Saturday, May 30, 2015

BREAKING NEWS REPORT: What IS DRUDGE SAYING? Where are HEADLINES on SCOTUS Case Judy v. Obama 14-9396?


FEATURED EDITORIAL: THE POST & EMAIL -Herculean Deeds
BREAKING NEWS REPORT: What IS DRUDGE Saying? Where are HEADLINES on SCOTUS Case Judy v. Obama 14-9396?


What exactly is The DRUDGE REPORT trying to say in favoring no less than four of our latest half dozen tweets at the Cody Robert Judy for President 2016 Twitter account? Of course Matt Drudge has been named one of the most powerful and influential characters in the Political Arena today. On May 7th the political powerhouse The Hill run a story with the headlines, "Is Matt Drudge the second most influential man in America?" calling him the single most influential man in America Media and posting the question is Drudge the second most powerful man in America?

The power of The Drudge Report has been in the simplicity of the political and eye-catching headlines in a world being drowned out or inundated with headlines. Reliability and trustworthiness have been noticeable hall marks attributing to the Drudge Reports success over its tenure. They would have to be or the credentials of news would be lost in a hurry. Consistently you can scan The Drudge Report and find the general speed of the Nation and World Reports. Does that make The Drudge Report a good Reporter writing detailed reports of everything going on? Absolutely not, that makes The Drudge Report a very good collector of headlines in the news.

So what does it tell you when The Drudge Report favorites four Tweets of the Cody Robert Judy for President 2016 Campaign? Well, you can decipher it yourself, but what that tells us is even Matt Drudge cannot believe there are no headline stories being written about the little known Democratic Party Candidate whose run for President in 2008, 2012, and now 2016 with not a single National Story Report written in the face of Herculean Deeds for the Republic that constitute a politician whose doing much more than spouting off words to capture headlines and is much more about deeds that actually go to the root problem we face in America of our whole Republic being saturated with fraud.

Where does the story rank in anyone's mind of the very real possibility that Mr. Obama is escorted out of the White House in handcuffs for fraud upon the Republic, fraud upon all of the contributors to his Campaigns for President,fraud upon the last two elections of the United States of America, and fraud upon Cody Robert Judy's Campaigns? Maybe the much simpler question is what is bigger than that in anyone's mind when it comes to a National Stories?

Is ISIS bigger? Is Iran Proliferation Bigger? Is the Floods in Texas Bigger? Is former Governor Martin O'Malley's entry into the political arena or Hillary's Campaign or anyone of the twenty Republicans in the field for President now bigger? Is any national world story of any other foreign Country bigger? We think Matt Drudge at The Drudge Report grasp a sense that nothing is bigger or affects more American's and he just can not believe not a single national reporter for a single open news organization has grasps it, or the power in it.

Just looking at the details of the Presidential Candidate with a case in the United States Supreme Court against Obama is pretty big..win.. lose or draw; not a single other Candidate for President in the fields on the Democratic or Republican side has anything remotely considered as a Primary Candidates consideration for actually taking a Recorded Action to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. We remind everyone that is actually in the oath of the Office of the President.

The other thing that we think Matt Drudge of The Drudge Report realizes in the detailed duty of his organization is the very real tear occurring in America that signals a greater problem than we have ever faced in racial divide. And that Cody Robert Judy in his actions over the last 6 years breaches that divide with character and the principles that The United States Constitution reflects upon the Nation, building a bridge for the racial barometer Obama seems bent on exasperating.

The Media has constantly picked upon The Birther Issue as racial, but what do they say to the law suit Cody Robert Judy filed first as a Candidate for President in 2008 that if Sen. McCain had won very well could have tail spun the Nation into another election with the circumstances of an elected Candidate, who still didn't qualify for the Office as is spelled out in circumstances of happening in Amendment XX, SECT.3? Indeed in Judy v. McCain the District Court Judge delayed, and delayed, and delayed again his ruling until after the election and than used the election results to determine the case was "moot".

While that doesn't reflect upon Obama it does reflect on the conditions of the 2011 release of Obama's long form birth certificate, proven to be a fabrication that could not have possibly been a copy of an original document, and that has been submitted as evidence within the U.S. Supreme Court writ of Certiorari in Judy v. Obama 14-9396, along with other evidence that details fraud upon Obama's Selective Service and Social Security identification. Indeed the whole identity of Barack Obama/ aka Barry Soetoro is indeed now questioned in the strict criteria of A) Who exactly was elected and B)Is that person even qualified under the standards of the expectations "We The People" have decided are the qualifications for the Office of the President?

We have a barrage of both Media Reports, populations assumptions, and scholarly opinions that now are saying the qualifications for the U.S. Senators and U.S. Representatives as "Citizen" is the exact same qualifications for the Office of the President's qualification of "natural born Citizen"; lending the question of why exactly would the founders have gone to any effort to make any of the Office qualifications different in the first place? That is in fact what the representations of U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio and U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz as well as Florida Gov. Bobby Jindal's campaigns for President are resting on, and its not a sure foundation at all.

The KEY to their success actually rest upon Cody Robert Judy v. Barack Hussein Obama/aka Barry Soetoro et.al Case No. 14-9396, being dismissed and swept away like some car in a Texas Flood never to be seen again. Believe the fact that there is a great deal of political force being waged now on the behalf of Mr. Obama's legacy by Republicans and Democrats, but we must ask ourselves at what expense to the Republic and those who do not affiliate themselves from any party on the conscripts of fraud?

Does anyone personally staked out to become the victim of Fraud really attribute that as something they hope and aspire to elect and find in a Presidential Candidate? Why not look for the Candidates in Prison who have robbed banks, forged checks, and cranked out false identities with the goal of taking the life savings of your grandparents, parents, and children or those people you call family, and using the proceeds for themselves without asking?

Who is famous among you that will stand up and state "I desire to be the victim of fraud?", George Clooney, You? Oprah Winfrey you? Tom Cruise, You? Brad Pitt, You? How about Angelina? Does she put up with Fraud Brad? You ask those people if they would like to have their life savings taken away with the use of Fraud, and see what they will say? We really don't even think drug dealers like to be taken in fraud. In the prison systems fraud will get you killed so you actually might be dealing with someone with some integrity if you did elect someone from prison.

We know Hillary Clinton doesn't like fraud, or does she? She has personally been invited to file an Amicus Curiae in taking a stand for the Qualifications for the Office of the President twice on Twitter from CRJ2016's Camp, but we have not seen anything from her attorneys yet. So, we have to assume the answer is, "Yes, and she loves and admires those who commit fraud upon the American Public".

There hasn't been a story written with those headlines for the Drudge Report to post. That actually might be a time sensitive story Hillary Clinton could not avoid or control, because of the natural time procedures of the Case in the U.S. Supreme Court reflecting upon her actions of being a champion of character for the people that she says she wants to be.

Do you want a Champion who turns her back while fraud is committed and gives Barack Obama a big hug and says how much she really appreciates him and the outstanding job of fraud he has committed himself to? The real story is that these words are not fringe or harsh at all in the reflections of the Standard placed in front of the Court in Judy v. Obama 14-9396. These words are very civil in nature.

The Drudge Report doesn't write stories, they post them, but if there are no stories written, what possible headline could Drudge Post on the Drudge Report? If he posted a headline directly from the communications of this Campaign it would most certainly be seen as a bias because he doesn't do that for other Candidates. The Drudge Report makes clear notices or favoring Tweets is not considered an endorsement of any Candidate. So, the public, the Drudge Report, and this Campaign are stuck at an impasse of reporters willing to write a story and that seems to be a bridge we all find ourselves on. This brings us to another topic.. Twitter.

THE MANIPULATION OF POLITICAL TWEETS CORRALLED BY TWITTER

Two days ago, my campaign was indeed able to communicate this story to a list of regular top notch writing reporters. That's normally how you get a story out to a reporter fast and easy. Hey, here's a Pulitzer Prize for you that involves some 5 Presidential Candidates pretty directly, and the rest very easily indirectly as they all must indeed realize the Constitution of the United States provides a list of qualifications for the Office of the President they are running for. That ought to be a very ground floor basic consideration for them before the foreign policy is asked about.

The next question would be how many of them would like their Campaign's sabotaged with fraud based upon their meeting those criteria, but someone else not measuring up to those qualifications and winning an election and calling them poor sports? Does that sound like someone else we know? Lance Armstrong was found out but not before winning how many world cup races and destroying the lives of those other racers who might have won? He was stripped of his titles from years back for cheating in the races and enhancing his performance with un-natural and illegal means. The same can be said for Barack Obama who in know way would have been elected if he came out and said, "Listen, these are my fake identifications. Here's my long form fabrications, my selective service fabrications, and you guys already have seen that my social security card could not pass and that I couldn't register for Obamacare. Now based on those qualifications and a couple of great speeches in 2002 please elect me because there's not likely to be a Candidate for President who has standing and makes a Case to the U.S. Supreme Court? So basically, I can get away with it for years!"

There is no way that happens! So why should Obama be allowed to finish his 1.5 years in office with a record of damages another 'racer' is and has brought to the U.S. Supreme Court for Justice? Cody made the point very clear when the question came in?
Why not just let Obama finish his term of 1.5 years? Well, it takes a lot of time to exhaust state remedies and Cody's got some 15 Cases that have cost him quite a bit. Additionally, look we have many Senators and people in Offices now pushing and bullying the Qualifications in the Republican field and the action is dangerous to our National Security.

How would anyone of us like half our incomes suddenly confiscated or our cars taken? This easily attributes the pain and damages motivating Cody's pursuit of Justice. He genuinely has suffered a lot of damages, and has not given that up. Now just because other Candidates did give up, doesn't make Obama's actions right, and it doesn't make Cody's legal actions any less significant either as fraud against anyone is a negative action. In fact, by giving up those other Candidates conceded the elections, Cody has never done that and the U.S. Supreme Court has his argument and his record in front of them.

Recently, Cody sent the headlines of this story to Twitter to a group of Reporters who may just not have known about what was happening. There "Handles" on Twitter he includes here for the public consideration. These are reporters who have written major political stories of some kind very recently and had those published many featured on The Drudge Report. They include:
@hunterschwarz, @DdavidGSauage,@Mollyhf,@JuriSense,@JakeTapper,@Toddgillman,@DavidZucchino,@Ruskygal,@DavidCloudLAT,@DylanByers,@StephenHayes,@bdomenech,@Gabby-Hoffman,@BuckSexton,@olivedarcy,@pagesixEmily,@llerer,@ANHQDC,@joebattenfeld.

Additionally, Cody has released his stories to at least 4 to 5 Reporters in 2 to 4 major newspapers in every State of the Union and many Nationally Radio and Televised Programs on all the Major Networks consistently with a dozen articles written on this Blog just since the U.S. Supreme Court Case was Docketed. As far as being a great communicator it is very difficult not to see the over 500 Post on this Blog as a Book Report to the Media of every step politically that has transpired that would be called a transparency unparalleled with most of the Candidates self written work and action. The silence by the Media can only be described as a capitulation of Obama's Fraud due to not reporting the complaint to the public.

Today, Cody tried to send out a Tweet on the CRJ2016 Twitter account @CodyRobertJudy2016 and received a message that he could not include Twitter addresses in his Tweets of people that did not follow him, even though the list above went out two days ago with no problem and none of those reporters followed him. What this does is make it very difficult to communicate a story to a Reporter on Twitter if they don't follow you. Cody did not abuse Tweeting to them numerous times, it was a single Tweet made to four or five of the reporters at a time due to the 120 character restraints placed on Tweets, but at least we do have that on his Twitter Record and the Public knows now.

If these reporters are being threatened in anyway, they can certainly report that on their own account and social networks. They could even Tweet, "Hey, I can't write a story about CRJ2016 Judy v. Obama 14-9396, Boss said "No"", and I'm sure the public would understand.

We here at the Campaign would certainly wish to extend a GENUINE HAT-TIP to The Drudge Report for saying in so many words with 4 Favorites of CRJ2016 Tweets "I don't have a HEADLINE to put on The Drudge Report about this!". We were quite excited Drudge shared that pain with us. At least someone in the Major Political Arena of Reporting recognizes the dedicated hard work Cody has gone through over the last six years unsung and unwritten in the pursuit of Justice for our Republic in really what is an unparalleled story of taking a stand for principle that holds the keys to the United States of America's national security. The fact it was as reported 'the most influential man in the American Media' is simply and undeniably an honor to Cody Robert Judy's 2016 Campaign for United States President and his fight for Principle over Political Party.

The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

Thank you to everyone who is and has contributed just a little here and just a little there, for we are working very hard in using the little that we do have as efficiently and proficiently as it comes in, as I'm sure everyone would agree. Please consider a contribution
Let's make it Official and support a Qualified Candidate whose has dedicated his time and talent to taking a stand for America. Let's raise a million dollars and give you the right to say, "I put my money where my mouth is. I'm not a hypocrite, I'm a Patriot!".


INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI




We NEED YOUR HELP AMERICA now, to educate Americans in the order of our Constitution to hear Cody's Case to the U.S. Supreme Court. We are Taking a Stand for individual Civil Rights and against an unprecedented ASSAULT upon your Constitution and prior decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court! With your help we can make it happen. You are a very important key to this. So its up to you America to help Restore America Today for a Better America Tomorrow. Like, Share, and Help us in the Contribution Revolution.


Get your questions answered by ordering Cody Robert Judy's Book here.

The 2016 Campaign begins now. Please send your contributions and help with the ABC (American Birther Campaign) today and my election for President in 2016 and Join the 257 of us now on my Facebook Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President 2016 site.

Cody Robert Judy for President 2016
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, Utah 84401

Thank you
Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for United States President 2016
www.codyjudy.us

CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION



The Commercial is simply called "America"


Join the new CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRES 2016 FB SITE Here



Thursday, May 28, 2015

BREAKING NEWS: OBAMA and GOVERNMENT Defaults U.S. SUPREME COURT'S ORDER to RESPOND in JUDY V. OBAMA


PART I. OF THIS REPORT HERE- IN CASE YOU MISSED IT

FEATURED EDITORIAL: The Post & Email
BREAKING NEWS: OBAMA /GOVERNMENT Defaults U.S. SUPREME COURT'S REQST to RESPOND in JUDY V. OBAMA
APPEARANCES THE U.S. SUPREME COURT "WILL" HERE JUDY V. OBAMA

'08, '12, and 2016 Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy told supporters Wednesday listening to Michael Medved's commercial that called Birthers "Attackers" and queried the listener that there was no good reason not to let foreigners into the Commander-In-Chief's position that handles keys to America's nuclear option as well like Obama has gutted the military commanders chiefly in charge of the leadership responsible for defending America, that there has come another sign or appearance upon the stage that indicates the United States Supreme Court has at least five Justices that would like to hear the case hurdling the Rule of Four that is necessary. [A little 'Thank You' to The Drudge Report for Favoriting our TWEET of this Report!]

"Chief among four things that points us in that direction", Judy said, "transpiring since my latest May 22nd Breaking News Report that has become this Blogs' Second Most Viewed Post eight days ago now on Case Judy v. Obama 14-9396 which you might find interesting as well:

" 1st Point-The Internet Site Certpool.com that manages to keep track of all the cases from every Circuit Court that has filed a Writ of Certiorari in the United States Supreme Court has begin posting CONFERENCE CASES listed for June 11th, 2015, which misses the June 8th Date we had projected as in sinc function of normal procedures for the Court dismissing cases.

"Elaborating on the details of this sites report we see that just one of the cases "set for Conference" had a due date of May 20th for the Respondent to Respond coordinating with mine. The greater number of cases that also contained the May 20th deadline were indeed set from the 10th Circuit for "the June 4th Conference" and the latest date of response I found on the June 4th Conference itinerary was 'Response Due June 8th' overlapping my Cases' Response due date of May 20th by some 17 days.

"Indeed of the 10 cases set for the Conference just from the 10th Circuit 7 have dates extended out beyond mine as "due dates for Response", set by the Court, upon the filing of the Writ of Cert."
DRUDGE FAVORS THREE CRJ TWEETS...................................

Not everything is recorded on the Docket Reports that are presented to the public view Cody continued, " I remember from my experience when I filed a Emergency Motion for the U.S. Supreme Court to hear my Case in 2012 based on the term of the Court expiring before the coming election, and it was listed as a Supplemental Brief by the Clerk of the Court, which hardly gives a clue to the Public Eye of what is before the Court. That was filed July 16th, 2012 in Judy v. Obama 12-5276 which would have if heeded given the Court and the political arena plenty of time to adapt for the Nov. Presidential Election. The result of course was not in the public interest or favor of fair elections in 2012 and represented an excruciatingly painful wound for all of us to bear.

"What this suggest is my case is not on the fast track to be dismissed as might otherwise be the case if it was or had been distributed for Conference on June 4th. On that web site, you'll see "BIO" and that stands for "Brief in Opposition" requested and you see that on this particular case listed on the Docket Report of the Site here. This of course tells us that the Court is wanting a response by the Respondent that was not otherwise filed or where the Waiver was filed first. On the other case listed on the BIO Reported cases thus far seen here, you don't see that same Report on the Docket, which exemplifies or emphasizes my point that not all that is happening in a case is seen on the Docket Report.

"2nd Point, and that LITTLE something that doesn't seem to bode all that well for me is that the U.S. Supreme Court Clerk has listed the Caption of my case as (CODY ROBERT JUDY vs. BARACK H. OBAMA, President of the United States et. al.,) and that is of course not how it was filed. Ask yourself how often you see the Clerk changing the caption of a case from how it appears on the papers they receive from attorneys? The public can see the Writ of Certiorari that was filed here on SCRIBD.

"3rd Point- of this would indeed be the actual Response that I received from Donald B. Verrilli Jr. the current Solicitor General just yesterday which was quite interesting in the way it was written. A. it was NOT signed! Now if I filed a Record to the Court that was not signed, it would not be counted as 'valid'. This of course would indeed be considered a HUGE error and represent a formal LACK OF RESPONSE to the U.S. Supreme Court Order. The Court in my case has gone to great lengths in the past to shall we say 'pull my hair out' with trivial points of crossing t's and dotting i's and has not been very lenient to me as a prose litigator causing me great pain at times. This has also been recorded as when they sent my Writ back to me needlessly costing me additional paper work that is expensive with mailing expenses over years as well as providing 'time' for the Respondent and successfully delaying the Case.

"B. It also listed the Case differently than is presented by me in the Court, listing the official position of Barack Obama in the Government as President of the US. last I checked the abbreviation written by most juveniles for the United States of America is was the U.S.A; therefore the wording of "US" pertains directly to, perhaps a small group of people that is not elaborated upon? Your guess is as good as mine. Who is "US"?

"One of the biggest points of my Case is if Obama was elected with fabricated identifications, forged long form birth certificate, fabricated selective service record, fake social security number that couldn't even pass e-verify as was the example when they tried to show how easy Obamacare was to register for, as well as not even being a qualified Candidate that, should he be elected is able to lawfully qualify for the Office and operate the powers of the President by the vested power WE THE PEOPLE have directed for the OFFICE after being both qualified and elected, then how is it possible to even admit Obama in the Court as "President of the US", unless it certainly doesn't mean U.S.A?

"Given the most equitably and lenient discernment possible we come to the body of of the Solicitor General's argument on the Waiver, which states, "The Government was never served in this case and has not appeared in any of the proceedings. The Government hereby waives its right to file a response to the petition in this case, unless requested to do so by the Court" and then.. it's unsigned. (?)

"While I do agree "Government" can be used properly in this case by the Solicitor General based on Rep. Nancy Pelosi's involvement and Sen. Harry Reid in the combination of a functioning 'cartel' formed in the corporations of the DNC and Obama's Campaign Corporation, unsigned its validity is worthless which DEFAULTS the Governments representation. And, let us not forget that May 20th was the date that Obama was given by the Court to Respond and he has failed to Respond by May 20th through any Counsel he might have privately for his defense also constituting a DEFAULT to the Court's Request that RESPONDENT'S file that on or before May 20th.

"4th Point and evenly appreciated is the fact that I did open the case up for any friend of the Court to file an Amicus Curiae Brief. These are filed and appear as little blue squares listed as "Amici" on the Certpool.com site. Of course when people are interested in say 'defending Obama' because they would like his policies protected against any disaster befalling his ability to function as President rather than having his ineligibility exposed by someone with standing in the U.S. Supreme Court and his ineligibility exposed thereby also nixing policies, we see none have been recorded for Obama.

" Summing this up very specifically and technically, the Court has not been addressed as it has ORDERED by either the Government or any person involved in this that was served. Obama was served at the WHITE HOUSE by signature if you remember I have recorded here, and by appearances we see the Court is mulling this over. I think we have 5 Justices that are inclined to hear the case."

We were dumbfounded with the Report of incompetence here. Who is "US"? Of course we will continue to keep you updated with details about when the United States Supreme Court decides to set the Case for Conference. For up to the minute Reports of what is happening in this Case Stay Tuned.


The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

Thank you to everyone who is and has contributed just a little here and just a little there, for we are working very hard in using the little that we do have as efficiently and proficiently as it comes in, as I'm sure everyone would agree. Please consider a contribution
Let's make it Official and support a Qualified Candidate whose has dedicated his time and talent to taking a stand for America. Let's raise a million dollars and give you the right to say, "I put my money where my mouth is. I'm not a hypocrite, I'm a Patriot!".


INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI




We NEED YOUR HELP AMERICA now, to educate Americans in the order of our Constitution to hear Cody's Case to the U.S. Supreme Court. We are Taking a Stand for individual Civil Rights and against an unprecedented ASSAULT upon your Constitution and prior decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court! With your help we can make it happen. You are a very important key to this. So its up to you America to help Restore America Today for a Better America Tomorrow. Like, Share, and Help us in the Contribution Revolution.


Get your questions answered by ordering Cody Robert Judy's Book here.

The 2016 Campaign begins now. Please send your contributions and help with the ABC (American Birther Campaign) today and my election for President in 2016 and Join the 257 of us now on my Facebook Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President 2016 site.

Cody Robert Judy for President 2016
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, Utah 84401

Thank you
Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for United States President 2016
www.codyjudy.us

CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION



The Commercial is simply called "America"


Join the new CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRES 2016 FB SITE Here

Wednesday, May 27, 2015

Laws of Nature v. The Laws of Men - The Balance in the U.S. Supreme Court being Weighed in Obama's Ineligibility



Laws of Nature v. The Laws of Men - The Balance in the U.S. Supreme Court being Weighed in Obama's Ineligibility

The fundamental question for American Politicians is, "Are you keeping up with America or has America passed you by?" At first it may seem a strange question. America has been rooted in its own traditions even as it is considered a very young Nation, but at the heart of America is Liberty and America's Politicians have become increasing despondent to her calls. A great transformation is occurring in America's yearning for nature, natural, and vintage. The real deal is sought in our water, food, and lifestyle. That translates to America's Political Arena, where liberty is threatened posing a second question; Why have America's Politicians been clamping down on Liberty when the opposite is at the heart of America?

Protection and security have been the staples of an ever increasing mandate of force we have seen stalking us ever closer into the minute details of our lives rather than the protection and security that we needed for our liberty. Barack Obama's forged identity was used as a fabricated package harnessed to cage America into a slavery with its guilt based identity of color rather than character. America increasing feels the call of organic natural food in healing and holistic living, but has had the laws of nature violated in an unqualified ineligible person in the White House who is not a "natural born Citizen" violating America's Constitution.

The false narrative has been fed to American's as a package to supersede nature, like an artificial sweetener, steroid injected meat, or mutated seed that fails to reproduce itself as a standard of control away from nature. So what is, and what has caused the fascination America has right now with 'nature', 'natural', and even 'vintage' that is pushing the limits of nostalgia we might see as a Revolution of canonical proportions?

Isn't it interesting to see the Citizens associated with clean air, clean water, organic food rooting their noses in the mire of exactly the opposite of what they staunchly defend as a diet when it comes to the politics of voting for Barack Obama who is as fabricated and unnatural as a hybrid seed that has had its chromosomes altered to a point of failing to produce itself? The Founders and signers of the Constitution of the United States had high regard for the Laws of Nature because they had a great interest in forming something that would actually last and perpetuate itself by the greatest laws known to man which the Laws of Nature represent.

High above the realms of man-made laws and interventions are those we call The Laws of Nature and it is these laws that have in deed lasted when man-made laws falter and implode upon themselves and the populations that seek to over-rule the laws of nature. Some of the tell tale signs that a population has drifted into the margin call opposing the Laws of Nature are seen as voluminous amounts of legislation seeking control of nearly every aspect of our lives. Another tell-tale sign striking at the heart of guilt is that the prisons become overflowing; another, leviathan national debt robbing future generations.

The reason for this is that the population through its legislation begin to make living as a natural man harder and harder confusing the morality taught in religion with the morality taught by nature. Some might say its been the tradition of religions to drift away from the Laws of Nature God has taught throughout the generations of man. Still, they continually choke off the population in the desire for power like corking off the top of the bottle and violently shaking up the mix which eventually explodes in ways that are unnatural and fly out of the normal means of channeling. The prohibition years proved a perfect example of that. America repealed the 18th Amendment that imposed a dry state suffered the consequences and with the 21st Amendment authorizing a wet one repealing the dry state of affairs. We seemed to learn that lesson.

The one we are facing now manifest itself also in a clogging of the Court Systems with nearly everything we would expect from an ineligible unqualified corruption of the 'natural born Citizen' clause in the Office of the President. We are 'told' that 'natural law' has now become extinct in the Law Schools of America and has been replaced by the study of 'man-made' laws. From what we already know the laws of man opposed to the laws of nature usually cause the population a good deal of problems.

The concern of Birthers goes far beyond the 'person' of Barack Obama whose supporters tragically attribute the opposition of as an unqualified, ineligible person in the Office, towards the physical characteristics of his person. The single definition missing from the quantified man-made 'naturalization' laws we find in aliens and nationals is "Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents" and it stands as a testament of organically grown. The unique establishment and harvest of America's own home grown that comes from Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents.

While the office of the President was particularly singled out with the natural born Citizen requirement, the "Citizen" requirement was indeed an open door and welcome mat for those who were first generation Americans. As America has only had 44 President's in its lifetime, the qualification excluding Citizens with a foreign parent or birth place from the Office of the President can hardly be called 'mass discrimination' as if America had no right at all to explicitly require for its President the singleness of heart found in 'natural born Citizen' for and in the protection of our own Liberty.

Indeed, those attempting to drum up other arguments can be shown to necessarily be in the dark works of confining America, her liberty, freedom, and unique Sovereignty in the World. Those who say that Sovereignty is not under constant attack or that America has no need since the end of our Inaugural Revolutionary Ball for concern of elimination are about as blinded in the fog of relative accounts of history as well the evil designs of power hungry men as can be punctuated.

For those wishing and hoping for a more 'natural state' of affairs America in a great historical sense has been a land of just that opportunity. People came from all over drawn in their hearts for a better way of living. A life style of permission they felt deep within their souls. Such beauty was heralding the ability to live as God built them and was/is seen as a Gift from God as pure as nature could have intended.

So why are so many politicians including Presidents opposed to the Laws of Nature? Maybe one of the biggest reasons is that most have come from the worship of the laws of man in their workshops. They saw how their own words could be translated into power over a population from the Districts of Congress, the States of the Senate to the Governorship and for the most part the Laws of Nature in the Office of the President have been historically protected and demanded by America.

The only way in fact to subvert has been by the sly cunning and craftiness of those willing to fabricate, forge, and de-fraud the population for their own gain. This has by its own nature of corruption perpetuated a great dis-trust among the Citizens of the United States of America and a turn is now not only manifesting itself in the populations diet of food, but is beginning to dawn in the political arena of America! Indeed the very laws of nature may be testifying to us as it gets our attention in more ways than one.

If the Laws of Nature are at least worthy of equal consideration in the context of man-made laws and we see the deportation of The Laws of Nature as foreign in our Law Schools, wouldn't we expect those in the Battle to indeed gain our attention? Far from judgement is the argument that is made. This is the time where the jury is listening and that jury now is the United States of America's People. We The People have been charged in forming a more perfect union with the laws of nature that would harmonize and be a construction of peace and good will towards man.

The confusion of darting and dashing from side to side has become the stage for all of us. Do the laws of nature testify that some are born gay and to respect nature our laws in deed must defend that nature by adapting? That consideration is being articulated in the U.S. Supreme Court as we speak. The U.S. Supreme Court also has ObamaCare, ObamaAmnesty, and ObamaForiegn Policy in its cross-hairs yet at the root of all of them is Judy v. Obama 14-9396 is Obama even qualified and eligible to be in the Office of the President wielding the sword as a pen in the Executive Branch of Government and gutting the Constitution's principles as a walking talking violation of the Office.

How can America even look at anything else or not SEE that an ineligible person in the Office of the President is bound to corruption, and in that the corruption of principles, and contempt of the very laws of nature that has kept us pretty well increasing our place in the world as a leader among the Nations? Was it all just a fluke? A happenstance of incredible place in the Universe that can be attributed to the roll of the dice?

We must all ask ourselves these poignant questions and answer them in the quite places of our heart. Indeed, if America had known Obama's social security card, draft card, and long form birth certificate were problematic fabrications and forgeries used to obfuscate an identity that would soil the Office of the President in an unbearable way how could defenders of Obama possible state Obama would have been elected or even state that he was elected? Indeed can it not be reasonable said, that with the considerations of the lie that is Obama- the lie that was elected, the lie which America is suffering now and indeed will continue to suffer in our problematic future,with fullest of confidence which the Laws of Nature provide, and will be protesting getting more and more of our attention as is historically been precedent, that until this be addressed we are bound for an historical hell with Nature unremitting upon even the innocent of our population? Tis with that consideration, I have taken my case to the highest Court available.

These and many more are reasons why I am TAKING a STAND, and representing what I do in my platform and my legal action. Indeed, the unconventional may be just what America is looking for in the coming 2016 election as she yearns for truth more than the lie presented by 'conventional' politicians in typical suits, and typical haircuts, as fake details of their lie rather then the resolve of their character of heart.

Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

Thank you to everyone who is and has contributed just a little here and just a little there, for we are working very hard in using the little that we do have as efficiently and proficiently as it comes in, as I'm sure everyone would agree. Please consider a contribution
Let's make it Official and support a Qualified Candidate whose has dedicated his time and talent to taking a stand for America. Let's raise a million dollars and give you the right to say, "I put my money where my mouth is. I'm not a hypocrite, I'm a Patriot!".


INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI




We NEED YOUR HELP AMERICA now, to educate Americans in the order of our Constitution to hear Cody's Case to the U.S. Supreme Court. We are Taking a Stand for individual Civil Rights and against an unprecedented ASSAULT upon your Constitution and prior decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court! With your help we can make it happen. You are a very important key to this. So its up to you America to help Restore America Today for a Better America Tomorrow. Like, Share, and Help us in the Contribution Revolution.


Get your questions answered by ordering Cody Robert Judy's Book here.

The 2016 Campaign begins now. Please send your contributions and help with the ABC (American Birther Campaign) today and my election for President in 2016 and Join the 257 of us now on my Facebook Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President 2016 site.

Cody Robert Judy for President 2016
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, Utah 84401

Thank you
Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for United States President 2016
www.codyjudy.us

CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION



The Commercial is simply called "America"


Join the new CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRES 2016 FB SITE Here


Sunday, May 24, 2015

MEMORIAL DAY and MORALE - WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE?


FEATURE EDITORIAL: The Post and Email
MEMORIAL DAY and MORALE - WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE?

A rather stunning SPECIAL REPORT U.S. MILITARY AND CIVILIANS ARE INCREASINGLY DIVIDED By DAVID ZUCCHINO AND DAVID S. CLOUD dawned today from the Los Angeles Times that revealed some very big problems that we have in America today that I feel really do need to be addressed in the public arenas of politics and popularity. This weekend being Memorial Day Weekend, and as we remember with heart felt gratitude those who have given their last breath in the service, dying in the line of duty in our Armed Forces, "giving all", it seems a good time.

Reading the article, one grasps a real sense of the good, the bad, and the ugly presenting a very real and rare picture opposite the sugar coated perspectives we oft times find accompanies journalism today. By that I mean I don't think you'd find the Military Brass and military families completely happy with what is written, nor is the Civilian Population going to find the article not tugging away in their conscience of increasingly insincere platitudes. Just highlighting very briefly a couple of the grim reapers to give you a sense of what I'm talking about without spoiling your own read of the article:

George Baroff's a 90 year old draftee of WWII as a Veteran posed a view: "..today's all-volunteer military has been robbed of the sense of shared sacrifice and national purpose that his[my] generation enjoyed six decades ago. Today's soldiers carry a heavier burden, he said, because the public has been disconnected from the universal responsibility and personal commitment required to fight and win wars." "For soldiers today, the war is never over; the enemy is never defeated." The result he added, is "a state of perpetual anxiety that the rest of the country doesn't experience."

Phillip Ruiz, 46 year old Army staff sergeant wounded twice during three tours in Afghanistan and Iraq said: "So many people give you lip service and offer fake sympathy. Their sons and daughters aren't in the military, so its not their war. Its something that happens to other people"

Douglas Pearce a former Army Lieutenant said civilians seem to think they "can assuage their guilt with five seconds in the airport." "What they're saying is, "I'm glad you served so that I didn't have to, and my kids won't have to."

The combining sentiment of all three of these statements might be more difficult to attribute to "Honor" or "Gratitude" for the opportunity to serve, then say, "Frustration" and or a "Disheartening dispiritedness", but through these I sense a much greater sense of "Concern" and "Love" at the root of their hearts. There were statements made within the article also of civilians just as impervious and disparaging to the understanding of what exactly they are missing in serving in the military that does the population no favors as to the reasons we find such statements coming out of the military.

These are of course the ramifications of what we would call a "Job", rather then a "Service" in the necessary circumstances of a voluntary Armed Forces - meaning there was no "Draft" or "Conscription", we have today. Civilians now look at the voluntary means of which one enters the Military as "Employment", no different then they had to do in filling out an application for their job. Of course their "job" comes with an occasional office party and award also and can be considered a 'service to the community' just as easily as any position in the military, where someone has the ability to say "I quit", "I retire", "I'm not going to do this anymore", or even "Take this job and shove it".

We all get up and do a job of some sort that are not necessarily honored with parades, or greetings, or a lot of fan fair to keep up our moral. Why does the voluntary military services of our Armed Forces require more than what we do serving in our regular civilian jobs that are all necessary to keep society running smoothly, and incorporating the tax money necessary to pay them for their jobs?

This actually is the dis-service or dis-connect of "value" inappropriately attributed to an ego of dis-connect rather than managed or taught as a connection of mutual appreciation. The "My JOB is MORE important then YOUR JOB" syndrome that is a division of classless enmity and that is the dereliction that leads to "might is right" rather than the protection of "individual rights". Of course there is a balancing act that needs to be mastered everyday and that it is where improvement and skill can be made. When the first is honored by the last, and the last is honored by the first, a mutual respect and honor is equally observed and provides a real joy. That joy is the greatest moral booster known to man.
The SENSE of "ENTITLEMENT" can be a malignant cancer to the heart and soul of a civilian population and it can just as easily infect the well-oiled-machine of a military expressed as "I deserve more than what I'm getting".

One of the very rich things about America was a purge of royalty as far as privilege that merged leaders and citizens as one from a state of one class above the other. That is even stated plainly in the prohibitions of the President to take on any other titles of nobility in Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 which states:
"No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever from any King, Prince, or foreign State."

Interesting to hear or read "United States" referred to as "Them" as in "Everyone of them 50 States". The problem is we have a Congress that constantly confers upon itself special privileges that include things like 'raises' and 'special health care' and well, they probably know the list better than I do of special privileges they have granted themselves. Yes, its legal, and occasional necessary, but is it balanced well with those also considered for Citizens?

One should very specifically consider that if its good enough for the President its good enough for me, which doesn't necessarily mean everyone should have an Air Force One to jet around in- (smile)Remember 'balance'. Now I want to talk a little more about military service because I thought it was interesting that the 90 year old Veteran Baroff referenced a theft taking place without a conscription stating the Armed Forces as much as having been robbed. Isn't that something we all should be concerned about? If our Military is being robbed of something maybe we should take a look at finding out who the robbers are? Wisdom of the elders huh?

Again Baroff stated that the military was being robbed of a sense.. of shared sacrifice and national purpose. We just talked about a sense of entitlement, so my sense is that that's coming from the Commander-In-Chief's position as the Leader of the Armed Forces. Of course being 'ineligible' and constitutionally unqualified as a natural born Citizen, 'born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents' you understand where America has been robbed of a qualified President and Commander-In-Chief who has robbed the Constitution and taken on a sense of entitlement of the office built on an unstable foundation of a fraudulent identification. This is both a moral decay of character as well as a destructive factor of moral that has to be recognized from the top down. How could it not be considered reasonably? Congress thus far refuses to address these facts as it reflects poorly on them, as well it should.

As both a former '08, '12, and 2016 current Candidate for U.S. President having fought in some 15 Civil Court Cases for the natural born Citizen qualifications of the Office of the President, for no pay, no reward, no parades, and very few pats on the back, I understand whole-heartedly the idea of not being appreciated very much. I think I've got that one down. This battle of the morale of our whole Military is not unrealistically understood here as to the boat adrift with no rudder, no wind, no sail or no engine to power out of the melee.

How many people identify and attribute the direct catastrophic affect of an unqualified person in the Office of the President to the spirit of the Country? How could something so minuscule they forage affect so many and so much? How does a small rudder affect the direction of a ship? How does the gas pedal affect the propulsion of your car? How does love in your home affect you when you walk through the door?

I don't talk about it very much but the experience in prison I had twenty two years ago was not what most people would call "serving in the Military", but it really in many respects is a Military Order of Discipline. I had Sergeants, Lieutenants and Captains to appeal to and inspections happened every day. I have come to appreciate and find gratitude in serving and learning from the time I did. Some people might find it offensive that I would dare compare our military to the service of time I was drafted for, but what that would really be what we'd call a disagreement with rehabilitation wouldn't it and the fantastic job they did?

The draft in our Country didn't give many the opportunity to 'not serve' either, unless you were a 'draft dodger'. They called you and you went. The sense of appreciation I gained might be due more to my "sense of duty" and "sense of service" during that time in my life than anything and we do have a choice as to who we will serve in every circumstance and condition of our life. Wither we will nurture a sense of entitlement or nurture a sense of service?

I served my fellow prisoners, regardless of what they had done or why they were in prison, in the discrimination being apportioned to them in the grooming standards by suffering the same punishments dished out to the Native Americans Indians who were in Maximum Security due to their 'religious belief' in not cutting or shorning their hair. I sued on a discrimination of gender and won, but to do that I had to join them in solitary confinement for three and half years. That meant getting an hour out of a very small individual cell to walk a hallway for an hour every 24 hours for 912 of the 3018 days I served in that military order. There was no family for years, no touching or sweet affection from a spouse or partner, and mail was very important.

One in five Americans have now experienced the conditions of being on probation, parole, or incarcerated: One in five! That is also costing tax payers and is a huge tax burden that many say is 'putting the population in prison'with an indentured servitude to support the empire building system. So my point is one way or the other you could think you are not affected by your "upper class" status, but that would be an unreasonable look at reality just as the 'judgement' against rehabilitated people is seen as a constant on every job application even though the Constitution Amendment 15, Sect. I. says, "the right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.

Why does Society spend so much money rehabilitating Citizens and then handicap them after their time is served faithfully? Isn't that like making someone pay the freight on something, and then constantly asking for more when the price has been paid in full? I think it is. Another point, the 2nd Amendment states the "right" of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed". How does the Government justify Citizens who can vote, pay taxes, as part of the people, not allowing them to defend themselves, their persons, and their property just the same as anyone else once their 'time' has been faithfully served that was demanded by Society?

This is the absolute hypocrisy polluting our Nation in the unreal classifications of 'entitlement' and 'divisions' and it has come to a head with Barack Obama being ineligible and unqualified, so that the entire population is now not under Law but is under "Lawlessness" and "Corruption", so you have and now find yourself in prison accused of three felonies a day and your state of living in fear is awful.

And so we find ourselves together looking at one another, and I out of every other Presidential Candidate in the Nation since 2008 am the only one who has filed suit for Justice on a bi- partisan stand against both Republicans and Democrats in McCain and Obama culminating now in front of the United States Supreme Court as Judy v. Obama 14-9396. Yes, a former prisoner who did eight years in prison, (we don't need to go into the circumstances of injustice and unlawful prosecution that surrounded the case but is in my book TAKING A STAND if your interested in reading it)and you can't believe it?

Do you know what I can't believe? I can't believe our Armed Services has not filed an Amicus Curiae as a friend of the Court in the United States Supreme Court Case Judy v. Obama 14-9396. I can't believe that all those organizations opposed to Obamacare and ObamaAmnesty and ObamaExecutive Orders haven't filed an Amicus Curiae. The reversals of rolls begins to make much more sense in a referendum on the sense of entitlements.

It actually makes perfect sense in the reversal God said would happen in just what former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush epitomized as the greatest immoral subversive idea he could think of resonating in Mark 10:31: "But many that are first shall be last."

Today we do in fact honor humbly those who have died for the Constitution and the individual rights in liberty and justice for all found in our Republic under God that we pledge our allegiance to as a Nation formed and called The United States of America. May God Bless the families of those who have suffered the loss of their loved ones and may our Military find an appreciation and value in the service of their fellow patriots with the rich respect and honor found in the service of Citizens.

Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

Thank you to everyone who is and has contributed just a little here and just a little there, for we are working very hard in using the little that we do have as efficiently and proficiently as it comes in, as I'm sure everyone would agree. Please consider a contribution
Let's make it Official and support a Qualified Candidate whose has dedicated his time and talent to taking a stand for America. Let's raise a million dollars and give you the right to say, "I put my money where my mouth is. I'm not a hypocrite, I'm a Patriot!".


INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI




We NEED YOUR HELP AMERICA now, to educate Americans in the order of our Constitution to hear Cody's Case to the U.S. Supreme Court. We are Taking a Stand for individual Civil Rights and against an unprecedented ASSAULT upon your Constitution and prior decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court! With your help we can make it happen. You are a very important key to this. So its up to you America to help Restore America Today for a Better America Tomorrow. Like, Share, and Help us in the Contribution Revolution.


Get your questions answered by ordering Cody Robert Judy's Book here.

The 2016 Campaign begins now. Please send your contributions and help with the ABC (American Birther Campaign) today and my election for President in 2016 and Join the 257 of us now on my Facebook Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President 2016 site.

Cody Robert Judy for President 2016
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, Utah 84401

Thank you
Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for United States President 2016
www.codyjudy.us

CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION



The Commercial is simply called "America"


Join the new CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRES 2016 FB SITE Here

Saturday, May 23, 2015

NEW YORK TIMES Hint- Clinton build on that Birther Wall? Second Biggest Mistake Missing Rubio Early! May the Ghost Democrats Choose Come to Haunt Them


FEATURED EDITORIAL: The Post & Email
NEW YORK TIMES Hint- Clinton build on that Birther Wall? Second Biggest Mistake Missing Rubio Early!
May the Ghost Democrats Choose Come to Haunt Them

The NEW YORK TIMES article released hours ago, hints the window may be closing for Hillary's Candidacy if you have followed the recent Clinton Cash and Clinton Email debacles tormenting her headlines and putting a bad taste in the American Baked apple pie of the Clinton Camp: but the window is closing faster on Hillary's chance to actually lead by filing a brief in Court that could place the nail in the coffin for Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, and Bobby Jindal. The problem: it also places the nail in the coffin for Barack Obama.

Hillary Clinton faces a decision that actually requires early leadership in her Campaign which may just be the same decision that blew the tires out of her 2008 Campaign by not putting Barack Obama's lack of Constitutional Qualifications to the test. Not seizing an opportunity to indirectly take Rubio out now is one the Clinton Camp could come to regret in a 2008 repeat of defeat, or self fulfilling prophesy.

Hillary's Camp was a Birther against Sen. John McCain Mid-Stream in 2008; also A FEATURED New York Times Article "Hint of New Life to McCain Birth Issue if you recall, raising questions and then succumbing early based on Obama. Articles HERE and HEAR. If Hillary Clinton doesn't file an amicus curiae in Judy v. Obama 14-9396, she has just made the second biggest political mistake of her life not taking out three top tier Republican Candidates. The first was NOT doing it with Obama and the New York Times just put the "Birther" writing on the wall.

Remember this? She'd shaken hands at a factory gate in Toledo, Ohio, then before flying to Texas held a media availability where she said: "Sen. McCain brings a lifetime of experience to the campaign. I bring a lifetime of experience. And Sen. Obama brings a speech he gave in 2002." If it didn't work well in 2008, how well is that strategy going to work in 2016 against Sen. Marco Rubio that even the Blaze ran a story on early in 2011 referencing what has become the stand in the U.S. Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama: that natural born Citizen means "born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents. This is a two generation protection from foreign alliance/allegiance for the Office of the President in the interest of our national security? If national security is not an interest in the Republican Platform to pick a bone with I don't know what is.

HAVE DEMOCRATS LOST THEIR FIGHT FOR CIVIL RIGHTS

If Democrats have lost their will to fight for Minorities that's another story. Of course I am not being paid to counsel Hillary Clinton and if she was faced with facing me or a handsome Cuban who brings women to tears and pulls the heart strings right out of your chest with the humble immigrant story as the New York Times Report capitulated multiple times referring to Marco's parents as immigrants of Cuba who did not become U.S. Citizens until their son was four years of age, WHO do you think she'd rather face? This then proves Rubio qualified as a Citizen to be a U.S. Senator. Rubio remains unqualified to be U.S. President for failure of being a "natural born Citizen". The Standard has served America well as a wall from foreigners seizing the reins until the wall was cracked with Barack Obama. I say cracked because its not busted down yet, but is teetering precariously from assault.

Let's face it now. If you put Hillary Clinton on the political debating stage with Barack Obama and she couldn't win eight years ago smashing his lack of experience all over the Media, and the Presidential 2016 Candidate has eight more years of wrinkles, eight more years towards a fading memory, and eight more years of political garbage, how on earth are you going to sway independent voters away from U.S. Senator Marco Rubio? Hillary does not win with her supporters. She wins by swaying those who are sitting on the wall as Independents.

If Republican Challenger Jeb Bush looks old on the debating stage of fresh horses in the Republican Arena, how does Hillary pave away to the finish line and not get tripped up crossing it against a Souped Up Republican Charge over the qualifications inspection of the Constitution as Independents look on at the unconstitutional state of affairs placed in front of them by Democrats? That's why Democrats have to change. The future is here and Barack Obama is not part of the American Future. He is the past, he's enjoyed the White House, now its over. Why not lower the boom on a lame duck to protect America's future Democrats especially when Republicans have a much deeper field of unqualified candidates?

Your just not going to be able to put enough make-up in those wrinkles when you allow unconstitutional Candidates to wear suits, and that's why Hillary Clinton has perhaps two weeks to show some leadership skills by finessing a amicus brief in the case of Judy v. Obama 14-9396. That takes three Candidates out of the picture very quickly who are siphoning gas. Three TOP TIER Republican Candidates GONE, who are set out for the early debating stage in August that threaten her Campaign.

Hillary Clinton hasn't had to do a thing in Court. She capitalizes on the work of a no-name unelected Candidate for President like me. Her name is not recognized in Court as a Birther, she simply gives a nod to the U.S. Supreme Court that says, "You know what, this has been a problem continues to be and we need to get it cleared up and now is a good time".

If Hillary Clinton doesn't do this she doesn't want to be President and she certainly doesn't want a women to be President. You can't help but wonder if there is some nagging housewife in her head that actually remains there screeching. "women don't follow women, they follow men", in some sort of blurry astigmatic self destruction? It would actually take real Leadership for Hillary to file an Amici or friend of the Court Brief with the potential to knock out three men across the isle with as little as one Brief in the United States Supreme Court that says, "Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, and Bobby Jindal are not qualified as natural born Citizens and this is a problem for me, but more importantly its a problem for the Country".

Far from being discriminatory, its a national security interest, and if a female Presidential Candidate doesn't have the courage to take a stand for our national security interest here at home, she sure doesn't have the courage to lead our Nation abroad. The "natural born Citizen" clause of the qualification for the Office of the President is the key to our Constitution and that Constitution includes the rights to so many minorities. If the Constitution is not protected minorities most certainly including women are the first casualties.

Not only does a Brief from Hillary signal a home run for destroying gender inequality, to take a stand for the Constitution, it signals the ability to lead both genders in a field of equality. Hillary is not just running to be the first female American President, she is running to lead a Nation and ours starts with the U.S. Constitution because it is the back bone of so many minorities and gender was considered as such with the passage of suffrage, or the ability for women to cast a vote. That was a huge minority victory for women that needed to be carved out in our Constitution and if Hillary doesn't stand for that, what does that tell you about her stability?

Far from being so prideful that I would stand opposed to a female, strictly based on her being a female for U.S. President, actually leadership,admired and recognized in England for her uncompromising politics and leadership style, was what characterized Margret Thatcher. Showing America Hillary can lead requires acting the part of leading, not waiting around for her turn, as if the Office of the President was a water fountain people stood around waiting their turn for. Leadership actually requires at times being out in front as a trail blazer where things are not always paved with a new black top that's easy on the tires and smooth on the ride.

Hillary is a at least qualified in my book according to the Standards set in the Constitution. Let it not be said "if" my case Judy v. Obama 14-9396 is dismissed without so much as a hearing by the United States Supreme Court with no tangible interference of current elections hinging on the hearing, such as the 'chad' count we had in George W. Bush v. Al Gore (which could turn out to be the ghost of Florida revisiting Democrats again) wasting 2.5 Billion Dollars with a loss to Florida U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio,it could prove the pivot point of regret for Hillary.

So what does it say about her if she's unwilling to defend herself with the Constitution? It says she's unwilling to defend you her biggest and most loyal women's rights advocates. If that doesn't resonate with men, it should at the very least among women, who not only are seeing Hillary's Clinton Foundation accept money from foreign countries with a dismal record of open gender discrimination, along with her paying her own employees who are female less than their male counterparts, both of which have been reported, it shows you she's no Champion for you.

Far from being an enemy to Democrats Cody Robert Judy has been a friend setting the stage and creating the vehicle Democrats could now certainly use. But that opportunity could be squandered or wasted if the U.S. Supreme Court dismisses Judy v. Obama without granting the CERT. In fact referencing McCain's own Lawyers in the 2008 Article is a direct testament of the standing I have in Judy v. Obama. In that article it says, "In the motion to dismiss the New Hampshire suit, Mr. McCain’s lawyers said an individual citizen like the plaintiff, a Nashua man named Fred Hollander, lacks proof of direct injury and cannot sue."

One thing is for sure, and that is the coming 2016 Election presents America adrift of leadership from its legislative body with culpable Candidates who are ineligible and part of a 'good ole boys' club protecting their own. I am not a member of that Club so the Constitution is a Standard I can live with. It was just for that certainty, the forming of Good Ole Boys Clubs, that a Judicial Body was necessary in our Republic, that was distinct and separate; able to see with a clear vision the Constitutional Standards without the pressures of being elected. If the Judicial Body headed by the U.S. Supreme Court fades into the shadows on this, the door is left open for the Legislative Bodies of the U.S. House and U.S. Senate unchecked in a Constitutional Corruption to ruin the Republic!

The six years it has taken Cody Robert Judy to get this principled stand to the U.S. Supreme Court, with the State options exhausted, and his Campaign in 2008, 2012, and now 2016 for President has not been an easy or popular road. By all accounts not one elected person in DC or in the past two Presidential Election cycles has taken the road on a bi-partisan stand with McCain and Obama. If the opportunity is to be wasted it is at the very least wasted with a full knowledge of the Clinton Camp adopting the ghost they choose to haunt them.


Sincerely,
Cody Robert Judy
The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

Thank you to everyone who is and has contributed just a little here and just a little there, for we are working very hard in using the little that we do have as efficiently and proficiently as it comes in, as I'm sure everyone would agree. Please consider a contribution
Let's make it Official and support a Qualified Candidate whose has dedicated his time and talent to taking a stand for America. Let's raise a million dollars and give you the right to say, "I put my money where my mouth is. I'm not a hypocrite, I'm a Patriot!".


INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI




We NEED YOUR HELP AMERICA now, to educate Americans in the order of our Constitution to hear Cody's Case to the U.S. Supreme Court. We are Taking a Stand for individual Civil Rights and against an unprecedented ASSAULT upon your Constitution and prior decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court! With your help we can make it happen. You are a very important key to this. So its up to you America to help Restore America Today for a Better America Tomorrow. Like, Share, and Help us in the Contribution Revolution.


Get your questions answered by ordering Cody Robert Judy's Book here.

The 2016 Campaign begins now. Please send your contributions and help with the ABC (American Birther Campaign) today and my election for President in 2016 and Join the 257 of us now on my Facebook Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President 2016 site.

Cody Robert Judy for President 2016
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, Utah 84401

Thank you
Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for United States President 2016
www.codyjudy.us

CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION



The Commercial is simply called "America"


Join the new CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRES 2016 FB SITE Here









Friday, May 22, 2015

BREAKING NEWS - OBAMA Waives RIGHT TO RESPOND to U.S. SUPREME COURT in ELIGIBILITY CASE! Is he a Flight Risk?


FEATURED ON BIRTHER REPORT
FEATURE EDITORIAL:The Post & Email
BREAKING NEWS - OBAMA Waives RIGHT TO RESPOND to U.S. SUPREME COURT in ELIGIBILITY CASE!
Is Obama a Risk for Flight out of the Country?


In a stunning show of arrogance Barack Hussein Obama waives his right to respond in a case set in the United States Supreme Court surrounding his eligibility and qualification to even be President by another Presidential Candidate claiming damages to his Campaigns in '08 and '12 based on inequality and discrimination.

Cody Robert Judy (CRJ) claims his rights to a fair and equal race based upon the standards set forth in the United States Constitution for the Office of the President have been fouled by the Cartel formed by the DNC and and OFA (Organization for Action)which is what Obama's Campaign Committee has morphed into and from its origin. Far from the "Citizen" requirement in the Constitution for U.S. Representatives and U.S. Senators was a much higher standard for President and Vice President in what was termed the "natural born Citizen" clause. This element hinges upon what Judy calls unequal, unfair, fervent and blatant discrimination of his rights and his person in a Civil Rights contamination he claims in his action to be wholly damaging.

The action filed today (May 21st,2015)constituted a willful high mindedness by Obama that the Court will blow the case off and he didn't want to bother defending the action that has been brought to the United States Supreme Court for Justice. CRJ's tenacious fight for the principle and honor of the Office of the President did not start with Obama but actually began first with a Las Vegas, Nevada U.S. District Court case against Sen. John McCain just days before receiving the Republican Nomination. Though Obama was included in the law suit as an Emergency Motion was filed, the Judge delayed ruling on the suit until after the election of November 2008, whereupon he ruled it was 'moot' because Obama had won and the action had predominately been filed against McCain.

Another 13 Court Proceedings have happened spanning West to East, and North and South all over the Nation between that case and the one happening right now in the United States Supreme Court Judy v. Obama 14-9396 the Main Stream Media has not sighed a word about to the public yet. That's why it would come as a big surprise to almost everyone accept those paying attention to these News Briefs if pictures suddenly emerged of Obama in handcuffs being led to the Court under arrest to prevent his fleeing the Country in Air Force One, which could very well happen within the next three weeks!

CRJ says there is going to be a whole lot of people pointing to this "Waiver of right to respond" as an understanding the Court will in no way shape or form take the case, but Judy says he can prove otherwise with very relevant and current procedure happening in the Court as we speak.

"All you have to do", he explained, "is look at the cases the Court is actually hearing now and walk them back on the Docket Report to when they were first filed. You don't even have to go back, just look at the Case currently in front of the court or very recently argued."

Cody cited three cases that indeed were being argued before the United States Supreme Court within the last few months or so. "There is a case called Clyde Reed v. Town of Gilbert, AZ. case number 13-502; Andre Lee Coleman v. Todd Tollefson Case No. 13-333 and Glenn Tibble v. Edison International Case No. 13-550 these cases were in Argument January and February of this year [2015]. They all had quite a bit in common as far as procedure goes right in line with mine and their Petition for Writ of Certiori was GRANTED!

ALSO MUST READ STUNNING REPORT DALLAS MORNING NEWS MEDIA DIRECTLY INFORMED OF CRJ CAMPAIGN

"First thing you notice right off the bat about these three case is all of them had just exactly what Obama just filed: "A waiver of the Respondent to Respond" and all of them had their Writ of Certiori's indeed granted. There is a lot of people spreading mis information out there about what the Court can and can't do. The next thing people say is, 'Well your case was categorically dismissed by the Lower Court and Twice Dismissed by the Circuit Court in an original petition and a petition for rehearing." Guess what, Don't be Fooled? So indeed were these three cases the United States Supreme Court decided to hear."

"That right, Look at them!" Judy said, so we did and hears what we found.

1st Case Docket Report:Case No. 13-502
REED V. TOWN OF GILBERT,AZ
9th Circuit
Court Decision -FEB 8
Rehearing: Denied
Oct 21 2013 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 20, 2013)
Oct 31 2013 Waiver of right of respondents Town of Gilbert, Arizona, et al. to respond filed.
Nov 19 2013 Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Professors Ashutosh Bhagwat, et al.
Nov 26 2013 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 13, 2013.
Nov 26 2013 Response Requested . (Due December 26, 2013)
Jul 1 2014 Petition GRANTED.

2nd Case Docket Report: No. 13-1333
Andre Lee Coleman, aka Andre Lee Coleman-Bey, Petitioner v. Todd Tollefson, et al.

6th Circuit
Decision Date: October 23, 2013
Rehearing Denied: January 17, 2014
May 5 2014 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 4, 2014)
May 28 2014 Waiver of right of respondents Todd Tollefson, et al. to respond filed.
Jun 4 2014 Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed.
Jun 18 2014 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 29, 2014.
Oct 2 2014 Petition GRANTED.

3rd Case Docket Report: No. 13-550
Glenn Tibble, et al., Petitioners v. Edison International, et al

9th Circuit
Decision Date: March 21, 2013
Rehearing Denied: August 1, 2013
Oct 30 2013 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 2, 2013)
Nov 15 2013 Waiver of right of respondents Edison International, et al. to respond filed.
Nov 26 2013 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 13, 2013.
Oct 2 2014 Petition GRANTED (limited to questions..)

Indeed! Everyone of the Cases were denied twice in the Circuit Courts before appearing on the U.S. Supreme Court's Docket Report, everyone of them had a Waiver of right of respondents to respond filed, and indeed everyone of them were in fact GRANTED, just as Cody had said.

CRJ Continues to Take A Stand for Americans
The next thing Cody pointed out was an interesting question. CRJ continued:

"Out of all three of those cases I've mentioned, do any one of them even compare to the fraud that having an illegal candidate running and collecting money from innocent people for a Campaign Office they are not qualified for? How many millions of people and millions of dollars are being collected fraudulently by unqualified Candidates who just think they can get away with it because no one has been granted STANDING by a Court of Law. I ran as a Democrat in 2012 in the Democratic Party standing was not an issue, but the damages were unacknowledged, and that's what really makes me mad. Its like having someone crash your house and then say there's nothing wrong with a car in your living room. Its unbelievable!"

"Well, my cases have never been dismissed because of that! My cases have all been like ghost just disappearing with a one or two sentence opinion, or as this case has proven, railed against so hard in an unprecedented candor you actually wonder what the Judge/or Justices have against me personally because of quite frankly a total stake in the heart of Court procedure? It's unreal when you have two witnesses in Court testifying of something and the Court won't even hold a hearing on it with Sheriff's Investigations right in front of the Judge/Justices! What do you do in that instance? The only think you can do is move on to the next Court and fork out another $250,000 of DC Lawyer time and effort expenses.

"At least Obama gets the benefit of talking to the Media and telling them what a big pain in the rear end Birthers are. That has got to be somewhat consoling. I haven't even got that much satisfaction. The Media feels so sorry for him, and they scowl at me for protesting that Big Foots Truck just crashed through the front door and wall of my house crashing the floor and ceilings in and look at me as if I shouldn't be bothered? That's why I haven't cared if it took FIFTEEN CASES AND 40 MILLION DOLLARS! That son-of-a-gun has he's truck parked on top of my house and I want it off and the damages it's caused the last six years. I don't care how long he has been sleeping in the White House. He stay there for all I care, just give me my damages and Congress can deal with it after that. If they don't want to, hey, that's the Peoples Problem not mine personally any longer. The people want to put up with that I can't tell them what to do. They haven't supported me that much monetarily, but the few dozen who have over the years, I've sworn to refund their money because I think they at least deserve that as they supported me on the basis of a fair race and that has been violated."

"It makes me sick to my stomach to think about the Fraud being committed on the basis that an unqualified Candidate doesn't think anyone will have standing simply because no one whose Elected is going to cross them. That's just a rotten 'good ole boy's club' if you ask me- Rotten to the core! If the People want to eat rotten apples supporting them, let'em eat until they get sick to. I'm not going to eat those rotten apples any more. I'm tired of it."

"I'm actually tired of doing a job that the People have elected and paid their Congressman and Senators to do. They aren't doing it if they are not apposing unqualified Candidates for the Office of the President. They are basically saying, "We don't care that every Grandma and Grandpa, every Husband and Wife, every Single Voting Adult, just can't do anything about being defrauded because they don't have standing. So what happens? They all suffer fraud and are being taken advantage of. I would not stand by watching and see anyone take advantage of someone I loved physically. I wade into that perp like a wild lion and they'd think twice before they did it again. That's kind of what I've done in Court in a Civil and respectable way."

We asked him, "What's Next with the U.S. Supreme Court Case?"

"Well, you will notice on all three of those cases, if you look at them on the Docket Report of the U.S. Supreme Court, that once that Due date has come, which is normally about thirty days after the Writ of Certiori has been filed, then the case is set for Conference in two weeks. In my case it was unusual because they gave Obama nearly double the amount of time to respond if you notice. My writ of 14-9396 was filed on March 30 and Obama had clear till May 20th to Respond. That's an extra twenty days on my clock and at my expense. The general public doesn't notice things like that but lawyers do and clients do when all that time is costing you. It feels like your being bled out."

"Anyway, from May 20th we could count two weeks on a Thursday, because that is when the Court hears new Certs and we'd come to June 4th. That's when I'm guessing my case will be set for Conference. They will decide if they would like to consider any of the three questions I have proposed to them in offering my case as an example requiring justice. I long ago learned you can be right and still not heard, especially if not enough people are affected by what your asking the Court to consider. In this case, it would just be a travesty for the Court not to grab it. We have the 2016 elections coming up Iowa Cauces in eight months. This affects all parties, both Republicans and Democrats and there is not an election per se hinging on it. Its just ripe for the Court to hear and I think America deserves for it to be heard."

You'll notice after the conference if the Court asks for the Respondent to Respond it usually comes in about five days. Now if that hits the Court docket, I'd really be looking for Obama to say "Good Bye USA", and sail away on Air Force One. He'll take that plane and we won't see it again and he'll be asking for Amnesty from Kenya or Indonesia, because the writing will be on the wall. You watch, it will be a lot worse than when Nixon just resigned the White House. Obama will flee probably right around June 10th if I had to guess."

Anything Else you'd like to add Mr.Judy?

"I could sure use your help America. Yes, it has been a long and difficult journey that is nearly over and America really needs to get on board and believe in themselves. Believe that their small contributions matter. Believe that their Constitution really does matter. I just attended my son's Kindergarten Graduation. It was so cute.
(That's Stradda with his Teacher Mrs Jennings) They got diploma's and sang songs about how they learned to spell and sound things out. Things we take for granted like the months in a year, or the fact they could spell "Rat" but it bothered them they couldn't spell hippopotamus. Well, I sit in a program like that and see my son and see all his class mates. That's the future of America. I wanna be able to say we are passing on a better one to them the we had handed to us. Its hard to think about that when we are 18 Trillion in debt, an ObamaCare costing tons more than expected and raising rates and costing families more, as well as our borders becoming porous and Obama fixed on an Amnesty that really puts a lot a pressure on a lot of already fake job numbers with 93 million Americans out of the job pool and not being counted in the 5.6% unemployment numbers. I know how bad America is hurting and the gap between rich and poor is getting bigger and bigger. One thing I know is that if you don't Take a Stand, (that's the title of my book, I had the title before U.S. Sen. Rand Paul did so don't think I copied him),more and more is going to be taken from you as far as your individual rights. It will encourage gang violence and a mob mentality. I've seen that and its not the kind of America we grew up in. A great Restoration is needed. If you believe that, you better get with some Candidate for President who believes it to, and has the action, not just words in the Senate, to prove it to you."

READ PART II. BREAKING NEWS REPORT FOR MORE DETAILS OF OBAMA'S FAILURE TO ADDRESS U.S. SUPREME COURT & UNSIGNED DOCUMENT RELEASED

The 2016 Cody Robert Judy Campaign for U.S. President
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

CAMPAIGN NEWS FLASH - Please visit a couple more of our Campaign Web Pages that are up, remodeled, and going. First the "Bio of Cody" page is up and also the "NEWS FLASH" page is up which details a news flash about Judy v. Obama 14-9396 in the United States Supreme Court.

Thank you to everyone who is and has contributed just a little here and just a little there, for we are working very hard in using the little that we do have as efficiently and proficiently as it comes in, as I'm sure everyone would agree. Please consider a contribution
Let's make it Official and support a Qualified Candidate whose has dedicated his time and talent to taking a stand for America. Let's raise a million dollars and give you the right to say, "I put my money where my mouth is. I'm not a hypocrite, I'm a Patriot!".


INSPIRING - I believe in You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7d-FcfeCPlI




We NEED YOUR HELP AMERICA now, to educate Americans in the order of our Constitution to hear Cody's Case to the U.S. Supreme Court. We are Taking a Stand for individual Civil Rights and against an unprecedented ASSAULT upon your Constitution and prior decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court! With your help we can make it happen. You are a very important key to this. So its up to you America to help Restore America Today for a Better America Tomorrow. Like, Share, and Help us in the Contribution Revolution.


Get your questions answered by ordering Cody Robert Judy's Book here.

The 2016 Campaign begins now. Please send your contributions and help with the ABC (American Birther Campaign) today and my election for President in 2016 and Join the 257 of us now on my Facebook Cody Robert Judy for U.S. President 2016 site.

Cody Robert Judy for President 2016
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, Utah 84401

Thank you
Cody Robert Judy
Candidate for United States President 2016
www.codyjudy.us

CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION



The Commercial is simply called "America"


Join the new CODY ROBERT JUDY FOR PRES 2016 FB SITE Here