Showing posts with label elections. Show all posts
Showing posts with label elections. Show all posts

Thursday, July 2, 2015

BREAKING NEWS- U.S. SUPREME COURT CRUZ, RUBIO, JINDAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO BE RETURNED?



ENJOY REGARDING THIS STORY "Exclusive CRJ INTERVIEW- GAINING THE EYE OF THE COURT by Sharon Rondeau The Post & Email

BREAKING NEWS- U.S. SUPREME COURT CRUZ, RUBIO, JINDAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO BE RETURNED?

In one stunning and sweeping Motion in the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) in Judy v. Obama 14-9396 U.S. Senator Cruz, U.S. Senator Rubio and Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal were squarely addressed with collecting contributions for an Office they are not qualified for. Cody Robert Judy '08, '12 and '16 Democratic Party Candidate for President asked Justice Sotomayer Wednesday in a Motion for the Court to Rule on during the Recess Period of the Court where Active Cases are continued to consider millions of dollars in contributions that are being siphoned off from legitimate Candidates Qualified under the qualifying grounds of the Constitution of the United States pressing the issue that contributions need to be returned or properly administered to Candidates who are at least qualified for the Office of the President according to the Constitution's guidelines of 'natural born Citizen' [Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents].

The MOTIONS pivotal statement reads:re: SCOTUS 14-9396 [9- DELAY is detrimental for Petitioner as well as Respondent(s) due in part to the Presidential Election in 2016. Fully six months exist before the Iowa Caucus in January 2016. This case revolves around an interpretation of ‘natural born Citizen’ in U.S.C. Art. II, Sect. 1, Clause 5. , that the Republicans U.S. Senator Ted Cruz, LA. Gov. Bobby Jindal, and U.S. Senator Marco Rubio are in effect in violation of as Candidates for President with no timely recourse or due process available. Without a ruling by the SUPREME COURT, Campaign donations as well as confusion exist among the VOTING PUBLIC. This is siphoning off important support to the Petitioner in contributions necessarily going to unqualified Candidates.]

"I urge people to reconsider these illegal and fraudulent Campaigns collecting dollars without authority under the United States Constitution", said Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy. "These guys", referring to Cruz, Rubio, and Jindal, "no better." They are trying to follow in Obama's wake and People need to understand that it doesn't matter how big a wake is, if its FRAUD its FRAUD. Stating you are qualified for an Office that you are not qualified in the 'hopes' that no one will have the due-diligence or time needed to get to Court for an ORDER to STOP your actions of fraud is like looting a store in a mob type rampage and that's what they are doing!"

"We Candidates for the Office of the President who are qualified under the Constitution of the United States are working very hard in our Campaigns", said Judy, "and there is a limited amount of money out there and a lot of Candidates vying for every dollar. I don't mind those Candidates who are at least qualified for the Office of the President or whatever the Office they are running for, but it is just ludicrous and an outrage to see Senator Cruz go on Nation Programs and in a scathing visceral wipe out the United States Constitution's demands for the Office of the President as if they were the same qualifications set for Senators and Representatives. They are not the same qualifications and Senator Cruz needs to be called on the carpet along with Rubio and Jindal for trying to 'hood-wink' the public out of Contributions. Silence does not give consent, because our Constitution is not silent."

"Perhaps other candidates out of some kind of immoral respect towards the public will keep their mouth shuts, but I won't. My American Parents taught me differently and I have more moral respect and esteem for the public than that. My Motion in the United States Supreme Court, that's something just a little bit higher than the internet Senator Cruz,", purportedly a swipe at Cruz's recent interview with Katie Couric on Yahoo.com News clip featured link- Update: Rush Limbaugh talked about it today also]," named U.S. Senator Cruz, U.S. Senator Marco Rubio, and Governor Bobby Jindal for un-american activities in their grab-n-go mugging of contributions with the perceived authority of the offices they hold which really ought to be yanked out from under them by the authority of the Constitution's 14th Amendment Section three which states:

"No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of an State Legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a two-thirds of each House, remove such disability."


In the strongest language any Candidate for President has come out with as a defense of the public trust on the subject of the violations Judy said, "If collecting money for an Office of the United States of America whilst you are unqualified by the demands of the Constitution for that Office, yet elected and maintaining an Office you are Qualified for, with the tacit implications of authority for the office you are in being considered and used as a tool to convince the innocent victims of your would-be fraud collecting for an Office you know you are not qualified for, with the complicit motivation in your own head that you will not have any authority that has standing come down on you, that constitutes and is a rebellion against your oath, and a rebellion against the People of the United States of America and a Rebellion against the Trust they have placed in you in the Offices that you hold, regardless of your race or religion or gender! It's UN- AMERICAN."

2nd CONFERENCE SCHEDULED

The Cody Robert Judy v. Barack Obama aka Barry Soetoro et.al, 14-9396 Case has gone further than any other eligibility principled law suit has gone in the United States Supreme Court. The Docket of the U.S. Supreme Court now shows a 2ND CONFERENCE has been scheduled.

Judy was asked, " Do you see any advantage to and for the Public in this new scheduled Conference? "

" I sure do! Number one, we have been given 'Time', and have NOT been dismissed and have not been denied. The case is wide open again for Amicus Curiae's or 'Friend of the Court Briefs'. Frankly, I think the Court was shocked that Cruz, Rubio, Jindal, and even Hillary Clinton have failed to weigh in on this in recommendations in their particular interest of the Case as current and former Presidential Candidates. Without their Legal Analysis placed in the highest Court on this very important and crucial interest, they are basically stating to the Court they don't care if their Campaigns are toasted with an adverse decision. Candidate Clinton is an eligible Candidate, but she is not doing anything to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution in this pivotal and crucial fight on behalf and for the Public Trust and it is certainly a show of incompetence in really what we all must admit is the most powerful position of our Government."

All 220 Law suits with Case Numbers some included in SCOTUS Records were not even considered because of a 'standing' issue either not brought directly by another Candidate for President or a jurisdictional error of not siting the actual Candidate in litigation ie. Many Cases were dismissed because petitioner's took Secretary of States to Court instead of the ineligible Candidate. Cody Robert Judy's Case fulfills both as he has been a Candidate for President in 2008 and 2012 and maintains his rights in the Presidential Field with his 2016 Campaign. Judy also maintains his stand is not partisan politics as he has taken both McCain in 2008 and Obama to task for violating the principle of 'natural born Citizen ie. '[Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.]

Another Campaign Commercial put out by the CRJ 2106 CAMP unfolds entitled: CONSTITUTIONAL RECKONING


UPDATED: FUND RAISING REPORT
We here at the Cody Robert Judy for President 2016 Camp would like to give you a little bit of an update on our Fund Raising. We thank those of you who are digging in and helping. We know there are many more of you out there sitting on the fence. We do not have the luxury of time to waste. Get off the fence and quit hoping for a better America Tomorrow and start helping us make a better America Today. We need your contribution today! The link here is a safe and secure Paypal account for your convenience.

Please continue to check back and we will post UPDATED information here on our FUND RAISING GOAL. We notice contributions coming in from all over this Nation and hope you will get your state on the board here. We notice FL.,CA.,TX.,OR.,PA.,N.C.,UT.,S.D,VA.,MA.,MI., now and one from a U.S. Citizen in the United Kingdom Thank You!

*If there is an UPDATE of ORDERS from the U.S. Supreme Court Today we will update that here.
UPDATE: On the ORDERS LIST of 6-29-15 of SCOTUS there are none for this Case

Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President Camp 2016
www.codyjudy.us

Quick Reminder Cody's interview with Mike Volin is up on Demand at WOBC Radio so tune in when you'd like!Tune in here: -
HOUSE KEEPING NOTE:
Cody Robert Judy's FB page has filled up with 5,000 so we would ask you to join the new and growing list of supporters on FB here! Pass it on!
We hope you will not spare your Contribution today in the Res-TOUR-Ation of our NATION and support Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President today.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

Thank you to everyone who is and has contributed just a little here and just a little there, for we are working very hard in using the little that we do have as efficiently and proficiently as it comes in, as I'm sure everyone would agree. Please consider a contribution
Let's make it Official and support a Qualified Candidate whose has dedicated his time and talent to taking a stand for America. Let's raise a million dollars and give you the right to say, "I'm not an Idiot, I'm a Patriot!".

INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI


It should be Noticed this is an unsigned rough draft of the original Document and the SCOTUS COPY reflects: "Gov. Bobby Jindal & Mr. Judy's original Signature. This has been done as a safety and authenticity measure which has become CRJ common practice DUE to misguided or malicious purposes".

Motion/Application for Time Extension Judy v. Obama 14-9396



Saturday, June 27, 2015

BREAKING NEWS: HOW COULD SAME SEX MARRIAGE BE THE KISS OF DEATH FOR OBAMA'S W.H. OCCUPANCY IN THE U.S. SUPREME COURT?



BREAKING NEWS: HOW COULD SAME SEX MARRIAGE BE THE KISS OF DEATH FOR OBAMA'S W.H. OCCUPANCY IN THE U.S. SUPREME COURT?

Among the hardest conundrums for Prophets and People alike to understand, though they recognize it in front of their own tenants of faith in extremist example that murder is wrong, but killing in defense of ones self, family, or even your Country's defense in the line of duty is right, is that with every action under the sun one can be justified by God's Mercy and the other be damned. So it is with the 'natures' of men that God has given them and for us all to seek to understand; for unrighteous judgments are among the greatest stumbling blocks of mankind's history within all the generations of time.

DIFFERENT RELIGIONS and BELIEFS

Yesterday our Nation faced a crossroads of epic proportions in that the United States Supreme Court tread upon the State's Rights of the Tenth Amendment to protect the Liberty of the 14th Amendment in the interest of Liberty. For that word I was moved with joy and celebration in the actions of the Court. It was in the interest of Liberty that the Lord sought to recover Israel through his Prophet Moses from the chains of Egypt's Pharaoh and in the next instant begin to weed out those whose progress was 'stopped' because of their lack of Faith in the actions of suffering those to die who would not look upon the 'idol' to be saved from the serpents sting Moses held up, choosing to die instead in their "conservatism", as well those who wondered in the 'conservative' desert until the generation whose Faith had not been sufficient had passed away who were forbidden to enter into the Promised Land. Any who would not say that the Lord in some instances is 'progressive' and in some instances is 'conservative' is really missing the examples of this Story in History.

I sense people wanting a more modern day story. Ok, here's one I am familiar with in the United States of America among a people who are a very small minority but are no less famous to the world. Why would a man of devout love for God whose most famous work he never purported to author but to translate in The Book of Mormon (B.O.M) institute in the religion of Mormonism "Polygamy" that has come to be known as one of its most famous tenants after seeing this verse found in B.O.M. Jacob Ch. 3 vs. 5,9
" Behold, the Lamanites your brethren, whom ye hate because of their filthiness and the cursing which hath come upon their skins, are more righteous than you; for they have not forgotten the commandment of the Lord, which was given unto our father - that they should have save it were one wife, and concubines they should have none, and there should not be whoredoms committed among them. v.9 Wherefore, a commandment I give unto you, which is the word of God, that ye revile no more against them because of the darkness of their skins; neither shall ye revile against them because of their filthiness; but ye shall remember your own filthiness, and remember that their filthiness came because of their fathers."
Joseph Smith Jr., the translator of this verse is recognized as having had 40 wives according to a story published in the New York Times Nov. 10 2014. This is an example of what people get hung up on in a cross over of doctrine simply understood to be the Lord's wisdom of giving more to those who are ready, and taking some from those who are not ready. We all know as Christian's Joseph Smith was not the first to be called to take on more than one wife or concubine and that many large "P" prophets were given the direction in the Old Testament including Abraham, Moses, David, and Solomon. All precious sons of the Lord and those whom he called as being men after his own heart.

The Governor of Utah Gary R. Herbert wrote on his Facebook Page yesterday June 26th,2015 "Marriage, as defined by the people of Utah, has been redefined, first by the federal courts and today the outcome of that decision has been upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court. I am disappointed with the decision by the court to usurp state authority and overrule the voice of the people of Utah as demonstrated by legislation with regard to marriage. I am also very concerned with the overwhelming trend to diminish state autonomy. I believe states should have the right to determine their own laws regarding marriage. Clearly, the majority of the justices disagree and their decision provides finality with respect to the law."

The rich history among the Native Americans marriage between what was termed "Two-Spirited" people were performed among other things as a sign of peace, protection, and and harmony from other tribes aggression.

The Bible as a standard many people refer to in diverse Christian Faiths also recognized those who were of a cross over between male and female with an attraction of same sex called "Eunuch". These were a class of emasculated men attached to the Courts of eastern rulers. They were employed to watch over the harems, and also were often given positions as trusted officials. See Bible 2 Kings 20:18;Isa 39:7 & 56:4; Jer. 38:7-13 & 41:16; Matt. 19:12; Acts 8:27-38. Let me just quote Matthew 19:12 as it recognizes that the differing natures of men can come from birth which many who call themselves Christians have not accepted yet even though it is in the New Testament and they often dismiss the Old Testament as invalid.
Mathew 19:12 " "For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom for heaven's sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it."

WHY SHOULD CHRISTIANS BE UPSET ABOUT THE SCOTUS DECISIONS TO ALLOW MARRIAGES TO ANY CITIZEN?

The dissenting Minority opinions of the SCOTUS came from Justices Roberts,Scalia,Alito,and Thomas. The ratifying opinions of the Majority came from Sotomeyer, Kagan, Ginsburg,Breyer, and Kennedy. From the NY Times Article by Adam Liptack June 26th, 2015 "Supreme Court Ruling Makes Same-Sex Marriage a Right Nationwide", some poignant parts of the opinions are made from both sides.

Probably the biggest fear I've seen expressed on social media's is that many Christians view this in a way that somehow this decision would "force" varying religions to actually perform same-sex marriages within their Churches irrespective of the opposing doctrine of the particular religion. I do not see that being the case at all in America. As long as the Government provides the option of a justice-of-the-peace down at the County Court house to perform marriages, I do not see any successful law suit coming against any particular church or religion that its own particular religious doctrines or creeds as well Leaders need to fear lest that Liberty also protected by the Constitution be lost. I do not think the Government can force a particular Religion to perform a marriage in the Church anymore than I could see the Government forcing Baptist to be Baptized in Mormon Temples, or Catholics who choose to sprinkle being forced to be dunked.

The assumption that any particular religion could now be sued for not performing the will of an individual negates freedom of religion and more importantly the reason there are so many differing religions all respected in America. Rather I see this 'pretended fear' as a way to simply assert a position, which now has been exposed for what it was; a farce. I have yet to see a Scripture that says in the Bible, if that's where Christians want to go, I'll go there even if the Justices feel restricted of their own rights, that "marriages" in the first place between a man and a women must be performed in a Government Institution. For the most part, I see in the canonical text "Marriages" as originating from being performed in a Church.

Has it not been by the Christians, we call elected Leaders, that marriages wound up as a performance of a Government Institution in the first place here in America? Of course it was. If Government had instituted the requirement for Civil Unions only in Government Buildings for Tax Purposes regardless of sex, and Marriages had been kept out of the Government by those going to Church and voting for such, would there be "Marriages" being performed between two of the same sex? The answer to that question is "No". So where is this "un-righteous judgement" coming from that would deny Citizens equality of the same Liberty referred to in the 14th Amendment of the Constitution? I say it doesn't have a leg to stand on.

The Court can only rule upon Cases brought to it. The Court can't for instance say, ""Civil Unions" should be performed in the Government Eye, and "Marriages" should be performed in the Church Leg." Now the Legislative Branches could have said that and passed laws in that direction. As it has been the Case, your Legislatures refused to do that because they didn't want to do it themselves between their own spouses of the opposite sex. They wanted a combination to exist and in that combination a 'tradition' and 'norm' of imposing 'marriage' outlines and now you might say the chicken come home to roost for all Citizens.

Page 44 of the Dissenting Opinion from Justice Roberts said: "But this Court is not a legislature. Whether same-sex marriage is a good idea should be of no concern to us. Under the Constitution, judges have power to say what the law is, not what it should be. The people who ratified the Constitution authorized courts to exercise “neither force nor will but merely judgment.” The Federalist No. 78, p. 465 (C. Rossiter ed. 1961) (A. Hamilton) (capitalization altered)."

I think a quick reminder of the 14th Amendment is important here so let me quote that and think about it in the regard that it applies to you in your circumstances as a Citizen, because if it can't be thought of that way, it serves no purpose whatsoever in the first place: plus I don't think even Government Leaders read the Constitution enough.
United States Constitution Amendment 14 Section I.:

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protections of the laws."

Now if marriage is not a privilege, there would be no age restriction among the states to it. If "Liberty" was not among the characteristics of circumstances in Marriage and were not defined as ones choice to create unions in intercourse, prearranged marriages would still be the 'norm' and would be enforced regardless of an individuals' 'desire' or 'feelings'. Parents would be making the choice to whom their children would marry, rather than their children making that choice.

From Page 33 of the decision: "No union is more profound than marriage, for it embodies the highest ideals of love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice, and family. In forming a marital union, two people become something greater than once they were. As some of the petitioners in these cases demonstrate, marriage embodies a love that may endure even past death. It would misunderstand these men and women to say they disrespect the idea of marriage. Their plea is that they do respect it, respect it so deeply that they seek to find its fulfillment for themselves. Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions. They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right."

Thus, I see Justice John Roberts assertion on page 68 opposing Justice Kennedy and the four justices who ruled that liberty and privileges include marriage under being a Citizen of the United States: ["Celebrate the decision if you favor it, he says in the concluding lines of the dissent [ON PAGE 68]. “But do not celebrate the Constitution. It had nothing to do with it.”], not to be based in the reality of Liberty and Citizenship 'privileges' as if there are none that don't have to do with being prosecuted.
Read other Post Cody Robert Judy has written on the Same Sex Marriage Issue here here and here

IN TOTALITY OF THE DECISION WE SEE A WIN FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AS AN AMERICAN NATION

The rights we have as individual Citizens has indeed made the United States of America one of the richest Country's of the world, some might say the envy of the world when it comes to the protections of ones life, liberty, and property. Of course there are other country's who have moved in that direction, but the Case for the United States can hardly be excluded in their own decisions of modern history to balance both conservatism and progressive-ism in a balance of Justice.

We are witness to "Old Judgments" as well as "New Judgments". We are witness to "New Judgments" being right replacing old judgments that were wrong all along. We are also witness to Old Judgments being right yesterday, today, and tomorrow just as Jesus Christ has claimed all along. Hebrews 13:8 "Jesus Christ the same yesterday, today, and forever."

Hebrews 13:4 Reminds Also: "Marriage is honorable in all, and the bed undefiled: ", meaning be true to your oaths that you take with your partners in marriage regardless of gender.

The "Individual's Rights" are an essential part of respecting my own rights as a Presidential Candidate in my petition to the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 14-9396, that contends my rights to run a fair race for President with the qualifications enumerated within the Constitution's bounds that the Office of the President devolve upon none other than a 'natural born Citizen', have been infringed by Obama and the DNC through their representatives also named in the action.

I have declared damages to my Campaign and Person that the 14th Amendment was not created nor did it diminish the requirements in Article II, Section 1, Clause 5. that only a 'natural born Citizen' can be President, unless he was a 'Citizen' at the time of the adoption of the Constitution. This gives great cause in exposing wither the Justices who decided in favor of Same-Sex Unions are true to their own words of respect towards "individuals" in "equality" and "liberty" under the Constitution's demands for the Office of the President.

Many court opinions state that if or when two aspects of the Constitution are in conflict, both must be given diligence. What that means is that 'natural born Citizen' can not be dismissed or diluted to the course of the qualifications for Representatives or Senators which is "Citizen". You can not do that. The 14th Amendment includes 'Citizens' to be anyone who is born reflecting only one aspect of 'natural born Citizen' which means "Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents" according to the Minor v. Happersett Case I have depended upon for relevance and precedent.

In that opinion it is stated,"it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners"- meaning to the other circumstances of Citizen there are doubts that they were not meant to be qualified to be President or Vice President, as the requirement of 'natural born Citizen' exist unique for both offices. This has been dramatized by the Legislatures eight failed attempts to change the definition since 2003.

The fact that these have failed is a witness to the Court my definition asserted since 2008 against McCain and Obama is right, but it remains a question the Court has not taken up from two Presidential Candidates; one opposed to the other's lack of eligibility or state of ineligibility.

It is also a challenge to the dissenting Justices of the Court's recent opinion that this is not found in the Constitution, for it truly is with much greater emphasis then that of Marriage. Article II, Section I, Clause 5 states even the time frame for which 'natural born Citizen' is required and that is after those who were "Citizens" at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution'
Art. II, Sect. 1, Clause 5 - "No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States."
U.S. SUPREME COURT CASE NEWS UPDATE

JUNE 18th, 2015 the United States Supreme Court held a Conference on my case and placed it in the "Pending Motions List" of the Court which meant my Case was not denied until the pending motions were taken care of. At issue was the informa pauperis status that I had claimed and the Court Denied.

The argument I have made for the Court to RECONSIDER THIS MOTION can be seen here and the news is that this now has indeed been placed on the Docket of the United States Supreme Court June 24th as is pictured.

UPDATED: FUND RAISING REPORT
We here at the Cody Robert Judy for President 2016 Camp would like to give you a little bit of an update on our Fund Raising. We thank those of you who are digging in and helping. We know there are many more of you out there sitting on the fence. We do not have the luxury of time to waste. Get off the fence and quit hoping for a better America Tomorrow and start helping us make a better America Today. We need your contribution today! The link here is a safe and secure Paypal account for your convenience.

Please continue to check back and we will post UPDATED information here on our FUND RAISING GOAL. We notice contributions coming in from all over this Nation and hope you will get your state on the board here. We notice FL.,CA.,TX.,OR.,PA.,N.C.,UT.,S.D, and VA., now. Thank You!
Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President Camp 2016
www.codyjudy.us

Quick Reminder Cody's interview with Mike Volin is up on Demand at WOBC Radio so tune in when you'd like!Tune in here: -
HOUSE KEEPING NOTE:
Cody Robert Judy's FB page has filled up with 5,000 so we would ask you to join the new and growing list of supporters on FB here! Pass it on!
We hope you will not spare your Contribution today in the Res-TOUR-Ation of our NATION and support Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President today.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

Thank you to everyone who is and has contributed just a little here and just a little there, for we are working very hard in using the little that we do have as efficiently and proficiently as it comes in, as I'm sure everyone would agree. Please consider a contribution
Let's make it Official and support a Qualified Candidate whose has dedicated his time and talent to taking a stand for America. Let's raise a million dollars and give you the right to say, "I'm not an Idiot, I'm a Patriot!".

INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI



Sunday, August 3, 2014

Madness Manipulated by The Media - You can't handle the Truth?


The PSYCH JOB - Playing Out on America by the Media's Fear Culture


FEATURED EDITORIAL: The Post & Email

Part II. of the exclusive interview I did with Editor-in-Chief Sharon Rondeau of The Post & Email has just been published there regarding Judy v. Obama et. al.,. The Complaint has a return of summons and service filed that would put an answer to the complaint and summons due this coming Tuesday –August 5th, 2014.

The Complaint is of course public information now and is available for anyone to read and last time I checked there were 116 reads. From the time it was published after the law suit was filed and served there is 116 reads.

It’s a 30 page document double spaced which is about 15 pages of reading that might take an average reader about 15 minutes to scan through. It really is a boring process to read someone else’s complaint when it doesn’t apply to you isn’t it? Besides, filing a complaint and actually winning a case are two different things.

I might expect that from the average citizen who really didn’t see a connection between the corruption happening in front of their face but it’s a little more difficult to say excuse the media from reporting it in a format that readers could understand or at least be notified about and this is what I wanted to kind of focus on today.

All of us are part of a community and in many respects are parts of what is happening around us in our communities. Local news is alive and well last time I checked. The news usually comes on about 5:30pm, 6:30pm and again at 10 pm in my community. Last night coming home from work I passed a multiple car accident scene that had happened about 5 minutes before my coming upon the gruesome scene.

The police and ambulances had not arrived yet, but had been called. I passed slowly noticing a man still pinned in the driver’s seat with an air bag exploded in his chest. He looked around and seemed a little dazed to his surroundings. The front end of his car was totaled, set right in the middle of a four lane street in kind of an intersection of urban areas, where the speed limit was appropriately set at 55mph.

At least 10 other cars were pulled over. They had happened on the accident as probable witnesses of the scene. Some had set themselves as post to steer traffic to the side and past the accident until police got there. At least six others were attending as best they could to a women with grey hair laid out flat on the paved road. I noticed blood on her head and thought she looked the worst at the scene with her car mangled.

Another car at the scene looked like it had actually been sandwiched in a crushing machine, the remains of a convertible I thought that had rolled completely over at least once. Debris was scattered in what looked like an area you could put a football field in. 55mph doesn’t seem that fast until you hit someone going the opposite direction at the same speed combining the force in whopping 110mph collision. I had no idea what had happened and my mind struggled to put the scene together, as it was not an intersection and the cars involved all faced the same direction.

Had it been a part failure, like a tire blow out where someone had lost control while passing? Had someone become distracted and then looked up and over corrected?

You pass a scene like that and your heart just melts with horror for those involved and with your even being in such close proximity to the accident. My mind traced my steps back where I had been delayed just 5 minutes which would have had me watching or even being a fatality at the accident scene.

“This had happened in the community where I live”, I thought. Three police cars passed me within the 10 seconds after I had passed the accident. Imagine the lives that had changed upon waking up this morning. Someone’s grandma is either in the hospital or the family is planning a funeral; someone’s dad wouldn’t be going to work this morning and all the bills would just keep on coming.

Can you imagine an accident happening like that that affected every community in the entire United States of America?

Barack Hussein Obama has shown us a fabricated long form birth certificate. His draft registration card has a fabricated year date stamp on it. He’s using a social security card someone else assigned to a dead man. Why?
Explain the “Why?” Can you tell me what the “Why Question” even is?

[Cody Robert Judy We are 4700 here and 219 dots here all over the Country representing every state in the Union now and spreading the news in our own little ways as one spoke in the wheel. Join us on Facebook here if you enjoy the truth. https://www.facebook.com/CodyRobertJudyForPresident2016...]


Glenn Beck had an interesting man on his Radio Program yesterday I took in bits and pieces of. He defined the positives for businesses in tending to What, Where, and Why and the extreme success for businesses like Apple who answered the “Why” for people in the business goals rather than just their product representation discussed by “Start with Why”’s ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sioZd3AxmnE ) Simon Sinek- Author of “Leaders Eat Last”.

He discussed how ‘fear’ in a company’s management style is much different then ‘trust’ which allows for ‘risk’and ‘freedom’. See a clip of the episode here.
http://www.video.theblaze.com/media/video.jsp?content_id=34901925


Simon said, “The world is filled with danger, but when we feel safe within our community’s we can face the dangers and seize the opportunities. When we have to protect (or feel we have to protect) ourselves from each other than the organization starts to break down.” I thought of the people at the accident and what they were doing before any officers or paramedics had arrived. A character was being shown to me of a culture or group right there in plain site.

“Culture is the character of a group of people”, so how does the culture of the media, act as a group when it comes to Obama’s fraudulent identification and being a watchdog for the public? What is their ‘collective belief’ on the subject and why are they in such denial?

Is that truly based in ‘fear’ and ‘covering their butts’ so they won’t get fired, or so they won’t get sued, or lose their license by the threats of some Government Organization in charge of manipulating them like the Federal Communications Commission - FCC? Why is that considered a 'service to the public'?

Sheriff Joe Arpaio has been involved with law enforcement some 55 years. Elected 5 times I believe to his Office as Sheriff and was asked in 2012 by constituents to thoroughly investigated something no other law enforcement agency has investigated in Obama's identification credentials that Obama himself handed out and posted on the White House web site for all Americans; he responded with forming a Cold Case Posse. That investigation led to the acertation that the long form birth certificate is a forgery and so is Obama's draft registration.

While that investigation has little to do with Obama not being a 'natural born Citizen' qualified for the Office of the President, the conclusions reached are a mirror image of Obama's culture and the horrific accident happening to the United States of America in and upon probably the most important aspect of our culture - Our Elections.

People are hurt in this accident, some people are stopping by assisting those involved in the accident, some rolled up after the accident happened and are just watching or passing it by because it looks like everything is being handled and they can't help, don't want to help, or are just not of the mind that it is going to effect them.

The bully tactic is one used often by those in authority positions. They are used to telling people what to do without explaining themselves. They get away with it almost all the time. Its where they use their offices to move people where they want them. Of course in some situations and circumstances you really do need to obey without question or you could be the cause of an accident.

If a policeman tells you to move your vehicle there is probably a really good reason to move it. When a policeman tells you to strip on the side of the road and you notice he turns his video camera off, there's probably a pretty good idea in your mind he is abusing or is about to abuse his authority in moving you and if you don't question it, your absolutely living in fear of the police, rather than the comfort of your rights detailed in the United States Constitution as well as the laws in your community.

With the exception of a very few brave souls in the Media exhibiting courage, our Media is living in a fear zone that is unprecedented in our Country. The rewards of this are not serving us, but are really hurting us and that culture is bound to break down. Hitler didn't win, but he did leave a pretty big wake in his path to remember.


If I lose the Civil Rights Complaint I have filed I'm sure the Media will think, 'We were right not to cover that', even though in reading the Complaint you could come up with a few facts acting as a jury member yourself. If I won the law suit, can you imagine the Media's blank stair at not having even read the complaint, or understood the merits of the case?

The elite culture of fear is truly an amazing belief many in the media have in the justice system not being a culture of equal justice under the law for everyone, but one of a perceived justice for those who are elite and have money. Inspiring a culture of character is indeed about setting a precedent of courage for the right; for the truth; for the Constitution that has come to be rewarded with a faith in liberty and freedom so many were willing to die for with only a reward in heaven.

Having courage for the truth actually does apply to the mercy and forgiveness your sowing as seeds of character. Many complain about others living off of them rather than choosing to work, but we are all less inspired by a culture of hypocrisy which denies Obama is qualified to serve in the Office of the President. That root is the biggest problem with the GOP at this time and it is not inspiring a culture of character.

The Psychological job conspiring fear rather than trust is at the root of our problem here in America and identifying "Why?" is also a key to change. That's the 'Why?' of my own action. I love America and am inspired by the actions of those who also were inspired to defend, protect, and preserve our Constitution and declaring the 'Why?' of our Nation in the first place in the Declaration of Independence.

The Commercial is simply called "America"


With the new patriotic hit being written, produced, and performed by myself. ( 2016 U.S. Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy) here: "Dawn Your Light America"

Meant as a wake-up call to America of the dire circumstances we now face in our Republic, and all the beautiful reason we need to take an active part now in our political process, I hoped to inspire and at the same time warn America that if the goal of immigration has 'changed' from the opportunity to produce and enjoy the fruits of your own labor to being able to devour someone one elses we have a very clear reason to be concerned with Obama's transformation of America and a very clear reason we need to enforce the qualifications of the Office of the President as its described in the United States Constitution for our own national defense.

Those wishing to read the U.S. Federal Civil Rights Complaint may now do so here now as it is public information: Judy v. Obama 2014 U.S. FED Case No. 1:14cv00093


Wow!Just found my book, Taking A Stand, on sale at your local B&N for nook users if you prefer over soft or hard bound - only $8.49 That's a Great price



Last, but certainly not least we want to Thank You for tuning in and reading this blog. We celebrate today 150,000 Views and appreciate every single one.

Cody Robert Judy
For U.S. President 2016

If you think “Truth” is worth it, support it and quit supporting the lie. That is the beginning of change, or we can just keep on going down this road and see where it leads with Obama. Which is it going to be?

TRUTH IS REAL


I'd sure appreciate your helping me out in the American Birther Campaign (ABC) Campaign for Cody Robert Judy for President 2016. Thank you for your consideration.






Friday, May 2, 2014

A Critical Analysis of the Birther Movement- Inventory of Our Own House


A Critical Analysis of the Birther Movement- Inventory of our own House


Introspection can be very positive for growth. To criticize oneself is to assess your own damages and that can be done both individually, and collectively.

You are one, we are two, and with your neighbor we make three. I received a poignant comment on my last article here that was posted on the World Net Daily (WND) Facebook site, because I want you to answer it to. (That post had a ton of information on it please visit all the links to it I provided you.) This is it verbatim and then I want to discuss a little bit where we are at as far as a national movement is concerned.

“Nobody seems to care about this Constitutional requirement. And the Repubs are not saying much about it either. Cruz, Rubio, Jindal are NOT qualified either yet many encourage them to run. Conclusion: most people have no clue what it really means “Natural Born”. [Reference to the ‘Natural Born Citizen’ clause of the U.S. Constitution for the Office of the President.

My Answer:
“Well, I think the biggest problem w that has been money, and the R’s and D’s willingness to circumvent it. I’m the only candidate that sued McCain and Obama in ’08 and 2012. The burden has been huge and contributions scant. The problem in educating comes w money and also in actually changing someone’s support because of a direct dis-satisfaction. I take your comment gratefully. I can say positively our movements successes are received nationally so the little support is spread out like butter on bread. The evidence of it hitting the public hard is that the switch will actually happen in the D’s. I say that because as you pointed out correctly, the evidence of support for Rubio, Cruz, and Jindal as well as McCain in ’08 is more tight in the R main body. You don’t see interestingly enough the D’s packed deep w unqualified candidates. Remember at one time Donald Trump pulling the long form fabrication out of Obama, 65% of R’s were in and around 40% of D’s. The numbers are there, its just a lack of money. I know the principles are w me, but the integrity or spirit is weak. It’s a test of truth and lies. There are people who care, many people, but relative to the masses we are so few it does seem we are no one I guess.”

Elections are typically what people think about in America as a time to make a change. We are 6 months away from a congressional election cycle, but it is not a Presidential election cycle that happens every 4 years. The good news is it doesn’t always have to be that way. We actually in the next six months could see Obama removed and President George W. Bush handle the reins as the last qualified person to hold the Office of the President, while we have a Presidential Election this coming November all because Obama is not qualified for the Office, and neither are his decisions or his picks for the entire Executive Branch.

That would all be quite constitutional; I mean the means are provided to/for us for just such a case as we are in, within the principles and directions of the U.S. Constitution. Its as if the Founders and Framers knew we would hit this road block and it is just a witness to how brillant they were in trying to reach out to us.

What needs to happen for that to happen? Well, you need to get your check book out or go directly to my web site www.codyjudy.us find the contributions button and send money. If I could get one dollar from every American we would see that happen. The problem is I can’t even get this message out to 10,000 Americans.

What happens on facebook is you have a group of people come together. Sure you might have a big group of 5-20,000 people of which I’m a member of a few, but people come home and scroll through twenty messages on the top and if yours isn’t there, you only were seen by 20 people in the group. You times 20 people by 120 groups and you see the people I can actually get this message out to. Its not that many. My campaign needs the ability to raise funds directly to people's email, direct to their door and yes it cost money, but at the very least in supporting my campaign you are sending politicians in DC a message that isn't going to be lost in the disemination of funds as they are being lost in many other groups and parties.

If a monitor, or leader, of the group decides your message is of value they can headline it on facebook so its stays on top for longer so more people see it. There’s also the choice people make on wither to re-post your article on their time line which dramatically increases exposure exponentially. This is huge and we have seen it happen once with the Bundy articles I wrote here and here that quickly became the two top rated post of this whole blog over 7 years and 415 entrys. That's the power passing it on and sharing has!

There was a recent story that I read that framed the Tea Party as receiving a lot of contributions but not giving it out to the candidates. I for one can validate that I have never received one dollar from a PAC or a Tea Party Group and it seems incredible to me that they are taking in the money that they are, and that they are not focusing it in on something that could really make a difference like a candidate as myself that wouldn’t be called a ‘racist’ because I sued McCain and Obama on the natural born citizen issue and included that in records that string clear up to the United States Supreme Court. Here is the article from the Washington Post, you should read it. http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/tea-party-pacs-reap-money-for-midterms-but-spend-little-on-candidates/2014/04/26/0e52919a-cbd6-11e3-a75e-463587891b57_story.html

I'll say it this way. Supporting the Tea Party is not going to get Obama a Disability Impeachment hearing in Congress. It shows the people in power now, nothing about that lazer focus we have to aim, with credibility,authority and standing. Its the one thing that could turn the Operation American Spring OAS a real execution of American power but leaders have be cordinated and focused or it will just turn into another meet-n-greet gather-and-go-home.

You cant tell me Congress has not met in hearings on Benghanzi, IRS Profiling,Fast & Furious, Obamacare, and a host of other scandals, but what havent they met on? Obama's eligibility.. they never have had a hearing to get the Executive Branch back in order.

Political Action Committees get their money as a middle man to do with what you hope they will do. But its just like giving your money to 90% of charitable cause 90% of the money can be earmarked for getting more contributions which take callers, mailers, and hiring companies with servers that can handle large bundled emails that go out to you and end up in your email junk box. Maybe you read them, but more likely you press “Delete all” button and never see them.

That’s why I’ve always thought direct was best, but I've never refused PAC money either. I just haven't had any. If you like what a candidate is doing, then hit his web site and make a contribution. Don’t suppose for a minute he is not floundering in the water, or gasping for oxygen. I mean really how do you keep the lights on? When your bills don’t get paid your lights will get turned off. I need your help to continue.

I always ask for contributions at the end of my post but this year I received two contributions one for $10 and one for $5. You know Anti-Birthers make stuff like this headlines. Over the last two presidential elections I’ve received less than $1,000 in total from outside sources: most of that coming from an average of $20. My web site cost $25 a month to keep up and if you times that by 7 years you get $2,100 and can already see I’m existing not on what you have contributed, but what’s been coming out of my own pocket. That means I’ve contributed about 40 million dollars in sweat equity.

I built a house like that before. Did it all myself, the whole thing,on two and half acres in Ca. minus a couple days labor from essentially what I could not physically do myself. I just bought the materials and did it. The value was there when the bank came in and did their assessment, but when it comes to a political campaign it’s just not the best way to do things because you need people that have a stake in both your wins and your losses.

The entire Romney campaign was worth what, say a Billion, and did what for taking Obama out of office because he was not qualified? The conservative answer is “nothing!” Romney didn’t even try and my guess as to why, remains somewhere between McCain supporters in 2008 and being called a racist by the Mainstream Media with McCain posed as the biggest reason to support that. Conversely if I say Democrats or anyone for that matter, oppose me for upholding both McCain and Obama's Natural Born Citizen qualification for the Office of the President, what does it tell you about them? It is very declarative of their intentions and desertion of the law all-together.

Why would you want to waste a billion dollars on a Presidential Campaign and not win? I think Romney wanted to win, but he knew so many in the Republican Party actually had excused McCain, that if they challenged Obama on his ‘natural born citizen’ qualification, they would be exercising a very racist view. That’s the way the Main Stream Media saw it, and really is it that far off?

McCain was not born in this country, and holds by virtue of his birth a Panama citizenship, and with it a foreign citizenship to that of his American Citizenship: dual citizens can’t be President. Why would Ted Cruz be undertaking a very expensive renouncement of his Canadian Citizenship if what I’m saying were not true? I mean really, why would anyone want to renounce the citizenship of where they were born?

There might be a few disadvantages to being dual citizens, but many Nations allow that to happen. In America you can be a U.S. Representative and a U.S. Senator with a dual citizenship and that’s a-ok. I mean that’s quite an honor. There’s only one office in America that as a requirement for the Office upheld by all the people in the U.S. Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land which no State can usurp,demands being a Natural Born Citizen and that is the Office of the President.

Even in the U.S. Constitution we were told when “Citizens” actually could be President, and it was to those who were “Citizens” at the time of the adoption of the Constitution. U.S.C. Art. II, Sect.1, Clause 5.


How important is the Qualification of the Office of the President?

Well, again I wish Ronald Reagan were here to tell you. I wish George Washington were here to tell you. Hell, I even wish George W. Bush were here telling you, but the only one you have who stood against McCain/Obama in 2008 and Obama in 2012 is me. I’m sorry to be such an embarrassment to God for you, but I don’t think I’m an embarrassment to truth. In fact I think I’m the only one that has stood up for the truth in a bi-partisan way. Is that of no value to you?

The reason the qualifications for the Office of the President are so important is first unlike the Body of the Judiciary Branch that is made up of thousands of Judges in Federal Courts all over America, 13 Federal Appeals Courts, and the U.S. Supreme Court; and second, unlike the Legislative Branch which is now made up of 233 Republicans and 199 Democrats for a total of 432 in the U.S. House and 51 Democrats , 47 Republicans, 2 Independents for a total of 100 in the U.S. Senate, there is only one person in the whole Executive Branch who authority is given to under the U.S. Constitution and that is the Office of the President.

None of the Cabinet’s under the President’s Office or their secretaries or Bureau’s under the Executive Branch holds any authority given to them outside of the Office of the President of the United States.

Now the Executive Branch is the enforcer of the Federal Law. If that weren’t true why would Congress be passing an “Enforce the Law Act” in 2014 directed right at Obama for all of his exemptions in Obamacare?

So you know all those Judges in the Federal Judicial Branch and their interpretations of law have no way to enforce the law without relying on someone in the Executive Branch under the Office of the President. A.G. Eric Holder is the chief law enforcement officer and he is under who? The Office of the President. Does he have any power granted to him by We the People in the Constitution outside of the Office of the President? No.

With the recent power struggle in Nevada that pitted a militarized BLM at the Cliven Bundy Ranch, does the enforcement arm of the BLM have any enforcement power outside the Constitution given to them that does not come from the Department of the Interior under the Office of the President? No.

Does the Army, Air Force, Navy, Marines or National Guard have any authority given to them outside of the Office of the President? No.

Does ole Uncle Sam’s Internal Revenue Service department have any authority given to them outside the Office of the President to collect a single dollar of your taxes?

Now if you want to neuter all those departments and bureau’s effectively from the power invested in the Office of the President by We the People through the U.S. Constitution all you have to do is put someone in that office who is not qualified. That’s one of the reasons that the requirements for the Office of the President are not very lengthy.

Our Framers and Founders thought certainly they could handle just a couple, I mean being over the age of 35 is indeed discriminating against those who are 34 and under, but it’s the law. And the standard of being a “Citizen” as in the case of the U.S. Representative or U.S. Senators’ qualification has actually been raised by the bar of only allowing a “Natural Born Citizen” in the Office of the President. They are not the same thing and every law student knows it.

Please excuse me if somewhere I missed the fact that the U.S. Constitution is not the Supreme Law of the Land with the rights and privileges of all the Offices in it being enumerated upon, but if it is not, neither are the offices filled with Judges, Representatives, U.S. Senators, 5 star Military Generals, Secretaries of Cabinets and all the like set with any authority to them. They might as well all go home because they are not elected under the Republic.

Please tell me you now know why the Office of the President MUST be filled with a Qualified Person?

You know what I feel like? I feel like with every post I write, (Note: Out of 415 post there is only a handful that don’t touch on the Office of the President and the important fight that this has been), I light a candle and it gets blown out.

You know the modern day Tea Party is only as great as the leaders in it who actually support by word and deed the Constitution. If I were the leader of the Tea Party and I said just for instance;
“I support the natural born citizen qualification for the Office of the President and Obama doesn’t qualify”, and then I turn around and don’t support ANY CANDIDATE who has taken a stand for that with a single dollar what does that make me?

It makes you “NO DIFFERENT”, no different from Republicans who spent a Billion dollars on Romney’s campaign and no different than the Republicans who spent half a billion on McCain’s campaign. It actually makes you quite susceptible to being called a racist, and there being some merit to it.

Not a single dollar from the Tea Party have I ever received. Now you be the judge. They can say but..but..but… all they want to. They are still fighting a fire without any fire. They are still spinning the lie that castigated the Republicans and Democrats on this very simple line in the sand that cuts to the core fabric our body politic.

I’d like to talk about my fears right now if you’d allow me that indulgence. This is after all critical analysis.

I went to prison for a very long time because the U.S. Constitution wasn’t upheld in the United States of America. I’d never run for Political Office prior to my entering prison twenty-one years ago in 1993. The lesson I learned in prison is not about what happens to you when you do something majorly wrong. The lesson I learned in prison is there is nothing you can do about being incarcerated or thrown in prison without the Constitution’s Principles.

I learned that lesson and it was drilled into me over, and over, and over, and over again. You know people talk about why Ted Cruz is so galvanized against Obama and it’s because he was raised by a dad who lived and breathed under a communist Cuba. You ask Esq. Orly Taitz why she is so determined against Obama and she references in a heavily Russian accent her experience as a little girl born in Moldavian Soviet Socialist Republic and fleeing oppression.

But somehow their experience is valid and mine is not valid? Both have to do with not having the principles of the United States Constitution available. Having them not upheld is equal to not having them at all. Losing a child to death and never seeing a child because of a divorce, an unlawful, and hiding mother has the same affect upon a Dad. The kids are missing. You can argue the differences but the affect is equal.

The thing I fear is that my experience is not enough for you to learn from and that to learn the lessons you will have to endure the same treatment. Then as far as I’m concerned everything I have gone through was just for my own learning experience and the value of it is greatly diminished.

The ravages of war are so very painful. I am afraid they will come to us on all sides and death will touch each family that has not stood up for the Constitution of the United States of America. I said in my comment that this is a war of truth verses the lie. There is no doubt that TRUTH will win, but if you are found supporting the lies coming out of Washington DC and you are championing people who are filled with lies, the kind that actually shred America’s futures then you might as well stand up and say God is not just and he has had no hand in carving this country out of stone with his own hand.

You declare yourself an enemy to God, a supporter of lies, and condemn yourself unfit for the privileges reserved for those who actually are Patriots and understand the opportunity that our U.S. Constitution provides. You basically sign yourself up for those who will only be saved with an understanding that comes directly from NOT having the U.S. CONSTITUTIONS protections. I can tell you how miserable that is and I have in my book Taking A Stand- The Conservative Independent Voice. You actually have to read the book to get anything out of it.

The 5 pages right here you have read are a condensed version of it so if you don’t want to take the time to read my book and are moved to contribute to my campaign and with your contribution at the very least have something to show to God what you actually did in supporting the TRUTH for America I think it would be good.

There are very few campaigns that you can actually do that with. Most running for Congress now did not choose to stand up against McCain or Obama. They are of the understanding that you can talk a big game but your actions don’t have to be the same when you get to Washington DC.

I can say at the very least that my actions spoke louder than my words. If you want someone like that in the Office of the President then your actions also have to speak louder than your words. I love this Country and the United States of America. I hope and pray they remain the same. I invite you to support my campaign now.

Cody Robert Judy
P.S.
If you would like to sponsor a fund raiser featuring Cody Robert Judy as a guest speaker please review the following article

Obama Eligibility 4 Dummies.
If you have no clue of Sheriff Joe's Cold Case Posse investigation concluding Obama's identification is a fraud, how you can write your elected leaders urging them to conduct hearings, I also am pushing for as a Candidate for PRES and took to the U.S. Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama Case 12-5276, go to this website and take the two part challenge. With your help America is made stronger and it will cost you some time and a couple of stamps. What have you done lately to protect this opportunity we have in the United States? We need your help. Oh, and pass it on. http://obamaseligibility.com/index.html

How You Can Help

Obama's long form birth certificate has been exhumed to be nothing more than a long form fabrication by professional law enforcement standards and that was brought to the attention of the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276, for which I served as the Presidential Candidate running in the Democratic Party and after the primary, as an Independent Presidential Candidate securing the 'standing' necessary for the complaint in 2012 and 2013.

Orrin Hatch R - U.S Senator from Utah and Mitch McConnell R- U.S. Senator from Kentucky just requested two sheriffs kits produced by Michael Volin of WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com (WOBC) with the purpose of informing the public and elected officials of the forgery of the long-form birth certificate image posted since April 27, 2011 on the White House website. These kits (Get Yours Free Here) contain the same evidence released in March 1,2012 (and a little more) that I included in my case against Obama that went from Georgia State- Georgia State Supreme- to U.S. Supreme 12-5276 in Judy v. Obama. There will also be a Sheriff Kit 2 that will follow the coming revelations of the Cold Case Posse set to be released in a short time.

Please urge and encourage your Representatives to OPEN AND TRANSPARENT HEARINGS in the House of Representatives on Obama's eligibility as the solution to eliminating Obamacare. These hearings must be held and the evidence must be heard that are in the Sheriff's kits most all of the Representatives have received now.

If these hearings are conducted in the open and reported in the open, the evidence will mount collectively and the U.S. Senate although it has a majority of Democrats will have to concede to the facts and evidences or will be seen as completely unfit for their duties and as incompetent. Utah would most likely see more benefits come from supporting the Candidates like myself, (well, Candidate as myself because there were no other candidates in the entire U.S.A. who stood up for principle regardless of party), fighting for equal protections under the law in pushing for Open and Transparent Hearings in Congress with two million dollars on Obama's Verification Eligibility qualification hearings on the stage to remove him as a disability according to Amend 14, Sec.3 would be a lot faster solution.

Like CODY ROBERT JUDY'S NEW 2016 PAGE ON FACEBOOK HERE
Follow me on Twitter: Official Cody Robert Judy 2016 on Tweeter here

If you want to join the NFT-VA like the Group on Facebook and make sure we can find the City and State in which you reside.

You Can Help Me [ If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign”, or ABC Campaign, which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President please make a contributions here:

We pray for the Lord to save our Country and restore America from the dilapidation we now find ourselves, and the principles of the Constitution in. For this I am Taking A Stand.

Sincerely, Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us www.codyjudy.blogspot.com YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES TV Get Cody's Book: Taking A Stand