Friday, May 27, 2016

HILLARY CLINTON TRIAL (FOIA) - Deposition Witness #1 Lewis Alan Lukens- State Department EXDrctr Exposing State Stupid Secrets

SPECIAL REPORT 

______________________
~HILLARY CLINTON TRIAL (FOIA) ~
 Deposition Witness #1 Lewis Alan Lukens- State Department EXD
__________________________________-

Deputy Executive Secretary of the State Department
& Executive Director 2008-2011

For those who didn't think Hillary Clinton's Practices as Secretary of State would every come under Trial, or think the FBI Investigation is taking too long, or haven't had enough with the release of the long-anticipated State Department Inspector General’s special report  which implicated her May 25th in incompetence and unlawful practice in policy check out   Judicial Watch, Inc. -v- U.S. Department State Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 13-CV-1363  action is kicking into full gear, covered on CSPAN. The first witness was called Wednesday May 18th, 2016 with some juicy details we'd like you to consider in the upcoming June 7th California Primary for the nomination of the Democratic Primary. One of the important things to remember is the Witnesses are questioned under oath.
http://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/jw-v-state-lukens-testimony-01363/

If there is a lesson coming for feminism, it is that equality in gender doesn't mean preferential treatment as a women in the mental capabilities expected, in Government Jobs at least. That should be received as a good sign!

If your as lazy as the rest of the Main Stream Media who didn't want to read through all those 'tiny' letters for two hours, we did it for you and will discuss here 6 of the most tantalizing screen shots.

The first thing as we go through this that is notable is the complete dereliction of the State Department under Obama, or is it even worse than that... simply 'protocol? For the record, we don't buy they didn't know, or were not talking about Hillary Clinton's Private Server, and here's why. The testimony just doesn't make sense if you start analyzing it.

We are to believe that a 'stand alone' computer is proposed for Hillary Clinton, in an office space even prohibiting cell phones because of sensitivity of communication and eaves dropping ability, that would bypass the State Department's System, plugged into an non-secure phone line, so Hillary Clinton can communicate with her family and friends in private and that is what is being discussed in the email transactions?

Where is my 'smiley hilarious-water-flooding- eye emoji s'? You know the FBI has got to be laughing over "Stupid" at some of the things being done here, and what the public is being told to buy?

What's wrong with stepping out to call her family or friends? Does the State Department's Deputy Director question any of Hillary Clinton's aids in the protocol of having an official government email to conduct business? Nope.

They are selling us a great story of their concern for her family and friends, and a system that is not traceable by The Freedom of Information Act ( FOIA). They are kind-of-missing the idea here of the position being responsible to the Public which was obviously not a high priority.

In fact if we didn't know better in understanding Hillary Clinton's private server set up meant especially to foil FOIA, We'd say the State Department did just about everything but set it up in her office themselves. 

So we are to swallow a few acts of protocol here. There are concerns for the 7th Floor communication in regards to security, but none whatsoever about setting up a Standardized Email for the new incoming Secretary of State? 

The next most preposterous thing I've ever heard is the explanation of  "what was meant by connecting the Internet without going through your system?" asked of Mr. Lukens.

Basically he explained the desire for an outside communication device, such as a computer hooked into an unsecured phone line that was just ... open all the time? Hummm, that's making a lot of sense. Hogwash!

We do find out this "System" would have been completely different than any other employees, but not because of the security of it, but rather because of the OPENNESS of it.
 Now of course you might be suspecting now that the in-house system is pretty closed down, no access to the Internet systems public domains, or email companies and she wants basic internet access to Gmail that is not provided?

Absolutely not!

No, We got Gmail, Hotmail, Yahoo, everything on the System!, says the State Department Executive Director.

There may be a few firewalls to prevent employees from hitting the hard core Tea Party dating or porn sites, but generally public email is possible in the State System so once your in it all you need to do is type in GMail and log in with your pass word and you have got a connection to your personal email.

Why wasn't that good enough for Hillary Clinton? You mean she could not figure out how to type in 'Gmail' hit the log-in button and type her personal pass-word in for personal communication with her family and friends... right?

The reason now is that the 'Log-In' process of that is too complicated for the person who wants to be President of the United States?  Are you getting the drift now as you read these about the pile of bull they are asking you to stand in?

So he's asked to describe the system that would not have been connected to the State Department's OpenNet email system and asked "Why" that would be necessary in the first place if she had capabilities of accessing the many public domains available for public emailing like the rest of the State Department did.

"For Ease of Access"

Of course, because if she had to type in "Gmail", click "Log-In"  and a password to her private email account, through the OpenNet system of the State Department, the computer knowledge of famous Hackers like Guccifer would be needed? The hacker claiming to have hacked into her "private server" through compromising her friend Sidney Blumenthal's AOL account? 

But wait.. there's more. Get this, "it would have been easier for her to [log-in}", meaning she still would have had to do the bear minimum of accessing the email. She still would have had to "Log In", the easier part would have been just not having to type in her pass word to the State Department's OpenNet System first, so she would have had to do it twice , maybe with two different pass words?


Again, we are talking about the capabilities here often assigned to Grade School kids and she want's to run the Country with the smarts of less than competent capability in our modern world?

So we learn that Hillary Clinton cannot run a computer, but assigning out the set-up for a Private Server, so that she is able to fully erase and scrub emails thereby avoiding FOIA is acceptable and she is knowledgeable about?

But wait, she expects her employees under her to all use the Government Emails System? Yes, A 2011 State Department cable from then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton admonished employees not to use personal email, for security reasons.

Can you imagine Hillary Clinton's deposition on her knowledge of FOIA having years and years of constant experience of coming up with documents and reports while she was married to the President of the United States and also elected as a U.S. Senator in New York?

So we are clear, the State Department System had Internet capabilities. Certainly then the next understanding in not knowing how to run a computer or email with a computer is that she didn't email very much.. like her husband who once claimed in a speech to have sent out only two emails?
Oh..ouch!, that was not really true was it?

Of course it's been awhile since 1998 when the he sent out that first email, but records show he had an email account in 1993. Seems Hillary Clinton does not yet know how to push the button and click the link?

The next tall-tale we find is that the State Department Executive Director sites 'Passwords' that must be entered to get in the OpenNet System of the State Department. Think about the Stallone movie Cliffhanger, where the plot involves a complicated system of pass-words changing every hour on a device inaccessible without the code to find the cases that contain millions of dollars worth of bonds?

The password must have been changed daily, no.. weekly.. no wait every eight weeks. "Probably too many times" for a 68 year old?

I mean if Hillary Clinton doesn't want us to bring her age into the debate of capabilities, then why does she press us with inabilities based on memory?

Lewis A. Lukens witness discussed today, Cheryl D. Mills up next.







For a list of the dates coming up for the other witnesses check out our first post.

 Later, we find out there is not "pass-words" to remember, but a "Pass Word", and the log-in process of the "System" that was being emailed about and thought as a good idea by State Department Employees was "never actually set up". It was all smoke that disappeared, but Clinton's Private Server didn't disappear.

Of course we know it was not ever really set up in the State Department Building where her Office was, but we do know it was set-up in her Home.

I privately wonder that the 2000 emails deemed classified and 22 top secret correspondences detailing reports that will never be released, are Clinton's emails to Obama threatening to release the details confirming his 'long form fabrication' that the U.S. Supreme Court would not hear based on a denied forma pauperis motion in Judy v. Obama 14-9396. Can't you just see the FBI Director laughing about that one? She did make the trip to Great Britain on her way to Africa to visit their Records Department. 
Today, May 27th, 2016, Cheryl Mills, Hillary Clinton's former Chief of Staff, is being called under oath as the next Witness.

The Judge granted Cheryl Mills request that the video of the proceeding deposition would not be made public as she thought it might be sliced and diced as Presidential Political Commercial material to ruin Hillary Clinton's chances in perhaps the California Primary, but the Judge will allow the Transcript to be made public, minus any State Stupid Secrets being made public of course.

Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders threaten to Debate for Charity
We'll try and tackle these one at a time as we see the depositions for you. Donald Trump may be a little too busy with Bernie Sanders.

Mean time, Hillary's got to be fuming about potentially being left out of the Debate between Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump. IN CASE YOU MISSED IT!❤Sanders submitted Q for Trump (challenging him to Debate. (Hillary Clinton canceled CA. Debate w Bernie)), and Trump submitted Q for Sanders on Jimmy Kimmel Live Show (If DNC Superdelegates "steal" the Democratic Nomination from you, will you run as an Independent?)
Networks are already reported to be now bidding the Debate Out for Charity.


You know, one of the knew Rules of the Democratic Party this year was that if any Officially Recognized FEC Democratic Party Presidential Candidate, such as myself, debated in an "unsanctioned Debate" they would not be invited to a Democratic Party sanctioned debate. I wonder if Hillary Clinton refusing to Debate in California has upset the DNC Chairmen Debbie Washerman Schultz, or if there is a penalty for canceling a Debate?

As our attention is focused on Hillary Clinton's Campaign in the current investigations going on, I hope Democrats will reflect upon the Choices at least one official Candidate in myself has been trying to explain to them in very clear and concise Print, even as Bernie Sanders has floated it, the Coronation was a bad idea and the exclusion of myself in Debates was not inclusive or meritorious of the respect our Democratic Party Members deserved.

Excluding me was not representative of any confidence in the voters or representative of Choice, but of dictatorship, tyranny and a denial of Facts I hope to be able to Debate!

CRJ


Have you anything to offer? Let it be your Record of Joinder with me as as Friends.
Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
#Democrats ‪#‎Republicans‬ ‪#‎Independents‬ #DemDebate #CRJ2016
Contribute:
http://codyjudy.us/i…/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm





Here's the Link to Contribute if you'd like to Cody's Campaign improve your record for Taking A Stand for the Constitution.



Thank You!


Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy



Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.

Web Site www.codyjudy.us
Keep coming back!


INSPIRING - I believe in You


Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!





Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION


1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts

12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial

13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008

14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case

15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.





























Thursday, May 26, 2016

DEMOCRATIC PARTY - WHEEL OF MIS-FORTUNE

SPECIAL REPORT

DEMOCRATIC PARTY 
WHEEL OF MIS-FORTUNE 

The biggest problem with the Democratic Party 2016 exclusivity mentality might just be listening to the Candidate with the highest negativity in the TRUST or Truth Department. According to an article at The Hill - "Clinton is now viewed unfavorably by 55 percent of the electorate, according to the HuffPost Pollster average, which tracks findings from 42 different polling outfits."“The No. 1 reason that her favorability is so bad is that you have large numbers of Americans who say they don’t trust her,” said Democratic strategist Brad Bannon. Unfavorability of Obama at this point  in 2008 was 33%. A recent FOX news poll finds Clinton's unfavorability at 61% and former Pres. Clinton says "Remain Calm"?

With the number one Problem being 'Trust', getting the Truth out of Hillary Clinton might would be the very last thing you could count on. That means, Democrats, the last person in the world you would want to be asking questions about problems that involve Hillary Clinton is Hillary Clinton. Millions have cast votes for her in the Primary and Caucuses around the United States and California's is coming up June 7th, and the Clinton Campaign is prepared to blame everyone of her choices on Republicans and politics, who are just in it to win?

Ask Hillary Clinton about the "Email Thingy" and the FBI is simply conducting a routine security inquiry. FBI Director Comey says the FBI does not do 'security inquiries' only 'investigations'.  Ask Hillary Clinton about the unique problem with the Private Server being set up to allow her flushing capabilities? It's nothing that other Secretary of States haven't done and we should trust her personal judgement about which of the 50,000 should be flushed and which should be saved? Debbie Wasserman Schultz was forced to admit the Private Server had never been done by a Secretary of State.
Interview with Chris Wallace
[WASSERMAN SCHULTZ: Other than the private server, right, with the exception --
WALLACE: Well, other than the private server is a big deal and nobody had 30,000 work e-mails on their private server or private e-mail, period. So, I mean, the comparisons to Colin Powell are -- I mean that's just not true, congresswoman.]

She made a choice she says was unfortunate but it was mostly to do with convenience? Well, it certainly wasn't your convenience when 40 FBI agents have been charging you for their investigation over a year now at an estimated cost of $20,000,000.00 Million, but that's just routine?

You know even if the investigation ends up not indicting Hillary Clinton in this FBI Investigation the unfortunate 'convenience' for Hillary Clinton is that it has rubbed every American the wrong way and there is no way six months is going fix that memory Democrats before the General Election!

Well, things just could not get any worse for Hillary Clinton's supporters who have shoveled out big time bucks near 290,000,000.00 Million, but they just did. For all of her claims of not doing anything illegal or wrong the State Department Inspector general's office just said otherwise.

[The State Department inspector general’s office concluded that the former Secretary of State violated legally-mandated record keeping requirements. Quote: “Secretary Clinton should have preserved any federal records she created and received on her personal account by printing and filing those records with the related files in the Office of the Secretary. At a minimum, Secretary Clinton should have surrendered all emails dealing with Department business before leaving government service and, because she did not do so, she did not comply with the department’s policies that were implemented in accordance with the Federal Records Act.” (That’s on document page 23, page 26 of the pdf. Check it out.) Mr. Autin Bay, a retired U.S. Army Reserve colonel and Iraq veteran with a PhD in Comparative Literature from Columbia University, wrote: Under no circumstances should Hillary Clinton ever serve as President of the United States. From the White House, her War on Honesty will become a war on the American people. ]

I suggest it already has.

The biggest concern I have at this point is that the Democratic Party is left very vulnerable and it's not something Hillary Clinton started. Indeed the election of Barack Obama in 2008 was mired in the conspiracy a $10 dollar long form birth certificate released a week after he declared could have been released but wasn't for three years and when it was it was declared a forgery by a law enforcement investigation.

Even without the law enforcement investigation, the Court's have been reluctant to try Obama's claim that he is a [natural born Citizen]. Yes, that is still going on. Judy v. Obama 14-9396 a Motion forma pauperis was denied arbitrarily by the U.S. Supreme Court. Court Records show Mr. Judy's finances were and are still below the Federal Poverty Guideline. The war on the poor in the Halls of  Justice is real.

The significance of this is that Hillary Clinton may indeed have thought she could get away with anything because she had a key of Obama's ineligibility which she would use at any time that she felt like "promise made to her" in 2008 to step aside in the order she would be 'next' failed. This emboldened Clinton to cross all kinds of lines that normally would have been seen as a nightmare for most politicians.

After she was appointed Secretary of State President Bill Clinton''s speaking fees went up

[At least two dozen different companies, groups or foreign governments paid former President Bill Clinton hundreds of thousands of dollars in speaking fees at the same time that they had issues pending with the State Department that was being run by his wife, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, alleges a new report this week.
More than $8 million was eventually paid out to the former president - and 15 of the organizations also donated as much as $15 million to the family's charity, The Clinton Foundation, according to the report published Wednesday in The Wall Street Journal.

Some of Clinton's speeches came on foreign soil. He was paid $1 million for two speeches sponsored by the government of Abu Dhabi, for example, around the same time the State Department and the Department of Homeland Security were negotiating with the city to build a U.S. diplomatic mission aimed at easing visa restrictions on travelers.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3380609/Bill-Clinton-s-speaking-fees-draw-new-attention-line-actions-wife-s-State-Department-took-2009-2013.html#ixzz49oolIkKg
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal- Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife,Hillary Rodham Clinton.][His donations through the Fernwood Foundation included $1 million reported in 2009, the year his company appealed to the American Embassy to help it keep its mines in Kazakhstan; $250,000 in 2010, the year the Russians sought majority control; as well as $600,000 in 2011 and $500,000 in 2012. Mr. Telfer said that his donations had nothing to do with his business dealings, and that he had never discussed Uranium One with Mr. or Mrs. Clinton. He said he had given the money because he wanted to support Mr. Giustra’s charitable endeavors with Mr. Clinton. “Frank and I have been friends and business partners for almost 20 years,” he said.

The Clinton campaign left it to the foundation to reply to questions about the Fernwood donations; the foundation did not provide a response.

Mr. Telfer’s undisclosed donations came in addition to between $1.3 million and $5.6 million in contributions, which were reported, from a constellation of people with ties to Uranium One or UrAsia, the company that originally acquired Uranium One’s most valuable asset: the Kazakh mines. Without those assets, the Russians would have had no interest in the deal: “It wasn’t the goal to buy the Wyoming mines. The goal was to acquire the Kazakh assets, which are very good,” Mr. Novikov, the Rosatom spokesman, said in an interview.

Amid this influx of Uranium One-connected money, Mr. Clinton was invited to speak in Moscow in June 2010, the same month Rosatom struck its deal for a majority stake in Uranium One.

The $500,000 fee — among Mr. Clinton’s highest — was paid by Renaissance Capital, a Russian investment bank with ties to the Kremlin that has invited world leaders,
 ..]

While Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Charity Foundation may have been the big winners raking in the cash in what seems a pay-to-play scheme of epic proportions, the losers very well might be the Democratic Party who in the interest of exclusivity refused the Democratic Party Candidate most willing and able to expose what Hillary Clinton held over Barack Obama's head - His Ineligibility all along. 

The case for the eligibility of a Presidential Candidate must be brought by another Presidential Candidate in order to fulfill standing rules in the Judicial Branch. That case was painfully difficult lasting now through three presidential Elections and lands in the U.S. Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 14-9396 only to have the Court refuse it arbitrarily denying a Motion for forma pauperis. 

If anything the Court could have cleared it up by hearing it and making an Opinion on the natural born Citizen clause, instead they avoided it like the plague. The question must be asked by every American: If the U.S. Supreme Court has never as many Constitutional Scholars claim, ruled specifically on the meaning of natural born Citizen in the qualification clause of the Constitution, why would they refuse the opportunity to do so, unless it negatively impacted the Election of 2008 and 2012 in a constitutional crisis? 

But here we are in 2016, and the crisis has branched out proving the decision an error.

CRJ

Have you anything to offer? Let it be your Record of Joinder with me as as Friends.
Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
#Democrats ‪#‎Republicans‬ ‪#‎Independents‬ #DemDebate #CRJ2016
Contribute:
http://codyjudy.us/i…/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm





Here's the Link to Contribute if you'd like to Cody's Campaign improve your record for Taking A Stand for the Constitution.



Thank You!


Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy



Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.

Web Site www.codyjudy.us
Keep coming back!


INSPIRING - I believe in You


Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!





Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION


1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts

12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial

13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008

14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case

15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.




































Wednesday, May 25, 2016

HILLARY CLINTON The FRAME-JOB OF ISLAM "A particular establishment of Religion" with Obama for 2012 Election

SPECIAL REPORT


OBAMA & H. CLINTON Proved to USE and FRAME "A Religion" 
As predominant WEAPONS [against] the AMERICAN PEOPLE 
to secure their Election 2012. 

The small amount of Main Stream Media (MSM) in television, radio, and print that have un-covered the lies and details of the 9/11 terrorist attack in Benghazi Libya three weeks before the 2012 election, that led to the travesty of American's being murdered in the service of their Country in U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens, U.S. Foreign Service Information Management Officer Sean Smith, and CIA contractors Tyrone S. Woods and Glen Doherty all heroes to America in their service and actions of 9/11/2012, have once again Focused the Nations attention with more intelligence emerging yesterday for better judgement in deciding who will lead America in 2016 with the upcoming elections. 

From my own perspective they, (the MSM), for the most part have not Spotlighted their Focus on what may be the worst part of the entire Benghazi Terrorist Attack minus the loss of life and from a strategic political perspective, which is the "Abuse" of a "particular Religion" to manipulate the United States of America's Presidential Election of 2012. For the life of me I can hardly imagine any Religion feeling favorable about a Presidential Candidate willing to castigate an entire religious sect in a frame job, but that's exactly what Obama and Hillary Clinton did by blaming the 'video'. I really struggle with Democrats applauding this or rewarding Hillary Clinton with Delegates.

"I think the Delegates of Every State in the Democratic Primary Season should be Released from supporting something they must not have known before their commitments and the Primary Vote in each State! I call for their Release of support by the Evidence now Released. The Fraud of the Election is at stake." 
Cody Robert Judy - D 2016 Presidential Candidate


They "used" , stood behind, and employed a FALSE FLAG actually framing Islam as "the cause" of 9/11/12 to get Elected by stating falsely the cause or entire motive was the Video! Perhaps that is because I have been prosecuted by the Government before based on Religious Sentiment that the State did not understand, or relate based on facts and evidence, that this is keen in my own awareness.

In my opinion, Benghazi was much more than Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton not wanting to label the Event as it was [A Terrorist Attack]. They instead 'FRAMED' a 'whole, entire, or Particular Establishment of Religion. The Terror Attack had compelling evidence in it's wake- murders or nefarious killing attached to it-  loss of life with a Presidential Election hanging in the balance happening in three weeks.

 It was much more their insidious 'frame job' we saw in their willingness to conspire in conspiracy, (not unlike Obama's own release of his $10 long form birth certificate fully three years after taking office, that now law enforcement experts have called a fabrication), using a whole or entire Particular Establishment of Religion in that scheme or conspiracy. This was the Government on the wrong side of the Framing Job of a Particular Religion.

 The First Amendment of the Constitution states in part "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion" meaning favoring a particular religion in the passage of laws, appropriations of money in their duties. Have we have seen Obama and Clinton actually 'abuse' this given Foreign Theocratic States?

The topic was featured in a Presidential Commercial in 2012 just before the Iowa Caucus entitled Obama's Religious War.

Indeed, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton were not a part of Congress at the time. However, how much money by Congress was appropriated in the wake of  Benghazi and how many laws were passed in the wake of Benghazi in the [frame job] of "Islam"? Just the Benghazi Hearings cost Americans over $5,000,000.00 Million Dollars and the State Department reports 14,000,000.00 Million Dollars! How much money was spent in the Arab Springs in Egypt that put in place the Muslim Brotherhood. In Libya 1.1 Billion was spent for what we now know was a vacuum for ISIS to emerge.

 It kinda makes you wonder if Congress is delusional about the simple long form birth certificate that would have cost Obama $10 to release a week after he declared in 2008, but also would have thwarted all of this expense we are going through?

This is absolutely despicable! New documents released prove the collaborated FALSE Story to the American People Blaming a [Terrorist Attack] on Muslims based in the "video" wrongly with no truth to it.

It's as if Obama and Clinton blamed or framed a [whole] or entire Religion falsely. They made commercials about it.

This is really insulting to Islam to be blamed nefariously to become elected in the United States of America.

If you switched out the Religion you may easily grasp what I'm saying. For instance, if Clinton and Obama had said, " The cause of the Trump Rally Riot in New Mexico where many police officers were injured was based on a Video with a negative conotations or themed against [all Christains] rather then violence against American's [for and by illegal aliens] that was Reported. [ http://dailycaller.com/2016/05/25/activists-and-illegal-aliens-attack-police-horses-outside-trump-rally-video/ ]

How would all Christians feel about being [Framed Falsely] like that? There is no doubt the majority religion in the Democratic Party as well as America is Christian.
According to a Pew Research Study of Religious Groups and their Political leanings based on exit polling in the 2012 Election the following graph indicates 62% of Muslims are preferred by Democrats to only 17% of Republicans in that faith, but the false 'frame job' of Islam has not been reported as such by the Media, but has got to be felt.

How information was used, and the truth of that information is imperative to understanding what the capabilities are of Hillary Clinton the predominant holder of Democratic Delegates in the coming Democratic Party National Convention happening in July.

Has or was the information available to those who voted prior to this information coming out been accounted by the Population or the Voters?

How may this account to literally millions changing their mind, just as they would have changed their mind had they understood 9/11/12 was a Terrorist Attack on Obama's watch! Given the closeness of the 2012 Election results Obama won by only a very small margin in the popular vote- Obama 51.1% to Mitt Romney's 47.2 with enough independents voting to change the outcome.

Ref:
http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-new-benghazi-documents-reveal-september-11-2012-hillary-clinton-call-sheet-describes-benghazi-assault-as-attack-by-armed-extremists/

A LOOK BACK SIX YEARS AGO...



Cody Robert Judy pictured here in 2010 getting back from driving across the entire Country for his Testimony as a Presidential Candidate in 2008  testifying in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial held in Harlem New York based on his Federal Court Record Complaints against Sen. John McCain and Sen. Barack Obama as unqualified natural born Citizens

SIX YEARS ago just pulling into OGDEN, UT canyon from 2 weeks trip across the Country to testify in ‪#‎CIAColumbiaTrial‬ held in Harlem, NY had $100.00 to my name. No rewards for the service to the Truth, wife filed divorce, custody battle began, and I lost the U.S. Senate Race I was in as a Write-In against Sen. Mike Lee who by the way would not stand up against Obama's Ineligibility ‪#‎Utah‬ has a very poor Record of Standing up for the Constitution in the greatest test, but they could also be proud of a Resident son as a Candidate for President in '08 being the only one to take a stand across party lines against McCain and Obama in Federal Court which was why my Testimony was valued at the Trial on Obama's Ineligibilty. ‪#‎Utpol‬ ‪#‎Democrats‬ fighting ‪#‎politicalcorruption‬ ‪#‎CRJ2016‬‪#‎DemDebate‬ say what you want about me, but the Record will not ever be erased in Heaven or on Earth and it is one that Stands for Truth.

If you believe God to be the Creator and his son Jesus Christ the Savior in the Plan of Salvation, if you believe Truth and Justice prevails and will have her way, If you believe in honor, and desire Trust you know Truth must have a perfect path in Justice and you know my Record to be a Winner and nothing that will be seen as shameful in the Court of the Most High God.

If you have shamed me, shamed my Stand, been embarrassed of me, you will also be ashamed of the Truth, you will be found defending a lie , you will be found in concert playing with the orchastra of Satan the father of lies, you will be weaping and sorry as you see as you are seen. .the devils advocate delighting in his delicacies of deception against all the blood, against all the Freedom and Liberty fought for in the History of the United States of America.

Will you be ashamed now and repent? Or will you continue procrastinating your day of a Restoration?

If you believe in the U.S. Constitution as the inspired [Judgement] of the Father-In-Heaven in the [Supreme Law of this Land], which by God every Citizen admits to be the Truth, you must then embrace the Qualifications of the Office of President in the [natural born Citizen] having no other inheritance assigned by [natural law] of place or parent in the definition of [Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents].

If by the [simple] you are found Traitors and Tyrants of the U.S. Supreme Law, why is the complicated necessary?

If I look forward to the Judgement Bar of God having the Courage of the Truth, how will you fair opposed to me and this Record?

Do not pollute the simple foundation as irrevalent as a Qualified President's signature is Required to pass any piece of Legislation including Obamacare. Literally 10Trillion Dollars has been illegally authorized that includes Seventy Thousand Dollars for every man, woman, and child in the United States.

If by God, God showed up, what will you say to him about The Truth? Whose Record would you appeal to in your Defense? Whose Record will hide your shame and embarrassment from the haze of the All Penetrating Eye?

It is ONLY for the GREATEST LOVE I have ever known , understood, or comprehended that I have anything to say at all. I emplore you, I beg of you, I certainly do love you in this Day of Restoration.

I will be your advocate as long as there remains a day to spare. .but you must not be embarrassed of me or I will be embarrassed of you. It is my wish my service to you would be appreciated by some token by which you also may lay claim upon me as not an embarrassment to you.

Have you anything to offer? Let it be your Record of Joinder with me as as Friends.
Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
#Democrats ‪#‎Republicans‬ ‪#‎Independents‬ #DemDebate #CRJ2016
Contribute:
http://codyjudy.us/i…/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm





Here's the Link to Contribute if you'd like to Cody's Campaign improve your record for Taking A Stand for the Constitution.



Thank You!


Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy



Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.

Web Site www.codyjudy.us
Keep coming back!


INSPIRING - I believe in You


Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!





Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION


1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts

12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial

13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008

14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case

15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

Thursday, May 19, 2016

~BENCH TRIAL BEGINNING~ First Witness Deposed in the [Anti-Government Clinton Server] but Can the Democratic Party Escape?

FEATURED EDITORIAL
The Post & Email

   ~BENCH TRIAL BEGINNING~   

FIRST WITNESSES CALLED - Can the Democratic Party Escape?

Discovery Gets Green Light for depositions of Witnesses-of-Collusion in Democratic Party DC Cartel 

“This court-order testimony could finally reveal new truths about how Hillary Clinton and the Obama State Department subverted the Freedom of the Information Act,” stated Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton."
http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-announces-schedule-deposition-testimony-clinton-email-lawsuit/

Many have complained about the alleged involvement of OBAMA's State Department setting up Clinton's Private Server turning the transparency for the People into a shroud of secrecy and in effect blacking out the People from their Government via FOIA in the Top Foreign Diplomat Job.

What is a Bench Trial? A bench trial takes place in front of a judge only; there is no jury involved. The judge is both the finder of fact and ruler on matters of law and procedure. This means that the judge decides the credibility of the evidence presented at trial and also decides what happens at the trial according to laws and rules of procedure.

You can almost here the shredder chomping in DC strike up a chord like combines cutting the wheat down. Motives for the "Inside JOB" that bypassed FOIA through the gate-way political positioning office of Secretary of State range from political blackmail to keeping Democrats in the Oval Office in 2016 all of which are speculated to the dumb-down rational of Clinton that it was mere "convenience" to turn the United States of America into the United States for Clinton's.

The First Witness to be deposed May 18th hits that very topic right between the eyes as well June 29 – Patrick F. Kennedy, both who were implicated by Emails involving the Anti-Government Private Server System while in Government Office.

May 18 – Lewis A. Lukens, deputy assistant secretary of state and executive director of the State Department’s Executive Secretariat from 2008 to 2011, who emailed with Patrick Kennedy and Cheryl Mills about setting up a computer for Clinton to check her clintonemail.com email account deposition was taken yesterday. No Reports have surfaced as yet describing the interrogation.

May 27 – Cheryl D. Mills, Clinton’s chief of staff throughout her four years as secretary of state.

June 3 – Stephen D. Mull, executive secretary of the State Department from June 2009 to October 2012, who suggested that Clinton be issued a State Department BlackBerry, which would protect her identity and would also be subject to FOIA requests.

June 6 – Bryan Pagliano, State Department Schedule C employee who has been reported to have serviced and maintained the server that hosted the “clintonemail.com” system during Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state. Bryan has been given immunity by the Government in the FBI Criminal Investigation.

June 8 – 30(b)(6) deposition(s) of the State Department regarding the processing of FOIA requests, including Judicial Watch’s FOIA request, for emails of Clinton and Abedin both during Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state and after.

June 28 – Huma Abedin, Clinton’s deputy chief of staff and a senior advisor to Clinton throughout her four years as secretary of state and also had an email account on clintonemail.com.

June 29 – Patrick F. Kennedy, undersecretary for management since 2007 and the secretary of state’s principal advisor on management issues, including technology and information services.

Trying to explain why People even want to be elected for Government Office yet are advocating and perpetrating anti-government curriculum that run parallel with espionage is what we would be discussing in Usurpation and Government Corruption Charges at the highest rank and file levels. This is what the depositions will Spot Light and Laser in on.

With the Discovery now in Spring Blossoms the Criminally Charged Harvest could come in late July or August culminating in a complete decimation of the Democratic Primary Season.

Clinton prophesied in summation  I DEFEAT ALL MAN in essence saying,“I will be the nominee for my party,” she told CNN Thursday. “That is already done, in effect. There is no way that I won’t be.”essentially dooming the Party to the results of Criminal Investigations being conducted Government Forces and pursued by Civil Hound Dogs- and you better gosh dang hurry-it-up and make me the nominee because times-a-wasting? She needs that nomination!

She needs that Nomination now more than ever because without it there is no violent rescue in Democrats circling the wagons for her, but we must not forget the control the Democratic Party has over it's own RULES. They could in fact release every single Delegate with a rule in short liberating them from contributing to the delinquency of any nominee under a Criminal FBI Investigation that was not known prior to the Primary of their State and in the instance not properly articulated by the Candidate.

It's really bad when the people are taken back in the Candidates lie to them. They certainly are victims of that deception, and they really should not be held to the deception of which they did not have a choice in properly framing their judgement, decision, or vote.

If Clinton were to be denied that nomination she would be that wood block out by the shed everyone had forgotten about, which actually may have been the smarter play for her Family not to have to fill out Prison Visiting forms to see Grandma. She will find sadly what she framed as a  'bad choice' really has made her family the victims.

Here's the Link to Contribute if you'd like to Cody's Campaign improve your record for Taking A Stand for the Constitution.

 www.codyjudy.us


Thank You!


Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy



Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.

Web Site www.codyjudy.us
Keep coming back!


INSPIRING - I believe in You


Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!





Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION


1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts

12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial

13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008

14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case

15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.