BREAKING NEWS: OBAMA and GOVERNMENT Defaults U.S. SUPREME COURT'S ORDER to RESPOND in JUDY V. OBAMA

PART I. OF THIS REPORT HERE- IN CASE YOU MISSED IT

FEATURED EDITORIAL: The Post & Email
BREAKING NEWS: OBAMA /GOVERNMENT Defaults U.S. SUPREME COURT'S REQST to RESPOND in JUDY V. OBAMA
APPEARANCES THE U.S. SUPREME COURT "WILL" HERE JUDY V. OBAMA

'08, '12, and 2016 Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy told supporters Wednesday listening to Michael Medved's commercial that called Birthers "Attackers" and queried the listener that there was no good reason not to let foreigners into the Commander-In-Chief's position that handles keys to America's nuclear option as well like Obama has gutted the military commanders chiefly in charge of the leadership responsible for defending America, that there has come another sign or appearance upon the stage that indicates the United States Supreme Court has at least five Justices that would like to hear the case hurdling the Rule of Four that is necessary. [A little 'Thank You' to The Drudge Report for Favoriting our TWEET of this Report!]

"Chief among four things that points us in that direction", Judy said, "transpiring since my latest May 22nd Breaking News Report that has become this Blogs' Second Most Viewed Post eight days ago now on Case Judy v. Obama 14-9396 which you might find interesting as well:

" 1st Point-The Internet Site Certpool.com that manages to keep track of all the cases from every Circuit Court that has filed a Writ of Certiorari in the United States Supreme Court has begin posting CONFERENCE CASES listed for June 11th, 2015, which misses the June 8th Date we had projected as in sinc function of normal procedures for the Court dismissing cases.

"Elaborating on the details of this sites report we see that just one of the cases "set for Conference" had a due date of May 20th for the Respondent to Respond coordinating with mine. The greater number of cases that also contained the May 20th deadline were indeed set from the 10th Circuit for "the June 4th Conference" and the latest date of response I found on the June 4th Conference itinerary was 'Response Due June 8th' overlapping my Cases' Response due date of May 20th by some 17 days.

"Indeed of the 10 cases set for the Conference just from the 10th Circuit 7 have dates extended out beyond mine as "due dates for Response", set by the Court, upon the filing of the Writ of Cert."

DRUDGE FAVORS THREE CRJ TWEETS...................................

Not everything is recorded on the Docket Reports that are presented to the public view Cody continued, " I remember from my experience when I filed a Emergency Motion for the U.S. Supreme Court to hear my Case in 2012 based on the term of the Court expiring before the coming election, and it was listed as a Supplemental Brief by the Clerk of the Court, which hardly gives a clue to the Public Eye of what is before the Court. That was filed July 16th, 2012 in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 which would have if heeded given the Court and the political arena plenty of time to adapt for the Nov. Presidential Election. The result of course was not in the public interest or favor of fair elections in 2012 and represented an excruciatingly painful wound for all of us to bear.

"What this suggest is my case is not on the fast track to be dismissed as might otherwise be the case if it was or had been distributed for Conference on June 4th. On that web site, you'll see "BIO" and that stands for "Brief in Opposition" requested and you see that on this particular case listed on the Docket Report of the Site here. This of course tells us that the Court is wanting a response by the Respondent that was not otherwise filed or where the Waiver was filed first. On the other case listed on the BIO Reported cases thus far seen here, you don't see that same Report on the Docket, which exemplifies or emphasizes my point that not all that is happening in a case is seen on the Docket Report.

"2nd Point, and that LITTLE something that doesn't seem to bode all that well for me is that the U.S. Supreme Court Clerk has listed the Caption of my case as (CODY ROBERT JUDY vs. BARACK H. OBAMA, President of the United States et. al.,) and that is of course not how it was filed. Ask yourself how often you see the Clerk changing the caption of a case from how it appears on the papers they receive from attorneys? The public can see the Writ of Certiorari that was filed here on SCRIBD.

"3rd Point- of this would indeed be the actual Response that I received from Donald B. Verrilli Jr. the current Solicitor General just yesterday which was quite interesting in the way it was written. A. it was NOT signed! Now if I filed a Record to the Court that was not signed, it would not be counted as 'valid'. This of course would indeed be considered a HUGE error and represent a formal LACK OF RESPONSE to the U.S. Supreme Court Order. The Court in my case has gone to great lengths in the past to shall we say 'pull my hair out' with trivial points of crossing t's and dotting i's and has not been very lenient to me as a prose litigator causing me great pain at times. This has also been recorded as when they sent my Writ back to me needlessly costing me additional paper work that is expensive with mailing expenses over years as well as providing 'time' for the Respondent and successfully delaying the Case.

"B. It also listed the Case differently than is presented by me in the Court, listing the official position of Barack Obama in the Government as President of the US. last I checked the abbreviation written by most juveniles for the United States of America is was the U.S.A; therefore the wording of "US" pertains directly to, perhaps a small group of people that is not elaborated upon? Your guess is as good as mine. Who is "US"?

"One of the biggest points of my Case is if Obama was elected with fabricated identifications, forged long form birth certificate, fabricated selective service record, fake social security number that couldn't even pass e-verify as was the example when they tried to show how easy Obamacare was to register for, as well as not even being a qualified Candidate that, should he be elected is able to lawfully qualify for the Office and operate the powers of the President by the vested power WE THE PEOPLE have directed for the OFFICE after being both qualified and elected, then how is it possible to even admit Obama in the Court as "President of the US", unless it certainly doesn't mean U.S.A?

"Given the most equitably and lenient discernment possible we come to the body of of the Solicitor General's argument on the Waiver, which states, "The Government was never served in this case and has not appeared in any of the proceedings. The Government hereby waives its right to file a response to the petition in this case, unless requested to do so by the Court" and then.. it's unsigned. (?)

"While I do agree "Government" can be used properly in this case by the Solicitor General based on Rep. Nancy Pelosi's involvement and Sen. Harry Reid in the combination of a functioning 'cartel' formed in the corporations of the DNC and Obama's Campaign Corporation, unsigned its validity is worthless which DEFAULTS the Governments representation. And, let us not forget that May 20th was the date that Obama was given by the Court to Respond and he has failed to Respond by May 20th through any Counsel he might have privately for his defense also constituting a DEFAULT to the Court's Request that RESPONDENT'S file that on or before May 20th.

"4th Point and evenly appreciated is the fact that I did open the case up for any friend of the Court to file an Amicus Curiae Brief. These are filed and appear as little blue squares listed as "Amici" on the Certpool.com site. Of course when people are interested in say 'defending Obama' because they would like his policies protected against any disaster befalling his ability to function as President rather than having his ineligibility exposed by someone with standing in the U.S. Supreme Court and his ineligibility exposed thereby also nixing policies, we see none have been recorded for Obama.

" Summing this up very specifically and technically, the Court has not been addressed as it has ORDERED by either the Government or any person involved in this that was served. Obama was served at the WHITE HOUSE by signature if you remember I have recorded here, and by appearances we see the Court is mulling this over. I think we have 5 Justices that are inclined to hear the case."

We were dumbfounded with the Report of incompetence here. Who is "US"? Of course we will continue to keep you updated with details about when the United States Supreme Court decides to set the Case for Conference. For up to the minute Reports of what is happening in this Case Stay Tuned.


The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

Thank you to everyone who is and has contributed just a little here and just a little there, for we are working very hard in using the little that we do have as efficiently and proficiently as it comes in, as I'm sure everyone would agree. Please consider a contribution
Let's make it Official and support a Qualified Candidate whose has dedicated his time and talent to taking a stand for America. Let's raise a million dollars and give you the right to say, "I put my money where my mouth is. I'm not a hypocrite, I'm a Patriot!".


INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI




We NEED YOUR HELP AMERICA now, to educate Americans in the order of our Constitution to hear Cody's Case to the U.S. Supreme Court. We are Taking a Stand for individual Civil Rights and against an unprecedented ASSAULT upon your Constitution and prior decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court! With your help we can make it happen. You are a very important key to this. So its up to you America to help Restore America Today for a Better America Tomorrow. Like, Share, and Help us in the Contribution Revolution.


Get your questions answered by ordering Cody Robert Judy's Book here.

The 2016 Campaign begins now. Please send your contributions and help with the ABC (American Birther Campaign) today and my election for President in 2016 and Join the 257 of us now on my Facebook Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President 2016 site.

Cody Robert Judy for President 2016
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, Utah 84401

Thank you
Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for United States President 2016
www.codyjudy.us

CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION



The Commercial is simply called "America"


Join the new CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRES 2016 FB SITE Here

BREAKING NEWS: The Ineligibility Storm in the SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Judy v. Obama

FEATURED EDITORIAL: The Post & Email
BREAKING NEWS: The Ineligibility Storm in the SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Judy v. Obama

In the interest of so many people wanting to know where the Writ of Certiorari is and why it has not yet been docketed in the Supreme Court of the United States up to this this date of April 20th, it having been served and noticed on this blog and Featured in Editorials here and here , it has come upon me to explain or perhaps redirect focus to where I have found the troubling storm to be in the Supreme Court of the United States.

It is not my wish to draw a scathing picture of criticism or ineptitude upon the brilliance of what is considered the highest Court in the United States of America and I have sat on this very frustrating experience since the Court received and returned my Writ of Certiorari stating to me something that just was not true, that my Motion for Informa Pauperis and Affidavit to the Supreme Court of the United States was not 'signed'.

Indeed, this was not true, clearly there are two signatures. It was a false statement made by the Office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States. Your right, you would not expect that. I mean its the Supreme Court with the top brass of scholastic legal achievers coming out great schools and high recommendations. Let's face it, there are not to many who get to Clerk for the top Court in the Nation. This is what makes this so disconcerting and inviting to the distortion of the administration of Justice.

With the discretion of the glass being half full, Court Error and Mistakes indeed can occur and it no doubt would be the 'justification' of any Clerk of the Court, but you know there is a standard of difficulty in filing a Writ of Certiorari in the Supreme Court of the United States. Shall we say those that have done it know, and if you haven't tried it you wouldn't know. If you've paid for a lawyer to do it you did understand it wasn't cheap and it was a much bigger deal than filing a motion.

Because the Court Clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States passed the writ of certiorari as acceptable by not objecting to any part of that in the letter; the only objection or discretionary review that was troublesome to the Clerk was really a complete bewilderment to me. The court clerk stated there was "no signature" on the Motion and Affidavit to proceed with the cost of the proceeding deferred in what is referred to as Informa Pauperis status. There was though. Both the Motion and Affidavit were signed and dated March 30th, 2015 which is the same date the Clerk noticed or acknowledged it was postmarked.

Indeed, we must all scratch our heads about this because on page 2 of that Motion and on page 3 which was the Affidavit is a big fat signature with a date of March 30th, 2015. Now to complicate this just a little bit in so doing the Supreme Court advises that the 'writ of certiorari' cannot be altered in any way as to content. That affirms there isn't anything technically or majorly wrong with it. The backhand to the face comes to the petitioner with the declaration from the Court clerk that the whole petition with the altered Motion and Affidavit must be re-served upon the Defendant/Respondents. The approximated time or purpose in requiring just that basically is shall we say an extra thirty days, more printing cost, and is very burdensome upon the poor or economically challenged class that I myself understand. The disadvantage also cost me a back seat to the Court's schedule and term in 2012 as the back and forth went on something like six times before being docketed finally when a bunch of other cases came up from Georgia that oddly had no Presidential Candidate in them. This of course is an easy shuffle to hide if you wanted to do that sort of thing.

Like I said, most people don't know what's involved. Just to review for those not filing informa pauperis status forty copies of a 54 page printed document in booklet form is required.The cost with the $300 dollar filing fee just for printing and service for mine would be $1386.81 and you can imagine if it cost that much to print it's going to cost a lot more for an attorney to write it especially when the stakes of the circumstances of the writ are factored in. Of course that's chump change for those making over $100,000 in the land of opportunity in the United States economy able to focus their full time effort in doing just that.

But what about those like myself, who are concerned about the opportunity being protected? We have and are dedicating and focusing so much effort into seeing that it is protected that our time is taken, and also is not compensated for? Elected leaders get a paycheck every month that you the tax payer have signed. If you lose elections you don't get a paycheck.

Barack Obama has been getting a paycheck from you the last six years of half a million dollars, as well all the Senators and Representatives with their compensations and appropriations who have been hired across the nation to represent the people none of whom I might add have taken Obama's ineligibility to Court. No not one has their name attached to a Court Record. Does that make the principle of the Constitution that the Office of the President be filled with someone who is a natural born Citizen, -Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents-, less valuable, true, of little consequence if its trampled? Secretary Hillary Clinton's words she wanted to be a Champion, a Champion for the working class People in her declaration and kick off Candidacy? Where or Who is the Champion of the Constitution's 'natural born Citizen' clause for the Office of the President?

'Hillary Clinton’s campaign announcement to the press included an embarrassing typo, as it declared the candidate has “fought children and families all her career.” It was, of course, supposed to claim that she fought for children and families.''The hard truth beneath all the gauzy campaign rhetoric is that government power tends to enrich those plugged into government. The ruling Party and its special friends make out like bandits, while everyone else is taught to make do with less. Obama’s tenure has offered an incredibly clear demonstration of this truth'

Well, I'm one of those people who has had to make do with less and make the most out of what I have. That has meant sacrificing tremendously on the focus of making a living for the sake of being a Champion for the U.S. Constitution's demand that a qualified person be in the Office of the President. Indeed, most know that 'standing' requirements for even bringing this to Court are required and notably fall upon someone in the presidential race as a candidate. The translation of that is there is no lawyer, no elected official whose not running for President, no Judge, no Officer of the Law that can Champion this "natural born Citizen' requirement legally. That burden has been mine and I'm the only Candidate for President in the entire United States of America who has done it on a bi-partisan non-racist level. see: McCain Obama consistently.

Now the main stream media, MSM , doesn't want or hasn't thought to tell you this. They continually trump Birthers as 'racist' and even point to Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio who have just entered the ring as Presidential Candidates as proof Birthers are Racist. Now, what do you think of someone who 'hides' and keeps 'secret' in their stories to the public what is plainly available on Court Records for the public? Well, that's seems a little like what the United States Supreme Court Clerk has done to me, actually seeing right there in plain site my signature twice on the first two pages of a document but yet stating its not there. It is there..right there! Everyone can type the numbers in I've provided and see they were delivered. I offer any Political Reporter who would like to see the certification in a submission, but they could also see the 10th Circuit and lower Court had already granted the Informa Pauperis status and its been less then a year since July 7th, 2014 when the original action was filed.

There is no affirmative action ACT OF CONGRESS upon the Office of the President and there is no gender diversity clause as an ACT OF CONGRESS upon the Office of the President. There's no family genealogy name required for the Office of the President and no former elected office requirement for the Office of the President. There's no economic millionaire status for the Office of the President, but there is a 'natural born Citizen' status or requirement. I really think its a dis-service to journalism to see so many 'racist' and 'sexist' reviews for the Office of the President but that is exactly what is happening when you withhold vital information that is pertinent to the Constitution's requirements.

Not building my story on 'racism' or 'sexism' hasn't been hard. Why it has been withheld from the public in the form of media print is what an example of 'secretive journalism', 'stealth reporting' or 'camouflaged court referencing' what is it? You know one thing the Reporters really hate is when a Government Representative in affect 'frame' a story by withholding very important information that would either make the story completely different or at least completely change the affect of the story. Well, don't you think "Reporters" that the public feels the same way about you 'forgetting' information or 'failing' to run a Court search or read a Court record before you print a story that is handed to you for your convenience on this blog? The truthfulness of a Record is an accounting of all the facts, not dust sweeping a few of them for the convenience of the political popular under the carpet.

The mirage of stability that has been built upon a weak foundation or lies is a credibility problem. It certainly is not little old me who threatens everything Obama has built, it is Obama's own weak foundation that threatens his own work. He didn't build it on truth, but built it on a lie. It doesn't matter how high it is or how grand it is if the foundation isn't true any structural engineer will tell you that it won't last. The United States of America's foundation has proven strong. Principle is much greater in power than any particular party or person. The principles will stand long after we are gone.

That all being said, I have tried to hold my tongue or key board, hoping the Supreme Court would see this error but it seems more and more likely that if they can sweep anything under the carpet that has Obama's name on it, especially coming from someone who is a eligible and qualified Candidate for Office of the U.S. President who has standing, they will do it. Let's hope it just a clerical error, but their error cost me another $14 dollars in mailing. Of course that's just nickels and dimes for rich people who sometimes it seems just don't get it.

UPDATE of this POST CASE NUMBER NOTICED IN SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Redacted Writ of Certiorari for Judy ( A U.S. Presidential Candidate ’08, ’12, ‘16) v. Obama (President Elect failing to Qualify Amend XX) et. al., signed and submitted to the Supreme Court of the United States post marked March 30th, 2015. Included are the important Ltr 2, and Ltr. 1 to the Court Clerk with the assigned United States Postal Service tracking numbers available for anyone to look up at usps.com as proof that they were served and received, and in so describe no fault of the Petitioner as to the delay of docketing this Case. It should be noted the page numbers of this redacted version are meant as a convenience but are otherwise in order as prescribed by each section having its own page numbers in the Supreme Court of the United States. The Informa pauperis Motion and Affidavit are acknowledged by the Clerk’s letter but are redacted from this document.

Writ of Certiorari

https://www.scribd.com/doc/262436958/2015-U-S-Supreme-Court-Judy-v-Obama-Writ-Certiorari

2015 U.S. Supreme Court Judy v. Obama Writ Certiorari

Again-
Enjoy our newly March Released THREE MINUTE infomercial entitled The Birthers and please join us anyway you can in supporting the restoration of our U.S. Constitution along with our Nation and the opportunity we all want. Please understand that however benign you may attribute a Candidate who is not qualified by being 'Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents', the very process of dismissing and not honoring the Office of the President with its unique qualification is a process to destroy the umbrella with the Office that sits in the middle of the United States Constitution, as its most important key holder.
The compromise on the 'natural born Citizen' clause is a compromise on the Blessings of God our Nation has been protected by, and a witness that time and place included in describing the Birth of our Nation are of no value.




Join us in taking a stand for "this place" and "this time" honored tradition in the United States of America.]

Cody Robert Judy for President 2016 find us on Facebook, Twitter and the Web.

Please visit my web site www.codyjudy.us and study the 3 point platform and 7 point platform.
Thanks You so much!
Cody Robert Judy


We need your help. Will you help us or are the outrageous lies your being told by your elected leaders okay for you and your children? Indeed, it is time to Restore America's Trust Today for a Better America Tomorrow.



We NEED YOUR HELP AMERICA now, to take the 10th Circuit Court's Decision not to hear Cody's Case to the U.S. Supreme Court. We are Taking a Stand for individual Civil Rights and against an unprecedented ASSAULT upon your Constitution and prior decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court! With your help we can make it happen. You are a very important key to this. So its up to you America to help Restore America Today for a Better America Tomorrow. Like, Share, and Help us in the Contribution Revolution.

CRJ

Get your questions answered by ordering Cody Robert Judy's Book here.

The 2016 Campaign begins now. Please send your contributions and help with the ABC (American Birther Campaign) today and my election for President in 2016 and Join the 257 of us now on my Facebook Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President 2016 site.



Cody Robert Judy for President 2016
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, Utah 84401

Thank you
Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for United States President 2016
www.codyjudy.us

CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION



The Commercial is simply called "America"


Join the new CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRES 2016 FB SITE Here

MEDIA Gloating over Obama's Eligibility Defeat Stranger than SCOTUS Anti- Natural Born Citizen?

FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:

MEDIA Gloating over Obama's Eligibility Defeat Stranger than SCOTUS Anti- Natural Born Citizen?
Update:
Inteview tonight - Wensday 8pm MST I'm being interviewed for about an hour on this show tonight by Mr. Donald Rutledge
www.truthfindersnetwork.com


Amidst the hoop-la and media frenzy surrounding the debates is the 'stone-cold-silence' that something really horrific has just happened in the United States Supreme Court. You don't have to be a Birther, only a part of the silent majority to understand this.

The media has covered very well over the last four years the reasons that the eligibility challenge to Obama's qualifications has failed, and the biggest reason if you were paying any attention at all, was that 'standing' had not been fulfilled. There was not a presidential candidate in the race, in the same party, suffering a loss because Obama was running under a different set of rules and in such was cheating in the race within his own party, and in such depriving eligible qualified candidates of everything he was siphoning off, including campaign contributions, free media spot-lights, and a framed window to the general electorate that was skewed in fraud and forgery.

All the cases that were trumpeted with horns and fanfare by the Media were dismissed over something even Birthers came to grasp as understandable with the three legs of standing once again if you missed they are:
Injury: The plaintiff must have suffered or imminently will suffer injury—an invasion of a legally protected interest that is concrete and particularized. The injury must be actual or imminent, distinct and palpable, not abstract. This injury could be economic as well as non-economic.
Causation: There must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of, so that the injury is fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendant and not the result of the independent action of some third party who is not before the court.
Redressability: It must be likely, as opposed to merely speculative, that a favorable court decision will redress the injury.

'Staying in the race and competitively making commercials, having everything necessary to compete as a campaign for President isn't cheap", says Cody Robert Judy, "We all recall John Huntsman getting out at 12 million dollars in the middle of January, Rick Santorum in April after 23 million, so we understand fundraising cost money, commercials cost money, staff, web sites, travel, the list goes on and on and on. So I hope people understand the level of commitment it has taken to stay in and here it is October, with our last 3 commercials being made just a couple of weeks ago. As a Campaign we had to be able to present ourselves ready and able to step in and be competitive with Mitt Romney at any time a Court made a decision."

The campaign was actually forced to go on because of the case in the United States Supreme Court Judy v. Obama 12-5276 appealed all the way through the Supreme Courts of New Hampshire and Georgia early in the presidential contest. Every Court we legitimately gave the benefit of the doubt to even if it was simply that through the State Supreme Courts the hand off might be made to the United States Supreme Court to ultimately decide a federal election question for all 50 states.

When Cody was asked if he thought the Monday decision to deny his Petition for Certiorari was made with an informed Court rather then glossed over or thrown in the same category of "no standing", Cody re-iterated, " I actually have no official way to calculate that. I know Analyst are in charge of breaking cases down for the Justices and there are so many cases in conference on those days my guess is they are more or less debating the ones that are fed to them, and I actually could clearly understand how for instance my case and Weldon v. Obama's case could be thrown into the same pot of 'no standing', but that case and mine are so far apart in the calculations and losses that our standing is clearly not even in the same category or realm as far as losses due to Obama's eligibility. WELDON was not running a presidential campaign, how could they be even close to the same financial scale or loss and injury?"

"If that's what happened, I can understand it, and I could understand how that could happen, but it clearly doesn't represent justice, or, the standing argument put to rest and Obama's eligibility considered with the evidence we had supporting fraud and forgery, which ultimately means a fraud committed with every single vote placed for him,or campaign dollar contributed."

"I actually think the media would be writing BIG STORIES and celebrating the fact that Obama has won the eligibility question without hiding behind the 'standing' argument. That in itself has been shouted upon the housetops of the anti-birther blogs as a calculation that in fact the United States Constitution has been changed without the legislative branch having to vote on the approval by 2/3rds majority."

" This is big news, the "natural born citizen" qualification clause of the United States Constitution has been really officially changed by this precedent with no standing dismissal coming in between the argument and the decision."

Anti-Birthers have blasted such things as " You see it takes more than 'standing!'", so they have celebrated this big time. The Main Stream Media I would think would grab a hold of this and tell it to every house-hold in America.

To fully appreciate the magnitude of the decision, and the equivalent of the loss, one must quantify the mentality to hide or keep secret the decision of the United States Supreme Court to the United States Supreme Court in denying my Petition for Certiorari. This is really an embarrassment to the anti-Birthers celebration, and that's why if one suspects its legitimate and the Justices were informed of the differences of our cases, a full and intelligent decision has been made and basically ceded the qualification of president understood in the Constitution which has not happened in legislative history!

Does anyone understand here that the Constitution has been re-written by the Justices with this decision? That's the magnitude of this decision. Now I didn't think the Constitution could be re-written by the United States Supreme Court under the laws prohibiting construction, but that has obviously happened also. There is no reason any foreign ruler cannot come over to America and one day be President with this ruling.

Now what is not to report to every house-hold in America? The Conservative leg of SCOTUS are not NATURAL BORN CITIZENS.

Cody continued, " Now what is not to report to every house-hold in America, unless, there is a little different thing going on? I suggest, if a decision has been made re-writing the Constitution, and that is not being celebrated by the Media, more then likely, ,my case was not represented to the Justices by the case analyst as very different in standing and circumstances then Weldon v. Obama."

"I really think this shows all of us, they through all of the Georgia cases in the same pot, which would be about as educated decision as throwing everyone in prison for a death sentence. It doesn't even make sense."

"In fact the following comment I received on my blog makes much more sense if indeed my case was not thrown in the same pot, and under these circumstances, the conservative branch of the whole United States Supreme Court really has grounds for being removed from the bench, and a Congressional Hearing and investigation needs to be undertaken immediately."

Anonymous Comment made:

[ It wasn't so much the clerks laughing but justices Scalia, Alito and Chief Justice Roberts.

All three of them have one or more foreign parents, and all three naturally tend to believe that their allegiance to the USA is not affected by whether the parents were naturalized before or after the justices were born. They are likely to have had friends who had foreign-born parents who were naturalized after their children were born---and they did not notice any difference in the behavior of these friends from people whose parents were naturalized before the children were born.

The laugh is that Judy was asking Scalia, Alito and the chief justice to vote that they believed the writers of the US Constitution may have believed that the US-born children of foreigners (who the justices ARE) are not as good as the US-born children of US citizens. Well, they do not believe it, and the certainly would not vote that the writers of the US Constitution believed it unless there were actual evidence that they did---and there isn't any.
That's quite a laugh. ]


Cody Robert Judy's Response:
[That is a good laugh for them I suppose.., and a good reason they should lose their nice cushy jobs because they failed the Constitution. There's a legislative mandate that says so, as we all know how many times the 'attempt' was made to change it in the Legislative Branch and the attempts failed. Its NOT their job to re-write it, and the construction prohibitions of the Constitutions say so. I do think your comment was very insightful, and I appreciate it.]

The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign - Cody Robert Judy - www.codyjudy.us - www.codyjudy.blogspot.com - YouTube: CODE4PRES
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9cCOHC2hW5A

Two updates on U.S. Supreme Court Case

/a>AAAAAAAgQ/OLEfQIEsQdk/s1600/U.S.SupremCrt.jpg">

4-13-2012 Update BREAKING NEWS: Obama's representative admits Long form Birth Certificate is a forgery! Wow! Will the press now say they are SORRY for badgering all the people they interviewed and demanded them to bow down to Obama with the release of his forged document?
http://www.teapartytribune.com/2012/04/13/obama-lawyer-admits-forgery-but-disregards-image-as-indication-of-obamas-ineligibility-damage-control/


The following letter is pretty self explanatory to what is going on so I'll just leave the link Here:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/89130109/April-12th-Letter-to-U-S-Supreme-Court-Clerk-stand-for-Obama-in-Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari

Its imperative that the U.S. Supreme Court get this in a timely fashion or the U.S.C is roughly delegated to the lower courts who have obstructed justice by not dealing with Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Cold Case Posse Investigation results.

If Barack Obama is allowed to become the nominee of the Democratic Party before the U.S. Supreme Court gets a chance to rule upon his eligibility it places the Court in an even more difficult political question, and no one knows that better than Barack Obama. You all saw exactly what Obama's comments were to the U.S. Supreme Court over the Health Care case going on now essentially telling the Court to not stick their nose in a political referendum, Constitution be damned.

I believe a Court of Last resort is in fact the last court that I can deal with before the U.S. Supreme Court gets shafted out of being able to decide an important question prior to a major political party choosing a nominee that is unqualified.

The U.S. Supreme Court is the Court that needs to rule on this issue before its too late. The requirement the Clerk put on me to go to Georgia Supreme Court first effectively could place the case another 6 months in that court and take the U.S. Supreme Court out of action. I did in fact also cite the New Hampshire Supreme Court case pending, so its not as if I'm not in a State Supreme Court now all ready, which the U.S. Supreme Court can take also.

The U.S. Supreme Court can on its own accord decide if a case is of such imperative public importance they need to hear it, that deals with the United States Constitution. That's what the Petition is, but the Justices have to at least see it before they can make a decision. That's why interference by the Court clerks can gum up that process.

Bottom line I'm not suppose to have to argue with Clerks on the merits of "imperative public importance', that's for the Justices to decide.

I also put together a couple of songs and a video for the occasion. Hope you enjoy it and pass it along.





Date: April 13,2012 BREAKING NEWS: Obama's representative admits Long form Birth Certificate is a forgery! Wow! Will the press now say they are SORRY for badgering all the people they interviewed and demanded them to bow down to Obama with the release of his forged document?
Obama the fool playn the press. How sad is that? http://www.teapartytribune.com/2012/04/13/obama-lawyer-admits-forgery-but-disregards-image-as-indication-of-obamas-ineligibility-damage-control/

Do Politicians in Washington DC Fear To Hear?

For IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:
Do Politicians in Washington DC Fear To Hear?


Dear WND Mr. Unruh and REPORTERS WORLD WIDE :

Just wanted to touch base with you on this developing story, and I think it is particular noteworthy given the responses of the Congressman asked about the investigation into Obama forgeries that report Drew Zahn featured in a recent WND story.

The link below provides the link on Scribd that details Sheriff Joe Arpaio's investigation has indeed reached the top already. In the case of Congressmen they most assuredly need or would rather have the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in order to substantiate Hearings of Investigation on Verification of Qualification.

Indeed they probably feel that the election is the best way out from underneath Obama, or, as many believe they are fixed on the way to handle Obama through policy rather then principle I'm sorry to say.

Principles of our Constitution have clearly been redefined by the GOP Candidates as they endured a scolding from Sheriff Joe himself reported in another story at WND.

Isn't it a sad day when "principles' of conservatism are no longer seen as important, and rather the 'economy' is instituted as the 'higher law' by the GOP?

You can't say the same thing about the Democratic Party though, least not in total, as I am running as a Democrat for President, and have taken Sheriff Joe's investigation and incorporated it from its initial release on March 1st,2012 right into the Superior Court of GA. March 2nd,2012, and representing it in the case on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court in the Petitioner for Writ of Certiori found here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/88039329/CRJ-Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-U-S-Supreme-Crt-Judy-v-Obama showing 331 reads here,

and 215 reads here on BIRTHERREPORT.COM WWW.obamareleaseyourrecords.com
http://www.scribd.com/doc/88295689/Judy-v-Obama-Kemp-Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-U-S-Supreme-Court-4-5-2012
As this is so important to WND readers, and indeed so many people across political party lines, I do hope your general readership can be informed directly.

Attached to this is the file that the U.S. Supreme Court received the Petitioner today even though the mailed method was estimated to be delivered last Friday April 6th,2012. I believe it was delayed through security as the tracking report showed that it was in Washington DC and had processed through their sort center at 2:02pm April 6th,2012, granted it was a big weekend with Passover happening with Jews and the Resurrection of Christ being celebrated on Easter with the Christians both of which celebrate uniquely a time of "Freedom and Liberation" from oppression of different times.

It would be an interesting research project probably only Heaven could have taken to ascertain the amount of prayer dedicated to God in prayers this last weekend for our Constitution, in our day, to be upheld, and for a delivery to take place. I think it would be nice to inform people a delivery did take place, via the U.S. Postal Service record. Perhaps many question the manner in which prayers are fulfilled but if you knew the story that took place, the whole story, in getting this done and mailed, you would understand most sincerely how the obstacles overcome were great and how humbled I was feeling the divine providence watching over the work herein expressed.

Perhaps people will have trouble with the messenger, but who are we to decide who will deliver the message? Certainly with the record of Moses nearly being stoned to death by the Jews, and of course Jesus Christ being crucified by his own, that record explains with a little bit of 20/20 hindsight vision is perfect vision, if you are a messenger you better have protection because there will be a lot of people who do not want to hear the message.

That brings me to the next point I want to express: Hearing the message without Fear. Americans are a brave and courageous people at heart I believe and of course by history. Ours has been carved out by great trials and test of courageous actions marked by The United States Constitution that declares a disciplined sovereignty for our Republic. I would like to say that as long as Congress has a fear to hear the truth, the American People should know there is a big problem!

If you don't think that 10,000 politicians in American have thought about doing what I have done you'd probably be wrong. I believe that over 10,000 politicians have indeed 'thought' about doing what I have done, but the point was they didn't do it. Maybe it was 'fear', maybe it was that they 'heard' but didn't listen. Is there a 'conspiracy' to hear when we indeed can hear? When we 'fear to hear', that's when we are in trouble.

My campaign is a campaign against the fear to hear and to listen. When a political regime is afraid, or fears being criticized, you undoubtedly have what became a famous clarion to JFK's Administration called "Think Tank", which is kind of what we have with all the politicians in Washington DC right now regarding Obama's eligibility. Who knows when difficult things are heard that actions contrary to the ones chosen might have ended something that got worse because of the initial decision to ignore them.

What if President George W. Bush as soon as he heard that a airliner had crashed into tower 1 had indeed acted with a swift phone call to scramble jets to protect the skies from the second hit coming in? Might things have been different? One thing we do know, there were American passengers who chose that day to act without the President's knowledge or directive and because of those actions lost their life's but protected many others. There are people who hear and listen who are not nor have they ever been in government.

As for my part, since 2008 when I listened and made the decision to challenge Sen. John McCain's eligibility as I did, I had no idea about Obama's plan to secure his own eligibility through the charge of racism that would exist because no one running for President challenged McCain's Eligibility, when I decided to run and challenge both of them. The time-line and development of Obama's plan has long roots and those roots must be discovered and understood plainly for all to see so America can stay together.

America is not and will not be a victim anyone can just do anything to because politicians hear but won't listen. I believe the blessing of the Creator are still upon this land and that prayers are answered. America was reserved for a light to the world, a beacon of hope, freedom, and liberty and ungodly cowardice actions that seek to undermine what men and women of America have consecrated with their prayers, with their sweat, and with their blood shall in no way go unrecognized by the Heavens throne, nor will they stand.

Under our United States Constitution is a safety that is the foundation of conservatism. Those standing up for it may truthfully have claim on conservative principles. Those denying and shucking it though they had the power will be soon found out and removed by the people. Indeed there is an election coming up and those in Washington DC should be fearing and trembling at their records and oaths that have been trampled in broad daylight of those people electing them.

There will be no place to hide their records and their recommends handed out by The United States Constitution.



Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES

23063250000021211149 Priority Mail Delivered
April 09, 2012, 7:45 am
WASHINGTON, DC 20543
Expected Delivery By:
April 6, 2012


Signature Confirmation™


Proof of Delivery

Notice Left (No Authorized Recipient Available)
April 08, 2012, 1:14 pm
WASHINGTON, DC 20543

Notice Left (No Authorized Recipient Available)
April 08, 2012, 1:10 pm
WASHINGTON, DC 20543

Arrival at Unit
April 08, 2012, 7:07 am
WASHINGTON, DC 20018

Processed through USPS Sort Facility
April 06, 2012, 2:02 am
WASHINGTON, DC 20066

Depart USPS Sort Facility
April 05, 2012
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84199

Processed at USPS Origin Sort Facility
April 05, 2012, 1:09 am
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84199

Acceptance
April 04, 2012, 4:39 pm
OGDEN, UT 84401



23063250000021211149

Please consider Amicus...

Petition for Writ of Cert to U.S. Supreme Court. Link on scribd

Signed and submitted March 4th,2012


FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:

As seen on www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:

Over the last year we all have worked very hard on the restoration of our U.S. Constitution and I have been happy to rub shoulders with you all.

This letter is really to a point of my consideration and respect for you in that work. Our fight is reaching a critical level in the time that we have to succeed. I don't think I have to tell you if Obama succeeds in becoming the Democratic Party Nominee that the probability of success in overturning that nomination and the billion dollars behind that has a small chance of success.

The damage has been great, but what will be done by Obama if he is allowed to either become the nominee or become the next President is incalculable. I don't have to tell anyone receiving this email that 'precedent' is being set and that precedent isn't about maintaining our Constitution , our Sovereignty, or our Liberty and Freedom. The lines on this are clear and the ever present danger is that we don't have enough people fighting for us.

The mainstream GOP Candidates are running on the 'hope' that our economy will be the manifest for repeal of everything Obama, but what about the history for our children to learn? What about all of our children? It pains me greatly to think about sitting in a History Class with a lesson being taught on the Constitution and how we used to have the freedoms and liberties in that document but foreign powers entered our White House and we became something else and it walked right in through the front door.

Bill Clinton's words have been engrained into the GOP Candidates heads...its about the economy. It appears with Marco Rubio's endorsement of Mitt Romney that a close may be happening in the GOP Race. Let me tell you I am a Conservative on the Constitution and running in the Democrat Party. I am now in the process of finishing a Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court. These are deep waters as any lawyer would tell you and when it comes to this level we are facing the same argument as we did in 2008 with 'standing'.

The problem with no main stream GOP Candidates taking a stand is viability. Independents are hard pressed to challenge Obama outside the Democratic Party as well. I am one who is challenging Obama within the Democratic Party because it makes the most sense right now in the Primary Season. That's the politics of party. I'm hoping the U.S. Supreme Court sees it that way too but I need your help.

Its important that all those who believe in the Constitution come together and set aside our differences for the common Supreme Law of the Land our U.S. History is built upon. God forbid it to come crashing down. As lawyers know, its important when Petitioning the U.S. Supreme Court to have Amicus Curiae's lined up and that's what I'm going to encourage you to start doing now, because once the Writ is filed you only have 30 days to file it. We need to have our ducks in a row and we cannot afford to dittle. The Primary Season is blossoming as fast as the trees are now and the time is ripe. Its a now or never proposition and we have to act now.

Of course there will be those who say I will stand on the sidelines and watch this go up in flames, but do you really want to have that as part of your history? I don't , that's why I'm in this fight and you know it is right. There's always something that will tickle your heart or your mind about someone who is Taking A Stand for something that is right even if it looks like a losing battle. I assure you there are many people just waiting to jump ship and all we need is one win. Come with me and lets get that win now.

Citizens who are not lawyers can help by supporting those who are and are in the fight. I need help in printing 50 copies of a 40 page document and paying for filing fees. That's just the first paper. The good news is I think there is a chance. The U.S. Supreme Court has never... let me say that again.. never had a petition in front of them with a Presidential Candidate in the Democratic Party while the Primary Season was still going on. The timing is right to avoid the 'political doctrine question' that makes Justices shrink because a major party has already chosen a nominee.

Once that happens, anyone should be able to tell you the proposition to the U.S. Supreme Court gets about 99% tougher and we are fighting uphill already. Please dig down in your heart and bend down on your knees and ask you Maker what you can do to help, because as I have described for you now is the time.

The election in the Primary Season has to be where Obama is stopped and you can see right now that the Administrative Courts and Law Commissions don't have the chutzpa to face down someone whose moved in to the White House. We need the U.S. Supreme Court to use its Supervisory Powers and for all intensive purposes its irony that my Writ For Certiorari is going to come landing on the desk of Justice Clarence Thomas with everything we've got including Sheriff Joe's Cold Case Posse results and a Presidential Candidate in the Democratic Party with multiple State Court ruling run amuck.

I'll tell you plainly it was Higher Providence which had Sheriff Joe's finding released on March 1st,2012 and the deadline for me to respond to Obama's Motion To Dismiss in Georgia on March 2nd,2012 so that I could include that, which is now on record to report to the U.S. Supreme Court!

That's the bone appetit of the U.S. Supreme Court granting a Writ of Certiorari but we need grass roots help with Amicus Curiae's and your help financially to coordinate this all out presentation to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Please visit me at my web site www.codyjudy.us and make a contribution because this isn't just my campaign it ours under the Constitution.

Let me again remind you that the primary season is rolling down hill very fast now and if Obama is not kicked out of it he's going to be the nominee and you won't find a U.S. Supreme Court Justice willing to tackle the question then. If I file my petition within the next week and we have 30 days to see some Amicus Curiae's roll up the Court steps, and the U.S. Justice's see what's taking place in the lower courts before a Democratic Nominee is chosen at the National Convention we have 'good fertile ground' for success in having the Writ of Certiorari granted and this is a key.

We won't have another opportunity to do what we have been working so hard to do, so its' get in the fight now or pack it in and see Obama pictured forever as the 44th President for our children to admire in their history books.

Enjoy my latest video at YouTube as I take a walk down memory lane from my childhood years to my professional horse training experience and finally to politics from 2002 until 2012 in a new song I did called Moon Walker. The chorus lyrics say "you dont' know where I've been and you don't know where I'm going" and I don't think Obama has any idea about that being his termination at the White House and my walk into the U.S. Supreme Court which I believe will ultimately lead the way for Congress to come in with Hearings of verification for qualification and get to the bottom of this.

Moon Walker
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8uEdsHH0Ew&list=UUymbINcxgM2q9HBmY2VnKdw&index=1&feature=plcp



Wait till you read my Writ of Certiorari its going to knock your socks right off!

Sincerely,
The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign
Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES