Sunday, May 25, 2014
NATIONAL TREASURE: HUNT FOR THE GOLD
NATIONAL TREASURE – HUNT FOR THE GOLD
The image of Birthers as it began was not unlike the image of a broken bloody sack of baby and placenta as it is seen in a birth; not really all that very attractive. Ridicule came upon us from the breached qualifications required for the Office of the President found in The United States Constitution. The breeched birth of the Movement itself has by definition come heel first and by no means has been united either by cause, affect, or even by a standard of uniting a definition head first. Factions have developed within it as fast as misinformation could be applied to the definition of Natural Born Citizen – Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.
About the only thing many Birthers do have in common is the word “Barack Obama aka Barry Soetoro”. Those two names are synonymous with the same man in the White House at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue not to be confused with Dracula’s castle in Transylvania or the occupant of it considered a blood sucking devil. The definition of Natural Born Citizen has haunted some of us and scared like a ghost from the Christmas past most others.
Every imaginable effort has been used by both sides opposed to one another to credit and dis-credit each other on the one hundred yard field of the Constitution. Winning has been assumed by anti-Birthers by the touchdowns made with so many court cases dismissed on standing, and technical fouls and their obvious choice in the White House. The biggest nightmare of any coach is seeing your team beat themselves with technical penalties and fouls that might have been avoided with discipline to the rules, support for one another as a team, and a clearly defined movement everyone within the movement supported. In kind of a joking way if the whole crowd is out on the field playing football it makes it very difficult for the actual players to have a game at all.
When fouls are called and the game is won or lost on technicalities rather than simply the score however there are a lot of people who go home screaming “The Referee’s had it in for us!”, and that erodes the game as well. Early on we had people in the Birther Movement who didn't understand the laws of "standing" and how important those were to the legal field to everyone regardless of political affiliation.
Rules are rules and referee’s are there to see to it they are followed. In the Birther Movement the Referee’s would be considered the Judges throwing one case after the other out. That’s considered the bad news or actually what you might hear has happened by the majority of the Birther Movement. I dare say we have had 100 people out on the field that didn't belong there, didn't have a uniform, had no standing, and ran around calling the Judges "out of their mind", and probably most hurtful of all unwilling to support anyone that actually had standing.
That’s not the way I see it, and it’s certainly not my hope. I think it’s very important to have faith in the law. In fact as I write that tears swell up in my eyes as a confirmation of my hope. Faith and Hope are bedrock moral values protected by the Constitution of the United States. People from all over the world and all walks of life have fled oppression to a place called The United States of America in the hope that they could practice their faith freely and somehow cohabitate with other people with varying degrees of faith sharing the same hope without killing each other.
Now in every Birther who has ever filed a legal action and been dismissed on standing or a technicality, we did have a hope that our case would not be thrown out on a small technicality because the issue was so huge we were bringing to the Court for justice. There is in fact a rule in the Constitution that no one can "be" President unless they are at least 35 years of age or older. We all agree on time and that age begins after birth and not before. Day one of our life ended after we had separated from our mothers body and 365 days later we had our first birthday. After 35 of those birthdays we could check off the box qualified age to run for President.
You didn't really understand ABC, NBC, CBS, Fox, etc., etc., that that information made you all Birthers did you? (smile) There are also two other qualifications for the Office of the President. One of them says you have to have been a resident within the U.S. for at least 14 years. Again a pretty straight forward rule. Proceeding the first two rules in an indication of importance is that you must be a "Citizen" of the U.S. at the time of the adoption of the Constitution, otherwise you must be a "natural born Citizen". That qualification excludes any kind of foreign citizenship either by birth or parents and was put in place as a measure for our protection or national defense. The natural defense was placing two generations between any kind of dual or foreign citizenship considered by birth and/or parents between any foreign government and the Office of the President.
Oscar-mad-man-dictator who rules Mars with an Iron Fist could not simply fly his sperm over to hired paid off Jane-Hoe have her artificially inseminated and enjoy the benefits of turning the military against the people, increasing his land holdings or sphere of influence, and boast his posterity in the Office of the President ruled the U.S.A.
I was so impressed with the hearings that took place in Congress where testimony was given that really brings home to us that within two uninterrupted generations in the United States, understood to be Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents, a natural national defense is actually understood. Loyalties can actually shift from father to son but it is much less likely that a natural born citizen turns the U.S. into an atheistic communistic national socialistic state run compound, which as you know is Mrs. Dr. Orly Taitz Esq.'s greatest fear. Just maybe anti-birthers should consider if Obama's qualified to be President, she's qualified to run for President to.
Really who wants postal workers packing heat on a really busy Wednesday, Thursday or Friday with the authority to shoot you if they get mad, go mad, or just don't like the way you said "Can you tape this?" That's the reasons we have qualifications for the Office of the President as well as U.S. Reps, and U.S. Senators. It makes sense.
While Rules are Rules and a Contract is a Contract, it has really been my secret hope that we Birthers were doing something wrong in the Court, and that all we really had to do was to find the right "KEY" that would unlock the door to the national treasure of seeing this qualification enforced with Obama,Taitz, Schwarzenegger, Rubio, Jindal, Cruz, Santorum, etc. You might think saying the qualification for the Office of the President was not a national treasure, but if you think about the debt being 10 trillion when Obama took office and the national debt weighing in on the eighteen trillion dollar side now I think my argument is working.
I understand completely that Courts have rules to follow just like a football game or any sport has rules; let's not forget though that so do elections. In some instances, you might see a murderer walk because of getting off on a technicality. That is were you see a minor rule used to excuse a really bad criminal action, but there are also cases where minor rules are excused because of a national security threat. If the damn was going to bust drowning millions of people in five days and the KEY to securing it was handed to the Panel of Judges can they altar the normal court procedure for the public interest, or should they stick to allowing the defense who has an interest in letting the damn break respond within 15 days? Well, in my own experience in Obama v. Judy I've had the time shortened to as little as 24 hours to respond, so I know court rules can be altered on the Judges Order.
You might expect if for instance a Judge had the real determination to destroy the Constitution that faith and hope and the law would be viciously and ferociously attacked claiming RULES had to be followed, and dismissing faith and hope and the law based on technicalities. Indeed faith and hope seem to always be under attack from those who don’t believe those who share different hopes, and would rather promote faith in themselves to the public rather than someone else.
They might even end a prayer in the name of Barack Obama- Amen (I agree) and find it an offense to end a prayer in the name of Jesus Christ-Amen (I agree) due to some kind of an alleged or particular ‘religion’ called Christianity even though Christianity is not any particular religion unless you consider an edict of scooping a whole bunch of religions together. If the theory that Christianity is a 'particular religion' based on Christ, then the same is true about Obots for Obama. The problem with having an unqualified candidate in the Office of the President is it actually neuters the whole executive branch of government which is the enforcement of the law. If the Constitution's Qualifications for President don't matter, and the Constitution doesn't matter, then everyone with Judge Appointments and Elected Positions in the Federal Government can go home now.
That's one of the Grand Keys of the Constitution of the United States- Three Branches-Check and Balance each other. If One goes down they all go down. So the hope of a Usurper of the Office of the President is actually that no one understands that authority is only given to the Office of the President upon a qualified candidate. You know what the biggest testimony of that is don't you? The Constitution provides language for the Congress if the Elected President shall fail to qualify or be found a Disability.
Its amazing, Amendment XX Sect. 3, "if the President Elect shall fail to Qualify.." That's amazing language that depicts an elected President failing to Qualify under the Constitution's Qualifications! U.S.C Amend 14,Sec. 3, which I'll abridge to clarify, "No person shall as an elector of President, having previously taken an oath to support the Constitution shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same Constitution, but Congress by a vote of two thirds of each House can remove such disability". That is amazing language for our time and situation. Is not changing the Constitution's Qualification's for the Office of the President Insurrection or rebellion against the same Constitution? U.S.C. Amend XX even tells us what to do if the Electoral College fails; "if the electoral college fails to resolve who will be President or Vice President (in other words if our Election fails to elect a qualified person) the incoming Congress as opposed to the outgoing one,would choose who would occupy the unresolved office or offices. That is amazing language for our time!
Indeed there are prayers spoken and there are prayers unspoken, but the objectivity of a prayer is to address, to thank, to ask, and to end. I have made a prayer to the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276, to thank the law for hearing me, to ask the law to consider my request, and ended it in my name. What offense should I cause in reading my petition in a school? I ask that because I don’t think really that any particular person would be offended and by the same logic I don’t think anyone should be offended with a prayer in school nor the name ending the prayer.
In fact 1.1 billion dollars was the prayer from Libya rebels hoping for the institution of Sharia law and receiving it in the name of Barack Obama. Yes, that's right. Obama didn't ask Congress. The execution of law is predicated upon the name of whoever is legally in the Office of the President. However, the legal authority is only predicated upon the office with someone who is qualified by the rules of the law or what we’d call ‘qualifications’. I hope that reflects to you the importance of making sure the Office of the President is filled with someone who is actually qualified for the authority that is given to the Office of the President by “We the People” for the Republic for and in which we stand.
In 1950 the introduction of "under God" in the pledge of allegiance was done during the Cold War, as a way to differentiate the U.S. from the concept of communist state atheism. Meaning summarily there were essentially two states: One accepted as under God, and another accepted as Under the State leaders however they got to be leaders by bully dictate or election. Though those people considered atheist, ruled only by self or man, denied the concept of God, those believing in God believed atheist are under God also, but accept they just don't believe it. We didn't ask them to bend the knee or even stand for the pledge, but we did require by law a qualified person in the Office of the President.
The prescription of a Republic is an agreement of a certain set of laws or rules. That is why we do not say for example, “I pledge of allegiance to the flag of the United States of American and to the “Democracy” for which it stands one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.”
Their voice speaks to us from the dust, "The pledge remains “and to the Republic for which it stands”, meaning the set of laws found in the United States of America’s Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land agreed upon by “We the People” that our flag represents. We have been warned that the law should not be changed for light or transient purposes as power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely often taken by monarchs or dictators."
You know something, I always stand amazed at our first President George Washington’s willingness to be ruled by the law in stepping down from the Office of the President after 7 years 10 months and 2 days. The birth of our nation was a precarious time no doubt about it. That tradition has actually shaken the whole world up as a storm of peace and tranquility and good will towards all men. What a play, what a touchdown, what a standard to unfurl to the shock of the world! What a trust to establish.
If you could bank on the perception of value in currency, the rule of law in a Republic ranks high for delivering that trust. The people actually trust the law as it ranks higher than men when all are subject to the law. The value of the United States of America is indeed made gold by the law and by the same token a breach of the Constitution weakens the nation. So it is we see the assault upon the faith and hope of the law for justice for all as an assault upon the people, the trust, and the value. It requires 2/3rds of both Houses to make a new Amendment so you know amending the qualifications for the Office of the President has not been seen as a good idea, and by the same token construction jobs on the Constitution are prohibited without that 2/3rds vote of both the U.S. Representatives House and U.S. Senators House.
This is tied easily to our economical place or current financial situation. I found an interesting gold nugget in a piece of conversation from a stock broker friend of mine who said, “It all starts with a dream. If you don’t have a dream you don’t have anything”. The irony of a ‘dream’ being seen as ‘valuable’ by someone who dealt in tangible money was a beautiful diamond to me. The “intangible” or “spirit unseen” is the kernel or seed money of even those most practiced and doubting atheist around us wrapped up in the little package they call a “dream”. My friend wasn't an atheist but he does deal in the tangible world, reality as it is called, or maybe said as being-down-to-Earth. We have all this intelligence floating around as an idea or dream or conception and the source of that disputed I guess. Maybe it just depends on where you walking on the Earth you know, when you bump into that intel? (smile)
OUR NATIONAL TREASURE
Speaking of dreams Walt Disney would be where without one or Steve Jobs? Well, if you made it this far with me I will thank you for the dance and the opportunity to explain just a little to you why fighting for the qualifications of the Office of the President is so important to me and why I see it as so valuable. When I started writing this post I thought of the movie produced by Walt Disney Pictures National Treasure with Nicolas Cage producers Jerry Bruckheimer and Jon Turteltaub.
The gripping attraction to the stories is the treasure hunt. We all love the fascinating and fun searches for the treasure in treasure hunts. In the movies National Treasure and National Treasure 2 Book of Secrets we find ourselves on a treasure hunt with clues found upon the most amazing national treasured documents. Our delight at finding a clue is also doused at finding the ridicule that comes when one clue only leads us to another, and another, and another.
That's search for the clue that led to another clue has all been for the key that would unlock the doors of justice. This is exactly what The Birther Movement has been about.
In the movies it’s depicted as secrets handed down from generation to generation until the treasure is so far removed from the secrets of the treasure that the treasure could be considered actually lost and more importantly the belief of the treasure even given up on. That could be a fair description of where we are at in the Birther Movement.
We are at the end where we are walking around saying, “I just really thought there would be a treasure” as the last clue has led us to an old dusty room with nothing to show for our five and a half year search. In listening to the Freedom Friday Show with Carl Gallups and Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse (CCP) lead investigator Mike Zullo last night I was sadly left with mixed emotions.
Don’t get me wrong, I have the most profound respect for Sheriff Joe for actually listening to the assertive 242 members of the Arizona Surprise Tea Party constituency in Maricopa County Arizona and their petition of August 20, 2011. They’re concern was of the crime surrounding identification fraud and in such election fraud. I love Carl Gallups voice and his manner that really brings whatever he’s talking about home to the heart.
I have read that letter of petition to Sheriff Joe. Twenty experts are referred to in it, including Doug Vogt a document expert who had filed a complaint with the FBI to no avail, as the backbone to begin a law enforcement investigation to protect the MCA citizenry from presumably illegitimate candidate(s) aka Barack Obama/Barry Soetoro who may circumvent the “votes cast in future presidential elections”. The 2012 election was happening in three months time and that didn’t give a whole lot of time for a criminal investigation.
In fact it wouldn’t be until March 1st 2012 when the CCP announced to the world that sufficient evidence had been established ascertaining the document presented by Obama as a long form birth certificate was not authentic but was a fabrication. The United States Congress and the Attorney General Eric Holder were unmoved by the findings.
The day of Sheriff Joe’s March 1st Media Conference was near an end and I sat glued to a chair having received an Order from the Judge that gave me one days notice to file an Objection to the Motion to Dismiss Obama’s attorney had filed in Fulton County Georgia’s State Superior Court. My Objection was to be emailed to the Superior State Court Judge Cynthia D. Wright who made an Order granting the Motion to Dismiss March 2nd, 2012.
I mention this as the circumstantial evidence that the results of Sheriff Joe’s Cold Case Posse investigation was indeed at least available in the lowest level of the state court which then would be appealed to the Georgia State Supreme Court and then to the U.S. Supreme Court 12-5276. I was the only case of the three being considered to include the CCP’s investigation released March 1st into the Objection to the Motion to Dismiss of the three being considered
March 2nd, 2012.
March 1st, 2012 was a long night for me. I spent literally all night detailing my argument with the facts and groggily emailed my Objection off near dawn. I’ll never forget that night as long as I live. Now getting back to the petition of the Arizona Surprise Tea Party, no mention is made in its entirety of Article II, Sect. 1, Clause 5’s demand for a natural born citizen and I do not mean that as derogatory.
What I want to convey in the mention is more of my hope and faith in our Constitution. Don’t you think that our United States Constitution upon which the whole foundation of our government rest ought to be stronger then a criminal complaint?
This is my thought. We know Obama most likely wasn’t the one in the room with his butt glued to the chair printing up his own long form fabrication and it follows whoever did is guilty of fraud and forgery the least of which has Obama handing it out to the press core. What’s the crime- Distribution of a forged document? Can’t you hear Obama now in Court under oath, “Well, I thought what they handed me was real. I had no idea it was a fabrication. Is it? That’s awful! Just like the deaths in Benghazi were awful, just like the veterans deaths were awful, just like the border patrol agents death was awful; just like the deaths of Loretta Fuddy and Andrew Breitbart was awful; just like the deaths of Seal Teams 6 was awful; just like the deaths of three gay lovers in one and a half months time in 2007 was awful. I’m going to hold whoever did this responsible!”
Now of course we believe that these deaths are awful and while tragic it’s a stretch to say they all may have saved Obama’s political life in one way or another. My thought is really on the power of our Constitution and the thought that it ought to have the power to stand up to a usurpation of the Office of the President even above proving a criminal complaint against someone who may or may not have been rewarded by Obama indirectly or directly.
People die every day in service of the United States of America, but it is the law of our Republic, the United States Constitution that makes their deaths a service to us all rather than simply awful. Knowing they didn’t die in vain is what matters to us and that is what is remembered and honored. This is what drives us Birthers.
I said I had mixed emotions with the Freedom Friday Show with Carl Gallups and Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse (CCP) lead investigator Mike Zullo . The mixed emotions I had came from Mike Zullo’s words that he was glad that the U.S. Supreme Court had dismissed the cases of Doug Vogt and H. Brook Paige’s Petition to the United States Supreme Court. Vogt’s petition was seeking the Court’s assurances that a Grand Jury could field criminal complaints.
The picture that Vogt drew with the help of assisting lawyer Sibley wasn’t meant so much to lay blame but to at least propose a scene or picture that a Grand Jury might indeed be worthy of considering. They certainly could not press for the rights of a Grand Jury without a case example. That would have been stupid. So they proposed one scenario. It didn’t have to be ‘right’ there just had to be one that was plausible.
A Grand Jury’s duty is not to try someone but to just kind of gather all the circumstances around to mull over wither an alleged criminal action is capable of being bound over for trial. Opening up a Grand Jury to consider actions surrounding forged documents and identity is basically what tries the evidence that the CCP is said to have gotten and said to be getting. I know Vogt’s petition secured or detailed affidavit was meant for the suggestion of a Grand Jury and not for the findings of a Grand Jury that was never allowed to be formed in the first place.
I also know the people named while being proved innocent might have gladly stood up as being a straw that lead to a Grand Jury receiving even more evidence from the CCP but Mike Zullo’s words he was glad or happy that the United States Supreme Court dismissed both cases put a knife right through my gut. If Vogt had named me in it I wouldn’t have cared because I know I’m innocent and I certainly do understand that when a Grand Jury gets together and all of the evidence is presented indictments can come out of those proceedings.
Giving Mr. Zullo the benefit of the doubt on a poor choice of words, I've made that mistake, it at the same time illustrates rather handily the example of the kind of infighting seen in the Birther Movement. I’m sure we will all have a good laugh when it’s over. We have seen this more than once, I have anyway. It’s like seeing someone from your team get up to bat and strike out. I have not in a single instance celebrated in any kind of joyful happiness any dismissal of Obama’s Eligibility. I have groaned in every one and cried, “I wish my team mate had hit a home run!” It’s true. Even though I’ve been taken out myself and flogged by the Birther Movement Members from time to time, I won’t mention names, I have defended you as my team players.
CAN THE U.S. CONSTITUTION STAND ALONE- WHAT IS THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT THINKING?
With that, I submit my hopes and dreams to you that simply hopes perhaps God will grant us a victory in his wisdom much greater than our own that you as my team mates can also share my faithful joys and my disappointments as well in the preservation of our national treasure the U.S. Constitution.
I had been doing a lot of thinking about the 2010 exchange between U.S. S.C Justice Clarence Thomas in front of the U.S. House of Representatives’ NY D- Jose Serrano who chaired the Appropriations Subcommittee on General Government. That exchange has been seen over 33,000 times on one station and a lot more than that on other YouTube stations.
In dissecting it I gained a new impression I hadn’t had before. That impression was that the Justice Thomas for United States Supreme Court was not evading the issue of the ‘natural born citizen’ requirement for the Office of the President. What they were evading in the respect of the Legislative Branch was what they knew was the duty of Congress.
The question then was how could the United States Supreme Court rule on the ‘natural born citizen’ clause qualification for the Office of the President without removing the person in the Office of the President who had been elected, leaving Congress to that option? Rep. Serrano compliments Justice Thomas for the service the Court provides to the Country.
Justice Thomas states the 15 years they have been working together in separate branches as a check and balance. Rep Serrano facetiously says “He’s not a Judge”. But he is a Judge in one very important matter and Justice Thomas reminds him of it. Justice Thomas says, “And you don’t have to be born in the United States ..and you never have to ask that… answer that question.
“Oh really” says Rep. Serrano. “So YOU haven’t answered the one wither I can serve as President BUT you answered this one?
That was a tip off. The United States Supreme Court doesn’t want to make a decision that would remove Obama directly from the Office of the President but they are happy to answer a question that does not lend them responsible for removing anyone from office. Justice Thomas says “we are evading that one”, which again was an agreement they will not make a decision that removes an elected person to the Office. Justice Thomas confirms, “We’re giving you another option”.
Meaning? The U.S. Supreme Court is respecting the Legislative Branch’s exclusive duty to a disability-impeachment trial where Congress serves as Judges on the Actions of the Trial-of-Facts only presided over by the Chief Justice as a referee of lawful practice and perhaps reading the decision like a Judge would read the decision of the jury.
So the question again, how could the U.S.S.C. rule and not remove?
SOLUTIONS EXTENDED WITH AUTHORITY
The answer came to me: by granting an Award to a Candidate for President who had been hurt directly in the unfair race, but was asking for compensatory damages and statutory damages that would still allow the person who won the election to maintain office. This is termed an unfair enrichment of property.
Holding legal right to a property that they should not possess due to unjust enrichment almost sounds like a riddle. How is that possible? Well, in my circumstance as a Candidate for Pres, Obama won the election, but he did so in violation of the rules. No one disputes the election or the votes that got Obama in to the property of the Office of the President, but doing so unfairly shows Obama has benefited at my expense, and no one should benefit at another’s expense especially where a contract or Constructive Trust has been broken.
Obama declared under penalty of perjury that contract which states that if elected he was able to meet the requirements of the office which he sought. In failing to qualify by the standards the Court has the option to award me compensation and leave wither or not Obama is removed by Congress to Congress.
It’s the type of thing this conversation between Justice Thomas and Rep. Serrano was alluding to. This also provides a way that U.S.S.C. can say to a political party, “Put who you want to on the ballot, but you are responsible to the Constitution. If you hurt anyone by the fact your candidate is not qualified you will pay the damages even if you make it in to office.”
“Every right when withheld must have a remedy and every injury its proper redress” is a basic Blackstone term quote.
The question remains will the United States Supreme Court consider this? I’m not sure but they have to see it to make that decision right? A few things we must consider. We know Congress has a majority of Republicans and Democrats in it so they are not going to favor politically anything that really doesn’t benefit them. They shook hands with each other on the eligibility issue or principle when D-Sen. Hillary Clinton and D-Sen. Barack Obama sponsored the U.S. Res. 511 for R-Sen. John McCain. We have record of that accord and it doesn’t bode well for any Independent objecting with any degree of success by votes in the Halls of Congress.
This is where the U.S. S.C. can come in and defend the rights of an Independent that have been trampled on by both the other parties at the very least calling a foul. This is a way that an Independent might survive the tactical power play of both parties ganging up against the Independent, in an illegal activity or flat out usurpation of the Constitution. The Constitution is made or tailored for individual rights.
Sure Congress can keep Obama in Office while they all debate with their constituency the 40 million dollar fine that was awarded to the smashed candidate. The U.S. Supreme Court didn’t kick anyone out that was elected. That’s chump change to the Republican and Democratic Party election war chest when you think about it.
My case is a little different because it is bi-partisan as well as could be expected as I took both the Republicans in McCain 2008 to task on Court Record as I did the Democratic Party in Obama 2008 and 2012 as a Candidate for President. No one else in America did that which is pretty unusual circumstances to say the least.
Ever heard it said that the United States of America needs to respect the rights of other countries because they feel like we might be the giant not respecting the rights of their/other country(ies)? Well, in my case I actually come to the defense of Indonesia and Kenya in asking the Court to respect the citizenship that Obama has from his step father Lolo Soetoro and his legal adoption with him. I ask the court to respect the legal citizenship of Kenya that Obama’s father Barack Obama gave him rather only looking at one half of the citizenship inherited. I ask the Court to respect the father’s rights to the children which has been unfairly stomped on and disrespected. Why does the media so completely disrespect these foreign citizenships?
Obama has a citizenship to Indonesia and one to Kenya says Attorney Klayman in the link. Why must the United States Supreme Court disrespect these countries alien citizenships just because they are foreign? Have we become a society the disrespects the rights of fathers just so someone can play president? Think of that message when you’re entertaining fairness and equality?
Now, the obvious elephant in the room is Rule 44 which gives someone asking for reconsideration a time limit to file it. While I’m an idiot pro se petitioner, the sliver of room I have to wiggle might be a bit wider than the eye of the needle a lawyer licensed to practice in the United States Supreme Court might be held to. I asked for a Waiver of Rule 44 and cited some exceptions to the law for which the U.S.S.C has held two rounds of reconsideration, not to mention the fact that the Court can on its own merit review any decision that it finds a conflict of law in within itself or re-write any decision as the case most recently presented itself with Justice Kagan’s misquote of George Washington’s trip to the first Jewish community of New Port rather than New York (formerly New Amsterdam).
This of course was changed when the public started making mince meat pie with it which brings me to my last point. The public can make mince meat pie that moves the United States Supreme Court to re-write decisions. That’s pretty good news.
Here's the Document: Motion for R44 Waiver for II Petition Reconsideration
HOW CAN YOU HELP
That’s why it’s important that you come over to my facebook page called Cody Robert Judy for President 2016 and give me a “Like”. Lord knows I haven’t received a dollar of contributions from you, so maybe as a Birther we could get the 203 people who are there bolstered up to 2,003 AND that can happen if you agree and share. Its really up to you?
When you clean the blood and the placenta off that brand new baby in the Birther Movement guess what? Yes, that’s right, a brand spanking new baby appears that everyone sees and says, “Oh .. look how cute that baby is!” Do you think you could lend a hand and support or do you just want me to do it all alone? Who knows, I might be able to do it and if I can, guess what? The Constitution was enough. Like the placenta after the birth is not necessary you can go right on prosecuting the Foggy Bottom boys and I don’t think anyone is really going to care about the Xerox machine or the classes the NSA teaches on how to alter a document.
If you think I’m an entertaining writer and that dis-credits me from say the seriously entertaining hearings on all of Obama’s cover-ups in Congress except his GRAND ILLUSION of Qualification I’m not sure that is a good sale to the public.
Why would I expect your support after five and a half years of not getting it? The answer is I don’t. I just want the record to reflect my hand was extended to you. My confidence has and always will be in the man who has never left me in alone in Spirit. The man who’s actually sent the Holy Ghost as a comforter of intelligence: The man whose example of love I would be happy to say is my example and in whom I hope to come close to. The man who has already given me so much more then I could ever repay in love and happiness: The man who has prepared a place for those who have passed away and is working to honor them that they did not die in vain- Jesus Christ is of course his name.
I tell you if this works I cannot credit myself or I would certainly be seen as ungrateful and if it doesn’t work I’m happy to retire from running for office because I won’t ever win unless the Constitution of the United States is actually upheld, that's for sure. It’s been a lot more pain then it has been pleasure, although it has been a labor of love. In a way it does remind me that having a child is not easy. It sure hasn’t been easy being a Birther.
Every step along the way has been a clue of sorts, every dismissed case, every trial (CIA Obama Sedition and Treason Trial I was a witness in), every rally, every report, and certainly every filed document. We haven't found the "KEY" that unlocks the door to protecting the Qualifications of the Office of the President yet, but that doesn't mean we will stop looking, searching, hoping that one day it will happen.
I leave you with your decision to join me on the quest for the National Treasure, I've already made mine. I'm on board. God Bless the 203 who have “liked” Cody Robert Judy for President 2016 on facebook.
Cody Robert Judy
I have to include my song Big Things Happen Every Day because I believe they do and I am not one who is letting Obama get away. We certainly don't have to win an election to win the hearts of DC Politicians already there. We just need to actually support with our dollars what we want them to see.
Please, make a contribution today. I assure you with my actions much more then my words, I am not just another politician seeking your contributions. You want a witness to that? What has been the action of EVERY politician in DC on this grand cover-up?
What Does Congress think of the Information becoming available? This video underscores the tepid respect that is seen in the Halls of Congress with Republicans and Democrats. Let's face it they all know but don't hold or embrace the value.
I'm honored by the value of our Constitution and if there was no difference between the way I thought and those in Congress there would be no reason for me to run for President. I'd be honored with your support as I have managed my respect in Judy v. McCain and Judy v. Obama by deed which in my opinion is much stronger than the flippant words of those others who may be running. I actually have respect for lawful investigations like Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Cold Case Posse and used it as evidence to the judges in my case that was appealed clear up to the U.S. Supreme Court. Maybe its time you stopped listening to those people also in the Birther Movement who tell you not to support me and understand that their reasoning in the political world is all wrong? Why? Because we are dealing with "politicians", handle them the right way for the best results! Support a different politician with your dollars. Thank you for sharing this!
I AM AMERICAN
Cody Robert Judy
If you would like to sponsor a fund raiser featuring Cody Robert Judy as a guest speaker please review the following article
Obama Eligibility 4 Dummies.
If you have no clue of Sheriff Joe's Cold Case Posse investigation concluding Obama's identification is a fraud, how you can write your elected leaders urging them to conduct hearings, I also am pushing for as a Candidate for PRES and took to the U.S. Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama Case 12-5276, go to this website and take the two part challenge. With your help America is made stronger and it will cost you some time and a couple of stamps. What have you done lately to protect this opportunity we have in the United States? We need your help. Oh, and pass it on. http://obamaseligibility.com/index.html
Obama's long form birth certificate has been exhumed to be nothing more than a long form fabrication by professional law enforcement standards and that was brought to the attention of the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5276, for which I served as the Presidential Candidate running in the Democratic Party and after the primary, as an Independent Presidential Candidate securing the 'standing' necessary for the complaint in 2012 and 2013.
Orrin Hatch R - U.S Senator from Utah and Mitch McConnell R- U.S. Senator from Kentucky just requested two sheriffs kits produced by Michael Volin of WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com (WOBC) with the purpose of informing the public and elected officials of the forgery of the long-form birth certificate image posted since April 27, 2011 on the White House website. These kits (Get Yours Free Here) contain the same evidence released in March 1,2012 (and a little more) that I included in my case against Obama that went from Georgia State- Georgia State Supreme- to U.S. Supreme 12-5276 in Judy v. Obama. There will also be a Sheriff Kit 2 that will follow the coming revelations of the Cold Case Posse set to be released in a short time.
Please urge and encourage your Representatives to OPEN AND TRANSPARENT HEARINGS in the House of Representatives on Obama's eligibility as the solution to eliminating Obamacare. These hearings must be held and the evidence must be heard that are in the Sheriff's kits most all of the Representatives have received now.
If these hearings are conducted in the open and reported in the open, the evidence will mount collectively and the U.S. Senate although it has a majority of Democrats will have to concede to the facts and evidences or will be seen as completely unfit for their duties and as incompetent. Utah would most likely see more benefits come from supporting the Candidates like myself, (well, Candidate as myself because there were no other candidates in the entire U.S.A. who stood up for principle regardless of party), fighting for equal protections under the law in pushing for Open and Transparent Hearings in Congress with two million dollars on Obama's Verification Eligibility qualification hearings on the stage to remove him as a disability according to Amend 14, Sec.3 would be a lot faster solution.
Like CODY ROBERT JUDY'S NEW 2016 PAGE ON FACEBOOK HERE
Follow me on Twitter: Official Cody Robert Judy 2016 on Tweeter here
If you want to join the NFT-VA like the Group on Facebook and make sure we can find the City and State in which you reside.
You Can Help Me [ If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign”, or ABC Campaign, which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President please make a contributions here:
We pray for the Lord to save our Country and restore America from the dilapidation we now find ourselves, and the principles of the Constitution in. For this I am Taking A Stand.
I am your faithful servant always.
Sincerely, Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us www.codyjudy.blogspot.com YouTube: CODY JUDY / CODE4PRES TV Get Cody's Book: Taking A Stand