the findings of the Cold Case Posse results included!

Today, the process of appeal was finalized in the highest court of the land. Sheriff Joe’s Cold Case Posse results have entered the U.S. Supreme Court through Cody Robert Judy’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari and have been appropriately glued into the weavers beam of the Solicitor General’s Office (as integral as Goliath’s spear was to Goliath), a person appointed to represent the federal government of the United States before the Supreme Court of the United States.

You can help by spreading the intricate word that forms the pattern formed by the loom of which the weavers beam is associated and help Cody as a modern day David fighting the Goliath of the eligibility silence of the U.S. House and Senate ultimately through the U.S. Supreme Court!



Help Cody’s campaign now to broadcast the commercials and strengthen the campaign with your contributions that have the first and most devastating chances of not only eliminating Obama from the 2012 Presidential contest, but repealing Obamacare based on it not being signed by a legitimate President of the United States, and most importantly securing Obama’s usurpation in the history books as exactly what it was, illegitimate, ineligible, and a constitutional crying shame in the history books as an example for us all to remember to uphold our United States Constitution.

Contribute to Cody’s campaign here: http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm


Sincerely,
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S. C. Eligibility Campaign
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
www.youtube/user/CODE4PRES
www.youtube/user/CODE4PRES

U.S. Supreme Court received Judy v. Obama July 6th

Breaking News Report on Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court Washington DC
The Pony Express has done their job.

Due to the 4th of July Holiday and United States Postal Service schedule, the legal pleadings of Judy v. Obama in the United States Supreme Court 'petition for writ of certiorari' were delivered as follows:

Tracking at www.usps.com

U.S. Supreme Court Writ of Cert.- July 6th, 2012 11:03AM
Tracking number- 0310 3490 0000 1696 2655

Solicitor General of United States - July 6th,2012 - 11:01AM
Tracking number- 0310 3490 0000 1696 2648


Mr. Michael Jablonski Esq. Counsel for Barack Obama Georgia - July 5th,2012 8:33AM
Tracking number- 0310 3490 0000 1696 2624

Mr. Brian Kemp SOS of Georgia Counsel Russo/ July 5th,2012 10:12AM
Tracking number - 0310 3490 0000 1696 2631

Here is the document they have received as per Mailing Certificate on approx Page 39 (page 1) of the below linked document; of course the U.S. Supreme Court received 11 copies of the some 80 pages therein:



http://www.scribd.com/doc/98883410/Judy-v-Obama-U-S-Supreme-Crt-Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-July-2012



Stay tuned, the Campaign will keep you updated here with any breaking news.

The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
www.codyjudy.us

www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

www.youtube/user/CODE4PRES

www.facebook.com/CODE4PRES

Projections: WWIII Deaths 613,870 Americans vs. Your Vote for The Constitution

Projections: WWIII Deaths 613,870 Americans vs. Your Vote for Constitution


The last few days I’ve been thinking of a dream I had just a few days ago actually. It was one of those intelligent dreams where you get information to think about from, but you have no idea where what you were talking about came from.

Someone asked me about the war with Iran coming because they had read about it in my book “Taking A Stand-The Conservative Independent Voice”. I said, “Yes., but it’s going to cost America more lives than WWI,WWII,Korea, and Vietnam.”

That was it..the end of the dream. I woke up thinking that was really strange. Of course I wondered to myself I wonder how many lives that really is. I also did recall the dream that I had that was actually in my book Taking A Stand-The Conservative Independent Voice, that was published in a rush for the 2008 Independent write-in campaign for President.

It really came down to the wire and I had to rush editing and really rushed proof reading, so there is more spelling errors in it then I’d like that spell check didn’t pick up. Anyway the point is I do recall wondering whether I should put the dream in the book that ultimately I did. Of course here it was Iran and we were involved with Iraq and Afghanistan was still in the future.

Saddam Hussein was put to death close to the beginning of 2007, and it’s incredible to think about a war from 2003 clear through 2011, but the point here is there were only 4,409 soldiers killed and a reported 31,928 wounded in action. That is a remarkable small number for that long of a war and then I started wondering about just how many the 4 wars would actually include as far as a tally for what I had said in my dream.

Well, I recalled doing a Veterans Day Memorial Show that I had done some research in on that subject so went back to see what I could find. Watching it I just started adding up the numbers and the impact started to hit me.
WWI – 116,516 WWII – 405,399 Korean War – 33,746 and Vietnam – 58,209

Here’s the YouTube Video I did: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DCGSfaFFiE


In my dream there was a projected loss of 613,870 soldiers. That is one staggering number.

When I woke up from that dream I was thinking also about the few numbers that actually have read or followed my blog. As of today, July 3rd,2012 I’ve only had 20,685 page views on my blog which was started also in 2008. Also begun in 2008, was my YouTube Station CODE4PRES that as of July 3rd,2012 with 165 videos has 47,024 views in its entire history.

For all intensive purposes you could say the General Public is completely un-aware of any of the work I’ve done. Maybe it just hasn’t quite caught on yet of course the added benefits of advertisement with guest appearances on shows and stories being written about you or your campaign can increase that dramatically as we’ve seen things go viral before and wooed and awed about it.

I started thinking about how many people don’t vote and thinking about the ‘apathy’ in America- reasons that so many Americans didn’t care to vote, or really get in there and push with enthusiasm their preference in voting.

The thought came to me how many people were in the families of the projected 613,870 soldier deaths that would feel affect by those deaths? Of course deaths don’t come close to the number in a war of wounded in battle. If Iraq were a measure we had approximately 5 times more wounded men then we had deaths.

Project that on the projected 613,870 deaths and you get a number like 3,069,350 wounded. With those kind of numbers it would be very difficult not to say everyone in America is going to be affected pretty directly by the war.

The thought of all the mothers in America came to me who would have missing children killed in WWIII.

Voting is such an easy thing to do. If you equated casting a vote meant that you wouldn’t have to choose which one of your children would die, how many people would vote then?

If you understood that defending the Constitution with your vote meant that your children wouldn’t have to die defending it, would you cast your vote for someone TAKING A STAND for the Constitution?

How many politicians in Washington DC have you voted for, that haven’t given a rats ass about Obama not being a ‘natural born citizen’ qualified by the demands of our Constitution?

When I do contemplate the record of Citizens voting for politicians who haven’t raised their voice up, I’m left wondering about the umbrella of God that has surrounded our Nation as the Constitution and the freedoms and liberties kept protected by it, and the prospects of that being removed and what the consequences of that would look like?

America, I encourage you with all my heart to somehow raise your voice and consider this very seriously and consider it very personally as it relates to your own record with our CREATOR.

I’d like you to register now to vote, call your U.S. Representatives and Senators and demand Obama’s Eligibility be heard and send them my United States Writ of Certiorari. It’s your record.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/98883410/Judy-v-Obama-U-S-Supreme-Crt-Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-July-2012

Go on record and please pass it on to others while your contemplating the Independence of the United States of America this 4th of July,2012. I urge you in joining with me in Taking A Stand

Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
www.youtube/user/CODE4PRES
www.facebook.com/CODE4PRES

July 8th 2012 Update Video

Cody Robert Judy Ltr. U.S. Supreme Court July 1st,2012

FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:




http://www.scribd.com/doc/98823939/U-S-Supreme-Court-Ltr-July-1st-2012-from-Cody-Robert-Judy

CODY ROBERT JUDY
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden UT. 84401

- - - - - - - -
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Office of the Clerk – Mr. William K. Suter
Washington, DC 20543-0001
- - - - - - - - -

RE: Cody Robert Judy v. Barack Obama July 1st, 2012

Dear Mr. Suter- Clerk of the Court:
The first class mail return of my document, Petition for Writ of Certiorari on June 30th, 2012, was returned with a letter dated from the Clerk Gail Johnson June 28th 2012 stating:
“Dear Mr. Judy- The above-entitled petition for a writ of certiorari was received again on June 28th, 2012, and is herewith returned for the reason stated in my letter May 17th,2012. Sincerely William K. Suter, Clerk – By Gail Johnson”

Also included in the returned box was a copy of the May 17th,2012 letter clarifying any doubt of the reasons it was sent back stating – “ The enclosed papers were received again on May 17th, 2012 and are herewith returned for the reasons stated in my letter dated April 10,2012. Until and unless you receive a decision from a United States Court of Appeals or highest state court within which a decision could be had this Court does not have jurisdiction of your case. By: Gail Johnson

Sir, the Petition for Writ of Certiorari dated June 25th,2012 has an appeal for the eleventh circuit from the highest court available in Georgia- The Georgia Supreme Court Judy v. Obama et.al., Case No. S12D1584.

The abusive treatment I am the recipient of in the return of my document by analyst Gail Johnson apparently not even analyzing my document and thinking it was the same document of April 4th,2012 is definitely a bias towards me that has prejudiced me and my Petition for a Writ of Certiorari. The first paragraph states Sir that the Supreme Court of Georgia granted my ‘indigent status’.

How could I have indigent status from the Georgia Supreme Court if I didn’t’ have a decision from the Georgia Supreme Court in my appeal to the U.S. Supreme court? Why would I have included a copy of the Notice of Appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court from the Georgia Supreme Court if I didn’t have an Appeal from the highest court in Georgia? Why should a document dated June 25th,2012 be considered the same document as one dated April 4th,2012 worthy of the same letter of May 17th,2012 when a denial is on record in the Petition for Writ of Certiorari of a decision made by the Georgia Supreme Court June 21st, 2012 case No S12D1584?

If the Clerk’s Office had a question for me why can’t you or Ms. Johnson just call me instead of sending the documents back costing the Court more money in the return and me time and more money in postage in re-sending them?

This employed tactic was used by the Georgia Supreme Court and I immediately faxed them copies of the Orders that were had in the Superior Court, which they could have got from the Court also but chose to get them from me which was okay, and I did my very best to accommodate any questions they had.

My concern of time is a genuine concern on the merits of the case and delay such as Ms. Gail Johnson seems to be employed in is having the affect of biasing me from the U.S. Supreme Court consideration.

I have now been to two State Supreme Courts both of which are entered in the Petition for Writ of Certiorari- One State Supreme Court decision from the New Hampshire Supreme Court and the latest Supreme Court decision from the Georgia Supreme Court. These are both Courts qualifying, as is stated in the May 17th, 2012 letter from Ms. Gail Johnson as “highest state court within which a decision could be had” and the presumption “until” and “unless” I had a decision from the highest state court presumes I would receive a U.S. Supreme Court case number with State Supreme Court case numbers which I haven’t so far.

My June 25th,2012 Petition for Writ of Certiorari to make things as simple and plain as I possible can is from the Georgia Supreme Court, case number again is JUDY v. OBAMA et.al, S12D1584 received June 21st,2012.

If the Justices had been informed of my case it may have altered their decision on the ACA Decision as Obama is not eligible or qualified by the demands of the Constitution for the Office of the President. I feel that withholding my case from their consideration is a blatant discrimination towards me and towards the Justice of their decisions that may have been altered if presented.

That circumvention of Justice is not at all my fault. It is remains at the feet of the Clerk’s office of which you are in charge. If the ACA needed an eligible person first qualified under the Constitution as President to sign it, and Obama was not, the Act was not ripe for the U.S. Supreme Court decision and their decision is rendered ‘moot’.

While the Justices have recessed as of June 29th,2012 my Petition for Writ of Certiorari was in their halls June 27th,2012 and absolutely capable of being considered albeit your handing it to them. The timing of my Petition is imperative to the scheduled Sept. 5th,2012 National Democratic Party Convention of which if considered from the moment it entered the halls of the U.S. Supreme Court June27th, 2012 meets the most important standing requirement number 3 ‘redressability’ thus the employment of stall is corrupting my redress of grievances rights.

There are three standing requirements:

1. Injury: The plaintiff must have suffered or imminently will suffer injury—an invasion of a legally protected interest that is concrete and particularized. The injury must be actual or imminent, distinct and palpable, not abstract. This injury could be economic as well as non-economic.
2. Causation: There must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of, so that the injury is fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendant and not the result of the independent action of some third party who is not before the court.
3. Redressability: It must be likely, as opposed to merely speculative, that a favorable court decision will redress the injury.


By sending my papers back the Clerk’s office created a problem in that the Court won’t see my Petition for Writ of Certiorari until after the Democratic National Convention Sept. 5th, 2012 because the Justices recess until I believe the first Monday in October, 2012.
My petition requires their immediate attention due to an election and when election dates are in place and cannot be and a complaint as mine is brought before the Court, a special consideration must be called by the Court.
1- http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/breaking-news-us-supreme-court-calls-special-session-on-obama
2- http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2012/06/breaking-news-us-supreme-court-calls.html

I’m informing you this must be done in the interest of elections that the Court’s decision is not ‘put-off’ until their decision is made ‘moot’. The U.S. Supreme Court is not meant to be ‘put out’ of the business of interpreting the Constitution as a check and balance in the Judicial Branch, especially in the interest of securing and protecting our United States Election process and our Constitution’s demands.
The Court is intended to serve the Constitution, rather than the Constitution to serve the Court.

The Supreme Court is well within its right to Order and or Announce a special session as it did in Jan 2010, and June of 2012 to specifically deal with a certain business and nothing else. I contend my case qualifies for that due to the nature and timing of the Democratic National Convention of which is still 2 months away but may be placed in jeopardy if a special session is not called for or delayed until October 2012.

The Petition must be given to the Justices immediately and the 30 days to grant or deny on the specific interest of the election timing. The order must be made for the timing of such responses to the Petition to be shortened to give all parties fair notice that delay is not a tactic that can be employed to prejudice justice, in the order of justice.

I have complied with your requirements that you set for me in getting a Supreme Court decision and I certainly would appreciate your sincere assistance in seeing this case to the Honorable Court Justices.

I have attached to this letter the decision noted on the Notice of Appeal from the GEORGIA SUPREME COURT attached also within the PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIOARI June 25th,2012.

Thank you most Sincerely Yours,
Cody Robert Judy

Complete Signed Petition for Writ of Certiorari Judy v. Obama
http://www.scribd.com/doc/98883410/Judy-v-Obama-U-S-Supreme-Crt-Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-July-2012

Breaking News- US SUPREME COURT CALLS SPECIAL SESSION ON OBAMA ELIGIBILITY? Cody Robert Judy says "They Should!"

Breaking News- US SUPREME COURT CALLS SPECIAL SESSION ON OBAMA ELIGIBILITY?

More and more Americans are seeing the value of the work I have been doing over the past 4 years. With the “Green Light” on Obamacare that the 5-4 U.S. Supreme Court held this past Thursday along with a ‘contempt’ vote that was shielded by Obama’s executive order on Fast & Furious, one could surmise we have had some very destructive blows to ‘freedom and liberty’ dealt to us.

I wish I had good news to report about the U.S. Supreme Court receiving my case on appeal from the Georgia Supreme Court but in the horse world I’m familiar with let me parlay, “We were headed in to the class for a show and 10 yards before entering our champion stallion threw a shoe by stepping into a deliberately dug hole meant to sabotage our entry, and we had no choice but to scratch the class, and head off to the blacksmiths shop for a new shoe.

The good news would be we didn’t break a leg stepping in the hole and when I relate to you what happened I think it will be quite obvious that the U.S. Supreme court clerk responsible for this has got a major grudge against my action and dug the hole.
The bad news is the Supreme Court in Washington DC is in recess till the first Monday in October and I’m beginning to wonder about the door to the U.S. Supremes being definitively closed to me because of the unprecedented action it represents to the establishment in maintenance of the status quo, which everyone knows I’m not representing really well but rather exposing.

Now I have never been one to take adversity placed upon me as some grand conspiracy and I believe my record will do for that fact. While I have been tested and perhaps pestered with deficiencies I represented I have attempted more to accommodate those and to understand them, and correct them, where they accumulated into facts.

I just don’t think losing a game legally is worthy of poor sportsmanship and so when I have lost legally I generally shake my opponents hand, congratulate him, lick my wounds, and move on. However, when I am wronged blatantly, deliberately and intentionally I have no problem relating the facts of that to others which I am about to do, especially in light of Obama’s ineligibility as it certainly affects many, many, many more than me.

I relate the facts you certainly can make your own calculations and do the math.
1-Wednesday- June 27th 2012 approximately 10:30am, I reported and show the service of the ‘Petition for Writ of Certiorari’ appealing the Georgia Supreme Court decision case no. S12D1584 JUDY v. OBAMA et.al, I received June 21st,2012, with a ‘received by signature’ United Postal Service Record, to the U.S. Supreme Court’s Clerks office which had been sent Monday morning.

2-Thursday-June 28th,2012 – Owing to security maintained at the U.S. Supreme Court and my own prior experience with them I know my document isn’t going to get a case number the day it gets there but I figure 24 hours later is a good time to check on it because you know it’s not like the DMV where they’re receiving thousands of entries every day and reasonably your document after its signed for, ought to make the Clerk’s office 24 hours after it’s received.

So I speak with Gail Johnson about Noon- EST time, who is my assigned case analyst and ask her point blank if she has received my case. She says “No” and refers me to the argument that you know it takes time from service to get through security and to them, and says, “ call back tomorrow”. I was actually encouraged by her request to ‘call back tomorrow’. This as you recall was the same day the U.S. Supreme Court was set, and did release their decision on the Health Care with a 5-4 vote upholding it in its entirety absent the confirmation that it was ‘Constitutional’, with Sotomayor and Kagan, both Obama appointees, in on the decision.

Of course without those two there, we are left with a pretty strong message from the dissenting Justices that the Act fails quite easily the Constitution, and we are also reminded quite clearly that without an eligible President signing their appointments, their confirmation is not legitimate. Now how important is Obama’s Eligibility? How important and imperative is my case?

3- Friday-June 29th –Noon -Approximately same time I call back and get Gail Johnson’s voice message that she’s out of the office until Monday July 1st,2012 and that if something urgent is needed please contact another analyst by the name of Redman, who also is ‘out of the office until July 1st. I make another call to the Supreme Court Clerk’s office and a nice operator tells me as I relate my predicament that he did see “Higgins” come in and will direct my call to his office. I get a voice mail and relate to him my name which they identify your case with, and ask for a call back. I call again at approximately 3pm EST and relate my desire for a call back upon the matter. Predictably I don’t receive a call back.

Of course I’m not all that discouraged because Gail Johnson related to me she had not received my package Thursday. The damndest thing happens Saturday morning.
4- Saturday-June 30th,2012 I receive in my mail box the entire box containing 11 copies of my Petition for Writ of Certiorari back with a letter from Gail Johnson dated Thursday June 28th,2012. Of course you recall I had called her and spoke directly to her and she confirmed she hadn’t received it.

Very interesting letter received that was taped to the top of the package that states the package is returned for the very same reason it was returned May 17th,2012 because the U.S. Supreme Court only reviews cases from the U.S. Court of Appeals or the highest State Court available.

Pictures of the Letters here:

June 28th Letter U.S. Supreme Court to Cody Robert Judy

May 17th, 2012 Letter U.S. Supreme Court to Cody Robert Judy

June 21st,2012 Order from Georgia Supreme Court

Wow! On the very first page of my document it says in the first paragraph, Georgia Supreme Court Case No. S12D1584 Judy v. Obama is being appealed, and that the Supreme Court of Georgia had granted my ‘indigency’ status. How did she miss that on the very first page, first paragraph signed with a notary seal June 24th,2012?
Incredibly two things available here for us to discern because we know she can read- Either Gail Johnson didn’t read the document as an analyst assigned to that duty is supposed to, and ordered it packaged up unread and sent back the exact same moment it was opened, or Gail Johnson doesn’t know the Georgia Supreme Court is the highest court in the State of Georgia presumed by her own letter to be appealed directly to the U.S. Supreme Court.

When I opened the box up, about 10 minutes after it cleared my security department, another letter was inside, which was indeed Gail Johnson’s letter to me May 17th,2012 that related to the April 4th 2012 version of my Petition for Writ of Certiorari which indeed hadn’t been reviewed by the Georgia Supreme Court, but had been reviewed by the New Hampshire Supreme Court which I argued should suffice.

So, now I have returned to me by the U.S. Supreme Court clerk Gail Johnson not one but two State Supreme Court decisions, one from New Hampshire and one from Georgia, that are legally reviewable by the U.S. Supreme court. I really think this should call for her termination in the employment to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Can you imagine just for an instance if perchance the U.S. Supreme court Justices had been notified Wednesday afternoon that my case had come into the Courts authority and was docketed, that could alter their decision on Obamacare, based on the eligibility requirement that an eligible president must first sign an Act of Congress before its legal?

How big is this case? How many people does it represent and or affect?

Can you imagine one Court Clerk having the power to keep something like this from the dissenting Justices on the eve of their Summer recess until after the Sept 5th National Democrat Convention in which a decision on my case could have moved Obama from even being included as a Democratic Party candidate at that convention verses being the nominee, and the Justices return scheduled for October after the convention?

I don’t think anyone upset with Obamacare passing even has a clue what it means to have another Presidential Candidate in the Democrat Party qualified for a U.S. Supreme Court hearing with two State Supreme Court referrals to them means.
If anyone did I really suspect people would be going through the roof, and contributing to my campaign and calling their Senators and Congressmen and faxing the U.S. Supreme Court of this outrage, and burning down the phone lines to the U.S. Supreme Court. WND would have feature stories about the outrageousness of it, and small business magazines across the United States would be saying “contribute” the individual maxim to this guy which is $2,400 per individual small businesses or pay the estimated annual increase of $54,000 on healthcare for your small business.

Of course I need your help and I hope to have somehow inspired you of the importance and urgency of this case. You know the Voeltz v. Obama case getting so much publicity is stated by Esq. Larry Klaymen to be appealed by either side upon a decision suffered a big set-back with the Judge granting the motion to strike the Amended Declarative relief. Here: http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/this-july-4-a-new-revolution-begins/ and here http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/unexpected-turn-in-eligibility-case-put-it-on-record/ - “Klayman told WND Obama’s lawyers immediately went into a tailspin and filed to have the amendment for declaratory relief stricken, which the judge granted,..” How long do you think it would take Klaymen to reach the Florida Supreme Court and hence the U.S. Supreme Court?

Now, put into that equation he does not have a Democratic Party Candidate for President on the complaint, but a Democratic party member who is a voter and who by the standards thus far used by the Judicial Branch won’t have or satisfy the 3 levels of ‘standing’ upon the appeals into the Judicial Branch?

Also factor in Obama will by Sept 5th,2012 have the nomination of the National Democratic Party Convention locked up and how many Supreme Court Justices are going to see that one clear against Obama? Ask Mr. Klayman about the Political Doctrine Question and he will tell you the chances after Obama becomes the Democratic Party nominee are slim to none after Sept. 5th, 2012.

I’m calling for the only thing I believe will help and that is an all points bulletin to every Conservative across the board in the political arena to rally for my case. I will send it back to the U.S. Supreme Court this Monday and by Wednesday I would like to see about 10 national stories about this outrage and calls numbering in the thousands to the U.S. Supreme Court, your representatives in Congress and the Senate and if you hold any value to reaching across the aisle I even challenge Mitt Romney to come out and make a statement on the Justice happening with my case being locked out of the U.S. Supreme Court.

I believe that is possible if you will do your part in sharing this very real possibility that you cannot let slip by. If you’re a business owner or interested in employment Obama care is a major blow to small businesses and the capital they have to work with that would necessarily be opening new jobs.

Please act now… just DO IT! What can America do from Sunday to Wednesday, for the sake of our Country I’m asking you contribute your time, talent, energy, contributions to ‘Vision to Believe in’ represented by our Constitution and my campaign, The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign.

I believe this case is so important and has been biased so fraudulently by the Clerk’s Office that when and if the U.S. Supreme Court Justices hear about it, that it will merit the call for a ‘Special Session’ to be called by the U.S. Supreme Court Justices in the Order to adjudicate the case without bias towards me before the National Democratic Party Convention Sept 5, 2012 in the interest of voting delegates at that Convention who have been chosen by the interest of State Tax Payers money to vote for Constitutionally eligible candidates.

Tell the U.S. Supreme Court Justices - Tax money has been used by the Democratic Party in the primaries and in such is responsibly connected to the Constitution and Obama’s eligibility. RESPONSIBILITY in taxes was the message of Obama care, let them hear about the responsibility to our Constitution that ‘taxes’ demands in representation.

Here is a copy of the complete signed Petition for Writ of Certiorari
http://www.scribd.com/doc/98883410/Judy-v-Obama-U-S-Supreme-Crt-Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-July-2012

Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us

www.youtube.com/user/CODE4PRES


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTJkId_GBis

JUDY V. OBAMA REACHES U.S. SUPREME COURT -THE DOOM OF JUNE FOR OBAMA

BREAKING NEWS:

JUDY V. OBAMA et.al., U.S. SUPREME COURT RECEIVES APPEAL OF GEORGIA SUPREME COURT OF OBAMA’S ELIGIBLITY ESCALATING-

THE DOOM OF JUNE FOR OBAMA

June is not shaping up to be the best month for Barack Obama, as more and more Democrats are looking at the toxicity of Obama and realizing that standing by the man is one thing, but declaring their own political future over is quite another.

Just how much weight must be placed upon the anchor before rational democrats who are still supporting Obama decide the same? I’m proud of Utah Democrat Rep. Jim Matheson here in my home state for realizing the truth when it comes to covering up weapon involvement in border patrol agent murders, dealing arms over the border to drug trafficking, and pulling federal programs meant to work with local law enforcement in enforcing laws passed for persons illegally entering the United States such as Obama did the day of the U.S. Supreme Court decision, are not really things that Democrats should be supporting.

Catering to the Hispanic/Mexican/Latino population vote has become all too clearly a mix of bad intention, and so it is with Obama clearly defying our U.S. Constitution’s demands for a ‘natural born citizen’, yet swearing out an oath and allegiance to preserve, protect and defend it. I can think of no better way to U.S.C. Amend. 14, Sect. 3- his sorry but blatant fraud and forgery.

For those hard working industrious people here working legally how big of a slap in the face is it for Obama/Holder/Clinton team to gun-traffic across the border? Why would they do that to people they claim to be working hard for?

Weapons to people known to be running illegal traffic across the border, drugs, sex-slaves, intelligence, and people are okay with that? That kind of makes standing up in a religious meeting where freedom of expression is the most important element of religious tenant and declaring I had a Book of Mormon abbreviated ‘BOM’ clearly represented as the evidence produced, in the Mormon Religion something that deserved 8 years in prison 20 years ago, while the other is seen as electable? WOW!

Come on , come on, come on – People I just know you anti-birthers on the Republican and Democrat side can do better than this. Your judgment is being strung out like a scrotum on the chopping block.

Has that been a service for the people here legally working hard on establishing good reputations or a dis-service?
Utah Democratic Rep. Jim Matheson said Tuesday he plans to vote in favor of holding Holder in contempt over his refusal to comply with a subpoena into the Operation Fast and Furious scandal.

“It just compounds the tragedy when both sides play politics instead of releasing the facts. The Terry family, the public and Congress deserve answers,” Matheson said in remarks first reported by the Salt Lake Tribune in his home state. “Sadly, it seems that it will take holding the attorney general in contempt to communicate that evasiveness is unacceptable.”

To make matters worse for Holder, President Barack Obama and the Democratic Party, more Democrats are expected to join Matheson in holding Holder in contempt. House Minority Whip Rep. Steny Hoyer, the House Democrats’ chief vote-counter, isn’t even sure how many Democrats will break ranks. According to the Associated Press — which framed the Democratic defections as a result of the NRA’s decision to score the vote — Hoyer wouldn’t say how many Democrats he expected to vote in favor of Holder in contempt, but confirmed he expects some, like Matheson, to abandon party lines.

http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/politics/54379772-90/holder-matheson-contempt-congress.html.csp
mcanham@sltrib.com

Now additionally to compound the doom of June for Obama, the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington DC received today, (June 27th,2012) at 10:49am the Petition for Writ of Certiorari, appealed from the Georgia Supreme Court denial of June 21st,2012.

Folks we are talking speed train 'fast-track', in the truest meaning of the word, and we may be talking just in time?

[Date: 06/27/2012
CODY JUDY:
The following is in response to your 06/27/2012 request for delivery information on your
Signature Confirmation(TM) item number 2308 3250 0000 2916 0065. The delivery record
shows that this item was delivered on 06/27/2012 at 10:49 AM in WASHINGTON, DC 20543
to L JOHNSON. The scanned image of the recipient information is provided below.]

There is a whole mess of problems the U.S. Supreme Court is dealing with the constitutionality of Obamacare, however wouldn’t it be shocking if they discovered in the late hour of deliberation they had a case that clearly met the criteria 3 legs of ‘standing’, and gave them power to rule upon Obama’s eligibility in the first place?

I felt like it was a slide into 3rd base and being called ‘SAFE!’ to have gotten the APPEAL in to the U.S. Supreme Court before the close of this session. I know it’s a nightmare but I didn’t plan it this way, it just happened.

Dealing with’ the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act’, the court has extended its session now till presumably Thursday, or tomorrow, at which time they planned to close shop until October 5th,2012. It is notable however that the Court has at times stayed open till even the 1st of July.

That’s 30 days after the Sept. 5th, 2012 Democratic National Convention and clearly their recess would biased not just my complaint, but the whole Democratic Party primary season, and certainly every delegate vote cast for an ineligible candidate.

Just to gain some inkling of what just happened let me reiterate; “Shake & Bake!” is the United States Constitution- parroting the famous line from movie Talladega Nights of which those who saw it can have a smile, and those who didn’t might have a look at a YouTube Clip here to grasp.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLF31AY25so


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43FfwAsSV4k&feature=related


I really don’t have a clue to what the U.S. Supreme Court will do, but I do know a couple of things that I will relate as facts to the anti-birther community that continues to roast the Birther movement as wing-nuts with a clue to any facts. Are you ready?

1- NEVER before has the U.S. Supreme Court received a Writ of Certiorari from a Presidential Candidate within the same party, clearing all 3 hurdles of standing, against Obama’s eligibility before the Democratic National Convention.

2- NEVER before has the U.S. Supreme Court received in such an appeal, a total disregard for their own precedent as they have from Judge Michael Malihi whose decision/opinion re-writes the Constitution’s unique qualification for our President that contrary to his opinion was not obliterated by the 14th Amendment’s “Citizen” clause found in Sect 1, which is an insult to the Constitution construction taboo.


Recently U.S. Supreme Court denied the Orly Taitz represented case that took a little over 3 years to get to the U.S. Supreme Court from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals starting in Central California Federal District Court in Keyes v. Obama. Allan Keyes was a presidential candidate but the 9th Circuit ruled he candidacy issue was moot as he didn’t continue in 2012 and the U.S. Supreme Court concluded the case on June 11th, 2012 with a denial of the Writ of Certiorari.

As a Presidential Candidate Allan Keyes was running in the Republican Party and never really had a clear shot at getting the Republican nomination from contenders like Mitt Romney or John McCain in 2008, so the standing was questionable at best. A similar ruling was just handed down on Presidential Candidate John Dummett represented by Liberty Legal Foundation in a Tennessee Federal District Court case that was basically made fun of by the Judge.

Defendants restate their position that Plaintiffs lack standing. Specifically with respect to Plaintiff Dummett, Defendants concede that Dummett is a candidate in Tennessee for the Republican Party’s nomination for President of the United States. As such, Plaintiff Dummett is not a competitive opponent of President Obama in any election and accordingly cannot establish that he has competitive standing to bring this suit. Furthermore, Defendants assert that Plaintiff Dummett has not taken steps to appear on a ballot in the state of Tennessee. For these reasons, Plaintiff Dummett cannot establish an injury-in-fact in this case.

Speaking on John Dummett’s write-in campaign for President filed a day after the defense argument that he would not likely face Obama as a Republican nominee as he ran in that party the court said:

Plaintiff Dummett’s certificate only came into existence after Defendants filed their reply brief. The introduction of a new argument with new evidentiary support would likely require that Defendants be given the opportunity to respond. Third, even if the Court considered the certificate, the exhibit on its face does not indicate that Plaintiff Dummett will actually be a write-in candidate simply by filing the certificate or whether other steps are required to establish his status. It is not clear then that the certificate proves that Plaintiff Dummett will face the President in general election. Finally, the exhibit is curiously dated the day after Defendants filed their reply, giving the appearance that the certificate is a device to cure whatever standing problems Plaintiffs may have. At this point in the proceedings, Plaintiffs have not properly brought that issue before the Court. For all of these reasons, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Response is DENIED.

Now I bring these cases up not to belittle the hard work that went into them, nor the desire to see the Constitution upheld, for I feel these cases had that intent, but I bring them up to point out the complete difference that is represented in my case to the U.S. Supreme Court case with the direct competition between Obama and I in the Democratic Party for the nomination, and the complete disregard I have received from getting on the Ballots from the Democratic Chairmen’s bias towards Obama who I have shown is ineligible to be represented to the Secretary of States as eligible.
Indeed it’s a fraud in my mind to represent one candidate in the Democratic Party as the potential nominee who is voted for and recommended to use the States primary funds collected from tax payers in the actions of voting for him when he is ineligible for the Office of the President.

Indeed my campaign has represented itself competitive as say Mitt Romney’s on the internet with over 160 campaign commercials and videos, a blog with near 200 entries, a maintained web site with some 100 pages and campaign contributions coming in from near half the states. My campaign started the week before Gov. Rick Perry got into the Republican Campaign for president just to let you know how long it’s been around, and how long it’s lasted.

Anyone who discounts the time and effort and money and sacrifice that has gone into my campaign ought to just itemize themselves my campaign using estimates of the Republican Candidates side for what they had as far as the campaign items I’ve mentioned. I think one of the least of these was former Gov. and China Ambassador John Huntsman’s who was into it over 11 million dollars before he resigned his campaign- Santorum near 18.7 million and Paul 35 million-

http://money.cnn.com/2012/04/25/news/economy/Romney-campaign-spending-vote/index.htm


These campaigns, all of them didn’t come close to challenging Obama directly as mine does now. So what will the U.S. Supreme Court do? It's anyone's guess but they sure wouldn't have to release any decision on Obamacare if they find he is not an eligible person qualified for the Office of the President and certainly could not sign any law.

That is why my case ought to take precedence over their deliberation of Obama care and they ought to immediately set up a time and schedule to hear my case.



Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us

www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

www.youtube.com/user/CODE4PRES

www.facebook.com/CODE4PRES


Just as an add I wanted to put the link up of Esq. Larry Klayman's proposed Order denying the Motions to Dismiss which I thought was very informative, professional, and thorough.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/98311427/FL-Voeltz-2012-06-25-Voeltz-Proposed-Memorandum-Order#page=23

Fast & Furious or Birther Champion Democrats? What's it gonna be?

With the executive privilege Obama has just pulled to cover A.G. Eric Holder one thing is crystal clear.

Obama just forgot to include a blackmail technique on Republicans when it came to devising a plan to abolish the 2nd Amendment. You see deep down that was the intent of Fast & Furious. They thought that it would provide a great reason to confiscate weapons from Americans ultimately it back fired.

Obama has down pat the ultimate blackmail technique on his Birther Score Card with U.S. Senate Res. 511 which he co-sponsored allowing McCain's "naturalization" at 11 months old to morph into a 'natural born citizen' and that closed the door on Republicans actually standing up for the Constitution's demands for a natural born citizen as President.

Now, Attorney General Eric Holder is held in contempt of releasing documents necessary for Congress to investigate the cover-up in a straight down party line vote, we see clearly Obama just forgot to cover his butt on gun-smuggling and providing weapons to the drug cartels ,which means we shipped a lot of weapons to the Mexican cartels and it appears the evidence supports Obama, Holder and Hillary Clinton have all been tied to walking the guns into Mexico in order to prop up a "90% stat" they raved about.

So, the way its shaping up, the Fast & Furious operation could easily be Obama's watergate and, of course Republicans aren't backing off this one, as its gone mainstream and doesn't sit well with the American People.

There comes a clear choice to Democrats, including all delegates, super-delegates, and homies of Obama. Either join the Birther Cause and isolate Obama for the usurpation he employed in stating he was a 'natural born citizen' on his Candidate Declaration when he wasn't, or watch the Republicans amazingly roll over Obama as an Republican promoted eligible candidate in the Fast & Furious operation.

Let me say that one more time. Republicans have allowed Obama's usurpation by not holding Congressional hearings on his eligibility in a Republican Controlled House, and have thus in treasonous action denied their oaths to defend the Constitution's demands for a natural born citizen. Republicans winked at the Constitution and that is their true colors exposed.

Not one Candidate for Republicans has had the courage to defend the Constitution's demands for a natural born citizen and offered a hint of removing Obama as a liability according to U.S.C. Amendment 14, Clause 3.

Democrat's have a choice here and now. End the Fast and Furious operation by Sponsoring Congressional Hearings in the Democrat Controlled U.S. Senate on Obama's eligibility, which will put an end to it, and at the same time will employ the U.S. Constitution far better then the Republicans have employed it in the face of thedeAmerican Citizenry.

The other choice of course? Obama goes down in flames on the Fast & Furious operation and Mitt Romney and Republicans lay waist to the Democratic Party for the last time. Think about it Democrats while you watch this hope and change video!

A few good reasons here about 'hope' and 'change' that an unqualified ineligible usurper provides Democrats. I encourage all Democrats not to go down in Obama's unconstitutional flames and provide America a constitutional hope rather then a winking-hope sponsored by Republicans.






Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us

www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

www.facebook.com/CODE4PRES

www.youtube/user/CODE4PRES