Tuesday, July 19, 2016

BIRTHER BENEFITS - A New Hope in the U.S. Supreme Court Tapping the Stupid-Tree of the MSM

Special Report

~BIRTHER BENEFITS~
A New Hope in the U.S. Supreme Court


The Birther Benefits yet escaping the Establishment Groupies of both the Democratic and Republican Parties, as well as the Main Stream Media (MSM) the same way the Brexit did, gives us a Prime example of why Hillary Clinton is about to lose what the Democrats have worked so hard at the last seven and a half years in the election of Republican Party Nominee Donald J. Trump with the ire and outrage of the Nation as the catapult. What? 

How could the Democratic Party let ire and outrage go to waste like that- especially in a sleeping giant that awakens? I know it sounds impossible, but six months ago saying Donald J. Trump never elected as mayor or even dog-catcher was going to be the Republican Nominee at the Republican National Convention was laughable. 

In the good-ole-days Democrats use to be smart people about Civil Rights. You know in the days before the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin before they tapped the same stupid-tree Hillary Clinton tapped into when with so many examples in her life she reiterates that in "hindsight it wasn't a good idea" in the form of an apology actually no real sound minded person would buy.

Democrats  have to buy the snake oil though because they got into the pit of selling "The First" rather than actually understanding moral character could not be uploaded and every Citizen had the right to vote already. They started discrimination all over again after they'd just won the battle. That was the same stupid-tree that Obama tapped into in voting "the first" colored person into office, and the same one Hillary decided to tap into asking people to vote based on her sex as "the first" women.

Minorities grabbed the microphone and started selling race, color, and sex as gender asking for preferential treatment or discrimination based upon those particular chromosomes. It's fad now to get preferential treatment based on a chromosome? What makes the KKK different in the supremacist ideology? I see very little difference in the discrimination of color, race, religion, sex, and national origin as I do the preferential treatment of color, race, religion, sex and national origin. Preferential treatment is discrimination and is beating itself upside the head creating divides were they had been mended,

They are after all, bound to the sinking ship of Barack Obama who never was and never will be qualified for the Office of the President according to the U.S. Constitution's demand that only a [natural born Citizen] or a [Citizen] at the time of the adoption of the Constitution be allowed by the Constitution's authority to be President. That was not a discrimination against immigrants or first generation Americans it was a discrimination or qualification of TIME in the interest of allegiance to the Country; really no different than the age/or Time discrimination between the offices of Representative (25), Senator (30), and President (35) that took into account seasons of experience and time on the earth also figured from the moment of birth.

There is a new case in the U.S. Supreme Court that is rattling the Birther Benefits department, and though it does not involve Barack Obama the ramifications will. This Case is titled Carmon Elliott v. Ted Cruz No. 16-13. Whether Obama can skate-out of office, like Hillary Clinton skated out of the Secretary of State office having usurped the office and responsibility to the people in FOIA accountability with her private servers, is questionable and hinging upon a few variables.

The hope of the Birthers in this case might modestly be scaled to the comment of chief anti-birther 'Doc' or Dr. Conspiracy himself Mr. Kevin Davidson on his Blog Obamaconspiracy.org and Post  and Comment pictured here about it.

 [So if I am reading that correctly, the Supreme Court could review the Elliott case if it so chose. And I think Apuzzo's argument that it is not moot is sufficient. I'm not willing to attach the DOOMED graphic to this one.]

  While it's not a fabricated long form birth certificate with layers, and I am not dead like the poor drowned Hawaii Health Department Director Loretta Fuddy, (The only official to say she saw Obama's long form birth certificate -May she rest in peace), I will attest to the validity of the comment in the constructs of my own research into the case that have profound new twist.


They say everything in Obama's Birther Circus and Carnival Barker Town has been litigated and then comes a long a State Court Judge who did not get the 'Obama memo' on this issue- 'you must stay plugged into the stupid-tree' and actually constructs a smart argument that [Standing] is sufficient by any old Citizen wanting to vote for a qualified Candidate, and brilliantly defies [The Political Question Doctrine] - something Judges have been hiding behind for decades on the qualification definition. The two Issues the Pennsylvania State Court Judge plowed through with nuclear powered tank are two issues that have been the malignant tumor-cancers that have plagued Birthers for nearly a decade.

The RED DISTRICT LIGHT flashing for the United States Supreme Court in Elliott v. Cruz 16-13, see Elliott's Go-Fund-Me site here, might just be in the advent of stopping the rogue argument of standing and the political question doctrine that in the process necessitates the Court actually defining [natural born Citizen] in the same light that Roe v. Wade was applicable even though the pregnancy was no more, in the facts presented under the Mootness Standard, that the issue was more than likely going to come up again and again and again in two applications:
1- Voluntary cessation of unlawful conduct
2- Conduct capable of repetition yet evading review

The 'Ark' that was touched in Elliott v. Cruz was that the Pennsylvania State Supreme Court 'affirmed' the State Court Judge's 'Opinion' that now if the U.S. Supreme Court does not here walks and talks like the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed also! This may be the last chance the highest Court in the Land gets a chance to weigh in on the Judicial Branches divine appointment to regulate a distinctive application that is part of the United States Constitution. 

As the attorney for the Case Mario Apuzzo Esq. ran around touching all the bases of the Pennsylvania Case, conservative Justice Samuel Alito will chair in handling Motions in the duties of his in the Third Circuit Command,  it was very well articulated the Legislative Branch was not given any powers in the U.S. Constitution to altar or control the definition of [natural born Citizen] in their limited capacity of [naturalization powers] Article I. Section 8 Cl.4 that are codified in the congressional acts of The Naturalization Act 8 U.S Code §1401 Nationals and Citizens at Birth a-h also reviewed in the 14th Amendment.

a- For jus sanguinis U.S. citizenship, i.e., citizenship for the children born abroad of U.S. citizen parents, which is established only by congressional statute and not the U.S. Constitution

b. For jus soli, or "right of the territory" the provisions in Section 1 interpreted to the effect that children born on United States soil, with very few exceptions, are U.S. citizens. (Notice: Not [natural born Citizens] This type of guarantee—legally termed again by congressional statute seen in the 14th Amendment.

[Natural Born Citizen] as Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents was codified by Nature and Nature's God something the United States Congress was not given authority to over-rule by the definitions of Article I, Section 8, Cl.4, and the Executive Branch sure wasn't given any authority in the U.S. Constitution to interpret [natural born Citizen], neither the MSM or the People's Vote as we here in the United States of America are a Constitution Republic not a mob-is-right Democracy as the Writ of Certiorari  shines the light on. (Ref.pg 10-12)

Finally the [Conflict of Courts] (the very strong basis for the U.S .Supreme Court hearing a Writ of Certioari) comes smashing through the windows of the U.S. Supreme Court!

[In arriving at his holding, Judge Pellegrini and authorities upon whom he relies have concluded that neither the English common law nor the Fourteenth amendment provide the definitive definition of an article II natural born citizen. Where Judge Pellegrini errs is in placing his reliance for his definition of a natural born citizen upon Charles Gordon, Jack Maskell, Paul Clement,and Neal Katyal (footnote 4) rather than on primary historical and legal sources, including decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court. The arguments of these commentators, who focus on “at birth” and “by birth” rather than on the birth circumstances upon which the Framers relied for defining a natural born citizen, are flawed and cannot serve as any reasonable basis for defining a natural born citizen]

PART II.     THE PROTECTION OF OBAMA HAS BECOME A RACIST ARGUMENT

The Question of Standing has been a criteria of the Court dismissing 95% of the Writ's coming into the United States Supreme Court who recently upheld Affirmative Action at the University of Texas in Fisher v. University of Texas, No. 14-981 , but no where in the U.S. Constitution is affirmative action declared as a protection upon the Qualification of the Office of the President. 

But let's just set that aside, and say the U.S. Supreme Court has indeed received two cases with Standing from 2008 Write-In Candidate and 2012 and 2016 [Democratic Party] Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy who has suffered a great deal of damages the Court saw fit not to recognize in even hearing that asks the exact same questions for the Court to define [natural born Citizen] giving much the same argument in two Cases 12-5276 and 14-9396.


The last case 14-9396 considered closed only October of 2015 (9 months ago) denied arbitrarily the Petitioner's right to have the fees and printing cost waved due to poverty. The court was even sent bank statements showing no possible way to pay the cost of printing and filing fees, yet Justice Sotomayor, presumed to be notable for low income people, responsible for the Tenth Circuit handling of Motions, deliberately slashed the tires of Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in an outrageous affront to low income people!

This has done more for Donald J. Trump's Campaign to the Republican Nomination than any single thing. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg recently called Donald J. Trump a 'Faker', and that is true in the Birther Fields in that Donald J. Trump never filed a single legal paper against his unqualified opponents even when he had Standing to do just that preferring a 'Bullies Way of doing things' to that of Law and Order!

 While Justice Ginsburg rationalized if Donald J. Trump gets in the Office of the President "everything is up for grabs", Democrats are aghast to the support the U.S. Supreme Court has flat-out given as an endorsement to Donald J. Trump as the King of Birthers without filing a single legal brief. Indeed, the issue is hotly contested in the 2016 election as Slate.com just two days ago published 141 Lies Donald Trump's told- Number 33 [Questioned President Obama’s American citizenship, bringing the “birther” campaign into the mainstream]

Hey it's not [Citizenship] it's [natural born Citizen] for the Office of the President.

Still the MSM as well as the Liberal Left of the Court, doesn't seem to get they are on the opposite side of the Brexit Standard in their pejorative of Birthers in the United States of America and compared to Hillary's 5 Lies, just in the latest FBI Criminal Investigation Review, they make Trump out to be a hero for questioning Obama for a Standard of Law equal under the Supreme Law of the Land totally bewildered of the General Population's (SMH) disbelief at their tap to the stupid-tree!

 The Supreme Court of the United States blatantly not hearing a case that has had a [Bipartisan Standing] (Judy v. McCain and Judy v. Obama) is and has paved the way for the reality of Justice Ginsburg HOLY GRAIL DECLARATION that "everything is up for grabs", if Trump is elected President with the nominations most likely to occur in the Court during the next four years.

What we are to gather from this is the Stupid-Tree Tappers are willing to give up Choice for Women, Same Sex Marriage for Citizens, Health Care, and whatever else is on the agenda of the Left including $15 dollars per hour for Obama's Ineligibility! I ask them, "Is that WORTH IT? Is that worth it?!

Apparently this is the Left Liberals giving the American Bird Sign to the Left of the Court and the part of the story where the head of the snake eats the tail and consumes itself into obliteration. That's the Stupid-Tree! Democrats have lost their mind, and they are about to lose a lot more than that and be just as surprised Election Morning as the world was at Brexit.

Of course there is a solution! Lock her Up in an orchard of Stupid Trees and let her nurse on them till she dies; get her as far away from Government Office as one can possible get. Maybe Syria where she can enjoy her reality of sniper fire and cattle futures and the way a 500% increase of refugees can be least expensive - shipping her there instead of bring them here? She'd could be with her experience a great Ambassador to them as Chris Stevens was. 

The Democratic Party National Convention is not for two more weeks and in Gore v. Bush the Court decided the outcome in eight days. It is not impossible for the Court to acknowledge a mistake and in hindsight regret their decision to devastate the poor who have come to the Court for Justice in Truth and Faithfulness against the Lies and Deceit. 

Otherwise.., what can we say? They just do not care about anything or any body and they proved it to us. Their Court will not last another four years.

CRJ 
www.codyjudy.us






CRJ

Thank You!


Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy



Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.


Web Site www.codyjudy.us
Keep coming back!


INSPIRING - I believe in You


Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!










































Thursday, July 14, 2016

TRUMP DELAYS VP ANNOUNCEMENT: Why the Choice?


TRUMP DELAYS VP ANNOUNCEMENT
Why The Choice

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1228528440515270&substory_index=0&id=510896692278452

 Many just haven't seen the Choice Trump would make for VP through the political eyes of a real future for the preservation of our U.S. Constitution that I have.

They, Trump included, are seeing it through the eyes of political personality but with a little bit of help from the view I've had consider this.

Trump became known Nationally as a consideration for President after his Birther Stand in 2011 he took pride in.

Trump often bleeted regarding his insistence on The View Obama ought to release his birth ceryificate, that he got Obama to release something.. what ever that was" , referring to Obama's long form birth certificate.

Maricopa County Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpiao (Who's also endorsed Trump) formed the Cold Case Possee to investigate the document following a petition signed by hundreds of his constituency and March 1st 2012 released findings they found the document did not hold up to criteria eventually calling it a fabricated document rather than a scan image as it was purported  by Obama April 30th, at his White House Press conference handing it out.

Because Hawaii Officials were involved, ( the only one to have witnessed the transaction Health Department Director Loretta Fuddy died in a weird drowning after a safe water landing of a plane), their testimony was sought under oath. She never got the chance to testify before her untimely death, but it's important to remember Trump was enduring a sever hail storm of racist stories in the Mainstream Media for his audacity remarking Obama should be qualified under the U.S. Constitution.

Trump never officially entered the 2012 Presidential Race which would have been a requirement for Standing and a Official complaint in the Judicial Branch recognized with jurisdiction as justiciable or able to be considered a legitimate complaint in the Judicial Branch by many Constitutional Scholars.

Trump never brought the issue up in 2008 against the Republican Nominee Sen. John McCain who was not born in the United States but maintains by his birth there a native Panamanian Citizenship. This provided the fodder for the media's basis of Trump as a racist
even if Obama was born in Kenya reported and advertised by Obama's own publicist and uncovered by Brietbart News.

Now why is this all important?

Well flash forward to 2015 and Trump did declare officially for Election 2016 and is now the presumptive nominee. He Publically challenged Ted Cruz for his birth in Canada but never filed an official complaint in Ballot Challenges although encouraged to do so. He would bring it up in debates.

Trump had absolutely no official record to stand against Obama's Constitutional lack of qualification or illegitmacy, but he had one (1) Choice left to bind his Candidacy with a Record that did. That is his choice for a Vice Presidential running mate simply because the President and Vice President have the exact same Constitutional Qualifications.

"So what?", you say.

The protection Trump may need in Court over dismantling Obamacare alone, remember that monster is 1/5 the entire U.S. Economy is proving or standing the ground Obama's Signature of Law is Invalid.

Now, where the truth is, in understanding this is those who would challenge it was legitimate Law would have to prove Obama was born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents. Trump wouldn't have to.

It makes all the difference in the world who has to wear the shoe of proving qualification.  It is very difficult to prove when you do not have access to someone's private info. .but Obama has it all. He chose not to release his long form fabrication for 3 years! All you have to ask is why? It's a $10 document.

However, if Trump does not have the binding Record of standing, and only one American has a Bipartisan Record since 2008, Trump has no defense and most likely will be dragged into the mountains of quagmire or Legal Battles simply trying to undo what Obama has done as he has promised in his Campaign.

When the real axe of Obamacare hits businesses deferred by Obama till 2016 and Democrats want to make the pain excruciating for Trump as a disaster, Trump will have no defense.

Because of his own choices he will be framed as a failure and he will bear the bigger brunt of Obama's fiscal mess and the 10 Trillion spent- more than all Presidents combined! It's BIG!

Since 2008 only one (1) Presidential Candidate has the Bipartisan standing necessary to stand up and show Obama's Signature moot- Cody Robert Judy (CRJ).

If Trump doesn't choose CRJ he forefoots the high ground most certainly coming in a legal fight if Hillary Clinton loses the general election. It will be bitter and Democrats have never shied away from the Check and Balance of the Judicial Branch as Republicans have.

It's the recipe to totally wreck Trump even if he won. But this Choice Donald Trump gets only happens one time and most people are only looking at the Show Case for the Election rather than real success in government.

Of course Trump is well aware of this and was set to announce Indiana Governor Mike Pence to the delight of Democrats.

He not only has a Record of Religion against the LGBT Movement it is one that used Religion to get there. Something that will be totally exploited by Democrats just as radical as Islam throwing Gays off the roof as an appropriate mercy for the crime.

 [Mr. Pence won the governorship in 2012 by just 3.2 points, failing to get 50% of the vote. In that election, he shared a ballot with 2012 GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney and underperformed Mr. Romney by nearly 5%. His 2016 race will be a rematch of the contest four years ago, featuring former Indiana House Speaker John Gregg as his Democratic challenger. Though Indiana usually is a Republican-leaning state, it is expected to be a competitive race.

Since the 2012 election, Mr. Pence has seen his approval ratings drop after he found himself in a national controversy when he signed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, a bill that critics said allowed discrimination against gays and lesbians. He later signed an updated version that banned discrimination based on sexual orientation.]

http://www.wsj.com/articles/indiana-governor-mike-pence-trod-tricky-path-in-republican-primary-1462321342

Pence might be the weakest Governor Trump could have chosen and it will not help Trump's strength to have a weak running mate especially one who endorsed Ted Cruz in the Republican Primary. Indiana even voted against their own Governor's Vote for Ted Cruz giving Trump the top-over National Presumptive Nomination.

Pence secures the Democratic Party hope and security for HRC. You could say Trump's falling for the trap that's been set.

With CRJ Trump secures his defense to Govern and encourages a much bigger Democratic Party cross-over vote in November, but it's a Choice he alone can make.


Trump was set to make that decision Tomorrow Friday at 11AM, but Radical Islam intervened killing 73 in France, and Trump delayed his announcement.

TRUMP 2PICKVP Mike Pence
 http://www.rollcall.com/mike-pence-chosen-as-trumps-v-p-nominee/

CRJ
www.codyjudy.us

#DonaldTrump #EricTrump #Democrats #Republicans #PaulManifurt  #Trump2016 #MikePence #Indiana #IvankaTrump
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1228528440515270&substory_index=0&id=510896692278452






CRJ

Thank You!


Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy



Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.


Web Site www.codyjudy.us
Keep coming back!


INSPIRING - I believe in You


Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!








Tuesday, July 12, 2016

Special Report:Lynch Flinch Cast Shadow on Justice in America


Special Report


THE LYNCH FLINCH 
The Shadows of Injustice Grows.

 Testifying before the House Judicial Committee the Nation's top law enforcement Official gave a sterling performance for any accused criminal on how to Duck and Dodge Questions to avoid Justice and responsibility.

One Congressman noticed the abscondsion had totaled over 75 Questions that A.G. Loretta Lynch had made to questions posed by Congressman.

What came out of the hearing was essentially that the Attorney General wanted to have it both ways.

She wanted to acknowledge very strongly she simply took the FBI's recommendation and had no part in formulation of any opinion, (with her unprecedented acknowledgement she would do so right after her meeting with Pres. Bill Clinton on the Tarmac in Arizona), while at the same time she refused to recuse herself and would have us believe she had reviewed the information thoroughly in a couple of hours the day after SOS Clinton's unrecorded and unoathed Saturday deposition with the FBI.

What was clear after 30 Million dollars of an FBI's 50 man team, 1 year Long investigation is the American People did not have an Attorney General fighting for Justice.

Rep. Steve King did an excellant job in his 5 min deposition of A.G Loretta Lynch. Rep. Trent Hanks had great thoughts and exposed the Attorney General's testimony as truly disappointing of Justice.

The overview was the A.G. basically admitted she was in gross negligence of overseeing any oversight of the Investigation. The extremely careless recollection of statute was evident by the Attorney general as to the actions of Hillary Clinton considering the investigation.

She made no reference to the avoidance of FOIA being considered a crime on the list.
18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2071

Rep. Louie Gohmert  made it a point to point out the A.G.'s job under oath was to the Constitution and the Law over and above the FBI's recommendation, but it was clear the Justice Department had a lot of input in drafting FBI Director's Statement per Justice Department considerations made by a seasoned and career panel assisting the FBI.

Rep. Jim Jordan corralled the A.G. in to in as much admitting the Justice Department through her had "no impact" on any Hillary Clinton decision- she had no roll but that she had contributed in her own unprecedented way in a prosecutorial discretion of a high official.

In a discussion of prosecutorial discretion the type of threat and violent backgrounds were considered in factors to prosecute. No mention that National Security of Top Secret Intel weighed heavy in type of threat or Hillary Clinton's domestic abuse upon Pres. Bill Clinton while First Lady in scratching him so bad he required covering bandages and minced he cut himself shaving., or, the abuse of hassling women who made accusations of sexual harassment in the domestic violence category.

Rep. Trey Gowdy made the point that the A.G's own email practises requires she use two different government systems to communicate via email. One for general business and a more secure one for any classified info., setting the double standard of practise and conclusion wide open to the understanding on main-street.

He trashed her on the issue of prosecuting cases with damages even that had no intention to do harm, but caused it.,like manslaughter or vehicular homicide. This showed "intent" was not necessary under more minor violations of gross negligence.

Several Congressmen asked the top law enforcement officer what her opinion was in the difference between gross negligence and extreme carelessness was, but she refused to give a coherent explanation.

Rep. Ron DeSantis stated the A.G's actions were unprecedented in stating she would abide the FBI's recommendation days before it came in.,but she refused to categorically reject that she would accept the job of A.G. under a Hillary Clinton Administration if she won the Election casting a big shadow on Justice.

Representative Mimi Walter's and Rep. John Ratcliff's time was well used, the latter stating with skepticism that the A.G. had come to the conclusion of the Facts of a year Long investigation very quickly over a cup of coffee and a few hours.

The one question that I didn't feel was hammered home was this one: Did the State Departments own involvement in not objecting to HRC's unsecured server and participating in HRC's own brand of delinquent stupidity have anything to do with not bringing charges or an indictment under the fear of a Rico Charges, where Obama's whole State Department would be seen also warranting charges?

It kind of reminds me under Sharia Law practised by Islamic Countries, the rape victim must have four witnesses stating she got raped. So, rape is difficult to prosecute. Similarly the perpetrator by involving others in the rape is able to get more witnesses against the victim.

So,  by so many participating in Hillary Clinton's crime, she in affect secured many witnesses for her and the collaboration to avoid FOIA was systemic and involved hundreds of people.

The hearing also involved many Democrats in the questioning, but they spent their time asserting the "guns" involved in San Bernardino,Orlando, Dallas, Minnesota and others stated were responsible for deaths rather than discussing the motives in the People pulling the triggers of the guns such as " Islam Religious Tenants of Supramacy " in California and Florida's, or Black Supremacy in Dallas which miserably failed in considering and identifying the roots of the problem rather than the toppings of the Tree.

Republican's also failed to identify this clarity.

  http://www.c-span.org/video/?412357-102/attorney-general-loretta-lynch-testifies-capitol-hill

It was also revealed today Wiki LEAKS released 23,035 confidential emails on Hillary Clinton's Server making U.Show. Congress, The FBI, and Justice Department under A.Giant. Lynch look like fools.


Monday, July 11, 2016

OBAMA's LEFT-LAKE--LEGACY OF FRAUD & FORGERY


PRESS RELEASE

OBAMA's LEFT-LAKE-LEGACY OF FRAUD & FORGERY

It's hard not to place Birthers high on the Pedestal of Political importance when Obama chose not to release his long form birth fabrications that split up like game of thrones levels as the PDF's did Obama released to the Press three years after the 2008 Election.

The example of getting-away-with -it when enough elite Government Officials decide the consequences are not worth prosecuting was a precedent here and continues with Hillary Clinton in more of a blackmailing way than ever.

It's the progression of corruption that has Hell for its destination like any Lie does unchecked and un-confessed. The only way to gain Relief from the Lie is to admit the Birthers were right.

Truth is the power over a Lie because Truth is a base that has no break down or lower level. It stands as a solid foundation. Lies are built up like a House of Cards.

We have seen the Lies Hillary Clinton actually told as if she's been compelled to utter on the levels built by Obama. FBI Director Comey addressed them fairly thoroughly but with little legal consequence although political consequence cannot be underestimated as a discipline.

My point is when we understand upward Progress is Prohibited upon the steps of a Lie, you cannot lie your way into Heaven, we should understand the only Progress allowed under the  Heavens in a Lie leads downward.

Look at the 10 Trillion dollars of Debt during Obama's 7.7 years, more than 42 Presidents before in U.S. History, as a sign of Truth.

Look at the Witness of ineptitude and Google  "25 Scandals and Growing" with Obama.

Look at the Witness of Lies about Benghazi costing American Lives and the "Video" blamed by Obama and Hillary weeks before the 2012 elections. It's like they were compelled in Cover Up because the consequences meant the Truth would be known and they just couldn't live with that.

Lives, Treasure, and Time wasted on Lies as an investment for Hell's Real Estate is ultimately an investment in the Lake of Fire and Brimstone. Corruption is the instrument in the destruction of corruption in the action of reaping the Harvest. It is not the pleasure of green pastures and peace.

The Question simply remains what Progress do you expect and want? The answer to that reveals your inheritances understanding this Life is to prove our Value and Glory of Truth.

This video simply remembers the identification Fraud present in the Office of President understood by the person Barack Hussein Obama.

SHERIFF JOE's Press Conference
https://youtu.be/z6Ngv16UQAA

It was never the intent or purpose of the Cold Case Possession to prove whether Obama was Constitutionally Qualified. Only that the three year quest for Obama's long form birth certificate ended with Obama releasing a fabricated identification that wasn't a scan. 

The Truth was Obama's father was not a U.S. Citizen confirmed by the release of this. That simply confirmed Obama was not Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents at the Time of his birth.

The Qualification in the Constitution considered in the U.S. Supreme Court Case of Minor v. Happersett. It was never doubted those born in the Country to Citizens were themselves the natural born Citizens as to the others there have been doubts. 

We heard FBI Director James Comey last week say in the "U.S History" of Prosecution only one case was prosecuted in the charge considered for Hillary Clinton. .a case of espionage. While failing to consider criminal intent and the legal crime considerations in this Investigation he would not confirm the avoidance crimes of FOIA did not apply or that the Clinton's Charity Foundation(s) were cleared. 

The reference of U.S. History is the Key point here. America's History supports [Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] natural born Citizen or Citizen at the Time of the Adoption of the Constitution. Obama is an anomaly outside U.S. History failing the Constitutions Qualification History as he was not a Citizen at the time of the Adoption of the Constitution. 

The frustrations of those working downward is they cannot change their direction to upward progress [unless] they confess and repent of the Lies.

This is the wonderful news and hope of change presented by the sacrifices of God's Only Begotten Son Jesus Christ. We have hope in this promise. If we will confess our weaknesses they will become our strengths.

What a wonderful thought that the chains and depressing tow to Hell can be stopped in such a simple confession and resolve, an upward mobility for everyone.

The focus of Government and the direct affect upon us, intertwined with the eternal and universal laws binding even Nature in her times and seasons give us the Witness of destination.

Let us Resolve here as Americans to take the Highway to Heaven in short Order allowing Truth to have her way with the lights speed possible with confession.

There is nothing that prevents us from this Choice Today. Nothing that Stops or impedes us from changing our course. Nothing that stands as false, fraud, or fabrication that will not be shown the Light in our eyes if we simply make that choice to see, hear, and speak Truth.

Make a contribution Today for Truth, and the only Presidential Candidate with a Bipartisan Federal Court Record on the red line of the Qualification of natural born Citizen in the Constitution for the Office of President !

http://codyjudy.us/i…/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm

www.codyjudy.us
CRJ

SHERIFF JOE's Press Conference
https://youtu.be/z6Ngv16UQAA


Another Short Version of Examination
https://youtu.be/m2L5a_KS6iw

CRJ

Support Today the Choice Democrats have of a solid common-sense-defense , not a politically correct weakness

Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
Contribute to the Cody Robert Judy Working Today for a Better America Tomorrow Campaign 2016 for U.S. President

https://twitter.com/CodyRobertJudy/status/742455835314376704


http://codyjudy.us/i…/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm

Here's the Link to Contribute if you'd like to Cody's Campaign improve your record for Taking A Stand for the Constitution.



Thank You!


Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy



Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.


Web Site www.codyjudy.us
Keep coming back!


INSPIRING - I believe in You


Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!




Saturday, July 9, 2016

RUTH BADER GINSBURG - Selling Out Justice in the Adoption of Force on the Left for Cash


SPECIAL REPORT


____________________________________

~RUTH BADER GINSBURG ~
Selling Out Justice in the Adoption of Force on the Left for Cash

____________________________________

JUSTICE made a surprising and noticeable Entry into the Presidential Election Ring with the feather weight of the heavy weights in The U.S. Supreme Court. The nimble Justice  Ruth Bader Ginsburg nodding her head for the only "Her" in the Race- Presumptive Democratic Party Nominee Hillary Rodham Clinton, proof in the pudding Justices are not afraid to enter the election contest especially when they feel so much of their "work" is at Stake. The Question herein highlighted is: When are the Justices hiding behind the prohibition of affecting elections, and when do they officially stand on the ground that they are certainly free to do just that?

Indeed it is an interesting balance of Freedom of Speech and nothing prevents a Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court from entering a preferential endorsement of their favorite Candidate particularly - doesn't everyone have that right? Ask many Federal Employees and Department of Defense employees if they are free of speech on even social media or at their work station desk to post a picture of their favorite Presidential Candidate, and you'll get a big fat overly cautious frown, but The Hatch Act does permit the Justices to:
Hey, It's Summer Recess for the Justices, but that doesn't mean they quit working as some people think. Indeed they may take off the 4th of July weekend off and take vacations, but they are still working cases during the Summer Months that are already set to be heard and drafting positions on Motions for those cases.

The Associated Press article carried by CBS News noticed that Justice Ginsburg was on the winning side of nearly all the high profile cases of the nearly five dozen cases heard since the death of the Justice Antonin Scalia over the last session. Perhaps one of the most intriguing articles I've read about Justice Ginsburg came from a September 28th, 2014 Interview Article with her by the title of : Ruth Bader Ginsburg Is an American Hero by Jeffery Rosen

I found this article fascinating because of the questions that were asked of her that offered real incite into her feelings and opinions of what she considered some of the best and worst cases prevoking this Tweet of mine that was Retweeted here:
in BALANCE CHOICE CORP greed GUN NUTS or it YOU


From the Article I loved the sense of humor I saw in Ruth when she complimented her mentor Justice John Paul Stevens in his example of correlating or combining Dissenting Opinions she said in a couple of extracts of the Interview:
"When I became the most senior member of four dissenters, I had a very good model to follow, Justice [John Paul] Stevens. He was always fair in assigning dissents: He kept most of them himself. ( A BIG RBG Smile )- I try to be fair, so no one ends up with all the dull cases while another has all the exciting cases. I do take, I suppose, more than a fair share of the dissenting opinions in the most-watched cases..-The experience I don’t want to see repeated occurred in Bush v. Gore. The Court divided five to four. There were four separate dissents, and that confused the press..
JR: Q.What’s the worst ruling the current Court has produced?
RBG: If there was one decision I would overrule, it would be Citizens United. I think the notion that we have all the democracy that money can buy strays so far from what our democracy is supposed to be. So that’s number one on my list.
It's an interesting notice - yes all three - Bush v. Gore, Citizens United, and the mentored archived example of Justice John Paul Stevens who noticed in the dissenting opinion of Citizens United, also considered an ace in the hole for 2016 Candidate Bernie Sanders stump speeches- 

"A Democracy cannot function effectively when it's constituent members believe laws are being bought and sold"

The context of this is very interesting as we have experienced both the suicide pact of the liberal side of the court in the economic inequality of the denied Motion for forma Pauperis arbitrarily handed down by the Courts Full Review in another presidential candidate v. presidential candidate case as we saw in the U.S. Supreme Court taking with consideration in Bush v. Gore, and the contrasting of that in Judy v. Obama's two cases 12-5276 and 14-9396.

In Bush v. Gore the Court was thrust into the decision of an Election that was pivotal to the outcome. Further it was a remarkably fast decision called for in Emergency Hearings based upon the importance of preserving the integrity of the Election also surrounding Article II. Bush, ultimately the winner, argued that the Florida Supreme Court's ruling violated Article II, § 1, cl. 2 of the U.S. Constitution.

In a similar call in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 the Court was called in an Emergency Motion right as their Summer Recess had begun, also contesting the importance of the Standard of the Constitution required qualification for the Office of the President found in Article II, § 1, cl. 5 as [natural born Citizen or Citizen at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution] with the U.S. Supreme Court precedent case defending the reference qualification applicable referred by the Court in Minor v. Happersett to be"never doubted" as [Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] with the express other definitions left "in doubt". In this case the [Motion for Forma Pauperis] was granted but the Writ of Certiorari was denied before the election on October 1st and a Review was denied after the Election Jan.7th, 2012.

In Bush v. Gore the case was handled in eight days with a rendered decision of importance! This should assure the Nation that when the Court is called to move, in the interest of an election, with the Constitution needing to be defended, that Court can move and move fast!

The Election was of course held the first Tuesday of November The oral argument in Bush v. Gore occurred on December 11.[14] Theodore Olson, a Washington, D.C. lawyer and future Solicitor General, delivered Bush's oral argument and New York lawyer David Boies argued for Gore.

During the brief period when the U.S. Supreme Court was deliberating on Bush v. Gore, the Florida Supreme Court provided clarifications[15] that the U.S. Supreme Court had requested on December 4 in the case of Bush v. Palm Beach County Canvassing Board, 531 U.S. 70 (2000). Because of the extraordinary nature and argued urgency of the case, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its opinion in Bush v. Gore on December 12, less than a day after hearing oral argument.

It's important to notice that in Citizens United v. FEC the allegation was that a derogatory film about 2008 Hillary Clinton (also herein noticed as Presumptive Democratic Nominee 2016) was set to be released pre-primary election and was a violation of The Bi-Partisan Campaign Reform Act also  commonly referred to as the McCain/Feingold Act highly esteemed as Bipartisan. That used to mean something to the Court it seems, based also in the high held esteem of The American People for anything or anyone touting Bipartisan.

As it relates to this circumstance, of my own Presidential Races of 2008, 2012 and now 2016, I, Cody Robert Judy am the only Candidate in the United States of America with a Bipartisan Record set in Federal Court Record attesting the lack of qualification of McCain and Obama on the Constitutional Requirement of [natural born Citizen].

The importance of this might only fully be understood by the presumptive Republican Nominee this 2016 Election year Donald J. Trump; based on the Title Wave of national stories in 2012 labeling him a 'racist' for expecting full cooperation and legal qualification from Barack Hussein Obama who drip-dripped his March 2012 law enforcement fortified long form fabrication out late in 2011, three years after the election of 2008. ( Check out Item Number 4 noticed by the recent 2016 Top-10 Stories of Donald Trump's alleged 'Racism' by the Huffington Post.)

If there is one thing that makes us strong in America it is not defending the Office of the President qualification requirements with forgery. Defending Obama over and above the Constitution's requirements for the office of the President is akin to dividing and making America weaker. 

It's not where America divides that makes us strong, it's where we come Together and no Banner is stronger than the U.S. Constitution.

If there was a message to minorities of all sorts and types in America it is that without your individual rights protected and understood in the Constitution, you are bound to be bullied over by a Majority Rule might-is-right mentality.

We have seen horrific events of recent in the News that are very troubling for all Americans. From San Bernardino, California to Orlando, Florida to Dallas Texas the slain are piling up spurred in divisions out-of-bounds of the United States Constitution.

This includes Religions radical Superiority of Jihads seen in radical Islamic claims in both California and Florida's tragedies. Racial mentality Superiority professed in Black Lives Matter such as was the case in Dallas as the shooter was on a hate campaign of violence against whites. These are where Speech Superiority mentalities all wanting to be protected are not acting in ways to be respected.

You cannot use the U.S. Constitution against Americans and this is where the left is falling and failing to defend the U.S. Constitution in an adoption of force for cash. It is where in Judy v. Obama 14-9396 the U.S. Supreme Court left fails to stand up for income inequality in the highest court of the Land as the arbitrary denial for a Motion for forma pauperis was denied.

Along with Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's nodd for presumptive nominee Hillary Clinton comes the injustice of income inequality right at the footsteps of the Court as well as all the crooked Hillary contamination of justice that L.A. Reporter McManus says just might Stick. As for the lack of defense of the Founding Qualifications for the Office of the President, Justice Ginsburg's own lack of defense for the fundamental qualification has given rise to the kind of wave that Trump is riding.

It is by this that indeed Ginsburg may have participated in the everything being up for grabs.


CRJ

Support Today the Choice Democrats have of a solid common-sense-defense , not a politically correct weakness

Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
Contribute to the Cody Robert Judy Working Today for a Better America Tomorrow Campaign 2016 for U.S. President

https://twitter.com/CodyRobertJudy/status/742455835314376704


http://codyjudy.us/i…/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm

Here's the Link to Contribute if you'd like to Cody's Campaign improve your record for Taking A Stand for the Constitution.



Thank You!


Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy



Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.


Web Site www.codyjudy.us
Keep coming back!


INSPIRING - I believe in You


Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!

























Thursday, July 7, 2016

TESTIMONY OF FBI DIRECTOR COMPROMISED BY HRC SULLIED INVESTIGATION

SPECIAL Report

_________
TESTIMONY OF FBI DIRECTOR COMPROMISED BY HRC SULLIED INVESTIGATION
_________

After watching the four plus hour Hearing held by the House Committee on Government Oversight and Reform chaired by UT. R. Representative Jason Chaffetz with FBI Director James Comey under sworn testimony, it is my Review that the Director has not conducted the Investigation in a thorough consideration of the interest of the Public, in consideration of the Standard of the Laws, by subscribing to the interest of the Facts, presented in the Case, held to the Standard of Laws of the United States of America, any Reasonable Director of an Investigation would Report Publically so as to conclude the matter rather than prolong the matter.

This "self-appreciated" grand-standing held by the Director as "Transparency" is a dis-service to the Public and has acted in a couched way of denying evidence that  existed, any reasonable prosecutor would prosecute the case with the Facts, he has become familiar with under a tiny scope of the Laws least likely to succeed, while ignoring the broader scope of Laws most likely to succeed under the exact same Facts or circumstances as Evidence.

If I may parlance the varying Sets, or Standards of Laws, under the parameters of the Investigation as Victims of a Predator. One victim was acknowledged alive and well, though carelessly victimized but without any real physical injury. The other victim was repeatedly stabbed over thirty thousand times and suffered an anagonizing death.

The Laws that suffered a death were the Felony Charges of: Obstruction of Justice by destruction of evidence and Obstruction of Justice to avoid FOIA in the usurpation of the Office of the Secretary of State.

The Director James Comey in his investigation as I understand it held [two] types of depositions under the circumstances surrounding the Events described as the conduct of officials and aids surrounding Hillary Clinton's Private Server in the duties and obligations of the Office of Secretary of State she held under the nomination of Barack Obama from approximately 2009 to 2013. One set of depositions placed lower aids and professionals associated under oath during the FBI questioning and another set placed an Official under no oath- Hillary Clinton.

If two sets of styles exist in even taking depositions by the FBI as evidense, if the collecting of evidence seen as testimony has two different criteria depending upon Position,  under an FBI Investigation, clearly the Investigation has one set of Rules for common people and another set of Rules for higher ups, and this [fact] alone decries and substantiates the conduct of the FBI in this Investigation as a dis-service to the Public and a calculated bias understood by all.

We know other witnesses in this Case were placed under oath. Why were they subject to different treatment if lying to the FBI is a crime, why does the FBI place anyone under an oath to collect evidence by testimony?

The FBI Director was placed under oath for this hearing. The FBI certainly patted itself on the back for integrity of the Investigation as non-partisan, but who is helped and who is hurt in this Affair? The People's Office of Secretary of State was usurped! Hillary Clinton in affect privatized the People's Office of Secretary of State.

Director Comey testified that Top Secret information was read by People without a Security Clearance. He assumed it did not hurt The People of the United States. He did not assume Top Secret Intelligence , evidence, destroyed by people without a Security Clearance working on that Server hurt The People of the United States and constituted the willful destruction of The People's Intelligence or Property.

That action constituted a stabbing Death of FOIA for that Intelligence that concerned National Security Matters in the People's Office of Secretary of State.

The coy response of Director Comey was he was not asked to investigate the specific crime of a violation of FOIA. The victim of FOIA was being repeatedly stabbed viciously in front of the FBI Director, yet no recommended options for indictment were given for consideration to the Justice Department.

Amending the charges is a routine procedure for Prosecutors at their discretion given the Facts. A recommendation for indictment with the exact same Facts involved simply with a violation consideration under a different statute.

The Director quoted two considerations of Laws in the 1917 and 1922 statutes but failed considerations of FOIA evasion, a much more modern Felony subscribed by Congress recently. Why?

If the entire "History of Prosecution" was the Bench Mark Director Comey was fielding or reaching for Reasonably, in his consideration of recommendation to prosecute or not to recommend Prosecution, he was grandstanding behind 99 years while completely missing ..completely missing, the closest 10 years!

Failing to recognise these crimes and many others in this collaborated offense to and upon The People in his considered recommendation, but grandstanding the Investigation Publically without the options of Prosecutors to Amend the Charges effectively places the choices of Prosecutors in a Compromised position of the exact set of circumstances.

If I were a Prosecutor I would say Director Comey intentionally hamstrung my amended charges in a public manner, and publicly shot justice in the foot.

For Instance, many Democratic Representatives in the Hearing today pressed Director Comey's assertion that the Hearing Today and the Investigation by enlarge recommended by a referal of a Government Agency properly, concerned with national security, was a witch hunt.

They continually pressed him about the considerations of the set of circumstances involved warranting no recommendation for indictment for Prosecution without citing specific statute. This had the broad affect of covering all laws intersecting the circumstances that most people would normally feel the FBI would consider in their recommendation to the Justice Department regarding the Investigation of the Facts.

Director Comey's Testimony today reminded me of a little boy told to clean his room by his mother. Upon inspection of the room the mother complained that the bed was still not made and many of the toys were noticeably pushed under the bed instead of being picked up and put in the toy box.

Upon seeing the unhappy look on his mother's face the boy exclaimed she did not tell him to make his bed or pick up the toys and put them in the toy box.

The Chairman Representative UT. R. Jason Chaffetz said in regards to Director Comey's assertion he did not have a direct complaint noticed from a Congressional Committee regarding the allegation of perjury under oath by Hillary Clinton in the Benghazi Hearings regarding her email, or the violation of FOIA abscondsion this Investigation considered in the intersection, that Director Comey would have those exact direct notice within hours.

The damage by the spokesman for the FBI in excusing by singular statute, many times not explicitly defined, the corruption apparent, mitigated by the compromise of national security, in what he testified was a Server easier to hack then a public domain Gmail account,  indeed places a greater burden on Prosecutors for instance finding the Felony ascribed to a deliberate destruction of FOIA eligible documents known to exist but destroyed by the directive of the person holding the office, or the Felony to produce such but not to comply, to Amend the charges for such.

Director Comey's Grandstanding in the name of Transparency also has the affect of polluting the Grand Jury pool quite thoroughly with the Media attention his Office Represents.

In fact, Director Comey testified he was hung up on establishing or proving, I assume to Prosecutors who would have to decide whither to take the case, by the evidence, "intent" to commit a crime, but noticeable testified that consideration excluded a malfeasance of applicable laws surrounding an avoidance of FOIA and the destruction of documents falling under FOIA's claims.

He watched these laws bleeding to death before him but could not bring himself to stop the bleeding, choosing to ignore them, and in Grandstanding the circumstance Publically, acted indeed as an accomplice. Perhaps a witness cheering the rape of a victim? Turning his head, and saying he saw "nothing"?

My opinion changed today of the integrity I hoped to see by Director Comey.  I saw a calculation to protect the Bureau over We The People in the application of Laws intersecting the circumstances of crime(s) and the recommendation of the Bureau three weeks before the Democratic National Convention kicking off July 25th through the 29th.

I saw a political calculation in polluting an Investigation and the blatant deferance in the manner of treating Witnesses in an Official Investigation. I think this was deplorable and a dis-service to the Public Interest in the Standard of the Laws.

This made me feel like Director Comey in compromising Standards was willfully more comfortable with Hillary Clinton as President than Donald Trump and he was acting childish about it. It made me feel like the service of the FBI hinged on elections rather than Justice and it made me feel like our Election System was further Compromised within Institutions rather than decided by We The People. It made me feel like Director Comey could not Trust the Democratic Party to find another Candidate in three weeks. Justice in our Election Process can never be claimed with a Compromised claim of Trust or Injustice no matter the Candidate Justice happens to claim. The assumption is Crooked.

I did watch the post-Hearing also with the Inspector Generals who were responsible for the negative or blistering IG Report on Hillary Clinton Server that said in essence her compromised Server was not approved nor would have been if she'd asked. I found the two Inspector General's testimonies more assuring than compromising of a Quality Standard.

We will see what happens in the continuation UT. R Jason Chaffetz promised would be forth coming and how the FBI Director acts upon the detailed request after his compromising indulgences this week.

CRJ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T41tTkKrBQ4&feature=player_embedded


________________________


CRJ

Support Today the Choice Democrats have of a solid common-sense-defense , not a politically correct weakness

Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
Contribute to the Cody Robert Judy Working Today for a Better America Tomorrow Campaign 2016 for U.S. President

https://twitter.com/CodyRobertJudy/status/742455835314376704


http://codyjudy.us/i…/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm

Here's the Link to Contribute if you'd like to Cody's Campaign improve your record for Taking A Stand for the Constitution.



Thank You!


Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy



Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.


Web Site www.codyjudy.us
Keep coming back!


INSPIRING - I believe in You


Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!