Friday, April 29, 2016

A SPECIAL REPORT: WOMEN - WE are The Majority - Sacrificing Choice, Innocence, & Our Children's Futures

 A SPECIAL REPORT 
___________________
 WOMEN - WE are The Majority -

Sacrificing Choice, Innocence, & Our Children's Future
________________________________


The thought occurred to me that woman are not acting like a Minority in defending the United States Constitution. Our Republic under the U.S.Constitution is designed to respect individual rights. The U.S. Constitution protects Individual rights in a synopsis the Minority is able to stand up against the Majority when specific rights are trampled. Because of the 19th Amendment that gave Citizen's suffrage without regard to sex, sometimes we think of women more as a minority needing these protections adopted in the Constitution.
I've been careening my head and wrestling about the dismal support in general of Woman for the [natural born Citizen] qualification for the Office of President. ie. Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents for some two weeks now. Scratching my head at this and trying to understand it because on the outset women have a great interest in protecting their children in a natural instinct of 'nurturing' that I think should be very friendly to this Core Protection in the Constitution.

Additionally, women very much in a Civil understanding have more experience of being treated as weaker sex, not being allowed to vote, being shunned for divorce or not being given a Choice in many instances of history in the reproductive rights, which should engender a defense for the protections of the U.S. Constitution especially at the Core of it in the Office of President.

This however has not translated into support either by Contributions or readership for which I've scratched my head about until the question was formed: Why? Why aren't woman acting like a Minority any more? And the answer is because they just aren't. The laws have been changed to favor them in almost every perspective and as it happens often the majority gets complacent with their rights because they begin taking them for granted. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has no doubt made great strides in achieving office and made unprecedented roads towards the Office of the President, but she's also made unprecedented roads in sacrificing the Principles of that Office by not challenging Obama's ineligibility which has in fact lead to everything we are going through now that is panning out like a golden road to disaster.

Women's choices are protected in most aspects. They can get divorced and file such as a Majority, most always getting favor in property which also might be parallel the majority filing. There's no CIVIL office they are prohibited from based on gender. They can vote. Minimum wage is the same for both genders.

So what's this thing in my head about so little respect for supporting the Constitution especially surrounding the Office of President in the concern for national security via children and weaknesses in vulnerability of gender in a Minority position?

Well, as I researched this I found the facts don't lie. Woman are a Majority and as such are, I believe, slipping into a complacency of their Constitutional Rights afforded and protected by the U.S. Constitution in their voting block faster then they even can comprehend; even whilst Hillary Clinton is promising the world to women they actually already have it as a Majority.

Perhaps in the hope that the FBI does not handle her choice to change the Computer Server of the U.S. Federal Government to her own private server in the official conduct of Secretary of State? No doubt, the U.S. Government might have something to say about changing their server, but she didn't ask, she just made that decision and I don't think it was in the interest of FOIA or serving the people in a responsibility of that office.Yes, its true women are the Majority.

With the exception of Alaska and North Dakota women are the Majority or equal in every State of the Union and Men are the Minority. Tossing the States whose population is equal, Women are a Majority in the Majority of States.

State by State Gender 2014 Population Distribution http://kff.org/other/state-indicator/distribution-by-gender/
FEATURED number of Women in Congress from 2008 to 2016



So my hunch was correct. Women are more to blame as the irresponsible voting block for our National Security breach in the Office of the President. In 2012 Mitt Romney lost the women's vote by 12 points, the largest ever since recording started in 1952 and despite winning the men's vote by 8 points lost the election by 2 points.

Make no mistake about it as an ineligible person in the Office of President has shown  more favorable to open borders that most harmfully leans on women's innocence & children 37%  of all federal crimes in 2014, ruining the American way of life as far as prosperity loading 10 Trillion of 20 on the backs of their children effectively adding 70K/person during the last eight years which is generational theft, favoring weapons sales to Muslim Theocratically Controlled Countries that support Sharia Law that is a known [subjectification of women] in philosophy. Four F16 Fighters, 200 Abrams Tanks [given] to Egypt Muslim Brotherhood, Iran Nuclear Deal releases 100 Billion,  Saudi Arabia 46 Billion, in fact "the volume of major deals concluded by the Obama administration in its first five years [exceeds] the amount approved by the Bush administration in its full eight years in office by nearly $30 billion. That also means that the Obama administration has approved more arms sales than any U.S. administration since World War II."

Of course the Office of the President or person in it cannot be blamed for every kidnapping, every rape, robbery, stabbing shooting or atrocity, however the choice in that Office is indeed responsible for a general course of action that must be weighed in the balance of good for or against the U.S. Picture a ship in the ocean smooth sailing on one side and shark invested waters on the other in the distance - which do you hope to drift toward with the rudder for a nice afternoon swim?

The President signs every Bill passed by the Legislature- Obamacare was one of those needing a qualified President's signature that encapsulated 1/5 of the entire economy. The Office of the President Directs and Commands nearly every turn of the Military and Border Security General Principle of our Nation. It's near impossible to say the Character of a person in that Office is not affected by Place and both Parents, which should be in the BIGGEST agreement with women as mothers.

It also just so happens to be the only Office in our Government requiring the unique qualification of born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents - [ natural born Citizen] and in the United States Supreme Court the defining articulation in Case, Minor v. Happersett [No Doubt] those born in the Country of Parents who are Citizens of it are [natural born Citizens].

[At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or [natural-born citizens], as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their [p168] parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first.]

Oh the irony of the [United States Supreme Court Case] and Decision that defined [natural born Citizen] actually being on behalf of a women-  Mrs. Virginia Minor, a native born, free, white citizen of the United States, and of the State of Missouri, over the age of twenty-one years, wishing to vote for electors for President and Vice-President of the United States, and for a representative in Congress, and for other officers, at the general election held in November, 1872, applied to one Happersett, the registrar of voters, to register her as a lawful voter, which he refused to do, assigning for cause that she was not a "male citizen of the United States," but a woman. She thereupon sued him in one of the inferior State courts of Missouri, for willfully refusing to place her name upon the list of registered voters, by which refusal she was deprived of her right to vote.

So it is a Great Burden of women that they as a Majority have and are sacrificing what is most precious to them., their children and innocence by their confirmation of a Majority and their slothful diligence to these precious Principles.

A Contemporary Understanding of two verses in ISAIAH
The circumstances are very difficult indeed for me to make this egregious report owning to my own heart naturally drawn out to protect women most natural and instinctive, but that protection cannot come  or be placed upon me as to be my own dereliction accept by my silence.

I noticed in the collection of contributions for my own presidential campaign nearly five to one were from males compared to females. 

What can we say after realizing this? Maybe we were not hard enough on you? Maybe we did not teach it well enough? Women today make up half of the entire professional and technical work force in the United States.

Yet men still dominate in political contributions . More women vote, but only about 30% of big donors contributing are women. Understanding this takes on some relevant features such as opinions may stretch:
ie. [ It’s not that women are less willing or less able to give in general. Despite the wage gap, women, across a variety of demographic variables, are more likely to give to charity than men are. Politics is the outlier, with men’s giving outnumbering women’s. A philanthropy researcher offers an explanation: “They give out of more empathetic and altruistic reasons than men do,” said Debra Mesch, the director of the Women’s Philanthropy Institute at the Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy. “Women may not feel that their money in the political arena is going to fulfill those motivations.”]

What?! Really? If women didn't feel that their money in the political arena was going to fulfill those motivations - in reference to empathetic and altruistic motivations of giving, why do more women vote than men? They obviously feel a responsibility to the voting booth. If women have failed to give in Political Campaigns I believe it's because they have not been educated to the direct link in the generals of the three things we have discussed, or.. well let's get to it.

1-The importance of the Constitution in their rights as individuals; 2- crime upon the innocents that can be given a deferred prosecution status allowed by law in the Executive Commander-In-Chief position in not enforcing borders and laws, and 3- the basics of responsibility to balancing a check book for the safety of our future generations as it pertains to our National Debt and the importance of delaying gratification in the spending department.

That's right 66% of women are carrying credit card debt compared to 33% of men. [ Stick to a budget. The easiest way to avoid credit card debt – regardless of your age or gender – is to create and stick to a budget. At the beginning of the month, decide how you’ll spend your money, and stick to it.]

Let's pose the question for women. You can get the belt and those matching accessory earrings  to that outfit or send $25 dollars to your favorite Presidential Candidate which one is more important to you?

Ask the same question to men. You can get the more expensive balls and walk for a round of golf instead of riding or send $25 dollars to your favorite Presidential Candidate?

What I'm trying to point out here is that women have so much more to lose in my biased male opinion that it is beyond making any sense for them to sacrifice one single line of the Constitution, and if they were to sacrifice a line the one of most value and importance to their rights and the safety of their children in indeed is the one I am protecting and standing up for. I am the only one in America to have a Federal Court Record in protecting and standing up for it in Judy v. McCain and Judy v. Obama in the U.S. Supreme Court. A women's world is the quickest one to change as it was the hardest one to get where they have finally gotten to in America and in the Office of the President can that world change the fastest and most dramatically with an ineligible person.

Now you might be saying to yourself that any money you send to me is a waste because of this or that. That's just bull.  If women get together and send me half of what ineligible Ted Cruz has been sent the Politicians in Washington DC will faint!!! Congress would real!!! and I'm thinking we could move the world in ways you have no idea we could, but the most important factors would be those three we discussed.
1- Safety 2- Crime & 3- National Debt -which could very easily lead to WWWIII slaying millions of your sons and daughters and leaving a lot of blood on your hands. No it's not a joking matter.

In my humble service to you, I haven't made a dime in the last 7 years and 15 Cases of law because I've felt it was so important. I hope you know it doesn't make a bit of sense for me to come here and to cuss you out and make you feel bad for not supporting me with contributions in order to get contributions. In this I agree, but in my motivation for doing and delivering the message I have to say it is indeed your Heavenly Father who has seen this and my interest is not in seeing how much or how many contributions I can get, because that is far from the main point of my relaying the message.

 What you do with it is between you and God. I had the courage and love to deliver it.

Let it not come to haunt me in my Eternal Judgement that my care, concern, and love for you my sisters in the USA was not a very high priority. I can only say., please please.. Repent of this which means change your course now. Do not let your hands be bloodied by your own children in this. It is an eternal regret that would be very difficult to bear. To have done harm to the ones you said you loved creates a very hot hell of regret that just a little effort now on your part can soothe in a big way. I hope you will take advantage of that now.

May God Bless You for that courage and may any contributions you make be seen as your sincere protection and interest for those little ones and the Rights you have, as something I am very weak in understanding but whom I trust God knows much better than I- Women. I certainly hope you receive this as as matter of great respect that I have for you.

Sincerely,
CRJ

Here's the Link to Contribute if you'd like to Cody's Campaign improve your record for Taking A Stand for the Constitution.
 www.codyjudy.us


Thank You!


Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy



Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.

Web Site www.codyjudy.us
Keep coming back!


INSPIRING - I believe in You


Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!





Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION


1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts

12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial

13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008

14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case

15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.


















































Wednesday, April 27, 2016

Revenge of the Birthers - Is it Coming?


BREAKING NEWS
The Post & Email Feature Editorial
The Rewards of Racism?

Devilish Discrimination in the U.S. Supreme Court


John G. Roberts, Jr., Chief Justice of the United States
Anthony M. Kennedy, Associate Justice
Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Associate Justice
Stephen G. Breyer, Associate Justice
Samuel Anthony Alito, Jr., Associate Justice
Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice
Elena Kagan, Associate Justice


Anti-Discrimination Laws have been made for housing, schooling, and employment, but what about Anti-Discrimination Laws on the Bench and in the Press? What are the Rewards for Taking a Stand for the [natural born Citizen] Qualification Requirement in the Constitution for the Office of President? It seems there is none as I'll address in more depth after a consideration of the length and breadth of my relationship with the U.S. Supreme Court Justices.

The Bench of the U.S. Supreme Court, [that includes Justices John G. Roberts, Jr., Anthony M.
Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen G. Breyer, Samuel Anthony Alito, Jr., Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and the late Antonin Scalia have been responsible for the greatest discrimination in the economic considerations of Justice in the United States of America in the [Decision of Review] which included the whole Court in the arbitrary denial of Judy v. Obama 14-9396's [Motion for forma pauperis] in the Case that included a request for the Court to uphold the [Natural Born Citizen] qualification for the office of the President, that we have ever seen in America I think said Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy.

In 2008 I wrote this Letter to the U.S. Supreme Court the day after my birthday on December 28th:
Cody Robert Judy
 
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 
United States Supreme Court
1 First Street NE Washington DC 20543 
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
   Re: LTR TO U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE ANTONIN SCALIA
                   Dear Justice Scalia:
                         Thank you for the service to the U.S. Supreme Court- the Court Just before God, as I see. No greater service can be rendered upon The People of The United States then preserved principles of the U.S. Constitution. Why it seems to many I know our U.S. Constitutional Rights are diminishing with the stroke of the pen, the moral persuasions of our United States Constitution echo as voices from the dust of the past, and cries from those yet unborn, for the fabric of freedom and liberty to be mended and stitched up from the assaults of the unwise who lack understanding of the importance of United States Constitution. For WE THE PEOPLE care and love every word and every line and decry the outrageous assaults upon the decorum of so noble an outline given in the qualifications of The President of The United States held within our U.S. Constitution and entrusted upon this Court.

 For which qualifications we do honor our President to be as said, a natural born citizen, and 35 years of age for purposes as supposed of protection, and defense, in wise councils. To the PROTECTION & DEFENSE: born in these United States of America and therein receiving the Spirit of Protection for the mother land from that Spirit which quickens the body and from which the body is dead without that Spirit. So to from whence that Spirit originates shall be called Home from the deepest energies of the soul and thus also the deepest yearnings TO DEFEND that are natural to the person. This is the articulation and the importance of the “Natural Born” qualification. For a fool’s errand is to deny this claim and his argument unnatural, in the course, of the existence of life. That these natural born tendencies exist and are true, and so were faithfully included in the drafts, as a “Key-Stone” of our Nation, known as The United States Constitution.

 Thus, I as one, and for others also I know, of WE THE PEOPLE, humbly pray for this courts greatest consideration in observance to our Nation’s Constitution in the proper vetting of President Elect Obama circulated in this Court as Berg v. Obama Case No. 08-570 (including my personally represented Motion for leave and Brief of AMICUS CURIAE), and articulated in the sacrifices of many in petitions to the Courts all over this Nation, costing us our lives in time, talents, and fortunes, and that humbly after those many who have died in service to our Nation; let them be remembered. That the Spirit be maintained in the House our Framers so wonderfully built, and that to ensure the preservation of Freedom and Liberty, to which we owe our economic success, spirited ingenuity, and accelerated maturity as a Nation roofless under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all, or be damned with failure for our forgetfulness. 
 To this end, I remind the U.S. Supreme Court of their sworn oath to defend the United States Constitution!
I AM a Patriot of the United States of America and Yours Humbly,
                                                                                       Cody Robert Judy 
                                           Signed this 28th day of December, 2008 ___________________________________


       ADMINISTERED TO THE JUSTICE OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT 
Supreme Court Justice John Stevens
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia
Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy
Supreme Court Justice David Souter
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas 
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Ginsburg
Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer
Supreme Court Justice Samual Alito
Supreme Court Justice John Roberts
Often injustice happens and we wonder why? I suppose the easy answer is if there were no injustice, justice would not be loved or for that matter even known.  Sometimes during calamities, accidents, trials we look for reason to 'justify' without any reasonable thing to blame or to warrant such from faith in  God. Without any our blame resides in the unexplained courts of God which is the normal place to put something you don't understand in a belief of God's Omnipotence or supreme or great power. Why? Why? Why? is our question - the question of desire to understand.

How in the world could we ever understand Justice here on the earth without the suffering injustice?How could we ever gain some semblance of it's value or importance if we constantly or only knew Justice?

So, yes the Justice's of the U.S. Supreme Court may have denied Cody Robert Judy's [ Judy v. Obama 14-9396 ]'s motion for forma pauperis unjustly and arbitrarily, making the gap wider for those who are poor suffering below the federal poverty level to slip through the cracks, but it doesn't mean they will escape being remembered for their part in the war on the poor or that they will not find the mistake and also be called upon in a Court to answer for it in the future.

Yes, I've suffered 'injustice' and Yes, I've suffered extreme poverty" says Cody Robert Judy, I've suffered discrimination, racism and very painful loss of children, wives, homes, property and even my liberty and freedom with incarceration; however, in all these things I've gained an appreciation of empathy and a value of Justice that as I look back on was nurtured and cultured in the bitterness, and I know I am not alone."

How many have suffered these things? I think a much greater number than those who have not. In this I have comfort in knowing that it is true, though offenses must come woe be unto those who they come by.

Matthew 18:7

“Woe unto the world because of offences! for it must needs be that offences come; but woe to that man by whom the offence cometh!”

When the Campaign for Cody Robert Judy designed the Feature Picture with a TIME LINE picture of Cody Robert Judy's run for U.S. President which has included a consistent run for President throughout the 2008, 2012, and now 2016 Elections, it was with the thought that people comprehend what exactly has unfolded in that time period and what is involved in  the Claim as is pictured here on the right in the form of a somewhat rudely based question asked by Mr. Michael D. Harrell.

What is a "Bi-Partisan Federal Court Record w/standing for the NBC" even mean? The Courts aren't partisan. And nothing the courts have ever ruled makes any of the other candidates NOT have "standing" for the NBC clause."

Of course this question comes with the turn-over of people's focus, attention span, even the turn-over of Reporters in the fields working for the story for their editor as well as Editors themselves over the last 8 years.

It comes with a rise of popularity of those who were "In" and now are "Out" along with the power that is entrusted.

Glenn Beck, bless his heart, a great story teller, but often on the wrong side of the U.S. Constitution the whole time he claims to be standing for it much like Sen. Ted Cruz who he openly supports and advocates for, was talking with a gentlemen on the phone who was from my short glimpse of it some kind of a leader in the European Union as a representative of England.  He had a heavy English accent and seemed quite the gentlemen though I did not catch his name, (may find it later here), but the thing that jumped out of me was Glenn Beck stating that "a lot  is coming from the Trump Campaign that is based on "anger and rage".

As a psychology major words like that jump out of me and I examine them carefully understanding that 'anger' is not a primary emotion. It is a secondary emotion that is stirred from the root emotion of 'hurt' or 'pain'. So its almost a natural transition of thought for me now to say when I hear that someone is angry to ask, "What are you hurt or feeling bad about?"

When we ask ourselves that question in light of Mr. Donald J. Trump's "quote unquote" 8 month Campaign that began June 16, 2015 and we figure the money that has figuratively disappeared in GOP rival campaigns against him, as well the fact he's on track to astound the Republican Party with a Primary Count of voters that smashed 2008 McCain and 2012 Romney's Records, we are left with a question of "deep hurt" that is being felt in America and a question of finding it's roots.

What did Donald Trump do differently? If the Press asked this question, they must go back to the headline action of 2011 where what most politicians would call a withering storm of accusations come out against Donald Trump as a non-candidate or possible candidate, but that were full throttled labeling and tagging as Trump as a racist for the gruesome audacity crime of being "American" and standing for the U.S. Constitution's [natural born Citizen] clause for the Office of the President?

As Mr. Michael D. Harrell's question came out, "What is a "Bi-Partisan Federal Court Record w/standing for the NBC" even mean?" , we see in a legal sense a lack of knowledge in the general public for Courts that often dismissal claims brought based on a lack of prosecution, as well as a general population forgetfulness based on being completely inundated with stories and sometimes a refresher course needed to jar the head so people do remember.

On the Legal Side - Rule 41 states:
(b) Involuntary Dismissal; Effect. If the plaintiff fails to prosecute or to comply with these rules or a court order, a defendant may move to dismiss the action or any claim against it. Unless the dismissal order states otherwise, a dismissal under this subdivision (b) and any dismissal not under this rule—except one for lack of jurisdiction, improper venue, or failure to join a party under Rule 19—operates as an adjudication on the merits.

As it applies to Judy v. Obama what it really means is if at anytime the Petitioner Mr. Judy was not running for President during the time of this application for Justice, or did not have a complaint relative to the action of injustice and damages happening Mr. Obama could ask for the court to dismiss for failure to prosecute and would most likely have that granted by a Judge. Conceding an election is prominent to conceding a complaint also, so it has been a great burden for Mr. Judy to keep his Candidacy current and the charges current which he has had to do from 2008 through now 2016.

From a write-in Candidacy in 2008 and a First Federal Court Complaint against McCain filed in Las Vegas Nevada Federal Court Case Number: 2:2008cv01162 Filed: September 3, 2008 Mr. Judy kept his write-in Candidacy going through the Election 2008 where Obama won. He then ran a U.S. Senate Campaign as an Independent against Republican Mike Lee who won. From there he filed as a Democratic Party Candidate in the Primary Challenge of Barack Obama in 2012 which gave him immediate standing to file Primary Ballot Challenges which were taken in New Hampshire and Georgia from executive courts to the States Supreme Court and on to the U.S. Supreme Court in 12-5276 and escalated in a Federal Court Challenge that has culminated in 14-9396.

These actions that take the Principle of the Qualification unique to the Office of the President across Party Lines to Republicans and Democrats as a Presidential Candidate were not followed by any other person in the entire Untied States of America. 

Before you say blowing that off as insignificant, "Well, no one else was crazy enough to do it? " insulting your own intelligence let's review in very short order how much this is worth in real time.

IF Obama is not a Constitutionally Qualified person in the Office of the President is/was/can Obamacare even (be) Legal? Just that one act alone is worth 1/5 of the entire American Economy! Without a Legal President's Signature Obamacare is not a piece of Legislation that has even passed the first Constitutional Check and Balance that every ACT of the Legislative Branch must go through to be Effective Law. It must be signed by the Executive Branch's presiding officer in the Office of the President understood to be Promulgation

An Act adopted by simple majorities in both houses of Congress is promulgated, or given the force of law, in one of the following ways:
1-Signature by the President of the United States,
2-Inaction by the President after ten days from reception (excluding Sundays) while the Congress is in session, or
3-Reconsideration by the Congress after a presidential veto during its session. (A bill must receive a 2/3 majority vote in both houses to override a president's veto).


That means even all the deliberations of the U.S. Supreme Court over Obamacare were a waste of time and money missing in the first instance if it was an actual Constitutionally Legal Law not to mention every Republican Candidate who has missed the opportunity as a U.S. Senator to object on those grounds rather than reciting Dr. Seuss in a pretended objection or filibuster.

Now we have the legally HUUUGE VALUE in mind of the importance of [natural born Citizen] in the Office of the President the U.S. Supreme Court has refused thus far to hear and the value of it being many times over the value or net worth of Mr. Donald Trump, let's remember the 'Racist' labels that were libelous by the Media who did worse the unthinkable in covering up McCain's Challenges by a Presidential Candidate in Judy v. McCain so that Obama's charges as well as the Media's of Racism could hold up. In other words to 'enable' Racism as in making it a successful charge as we discuss why the American People are hurt and thus angry and in a rage.

These were all Stories that captured Trump as the head of the Birther Movement despite the fact Trump never actually filed a single legal paper on it presumably because he had no standing on the issue. Trump didn't run in 2012 as a Candidate for President.

1- April 28th 2011 CBS Racism underlying Trump's Assertions http://www.cbsnews.com/news/schieffer-racism-underlying-trumps-assertions/

2- Mediate April 11, 2011 Trump Racist Bob Scheieffer http://www.mediaite.com/tv/cbs-bob-schieffer-donald-trump-is-showing-an-ugly-strain-of-racism/  
CBS’ Bob Schieffer: Donald Trump Is Showing An ‘Ugly Strain Of Racism’
3- April 28th, 2011 New York Daily News Is Donald Trump a Racist? Critics say Yes 
Whoopi Goldberg, Joy Behar, Bob Schieffer, Jesse Jackson say yes ...Bob Schieffer have charged Donald Trump's latest comments are racist. http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/donald-trump-racist-whoopi-goldberg-joy-behar-bob-schieffer-jesse-jackson-yes-article-1.115621

Now the only legitimacy to these claims of Racism was that Trump had not raised them with McCain or any other Presidential Candidate and this was in the face of all these huge Media Companies with their great powers to research the Legal Files of history and miss Judy v. McCain. You see they had to miss it or their 'enabling' claim could not stand.

Now you can call it luck, a blessing, you can call it informal justice, but no one survives claims of racism and goes on to beat Jeb Bush, and 15 others GOP heavy weight presidential Candidates out of the gate having NEVER run for political office before.

If you suppose the value of being the only Candidate with a Bi-Partisan Stand on the [natural born Citizen] clause from 2008- 2016 is of no value, than you suppose charges made by the Main Stream Media that covered months of very big stories on Racism and Donald Trump had absolutely no affect on Donald Trump and that just would not make any sense at all would it?

Think the Birther Issue is Dead - Think Again!

 That brings us to ABC News coverage of Michelle Obama letting Birthers have it still. On April 23,2016 as an invited Guest Speaker at a Commencement Graduation for University of Jackson in Mississippi she said:
"How easy it is to single out a small group and marginalize them because of who they are or who they love."
I don't think she meant like labeling people who love the Country, who love the U.S. Constitution "Birthers", but the application can sure be easily seen.

Let's face it, no Court of Law has had a Trial on it! No Court of Law has allowed Witnesses and Discovery! And thus the issue of Obama's Constitutional Eligibility has not been exhausted or even really heard on the merits as legitimate complaints with a Candidate like myself have come forward asking the Court to please take a look at the issue with it's own professional resources and constitutional charge.

That is pretty easily swiped opinion that we are seeing over-rule the whole Constitution and just plain being American, but if we take Obama's own words in a call to Borderless Globalization of all Europe as the internal belief he holds of Nations; his dismal action and objection enforcing the borders here in America have garnered him quite a reputation- is it really any surprise?

Obama is telling us he does not truly believe  an American Nation should exist either by calling for borderless countries to consolidate into Globalization. Unfortunately for him that makes him actually the leader of nothing in the United States of America, and its true, he's not Constitutionally Qualified as required by the U.S. Constitution. He's a squatter in the Office of the President- officially a usurper unofficially a defacto president.


Oh yes, Obama may make it through his eight years, but if Hillary Clinton becomes the Democratic Nominee and Donald Trump becomes the Republican nominee it might be a difficult choice, but because Trump has wound up with a greater record than Hillary on this constitutional core issue which is the root of America's Pain and Hurt, I think he'll beat her.

Strategist Bill Carville for President Bill Clinton in 1992 coined the term It's about the Economy Stupid , but really "It's about the Constitution" because our Economy as well as our Defense falls under the National Security of the United States. I've tried earnestly to make the tie that the success of our Economy was predicated upon the success of the Principles upheld by our Constitution.

As those have suffered in a most dramatic fashion Obama has been credited with what historians would call the greatest financed 8 years of the whole United States of American - 10 Trillion Dollars or half of all the U.S. Debt. The recipe of disaster was indeed started with The Bush Doctrine like- wise against the U.S. Constitution's sound principles of  defense that began a pre-emptive military doctrine used to invade foreign countries like Afghanistan and Iraq.

They go like this: [When Reagan took office the debt was $1 trillion. When he left it was $2.86 trillion. So $1.86 trillion for him. Then Bush-I added $1.55 trillion. Total so far: $3.4 trillion. Then Clinton took over. Obama started at 10.6 Trillion. We are now under Obama up to $20 Trillion nearly doubling the entire national debt and any recovery is only seen as a matter of our buying our debt or way deeper into the hole. Obama no doubt has been the most well financed person in the office but the burden he leaves on future generations is as fraudulent as he is in the office as a natural born Citizen and represents a gross generational theft no matter how you look at it.

This is the Economy standardized under the Constitution that has wreaked havoc on the national security of all Americans. It is impossible to escape. 

So as much as BIG BUSINESS supports borderless countries and globalization on the backs that FOREIGN LABOR can increase the profit level based on getting around the cost of unemployment insurance and day care cost if Americans want to hold together any as-semblance of what has indeed made America great in the opportunity to reap what you sew under your own vine we had better start making our Constitution a priority and protecting its Value in our everyday American Lives.

Breaking:
NATIONAL SECURITY CONCERNS that involve the Constitutional Qualifications of the Office of the President cannot help but intertwine with national security concerns abroad and we are seeing it like no bodies business in so many ways.. the least of which involves a conflict brewing in Syria perhaps hatched to escalate into WWWIII, so we better start really reflecting on those who say "eligibility" doesn't matter.

China joins Russia in Syria to help the Government of Asadd fight ISIS.
WHY is Obama and Hillary Clinton Horrified if the enemy is the same? #Democrats #DemDebate #Election2016

Which side is the US on?

What seems a three way claim of a United Front in Syria to be fighting ISIS has some problems.

Hillary Clinton and Obama's war against ISIS in Syria remove Asadd with rebel trained forces. The Russia and China war in Syria against ISIS keeps Asadd in.

ONE would suspect that ISIS being the common denominator with three major heavy weights in the same ring would not stand a chance.

That is unless one of the heavy weights was actually not fighting ISIS but was rather supporting ISIS and arming ISIS.

SO how do we tell whose fighting ISIS and who is fighting Government?

Has ISIS controlled Syria for the last 20 years? Or has ISIS simply become the name every government involved now has taken to their populations to justify intervention that is acceptable to the world?

Does anyone really believe with the USA, Russia, and China against ISIS that they would have a prayer of not collapsing in days never to be heard from again?

Well, are we celebrating China and Russia helping us in a wonderful military collaboration?

Why is Obama horrified then?

April 25, 2016
[The Kremlin announced that China is to send 5,000 of its most elite military forces into the Levant War Zone to help Russia’s fight against ISIS. The announcement has left the Obama administration “horrified.”]
http://www.worldnewspolitics.com/2016/04/25/pentagon-stunned-thousands-chinese-troops-enter-isis-war/
[Putin reiterated his support for Syria’s regular army – the army of President Bashar Assad. “He [Assad] is confronted with what some of our international partners interpret as an opposition. In reality, Assad’s army is fighting against terrorist organizations,” Putin said.]

https://www.rt.com/news/316705-china-syria-isis-fight/
Clinton: "The world will not waver, Assad must go"
1 April 2012
[US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, addressed the meeting, saying that it was the first step towards a better future for the people of Syria.]

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-17578802

[China will be helping out the Syrian government in the fight against Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIL/ISIS) by sending “military advisers,” media reports have claimed.]

April 25, 2016-
[Meantime, Barack Obama says he is to send up to 250 more special forces troops to Syria to support local militias in the fight against so-called Islamic State (IS).]

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-36126944

April 27th, 2016 China 6th Test successful DF ZF Hyper sonic Missile capable of delivering multiple nuclear war heads anywhere in the world in an hour traveling at 4-7000 mph capable of “extreme maneuvers” at speeds between Mach 5 and Mach 10.

The STAKES are BEING TESTED

What we have seen in this report is both domestic disaster and foreign disaster in both economic and militaristic arenas. Now it might be a bridge to jump for anti-birthers who basically have set up a policy that the U.S. has nothing the rest of the world would desire (that's delusional), and that the U.S. Constitution as a document is fatally flawed based on its denial of global citizenship in an extreme and radical nature of Americanism (that's really only held by foreigners so its delusional) but with the evidence that the U.S. Supreme Court has of Record of their discrimination against the 'forma pauperis' motion of Judy v. Obama 14-9396 and the then unheard [natural born Citizen] costing Americans both the integrity of the Election System with more fraudulent candidates creeping up as well as the dereliction of hearing cases that are moot based on Obama's signature being moot, there we see at the root of this proceeds a path of revenge that is unparalleled in U.S. History with an anti-establishment candidate that could CALL for impeaching every sitting U.S. Supreme Court Justice for bad behavior of their own Record. 

In some ways, Americans might be fooled. In some ways Americans might be tricked. However at the root of the heart of America is something that has attracted the fear in politicians and judges who never last long in America once they drift. Fool us once - shame on you. Fool us twice - shame on us. 

The rise of the anti-establishment in America is amazing!!! Cowboy UP Spur'em in the GUTS!!! In this respect, I am certainly honored to rub shoulders with my fellow Patriots and though its been hard, the Record of being the only American Presidential Candidate in U.S. History with a Bi-Partisan Federal Court Record taking a stand for the Core of the Constitution in the qualification for the Office of the President has been my honor and is something for which I am not ashamed. 

CRJ

Here's the Link to Contribute if you'd like to Cody's Campaign improve your record for Taking A Stand for the Constitution.
 www.codyjudy.us


Thank You!


Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy



Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.

Web Site www.codyjudy.us
Keep coming back!


INSPIRING - I believe in You


Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!





Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION


1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts

12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial

13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008

14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case

15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.




















Friday, April 22, 2016

For the LOVE OF TRUMP- MEDIA - SCOTUS - HILLARY & SANDERS They ALL LOVE HIM! Here's the Proof

BREAKING REPORT


~For the LOVE OF TRUMP!~

MEDIA - SCOTUS - HILLARY & SANDERS 

They ALL LOVE HIM! Here's the Proof
___________________________


MAINSTREAM MEDIA PROTECTING TRUMP'S POLITICAL BASE?
PLUS
UK - LONDON -
 MAYOR Boris Johnson 
QUESTIONS FRACTURED ALLEGIANCE 
OF OBAMA
                                            

You have to admit it! We were all fooled. The MSM is not against Trump but secretly they Love him!!!❤ And that goes for the U.S. Supreme Court JUSTICES too!

The stomach problems of Democrats are actually love butterflies in the tummy! They love the way he trash talks, and labels reminiscent of their own famous vagina diaries further talk with "Birthers!"

Why it's a well known fact Donald Trump's rise into the Politic Arena began by asking Obama to show his long form birth certificate.

That revelation 3 years AFTER the 2008 Election simply proved Obama had a [foreign father] which most scholars agree was a qualifier in the [natural born Citizen] allegiance to America in the Office of President; unless you were a [Citizen] at the time of the adoption of the Constitution.

Mr. TRUMP solidified his political base with TENS-of- Millions of Americans without filing a single legal paper.

Of course Mr. Cody Robert Judy has fought hard through 15 Cases, two that ended up in the U.S. Supreme Court 12-5276 & 14-9396 that the #MainStreamMedia would not Cover a single story on.

This in fact was because the Main Stream Media was secretly working to keep Mr. Trumps Base secure.

They knew if a single story was written about ACTUAL "Legal Standing" and a "Presidential Candidate" who had also sued McCain in 2008 for being born outside the United States and being naturalized by an Act of Congress not once but twice, that TRUMP's Base pulled from asking Obama would be threatened; so they didn't.

Mr. Trump is the Luckiest son of New York to have even the Democratic Spin in Media helping him!!!❤ Boy, haven't they done a Great Job protecting Trumps Base?
They 'fawn-over-the-Don' don't they? So from now on Folks if you hear Rachael Madow saying she's all for the Republicans and has a GOP inside liner blanket she sleeps in at night, you know she has protected at all cost Trumps Base and it's True!

When you here any word out of the U.S. Supreme Court that they haven't taken a position politically you know they are simply protecting Trumps Base. They wouldn't want to mess it up by Hearing Judy v. Obama 14-9396 at ALL COSTS!

That's why they denied the forma pauperis Motion even arbitrarily. They had to protect Mr. Trump's Base and Mr. Judy was a Democrat.

They don't care even about looking bad about denying Justice to poor people. Its the rich by God they are dedicated to serve.

Protect the TENS-of-Millions in Trump's Base at all Cost- Even $350 filing fee and printing cost. They really don't want any of that Base threatened because he'll need it to beat the FBI enchanted Hillary Clinton, and those Sanders Supporters keep'em coming over to "The Don". That's why Sanders will interfer with Birthers being actually heard by the SCOTUS, but not a peep out of him about protecting the poor in the Courts of Law, and not a peep out of him about #EmailGate. COVER IT UP, protect Trump's Base at all Cost.


The WALL they want secretly must get BUILT! The Muslims they don't want here must be kept out at all Cost! That requires protecting Trumps Base and making Damn Well Good and Sure no one.. and you can ask Jeb Bush to confirm this, no one under any circumstances and at any cost cuts into Trump's Base.

So you see how we have all been really fooled by the Megyn Kelly "blood sport" FOX NEWS, ABC NEWS, CBS NEWS, NBC NEWS, CNN, MSNBC.. All of them LOVE Mr. Donald Trump and have viciously and fiercly defended The Rise of Trump, by keeping the real OBAMA Ineligibility Case filed in Court covered up!!!❤

Can I get an 'AMEN' Brother? Can I get a
Hallel.. uuuuu.. jah ?! Trump's got them working for him.The whole Bunch of them and the U.S. Supreme Court. Its True, believe me. All evidence supports these facts.

Even with a defacto President in the Office, they do NOT want that Case Heard. Gotta protect Trump's Base.

Here.. Watch the video.
 Birther Pie In the Sky 



UK - LONDON -
 MAYOR Boris Johnson 
QUESTIONS FRACTURED ALLEGIANCE 
OF OBAMA

In what can be called a simply brilliant observation the London U.K Mayor, rumored to be favored to replace David Cameron as Prime Minister, stated what was simply natural to Obama in his divided or fractured allegiances of [inherited] Kenyan Citizenship from father and U.S. Citizenship from mother - that Obama basically had a grudge against the U.K. based in contextually or inherited allegiance of and from his father's Kenyan natural born Citizenship.

When trying to understand someone's actions parents are naturally often referred to in gaining an understanding in what's called the 'Dose Affect". The Father affects of abandoning a child is really damaging: research has shown that many kids whose fathers have died fare better than those whose fathers have left as Obama Sr. did. Each [Parent] equally ( Jus sanguinis (Latin: right of blood) ) plays a part of the 'natural' in [natural born Citizen] inherited by a child, as well as [Place] of birth (Jus soli meaning 'right of the soil' ) which more stridently reflects the official or legal jurisdiction of laws a child was born under as far as Country or Nation.
Ted Cruz is not a natural born Citizen missing two legs of
the three legs he was [naturalized] by statute or law

A combination of four factors, father, mother, soil and choice allow a multitude of dual allegiances formally recognized by governments of the world. The [naturalization] processes of most Governments allow one to choose a citizenship perhaps not even associated with the other three. That process is also a adaptation or adoption understood as being 'naturalized', however it is an adoptive statute of law that is foreign to natures own recipe of [natural born Citizen] ie. born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.  

Kenya gained it's independence from England as a Nation December 3rd, 1963. Obama was born August 4th, 1961 according to the long form birth certificate he released to the White House Press core April 4th, 2011 as The New York Times Reported [WASHINGTON — President Obama released his long-form birth certificate on Wednesday, a step that injected him directly into the simmering “birther” controversy in the hope of finally ending it, or even turning it to his advantage.]

This is exactly why Divided or Dual Citizenship was/and is/ suppose to be prohibited from the Office of the President of the United States and why a fractured allegiance lends government disaster towards a malfeasance of credibility disassociate of one truly representative as undivided or un-fractured of the U.S.A. as a sovereign Nation Country. It remains the reason why we call 'naturalized' persons [Citizens] but have reserved the rights as Americans of the Office of the President to only [natural born Citizens] which ultimately is a TIME TEST of coming around and sticking around.

Twas not just 'favor' in ones own Country, or towards a native land that the [natural born Citizen] ie. born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents, was initiated and has survived, but also what would be considered inappropriate 'disfavor' that can malign an ally-Country ill-faded in this instance for the United States of America in judgement, trade, or friendly association all of which are key components of being an ally. 

The U.S. House Congressional Testimony of 2002 in the Judicial Committee brought this into the spotlight focusing the attention of Congress on the merits which lead to a defeat of an alteration of the qualification. Therein it was confirmed and recognized that although a first generation or naturalized U.S. Citizen commits to being American and distinguished loyalty can be awarded and noticed in the offices of Judges, Representatives, and Senators, and military there is a significant American adaptation that also takes place naturally in the second generation of someone Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents that takes more TIME.  This time factor is really what opponents are wedgie'd over, however it is precisely the time factor which places a natural barrier towards infiltration or usurpation of what has become the greatest military force on the Earth by the grace of God.

This adaptation to cultural norms is especially prevalent for those coming from Theocracies or Religion Republics where toleration for multiple religions is scorned or even illegal. For Example, "The Islamic Republic of Iran" setting favor for a particular religion Islam, or even the mind-set of control wherein a Totalitarian or Empirical State has been the custom for lifetimes like The People's Republic of China where single candidate elections are the norm, and a very tight state control against the pluralitas of religion theology is taken in contrast from a system of equal checks and balances of authority, as the norm in the United States is understood under the U.S. Constitution in its three legged stool of Judicial, Legislative and Executive Branches all having a check and balance on the other, and standing strong for multiple Faiths in freedom of religion.

So many press reporters and scholars have pointed to the [ natural born Citizen] clause as 'out-dated' and laughed incredulously at the notion of the Office of President being infiltrated by foreign influence or a foreigner in our day, even calling it discriminatory to every 'naturalized' Citizen, without the slightest thought to what a divided loyalty or fractured allegiance can represent or in fact misrepresent in a dual or fractured allegiance by Parent or Place as it is resolved upon the child as the predominant forces of natural accommodation that is subsequently chosen by the Creator. 

News Flash

China: April 22, 2016 Test Ballistic Missiles Capable of Reaching United States that Could be Fitted with 10 Nuclear Warheads 

Russia: March 17th, 2016 High Operational Intensity and Improved Inter-Service Coordination

Iran: April 22, 2016 - U.S. Military Marine General says Iran nuclear deal fell short.
North Korea- April 22, 2016 - North Korea Preparations for 5th Nuclear Test Complete

Hillary Clinton- Feb 1, 2016  The Public Policy Implications of Clinton’s Emailgate -'Under Clinton, the State Department approved $165 billion worth of commercial arms sales to 20 nations whose governments gave millions to the Clinton Foundation.'

While Hillary Clinton is a [natural born Citizen] the work she did under Obama was certainly work done under a great compromise of the Office of the President's [natural born Citizen] qualification requirement, and that has nothing to do with where Obama was born, but who he and the State of Hawaii has said his father was- a Kenyan natural born Citizen which split Obama's natural allegiances into an inherited dual citizenship or fractured allegiance. 

While foreign Government's are updating systems that could very well wipe out literally millions of American's with new supersonic maneuvering capabilities of sophisticated intercontinental ballistic missiles capable of delivering a pay load of ten warheads in thirty minutes to multiple targets the happy reporter children of propaganda have grown up seeing Obama admonish Congress from releasing the 28 pages believed to involve the Saudi Arabia financing of both 9/11 tragedies in America. You'd think they'd learn?

Still!, they haven't digested a fact that the [natural born Citizen] clause in our Constitution just might be what has thus far allowed them to grow up and report. The mudslinging they're doing upon the Principle of [natural born Citizen] might not have the same benefit for their own children in their national security welfare.

Not only do we see Obama involved in the disparaging the UK in the return of a special heartfelt memorial given on loan from the British government to the White House after the September 11th attacks back in 2001 from England of Winston Churchill, but they are involved in a cover up and lie about doing so!

The White House said in 2012 that the story of the bust being moved was “100 per cent false” and that the bust remained in the White House, having been moved to the President's private residence.

It was however later forced to clarify that the Churchill bust still located in the President's residence was in fact a different bust, and that one had indeed been removed.

 If that is not endemic of the inner fractured allegiances within the person of Obama and the ability to cover it up right in front of the Main Stream Media, I don't know what is? That the Media for all it's hype about scrutinizing Presidential candidates and vetting them thoroughly on one hand and on the other were seen turning their nose down on Sheriff Joe Arpaio's cold case posse investigation relating the [long form birth certificate] was a [fraudulent document], a stunning revelation from a law enforcement investigation that Congress has failed to even hear, is sickening at best and traitorous at worst to the national security concerns of our Country.

The Mayor from London Boris Johnson said that the US would never dream of engaging in an arrangement similar to the EU. While that might be true under normal circumstances, we have slipped. Where the sovereignty of our own nation is so broadly dismantled to foreigners and disrespected by domestic enemies of that sovereignty, it certainly seems that's exactly what Obama's been up to with the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP apposed by Democrats) and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP apposed by Democrats)? His own Political Party is appalled by his free balling our sovereignty!

Boris Johnson: UK and America can be better friends than ever Mr Obama... if we LEAVE the EU.

So, why does Obama want the UK to stay in the EU? [US President Barack Obama is in the UK to impose the “toxic” Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) deal on Britain, a move which will allow US firms to demolish the state health system and more besides, War on Want warns.]
Title 8 Nationality and Naturalization defining [Citizen]
'naturalized Citizens' are not nor can be [natural born Citizens]

The idea that the [natural born Citizen] clause is a technical miscreant or that it doesn't matter is almost as easily splintered by what Democratic Party Representative Levin from Michigan stated was important about the technical aspects of our Trade Agreements with foreign nations.

The top Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee Rep. D-MI Sander Levin also opposes a provision in the agreement that would make it easier for member countries to undercut the U.S. auto industry by importing cheap auto parts from China. He said the complex “rules of origin” system could allow TPP member countries to ship Chinese parts to auto plants in Mexico where cars destined for U.S. dealerships are assembled.

They are very technical but they really matter,” Levin said. Well, the [natural born Citizen] requirement for the Office of the President is very technical, but it really does matter.

CRJ

CRJ
Here's the Link to Contribute if you'd like to Cody's Campaign improve your record for Taking A Stand for the Constitution.
 www.codyjudy.us


Thank You!


Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy Campaign
Cody Robert Judy



Campaign Committee to elect Cody Robert Judy U.S. President in 2016.

Web Site www.codyjudy.us
Keep coming back!


INSPIRING - I believe in You


Cody's Record is one you can Trust as one in the public service, and one that has served our Nation and will serve our Nation well in the Office of the President. The nucleus of our Constitution that may just be the collaboration or difference between the Truth and the Lie you will have a choice in voting for.

Help Support Cody Robert Judy's Campaign for President Cody is doing what not even Mr Trump or any other Republican Candidate for President can do. Remember - Principle over Party!





Every dollar counts towards a Campaign willing to take a stand for your individual Civil Rights and having a President like Cody Robert Judy, you can be sure that your Rights are going to be stood up for because he's the one with a Record in Court to prove that actions speak louder than words. Helping him out today is going to help you out Tomorrow.

*COURT CASES AND OTHER CASES OF ACTION


1) Judy v. McCain Las Vegas, Nevada 2008 U.S. Fed. 2)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Ballot Challenge Executive Court 3)Judy v. Obama New Hampshire State Superior Court 4)New Hampshire State Supreme Court 5)Judy v. Obama Georgia Ballot Challenge Executive Court 6)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Superior Court 7)Judy v. Obama Georgia State Supreme Court 8)Judy v. Obama Ballot Challenges United States Supreme Court 12-5276 9)Judy v. Obama Utah U.S. Fed Court 10)Judy v. Obama Utah Division Circuit Court of Appeals (Denver, Colorado) 11.) Judy v. Obama U.S. Supreme Court 14-9396

Other Courts

12-10th Amendment Trial New York witness in the CIA Columbia Obama Sedition and Treason Trial

13-Amicus Curiae Filed in Berg v. Obama 2008

14-Amicus Curiae Filed in Keyes v. Obama Judge Carter case

15-Amicus Curiae Filed in Military Court if Lt. Terry Lakin

The proceeding referenced Court actions have been within the three Presidential Races 2008, 2012, and 2016.

Cody Robert Judy - U.S. President 2016
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.