Saturday, June 30, 2012



More and more Americans are seeing the value of the work I have been doing over the past 4 years. With the “Green Light” on Obamacare that the 5-4 U.S. Supreme Court held this past Thursday along with a ‘contempt’ vote that was shielded by Obama’s executive order on Fast & Furious, one could surmise we have had some very destructive blows to ‘freedom and liberty’ dealt to us.

I wish I had good news to report about the U.S. Supreme Court receiving my case on appeal from the Georgia Supreme Court but in the horse world I’m familiar with let me parlay, “We were headed in to the class for a show and 10 yards before entering our champion stallion threw a shoe by stepping into a deliberately dug hole meant to sabotage our entry, and we had no choice but to scratch the class, and head off to the blacksmiths shop for a new shoe.

The good news would be we didn’t break a leg stepping in the hole and when I relate to you what happened I think it will be quite obvious that the U.S. Supreme court clerk responsible for this has got a major grudge against my action and dug the hole.
The bad news is the Supreme Court in Washington DC is in recess till the first Monday in October and I’m beginning to wonder about the door to the U.S. Supremes being definitively closed to me because of the unprecedented action it represents to the establishment in maintenance of the status quo, which everyone knows I’m not representing really well but rather exposing.

Now I have never been one to take adversity placed upon me as some grand conspiracy and I believe my record will do for that fact. While I have been tested and perhaps pestered with deficiencies I represented I have attempted more to accommodate those and to understand them, and correct them, where they accumulated into facts.

I just don’t think losing a game legally is worthy of poor sportsmanship and so when I have lost legally I generally shake my opponents hand, congratulate him, lick my wounds, and move on. However, when I am wronged blatantly, deliberately and intentionally I have no problem relating the facts of that to others which I am about to do, especially in light of Obama’s ineligibility as it certainly affects many, many, many more than me.

I relate the facts you certainly can make your own calculations and do the math.
1-Wednesday- June 27th 2012 approximately 10:30am, I reported and show the service of the ‘Petition for Writ of Certiorari’ appealing the Georgia Supreme Court decision case no. S12D1584 JUDY v. OBAMA, I received June 21st,2012, with a ‘received by signature’ United Postal Service Record, to the U.S. Supreme Court’s Clerks office which had been sent Monday morning.

2-Thursday-June 28th,2012 – Owing to security maintained at the U.S. Supreme Court and my own prior experience with them I know my document isn’t going to get a case number the day it gets there but I figure 24 hours later is a good time to check on it because you know it’s not like the DMV where they’re receiving thousands of entries every day and reasonably your document after its signed for, ought to make the Clerk’s office 24 hours after it’s received.

So I speak with Gail Johnson about Noon- EST time, who is my assigned case analyst and ask her point blank if she has received my case. She says “No” and refers me to the argument that you know it takes time from service to get through security and to them, and says, “ call back tomorrow”. I was actually encouraged by her request to ‘call back tomorrow’. This as you recall was the same day the U.S. Supreme Court was set, and did release their decision on the Health Care with a 5-4 vote upholding it in its entirety absent the confirmation that it was ‘Constitutional’, with Sotomayor and Kagan, both Obama appointees, in on the decision.

Of course without those two there, we are left with a pretty strong message from the dissenting Justices that the Act fails quite easily the Constitution, and we are also reminded quite clearly that without an eligible President signing their appointments, their confirmation is not legitimate. Now how important is Obama’s Eligibility? How important and imperative is my case?

3- Friday-June 29th –Noon -Approximately same time I call back and get Gail Johnson’s voice message that she’s out of the office until Monday July 1st,2012 and that if something urgent is needed please contact another analyst by the name of Redman, who also is ‘out of the office until July 1st. I make another call to the Supreme Court Clerk’s office and a nice operator tells me as I relate my predicament that he did see “Higgins” come in and will direct my call to his office. I get a voice mail and relate to him my name which they identify your case with, and ask for a call back. I call again at approximately 3pm EST and relate my desire for a call back upon the matter. Predictably I don’t receive a call back.

Of course I’m not all that discouraged because Gail Johnson related to me she had not received my package Thursday. The damndest thing happens Saturday morning.
4- Saturday-June 30th,2012 I receive in my mail box the entire box containing 11 copies of my Petition for Writ of Certiorari back with a letter from Gail Johnson dated Thursday June 28th,2012. Of course you recall I had called her and spoke directly to her and she confirmed she hadn’t received it.

Very interesting letter received that was taped to the top of the package that states the package is returned for the very same reason it was returned May 17th,2012 because the U.S. Supreme Court only reviews cases from the U.S. Court of Appeals or the highest State Court available.

Pictures of the Letters here:

June 28th Letter U.S. Supreme Court to Cody Robert Judy

May 17th, 2012 Letter U.S. Supreme Court to Cody Robert Judy

June 21st,2012 Order from Georgia Supreme Court

Wow! On the very first page of my document it says in the first paragraph, Georgia Supreme Court Case No. S12D1584 Judy v. Obama is being appealed, and that the Supreme Court of Georgia had granted my ‘indigency’ status. How did she miss that on the very first page, first paragraph signed with a notary seal June 24th,2012?
Incredibly two things available here for us to discern because we know she can read- Either Gail Johnson didn’t read the document as an analyst assigned to that duty is supposed to, and ordered it packaged up unread and sent back the exact same moment it was opened, or Gail Johnson doesn’t know the Georgia Supreme Court is the highest court in the State of Georgia presumed by her own letter to be appealed directly to the U.S. Supreme Court.

When I opened the box up, about 10 minutes after it cleared my security department, another letter was inside, which was indeed Gail Johnson’s letter to me May 17th,2012 that related to the April 4th 2012 version of my Petition for Writ of Certiorari which indeed hadn’t been reviewed by the Georgia Supreme Court, but had been reviewed by the New Hampshire Supreme Court which I argued should suffice.

So, now I have returned to me by the U.S. Supreme Court clerk Gail Johnson not one but two State Supreme Court decisions, one from New Hampshire and one from Georgia, that are legally reviewable by the U.S. Supreme court. I really think this should call for her termination in the employment to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Can you imagine just for an instance if perchance the U.S. Supreme court Justices had been notified Wednesday afternoon that my case had come into the Courts authority and was docketed, that could alter their decision on Obamacare, based on the eligibility requirement that an eligible president must first sign an Act of Congress before its legal?

How big is this case? How many people does it represent and or affect?

Can you imagine one Court Clerk having the power to keep something like this from the dissenting Justices on the eve of their Summer recess until after the Sept 5th National Democrat Convention in which a decision on my case could have moved Obama from even being included as a Democratic Party candidate at that convention verses being the nominee, and the Justices return scheduled for October after the convention?

I don’t think anyone upset with Obamacare passing even has a clue what it means to have another Presidential Candidate in the Democrat Party qualified for a U.S. Supreme Court hearing with two State Supreme Court referrals to them means.
If anyone did I really suspect people would be going through the roof, and contributing to my campaign and calling their Senators and Congressmen and faxing the U.S. Supreme Court of this outrage, and burning down the phone lines to the U.S. Supreme Court. WND would have feature stories about the outrageousness of it, and small business magazines across the United States would be saying “contribute” the individual maxim to this guy which is $2,400 per individual small businesses or pay the estimated annual increase of $54,000 on healthcare for your small business.

Of course I need your help and I hope to have somehow inspired you of the importance and urgency of this case. You know the Voeltz v. Obama case getting so much publicity is stated by Esq. Larry Klaymen to be appealed by either side upon a decision suffered a big set-back with the Judge granting the motion to strike the Amended Declarative relief. Here: and here - “Klayman told WND Obama’s lawyers immediately went into a tailspin and filed to have the amendment for declaratory relief stricken, which the judge granted,..” How long do you think it would take Klaymen to reach the Florida Supreme Court and hence the U.S. Supreme Court?

Now, put into that equation he does not have a Democratic Party Candidate for President on the complaint, but a Democratic party member who is a voter and who by the standards thus far used by the Judicial Branch won’t have or satisfy the 3 levels of ‘standing’ upon the appeals into the Judicial Branch?

Also factor in Obama will by Sept 5th,2012 have the nomination of the National Democratic Party Convention locked up and how many Supreme Court Justices are going to see that one clear against Obama? Ask Mr. Klayman about the Political Doctrine Question and he will tell you the chances after Obama becomes the Democratic Party nominee are slim to none after Sept. 5th, 2012.

I’m calling for the only thing I believe will help and that is an all points bulletin to every Conservative across the board in the political arena to rally for my case. I will send it back to the U.S. Supreme Court this Monday and by Wednesday I would like to see about 10 national stories about this outrage and calls numbering in the thousands to the U.S. Supreme Court, your representatives in Congress and the Senate and if you hold any value to reaching across the aisle I even challenge Mitt Romney to come out and make a statement on the Justice happening with my case being locked out of the U.S. Supreme Court.

I believe that is possible if you will do your part in sharing this very real possibility that you cannot let slip by. If you’re a business owner or interested in employment Obama care is a major blow to small businesses and the capital they have to work with that would necessarily be opening new jobs.

Please act now… just DO IT! What can America do from Sunday to Wednesday, for the sake of our Country I’m asking you contribute your time, talent, energy, contributions to ‘Vision to Believe in’ represented by our Constitution and my campaign, The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign.

I believe this case is so important and has been biased so fraudulently by the Clerk’s Office that when and if the U.S. Supreme Court Justices hear about it, that it will merit the call for a ‘Special Session’ to be called by the U.S. Supreme Court Justices in the Order to adjudicate the case without bias towards me before the National Democratic Party Convention Sept 5, 2012 in the interest of voting delegates at that Convention who have been chosen by the interest of State Tax Payers money to vote for Constitutionally eligible candidates.

Tell the U.S. Supreme Court Justices - Tax money has been used by the Democratic Party in the primaries and in such is responsibly connected to the Constitution and Obama’s eligibility. RESPONSIBILITY in taxes was the message of Obama care, let them hear about the responsibility to our Constitution that ‘taxes’ demands in representation.

Here is a copy of the complete signed Petition for Writ of Certiorari

Cody Robert Judy


  1. well with robert the trailor siding with the far left, big deal you know they will say obama is legal and we all know that he is not. You can not count on the court anymore, they all need to be replaced.

    1. You were denied because you failed to apply in a timely fashion. According to attorney's that I know, you are not able to appeal to SCOTUS because of your lack of standing.

    2. Ahhh refreshing Steven a note from you without derogatory labels.
      According to attorneys that you know? Please do tell?
      You know yourself that whatever attorney your talking about hasn't had his foot in this fire and again, why are you wasting your breath trying to convince Mr. Judy not to file something that's already filed?

      Or is it that your not convinced your right?

      The Jurisdictional Statement should be sufficient for you to understand the U.S. Supreme Court can take any decision from the highest Court on appeal.
      Standing argument again.. Mr. Judy fulfills all such standing requirements known under the standing doctrine:
      Standing requirements

      There are three standing requirements:
      1-Injury: The plaintiff must have suffered or imminently will suffer injury—an invasion of a legally protected interest that is concrete and particularized. The injury must be actual or imminent, distinct and palpable, not abstract. This injury could be economic as well as non-economic.

      2-Causation: There must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of, so that the injury is fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendant and not the result of the independent action of some third party who is not before the court.

      3-Redressability: It must be likely, as opposed to merely speculative, that a favorable court decision will redress the injury.

      Have a good day
      The Regulators/Moderator

  2. i respect and appreciate your tenacity , tyvm

  3. Mr. Judy,

    My Florida case has perfect standing. I am a Florida Democrat voter, who has filed in the correct venue, time period, and with the correct "indispensible parties" by Fl. Ss. 102.168. By MANY holdings of the Supreme Court of Fla., eligibility is a judicial question, to be determined upon a "contest properly made". My contest is certainly "properly made". The Fla statutes only give remedy to another candidate, and are silent w/ regard to an "elector" (voter) contest, necessitating Declaratory Judgment relief--- that is why Obama's lawyers are fighting Declaratory Judgment--- they do not want an actual determination of eligibility on the books-- which no case has given thus far. All have been denied standing, including Ankeny. We press on. I applaud your efforts, but don't begrudge mine.

  4. For those of you who can post on Mr. Judy's wall (I have been banned), would someone please tell this crackhead that a denial of his appeal in the highest court in Georgia for failing to timely file the appeal is not appealable to the Supreme Court. Thanks so much. (courtesy of Steven Feinstein)

    1. ;) Steven - Your not banned your just have no tolerance or patience. Let's take your consideration into context okay?

      1- If the appeal was "banned", your too late! Because its already filed! So why waste your breath or fingers trying to convince Mr. Judy? That makes no sense.
      2- Mr. Judy is not a crackhead and that represents a pretty doggone good reason to everyone why your comments don't get published.
      3- Any and every issue disagreed in a Court of law is appeal-able, ask any lawyer who ever filed.
      4- A Petition for a Writ of Certiorari is not a "right" of appeal but discretionary according to a Courts desire. So certainly ANY QUESTIONS the Court, especially the U.S. Supreme Court deems out of their own discretion worthy, which can be as vast as the Grand Canyon, they can and do have the power to grant.
      5- If the Court were limited to "procedural appeal' your comment might have validity, but that is not the case with a Writ of Certiorari which is in its nature 'discretionary'.

      You know we would appreciate your comments in the future not to be derogatory or incendiary as Mr. Judy is working through the appeal process. Of course he understands the percentages are very low for even acceptance of a Writ in the U.S. Supreme Court, but you yourself would not want your appeal process undermined.
      The process of Appeal itself is discouraging for one has already suffered a rejection of what one felt or understood was the law. Of course lower courts have made mistakes but less probably less on procedural grounds and more on moral grounds. This is something the U.S. Supreme Court will take its time with.

      And if Mr. Judy is to be told "no" Steven, why don't you and I just wait for them to tell him "no", and no one misses dinner about it.

      Hey... don't sweat the small stuff. Relax, you may be right, but just let it play out.

      Thanks for your comments
      The Regulators / Moderator/

  5. Dear Mr. Voeltz;

    I certainly in no way shape or form be-grudge your efforts at all. Contrary to that I appreciate the great notoriety of your case educating more and informing more people of the Constitutional Crisis.

    I certainly do not think I have stated anything that is untrue or hurtful to your case as it relates to the facts and happenings of the Court.

    As to the realities of success on Appeal I wish you the best but understand also what the 9th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals has ruled on 'standing' and believe me every State Case has warranted standing for Citizens as every single citizen who has filed a complaint thus far has articulated in their state. You know I've been a part of 2 state ballot challenges in Administrative Courts just like yours and actually your incorrect as far as getting a Judge to rule on the merits of Obama's eligibility in the natural born citizen definition as my Judge in Georgia- Judge Malihi was the first did in fact make a ruling on that specifically which I have been in the very long trenches to Appeal.
    That ruling is included here in the U.S. Supreme Court Petition for Writ of Certiorari

  6. Part II.
    Contrary to be-grudging your case I have spot-lighted and commented on it bringing it even more notoriety, but please let me just say I understand whole heavyhearted the disappointment every single litigant feels when they put a lot of effort into contesting Obama's eligibility in the Ballot Challenges.
    It goes without saying that you do have 'standing' when it comes to the executive branch court, however, I believe what you'll find in Appeals courts is your standing disappears completely because your not a presidential candidate.

    I actually wrote Mr. Klayman out of concern for this, hoping on the Addendum he filed that he could somehow include me in the interest of your case surviving in the Judicial Branch, which has a completely different view of 'standing' which has been repeatedly laid out by the Courts on the eligibility question of Barack Obama.

    For whatever reason I don't think he chose to include my extended hand of inclusiveness for your case in the Judicial Branch.

    People need to understand that as soon as you enter a different Branch of Government, from the executive branch court your in now, to the Judicial Branch Court your probably headed to, no matter how hard you hope its' different the Judicial Branch is not going to wipe away all of its rulings for your accommodation.

    I'm pretty much a senior member in the Birther Movement having sued McCain and Obama in 2008 as a Presidential Candidate with standing. I continued in 2010 testifying in New York in a 10th Amendment Trial that found Obama guilty and ineligible, and now in 2012 have worked continuously on the fight for the Constitution. You know I am very familiar with disappointing news from Judges.

    The U.S. Supreme Court Petition for Writ of Certiorari will be the very first time Obama has every been challenged by a candidate in the same party before the National Democratic Party Convention, that has been through 3 different Courts to get there.

    I was sorry to hear your Declaratory Judgement for Relief was denied in your first instance case and I understand Mr. Klayman is considering another filing and I wish you all the best as I do everyone in all 50 states who have objected to the ineligibility of Obama.
    Please take the time to read my United States Supreme Court Petition for Writ of Certiorari because it explains exactly what the 9th Circuit has ruled on 'standing' which is a very tough order for you to fill on Appeal by law. Here are the 3 legs for your considerations also:

    Standing requirements
    There are three standing requirements:

    1-Injury: The plaintiff must have suffered or imminently will suffer injury—an invasion of a legally protected interest that is concrete and particularized. The injury must be actual or imminent, distinct and palpable, not abstract. This injury could be economic as well as non-economic.

    2-Causation: There must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of, so that the injury is fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendant and not the result of the independent action of some third party who is not before the court.

    3-Redressability: It must be likely, as opposed to merely speculative, that a favorable court decision will redress the injury.

    We are very close to running out of time on this 3rd one because if Obama is made the nominee for the D Party another hurdle comes into a much higher existence and that is "The Political Doctrine Question.

    May your efforts find success, and I also pray for your support and help for my case as it has been where yours treads now clear back in February, and has gone through the rough and tough tangles of 2 levels of Appeals, and is as close to the end as it gets to a U.S. Supreme Court with all the requirements of 'standing' fulfilled that have been ruled upon in the United States Courts considerations thus far.

    Cody Robert Judy

  7. can file all you want , what Steven is telling you is it will be kicked out..Understand now?

  8. Yes.. we understand. Thank you so much for your reply. Thank you again.

  9. I really need to get in touch with you about my Maryland ballot challenge, can you email me at