In God We Trust On Birthers We Ride - Trumps non-Birther Problem?

In God We Trust On Birthers We Ride

TRUMPS NON-BIRTHER PROBLEM  

Road the Birther Horse to the White House, but then Horse Traded?

You either had to be a Birther or Donald J. Trump to understand the tsunami Anti-Birther Wave of political insult hurled your way in the Election of 2016. The President Elect did a share of protesting Sen. Ted Cruz about his ineligibility for being foreign born and having a father who was native Cuban  but defector citizen along with his mother to Canada, at the time of his Birth insinuating America's Qualification for a 'natural born Citizen' - Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents was not something Ted was standing up for as a Presidential Candidate but was something he was subverting. Donald J. Trump did not and does not have a Birther Problem as a Constitutionally Qualified American natural born Citizen : born in the the U.S. to Citizen Parents at the time of his birth.

Trump will not be taken to Court over that Principle in our Constitution- for no one doubts it a single bit - born in the United States to Citizens not owing any foreign allegiance. The position was made for the USA in the USA and by the USA representing two generations- It's takes awhile for no one to dispute your being a [natural born Citizen] but after two generations of true red-white-and blue, it happens. 

Let's face it - Obama's inherited foreign father representing a Kenyan-Citizenship was not representing any other country but Kenya, and his birth place was the subject of criminal investigation by lawful authorities because of Obama's own personal choice amounting to a three year delay on his long form birth certificate. This also is undisputed.

Obama's declaration for President was on February 10, 2007 and his long form birth certificate he released was on April 27, 2011 which represented fifty months (50) of stoking the fire and blowing on the coals of The Birther Movement. Did the fire cease? Oh no, it only increased because now the fifty months (50) of not releasing a ten dollar $10 document (which I don't think any American would have a problem turning over if it meant you could be President), was crucially the investigation of the Cold Case Posse under Sheriff authority who is responsible for keeping the peace and enforcing the law.

The Feds may have forgotten but Sheriff Joe Apaio didn't. He understood as a sheriff, an elected official of his County, he is known as the highest law enforcer of the county and the Sheriff has law enforcement powers exceeding that of any other state or federal official. Sheriff Joe was one of the first law enforcement officers to endorse Donald J. Trump and the Birther label they both wore equally if you recall Trump standing up on The View and saying I think he should show his birth certificate.

Obama Administration White House Employees Departing is Bitter-Sweet

As the long faces in the picture depict, no one in the Obama White House administration looks happy about the day ending, and with it their jobs. Many of us have been there; last day on a job that you liked? It's not a fun day.

I remember feeling like that when the U.S. Supreme Court almost unbelievably denied my Motion for Forma Pauperis waiving the printing cost ($4,500.00) and (Filing Fee $350) the lower Federal District and 10th Circuit Panel Courts had granted in the same year. Federal Courts ask for a prior year of information, so it makes absolutely no sense to have a granted Federal Forma Pauperis Motion denied in the same year by a Federal Court (which the U.S. Supreme Court is) with a Presidential Candidate who has standing.

D -Candidate for President Excluded from
Debates, DNC Mailing List, and Debates

Trust me, its no fun showing up for a job that you liked the last day of the job, but it's really no fun running as a Presidential Candidate and having the party your running in treating you like the U.S. Constitution is the last thing that is important about whose going to be their Candidate when that has a lot to do with the job in the first place.                                                                                                                                                   With the standing  you receive as a Candidate for President, comes the responsibility also to those who do not have standing, mainly those who will be your constituents- The Voters. You kind of get those same looks from people who are populist for their Candidate who is running but ineligible. Well, yes, he's black and beautiful but he's illegal as the devil in heaven in that office folks.                                                                                                                                                             Now you may be right but we all know what they did to Jesus Christ and he was right also. Sometimes being right is not what makes you friends or makes you a populist Candidate like Barack Obama. In fact, often a Presidential Candidate is viewed as valuable by his deferred prosecution stand rather than his prosecutorial adherence to law. Well that may be the reason Donald Trump chose not to file legal papers on Sen. Ted Cruz, but the tit-for-tat on the national debate stage was cemented in millions of peoples minds far more than my two cases in the U.S. Supreme Court Judy v. Obama 12-5276 and 14-9396.

However, I thought it was telling and also the greatest insult to the Democratic Party's Progressive Stand in defense of the poor, to stand by and witness the stain produced by Justices of the United States Supreme Court denying justice based solely upon the disadvantage of economic disparity defiling Justice for All.  

Trust the Media? You got to be kidding me? Can you imagine the court jesters laughing as witnesses to that most nefarious cruelty? Well, as you can see their faces now, as their party is over, what they have done may be coming back to them?

There are many farewells happening as Obama poses for a few last pictures at his final and last news conference.   He said ,"At my core, I think we are going to be OK." "We just have to fight for it, work for it, and not take it for granted."

ObamaConspiracyTheories.org  a dedicated anti-birthers site of which I have been a bur-under-the-blanket labeled as a Bad in the catalog of the Good the Bad and the Ugly is also saying Farewell.  In fact they pronounced Trump a former birther when he in September 16, 2016 announced Obama was born in the United States. The media frenzy over that seemed as jubilant as Trump was about getting the long form fabrication out of Obama April 27th, 2011. Now, Trump like regurgitating Obama in 2011, says "We've got better things to do."

With what Obama did- 10 Trillion of more debt, over 50,000 bombs dropped the last two years, and a melee of legislation recorded as the worst in modern history, God help us if at his heart he thinks we are going to be OK. What a revelation to the [framed story] by the Media and the scholastic report card? 

[“The president was never good at reaching across the aisle. So when the composition of Congress changed relative to what it was in his first two years, he wasn’t able to accommodate that very well,” said Andrew Busch, a presidential scholar at Claremont McKenna College in California. “He never accustomed himself to operating in a system where he was not the sole player.”]

Indeed Democrats have not found a friend in Obama on whose heels the party lost over 1,000 seats and in whose legislative pinnacle Obamacare currently finding its way into the grinder of repeal and replace, was the biggest broken glass promise America has every had to melt and drink. 

Still Obama has not lost any of his 'cool', but America sure has with an unconstitutional president. Am I happy about Trump being a [natural born Citizen]? Why oh yes I am. I feel no greater pleasure than admitting Trump more than likely won't have a single law suit saying he's not a [natural born Citizen] make it to the U.S. Supreme Court. 

Am I happy about the U.S. Supreme Court Justices being silent on the case that represented a Presidential Candidate v. Presidential Candidate  on the Constitutional Term [natural born Citizen] whose silence elected Trump? 

I can't say 'Yes' to that any more than any Democrat can say they are happy about the Russians influencing the Presidential Race (if it was significant or if Podesta and DNC Emails had just been about flowers), or Recounts not coming out in favor of Hillary Clinton. It goes without saying as my  comment at Obamaconspiracy.org reflected :

We can indeed suppose as Hillary Clinton also reflected in National Debate beginning at 2m45sec Trump started his political activity based on the Birther Movement we can see the barbs did not have affect. IF the U.S. Supreme Court had not been silent on 14-9396 denying it unjustly due to poor circumstances amounting to less than $5,000 dollars in the bank, Donald Trump may not have become President. How do the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court feel about making Donald J. Trump President?

      REWARDING FORGERY AWARDING FRAUD    

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANqhpkkVH8s&feature=youtu.be

Next the Cold Case Posse make the Case Obama's Birth Certificate is a Fraud.
50,000 + Hits in four weeks!
Obama's Last Press Conference BLOWS UP with Birth Certificate https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGEMHOEil5c

Assist Cody Robert Judy' Campaign Debt here thank you

http://codyjudy.us/information/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm

CRJ

The reason Cody wants you to understand that the Race for the Presidency is a really tough marathon race is because of the Standards of the Race that are defined in the U.S. Constitution have been something he specifically has stood up for with the standing that is represented by competitors in the Race. 

Check Mate is still a question as long as the U.S. Supreme Court has Action Available. That action could be sustained as a Court Error or Clerical Error very easily.

  U.S. House Petition to Impeach Constitutionally Unqualified Defacto Pres by Cody Robert Judy on Scribd

  U.S. House Petition to Impeach Constitutionally Unqualified Defacto Pres by Cody Robert Judy on Scribd

The PATRIOT FIGHT in SCOTUS for the Constitution JUDY v. OBAMA 14-9396 Hanging by a THREAD

FEATURED EDITORIAL: The Post & Email
The PATRIOT FIGHT in SCOTUS for the Constitution JUDY v. OBAMA 14-9396 Hanging by a THREAD

As we approach the end of June many people have been making comments and asking questions about the United States Supreme Court case Judy v. Obama 14-9396 that I'd like to take a little bit of time to discuss in this post. Just to update briefly June 18th The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) had a conference date for my Case. The case was placed on the "Pending Motions List" rather then being outright put out to pasture on the "Dismissed List", which very easily could have happened. What that did essentially was breath a little oxygen into this Case. No other case having to do with Obama's Ineligibility has made it past the Original SCOTUS Conference date given to it in the nearly six years challenges have been being made. Now, what is happening in the contentious waves of the oceans of people becoming aware of this?

Many more people are becoming aware of this Case, and realizing that most of the Cases that Obama has been involved with in some way challenging his eligibility to be President according to the Constitution's demands for the Office of the President have never even seen the light of day insomuch as being given a hearing within a Court of Law, let alone the Supreme Court of the United States. What is the logistics or cause of this?

Well, among Obama die-hard supporters there is a theory that Obama is the ONLY acting Office really legally holding any authority in the jurisdiction of the United States right now. As preposterous as the Media has made "Birthers" out to be, this theory running through and very much outwardly spoken and written about among "Obots", or Obama Supporters, is really haunting. The theory supposes that because Obama was elected as an ineligible Candidate by The People of the United States of America, the Constitution is actually no longer a valid document. As you know the U.S. Constitution outlines the Offices of U.S. Representatives and U.S. Senators and outlines the individual States. [Image Source Gaateway Pundit .com]

So, this very theory is the way that Obama thinks and its how he is governing. You may have heard about Obama wanting to redistrict neighborhoods using the 'Federal cart-rope' of subsidized housing that communities and States receive. With this "tool" Obama claims authority to withhold Federal Funds if say there is not enough "subsidized" housing opportunity in that neighborhood. The States could lose millions upon millions if they didn't meet a criteria of getting subsidized housing in rich neighborhoods.

The affect of this is a redistricting of the vote essentially neighborhood by neighborhood and its being said Obama's been saving "the best for last". The Goal is to displace by the numbers the voters in areas more responsible for upholding economic class difference. It will annihilate the prospects of Republicans in the vote by moving people in neighborhoods and districts that are dependent upon Government subsidies, but we've already talked about the Republicans never gaining the White House as a party again because they will not and refuse to actually "use" the Constitution against Obama in his ineligibility. Now ask yourself "Why?"

As Obama's policies begin to reflect and resonate his strategy among the people, an exponential alarm is resounding. This explains the high PROFILE reasons my Case is gaining attention not seen before, even in 2012! The Elected Office in our Government as Representatives, Senators and the "States" and their elected Governors and Legislatures who depend upon BORDERS and outlines for their authority has been 'washed away', according to Obama and his minions and their 'proof' is that Obama was elected as an ineligible Person into the Office of the President. These same folks are stating that the Supreme Court of the United States, as well as the lower Tenth Circuit and United States District Court actually has not authority to even rule on my case and that is why it was ruled as 'frivolous' from the beginning. They are stating the Courts of Law have no authority over Obama whatsoever and neither does Congress because Obama won over the authority by and through the People's Vote. Could that possibly be the Case?

People have not understood how serious this is. Now you might say, as I do and my Petition States, that Obama was 'elected' under false circumstances, conditions, under an identification that was false. That because of these facts, this so-called 'winner take all' authority and mentality of his is also false. My Court Case in the United States Supreme Court asserts in the FIRST QUESTION, that if the Court refuses my Case it negates and disbands its entire authority under the United States Constitution. People have mocked me because of that assertion, but its true and Obama and his Supporters believe it also.

Now the comment coming out of this guy over at Obamaconspiracy.org was banned and the reason is Obama and his supporters don't want this information getting out to the general public and going viral because he's second term isn't finished yet. It did not represent correctly that I sought 'damages' from injury after the Government refused to recognize an ineligible President. The Government in fact has not recognized any of that evidence yet and very importantly, there are more people involved than just Government officials forming an illegal Cartel. Obama's actions as a Candidate, his Campaign for President is for example an entity not subject to Government protections of immunity. The Government Leaders like Rep. Nancy Pelosi were not 'acting' under the color of her position either. When she certified Obama '08 that was not under the duty of her elected position, but rather from her being speaker of the House a position she was acting in elected by her colleagues not the public. Other people named in the suit do not hold elected offices who are DNC Leaders and do not have such immunities at all, nevertheless are involved heavily round down to the local level. Also it is incorrect that if my Judge in the District Court level recognized Obama as ineligible he would have found himself out of a job. Simply stated my suit begins before Obama was even in the Office of the President and contends that over two elections. Its not my fault the Government hasn't given it hearing and they have received evidence from law enforcement authority.

Obama's second term isn't over yet. This story depicts in its headlines "Obama sheds cool style for fearless final lap". It states, [It may also be in recognition that he has few big-ticket policy achievements left to enjoy in polarized Washington as the end of his two-term presidency approaches.In a remarkable week for the president, a victory on Pacific Rim trade was snatched from the jaws of defeat on Capitol Hill on Wednesday. The Supreme Court on Thursday validated his signature healthcare law, guaranteeing he would accomplish a central second-term goal, to protect the 2010 Affordable Care Act from being dismantled by Republicans. The icing on the cake came on Friday with the high court’s decision to legalize same-sex marriage,.. After the court decision was announced, Obama took a Rose Garden victory lap.]

I don't recall Obama being the one that was at the Court, but it appears he feels this decision is due to his authority more than the Courts. I disagree and recognizing a 'two term presidency approaching' leaves what a third term kind a maybe open, maybe through Sanders or Biden as Hillary's Campaign is threatened by racketeering charges set for a January 2016 Trial?

Now its really anyones guess as to the circumstances that may unfold prior to the 2016 elections fully 18 months away with economic and military sabers rattling the world over. I mean really, if fraudulent circumstances can accommodate two United States Elections in the Presidency Race of 2008 and 2012, why not WWWIII to keep it going? Without the U.S. Constitution there is no 14th Amendment for which the decision to honor same-sex marriage exist. Stated more plainly, Obama opposes the same-sex union under the auspices of a United States Constitution he is a walking talking violation of in the Office of President. The LGBT Community has not done themselves any favors supporting Obama and in fact have caused themselves harm. Its very important to realize that as I related more heavily in my last post.

Obama's near total abandonment of even Democrats is resonating strongly as he managed a first flight on Air Force One to House Speaker Republican Boehner as well Republicans have managed passage of Obama's request for the FAST TRACK Trade Deal as Democrats dug in their heels against their own nominated White House Resident about it.

The picture is becoming clearer and clearer to more and more people as well elected officials who have couched and shied away from the qualification demand for the Office of the President that Obama fails. As they begin to look to see really what Law is Governing who and why more questions then answers are coming. Have the People actually unknowingly disbanded the Officers Elected as Representatives and Senators, Disbanded the Court's held under the United States Constitution's Standards, and Disbanded even the outline of the States and their respective Officers under the Constitution by electing an ineligible unqualified person in the Office of the President? The tangible evidence against Obama's being elected under fraudulent identity is clearly a Ghost Buster. Here's a video I put out in 2012 Campaign that enumerated some of these.

Obama Ghost Busters


I believe Obama feels as a Constitutional Law Professor their is weight to that theory and he is taking full advantage of it while the Courts and the Officers of the Government under the Constitution try to fight with one hand tied behind their back because they have no standing in Court to challenge Obama's two election wins. The only one who does and hasn't been labeled a 'racist' by the Main Stream Media because he also sued McCain in 2008, is Presidential Candidate in '08, '12. and '16 Cody Robert Judy, (me). That Case is Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States of America's Supreme Court right now, because I have never ceded a loss to Obama in those elections technically in Court holding my standing firm.

Now they got a few things wrong in the assumption. That story over at Birtherconspiracy.org was actually published before the Court upheld my Case on the "Pending Motions List". The author of it pretentiously publishing it at Midnight the day of the June 18th Conference, and admitted after my Case was not Dismissed that it had to be rewritten or reworded.

The Court did not Dismiss my Case, but his story is out there when you google my name creating uncertainty and question that forces me to address the issue and his headline as a lie. The story is damaging our fundraising abilities and I'm sure that is figured in its purpose. The Founder admits in a story "The ephemeral nature of the Birther Movement" his purpose has been served and plans retirement in 2017, and that should tell you very clearly how vital the site has been in Support of Obama. [I’m giving Cody Judy the kind of coverage that would have been reserved for someone like Orly Taitz just a few years ago.][I can’t remember when the last birther lawsuit was filed. Come my retirement in 2017, we’ll see if there is anything left.]

The public outrage in the assumption that they were "Taken Advantage Of by Fraud" in the elections of 2008 and 2012, and that they did not know or understand that they were in theory voting the United States Constitution completely void and all its Officers, Courts, and Boundaries out with their vote for Obama while understood in the legal minds is not something I believe the public is in agreement with. However, their support is extremely lacking to say different as my Case hangs by a thread in the Supreme Court of the United States!

I'm telling you people if you do not start supporting this Case and I mean by the hundred, and thousands, and millions of dollars of contributions we are headed for a hell of which you cannot imagine! Far be it for me not to have spelled it out very plain and clear to you because I have done that and it is a matter of public Record within the Halls of the United States Courts now pondering the totality of the Obama Elections.

I have to say I am very grateful for those who have responded, but we are very short to our stated goal. We had a little uptick, but its quite now and we are short. We do not have the money needed. Anticipating this, I have delivered to the Court a "Motion for Reconsideration and Review of my inform pauperis status", which you can review here. Though the Court recesses at the end of June it does continue to take and rule on Motions. It should be noted that the Justices do continue to study the Cases pending before it as is stated on its website during recess that you can read yourself here.

Now you will see on the Court's calendar of June tomorrow is the last day for ORDERS to be released on its normal in session condition. The condition of the Court changes in July, August, September and resumes again in October. My hope was to get that Motion Reconsideration Review into the Court at least a week before its ending June Session and perhaps be granted Cert along with it in Monday June 29th, 2015 (tomorrows) Orders.

The Motion for Reconsideration and Review was fast-tracked overnight and was Docketed June 24th. That means the Court has had a full week to consider overturning the denial of informa pauperis which had been denied with the new and pertinent updated evidence that I provided them. In the best case scenario, they good Grant my Informa Pauperis standing over turning their decision of June 18th, that forces me to comply with printing and court fees that approximate between two thousand and four thousand dollars by July 13th. Complying with that Order means having the Document in the Printing Office this July 7th at the latest to get it finished and into the Court by July 13th also which we simply do not have the money for yet.

Its just not there yet. I have done my best at trying to motivate you to move now and received with grateful heart letters and contributions of support like this . I'd like to share with you this very heart wrenching Card. I hope he doesn't mind me sharing it with you. I'm having a difficult time even typing it with my eyes leaking.

"Dear Cody - Thank you - - Patriot - - for your courage and perseverance in standing up for the Constitution against the usurper. You took a big risk in fighting Obama for the sake of the United States of America and We The People. Hopefully SCOTUS will decide to hear your case and it will result in Obama's ouster and the restoration of the nation. God Bless You and God Bless America - Mr.Jack X. XXXXXXX Florida." A ten dollar check attended the card.

If 3% of America would do that do you know how much the Campaign would bank? There's roughly 325 million Americans. 3% is roughly 3 million at $10 a piece puts the Campaign Treasure Chest needed to fight this fight at $30 Million. Will you now, knowing and understanding the implications of an Ineligible person in the Office of the President join this Patriot's Campaign?

You have got to understand that little ole me, Cody Robert Judy is the only one who has standing to fight this. If Governor Christie or Governor Walker or even Mr. Donald Trump went into to Court today and tried they would be dismissed because they missed the fight beginning in 2008. This is not a 'grandiose' statement but one of facts. The Courts would say they were a day late and a dollar short and kick them out. You have just got to understand how important and valuable that word "perseverance" as a Presidential Candidate in '08 '12 and now '16 is. Without it we do not have a single person in this Nation with Standing the Court can remotely honor to ascertain its own legitimacy through the fog of fraudulent elections.

That is why we can't go forward. We have to go back and reset the damages. I hope that is crystal clear to everyone reading this and that you will pass it on. If you have decided to support another Candidate for President it could well be understood you have decided to give up the United States Constitution also. Please re-read if you haven't got it yet. Its a little complicated but this post is in fact a nutshell from the volumes that could be written about it.

UPDATED: FUND RAISING REPORT

We here at the Cody Robert Judy for President 2016 Camp would like to give you a little bit of an update on our Fund Raising. We thank those of you who are digging in and helping. We know there are many more of you out there sitting on the fence. We do not have the luxury of time to waste. Get off the fence and quit hoping for a better America Tomorrow and start helping us make a better America Today. We need your contribution today! The link here is a safe and secure Paypal account for your convenience.

Please continue to check back and we will post UPDATED information here on our FUND RAISING GOAL. We notice contributions coming in from all over this Nation and hope you will get your state on the board here. We notice FL.,CA.,TX.,OR.,PA.,N.C.,UT.,S.D,VA.,MA., now and one from a U.S. Citizen in the United Kingdom Thank You!

*If there is an UPDATE of ORDERS from the U.S. Supreme Court Today we will update that here.
UPDATE: On the ORDERS LIST of 6-29-15 of SCOTUS there are none for this Case

Cody Robert Judy
The Cody Robert Judy for President Camp 2016
www.codyjudy.us

Quick Reminder Cody's interview with Mike Volin is up on Demand at WOBC Radio so tune in when you'd like!Tune in here: -

HOUSE KEEPING NOTE:
Cody Robert Judy's FB page has filled up with 5,000 so we would ask you to join the new and growing list of supporters on FB here! Pass it on!
We hope you will not spare your Contribution today in the Res-TOUR-Ation of our NATION and support Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President today.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION

1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts
12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial
13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008
14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case
15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

Thank you to everyone who is and has contributed just a little here and just a little there, for we are working very hard in using the little that we do have as efficiently and proficiently as it comes in, as I'm sure everyone would agree. Please consider a contribution
Let's make it Official and support a Qualified Candidate whose has dedicated his time and talent to taking a stand for America. Let's raise a million dollars and give you the right to say, "I'm not an Idiot, I'm a Patriot!".

INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI

BREAKING NEWS REPORT – OBAMA’S INELIGIBILITY PRODUCES BIG WIN for BIRTHERS!

FEATURED EDITORIAL: The Post & Email
BREAKING NEWS REPORT – OBAMA’S INELIGIBILITY PRODUCES HISTORIC WIN for BIRTHERS!

Shepard Smith anchor at Fox News complained January 20th, 2015 that the White House had dropped the word ‘News’ from Fox News Placeholders at the State of the Union Lunch Obama held to map out all of their key talking points for his address, hoping no doubt to assure they got it right. Shepard pointed out as he sat next to Brian Williams he noticed his placeholder sign read ‘Brian Williams NBC News’. Then he looked over at David Muir’s from ABC and it read ‘David Muir ABC News’. Both his and fellow anchor from Fox News Bret Baier’s simple read their names with the word “Fox” under it. Remember in 2009 the Obama Administration’s attempt to shut Fox News completely out of the White House Press Core?

Many of the comments over at the NATIONAL REVIEW ONLINE Story defended the sleight of hand story claiming Fox News didn’t report ‘news’ and I quickly thought none of the other networks have either when it comes to the Appeal over at the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, the stories of history are being made, but no one is covering it. No one is writing stories about it. What story you ask? Hummmmm.

Yet another first has happened in American political and judicial History and no one see’s the story? ABC, NBC, CBS, and FOX news have not called in their political and judicial experts to review the fact that two very experienced Justices have just been laced with corruption charges for failing to recuse themselves destroying a whole panels ORDER and JUDGEMENT and causing a shadow of embarrassment for the whole U.S. Court of Appeals 10th Circuit Court. That’s actually the biggest win in the Nation yet for Birthers who have been protesting that the United States Constitution was in jeopardy!

Of course if the United States Constitution is in jeopardy then so is every black robe in every Court including those of the United States Supreme Court under it, as well as every U.S. Representative and U.S. Senator’s seat, I think and hope you get the point of how important the U.S. Constitution is for all of these positions. Without the U.S. Constitution they simply don’t exist. Ask George Washington how many times King George wiped out the Congress or elected spokesman for the people and called for new elections before our Revolution? That was one of the very angering ways decisions by the elected were subverted entirely by the King and what led to our Revolution. Minus that and it might not have ever happened.

What has happened in the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals is by all accounts fascinating for political junkies. Never in all of Birther History for sure has a Judgment and Order by a panel of Judges been wiped out so cleanly. Ok, break it down why is this fascinating?

Well, when you consider how many Birther Cases have gone up to the United States Supreme Court now and been denied. How many? I can think of more than six, maybe even more than a dozen starting with Phil Berg’s case since 2008 I’ll let NBC, CBS, ABC and FOX News work on that details of that one, (Do you feel vindicated now Shepard Smith (smile), you will see that we never see which Justices are involved in the Conferences if a panel is used or whose on the panel? All we have ever received is “No” answer meaning in conference the Justices refused to take it up.

As we take a step down on the decisions or opinion’s rendered to get to the U.S. Supreme Court we are necessarily faced with two general Courts. Those of a State Supreme Court’s often also deciding not to take it up with no opinion; just a denial or a affirmation of the lower Courts decision, or a U.S. Court of Appeals Circuit Court decision.

So out of all the Court’s in the United States rendered on Birther or the Article II Patriot Platform, we have essentially no word from whose decision was “No” on the U.S. Supreme Court cases, and no opinion’s from the U.S. Supreme Court. Further we have a few Court of Appeal’s opinion’s and a few State Court Decisions that basically upheld the lower Court’s Standing arguments against the plaintiff’s or petitioners smashing their cases into a billion pieces. That’s all we have. Probably the most significant of those was in fact the one from the 9th Circuit Court Orly Taitz argued with a candidate for office in toe Allan Keyes Barnett v. Debra Bowen, but this made no claim for damages to a Campaign and was leveled at the California Secretary of State for basically failing to vet Obama.

That case did not level a claim of damages against Obama for say the infraction of stating he was qualified under oath for the office he was seeking should he be elected. In defense of The Secretary of State(s) they are more or less either relying on what the Candidate says or what the Party’s nomination form states for the Candidate. Rep. Nancy Pelosi filed two forms for Obama in 2008 one for Hawaii and one for the other 49 states dues to Hawaii’s assertion that it must be known that he was qualified under the U.S. Constitution’s demands and not for simply the parties choice. To my knowledge there has never been damage assessment made from any Campaign accept mine against Obama’s Campaign based on his not being qualified. This figures that a Campaign against Obama has not suffered injury or loss due to the investment of the Campaign including commercials, web pages, travel and on and on and on.

In truth I don’t think Allan Keyes Campaign even made commercials at all and sure didn’t come close to Mitt Romney’s Campaign, my campaign actually kept up and so suffered a much heavier or substantial loss or damage as a result of Obama’s ineligibility. So in a sense you had a big claim for damages but the only real damages was a claim against the office of the President itself. No monetary claim whatsoever.

Now to understand the special circumstances coming out of the loss February 3rd, 2015 of Judy v. Obama et.al., is to look at the real victory that unfolded. Unparalleled in any Birther Case History is a total destruction of a Circuit Court of Appeals opinion which has imploded upon that Court by its own dereliction of Justice. You might even call that a manifestation of the Case’s Merit or else why would the Court lower itself to such an implosion of Court corruption?
Two of the three Justices of that panel have received direct favor from two presidential candidates who I opposed in 2012- Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. The Defendant’s/Appellee’s in this case are Barack Obama his Campaign Corporation(s) and the DNC Officials and the DNC as a Corporation.

Justice Gregory A. Phillips received his nomination from Defendant Obama. Justice Carlos F. Lucero received his nomination from President Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton’s husband. Their very employment in the 10th Circuit Court would not be possible without that favor, so it’s very significant as it encompasses the defendant’s of the case in relation to competitors with or against the Plaintiff, me. If these two Justices would not have their jobs without Obama and Clinton I’d say they favored them and to say otherwise is …what was the words they used to describe my case…wholly incredible, frivolous, and malicious? That fits pretty well actually. Never before in any case against Obama’s eligibility has this happened and it’s a big win! It puts the Court itself on defense, smashes or renders the opinion into a billion pieces and requires the further Action of the Court on the question, “What are they going to do now?”.

To deny that favor exist of which recusal was merited invokes a real claim for corruption that pretty much anyone could comprehend. That’ doesn’t take a legal genius or a great understanding of law. What are the options? Well, they can regroup, form another Panel of three or five they feel has no bias or issue in the Campaign Races and Presidential Appointments of the last decade and render another decision. They could defer the question to the United States Supreme Court for settlement saying “hey, listen we have a problem down here and don’t know the best way to handle it. Could you assist?”

Either way it invokes careful consideration and maybe more eyes on the case itself. In Birther or Article II Patriot Platform history has that ever happened in a U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals? The answer is no, and that means we are in new territory never explored which is for all intensive purposes a victory of progress for we have never been able like this to lay a claim on ‘injustice’ in the Court the population could understand.

Ok so we have established a connection between the Defendant’s and two Justices of the three-Judge- panel. Did their decision reflect that partiality in a reasonable consideration? Let’s break that down.

PART II.

To understand the absurdity of the Justices declaration that “no claim upon which relief could be granted has been made” would be like stating while looking at a dead body with a head chopped off, no murder has taken place upon which the death penalty exist for; or while looking at a recently robbed banks vault that the joker had just emptied and saying, ‘no burglary has taken place upon which a relief exist. I mean you could say that because maybe the murder didn’t happen in our Country or the Joker is a foreigner not subject to our laws, but that really gets into the absurd realms of extremism and the far limbs and twigs of justice. I think with all of the legal experience we do in this nation, all the brilliant legal minds that we have, that we can do better.

The Justices in the panel decision basically said two things upon two different subjects. First, allowing me third person leeway here speaking as my lawyer, regarding Cody’s Civil Rights as a Candidate for the Office of the President they said in so many words that Cody has no right to a fair and equal race that is based upon the rules within the Constitution’s declarations in the qualifications for the Office of the President because there are no penalties that exist or that have been let’s say criminally or congressionally codified. This is not true.

Acknowledging the truth, Cody has stated, well the entire race for my Presidency has cost around this much and those are the damages that have been received upon me personally, and upon my Campaign based on Obama’s Campaign in this particular race. Its’ like an accident and any insurance job that the defendant should be responsible for because of his reckless and irresponsible driving. Obama should have known better. He claims a license of responsibility. I mean if someone comes up and totals your car wouldn’t you want it fixed by his insurance?

This case not only shows Cody’s civil rights were violated which are absolutely declared in the Constitution by the rules, and the disregard of those rules comporting a standard of illegality, further by some pretty well known Constitutional Acts of Congress (Sherman & Clayton Acts) that actually spell out penalties for the Court to uphold and declare Cody has a right to spell them out to the Court without an Attorney General doing it. That’s Big! It certainly doesn’t happen often, and perhaps never has been seen in the Court. As such it is really new for the Court’s consideration.

To back that up, the Panel of Three Judges did entertain in their language that Cody could not point to a single case like it, but it was done in more of a mocking way to shall we say scuttle ingenuity and unique creativity afforded to an individual, oh say like the recent plea’s for same sex marriage to be given the same tax breaks as heterosexual marriages? Yes, the Court’s have not upheld that for a very long time, it’s pretty unique and the Court even mentions that in their decision June 25th, 2014 in Kitchen v. Herbert.

To for instance render a decision like the Court’s ORDER and JUDGEMENT gave me to the same-sex marriage Plaintiff’s would be for the Court to tell them they were sick and wrong, needed to repent, and find opposite sex relationships to assist in population growth and the continuation of the species BECAUSE that was normal. I pointed this out to the Court. Just because they haven’t seen a case like this in their lifetime or our American History in the Judicial Branch doesn’t give weight to dismissing the principles and good reason they haven’t – No one’s violated them like this usurper since they have been alive!

Now the Court might say “well, no other candidate for President has come to the Court and asked for recompense.” To which, Cody has stated, “You know what there is a good reason for that? The reason Mitt Romney hasn’t come in is because he was actually made an indirect recipient of good will or favor if he wouldn’t. The evidence of that is in U.S. Sen. Res. 511 where all the Republican U.S. Senators voted for a non-binding resolution that naturalized McCain’s ‘natural born citizenship’ in a similar process that an alien would be naturalized. Yes, the Court received this in my pleadings.

This didn’t go through The House of Representatives and it wasn’t signed by an eligible President so it’s non-binding however, the favors that are attached to it are very binding in support politically for his candidacy for President. Would anyone deny that if Mitt Romney really embarrassed the entire spectrum of Republican Senators exposing their drunkenness at a party they were all involved in that they would support him? Think about every State having two Senators and that body being controlled by Democrats. That means Mitt Romney can’t afford to lose a single U.S. Senator, he needs everyone of their support.

Now it wasn’t Mitt Romney’s fault that every single Republican U.S. Senator in 2008 made a deal with all three candidates in U.S. Sen. Res 511 co-sponsor Hillary Clinton and co-sponsor Barack Obama for Sen. McCain but it sure was the ticket he was running on and he had to procure the favor of support and the compromise to that was not to claim damages against Obama’s Campaign for his not being qualified as a natural born Citizen. He also backed away from McCain in 2008 who he’d lost to and failed to bring it up in-house Republican nomination. I didn’t. I jumped in and sued McCain before Obama in fact like the good little write-in Candidate I was.

To say otherwise, Mitt Romney would have to publically declare he didn’t care or need any Republican U.S. Senator’s support. Then he would also have to declare that he didn’t believe in the U.S. Constitution’s demand and qualifications for the Office of the President and he’d rather subvert them in much the same manner Obama has handed out exemptions for Obamacare and ObamaAmnesty which grants Amnesty by Executive Order refusing to uphold Congressional Legislated laws based on a term referred to as deferred prosecution which amounts to a Presidential Favor or pardon from a particular law, order or judgment. Can you imagine those questions being aired on ABC, CBS, NBC and Fox news and discussed in their panels over coffee?

Some say the Democrats want more naturalization populations in any form possible Amnesty included because they can get people on the political dole by giving them help and support and telling them if they vote Republican they would necessarily have all this help they are receiving taken away. Some say Republicans don’t mind the same process because it attracts people who are hard workers and want also to preserve the opportunity America offers in keeping the fruits of your own labors and private property ownership along with a slew of other civil rights not afforded in other Countries.

Really the totality of the argument rest upon how big of a swath and how fast it happens because America has always maintained an open door for legal immigration and we are a Country of historical immigrants if you want to walk the trail backwards in every family that has come under the umbrella of the United States Constitution. The problem has been how to handle a rush and break down on the door for those who chose to smash it down or not come through the front door legally. Its’ Congress’s job to decide how big that door is but if they make it the whole border our Nations sovereignty can be placed in jeopardy for a nation without borders is no nation at all and most Nations would agree with that.

If the U.S. all of a sudden decided to not respect borders, oh let’s just say Obama invaded Libya supplied weapons to the gangs taking over the Country killing the President, then pretty soon other nations wouldn’t think very highly of us. Oh I’m sorry, I used an example of Democrats not respecting borders and using our military complex to take over things. That’s kind of a bad example because that’s actually why people want to come to America because they are fleeing oppressive governments and if we are one there’s no reason to come. Maybe that’s what Obama is trying to get across and no one’s printing the story of it? Let’s get back to our discussion as we’ve digressed three paragraphs.

So in theory for the Court, I have argued former Governor Mitt Romney actually has already received his compensation by an award of favor and so he didn’t need to go to Court to get one. I on the other hand have not received any favor from the Republican U.S. Senate and their might be a good reason for that. I sued Sen. McCain in 2008 for not being a ‘natural born Citizen.’ If all of McCain’s U.S. Senator buddies voted for U.S. Sen. Res. 511, and they did, that would necessarily put me on the outside of their favor and I explained this to the Court as a reason they didn’t hear from Gov. Romney as the Republican Nominee in 2012.

The Court cannot simply continue to refuse justice to third parties and independent political stands for fair and equal treatment under the laws. Our Country allows third party candidates allows write-in candidates, and those laws while exercised rarely have claim on precedent cases of the U.S. Supreme Court: Namely Minor v. Happersett which declares a natural born Citizen to be born in the U.S. to Citizen parents! Obama fails this and it’s a decision rendered in a higher court that the lower courts are suppose to uphold!

This panel of Judges in the 10th Circuit Court have not only compromised themselves by not recusing two of the three judges with conflicts of interest favoring the defendant/Appellee, but have set out to flip the bird at the United States Supreme Court precedent case law. It is on those conditions we must at the least recognize this as a big win!

You can read the ORDER and JUDGEMENT here and... you can read my RESPONSE or request for a REHEARING En Blanc here.

Update: Here are the three very important questions I posed to the Court to justify Rehearing if:

Question #1- Does Justice Gregory A. Phillips having ENTERED FOR THE COURT the ORDER AND JUDGEMENT on this case February 3rd,2015 having been considered to the U.S. Senate for Confirmation with the favor of the Appellee/Defendant in this case, Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro in the nomination process and thus his very employment as a Justice in the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals constitute an prejudiced dismissal summarily instigated upon the Plaintiff that would seem at best a compromise of judicial discipline in recusal decorum and at worst an impeachable offense?

Question#2- June 25th, 2014 this Court handed down a decision favorable to ‘individual rights’, considered standing and upheld marriage in Kitchen v. Herbert No. 13-4178 and considered the rights of an individual who is unpopular more important per the conflicting referendum of all the people in the entire State of Utah and it’s Constitutional Amendment in the State, which does not come on political easy street; isn’t the ORDER AND JUDGEMENT of this case dismissing it as frivolous a conflict of the Court’s own interest and judgment in that case in the interest of Individual Rights?

Question#3- The conflicting statements in the ORDER and JUDGEMENT asserted by the Court leave criminal mischief, fraud, forgery, and a declaration of the precedent case in Minor v. Happersett regarding a natural born Citizen being “Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents” by the U.S. Supreme Court undefended and a wreck; and fair elections on equal terms for all the Candidates, per race, per qualifications within the U.S. Constitution in total disarray and the Appellant/Plaintiff without recourse in the infringements of his Civil Rights to a fair race; Does this not deserve the attention of the full Court and the political corrections that might be made for the next general election where the entire U.S. population has a stake and claim for fairness, equal treatment under the law in the considerations of our Republic?

I'll keep you updated as things happen and discuss this more in detail so pass it on and keep checking back. Thanks so much for your help and support needed at this time more then ever.
Yours Truly
Cody Robert Judy

We need your help. Will you help us or are the outrageous lies your being told by your elected leaders okay for you and your children? If you won't defend your children and their future who will you defend?

The 2016 Campaign begins now. Please send your contributions and help with the ABC (American Birther Campaign) today and my election for President in 2016 and Join the 257 of us now on my Facebook Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President 2016 site.

Cody Robert Judy for President 2016
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, Utah 84401

Thank you
Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for United States President 2016
www.codyjudy.us

CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION



The Commercial is simply called "America"


Join the new CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRES 2016 FB SITE Here

New Update on SCOTUS 24th Conference Judy v. Obama 12-5276

The interest in this is to be applauded, and I thank you for tuning in. Its a really wonderful thing when Americans start tuning in to what the United States Supreme Court is doing, and the interest generated specifically in this case has been terrific.

Our campaign is posting the following information for the benefit of those interested. We hope these links and the information is helpful, and that you have a great night and continue to tune in!

The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Camp.


http://www.scotusblog.com/2012/09/change-in-orders-release/

[ Change in orders release (UPDATED)
UPDATE 12:45 pm. The new early release procedure will be followed on all days when a regular Order List is due to be released, and not just on days when the Court will be sitting. With that policy going into effect tomorrow, presumably that means that, if there are grants out of today’s Conference, they will be made available at 9:30 am Tuesday. Otherwise, all orders coming out of that Conference will be released next Monday at 9:30 am.

——————-

In the Supreme Court’s new Term, soon to open, the Justices will follow a new routine in the release of orders when the Court is sitting. On those days, the list of orders will be made public at 9:30 a.m., rather than 10 a.m., the custom for many years. The Court announced the change in a news release Monday morning; it can be read here.

The Court explained the switch by saying that, on days when the Justices take to the bench, the release of the orders a half-hour earlier will give the public, the press, and attorneys more chance to review the Court’s actions before the public sitting begins.

The change will take effect tomorrow morning.

The Court’s Term formally begins next Monday, when oral arguments resume. The Court is meeting in a private Conference this morning to decide which new cases, if any, will be granted for review in the new Term. The Court has released its calendars for oral argument for the October, November, and December sittings. ]

[ORDER]
For Immediate Release For Further Information Contact:
September 24, 2012 Kathleen L. Arberg 202-479-3211


Beginning with October Term 2012, the regularly scheduled Order Lists of the Supreme Court of the United States will be released by the Court at 9:30 a.m. rather than at 10 a.m. as had been the previous practice. On days when the Court is in session, the change will provide members of the Supreme Court Bar, the public, and the media an opportunity to review Order Lists before the Court sits at 10 a.m.

Regularly scheduled Order Lists are typically issued on each Monday that the Court sits. On occasion, regularly scheduled Order Lists are issued on days that the Court is not sitting. The issuance of such a list is announced in advance. Miscellaneous orders may be issued in individual cases at any time. Scheduled Order Lists will continue to be posted on the Court’s Website (http://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/orders.aspx) immediately following their release by the Court. Miscellaneous orders will continue to be posted on the Website the day of issuance or the next day in the instance of some emergency applications.

The change in practice will go into effect on Tuesday, September 25, 2012.

http://www.scotusblog.com/2012/09/this-week-at-the-court-85/
This week at the Court
On Monday, the Court meets for the “Long Conference” to consider petitions on the summer lists. Our list of “Petitions to watch” for that Conference is available in three installments (here, here, and here). We expect the Court to issue grants from its Conference on Tuesday morning and will report on those grants and any other actions by the Court as soon as possible.