I-CPAC 2015 IGNITES PATRIOT FIRES ACROSS THE USA- CRUZING IN THE BIRTHER CROSSHAIRS

FEATURED EDITORIAL - THE POST & EMAIL
I-CPAC 2015 IGNITES PATRIOT FIRES ACROSS THE USA- CRUZING IN THE BIRTHER CROSSHAIRS
The ruse or subterfuge of #CPAC2015 (Conservative Political Action Conference 2015) is that the organizers refuse to support the very stalwart foundation of the United States Constitution in the demands for a 'natural born Citizen' in the Office of the President, or invite anyone to speak at the conference who embodies the conservative nature of which this very important principle rest as a national security measure for our Nation. The deception this year was actually worse than last year when the Republicans had some kind of an excuse not to call for hearings on the ineligibility of Barack Hussein Obama because the Democratic Party controlled the trial house of Congress or U.S. Senate.

The deception actually took place during today's Sen. Ted Cruz speech with conservative talk show host Sean Hannity interviewing Sen. Cruz after his CPAC2015 speech February 26th,2015 and covered rather well on RAW STORY.



Beginning at 7m:22s - 8m:12sec
During this interview Sean Hannity actually pitches for Sen. Cruz. [

Hannity: Alright, I want to warn everybody. I am asking this question because I know the liberal media will. So might as well get it out of the way for them. That's my job I get paid to do that.

Cruz: No, I have not stopped beating my wife. (Laughs) (Crowd Laughs)

Hannity: Ok ,Your mother was an American citizen, you talked about your Dad coming from Cuba. You were born in Canada. You had dual citizenship There are a bunch of Liberal birthers out there that would try to make the case that your not eligible? Just a quick.. short answer.

Cruz: “Look, I was born in Calgary, my mother was an American citizen by birth. Under federal law, that made me an American citizen by birth. The Constitution requires that you be a natural born citizen.”

Hannity: Ok.. now we're going to do our quick lighting round cuz were running out of time...]


Believe it or not the perfect answer comes directly from a highlighted I-CPAC2014 VIDEO that I made which really directed the message right at Sen. Ted Cruz back in 2014!
I-CPAC 2014 MOMENT

Like a "candid camera moment" or a 'Precious Moment", Cody Robert Judy candidate for President created I-CPAC AMERICAN 2014 so that you could tell the GOP just how unhappy you are with their "conservative" stand on 'principles' of the Constitution.
Cody as a Presidential Candidate in 2008 took Obama and America's most unpopular U.S. Senator according to a recent poll by Fox, Sen. John McCain to task in 2008 for not being a 'natural born citizens'. McCain having been born as a native son of Panama and being naturalized 11 months after his birth by a Congressional Act, and then receiving his 'natural born citizenship' from his good ole boys club in non-binding U.S. Sen. Resolution 511 in 2008 sponsored by none other then Sen. Hillary Clinton and Sen. Barack Obama. Judy proceeded to the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 in 2012 and 2013 without so much as a hearing.
Its understandable then that Cody has actually stood fast upon the principles of the Constitution wherein only a 'natural born citizen', born in the U.S. to Citizen parents, was qualified for the Office of the President. Mr. Judy has stood up time and time again asking Republicans to hear his case in Congress presented with the evidence of professional law enforcement witnesses in Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Cold Case Posse, which many of the courts defer the issue to on the basis of the political question doctrine.

REPUBLICANS TAKE OVER HOUSE AND SENATE IN 2014

Now Americans, facing huge premium increases with Obamacare not being able to keep doctors as they were promised by Obama are faced with the dilemma that the Republican Party has not called for hearings on Obama's ineligibility which would in fact halt Obamacare mandates as not being signed by a legal president. Instead Sen. Cruz rambles on he will be the savior to the American people by offering promises as an ineligible candidate for President himself.

Its as if the American People are seeing in front of their eyes the whole reason the U.S. Senate controlled by Republicans now have not called for a hearing on Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Cold Case Posse's report finding many deceptions in Obama's long form fabricated birth certificate and draft registration, that being to protect Sen. Ted Cruz's ineligibility!

[UPDATE MARCH 4-'15- Bombshell: Illinois National Republican Assembly Chairwoman;
Senator Ted Cruz Told Me He's Not Eligible To Be President
Read more at http://www.birtherreport.com/2015/03/bombshell-illinois-national-republican.html
Excerpt

]
To hear Sen. Cruz admit that he was an "American Citizen" by birth, not a natural born Citizen needed to qualify for the Office of the President was tantamount to the bait-n-switch tactic of a fraudulent sale, however, this bait-n-switch has power strings attached to it that include being the Commander-In-Chief of the whole American Army and sitting in the Oval Office as President of the United States.

Cruz admitted his 'citizenship' comes from his mother, and then cites the Constitution telling us that 'natural born citizenship' is what's necessary to qualify for the Office of the President nodding his head as if he is now qualified for the Office. There was absolutely no confusion in the interview of what office he was being interviewed for. Sean Hannity recites in the interview: "President Cruz".

Folks have we heard this story before? A former adjunct professor of Law turned politician and as a freshman U.S. Senator deciding to enter the U.S. race for President?

Senator Ted Cruz-1970 at the University of Texas School of Law where he taught U.S. Supreme Court litigation from 2004-2009

Senator Barack Hussein Obama-1961-taught constitutional law at the University of Chicago Law School for twelve years, first as a Lecturer from 1992 to 1996, and then as a Senior Lecturer from 1996 to 2004

What a coincidence both men are ineligible due to one parent being an alien citizen, and being born outside the U.S. We have to assume due to Sheriff Joe's Cold Case Posse Obama was not born in Hawaii because he's leaned on that as his qualification horse and forging a birth certificate doesn't make a bit of sense unless something's being covered up that would disqualify him from that which assumed is the criteria and meets qualification standards.

If Cruz, Rubio, and Obama's ineligibility is put to trial Folks they are toast. There is no way they can stand up because the whole purpose of 'natural born Citizen' was to exclude any foreign citizenship from the Office of the President.

The Framers of the US Constitution decided, after much debate, that the President must be a 'natural born Citizen',not just a US Citizen, but a 'natural born Citizen.' Only the President is required to be a natural born Citizen. This incorporates two full generations and prohibits any foreign king from even financing his children to the Office of the President of the United States. All other offices like U.S. Representatives', U.S. Senators', even Supreme Court Justices' need only be a Citizen of the United States.

During the Constitutional Convention of 1787, discussions and intelligence between Founding Fathers John Jay (who would become the U.S. Supreme Court's first Presiding Judge), Alexander Hamilton ( who became the first U.S. Secretary to the Treasury), and George Washington (who became the first U.S. President) led them wisely to choose the definition of natural born Citizen provided by Emerich de Vattel's "Law of Nations or Principles of Natural Law," Book 1, Chapter 19, Section 212, (1758).

According to "Law of Nations," natural born Citizen is a child born in the USA of two (2) U.S. Citizen parents. Vattel's Law of Nations defines how being a Natural Born Citizen differs from a classification of citizenship given to those simply born in the United States. Natural born and being born in the USA do not share the same meaning. The parents can be US Citizens by birth or they can be US Citizens by Naturalization after immigrating to the USA. But to create a natural born Citizen of the USA, 'both' parents must be US Citizens at the time the child is born on USA soil.

John Jay's letter to General George Washington
New-York, 25th July, 1787.

Dear Sir,

Permit me to hint whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of foreigners into the administration of our national government ; and to declare expressly that the command in chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolve on any but a natural born citizen.

I remain, dear sir,

Your faithful friend and servant,

John Jay.

Now the recommendation is as good today as the United States of America is coveted by foreign nations. Has the USA lost any such charm- is it not a jewel to the world with its vast expanses of land, cities, and natural resources or has it all pretty much been spent now? If anything the U.S.A. is sought now more then ever by even greater and more cunning powers then sought it at the time of its founding. To this no doubt Obama, Cruz, Rubio, and McCain would scoff, but our national security is no laughing matter.

I'm not laughing with the audience and Sean Hannity at CPAC 2015. I want to point something out about this letter. Not only is the letter an EXPRESSED DECLARATION that the President/Commander-In-Chief of the American armies not to devolve on any but a natural born citizen ( a clear dedication and warning to two American generations) , but a very strong check is also to be given to any 'foreigners' (first generation citizens) being admitted into the National Government.

Its a very clear warning we should even be very cautious about First Generation Citizens of the U.S. who were still considered foreigners either by one or the other parent or by birth place, and were not as trust-worthy to the U.S.A as a second generation American termed 'natural born Citizen'. Now it was decided that the qualifications for U.S. Reps and U.S. Sen's as far as Citizenship would include first generation Citizens meaning children of foreigners born here, or immigrants and their children born here but even the time for being here was made a stronger check for U.S. Senators then U.S. Representatives as well as a 5 year age difference.

This shows a very clear progressively stringent qualification paradigm according to the responsibilities of the office. U.S. Reps are only elected for two years, U.S. Senators for six years. For the President one can serve two four year terms however two full American generations in a pedigree is required and was seen as long enough to wipe out the plans of some ill intended foreign scheme concocted for the nefarious purposes of the Snidely Whiplash or foreign Despot.

To witness Sen. Ted Cruz perform that snazzy bait-n-switch was just exactly what America needed to see to understand what lies beneath his skin and how easily it comes to him- the forked tongue of a Republican. I've hypothesized Sen. Ted Cruz with such a willingness to defraud the American Public in their hard earned contributions for an Office if he were elected to he would not qualify for, is at best 'pretended' and his 22 hour hold-up of the U.S. Senate over Obamacare funding also nothing more than deceptive practices to gain American's trust and insert the knife with a thrust. He has shown those colors now very emphatically. I wouldn't trust a retainer to that guy now to file a will for my dog.

He seems to me a born loser. A guy who would snake his way into a GOP Nomination and then portend, "I did my best, but it just wasn't to be." You know form Secretary of State Hillary Clinton might even gain some advantage by a GOP Nominee like Sen. Ted Cruz and let me explain this by a question. You might think the Birther movement was started by the Tea Party or Republicans but it wasn't. It was actually started by Bill and Hillary Clinton in 2008. But lets just say after losing to Barack Hussein Obama in 2008, because she either refused or was somehow threatened that if she challenged Obama's 'natural born citizenship' it would be bad news,do you think she would back down twice or be nice to a GOP Nominee who wasn't a natural born citizen?

Now I'm laughing, because if you don't think every Democrat Senator would be called upon to cry for a Trial at the top of his / her voice in the U.S. Senate, as well as every Court appointed Judge Democrats now control with a whole bunch of appointments from President Bill Clinton and Barack Obama you have a really scary suicidal sense of well being, not to mention the Media hasn't exactly warmed up to Republicans since the 2014 election. Do you really think by the definitions of U.S.C. Amend. XX regarding Sect. 3, a "President Elect shall have failed to qualify,", meaning a president can indeed be elected by the public but still fail to qualify, that would not be used by a Candidate Runner Up like Hillary Clinton after what happened to her in 2008?

Bettina Viviano is one of my facebook friends and I've had quite a few FB Conversations with her over an extended period of time since 2008. She was a vice president with Amblin Enterntainment, Steven Spielberg’s company, before launching her own film production company in 1990. In 2008, Bettina was asked to produce a documentary film about voter fraud within the Democratic Party. Remember it was 2009 James O'Keefe who just last week tipped the jar over of Al Sharpton with is project Veritas Eric Garner & Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown all have in common video published Feb 23rd,2015 and pushing over 300,000 views already, who uncovered the ACORN SCANDAL. So you know fraud was happening when Bettina was assigned the production in 2008.

Reported at Godfatherpolitics, [During the documentary process, Viviano says that she quickly became aware of just how dangerous and insidious the Obama campaign was. A number of the Democrats she interviewed refused to appear on camera and told her that their lives and property had been threatened by people working with the Obama campaign. She also heard former President Bill Clinton say that Obama was not eligible to be president because of his lack of birth records. In fact, she said it was common knowledge around many top Democrats. Bill Clinton has often said that he would go public with the information when the time was right. Before that could happen, his close friend and head of the Arkansas Democratic Party, Bill Gwatney was murdered in his office and then someone told Bill that he was next if he said anything about Obama’s eligibility. In the video {linked here} below, she said that Clinton was not intimidated until someone associated with the Obama campaign told him that his daughter Chelsea would be next if he opened his mouth. From that point on, the Clinton’s remained silent about Obama’s birth certificate or lack thereof.]


Now you think after all of that Bill and Hillary Clinton are going to sit back and watch a Canadian Born Cruz with a foreign Cuban father walk into the White House as President? No., that's not happening. However, it might be the best way to get rid of U.S. Senator Cruz because if Texas is like Kentucky for Rand Paul he can't run for President and be a U.S. Senator. He has to give one or the other up and he's a self declared wimp about taking a stand for the Constitutions qualification of natural born Citizen as I reported this week. Potential 2016 candidate, Sen. Marco Rubio has said he will not run for both.

So, it might be good riddance to both Cruz, Rubio, and Paul in one sweeping presidential run that could really benefit Democrats taking back the U.S. Senate in 2016 with perilous GOP Scandals so 'conservatively' racking up points with the public hazings of the U.S. Constitution while they spew hypocritically and state they are the party of 'national security' and we all vomit understanding how perilously they have not only exposed us but are set and willing to exploit us.

Here was my Tweet to Hillary today.
Help #Hillary2016 @seanhannity & #tedcruz2016 are walloping me as a #Birther Frgt BO get 2R's Rub&Crz for 2 yrs of BO http://t.co/6YdG3rvXZt

Translated it says in more words than Tweets allow,
Help me Hillary because your Campaign could benefit, Sean Hannity is pitching for Sen. Ted Cruz and together they are walloping me. A few hours ago I was a 'conservative' Birther against Barack Obama, now I'm a 'liberal' Birther. Forget your loyalty to Barack Obama heck he's a lame duck. If you help expose in Judy v. Obama 14-4136 with an Amicus Curiae Obama he only loses two years. He's had six in the White HOuse for good memories. Now turn on him , throw him under the bus on his natural born citizenship and ineligibility. You also get the benefit of knocking out two young freshman Senators in Cruz and Rubio by your heroism who could whip your butt in the Presidential Race, and you might collect their fans campaign dollars at the same time?

YOU DIDN'T KNOW HIM


The denial of so many is of course a fear of being called 'racist', but on this issue specifically R's and D's have teamed up with three of the major Candidates for President Sen. McCain, Sen. Hillary Clinton, and Sen. Barack Obama in non-binding U.S. Sen. resolution 511. This is the biggest reason both R's and D's are not petitioning the courts on the definition. They teamed up to usurp the definition, but that is not how America works.

As always,I'll keep you updated as things happen and discuss my case in more detail as we find out what the Court's decision is going to be on the Poll being taken on a rehearing consideration. Thanks so much for your help and support needed at this time more then ever. Remember every "like" and every "share" is very important America!

Sincerely,
CRJ

We need your help. Will you help us or are the outrageous lies your being told by your elected leaders okay for you and your children? If you won't defend your children and their future who will you defend?

Get your questions answered by ordering Cody Robert Judy's Book here.

The 2016 Campaign begins now. Please send your contributions and help with the ABC (American Birther Campaign) today and my election for President in 2016 and Join the 257 of us now on my Facebook Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President 2016 site.




Cody Robert Judy for President 2016
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, Utah 84401

Thank you
Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for United States President 2016
www.codyjudy.us

CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION



The Commercial is simply called "America"


Join the new CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRES 2016 FB SITE Here

America's FIGHT for Civility -Where are America's Newspapers?

FEATURED EDITORIAL- THE POST & EMAIL
America's FIGHT for Civility

The News day is slow, reporters, journalist, and TV Anchorman are yearning for some heads to roll to make or report a story on. The Pulitzer Prize for an article, recognition, a big star on the resume is just one story away. Violence is so often reported on by the Media in print,on the radio and TV that Americans when fully emerged can barely hold down their lunches.

Of course a Pulitzer Prize is a good goal. Its the touchdown of print in the Superbowl. That's is why it is so very interesting that most all the people involved in the game of printing are so reluctant to report the truth on Obama's not being qualified for the Office of the President.

February 25th,2015 a very big reporter Charles C. Johnson made a swan dive in Twittering that was reported by BIRTHER REPORT. His self reported Bio- 'Charles C. Johnson is an investigative journalist and author. He is a contributor to the Daily Caller. Most recently, he is author of Why Coolidge Matters: Leadership Lessons from America’s Most Underrated President (Encounter Books). He has written for The Wall Street Journal, The New York Post, The Los Angeles Times, The New Criterion, The American Spectator, The Claremont Review of Books, City Journal, Reason.com, National Review Online, Tablet Magazine, The Weekly Standard, Powerline, and The New York Sun. His work has been featured on Real Clear Politics, the Drudge Report, Hotair.com, The Blaze, Breitbart.com, Rush Limbaugh’s Show, and the Wall Street Journal’s Best of the Web. He has been on Fox News with Megyn Kelly, Sean Hannity, and Lou Dobbs and numerous radio programs, including Larry Elder, John Batchelor, Rusty Humphries, Dennis Prager, Larry Elder, Mark Levin, and Larry Kudlow. - Charles Johnson.'

His Twitter Dive included
1)How much would you enjoy a foreign government leaking their file on Obama?
2)How days did Obama really spend in Pakistan when he was younger?
3)I know most of the classes that Obama took at Occidental & Columbia.
4)Why has no one ever profiled Obama's gay roommate Sohale Siddiqi?
5)Why did Obama's mother live in Pakistan during the '80s & Indonesia in the '60s?
6)Why has no one ever found any of the black women whose "hearts" Obama says he broke in "his" book?
7)Why did Obama join the gay club at Occidental College upon entrance in 1979?
8)Is there any real evidence that Barack Obama the first ever came to Hawaii in 1971? Cc: @DineshDSouza
9)Why did Obama's grandfather have an FBI file?
10)Why do none of the Obamas have proof of communications with Barack Obama before 1988?
11)Why is there no evidence that Obama's grandfather ever sold furniture in Hawaii despite the depiction of him selling it in Obama's book?
12)Should I publish who really funded Barack Obama the first's education in Hawaii? (I replied to this one)
13)Is there anyone in Hawaii who remembers Obama's "father" coming to his school in 1971?

My reply to the 12th one was as follows:
"@ChuckCJohnson Publish wht Matters has COTUS teeth JUDY V. OBAMA 14-4136 10TH CIR. @DRUDGE #Birthers R right. #America #CivilRights answers!"

My point really is why are America's Newspapers not reporting a very precedent case in American History to the Public in the Civil Rights case involving two Presidential Candidates in a dispute of one Campaign hurting the another's Campaign by the disregard of the United States Constitution's definition of what a 'natural born Citizen' is that would indeed knock the one out of the White House? Does anyone remember Watergate or the initial cover up?

This is especially meritorious or relevant because February 24th the L.A. Times went Birther on Sen. Ted Cruz. The story questioned Sen. Ted Cruz's constitutional qualifications to occupy the Office of the President due to two first generation foreign citizenship's in his person. He receives one from Canada being born there, and one from his father as a Cuban at the time of his birth. Isn't this the height of party publishing rather than a Publisher Publishing?

The question then becomes are Pulitzer's dependent upon Political Parties rather than stories at all and if so, how big of a dis-service is that to the American Public? Perhaps this is why newspapers are struggling with their place in the new age of the internet and it might also be why Government is working so hard to regulate what they see as a source of truth to manipulate in net neutrality?

Staying in the lines seems to make the best picture when coloring. We learn that in Kindergarten coloring assignments. So, suddenly the natural born Citizen clause distinct from the 'citizen' requirement of a U.S. Rep or U.S. Sen, is obscure to Newspapers and really needs to be 'clarified' before 2016? Why not now in 2015 when the case involves Obama whose birth certificate and draft registration have been determined to be a fabrications that didn't pass a Law Enforcement Investigation scrutiny?

With my case(s) as a Presidential Candidate involving first McCain and then Obama in '08,'12,'13, and now'14 not only is the 'natural born Citizen' clause placed upon the Justice Scales in a case which is unique in American History, and backed up by the closest case understood in the U.S. Supreme Court in Minor v. Happersett where we see its clear, "There was never a doubt to that those who were Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents are natural born Citizens', but the damages asserted and clearly required for standing are made.

A real maliciousness is made upon Americans fight for civility if both the Courts and the Newspapers of today in Mainstream Media actually deny the harm and damages caused by such a disregard to the principle in the Constitution defining the qualifications of the President and Commander-In-Chief. We as Americans must see this for what it actually is. If the Court refuses to hear and clarify as the Media fails to report and bring the alert to Americans via the print industry, we must state the result is an assault upon civility and an invitation to war.

The Post & Email just released a story by Sharon Rondeau pointing out this exact controversy. "In a lengthy column on Wednesday former Nixon administration aide and Washington Times editorial column editor Monica Crowley wrote that Barack Hussein Obama was never vetted before attaining the presidency in 2008." The article entitled "The stranger in the White House", she writes, "As a result of their stalkerish obsession, the media never vetted Mr. Obama. While they have made sport of rummaging through Republican candidates’ garbage, college records and past romantic relationships, they refused to do even rudimentary investigative work into Mr. Obama’s background, education, family, friends and professional associates. Digging into Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker’s college years is called “vetting.” Digging into Mr. Obama’s college years is called “racism.”

Crowley continued at least giving some answers of just what may have happened to the press, "Once he became president, he used the full force of the White House to intimidate and punish folks who refused to play along. From the monitoring of opponents of Obamacare to the use of the Internal Revenue Service against tea party critics to the punishing of newspapers and individual journalists who dared to report the truth about its “war” on Fox News, Team Obama called out, dressed down and froze out folks who did not toe the line.Nobody has been allowed to get close to the origins of Mr. Obama, or to how they inform what he’s doing as president."

WE the PEOPLE have clearly made a case of words and law and petitioned the Courts in so many pleas and we haven't given up on that. That is exactly what my case represents that the full Court in the 10th Circuit is deciding now in a poll taken within the court. I called yesterday and was told by the Court Clerk that my Rehearing Request En Banc was still pending in the Court. I'd reported a little over two weeks ago that the Deputy Clerk had told me to call back in about two weeks if a decision had not been made yet which I did, so I felt an update to you was necessary.

As for the Media's Reluctance to at least inform the public of this case in print, I can only hold my hands up and report to you that at least 2-4 major newspapers in every state of the Union and 2 to 3 reporters of each Newspaper are indeed receiving these PRESS RELEASES, accept for Alaska and Hawaii which I just haven't got to yet, accept I have as you saw on the Text Screen picture petitioned Sarah Palin who kind of highlighted in my last post also as being on Team Rand who emphatically will not take a stand for the requirements of the Constitution's Q's for president.
YOU DIDN'T KNOW HIM


The denial of so many is of course a fear of being called 'racist', but on this issue specifically R's and D's have teamed up with three of the major Candidates for President Sen. McCain, Sen. Hillary Clinton, and Sen. Barack Obama in non-binding U.S. Sen. resolution 511. This is the biggest reason both R's and D's are not petitioning the courts on the definition. They teamed up to usurp the definition, but that is not how America works.

The People are very unslaked with the party politics involved in both reporting the news and hearing the case. The dictum of civility is being pressed as the focus is neglected in the scales of justice. To say America has been and is engaged in exhausting peaceful prospects is not dilatory. To her credit, the rewards of civility have been America's honor and beauty affording people of all sects, colors, and cultures a process of peace. Let us all pray it remains so.

I'll keep you updated as things happen and discuss this more in detail so pass it on and keep checking back. Thanks so much for your help and support needed at this time more then ever. Remember every "like" and every "share" is very important America!

Sincerely,
CRJ

We need your help. Will you help us or are the outrageous lies your being told by your elected leaders okay for you and your children? If you won't defend your children and their future who will you defend?

Get your questions answered by ordering Cody Robert Judy's Book here.

The 2016 Campaign begins now. Please send your contributions and help with the ABC (American Birther Campaign) today and my election for President in 2016 and Join the 257 of us now on my Facebook Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President 2016 site.




Cody Robert Judy for President 2016
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, Utah 84401

Thank you
Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for United States President 2016
www.codyjudy.us

CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION



The Commercial is simply called "America"


Join the new CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRES 2016 FB SITE Here

Breaking Report: PIRATING THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION - Are Birthers to Blame?

FEATURED EDITORIAL: THE POST & EMAIL
BREAKING REPORT PIRATING THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION - Are Birthers to Blame?

As the backdoor is closed on Hollywood’s Oscar night and Lady GaGa was quoted by a dear friend and former Mrs. Utah and runner up to Mrs. America Rachelle Clements as having ‘shed the meat suit’ and wowed us with a surprisingly thrilling ‘Rodger and Hammerstein score’ from The Sound of Music, a testament of talent in many different costumes, they have indeed lobbied for anti pirating warnings and penalties going to a great effort to sure up their copyrights were protected even though pirates and the definition of pirating though mentioned is not spelled out in the United States Constitution directly. So, why can’t Hollywood understand the differences of “U.S. Citizen” spelled out as a qualification for U.S. Representatives and U.S. Senators from the “natural born Citizen” requirement spelled out for the Office of the President?

(Pictured Rachelle Clements & Cody Robert Judy)

Indeed, the Hollywood and Entertainment lobby and others have pushed with so much foreign theft going on of their products for stricter protections of their data property. In 2012 a new federal regulation regarding the FBI’s Anti-Piracy Warning (APW) Seal took effect on August 13, 2012. The new 41 CFR Section 128-1.5009 authorizes use of the APW Seal by all U.S. copyright holders, subject to specific conditions of use. Copyrighted works can include, but are not limited to, films, audio recordings, electronic media, software, books, photographs, etc. The seal demonstrates the words clearly echoing the standards of “Fidelity, Bravery, and Integrity” and I think raises serious questions to even potential candidates like Sen. Rand Paul ,Sen. Ted Cruz and Sen. Marco Rubio as to even being competent to the duties of the President to ‘preserve, protect, and defend’ the U.S. Constitution.

It’s a fair question, “Where would Hollywood be if all their talent, all their time, and all their products were just pirated out of the U.S. by pirates and sold or ‘redistributed’ for the Pirates own profit? One could say there is no protected U.S. interest dearer then ‘property’. The conundrum question is why would Hollywood want to set up a pirate in the Office of the President to do just that when it came to their own property they had fought so hard for?

This essentially spells out exactly why ‘natural born Citizen’ was inserted as a higher standard for the Office of the President which was not exacted for the offices of Representatives and Senators that actually allows foreign influence by birth place or parent(s). And also why when the higher standard is diluted, watered down, or hypothesized as succinct to ‘citizen’ that an act of Constitutional Piracy is going on. This helps one identify pirates or candidates attempting to steal from your rights, also not expressly defined in the Constitution but well understood. After all what is ‘free speech’? Something you heard and didn’t pay for? Something you said and impossibly didn’t spend any calories on? We could go on, but that is exactly the ridiculous argument that flows from security through obscurity- the ability to obscure that which is in plain sight and understood.

Indeed it is not a testament of isolationism our Founders and Framers were afraid of as leniency for foreigners was provided in many important offices including both houses of Congress and all the Courts whose qualification for offices did not require being a ‘natural born Citizen’, but rather ‘Citizen’ with time specifications differing. In fact, even the Office of the President was at one time able to be divested upon some form of alienship as was included in the Constitution for the Office of the President as is stated in Art II, Sect. I Clause 5, “Or a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution”.

Amid a flurry of eight attempts to change even since 2003 but steadfastly enduring has been the national security protection that charged two full generations must pass an individual’s history free of foreign influence before being qualified for the Office of the President excepting those as stated above.

“No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President;”

Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents meets the no foreigner-state-of-person defining the difference between those who were born in foreign lands and to foreign parents who are welcomed as Citizens and able to hold very high offices in the U.S. Government but are not qualified because of the single generational status caused by either a foreign place of birth or a foreign parental influence. Considering the “Welcome Mat” of Americans winning elections in Foreign States, I’d say America has a very beautiful red carpet that is stunning for most willing to come through the front door and stick around.
CONSTITUTIONAL RECKONING

Trouble exist of course when those with foreign backgrounds by birth or parent or histories through their ego’s begin to succumb to the calls of the disqualifying factor as more then what exist in the U.S. Constitution.

Who would we expect to object first to the U.S. Constitution’s Qualification Demands in the Office of the President? Of course, it would be those who are not qualified because of their single generation state of U.S. Citizen but who had been given so much as an elected office in this great new Nation among Nations of the World. Rather than honor the U.S. Constitution being grateful for the sweetest opportunity America opens her arms to in so many different offices, they choose to dishonor the Country of which they represent by obscuring their own disqualification and substituting it with their own ego. That’s what Pirating is all about folks. Taking something that’s not yours to buy or have. There some things that are so precious to a family they are not for sale.

Rather than acknowledge this in the Office of the President, they have fits of rage and exclamation that they can pay the price as if the Office of the President is for sale to the highest billion dollar winner. When dollars are not wanted theft becomes the answer. If they won’t sell it, we’ll steal it. Imagine a grandmother holding the most precious item in her arms she has. Imagine she has paid a great deal of time and afforded and seen great sacrifices in protecting it. Maybe it is actually a who and is her grandchild. Maybe it is her wedding ring that has been worn so many days and was given to her many years ago by her husband whose passed on. Imagine a candidate for president walking up to the Grandmother and grabbing it and pulling it away from her by force or by bullying her.

It means nothing to the Pirate compared to the Grandmother. To him its only a tank of gasoline for his next conquest and to fill his own war chest. To her, its years and years of time that can never be paid for with a dollar amount. The office of the Presidency of the United States of America is special folks requiring two full generations of time to qualify for. It’s a dream of possibilities for parents immigrating and becoming U.S. Citizens for their children.
It is an Office that is only qualified for with a dedication of time and that in itself makes it honored. That’s why I think it’s such an awful shame of dis-honor and malcontent for the rights of all secured under the U.S. Constitution to pirate that office.

More than anything my heart broke to hear Sen. Rand Paul like his father steer clear of being a Birther. As he’s interviewed here in a short clip, pay close attention to the words and frame job by the Reporter doing the interview and the very clear mistake or assertion that is made. She sets the bait and the trap in one sentence speaking to U.S. Sen. Rand Paul about Sen. Ted Cruz:


“You’ve heard this whole situation; he was born in Canada to a mother who was from Delaware, so she was a natural born American and a father who was born in Cuba at the time. So the law, we looked into it, says he should be eligible to run for President. Do you agree?”

By the way, his mother being born in Delaware does not imply she’s a ‘natural born Citizen’. It indicates she’s at least a ‘Citizen’ which then passes on the same state to her child- ‘Citizen’. It has no implications of inheritance of a ‘natural born Citizen’ to Sen. Cruz which is attained she inadvertently suggest by dis-honoring his father from Cuba (Cuban Citizenship) and his birth in Canada (Soil or native Citizenship).

And a U.S. Senator elected to office swearing to uphold the U.S. Constitution and perhaps even running for President himself in 2016 refuses to take a stand for the Office in which literally the execution of law resides. Folks, if you’re willing to concede the Office of the President to foreign first generation Americans you might as well concede the Country to foreign States and Pirates who have the greatest salivation in obtaining it.

What’ does U.S. Sen. Rand Paul say?

“You won’t find me questioning his eligibility. I..I..I.. decided a long time ago I’m not going to be a Birther.”

She says laughing, “You’re not going to be a Birther?” and her laughter continues.

Rand continues, “ I’m not a Birther for Republicans I’m not a Birther for Democrats I’m staying out of that.”

She quips, “That’s a smart move”.

He says, “Yea, I’m just staying out of that one.”

In other words, I have no courage to take a stand for the U.S. Constitution when it comes to defending the highest standards reserved for the Office of the President and the attempts at pirating it happening right in front of my face. Folks if he has not, fidelity, bravery, and integrity to preserve the most powerful position in our Government from foreigners and their off-spring, how could you possibly think he has the assets to protect your artistic products and property? I mean what sense does it make to thank Sen. Rand Paul for saving your favorite coffee mug whilst your whole house is dragged away by the Pirate Ship? At least you got the mug? It just doesn’t make any sense.

Senator Rand Paul is one that doesn’t have any problem qualifying for the Office of the President as a natural born Citizen, but you can see by his response it takes bravery as another principle; and the product of bravery are, deeds. I listened to Sen. Cruz speaking to the Iowa Freedom Summit say he wanted to talk about ‘Bold Colors’. He elaborated America was not defined by pastels and weakness, but by Bold Colors. He stated those defending the U.S. Constitution would bear the stripes of it.

Where has Sen. Cruz stood up against Obama’s fake identifications? Where are Sen. Cruz’s stripes against a fake long form birth certificate and a fake draft registration and a fraudulent social security number and sealed college records? It’s a fair assessment to say he has no stripes in defending the BIGGEST FRAUD AMERICA has ever witnessed! Can he be proud of that or should he be somewhat regretful or as Sen. McCain stated ashamed?

In this next video CNN’s Wolf Blitzer hails Sen. Cruz as a Tea Party favorite for 2016. Has Wolf Blitzer lost his mind or does he not know that the biggest Tea Party in America has taken a stand against Obama’s fabrications in the endorsement of the Cold Case Posse’s investigation and Report? In this video listen carefully, Sen. Cruz admits and calls himself a Citizen, not a natural born Citizen. While many ears on not trained to catch it, as a Candidate myself for President suing McCain and Obama in ‘08 , ’12, ‘13 and ‘14 I catch it and implore you to not just listen but hear!

Now CNN’s Athena Jones is who Wolf brings into the conversation and what you should hear her say while she’s backing up they have talked to ‘Constitutional Experts’ on the deal is the point that all of them probably explained to her, “That the Constitution doesn’t define who is a natural born Citizen”. Notice she leaves out that the Constitution does not define who a Pirate of the Constitution is either, but Pirates are mentioned. She also says, “The Supreme Court has never ruled on this issue”.

Well, while it is true the U.S. Supreme Court has not taken two Candidates for the Office of the President; one claiming harm against the other in the Campaign showing standing, based on that qualification that is exactly what is happening in the 10th Circuit Court right now in Judy v. Obama 14-4136. The office of the President has been respected and honored. We in our lifetimes, mine anyway, have not witnessed this type of argument in the Court for clarification. However, the U.S. Supreme Court has stated in Minor v. Happersett that there was never a doubt that those born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents were natural born Citizens. Just because that case didn’t involve two fighting Presidential Candidates does not mean the definition is not understood.

Cruz says he is eligible states Athena at 1m45sec and at 1m52sec you here Cruz state correctly, “My mother was born in Delaware she is a U.S. Citizen, and so I am a U.S. Citizen by Birth.” The pirate or bait and switch tactic here is you do need to be a U.S. Citizen to run for U.S. Senate, but the requirement moves up a notch to ‘natural born Citizen’ for the Office of the President.

Because Cruz does not admit he is a ‘natural born Citizen’ he is not lying, but pirating the qualification of ‘natural born Citizen’ to the trained ear. He confuses the issue by stating he is a U.S. Citizen by birth. Reporters need to be clear, being born naturally through the vaginal tract could be construed to be ‘naturally born’, but we’d all agree those qualifications still disqualify foreigners and their children from running for President. The way in which you are born ‘naturally’ is not a parameter of being a ‘natural born Citizen’ and many are using even that to pirate the property of the Office of the President into foreigners’ hands.

Now a Law Professor named Randy Barnett comes on at 2m.09 seconds says something totally false. He states, “As long as he qualified as a U.S. Citizen at birth, which he does by law, then that makes him a ‘natural born Citizen’. Anti-Construction laws prohibit pirating the Constitution so saying for instance the 14th Amendment wiped out Art. II.,Sect.I, Clause 5 outlining the qualifications for the Office of the President is just outright pirating. What you see however is a demonstrable demonstration through disinformation and bullying tactics that Pirates succeed in stripping Hollywood from their product rights, stripping your Grandmother of her most prized positions, and stripping your children of their inheritance here in the USA. Where in Sen. Cruz and Sen Rubio are any Amendment Proposals for the 'natural born Citizen' clause of the qualification for the Office of the President? They have made none! Thus what you are witnessing is pirating!

At 2m12sec you see the report switch to McCain born in Panama, not in a military hospital, but maintaining a ‘native citizenship of Panama’ by soil because that’s where he took his first breath. It’s special to him. He’s a native of Panama. The report fails to mention my law suit against McCain as a pirate of the principle of ‘natural born Citizen’ through U.S. Senate Resolution 511. This of course was made with only the U.S. Senate so its non-binding, didn’t go through the House and was not signed into law by an eligible President. The report also fails to report the three Candidates for President this involved, Sen. McCain, Sen. Hillary Clinton, and Sen. Barack Obama.

It should be clear to everyone, a quid pro quo was happening with the Republicans and Democrats on their Candidates. You don’t hassle ours, we won’t hassle yours. The only Candidates left to hassle or defend against the Piracy was candidates willing to take a stand for America like myself. The Congressional Research Service or CRS Report revered to in the report also fails to mention that specific Congressional Report pirated ‘natural born Citizen’ from case law.

I actually did two videos on that called Dumb and Dumber that rebuffs specifically the error in the CRS Report meant to either deceive Congress or give them a scape-goat of being dis-informed as collateral damage control to fall back on should the issue reach their offices and the public.

The summation of this is lies, lies, lies, propaganda, propaganda, propaganda meant to pirate, pirate, and pirate not only your rights but your property. It is really that simple. I’ve stood up against that but I need your help too. If you think so little about your property that you’re willing to give it away, what is it for me to try and protect something you don’t care about? It is nothing but a futile effort.

I want to publically thank the Gentlemen who recently contributed $20 Dollars to my Campaign, Mr. B. Thank You, as the first and only contribution since 2012. I would implore you to take a stand for yourself, your children and your property against Piracy, through my Candidacy for President, and contribute and help us win this battle!

Once it is over, we might have more Birthers running for the Office of the President who have been elected for you to choose from, but right now, I’m the only one who can stand on the principle in my record, which are my stars and stripes in a non-racist and tri-partisan way, including Democrats, Republicans, and Independents. The media right now seems to impugn racism exists if McCain was not challenged by anyone and is pounced on for Obama. I agree to the degree it should be held as a standard for all Candidates, and that mine as an individual should also be respected and honored by the Media in the tradition of equal and fair reporting that they are certainly falling short on.

Really the main point is if you care so little about your self and your children's rights as to not send a contribution of anything you can to me as a candidate for President, having been in this fight for a long time which you have not supported in the least, because you believe those who are popular who haven't stood up against the Pirates will soon start among the D's and R's without a single example that your support translates into, I think your in for a very big surprise and you'll be very disappointed.

Please, I beg you to take notice now and ask yourself what has been clearly explained to you. Where do you stand with Pirates or Patriots? When you decide that ask yourself if you have any stars or stripes supporting a Candidate whose been fighting this fight that you can point to in the defense of freedom and liberty when you meet your Maker, and he asks in an accounting of every dollar passing through your hands we Christians consider all God's anyways, "Did you contribute?"

We seriously need to take inventory and understand this is the BIGGEST FRAUD AND FABRICATION EVER perpetrated by Pirates in our history! I plead with you not just for the money, but for your answer to our Creator mentioned in our Constitution that you might answer in the affirmative. Yes, I did contribute and I am Taking A Stand against the biggest fraud ever in American History!

Oh, you were wondering were pirates and piracy were mentioned in the U.S. Constitution were'nt you? (smile) Article I, Section 8, Clause 10 interestingly enough also mentions by capitalization a book that certainly defines what a natural born Citizen is stating on the subject given to Congress as powers, "To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations." This was a book highly revered by our Founding Fathers and three copies were purchased by Benjamin Franklin.

I may have dress up for Halloween as a Pirate but after Halloween my costume came off, but those elected into Offices right now avoiding making a stand for the qualifications are acting the part much more realistically and should be the center of concern that can be punctuated by your contribution now.

Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy
I'll keep you updated as things happen and discuss this more in detail so pass it on and keep checking back. Thanks so much for your help and support needed at this time more then ever. Remember every "like" and every "share" is very important America!


We need your help. Will you help us or are the outrageous lies your being told by your elected leaders okay for you and your children? If you won't defend your children and their future who will you defend?

The 2016 Campaign begins now. Please send your contributions and help with the ABC (American Birther Campaign) today and my election for President in 2016 and Join the 257 of us now on my Facebook Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President 2016 site.

Cody Robert Judy for President 2016
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, Utah 84401

Thank you
Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for United States President 2016
www.codyjudy.us

CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION



The Commercial is simply called "America"


Join the new CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRES 2016 FB SITE Here

Republicans Continue to Lose in the U.S. Senate with Lack of Will for the U.S. Constitution

FEATURED AS EDITORIAL: The Post & Email
Republicans Continue to Lose in the U.S. Senate with Lack of Will for the U.S. Constitution

BREAKING NEWS4: BIRTHERS TEAM UP IN RARE RADIO PRESENTATION & SCOLD OF MAINSTREAM MEDIA

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is besieged by the perils of the filibuster, inspite of the added arsenal of the nuclear option in their pocket which eliminates most filibusters when it comes to federal judicial nominees and executive-office appointments that can now advance to confirmation votes by a simple majority of senators, rather than the 60-vote supermajority that had been the standard for nearly four decades before being changed by the Democratic Party controlled U.S. Senate, now a dead horse.

Well, perhaps if one civil term doesn't work Republicans should try another that has worked for States and Court proceedings considering and placing Obama's ineligibility in the scales of Justices. Georgia's Secretary of State Kemp made it a goal to insist if Obama did'nt show up for his hearings he did so at his own peril, perhaps it was just a coincidence that Georgia having Obama's ineligibility in their Courts also just before the 2012 election received a total of 264 Million in Federal Contracts as well as $650 Million in federal Port expansion contracts.


Lockheed Martin Corp.,Marietta, Ga. (FA8625-11-C-6597P00069), is being awarded a $218,000,000 modification to contract for purchasing additional Coast Guard HC-130J aircraft. The location of the performance is Marietta, Ga., and Greenville, S.C. Work is expected to be completed by May 31, 2016. The contracting activity is AFLCMC/WLNNC, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio.

Georgia Tech Applied Research Corp., Atlanta, Ga., (GA30332-0420) is being awarded a $25,000,000 cost plus fixed fee contract for U.S. Naval Air Systems Command air combat electronics mission systems and sensor technology engineering analysis and assessment. The location of the performance is Georgia Technical Research Institute, Atlanta, Ga. Work is expected to be completed by Sept. 27, 2015. The contracting activity is ESG/PKS, Offutt Air Force Base, Neb.

Georgia Tech Applied Research Corp., Atlanta, Ga., (HC1047-05-D-4000-0208) is being awarded a $21,037,945 cost plus fixed fee contract for a Tactical Aircraft Defensive Suite (TADS) Sensor Integration and Interoperability Task for A-10, F-16, C-130, B-1B and HH-60 aircraft. The location of the performance is Atlanta, Ga. Work is expected to be completed by Sept. 27, 2015. The contracting activity is ESG/PKS, Offutt Air Force Base, Neb.

The bowls of cash came on the heels of Judge Malihi's decision, children born to illegal aliens, tourists and/or terrorists are natural born citizens and eligible to become President about the same time.

So perhaps the U.S. Senate is just not pushing the right levers as they find themselves torn between not shutting the Government down because of Democratic Party filibusters in the funding fight for the Department of Homeland Security to avoid the shutdown of a key federal agency. The DHS budget fight follows an effort among GOP conservatives to roll back President Obama’s recent executive orders on immigration.

Republicans have to realize just about all the favors Obama could hand out have already been handed out, and that still leaves Obama's ineligibility impeachment trial and the power of the U.S. Senate to hold trials on such in the hands of a Republican controlled Senate, as a way to bring Democrats to the edge of their chairs.

It is certainly not as if the evidence of Sheriff Joe's Cold Case Posse could not be brought in before the U.S. Senate and certified under oath as well as myself as a Presidential Candidate who has suffered in standing the direct damages of Obama's illegal usurpation as well as the protections against 'racism' that exist from my testimony because I actually have held both Republicans and Democrats to the Article II, Sect. 1, Clause 5 standard of a natural born Citizen being 'born in the U.S. to Citizen parents. It's not as if actually taking a stand for the Constitution would be seen as ill gotten by anyone when it comes down to it.

YOU DIDN'T KNOW HIM


Obama released his 'long form birth certificate' to quell the national concern he was not eligible by reason of not being born in the U.S., but the U.S. Senate still holds a responsibility to the People to see to it no foreign influence was allowed in the Office of the President by the qualification of 'natural born Citizen' as well as a concern over our national security that someone in the Office of the President acting as President is not a fraud, usurper, willing to deceive the very elect of the United States Government.

A great discussion and interview was recently conducted by WOBC Radio in which former deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania Phillip J. Berg, who also was the first litigant in the Democratic Party to place the ineligibility card on the table in front of the U.S. Supreme Court, called in during the interview of myself, (Cody Robert Judy)in the discussions of the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals poll coming up very soon in Denver, Colorado.

The whole scene of the interview was quite a rare scene to consider with so many differing factions of the Birther Arena coming together in rather team oriented cooperative discussion. If you missed the live edition the work of WWW.BIRTHERREPORT.COM, WWW.WHERESOBAMASBIRTHCERTIFICATE.COM, THE POST & EMAIL, WWW.OBAMACRIMES.COM, WWW.BIRTHERS.ORG , as well as WWW.CODYJUDY.US came together.

Due to circumstances beyond my control I was late and appeared in the discussion about 20 minutes into it. Phil Berg was the first caller surprising us all and was a real delight to here and speak with. The show continued its amazing information show as SARG called in adding to the conundrum presented by the discussion of Judge Malihi's decision in Georgia I was a Plaintiff to. This show was really a two hour presentation that you shouldn't miss and the turn out of spectacular patriots concerned about our Country and the direction in which we are headed is one that is very encouraging.

I highly recommend if you haven't listened to the show that you find the time and catch it as a rare culmination of concern that is finding its way to a head that no doubt is going to come out as a tulip piercing the ground in Spring in the wonder of warmth the green brings from the barren and cold winter.

Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy


We need your help. Will you help us or are the outrageous lies your being told by your elected leaders okay for you and your children? If you won't defend your children and their future who will you defend?

The 2016 Campaign begins now. Please send your contributions and help with the ABC (American Birther Campaign) today and my election for President in 2016 and Join the 262 of us now on my Facebook Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President 2016 site.

You can also Snail Mail your Contribution in.
Cody Robert Judy for President 2016
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, Utah 84401

Thank you
Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for United States President 2016
www.codyjudy.us

CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION



The Commercial is simply called "America"


Join the new CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRES 2016 FB SITE Here

WOBC Radio Show with Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy Explains Obama's Fraud in the Elections

FEATURED STORY: BIRTHERREPORT
The show tonight over at WOBC Radio was excellent! I want to thank Mike Volin and Ed Sunderland over at wheresobamasbirthcertificate.com for having me on. It was great to here from Mr. Phil Berg who was a surprise call in. Thanks Phil for your contribution tonight as well as Sarg and the others that called in. I appreciate your contributions.

If you missed it here's the link the to play catch up. Over all its been a great President's Day and one we all will remember I think.

PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE CODY ROBERT JUDY EXPLAINS OBAMA'S FRAUD

Our fantastic guest for Monday night is Cody Robert Judy. Cody resides in Ogden Utah, a business owner and graduate of Utah State with a degree in Psychology. Cody grew up in a ranching and farming atmosphere in where he learned the lessons of independence, hard work, self determination and self reliance.

Cody, a presidential candidate and conservative patriot with a passion for constitutional principles and rule of law will discuss his latest court challenge seen on Postandemail, birtherreport.com and many other news sites. What makes this guest subject matter very interesting is the 10th circuit is preparing to discuss opening an appeal to a challenge Cody Robert made regarding Obama's eligibility previously.

Having a high court revisit a case of this caliber is monumental and could very well have earth shaking reverberations. Not a single court in the land so far has allowed anyone a fair platform of discovery. Indeed some who have ran for president eliminating the fictitious "standing" rule and filed charges questioning Obama's legitimacy have been summarily dismissed as having been "Twittered, fact checked, and snoped" as one biased and clueless Judge said

It takes courage, grit, and intelligence to challenge this illegitimate squatter at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. and Cody Judy isn't the only one who is questioning Obama's credentials no matter what our detached and clueless congress and senate says. Their inaction on this subject is exactly what Col. Larry Sellin said, "by congress not investigating Obama's proven forgeries, they are institutionalizing criminal behavior"

Call in or chat with us on WOBC Monday eve and let's see what we can learn from Cody. "Could this be the break we've been looking for?"

PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE CODY ROBERT JUDY EXPLAINS OBAMA'S FRAUD


We had a special President Memorial made up today for Barack Obama we'd also like to share with you on this President's Day.

We've had a number of request to have this on T-Shirts and a Plaque and if you are interested please let us know.
Sincerely,

Cody Robert Judy

We need your help. Will you help us or are the outrageous lies your being told by your elected leaders okay for you and your children? If you won't defend your children and their future who will you defend?

The 2016 Campaign begins now. Please send your contributions and help with the ABC (American Birther Campaign) today and my election for President in 2016 and Join the 262 of us now on my Facebook Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President 2016 site.

You can also Snail Mail your Contribution in.
Cody Robert Judy for President 2016
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, Utah 84401

Thank you
Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for United States President 2016
www.codyjudy.us

CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION



The Commercial is simply called "America"


Join the new CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRES 2016 FB SITE Here

Fight Over Forgiveness LDS Church Leaders & Church Owned Deseret Newspaper CEO Charged in Hate Crimes

Fight Over Forgiveness LDS Church Leaders & Church Owned Deseret Newspaper CEO Charged in Hate Crimes

Today is Friday the 13th 2015, I'll never forget a Friday the 13th 1993 when I was walking a long hallway with cell doors and sections down it. I thought, "Boy this seems like a bad day for sure, like I'm walking into to hell." I've tried very hard to live a Christ centered life. To not only treat others the way I'd like to be treated but also to walk the extra mile and forgive not just seven times but to forgive seventy times seven knowing I myself would fall short at times and sin in some way against my brother and that I would need to be forgiven even as I forgave.

The feeling of forgiving someone whole heartedly after they have done you wrong is a good one and it releases a burden on your shoulders. I've tried very hard to separate church and state from my own prosecution and include those principles of goodness we know are inherently good in both, as they are called for by example, in word and deed. There does come a time when you are called to fight back and when you do or when you are called to, you understand God is with you and not against you in the motive and that the tolerance of the Almighty has reached a breaking point for which you know that the seventy times seven time-threshold has been accomplished.

I was startled awake last night with a dream that The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Leadership and its corporate conglomerations associated with The Deseret News should be reported for the 'hate crimes' perpetrated upon me in my federally protected Campaign activity by law. I myself was stunned by the revelation being in such the habit of taking the stripes instead of delivering them as they are merited. I do not deliver the news in any kind of triumph, but rather by duty to the law and the recognition of the wisdom. I will state I have nothing but love for those of the community who are generally good practicing and faithful members of the LDS Church whom I both live around and respect for their general goodness, charity, and all around tranquility in a law abiding way to live peaceable among many differing faiths and beliefs. I am clearly drawing a line of aggression towards those so named in leadership as to the aggrieved state of my person.I am not a representative member any longer being excommunicated by the Faith in 1995 or 1996.

The incidents I related substantiating the violations of The Mathew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Act of 2009 cooperating in line with the 1969 Federal Hate Crimes Law are rooted in both the character assassination made in print at The Deseret News and physical beating I took at the Marriott Center Feb. 7th, 1993 in my civil protest, predicated today in my run(s) for President and other offices over the last twelve years in contaminating and aggravating my record.

FIRST
To substantiate this I call upon two things. Number One the video tape of the protest at the Marriott Center (The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, hereafter also(LDS) or (Mormon)Fireside. The link provides an attempt by KTVX to also obtain the evidence of the tape you can find at the bottom of the linked article. Also (FootNote 1)

This tape shows the assailants and is a record of me beaten and beaten into an unconscious state and lying on the floor as an attempt to kill or murder me for which I was rushed to the hospital receiving and diagnosed with head trauma, black eyes, broke or cracked rips and multiple bruises up and down my entire body including my legs, calves, thighs, arms, back, and sides.

The tape is held under copyright by The LDS Church Presidency (current). It was given by the LDS Church to the prosecuting attorney in my criminal case, shown to the Judge of my case but I was denied a copy of it, because as the 4th District Court Judge Guy Burningham, criminal case of State of Utah v. Judy, (who also simultaneously was set apart in the LDS Church acting in the office of the Church as a Bishop) told me, "They didn't want it to end up with Barbara Walters on 20/20".

I did do diligence to obtain the tape as instructed by the Judge/Bishop stating I would have to get it from the LDS Church Presidency. I sued the LDS Church Presidency for the evidence depicting the assault but was denied it in Federal Court appealed to the 10th Circuit and then to the United States Supreme Court. From the United States Supreme Court I received the condolences that not enough people suffered from not being given their evidence used against them in criminal proceeding for worry of that court, meaning my individual rights had been violated but that was just to bad.

SECOND
I was incarcerated for 3018 days, or eight point two years and that begin just over twenty two years ago. The thing which makes this so relevant today has been the continuous actions of The Desert News, a conglomerate subsidiary of the LDS Church as I will show, in a continuously crafted character assassination that fabricates and embellishes not only the incident, but outright lies regarding the prosecution and circumstances, lending a devastation to not only myself but the community at large in fear of the same bias and prejudice treatment based on actual or perceived religion as it relates to our continually evolving digital data record(s) available to anyone that searches the internet.

The Deseret News is singled out here because of a particular practice I find rather unique and which might be directly attributed to the CEO and President of The Desert News Mr. Clark Gilbert. The practice unlike other papers even within the Utah area like the Salt Lake Tribune is to leave off the "year" of the article in the i-phone review of the article. How this relates in the data search fields of the article is seen by users as if it happened yesterday and with me not twenty two years ago BUT yesterday or today.

This then acts as a prosecution of my religion every day of my life, the same as if a sign was held up around the world that desecrated my religion and persecuted me every day for it. The maximum penalty in Utah's discretionary minimum mandatory laws Utah practices sentenced me to 1-15 years. Fifteen years was over seven years ago and the Utah Board of Pardons & Parole actually held me eight years with four on parole, which was incredibly harsh for a first offense with no damages to life, limb or property and no weapon. However, The Deseret News has continually aggrieved and aggravated me over the same thing twenty-two years causing both a hardship on my employment and participation in commercial activity. To add to that, the State forgave me long ago stating I have full filled their obligation of penalty, but the LDS Church has maintained their trespassing restraining order against me even to this day, twenty-two years later. Not that I care or that they don't have a right to do that, but only to emphasize a continued malice that exist that goes hand in hand with these hate crime assertions that collaborate with the Deseret News fabricated headlines.

In fact, if you search my name this story of The Deseret News comes up in the top 5 as number 4 on the Internet. No other television, radio, or newspaper story comes up twenty two years later. The reason for this could be that The Deseret News runs the story as if it happened today with no year attached to the story itself, and represents a 'hate crime' of bias and prejudice against my person that is contrary and in violation of hate crimes laws regulated in particular of this incidence in the frame of "Religion". I also believe the story has been updated to include my middle name in particular since I have been running for Federal Office, which accommodates an active and willful prejudice and bias to do me, and my reputation harm in the federally protected activity of running for office in elections of the population, substantially creating a serious national problem. This warrants the FBI's investigation and a federal grant to accommodate that.

The Hate Crimes perpetrated by these actions are collaborated by the binding ties of the LDS Church Presidency & Twelve Apostles and The Deseret News President Mr. Clark Gilbert as are illustrated in the following snap shots of CEO and President of The Deseret News posted on the Internet.

These snap shots illustrate in the story my testimony that God had told me what to do, what to say, and who to say it to. The harm upon our society as labeling this as a psychotic action is what? No one can say In God We Trust anymore? No one can say, "God told me" and its a direct violation of our God Given Rights and Freedom. God gave us our Freedom. Men did not give it to us. Thus it is only evil men that seek to take away our freedoms. Many times in our Declaration of Independence as well our Constitution is God referred to.

What gives anyone the right to say God didn't tell me that and take away my Freedoms and Liberties and imprison me for it? No one has that right and its a basic right of our inalienable rights. You can certainly tell me to 'shut up', but its the penalty that was attached to it that makes it an infringement of my rights based on MY RELIGION. Did anyone else go to prison? Was anyone else charged? No. So, what we have here is two religious interpretations of my words.

Does the State have the right to come into the Church and dictate terms? That's actually a good sign there is a Tyrannical Dictator involved in Government. Where there is a difference of interpretation and evidence supporting mine exist physically, and the evidence of their's is not, whose should the State's favor? Well, the state and the newspaper should observe mine. I in fact did have nothing but a brief case full of scriptures I do think are dynamite one of which was a Book Of Mormon, most Mormons will tell is not fake, but is abbreviated B.O.M. This makes any headline using the word Bomb a false narrative, a fabrication, an embellishment or aggrandizement of facts.

So, what does that have to do with the headline of The Deseret News story? Well, you can clearly see not only has their headline been false for twenty two years, but they have embellished it contrary to the State charges which amounts to a fabrication of deceit upon the public in a religious assault to me, my family, and my friends making them fear ever hearing from God. That is a hate crime based on an assault upon our inalienable rights. Are you going to arrest Katy Perry next for saying she heard a word from God and received a confirmation for it at the Superbowl half time show or is that ok, because you agree with it?

Now the headline from the Deseret News says what? Well, its false I did not plead guilty to a "Bomb Threat". That's totally false! I mean Brian Williams mis-remembers his helicopter being shot at, and is suspended for six months from a job that pays 10 Million a year and the Deseret News wants to fabricate my life everyday for the rest of my life, make a profit selling advertisment on it, and cut out the "year", so in the general public's mind they supposedly serve, a fabricated story is up every day? That's a hate crime! The first paragraph of the story is totally false.

I did not plead guilty to 'threatening the life of an LDS Church Leader with a fake bomb!" Read the Court documents! It did not happen!
SUSPECT IN FIRESIDE BOMB THREAT SAYS HE WAS FULFILLING PROPHECIES

JUDY PLEADS GUILTY TO `BOMB' THREAT


These are fabricated and false headlines meant to do me much more harm in a nefarious intent over a life time! Because I only have one, I have to protect it and there clearly is a much more sinister and libelous account coming from The Desert News that for some reason is much longer lasting. The connection of ownership with the LDS Church Leadership is the obvious connection, and accounts, perhaps on a broader scale the exaggeration and fabrications of falsehood in reporting with the connection of the cover-up of the video tape that has protected those of its members who participated in the mob like violences against my person.

Now I can say nearly every day over twenty two years, I have been psychologically pounded with defending myself of the false report specifically and intentionally kept in the public eye as if it happened yesterday by The Deseret News CEO and President who has a direct tie to the LDS Church 12 Apostles and Church President who have held my evidence and protected the prosecution of others in their assault upon me. That is happening today as vigorously as it was twenty two years ago. This is a hate crime against me based upon my Religion and the word of God to me.

I'm telling you I should not be persecuted or prosecuted like this. We have laws forbidding it and my suffering is intense and is pretty well recorded yet I have no relief and I'm sick of it. I can not bear the fault for relaying a message from God, and that's all I did. I was not playing the enforcer role. I was reporting the truth that was no harm or threat to anyone, yet it is still being framed that way by The Desert News owned by the LDS Church and this is a hate crime against a candidate for Office that is protected as a Federal Activity.

Now the Deseret News has heard my complaint before, but they have not heard that the complaint was formalized into a Civil Rights law suit for damages, and forwarded to the FBI for prosecution. Now if you type in "Cody Judy" you get an even worse scenario the Wiki page of Howard W. Hunter and two stories from the Deseret News, one from BYU Universe regarding this. It takes 5 pages to find another story from another newspaper that has a story actually from the Daily Clipper that revolved around my run for the U.S. Senate in 2004. This is why the policy of continual persecution from a Religious Bias or Prejudice exist with The Deseret News and I feel full fills the hate crime criteria.

COLLABORATIVE FACTS OF LAW

The Hate Crimes Bill of 1969 that are also afforded in the more recent Mathew Shepard Act are as follows:

Sec 4701 - Short Title
Sec. 4702
1)The incident of violence motivated by the actual (religion) of victim poses a serious national problem.
2)Such violence disrupts the tranquility and safety of communities and is deeply divisive.

5)A prominent characteristic of a violent crime motivated by bias is that it devastates not just the actual victim and the family and friends of the victim, but frequently savages the community sharing the traits that caused the victim to be selected.

6.B)Members targeted associated with - sustaining employment - or participating in other commercial activity

1)In General
Offenses involving actual or perceived (religion)in origin - whoever willfully causes bodily injury to any person because of the actual or perceived religion of any person -
A) Shall be imprisoned not more than 10 years, fined in accordance with this title or both
ii) An attempt to kill

(2)(c) (1) RULES OF CONSTRUCTION - the term bodily injury has the meaning given such term in section 1365(h)(4) of this title, but do not include solely emotional or psychological harm to the victim:

Conspiracy Against Rights, 18 U.S.C. § 241. Section 241 of Title 18 is the civil rights conspiracy statute. Section 241 makes it unlawful for two or more persons to agree together to injure, threaten, or intimidate a person in any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the Unites States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same). Unlike most conspiracy statutes, Section 241 does not require that one of the conspirators commit an overt act prior to the conspiracy becoming a crime. The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.

Voter Intimidation (upon the readers of The Desert News,State of Utah Citizens, and in fact all the People in the Nation with my Candidacy for President in 2008, 2012, and now 2016.)

Intimidation of Voters, 18 U.S.C. § 594
Section 594 makes it illegal to use intimidation, threats, or coercion, or attempt to use any of these means, to interfere with the right of another to vote or vote as the individual chooses, or to cause the individual to vote or not vote for any particular candidate for federal office.

The State Blew Up my Scriptures in front of the cameras for the news when they knew there was no weapon!

Damage to Religious Property
Damage to Religious Property, 18 U.S.C. § 247. Section 247 of Title 18 prohibits anyone from intentionally defacing, damaging or destroying religious real property because of the religious nature of the property, so long as the crime is committed in or affects interstate commerce. The statute also prohibits anyone from intentionally obstructing or attempting to obstruct, by force or threat of force, a person in the enjoyment of that person's religious beliefs, where the crime is committed in or affects interstate commerce. Finally, the statute prohibits anyone from intentionally defacing, damaging or destroying any religious real property because of the race, color, or ethnic characteristics of any individual associated with the property, regardless of any connection to interstate or foreign commerce. Section 247 also prohibits attempts to do any of the above.

The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.
It took me years to convince my own mother I did not have an incendiary bomb or device because the authorities used theirs to blow up my Bible and B.O.M. (Book of Mormon). They did it to frame me and deceive the whole population!

Hate Crimes adds an element of bias to traditional crimes—and the mixture is toxic to our communities. The FBI States: Crimes of hatred and prejudice—from lynchings to cross burnings to vandalism of synagogues—are a sad fact of American history, but the term “hate crime” did not enter the nation’s vocabulary until the 1980s, when emerging hate groups like the Skinheads launched a wave of bias-related crime. The FBI began investigating what we now call hate crimes as far back as World War I, when the Ku Klux Klan first attracted our attention. Today, we remain dedicated to working with state and local partners to prevent these crimes and to bring to justice those who commit them."

The Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr., Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009 , 18 U.S.C. § 249. Section 249 of Title 18 was enacted as Division E of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (starts at pg. 646 of the Act). Section 249, which went into effect in October 2009, created a new federal criminal prohibition against willfully causing bodily injury (or attempting to do so using fire, a firearm, or another dangerous weapon), when (1) the crime was committed because of the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin of any person, or (2) the crime was committed because of the actual or perceived religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability of any person and the crime affected interstate or foreign commerce or occurred within federal special maritime and territorial jurisdiction. The law also provides federal funding and technical assistance to state, local, and tribal jurisdictions to help them to more effectively investigate and prosecute hate crimes.

With that also comes a LIBEL LAW SUIT
a published false statement that is damaging to a person's reputation; a written defamation.
synonyms: defamation, defamation of character, character assassination, calumny, misrepresentation, scandalmongering; aspersions, denigration, vilification, disparagement, derogation, insult, slander, malicious gossip; lie, slur, smear, untruth, false report; informalmudslinging, bad-mouthing
the action or crime of publishing a false statement about a person.
"a councilor who sued two national newspapers for libel"
a false and malicious statement about a person.
a thing or circumstance that brings undeserved discredit on a person by misrepresentation.
2.
(in admiralty and ecclesiastical law) a plaintiff's written declaration.
LAW
defame (someone) by publishing a libel.
"she alleged the magazine had libeled her"

Summation
The damages to my life are extensive and as a practicing Christian I believe these are punishable by law. The Cover-Up is scandalous. The Frame Job nefarious. The Prosecution and persecution sinister, intolerable, and happening every day.
I feel conservatively the penalty for the LDS Church Leadership ought to be at least $100,000 per year for 22 years that's $2,200,000.00

For The Deseret News Corporation who has profited upon the fabrications a conservative judgement might be $100 for every day that has passed for 22 years those stories have run- that's $803,000.00.

These would be no more than slaps on the wrist to them and I know that. I'm not trying to run anyone out of business here or destroy something that has been built. I'm fighting for our rights and respect for people and everyone's individual rights. I don't want anyone to have to go to prison like I did. That idea is not appealing to me because I value freedom and liberty so much, but I need a honest penalty to be paid now not only for me, for the honor and respect of our community, my friends, and family as well myself.

Sincerely
Cody Robert Judy

AN UNLAWFUL PROSECUTION




FOOTNOTE

#1
1-State Records Committee Appeal 94-13

BEFORE THE STATE RECORDS COMMITTEE OF THE STATE OF UTAH UNITED TELEVISION, INC., a Delaware Corporation, d.b.a. KTVX CHANNEL 4, Appellant, v.
UTAH BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLE, Appellee DECISION AND ORDER, Case No. 94-13 By this appeal, United Television, Inc. seeks an order compelling the Utah Board of Pardons to release to it a copy of a video tape regarding an incident at Brigham Young University regarding an assault on Howard W. Hunter, an official of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The initial hearing on this matter was held on July 27, 1994 in which the parties appeared and presented argument before the Records Committee. Based on the issues that were raised in that hearing, the Records Committee requested the parties to research and submit memorandum to the Records Committee on the topics discussed. The Records Committee continued the hearing until the memorandum were submitted. The parties did submit the requested memorandum and the hearing was reconvened on October 5, 1994. The State Records Committee, having reviewed the materials submitted by the parties, having heard testimony from witnesses, having heard oral argument and having solicited public comment at the time of the hearing, and being fully advised in the premises, now issues the following Decision and Order. BACKGROUND 1. The video tape sought by United Television, Inc., was supplied to the Utah Board of Pardons by the Utah County Attorney's Office in response to a request of the Board of Pardons to supply information on Cody Judy, an inmate at the Utah State Prison who had pled guilty and was incarcerated for an assault on Howard W. Hunter at a Church Educational System young adult fireside for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. 2. The portion of the video sought by United Television, Inc. had been blacked out of the live broadcast and had never been published by the Church Educational System. The Church Educational system claimed copyright privilege of the material and had chosen not to broadcast or publish the portion of the fireside blacked out, but contained on a master tape made of the proceedings. 3. The Utah County Attorney's office obtained a copy of portions of the master tape showing the assault for purposes of prosecution. Without permission from the LDS church or other copyright owner of the video tape, it gave a copy of the video tape to the Board of Pardons. The Video was not shown publicly at the Board of Pardons. 4. United Television, Inc., sought release of the video from the Board of Pardons. The Board denied the release of the video on the basis that it was not a record under Utah Code Ann. 63--2- 103(18)(b)(iii). STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DECISION 1. The Government Records Access and Management Act (GRAMA) specifies that "all records are public unless otherwise expressly provided by statute." Utah Code Ann. 63-2-201(2). 2. Materials kept or maintained by a governmental entity or employee that is not a record under GRAMA is not subject to release and disclosure under the Act and the Records Committee has no jurisdiction over such records. Utah Code Ann. 63-2-103(18)(b). 3. Copyrighted material maintained by the State or any of its agencies is not automatically excluded as being a record under GRAMA. The provision excluding copyrighted material includes provisions that it is not a record if access to the material held by the public entity is limited by copyright. 4. The Church Educational System of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints intended the material contained on the videotape to be copyrighted from its inception and gave no permission for the material contained in the blacked out portion of the video tape but contained on the master to be released to the Board of Pardons. The Church Educational System also never published the material which is subject to the request of United Television, Inc. 5. If the video does not fall under the exclusion of Utah Code Ann. 63-2-103 (18)(b)(iii), it is a record and subject to the jurisdiction of the Records Committee to order released if the Records Committee finds it is not protected by other factors. 6. Testimony and evidence raised the issue of the video being subject to a secrecy order entered by a Judge of the Fourth District Judicial Court in Utah County. The Records Committee need not reach this issue because it resolves the issue on other grounds. 7. The video segment sought is not a record under Utah Code Ann. 63-2-103(18)(b)(iii) because the owner of the video intended the video to be copyrighted and never published it. ORDER THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the decision of the Board of Pardons denying release of the video tape sought by the Appellant is affirmed and the appeal is denied. RIGHT TO APPEAL Either party may appeal this Decision and Order to the district court. The petition for review must be filed no later than 30 days after the date of this order. The petition for judicial review must be a complaint. The complaint and the appeals process are governed by the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure and by Utah Code Ann. 63-2-404 and 63-2-502(7). The court is required to make its decision de novo. In order to protect its rights on appeal, a party may wish to seek advice from an attorney. Entered this 11th day of October, 1994. BY THE RECORDS COMMITTEE,
MAX J. EVANS,
Chairman, State Records Committee