Breaking News- US SUPREME COURT CALLS SPECIAL SESSION ON OBAMA ELIGIBILITY? Cody Robert Judy says "They Should!"

Breaking News- US SUPREME COURT CALLS SPECIAL SESSION ON OBAMA ELIGIBILITY?

More and more Americans are seeing the value of the work I have been doing over the past 4 years. With the “Green Light” on Obamacare that the 5-4 U.S. Supreme Court held this past Thursday along with a ‘contempt’ vote that was shielded by Obama’s executive order on Fast & Furious, one could surmise we have had some very destructive blows to ‘freedom and liberty’ dealt to us.

I wish I had good news to report about the U.S. Supreme Court receiving my case on appeal from the Georgia Supreme Court but in the horse world I’m familiar with let me parlay, “We were headed in to the class for a show and 10 yards before entering our champion stallion threw a shoe by stepping into a deliberately dug hole meant to sabotage our entry, and we had no choice but to scratch the class, and head off to the blacksmiths shop for a new shoe.

The good news would be we didn’t break a leg stepping in the hole and when I relate to you what happened I think it will be quite obvious that the U.S. Supreme court clerk responsible for this has got a major grudge against my action and dug the hole.
The bad news is the Supreme Court in Washington DC is in recess till the first Monday in October and I’m beginning to wonder about the door to the U.S. Supremes being definitively closed to me because of the unprecedented action it represents to the establishment in maintenance of the status quo, which everyone knows I’m not representing really well but rather exposing.

Now I have never been one to take adversity placed upon me as some grand conspiracy and I believe my record will do for that fact. While I have been tested and perhaps pestered with deficiencies I represented I have attempted more to accommodate those and to understand them, and correct them, where they accumulated into facts.

I just don’t think losing a game legally is worthy of poor sportsmanship and so when I have lost legally I generally shake my opponents hand, congratulate him, lick my wounds, and move on. However, when I am wronged blatantly, deliberately and intentionally I have no problem relating the facts of that to others which I am about to do, especially in light of Obama’s ineligibility as it certainly affects many, many, many more than me.

I relate the facts you certainly can make your own calculations and do the math.
1-Wednesday- June 27th 2012 approximately 10:30am, I reported and show the service of the ‘Petition for Writ of Certiorari’ appealing the Georgia Supreme Court decision case no. S12D1584 JUDY v. OBAMA et.al, I received June 21st,2012, with a ‘received by signature’ United Postal Service Record, to the U.S. Supreme Court’s Clerks office which had been sent Monday morning.

2-Thursday-June 28th,2012 – Owing to security maintained at the U.S. Supreme Court and my own prior experience with them I know my document isn’t going to get a case number the day it gets there but I figure 24 hours later is a good time to check on it because you know it’s not like the DMV where they’re receiving thousands of entries every day and reasonably your document after its signed for, ought to make the Clerk’s office 24 hours after it’s received.

So I speak with Gail Johnson about Noon- EST time, who is my assigned case analyst and ask her point blank if she has received my case. She says “No” and refers me to the argument that you know it takes time from service to get through security and to them, and says, “ call back tomorrow”. I was actually encouraged by her request to ‘call back tomorrow’. This as you recall was the same day the U.S. Supreme Court was set, and did release their decision on the Health Care with a 5-4 vote upholding it in its entirety absent the confirmation that it was ‘Constitutional’, with Sotomayor and Kagan, both Obama appointees, in on the decision.

Of course without those two there, we are left with a pretty strong message from the dissenting Justices that the Act fails quite easily the Constitution, and we are also reminded quite clearly that without an eligible President signing their appointments, their confirmation is not legitimate. Now how important is Obama’s Eligibility? How important and imperative is my case?

3- Friday-June 29th –Noon -Approximately same time I call back and get Gail Johnson’s voice message that she’s out of the office until Monday July 1st,2012 and that if something urgent is needed please contact another analyst by the name of Redman, who also is ‘out of the office until July 1st. I make another call to the Supreme Court Clerk’s office and a nice operator tells me as I relate my predicament that he did see “Higgins” come in and will direct my call to his office. I get a voice mail and relate to him my name which they identify your case with, and ask for a call back. I call again at approximately 3pm EST and relate my desire for a call back upon the matter. Predictably I don’t receive a call back.

Of course I’m not all that discouraged because Gail Johnson related to me she had not received my package Thursday. The damndest thing happens Saturday morning.
4- Saturday-June 30th,2012 I receive in my mail box the entire box containing 11 copies of my Petition for Writ of Certiorari back with a letter from Gail Johnson dated Thursday June 28th,2012. Of course you recall I had called her and spoke directly to her and she confirmed she hadn’t received it.

Very interesting letter received that was taped to the top of the package that states the package is returned for the very same reason it was returned May 17th,2012 because the U.S. Supreme Court only reviews cases from the U.S. Court of Appeals or the highest State Court available.

Pictures of the Letters here:

June 28th Letter U.S. Supreme Court to Cody Robert Judy

May 17th, 2012 Letter U.S. Supreme Court to Cody Robert Judy

June 21st,2012 Order from Georgia Supreme Court

Wow! On the very first page of my document it says in the first paragraph, Georgia Supreme Court Case No. S12D1584 Judy v. Obama is being appealed, and that the Supreme Court of Georgia had granted my ‘indigency’ status. How did she miss that on the very first page, first paragraph signed with a notary seal June 24th,2012?
Incredibly two things available here for us to discern because we know she can read- Either Gail Johnson didn’t read the document as an analyst assigned to that duty is supposed to, and ordered it packaged up unread and sent back the exact same moment it was opened, or Gail Johnson doesn’t know the Georgia Supreme Court is the highest court in the State of Georgia presumed by her own letter to be appealed directly to the U.S. Supreme Court.

When I opened the box up, about 10 minutes after it cleared my security department, another letter was inside, which was indeed Gail Johnson’s letter to me May 17th,2012 that related to the April 4th 2012 version of my Petition for Writ of Certiorari which indeed hadn’t been reviewed by the Georgia Supreme Court, but had been reviewed by the New Hampshire Supreme Court which I argued should suffice.

So, now I have returned to me by the U.S. Supreme Court clerk Gail Johnson not one but two State Supreme Court decisions, one from New Hampshire and one from Georgia, that are legally reviewable by the U.S. Supreme court. I really think this should call for her termination in the employment to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Can you imagine just for an instance if perchance the U.S. Supreme court Justices had been notified Wednesday afternoon that my case had come into the Courts authority and was docketed, that could alter their decision on Obamacare, based on the eligibility requirement that an eligible president must first sign an Act of Congress before its legal?

How big is this case? How many people does it represent and or affect?

Can you imagine one Court Clerk having the power to keep something like this from the dissenting Justices on the eve of their Summer recess until after the Sept 5th National Democrat Convention in which a decision on my case could have moved Obama from even being included as a Democratic Party candidate at that convention verses being the nominee, and the Justices return scheduled for October after the convention?

I don’t think anyone upset with Obamacare passing even has a clue what it means to have another Presidential Candidate in the Democrat Party qualified for a U.S. Supreme Court hearing with two State Supreme Court referrals to them means.
If anyone did I really suspect people would be going through the roof, and contributing to my campaign and calling their Senators and Congressmen and faxing the U.S. Supreme Court of this outrage, and burning down the phone lines to the U.S. Supreme Court. WND would have feature stories about the outrageousness of it, and small business magazines across the United States would be saying “contribute” the individual maxim to this guy which is $2,400 per individual small businesses or pay the estimated annual increase of $54,000 on healthcare for your small business.

Of course I need your help and I hope to have somehow inspired you of the importance and urgency of this case. You know the Voeltz v. Obama case getting so much publicity is stated by Esq. Larry Klaymen to be appealed by either side upon a decision suffered a big set-back with the Judge granting the motion to strike the Amended Declarative relief. Here: http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/this-july-4-a-new-revolution-begins/ and here http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/unexpected-turn-in-eligibility-case-put-it-on-record/ - “Klayman told WND Obama’s lawyers immediately went into a tailspin and filed to have the amendment for declaratory relief stricken, which the judge granted,..” How long do you think it would take Klaymen to reach the Florida Supreme Court and hence the U.S. Supreme Court?

Now, put into that equation he does not have a Democratic Party Candidate for President on the complaint, but a Democratic party member who is a voter and who by the standards thus far used by the Judicial Branch won’t have or satisfy the 3 levels of ‘standing’ upon the appeals into the Judicial Branch?

Also factor in Obama will by Sept 5th,2012 have the nomination of the National Democratic Party Convention locked up and how many Supreme Court Justices are going to see that one clear against Obama? Ask Mr. Klayman about the Political Doctrine Question and he will tell you the chances after Obama becomes the Democratic Party nominee are slim to none after Sept. 5th, 2012.

I’m calling for the only thing I believe will help and that is an all points bulletin to every Conservative across the board in the political arena to rally for my case. I will send it back to the U.S. Supreme Court this Monday and by Wednesday I would like to see about 10 national stories about this outrage and calls numbering in the thousands to the U.S. Supreme Court, your representatives in Congress and the Senate and if you hold any value to reaching across the aisle I even challenge Mitt Romney to come out and make a statement on the Justice happening with my case being locked out of the U.S. Supreme Court.

I believe that is possible if you will do your part in sharing this very real possibility that you cannot let slip by. If you’re a business owner or interested in employment Obama care is a major blow to small businesses and the capital they have to work with that would necessarily be opening new jobs.

Please act now… just DO IT! What can America do from Sunday to Wednesday, for the sake of our Country I’m asking you contribute your time, talent, energy, contributions to ‘Vision to Believe in’ represented by our Constitution and my campaign, The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign.

I believe this case is so important and has been biased so fraudulently by the Clerk’s Office that when and if the U.S. Supreme Court Justices hear about it, that it will merit the call for a ‘Special Session’ to be called by the U.S. Supreme Court Justices in the Order to adjudicate the case without bias towards me before the National Democratic Party Convention Sept 5, 2012 in the interest of voting delegates at that Convention who have been chosen by the interest of State Tax Payers money to vote for Constitutionally eligible candidates.

Tell the U.S. Supreme Court Justices - Tax money has been used by the Democratic Party in the primaries and in such is responsibly connected to the Constitution and Obama’s eligibility. RESPONSIBILITY in taxes was the message of Obama care, let them hear about the responsibility to our Constitution that ‘taxes’ demands in representation.

Here is a copy of the complete signed Petition for Writ of Certiorari
http://www.scribd.com/doc/98883410/Judy-v-Obama-U-S-Supreme-Crt-Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-July-2012

Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us

www.youtube.com/user/CODE4PRES


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTJkId_GBis

Cody Robert Judy Comments about Florida Ballot Hearing

Did you know that lawyers for Florida Republican Govenor Rick Scott joined with Obama lawyers to fight the eligibility challenge in Florida?


http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/06/18/2855160/florida-judge-hearing-obama-ballot.html#storylink=cpy


Wow! Unreal.. you know I was thinking about calling Larry Klaymen up and telling him,' you know if you case gets dismissed and you don't have a Presidential Candidate preferably in the same party your case won't meet the criteria of "standing' as soon as you enter a 'Judicial Branch Court' so says the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals', and see if he would like to put me on an 'amended complaint' if the Judge gave him that leeway.

Comments I made about the hearing from WND's article here:

http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/obama-attorneys-argue-hes-not-dem-nominee/

1- Any law conflicting with the order of Supreme Law of the Land, U.S.C. is by its nature un-constitutional, more especially dealing with the right of the people to vote in the Primary and for the Delegates to be bound to the People's wishes by their vote. That's exactly why anything Obama signed is 'moot', he's not an eligible candidate, he is not an eligible person in office, that's what usurpation means. He needs to be removed from the White House on the 14 Amendment's clause of a 'Disability' in Sect. 3.

2- 'I know the eligibility question has been argued with the Briefs pretty well, and its not really necessary to argue in Court unless the Judge is asking questions. Argument in Court really plays to the "key" issue hanging the Motion to Dismiss out for a decision. If its denied, further deliberations on the merit might go ahead along with 'discovery'. So Klaymen was a little 'controlled' in his argument of the 'purpose' of the hearing. However, I do think he failed in pointing out the money trail to the Democratic Party sponsored by the State tax payers. And that is that State voters are 'paying' for the primary results and process, so that burdens the Democratic Party to adhering to a qualified candidate by the Constitution. Any political party participating in any form of State procedure is using tax payer money, so is at least obligated to adhere to eligibility requirements. That is why the SOS is obligated!"

3- "No decision was announced immediately. The judge said he would review the law, but he had pointed questions for both sides. He asked Klayman about the presidential eligibility of a person who is born in the U.S. to two U.S. citizens, but the parents later emigrate to Israel." .. Klayman could have followed up with the other requirement here, and "14 years a resident", but he missed the slam dunk.

4- The biggest problem Klaymen did allude to briefly was that its a "shell game" I believe was the term he used. Obama's strategy exist, and counts on shoving the argument down stream. The reasons' are obvious: 1)Less contention exist when Parties want to be seen as co-hesive for the general public viewing them at the National Conventions. They don't want 'war on the floor'. 2) Again, Money.. the more a candidate has been contributed to the more appealing. Ride the coat-tails of a winner theory. 3) The Courts then become subject to a less talked about doctrine called, "The Political Doctrine Question" where the Judicial Courts arbitrarily resign themselves to not confounding the Peoples wishes. Obama knows this one very well and has already thrown it as red tomatoes at the U.S. Supreme Court Justices over the Obama care hearings. The concept however was not meant to impede our Judicial Branch from being a balance in the check and balance of our system where Legislatures can find themselves making a law that is unconstitutional, or the Executive Branch can find itself overstepping the Constitution on law enforcement like privacy issues. That's the role of the Judicial Branch so to will that to a 'bully' through the election process is sickening!

5- If he goes to "Appeal" with his Plaintiff he's done, just like most of the Plaintiffs in Georgia went to the Supreme Court and were denied Application for Review. If by chance mine isn't (Judy v. Obama S12D1584) denied, we will know for sure that you have got to have a presidential candidate and 'standing' is removed from the Ballot Challengers once they enter a Judicial Branch Court from the Administrative Court.

Writing about this might be really good because these attorneys aren't remembering/ getting / employing the lesson that the 9th Circuit taught us.

Klaymen indicated he would go to Appeal no matter what, but how can he see an Appeal winning when a State Judicial Branch Court, is under or lower then say a 9th Circuit Federal Court, and the 'Standing' issue will come into play again just like it has over 100 times. Isn't that enough for these eligibility attorneys to KNOW they are done if the step into a Judicial Court?

I understand there may be Judges in States that don't rule the same way, but when it comes to unseating a guy in the White House, most administrative court Judges are gonna say, "Hey, that belongs to a panel of Judges, not to my shoulders". They aren't gonna want to have the world come tumbling down on them, so what's the motive not to just let the Plaintiff appeal?

The Problem is if they appeal, in the Judicial Branch, we're playing under a different set of rules about 'standing' again.

If that's the case, Klaymen probably won't have time to 'amend' a complaint in Florida before my case is ruled upon by July 1st, Klaymen would have to amend and add me now.



Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Cody Robert Judy for President 2012
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
Youtube: CODE4PRES
www.facebook.com/CODE4PRES

Do Politicians in Washington DC Fear To Hear?

For IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:
Do Politicians in Washington DC Fear To Hear?


Dear WND Mr. Unruh and REPORTERS WORLD WIDE :

Just wanted to touch base with you on this developing story, and I think it is particular noteworthy given the responses of the Congressman asked about the investigation into Obama forgeries that report Drew Zahn featured in a recent WND story.

The link below provides the link on Scribd that details Sheriff Joe Arpaio's investigation has indeed reached the top already. In the case of Congressmen they most assuredly need or would rather have the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in order to substantiate Hearings of Investigation on Verification of Qualification.

Indeed they probably feel that the election is the best way out from underneath Obama, or, as many believe they are fixed on the way to handle Obama through policy rather then principle I'm sorry to say.

Principles of our Constitution have clearly been redefined by the GOP Candidates as they endured a scolding from Sheriff Joe himself reported in another story at WND.

Isn't it a sad day when "principles' of conservatism are no longer seen as important, and rather the 'economy' is instituted as the 'higher law' by the GOP?

You can't say the same thing about the Democratic Party though, least not in total, as I am running as a Democrat for President, and have taken Sheriff Joe's investigation and incorporated it from its initial release on March 1st,2012 right into the Superior Court of GA. March 2nd,2012, and representing it in the case on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court in the Petitioner for Writ of Certiori found here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/88039329/CRJ-Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-U-S-Supreme-Crt-Judy-v-Obama showing 331 reads here,

and 215 reads here on BIRTHERREPORT.COM WWW.obamareleaseyourrecords.com
http://www.scribd.com/doc/88295689/Judy-v-Obama-Kemp-Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-U-S-Supreme-Court-4-5-2012
As this is so important to WND readers, and indeed so many people across political party lines, I do hope your general readership can be informed directly.

Attached to this is the file that the U.S. Supreme Court received the Petitioner today even though the mailed method was estimated to be delivered last Friday April 6th,2012. I believe it was delayed through security as the tracking report showed that it was in Washington DC and had processed through their sort center at 2:02pm April 6th,2012, granted it was a big weekend with Passover happening with Jews and the Resurrection of Christ being celebrated on Easter with the Christians both of which celebrate uniquely a time of "Freedom and Liberation" from oppression of different times.

It would be an interesting research project probably only Heaven could have taken to ascertain the amount of prayer dedicated to God in prayers this last weekend for our Constitution, in our day, to be upheld, and for a delivery to take place. I think it would be nice to inform people a delivery did take place, via the U.S. Postal Service record. Perhaps many question the manner in which prayers are fulfilled but if you knew the story that took place, the whole story, in getting this done and mailed, you would understand most sincerely how the obstacles overcome were great and how humbled I was feeling the divine providence watching over the work herein expressed.

Perhaps people will have trouble with the messenger, but who are we to decide who will deliver the message? Certainly with the record of Moses nearly being stoned to death by the Jews, and of course Jesus Christ being crucified by his own, that record explains with a little bit of 20/20 hindsight vision is perfect vision, if you are a messenger you better have protection because there will be a lot of people who do not want to hear the message.

That brings me to the next point I want to express: Hearing the message without Fear. Americans are a brave and courageous people at heart I believe and of course by history. Ours has been carved out by great trials and test of courageous actions marked by The United States Constitution that declares a disciplined sovereignty for our Republic. I would like to say that as long as Congress has a fear to hear the truth, the American People should know there is a big problem!

If you don't think that 10,000 politicians in American have thought about doing what I have done you'd probably be wrong. I believe that over 10,000 politicians have indeed 'thought' about doing what I have done, but the point was they didn't do it. Maybe it was 'fear', maybe it was that they 'heard' but didn't listen. Is there a 'conspiracy' to hear when we indeed can hear? When we 'fear to hear', that's when we are in trouble.

My campaign is a campaign against the fear to hear and to listen. When a political regime is afraid, or fears being criticized, you undoubtedly have what became a famous clarion to JFK's Administration called "Think Tank", which is kind of what we have with all the politicians in Washington DC right now regarding Obama's eligibility. Who knows when difficult things are heard that actions contrary to the ones chosen might have ended something that got worse because of the initial decision to ignore them.

What if President George W. Bush as soon as he heard that a airliner had crashed into tower 1 had indeed acted with a swift phone call to scramble jets to protect the skies from the second hit coming in? Might things have been different? One thing we do know, there were American passengers who chose that day to act without the President's knowledge or directive and because of those actions lost their life's but protected many others. There are people who hear and listen who are not nor have they ever been in government.

As for my part, since 2008 when I listened and made the decision to challenge Sen. John McCain's eligibility as I did, I had no idea about Obama's plan to secure his own eligibility through the charge of racism that would exist because no one running for President challenged McCain's Eligibility, when I decided to run and challenge both of them. The time-line and development of Obama's plan has long roots and those roots must be discovered and understood plainly for all to see so America can stay together.

America is not and will not be a victim anyone can just do anything to because politicians hear but won't listen. I believe the blessing of the Creator are still upon this land and that prayers are answered. America was reserved for a light to the world, a beacon of hope, freedom, and liberty and ungodly cowardice actions that seek to undermine what men and women of America have consecrated with their prayers, with their sweat, and with their blood shall in no way go unrecognized by the Heavens throne, nor will they stand.

Under our United States Constitution is a safety that is the foundation of conservatism. Those standing up for it may truthfully have claim on conservative principles. Those denying and shucking it though they had the power will be soon found out and removed by the people. Indeed there is an election coming up and those in Washington DC should be fearing and trembling at their records and oaths that have been trampled in broad daylight of those people electing them.

There will be no place to hide their records and their recommends handed out by The United States Constitution.



Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES

23063250000021211149 Priority Mail Delivered
April 09, 2012, 7:45 am
WASHINGTON, DC 20543
Expected Delivery By:
April 6, 2012


Signature Confirmation™


Proof of Delivery

Notice Left (No Authorized Recipient Available)
April 08, 2012, 1:14 pm
WASHINGTON, DC 20543

Notice Left (No Authorized Recipient Available)
April 08, 2012, 1:10 pm
WASHINGTON, DC 20543

Arrival at Unit
April 08, 2012, 7:07 am
WASHINGTON, DC 20018

Processed through USPS Sort Facility
April 06, 2012, 2:02 am
WASHINGTON, DC 20066

Depart USPS Sort Facility
April 05, 2012
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84199

Processed at USPS Origin Sort Facility
April 05, 2012, 1:09 am
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84199

Acceptance
April 04, 2012, 4:39 pm
OGDEN, UT 84401



23063250000021211149

Please consider Amicus...

Petition for Writ of Cert to U.S. Supreme Court. Link on scribd

Signed and submitted March 4th,2012


FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:

As seen on www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:

Over the last year we all have worked very hard on the restoration of our U.S. Constitution and I have been happy to rub shoulders with you all.

This letter is really to a point of my consideration and respect for you in that work. Our fight is reaching a critical level in the time that we have to succeed. I don't think I have to tell you if Obama succeeds in becoming the Democratic Party Nominee that the probability of success in overturning that nomination and the billion dollars behind that has a small chance of success.

The damage has been great, but what will be done by Obama if he is allowed to either become the nominee or become the next President is incalculable. I don't have to tell anyone receiving this email that 'precedent' is being set and that precedent isn't about maintaining our Constitution , our Sovereignty, or our Liberty and Freedom. The lines on this are clear and the ever present danger is that we don't have enough people fighting for us.

The mainstream GOP Candidates are running on the 'hope' that our economy will be the manifest for repeal of everything Obama, but what about the history for our children to learn? What about all of our children? It pains me greatly to think about sitting in a History Class with a lesson being taught on the Constitution and how we used to have the freedoms and liberties in that document but foreign powers entered our White House and we became something else and it walked right in through the front door.

Bill Clinton's words have been engrained into the GOP Candidates heads...its about the economy. It appears with Marco Rubio's endorsement of Mitt Romney that a close may be happening in the GOP Race. Let me tell you I am a Conservative on the Constitution and running in the Democrat Party. I am now in the process of finishing a Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court. These are deep waters as any lawyer would tell you and when it comes to this level we are facing the same argument as we did in 2008 with 'standing'.

The problem with no main stream GOP Candidates taking a stand is viability. Independents are hard pressed to challenge Obama outside the Democratic Party as well. I am one who is challenging Obama within the Democratic Party because it makes the most sense right now in the Primary Season. That's the politics of party. I'm hoping the U.S. Supreme Court sees it that way too but I need your help.

Its important that all those who believe in the Constitution come together and set aside our differences for the common Supreme Law of the Land our U.S. History is built upon. God forbid it to come crashing down. As lawyers know, its important when Petitioning the U.S. Supreme Court to have Amicus Curiae's lined up and that's what I'm going to encourage you to start doing now, because once the Writ is filed you only have 30 days to file it. We need to have our ducks in a row and we cannot afford to dittle. The Primary Season is blossoming as fast as the trees are now and the time is ripe. Its a now or never proposition and we have to act now.

Of course there will be those who say I will stand on the sidelines and watch this go up in flames, but do you really want to have that as part of your history? I don't , that's why I'm in this fight and you know it is right. There's always something that will tickle your heart or your mind about someone who is Taking A Stand for something that is right even if it looks like a losing battle. I assure you there are many people just waiting to jump ship and all we need is one win. Come with me and lets get that win now.

Citizens who are not lawyers can help by supporting those who are and are in the fight. I need help in printing 50 copies of a 40 page document and paying for filing fees. That's just the first paper. The good news is I think there is a chance. The U.S. Supreme Court has never... let me say that again.. never had a petition in front of them with a Presidential Candidate in the Democratic Party while the Primary Season was still going on. The timing is right to avoid the 'political doctrine question' that makes Justices shrink because a major party has already chosen a nominee.

Once that happens, anyone should be able to tell you the proposition to the U.S. Supreme Court gets about 99% tougher and we are fighting uphill already. Please dig down in your heart and bend down on your knees and ask you Maker what you can do to help, because as I have described for you now is the time.

The election in the Primary Season has to be where Obama is stopped and you can see right now that the Administrative Courts and Law Commissions don't have the chutzpa to face down someone whose moved in to the White House. We need the U.S. Supreme Court to use its Supervisory Powers and for all intensive purposes its irony that my Writ For Certiorari is going to come landing on the desk of Justice Clarence Thomas with everything we've got including Sheriff Joe's Cold Case Posse results and a Presidential Candidate in the Democratic Party with multiple State Court ruling run amuck.

I'll tell you plainly it was Higher Providence which had Sheriff Joe's finding released on March 1st,2012 and the deadline for me to respond to Obama's Motion To Dismiss in Georgia on March 2nd,2012 so that I could include that, which is now on record to report to the U.S. Supreme Court!

That's the bone appetit of the U.S. Supreme Court granting a Writ of Certiorari but we need grass roots help with Amicus Curiae's and your help financially to coordinate this all out presentation to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Please visit me at my web site www.codyjudy.us and make a contribution because this isn't just my campaign it ours under the Constitution.

Let me again remind you that the primary season is rolling down hill very fast now and if Obama is not kicked out of it he's going to be the nominee and you won't find a U.S. Supreme Court Justice willing to tackle the question then. If I file my petition within the next week and we have 30 days to see some Amicus Curiae's roll up the Court steps, and the U.S. Justice's see what's taking place in the lower courts before a Democratic Nominee is chosen at the National Convention we have 'good fertile ground' for success in having the Writ of Certiorari granted and this is a key.

We won't have another opportunity to do what we have been working so hard to do, so its' get in the fight now or pack it in and see Obama pictured forever as the 44th President for our children to admire in their history books.

Enjoy my latest video at YouTube as I take a walk down memory lane from my childhood years to my professional horse training experience and finally to politics from 2002 until 2012 in a new song I did called Moon Walker. The chorus lyrics say "you dont' know where I've been and you don't know where I'm going" and I don't think Obama has any idea about that being his termination at the White House and my walk into the U.S. Supreme Court which I believe will ultimately lead the way for Congress to come in with Hearings of verification for qualification and get to the bottom of this.

Moon Walker
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8uEdsHH0Ew&list=UUymbINcxgM2q9HBmY2VnKdw&index=1&feature=plcp



Wait till you read my Writ of Certiorari its going to knock your socks right off!

Sincerely,
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES

WND Breaking News Cody Robert Judy for Pres 2012 Wins Subpoena Battle w Obama

Boy the last few days have been BIG DAYs... GOOD DAYs!



The campaign was featured at The Post and Email in the BLOG OF THE DAY-http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/01/19/what-are-competitive-standing-and-the-political-doctrine-question-in-obamas-q/
, which is a very nice honor as they receive so many.

The campaign was also featured in another publication World Net Daily (WND.com):here


1- Jan 3rd 2012 Obama must be Constitutionally Eligiblehttp://www.wnd.com/2012/01/court-obama-must-be-constitutionally-eligible/

2- Jan 18th 2012 Obama argues against appearing at eligibility hearinghttp://www.wnd.com/2012/01/obama-argues-against-appearing-at-eligibility-hearing/

3- Jan 20th 2012 Judge regects Obama demand to quash subpoenahttp://www.wnd.com/2012/01/judge-rejects-obama-demand-to-quash-subpoena/

In an effort to help Americans understand more of what was happening with our Campaign the following email exchanges were made between Mr. Judy and Mr. Unruh. We publish these as a matter of record for all to see so that we don't have to keep responding to individuals who are asking us why Cody Robert Judy doesn't contain a link in the WND articles, which is just basically a consideration of professional consideration in a Presidential Election that would help people link Cody Robert Judy's name with at the very least a link to his web site www.codyjudy.us

We at the here at the Cody Robert Judy Camp would also like to give a BIG SHOUT OUT to Orly Taitz Esq. for a great job in representing Cody with great American Zeal in the Opposition to the Motion to Quash the Subpoena. Obama's attorney got a little quiver in his lip as the Judge denied his Motion with his bully and defamation tactics which were disgusting.

Of course these are small battles and victories but they are moving in the right direction and we certainly can share her celebration for the Constitution's Principles we endeavor to defend as a Plaintiff in the case Farrer v. Obama.




From: codyjudy@hotmail.com
To: runruh@wnd.com
Subject: Again? Will you Please link my name? FW: Your story Obama argues against appearing at eligiblity hearing
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 02:42:17 +0000


Dear Mr. Unruh,

Well, thanks for the updated story however you did it again , not having the courtesty to place a link on my name as a Plaintiff at www.codyjudy.us , and this time you made it sound like all of Mrs. Taitz Plaintiffs are Georgia Citizens...

http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/judge-rejects-obama-demand-to-quash-subpoena/
I'd really appreciate your understanding that this is not "all " about Obama being taken off the ballot, but also allowing "other Democrat Candidates" on the ballot. I have been denied on the ballot. A reading of the Complaint makes that very clear but your story is really missing entirely this angle of the complaint.

Thank you for your consideration in this and your attention to the last email I sent you that you promised to address this morning.

Sincerely
Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: runruh@wnd.com
To: codyjudy@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: Your story Obama argues against appearing at eligiblity hearing
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:27:58 -0700


thanks for your note. am swamped with assignments that need to get finished tonight right now. will take a look first thing in the morning. regards. bob
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: cody judy [mailto:codyjudy@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 6:59 PM
To: WND Rpt Unruh; WNDCEO
Subject: Re: Your story Obama argues against appearing at eligiblity hearing



RE: Obama argues against appearing at eligibility hearing


Dear Mr. Unruh;

Thank you so much for covering the story entitled "Obama argues against appearing at eligibility hearing". Your article was very well understood, the approach, and angle appreciated.

Mr. Unruh, this article represents the second article that my name, Cody Judy, ( I prefer Cody Robert Judy which is also listed in the body of pleadings from my attorney Orly Taitz, as an honor to my father who also served in the army, and to distinguish me from others with the same name.) has been mentioned in the context of the article as a Plaintiff in Farrar v. Obama, which I really appreciate also. I'm running a campaign for President and have been working very hard on exposure and building this campaign for the last 6 months.

If at all possible, I was wondering if you would be so kind as to insert a link on my name at www.codyjudy.us , just as a service for people to see my campaign site, platform, and get to know me a little better at their discretion?

You know I was published today at the Post & Email and received the honor post of BLOG-OF-THE-DAY over there and what I wrote in that article I'd really appreciate your taking the time to read, if at all possible, because you should know after 68 cases dismissed it "Takes a Good Plaintiff ", and I am a good Plaintiff for Orly Taitz for many reasons, a few I mention in this article.

Of course it takes a good lawyer too, but without the Plaintiff there is no case for the Lawyer, and with Obama sitting in the White House you can bet the Judges are doing a little research on the Plaintiffs on their own.

We need to band together as Birthers and help one another fight for our Constitution, and people need to know who they can support that is taking on Obama with "Competitive Standing" don't you think? Some people don't even know what that is or how a candidate achieves it.

Please read this article and I'd be very happy to answer any questions you may have that might come of it.

http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/01/19/what-are-competitive-standing-and-the-political-doctrine-question-in-obamas-q/

I'm not sure if just being a Democrat and standing up within the Democrat Party is such a bad thing to WND that they haven't mentioned my campaign or if its just because I haven't been elected before, but it would really be an appreciated gesture if WND could at least place a link on my name to my web site for those who are curious and would like to know more.

Of course they can google it if they are interested to, .. I understand that, but I just think that it would say something about WND if they just gave a little respect to those standing up in this case for all of America.

WND has been a leader in the Birther Movement and has spent millions of dollars in campaigns for the public eye and I for one have appreciated that so much I've even featured the Bill Board Campaign and some articles on my Station!

There are expenses to a campaign as your well aware of no matter what, and those expenses must be absorbed by contributors or the candidate. So far I'm the one absorbing the cost as I've only had $435 worth of contributions which doesn't even pay phone bill for 6 months, but I am very greatful for them coming in from TX, NC, NY, MIN.,AZ.,CA.,UT.,FL.,WA.,WY. These are meaningful contributions coming from folks who care a great deal about our Country and our Constitution in tough times. I ask God to bless every one who makes an effort to help and it touches my heart to read notes within them.., " don't let us down", " keep fighting ", " We are behind you".

As far as time goes it has been all consuming even though you may not have heard of my campaign: The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign. I have put so much work into it building my web site, making commercials. I mean it takes a week to outline,shoot, an edit a commercial and I have 141 on my YouTube Station CODE4PRES, most of them dealing with the usurpation of Obama.

Thank you so much for taking the time out of your day to read this, I appreciate it.

Sincerely

Cody Robert Judy

The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign

www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

YouTube: CODE4PRES


Latest Video- Here's My Subpoena for Obama Where's Yours Congress?





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07hH-ZbdnxM&feature=related

Come On Mr. Joseph Farah of WND Eligibility Confusing New Birther In Town?

In contempt of:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=360085

Come on Mr. Farah, talk about making the principle of the Constitution confusing, and the disinformation of “Big Media”, and can I believe you actually wrote, “It matters not where he was born”, after what has to be a multimillion dollar campaign of bill boards, “Where’s the Birth Certificate”?

With hardly a word about Obama’s father for 3 years and WND focused so hard on Hawaii and determining Obama was not born there, now you’re ready to ‘can’ it and rely on what Obama’s Certification of Life Birth (COLB) said all along, that his father was not an American? What are we suppose to tell all the people that contributed to the bill board campaign?

We had the information all along with the COLB, and now we are running the “We don’t need the Birth Certificate” Campaign?

What makes this so offensive and completely unacceptable, even revolting, is the example of your disinformation of Minor v. Happersett considering the NBC criteria there was no question about the “person born in this country to citizens of this country” , http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAwdtcpFBB0 see at approx 4:40 seconds on.



They did not excuse being ‘born in the U.S.” as part of being a natural born citizen, any more than was excused having citizen parents in the case. Why is it so hard to defend the two prong test of natural born citizen for you: “Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents”? Please enlighten us all.

Time and time again it seems WND wants to make this a partisan case, Republicans holding a firm grip on the fact that McCain was a natural born citizen and Obama is not. The disinformation continues: Omitting the fact that U.S. Sen. Res 511 was “non-binding” or not constitutional because it was not signed by a president or passed by the House. Omitting McCain was given his ‘naturalization status” with the act specifically passed by Congress for the Panama Canal Zone 11 months after McCain’s birth.
Now we see, not one but two acts of Congress here. One gets McCain naturalized from being a native of Panama, which we classify as ‘naturalized’, which then precludes him from ever being a natural born citizen. Then as if adding insult we see you defend McCain’s 2nd ruse, stunt, or ploy in gaining natural born citizenship by a non-binding act of the Democrat majority U.S. Senate co-sponsored by Obama and Hillary. My God Sir, are we all that stupid in your eyes?

Your wile of law and our Constitution deserves a better usher not to mention your outright collusion with the Big Media about myself as a presidential candidate who sued both McCain and Obama.
What’s your theory of making it a Constitutional Issue rather than a partisan issue? It won’t sell newspapers or interest readers? Oh yes, everyone Obama has a primary challenger swept under the rug by WND based on what? You get to guess.

Rather than rally the troops to 50 some primaries challenging Obama in every state within the Democrat Party, WND, is content to place it all on a Republican candidate in one big general election? Let me get this straight, 50 fights is less or more than 1? Not to mention over the course of the 50, maybe, just one of those Rhino speaking Republicans grows a pair of nuts on a tree and comes in hard for Congressional Hearings stirring the base as Donald Trump did… Oh yeah, don’t forget about the numbers he had, or the fact you have got to have a candidate who sued McCain to avoid the racist charge of the Big Media! I am that boy.

It’s plain that you’re contempt for our Constitution hinges on contempt at seeing a conservative democrat elected over a Republican rat-holing our Constitution somewhere below economic policy. That Mr. Farah is a pretty good definition of hypocrite or in other words, exactly what Obama is. While disparaging Obama you’ve become exactly what he is. Maybe it’s time for you to change, and for this we can all hope.

Cody Judy says "Big Lines? Together, We Can Govern Politicians"

Cody Judy says "Big Lines? Together, We Can Govern Politicians"

Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 says solvency within the United States is possible but to keep choosing the same kind of candidates will not get it. Those candidates in the Republican Party that don't raise Obama's ineligibility up are complacent with fraud and forgery, and that is their ideal. Cody says,"Big Lines? Together, we can Govern Politicians."




This is heart breaking for our military- look what is happening.
Citizen WElls

Staff Sergeant Daryn Moran refuses orders, Obama birth certificate eligibility, Landstuhl Germany, Obama is a criminal
http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/

“Air Force Staff Sergeant Refusing Orders Until Obama’s Eligibility Dealt With”

“Here is the email from Air Force Staff Sergeant Daryn Moran,
My name is Daryn J. Moran. I am a SSgt in the USAF stationed in Germany.

I called Pastor Manning of the Manning Report just recently (Youtube video posted below) to share my concern for our country. Boils down that I have not gone in to work last Thurs. and Fri. First time I was AWOL in nearly 13 years. Until B. Obama provides a birth certificate which stands up to professional examination, not even mentioning the seriousness of the fact that his father was never an American, I no longer serve the Armed Forces or take orders.

Basically, I’d rather follow Mr. Lakin, the ex-Army officer who went to Ft. Leavenworth, into war against our real enemies.

My family is in turmoil because I cannot change my heart to support Obama, or protect his criminality. I love America and the Constitution and stand against B. Obama. He should be arrested.

I will not be going to work Monday morning at Landstuhl. They haven’t even called my house yet, but they will come for me soon.

Daryn J. Moran

P.S., I don’t want to lose my freedom, but our freedom is already gone. Tell your friends and family I’m calling for Americans to arrest Obama. I can’t see how they won’t throw me in jail for it.

Read more story here

Burning Koran Huh? Watch Burning of U.S.C Rush Limbaugh

Cody Judy burns 12 pages of the Constitution in effigy of Obama and Congress's silence on a Verification Qualification Hearing. Burning Koran Huh? Americans ought to be upset about Congress burning 12 pages of the Constitution, the Central Feature of U.S.C.; qualifications, duties, and restraints on U.S. President. Allowing Obama to remain another 2 years because of a mis representation to voters of credentials? That is a crime and upholding voter fraud upon Americans. Angela a caller on the Rush Limbaugh Show features "Those responsible R's and Rush, should be ashamed". Cody says "Read his letters to Donald Trump and Rush Limbaugh in Taking A Stand;"We gotta put a lid on this!"


Burning Koran Huh? Watch Burning of U.S.Constn Rush Limbaugh Part A




Burning Koran Huh? Watch Burning of U.S. Constn Rush Limbaugh Part B